Trust Either Government or Corporate Business?

Bilderberg’s head Viscount Davignon. Does this man control the world?

Every year since 1954, a small network of rich and powerful people have held a discussion meeting about the state of the trans-Atlantic alliance and the problems facing Europe and the US.
Organised by a steering committee of two people from each of about 18 countries, the Bilderberg Group (named after the Dutch hotel in which it held its first meeting) brings together about 120 leading business people and politicians. –BBC News

I heard an argument the other day which thesis was that Business should be trusted over government. The idea being advanced was we need limited government on the one hand and free trade on the other in order for the United State to effectively compete in this global market. This argument was put forward by a very famous Conservative who is just as wrong about this topic as he is famous.

First the question is not whether we can trust one, government or business, above the other we can not. Both are equally worthy of our disdain. In this much I agree with Sen. John McCain, corporate power should be curtailed.

What is clear is that our founding fathers had a disdain for government. What is apparently unclear is why they did. The founders realized that consolidated power in whichever form it took, government or religion, would be ultimately used against the people. What the founders did not see coming was the entity that we face, unregulated and unrestrained global corporate power. And (here)

That notwithstanding is why they took great pains to warn us against government and that is why they invented the checks and balances of a triadic form of government. The intention was to keep power from consolidating into any one branch of government. In addition, the vote of the people was instituted to ensure that this government would be answerable to the people.

Therefore, Government can be feared slightly less than business because there are these mechanisms in place to make government somewhat responsive to the people and government must comply, if only for appearance sake, to the vote of the people whereas unlike government there is relatively nothing that citizens can do to make business heed the will of the people.

"If we will not endure a king as a political power we should not endure a king over the production, transportation, and sale of any of the necessaries of life."—John Sherman

And don’t trot out the idea that market forces control business. Business has made it it’s business to control market forces as well, business has made it it's business to control governments as I will attempt to argue.

I have previously argued that everything that is wrong with America today can be laid at the feet of Corporations.

Everything that is wrong in America today can be blamed on an out-of-control corporate environment that will do anything and everything for the sake of the bottom line. Profit!—Alaphiah

It was the Oil Corporations that made billionaires and trillionaires in the middle east therefore these Corporations are directly and indirectly responsible for the rise of Islamic terrorism, the war in Iraq, secret Saudi manipulations and funding of terrorists, a brazen Iran and an out of control Venezuela.

Oil revenues provided by corporations have lead to the undermining of the Western way of live through the Middle East control of oil prices and have set the stage for an upcoming mother of all jihads, battle of economic power between the West and the East.

Without the oil revenues that corporations made possible Islamist would still be running around in the Middle Eastern deserts waging tribal wars against one another instead of the global terrorism that we are daily forced to contend with.

With only regard for their own enrichment Oil Corporations have put the world in grave danger by placing the world economic power in the oil reserves of the Middle East thus changing the balance of economic power from the West to the East.

As testament to this even as you read this the U.S. dollar is being replace by the Euro which in turn will be replaced by what ever currency that oil enriched nations decide will benefit their objectives, business and otherwise, of world domination.

In addition to the just mentioned Middle Eastern investors and bankers are buying up U.S. debt placing the United States in the power of foreign creditors. This is a world that unregulated and unrestrained corporations have created not government!

America is in the last throes of a decadent sexualized wanton hedonistic consumer driven society in which value is only placed in how much money one can make and/or what one can eat, wear, play with and have sexual relationship with for the moment.

It is corporations that have worked hard to appeal to our most debased appetites in effort to condition us to buy their latest little i-phone or i-pod bobble which to entertain ourselves to death with while simultaneously increasing their bottom line.

Every aspect of one’s life is now controlled by Corporations what you hear, what you watch where you work or if you work. America is truly at the mercy of corporate power.

And we allow these controlling corporate bodies to virtually manipulate every aspect of our lives from who to vote for to which automobile to purchase. From health care, HMO’s and Pharmaceuticals unregulated and unrestrained corporations are the cause for the economic woes of the United States of America.

"The combined profits for the ten drug companies in the Fortune 500 ($35.9 billion) were more than the profits for all the other 490 businesses put together ($33.7 billion).

Over the past two decades the pharmaceutical industry has moved very far from its original high purpose of discovering and producing useful new drugs. Now primarily a marketing machine to sell drugs of dubious benefit, this industry uses its wealth and power to co-opt every institution that might stand in its way, including the US Congress, the FDA, academic medical centers, and the medical profession itself."-- Marcia Angell, M.D.

Last, but certainly not least, how is the world food supply holding up? Well since control of the world’s food supply has fallen under corporate control even food is being mismanaged.

Food is being genetically altered or becoming scarce because of use for biofuels either of which has exposed and left vulnerable world food supplies.

From food to energy and to medicine unregulated and unrestrained corporate business have remained unaccountable for all of the world-wide disasters that they have caused.

How anyone can argue that government should be limited with respect to controlling corporations is beyond me and not to mention that thought is not in line with concepts of liberty and freedom and certainly not in line with what is best for America.

No protecting American on his watch

Phil Gordon, Mayor of Phoenix Arizona

Phil Gordon, Mayor of Phoenix Arizona is an enemy of the United States of America. Why? Mayor Gordon is using the United States’ own laws and it’s Constitution against it in order to help foreign nationals in their goal to reconquer Azlan.

What is Azlan? Here’s is what Phoenix news.com had to say about it, and here’s some commentary from La Indymedia.org regarding a threat against a La Raza school in Los Angeles which the writer believes is because of the white man’s fear of Azlan philosophy. Better yet here’s a student MeCHA club at Western Oregon University giving the history of Azlan. Finally here Pat Buchanan warning back in 1996 as reported by Drudge about the plan to reconquer Azlan. Read and decide for yourself.

Mayor Gordon has asked the FBI to interfere and intercede against Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the only elected sworn official of Phoenix who is attempting to protect the United States.

The Mayor is attempting to prevent the sheriff from protecting the United States from those who would violate her immigration laws.

ICE officials say Arpaio is not violating the formal agreement he has with their office that allows sheriff's deputies to enforce immigration laws.

In an April 4 letter to U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey, Mayor Phil Gordon asked the agency and the Justice Department's civil rights division to examine what he called discriminatory harassment and improper stops, searches, and arrests by sheriff's deputies in Maricopa County, which encompasses the metropolitan area.

Yet Mayor Gordon and the U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey are conspiring against the United States of America claiming phony civil rights violations against Sheriff Arpaio in an effort to aid and abet foreign nationals who violate immigration laws.

Can you believe it? In this topsy-turvy world of civil rights for foreign nationals and public officials who act to enforce these false rights, it is the citizens of the United States who are being cheated of their rights by these actions.

Mayor Gordon and U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey should be immediately thrown out of office and Sheriff Arpaio should be supported and commended.

Enough of the anti-Americanism from public officials, down with Gordon and Mukasey and down with elected officials who violate the spirit and letter of the law in attempts to destroy this union.

What Will it Take?

I can't believe that the liberals are still sucking their Kool-aid!

What has to happen before they believe that this Obama is a fraud? He presented himself as a "uniter" (he figured it worked for Bush) but has never reached across the aisle, except for a couple of bills that he thought would help his image.

What kind of a President would he make? He doesn't salute our flag, he won't wear the small American flag pin on his lapel, he associates with known terrorists and a "Reverend" who insults the spirit of Christianity. How dumb can the American voter be?

I don't care what people call me.......... racist, bigot, etc. I call the shots as I see them............ and let the chips fall where they may. Obama can attempt to explain away his associations, but when you lie down with dogs, you get fleas.

"Reverend Wright" was his pastor, confidant, friend and counselor for some 23 years. He married the Obamas and christened their two children. Over this period of years, not a short time I might add, Barack had dozens of opportunities to discover just what a bigotted, racist, unpatriotic man Wright is................ and yet, he continued his close association. Does anyone really believe that he had no idea of where the "Reverend" was coming from?

First........ when the news about Wright broke, Obama played typical politician, and disclaimed any knowledge of the vitriolic sermons......stating
that had he known of them, he most certainly would have expressed his
dissatisfaction to his mentor. I don't believe that for one minute!

As the facts would have it, when he found himself caught in a lie (not a small one, I might add), he spoke publically at length, but somehow managed to turn the conversation toward race, and just skirted the real issue. This outcry wasn't about race............. though Wright is definitely
a racist............ but about pride in country and patriotism. We all had to suffer through Obama's labored explanations, even involving his grandmother, who was described as a "typical white person". One thing that was conveniently left out, was an open and honest explanation of why he had lied about sitting in the church hearing those sermons, in the first place. But I guess he figured that he had masked the whole situation with the race-bait. The really amazing part of this is, that Obama, the DNC, the Democratic strategists, and most of the liberal MSM, just can't understand why we keep revisiting this situation. What part of lies and deceit don't any of them understand?

Now, as more comes to light over Obama's "friendship" with the organizer of the "weathermen", who has a total lack of remorse over the bombings at the Capital, NYC Police Headquarters, and other government facilities...... those same lame-brains are wondering why people are getting upset once again. This is even a more serious situation than the Wright controversy, and is going to require a lot more detailed explaining.

I want to know just how "friendly" Obama and Ayers really are..... and what Obama really thinks about his participation in these terrorist operations. I also will not feel completely comfortable, until an in-depth investigation of Obama is done. On the surface, his wife seems cold and uncaring.... in spite of the fact that she had the benefit of attending the best schools in the world, received her degrees, became an attorney, and earns well into the six figures each year.

And THIS is the first time that she is proud of her country?..... only because her husband is in the Democratic primaries??? Where was she when we caused the collapse of one of the most oppressive regimes in history, the Soviet Union, where was she when we were feeding, clothing and protecting million around the globe?......... where was she when they were teaching American history? She got hung up on slavery in America, and still hasn't gotten past that. In her thesis, she states that she is FIRST AND FOREMOST BLACK............ and THEN everything else. She should be an American, who happens to be black. But then, I guess that she got to where she is BECAUSE she is black, and had the benefit of Affirmative Action. So she made it all about race!

For the reasons above,............ I am totally uncomfortable with the idea of an Obama presidency. I hope that the American people will see through this sham, and vote according to their own brains and hearts.

Please turn the Global warming up ‘cause it’s Cold

Will someone turn the Global warming up ‘cause its Cold! I’m never amazed at how gullible people are. Sure we all are concerned about our environment and our planet but to allow people to use our concerns against us in this Global warming/Climate change scheme indicates that people in general have lost the ability to reason when so many people are assaulting reason on the topic of Global warming/Climate change.

You’ve probably heard that Los Angeles that bastion of common sense, logic and reason is considering imposing a Global warming tax on its citizens. Oh you haven’t heard?

Well its billed as a "climate change mitigation and adaptation fee,” it targets LA motorist and according to the Orange County Register it would cost motorists either an additional 3 percent motor fuel tax, or up to a $90 annual flat fee, based on vehicle emissions. The new charges would be on top of taxes already paid at the pump. Either option requires a majority approval by a vote of the people.

But wait, what scientific fact(s) is this new Global warming tax based on? Why it’s not base on scientific facts, which support the theory of Global warming/Climate change at all. No, Assemblyman Mike Feuer’s, a Los Angeles Democrat and author of California Assembly Bill 2558, reason for attempting to impose about $400 million in additional taxes on the people of Los Angeles is in his words, "At this point the people of the Los Angeles region have just had it when it comes to traffic and air quality,"

Okay he said “air quality” so I’m guessing that that ties into Global warming/Climate change in some way that Californians only understand.

But really to attempt to sneak a new tax on the people of California on something that they are already paying taxes for “traffic congestion and air quality” by labeling it a Global warming/Climate change is simply unconscionable Assemblyman Feuer. But to have the people vote on taxing themselves on your scheme is criminally insane sir and you should be recalled at the earliest opportunity.

Global warming at best amounts to less than a degree of temperature increase during the past century. If the recent several-year cooling trend is an indication, global warming may be going away.

But because the only "proof" of long-term catastrophic consequences lies in contrived computer models, politicians like Mr. Feuer can insist even as temperatures decline that doomsday still lies ahead unless people tax themselves to fix the problem.—The Orange County Register

But it is not only the little peon politicians who are attempting to abscond with your Global cash the World bank knows a patsy when it sees one (that would be you) and is already plotting on getting all of those “Global warming/Climate change” billions of dollars when you my friend are taxed on your carbon emissions which is coming soon, the tax that is.

At the week-long Bangkok conference, the World Bank pushed its proposals for a $5-10 billion Clean Technology Fund, a $500 million "adaptation" fund and possibly a third fund dealing with forestry.

However, developing countries want climate change cash to be administered through the existing United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC), which they feel is much less under the control of the Group of 8 (G8) richest countries. --Ed Cropley

What’s at stake here is that rich nations, countries like the United States, would be taxed billions of dollars for their carbon emissions and that money will be given to poor nations as payment for our environmental sins. It’s true!

What? You thought that Global warming/Climate change was about saving the Earth? Wrong again it’s about wealth transfer and the World Bank wants in on this cash cow and its cut of the loot.

Before they agree to any sort of restrictions on emissions of the greenhouse gases fuelling global warming, poor countries want firm commitments of billions of dollars in aid from their rich counterparts.

The money will be used for everything from flood barriers against rising sea levels to "clean" but costly power stations, an example of the "technology transfer" developing countries say they need to curb emissions of gases such as carbon dioxide. --Ed Cropley

It’s the Global warming/Climate change hokey-pokey and taking your money is what it’s all about!

Finally, all this talk about the revenues that Global warming/Climate change will produce we forgot the important stuff like actual Global warming!

Well according to David Archibald, a solar scientist speaking at the "Greener Skies 2008" conference an environmental confab in Hong Kong recently this year Global warming/Climate change is mostly dictated by solar cycles, not carbon dioxide levels, as conventional wisdom suggests.

And to top that bit of shocking news off Archibald told the scientist gathered to hear about global warming that they should figure out ways of increasing CO2 output because the sun is not as giving as in the past. More Carbon Dioxide?

In other words according to Archibald trends of Global cooling are afoot. If there is the remotest possibility that Archibald is correct the schemes to collect all of that Global loot would be put in jeopardy so you can believe that Archibald will be silenced even though the Earth hasn’t warmed since 1998.

The Consequences of Defeat

Newt Gingrich, Former Speaker of the House

Was Iraq worth it? That's the economic question Democrats are again highlighting because of Gen. David Petraeus's congressional testimony this week. And implicit in that question is the assumption that even if the surge works and Iraq someday ends up as a democratic capitalist, antiterrorist ally of America, the price has been too high—James Pethokoukis

Democrats wish to frame the argument for leaving Iraq in terms of “blood and treasure,” meaning that the cost is too great both in American lives and tax payer’s money and they want to just leave. They wish to quit without regard to the consequences of that action.

Though there is no denying that the cost is great in American lives and resources. I believe that the cost is worth every life lost and every dollar spent if we defeat those who are attempting to destroy this country.

Newt Gingrich appearing on Hannity and Combs and speaking to Allan Combs put it another way when asked by Combs, how can the American people vote for someone who is out of sync with the American people’s present views on the war in Iraq?

Gingrich adeptly pointed out to Mr. Combs that he (Combs) was asking the wrong question the proper question is, are the consequences of defeat too great for America if Congress manufactures America’s defeat by sabotaging American’s war efforts. (See video)



And then James Pethokoukis of Capital Commerce says it in another way when crunching the numbers in his, “The Cost of Not Liberating Iraq.”

Mr. Pethokoukis’ cost analysis list the cost of containing Iraq, which is what we would have had to do had we not put Saddam out of power, at $350 billion to $700 billion dollars, he projects that gas prices would have risen because of our containment activities, and that the U.S. economy notwithstanding recent economic news has done remarkably well in the five years of war.

Real GDP has increased by 16 percent, or 3 percent annually. The unemployment rate has hovered below a historically low 5 percent for quite some time. Nearly 10 million jobs have been created. Household net worth has increased by $20 trillion. Industrial production has expanded by 13.5 percent.

Even home prices, despite the current correction, have increased by 20 percent. Global GDP has averaged nearly 5 percent annually. The capitalization of the world's stock markets increased 159 percent, or $35 trillion. Meanwhile, new emerging-market economies saw their stock market index collectively rise by 223 percent.

In all I agree with Gingrich and Pethokoukis. Gingrich believes that if Congress manufactured a defeat in Iraq it would hurt America’s image in the world and if we withdraw or if we were defeated. Defeat would signal to the world that America's word is no good and American can’t be trusted to live up to it’s commitments.

Pethokoukis thinks that politicians who talk about the cost of the war are disingenuous when they do nothing about the $2trillion dollar crisis in additional long-term liabilities that is soon to be facing the United States. Also he cites a strong U.S. economy during the war, though that has recently changed.

The consequences of losing are too great of a price for America to pay and this Congress should cease attempting to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory and let Gen. Petraeus and the U.S. military win this war without anymore interference.

Democrats are Right

Gen. David Petraeus, left, accompanied by Ambassador Ryan Crocker (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Democrats plan to push legislation this spring that would force the Iraqi government to spend its own surplus in oil revenues to rebuild the country, sparing U.S. dollars.-- ANNE FLAHERTY

Bet you never thought you’d see that title here, but when you’re right you’re right. I thought that I would never see anything positive come out of a Committee Chaired by Democrats about the Iraq war but this one thing did.

Iraq has about $30 billion in surplus funds stored in U.S. banks, according to Sen. Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) and this is one point that we can all agree, Iraq should use those funds to rebuild their country.

I believe everyone agrees that the American tax payers have shouldered tremendous financial and personal cost in this 5 year war and Iraq is not exactly cash strapped. What the Democrats are proposing is not only acceptable but sensible in this regard.

Iraq is looking at a potential boon in oil revenue this year, possibly as much as $100 billion in 2007 and 2008. Meanwhile, the U.S. military is having to buy its fuel on the open market, paying on average $3.23 a gallon and spending some $153 million a month in Iraq on fuel alone.

This recommendation is but one of the positive developments coming out of the SASC hearings the other is Gen. Petraeus’ professional assessment of the war.

Petraeus is recommending to the President the withdrawal of the 20,000 extra troops. Beyond that, the general proposed a 45-day period of "consolidation and evaluation," to be followed by an indefinite period of assessment before he would recommend any further pullouts.

Democrats should accept this aspect of Gen. Petraeus’ plan too; it wouldn’t hurt to be right twice in the same day now would it?

Disgusting Duo!

The Huffington Post and the Daily Kos should be
ashamed to face the world. Their disgusting posts
after the death of Charlton Heston, were unworthy
of even such degenerative websites.

To wish agonizing deaths on the likes of former
First Lady Nancy Reagan, and celebrate the death of
such steadfast Americans as Mr. Heston, shows the
low level to which the likes of Arriana and Kos will stoop.

But I guess when you are that far down into the gutter,
it isn't such a big step after all.

brooklyn

The War Over the War

General David Petraeus

Winning hearts and minds, I bet you haven’t heard that cliché for quite some time yet it does bear bring up again because of the turn of events in Iraq.

Convening today are the Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations committees where General David Petraeus returns to a partisan divided Capital Hill.

There will be three simultaneous things happening in those hearings Gen. Petraeus will be attempting to give an assessment of the conditions as they are in Iraq.

Democrats will be attempting to justify their anti-Bush stance by insisting that no substantial political progress has been achieved in Iraq.

And Republicans will be attempting to justify their support for the war and argue for its successful completion.

What is undeniable is that the Iraqi people have changed their sentiments with regards to al Qaeda in Iraq. Iraqis now view al Qaeda with distain because of the shear brutality with which al Qaeda indiscriminately destroyed property and killed fellow Muslims.

Iraq’s are rejecting al Qaeda’s presence in Iraq largely because of the way that America has conducted itself in this war.

America has allowed the Iraqis to see a clear distinction between the way we fight and the way that al Qaeda wages war.

It is not so much that America has won the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people it is more that al Qaeda lost the hearts and minds of the Iraqis.

Our role is to deal a blow to Al-Qaeda and the militias, wherever they may be. The militias, by the way, also play a role in Iraq, when it comes to the displacement of people and mass murder.--Sheik Ali Hatem Ali Seliman

In the following remarkable example Sheik Ali Hatem Ali Seliman issues a fatwa against al Qaeda fighters in Iraqi



And in this video clip U.S. soldier Maj. Gen. Kevin Bergner remarks on the change of attitude with which al Qaeda has achieved “personae non gratae” status and with the help of the Sunni Muslims who once helped al Qaeda the U.S. is finding intelligence to aid in destroying al Qaeda.



I’m betting that because this is a remarkable victory for the American forces it will not even be brought up in these hearings.

But in essence America as won, we have won at last the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people.

To abandon them or to betray them by immediately withdrawing troops at this time would be a slap in the face of all those Iraqis who are now standing up to al Qaeda because they feel supported by America.

Sens. Obama and Clinton lose this discussion if they suggest anything but support for the mission and its successful completion with victory!

More Demands from Islam!

I wish that the rest of us in the West, had the courage of
this gentleman from England. He is voicing what I and
many that I know, have felt for a very, very long time.

It is impossible for me to reproduce the entire article here,
so I will just attach the link. I hope that those who view
this will wake up and smell the coffee, before it is too late.

http://www.dotsub.com/films/moredemands/index.php?autostart=true&language_setting=en_1618

McCain’s Chickens come home to Roost

Sentor John McCain

We can be slow as well to give greatness its due, a mistake I made myself long ago when I voted against a federal holiday in memory of Dr. King.

I was wrong and eventually realized that, in time to give full support for a state holiday in Arizona. We can all be a little late sometimes in doing the right thing…--Sen. John McCain, 4/5/08 40th Anniversary of Dr. King’s assassination

For three solid weeks, if not a month, my fellow Republicans pounded Sen. Barack Obama for the words and actions of another man, his former pastor of 20 years Rev. Jeremiah Wright. The inference being made was that because Sen. Obama chose to attend Pastor Wright’s congregation Obama is a racist.

I repeatedly warned this was a path that we did not needed to take nor that we should have wanted to take to defeat Sen. Obama because though it made sense to some of us I believed this attack would not gain traction among Obama supporters.

I was right the Rev. Wright story while it dissuaded some did not sufficiently harm the Obama campaign rather it made Republicans look as if we where desperately attempting to attack Sen. Obama by any means necessary. Meaning by projecting Republican’s own weakness onto Sen. Obama that weakness was and is Racism.

So it was only fitting that standing in front of the Lorraine Hotel this past weekend where 40 years ago Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King was assassinated Republican Presidential nominee Sen. John McCain was booed for obliquely acknowledging his own racist past as a 47 year old Senator who voted against making Dr. King’s birthday a national holiday. (Transcript of McCain’s remarks)



For years the state of Arizona refused to recognize the day as a day of significance making Arizona the last state to do so. Sen. John McCain is the classic kind of Racist yet the same holier-than-thou Republicans who excoriated Sen. Obama and Rev. Wright have seemed to have forgotten the history of their own racist candidate, John McCain.

This would be but a foot note in the 2008 presidential campaign were it not for Republicans who self righteously have whipped themselves up in a racial frenzy regarding Sen. Obama’s former pastor Rev. Wright connecting Obama by inference to Wright’s words and ultimately suggesting that because Obama listened to Wright and was a member of Wright’s congregation that Obama somehow bears responsibility for Wright’s words and actions. Republicans have gone as far to label Sen. Obama a racist because he was a member of Rev. Wright’s congregation.

But with Sen. McCain we have no secondary party guilt, no we have McCain’s own words and actions they convict him of the actual racism, racism which Republicans attempt to project on Sen. Obama by association. Sen. McCain’s racism led him to actions, such as voting against the King Holiday and working against acknowledging Dr. King’s accomplishments.

While Sen. McCain attempted to hide behind the military and his POW experience his racism is clearly evident. On Friday McCain said, “I remember first learning what had happened here on the 4th of April, 1968, feeling just as everyone else did back home, only perhaps even more uncertain and alarmed for my country in the darkness that was then enclosed around me and my fellow captives.”

Yet when McCain arrived home and became a Senator at the age of 47 he voted against a national King Holiday in 1983 and according to Buzzflash.com McCain supported efforts in his state of Arizona to repeal the King Holiday in 1987 and opposed the Holiday even as late as 1989.

In 1994 McCain continued his assault on civil rights and voted against funding the commission that’s purpose was to promote the King Holiday.

John McCain’s actual racism in action is the difference between him and Obama. Obama according to Republicans is guilty of going to Rev. Wright’s congregation. McCain is guilty of overt racism and racist acts against the memory of the icon of the civil rights movement in this country Dr. Martin Luther King specifically and against Black people in general. When asked about his record on civil rights Sen. McCain instead of being repentant often becomes combative as he did in this interview about his opposition to the King Holiday.

See how Republican candidate John McCain lies as he attempt to hide behind this POW and military experience as the reason that he didn’t know about racism in American, McCain suggest that there was no racism in the military so he didn’t understand and he had to learn how important Dr. King was.



Though it has been stated that Obama was a member of Wright’s church for twenty years there has not been produced one act of racism on Sen. Obama part.

Furthermore Rev. Wright has been labeled anti-American and racist in spite of the fact that he served his country as a U.S. Marine.

It is being advanced by some Republicans that Wright preaches hate yet there can not be attributed to Wright one instance when the people of his church after a sermon poured out into the streets and rioted, not one burning cross on white people’s lawns, not one lynched white person, not one bombed white church, no one shot, no one killed, no suicide bombings and no one committed any act of violence whatsoever that would support the contention that Rev. Wright was promoting hatred.

Either Rev. Wright is the most ineffectual preacher that ever stood in a pulpit or perhaps his messages where not advocating death and destruction of white America. Wright must feel incompetent, after twenty years of preaching we would have expected at least one roadside bomb in America or one beheading or act of Wright inspired violence wouldn’t we?

Osama bin Laden says the word and hundreds of thousands of people are willing to sacrifice themselves to kill their enemies so what’s wrong with Wright’s preaching that he can’t produce the same results? You saw the videos you heard the messages you’d certainly think that those awe inspiring messages would have produced some action in the last twenty years wouldn’t you?

Yet, John McCain though reserved about his religious beliefs and affiliations did act in a way that was consistent with hate and racism by opposing the efforts of Black people to be treated equally and by opposing legislation that would honor Dr. King a man who epitomized equality.

The irony is no matter how one justifies their hate for Rev. Wright and Sen. Obama there was no actions put to the words of Rev. Wright, words that Republicans are so viscerally attacking.

Yet the soon to be leader of the Republican Party, Sen. John McCain 40 years after the death of Dr. King and now because he is running for president of the United States is now just realizing that maybe he should apologize for his acts of opposition against Blacks and a holiday in the honor of Dr. King.

All Republicans and moderate Democrats alike who vilified Obama via Rev. Wright are now finding that the chickens are coming home to roost in their own racist and very flawed candidate. And if they feel as strongly as they do about Obama’s alleged racism then they must denounce John McCain as strongly as they’ve denounced Obama and Wright.

McCain’s sins are his own not another man’s.

I attempt to warn Republicans not to go down this road against Obama when there were so many other viable ways of demonstrating that Obama should not be president yet you did and now you are caught, trapped in your own self righteous piety.

Now in order not to be seen as completely hypocritical McCain must be denounced with the same visceral hatred as you used against Sen. Obama.

McCain can’t be allowed to hide behind his POW and military experience as an excuse as if he knew nothing about racism in America as if there was no racism in the military. To hear McCain tell it he didn’t understand the importance of Dr. King’s work until he was convinced of it by others.

McCain was a grown man a U.S. Senator and he had to be convinced that civil rights work was justified?

Your racism was only a mistake Sen. McCain? It is interesting how running for President can make one realize that racism is wrong but to use the 40th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s death to excuse your racism and campaign on that day Sen. McCain is still wrong.

And yes you were wrong to harbor racist attitudes as you are wrong to think that your convenient “I found Jesus” moment in front of the Lorraine Hotel on April 4, 2008 is any consolation for the over 40 years history of your racist life Sen. McCain.

Media ignores Record Ice Growth and Cooling Temperatures

The Continent of Antarctica hasn’t warmed since 1979

Let’s put this in perspective. The account [Wilkins Ice Shelf collapse] may be misinterpreted by some as the ice cap or a significant (vast) portion is collapsing.

In reality it and all the former shelves that collapsed are small and most near the Antarctic peninsula which sticks well out from Antarctica into the currents and winds of the South Atlantic and lies in a tectonically active region with surface and subsurface active volcanic activity. The vast continent has actually cooled since 1979 – Icecap

Like many of you I was astonished when I saw the video of the Wilkins Ice Shelf collapse in Antarctica. Unlike many of you I was skeptical enough not to accept the dinosaur media’s account without a little further investigation.

The reports all touted the fact that the huge enormity of area that this particular Ice Shelf covered as well as the event itself demonstrated more proof of Global warming.

However there is another side to this story. So if everyone can just step back a little and take a breath.

The crops are not all about to die because of Global warming and we are not going to all be forced into cannibalism because of Global warming. Oh and another thing just because you’re rich doesn’t mean that you’re smart. I think you will see what I mean in a moment.

The Ice in Antarctic is not melting at a dangerous rate because of Global warming. In reality temperatures have been cooling on the continent since 1979.

Yet this MSNBC report filed by Andrea Thompson gives the unwarranted impression that one, the shelf collapse was due to Global warming and two, this collapse was an enormous Ice mass.

Wrong on both counts tectonic activity (earth movement) was the cause of the Wilkins Ice Shelf collapse not Global warming as reported. This movement is usually associated with Earthquakes, volcanic activity, mountain-building and oceanic trench formation and secondly in relations to the vast geographic region of Antarctica the Wilkins Ice Shelf collapse is but a small section of ice in comparison. The picture above demonstrates how large and cold the area is which we are discussing.

According to Joseph D’Aleo a certified consulting meteorologist last year the Antarctic set a new record for ice growth and this summer a unprecedented snow fall covered the southern hemisphere but you didn’t hear that in the media did you? Why? I think we all know why. That type of news doesn’t fit in with the popular media meme of Global warming.

D’Aleo claims that recent reports citing Global warming as the fault for the phenomena in Antarctica are misleading. According to D’Aleo in comparison to the vast ice mass of Antarctica the Wilkins ice sheet break amounts to an icicle falling from a snow and ice cover roof. No big deal.

It is also D’Aleo claim that,

…winter is coming on quickly. Satellite images show the ice has already refrozen around the broken pieces and expanded. In fact the ice is returning so fast, it is running an amazing 60% ahead (4.0 vs 2.5 million square km extent) of last year when it set a new record.

The ice extent is already approaching the second highest level for extent since the measurements began by satellite in 1979 and just a few days into the Southern hemisphere fall season and 6 months ahead of the peak. (In other words Antarctica’s ice is growing not shrinking because of Global warming.)

We are very likely going to exceed last year’s record. Yet the world is left with the false impression Antarctica’s ice sheet is also starting to disappear.

Speaking of false impressions, these are the false impressions that drive the discussion on Global warming in all areas of our society. In politics candidates often pander to constituents regarding what they will do about Global warming as Sen. Barack Obama did recently by promising that Al Gore will be at the table of his Global warming problem solving if he is elected President. Sen. Obama promised to insert the controversial Al Gore in the middle of an already highly contested social subject. (see for yourself)



Not everyone is convinced like people at an Obama rally apparently are, that the Climate is warming by anthropogenic means or that Al Gore is anything more than a Global warming con man.

Yet inspired by and because of Mr. Gores propaganda millions of people believe in man-made Global warming in spite of facts that point to no Global warming since 1998 and that man’s CO2 emissions or Carbon footprint have relatively nothing to do with earthly temperature increase.

Media mogul Ted Turner

A recent Court ruling in Great Britain found that Gore exaggerated his case in his film, “An Inconvenient Truth.” Yet media mogul Ted Turner is so taken by Gore’s arguments that Turner has taken the liberty to add a few Hillary Clinton enhancements to the story of Global warming.

According to Turner crops will fail and we all devolve into cannibalistic sub-humans by the year 2025 because of Global warming. Listen to the rantings of a fellow all hyped up like a junkie on Gore propaganda: (see video)



Joseph D’Aleo says that earth movement, wind and sea caused the Wilkins Ice Sheet break off and in any event temperatures are so cold in Antarctica that the self is already frozen back a far different story than was report by Andrea Thompson on MSNBC but you will only hear the MSNBC story and think that the world is coming to an end like Ted Turner if you get your news from CNN or MSNBC.

Sen. Reid Claims Income Taxes are Voluntary

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid

Now we know why Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid believes that the Iraq war is lost and that the surge is a failure in spite of the evidence to the contrary which is we are winning the war and the surge is a huge success.

Reid is a Liberal and by definition that means he is a contrarian, whatever the facts are, people like Reid will say or believe the opposite. This is especially true if the facts are present by anyone who a Liberal believes is connected to the Republicans in any way.

You remember General David Petraeus’ report before the Congress on surge in Iraq? Moveon.org condemned Petreaus before they heard one word of testimony and several Democrat Senators, Hillary Clinton was one, contradicted Petraeus’ every factual claim.

They were all wrong. Petraeus was right!

No clearer example of this is this interview where interviewer Jan Helfeld makes the statement that the government forces people to pay taxes. Sen. Reid takes exception at that statement and attempts to contradict Helfeld by arguing that taxes are not forced the American people pay taxes voluntarily. (Do you?)

This is a free country right? So if you decided, “I’m not paying a single penny more in taxes!” Could you just flat out stop paying your voluntary taxes?

The Democrats are set to increase their majority status in the Congress this election year and the country will be at the mercy of people who think like Senator Reid. Do we really want that? Before you answer you might want to take a look at this! (Please view video)

Considering Al Gore

Al and Tipper Gore sharing a intimate moment with us all

If neither Mr Obama nor Mrs Clinton has the 2,025 delegates needed to win the nomination, and if both appear unable to beat Mr McCain, under one scenario a group of about 100 party elders - the "super-delegates" - could sit out the first ballot in Denver, preventing either candidate winning outright, and then offer Mr Gore the nomination for the good of the party.-- Tim Shipman

They're kidding right?

Democrats want the win in November and fearing that their two History making candidates who have fought their way to the top of their nomination process are flawed beyond electability they are casting about for an alternative.

But Al Gore? Really? Has desperation brought them so low that their two history making prospects, a Black man and a woman, makes even Al Gore look tenable?

What has brought the high flying Democrats to this nadir? Need I remind you that it was Al Gore that single handedly caused the ultra-partisanship that drives the hate from the left today?

Gore conceded to George Bush on election night November 1999 and upon advice from his advisers took his concession back thus launching the country into the nasty bitterness that divides us today.

At a time when Gore could have shown statesmanship and conceded graciously for the good of the country he chose the divisive road of counting Chads that led to the red state blue state divide. So the father of Global warming can lay claim to the fact that he invented the reason that Democrats are so crazed today.

So it is not at all surprising that the conflict that Democrats openly waged against Republicans has found its way home inside the Democrat camp. Boy Karma is great isn’t it?

Eight years of total Bush bashing and the politics of personal destruction have commentated into Democrats virtually destroying one another with the same tactics, dirty tricks and lies that they used against Republicans, they’re using these things against one another.

No matter who comes out of this dog fight they will be crippled in their future attacks against Republicans because no one, but the dumbest partisan Democrat is going to believe the things Democrats say about Republicans are anything but some fake “paint by the numbers” scripted play book attacks that they will use against anyone Democrat or Republican.

So after waging attacks against one another that would normally be reserved for Republican enemies both Democrat candidates are severely wounded prompting senior Party Democrats to consider the prospects of dumping both the front runner Sen. Barack Obama and his challenger Sen. Hillary Clinton at the Democratic Convention by withholding their Superdelegate votes in the first round of voting and when neither candidate has enough votes to claim the nomination they would then draft Al Gore to be the Democrat nominee.

So much for disenfranchising Democrat voters and count every vote, every vote counts, Democrat Party leaders would simply void out their whole primary election casting aside hundreds of thousands of votes. But it would be for the good of the Party!

Do Democrats honestly believe that anyone but them would have Al Gore this Global warming charlatan and profiteer as the President of the United States?

Well maybe Europeans would but the last I checked they're not voting in American elections or are they voting too along with the illegals?

By all accounts this was supposed to be the Democrat’s year yet it appears that they have virtually self destructed by their own made gender, race and pseudo-scientific environmental specific politics.

Now they believe they have no good choices. They know it and now we know that they know it and they know that we know that they know it. Karma!

So all of the talk about groundbreaking first and getting past race and getting past gender have led the Democrats to the same place they they’ve always been in back to the 1950s.

In their hate mongering Democrats have managed to stir up neo-racists against Sen. Obama and the anti-women against Sen. Clinton and their solution? Al Gore a white man.

How ironic if you remember on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 in front of a Georgetown audience Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean is reported to have said the 2008 GOP presidential field, "looks like the 1950s and talks like the 1850s," according to The Georgetown Voice since the GOP nominee is Sen. John McCain but obviously spoken before Democrats realized that they conjured up the hates of the 1950s or a recounting of the actual history of the 1950 and 1850s.

In the 1800s, it was Democrats who gave their lives to perpetuate slavery during the American Civil War, and it was Democrat governors and sheriffs who used fire hoses and attack dogs on black civil rights activists in the 1950s according to an answer to Mr. Deans remarks by Christ Plante.

Such an a lustrous history and fitting too that Democrats are considering dumping the woman and the black that they touted as proof that they were no longer tied to the discriminations of the past.

These same duplicitous Democrats are considering appointing Al Gore as their Democratic nominee thus starting the 21st Century off like they’re back in the future and this after all of that bravado from Howard Dean!

Yes, Democrats are thinking like the 1950s and acting like the 1850s by even considering bringing back yesterday’s old news of Al Gore!

Gore to spend $300 million on Mind Change

David Blood, Al Gore, and John Doerr, photographed at Gore's Nashville home on Oct. 16, 2007.

Gore… has demonstrated a real knack for using mass communications to influence public opinion. (He estimates that he's shown his homespun slide show on global warming more than 1,000 times, while the documentary version, An Inconvenient Truth, won him an Oscar.) -- Marc Gunther and Adam Lashinsky, Fortune

Will a $300 million dollar brainwashing or advocacy campaign on climate change your mind about Global warming/Climate Change? Al Gore has gone from advocating for Global warming/Climate Change to a more direct approach, Mind Change because you are not responding as he would like you to in America.

I’m not a reporter and I’m not sure that anyone in the United States is functioning in that capacity any more.

Because if there were a reporter anywhere in the contiguous United States of America would not that reporter be curious when he or she heard the news that former Vice President Albert A. Gore, who had a personal net worth of 2 million dollars in 2000 when he left the White house, a mere eight years later can plop down a cool $300 million dollars to buy propaganda with which to advance his pet global project Global warming/Climate Change/Mind Change? Where did he get that kind of money?

I don’t mean ask Gore (a known liar) where he got the money, he’d probably tell you from his film, An Inconvenient Truth and book of the same title. I mean hard investigative reporting to uncover how this kind of money and power can be amassed in such a relatively short period of time.

Is there that kind of money in Global warming? And if there is, does Gore have a conflict of interest going? It would seem to me if Gore is profiting from Global warming he just might be hyping the severity of his claims or the reality of them to make a profit.

Why is there not one reporter in the United States of America asking these questions?

Gore is going to spend $300 million dollars to convince you that Global warming is real.

No he’s already convinced you he’s now attempting to convince the lawmakers in the United States Congress to sell you out by enacting Global warming/Climate Change/Mind Change laws and policies in the United States.

Gore has started another company, The Alliance for Climate Protection to help change yours and your Congressional lawmaker’s minds about Global warming/Climate Change.

The Alliance for Climate Protection's "we" campaign will employ online organizing and television advertisements on shows ranging from "American Idol" to "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart."

It highlights the extent to which Americans' growing awareness of global warming has yet to translate into national policy changes, Gore said in an hour-long phone interview last week. He said the campaign, which Gore is helping to fund, was undertaken in large part because of his fear that U.S. lawmakers are unwilling to curb the human-generated emissions linked to climate change.

"This climate crisis is so interwoven with habits and patterns that are so entrenched, the elected officials in both parties are going to be timid about enacting the bold changes that are needed until there is a change in the public's sense of urgency in addressing this crisis," Gore said. "I've tried everything else I know to try. The way to solve this crisis is to change the way the public thinks about it."-- Juliet Eilperin,Washington post staff writer

But shouldn’t Global warming/Climate Change/Mind Change be obvious by the more frequent and stronger hurricanes that we are experiencing and the increasingly server hotter temperatures? Gore predicted immediate catastrophic apocalyptic four horsemen like weather events about three years ago all due to Global warming. Where are they?

According to Gore we should have had at least a half-a-dozen Ritas and Katrinas by now and much hotter weather around the World. If any of his dire prediction would have come true you can bet he wouldn’t have to spend $300 million dollars the media would have given $300 million dollars worth of coverage to stand in the eye of a hurricane to tell you, “And this is all due to Global warming Jim and now back to you!”

But where did Al Gore get $300 million dollars to spend on Global warming/Climate Change/Mind Change?

It’s an investment. You see if Gore can convince your leaders to get on board of the Global warming scare he stands to profit by trillions of dollars. If you could spend $300 million to make trillions wouldn't you?

Again is there that kind of money in Global warming? I didn’t know that my plastics and aluminum cans were so valuable. Plastic must be the new diamond and aluminum must be the new gold

Gore’s $300 million dollar venture is propaganda on a scale that is mind boggling. Beware of bipartisan coalitions when you see Pat Robinson and Al Sharpen agreeing on Global warming/Climate Change (GW/CC), beware when you see Nancy Pelosi and Newt Gingrich agreeing on GW/CC. Gore has employed the likes of The Girl Scouts, The United Steel workers of America, American Idol, The Daily Show, John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama all to brainwash Americans regarding Global warming/Climate Change.

In an effort to penetrate Americans' consciousness and change lawmakers' political calculus, the group aims to enlist 10 million volunteers through a combination of network and cable commercials, display ads in magazines ranging from People to Real Simple, and online social networks. By contrast, the civil rights and antiwar movements in the 1960s each boasted about 5 million activists.

While "An Inconvenient Truth" urged viewers to fully inflate their car tires and to install compact fluorescent light bulbs to combat global warming, Gore said he is now focused on ensuring that the United States enacts a national carbon emission cap and ratifies a new global pact on climate change in the next three years.

"The simple algorithm is this: It's important to change the light bulbs, but it's much more important to change the laws," he said. "The options available to civilization worldwide to avert this terribly destructive pattern are beginning to slip away from us. The path for recovery runs right through Washington, D.C."

You are being targeted with a three year propaganda blitz from media and your political leaders orchestrated by Al Gore to Change your Mind about Global warming/Climate Change so that Mr. Gore can enact laws in the United States of America through your elected officials, with your consent of course, to enrich himself and his associates on a scale that makes Halliburton look bush league.

I hate to break the news to you Democrats Al Gore will not be running for president anytime soon. It seems that he’s to busy with his current job of buying and selling America a global warming bill of goods!

Let Me Get This Straight!

Unless I totally misunderstood a report on Fox News,
Obama has been a huge supporter of Planned Parenthood.
He has even taken donations linked to the organization.

Recently, an undercover operation by citizens, called
Planned Parenthood about making donations. They explained
that they specifically wanted the money to be earmarked for
abortions of "black" pregnancies only.

The taped phone conversations clearly show that the phone
representatives at the organization, were more than eager to
accept the money, with those stipulations. Some of the
dialogue was racist to the extreme, from an organization that
professes the desire to help the least fortunate of black and
other minority women end those unwanted pregnancies.

I hope that this comes as a big surprise to Obama, one of Planned
Parenthood's biggest supporters. Otherwise, we have seen yet
another side of our "wannabee" president exposed.

I also wonder whether the Obama campaign will return any
monies received from that organization.

And She wants to run Our Government?

Democrat Nominee hopeful Sen. Hillary Clinton

There she goes again, she’s never managed, run or been an executive of anything besides this Presidential campaign and she’s in the red again.

Oh, but according to Sen. Clinton she’s “tested and ready” on day one to lead this nation. How long must we endure this assault on our good sense and judgment? Just who do the Clintons think that they are fooling?

Yes I know, I know that there are those who would support Hillary Clinton even if Rev. Jeremiah Wright were her pastor, and even if she is a sniper fire fraud, but come on guys if one of the two reasons (one is her experience the other is she’s a woman) that Sen. Clinton gives as justification for what qualifies her to be President turns out to be phony like for instance her 1996 Hillary and Chelsea most excellent Bosnia Adventure doesn’t that give you pause?

The fact that her Campaign is cash-strapped (again) and not paying its bills is an indication to everyone who is a conscious, sentient human being that Sen. Clinton is not credible even in her claim that only she has the experience to be president.

Clinton's campaign did not respond to recent, specific questions about its transactions with vendors. But Clinton spokesman Jay Carson pointed on Saturday to an earlier statement the campaign issued to Politico, asserting: "The campaign pays its bills regularly and in the normal course of business, and pays all of its bills."—Kenneth P. Vogel

Let’s look at how the two campaigns compare:

The New York senator’s presidential campaign ended February with $38 million in the bank, according to a report filed last week with the Federal Election Commission, but only $16 million of that can be spent on her battle with Obama.

The rest can be spent only in the general election, if she makes it that far, and must be returned if she doesn’t. If she had paid off the $8.7 million in unpaid bills she reported as debt and had not loaned her campaign $5 million, the cash she would have had available at the end of last month to spend on television ads and other upfront expenses would have been less than $2 million.

By contrast, if you subtract Obama’s $625,000 in debts and his general-election-only money from his total cash on hand at the end of last month, he’d still be left with $31 million.—Kenneth P. Vogel

So based on the facts Sen. Obama has less debt than Sen. Clinton and more net cash reserves so who between the two would you say has the experience to lead this country if running a campaign is any indication of the ability to manage a multi-complex multimillion dollar enterprise?

Sen. Clinton once boasted that she has plenty of ideas yet the country would not be able to afford them all.

That statement is perhaps the only truthful thing that Sen. Clinton has said in this whole campaign.

With her claims of experience gone the way of sniper fire in Bosnia the only reason to vote for Sen. Clinton now is because she is a woman.

How ironic when the feminist movement was principally about making the genders equal while working for a day when gender would not matter. Yet, Sen. Clinton as managed to even set that idea of the movement back 50 years with her use of “Socialist Femi Nazi” gender specific politics.

And she wants to run our Government?

Meteorological Community In Shock Global warming not Real

Dr. Jennifer Marohasy, Director of the Australian Institute of Public Affairs, Environment Unit

Like a Hillary Clinton Sniper fire visit to Bosnia the real story is finally presenting itself about the one thing that Al Gore did actually invent, Global warming. And just like Sen. Clinton misspoke about her mis-recollection of her 1996 trip to Bosnia Gore has been misspeaking regarding catastrophe greenhouse effects and CO2 emissions all along. They are all made up stories, just as made up as corkscrew landings, and are not supported by the science.

Christopher Pearson of The Australian relates a recent interview between ABC’s National Radio Counterpoint co-host Michael Duffy and Dr. Jennifer Marohasy, a biologist and senior fellow of Melbourne-based think tank the Institute of Public Affairs, which absolutely is the video that shows that there is and was no sniper fire in the theory of Global warming.

Duffy begins the interview with a straightforward and simple, “Is the Earth still warming?”

Dr. Marohasy replied, "No, actually, there has been cooling, if you take 1998 as your point of reference. If you take 2002 as your point of reference, then temperatures have plateaued. This is certainly not what you'd expect if carbon dioxide is driving temperature because carbon dioxide levels have been increasing but temperatures have actually been coming down over the last 10 years."

What that initial answer she lays ground for the debunking of the CO2 greenhouse effect myth that is at the heart of the rhetoric which drives the Global warming hysteria.

Duffy’s follow up question, "Is this a matter of any controversy?"

A very polite way of saying that is just your opinion Dr. Marohasy but what do the real scientists say? Dr. Marohasy’s response was “No” it’s not. Real scientists already know it and have acknowledged the fact that the Earth is actually cooling.

"Actually, no. The head of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has actually acknowledged it. He talks about the apparent plateau in temperatures so far this century.

So he recognises that in this century, over the past eight years, temperatures have plateaued ... This is not what you'd expect, as I said, because if carbon dioxide is driving temperature then you'd expect that, given carbon dioxide levels have been continuing to increase, temperatures should be going up ... So (it's) very unexpected, not something that's being discussed. It should be being discussed, though, because it's very significant."

Why is it that something so significant is not being discussed?

This is a monumental development in the discussion regarding Global warming and totally contradicts the narrative at the societal level which is the arctic ice shelves are breaking apart because of Global warming. Many believe Global warming to be decided science and they credit the United Nation’s IPCC which shares the Nobel Peace Prize for their work along with Al Gore in spreading the myth about our planet heating up.

While it is true that there are many who are attempting to create an atmosphere of controversy around the subject the science is not supporting the initial postulations for anthropogenic Global warming because as scientists actually study the phenomena the data is not supporting the initial thesis that man’s carbon emissions is the cause nor is the theory that the planet is heating up supported by the actual scientific study.

This is devastating news for people like Al Gore, Kevin Rudd and Ross Garnaut who are speaking as though the Earth is still warming at an alarming rate.

Marohasy says that the IPCC is just now accepting the arguments of the critics of anthropogenic Global warming. It probably will take time for some of the hard core proponents of the theory to divest themselves of their beliefs.

Christopher Pearson concludes, “If Marohasy is anywhere near right about the impending collapse of the global warming paradigm, life will suddenly become a whole lot more interesting.

A great many founts of authority, from the Royal Society to the UN, most heads of government along with countless captains of industry, learned professors, commentators and journalists will be profoundly embarrassed.”

That is what is at the heart of this issue, so many people “went all in” on this hyped up non-scientific green Earth fad and reputations are at stake. It will be extreme hard for the consensus to say, we misspoke about Global warming.

But they must we have the science, we have the video!

Superdelegates: Will they steal the Election?

Al Gore and Superdelegate Donna Brazile

[T]he superdelegate system is doing exactly what it was designed to do: defend the Democratic Party from Democratic voters. --Ted R. Bromund

Donna Brazile a Democrat superdelegate and campaign manger for Al Gore’s 2000 presidential bid has threaten to leave the Democrat Party if her fellow superdelegates decide this Democrat candidate process contrary to the vote of the Democrat voters.

It is against that backdrop that a group of rich and powerful Hillary Clinton backers are pressuring House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to withdraw her statements that superdelegates should support the will of the majority of voters.

They believe that superdelegate should go against the will of the voters and appoint Hillary Clinton as the nominee of the Democrat Party in spite of the fact that Sen. Barack Obama is presently ahead in the pledged delegate count and not to mention the fact that numerically Sen. Clinton has no possibility to over take him in the pledged delegate vote.

You remember the 2000 Florida presidential campaign between George W. Bush and Albert A. Gore. You remember the alleged disenfranchisement of Florida voters and the slogan, “Count every vote, every vote counts.”

Back then Democrats felt that ballot confusion and the inability to punch through paper voting ballots prevented citizens from exercising their constitutional guaranteed rights to vote. They blamed Republicans for their voting woes when most of their problems happened in polling places that were completely under Democrat control.

Al Gore threw the election into the Florida courts the process then when through to the Florida Supreme court which was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. And because of the outcome at the U.S. Supreme court Democrats felt that the elections were stolen.

In essence what the U.S. Supreme court decided was that the Florida court should not have intervened, that voting process should have progressed without court interference that was not the ruling Democrats wanted so they claimed that the U.S. Supreme stole the presidential elections and appointed George Bush president. How twisted a claim!

Now 8 years later and according to David Saltonstall of the Daily News more than 14 million Americans have voted in this Democratic primary yet this election primary can be stolen from the voters quicker than a Floridian can say Chad! How?

Superdelegates that’s how. The superdelegate’s job is to bequeath the nomination to the Democrat candidate that they feel would be the best nominee regardless of how 14 million of you voted. The nominee is chosen by 795 party insiders. Normally the number of superdelegates would be 796 however it is presently minus one because of a death and a new delegate has not been assigned yet.

If Democrats who have protested so viscerally that 2000 and 2004 were stolen from the voters stand idly by and allow Democrat Party elites to dictate who the Democrat nominee will be in spite of the vote of the people or against the vote of the people then the Democrats are hypocrites and not fit to lead in this country.

Democrats for 8 years have blamed Republicans for their political misfortunes and if these same Democrats allow their own Party members to steal away their choice by vote, how can these Democrat hypocrites hold their heads up after the political hell that they've put this country through for what they called stolen elections?

Superdelegate is a Democrat code word that means that Democrat Party elites don’t trust their Democrat voting constituents’ ability to make the right choice for their Party.

Democrat superdelegates are training wheels for the Democrat unwashed masses the first sign of a Fascist like attempt of government control of the people and another in the long list of reasons why Democrat paradoxes such as superdelegates make them unfit to lead this great Nation.

Is Hillary Clinton Self-Deluded

Decked out in a scarf that appears to be a black and green Clown’s big bowtie Senator Clinton may be showing the early signs of Alzheimer’s because clearly she can’t tell the difference between sniper fire and flowers. Or at least she can’t remember the difference.

She says that she misspoke, that she made a mistake. Yeah like lying about an event that was recorded on video tape that’s a BIG mistake. And much different than her typical stealing and destroying documents which the Clintons are infamous for á la Sandy Burger, Rose law firm billing records and FBI files found in the White house living area.

Yet I heard an interesting comment made about Sen. Clinton from Robert Novak last night. It was Novak’s opinion that Sen. Clinton had told the Bosnia story many times and over time it evolved and that she began to believe it so much that if she were given a lie detector test on her version of the story she would pass a lie detector test with flying colors.

What!?! Only someone who is totally self-delusional could believe a made up concocted story to the point that reality no longer mattered. That’s deluded. Is that the type of personality that we are dealing with in the person of Hillary Rodham Clinton? Are the Democrats offering up another in a long line of delusional candidates?

This is an, I invented the internet, lie. No, this is an, I actually voted for the $87 million before I voted against it, moment. This is the time that we ask ourselves why is it that Democrats always seem find a seminal lie with which to define their candidacy and their candidates by?

But even greater than that, Hillary Clinton has once again made a world-wide laughingstock out of the Democrats, the stories of her Bosnia renown in her own mind will be forever told as the reason that the Democrats lost the 2008 elections. She had her laughs on Saturday Night Live a couple of weeks ago and I for one think that she has made this Democrat race for a candidate to be president SNL funny. Which is not good for Democrats but it great for Republicans.

And Saturday Night Live, I’ve got your next comedy skit… Now get this, Hillary and Chelsea are in an airplane over Bosnia Sniper fire is everywhere. Everyone is ordered to sit on their bullet proof vests and Hillary and Chelsea are ushered up front to the planes cockpit where it’s better enforced against bullet fire.

The Airplane does a corkscrew landing and sniper fire is everywhere and Hillary and Chelsea are rushed into cars as they are ducking sniper fire.

Then as they are driving away in the cars a faint phone ring is heard and it increases to loud, the first scene evaporates and now we are in a White house bedroom the camera pans over and we discover that the ringing phone is the “Red” phone.

We then hear a startled woman’s voice that has been startled awake from her sleep perhaps a dream the phone is ringing off of the hook.

The woman raises and its Hillary and she’s appears sleepy but angry that her sleep was disturbed and then she yells,“WILL SOMEBODY ANSWER THAT DAMNED PHONE, I’m dreaming here!!!

Live from New York its Saturday Night!

(Of course you’ll need to contact my people to discuss remunerations you’ll find we’re very agreeable.)

But seriously, who would have guessed that Hillary Clinton would single-handedly make the Democrats the laughingstocks of the world? It was such a silly avoidable lie. The sniper fire over Bosnia lie, yet the “do anything, say anything” Clintons prove once again that they are true to themselves.

To top even that, unbelievably, Sen. Clinton in true “Pimp my Child” fashion, even has Chelsea lying for her out on the campaign stump. When Chelsea was asked about her mother’s account of the events in Bosnia Chelsea replied, "Well sir, I think that my mother’s on record as having talked about this and I support what she said. I mean, I was there as well and I’m so honored that I was there."

Which means, translated from Clintonese which apparently Chelsea has learned to speak and since we now know that Sen. Clinton has admitted that she lied about the whole thing, Chelsea supports her mother’s lie. How embarrassing. Is there anyone in that household that tells the truth?

Which leads me to this, If Hillary is not busy this January I’ve got the perfect suggestion. A real life sitcom entitled, “The Clintons” or “Liar, Liar, Liar” (but the second title has kind of already been used minus one Liar.)

Put a camera on them and let America watch the most political dysfunctional family to ever once occupy the White house plot and plan to get back into the White house by any way that they dream up. (Again contact my people and we’ll work out the details.)

You’ve got to laugh out Loud, LOL, How many of you did Hillary sell on that “tested and ready” shtick? Boy it’s a knee slap!!! Then to top it off at a press conference Clinton had some jive brother, campaign spokesman Phil Singer trying to dis Sinbad’s recollection of the events in Bosnia.

Singer attempted to discredit Sinbad’s account of the events because Sinbad is a comedian. Singer kept saying something like, “You know Sinbad IS a comedian!” But ironically there’s not much difference in what Sinbad does for a living and what Sen. Clinton does, they both make up stories. Sinbad for paid audiences and Sen. Clinton for free for the American people.

Self-Delusional? You decide, in her Iowa stump speech, Clinton also said, "We used to say in the White House that if a place is too dangerous, too small or too poor, send the First Lady." Now that’s delusions of Grandor and totally made up!

Which invoked this response from the paid comedian, Say what? As Sinbad put it: "What kind of president would say, 'Hey, man, I can't go 'cause I might get shot so I'm going to send my wife...oh, and take a guitar player and a comedian with you.'"

Man, you can only make this kind of stuff up if you’re Al Gore and John Kerry deluded. Republican have always know this about Sen. Clinton to which Democrats responded, “Aw you Repukes are always hatin’ on Hillary.”

I suppose now Democrats can no longer deny that the Clintons lie, not to say that Democrats mind having a liar for president heck they defended Bill Clinton’s lie! Remember, the “It was only sex” response. What they going to say now “Well she really was in Bosnia!” Just give me a break!

No what Democrats don’t like is a clumsy liar like Gore or Kerry someone that is so obvious that even the typical Democrat delusional person can tell that they’ve been lied too.

To which the sniper fired over Bosnia lie will now be added to the annuals of Democrat Party folk lore as the reason why it is not good to put forth your most self deluded candidates to run for the highest office in the land.

Not only is Hillary delusional, that whole Party is nuts! What’s next they going to bring back Al Gore? Now that would be delusional but funny!

Misspoke?

Hillary and Chelsea Clinton

Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign said she "misspoke" last week when saying she had landed under sniper fire during a trip to Bosnia as first lady in March 1996.-- ANN SANNER, Associated Press Writer

Question how do you misspeak about sniper fire that involved a plane that you, your child and witnesses were on? And how do you say lied in Clintonese?

I understand that rappers expand on the truth about their bullet wounds to get that much coveted street cred. But does a presidential candidate need bullet holes in a plane to get dangerous foreign experience cred to bolster her political résumé?

Apparently Sen. Hillary Clinton though so when she began to convey a ridiculous story of how her good will tour, loaded up with a Singer, a Comedian and her baby girl, to Bosnia in 1996 all of a sudden became a harrowing fly by the seat of your pants mission that took on sniper fire.

And then when the plane landed she, because she was an important dignitary, the first lady, was rushed to safety crouching under the stalwart protection of the secret service.



Is that the way you remember it Sen. Clinton? Well unfortunately for you, but fortunate for the American people, you also took a camera crew and the camera remembers it a little bit different then you do, ergo your campaign’s admission that you may have “misspoke” about your Bosnia trip. Hum, where is Rev. Wright when you need him?

Sen. Clinton you could have opted to use your ‘I don’t remember’ shtick that worked so well for you in the past as it is reported that you used in an effort to avoid being indicted for perjury and obstruction of justice by repeating the phrases; ‘I do not recall,’ ‘I have no recollection,’ and ‘I don’t know’ 56 times under oath involving your Rose law firm dealings. Now, I don’t know if that is true or not. But boy, that strategy would have come in quite handy when Sen. Clinton was asked about her recollection concerning her ’96 trip to Bosnia.

Just another in the long line of lies by the Clintons and as David Geffen reminds us:

"Everybody in politics lies, but they do it with such ease, it's troubling."--David Geffen, one time friend and confidante of the Clintons

Oh and by the way here is that video Sen. Clinton that contradicts your account of running from sniper fire. In the actual account I think that you’re getting poetry read to you, a flower and greeted by a little girl.

I’m sure you probably would have preferred bullets instead. Got to keep up that dangerous foreign experience rep, now don’t we!
(see video below)

Richardson Number Two?

Wouldn’t surprise me! Governor Bill Richardson
who was extremely close to the Clintons, until Obama
moved ahead of Hillary in Democratic delegates, seems
to have slimed his way onto the presidential ticket.

I’m willing to go on record, based on Obama’s recent
statement that he has had numerous "meetings" with
the Governor of New Mexico, that they have struck a
deal. Richardson would swing his support from what
many considered a definite Clinton backing, to Obama,
in exchange for a spot on the ticket.

Obama, pretty seriously hurt by the revelations about
his relationship with the unpatriotic bigot "Rev"Wright,
desperately needs to take the Hispanic vote from Hillary,
if he is to even stand a chance of winning in November.
That is also why he is blocking an agreement that would
allow the Florida and Michigan primary results to be
counted. If those delegates were distributed according
to the popular vote, and Hillary takes Pennsylvania by a
huge margin (which looks more and more the case) Obama
would be in big trouble by the time the balance of the
states have their primaries.

Clinton could then argue that she has all the "big" states,
and that the delegate difference between her and Obama is
negligible at best................. she might just convince the
"super delegates" to vote in her favor. With each passing
day, it appears that Obama will not be electable come November.

In any case, I, along with millions of voters who have
already made up their minds NOT to let the country fall into
the hands of the super-liberals, are having a field day. I am
looking forward to watching the Democratic party self-destruct,
so that maybe after the extremists have been purged and
eliminated from the party, it will once again return to the "Party
of my father".

SORRY IT IS RACISM!

Frank Schaeffer

When Sen. Obama’s preacher thundered about racism and injustice, Obama suffered smear-by-association. But when my late father - religious right leader Francis Schaeffer denounced America and even called for the violent overthrow of the U.S. government, he was invited to lunch with presidents Ford, Reagan and Bush Sr.—Frank Schaeffer

Frank Schaeffer a convert to the Eastern Orthodox Church is calling all those who are bashing Senator Obama for associating with Pastor Jeremiah Wright Hypocrites. Why? Because according to Schaeffer Whites are smearing Sen. Obama by association and they are holding his pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright to a double standard.

Schaeffer is suggesting that White people have been motivated by Racism because according to Schaeffer they are trying to keep the first viable Black candidate for President from achieving the goal of becoming president by racial means. Schaeffer also blames the right wing and Hillary Clinton for being complicit in the smearing Sen. Obama by association.

You’ve all have heard the incessant droning on about Senator Obama’s Pastor and why Senator Obama’s attendance at his church makes Obama a racist.

You all know of the hours upon hours that Rush, Fox News and my fellow Conservatives have put into this story dubbed pastorgate.

Yet, according to Schaeffer white Republican preachers cursed American all the time in the 1970s and 1980s, and he and his dad, Francis Schaeffer, crisscrossed America with a message denouncing our nation’s sins, but contrary to Rev. Wright’s experience, instead of getting in trouble they became darlings of the Republican Party. It was never called hate speech or anti-Americanism then. It was called a wake up call to the nation. Just what I’m I talking about?

The late Francis Schaeffer

Frank Schaeffer has recently come forward and argues that "right-wing preachers as his dad often did, preached that we are, 'under the judgment of God.' They call America evil and warn of imminent destruction. By comparison, Schaeffer says, Obama's minister's shouted 'controversial' comments were mild. (Can you imagine that?)

Every Sunday thousands of right-wing white preachers (following in my father’s footsteps), says Schaeffer, and rail against America’s sins from tens of thousands of pulpits. They tell us that America is complicit in the “murder of the unborn,” has become “Sodom” by coddling gays, and that our public schools are sinful places full of evolutionists and sex educators hell-bent on corrupting children.

What’s so amazing is that so many whites have feigned as if they never heard such preaching as Rev. Wright’s, as if his preaching were an anomaly that just comes out of the Black churches.

Which is surprising to Schaffer because he states that this type of America condemnation, this type of social commentary from the pulpit has its roots in the heart of the rock rim conservative sanctified and holy white churches of America of the 70’s and 80’s. How quickly we forget, Amen?

For those of you that read this blog you know that I said that this type of attack on Sen. Obama would come back to haunt Conservatives. And now the stench of Conservative hypocrisy is wafting through the air as this new revelation is unfolding.

Instead of asking the germane questions, who leaked the sermons of Rev. Wright, and for what purpose, we have been willingly lead down the path of 50’s and 60’s racial divides without putting up the slightest form of resistance. So what does that say about us?

The whole national narrative changed from Hillary’s red phone and lack of real foreign crisis experience to Sen. Obama’s pastor and race.

Here I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again Sen. Obama did not use his race as Sen. Clinton used her gender in this campaign but Sen. Obama’s race was always brought up by President Clinton, Sen. Clinton surrogates and the media.

The leaked sermons of Rev. Wright made it virtually impossible for Sen. Obama to avoid discussing race any longer, so the Senator from Illinois spoke as honestly about the subject as any politician has in recent memory, he offered hope and suggestions than would once and for all heal this nations wounded racial torn past.

Yet haters call Sen. Obama a reverse racist for his efforts. And in addition to that Sen. Obama was called un-American for attending a hate mongering, anti-American church.

Now it is revealed, according to Frank Schaeffer, that white churches all across America sermonized in this America condemnation kind of rhetoric all thorough the 70’s and 80’s and Schaeffer knows of which he speaks because he claims that he and his father were apart of it.

Now that the self-righteous and the holier-than-thou Obama bashing is slowly subsiding maybe we can have a mature discussion about the direction that this country is going in and about who we will chose to lead us in this confusing and volatile time in America.

To be sure, if we continue to allow the politics of the racist past to dominate the politics of our present we will continue in the back to the future attitudes of divisiveness that our Grandparents knew.