Global warming is not settled Science. It’s technically Math

1) There is "no real scientific proof" that the current warming is caused by the rise of greenhouse gases from man's activity.

Technically, proof exists only in mathematics, not in science.—Michael Le Page, features editor, Short Sharp Science A science news blog from NewScientist

The London DailyExpress published 100 reasons why Global warming is a natural occurrence rather than a man-made occurrence, to which Michael Le Page from NewScientist responded by arguing 50 points in rebuttal.

In La Page’s opening he writes:

A British newspaper today published a list of "100 reasons why global warming is natural".

Here we take a quick look at the first 50 of their claims - and debunk each one.

Yet incredibly La Page had to concede the very first point, he didn’t debunk it as he claimed. The first point was there is “no real scientific proof” that the current warming is caused by the rise of green house gases from man’s activities. La Page responded to this point by agreeing with it, “Technically, proof exists only in mathematics, not in science,” he said.

What? And it gets worst. But to first concede that the rest of your arguments are not based on science, “technically” makes your other 49 points suspect, I think Mr. La Page. In other words you have no argument.

So why is Al Gore going around stating that the Science is settled if there is “no real scientific proof”? Why are world governments ready to sign agreements in Copenhagen regarding Climate Change when there is “no real scientific proof”?

Below are the 100 reasons why Global warming is a natural occurrence and here is the link to La Page’s rebuttal to only 50 of those reasons.

There is a futility in argument when a person concedes the point but does not concede the argument. And that is the place where Global warming Alarmists find themselves. They argue in the name of science for a cause that, by their own admission, is not based on science:

1) There is “no real scientific proof” that the current warming is caused by the rise of greenhouse gases from man’s activity.

2) Man-made carbon dioxide emissions throughout human history constitute less than 0.00022 percent of the total naturally emitted from the mantle of the earth during geological history.

3) Warmer periods of the Earth’s history came around 800 years before rises in CO2 levels.

4) After World War II, there was a huge surge in recorded CO2 emissions but global temperatures fell for four decades after 1940.

5) Throughout the Earth’s history, temperatures have often been warmer than now and CO2 levels have often been higher – more than ten times as high.

6) Significant changes in climate have continually occurred throughout geologic time.

7) The 0.7C increase in the average global temperature over the last hundred years is entirely consistent with well-established, long-term, natural climate trends.

8) The IPCC theory is driven by just 60 scientists and favourable reviewers not the 4,000 usually cited.

9) Leaked e-mails from British climate scientists – in a scandal known as “Climate-gate” - suggest that that has been manipulated to exaggerate global warming

10) A large body of scientific research suggests that the sun is responsible for the greater share of climate change during the past hundred years.

11) Politicians and activiists claim rising sea levels are a direct cause of global warming but sea levels rates have been increasing steadily since the last ice age 10,000 ago

12) Philip Stott, Emeritus Professor of Biogeography at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London says climate change is too complicated to be caused by just one factor, whether CO2 or clouds

13) Peter Lilley MP said last month that “fewer people in Britain than in any other country believe in the importance of global warming. That is despite the fact that our Government and our political class—predominantly—are more committed to it than their counterparts in any other country in the world”.

14) In pursuit of the global warming rhetoric, wind farms will do very little to nothing to reduce CO2 emissions

15) Professor Plimer, Professor of Geology and Earth Sciences at the University of Adelaide, stated that the idea of taking a single trace gas in the atmosphere, accusing it and finding it guilty of total responsibility for climate change, is an “absurdity”

16) A Harvard University astrophysicist and geophysicist, Willie Soon, said he is “embarrassed and puzzled” by the shallow science in papers that support the proposition that the earth faces a climate crisis caused by global warming.

17) The science of what determines the earth’s temperature is in fact far from settled or understood.

18) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, CO2 is a minor greenhouse gas, unlike water vapour which is tied to climate concerns, and which we can’t even pretend to control

19) A petition by scientists trying to tell the world that the political and media portrayal of global warming is false was put forward in the Heidelberg Appeal in 1992. Today, more than 4,000 signatories, including 72 Nobel Prize winners, from 106 countries have signed it.

20) It is claimed the average global temperature increased at a dangerously fast rate in the 20th century but the recent rate of average global temperature rise has been between 1 and 2 degrees C per century - within natural rates

21) Professor Zbigniew Jaworowski, Chairman of the Scientific Council of the Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection in Warsaw, Poland says the earth’s temperature has more to do with cloud cover and water vapor than CO2 concentration in the atmosphere.

22) There is strong evidence from solar studies which suggests that the Earth’s current temperature stasis will be followed by climatic cooling over the next few decades

23) It is myth that receding glaciers are proof of global warming as glaciers have been receding and growing cyclically for many centuries

24) It is a falsehood that the earth’s poles are warming because that is natural variation and while the western Arctic may be getting somewhat warmer we also see that the Eastern Arctic and Greenland are getting colder

25) The IPCC claims climate driven “impacts on biodiversity are significant and of key relevance” but those claims are simply not supported by scientific research

26) The IPCC threat of climate change to the world’s species does not make sense as wild species are at least one million years old, which means they have all been through hundreds of climate cycles

27) Research goes strongly against claims that CO2-induced global warming would cause catastrophic disintegration of the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets.

28) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, rising CO2 levels are our best hope of raising crop yields to feed an ever-growing population

29) The biggest climate change ever experienced on earth took place around 700 million years ago

30) The slight increase in temperature which has been observed since 1900 is entirely consistent with well-established, long-term natural climate cycles

31) Despite activist concerns over CO2 levels, rising CO2 levels of some so-called “greenhouse gases” may be contributing to higher oxygen levels and global cooling, not warming

32) Accurate satellite, balloon and mountain top observations made over the last three decades have not shown any significant change in the long term rate of increase in global temperatures

33) Today’s CO2 concentration of around 385 ppm is very low compared to most of the earth’s history – we actually live in a carbon-deficient atmosphere

34) It is a myth that CO2 is the most common greenhouse gas because greenhouse gases form about 3% of the atmosphere by volume, and CO2 constitutes about 0.037% of the atmosphere

35) It is a myth that computer models verify that CO2 increases will cause significant global warming because computer models can be made to “verify” anything

36) There is no scientific or statistical evidence whatsoever that global warming will cause more storms and other weather extremes

37) One statement deleted from a UN report in 1996 stated that “none of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to increases in greenhouse gases”

38) The world “warmed” by 0.07 +/- 0.07 degrees C from 1999 to 2008, not the 0.20 degrees C expected by the IPCC

39) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says “it is likely that future tropical cyclones (typhoons and hurricanes) will become more intense” but there has been no increase in the intensity or frequency of tropical cyclones globally

40) Rising CO2 levels in the atmosphere can be shown not only to have a negligible effect on the Earth’s many ecosystems, but in some cases to be a positive help to many organisms

41) Researchers who compare and contrast climate change impact on civilizations found warm periods are beneficial to mankind and cold periods harmful

42) The Met Office asserts we are in the hottest decade since records began but this is precisely what the world should expect if the climate is cyclical

43) Rising CO2 levels increase plant growth and make plants more resistant to drought and pests

44) The historical increase in the air’s CO2 content has improved human nutrition by raising crop yields during the past 150 years

45) The increase of the air’s CO2 content has probably helped lengthen human lifespans since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution

46) The IPCC alleges that “climate change currently contributes to the global burden of disease and premature deaths” but the evidence shows that higher temperatures and rising CO2 levels has helped global populations

47) In May of 2004, the Russian Academy of Sciences published a report concluding that the Kyoto Protocol has no scientific grounding at all.

48) The “Climate-gate” scandal pointed to a expensive public campaign of disinformation and the denigration of scientists who opposed the belief that CO2 emissions were causing climate change

49) The head of Britain’s climate change watchdog has predicted households will need to spend up to £15,000 on a full energy efficiency makeover if the Government is to meet its ambitious targets for cutting carbon emissions.

50) Wind power is unlikely to be the answer to our energy needs. The wind power industry argues that there are “no direct subsidies” but it involves a total subsidy of as much as £60 per MWh which falls directly on electricity consumers. This burden will grow in line with attempts to achieve Wind power targets, according to a recent OFGEM report.

51) Wind farms are not an efficient way to produce energy. The British Wind Energy Association (BWEA) accepts a figure of 75 per cent back-up power is required.

52) Global temperatures are below the low end of IPCC predictions not at “at the top end of IPCC estimates”

53) Climate alarmists have raised the concern over acidification of the oceans but Tom Segalstad from Oslo University in Norway , and others, have noted that the composition of ocean water – including CO2, calcium, and water – can act as a buffering agent in the acidification of the oceans.

54) The UN’s IPCC computer models of human-caused global warming predict the emergence of a “hotspot” in the upper troposphere over the tropics. Former researcher in the Australian Department of Climate Change, David Evans, said there is no evidence of such a hotspot

55) The argument that climate change is a of result of global warming caused by human activity is the argument of flat Earthers.

56) The manner in which US President Barack Obama sidestepped Congress to order emission cuts shows how undemocratic and irrational the entire international decision-making process has become with regards to emission-target setting.

57) William Kininmonth, a former head of the National Climate Centre and a consultant to the World Meteorological Organisation, wrote “the likely extent of global temperature rise from a doubling of CO2 is less than 1C. Such warming is well within the envelope of variation experienced during the past 10,000 years and insignificant in the context of glacial cycles during the past million years, when Earth has been predominantly very cold and covered by extensive ice sheets.”

58) Canada has shown the world targets derived from the existing Kyoto commitments were always unrealistic and did not work for the country.

59) In the lead up to the Copenhagen summit, David Davis MP said of previous climate summits, at Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and Kyoto in 1997 that many had promised greater cuts, but “neither happened”, but we are continuing along the same lines.

60) The UK ’s environmental policy has a long-term price tag of about £55 billion, before taking into account the impact on its economic growth.

61) The UN’s panel on climate change warned that Himalayan glaciers could melt to a fifth of current levels by 2035. J. Graham Cogley a professor at Ontario Trent University, claims this inaccurate stating the UN authors got the date from an earlier report wrong by more than 300 years.

62) Under existing Kyoto obligations the EU has attempted to claim success, while actually increasing emissions by 13 per cent, according to Lord Lawson. In addition the EU has pursued this scheme by purchasing “offsets” from countries such as China paying them billions of dollars to destroy atmospheric pollutants, such as CFC-23, which were manufactured purely in order to be destroyed.

63) It is claimed that the average global temperature was relatively unchanging in pre-industrial times but sky-rocketed since 1900, and will increase by several degrees more over the next 100 years according to Penn State University researcher Michael Mann. There is no convincing empirical evidence that past climate was unchanging, nor that 20th century changes in average global temperature were unusual or unnatural.

64) Michael Mann of Penn State University has actually shown that the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age did in fact exist, which contrasts with his earlier work which produced the “hockey stick graph” which showed a constant temperature over the past thousand years or so followed by a recent dramatic upturn.

65) The globe’s current approach to climate change in which major industrialised countries agree to nonsensical targets for their CO2 emissions by a given date, as it has been under the Kyoto system, is very expensive.

66) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had emailed one another about using a “trick” for the sake of concealing a “decline” in temperatures when looking at the history of the Earth’s temperature.

67) Global temperatures have not risen in any statistically-significant sense for 15 years and have actually been falling for nine years. The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed a scientific team had expressed dismay at the fact global warming was contrary to their predictions and admitted their inability to explain it was “a travesty”.

68) The IPCC predicts that a warmer planet will lead to more extreme weather, including drought, flooding, storms, snow, and wildfires. But over the last century, during which the IPCC claims the world experienced more rapid warming than any time in the past two millennia, the world did not experience significantly greater trends in any of these extreme weather events.

69) In explaining the average temperature standstill we are currently experiencing, the Met Office Hadley Centre ran a series of computer climate predictions and found in many of the computer runs there were decade-long standstills but none for 15 years – so it expects global warming to resume swiftly.

70) Richard Lindzen, Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, wrote: “The notion of a static, unchanging climate is foreign to the history of the Earth or any other planet with a fluid envelope. Such hysteria (over global warming) simply represents the scientific illiteracy of much of the public, the susceptibility of the public to the substitution of repetition for truth.”

71) Despite the 1997 Kyoto Protocol’s status as the flagship of the fight against climate change it has been a failure.

72) The first phase of the EU’s Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), which ran from 2005 to 2007 was a failure. Huge over-allocation of permits to pollute led to a collapse in the price of carbon from €33 to just €0.20 per tonne meaning the system did not reduce emissions at all.

73) The EU trading scheme, to manage carbon emissions has completely failed and actually allows European businesses to duck out of making their emissions reductions at home by offsetting, which means paying for cuts to be made overseas instead.

74) To date “cap and trade” carbon markets have done almost nothing to reduce emissions.

75) In the United States , the cap-and-trade is an approach designed to control carbon emissions and will impose huge costs upon American citizens via a carbon tax on all goods and services produced in the United States. The average family of four can expect to pay an additional $1700, or £1,043, more each year. It is predicted that the United States will lose more than 2 million jobs as the result of cap-and-trade schemes.

76) Dr Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, has indicated that out of the 21 climate models tracked by the IPCC the differences in warming exhibited by those models is mostly the result of different strengths of positive cloud feedback – and that increasing CO2 is insufficient to explain global-average warming in the last 50 to 100 years.

77) Why should politicians devote our scarce resources in a globally competitive world to a false and ill-defined problem, while ignoring the real problems the entire planet faces, such as: poverty, hunger, disease or terrorism.

78) A proper analysis of ice core records from the past 650,000 years demonstrates that temperature increases have come before, and not resulted from, increases in CO2 by hundreds of years.

79) Since the cause of global warming is mostly natural, then there is in actual fact very little we can do about it. (We are still not able to control the sun).

80) A substantial number of the panel of 2,500 climate scientists on the United Nation’s International Panel on Climate Change, which created a statement on scientific unanimity on climate change and man-made global warming, were found to have serious concerns.

81) The UK’s Met Office has been forced this year to re-examine 160 years of temperature data after admitting that public confidence in the science on man-made global warming has been shattered by revelations about the data.

82) Politicians and activists push for renewable energy sources such as wind turbines under the rhetoric of climate change, but it is essentially about money – under the system of Renewable Obligations. Much of the money is paid for by consumers in electricity bills. It amounts to £1 billion a year.

83) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had tampered with their own data so as to conceal inconsistencies and errors.

84) The “Climate-gate” scandal revealed that a scientific team had campaigned for the removal of a learned journal’s editor, solely because he did not share their willingness to debase science for political purposes.

85) Ice-core data clearly show that temperatures change centuries before concentrations of atmospheric CO2 change. Thus, there appears to be little evidence for insisting that changes in concentrations of CO2 are the cause of past temperature and climate change.

86) There are no experimentally verified processes explaining how CO2 concentrations can fall in a few centuries without falling temperatures – in fact it is changing temperatures which cause changes in CO2 concentrations, which is consistent with experiments that show CO2 is the atmospheric gas most readily absorbed by water.

87) The Government’s Renewable Energy Strategy contains a massive increase in electricity generation by wind power costing around £4 billion a year over the next twenty years. The benefits will be only £4 to £5 billion overall (not per annum). So costs will outnumber benefits by a range of between eleven and seventeen times.

88) Whilst CO2 levels have indeed changed for various reasons, human and otherwise, just as they have throughout history, the CO2 content of the atmosphere has increased since the beginning of the industrial revolution, and the growth rate has now been constant for the past 25 years.

89) It is a myth that CO2 is a pollutant, because nitrogen forms 80% of our atmosphere and human beings could not live in 100% nitrogen either: CO2 is no more a pollutant than nitrogen is and CO2 is essential to life.

90) Politicians and climate activists make claims to rising sea levels but certain members in the IPCC chose an area to measure in Hong Kong that is subsiding. They used the record reading of 2.3 mm per year rise of sea level.

91) The accepted global average temperature statistics used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change show that no ground-based warming has occurred since 1998.

92) If one factors in non-greenhouse influences such as El Nino events and large volcanic eruptions, lower atmosphere satellite-based temperature measurements show little, if any, global warming since 1979, a period over which atmospheric CO2 has increased by 55 ppm (17 per cent).

93) US President Barack Obama pledged to cut emissions by 2050 to equal those of 1910 when there were 92 million Americans. In 2050, there will be 420 million Americans, so Obama’s promise means that emissions per head will be approximately what they were in 1875. It simply will not happen.

94) The European Union has already agreed to cut emissions by 20 percent to 2020, compared with 1990 levels, and is willing to increase the target to 30 percent. However, these are unachievable and the EU has already massively failed with its Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), as EU emissions actually rose by 0.8 percent from 2005 to 2006 and are known to be well above the Kyoto goal.

95) Australia has stated it wants to slash greenhouse emissions by up to 25 percent below 2000 levels by 2020, but the pledges were so unpopular that the country’s Senate has voted against the carbon trading Bill, and the Opposition’s Party leader has now been ousted by a climate change sceptic.

96) Canada plans to reduce emissions by 20 percent compared with 2006 levels by 2020, representing approximately a 3 percent cut from 1990 levels but it simultaneously defends its Alberta tar sands emissions and its record as one of the world’s highest per-capita emissions setters.

97) India plans to reduce the ratio of emissions to production by 20-25 percent compared with 2005 levels by 2020, but all Government officials insist that since India has to grow for its development and poverty alleviation, it has to emit, because the economy is driven by carbon.

98) The Leipzig Declaration in 1996, was signed by 110 scientists who said: “We – along with many of our fellow citizens – are apprehensive about the climate treaty conference scheduled for Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997” and “based on all the evidence available to us, we cannot subscribe to the politically inspired world view that envisages climate catastrophes and calls for hasty actions.”

99) A US Oregon Petition Project stated “We urge the United States government to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse gases would harm the environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and damage the health and welfare of mankind. There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of CO2, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.”

100) A report by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change concluded “We find no support for the IPCC’s claim that climate observations during the twentieth century are either unprecedented or provide evidence of an anthropogenic effect on climate.” (see source)

Jesus the reason for the Suspension

Maxham Elementary School Student’s depiction of Jesus on the Cross which got him suspended from school

A Taunton father is outraged after his 8-year-old son was sent home from school and required to undergo a psychological evaluation after drawing a stick-figure picture of Jesus Christ on the cross.—Gerry Tuoti

In the spirit of Christmas officials at Lowell M Maxham Elementary School In Taunton Massachusetts apparently believe that Jesus’ death on the cross was violent. Apparently they also believe that someone should be punished for it.

So after a 2nd grade teacher asked student’s in class to sketch something that reminded them of Christmas one little 8-year-old boy responded by sketching a picture of Jesus’ death on the Cross as what he was reminded of when he thought of Christmas. (see picture above) (see story)

Maxham School principal Rebecca Couet and the 2nd grade teacher, whose name is being withheld, thought the stick figure depiction of Christ’s death on the cross was violent so they suspended the little 8-year-old student for three days and ordered him to submit to a psychological evaluation. Apparently these officials missed Mel Gibson’s 2004 movie The Passion of the Christ.

For those of you, Readers, who see this as yet another example of teachers and school administrators Gone Wild you might consider doing something about this blatant encroachment on freedom of thought.

Yes it is an obvious attack on religion and freedom of expression too. But the insidious act of ordering a psychological evaluation goes directly to controlling thought.

Maxham Elementary School is a K-4 public school serving 219 students with 15 Teachers, two teachers are 2nd Grade teachers.

Superintendent Julie Hackett speaking for the school said, “Generally speaking, we have safety protocols in place. If a situation warrants it, we ask for outside safety evaluations if we have particular concerns about a child’s safety. We followed all the protocols in our system.” (Taunton Public Schools)


Since the good people of Massachusetts are treating Christianity like it is a foreign cultural expression of which they know absolutely nothing about. Perhaps the people of Massachusetts at large and the Taunton Public Schools specifically need some sensitivity training. This kind of ignorance about cultural beliefs can not be tolerated. And it hasn’t been in the past.

What should be recommended to all of the school administrators involved, in the traumatizing of this little 2nd grade boy, is some culture sensitively training for school officials who apparently need to learn about the foreign American cultural religion Christianity.

And in addition Christianity should be taught in the Massachusetts schools as the apparent foreign culture that it has become. This is so that when teachers come across the word or name Jesus or a picture of Jesus on a cross or a bible they won’t be so confused or confuse these references with potential violence rather then the depicting of a biblical events that occurred over 2,000 years ago.

Also, you, Reader, might call Superintendent Julie Hackett and suggest sensitivity training regarding the ignorance in her school system regarding the cultural belief Christianity. This training is needed for the entire school system.

I’m sure you’ll agree that sensitivity training is warranted for the Massachusetts schools system so that no other American child will be traumatized for their cultural beliefs by an over-reacting government school system and authorities within that system.

Copenhagen’s Circular Argument

In the high-stakes game of chicken the Obama White House has been playing with Congress over who will regulate the earth's climate, the president's team just motored into a ditch.—KIMBERLEY A. STRASSEL

Who will regulate the Earth’s Climate ?

Call me a traditionalist but my first thought would be God…but silly me, somehow I continue to forget that the Barry Hussein Soetoro’s EPA, the EU and the UN have assumed any and all authority over the Earth’s environment—authority that God might have had. I guess each of these organizations have a little god in them because they claim that they have the power to regulate the Earth’s Climate at least that’s what they are attempting to agree to in Copenhagen. Or are they? (see story)

In Copenhagen the powers of the world are attempting to put in place means to restructure government as we have known it. Oh, yes I am aware that focus in Copenhagen is supposed to be about weather, but actually, what’s really going on in Copenhagen has very little to do with the weather.

No, the topic of Climate Change is misdirection, a bait and switch if you will. Its intended purpose is to have you thinking “save the planet” when what is actually going on is the enslaving of the people of the planet.

Through the guise of Climate Change the leaders of the world intent to take government from local and national and make government centralized and global. And all of this starts with getting you and me to fund their efforts. You and I are expected to comply with whatever agreement world leaders make in Copenhagen. Just how we are expected to comply? We are expected to pay for it through taxes.

Of course world leaders only lack a little thing for complete world domination over the world’s populace and that is your heart and your mind, again your compliance. You see if you could be convinced that what they are doing is on your behalf and is for your good—the greater good, then you will allow them to sign treaties in your name committing you to funding your own enslavement. That translates into global taxation without representation. It’s a wonderful dastardly plan don’t you think? But it sounds kind of conspiratorial doesn’t it, and who would believe such a story?

Yet these problems can be overcome by a joint effort between our countries. 2009 is also the first year of Global Governess with the establishment of the G20 in the middle of the financial crisis.

The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step toward the global management of our planet. Our mission—our presidency is one of hope supported by acts and by deeds.—European Union President Herman Van Rompuy (previous post)

Newly appointed president Herman Van Rompuy of the European Union believes such a story! He has so much as openly admitted that the purpose of the Copenhagen is a step toward global management of the planet. That plan requires money and where do you think that money is going to come from? Taxation!

Global institutions such as the European Union or the United Nations do not have the right to tax sovereign nations. To attempt to force taxes on sovereign nations would make the EU and the UN 21st Century Environmental Despots.

The only way that these international bodies could exact taxes from a sovereign nation is if a leader of any sovereign nation signed a treaty giving the EU or the UN authority to tax their country. Barry Hussein Soetoro has already signaled that he is ready to do this.

You remember that was unjust taxation that spurred the thirteen colonies, in the brave new world, to revolt. Unjust taxation gave the colonies the motivation to throw off the tyranny of England ’s King George.

Nasty King George wanted to tax tea and everyone knows that tea was essential to the sensibilities of the good European settlers of the new world. And what do the 21st Century Environmental Despots wish to tax, nothing less than the essential air that you breathe or exhale.

That’s right a world tax on air! Billions upon trillions of dollars based on CO2 emissions that all live carbon based life forms either emit or consume. Animals emit CO2 and plants consume CO2—it’s the circle of life. CO2 is not a pollutant and CO2 is not detrimental to the environment.

Yet the president Soetoro’s EPA has wrongly concluded that a fundamental element of life for this planet is contradictorily a deadly threat to life on this planet. It’s the circle of the ridiculous!

Yet based on this ridiculous notion Barry Hussein Soetoro and other citizens of the world are in Copenhagen attempting to agree to put in place this sinister cap and trade tax on developed and undeveloped nations. And that would be a tax which will once again place all earthly power in the hands of the descendants of King George. And that would be the circle of tyranny!

Obama to Oslo: War is Peace

I cannot argue with those who find these men and women - some known, some obscure to all but those they help - to be far more deserving of this honor than I.—Barry Hussein Soetoro, Oslo Norway 12/10/09 (see transcript)

There they sat royalty, commoner, academic, rich and the privileged being lectured to by someone that many in his own country consider to be a Usurper to the presidency.

The sweet irony of it all is Barry Hussein Soetoro illegitimately holds the office of president and as a usurper he accepted a prize that by his own admission was generous given and quite undeserved.

Yet the ultimate contradiction—the Orwellian redefinition of reality was Soetoro standing before the Oslo gathering. And standing there he told them that the prize which they awarded him, the Nobel Peace Prize, could in fact be awarded to a usurper who is conducting two wars because war can be conducted justly (as he is doing) and if waged correctly war is peace. That right Soetoro told Oslo that WAR IS PEACE.

But perhaps the most profound issue surrounding my receipt of this prize is the fact that I am the Commander-in-Chief of a nation in the midst of two wars. One of these wars is winding down. The other is a conflict that America did not seek; one in which we are joined by forty three other countries - including Norway - in an effort to defend ourselves and all nations from further attacks…

…Over time, as codes of law sought to control violence within groups, so did philosophers, clerics, and statesmen seek to regulate the destructive power of war. The concept of a "just war" emerged, suggesting that war is justified only when it meets certain preconditions: if it is waged as a last resort or in self-defense; if the forced used is proportional, and if, whenever possible, civilians are spared from violence.—Barry Hussein Soetoro (see 9:38min video 4mins in)

Soetoro said if war is waged as a last resort or in self-defense or if force is used proportionally and if civilians are spared from violence if possible then War is Peace. I'll bet Oslo was so glad to learn that they actually awarded the Nobel Just War Prize instead of the one that they intended to award.

There is one other Orwellian concept that the American people have had to accept under the Soetoro presidency and that is article II of the Constitution; The Constitution does not a President make or you don’t have to be constitutionally eligible to be a Nobel Just War Prize awarded president.

Democrats protect ACORN Funding for Reinstatement

Last night, defying the will of a bipartisan majority of the House and Senate, Democrats voted to allow the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) to receive federal taxpayer dollars.—Rep. John Boehner

They’re Baaack! Oh it’s not like they ever left but while the American people are preoccupied with Democrats’ Fascist efforts to force Comprehensive Health Care and Cap and Trade taxes on the America people Democrats also thought they’d slip ACORN their complete funding back while you weren’t looking.

You already know that the Barry Hussein Soetoro Justice Department disallowed a presidential order to defund ACORN. (see previous post)

It’s reported by Rep. John Boehner that Rep. Tom Latham (R-IA) attempted to offered an amendment during deliberations on the Democrats’ massive year-end appropriations bill to clarify the prohibition on federal funds going to ACORN or its subsidiaries. That amendment was shot down on a 5-9 party line vote as Republicans sided with taxpayers while Democrats stood with ACORN, five Republicans for the amendment Nine Democrats against the amendment.

What that means is Democrats support AG Eric Holder’s office decision to continue to fund ACORN whether Americans like it or not. (see story)

Rep Boehner reported that Rep. Latham’s amendment is necessary to prevent taxpayer money from going to ACORN because the Obama Administration’s Department of Justice has taken advantage of a legal loophole to allow ACORN to continue to receive federal funds – despite the passage of the House GOP’s Defund ACORN Act in the fall.
Please let it be known that your are outraged that your Government would knowingly fund what has been described as a continuing criminal enterprise that is currently been sued in courts across the United States of America for voters fund in the 2008 elections.

The America people do not what their government associated with overt corruption and criminal wrong doing and if there are elements presently in our government that find such associations acceptable these people should be identified and summarily dismissed.

What does all this money have to do with Global warming?

A draft text leaked to news organizations Tuesday has disrupted the Copenhagen climate talks, outraging poor nations who feel that the agreement gives far too much power to developed countries.

The so-called “Danish text,” produced in secret by a small group of developed nations, would give rich nations significant power over the billions of dollars that would be distributed as part of the agreement. –LISA LERER

They're talking about Billions to Trillions of Dollars in Copenhagen and who will control it. I can hear the naïve among us saying, “But, I thought they were there for Climate Change and saving the planet.” Yeah, right!

More leaked information about Global warming. This time the “Danish text” was leaked to the press during the Copenhagen climate meetings and its content has nothing to do with phony science this time the leak has to do with phony intent. (see story)

According to the “Danish text” Global warming is not about saving the planet. No, on the contrary, Global warming is about enslaving the planet.

Global warming is about enriching a few people with billions of dollars by creating a new world system. Call it Kyoto II, or call it cap and trade, it’s all the same thing! This is a scheme concerning American tax payers’ dollars to create an international trading market from which to buy and sell carbon credits. It is a market which will be controlled by the European Union and the United Nations.

The agreements that are being sought by developing nations in the Copenhagen meetings are about billions of dollars in carbon trading and credits. But smaller non-developed nations believe that with all of that money at stake developed nations can’t be trusted to do the right thing.

The unearned windfall [Russia’s carbon credits], a legacy of the Kyoto agreement that tried to deal with the threat of climate change, is worth several billion dollars.

If abruptly sold abroad, those credits could send the price of carbon on the world’s fragile emissions markets plunging toward zero.

Without a predictable and reasonably high price for carbon emissions, most economists say, there is little prospect of setting in motion the many investments needed to shift from a carbon-intensive industrial economy to a more sustainable energy base in developed and developing countries alike.—James Kanter

There is also the problem of Russia! Russia has a surplus of carbon credits according to James Kanter. They received them as a result of the collapse of much of its heavy industry in the 1990s, Russia owns one of the largest stocks of credits to offset carbon emissions. (see story)

What does all of this mean? The agreements set to be signed by president Barry Hussein Soetoro and other leaders of the world will begin the shutting down the productivity of western industries by imposing draconian carbon fines on them while allowing under developed nations to emit just enough carbon emissions to keep them poor and limit their growth too. The E.U. and the U.N. are set to collect all of the fines or “taxes.”

Their ultimate goal is to have all nations equally in economic bondage while placing the European Union and the United Nations above them all thus replacing the United States as the world’s pre-eminent and predominant economic power.

Ultimately according to the "Danish text" the Europe Union will supplant even the United Nations to become the sole World power.

The above explains the decades of weakening the U.S. economy by outsourcing middle class jobs, the in-sourcing Illegal Aliens to take up low wage American jobs, the banking crisis and the collapse of the dollar. There is a saying that nothing in politics is by accident. America’s economic troubles are due to world politics.

The world politics of changing from one economic power to another, don’t look now but America has been replaced. We are in the last throes of being a world economic leader.

Everything that has happened was needful in order to replace America as the world’s leader in economic power as Bill Clinton forecasted in 2002:

[T]his "brief moment in history" when the US had pre-eminent military, economic and political power, would not last.

"This is just a period, a few decades this will last, and I think that all of us who are Americans should think about this and ask ourselves how do we wish this moment to be judged 50 years from now," –Former President Bill Clinton (see story)

As more and more of you are about to discover Copenhagen is not about Global warming, it’s about global power, global dominance and global money.


Zie spoedig u!

Obama Admits he lied about Jobs

WASHINGTON, March 3 (UPI) -- Shovels already are hitting the ground in just the two weeks since the $787 billion stimulus package was signed, U.S. President Barack Obama said Tuesday.

Speaking to Transportation Department employees and flanked by Vice President Joe Biden and Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, Obama said 400,000 jobs of the estimated 3.5 million jobs either created or saved were involved in rebuilding infrastrucuture, updating transit or laying broadband line. –UPI(see source)

He promised shovel ready jobs if the Congress rushed through the $787 billion dollar stimulus earlier this year. He promised 400,000 to 3.5 million jobs and that unemployment would not rise above 8%. But as we all know by now absolutely nothing that he promised was real. It was all made up. (see 4:21min video)



Now that he can no longer deny the reality of unemployment as high as 10.2% nor can he deny the made up Congressional districts in which made up jobs appeared, Soetoro admitted that he lied about jobs. No he didn’t say that he lied, and he didn’t admit that he was wrong about everything, he did just the opposite. Soetoro pretended like his economic policies worked but at the same time he's called for a jobs summit.

What does calling for a Jobs Summit mean? It means that Soetoro's economic stimulus failed. It means that his economy stimulus did not create the jobs that he said it would. Calling for a jobs summit is an admission that what he's done didn't work, it is an admission that Soetoro lied.

He’s finally realizing that government cannot produce the jobs that are needed to help the economy grow. Astonishingly, in true Orwellian doublethink and in full knowledge of the fact he is wrongly taking credit for none existent improvements in the economy Soetoro continues his false jobs creation rhetoric while at the same time calling for a jobs summit to create the jobs that his 787 billion stimulus didn't. (see 3:28 min video)



But it’s much more than a jobs summit, it’s an open acknowledgement that the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration’s philosophy that Government is the solution to all of America’s problems is totally wrong. It is also an acknowledgement that this present course in 700 billion dollars in bailouts, 787 billion dollars in stimulus spending, 1 trillion dollars in health care reform and trillions of dollars in global warming cost is unsustainable.

Although president Soetoro will never say straightforwardly that he is wrong about jobs,that he is wrong about the economy and he is wrong about everything that he and Democrat have done up to and including this point, he did acknowledge that the stimulus has not worked and that the government cannot create enough jobs to save this economy.

"The tension we've been seeing is that what is good for the longer term may not work as an immediate short-term stimulus. We're still getting slapped around in the Recovery Act for this.

The term 'shovel-ready' -- let's be honest, it doesn't always live up to its billing."—president Barry Hussein Soetoro (see source)

A fix will only come from the private sector. This is exactly what Conservatives and Republicans have been saying all along and as Soetoro now acknowledges true economic recovery is only going to come from the private sector so the 787 billion dollars that Democrats voted to give to themselves was a fraud perpetrated on the American people in the name of jobs creation. All of the promises were lies. (see 1:39min video)

"While I believe that government has a critical role in creating the conditions for economic growth, ultimately, true economic recovery is only going to come from the private sector.

We don't have enough public dollars to fill the hole of private dollars that was created as a consequence of the crisis. It is only when the private sector starts to reinvest again; only when our businesses start hiring again and people start spending again and families start seeing improvement in their own lives again, that we're going to have the kind of economy that we want,"—president Barry Hussein Soetoro

You see the 787 billion dollar stimulus was never about saving or creating jobs,if it was it was a miserable failure. It was so bad that president Soetoro had to call for a Jobs Summit.

The Jobs Summit is proof that the Congress and the president were derelict in their duties and they defrauded the American people. Something to think about for the 2010 and 2012 elections.

Enemy Mine, Maybe?

Chris Matthews, enemy mine!

I've gotten some very tough calls from parents of Cadets and from former Cadets at West Point about my saying last night that the President had gone to speak to "maybe the enemy camp."

I was talking about the skepticism I saw on the faces in the crowd as President Obama spoke, also how West Point was where President Bush went in 2002 to make his most hawkish speech before the Iraq War. –Chris Matthews

West Point is the enemy camp? Not the first or only outrageous thing that Chris Matthews has said but clearly the most unpatriotic and most dangerous. Yet I just love it when Liberals say what they really think and even they realize what they think is so outrageous that maybe they should apology for it. Even though it is a fake apology.

Remember for Democrats the CIA, Returning war veterans, Christians, gun owners, Conservatives and Proponents of traditional marriage are potential enemies of the state. (see here and here)

So I have no doubt that Chris Matthews feels that West Point IS the enemy camp. He reaffirms as much in his apology when he said, “ I was talking about the skepticism I saw on the faces in the crowd as President Obama spoke, also how West Point was where President Bush went in 2002 to make his most hawkish speech before the Iraq War. “ In liberal math skepticism about president Barry Hussein Soetoro plus a place that approves of president Bush (as Matthews perceives West Point to be) adds up to the enemy camp!

But first what Matthews really thinks (see 31 sec. video)



Now I've found that an apology that is forced can be one of necessity. And after hearing Matthews’ apology I find it was forced. He may have also felt that his career depended upon an apology. I also have experienced that an apology full of explain rather than a concise acceptance of wrong doing is not an apology at all. Instead it is an attempt to justify one's position under the guise of, “I’m sorry.” (see 1:59min video)



I've gotten some very tough calls from parents of Cadets and from former Cadets at West Point about my saying last night that the President had gone to speak to "maybe the enemy camp." I was talking about the skepticism I saw on the faces in the crowd as President Obama spoke, also how West Point was where President Bush went in 2002 to make his most hawkish speech before the Iraq War.

Now I've heard too many politicians say things like "oh that was taken out of context" to explain something they wish they hadn't said. Let me just say to the cadets, their parents, former cadets, and everyone who cares about this country and those who defend it, I used the wrong words and worse than that I said something that is just not right. For that I deeply apologize.

As those who watch me regularly probably got right away, my point was that the military up at West Point was probably a skeptical audience for President Obama given his strong position against the war in Iraq and generally more dovish image.
I was wrong to make that conclusion based on the lack of applause or apparent enthusiasm in the ranks of officers and cadets last night. Cadets, one former cadet and friend just told me, aren't supposed to show that kind of reaction to a speaker.

He reminded me that soldiers, including those now in training to face the enemy, want wars to be fought effectively and ended as quickly as possible. I had no reason to assume that the cadets at West Point or the officers present last night are more hawkish than the President.

People who have watched me over the years know, I think, of my strong devotion to this country and strong gratitude toward those who serve it in the military. It's because our military is so good and true, I want the civilians who make the policies, and set the missions, to get them right, in this country's best possible interest. And it's something we're allowed to argue about in this country

Whenever I meet someone with a service record, I always say "Thank you for your service." They know I say it and I hope they know I mean it. –Chris Matthews (source)

As Matthews readily admits Liberals speak a special language among themselves.

As those who watch me regularly probably got right away, my point was that the military up at West Point was probably a skeptical audience for President Obama given his strong position against the war in Iraq and generally more dovish image.

Yes we all got you Chris. The military hence West Point is pro-Bush, pro-war and Conservative by Liberal definition, therefore they would naturally be skeptical of a dovish and anti-war president like Barry Hussein Soetoro.

Your Liberal bias, prejudice and ignorance are once again showing Mr. Matthews. Even though president Soetoro exploited the cadets of West Point, using them as a back drop and photo op for his most unfortunate exit Afghanistan speech, nevertheless the cadets showed him the utmost respect.

The Cadets of West Point showed the president the respect that they would show any president. Just because you didn’t perceive tingles up the Cadets legs or the “Oh my gosh Mr. President, thank you for taking time out of your busy day,” unmerited adulation for Soetoro that you think he deserves doesn’t mean that West Point was in any way hostilely negative toward Soetoro.

But thank you Chris for pointing out once again that you consider any and all things traditionally American the enemy. That also explains a lot about you and your viewers.

Again what it explains without question is like al Qaeda's declared war on America in 1998 for the most part Americans didn’t know it, in like fashion Liberals have declared war on Conservatives.

The twin towers of Conservative power have already been devastated in 2006 and 2008 when Conservatives loss both houses and Congress and the presidency. When will Conservatives realize that they are at war with Liberals and in fact we ARE the ENEMY CAMP!

Democrat Big Tent on Healthcare a Big Three Ring Circus

Congresswoman you know I have heard Democrats now saying that these four Moderates, these holdouts, Congresswoman Wasserman-Schultz, these hold outs are the tail driving the Donkey here[…]

How are you going to reconcile all of these seemingly irreconcilable positions to get a bill even that you can, you know, you can bring to a vote—Geraldo Rivera

They’ve got 59 votes plus 1 Independent and 1 RINO, that’s 61 votes, but they still can’t past their signature bill, Universal Health Care Reform. Let this be a lesson for all of you who continue the insane meme that Republicans need a big tent. Big tents don’t work; they never have in the truest sense.

Geraldo Rivera states the big tent conundrum. How do you reconcile all the irreconcilable positions of the big tent?

Democrats won the 2006 and 2008 elections by running “Conservative Democrats” otherwise known as Blue Dog Democrats and now as a result their caucus is a virtual battleground of political ideological cagefighting. (see 5:10min video)



Attempting to make their big tent work Democrats have had to exhort a 300 million dollar Health Care vote from Sen. Mary Landrieu otherwise known as the second Louisiana purchase. They have had to arm twist and cajole their own Party members to get them in line in spite of their irreconcilable differences over abortion and the government private option.

Obama and Reid must unite liberals and moderates in the 60-member caucus, even as moderates balk over abortion and a proposal for the government to sell health insurance in competition with the private market.—Washington (AP)

Things are deteriorating in the Democrat big tent at such an alarming rate that they have had to call in their Nobel Peace awarded Icon to make peace under the big tent. No doubt that he will stress the historic importance of the big picture of Democrat unity in spite of the losses that they are sure to incur when Democrats use their Fascist force to impose Universal Care on an American populist that has resoundedly said that they do not want their government to run one-sixth of the economy through government takeover of health care. (see story)

Notwithstanding, what is continuing to be a huge disappointment is how the Liberal Elite Media attempts to keep up the intellectually deceptive narrative that this is a Republican verses Democrat battle.

Sixty is the precise number needed to overcome Republican stalling tactics in the 100-member Senate, so Reid doesn't have a vote to spare.—Washington (AP)

Com’ on Man! There is absolutely nothing that Republicans can do to stop Democrats from passing health care. This is strictly a Democrat against Democrat inside fight which is a result of the Democrat big tent. If health care is defeated or if it passes this year it will be solely the responsibility of Democrats alone so stop the bull! The fight is within the super majority filibuster proof 60 to 61 numbers that Democrats control not the 40 Republicans in the minority.

Will president Barry Hussein Soetoro and Democrats double down by demanding that Democrats goosestep into infamy by fundamentally changing the health care industry against the wishes a majority of the American people?

If Democrats can get their political Clowns, high wire Aerialist and Animal handler acts coordinated in the Senate’s three ring health care circus under the Democrat big tent, they will pass health care reform and they will be solely responsible for doing so. But should they fail to pass health care reform, again the fault will be solely their own.

Full liability is the responsibility Democrats assumed when they convinced the America people to give them super majorities in both houses of Congress and put them in charge of all three branches of Government. In addition the reigning confusion which Democrats are experiencing was concocted when Democrats forsook their Liberal values recruited Conservative Democrats in order to gain their majority numbers in Congress.

Whether health care passes or not, the Democrat Party will continue to be in a state of confliction due to the corrupting of ideology for artificial political advantage. Republican should be well aware of this phenomenon because it was big tent politics that gave Republicans a Compassionate Conservative, a Maverick and the RINO things from Maine. All of which combined to ultimately result in a failed political Party!

RNC Chairman Michael Steele's idea for a 10-point Republican values test received some push back by pundits. I would check to see if these critics had the Republican Party's best interest at heart before I would completely scrap the idea if I were Mr. Steele. I see no better time for some values clarification then now when various nefarious agenda driven groups have attempted to weaken the Republican Party with their own agenda driven politics, the Log Cabin Republicans being just one such group. Having a set of values defined can do nothing but strengthen the Party.

At any rate, let the trouble that Democrats are experiencing be a lesson for all of those calling for Big tent politics within the Republican Party. Republicans are in the minority because of the big tent and ultimately Democrats will be too!

Howard Dean on Capitalism and The Permanent Campaign

Howard Dean, Former DNC Chairman

And then Dean explains why Barry Hussein Soetoro has not gotten off of the campaign trail since he’s been elected. It’s a new ploy by the Democrats called, “The Permanent Campaign.” In the permanent campaign an elected official, Soetoro in this case just keep right on campaigning as if he is still running for office. For those of you who said that it seemed like he was still campaigning after 10 months in office you were right, he was!

Howard Dean speaking in Paris France April 5, 2009 explains how the Democrat Party uses double think to justify their contradictory position on Capitalism and the perpetual campaign of Barry Hussein Soetoro. What is double think you ask?

Double think as described in the George Orwell book 1984 by Winston Smith the novel's protagonist, described doublethink in this fashion:

"To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself. That was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word 'doublethink' involved the use of doublethink.'

Dean explains how Democrat Political hierarchy no longer rejects Capitalism out of hand. No, Democrats believe that they can have the best of Capitalism and Socialism. Call it a hybrid Socitalism or Capocialism. Democrats use the Orwellian concept of double think to create the impossibility of two contradictory ideologies existing in the same space at the same time in both thought and reality.

There is not so much a debate on the left anymore about Capitalism, whether we should have it or not. There is a debate about how to have it. I think capitalism is always going to be with us because capitalism represents part of human nature. But the other part of human nature is communitarianism.

There is a natural tendency for human beings in addition of wanting to do things for themselves; they feel a great responsibility in wanting to be a part of a community.

So I think the debate for the new generation, instead of capitalism or socialism, is we’re going to have both and then which proportion of each should we have in order to make this all work, a much more sensible debate.–Howard Dean (see 1:46min video)(start 44secs. in)

And then Dean explains why Barry Hussein Soetoro has not gotten off of the campaign trail since he’s been elected. It’s a new ploy by the Democrats called, “The Permanent Campaign.” In the permanent campaign an elected official, Soetoro in this case just keep right on campaigning as if he is still running for office. For those of you who said that it seemed like he was still campaigning after 10 months in office you were right, he was!

According to Dean Democrats also use the permanent campaign for issues too. So now that you Conservatives know the new strategy it’s time for you to learn and adapt.

This is very, very important this in an innovation from Obama and I think it’s a great thing for the Democrat Party.

Remember I talked about the permanent campaign Well before I got to the DNC we don’t have a permanent campaign you would campaign for one year when you had a candidate and if you don’t win you wouldn’t campaign for another three years. No wonder we’d lose.

Now we don’t just have a permanent campaign for electing Democrats we have a permanent campaign for influencing policy. It’s a little closer to the European model.—Howard Dean

Thank you Dr. Dean for verifying the Democrat strategies what we were seeing. I always told you Liberals are Orwellian on the Machiavellian side. Now with Dean's help you see why I say so.

Why is your government fighting for ACORN?

David Barron

The Justice Department has concluded that the Obama administration can lawfully pay the community group Acorn for services provided under contracts signed before Congress banned the government from providing money to the group.—CHARLIE SAVAGE

The Eric Holder Justice Department has not failed to error on the side of the enemies of the United States of America whether those enemies are either foreign or domestic. Khalid Sheik Mohammed mastermind of 9/11 was set to be sentenced in a Congressional approved military tribunal. President Barry Hussein Soetoro stopped that preceding to have his Justice department weigh in to this most critical trial for America.

AG Eric Holder set the trial’s venue in New York City near the site of the 9/11 act of war, giving enemy combatants full rights of the citizens whose country they intended to destroy.

ACORN long suspected of voter fraud and other nefarious acts of criminality was caught red headed in the act of conspiracy to aid and abet criminal activity. On video tape no less and so evident that On October 1, 2009 president Soetoro signed a law prohibiting taxpayer money to go to the organization. That includes taxpayer money that was authorized by previous legislation.

[O] n Oct. 1, President Obama signed into law a spending bill that included a provision that said no taxpayer money — including money authorized by previous legislation — could be “provided to” the group or its affiliates.—Charlie Savage

However when a Housing and Urban Development Department lawyer asked the Justice Department whether the new law meant that pre-existing contracts with Acorn should be broken Holder Justice Department acting assistant attorney general David Barron found a way to preempt an Obama signed law and continue payments to ACORN. (see story)

This is exactly why so many people are so pissed off at attorneys and why I personally never want to see one as president of the United States of America. Too many attorneys seem to lose the sense of right and wrong seeking that fanciful fantasy third way; Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, David Barron and Barry Hussein Soetoro all attorneys by training all see things unlike you and I do. Sex is not Sex, Bullets over Bosnia, Terrorists are not Terrorists, a presidential order doesn’t mean what it says and the Constitution is a defective document according to these lawyers.

According to Charlie Savage David Barron essentially cancels out a presidential order based on his interpretation of one phrase, “provided to.” Savage reports that it was Barron’s interpretation that [t]he new law “should not be read as directing or authorizing HUD to breach a pre-existing binding contractual obligation to make payments to Acorn or its affiliates, subsidiaries or allied organizations where doing so would give rise to contractual liability,” Mr. Barron wrote.

Huh? The order says …no taxpayer money — including money authorized by previous legislation — could be “provided to” the [ACORN] group or its affiliates.

This wording could have easily been interpreted to mean the exact opposite of what David Barron interpreted it to mean. With officials in our government like these who needs enemies?

Barron was a Harvard law professor who wrote legal arguments against President Bush’s claims of executive power many of the executive powers that his boss Barry Hussein Soetoro is now using. He also wrote about his support of the Boumediene decision, the case which granted Guantanamo detainees habeas corpus.

ACORN is facing voter fraud charges in multiple states, they were caught red headed nationally encouraging criminal activity and they are known by many as a continuing criminal government funded enterprise.

One would think that any contract that they have with the government would be breached by charges of criminality at the very less or at the most a signed presidential federal law would be enough to break any ties that the government would have with a continuing criminal enterprise, but not so with the Eric Holder Justice Department.

It is clear to everyone except criminals and the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration that the Federal government should immediately sever all ties and halt all funding of ACORN. That was apparent by president Soetoro’s signature on a law that made it unlawful to pay taxpayer money to ACORN from present or previous legislation.

But to David Barron words don’t have meaning, at least the meaning that you and I understand. To Barron a law that makes it unlawful for the government to pay taxpayer money to ACORN doesn’t real mean that.

And to Barron protecting the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic apparently doesn’t really mean that either. If it did Barron would have been looking for an interpretation that prevents the government from continuing funding to ACORN rather than the interpretation that he came up with.

One Fat Lip for the Terrorist, One Black Eye on America

March 31, 2004: Iraqis chant anti-American slogans as the charred and mutilated bodies of U.S. contractors hang from a bridge over the Euphrates River in Fallujah, Iraq.

Navy SEALs have secretly captured one of the most wanted terrorists in Iraq — the alleged mastermind of the murder and mutilation of four Blackwater USA security guards in Fallujah in 2004. And three of the SEALs who captured him are now facing criminal charges—Rowan Scarborough

In one of those I can’t believe what my government just did moments, your government sent in Navy SEALs to capture Ahmed Hashim Abed the alleged mastermind of four mutilated and burned U.S. security guards in Fallujah in 2004. No that’s not the unbelievable moment the moment that is giving America a black eye is the fact that America is prosecuting three of the four U.S. SEALs because Abed a terrorist accused them of fattening his lip in the process of his capture and custody. (see story) (see 4:37min video)



According to Reporter Rowan Scarborough; Matthew McCabe, a Special Operations Petty Officer Second Class (SO-2), is facing three charges: dereliction of performance of duty for willfully failing to safeguard a detainee, making a false official statement, and assault.

Petty Officer Jonathan Keefe, SO-2, is facing charges of dereliction of performance of duty and making a false official statement.

Petty Officer Julio Huertas, SO-1, faces those same charges and an additional charge of impediment of an investigation.

Apparently Terrorists have some new given rights under the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration. Apparently Terrorists can now accuse U.S. military men of war crimes. Haven’t you noticed the Mirandizing of enemy combatants and all of that kind of International court at the Hague policy we are now employing under this administration?

It seems that we have an abundance of lawyers on hand—maybe too many. And since volunteer numbers for the Armed Services are down, under the president Barry Hussein Soetoro administration, why don’t we draft all Liberal Lawyers to send them to Afghanistan to fight in the war and a way to make sure we have the forces we need that will comply with all of the new Obama rules of engagement.

We still may lose the Afghanistan war but it would be so worth it to thin out the Liberal Attorney Herd in America.

The travesty which our government committed here is simply charging U.S. Navy SEALs for something that a Terrorist has accused them of while in the act of capturing and holding him.

These charges are inconceivable as well as unconscionable. While Ahmed Hashim Abed may have received a fat lip, the American Military and the America government who charged the Navy SEALs, our government, has sustained a black eye for bring unnecessary and severe charges against men who were carrying out their duties protecting America from further acts of terror.

Global Fraud

Ed Begley, Jr. Global Warming Alarmist

Science has been Corrupted!

There is this quite humorous story about a little eleven-year-old boy who was sent to the counselor’s office for a talking to. After minutes of manipulation by the science of mind and behavior at the hands of the school’s trained professional the little eleven-year-old boy looked up at the counselor who was well endowed with post graduate degrees and asked, “Hey are you trying to use psychology on me?”

Yes that is exactly what the counselor was “trying” to do, but apparently not very discreetly and not very effectively either. The little boy for his part had the wherewithal and the common sense to understand that he was being manipulated.

I laugh at that story every time I see an example of the “experts” trying to allay our common sense for some kind of groupthink psychological ploy which is meant to herd us into accepting the experts’ opinion over and above real world evidence or our personal experiences or our common sense.

Take the subject of Global warming for instance, for years the “experts” tried to force this kind of groupthink psychological idea on us that the earth was in danger because of the actions of mankind. (see story)

They invented a name for it by calling it “Climate Change” and they set out to use their post graduate degrees to manipulate the data, the dialogue and the laws/policies that were meant to control the entire world population.

Knowing that it is our normal inclination to defer to authorities these “experts” used that knowledge against us to refute anyone who would disagree with their professional opinions or “Scientific evidence” that Global warming was real and that humans are the cause of it. (see story)

And because they are the “experts” they think we are to mindlessly defer to their expertise on such matters of CO2 emissions and Global warming, completely foregoing the physical evidence that earth’s temperatures are dropping and completely ignoring the fact that global warming theory is based on corrupt science.

How do we know the science is corrupted? While those of us who aren’t mindlessly compliant Global warming-bots have always had our doubts, the evidence of massive conspiracy and corruption was released showing e-mails of the inter-workings of the conspirators of the Global warming hoax, the CPU at East Anglia University, UK. This CPU is the premier scientific data bank and fundamental scientific authority on Global warming. (see source)

Officials of the CPU have not refuted the veracity of the released documents on the contrary they have confirmed their genuineness. And in spite of that we are supposed to be that little eleven-year-old who was supposed to just acquiesce to the authority figure who was attempting to manipulate him. You know like this example of Actor/Activist Ed Begley, Jr. who has been so totally psycho-manipulated into groupthink about global warming that he can no longer think for himself. (see 4:23mins video)



Global warming-bot Ed Begley, Jr. went absolutely ballistic spouting the Global warming meme in the face of evidence of no Global warming. Take note Begley is an example of how Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) Alarmist would have us all to be.
Not so fast Mr. Begley the science is there is no Global warming. And the peer review that you defer to is corrupt as the leaked e-mails show. So yeah we wouldn’t be listening to you Ed. But as to real objective scientific research like the following we will still be using. (see 1:50min video)



Global warming is a Fraud and Copenhagen will be a den of thieves. President Barry Hussein Soetoro will be among his peers when he arrives there on the 9th of December a stopover on his way to pick up his unmerited Nobel peace prize.

Obama Jobs Fraud

Then you get the argument, ‘This is not a Jobs bill this is a spending bill’—What do you think a stimulus is?—President Barry Hussein Soetoro

It was billed as a 787 billion dollar economic stimulus package and when critics said that it wouldn’t work they were roundly ridiculed by Barry Hussein Soetoro himself. (see 50sec. video)



Well one thing that we don’t think a stimulus is, is what Democrats and president Soetoro have done with the economy, seriously!

And don’t get it twisted Barry, George Bush pulled this economy back from the brink not anything that you did. Before you were in office Bush signed a 700 billion dollar bank bailout, and whether or not we agree with bailing out banks, that is what kept the economy from collapsing.

What did you do once you got into office? You perpetrated a 787 billion dollar fraud on the American people and called it stimulus, proving that yours is the most fiscally irresponsible, overpromising and intellectually dishonest presidency ever in the history of the United States of America.

But leaving the aforementioned aside, why did critics of the stimulus plan (rightfully) believe that the Democrat backed 787 billion dollar stimulus package won’t work to begin with? Perhaps it was because written in the bill was a variable cornucopia of costly Democrat pork, social programs and expansions of federal government the likes of which had never been seen before.

Also the stimulus bill was a time released back loaded bill, meaning that even though we need jobs now it wasn’t designed to spend the majority of the money until the 2010 and 2012 elections to help Democrats win elections. Apparently Democrats believe in “Spend it to win it!” By design this bill was asking the question, “What’s jobs got to do, got to do with it,” in Tina Turner like fashion.

In real plain language the Obama Stimulus package was not designed to save or create one single job even though president Soetoro constantly told the American people that it would. It was never meant to. The stimulus package had nothing to do with saving or creating jobs and this bill had nothing to do with stimulating the economy. This bill was a Hollywood Oscar goodie bag for Democrats and nothing else.

So the claims that the Soetoro administration pulled the economy back from the brink or that this administration saved or created 640,329 jobs is as ridiculous as the science behind Global warming. (previous post here)
As a matter of fact, like the made up theory of Global warming, the Soetoro administration has been doing a little making up of its own. The Soetoro administration made up 440 congressional districts in 50 states all to continue the meme that they are, saving or creating jobs, of which 30,000 phony jobs where saved or created.

Caroline Baum reports that Watchdog.org, a collection of independent journalists covering state and local government, has put together a “Guide to the Stimulus, District by (Phantom) District.” Overall the group found that 440 phantom districts in 50 states, the District of Columbia and four U.S. territories received $6.4 billion and created or saved (see source)

In Ms. Baum’s commentary found on Bloomberg.com she communicates that president Soetoro’s job claims have been based on trumped-up numbers and political incompetence. (see story)

This administration does seem to have its problems with math, science, ethics, constitutional law and American history. Though, I’m sure all of their self-esteem is unwaveringly intact due to the fine Liberal education that most of them probably received.

And just for the record Barry what’s become painfully obvious, even for liberals, is just because you spend billions of hardworking taxpayers’ money doesn’t mean that you are stimulating the economy. The point is, Barry neither you nor Democrats were very smart or honest with tax payers hard earned money. But what is obvious is, “It’s the jobs stupid!”

Thus you Mr. Soetoro and Democrats will be calling for a second stimulus or your deceptively labeled “Jobs Initiative” because of your total incompetence with the first 787 billion dollars bill. A bill that you were warned would not create or save jobs because it was a spending bill for Democrat ideological advancement.

What you’ve already perpetuated on the American people Mr. Soetoro is Job Fraud in the name of job creation so at this point there is really no reason to believe that anything that Democrats will do is for anything other than Democrat political advancement.

Democrats have already shown that they place politics above the health, welfare and prosperity of the American people. Democrats also put their political agenda above safety and sovereignty of this nation.

There is only one way to protect this Nation from these partisans, in 2010, 2012 we must do what Democrats hate the most. Vote Democrats out and Republicans in.

The Conference About Nothing

"It would be a mistake to conclude that the international community's failure to reach a final treaty in Copenhagen is due to a lack of domestic legislation in the United States," said a senior White House official, who briefed reporters on the condition of anonymity.—Lisa Lerer

Like a squabble between jilted lovers the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration and the pro-Global warming international community are spatting about who’s committed to the cause of Global warming. (see story)

But in the spirit of Jerry Seinfeld who’s classic story line about a television show about nothing, Seinfeld's show about nothing, is nothing (no pun intended) compared to the Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen Denmark this coming December. This Conference is literally about nothing because there is no Global warming--there never was. Yet Barry Hussein Soetoro, Europe and the United Nations intend to ratify an agreement among themselves regarding Climate Change. This act—no this conference will be pretentiously important in light of certain recent facts that have surfaced.

The release of e-mails stolen from computers at the Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia University, UK, reveals that some mainstream scientists have fought dirty in their attempts to call attention to global warming. However, this will not affect the international climate negotiations, according to various media reports.

“The issue of scientists behaving badly does nothing to invalidate the science. This does nothing to the US climate bill, which will be decided mostly by economic forces, not environmental ones.”—Morten Andersen

If you were wondering how Global warming Alarmists would respond to the email scandal which exposes Climate Change has a fraud. They have admitted to the veracity of the stolen emails from the Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia University on the official Climate Change Copenhagen website however at the same time they attempt to mitigate the damage by saying that it was just a few mainstream scientists acting badly and fighting dirty to promote global warming. (see story)

Yes according to these facts there is one big problem for the Copenhagen meeting…there is no Climate Change. (see story)

There has never been any Climate Change, not in the fashion that Al Gore has been promoting it, that fact was recently uncovered by documentation of corrupt scientist who invented the whole Climate scare to exact money from the world community.

Yet like the Emperor with no clothes the Obama administration and other pro-Global warming world nations are continuing the pretense that their meeting in Copenhagen means something other than a world shakedown of money. Soetoro and his cohorts are in full “The show must go on” mode! So these duped buffoons would have us all to be duped too.

They will continue to engage in the various dressings and undressings of international agreement while they stand naked before the world while claiming that they are really clothed with the intent to save the planet when what they really are intending to do is fleece the international community as outlined in Heidi Bachram’s Climate Fraud and Carbon Colonialism. (see report)

What is true is Global warming alarmists will be laughingstocks to the world when these so-called leaders gather in Denmark and pontificate on the relevance of the Climate Change treaties which they propose to sign even in light of the fact that they have all been expose as money grubbing charlatans who are attempt to deceive the world populace with junk science and terror stories of cataclysm world devastation.

They still believe that their made up theories of Global warming are enough to be allowed to enslave the people of the world by their world tax on the air that we breath.

Well they are wrong. Their Orwellian attempts to introduce a Carbon tax on the world will not succeed, not even with Barry Hussein Soetoro's participation in this deception.

Climate Change Alarmists don’t Care about Lies

Global warming Alarmist Barry Hussein Soetoro and Albert A. Gore

U.S. President Barack Obama will go to Copenhagen for a U.N. climate change meeting on December 9, hoping to add momentum to an international process despite slow progress on a domestic bill to cut carbon emissions.—Jeff Mason

YOU LIE--ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING TOO!

Carbon emission, greenhouse gases, climate change, global warming all lies that scientists told to extort control over the society. It was all a lie, it has been exposed and now Global warming needs a savior.

It was first reported that he would not be attending the Copenhagen meetings but that was before the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming was exposed as the total fraud that it is. (see story)

And now that this multi-trillion dollar global tax initiative is in terrible trouble, they need their most important asset to be in attendance. So U.S. president Barry Hussein Soetoro will make an appearance in Denmark on December 9, 2009 to shore up support among world leaders urging them to continue on with the original plan of signing the treaty that will be the keystone to funding one world rule.

As many of you know by now data was hacked from computers at the Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia University, United Kingdom the premier Global warming Research and information scientific organization. This information details an international scientific conspiracy to promote the theory of Global warming or Climate Change in total contradiction of scientific facts.

Furthermore these co-conspirators of corrupt science planned to destroy any and all opposition to their false claims of complete planetary destruction due to Anthropogenic Global Warming. They thought that the planet’s populace had no choice but to comply with their phony junk science claims of CO2 emissions causing the sea levels to rise and all the other made up cataclysmic results of an overheated planet.

The hacked emails are the smoking gun that proves that everything that Al Gore has been propagating for the last 3 to 4 years concerning global warming is patently false.

The only question is, are the emails authentic? To date no one in the Global warming community has challenged the veracity of the emails. As a matter of fact on the official Copenhagen Global warming website they do just the contrary they confirm that the e-mails were in fact stolen and the content of those e-mails could be detrimental to the Global warming movement. I have documented the report below in case it is removed.

NEWS
Scientists "behaving badly" won’t influence UN climate conference
While e-mails stolen from one of the world’s top climate research centres may embarrass some of the involved scientists, the incident is reported not to affect the ongoing political negotiations.

Morten Andersen 24/11/2009 22:25

The release of e-mails stolen from computers at the Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia University, UK, reveals that some mainstream scientists have fought dirty in their attempts to call attention to global warming. However, this will not affect the international climate negotiations, according to various media reports.

Some of the e-mails indicate that mainstream scientists have attempted to block publication by dissenting scientists in peer reviewed publications. On that background Republican senators at the US Congress are calling for an investigation into the state of climate science. An investigation would potentially delay Congress’ adaptation of a climate bill, expected to be passed sometime during spring 2010, but this is not a likely scenario, Kevin Book, an analyst at ClearView Energy Partners, LLC in Washington, tells Reuters:

“The issue of scientists behaving badly does nothing to invalidate the science. This does nothing to the US climate bill, which will be decided mostly by economic forces, not environmental ones.”

Some of the attempts to block dissenting scientists’ articles were directed at the journal Climate Research. Having read the stolen emails, Hans von Storch of the University of Hamburg, who was editor of the journal at the time, feels that the mainstream scientists went too far.

“The (East Anglia researchers) violated a fundamental principle of science (…) they built a group to do gatekeeping, which is also totally unacceptable. They play science as a power game,” Hans von Storch tells The Wall Street Journal.
Other scientists are less outraged.

“Whilst some of the e-mails show scientists to be all too human, nothing I have read makes me doubt the veracity of the peer review process or the general warming trend in the global temperature recorded,” Piers Forster, an environment professor at the University of Leeds, tells Reuters. (see source)

While this article attempts to mitigate the greatest scientific scandal of modern times by suggesting that this conspiracy affront to human intelligence and truth telling is concentrated among a few mainstream hothead scientists it does not dispute that fact that the e-mails indicate that scientists knew Global warming was a fraud and yet they promoted it while they attempted to destroy anyone who disagreed with their lies.

“The issue of scientists behaving badly does nothing to invalidate the science. This does nothing to the US climate bill, which will be decided mostly by economic forces, not environmental ones.”—Kevin Book, an analyst at ClearView Energy Partners, LLC in Washington

It is clear that Global warming alarmists never had science, the climate or the earth in mind. Global warming remains and always has been driven by economic forces. Global warming is and always has been a conspiracy to exact global taxes from an unwary world populist.

What is also clear is that Climate Change alarmist are not going to let a little thing like facts and being busted in the greatest lie in the scientific era be a deterrent to their plans to enact fraudulent Global warming policies (see story)

President Barry Hussein Soetoro will do what he does best when he arrives in Copenhagen. He will support forces that are detrimental to America. No legitimate America president would support a system that by its very nature will destroy the American economy like the agreement that internationalist are attempting to construct in Copenhagen.

Yet President Soetoro will support it and even sign it in spite of the fact that it has been proved beyond a doubt that Global warming is a fraud.

The president and his co-conspirators are going to move ahead with their plans according to the news coming out of Copenhagen.

Roll Obama Back!

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell

“The American people are opposed to this particular health care bill. They thought this was all going to be about controlling costs, but, in fact, we've ended up with a $2.5 trillion budget-busting proposal that CBO, the scorekeeper in Congress, tells us, after it's all over, will not control costs.”—Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky)

[D]uring the 2008 campaign, Mr. Obama promised to reduce the federal deficit. But his tsunami of deficit spending – in the failed “stimulus”, nationalization of GM and Chrysler, his $3.6 trillion budget for FY 2010 and more – has created an enormous voter backlash. In his first 100 days, he increased spending and grew government faster than at any time since World War 2.

So says Jeb Babbin in his article, Roll Obama Back, Babbin’s main point is that Democrats have made a horrible mess of the economy and war and if Republicans are going to save the American people from this amateurish White House and out of control Congress Republicans can’t be incremental mini-me Democrats. Republicans must boldly promise the American people that they will Roll back all of the excessive spending and draconian proposed taxation of the American people. (see article)

Mitch McConnell Senate Minority Leader interviews with CNN’s John King and exposes the Democrat lies about their Health Care Reform bill and how it will cut health care cost. But the nasty little secret is Health Care Reform as Democrats propose it will not lower cost it will only raise them. (see 10:19min video)



Democrats are taking America in the wrong direction. They must be stopped and all of their policies must be repealed. If Republicans are not willing to forcefully make the case that they will end the spending and stop the Obama socialization of America and Roll back everything that Obama has put in place according to Jeb Babbin Republicans will only have minimal gains in 2010 and 2012.

I agree with Babbin, if Republicans didn’t learn from 2006 how to campaign against an unpopular president and his unpopular policies then they deserve to be the minority Party for years to come.

If Republicans wish to win in 2010 and 2012 their political war cry must be “Roll Obama Back!”