Bailout Blows up in Pelosi’s Face

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi

In a stunning show of lack of leadership Nancy Pelosi sets in motion a $700 billion dollar blow up by rubbing the Republicans’ noses in the nastiness which is Democrat disdain for Republicans.

Understand that this has nothing to do with Republicans contrary to what Barney Frank is saying and contrary to what Barack Obama is saying and contrary to what the partisan media is reporting. (see story)

You don’t believe me? Okay get your pencils out and I’ll prove it to you with some plain elementary school arithmetic. How many Democrats in the Democrat controlled House of Representatives? That’s right 235! And how many Republicans in the minority in the House, 198 that’s right again!

So if the Democrats wanted to pass, oh let’s say a measure stating that this is Anti-President Bush day they could do it and the hapless Republicans could do nothing about it and nothing to stop it! On a straight partisan line vote Democrats win every time 235 to 198.

So if the Democrats wanted to pass this bailout they could have done it without one single solitary Republican vote. So you see this has nothing to do with Republicans it has everything to do with politics as it always does with Democrats.

What are the politics? The Democrats want to eat their cake and have it too. (see story)

Democrats want to blame Republicans for this crisis and at the same time have Republican help them hide the fact that this crisis came about as the result of the direct failure of years of Democrat policies of forced socialism put upon the housing and financial markets. Not Republican policies of free trade as Democrats and the partisan media is reporting. (see my previous post on this subject on this site)

If the Republicans go along silently with this, this is a win, win for Democrats. Why, because Democrats get to continue to perpetrate the lie that this crisis is the Republicans fault and by allowing that lie to stand, Republicans participate in their own defeat at the voting polls and John McCain goes down in defeat because of the $700 billion pound gorilla in the room, and that is the Democrat mantra, we need change from the Party that created this mess, The Republican Party.

At every opportunity Barney Frank has said it, Barack Obama has said it and on the floor of the House just before taking the vote to pass this bailout measure Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi blasted the Republicans out right in front of their faces signaling that after Republicans signed on to this monstrosity Democrats would use it to beat down any chance of Republicans winning in 2008 while Democrats wrongly took credit as the saviors of Wall and Main Street .
Pelosi’s remarks were:

"When President Bush took office, he inherited President Clinton's surpluses — four years in a row, budget surpluses, on a trajectory of $5.6 trillion in surplus.

And with his reckless economic policies within two years, he had turned that around ... and now eight years later the foundation of that fiscal irresponsibility, combined with an anything-goes economic policy, has taken us to where we are today.

They claim to be free-market advocates when it's really an anything-goes mentality, no regulation, no supervision, no discipline. ..."

"... Democrats believe in a free market ... but in this case, in its unbridled form as encouraged, supported by the Republicans — some in the Republican Party, not all — it has created not jobs, not capital, it has created chaos."—Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi

Listen for yourself at the sixteen minute rant against President Bush and Republican policies by the Speaker of the House and tell me if she knows anything about bipartisanship. (see video 16 mins) This is a must see



You see all the blame for the Republicans and all of the credit for the Democrats no wonder Republican house members voted against this bill.

But wait it was a moot point as I mentioned above even if all Republicans voted against this bill and they didn’t some 65 Republicans voted for it, but even had all voted against it if Democrats wanted to they could have passed this bill all by themselves but why didn’t they do it?

If the Republicans screwed every up why didn’t Democrats vote 235 to 198 to pass this bill and earn the title Democrats saviors?

One word answer, blame…Democrats wanted to say Republicans voted for this bill too, Democrats wanted it to appear bi-partisan without actually being bi-partisan.

The deal that Pelosi refers to at the end of her rant is an agreement that half of the House Republicans would vote for this bailout to provide cover for Democrats who vote for it. But why would Democrats need cover?

Democrats wanted to have the political advantage even in this crisis situation. This is a remarkably partisan act of putting Party before Country and putting politics before the welfare and protection of the American people. And what do Democrats do when they fail? They do what they always do they blame Republicans.

Barney Frank is such a liar! Listen how Barney Frank continues to mischaracterize the failure of Pelosi’s leadership and blames Republicans.



Remember Republicans did not stop this nor could they Democrats out number Republicans 235 to 198 so if Rep. Frank wishes to speak to someone then why doesn’t he speak to the 95 Democrats that usually vote in lock step with Democrat leadership who voted against this bill. This is solely a Democrat failure and the American people must know that.


This is what Republicans must demand to turn this crisis around.

Nancy Pelosi must correct the Congressional record and withdraw her highly partisan statement further she must rightly fault Democrats for this crisis.

If Democrats want to work in a bi-partisan way then they must stop laying the blame for this crisis on President Bush, or on any Republican for that matter when so much evidence points to Democrats’ culpability.

If Democrats want Republican participation Barack Obama must cease and desist in his blaming the Bush administration for this crisis.

If Democrats want Republican participation Barney Frank must stop lying about his part in this political fiasco and take his rightful guilt.

Nancy Pelosi must call for an independent counsel to look into who in government is at fault for putting the American people at risk.

This is the reform that we need and this is the way to piece back the agreement that Pelosi has single-handedly destroyed.

How do Democrats Keep Getting All of the Credit and None of the Blame

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV)

So they've decided to spend $700 billion of taxpayer money, our money! They said that there was enough blame to go around for everyone. You heard it didn’t you?

So just how do they do it? How do Democrats play on the ignorance of the American people and keep on getting away with it.

Surely voting Liberals and Democrats are not that stupid! Yet Democrat Leaders Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barney Frank, Charles Schumer, Barack Obama and Sen. Charles Dodd’s liberal policies caused the World wide financial collapse and now they are taking credit for spending $700 billion dollars of taxpayer’s money like they’ve done Americans a favor.

Pelosi and her allies blame Republicans and business for the calamity which they have caused and created in the housing market (see video 10mins you may need to view more than once)



Everyone in the know rightly blames Democrat cronyism and Democrat policies for blocking regulations that Republican attempted to place on Frannie Mae and Freddie Mac the financial institutions primarily involved this fiasco. Yet Sen. Barack Obama is still lying on the Campaign trail blaming President Bush and Republicans when in actually the reverse is true. Democrats are responsible. The faulted policies of liberalism are responsible.

President Clinton when asked by Chris Cuomo about Democrats like Sen. Obama who blame Republicans President Clinton said that it was Democrats who where largely at fault. (see video about 5mins about 3mins in)

“I think the responsibility that the Democrats have [in this financial crisis] may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac"—Former President Bill Clinton, Good Morning America September 25, 2008

Rather than gaining a single seat in Congress or ascending to taking the most powerful political office in the world Democrats should be sweep out of office in 2008 and Sen. Barack Obama and all Democrat who perpetrated this flim-flam sham upon the American people should be arrested for negligence of their fiduciary duties to the American people, libel and slander against Republicans, fraud and conspiracy to cover up mismanagement and crimes that caused the near destruction of the Capitalism system of the West.

Bush Didn’t Convince the Nation

Recently, we've seen how one company can grow so large that its failure jeopardizes the entire financial system.—President George W. Bush, September 24, 2009 explains taxpayer bailout

Speaking in sweeping generalities Wednesday night President Bush asked the American people to trust that he and Congress would do the right thing in using $700 billion dollars of taxpayers money to give to unnamed people who have up until now made historical profits at the expense of the American taxpayer while these unnamed people and Corporations gamed the free market enterprise system. (transcript of speech)

In the President’s attempt to justify this criminal request he gave all the reasons why Americans shouldn’t allow for a bailout of the free market economy.

Number one companies have gotten to big. The only reason that companies are consolidating into such huge Global entities is to amass more wealth and more power.

These huge monstrosities are not helping competition in the market place, furthermore such wealth and power are a direct threat to the freedoms of the American people.

No to the contrary, what these Corporations are doing is they are devouring their competitors while creating tyrannous control and power over the markets of which they are apart. But if these Mammoths are threaten in any way the whole system is threaten and that includes the American people, and as we now see that also includes the World.

If the President was referring to the Corporation AIG as the one company that grew so large that its failure jeopardizes the entire financial system, then that is a rock solid case which demonstrates that it is detrimental to Americans and people of all countries to allow a company or companies to get so huge by not allowing some controlling authority to ensure that a company might not destroy the entire system by greed. (see related story)

Second the President should not expect the American people to give him trust without going into great detail who are the people and companies responsible for this crisis. Isn’t the President doing the same thing as he says caused this problem?

The President is asking the American taxpayer to hold so-called bundled bad debt without getting proper information on the requestors of the $700 billion dollar loan.

The American people need to know in detail names of who, methods of how and the amounts of money that was taken in what resulted in the need for entire free market to crawl on its knees to the American taxpayer to beg for a loan.

In the following excerpt from the president’s speech he describes a market that was working as it should:

[W]ell, most economists agree that the problems we're witnessing today developed over a long period of time. For more than a decade, a massive amount of money flowed into the United States from investors abroad because our country is an attractive and secure place to do business.

This large influx of money to U.S. banks and financial institutions, along with low interest rates, made it easier for Americans to get credit. These developments allowed more families to borrow money for cars, and homes, and college tuition, some for the first time. They allowed more entrepreneurs to get loans to start new businesses and create jobs.

Unfortunately, there were also some serious negative consequences, particularly in the housing market. Easy credit, combined with the faulty assumption that home values would continue to rise, led to excesses and bad decisions.

Many mortgage lenders approved loans for borrowers without carefully examining their ability to pay. Many borrowers took out loans larger than they could afford, assuming that they could sell or refinance their homes at a higher price later on.

Optimism about housing values also led to a boom in home construction. Eventually, the number of new houses exceeded the number of people willing to buy them. And with supply exceeding demand, housing prices fell, and this created a problem.

Borrowers with adjustable-rate mortgages, who had been planning to sell or refinance their homes at a higher price, were stuck with homes worth less than expected, along with mortgage payments they could not afford.

As a result, many mortgage-holders began to default. These widespread defaults had effects far beyond the housing market.

See, in today's mortgage industry, home loans are often packaged together and converted into financial products called mortgage-backed securities. These securities were sold to investors around the world.

Many investors assumed these securities were trustworthy and purchasers of mortgage-backed securities were Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Because these companies were chartered by Congress, many believed they were guaranteed by the federal government. This allowed them to borrow enormous sums of money, fuel the market for questionable investments, and put our financial system at risk.

The decline in the housing market set off a domino effect across our economy. When home values declined, borrowers defaulted on their mortgages, and investors holding mortgage-backed securities began to incur serious losses.

Before long, these securities became so unreliable that they were not being bought or sold. Investment banks, such as Bear Stearns and they could not sell. They ran out of money needed to meet their immediate obligations, and they faced imminent collapse.

Other banks found themselves in severe financial trouble. These banks began holding on to their money, and lending dried up, and the gears of the American financial system began grinding to a halt.

With the situation becoming more precarious by the day, I faced a choice, to step in with dramatic government action or to stand back and allow the irresponsible actions of some to undermine the financial security of all.

I'm a strong believer in free enterprise, so my natural instinct is to oppose government intervention. I believe companies that make bad decisions should be allowed to go out of business.

Under normal circumstances, I would have followed this course. But these are not normal circumstances. The market is not functioning properly. There has been a widespread loss of confidence, and major sectors of America's financial system are at risk of shutting down.- George W. Bush

The above is how free enterprise works and here’s a very simple principle, What goes up, must come down!

According to the President everything worked except criminals who took advantage of the system. The President needs to identify these people clearly.

In addition to that, we can not artificially prop up a market that has over-reached and gotten too big. At some time this system was due to collapse because too many unscrupulous people were taking billions of dollars out of the system to place in their individual private accounts we should make them return that money.

Third Republicans have allow Democrats who are primarily responsible for not allowing regulation on these huge financial companies take the high ground in this crisis and by doing so have virtually cost Sen. McCain the election.

Democrats are blaming Conservative principles of allowing the markets to take care of themselves when it was Democrats who blocked Republican efforts to regulate these markets.

Sen. John McCain and Republicans attempted to do something to regulate these companies in 2005 and was blocked by Democrats and Rep. Barney Frank, Sen. Charles Schumer Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and Sen. Charles Dodd . (see story)

Yet Republicans continue to allow Democrats to act if they had nothing to do with this problem and the Media is describing this as a Republican problem.

In an interview with Chris Cuomo of Good Morning American President Clinton freely admits that Democrats blocked reform and regulation that Republicans attempted to enact as my previous two post outlined. President Clinton says that Democrats even blocked his attempts to regulate the financial markets. (see 5min video about 3mins in)

“I think the responsibility that the Democrats have [in this financial crisis] may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac"—Former President Bill Clinton, Good Morning America September 25, 2008

If the McCain campaign doesn’t get on the front end of this perception and reverse it this spells doom for his chances to be President.

As long as the Democrats can play on the ignorance of the America people Sen. Obama has a fair chance of turning sentiment away from Sen. McCain.

This crisis is the canary in the mine shaft for the American people there is something terribly wrong with America and it is my belief that Barack Obama and his Party the Democrat Party are the problems not the situation.

The last time Democrats worked with President Bush was on a Comprehensive Illegal Alien bill which would have given upwards of 20 million illegals unmerited and unwarranted citizenship.

This time President Bush and his Democrat allies would give criminals who have distressed the free market system $700 billion dollars to continue in their criminal enterprises against the American people.

Somehow the President didn’t convince me that this is the right thing to do! And I don’t believe that he convinced the American people.

Maybe it’s Beyond Me??

I don’t know, maybe I haven’t learned anything in
all my years. But having run three businesses in my lifetime, and been through some hard financial times myself, it seems to me that there has to be a better way of averting this “financial calamity” that the government is warning about.

We all know what is going to happen to that 700 Billion.
It’s going to go to those banks/brokerage houses, and go right down the tubes, with absolutely no help for the individuals who really need it.

I was discussing this with my daughter (extremely intelligent) last night, and she hit on what seems to be a pretty good plan for the salvation of the “deserving” rather then the “bloodsuckers”.

Rather than taking over all these high-interest mortgages that these unscrupulous organizations knowingly forced on buyers,
why not try something a bit more sensible? The government would save half of the 700 Billion, the homeowners would be protected from foreclosure, and the so-called “bank/brokerage house companies, have a chance of remaining solvent. Not that they deserve it by any means, but only because killing them
off might provoke a financial panic.

Say a homeowner got horn-swaggled into a 10.75% 30-year fixed rate mortgage, and now can’t make the payments. If the bank forecloses, it is stuck with a physical asset, that is falling in value each day. When they write it off, or sell it for next to nothing, they lose a fortune. Rather than put greed before the
welfare of the country, what if the government offered to do this?

Force all mortgage holders to roll back interest rates on all mortgages, effective immediately, to 5.25%. The banks benefit by not having to
write off all these assets, while still making fair profit on the lower rate mortgages, and the homeowners get to keep their homes with affordable payments.

Then, the government can guarantee the homeowner mortgages to the banks. Even assuming that half the homeowners will default, which is absurd, we would be stuck with a 350 Billion Dollar bill, rather than 700Billion.

And the best part is that none of this money winds up in the hands of the charlatans and crooks who are so adept at mismanaging finances. They would only waste it on incompetent fools who look for huge “performance bonuses” for doing inferior jobs.

Democrats Are Responsible for Hell on Wall Street!

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., speaks to reporters after members of Congress met with SEC Chairman Chris Cox, 3rd left, and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, fourth from left, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke. right. Congressional leaders met with financial leaders late into the evening Thursday, Sept. 18, 2008 on Capitol Hill in Washington .
(AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke)

As financial storm signals appeared the last 18 months, some Bush officials urged drastic reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

But according to internal government sources, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson objected because it would look "too political." The Republican administration kept hands off the government-backed mortgage companies that are closely tied to the Democrats.—Robert Novak

What you are about to read should quash any hopes of Democrats picking up a single additional seat in Congress and as well, this information should stop Barack Obama’s bid to become President. The only thing is not enough people will see this.

I make this bold statement based on three completely verifiable findings:

• Democrats caused this financial 9/11
• The Bush Administration attempted to do something about this crisis 18 months ago and was told not to act by Secretary of Treasury Henry Paulson who is in complete conflict of interest just two years from being employed by Goldman Sachs.
• Sen. John McCain attempted to do something to regulate these companies in 2005 and was blocked by Democrats and Rep. Barney Frank, Sen. Charles Schumer Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and Sen. Charles Dodd .

Everything that is wrong in America today is the direct result of uncontrolled unregulated corporate greed and criminality. However it took this financial fiasco to get people to see it. (see post)

Now that, that point is indisputable here’s a second point, our government is no longer functioning to protect and serve the people of this country our government is an instrument of corporate and special interest will.

That is why the President of the United States can back the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act or CIRA. And further that is why the Republican nominee can back CIRA too as well as Global warming. Both CIRA and Global warming are big money interest and they are directly in opposition to the interest of the People of the United States.

But most importantly, that is why the Democrat led Congress and the President can orchestrate a $700 billion dollar bail out for failed lenders who ripped off the American People. What’s worst is the President and Congress can do this without holding one single investigative hearing into who is at fault and why it was allowed to happen.

We had a 9/11 commission I’m thinking a Financial Industry Collapse Commission is needed.

First here are three sources that detail Democrat complicity in this Wall Street meltdown.
See (here), (here) and (here)

The following source you probably will not be able to find on the internet if you google you just may come up with this only (see here)

However in this report Robert Novak discloses that the Bush Administration was talking about a fix 18 months ago only to be dissuaded by Henry Paulson who is heading up the affords to bring stability back to the U.S. Economy. (see article below)

Crony image dogs Paulson's rescue effort
Published: 12:00 AM Jul 17,2008
Chicago Sun-Times by ROBERT NOVAK

As financial storm signals appeared the last 18 months, some Bush officials urged drastic reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. But according to internal government sources, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson objected because it would look "too political." The Republican administration kept hands off the government-backed mortgage companies that are closely tied to the Democrats.

Paulson is a Republican, but as head of the Goldman Sachs investment bank, he had close ties with Democratic-dominated Fannie Mae. After prominent Democrat James A. Johnson left Fannie after eight years as chairman and CEO, he was named head of Goldman Sachs' compensation committee, helping set Paulson's abundant salary there.

That connection clearly was not enough for Paulson to consider recusing himself from dealing with the crisis threatening Fannie, Freddie and the whole American economy. He structured the bailout and was on the phone last weekend encouraging leading investment bankers to buy Freddie Mac bonds. Financial consultant Lawrence Lindsey, President Bush's former national economic director, told clients Sunday, "Surely things are somewhat amiss when a country's finance minister plays bond salesman for a supposedly privately owned company."

Testifying before the Senate Banking Committee on Tuesday, Paulson stressed the U.S. would purchase assets only if necessary. But relying on investment bankers could be awkward for Paulson because of indiscreet jubilation from his old company. "This is our bailout," a senior Goldman Sachs official told a Wall Street colleague this week, suggesting the firm will cherry-pick for mortgage bargains.

The only senior executive branch officials who expressed alarm about overextended Fannie and Freddie were former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, and their warnings were shrugged off.

It was worse on Capitol Hill. Former Rep. Richard Baker could not find a single House co-sponsor for his reform bill. He lost his bid to become ranking Republican on the House Financial Services Committee though he had seniority, and then retired from Congress to become a lobbyist. Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel had trouble finding other Senate supporters of Baker's bill.

Baker, Hagel and Sen. Richard Shelby, ranking Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, were rare members of committees with jurisdiction who took the issue seriously. The powerhouse Democratic overseers of the banking committees -- Rep. Barney Frank, Sen. Christopher Dodd and Sen. Chuck Schumer -- protected Fannie and Freddie.

Tuesday's hearing was more than an hour old when Hagel became the first senator to ask whether the well-paid officials and directors of the mortgage companies should be held accountable. "I'm not looking for scapegoats," Paulson replied.

Many of Paulson's non-scapegoats have traveled a familiar path from modest net worth to sudden wealth at the mortgage companies, especially Fannie Mae. Most have been Democrats, but token Republicans also have enjoyed the profitable ride. It is an old story, well described in "Crony Capitalism: American Style" by financial affairs reporter Owen Ullman in the July-August 1999 issue of the International Economy magazine. He portrayed rich "rewards" for fortunate insiders.

In that article, former Treasury official Peter Wallison of the American Enterprise Institute saw Fannie and Freddie posing a "prescription for financial disaster," similar to the savings-and-loan debacle a decade earlier. Will Paulson follow Wallison's advice and put the mortgage companies in federal receivership at the expense of shareholders? Wall Street tycoon Hank Paulson was the secretary of the treasury that Bush finally found on his third try. Now, grumbling has begun inside the Senate Republican Conference. The grumblers are asking whether Paulson will prove more than a crony in this crisis.


Lawrence B. Lindsey
Larry Lindsey is President and Chief Executive Officer of The Lindsey Group. He has held leading positions in government, academia, and business. Prior to forming The Lindsey Group, he held the position of Assistant to the President and Director of the National Economic Council at the White House and was the chief economic adviser to candidate George W. Bush during the 2000 Presidential campaign.

Dr. Lindsey also served as a Governor of the Federal Reserve System from 1991 to 1997, as Special Assistant to the President for Domestic Economic Policy during the first Bush Administration, and as Senior Staff Economist for Tax Policy at the Council of Economic Advisers during President Reagan's first term. Dr. Lindsey served five years on the Economics faculty of Harvard University and held the Arthur F. Burns Chair for Economic Research at the American Enterprise Institute. From 1997 until 2001 he was Managing Director of Economic Strategies, a global consulting firm.

Dr. Lindsey earned his A.B. Magna Cum Laude from Bowdoin College and his M.A. and Ph.D. from Harvard University. He was awarded the Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation Award by the National Tax Association and named the Citicorp Wriston Fellow for Economic Research at the Manhattan Institute. He is the author of numerous articles and three books: The Growth Experiment, Economic Puppet Masters and What a President Should Know...but Most Learn Too Late.

Finally Sen. McCain has not only talked about what to do and what he would do but Sen. McCain has already attempted to enact the reforms over Financial Loan institutions only to be stopped by Democrats. See (here) and (here)

And last for all of you that still don’t quit get it the following 10 min video shows how a the proposed bail out will harm the American people.



If anyone is still willing to elect Barack Obama or any Democrats after seeing this information then you really don’t have this country’s best interest at heart.

Finanical Katrina and Dems Don’t Blame Bush?

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi speaks next to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke (R) after meeting with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson (2nd L), Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (L) and other congressional leaders in Washington September 18, 2008.
(Mitch Dumke/Reuters)

"The Powerhouse Democratic Overseers Of The Banking Committees -- Rep. Barney Frank, Sen. Christopher Dodd And Sen. Chuck Schumer -- Protected Fannie And Freddie." (Robert Novak, Op-Ed, "Crony Image Dogs Paulson's Rescue Effort," Chicago Sun-Times, 7/17/08)

The silence is deafening! This is the catastrophe Global warming meltdown of modern Western financial markets, it is potentially going to be far worst than the Iran Israel coming Armageddon of the Middle East, it is the hurricane Rita and Katrina of the entire Global economy and nobody absolutely no Democrat is pointing a finger at President Bush?

Unbelievable! I’ve been watching and waiting and you gotta know that after 8 years of constant, pedantic mantra like Democrat partisan droning that Bush did everything wrong somebody was going to say that this financial meltdown is Bush’s fault.

But no it didn’t happen. Oh Obama tried to say that he’s been warning people for years that this crisis was going to happen, if people would have listened to him it would not have happened and that this crisis is a result of the policies of the Bush administration but quickly added that now wasn’t the time for partisan wrangling. (wink, wink)

When have Democrats ever passed up a time for partisan wrangling I ask you? Then I began to get suspicious when President Bush and the Democrats begin to work together on the $700 billion dollar bailout without so much as blaming anyone.

President Bush said that this was no time to play the blame game and the Democrats began to work with the Bush administration like no time since the Comprehensive Illegal Alien bill that they tried to force on Americans and the North American Community without borders that they worked on together... Hey wait a minute; something about this whole thing is not right.

Democrats aren’t blaming Bush and Democrats are working with Bush…hum?

Then it hit me when does a Democrat work with a Republican? Answer when it’s in the Democrat’s best interest to do so.

And of course a Republican will work with a Democrat just to feel cool, sort of like when a Nerd is accepted to the elite echelon of the High school Jocks and Cheerleaders social network. Only the Jocks and Cheerleader only want Nerds around to do homework and tutor for test.

So what is really going on here?

Well two things first the simple answer is President Bush doesn’t want his legacy to include, “The End of Western Civilization happened under the Bush Administration.”


And the second thing which is far more complex is that this is the greatest Democrat cover-up of incompetence and mismanagement this side of the President Carter Administration!

Democrats don’t what any finger pointing because for every one finger that they can point at the Republicans on this financial Armageddon three fingers point back at Democrats.

Andrew Cuomo, a Clinton Appointee, the youngest Housing and Urban Development secretary in history, made a series of decisions between 1997 and 2001 that gave birth to this current crisis. (see story)

In 2005 Sen. McCain was a co-sponsor of Fannie and Freddie reform bill was passed by the Senate Banking Committee. The bill gave a regulator power to crack down, and would have required the companies to eliminate their investments in risky assets.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson (3rd L) and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke (2nd L) attend a closed meeting with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Rep. Barney Frank (D- MA) and Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Connecticut) other congressional leaders on Capitol Hill, September 18, 2008.
(Molly Riley/Reuters)

Had this bill been passed after it left committee instead of being killed it could have averted this crisis by providing the oversight that everyone is talking about now but Democrats by partisan vote blocked it and who was the overseers of the banking committees, none other than, Rep. Barney Frank, Sen. Christopher Dodd And Sen. Chuck Schumer. (see story) (see bill)

Pelosi, Reid, Dodd and Frank around table with Bernanke, Paulson and others

Sen. Obama has received more money from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae than any other member of Congress other than the Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sen. Chris Dodd. See Democrat links to this financial melt down. (GOP.com)

Obama Ranks Second Among Donations From Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac Among All Members Of Congress Since 1989:
In Just Four Years, Obama Has Received More Money From Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac Than Any Other Member Of Congress In The Past Two Decades (Since 1989) Except Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sen. Chris Dodd. (Lindsay Renick Mayer, "Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac Invest In Lawmakers," Center For Responsive Politics' "Capital Eye" Blog, www.opensecrets.org, 9/11/08)—GOP.com

It was Clinton policies enforced by Attorney General Janet Reno that put the current policies in play. (see story)

Under the Clinton administration, federal regulators began using the act to combat “red-lining,” a practice by which banks loaned money to some communities but not to others, based on economic status. “No loan is exempt, no bank is immune,” warned then-Attorney General Janet Reno. “For those who thumb their nose at us, I promise vigorous enforcement.”

The Clinton-Reno threat of “vigorous enforcement” pushed banks to make the now infamous loans that many blame for the current meltdown, Richman said. “Banks, in order to not get in trouble with the regulators, had to make loans to people who shouldn’t have been getting mortgage loans.”

This threat combined with the government backing of Fannie and Freddie set the stage for the current uncertainty, because the “banks could just sell the loans off to Fannie or Freddie,” who could buy them with little regard for negative financial outcomes, Richman said.-- Matt Cover, CNSnews

If word were out that it was Democrat leadership and Democrat policies that primarily drove the financial institutions Frannie Mae and Freddie Mac to greed and corruption because Democrats blocked legislation that would have provided oversight not only would Democrats lose this Presidential election but Democrats and Republican who are Democrat allies would all be voted out of Congress.

Pelosi, Bernanke, Paulson and Schumer in the shadows

No there will be no finger pointing at President Bush just a sweeping sound, do you hear it?

That is the sound of Democrats sweeping all of their responsibility for this economic Katrina under the rug.

Hello!!!..... Anybody Listening?

With our own economic house falling down around our
ears, why do we still provide so much aid to foreign
countries............... even those that hate us and want to
see us destroyed?

Look at this list, and tell me why, why, we have to send
so much of our national wealth, to nations that neither
deserve it nor appreciate it?

In 2006.......(not even looking at present day)

Egypt received more than $1,795,000,000 total aid.

Jordan received $461,000,000 to leave Israel alone.

Pakistan got $698,000,000 to chase terrorists, with a questionable result.

Peru received $133,000,000 for “drug abatement”.

Kenya got $213,000,000 “free money”.

Haiti received $163,000,000

Russia, our dear friends, received $52,000,000 so that they could confront us more.

West Bank/Gaza got $150,000,000, so that next time there is a terrorist attack on the US,, they
can be seen dancing in the streets once again.

Bosnia received $51,000,000 for “reparations”

With all of the above, corruption remains the major
problem. Many funds wind up in private bank accounts. The leaders get the money, not the people, and ironically, the richer nations receive the most aid..

Congress should remember that charity begins at home!

Racist and Misogynic Democrats

Rejected Sen. Hillary Clinton: First woman seriously considered for President

Race is not the biggest factor driving Democrats and independents away from Obama. Doubts about his competency loom even larger, the poll indicates. -- RON FOURNIER AND TREVOR TOMPSON

You remember Harriet Christian, Sen. Clinton supporter who damned the Democrats for their blatant sexism against her candidate don’t you? I knew you would!

Harriet on Neil Cavuto has a chance to explain why she is voting for John McCain is seems that the racial bigotry and sexism of the Democrats have driven Harriet to vote for Sen. Cain. In Harriet’s words she didn’t leave the Democrats the Democrats left her! (see video)




So just where do Democrats get off lecturing anyone about race or sexism? I have seen enough racism and misogyny coming from the Democrats in the last nine months in the Democratic primaries, where Democrats battled for either Black supremacy or Women’s empowerment that Democrats have lost and no longer hold exclusive rights on championing minority rights.

Democrats rejected Hillary Clinton which would have given women the first opportunity to become President of the United States of America. And now Democrats and their Media allies have launched a full scale attack to destroy a second woman, Gov. Sarah Palin, who if her ticket is elected Palin would be the first woman to become Vice President.

But it doesn’t stop there, according to the Media one third of Democrats say that they will not vote for a Black man, Barack Hussein Obama to become President of the United States of America. Striking a pre-emptive Racism Card at Democrats and Republicans alike to get Barack Obama elected.

Democrats are one screwed up hate filled Party, yes they are, and now they are attempting to infect the general election with their own unique brand of Obama racism and Palin, women hatred.

“If you don’t vote for Obama you’re a bigot!” Oh please! If you don’t vote for Obama that’s because like Harriet Christian you know that Obama is inadequate and unqualified! It has everything to do with his using the Senate, the 143 days of the four years that he actually worked there, as a springboard for the presidential nomination of his Party.

Obama gave one speech at the Democrat Convention in 2004 and took a field trip to Europe and the Middle East a couple of months ago (where by the way he violated the Logan Act) and Democrats think that, he’s qualified to be President?

Sen. Obama is a Prom King hoping for the popularity vote to crown him President of the United States. Obama is the Paris Hilton, Barbara Steisand celebrity candidate that 250 Democrat luminaries plopped down $28,500-a-plate like "buttah" to wine and dine with for a night.

Obama is the first cause célèbre Presidential candidate of the United States, just put his face on a tee shirt right next to your “Save Darfur!” button and you’re the coolest hippest 21st century "back to the 60s radical" this side of Chicago!

Even Film maker Woody Allen is down for the cause! Allen says: (see story)

"It would be a disgrace and a humiliation if Barack Obama does not win,"—Woody Allen, American film producer and incestuous father, husband

Funny I always thought that sleeping with and marrying your adopted daughter was a disgrace and a humiliation. I guess things have changed right Woody? Right Sen. Obama?

Interesting how RON FOURNIER AND TREVOR TOMPSON attempted to report that bigoted white Democrats could spell doom for the Obama Presidential campaign. But failed because deep down hidden in their race baiting article a little light of truth peered out from their media driven Obama Racism and Misogyny. (see story)

At the very bottom of the story Fournier and Tompson admitted:

Race is not the biggest factor driving Democrats and independents away from Obama. Doubts about his competency loom even larger, the poll indicates. Still, the effects of whites' racial views are apparent.

Whoa!!! It’s just like Harriet Christian said! People are not voting for Obama because he is an inadequate, unqualified, inexperienced and incompetent Presidential nominee.

How dare the Democrats attack another woman running for office, Gov. Sarah Palin and how dare the Democrats attempt to make Racism a factor when it has been them all along that have had issues with Racism.

If they didn’t want a Black candidate they shouldn’t have nominated him. But if he loses don’t try to blame it on American Racism. The blame should rightly go on Democrats themselves for putting up two candidates based solely on the Sex and Race of those candidates and not on real experience and qualifications.

I agree with Harriet Christian, God damn the Democrats for attempting to invoke Racism to cover up their candidate’s inadequacies!

Congress to force American Taxpayers to Bail Out Foreign Banks ?

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson

In a change from the original proposal sent to Capitol Hill, foreign-based banks with big U.S. operations could qualify for the Treasury Department’s mortgage bailout, according to the fine print of an administration statement Saturday night.-- MIKE ALLEN, Politico

In what has been reported as the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression things keep getting worst.(see story)

Not only are the American taxpayer expected to bail out Wall street and American big money Bankers as under the original $700 billion dollar Bail Out plan that was submitted to Congress. Is has been reported that plan has been changed in the dark of night to included foreign-based banks also such as Barclays, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, HSBC, Royal Bank of Scotland and UBS. (see story)

In an extraordinary interview with George Stephanopoulos on this weekTreasury Secretary Henry Paulson engaged in verbal slight of hand when he attempted to sneak pass the fact that unregulated investment Bankers have put the whole Global Free Trade and Money Market systems at risk and are now attempting to have the American taxpayer pay for it all.

You are going to want to see the entire 8mins of this interview where 7mins in Paulson explains to Mr. Stephanopoulos that just like illegal aliens in America if a foreign bank is doing business in America, it doesn’t matter that they are foreign, they have the right to the same protections that any America bank would have.

What that means is just like the America taxpayers bears the cost of 20 million illegal aliens in this country we will now bear the cost of foreign investment risk made by private foreign Global Bankers doing business in this country.(See 8min Video)

"If a financial institution has business operations in the United States, hires people in the United States, if they are clogged with illiquid assets, they have the same impact on the American people as any other institution.

That's a distinction without a difference to the American people. The key here is protecting the system. ... We have a global financial system, and we are talking very aggressively with other countries around the world and encouraging them to do similar things, and I believe a number of them will.

But, remember, this is about protecting the American people and protecting the taxpayers. and the American people don't care who owns the financial institution. If the financial institution in this country has problems, it'll have the same impact whether it's the U.S. or foreign."—Henry Paulson

What is so ironic about this development is Europe is condemning America for the lack of regulation of its markets and that condemnation comes even in the face of the American government’s attempt to protect European banks too. Europe is ridiculing America for what they call the "savage neoliberal capitalism" of Wall Street.

One such European that is holding America up to scorn is Hanna Evers of Berlin, a cellphone retailer. Hanna says, "I was taught that the U.S.A. is the motherland of moneymaking," she added. "And now all I can see is a herd of headless chickens running around on Wall Street." (see story)

No Hanna the herd of headless chickens that you see are the American people who are sitting by idly and allowing Henry Paulson and the American Government double talk them while getting away with placing the entire debt of Global speculators in the Global markets directly on the American people.

Deception Compounded!!!!!!

House Republican Leader, John Boehner writes about
how the Democrats keep doing what they do so well!

"Tuesday night, Democrats in Congress passed a sham "no energy" bill that will actually raise energy prices for families and small businesses.

Their bill raises taxes and puts billions of barrels of American energy permanently off-limits
This was a hoax on the American people - a bill meant to fool voters into thinking Democrats are voting on real energy reform without actually doing it. We can't let them get away with it.

As the Republican Leader in the House of Representatives, I have an "all of the above" energy reform plan called the AMERICAN ENERGY ACT that will actually help lower gas prices and break our dependence on foreign oil. the But it's being blocked bythe Democrat-led Congress.

My bill includes everything: more conservation and efficiency, new alternative fuels and renewable technologies like nuclear power and clean coal, and environmentally safe drilling.An "all of the above" plan would help bring down fuel costs for struggling families and small businesses. But the radical Left doesn't want lower energy prices - and it's the radical Left that pays the bills for Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Nancy Pelosi."

Remember this on Election Day, folks. Let's unblock the Congress and unlock our vast wealth of natural resources. It IS time for a change!!! Let's reverse 2006, which was a big mistake!

Obama Has the Answers!

This is the man who knows more than John McCain,
about how things work. He blames McCain for the
crisis in the financial markets, brought about by
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. But he doesn’t
acknowledge that he was in the Senate, while John
McCain was warning about the impending crisis with
those two organizations.

As most of the senators did, Obama ignored the warning,and along with Senator Dodd, he accepted huge sums of
money for his campaign from both Fannie and Freddie.

Now suddenly, after hesitating about the government
bailout, Obama agrees that it is the wise thing to do.
However............in addition......... he asserts that we have
to do something similar to help the homeowners.

Every time this man opens his mouth about economics,
he shows that his knowledge is the poorest of any of the
candidates. In addition to this over 700 Billion dollar
bailout, he wants to add an almost equal amount for the
homeowners, on top of his already massive deficit spending
programs for health, education, and infrastructure.

Just today, he and Biden have proposed 50 Billion dollars
to be pledged to the UN for their anti-poverty programs
throughout the world. At a time when our own country is
in such financial straits, how can any intelligent person,
especially one who wants to be President, even think of
offering such stupidity as a program?

If you take all of his proposals that he would bring with
his presidency;........... health, education, “tax cuts for the
middle class”, anti-poverty programs for the UN, he is
talking trillions of dollars being added to an already big
deficit.

This is truly “change you can believe it”.......... change that
we cannot afford as a country or as individuals. His plans
would bring this entire economy crashing down around us,
and we would experience a depression far greater than the
1929 crash. We cannot allow this to happen, especially in
such a dangerous world that now exists. With the obvious
threats from terrorism, Russia, Iran, North Korea, and all those
who would love to see the US fail, we need a team with the
brains and experience to stand up to our enemies, while keeping
the country strong!

ACLU, Where are You???

Strangely silent, on the hacking of Sarah Palin’s personal
email account at Yahoo, shows just where the UnAmerican
Civil Liberties Union’s sympathys lie. As if we needed
any further proof!

Had somebody hacked Obama’s, Biden’s or even Pelosi’s
email account, the entire media would be up in arms, but
I don’t see any media complaints about invasion of privacy,
or any of the usual “constitutional protection” violations.
The ACLU would be screaming in the streets, if a Republican
had violated the rights of a liberal, to investigate and
to hang the perpetrator...... even before any guilt was proven.

Also very strange, is that the guy who is suspect in this
hacking, is the son of a Democratic activist, and I wonder
just who put him up to it?

If the public puts pressure on the FBI to investigate and
prosecute the offender, maybe there might be some results,
but I don’t hold too much hope for that.

Too often, during the 2000, and 2004 elections, the liberals have gotten away
with breaking into Republican offices, slashing tires of
“Voting vans”, and generally harassing voters to keep them
from the polls.

The one consolation in this whole mess, is the fact that though
he is presently a few points ahead in the national polls,
Obama is running very scared. He lucked out with this
financial crisis, which he absolves himself of completely,
blaming McCain more than himself. However, McCain did
see the problem coming down the track, and warned over
two years ago that Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac were disasters
waiting to happen. The Democratic Congress ignored his
warning................ so what else is new? Now they are all
upset and blame this on Bush and the Republicans.

It sickens me!

The Obama Deceived-o-crats

Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild Democrat and McCain Supporter

Unimpressively Sen. Barack Hussein Obama has served 143 working days as a U.S. Senator since he was elected in 2004. The rest of that time, just under four years, in office he has been campaigning to be President.

Before that Obama was a part-time Illinois State senator with no major accomplishments along with being a law lecturer at the University of Chicago law school and before that Sen. Obama was a community organizer.

And with one speech, that Hillary Clinton often refers to, which Sen. Obama gave to the 2004 Democrat Convention he has deceived Liberals and Democrats alike in believing that he is ready to be President of the United States of America.

Democrats simply are deceived. Sen. Barack Hussein Obama is not ready to be President and all of the Democrat leadership knows it. But because Democrats are so ultra partisan as to put their Party above the interest of this country they will support an obvious inadequate Black male instead of doing what is best for this country.

So image my surprise to hear a Democrat say that she is voting for Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin because she refuses to put Party above her country and along with that the extraordinary lives of both Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin are reasons why she believes McCain and Palin are uniquely qualified in this election to lead that and she is placing her full support behind the two. (see story) and a related (story here.)

This is no ordinary Democrat. Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild was a major money contributor to the Sen. Hillary Clinton campaign as seen in this pre Convention video. (see video)




Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild is and remains a Democrat who is supporting Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin for President and Vice President of the United States of America.

To hear it from her own mouth in the interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer signals that the McCain and Palin campaign has truly turned a corner a is on track to appeal to any fair minded non partisan. (see video)




I had to share this incredible interview with several friends. If you have friends who are Democrats, Independents or Undecideds and haven’t be able to convince them that the correct thing to do is vote for McCain and Palin try showing them Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild there is no better argument than what she presented here!

Froma Harrop, You’re All Wet!

"The fundamentals of our economy are strong," John McCain said as Wall Street went into white-knuckle panic over diving investor confidence. Does he believe that? It doesn't really matter, because the Republican has outsourced his economic policy to the ideologues whose opposition to regulations brought the financial markets to their knees.”

The above is a quote from a Rasmussen Reports article by the infamous Froma Harrop, who obviously is no fan of either McCain or Palin.

She is pulling the same kind of crap that Obama/Biden and the entireDemocratic party is trying to do.
They try to play up the statement that Senator McCain made
at the beginning of the primary season, that he is not an
expert on the economy. Well guess what Froma, neither are
you!

All of them fail to mention that in spite of “being no expert”, it was McCain, who two years ago, warned of the immanent collapse of both Fanny Mae and Freddie Mack, and urged that some legislation be passed to prevent it. It wasn’t Obama, and it wasn’t Biden.........but McCain!!!!

Now, Harrop and the Democrats in general, are trying to paint the same picture that Obama has unsuccessfully tried to do..... that McCain doesn’t know how to handle the economy. By the deafening
silence, you would never know that Obama has all the solutions.

Senator John McCain is more qualified on the economy than Obama, Biden, and the entire do-nothing Democratic Congress is. Senator Biden made an absolutely “brilliant” remark today.......... straight from the
liberal Democratic playbook........that “paying more taxes is the patriotic thing to do”. I agree with John McCain............. in this economy, raising taxes is not patriotic,..........it’s just plain dumb!

Add to McCain’s ticket, the experienced, savy and utterly determined Sarah Palin, and you have the only qualified team to fix this country’s economic problems. Of course, in order to do that, they will need the total cooperation of a bitter, divisive, arrogant and utterly partisan Democratic controlled congress, who still didn’t get over 2000.

I think the solution is to vote out half of the Democrats and to give the McCain/Palin ticket a chance to do it’s job, with an evenly balanced, House and Senate.

Barack Obama the first Unconstitutional President of the United States of America?

Democrat Unconstitutional Presidential Candidate Barack Obama

If Democrats have their way he could very well be! We already suspect that democrats will do anything and say anything to gain the Presidency. That is why Sen. Hillary Clinton couldn’t get out of her own Party’s primaries. Democrats knew that if they didn’t believe Hillary there was no way in the world that the general electorate would be taken in by Clinton’s deceptions so they rejected her for Barack Obama instead.

Only problem is there has been a recent line of Democrat liars rejected by the general electorate; Al Gore, John Kerry and now Barack Obama.

But am I premature in adding Sen. Obama’s name to the list? Well if the Senator’s pre European victory tour was not premature to your thinking then I suppose that adding his name to a list that includes Al Gore and John Kerry is not premature either.

Nevertheless the question is, is Barack Obama properly vetted, did Democrats properly vet their Presidential nominee? There are legitimate questions that up until now Democrats have side stepped. Questions regarding the constitutionality of an Obama presidential run.

A broader question is just who is responsible to guarantee that a candidate running for the highest office in the United States is qualified according to the Constitution?

Sen. Obama claims that he was born in Hawaii however there are contradictory statements from his own relatives that claim that he was born in Kenya Africa.

Also according to the Constitution Obama’s mother would have had to have lived ten (10) years in the U.S., five (5) of which were after she reached the age of fourteen (14).

At the time of Obama’s birth, his mother was only eighteen (18), and therefore did not meet the residency requirements under the law to give her son (Obama) U.S. Citizenship.

The laws in effect at the time of Obama’s birth did not recognize U.S. Citizenship at birth of children born abroad to a U.S. Citizen parent and a non-citizen parent, if the citizen parent was under the age of nineteen (19) at the time of the birth of the child. Obama’s mother did not qualify under the law on the books to register Obama as a “natural born” citizen.

Obama’s mother apparently did not meet this Constitutional law.

And on an unrelated charge Sen. Obama has been using falsified documentation to establish his citizenship as American and in the process falsified several legal documents such as his law license. Obama did not reveal any of his aliases. (See application)

If Sen. Obama is not a U.S. Citizen he has not qualified to be President on that fact alone. The American people should demand a full accounting of the facts before an imposter assumes the highest office in America under false pretenses.

There are a small army of reporters, investigators, and lawyers in Wasilla Alaska attempting to find a shred of evidence to invalidate the candidacy of Gov. Sarah Palin but who is looking into this Obama scandal?

Apparently only Philip J. Berg, Attorney at law. Berg has filed suit to make the Democrat Party accountable to the American people for putting up a fraudulent candidate Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. If Atty. Berg's suit is successful Sen. Obama would be disqualified as the fraud that he is and the Democrat Party would be exposed as the rabid radical partisan Party that it is and that would put a non citizen into the Office of President which is in total opposition to the Constitution of the United States of America. (see Complaint filed) and (see Memorandum in support of Plaintiff’s motion) and (see motion of temporary restraining order) and (see attorney Philip J. Berg’s website)

Defendant Obama claims he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961 and it is uncertain in which hospital he claims to have been born.

Obama’s grandmother on his father’s side, his half-brother and half-sister all claim Obama was born not in Hawaii but in Kenya. Reports reflect that Obama’s mother traveled to Kenya during her pregnancy; however, she was prevented from boarding a flight from Kenya to Hawaii at her late stage of pregnancy (which, apparently, was a normal restriction, to avoid births during a flight).

By these reports, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama gave birth to Obama in Kenya, after which she flew home and registered Obama’s birth. There are records of a “registry of birth” for Obama, on or about August 8, 1961 in the public records office in Hawaii.

Upon investigation into the alleged birth of Barack Hussein Obama in Honolulu, Hawaii, Obama’s birth is reported as occurring at two (2) separate hospitals, Kapiolani Hospital and Queens Hospital. Wikipedia English Version, under the subject “Barack Obama,” states Obama was born at Kapiolani Hospital. Wikipedia Italian Version, under the subject “Queens Hospital,” states Barack Obama was born in Queens Hospital.

There are further references circulation on the internet claiming examination of the hospital’s records in Hawaii show no birthing records for Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama), Obama’s mother. However, there are records of a “registry of birth” for Obama, on or about August 8, 1961, in the public records office in Hawaii.

Wayne Madsen, Journalist with Online Journal as a contributing writer and published an article on June 9, 2008 stating that a research team went to Mombassa, Kenya, and located a Certificate Registering the birth of Barack Obama, Jr. at a Maternity hospital, to his father, a Kenyan citizen and his mother, a U.S. citizen.—Civil Action 08CV4083 USDC Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania

If Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. were elected President he would have convinced Americans to disregard their Constitution to elect him the first foreign national born citizen of the world to become President of the United States of America.

It would be the beginning of the end of Constitutional relevance if Obama were allowed to assume the Presidency illegally, that act would place Obama and his Democrat Party above the Constitution should that happen. Therefore the change that Sen. Obama would bring is a defunct America.

I’m guessing that, that’s not the change that Americans want. In any event, if it is true that Barack Obama is not a naturally born United States citizen, he should not be allowed to swear into the Presidency until it is determined that he is naturally born.

Actually he shouldn't even be running to became President while these matters are still in question. If Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States of American his candidacy is illegitimate as would be his presidency.

The “Left” Attempts Assassination!!!

Now you know just how frightened the Obama campaign
and the far-left wackos are, that Sarah Palin might just
become Vice President of the United States.

First they send about thirty attorneys and investigators
up to Alaska to see what dirt they could dig up on her
past, and about her Governorship. All they found was
“Troopergate”.......... a seemingly legit investigation (opened
by Democrats, and run by Democrats) of
the firing of an insubordinate employee of the State
Government............ over his refusal to dismiss a trooper,
who just happens to be Palin’s former brother-in-law.

What the media has deliberately witheld is the facts in
the case. The prosecutors already have evidence that
this piece of trash drank while on duty, was involved in
graft, and used a taser on his son. And the democratic
controlled “investigating committee” is trying to pin
something on Sarah Palin????

I applaud her refusal to respond to a subpoena, along with
her husband’s refusal to appear. And now, they are having
a tough time finding anyone in Alaska who will cooperate
with this kangaroo court.

I guess in a last ditch effort, they have now hacked into
Palin’s personal email account, and found some inconsequential
emails that they are trying to make hay on. The Associated
Press is involved in this up to it’s slimy neck, because they
are refusing to release to federal Investigators, the offending
emails.

But this will all turn around to bite the liberals on their collective
ass. People have just about had it with the “holier-than-thou
media attitude, especially when it is so partisan......and Obama
just lost a few more votes. There is no way that the Obama
campaign and the DNC isn’t involved in this blatant attempt
to get Palin off the ticket. Obama has a history of that,
from when he was running for the State Legislature in Illinoise.
He had his Republican opponent disqualified on a technicality,
and took the seat by default. Even then, he couldn’t earn it!

With each passing day, the polls get tighter and tighter, and the
Democrats get more and more nervous, and Obama creates
another brick for his new house. It certainly isn’t going to be
the White House!!!!!

What More Do You Need????

Yet another example of the “elitist” Barack Obama!
While he talks the good talk, and even walks the
good walk, he runs with the far left wackos.

Obama loves being a celebrity, and that is what this
election is all about for him. He hangs with the liberal
likes of Barbra Streisand, who performed at a benefit
for his ticket last night. Thanks to her, and the other
wacko leftists in Hollywood, he raised another nine
million dollars for his campaign, in just one night.

His campaign thought it was a great idea, snuggling
up to the Hollywood “elite”, but I think that the photos
of him playing cozy-cozy with them, are going to
backfire on him.

How can he in good conscience, preach that he “understands”
what the people are going through in these tight times, and
then attend a lavish party in his honor? Especially when
they paid such an exorbitant price per plate. These are
the people that he feels most comfortable with. These are
the people that he can “preach” to, without the need for a
teleprompter..........because he is preaching to the choir.

He rubs shoulders with them, and then takes pot-shots at
the people in small towns....... where he has to use the
teleprompter, in order to stick to his “remarks” which were
prepared by professional speech writers. This is also the
reason that the refused John McCain’s offer of weekly
debates, in 'town hall format'............ because he is scared. Scared that the people will see that he is merely the stuffed shirt that is fronting for the far left in the Democratic party. A man with no principles, seeking the highest political office just because he wants the prestige, and screw the country and us.

Go on, Barack.........keep doing what you are doing. Have you noticed how each day, the poll numbers are changing. Even New Jersey has finally caught onto the fact that you are nothing.............. you offer nothing,............. you have nothing.

For the first time in four presidential elections, New Jersey is on the verge of voting Republican. I hope that when that happens, the people have the sense to sweep out of office the two liberal do-nothing Senators.........Lautenberg and Menendez.
Then maybe, without the obstructionists, we can proceed to
execute, not a change we can believe in, but that much “Needed Change”!

Obama’s Secret Negotiations in Iraq Violate Logan Act?

Sen. Obama and Gen. Petraeus touring Iraq

In an explosive revelation while Sen. Barack Obama was making all of those public pronouncements about immediate withdraw from Iraq, he was secretly going behind the back of Americans attempting to delay President Bush’s negotiation talks regarding withdraw from Iraq. (see story)

That’s right Barack Obama, the two-faced political animal that he is placed his political career above the interest of the American people and attempted to sabotage the Bush negotiations for troop withdraw from Iraq possibly violating the Logan Act (private citizens can not interfere in foreign affairs.)

Yet in Obama’s July European tour where he also toured Iraq he held private meetings in which Obama tried to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence.

According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.

"He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington ," Zebari said in an interview. –Amir Taheri, New York Post

Whether or not this is prosecuted it should noted that Obama does put partisan politics above all else.

And of course, Obama still in his usual undermine the Bush administration at all cost mode told Zebari that it was in the interest of both sides not to have an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its “State of weakness and political confusion.”

Zebari said to Obama to Zebari’s credit that he preferred to have a security agreement that regulates the activities of foreign troops, rather than keeping the matter open.

Apparently the Iraqi leadership does not trust Sen. Obama, Iraqi President Jalal Talabani (whose party is a member of the Socialist International) sees Obama as "a man of the Left" - who, once elected, might change his opposition to Iraq's liberation.

Indeed, say Talabani's advisers, a President Obama might be tempted to appropriate the victory that America has already won in Iraq by claiming that his (Obama’s)intervention transformed (Bush) failure into (Obama) success.

[Prime Minister Nouri al-] Maliki's advisers have persuaded him that Obama will win - but the prime minister worries about the senator's "political debt to the anti-war lobby" - which is determined to transform Iraq into a disaster to prove that toppling Saddam Hussein was "the biggest strategic blunder in US history."—Amir Taheri

Obama has given Iraqis the impression that he doesn't want Iraq to appear anything like a success, let alone a victory, for America. The reason why?

Obama fears that the perception of US victory in Iraqi might revive the Bush Doctrine of "pre-emptive" war - that is, removing a threat before it strikes at America.

Despite some usual equivocations on the subject, Obama rejects pre-emption as a legitimate form of self -defense. To be credible, his foreign-policy philosophy requires Iraq to be seen as a failure, a disaster, a quagmire, a pig with lipstick or any of the other apocalyptic adjectives used by the American defeat industry in the past five years.

There can be no denying now that Democrat’s opposition to the war is primarily political and Sen. Obama and his Democrat Party would have lost the war to win the 2008 Presidential election.

The fact that President Bush has produced a victory in Iraq in spite of and against the opposition of the entire Democrat Party including Sen. Barack Obama proves that the Democrats were wrong in their attempts to subvert and undermine U.S. war efforts.

These charges alone should disqualify any Democrat candidate from becoming President especially Barack Hussein Obama!

The Democrats “Shell” Game!

In response to the deluge of emails, phone calls and faxes
to the Democratic Congress.............guess what?

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, have accepted defeat, without
saying it of course, and stated that they are about to present
their long-overdue and belated Energy Bill. Well.............
a bill of sorts, but certainly not an energy bill.

Those in the know, say that they will open up “offshore
drilling”, but not the way the public is demanding. Their
criteria will be no drilling within 50 miles of our shorelines.
That is to pacify the public, and still keep faith with the
environmentalists, who form a good chunk of the Democratic
party, and whom the Democratic Congress fears.

What good will that do, when 85% of the proven reserves are
only about 7 miles offshore? Why on earth do we have to
sail right over the bonanza, to drill in areas that have virtually
no oil worth pumping? This is the other side of the stupid
Democratic argument, that the oil companies should drill where
they already hold leases. But that wouldn’t work because
every time they tried to drill the wacky environmentalists
would file suit through their ally and supporter, the ACLU.

This is the Democratic Congress that made all those grandiose
promises to voters about bringing “change”. The only change
that happened in ‘06, was a change for the worse. Look back
and check on the facts. Without doubt........... this congress
has the all-time lowest approval rating of all time..... a mere 9%.

That is a disgrace.................. and yet we continue to reward them with the best life insurance policy, best pension plan, best medical
and dental coverage, in the entire world. .... at any price! We
pay for their hair salons and barber shops, and their free cafeteria.
We supply their limousine and their airplanes.

Is it so much to ask that they represent us in the fashion that
we are requesting? Who made them “gods” of our lives and
our fate? They work for us, but yet they feel that we are subject
to their whims...........like it or lump it!!!

Now............. they are offering more “change”....... God help us!

Something to Ponder!

I can’t give credit to the person who wrote this, because
I have no idea where it started. I received it in an email
........... from a very long list of senders. Whoever this
person is, I congratulate you, for being a true American,
who remembers the way this country was, before it was
highjacked by the liberals.I pass it on to all of you to read, maybe copy, and send
it to some of your friends.

FIRST OF ALL, I HOPE EACH OF YOU WILL TAKE THE TIME TO READ THIS ENTIRE E-MAIL; WHETHER YOU ARE DEMOCRAT, REPUBLICAN OR INDEPENDENT MATTERS NOT. BUT MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WILL NEVER KNOW OF AMERICA'S PAST LOYALTY TO THIS GREAT COUNTRY, IF THEY DO NOT HEAR IT FROM THOSE OF US WHO SPEND THE TIME TO E-MAIL TO THOSE PEOPLE WE LOVE..........
It doesn't matter who you are, where you live, your religion, race, or sex. This is serious stuff. What a differ ence 60 years makes..!!!I know everyone has a different opinion on the war and our current President, But this article makes a lot of sense and I hope you will take 2 minutes and read it and give it some thought.

I have never seen the 'situation' expressed any better in words!

Recently I was talking to a friend about the upcoming election and the candidates. As we ended our discussion he said, 'The only decision you have to make is who you want sitting in that seat in the White House when - NOT IF - but 'when' we get hit again and millions of American lives are put at risk! You ain't gonna like losing.'

President Bush did make a bad mistake in the war on terrorism. But the mistake was not his decision to go to war in Iraq. Bush's mistake came in his belief that this country is the same one his father fought for in WWII. It is not.

Back then we had just come out of a vicious depression. The country was steeled by the hardship of that depression but they still believed fervently in this country. They knew that the people had elected their leaders so it was the people's duty to back those leaders.
Therefore when the war broke out the people came together, rallied behind and stuck w ith their leaders whether they had voted for them or not or whether the war was going badly or not.

And war was just as distasteful and the anguish just as great then as it is today. Often there were more casualties in one day in WWII than we have had in the entire Iraq war. But that did not matter. The people stuck with the President because it was their patriotic duty. Americans put aside their differences in WWII and worked together to win that war.

Everyone from every strata of society from young to old pitched in. Small children pulled little wagons around to gather scrap metal for the war effort. Grade school students saved their pennies to buy stamps for war bonds to help the effort. (Yes, we actually did these things 'back then')...........

Men who were too old or medically 4F lied about their age or condition trying their best to join the military. Women doubled their work to keep things going at home. Harsh rationing of everything from gasoline to soap to butter was imposed yet there was very little complaining. You never heard prominent people on the radio belittling the President. Interestingly enough in those days there were no fat cat actors and entertainers who ran off to visit and fawn over dictators of hostile countries and complain to them about our President. Instead they made upbeat films and entertained our troops to help the troops' morale. And a bunch even enlisted.

And imagine this: Teachers in schools actually started the day off with a Pledge of Allegiance and with prayers for our country and our troops! Back then no newspaper would have dared point out certain weak spots in our cities where bombs could be set off to cause the maximum damage. No newspaper would have dared complain about what we were doing to catch spies.

A newspaper would have been laughed out of existence if it had complained that German or Japanese soldiers were being 'tortured' by being forced to wear women's underwear or subjected to interrogation by a woman or being scared by a dog or did not have air conditioning.

There were a lot of things different back then We were not subjected to a constant bombardment of pornography, perversion, and promiscuity in movies or on radio. We did not have legions of crack heads, dope pushers, and armed gangs roaming our streets.

No, President Bush did not make a mistake in his handling of terrorism. He made the mistake of believing that we still had the courage and fortitude of our fathers. He believed that this was still the country that our fathers fought so dearly to preserve. It is not the same country. It is now a cross between Sodom and Gomorrah and the land of Oz. We did unite for a short while after 9/11, but our attitude changed when we found out that defending our country would require some sacrifices.

We are in great danger. The terrorists are fanatic Muslims. They believe that it is okay, even their duty to kill anyone who will not convert to Islam. It has been estimated that about one third or over three hundred million Muslims are sympathetic to the terrorists' cause... Hitler and Tojo combined did not have nearly that many potential recruits.
So... We either win it - or lose it - and you ain't gonna like losing.

America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall.

Take a couple of minutes to read this. Then I ask that you THINK ABOUT IT when you vote in November. Voting Democrat or Republican is most definitely YOUR CHOICE. Just remember what you have just read.

Send this to everyone you know, if you've got the guts to do it!!!

However, millions of the younger generations will not even know what this is all about.......all we can do is try to inform.....try to help in any way we can!

Whoopi’s Ignorant and Offensive Slave Remark

Sen. John McCain and the women of the View

"Should I be worried about being a slave, about being returned to slavery because certain things happened in the Constitution that you had to change?"—Whoopi Goldberg, the View

They’re doing it again. I remember being in line in 2000 at an event and two African American’s were in line before me and they were talking about the 2000 Presidential elections between Vice President Al Gore and Gov. George W. Bush.

What I heard was a startling display of reverse racism. One said to the other that they would never vote for George Bush because if Bush were elected he is going to re-institute slavery.

Of all of the most outlandish of claims why must it always revert to this? Need I remind everyone the Republican Party is the Party of Lincoln?(See story)

Everyone knows this, but it's worth repeating: The Republican Party is the party of Abraham Lincoln and was established in 1854 to block the expansion of slavery.

The Democratic Party was the party of slavery: Its two founders, Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson, owned large numbers of slaves, and every party platform before the Civil War defended the institution unequivocally.

After the war, it was the Republican Party that rammed through the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution over Democratic opposition.

Republicans also enacted a series of civil-rights laws that culminated in the Civil Rights Act of 1875, which basically did what the Civil Rights Act of 1964 accomplished … Historically speaking, the Republican Party has a far better record on race than the Democrats. Sen. McCain should not be shy about saying so.--Bruce Bartlett

One of my friends, he’s black, makes it known emphatically that he is voting for Sen. Barack Obama because he is a Black man.

This reverse racism that Whoopi and people who think like her are displaying is not only ignorant but it is as ugly if not uglier than its progenitor.

Racism has been heretofore say to have come from ignorance but this neo reverse racism is a willing self delusion that some Black have believing somehow that Whites have the power or the desire to put Black people back in chains.

Affirmative Action’s original intent was to allow opportunities that qualified Blacks where not receiving because of racism. Lately Affirmative Action has been identified with placing unqualified minorities into positions that they do not warrant.

It is ashamed that Black people are backing an unqualified Black man for the most important office in this country. Barack Obama is not qualified to be the President of the United States thus fulfilling all of the stereotypes about Blacks and Affirmative Action that have currently developed about Affirmative Action and Black people.

Whoopi it is the welfare state, which Liberals promote, that is what has destroyed Black families by creating the slavery of dependency on the State. Those are exactly the policies that Barack Obama and the Democrat Party are campaigning to enact if he should be elected President.

Whoopi should be reminded that Blacks owned slaves too! So your Massa, Whoopi, could be the candidate that you’re voting for Barack Obama not John McCain!