Can a Citizen of the World lead America?

U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama waves to the crowd after making a speech in front of the Victory Column (Siegessaeule) in Berlin July 24, 2008.

"Tonight, I speak to you not as a candidate for President, but as a citizen -- a proud citizen of the United States, and a fellow citizen of the world."—Senator and Democrat presumptive nominee Barack Hussein Obama

Sen. Barack Obama has not yet secured his Party’s nomination. Sen. Obama has not been elected President of the United States of America. Yet Sen. Obama stood in front of the Victory Column (Siegessaeule) in Berlin and lectured 200,000 German people and called out to the people of the world for all existing divisive walls of the world to be torn down. I think the Senator presumes too much!

"The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes, natives and immigrants, Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand,"—Sen. Barack Hussein Obama

What is so preposterous and hypocritical about a Democrat making such a plea is it was Democrats who have build the walls of partisan separation in this country. A Democrat has no business lecturing the world about tearing down walls that divide, if it were not for Al Gore and the 2000 elections and subsequently the likes of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Charles Schemer, Hillary Clinton, and Howard Dean American would not be stuck in the quagmire of a Red State Blue State divide.

Sen. Obama’s words were words coming from an ultra-Partisan that only beat out a super Partisan Sen. Hillary Clinton because the radical left wing netroots of George Soros and Moveon.org boosted his candidacy to a multimillion dollar campaign victory. This is the same radical far left wing arm of the Democrat Party which wishes to help Sen. Obama secure the Presidency now.

Sen. Obama’s Party is guilty of building walls of partisanship and separation in this country. For almost 8 years Sen. Obama’s Party undermined and demonized the leader of the Free world. So much so that leaders of oppressive theocratic and socialist nations felt welcome to come to the United Nations in New York and denounce our President before the world.

If the world hates America and America’s president it is because Democrats introduced and unleashed the venom of political hatred into the political mainstream of world politics. For Sen. Obama to call on the world to tear down walls epitomizes the sheer two-facedness of the Democrat party.

Sen. Obama’s hypocrisy notwithstanding the question that begs an answer is as a citizen of the world would Sen. Obama’s total allegiance be to the United States of America or would he feel that he is subject to the United Nations’ World Court at The Hague?

For that matter would a President Obama felt that he has two governing principles, the U.S. Constitution and the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to be equally followed?

Would a President Obama allow the World Court to try a U.S. citizen for any reason?

Would a President Obama, and citizen of the world, govern by superceding the U.S. constitution with International law if he felt that it was appropriate to do so?

I don’t know maybe I’m old-fashioned but I think that one should first be President of the United States of America before one goes around the world acting like it and lecturing the world. (Transcript of speech)

People of Berlin - and people of the world - the scale of our challenge is great. The road ahead will be long. But I come before you to say that we are heirs to a struggle for freedom. We are a people of improbable hope. Let us build on our common history, and seize our common destiny, and once again engage in that noble struggle to bring justice and peace to our world.—Barack Hussein Obama

Also, before you call on the people of the world Sen. Obama maybe you should be elected President of the World or some such magnanimous title befitting of someone of your vision to speak to the world’s masses.

I’m thinking that Americans would settle for someone who is an American first, last and always. America now faces challenges that will require the full attention and allegiance of its elected leader someone who will protect American from all enemies both foreign and domestic if that is not your vision as to what an American President is Sen. Obama then maybe you should run for President of the world.

Right now in America it is not the time for blurred citizenship we need a leader who can tell the difference between an American citizen and someone who uses the American citizens. We need a President who will protect America from those who have no allegiance to this great country and its traditions but continue to take her resources and wealth.

America is in serious need of a President, a citizen of America and in your speech before the German people and the world Sen. Obama you told America that, that person is not you! (see entire speech)about 20mins.

Global warming has made us stupid!

Dr. David Evans
I was in a meeting the other day (true story) and the presenter shot this Global warming round off on us a captive audience of about fifty people. She said, “Whether you believe in Global warming or not the climate is changing!”

I don’t know much else of what she said after that because my mind went into overdrive picking apart the logical fallacies of her little sneak assault on the reasoning capabilities of everyone in that room.

This was somewhat of an educated person, she took the time to name her degrees and her expertise, but somehow she didn’t quite understand just how ridiculously preposterous her statement was.

She might as well as said, “Whether you believe in Santa Claus or not there are men dressed in red suits at the mall.”

While it is true that men dress in red suits at the mall, particularity during the holiday season, that does not support nor does it prove that there is a Santa Claus!

Neither does drawing a false correlation between the fact that the earth’s climate does change to validate the erroneous claims of Global warming, prove the theory of Global warming!

Dr David Evans a one time proponent of anthropogenic global warming spent six years doing carbon accounting, building models for the Australian government to estimate carbon emissions from land use change and forestry. When he started that job in 1999 Evans says the evidence that carbon emissions caused global warming seemed pretty conclusive, but since then new evidence has weakened that case. Therefore he is now skeptical.

So scientific evidence changed the mind of Dr. Evans, which is quite extraordinary because global warming was Dr. Evans’ livelihood as he outlines in his article, “I was on the Global warming Gravy Train.”

Coming out against the political correct accepted model that man-made carbon dioxide emissions are the cause for raises in the earth’s temperature would put Dr. Evans out of a job. Yet he did just that with his paper entitled, “Carbon Emissions Don’t Cause Global Warming”

Some of us will continue to accept and support fallacious climate change arguments no matter what the scientific evidence. But according to a growing body of scientist and scientific evidence, “It’s not CO2 that causes Global warming, stupid!” (see video)

Congratulations!!!!!!

The Dems have just come up with a plan........... (finally),
but one that has no chance in hell, of ever working.

Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi intend to block the lifting of the
offshore drilling ban. In their infinite wisdom, and against
the wishes of a very large majority of American voters, the
congressional Democrats will do all they can to prevent
President Bush’s lifting of the offshore drilling ban from
becoming fact.

What is wrong with these morons? Are they that stupid
naturally, or did they have to take special “Congressional
Idiot” courses? With each passing day they show that
their heads and their asses are totally interchangable,
that they took office under false pretenses. As usual,
Democrats campaign promises in no way correlate to fact.

Talk to any first-year economics student, and he/she will
tell you that when the US federal government legislates or
regulates who may buy what on the world market, the trading
simply moves offshore. What good will it do to prevent
oil speculators from running up the market in the US, when
we can only “control” less than 15% of the world’s oil output.
The best that can happen is these speculators will move offshore,
out of reach of the US government, and the idiots who came
up with such a brilliant idea.

Of course it never occurred to them that by immediately
authorizing offshore drilling, opening up Anwar, using the
billions of barrels of shale oil in the Rockies, and authorizing
immediate construction of 45 new nuclear power plants......
we could see improving oil prices thoughout the world in a
couple of months. All that the markets need is the FEAR
that the US will become energy independent quickly, and
you will see prices fall like a lead balloon. The speculators
will tread cautiously, for fear of stepping into the deep end
of the pool, and the Saudis will have to increase production
in order to retain the income to which they have become
accustomed.

Once the urgency is addressed, we can proceed with research
into wind, solar, water and biofuels, which will take much
longer to become a reality, than tapping the oil we know is
in the ground.

In addition to moving toward energy independence, these actions
will create millions of new jobs, and prevent the “tax and spend”
liberals from completely ruining the country. The last thing we
need on top of the present oil crisis, is for some self-serving idiot like Obama to get into office and raise taxes on EVERYONE. If you take a look at his plan, IN DETAIL, his idea of “rich” is anyone making over $50,000 per year. Even if you believe the hype
that he is going to “reduce” your taxes by $1,000, he hides very
well, the undisputable fact that when he allows the Bush tax cuts
to expire...... your taxes will actually RISE by $1,500.00

Don’t blame me,..........I didn’t vote the Democrats into office,
you did!

Lights cameras, action!

Sen. Barack Obama and Afghan President Hamid Karzai in Kabul

It's all fake! It’s the making of the image of a President named Obama. One might call it high drama; I would call it fantasy on the scale of the new Batman movie the Dark Knight. I’m just waiting to see if Keith Ledger’s nomination for an Oscar will be in any way threatened.

Andrea Mitchell just blew up Sen. Obama’s foreign policy burnishing. Chris Matthew’s leg may tingle whenever he hears Barack Obama speak but even a tingling Chris Matthew’s leg wouldn’t help Sen. Obama now.

Obama’s campaign hoped a few pictures with foreign dignitaries and touring the war zone would give the Senator foreign policy credibility by osmosis not to mention the Senator took a plane load of reporters to record the Senators every step.

But wait according to Andrea Mitchell, Chief Foreign Affairs Correspondent for NBC News up to this point no reporter has been allowed within arms length of the Senator.

Everything coming out of this trip is completely staged to ensure that the Senator doesn’t make one of the gaffes that he so frequently makes. There has not been one substantial interview by a real reporter. What’s so incredible about this is Mitchell breaks this story and Chris Matthews attempts to continue on with glowing accolades of his hero as if Ms. Mitchell didn’t just bring the whole house down on this made for TV Obama fiction. (see video)



Obama in Iraq a place that by all Democrat accounts Obama shouldn’t even be in, because according to Sen. Harry Reid, Congressman John Murtha and the good Sen. Obama himself the war in Iraq was lost. And Iraq is now under the control of al Qaeda.

What?!? That isn’t so? That’s not the reality of Iraq? The surge actually did work? Iraq is stable enough for a United States presidential hopeful to visit and tour with an entourage of news and campaign filmmakers who will use this trip as a campaign ad for Sen. Obama.

I can’t wait! But in all fairness, I must admit that any campaign ad that I see coming out of the middle east and Europe featuring Sen. Obama will only remind me of how wrong he, his Democrat allies and the Liberal leaning media was about Iraq and the surge. I will see any ad or news account as proof that the Republicans were right and that they alone are deserving of winning in the House, the Senate and the White house in November.

Oh wait a minute Obama’s not using the real reporters that he took to cover his trip, that’s almost as low as planting questions in a democrat debate to make one look good. I guess Obama and Clinton do have some things in common. Clinton plants questions and Obama fakes foreign policy tour movies.

Here’s another movie term, “cut.” Senator Obama will probably hear that term after the fake media and fake film crew wrap up filming his descent on Iraq, only thing is when the Democrats use that term “and run” is usually attached to it!

The Woman is "Wacko"!!!!!

I heard Nancy Pelosi's desperate attempt to take
major swipes at President Bush, as incompetent
and helpless. Well, if he is, it is 100% the
fault of the liberals in Congress.

Have you looked at approval ratings lately? She
had the gall to mention that he now has the lowest
approval rating since he first got into offiice.
Duhhhhhhh........ but she totally failed to mention
that because he is President, legislation that fails
to pass is usually blamed on the man in charge.

It just so happens that most of what Bush has tried
to do since the 2004 elections (misguided at best)
has been thwarted by a partisan and bitter Congress.
Had this pathetic excuse for a Congress (18% approval
rating, by the way) passed worthwhile legislation and
reversed the ban on offshore drilling, we probably
would not be in the situation that we are in right
now. Not with the economy, nor with the high gasoline
prices.

So Nancy, ............. let's put the blame where it
really belongs. Squarely on the shoulders (or hips
as the case may be) of the current "do-nothing" Congress,
with the WORST APPROVAL RATING EVER, in the history of
the United States Congress.

Obama In Iraq

Sen. Obama and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki

On Monday, [Sen. Obama] inspected the southern city of Basra, where an Iraqi-led offensive launched in March broke the control of Shiite militias with suspected links to Iranian forces.

Anbar, meanwhile, was the birthplace of the Sunni insurgency and scene to some of the intense urban battles of the war that Obama has long opposed.—Associated Press

Just the sound of it is astonishing. The sheer irony of this moment should not be lost on anybody! The fact that any United States Democrat can set foot in Iraq is a tribute to President George Bush and the Republicans.

Sen. Obama should have taken out his prayer rug faced west toward the White house, fell on his knees and prayed for the long life of President Bush then the Senator should have repented from his sins of cursing Iraq into the hands of al Qaeda by supporting Democrats efforts to sabotage the United States war efforts all along the way by chanting the Democrat mantra, “We can’t win in Iraq, we can’t win in Iraq!”

Not only that, Democrats including Sen. Obama, were convinced that the surge would not work.



The fact that Sen. Obama is able to travel to a former hotbed of the Sunni insurgency to talk with tribal leaders is a Republican victory, the fact that Sen. Obama could sit in an ornate gold-colored chair next to the Anbar governor, Maamoun Sami Rashid al-Alwani, is a Republican victory, the fact that he also met with Sheik Ahmed Abu Risha, the older brother of Abdul-Sattar Abu Risha, a leader of a Sunni revolt against al-Qaida in Iraq, that too is a Republican victory.(see story)

This trip should be called the “Democratic we were wrong, the Republicans were right Magical Middle East tour”

The fact that Sen. Obama can talk about an "aspirational timeline, with a clear date," for the departure of U.S. combat forces once again is a Republican victory because we all know that if the United States of America were under Democrat leadership we would have cut and run like Sen. Obama, Sen. Harry Reid, Congressman John Murtha and all of the Democrat Congressional leadership along with all of the Democrat leaning media all wanted to do.

For any Democrat to stand in the Middle East and pretend that they know something about foreign policy is a Sen. Hillary Clinton fantasy flight over Bosnia situation. There was no sniper fire as Sen. Clinton imagined as there is nothing that Sen. Obama can do to get foreign policy credentials on a trip, that if his and fellow Democrats’ policies had been enacted, he would not have been able to take!

This whole trip is an attribute to Republican leadership that has produced safety all around the world. Apparently Sen. Obama felt save enough to visit what used to be an al Qaeda stronghold that was taken over by the policies that he and other Democrats fought so hard to defeat.

Republicans should be proud that even a Democrat who was wrong about the war in Iraq can go to Iraq and see the Iraq is not lost to al Qaeda, we are not losing in Iraq and there is progress politically and militarily in Iraq.

When Sen. Obama gets back he ought to go over to the White house and thank President Bush personally for not listening to him and his fellow Democrats about Iraq and then he should apologize for all of the things that he said that were clearly wrong and clearly politically motivated.

But that’ll never happen that’s just my little flight over Bosnia fantasy!

Poor Democrats they think that an Obama field trip equals foreign policy credentials

Sen. Barack Obama

“What you’re about to see is enormous publicity,” Democratic strategist Susan Estrich said. “He’s got three anchors coming with him. He’s got the glitterati of the press corps.”

With his visit, the presumptive Democratic nominee is recreating the kind of public whirlwind that he enjoyed at the height of the Democratic primary — only on a global scale.—Foxnews.com

How do you market your inadequate black male, a term used by Clinton supporter Harriet Christian, to the American people when you know that he hasn’t the experience to lead in this uncertain time.

Why you send him on a week long Middle east, European field trip and when he comes back, voilà! He has foreign policy credentials!

If only it were that easy. If that were the case Jane Fonda’s 70’s two week trip to Hanoi would have qualified her as an expert on the Vietnam war, or Nancy Pelosi’s short trip to Syria at a time of war, a country which was considered to be a state supporter of terrorism certainty makes Pelosi an expert on terrorism or Sen. Hillary Clinton flight over Bosnia undoubtedly make her an expert on American aircraft taking fire over war zones!

Such is the ridiculous thinking of the Democrat Party. Their candidate has virtually no experience or leadership in the area of foreign policy so 4 months before the election of the United States President, Democrats package what equates to a laughable grade school field trip to Afghanistan and Europe to give their candidate the appearance of foreign policy credentials. (See story)

So here’s how a conversation would go, Sen. Obama do you feel that you have the foreign policy experience to lead this nation at this time?

Sen. Obama would probably respond (heavily coached by his Democrat mentors, no doubt) I have spoken to leaders in Afghanistan, Jordan, Israel, Germany, France and England face to face, I have seen our troops doing their jobs and I commend them for their valiant efforts and I believe that I have enough information to make the proper judgments for America in regards to Iraq, Afghanistan and the war on terror.

But not even Democrats really believe that Sen. Obama has the experience to lead no matter what he does in the next 4 months. (see video)



The question is would you hire someone for a job because that person visited one of your work sites or that person had a cadre of friends that would tell them the right things to say in an interview with you?

Democrats are betting the Presidency on the fact that you, dear voter will do exactly that.

A splashy public speech in Germany. A wreath-laying at Israel's Holocaust museum. Perhaps a short side trip to the Palestinian West Bank. A visit to the palace of Jordan's king. Quick stops in Paris and London. They're all on the agenda of Sen. Barack Obama when the presumptive Democratic nominee takes his campaign overseas in the coming days.

The tour is designed to burnish Obama's national security and foreign policy credentials and beef up his image as a commander in chief with U.S. voters as he meets with international leaders. As long as Obama does not make a gaffe, the highly choreographed, nearly weeklong trip may plug what has been a lingering hole in his resume despite more than a year of campaigning.—Lynn Sweet, Sun-Times

Just months ago Democrat leaders and their allies in the media were telling the American people that the surge in Iraq, that General Petraeus advocated and which President Bush put into action, would fail.

Democrat Senate Leader Harry Reid pronounced that the Iraq war was lost, Congressman John Murtha declared that the surge would not work, Moveon.org slandered and libeled the General in a discounted printed ad taken out in the New York Times rhyming the General’s name with betray us. And Sen. Hillary Clinton all but called the General a liar and a toady for the Bush Administration when she said that believing the General’s assessment on Iraq would require, “The willing suspension of disbelief.” But they were all wrong!


No Democrat has, as of this date, apologized or admitted that they showed the slightest bad judgment or that they were just blatantly wrong in talking down our military efforts in Iraq.

No Democrat has denounced those politically motivated acts. Democrat acts which obviously were meant to turn the American people against the war and the president, acts committed to make the war effort look bad for the President’s administration.

Based on the poor judgment that Democrats have made since they voted to give the president the authority to go to war with Iraq, they’ve selected a Chicago community organizer turned one year Senator to be their nominee for the most powerful job in the world. They knowing that he doesn’t have the credentials to lead send him on a week’s tour four months before the election hoping that you will equate this tour with leadership and judgment to lead America.

This is an astounding affront to the intelligence of the American people. Do Democrats honestly believe that the American people can no longer tell the difference between appearances and actuality?

Or maybe it is something even more insidious than that, maybe Democrats believe that Americans don’t care about the quality of their leaders anymore. After all, Democrats did offer up Bill Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry and now Barack Obama.

Democrats are fast becoming the Party of make-believe and tinsel town. From phony sniper fired to phony foreign policy credentials. Make the candidate look presidential, make him seem to have the right credentials and create the image.

Yeah that good enough for a star struck America!

As the great and powerful Oz once said, “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!” Why because that man really wasn’t great or powerful and I suspect that minus the efforts to make Sen. Obama a world rockstar/foreign policy expert in a week, just a pull back of the media curtain will leave the American people with Harriett Christian’s assessment, the Democrat Party has nominated an inadequate black male.

And then they, the Democrats, have sent him on a field trip to convince you otherwise.

It’s Getting harder to Justify Belief in Global Warming

As real as Global warming?

The American Physical Society, an organization representing nearly 50,000 physicists, has reversed its stance on climate change and is now proclaiming that many of its members disbelieve in human-induced global warming.—Michael Asher

Using Sen. Clinton’s words believing in the theory of anthropogenic global warming requires "a willing suspension of disbelief." The United Nation’s International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Al Gore says that there is a consensus in the scientific community that anthropogenic Global warming or as it recently called Climate change is caused by man-made emissions of CO2, carbon dioxide, into the atmosphere.

The American Physical Society once lent its voice to the clamor of dire global warming warnings. However the APS no longer believes that Al Gore and James Hansen’s theories are valid.

Jeffrey Marque APS forum editor explains,” There is a considerable presence within the scientific community of people who do not agree with the IPCC conclusion that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are very probably likely to be primarily responsible for global warming that has occurred since the Industrial Revolution."

It’s not the CO2, stupid! And man is not the culprit. In addition to that, the APS is willing to debate all comers unlike Gore and his associates.
Lord Christopher Monckton a UK climate researcher wrote a paper in which he states his beliefs that the IPCC has overstate its case regarding Global warming. Monckton believes that CO2 has little effect on global climate.

Larry Gould, Professor of Physics at the University of Hartford and Chairman of the New England Section of the APS, called Monckton's paper an "expose of the IPCC that details numerous exaggerations and "extensive errors."

In spite of the IPCC errors that Al Gore has based his entire Global warming “Inconvenient Truth” on, Gore was in Washington yesterday attempting to exploit high gas prices in a speech at Washington's Constitution Hall, Gore called for total independence from gasoline within the next 10 years. Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio) found Gore’s speech ridiculous.

There’s too much money to be made in Global warming to turn back now, it doesn’t matter whether Global warming is real or not. As Gore said the scientific debate on global warming is over.

Hey I demand a recount! I think there are some hang issues in this debate somebody call an attorney!

World Court Messin’ with Texas

Convicted rapist, murderer Jose Medellin

"The world court has no standing in Texas and Texas is not bound by a ruling or edict from a foreign court, [i]t is easy to get caught up in discussions of international law and justice and treaties. It's very important to remember that these individuals are on death row for killing our citizens."—Robert Black, spokesman for Texas Governor’s Office

The fact that two American teenaged girls were brutality raped for hours, sodomized, and murdered by a gang of six cold-blooded killers almost turns out to be only a subplot for those who support illegal entry into the United States.

In complications that only occur when a nation willfully leaves its borders unenforced coupled with international meddling into U. S. affairs the memories of Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena have been forever diminished by the country of Mexico, President Bush and the International World Court at the Hague.

In spite of ruling of the World Court Texas will continue with the execution of the confessed, tried, and sentenced murderer, Jose Medellin.

Jennifer Ertman, 14 and Elizabeth Pena, 16 are dead due largely because the United States refuses to enforce its borders against the invasion of illegal aliens into the United States.

But somehow the deaths of two teenage American girls is unimportant what is important is that illegal aliens are protected by the full measure of international law and treaties or so it would seem.

The International World Court at the Hague, the United States President, the Mexican Government, the State of Texas and the United States Supreme Court have figuratively battled over the graves of Ertman and Pena on the behalf of an illegal alien, Jose Medellin and his rights as an illegal alien in the United States.

Apparently the inadequate State courts of Texas that tried, convinced and sentenced Medellin to death for the murders was not good enough for the country of Mexico, President Bush and the International Court at the Hague.

The state of Texas rightly tried, convicted and sentenced Medellin to death the same as any citizen of this country. Mexico argued in effect, to the Supreme Court and then to the World Court, that because Medellin is not a citizen of the United States he has special rights.

The United States Supreme Court ruled that the country of Mexico, nor a President of these United States by treaty with a foreign government nor the World Court supercedes the sovereignty of the United States of America.

Jose Medellin is due to be put to death August 5, 2008 by the state of Texas for his part in the cruel and heinous torture, rape, sodomizing and murder of the two American teenagers.

This is an American tragedy that can and should be laid at the feet of everyone who advocates for open borders. You killed Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena just as surely as Jose Medellin and his gang did.

Only you get to pretend that you are not guilty and that you had nothing to do with the deaths of these two young girls.

May Jennifer and Elizabeth now at last rest in peace after they receive a small measure of justice for their untimely deaths and may you all who advocate for open borders be brought to some justice of your own!

Staffers at EPA set to do job that American Politicians wouldn’t do

Sen. Jim Inhofe
Earlier this year Congress went though the motions of rejecting a “cap-and-trade” proposal that would have allowed companies to buy or sell allowances to pollute the air.

Such a system would not decrease one iota of Carbon from the air however this would allow American businesses and politicians to Europeanize by taxing the American people with similar “cap-and-trade” systems that are already in place in Europe.

It’s the world-wide ponza scheme that is all rage, how else would world governments raise unaccountable trillions of dollars without offering a serves in return? By no other means but Cap and Trade!

Sen. Jim Inhofe warns that staffers of the Environmental Protection Agency are set to do the job that that President Bush and Congress won’t do. This would create an unprecedented expansion of the Environmental Protection Agency's authority. Sen. Inhofe fears that such bureaucratic workings would be virtually insulated from the American people’s control. (see story)

In a recent ruling the U.S. Supreme Court said that under the Clean Air Act the EPA has the authority to regulate carbon dioxide but so far the Bush administration has held the EPA in check however these cubicle jockeys are just chomping at the bit for their chance to impose strict Global warming standards on the United States according to Sen. Inhofe.

"It is ironic that the EPA has proposed an even more economically destructive scheme this close to that bill's demise, [i]f Congress does not act, then the resulting regulations could be the largest regulatory intrusion into Americans' personal lives, a nightmare scenario. Big Brother is alive and well in the career ranks at the EPA."—Sen. Jim Inhofe

The EPA is already soliciting public input on an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking setting the stage for policy on carbon reductions when a new Global warming friendly administration is elected in November.

What this means is unaccountable faceless bureaucrats will be enforcing Global warming policies and taxes on Americans if the EPA is allowed to assume power under the Clean Air Act.

This must not be allowed the American people must be aware of any and all regulatory action that will come out of the EPA under the Clean Air Act upon either Sen. Obama’s or Sen. McCain’s presidency.

We have been made aware thus far by the tireless efforts of one man Sen. Jim Inhofe. We owe him a debt of gratitude! Thank you Sen. Inhofe.

Barack’s vision of a Changed America?

"Whatever we once were, we're no longer a Christian nation. At least not just. We are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, and a Buddhist nation, and a Hindu nation, and a nation of nonbelievers,"—Sen. Barack Obama

Here’s a phrase that Senator Barack Obama is obviously unfamiliar with, “E Pluribus Unum.” Someone really should explain the term to presumptive Democrat nominee for president and Illinois Senator Barack Obama.

It means, “Out of the many one.” What it doesn’t mean is a balkanized nation of multiculturalism and multi-theism maybe someone should explain that to Sen. Obama.

Oh that’s right, silly me American’s want change, so I guess such an out dated concept as coming out of many backgrounds and cultures to become one America is no longer the goal for this country, no that was an invention of dead old white men an invention that is no longer relevant for a progressive America right?

According to Sen. Obama America is no longer operating under the tenet of E Pluribus Unum, America has changed, America wants change. So much so that if that change required America from ceasing from being America well that’s all good too!

According to Sen. Obama America has became a religious and cultural balkanized nation in the similitude of the nations of the east Nations that people have and are fleeing from by the hundreds of thousands to come to a nation that they were told believes in E Pluribus Unum and freedom. (see story)

Where else in the world (except a dieing Europe) could a presidential hopeful boast that the traditions that have made their nation what it is are no longer needed?

Think about it. Most nations’ traditions are so oppressive that people flee from those places to come here to America. Yet we don’t see anyone in the world so willing as Sen. Obama to give up on the traditions that they are fleeing from, even if those traditions have bankrupted their nation.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would never stand up to declare that Iran is no longer a Muslim nation. No Saudi Arabian royal would claim that Saudi Arabia is not longer a Muslim nation; No Egyptian president would ever say that Egypt is no longer a Muslim nation; Hu Jintao the Chinese president would never assert that China is no longer a Communistic Atheistic nation. Ironically these nations are looking for change too, only the change they seek is to impose their tyrannical wills on other nations, like America for instance.

Yet in America, the shining beacon on the hill, a once great nation because people like the old dead white men, I previous referred to, believed in traditions that made this nation uniquely a great nation. Yet we have fallen so low as to have a man running for president who obviously doesn’t understand what tyrannical and oppressor nations know?

What they know is that for any nation, free or dictatorial, to keep operating they must keep and stay true their original traditions their systems of government must be upheld not undermined if they are going to continue to exist.

Someone should tell Sen. Obama that America has always been a nation that has accommodated others of different faiths and backgrounds, because we are a Christian nation not in spite of that fact. America has not always been perfect in this but nothing’s perfect.

We can and must always be traditionally America the home of the free and the land of the brave. That distinction must be maintained no matter who comes here, no matter their beliefs or their faith because the American tradition was made possible because we are who we are, a Christian nation.

Sen. Obama you show me another nation, Muslim, Hindu, or an atheist nation, that is like America; free, welcoming of other faiths and beliefs and I will gladly agree with you that America needs to change from being a Christian nation to just being one of the many multicultural and multi-theistic nations of the world!

You have only to look to Europe and see that when a country forgets its own traditions and allows other traditions and religions to set up as equal residents the other religions are generally not as tolerate as the faith and traditions that welcomed them.

Contrary to your belief Sen. Obama, America is not a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, a Buddhist nation, a Hindu nation or a nation of nonbelievers.

Yes people who practice those beliefs came to America and are apart of the American dream of freedom and they are free to practice their beliefs however they see fit.

That notwithstanding, one only has to read the documents that began this nation, the Mayfair compact for instance, Sen. Obama you should read it and others like it and you will discover that the ideas that made this nation what it is today come from a unique root and if that root is ever severed that would be the death of the freedoms that we all enjoy today.

Is that the change that you offer Sen. Obama? Do you offer the change that is the death knell that has multicultural Europe in its last throes?

To wit a look to Europe is evidence enough that multiculturalism and multi-theism does not work and if we are as Sen. Obama says no longer a Christian nation then the root has indeed been severed and we are no longer America!

More Homosexual Oppression by Fascist Homosexuals

Fred Karger, homosexual organizer and oppressor of non-homosexuals

When is the last time you heard of a minority group attempting to deny someone of their rightful constitutional rights?

Legitimate minority groups have always fought for their own rights but never have I heard of a minority group fighting to deny a citizen or citizens from exercising his, her or their constitution guaranteed rights to legitimately participant in this society the way that they see fit.

That is what freedom is all about right, being able to do, say, believe, support or oppose whatever one chooses to.

Not so to Homosexual Oppressors who just recently used the California state Supreme Court to deny millions of California voters their right to a constitutional valid and legitimate voted on proposition 22 that defined marriage as it had always been since the genesis of man and womankind.

Now homosexual oppressors are targeting Doug Manchester who contributed $125,000 to Proposition 8, a proposition that is attempting to reestablish the people’s 2000 vote on proposition 22 which only became necessary because of the corporate funded Supreme Court homosexual attack against California's voters in the first place! (see story)

This fascist attack against Manchester is meant to intimate citizens who disagree with the unconstitutional California Supreme Court judicial fiat from exercising their constitution rights to dissent against the powerful government/special interest group partnership of corporate/government homosexual oppressors.

Millions of California put up the firewall of proposition 22 in 2000, 61 percent of California voters approved the proposition, which defined marriage as it had always been between one man and one woman, ahead of the advancing corporate funded homosexual Orwellian court sanctioned court invention of homosexual marriage.

This well funded corporate homosexual movement is backed by corporations and investors that you know and trust. Corporations that have undermined and devalued marriage in this country, the following corporations are: (list credited to Worldnetdaily)
• Aetna
• Agilent Technologies
• Alston & Bird
• American Airlines
• American Express
• Apple Computer
• AT&T
• Avaya
• Bausch & Lomb
• Best Buy
• Borders Group
• BP America
• California State Automobile Association
• Capital One Financial
• Cargill
• Charles Schwab
• Chevron
• ChoicePoint
• Chubb
• Cisco Systems
• Citigroup
• CMP Media
• Corning
• Credit Suisse First Boston
• Cummins
• Daimler Chrysler
• Dell
• Deutsche Bank
• Dominion Resources
• Dow Chemical
• Eastman Kodak
• Ernst & Young
• Estee Lauder Companies
• Faegre & Benson
• Ford Motor Co.
• Freescale Semiconductor
• Gap Inc.
• General Mills
• GlaxoSmithKline
• Global Hyatt
• Goldman Sachs Group
• Hewlett-Packard
• Intel
• IBM
• Intuit
• J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
• Jenner & Block
• Johnson & Johnson
• Kaiser Permanente
• Keyspan
• Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group
• KPMG
• Kraft Foods
• Lehman Brothers Holdings
• Levi Strauss & Co.
• Lexmark International
• Lincoln National
• Lucent Technologies
• Mellon Financial
• Merrill Lynch
• MetLife
• Microsoft
• Miller Brewing
• Mitchell Gold and Bob Williams
• Molson Coors Brewing
• Morrison & Foerster
• Motorola
• Nationwide
• NCR Corp.
• New York Times Co.
• Nike
• Nordstrom
• Northern Trust
• The Olivia Companies
• Owens Corning
• Pepsico
• Pfizer
• PG&E
• Prudential Financial
• Raytheon
• Replacements
• SBC Communications
• SC Johnson & Son
• Sears, Roebuck and Co.
• Southern California Edison
• Sprint
• Sun Microsystems
• SunTrust Banks
• Tech Data Corp.
• Toyota
• UBS
• Unisys
• US Airways
• Viacom
• Walgreens
• Washington Mutual
• Wells Fargo
• Whirlpool
• Worldspan Technologies
• Wyndham International
• Xerox

If you ever wondered why homosexuals were able to achieve the total undermining of marriage in California the answer is funding from these corporations is the reason why!

When will it stop? Not until homosexuals are de-funded of multimillion dollar donations that they extort from corporations

Finally, buoyed by homosexual’s recent California victory a Michigan homosexual man is suing bible publishers for $70 million dollars for what he calls “homophobic language” that the bible has used over the years that he claims has personal caused him emotional distress and endangered his safety.

Outrageous you think? No so much, if homosexuals can find a court in California to listen to their bogus Civil rights arguments and thereby invent homosexual marriage why not a court to condemn the Christian Bible as unconstitutional on equally bogus civil rights claims of emotional distress and endangerment.

The just cited example only goes to show if homosexual oppressors and their corporate and government backers are not resisted now we can only expect more of the same.

Homosexuals didn't stop at their fake argument that the government should stay out of the bedroom what two people do in privacy is their business. No that argument was only just the beginning because they proudly parade what they do in the nation's streets and in it's the courts now.

Homosexuals will not stop until every man, woman and child in America, no in the world, is force to chant, "Homosexuality is good, anyone who opposes homosexuality is bad!"

Now that's creating Orwellian worldview by Machiavellianism at its very best!

The Man Can't Help It!

Here is a very interesting article that I came across today. Rather then send you to the website, I copied it here. I hope that it enlightens some, and gratifies those of us who saw this coming.

Flipping and Flopping
It's getting difficult to tell whether Obama stands for anything

By Jack Kelly, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
July 10, 2008

It's a good thing many of Barack Obama's supporters don't care much about issues, because their candidate has been changing his position on them with dizzying speed.

"Barack Obama aligned himself with welfare reform on Monday, launching a television ad which touts the way the overhaul 'slashed rolls by 80 percent,' " ABC News reported July 1. "Obama leaves out, however, that he was against the 1996 federal legislation which precipitated the caseload reduction."

When the Supreme Court overturned the District of Columbia ban on handgun ownership June 26, Mr. Obama said he supported the decision of the 5-4 majority. But last November he told the Chicago Tribune he thought the D.C. handgun ban was constitutional. While in the state legislature, he proposed legislation that would, in effect, have banned handguns in Illinois.

Mr. Obama said he disagreed with another 5-4 Supreme Court decision the day before, which struck down a Louisiana law that had authorized the death penalty for someone who rapes a child. When he first ran for the state Senate in 1996, Mr. Obama said he opposed capital punishment, and in the legislature he opposed applying the death penalty to gang murders.

Campaigning in Ohio before the Democratic primary there, Mr. Obama said the North American Free Trade Agreement should be renegotiated. One of his economic advisers, University of Chicago professor Austan Goolsbee, told a Canadian official that Mr. Obama's anti-NAFTA rhetoric "should be viewed as more about political positioning than a clear articulation of policy plans."

When the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. reported this, the Obama campaign initially denied that Mr. Goolsbee had met with the Canadian consul in Chicago and then claimed he had been misquoted. After the CBC provided conclusive proof both of the meeting and what Mr. Goolsbee had said, Mr. Obama distanced himself from his economic adviser.

No longer. In an interview with Nina Easton of Fortune magazine published June 18, Mr. Obama said he didn't want unilaterally to reopen negotiations on NAFTA. "Sometimes during a campaign the rhetoric gets overheated and amplified," he said.

Last August, Mr. Obama called for easing the economic embargo on Cuba. When he was running for the U.S. Senate in 2003, he indicated he favored lifting it entirely. But in a speech to the Cuban American National Foundation May 23, Mr. Obama said he'd maintain the embargo.

Last September, Mr. Obama said he would accept federal matching funds for the general election campaign if his GOP opponent did the same. But on June 19, he announced he wouldn't. The reason was simple. The Obama campaign thinks it can raise more than twice as much as the $85 million he'd get from the feds. The flip-flop probably would have gone down better if he hadn't offered a transparently phony rationale for it.

"Mr. Obama had an opportunity here to demonstrate that he really is a different kind of politician, willing to put principles and the promises he has made above political calculation. He made a different choice," said The Washington Post in an editorial. "Fine. Politicians do what politicians need to do. But they ought to spare us the self-congratulatory back-patting while they're doing it."

Mr. Obama said on Jan. 28 that he would "strongly oppose" an intelligence surveillance bill that provided retroactive immunity from lawsuits to telephone companies that cooperated with the U.S. government. But on June 20, he announced he'd support a bill that does just that.

Supply and Demands

Abdalla Salem El-Badri, left, the OPEC secretary general, met in April with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran. (Morteza Nikoubazl/Reuters)

The head of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries warned Thursday that oil prices would see an "unlimited" increase in the case of a military conflict involving Iran…

"We really cannot replace Iran 's production - it's not feasible to replace it," Abdalla Salem El-Badri, the OPEC secretary general, said during an interview.—James Kanter, IHT

Gasoline is just under $5.00 a gallon in some parts of the United States and you’re probably driving less, I know I am, do you still believe in the theory of supply side economics?

I’m thinking that current gasoline prices have very little to do with the supply of oil and a lot to do with demands made by oil producing Nations. (see here)

OPEC pumps about 40% of the world oil supply which seems to make them feel that they are entitled to make demands on the world! Its supply side economics gone jihad, here’s why I say that.

OPEC just pronounced that if there is any attack on Iran gas prices would raise precipitously without any restraint. This somewhat oblique warning seems to test just were the balance of world power resides. Given that there has been no equal warning or restraint demanded on Iran’s calls for Israel’s destruction by President of Iran Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

No longer should there be any doubt as to who is in control of the world. Oil is the life’s blood of the world and in a not so veiled threat OPEC has declared its protection of Iran and demands that those who threaten Iran back off.

So it would seem that it is OPEC that is controlling the price of oil in world markets and equally it would seem that they are at fault for the high gasoline prices in consumer nations, but not so says OPEC.

OPEC has been saying, as early as 2007 that increased oil supply will not bring the price of gasoline down. OPEC says there are causes for high gas prices other than supply and demand.

As reported in October 2007 in the International Herald Tribune representatives from top oil producing countries Tuesday blamed the steady advance of oil toward $100 a barrel on a combination of financial speculation, geopolitical instability and a shortfall in refining capacity.

The president of OPEC, Mohammed bin Dhaen al-Hamli, who is also the oil minister of the United Arab Emirates, pledged to keep markets amply supplied. But at an oil industry conference in London, he said there was only so much OPEC could do in the current circumstances to keep a lid on prices.

"Increasingly oil markets are being driven by forces beyond OPEC's control, such as geopolitical events and the growing influence of financial investors," Hamli said. "We are of course concerned about the high level of oil prices."

This directly contradicts proponents of supply side economics. According to CNN crude oil prices are driven largely by fluctuations in the global supply and demand.

Gas price increases in recent years have been due in part to crude oil production limits set by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, and rising demand across the globe, especially in countries like China and India. Instability in key oil-producing countries can also affect the supply of crude oil.

The purchasing power of the dollar also has an impact because oil is bought in dollars in every world market. If the dollar is cheaper against foreign currencies, U.S. consumers will pay more at the pump.

In addition to that in 1999 OPEC worked to convince all oil producing nations to cut the world supply of oil by 3%

With remarkable speed and unity, OPEC clinched a far-reaching agreement with four independent oil-producing nations today to cut world output by 2.1 million barrels a day. The move, if carried out, would significantly reduce the supply of crude oil and drive up the price of gasoline and other fuel.

The pact, announced here, is to take effect on April 1 and last for a year. It would reduce daily world oil production of 70 million barrels by about 3 percent.

The deal was reached despite resilient skepticism about the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries' ability to stop cheating by its own members. On the contrary, there is now considerable optimism that the cutbacks will work.

One would think that if OPEC believes that cutting supply would raise the price of oil then increasing supply would lower prices.

This too, OPEC controls the output of its members through a production quota system designed to influence the price of oil. Quotas are set at regular meetings.

But contrary to the reality of what is happening Saudi economist Ali al-Dakkak said world prices were being driven by "wild speculation" and a lack of refining capacity in consumer countries, especially the United States.

Al-Dakkak adds, "Consumer demands for increasing output are politically motivated." —Worldnews Australia

Consumer demands for increasing output are politically motivated? And here I thought that not being able to drive my car and feed my family at the same time motivated me and millions of American consumers of gasoline to demand more output of oil, silly me!

In Venezuela gasoline is $0.12 a gallon in Kuwait it is $.078 a gallon, in Saudi Arabia it is $0.91 a gallon so why doesn’t fluctuations in the global supply and demand affect these prices to the extent that the U.S. prices are affected? (see here)

I’ll tell you why because it is just the reverse of Saudi economist Ali al-Dakkak’s statement, the exorbitant increases in oil and gasoline prices are politically motivated not the other way around.

Finally there has been a 25% reduction in combined expenses to produce oil for the OPEC nations and a 181.15% increase in price to consumer nations that’s a 206.15% increase in profitability over the period 2000-2007 to April 2008 (see here)

This means that lower cost to produce the oil, higher profits based on higher pricing and political posturing point to OPEC manipulation of oil supplies and prices to make demands to control world events and world politics which is very bad for the Western world.

A virtually new OPEC spin on supply and demand to the Western world. "If you don't do what I demand, then I won't supply the oil that you need!"

Another Stupid Remark!

That’s a boy, Obama.......... Sometime’s its better to
remain silent and have people think you are stupid,
than to open your mouth and remove all doubt!

Add this one to his long, long list of ridiculous or
supremely impractical proposals, and you have an
improving picture of who this man Obama really is!

Today’s Rasmussen Reports states............Barack
Obama said yesterday that “instead of worrying about
whether immigrants can learn English,” Americans
“need to make sure your child can speak Spanish.”
Nothing like a blatant attempt to garner the Spanish
vote in the US.

A national telephone survey conducted last month by
Rasmussen Reports found that U.S. voters overwhelmingly
disagree with the presumptive Democratic presidential
nominee.

This man is a total danger to America, and would drag
us down to the level of a Third World Country, by among
other things, forcing a multi-lingual society on us.
It’s bad enough now, that you can’t converse with half
the people who are in “customer service” in many companies,
can you imagine what his proposal would bring? Chaos would
be putting it mildly!

Obama is heavily influenced by Europe, but have you noticed
that in France they wont speak English to you, even as a visitor? French for the French! That is even reflected in Quebec....... where they turn their noses up if you try to
speak English to them. HOWEVER...... Obama totally ignores
the GOOD from France. Like the fact that they get 87% of
their electricity from nuclear power....... a fact that he conveniently ignores.

It is now obvious that those who were so enamored by this
“flash in the pan” contrived and created candidate, are
beginning to see where he is coming from. Finally, a
light at the end of the tunnel, which IS an oncoming train.

New polls show Obama slipping in many states.... among
them one of the Democratic strongholds.................
my home state, New Jersey. The Party of failure has always
called this one of their “guaranteed” wins. Well guess what?...........it is no longer the unwritten rule that if
you are Republican or Conservative and live in New Jersey...
don’t bother to vote, because the Electoral Votes belong to
the Democrats. More and more the Republican strongholds
within the state are making their voices heard......... and
I doubt that Lautenberg will make it to Congress after November this year.

I predict that McCain will trounce Obama on Election Day,
and take back some of the Congressional seats deceptively
taken by the Democrats in the last cycle. Pelosi and Reid had their chance to back their lies and empty promises with action, which obviously didn’t come! This Congress holds the all-time record as the least capable and productive in history........9% approval rating. And they have the gall to point to President Bush, who holds a 25% rating.

When it comes right down to it, the voters will see through
this ruse that the Democrats and the Main Stream Media have fostered upon the American people. This Obama is not the
“savior of the country” as he has been promoted. He is
divisive and controversial and cut from the same lowly public servant cloth as all the other ambitious politicians that
have come up from the liberal ranks. The only difference
between him and them was the ‘perceived’ one, that he would
be the instrument of change, because he was not a
“Washington insider”. Well.............guess what? He not
only hid his true self from the voters, he may even have
fooled his own party.......................(but I doubt it)!

Scaring Kids to Save the Planet!

Kevin Rudd, Australian Prime Minister

PSYCHIATRISTS have detected the first case of "climate change delusion"—Andrew Bolt, reporter for the Herald Sun

A Seventeen year old adolescent (which Mr. Bolt referred to as a man) was admitted to the psychiatric unit at Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne in Melbourne Australia.

The boy was diagnosed as depressed, delusional and given to visions of apocalyptic events.

According to Bolt the boy also developed the belief that, due to climate change, his own water consumption could lead within days to the deaths of millions of people through exhaustion of water supplies." He became too terrified to even drink according to the report. (see story)

So now Global warming fear mongers have succeeded in scaring the water out of a 17 year old kid with their incessant droning-ons about “apocalypse now” also known as climate change, well that was their intent. Right!

There is nothing like a scared global population when you are attempting to impose a global taxation scheme to the tune of $45 trillion dollars.

You thought we had it bad in America? You do realize that Australia has newly elected Prime Minister Kevin Rudd on his platform to fight global warming unlike the Conservative John Howard he defeated.

Under Rudd’s leadership the whole government of Australia has given in to global warming hysteria to which some of its children are now afraid to drink water for fear that, that too will cause climate change.

Rudd paints his own picture of earth’s doom:

"If we do not begin reducing the nation's levels of carbon pollution, Australia's economy will face more frequent and severe droughts, less water, reduced food production and devastation of areas such as the Great Barrier Reef and Kakadu wetlands."—Kevin Rudd, Prime Minister of Australia

Rudd has a James Hansen like Al Gore has, he is Professor Ross Garnaut and he is also in the climate change scare business.

"Australians must pay more for petrol, food and energy or ultimately face a rising death toll . . ."—Professor Ross Garnaut

No wonder the children in Australia are peeing in their pants!


In the United State both candidates, Senator Barack Obama and Senator John McCain have indicated that they too will back the theory of anthropogenic climate change which only means that they too are willing to scare teens and babies for the huge moneyed interests who are promoting global warming for dollars.

Climate change delusion, we already knew that Al Gore, James Hansen and the like were delusional but now they are affecting and scaring our kids and that is not acceptable.

The media needs to cease and desist in aiding these fear monger’s attempts to extort money from the world’s people and tell the truth concerning the cooling earth that scientist say that is actually occurring.

At the very least, stop scaring our kids with bogus climate change claims!

The G8 Tilts at Solar Windmills

Chinese and Indian leaders have been reluctant to make commitments on cutting gases, arguing that they are not responsible for decades' accumulation of carbon levels in the atmosphere, and that developed countries have a moral obligation to lead in cutting emissions. -- Don Lee

How does one do battle with the bogeyman? How do you slay a dragon? Or why would you spend 45 trillion dollars to tilt at windmills?

Don Quiote believed that windmills were dragons, could the most power men and woman in the world believe in anthropogenic Global Warming?

Apparently the G8 is considering the answers to all of the above. That is the undertaking that they have agreed to as they have pledged to seek, to consider and adopt as a goal the cutting in half of greenhouse gases and the reduction of carbon emissions by 2050 but only if China and Indian agree that their countries will do the same. (see here)

China and Indian looking to their own economic self interests wish to remain unencumbered by any agreement on economy restrictive emission reduction regulations voicing the point that all ready developed nations have caused the problem, their countries are only just beginning to pollute the atmoshere.

This argument falls flat when people understand that China now has become the single worst emitter of so-called green house gases.

Even so, the simple pledge that the G8 made has infuriated environmentalist that front for Investment speculators who are using Global warming/Climate Change as the next multi-trillion dollar commodities trading market. The world’s leader’s cautious approach is just not fast enough for those who are lining up to cash in on Global warming. (See video)



It doesn’t matter that it has all been disproved, carbon emissions are not heating up our planet, our planet has not heated up since 2003 and scientist say that it may not heat up again until 2015. There is no carbon emission caused global warming so why are the heads of the industrial free world swearing on their sacred honor to seek, to consider to adopt as a goal binding resolutions to cut carbon emissions?

Pressure! The whole world has gone after Al Gore’s debunked theory and rather than show leadership and denounce the folly world leaders do what politicians are good at doing, giving in to what is popular but wrong.
As founder of the weather channel John Coleman has said Global warming is a fraud.

Here are John’s own comments on the subject:

Hello Al Gore; Hello UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Your science is flawed; your hypothesis is wrong; your data is manipulated. And, may I add, your scare tactics are deplorable. The Earth does not have a fever. Carbon dioxide does not cause significant global warming.

The focus on atmospheric carbon dioxide grew out a study by Roger Revelle who was an esteemed scientist at the Scripps Oceanographic Institute. He took his research with him when he moved to Harvard and allowed his students to help him process the data for his paper. One of those students was Al Gore. That is where Gore got caught up in this global warming frenzy.

Revelle’s paper linked the increases in carbon dioxide, CO2, in the atmosphere with warming. It labeled CO2 as a greenhouse gas.

Charles Keeling, another researcher at the Scripps Oceanographic Institute, set up a system to make continuous CO2 measurements. His graph of these increases has now become known as the Keeling Curve. When Charles Keeling died in 2005, his son David, also at Scripps, took over the measurements. Here is what the Keeling curve shows: an increase in CO2 from 315 parts per million in 1958 to 385 parts per million today, an increase of 70 parts per million or about 20 percent.

All the computer models, all of the other findings, all of the other angles of study, all come back to and are based on CO2 as a significant greenhouse gas. It is not.

Here is the deal about CO2, carbon dioxide. It is a natural component of our atmosphere. It has been there since time began. It is absorbed and emitted by the oceans. It is used by every living plant to trigger photosynthesis. Nothing would be green without it. And we humans; we create it. Every time we breathe out, we emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. It is not a pollutant. It is not smog. It is a naturally occurring invisible gas.

Let me illustrate. I estimate that this square in front of my face contains 100,000 molecules of atmosphere. Of those 100,000 only 38 are CO2; 38 out of a hundred thousand. That makes it a trace component. Let me ask a key question: how can this tiny trace upset the entire balance of the climate of Earth? It can’t. That’s all there is to it; it can’t.

The UN IPCC has attracted billions of dollars for the research to try to make the case that CO2 is the culprit of run-away, man-made global warming. The scientists have come up with very complex creative theories and done elaborate calculations and run computer models they say prove those theories.—John Coleman, Founder of the Weather Channel

The G8 would do good to steer away from the politically correct debunked non-science of Global warming and address real problems like restraining free market economies that are attempting to take over the world.

But that’s just my opinion!

It Amazes Me!!!!!!

It never ceases to amaze me that so many liberals,
and Democrats in particular, continue to hang onto
the myth that a Democratic Congress was going to do
anything to improve the lives of Americans.

For the most part, they are just a bunch of self-serving
hypocrits, who created a tsunami of criticism aimed at
any Republicans who held office during the last election
cycle. Needless to say, most of what they played on the
national stage, was either totally fabricated or blown
so totally out of proportion, that the American voter
was led to believe that all Republicans and conservatives
were involved in graft, corruption and sex scandals.

Actually.......... the opposite is true! Check any
website that lists and elaborates on Congressional scandals
going back to Boss Tweed, to present. There have been
more Democrats involved in corruption and sex escapades
than any Republicans ever could be.

In addition to the myth that the Democrats created about
Republican congressmen, they forever pound the "approval
rating" of President Bush..... as the lowest of any
President in memory. Well guess what???? This particular
Congress holds the ALL TIME RECORD for the LOWEST APPROVAL
RATING of ANY CONGRESS IN HISTORY. According to Rasmussen's
political polls, Nancy Pelosi's and Harry Reid's gang, has
a SINGLE DIGET approval rating.

Read it and weep you creeps!!!!!!...........

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/congressional_performance/congressional_performance

California’s Fools Gold!

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger

As Californians brace for big reductions in government services, the possibility of tax hikes and a long summer of budget bickering, they may be under the impression that everyone else is slogging through the same financial misery.

Not so.

Analysts say the state's troubles stem largely from its budget system -- the most dysfunctional in the country -- and they look to California as an example of how not to do things. In a recent ranking of state policies by the Pew Center on the States, California scored D+ on fiscal management. The average grade was B-.--Evan Halper, Los Angeles Times

California the State that is primarily concerned with Homosexual mock-marriages, Global warming, providing sanctuary to illegal aliens, and a multi-million dollar voter initiative stem cell research tax payers grant is in fiscal trouble, hum I wonder why?

Tax payers don’t usually like being ripped off unless of course it is for a good purpose like stem cell research. If it is stem cell research then please take 3 billion dollars that’s what the state of California is being fleeced for.

Did I say fleeced? Are the tax payers of the state of California going to be ripped off? Usually when one speaks of stem cells it is in noble terms as in regenerating damaged nerves for someone like Christopher Reeves to walking again, growing vital organs, and even producing body parts. That’s the misdirection, the reality is the real backers of stem cell research are profiteers who plan to use publicly-funded government research to yield usurious private profits for themselves.--Alaphiah

The state of California recalled one Governor, Gray Davis, only to replace him with a RINO, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Schwarzenegger gives one an indication of how John McCain would govern as President of the United States with a Democrat controlled Congress. McCain has already embraced most of the non-Conservative issues that Schwarzenegger governs by.

A Republican in name only and a liberal Democrat controlled state legislature presides over the dysfunctional almost bankrupted government of California, which by the way is a virtual Liberal’s Nirvana, and is a model of where the United States is headed. As the saying is, “As California goes so goes the nation.”

If one ever wished to see what the world would be like if Liberals ran everything one only has to look to California. Liberals have run the state of California into the ground for decades and it’s only getting worst! In a recent Pew research study California’s fiscal management comes in dead last!

California starts the new budget year today -- and once again no budget is in place.

Legislators are making little progress closing a $15.2-billion shortfall. Democrats demand new taxes. Republicans say that is out of the question. Meanwhile, their inability to strike a deal threatens millions of Californians who rely on the government for healthcare and other services.—Evan Halper

California the once golden state, the state where speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi and Senators Diana Feinstein and Barbara Boxer all hail from, the state that’s golden luster has been tarnished by special interest control over its Supreme Court, Governor and Legislative branch is a study in what not to do in government.

California is a study of what not to do at any and all levels of government, fiscal or social

Of the 46 states that began their fiscal year on Tuesday, California is one of just four that still have no spending plan. Lawmakers are nowhere near agreement on how to patch a $15.2-billion shortfall, and the budget will probably include borrowing, accounting shifts and other maneuvers that make money managers cringe.

An outdated tax code, voter-approved initiatives that lock in billions of dollars for programs, inadequate oversight of spending and the lack of a substantial rainy-day fund all add to California 's financial ills. Other states have addressed such issues with impressive results. But attempts at similar changes here routinely fall flat.-- Evan Halper, Los Angeles Times

Nationally Democrats are succeeding in convincing the people that more Democrats would solve the nation’s ills but a reality check of the ultra-Democratic state of California which is a strong-hold for Liberal Democrats in and outside of government is a reminder to us all that too many Liberals means dysfunction and a government wrought with overspending and high taxes.

Let California’s troubles be a warning to the rest of the Nation.

IT’S THE STUPID PEOPLE, STUPID!

Rick Shenkman author of the book, “Just How Stupid Are We? Facing the Truth About the American Voter”

Has a five point Duncecap score card to test just how stupid American politics has become.

Shenkman’s five points are as follows;

First, is sheer ignorance: Ignorance of critical facts about important events in the news, and ignorance of how our government functions and who’s in charge.

Second, is negligence: The disinclination to seek reliable sources of information about important news events.

Third, is wooden-headedness, as the historian Barbara Tuchman defined it: The inclination to believe what we want to believe regardless of the facts.

Fourth, is shortsightedness: The support of public policies that are mutually exclusive, or contrary to the country’s long-term interests.

Fifth, and finally, is a broad category I call bone-headedness, for want of a better name: The susceptibility to meaningless phrases, stereotypes, irrational biases, and simplistic diagnoses and solutions that play on our hopes and fears.

The Democrat Party first coined the phase, “It’s the economy, stupid” used by Bill Clinton in his presidential campaign.

Since then the phrase has taken on a life of its own and like the franchise “(insert name here) for Dummies,” the bright yellow book that would lead us stupid dummies around by the hand on any given subject, the phrase,"It's the(blank)stupid" means to tell us that everything from the economy to our politics are the obvious reasons for our troubles, so plan is it that we have to be stupid not to understand it.

Speaking of stupid I’m thinking of the last three offerings for President that the Democrats have made to the American people; Al Gore, John Kerry and now Barack Obama (or Hillary Clinton who has just suspended her campaign just in case something were to happen) and I’m thinking there must be a reason that the American people rejected Democrats twice and potentially a third time.

It then became so obvious to me that the reason Barack Obama is running as the candidate of change is because the American people can’t and couldn’t stomach the political bile and socially corrupting policies that Democrats offer every Presidential election cycle. Democrats, It your politics, stupid!

That gives me great optimism that Democrats will have the same results in this election year as they had in 2000 and 2004 even if the Republican candidate is an old white guy.

That old white guy, in my opinion, is better than Democrat’s stupid politics and this guy. (See videos)

Barack Obama at Bristol Va. Townhall meeting June 5, 2008



And this!



I think these truths are self evident that our politics have become stupid, stupid!

Not to mention that Democrat candidates need plenty of sleep!

Happy 232 birthday America

HBO’s mini series John Adams scene thirteen colonies vote for independence

Global warming is not Science

Last week marked the 20th anniversary of the mass hysteria phenomenon known as global warming. Much of the science has since been discredited.

NASA now begrudgingly confirms that the hottest year on record in the continental 48 was not 1998, as previously believed, but 1934, and that six of the 10 hottest years since 1880 antedate 1954. Data from 3,000 scientific robots in the world's oceans show there has been slight cooling in the past five years, never mind that "80% to 90% of global warming involves heating up ocean waters," according to a report by NPR's Richard Harris.-- BRET STEPHENS

Bret Stephens’ “Global Warming as Mass Neurosis” explains that Global warming is not science and that its proponents offer religious like claims about Global warming which are to be believed by faith in spite of the physical evidence that the Earth is actually cooling.

Stephens offers three reasons why Liberals blindly follow Global warming propaganda.

Ideological convenience, theological replacement, and Munchausen syndrome

According to Stephens, global warming is a hodge-podge of all Left leaning Ideological beliefs conveniently wrapped up into and ultimately resulting in a cataclysmic eco- disaster.

Then Stephen seems to suggest that global warming allows the Liberal to replace belief in God and God’s judgment on the earth and man with an animist paganism which ironically has nature pronouncing judgment on man via itself.

Lastly Munchausen syndrome according to the Cleveland clinic, is a type of factitious disorder, or mental illness, in which a person repeatedly acts as if he or she has a physical or mental disorder when, in truth, they have caused the symptoms. People with factitious disorders act this way because of an inner need to be seen as ill or injured


Likewise, Global warming proponents have an unhealthy need to see the earth as injured by mankind (more correctly that would be Munchausen syndrome by proxy). So they have created the perfect multi-symptom conflicted affliction in which the phenomena of cooling or heating, storms or lack of storms, floods or droughts are all symptomatic of Global warming.

Stephens concludes that global warming is not science at all and its adherents are merely sick-souled believers in a theory that is a sick-souled religion.

Somebody’s been listening to too much Al Gore

Senator Harry Reid (D-Nevada)
He’s the gift that keeps on giving, if there were ever a reason we needed to be reminded that Democrats should not be empowered to put their ideas into action Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid convinces us once again that, “ No, I may not like the other guy but I’m sure in hell not going to let this guy out of the insane asylum!” (See Video)



Come on now, if Senate Major Leader Harry Reid really believed what he just stated it would be criminal for him and his fellow Democrats not to attempt to pass legislation to immediately stop all coal and gasoline (fossil fuel) production and consumption in the United States.

If Reid actually though coal and gasoline is making us sick shouldn’t he and his fellow Democrats stop wasting time attempting to cancel out the second amendment and simply ban all gas using engines? After all gas engines are not a guaranteed constitutional right and more people are killed by cars than guns in America.

But as yet not one piece of legislation has been written and put forth to stop all coal and gasoline produce.

Since there is no legislation pending in the Democrat controlled Congress to stop and end all gasoline and coal production I would have to assume that Sen. Reid is not really sincere about his assessment regarding coal and fuel.

Unless he does believe what he says but he doesn’t care about the American people’s welfare.

Now I’m not advocating a ban on gasoline run engines that would be silly almost as silly as Senator Reid talking about Global warming and putting carbon in the air.

I’m just saying as a Carbon-based life form that 100% of all life on earth is carbon based. Carbon is the primary building block for all life, animal, insect or plant.

Senator Reid where did you get your information that carbon is making us sick, because whether you realize it or not, Senator Reid, carbon is essential.

Carbon is not the problem Senator Reid only Carbon-based Democrat Senators and Carbon-based Liberals who are attempting to erase all carbon from the universe, they are the problem!

I Can’t Stop Laughing Must Be Silly Season Once Again

Ret. Gen. Wesley Clark

I have to say, Barack Obama has not had any of those experiences either—Bob Scheiffer, To Face the Nation

I almost fell out of my seat laughing watching Ret. Gen. Wesley Clark’s assault on Sen. John McCain.

I thought what temerity and out right brazenness the Democrats have. They offered up two candidates in Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton with absolutely no executive experience, with absolutely no military experience and now they want to attack a candidate that has that experience.

I’m still laughing at the look on Wesley Clark’s face when Bob Scheiffer interrupted him and said, “I have to say, Barack Obama has not had any of these experiences either”

And this is the funny part, in election 2004 it was all about who had the military experience Sen. Kerry even had home made videos as proof that he was in Vietnam commanding a little swiftboat. Interesting enough that was plenty of necessary experience for the Democrats then. Not to mention that according to Democrat’s President Bush’s military experience was fraudulent.

So now here’s Wesley Clark he can’t say that Sen. McCain didn’t actually fly combat missions in the war, and Clark can’t actually say that Sen. McCain didn’t actually have a large squadron Air command in the Navy but what he can say is what McCain did was not good enough for Democrats.

What Wesley Clark can say is that a two term Senate political neophyte with absolutely no credentials is better than any credentials that a Republican who has served in the Senate 21 years and has greater experience in politics, military and governess than Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama combined.

Well its silly season and Democrats have started the season up by taking aim at Sen. McCain’s strongest attribute his distinguished military service.

When fellow Democrat and rival Sen. Clinton took aim at Senator Obama’s life style and education in the Democrat primary by calling him an elitist Sen. Obama took note,

“When somebody makes that argument, particularly given that I've spent my entire life working with workers in low-income communities to try to make people's lives a little bit better, that's when you know you're in political silly season, [t]his is what we do politically when we start getting behind in races, and we start going on the attack.”—Sen Barack Obama

I guess Silly Season was declared early by Sen. Obama’s camp on Sen. McCain via Obama supporter Wesley Clark particularly given that Sen. McCain spent so much of his life in service to his country in the military and as a private citizen.