Thursday, May 08, 2008

SHE CAN’T WIN

Sen. Hillary Clinton

"I'm kind of still up in the air between McCain and Hillary," said Jason Jenkins, 32, who cited information from a hoax e-mail as a reason to spurn Obama.

"I'll be honest with you. Barack scares the hell out of me,” he said. "He swore on the Koran."
--THOMAS M. DeFRANK
In the last eight years Democrats have demonstrated a propensity for a Myanmar cyclone type of politics where huge numbers of people are devastated and where political destruction is of such a wide berth that the impact and the effects of Democrat’s brand of political disaster will reverberate throughout American and World politics for years to come.

The Myanmar cyclone cut a devastating swathe through Yangon Indonesian where it exacted an overwhelming human toll upwards of 100,000 deaths.

Democrats in 2000 via Al Gore, who was running for President, tore this country apart in a red state, blue state divide that has not been seen since brother fought brother in the United States 1861 Civil war.

Democrat John F. Kerry, who was running for President, in 2004 assaulted a sitting President in the most un-statesman like manner exacerbating an already volatile partisan hatred that threatens the very unity of these united states.

And now Democrat Hillary Clinton, who was running to be the Democrat nominee for President, has inflamed racial tension by her sexist, racist politics that for sure has damage her opponent’s chances of winning in the general election, but larger than that she has forever sat back racial relations in America to the time of the 1861 Civil war!

In Thomas DeFrank’s, “Ugly Truth why Hillary Clinton Won’t Quit” DeFrank lays out what everyone knows but few are honest enough to say. (see here)

Sen. Clinton is sown the seeds of racial hatred and she waits to see what harvest she might glean when and if her handiwork bears the fruit that she anticipates.

After all Sen. Barack Obama can’t win because he’s Black right?
Obama did manage to pull in many white voters, but still encountered similar sentiments from a man who refused to shake his hand at a diner in Greenwood, Ind.

"I can't stand him," the man said. "He's a Muslim. He's not even pro-American as far as I'm concerned."
–Thomas DeFrank
Democrats never cease to amaze me to what depths they will sink to gain power. Even if it means destroying the country over lies about the 2000 Florida vote, or lies about the Iraq war and MWD in 2004 or racial lies about one another in their own 2008 primary Democrats leave Myanmar cyclone political destruction in their wake every Presidential cycle which leaves the rest of us to clean up the miss from the fallout.

There is a saying about one should be careful as a guest to not wear out one’s welcome, Sen. Clinton should learn that adage so the rest of us can begin to clean up the devastation that she has caused.

Senator it’s time to quit!

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

Who’s Playbook Is It?

Under pressure in a feisty debate, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton accused her closest rivals Thursday night of slinging mud "right out of the Republican playbook" and leveled her sharpest criticism of the campaign at their records.Beth Fouthy
I keep hearing of the Republican playbook or sometimes referred to as Karl Rove’s playbook or George Bush’s playbook. Yet when I hear of it, it is undoubtedly always referred to by Democrats.

It’s like the Conservative vast right-wing conspiracy or the sniper fire over Bosnia both of these things were inventions of the Democrat mind in order to foil the Republicans and/ or to enhance Democrat standing in the eyes of fellow partisans.

Likewise the Republican playbook is an invention. an old wife’s tale told to scare naïve little Democrats into voting against the great big Republican bogyman.

Also, the term, the Republican playbook is used by Democrats to justify the ruthless dirt that Democrats do while blaming Republicans for Democrat foibles and Democrat viciousness à la recent examples of Democrats accusing one another of using the Republican playbook against one another on television debates and on the campaign stump.

As I write this Sen. Obama has won North Carolina and Sen. Clinton is giving a victory speech in Indiana even though CNN says that it is too close to call right now.

It is quite clear to me that Sen. Obama could have run the table in every primary in every state and Sen. Clinton would have remained in the race as she undoubtedly will do whether she wins Indiana tonight or not.

Sen. Clinton likes to refer to herself as a fighter and yes she does fancy herself as a sniper fire dodging derringdo but what is also frightening is the Clinton ability to suspend reality for scenarios that they concoct themselves out of whole cloth. In other words the Clintons make up their own reality regardless of what the facts are on the ground.

Case in point this Democratic campaign was supposed to be a historic campaign one that women and minorities could be proud of because the Democrat Party was putting forth both a woman and a minority man to be the first woman or Black person to win the Democrat nomination to be President.
Race again played a pivotal role in Tuesday's Democratic presidential clashes, as whites in Indiana and North Carolina leaned solidly toward Hillary Rodham Clinton and blacks voted overwhelmingly for Barack Obama, exit polls showed.

Almost half said they were influenced by the focus on Obama's former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
-- ALAN FRAM
But through a series of strategic strikes along the lines of Race the Clintons have turned the historical into the racially horrific.

In Richard Kim’s “How does Hillary Clinton feel about the White Racist vote” he says ;
So, in the name of another personal quality--honesty--I'd like Hillary Clinton to make the following statement: "Though my opponent has run a terrific campaign, in primary after primary, I have proven that I am the more electable candidate.

I am more electable because I am white.

Barack Obama--Wow!--he's certainly inspired a lot of hope, but as voters in Indiana and North Carolina make up their minds, as the superdelegates make up their minds, they should remember that Barack Obama is black.

They should also remember that a whole lot of white working-class Americans are racists. White racists are an important part of the Democratic Party, and time and time again, they've supported me because I am white.

I am ready on day one to govern as your white American president."
Richard Kim, the Nation
Is Mr. Kim calling Sen. Clinton and White people who vote for her because she’s not that Black man racist? Therefore linking such an attitude to Republicans or to the infamous Republican playbook?

My question is if there were such a sacred relic as a Republican play book how did it fall into the hands of the Democrats and how do Democrats seem to know so much about it.

Sen. Clinton seems to always be on the lookout for the slightest indication that someone Democrat or Republican is running a play from that book and when she perceives a violation she immediately whistles and tosses up a yellow flag as she points out that her opponent is guilty of using the dreaded Republican play book.

As I see it that book is not all that it’s cracked up to be. If it were and if there were any good plays in that book certainly the Republicans would have used them in the 2006 mid-term elections instead of dismally losing both houses of Congress.

Surely in the least it could have been protected better and kept out of the hands of Democrats.

And one would think if the Republican playbook was, “all of that” Sen. John McCain would not have been able to do an end-around Conservative Republicans to get the presumptive Republican nomination to be President.

Its instances like that, which make me, believe that Republicans need superdelegates too!

My thought is this, if you know a certain playbook and you are able to identify each and every play from that playbook that playbook is not your opponent’s playbook that playbook is yours.
Yet what is most troubling--and what has the most serious implications for the feminist movement--is that the Clinton campaign has used her rival's race against him. In the name of demonstrating her superior "electability," she and her surrogates have invoked the racist and sexist playbook of the rightBesty Reed, The Nation
As Besty Reed sees it the Clintons used the racist and the sexist playbook to get where they are today. Only I disagree with her on one small point, and that is, the playbook which she is referring to is of the left not the right!

If Barack Obama is where he is because he is Black, Hillary Clinton is where she is because she is a White woman. In other words no matter how Democrats accuse each other of using Republican tactics or the Republican playbook what we are really witnessing is Democrats using tactics against one another that they would normally use against Republicans.

The only thing is, after Democrats use these sexist and racist attacks against one another they then have the temerity to blame Republicans for Democrat's own tactics because after all Democrats aren’t racist and sexist only Republicans are.

Finally, the much touted playbook is a playbook but it isn’t a Republican playbook! No Democrats need to take responsibility for their own racist and sexist attacks. When they attempt to use these same playbook attacks in the general election against John McCain American’s collective memory should not be so short as to forget that the attacks that Howard Dean and the Democratic machine will use against Sen. McCain are the same ones that they’ve used on one another just a few short weeks ago.

No, instead we should all remember that Democrats play dirty, sexist, racist, divisive politics among themselves so it shouldn’t be too hard for anyone to understand that they would use these same tactics against Republicans any Republican.

Just look at the eight straight years of virulent Democrat attacks against one George W. Bush… There my point is made!

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

London’s Bridges of Liberalism Falling Down

London England
Three years ago the idea that the Conservatives would win London and build up a 20-point lead across the county would have been literally unthinkable,"—Dave Cameron, Conservative Leader
Ken Livingston known to some as “Red Ken” for his far left-wing politics and an eight year incumbent in London England’s recent Mayoral race was defeated by Conservative Tory Boris Johnson. (see here)

Former Mayor Ken Livingston and Mayor Boris Johnson

Conservatives have not held power in London for almost 20 years yet voters swept out the Liberal Labour Party and handed power over to the Conservatives.
Results from the 159 local councils which held ballots in England and Wales on Thursday showed the Conservatives gaining 260 seats with Labour losing 333. The Liberal Democrats gained 34 seats.

Most results were announced Friday, but a high turnout in London -- where around 5.5million cast ballots -- meant the count there continued until early Saturday.

The British Broadcasting Corp. projected the Conservatives would take 44 percent of the vote in England and Wales, putting it 20 points ahead of Labour. Brown's party was a point behind the Liberal Democrats, usually the country's third-largest party, according to the BBC.
–CNN.com
In what this being perceived as a defeat for the ideology of Liberalism world-wide conservatives swept Liberal Labor and Liberal Democrats from power.

Former Mayor Livingston an avowed atheist, was against the Iraq war, embraced Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez , and kowtowed to the racial Islamic figures so much so that Londoners thought that London, the most metropolitan city in the world, was going in the wrong directing and the voters wanted change.

Interesting enough America seems to always be a step behind Europe and is moving in an opposite direction a direction in which we will be forced into the old failed Liberal politics that much of Europe is beginning to cast off.

France has recently elected an America loving President in the person of Nicolas SARKOZY and Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel also supports the United States.

This is a marked change in world politics which can be directly credited to President Bush’s leadership in America and his leadership in the fight against terrorism.

To elect a Liberal now, either Sen. Hillary Clinton or Sen. Barack Obama, would send America falling backward and out of step with the world’s movement of attempting to solve the problems that 20 years of Liberalism has caused for Europe and the rest of the world.

Mayor of London Boris Johnson


Newly elected Mayor of London Boris Johnson has vowed to work with everyone in a nonpartisan kind of government where Johnson even appeared to offer the former Mayor a place at the table of his new administration.

No one who has seen the state of Europe for the last 20 years could possibly want that for the United States of America yet America seem hell bent on repeat the mistakes of Socialism and Liberalism that Europe just now understands do not work.

Yet under the guise of “change” America is considering putting Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama on the world stage which would be highly embarrassing to the United States since the policies which Sens. Clinton and Obama say they would implement are policies that the rest of the world has already “been there and done that” and have failed with.

In fact the rest of the world is moving closer to the American model, a model and way of life that Clinton and Obama say that they would change.

Proving once again that American Liberals are not ready to lead as London's bridges of Liberalism are all falling down!

Monday, May 05, 2008

SCIENCE IS CORRUPT!


As Friedrich Nietzsche’s “God is dead” pronouncement resonated for some. If he were alive today I could totally hear him declaring today that, science is corrupted.

Science like all man-made institutions has become corrupted by commercialism, political agendas and greed.

Science stood silent when Gays hijacked the psychiatric profession to remove the DMSII definition that homosexuality is a mental disorder giving in solely to a political agenda with no scientific research to justify the change in the DMSII.

Science muted itself again when HIV and AIDS was being redefined as a needle induced drug caused infection while down playing the same sex cause for the transmission of the disease.

Science was involved in the corrupting of the supply of corn used for human consumption contaminating it with corn used for animal feed , they are involved in cell splicing or Genetically altered foods or Frankenfoods and cloning of animals for food.
StarLink™ is a corn variety that has been genetically modified to contain an insecticidal protein derived from a naturally occurring bacterium (Bacillus thuringiensis, or Bt.)

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved the gene-spliced variety of yellow corn in 1998 for use only as animal feed and set a zero-tolerance level for its use in human food based on the fact that this particular Bt protein does not break down easily in the human digestive system, is heat resistant, and could prove allergenic. StarLink corn was detected in taco shells in [m]id-September 2000.
CRS report for Congress
Science colluded in the fetal stem cell research multimillion dollar grab because of the millions of dollars of grant moneys that were involved.

Science mapped the Human genome for purposes for patenting genes for profit

Science wrongly established the theory of Darwinism as unquestionable scientific truth though many of Darwin’s claims have not held up under scientific view.

Recently science has come to a consensus that anthropogenic Global warming is an eminent and immediate danger to our planet.

Which brings us to the point of this post; recently mountains of physical evidence has continued to contradict the un-scientific consensus of anthropogenic Global warm yet official science has refused to admit that they were wrong about CO2 emissions and man’s impact on the climate.
A notable story of recent months should have been the evidence pouring in from all sides to cast doubts on the idea that the world is inexorably heating up.

The proponents of man-made global warming have become so rattled by how the forecasts of their computer models are being contradicted by the data that some are rushing to modify the thesis.
—Christopher Booker
Leaving one with only one unavoidable conclusion after all of the wrong turns and wrong answers that science as given us over the years which were usually motivated by political or monetary gain, “SCIENCE IS ABSOLUTELY CORRUPT!”

Friday, May 02, 2008

Global warming stops because of Climate Change?

Global warming will stop until at least 2015 because of natural variations in the climate, scientists have said.

Researchers studying long-term changes in sea temperatures said they now expect a "lull" for up to a decade while natural variations in climate cancel out the increases caused by man-made greenhouse gas emissions.
--Charles Clover
You can’t make this kind of stuff up, but after being inconvenienced by somebody’s version of the “truth” we are now being told that Global warming is on vacation and will return after 2015?

And not only that, variants in the climate are response for canceling out the effects of man-made greenhouse gases! Soooo in essence Climate change has stopped Global warming! (see here)

Well praise the Lord it’s a miracle!

But wait what about all of those draconian CO2 regulatory laws that are being implemented world-wide as suggested by Global warming Nazis like Al Gore, NASA’s James Hanson and the United Nations’ IPCC?

Didn’t these guys recently have a Global warming conference in Bali Indonesia where they decided that there was going to be a Global 0.3ºC temperature rise which in turn would cause catastrophe events such as increased hurricane activity, increased severity in storms, melting polar ice caps, and rising sea levels due to melting polar ice caps which where due to global temperatures rising which where due to heat being tripped in our earth’s atmosphere due to man-made greenhouse gases?

And weren’t these Bali conferences attempts to force world-wide acceptance of the Kyoto 2 agreement or treaty which would give un-elected governing bodies authority to mandate carbon taxes on the nations of the world?

So all of the above was just sniper fire over Bosnia?
The average temperature of the sea around Europe and North America is expected to cool slightly over the decade while the tropical Pacific remains unchanged.

This would mean that the 0.3°C global average temperature rise which has been predicted for the next decade by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change may not happen, according to the paper published in the scientific journal Nature.
-- Charles Clover
What is interesting is that the paper published in the scientific journal Nature blames the increase and decrease of earth temperatures on a cyclical effect.

Yes that cyclical effect is called climate change an event that has been happening on this planet since its inception and will no doubt continue to happen as long as this planet remains.

In the earth’s history there have been periods of alternating cooling and warming phenomenon that lay outside of the control of man.
Writing in Nature, the scientists said: "Our results suggest that global surface temperature may not increase over the next decade, as natural climate variations in the North Atlantic and tropical Pacific temporarily offset the projected anthropogenic [manmade] warming." —Charles Clover
If this is true this is a complete contradiction of the Greenhouse gases theory in which a layer of man-made CO2 gases are trapping heat into the Earth’s atmosphere causing a build up of the Earth’s temperature because heat can not escape.

This would not be a good thing for those who make their living from the Global warming/Climate change crisis.

As my pastor used to say, “Nobody’s mad but the devil!”

Thursday, May 01, 2008

Happy Illegal Alien and Illegal Immigration Day

Immigration activists and civil rights leaders are gearing up for rallies and marches in cities across the nation, hoping to revive the stagnant immigration debate in time for the presidential election.--SOPHIA TAREEN
Today is the third year anniversary of Americans and Foreign Nationals who come together to celebrate our differences and unite in our common goals of lower American wages, failing American schools, forcing closure of American hospital emergency rooms due to nonpayment of services by illegal aliens, higher medical insurance cost, food shortages, American infrastructure and highway systems collapsing and overcrowding and other illegal activities and pursuits.

I think it’s great that we can organize ourselves to celebrate the planning and the actual breaking of Federal laws I think it’s so freeing don’t you!

I’m thinking of other laws that we might one day celebrate the breaking of. Now we must organize but I believe that we can do it because we are not a nation of laws any longer we are a nation of corporate and special interest which business it is to undermine laws that protect the people’s rights.

So in light of that let the people get together and organize because there is strength in numbers, how about non-payment of taxes day or refuse to pay for traffic violations day or anarchist day, yeah that’s the ticket anarchist day.

A day where everyone in America decides collectively to just do what the hell that they want. Like the Clintons , no like Congress, no like people that cross our borders and then organize marches in our streets and vote in our elections. (Illegal alien activities across the United States)
Organizers say this year's efforts are focused less on protests and more on voter registration and setting an agenda for the next president. At least two major national organizations that traditionally have rallied large numbers of immigrants on May 1, National Council of La Raza and Service Employees International Union, have purposely put less energy into the marches.

"In 2006 we said: 'Today we march. Tomorrow we vote.' This is tomorrow," said Eliseo Medina, executive vice president of the SEIU. "Mass mobilizations ensure that people go to the polls. There's this whole culture of participation that's been created in the community."
--SOPHIA TAREEN
So since we have allowed the meaning to be blurred between the words Illegal alien and Immigrate do I understand that non-citizens are now voting in American elections? I suppose it doesn’t matter any longer.

Be that as it may, imagine a day where we all organize to express the true meaning of the second amendment against a government that is no longer responsive to the will of the people, a government that is totally out of control.

On May 1st 2006 1 million people nation wide, illegal aliens, foreign nationals and their supports marched through American streets waving flags of foreign governments to announce to whomever was listening they were here and there was nothing that anyone could do about it.

They held subsequent events and marches in 2007 and now they have planned this day, May 1 2008 to impact the presidential elections.

Imagine that a foreign power influencing your presidential elections, wouldn’t be long until your country is but a memory. It already is in many respects.

So happy Illegal alien day America although the late Cesar Chavez a farm worker activist is turning in his grave right about now because Chavez was staunchly against Illegal aliens you go right ahead and desecrate Chavez’s memory. As a matter of fact go ahead and desecrate the constitution and the meaning of citizenship in this country for that matter.

When breaking immigration laws can be equated to the civil rights movement in the minds of any American then we are not far from believing that Communism is equal to Democracy and Islam is equal to Christianity.

The fact that some of you already believe that one of the three just mentioned comparisons are true (or maybe all three) speaks to the assault on reason in this country.

An assault that has left people ignorant and susceptible to the erosion of freedoms that we are presently experiencing not to mention the subsequent lost of liberty that is guaranteed to ensue from our lack of vigilance and our lacking of the ability to understand the signs of our times.

When a million foreign nationals and their supporters march in the streets of America and celebrate that occurrence for two consecutive years and the American people do absolutely nothing about it that is a sign that America is in its last throes as a free and independent nation.

The reality is America has been conquered without a single shot fired and she has been gutted and left with a government that does not protect its citizens from enemies either foreign or domestic. On that happy note…
Happy Illegal Alien, Illegal Immigration Day, the former country that was once known as America!

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Will Sen. Clinton fix the mess that she’s made?

Gerald Seib

[I]t is Sen. Clinton who now has the greater ability to ease racial tensions within her party. Arguably, she also has the greater need to do so, for her long-term standing.

Simply stated, her camp is the one now being accused of, or at least implicated in, using the race card.

The most recent assertions came in the form of comments last week by Rep. James Clyburn, a black Democrat from South Carolina, who accused Sen. Clinton and, more pointedly, former President Clinton, of damaging the Democratic Party by using race to political advantage.
—Gerald Seib
REP. JAMES CLYBURN INTERVIEWING WITH KEITH OLBERMANN REGARDING THE CLINTON CAUSED DEMOCRAT RACIAL DIVIDE (see video)


Gerald Seib has only one thing right in his assessment of the Clinton caused Racial facture in the Democrat Party that is Sen. Clinton could ease the Racial Tensions if she chooses too, but she won’t.

Hasn’t Mr. Seib noticed that Sen. Clinton campaign is built on only two pillars, one the fact that she is White the other the fact that she is a woman. That’s it. Nobody’s buying that tested and ready shtick. Nobody’s accepting her experience by osmosis claims either.

Just because someone lives in a barn doesn’t mean that they are a tractor, likewise just because Sen. Clinton lived in the White house doesn’t mean that she has somehow intuited the experience to be the chief executive. Yet Sen. Clinton is running her campaign like all that she has to do is cry a little and lie a little and then remind America that Barack Hussein Obama is a Black man, just a little, to win the Democrat nomination.

Sorry Mr. Seib Sen. Clinton isn’t going to give up her only advantage over Sen. Obama just to save the Democrat Party. No, she hasn’t say it, as far as I know, but by her actions you’d swear she’s thinking, “No, no, no God damn the Democrat Party, I’m in it to win it!” à la Rev. Wright’s infamous curse against America.

Speaking of damning when Sen. Clinton was asked just before the Pennsylvania primaries how she would respond if she were president if Iran attacked Israel with nuclear force, Senator Clinton retorted that she would totally obliterate Iran!

Yeah, Sen. Obama knows a little something about being totally obliterated by the Clintons as Robert Scheer of the Huffington Post relates in his “Clinton threatens to obliterate Iran.”

Sen. Clinton's eminently sensible and centrist--to a fault—opponent [Sen. Obama] is now viewed as weak and even vaguely unpatriotic because he is thoughtful. Neither Karl Rove nor Dick Morris could have done a better job.—Robert Scheer
Again sorry Mr. Seib Hillary Clinton is not going to do anything to jeopardize her perceived momentum in this campaign to be the Democrat nominee.

And though it would be beneficial for the Democrat Party for Senator Clinton to repudiate anyone who is basing their vote on the Race of the candidates, not to mention that the Clintons should also apologize for the racial overtones that she and president Clinton have caused, However, you gotta know that anyone who would obliterate Iran is not concerned about a little Racial collateral damage caused by their ambitions to became President!

I’m sure the Clintons feel that they can repair any damage that they’ve caused much later after they’ve won the nomination. After all she is offering Universal Health Care isn't she?

This whole scenario would be funny if it wasn’t so tragic.

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Clintons unleash the Race bomb to blow up Obama

Barack, Hillary and Bill with Black people in happier times

"I think she is destroying the Democratic Party," said New York lawyer Daniel Berger, who had backed Clinton with the maximum allowable donation of $2,300.

"That there's no way for her to win this election except by destroying [Obama], I just don't like it. So in my own little way, I'm trying to send her a message."

The message came in the form of a $2,300 contribution to Obama.
—Daniel Berger as reported by Jonathan Weisman and Matthew Mosk of The Washington Post
In the Democrat’s own version of Hiroshima and Nagasaki the Clinton’s “He can’t win” bomb against Sen. Obama is latent with implications that Sen. Obama can’t win because he is Black.

The fact that the Clinton campaign would stoop to direct and indirect race baiting has the Democrat Party fearing that Bill and Hillary Clinton are causing irreparable racial damage to the Party! The fact that our nation dialog has turned to divisive matters of Race indicates that Hillary and Bill Clinton have managed to polarize this country once again only this time along the lines of Race.

Who would have thought that the Clintons who received nearly 100 percent of the Black vote in their respective campaigns, his for Presidency twice and hers twice for her U.S. Senate runs would turn to Race baiting in an, “If I can’t have the Black vote then I’ll make it an albatross for Sen. Obama.” Plainly said the Clintons are Race baiters!

See CBS report on the controversy (after commercial interruption):


Sen. Clinton’s recent Pennsylvania win will no doubt be used to punctuate the claim that Sen. Obama a Black man can’t win the Presidency and provide ammunition for the upcoming North Carolina primaries. Completely disregarding the fact that Pennsylvania was a virtual home state for Sen. Clinton one where her grandfather and father gave the Senator familial ties to the state.

The Black Vote

In addition to that as I previously reported Gov. Ed Rendell a Clinton supporter claimed the reason that Sen. Obama lost in Pennsylvania is because white voters in Pennsylvania are >not ready to vote for a Black candidate.

Ironically, if the same claims had been made by Kanye West a Black rapper who said that President Bush doesn’t like Black people West would have been immediately renounced for being a reverse racist.
When one-fifth of Democratic primary voters admit taking race into account in the ballot booth, it shows the nation still has social hurdles to overcome.

If a candidate's race is as important to some voters as his or her views on the economy, or the cost of health care, then something is being lost in the debate over how to move the country forward.
—The Philadelphia Inquirer
So perhaps Gov. Rendell has something to his claim.

It was the Clinton campaign that leaked the Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan links to Sen. Obama in this Presidential campaign yet in 1997 Gov. Ed Rendell praises Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam. (see below)


Democrats have made this campaign a confusing mix of gender and Race that apparently even they can’t seem to figure out. Here’s Democrat and Liberal Juan Williams on Fox News, along with most of the Fox News panel, admitting that the Clintons are using divisive tactics of Race in their do anything, say anything campaign to win. (See below)


Unable to beat Obama on delegates and still unlikely to beat him in the popular vote, Hillary Clinton has just one strategy left - to persuade super delegates that Obama is unelectable. She has tried branding him as inexperienced and slick-tongued, and neither of those have worked.

At this stage she has just one argument left: his race. For several months now, her aides have been whispering to whoever would listen that America would never elect a black candidate. In desperation, some are now raising their voices.
—Gary Younge, The Guardian
The Clintons have demonstrated an anything to win power no matter what the cost mentality, if Democrats thought that way about protecting America against terrorism and winning the war in Iraq as they do about politics and winning power we would have won the war by now and would be bringing the troops home.

But it seems that the only thing that Democrats have the stomach for is winning with their politics of personal destruction is politics even if the person or persons that they destroy are members of their own party!

Monday, April 28, 2008

Is it because he’s Black?


In the following Hannity and Combs interview with the Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright it is made apparent to all why Conservatives are having embolic brain infarctions over Sen. Barack Obama’s pastor.

Sean Hannity speaking for all Conservatives made it clear why he doesn’t like Sen. Obama’s church. The reason is Rev. Wright’s church’s emphasis!

You see Trinity United Church of Christ specializes in catering to the Black community.

Black, Black, Black as Hannity, in a very self revealing moment, pointed out as if something were wrong with a Black pastor preaching, teaching and ministering to Black people.

Hannity then attempted to use reverse relativist logic to pose the question, that in like fashion if a church specialized and catered only to the white community would that be considered racist? Mr. Hannity forgets his history!
"It is appalling that the most segregated hour in Christian America is 11 o'clock on Sunday morning."—Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Dr. King wrote those words in 1958 describing the Sunday Morning Apartheid that was practiced in the United States of America during that time and that continues largely today. An America where for 200 years White congregations and White pastors specialized and catered only to the white communities in which they lived because Blacks where excluded from their neighborhoods, their churches and their day to day lives.

Many people point to what they call the divisive and incendiary language that Rev. Wright uses in his sermons some would even suggest that Rev. Wright is anti-American for some of his sermonizing.

But let us not forget that there was a Christian minister that spoke about love and character in the ways that no one could object too. He spoke about the highest concepts of the constitution of the United States, inclusion and the American life and how everyone should share equally under the true meaning of America’s constitution. And for all of those love filled and inspired words Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was murdered in cold blood by the America that he was attempting to embrace.

When I view the following video I see an arrogant, elitist and ignorant Sean Hannity attempting to force his concepts of Christianity on someone who believes in God and Christ but does not believe in the way that Mr. Hannity’s view of Christianity has manifested itself to the world in the past or presently.

What do you see?



I must tell you that after viewing this piece I am disturbed that in 2008 the Clinton campaign could leak the Rev. Wright tapes into the middle of a presidential campaign for the purpose of inciting racial hatreds in this campaign, thus making it absolutely racially toxic for Sen. Obama. And to think that Conservatives would buy into the Clinton’s deviant plan hook line and sinker because of what, latent hatred of Blacks?

Could it be that Black people were right all along about the present day Conservative party?
Gov. Rendell may have been right all along when he said some white voters in Pennsylvania aren't ready to vote for a black presidential candidate.

In the Democratic primary, 19 percent of all voters said race was an important factor in their decision. And 4 percent of voters said it was the most important factor.

Among this group that acknowledged taking race into consideration, Hillary Clinton beat Barack Obama, 59 percent to 41 percent.
The Philadelphia Inquirer
So you tell me!

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Greek Orthodox Church in Crisis

Greek Orthodox Patriarch of the Holy Land Theofilos III--(AP Photo/Sebastian Scheiner)
Secretive real estate deals, hostility to priests, fist fights over Christ's tomb, a power struggle between patriarchs - one of the oldest churches in the Holy Land is struggling to get through a moral and financial crisis, its leader says.--SARAH EL DEEB
Adherents were embarrassed to say they were Orthodox? According to Dimitri Diliani, a church member they were! (see here)

The Orthodox Easter Week, which ends today, was overshadowed again by intra-denominational fighting. On Palm Sunday, Armenian and Greek Orthodox worshippers exchanged blows over rights of worship at Church of the Holy Sepulcher, built on the site where tradition says Jesus was entombed and resurrected.

Also Greek Orthodox patriarch, Irineos I has been ousted and demoted to monk behind what is being referred to as a secret real estate deal that favored Israel in the eastern part of Jerusalem.

Allegedly the patriarch leased two church-owned hotels in traditionally Arab east Jerusalem to groups trying to expand a Jewish presence there. The deal enraged his predominantly Palestinian flock, because Palestinians claim east Jerusalem as the capital of a future state.

Theofilos III succeeded Irineos I after Irineos’ ouster in 2005. But not until last December was he formally recognized by the three governments in the Holy Land - Israel, Jordan and the Palestinian Authority. This Easter was the first in which he has led the rites unchallenged.

Theofilos oversees an ever decreasing congregation as Christianity is ever diminishing in the East being replaced by Islam. A fact that continues to leave the Orthodox Church in crisis.

Friday, April 25, 2008

Religion of What????

So what is this “religion of love”, that is defended
to the death........... of not only the participants,
but of innocent bystanders?

Forget everything that you ever thought or heard about
Islam................ it is NOT the peaceful religion
that they pretend it to be.

Remember............ theirs is the “”only true”
religion in their warped minds, all other claims to the contrary.............. you will be Muslim or you will be
dead!!!!!

Take a very close look at this.........................
http://liveprayer.com/fitna.cfm , and then talk “peace
and love”, with a religion that puts out “hits” on anyone
exposing this false religion for what it is!

brooklyn

Global Stravation: The imminent global food crisis

Photo by tlindenbaum
The United Nations Food Agency said that rising food prices threatened to plunge 100 million people across the world into hunger.-- Steve Hawkes, Greg Hurst and Valerie Elliott
“This is the new face of hunger — the millions of people who were not in the urgent hunger category six months ago but now are.” -- Josette Sheeran, head of the UN’s World Food Programme, Timesonline
Global Starvation as I've previously discussed is a man-made phenomenon. Unlike the crisis of Global warming/Climate change which may or may not be man-made and even so man can do little to nothing about we can do something about man’s world markets and globalization policies which are what is causing the recent rationing of rice and other world food staples.

SIGNS POINT TO AMERICA’S DECLINE
Speaking at the 2002 World Congress on the Peaceful Reunification of China and World Peace in Sydney, Mr Clinton said this "brief moment in history" when the US had pre-eminent military, economic and political power, would not last.

"This is just a period, a few decades this will last, and I think that all of us who are Americans should think about this and ask ourselves how do we wish this moment to be judged 50 years from now," he said.
The Canberra Times
It’s finally here, the day that Bill Clinton predicted six years ago while speaking at the 2002 World Congress on the Peaceful Reunification of China and World Peace in Sydney Australia. His comments escaped many Americans at that time but nobody is going miss the results of his words as they are coming true right before our eyes.

Clinton forecasted America’s decline. A military, economic and political meltdown that sounds an awful lot like what we’re just beginning to experience in America today.

One has to wonder what he knew exactly. Nevertheless it is becoming painfully obvious that he did know something. The fact is America is in an economic decline. The Euro is replacing the dollar in strength and value, six years of war has placed a crippling toll on the U.S. military, oil and gas prices are the highest that they’ve ever been, the U.S. economy is in recession , banks have caused a world-wide credit crisis and now there is a food shortage.

By and large the one threat that is more imminent than the war on terrorism, Global warming/Climate Change, rising gas prices, the sinking dollar, and the credit/mortgage crisis is Globalization in general and specifically attempting to control food supplies by world markets.

In 1996 the United Nation’s Food and Agriculture Organization was already calling for globalization of world food supplies when it cited that 40 countries faced food shortages since then world food supplies are governed by global commodity markets.

Commodity markets Investors buy sell and trade the food that is produced by farmers and according to this trading the price and availability of food is determined.
Farmers and food executives appealed fruitlessly to federal officials yesterday for regulatory steps to limit speculative buying that is helping to drive food prices higher.

Meanwhile, some Americans are stocking up on staples such as rice, flour and oil in anticipation of high prices and shortages spreading from overseas.
—Patrice Hill
There are all sorts of markets on which anything from gasoline to carbon credits can be traded, bought and sold. These markets affect supply and cost and can artificially drive the cost up or create an artificial shortage.

However because of World Trade Organization treaties no country any longer has the authority to keep it’s own food supply all food supplies must be available for the world markets according to Canadian Wayne Roberts’ 2006 article, “Grain Drain” found in the Energy Bulletin.
Turns out that if massive disaster strikes, there's enough in the global cupboard to keep people alive on basic grains for 57 days. Two months of survival food is all that separates us from mass starvation due to drought, plagues of locusts and other pests, or the wars and violence that disrupt farming, all of which are more plentiful than food.

And since the World Trade Organization prohibits government intervention that keeps any items off the free trade ledger, there's no law that says Canadians, or any other people, get first dibs on their own food production.
--Wanye Roberts
The best known example of this market manipulation was The Enron Corporation that manipulated market prices on electricity by creating artificial shortages thus putting many businesses out of business by artificially driving the price of electricity up thus making it impossible for many small businesses to operate. Enron destroyed many lives through its market exploitation.

Market forces that are similar are at work in everything from Global warming/Climate Change to Business and Banking and are now at work governing your food supply. As more and more countries become less self reliant, not growing their own food supplies, they become more susceptible to supply and demand forces that create shortages as in the Enron example just cited. This Americans is Free Trade!

This is a warning to Americans of what’s in store for us all if we allow our government to give in to the proponents of Kyoto 2 and Global warming profiteers such as Albert Arnold Gore Jr. these entities intend to consolidate power over our economy by cap and trade markets that are meant to regulate CO2 emissions however the reality is if they are allowed the power to levy any kind of tax on the United States they become a de facto unelected governing body over the United States.

WHY IS OUR FOOD SUPPLY IN JEOPARDY?
Experts told The Times yesterday that prices of rice, wheat and vegetable oil would rise further. They also forecast that high prices and shortages — which have caused riots in developing countries such as Bangladesh and Haiti — were here to stay, and that the days of cheap produce would not return.

Food-price inflation has already pushed up a typical family’s weekly shopping bill by 15 per cent in a year.
—Steve Hawkes, Greg Hurst and Valerie Elliott
The rice, grain and food shortages are a result the Globalization of world markets combined with using food supplies to create alternative renewable fuel solutions as an answer to Global warming. Both of these practices, Globalization and growing food to burn for energy, are detrimental to humanity and most be stopped.

If there isn’t enough food the very least of our worries is Global warming/Climate Change!

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Clinton wins at Home

Sen. Clinton in a self congratulatory moment(Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
Amid brisk turnout, Clinton won a victory that many polls had predicted and which the New York senator had to have.Bill Nichols
Sen. Clintonwins! But wait a minute wasn’t she supposed to?

That’s right Sen. Clinton was supposed to win Pennsylvania. She has familial ties there and has been projected to win there since March by a 12 point lead no less. Last night in her victory speech she invoked her father and her grandfather, who use to work in a Pennsylvania mill (much like Sen. Edwards’ mill worker father), names as testament that she was one of them a bitter, religious, gun hugging small town girl who’s made it big.

Ich bin ein Pennsylvanian!

So why all of the hoopla? It’s the continuation of the fairly tale the classic victim card Sen. Clinton is portraying herself as the underdog the poor little white woman running against that big Black man with those good speeches and all that money.

If you remember Sen. Clinton at the beginning of this campaign was the candidate of inevitability she was supposed to win, she was destined to win and she was going to win not just the Democratic primary in Pennsylvania but she was supposed to win 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, too.

So why are Democrats acting as if they are surprised that Sen. Clinton won the state of Pennsylvania? In a word perception.

The Clintons understand all to well that everything is about perception. Nothing is real unless they say that it is real. Sniper fire now that was real, Clinton real!

It’s what President Bill Clinton says about what is, is! Tell him what you think is, is and he’ll take your is, redefine it and tell you what is really is! Whew!

It is totally the defining of reality by crafty lawyerly wordsmithing in which a step off of a curb is not really that at all, no a step off of a city curb becomes a multimillion dollar law suit against the city for neglecting to maintain potholes.

So whether it’s sniper fire over Bosnia or celebrating a Pennsylvania victory, that was hers to lose in the first place, the perception must be that she is the come back kid who traversed dangers and fought off the advances of a Black man even though all that he was after was her voting constituents.

It also struck me as odd that a political contest in which Democrats, the exemplars of gender and racial equality, where in fact voting along gender and racial lines. Does gender and race matter for progressive inclusive Democrats who are above their rival’s the prejudice, sexist Republicans? Apparently it does!

In some of the exit polling voters where suggesting that gender or race didn’t matter but than wasn’t supported by the actual voting and in addition to that isn’t the media overly concerned with how the vote is playing out demographically this elect? Is it hot in here or is it only me?

In other words I’m I the only one who sees the irony of this? Democrats no matter how they portray themselves are just as prejudice and sexist as anyone else!

The Clinton campaign was wise to play the race and gender cards in Pennsylvania along with the Ich bin ein Pennsylvanian card of Sen. Clinton’s father and grandfather. Those tactics won Sen. Clinton the day.

As the Clinton’s would say a win is a win no matter by what percentage, no matter what is, is and no matter if they exacerbate and inflame gender and racial volatiles in America on their way back to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. And apparently Pennsylvanians agree.

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Iago and Hillary have much in common

Eleanor Clift


On the day of the Pennsylvania primary I thought this Eleanor Clift piece appropriately tells the story of the Democrat Party’s Shakespearean like tragedy. It is a tale of deceit gender and Race that rivals even the telling of Othello.

Likewise, this fateful Democrat tale of Orwellian-Machiavellianism is what inspires this blog and Clift unknowingly gives us a very candid look into the state of mind of Liberal partisan Democrats. A mind of doublethink where one can hold two diametrically opposite ideas at the same time and accept both of them as true much as Hillary Clinton did in her most excellent Bosnia Sniper Fire Adventure.
George Orwell coined the term doublethink in his classic novel 1984. Doublethink is the power to hold two completely contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accept both of them.
Likewise, Sen. Clinton’s campaign has been absolutely unscrupulous and dishonest. In a word they have been Machiavellian in their use of political manipulation placing expediency above morality in her attempt to use deceit to gain the presidency.

Poignantly the ultra-partisan Clift assesses the Democratic primaries race as a lose, lose situation instead of the “It’s the Democrat’s Year to Win.” Which we have recently become accustomed to hearing about for going on a year. Clift relates as much in her Newsweek piece, “The Damage is Done.”

In it unwillingly Ms. Clift’s piece blames Hillary Clinton for the lost prospects of the Democrat Party.

But it’s not that easy to decipher. Going through the reasoning of a Liberal who’s just realized that the promise of Sen. Clinton’s inevitability is in fact a losing inevitability, not the winning inevitability as promised is clouded to say the least. Clift seems to struggle with the idea that winning has once again slipped through the fingers of her fellow Partisans.

According to Clift, like presidential hopeful, Al Gore before her, Sen. Clinton has hung on much too long and has caused a damaged and divided party. In the 2000 presidential race Gore divided the entire nation while destroying the unity of this Nation. According to Clift Sen. Clinton has virtually ruined Democrats chances of winning the presidency this year as well.

Surprisingly Clift condones what she believes is a lie told by Senate Clinton when the Senator answered Yes, yes, yes when asked if she thought that Senator Obama was qualified to be President. Clift calls it a, “Right move” even if she (Sen. Clinton) didn’t mean it.

Ironic for someone who’s called George Bush a liar a thousand times if once, Ms. Clift doesn’t seem to mind the fact of Sen. Clinton’s “Right move.”

Ms. Clift relates what must be unpleasant facts for her like Sen. Clinton is polling at a 50% negative rate and due to the scorched earth tactics of the politics of personal destruction used against Sen. Obama which Sen. Clinton would have normally used against Republicans both candidates are halt and maimed at this point.

Ms. Clift concludes cautiously hopeful yet resigned;
Unless Hillary can surprise us once again, repeating the triumph she had in Ohio when Pennsylvanians go to the polls, Rove is likely to have Obama to kick around. The Philadelphia debate didn't do anything to help either candidate, and quite possibly hurt them both, but we are slowly evolving toward a result that seems increasingly inevitable: Obama as a Democratic nominee whose vulnerabilities boost chances of a Republican victory in the fall.
Imagine that ultra-partisan Eleanor Clift contemplating a Republican victory in the fall. Shakespeare couldn’t have written this tragic tale any better.

Iago wasn’t above stabbing his Moor in the back to get what he desired and neither is Sen. Clinton!

Here’s hoping that all of Ms. Clift’s fears are realized! Go vote Pennsylvania!

Monday, April 21, 2008

Environmental Fascism

Time calls green "the new red, white and blue" and likens global warming to the fight against Nazism and fascism. As it insults World War II vets, the magazine seeks to impose a tyranny all its own.—Investor’s Business Daily
I had the privilege of seeing Ben Stein’s “Expelled, No intelligence allowed” this past weekend. Mr. Stein’s work is a remarkable documentary which exposes the Scientific Fascism that currently poses as academic science in this country a Fascism that easily lends itself to the Global warming/ Climate Change scientific community as I will show in a moment.

In the film Mr. Stein shows that academia has held up Darwinism as a Dogma which can not be questioned but under penal of harsh reprisal, which is an unscientific position within itself. Furthermore Mr. Stein documents several college professors who have actually lost their jobs at major universities for exploring alterative explanations for life which Darwin doesn’t explain.



The result, any credible Academic that does question Darwinism in the least degree is ostracized removed from any teaching pursuits and his or her career is destroyed. Academic Fascism!

It is this same hard Left fascist attitude that permeates the advocacy of Global warming. The purveyors of “Global warming/Climate change”(GW/CC) intend to force their theories on the world by law and by taxation, it’s already happening anyone who disagrees with GW/CC is labeled a “denier” in reference of those who deny the realness of the Holocaust, the extermination of Jews by Nazi Germany.

Investors Business Daily called the recent cover of Times (above) and the article which it proceeds it a TIME BOMB of radical confused Global Warmist and Environmentalist concerns with which radicals are attempting to compromise the best recognized images of actual passed global dangers by equating their GW/CC current agenda driven social plans of indoctrination and efforts of highly propagandized social change with the atrocities of the historical pass.
"As someone who lived under communism for most of his life, I feel obliged to say that I see the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity now in ambitious environmentalism, not communism. This ideology wants to replace the free and spontaneous evolution of mankind by a sort of central (now global) planning."-- Vaclav Klaus, president of the Czech Republic
First of all Global warming/Climate change is not as great a threat as Nazism, Communism or Fascism and neither is GW/CC the same as environmental concerns that are typically associated with energy saving measures such as recycling, new clean energy, and other “Green” movement pursuits. These two totally different concepts were just recently confused in order to deceive honest caring people who actually wish to protect our environment and planet.

In the Green movement there are actual solutions that can help clean our environment and save energy or find alterative fuel solutions.

In contrast the Global warming/Climate change movement (GW/CC) is a geo-political movement which underlying purpose is not the decreasing of CO2 gases in the atmosphere as many of you suppose, no the actual purpose of advocating GW/CC is to create a cap and trade market mechanism similar to the present day stock market which world nations and people will be forced into and taxed from thus creating a new tax base from which to enslave the world community.

GW/CC promoters will be able to also purchase credits or rights to continue to emit carbons into the atmosphere themselves as long as they pay for it.

No, let me repeat, no actual CO2 reduction will take place under Global warming/Climate change!

Yet like Darwinism, Global warming/Climate change has been accepted by the authorities whether real or not, or whether proven or not and anyone who attempts to raise questions or discussion concerning GW/CC is set upon by fascist forces within the Global warming movement. Forces that stand to make usurious profits on unearned forced world taxation in like fashion of the Federal Reserve System.

Al Gore explains that he intends to impose an “environmental tax” or carbon tax which could partially or fully replace income taxes. What that means is taxation without representation! By replace I simply mean that you will still pay taxes but only to a new master the Environmental police of some sort or some like Orwellian Agency.

Some un-elected and unaccountable body of environmental regulators would be in control of imposing taxes of the American people and the people of the world.

Hey, isn’t that one of the reasons that Americans fought the revolutionary war against Great Britain? Yet, here’s Al Gore suggesting that very taxation scheme. (See below)



So how would Mr. Gore’s taxation without representation scheme or Carbon tax work? Here’s Kenneth Green of the American Enterprise Institute attempting to explain cap and trade and carbon taxes which will inevitability be forced on the American people and the world community.




Is that clear now? Clear as mud right! One thing that should be extremely clear to you is the impeding GW/CC catastrophe is not going to happen environmentally but the GW/CC taxation catastrophe which will enslave the people of the world by taxation without representation is going to happen as certain and you and I exhale Carbon Dioxide!

Friday, April 18, 2008

Al Gore Is Right

Al Gore, at the TED corp.


About Global warming/Climate change? No. Gore announced that the debate about GW/CC is over he is right about that. Gore's piped piper like arguments has the whole world following and the latest addition to his list of devotees is President Bush.

President Bush has recently announced that his administration wants Congress to pass a law to fight Global warming.
Bush administration officials have told Republicans in Congress that they feel pressure to act now [on Global warming legislation] because they fear a coming regulatory nightmare.--Stephen Dinan
This regulatory nightmare is a world carbon tax that will be imposed on industrial nations by the United Nations backed by profiteers who stand to make trillions of dollars from taxing world economies and changing world energy consumption to sources that these profiteers control.

Instead of Bush challenging Gore's premise as mounting scientific evidence shows that Global warming as Al Gore is presenting it is all wrong, President Bush caves, in "go along to get along" fashion .

Following is a February 2008 presentation that Al Gore gave to the TED corporation it is about 27 minutes long. In it are the usual Global warming doomsday scenarios however about 15 minutes into this pitch to “raise the consciousness” of the world Mr. Gore admits that he is profiting and that he stands to profit a great deal from these initiatives as the whole world starts to comply.

Gore’s final thought is with you the American people and your Congress. His wish is to strip out all opposition in Congress to his plans to change the world and he cites the very plan used to accomplish that in Australia with the newly elected administration there. He also notes that all three current U.S. presidential hopefuls are on board with his program.

President Bush’s about face on this issue is a warning that World Carbon taxes are inevitable no matter if the science of Global warm is wrong the consensus is to be followed. And now Al Gore making his case. And note from the very beginning he wishes to control worldwide behavior. (please play video)


There are a lot of great investments you can make. If you are investing in tar sands, or shale oil, then you have a portfolio that is crammed with sub-prime carbon assets.

And it is based on an old model. Junkies find veins in their toes when the ones in their arms and their legs collapse. Developing tar sands and coal shale is the equivalent. Here are just a few of the investments I personally think make sense.

I have a stake in these so I’ll have a disclaimer there. But geo-thermal concentrating solar, advanced photovoltaics, efficiency, and conservation.
– Al Gore

As Gore spoke these words, pictures of electric cars, windmills and solar panels appeared in multiple slides on the screen with company names at the bottom such as Amyris (biofuels), Altra (biofuels), Bloom Energy (solid oxide fuel cells), Mascoma (cellulosic biofuels), GreatPoint Energy (catalytic gasification), Miasole (solar cells), Ausra (utility scale solar panels), GEM (battery operated cars), Smart (electric cars), and AltaRock Energy (geothermal power).

As such, like an investment advisor or stock broker giving a seminar to prospects and clients, Al Gore was actively recommending people put money in companies he already has a financial stake in.

And, as he tours the world demanding nations stop burning fossil fuels, he will financially benefit if they follow his advice and move to technologies that he has already invested in. -- Noel Sheppard


Least you forget Global warm/Climate change is really about Global money, Global profiteering, Global taxes and Global control over people that’s what I hear when I listen to Al Gore, what are you hearing?

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Obama Needs a Better Memory!

I just heard on the news that Barack Obama has
criticized former President Jimmy Carter, for meeting
with the leaders of Hamas!

Obviously he is annoyed at this development, since he
wanted to be the first to meet with terrorist groups
such as Hamas, al Qaeda and the like.

Wasn't that part of his "platform" a couple of months
ago?......to meet with our terrorist enemies, in order
to bring closure to the mid-East problems with these
redical groups?

He not only lies through his teeth, he waffles from
one side of the issue to the other.

I cannot believe the stupidity of those who are backing
this fraud!

brooklyn

He Deserves It!

Al.............. that debate, or whatever you choose to
call it, was an expose of Barack Obama, a man who pretended
to be someone that he certainly isn’t!

Those horses ARE, Wright, Ayers, Farrakhan, the
Million Man March, saluting the American Flag, and a host
of other issues that have neither been completely addressed,
nor sufficiently explained by Obama. They will continue
being the millstones around his neck..... right through the
upcoming elections, should he be the chosen Democratic
candidate.

As the those political issues that both Hillary and Barack
seemed to somewhat agree on............ their promises show
that neither of them is qualified to lead this country. Any
sitting president, who is determined to totally disregard the
advice of the commanding generals, at a time of war, and
recall an ever succeeding army home, is an idiot at best.

As for the “no new taxes on the middle class if elected”,
claim....... how closely were you watching their definition of
“middle-class”? If the Democrats in Congress allow the
Bush tax cuts to expire, and they don’t kill the AMT, anyone
making more than $50M per year, is in for the largest tax
increase in history. Enough to bring on the most severe
recession ever experienced in the US.

Time to stop waving the Obama flag Al........... and let Hillary
loose on him. She is just echoing the feelings of most of the
electorate, and he deserves everything that he is getting, after
having deceived everyone, as to exactly who this Barack Obama
really is. Once he is out of the way, she and McCaine can battle
it out to the finish. I have no doubt of the outcome of that contest..

Ripping Obama

Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama

Senator Barack Obama found himself consistently on the defensive as he and Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton met Wednesday night in a tense debate that left him parrying questions and criticism on issues including values, patriotism and his association with onetime radicals from the 1960s.-- ADAM NAGOURNEY and JEFF ZELENY
I tuned in expecting a debate last night between Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama but instead the program that was on was Barack Obama’s extremities tied by rope to two horses that were pulling in opposite directions until Obama was ripped part. A debate this wasn’t. This was more like Obama being tortured at Abu Ghraib.

The team of ex-Clinton White house adviser George Stephanopoulos and Charles Gibson both ABC affiliates where the horses while Sen. Clinton was in cool command of the whip of personal destruction which she used unrelentingly to prod her two horses into directions that kept Sen. Obama stretched to the limits all night with limbs about to be pull away from his six foot frame. If given his druthers I’m sure Obama would have preferred water boarding to this piling on of Hillary shills.

Mangled words, Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, Louis Farrakhan, and the American Flag, most of which were Clinton smears (with the exception of the American Flag) brought to bear on Obama in this formal setting giving the smears even more legitimacy. One could see Sen. Obama wilting under the Clinton offensive with shots of Chelsea Clinton in the audience for good measure adding to that subliminal pro-Clinton ABC touch.

There were two salient points in the midst of this Obama Abu Ghraib session. One, both candidate vowed to withdraw troops from Iraq no matter what their Generals and Commanders advised if they were President and two, both candidates vowed no new taxes on the middle class if elected.

Other than those two points it was definitely an all out effort to sway Super delegates and Pennsylvanians to kept Sen. Clinton in the race for the presidency.

Yet I don’t think that Sen. Clinton baggage statement is a very good selling point if she intended to impress Super delegates and Pennsylvanians.
“I have a lot of baggage, and everybody has rummaged through it for years, and so therefore, I have, you know, an opportunity to come to this campaign with a very strong conviction and feeling that I will be able to withstand whatever the Republican sends our way.”—Sen. Hillary Clinton
Fact is Sen. Clinton it is your kind of baggage that we would do well to rid Washington of at the earliest opportunity that we can afford.

Other than show us the entire Democrat playbook this airing of Democrat dirty laundry did nothing to enhance either Democrat candidate’s standing in my opinion.

And then there was Sen. Clinton’s Yes, yes, yes, in response to the question would Sen. Obama be qualified to lead this nation as president, Sen. Clinton don't you realize that that type of blantant reversal still shows your propensity for lying.

What, after all that she has been saying about Sen. Obama’s lack of qualifications to be president she now all of a sudden believes that he is qualified?

In spite of all of the help from ABC in last night’s pile on and torture Obama, Sen. Clinton you still have not given the American people a reason to trust you or entrust you with the most powerful job in the world.

And for Democrats and ABC this pro-Hillary showing was a big No, no, no!

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Skewing the News!

Time after time the MSM and the likes of CNN and CNBC, bend
the news to make their leftist points.

The much despised "Christian coalition" FOX NEWS put out a
straight-forward news story about Pope Benedict's XVI's trip to
the US. They stated on their broadcast that "President Bush
welcomes Pope Benedict with a State Dinner. Simple, unadorned and
truthful reporting.

Not to be outdone, CNN brings it down to their usual gutter level, with, "White House justifies LAVISH dinner for Pope!"
What kind of crapola is this? Are these people so into themselves
that everything that isn't falling off the left coast, is
something that has to be questioned or justified?

You want justification CNN??? Pope Benedict XVI happens to be a
Head of State........ just the same as our President is, Queen Elizabeth is, and Putin was. So take your stupid gripe, along with
your bent view of political relations, and stuff it!

I noticed that you haven't tried justifying former President
Jimmy Carter's foolhardy and traitorous trip to meet with the leaders of Hamas!

The Pope’s Visit

President Bush, first lady Laura Bush and daughter Jenna Bush greet Pope Benedict XVI during the arrival ceremony at Andrews Air Force Base, Md., Tuesday, April 15, 2008. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
America is great because she is good. If America ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.— attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America by Sherwood Eddy, The Kingdom of God and the American Dream, chapter 1, p. 6 (1941)
In the 19th Century a French foreign visitor by the name of Alexis de Tocqueville came to America in an attempt to assess why America was so vibrantly healthy, successful and prosperous. He produced a tome one of the great works of American literature entitled, “Democracy in America” in which he dissected every aspect of American life looking for the answer to his question. In it he said, “The Americans combine the notions of religion and liberty so intimately in their minds that it is impossible to make them conceive of one without the other.” Well a lot has change since de Tocqueville’s visit.

In this the 21st Century Pope Benedict XVI comes to America to assess what is the failing of religion in America. The demonizing of Christianity in America has weakened the Church and the persecution of Christianity in America is just short of some of the more odious anti-religious regimes in current history. Of course the gaiety of a White house welcome is intended to blunt these realities but it won’t be successfully done.

The media has already lined up the running narrative of what will be negative coverage of the papal visit. It has to because what the Pope stands for is so diametrically polar opposite of what America has become and what the media stands for.

Of course the Church has aided in its own persecution by allowing itself the indulgence of sexual perversion and molestation.

In this the Church seems to have reversed its gospel command, “And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind,’ (Romans 12:2) and has became a secularized and marginalized “also ran” in the eclectic mix of poly- philosophic belief systems that make up the United States in the 21st Century.

For de Touqueville religion in America was a given reality. The only question was which form of Christianity was the most influential in this country.
I sought for the greatness and genius of America in her commodious harbors and her ample rivers—and it was not there … in her fertile fields and boundless forests—and it was not there … in her rich mines and her vast world commerce—and it was not there … in her democratic Congress and her matchless Constitution—and it was not there.

Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits flame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power. America is great because she is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.
--Attributed to ALEXIS DE TOCQUEVILLE by Dwight D. Eisenhower in his final campaign address in Boston, Massachusetts, November 3, 1952.
For Pope Benedict he will find an American people on the whole ignorant of their Christian heritage and in rebellion against Christian tenets and teachings. Benedict will find superficial Christians who rather sequester themselves behind the four walls of their Churches rather than follow the Great Commission of “go and teach” or Apostle Paul’s edict to, “give everyman a reason for the hope that is within you”

Benedict will find love and total acceptance from the adherents of his faith but a cold austere rebuke is waiting if the Pontiff ventures into the kingdoms that were once offered to the Messiah if He but bow down. Those kingdoms are reserved for the secular real world that religion has no business in, a world in which the Pope or religion really ought not mettle.

Alexis de Tocqueville would not recognize the America which Pope Benedict XVI is visiting today.

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

For the Mayor of Phoenix!

You think the war in Iraq is costing us too much?

Read this from an anonymous email sender:

Boy am I confused. I have been hammered with the propaganda
that it is the Iraq war and the war on terror that is bankrupting us.
I now find that to be RIDICULOUS.

I hope the following 14 reasons are forwarded over and over
again, until they are read so many times that the readers get
sick of reading them. I have included the URL's for verification
of all the following facts.

1. $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens
each year by state governments. Verify at: http://tinyurl.com/zob77

2. $2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs
such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens. Verify at: http://www.cis..org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html

3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens.
Verify at: http://www.cis..org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html

4. $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary schooleducation for children here illegally and they cannot speak
a word of English! Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.0.html

5. $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the
American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.
Verify at http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

6. $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens. Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

7. 30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens. Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

8. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare &
social services by the American taxpayers. Verify at: http://premium.cnn.com/TRANSCIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.html

9. $200 Billion Dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens. Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's
two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US Verify at: http: //transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0606/12/ldt.01.html

11. During the year of 2005 there were 4 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens
that crossed our Southern Border also, as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from Terrorist Countries. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin and marijuana, crossed into the U. S from the Southern border. Verify at: Homeland Security Report: http://tinyurl.com/t9sht

12. The National Policy Institute, "estimated that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion or an average
cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.
"Verify at: http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/pdf/deportation.pdf

13. In 2006 illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances
back to their countries of origin.Verify at: http://www.rense.com/general75/niht.htm

14. "The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration: Nearly One Million Sex
Crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States."Verify at: http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml The total cost is a whopping $ 338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR.

Are we THAT stupid? Seems the Mayor of Phoenix sure is!