Racist and Misogynic Democrats

Rejected Sen. Hillary Clinton: First woman seriously considered for President

Race is not the biggest factor driving Democrats and independents away from Obama. Doubts about his competency loom even larger, the poll indicates. -- RON FOURNIER AND TREVOR TOMPSON

You remember Harriet Christian, Sen. Clinton supporter who damned the Democrats for their blatant sexism against her candidate don’t you? I knew you would!

Harriet on Neil Cavuto has a chance to explain why she is voting for John McCain is seems that the racial bigotry and sexism of the Democrats have driven Harriet to vote for Sen. Cain. In Harriet’s words she didn’t leave the Democrats the Democrats left her! (see video)




So just where do Democrats get off lecturing anyone about race or sexism? I have seen enough racism and misogyny coming from the Democrats in the last nine months in the Democratic primaries, where Democrats battled for either Black supremacy or Women’s empowerment that Democrats have lost and no longer hold exclusive rights on championing minority rights.

Democrats rejected Hillary Clinton which would have given women the first opportunity to become President of the United States of America. And now Democrats and their Media allies have launched a full scale attack to destroy a second woman, Gov. Sarah Palin, who if her ticket is elected Palin would be the first woman to become Vice President.

But it doesn’t stop there, according to the Media one third of Democrats say that they will not vote for a Black man, Barack Hussein Obama to become President of the United States of America. Striking a pre-emptive Racism Card at Democrats and Republicans alike to get Barack Obama elected.

Democrats are one screwed up hate filled Party, yes they are, and now they are attempting to infect the general election with their own unique brand of Obama racism and Palin, women hatred.

“If you don’t vote for Obama you’re a bigot!” Oh please! If you don’t vote for Obama that’s because like Harriet Christian you know that Obama is inadequate and unqualified! It has everything to do with his using the Senate, the 143 days of the four years that he actually worked there, as a springboard for the presidential nomination of his Party.

Obama gave one speech at the Democrat Convention in 2004 and took a field trip to Europe and the Middle East a couple of months ago (where by the way he violated the Logan Act) and Democrats think that, he’s qualified to be President?

Sen. Obama is a Prom King hoping for the popularity vote to crown him President of the United States. Obama is the Paris Hilton, Barbara Steisand celebrity candidate that 250 Democrat luminaries plopped down $28,500-a-plate like "buttah" to wine and dine with for a night.

Obama is the first cause célèbre Presidential candidate of the United States, just put his face on a tee shirt right next to your “Save Darfur!” button and you’re the coolest hippest 21st century "back to the 60s radical" this side of Chicago!

Even Film maker Woody Allen is down for the cause! Allen says: (see story)

"It would be a disgrace and a humiliation if Barack Obama does not win,"—Woody Allen, American film producer and incestuous father, husband

Funny I always thought that sleeping with and marrying your adopted daughter was a disgrace and a humiliation. I guess things have changed right Woody? Right Sen. Obama?

Interesting how RON FOURNIER AND TREVOR TOMPSON attempted to report that bigoted white Democrats could spell doom for the Obama Presidential campaign. But failed because deep down hidden in their race baiting article a little light of truth peered out from their media driven Obama Racism and Misogyny. (see story)

At the very bottom of the story Fournier and Tompson admitted:

Race is not the biggest factor driving Democrats and independents away from Obama. Doubts about his competency loom even larger, the poll indicates. Still, the effects of whites' racial views are apparent.

Whoa!!! It’s just like Harriet Christian said! People are not voting for Obama because he is an inadequate, unqualified, inexperienced and incompetent Presidential nominee.

How dare the Democrats attack another woman running for office, Gov. Sarah Palin and how dare the Democrats attempt to make Racism a factor when it has been them all along that have had issues with Racism.

If they didn’t want a Black candidate they shouldn’t have nominated him. But if he loses don’t try to blame it on American Racism. The blame should rightly go on Democrats themselves for putting up two candidates based solely on the Sex and Race of those candidates and not on real experience and qualifications.

I agree with Harriet Christian, God damn the Democrats for attempting to invoke Racism to cover up their candidate’s inadequacies!

Congress to force American Taxpayers to Bail Out Foreign Banks ?

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson

In a change from the original proposal sent to Capitol Hill, foreign-based banks with big U.S. operations could qualify for the Treasury Department’s mortgage bailout, according to the fine print of an administration statement Saturday night.-- MIKE ALLEN, Politico

In what has been reported as the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression things keep getting worst.(see story)

Not only are the American taxpayer expected to bail out Wall street and American big money Bankers as under the original $700 billion dollar Bail Out plan that was submitted to Congress. Is has been reported that plan has been changed in the dark of night to included foreign-based banks also such as Barclays, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, HSBC, Royal Bank of Scotland and UBS. (see story)

In an extraordinary interview with George Stephanopoulos on this weekTreasury Secretary Henry Paulson engaged in verbal slight of hand when he attempted to sneak pass the fact that unregulated investment Bankers have put the whole Global Free Trade and Money Market systems at risk and are now attempting to have the American taxpayer pay for it all.

You are going to want to see the entire 8mins of this interview where 7mins in Paulson explains to Mr. Stephanopoulos that just like illegal aliens in America if a foreign bank is doing business in America, it doesn’t matter that they are foreign, they have the right to the same protections that any America bank would have.

What that means is just like the America taxpayers bears the cost of 20 million illegal aliens in this country we will now bear the cost of foreign investment risk made by private foreign Global Bankers doing business in this country.(See 8min Video)

"If a financial institution has business operations in the United States, hires people in the United States, if they are clogged with illiquid assets, they have the same impact on the American people as any other institution.

That's a distinction without a difference to the American people. The key here is protecting the system. ... We have a global financial system, and we are talking very aggressively with other countries around the world and encouraging them to do similar things, and I believe a number of them will.

But, remember, this is about protecting the American people and protecting the taxpayers. and the American people don't care who owns the financial institution. If the financial institution in this country has problems, it'll have the same impact whether it's the U.S. or foreign."—Henry Paulson

What is so ironic about this development is Europe is condemning America for the lack of regulation of its markets and that condemnation comes even in the face of the American government’s attempt to protect European banks too. Europe is ridiculing America for what they call the "savage neoliberal capitalism" of Wall Street.

One such European that is holding America up to scorn is Hanna Evers of Berlin, a cellphone retailer. Hanna says, "I was taught that the U.S.A. is the motherland of moneymaking," she added. "And now all I can see is a herd of headless chickens running around on Wall Street." (see story)

No Hanna the herd of headless chickens that you see are the American people who are sitting by idly and allowing Henry Paulson and the American Government double talk them while getting away with placing the entire debt of Global speculators in the Global markets directly on the American people.

Deception Compounded!!!!!!

House Republican Leader, John Boehner writes about
how the Democrats keep doing what they do so well!

"Tuesday night, Democrats in Congress passed a sham "no energy" bill that will actually raise energy prices for families and small businesses.

Their bill raises taxes and puts billions of barrels of American energy permanently off-limits
This was a hoax on the American people - a bill meant to fool voters into thinking Democrats are voting on real energy reform without actually doing it. We can't let them get away with it.

As the Republican Leader in the House of Representatives, I have an "all of the above" energy reform plan called the AMERICAN ENERGY ACT that will actually help lower gas prices and break our dependence on foreign oil. the But it's being blocked bythe Democrat-led Congress.

My bill includes everything: more conservation and efficiency, new alternative fuels and renewable technologies like nuclear power and clean coal, and environmentally safe drilling.An "all of the above" plan would help bring down fuel costs for struggling families and small businesses. But the radical Left doesn't want lower energy prices - and it's the radical Left that pays the bills for Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and Nancy Pelosi."

Remember this on Election Day, folks. Let's unblock the Congress and unlock our vast wealth of natural resources. It IS time for a change!!! Let's reverse 2006, which was a big mistake!

Obama Has the Answers!

This is the man who knows more than John McCain,
about how things work. He blames McCain for the
crisis in the financial markets, brought about by
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. But he doesn’t
acknowledge that he was in the Senate, while John
McCain was warning about the impending crisis with
those two organizations.

As most of the senators did, Obama ignored the warning,and along with Senator Dodd, he accepted huge sums of
money for his campaign from both Fannie and Freddie.

Now suddenly, after hesitating about the government
bailout, Obama agrees that it is the wise thing to do.
However............in addition......... he asserts that we have
to do something similar to help the homeowners.

Every time this man opens his mouth about economics,
he shows that his knowledge is the poorest of any of the
candidates. In addition to this over 700 Billion dollar
bailout, he wants to add an almost equal amount for the
homeowners, on top of his already massive deficit spending
programs for health, education, and infrastructure.

Just today, he and Biden have proposed 50 Billion dollars
to be pledged to the UN for their anti-poverty programs
throughout the world. At a time when our own country is
in such financial straits, how can any intelligent person,
especially one who wants to be President, even think of
offering such stupidity as a program?

If you take all of his proposals that he would bring with
his presidency;........... health, education, “tax cuts for the
middle class”, anti-poverty programs for the UN, he is
talking trillions of dollars being added to an already big
deficit.

This is truly “change you can believe it”.......... change that
we cannot afford as a country or as individuals. His plans
would bring this entire economy crashing down around us,
and we would experience a depression far greater than the
1929 crash. We cannot allow this to happen, especially in
such a dangerous world that now exists. With the obvious
threats from terrorism, Russia, Iran, North Korea, and all those
who would love to see the US fail, we need a team with the
brains and experience to stand up to our enemies, while keeping
the country strong!

ACLU, Where are You???

Strangely silent, on the hacking of Sarah Palin’s personal
email account at Yahoo, shows just where the UnAmerican
Civil Liberties Union’s sympathys lie. As if we needed
any further proof!

Had somebody hacked Obama’s, Biden’s or even Pelosi’s
email account, the entire media would be up in arms, but
I don’t see any media complaints about invasion of privacy,
or any of the usual “constitutional protection” violations.
The ACLU would be screaming in the streets, if a Republican
had violated the rights of a liberal, to investigate and
to hang the perpetrator...... even before any guilt was proven.

Also very strange, is that the guy who is suspect in this
hacking, is the son of a Democratic activist, and I wonder
just who put him up to it?

If the public puts pressure on the FBI to investigate and
prosecute the offender, maybe there might be some results,
but I don’t hold too much hope for that.

Too often, during the 2000, and 2004 elections, the liberals have gotten away
with breaking into Republican offices, slashing tires of
“Voting vans”, and generally harassing voters to keep them
from the polls.

The one consolation in this whole mess, is the fact that though
he is presently a few points ahead in the national polls,
Obama is running very scared. He lucked out with this
financial crisis, which he absolves himself of completely,
blaming McCain more than himself. However, McCain did
see the problem coming down the track, and warned over
two years ago that Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac were disasters
waiting to happen. The Democratic Congress ignored his
warning................ so what else is new? Now they are all
upset and blame this on Bush and the Republicans.

It sickens me!

The Obama Deceived-o-crats

Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild Democrat and McCain Supporter

Unimpressively Sen. Barack Hussein Obama has served 143 working days as a U.S. Senator since he was elected in 2004. The rest of that time, just under four years, in office he has been campaigning to be President.

Before that Obama was a part-time Illinois State senator with no major accomplishments along with being a law lecturer at the University of Chicago law school and before that Sen. Obama was a community organizer.

And with one speech, that Hillary Clinton often refers to, which Sen. Obama gave to the 2004 Democrat Convention he has deceived Liberals and Democrats alike in believing that he is ready to be President of the United States of America.

Democrats simply are deceived. Sen. Barack Hussein Obama is not ready to be President and all of the Democrat leadership knows it. But because Democrats are so ultra partisan as to put their Party above the interest of this country they will support an obvious inadequate Black male instead of doing what is best for this country.

So image my surprise to hear a Democrat say that she is voting for Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin because she refuses to put Party above her country and along with that the extraordinary lives of both Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin are reasons why she believes McCain and Palin are uniquely qualified in this election to lead that and she is placing her full support behind the two. (see story) and a related (story here.)

This is no ordinary Democrat. Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild was a major money contributor to the Sen. Hillary Clinton campaign as seen in this pre Convention video. (see video)




Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild is and remains a Democrat who is supporting Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin for President and Vice President of the United States of America.

To hear it from her own mouth in the interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer signals that the McCain and Palin campaign has truly turned a corner a is on track to appeal to any fair minded non partisan. (see video)




I had to share this incredible interview with several friends. If you have friends who are Democrats, Independents or Undecideds and haven’t be able to convince them that the correct thing to do is vote for McCain and Palin try showing them Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild there is no better argument than what she presented here!

Froma Harrop, You’re All Wet!

"The fundamentals of our economy are strong," John McCain said as Wall Street went into white-knuckle panic over diving investor confidence. Does he believe that? It doesn't really matter, because the Republican has outsourced his economic policy to the ideologues whose opposition to regulations brought the financial markets to their knees.”

The above is a quote from a Rasmussen Reports article by the infamous Froma Harrop, who obviously is no fan of either McCain or Palin.

She is pulling the same kind of crap that Obama/Biden and the entireDemocratic party is trying to do.
They try to play up the statement that Senator McCain made
at the beginning of the primary season, that he is not an
expert on the economy. Well guess what Froma, neither are
you!

All of them fail to mention that in spite of “being no expert”, it was McCain, who two years ago, warned of the immanent collapse of both Fanny Mae and Freddie Mack, and urged that some legislation be passed to prevent it. It wasn’t Obama, and it wasn’t Biden.........but McCain!!!!

Now, Harrop and the Democrats in general, are trying to paint the same picture that Obama has unsuccessfully tried to do..... that McCain doesn’t know how to handle the economy. By the deafening
silence, you would never know that Obama has all the solutions.

Senator John McCain is more qualified on the economy than Obama, Biden, and the entire do-nothing Democratic Congress is. Senator Biden made an absolutely “brilliant” remark today.......... straight from the
liberal Democratic playbook........that “paying more taxes is the patriotic thing to do”. I agree with John McCain............. in this economy, raising taxes is not patriotic,..........it’s just plain dumb!

Add to McCain’s ticket, the experienced, savy and utterly determined Sarah Palin, and you have the only qualified team to fix this country’s economic problems. Of course, in order to do that, they will need the total cooperation of a bitter, divisive, arrogant and utterly partisan Democratic controlled congress, who still didn’t get over 2000.

I think the solution is to vote out half of the Democrats and to give the McCain/Palin ticket a chance to do it’s job, with an evenly balanced, House and Senate.

Barack Obama the first Unconstitutional President of the United States of America?

Democrat Unconstitutional Presidential Candidate Barack Obama

If Democrats have their way he could very well be! We already suspect that democrats will do anything and say anything to gain the Presidency. That is why Sen. Hillary Clinton couldn’t get out of her own Party’s primaries. Democrats knew that if they didn’t believe Hillary there was no way in the world that the general electorate would be taken in by Clinton’s deceptions so they rejected her for Barack Obama instead.

Only problem is there has been a recent line of Democrat liars rejected by the general electorate; Al Gore, John Kerry and now Barack Obama.

But am I premature in adding Sen. Obama’s name to the list? Well if the Senator’s pre European victory tour was not premature to your thinking then I suppose that adding his name to a list that includes Al Gore and John Kerry is not premature either.

Nevertheless the question is, is Barack Obama properly vetted, did Democrats properly vet their Presidential nominee? There are legitimate questions that up until now Democrats have side stepped. Questions regarding the constitutionality of an Obama presidential run.

A broader question is just who is responsible to guarantee that a candidate running for the highest office in the United States is qualified according to the Constitution?

Sen. Obama claims that he was born in Hawaii however there are contradictory statements from his own relatives that claim that he was born in Kenya Africa.

Also according to the Constitution Obama’s mother would have had to have lived ten (10) years in the U.S., five (5) of which were after she reached the age of fourteen (14).

At the time of Obama’s birth, his mother was only eighteen (18), and therefore did not meet the residency requirements under the law to give her son (Obama) U.S. Citizenship.

The laws in effect at the time of Obama’s birth did not recognize U.S. Citizenship at birth of children born abroad to a U.S. Citizen parent and a non-citizen parent, if the citizen parent was under the age of nineteen (19) at the time of the birth of the child. Obama’s mother did not qualify under the law on the books to register Obama as a “natural born” citizen.

Obama’s mother apparently did not meet this Constitutional law.

And on an unrelated charge Sen. Obama has been using falsified documentation to establish his citizenship as American and in the process falsified several legal documents such as his law license. Obama did not reveal any of his aliases. (See application)

If Sen. Obama is not a U.S. Citizen he has not qualified to be President on that fact alone. The American people should demand a full accounting of the facts before an imposter assumes the highest office in America under false pretenses.

There are a small army of reporters, investigators, and lawyers in Wasilla Alaska attempting to find a shred of evidence to invalidate the candidacy of Gov. Sarah Palin but who is looking into this Obama scandal?

Apparently only Philip J. Berg, Attorney at law. Berg has filed suit to make the Democrat Party accountable to the American people for putting up a fraudulent candidate Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. If Atty. Berg's suit is successful Sen. Obama would be disqualified as the fraud that he is and the Democrat Party would be exposed as the rabid radical partisan Party that it is and that would put a non citizen into the Office of President which is in total opposition to the Constitution of the United States of America. (see Complaint filed) and (see Memorandum in support of Plaintiff’s motion) and (see motion of temporary restraining order) and (see attorney Philip J. Berg’s website)

Defendant Obama claims he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961 and it is uncertain in which hospital he claims to have been born.

Obama’s grandmother on his father’s side, his half-brother and half-sister all claim Obama was born not in Hawaii but in Kenya. Reports reflect that Obama’s mother traveled to Kenya during her pregnancy; however, she was prevented from boarding a flight from Kenya to Hawaii at her late stage of pregnancy (which, apparently, was a normal restriction, to avoid births during a flight).

By these reports, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama gave birth to Obama in Kenya, after which she flew home and registered Obama’s birth. There are records of a “registry of birth” for Obama, on or about August 8, 1961 in the public records office in Hawaii.

Upon investigation into the alleged birth of Barack Hussein Obama in Honolulu, Hawaii, Obama’s birth is reported as occurring at two (2) separate hospitals, Kapiolani Hospital and Queens Hospital. Wikipedia English Version, under the subject “Barack Obama,” states Obama was born at Kapiolani Hospital. Wikipedia Italian Version, under the subject “Queens Hospital,” states Barack Obama was born in Queens Hospital.

There are further references circulation on the internet claiming examination of the hospital’s records in Hawaii show no birthing records for Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama), Obama’s mother. However, there are records of a “registry of birth” for Obama, on or about August 8, 1961, in the public records office in Hawaii.

Wayne Madsen, Journalist with Online Journal as a contributing writer and published an article on June 9, 2008 stating that a research team went to Mombassa, Kenya, and located a Certificate Registering the birth of Barack Obama, Jr. at a Maternity hospital, to his father, a Kenyan citizen and his mother, a U.S. citizen.—Civil Action 08CV4083 USDC Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania

If Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. were elected President he would have convinced Americans to disregard their Constitution to elect him the first foreign national born citizen of the world to become President of the United States of America.

It would be the beginning of the end of Constitutional relevance if Obama were allowed to assume the Presidency illegally, that act would place Obama and his Democrat Party above the Constitution should that happen. Therefore the change that Sen. Obama would bring is a defunct America.

I’m guessing that, that’s not the change that Americans want. In any event, if it is true that Barack Obama is not a naturally born United States citizen, he should not be allowed to swear into the Presidency until it is determined that he is naturally born.

Actually he shouldn't even be running to became President while these matters are still in question. If Obama is not a natural born citizen of the United States of American his candidacy is illegitimate as would be his presidency.

The “Left” Attempts Assassination!!!

Now you know just how frightened the Obama campaign
and the far-left wackos are, that Sarah Palin might just
become Vice President of the United States.

First they send about thirty attorneys and investigators
up to Alaska to see what dirt they could dig up on her
past, and about her Governorship. All they found was
“Troopergate”.......... a seemingly legit investigation (opened
by Democrats, and run by Democrats) of
the firing of an insubordinate employee of the State
Government............ over his refusal to dismiss a trooper,
who just happens to be Palin’s former brother-in-law.

What the media has deliberately witheld is the facts in
the case. The prosecutors already have evidence that
this piece of trash drank while on duty, was involved in
graft, and used a taser on his son. And the democratic
controlled “investigating committee” is trying to pin
something on Sarah Palin????

I applaud her refusal to respond to a subpoena, along with
her husband’s refusal to appear. And now, they are having
a tough time finding anyone in Alaska who will cooperate
with this kangaroo court.

I guess in a last ditch effort, they have now hacked into
Palin’s personal email account, and found some inconsequential
emails that they are trying to make hay on. The Associated
Press is involved in this up to it’s slimy neck, because they
are refusing to release to federal Investigators, the offending
emails.

But this will all turn around to bite the liberals on their collective
ass. People have just about had it with the “holier-than-thou
media attitude, especially when it is so partisan......and Obama
just lost a few more votes. There is no way that the Obama
campaign and the DNC isn’t involved in this blatant attempt
to get Palin off the ticket. Obama has a history of that,
from when he was running for the State Legislature in Illinoise.
He had his Republican opponent disqualified on a technicality,
and took the seat by default. Even then, he couldn’t earn it!

With each passing day, the polls get tighter and tighter, and the
Democrats get more and more nervous, and Obama creates
another brick for his new house. It certainly isn’t going to be
the White House!!!!!

What More Do You Need????

Yet another example of the “elitist” Barack Obama!
While he talks the good talk, and even walks the
good walk, he runs with the far left wackos.

Obama loves being a celebrity, and that is what this
election is all about for him. He hangs with the liberal
likes of Barbra Streisand, who performed at a benefit
for his ticket last night. Thanks to her, and the other
wacko leftists in Hollywood, he raised another nine
million dollars for his campaign, in just one night.

His campaign thought it was a great idea, snuggling
up to the Hollywood “elite”, but I think that the photos
of him playing cozy-cozy with them, are going to
backfire on him.

How can he in good conscience, preach that he “understands”
what the people are going through in these tight times, and
then attend a lavish party in his honor? Especially when
they paid such an exorbitant price per plate. These are
the people that he feels most comfortable with. These are
the people that he can “preach” to, without the need for a
teleprompter..........because he is preaching to the choir.

He rubs shoulders with them, and then takes pot-shots at
the people in small towns....... where he has to use the
teleprompter, in order to stick to his “remarks” which were
prepared by professional speech writers. This is also the
reason that the refused John McCain’s offer of weekly
debates, in 'town hall format'............ because he is scared. Scared that the people will see that he is merely the stuffed shirt that is fronting for the far left in the Democratic party. A man with no principles, seeking the highest political office just because he wants the prestige, and screw the country and us.

Go on, Barack.........keep doing what you are doing. Have you noticed how each day, the poll numbers are changing. Even New Jersey has finally caught onto the fact that you are nothing.............. you offer nothing,............. you have nothing.

For the first time in four presidential elections, New Jersey is on the verge of voting Republican. I hope that when that happens, the people have the sense to sweep out of office the two liberal do-nothing Senators.........Lautenberg and Menendez.
Then maybe, without the obstructionists, we can proceed to
execute, not a change we can believe in, but that much “Needed Change”!

Obama’s Secret Negotiations in Iraq Violate Logan Act?

Sen. Obama and Gen. Petraeus touring Iraq

In an explosive revelation while Sen. Barack Obama was making all of those public pronouncements about immediate withdraw from Iraq, he was secretly going behind the back of Americans attempting to delay President Bush’s negotiation talks regarding withdraw from Iraq. (see story)

That’s right Barack Obama, the two-faced political animal that he is placed his political career above the interest of the American people and attempted to sabotage the Bush negotiations for troop withdraw from Iraq possibly violating the Logan Act (private citizens can not interfere in foreign affairs.)

Yet in Obama’s July European tour where he also toured Iraq he held private meetings in which Obama tried to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence.

According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.

"He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington ," Zebari said in an interview. –Amir Taheri, New York Post

Whether or not this is prosecuted it should noted that Obama does put partisan politics above all else.

And of course, Obama still in his usual undermine the Bush administration at all cost mode told Zebari that it was in the interest of both sides not to have an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its “State of weakness and political confusion.”

Zebari said to Obama to Zebari’s credit that he preferred to have a security agreement that regulates the activities of foreign troops, rather than keeping the matter open.

Apparently the Iraqi leadership does not trust Sen. Obama, Iraqi President Jalal Talabani (whose party is a member of the Socialist International) sees Obama as "a man of the Left" - who, once elected, might change his opposition to Iraq's liberation.

Indeed, say Talabani's advisers, a President Obama might be tempted to appropriate the victory that America has already won in Iraq by claiming that his (Obama’s)intervention transformed (Bush) failure into (Obama) success.

[Prime Minister Nouri al-] Maliki's advisers have persuaded him that Obama will win - but the prime minister worries about the senator's "political debt to the anti-war lobby" - which is determined to transform Iraq into a disaster to prove that toppling Saddam Hussein was "the biggest strategic blunder in US history."—Amir Taheri

Obama has given Iraqis the impression that he doesn't want Iraq to appear anything like a success, let alone a victory, for America. The reason why?

Obama fears that the perception of US victory in Iraqi might revive the Bush Doctrine of "pre-emptive" war - that is, removing a threat before it strikes at America.

Despite some usual equivocations on the subject, Obama rejects pre-emption as a legitimate form of self -defense. To be credible, his foreign-policy philosophy requires Iraq to be seen as a failure, a disaster, a quagmire, a pig with lipstick or any of the other apocalyptic adjectives used by the American defeat industry in the past five years.

There can be no denying now that Democrat’s opposition to the war is primarily political and Sen. Obama and his Democrat Party would have lost the war to win the 2008 Presidential election.

The fact that President Bush has produced a victory in Iraq in spite of and against the opposition of the entire Democrat Party including Sen. Barack Obama proves that the Democrats were wrong in their attempts to subvert and undermine U.S. war efforts.

These charges alone should disqualify any Democrat candidate from becoming President especially Barack Hussein Obama!

The Democrats “Shell” Game!

In response to the deluge of emails, phone calls and faxes
to the Democratic Congress.............guess what?

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, have accepted defeat, without
saying it of course, and stated that they are about to present
their long-overdue and belated Energy Bill. Well.............
a bill of sorts, but certainly not an energy bill.

Those in the know, say that they will open up “offshore
drilling”, but not the way the public is demanding. Their
criteria will be no drilling within 50 miles of our shorelines.
That is to pacify the public, and still keep faith with the
environmentalists, who form a good chunk of the Democratic
party, and whom the Democratic Congress fears.

What good will that do, when 85% of the proven reserves are
only about 7 miles offshore? Why on earth do we have to
sail right over the bonanza, to drill in areas that have virtually
no oil worth pumping? This is the other side of the stupid
Democratic argument, that the oil companies should drill where
they already hold leases. But that wouldn’t work because
every time they tried to drill the wacky environmentalists
would file suit through their ally and supporter, the ACLU.

This is the Democratic Congress that made all those grandiose
promises to voters about bringing “change”. The only change
that happened in ‘06, was a change for the worse. Look back
and check on the facts. Without doubt........... this congress
has the all-time lowest approval rating of all time..... a mere 9%.

That is a disgrace.................. and yet we continue to reward them with the best life insurance policy, best pension plan, best medical
and dental coverage, in the entire world. .... at any price! We
pay for their hair salons and barber shops, and their free cafeteria.
We supply their limousine and their airplanes.

Is it so much to ask that they represent us in the fashion that
we are requesting? Who made them “gods” of our lives and
our fate? They work for us, but yet they feel that we are subject
to their whims...........like it or lump it!!!

Now............. they are offering more “change”....... God help us!

Something to Ponder!

I can’t give credit to the person who wrote this, because
I have no idea where it started. I received it in an email
........... from a very long list of senders. Whoever this
person is, I congratulate you, for being a true American,
who remembers the way this country was, before it was
highjacked by the liberals.I pass it on to all of you to read, maybe copy, and send
it to some of your friends.

FIRST OF ALL, I HOPE EACH OF YOU WILL TAKE THE TIME TO READ THIS ENTIRE E-MAIL; WHETHER YOU ARE DEMOCRAT, REPUBLICAN OR INDEPENDENT MATTERS NOT. BUT MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WILL NEVER KNOW OF AMERICA'S PAST LOYALTY TO THIS GREAT COUNTRY, IF THEY DO NOT HEAR IT FROM THOSE OF US WHO SPEND THE TIME TO E-MAIL TO THOSE PEOPLE WE LOVE..........
It doesn't matter who you are, where you live, your religion, race, or sex. This is serious stuff. What a differ ence 60 years makes..!!!I know everyone has a different opinion on the war and our current President, But this article makes a lot of sense and I hope you will take 2 minutes and read it and give it some thought.

I have never seen the 'situation' expressed any better in words!

Recently I was talking to a friend about the upcoming election and the candidates. As we ended our discussion he said, 'The only decision you have to make is who you want sitting in that seat in the White House when - NOT IF - but 'when' we get hit again and millions of American lives are put at risk! You ain't gonna like losing.'

President Bush did make a bad mistake in the war on terrorism. But the mistake was not his decision to go to war in Iraq. Bush's mistake came in his belief that this country is the same one his father fought for in WWII. It is not.

Back then we had just come out of a vicious depression. The country was steeled by the hardship of that depression but they still believed fervently in this country. They knew that the people had elected their leaders so it was the people's duty to back those leaders.
Therefore when the war broke out the people came together, rallied behind and stuck w ith their leaders whether they had voted for them or not or whether the war was going badly or not.

And war was just as distasteful and the anguish just as great then as it is today. Often there were more casualties in one day in WWII than we have had in the entire Iraq war. But that did not matter. The people stuck with the President because it was their patriotic duty. Americans put aside their differences in WWII and worked together to win that war.

Everyone from every strata of society from young to old pitched in. Small children pulled little wagons around to gather scrap metal for the war effort. Grade school students saved their pennies to buy stamps for war bonds to help the effort. (Yes, we actually did these things 'back then')...........

Men who were too old or medically 4F lied about their age or condition trying their best to join the military. Women doubled their work to keep things going at home. Harsh rationing of everything from gasoline to soap to butter was imposed yet there was very little complaining. You never heard prominent people on the radio belittling the President. Interestingly enough in those days there were no fat cat actors and entertainers who ran off to visit and fawn over dictators of hostile countries and complain to them about our President. Instead they made upbeat films and entertained our troops to help the troops' morale. And a bunch even enlisted.

And imagine this: Teachers in schools actually started the day off with a Pledge of Allegiance and with prayers for our country and our troops! Back then no newspaper would have dared point out certain weak spots in our cities where bombs could be set off to cause the maximum damage. No newspaper would have dared complain about what we were doing to catch spies.

A newspaper would have been laughed out of existence if it had complained that German or Japanese soldiers were being 'tortured' by being forced to wear women's underwear or subjected to interrogation by a woman or being scared by a dog or did not have air conditioning.

There were a lot of things different back then We were not subjected to a constant bombardment of pornography, perversion, and promiscuity in movies or on radio. We did not have legions of crack heads, dope pushers, and armed gangs roaming our streets.

No, President Bush did not make a mistake in his handling of terrorism. He made the mistake of believing that we still had the courage and fortitude of our fathers. He believed that this was still the country that our fathers fought so dearly to preserve. It is not the same country. It is now a cross between Sodom and Gomorrah and the land of Oz. We did unite for a short while after 9/11, but our attitude changed when we found out that defending our country would require some sacrifices.

We are in great danger. The terrorists are fanatic Muslims. They believe that it is okay, even their duty to kill anyone who will not convert to Islam. It has been estimated that about one third or over three hundred million Muslims are sympathetic to the terrorists' cause... Hitler and Tojo combined did not have nearly that many potential recruits.
So... We either win it - or lose it - and you ain't gonna like losing.

America is not at war. The military is at war. America is at the mall.

Take a couple of minutes to read this. Then I ask that you THINK ABOUT IT when you vote in November. Voting Democrat or Republican is most definitely YOUR CHOICE. Just remember what you have just read.

Send this to everyone you know, if you've got the guts to do it!!!

However, millions of the younger generations will not even know what this is all about.......all we can do is try to inform.....try to help in any way we can!

Whoopi’s Ignorant and Offensive Slave Remark

Sen. John McCain and the women of the View

"Should I be worried about being a slave, about being returned to slavery because certain things happened in the Constitution that you had to change?"—Whoopi Goldberg, the View

They’re doing it again. I remember being in line in 2000 at an event and two African American’s were in line before me and they were talking about the 2000 Presidential elections between Vice President Al Gore and Gov. George W. Bush.

What I heard was a startling display of reverse racism. One said to the other that they would never vote for George Bush because if Bush were elected he is going to re-institute slavery.

Of all of the most outlandish of claims why must it always revert to this? Need I remind everyone the Republican Party is the Party of Lincoln?(See story)

Everyone knows this, but it's worth repeating: The Republican Party is the party of Abraham Lincoln and was established in 1854 to block the expansion of slavery.

The Democratic Party was the party of slavery: Its two founders, Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson, owned large numbers of slaves, and every party platform before the Civil War defended the institution unequivocally.

After the war, it was the Republican Party that rammed through the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution over Democratic opposition.

Republicans also enacted a series of civil-rights laws that culminated in the Civil Rights Act of 1875, which basically did what the Civil Rights Act of 1964 accomplished … Historically speaking, the Republican Party has a far better record on race than the Democrats. Sen. McCain should not be shy about saying so.--Bruce Bartlett

One of my friends, he’s black, makes it known emphatically that he is voting for Sen. Barack Obama because he is a Black man.

This reverse racism that Whoopi and people who think like her are displaying is not only ignorant but it is as ugly if not uglier than its progenitor.

Racism has been heretofore say to have come from ignorance but this neo reverse racism is a willing self delusion that some Black have believing somehow that Whites have the power or the desire to put Black people back in chains.

Affirmative Action’s original intent was to allow opportunities that qualified Blacks where not receiving because of racism. Lately Affirmative Action has been identified with placing unqualified minorities into positions that they do not warrant.

It is ashamed that Black people are backing an unqualified Black man for the most important office in this country. Barack Obama is not qualified to be the President of the United States thus fulfilling all of the stereotypes about Blacks and Affirmative Action that have currently developed about Affirmative Action and Black people.

Whoopi it is the welfare state, which Liberals promote, that is what has destroyed Black families by creating the slavery of dependency on the State. Those are exactly the policies that Barack Obama and the Democrat Party are campaigning to enact if he should be elected President.

Whoopi should be reminded that Blacks owned slaves too! So your Massa, Whoopi, could be the candidate that you’re voting for Barack Obama not John McCain!

THE BUSH DOCTRINE

Got cha’ ! This moose huntin’ babe from Alaska doesn’t know anything about foreign policy.

That was the impression that the elitist reporter Charles Gibson of ABC news attempted to convey to the American people with his surprise pop quiz amid his interview with Vice President Candidate Gov. Sarah Palin only thing is according to the journalist that coined the phase the Bush Doctrine, Charles Krauthammer, Gibson failed his own test. (see story)

Gibson didn’t know what the Bush doctrine was and his condescending definition of the so called Bush Doctrine was simply wrong! (related story)

The fact is this question was simply newspeak the term Bush Doctrine was made up by a journalist and apparently the definition changed over time so Gibson’s question to Palin really was, “Governor do you keep up with the media’s pronouncements and definitions?”

Obviously Gibson doesn’t keep up with those pronouncements and definitions himself yet he attempted to be the journalist that single-handedly took Sarah Palin down and who sparked the Obama campaign to victory by derailing the McCain campaign, but what’s happening instead is Gibson is having his own Dan Rather moment.

CBS news’ Dan Rather attempted to affect the 2004 elections by reporting unvetted stories meant to disparage President Bush but because Rather’s information was proven forged subsequently Rather was disgraced and lost this job.

Tactics like these have put the major networks CBS, ABC and NBC under a cloud of suspicion along with their cable counterparts MSNBC and CNN. Gibson’s got’cha does more damage to image of the major networks!

Why would they attempt such a stunt? Right now the media is mad that Sen. McCain is ahead in the polls. (see story)

No one should be surprised that the media is attempting to affect the outcome of this election after what they did in 2000 and 2004.

It’s just nice to know that Gibson and his allies will make so evident, what they are doing, from time to time. So evident that only the most rabid of partisans can’t see it.

I’ve got a definition Charlie, Media attempting to affect the outcome of an election I think I’ll call that the Dan Rather Doctrine!

Mr. Gibson do you know what the “Dan Rather Doctrine” is? Hum?

You Knew This was Coming....Right?

The Obama campaign and the liberal left had sent
all those investigators and lawyers up to Alaska,
with the sole purpose of digging up dirt on Sarah
Palin. Well, it seems that they are getting some
help from the resident politicians there. I guess
they see it as payback, for Sarah’s 81% approval
rating among voters, and are doing their best to kill her
VP candidacy.

When you are a tough governor, you make enemies.
We all know that and the Democratic politicians are
going to do their best to work for Obama in this investigation.
Especially since those on the investigating committee
are Democrats. Am I the only one, or does anybody
else see this as a 100% set-up?

Add to these flunkies, the Republicans whose toes
she has stepped on by refusing earmarks, cutting graft
and corruption and you’ve got a pretty “air-tight” case
against her.

Now,.......... probably because he adds so much to this
family, as the “perfect” husband and father, they are
planning to subpoena Todd Palin for the investigation.

Maybe they plan on issuing subpoenas for the children
including the baby with Down's Syndrome.

Desperate times produce desperate measures.......... and
after the way the left has attacked Sarah Palin, it doesn’t
surprise me in the least that this “investigation” comes on
the heels of the major trouncing that she is giving to the
Obama campaign.

Hang in there Sarah.............. you’ve got the support of
the fair-minded people in this country. They did warn you
that you were going to be attacked in any way the Democrats
could get to you. It didn’t work when they attacked you, so
they went for your children. When that didn’t work, they
decided to dig up some dirt, blow it all out of proportion with
the help of the liberal media, and bring it all out into the
open before election day. You got my vote, no matter what
they claim or how they manipulate the findings.

The Pot, Calling the Kettle..............

Sorry, I can’t say that word.......... I might be accused
of not being “politically correct”.

I quote from the Associated Press...........

WASHINGTON - The question of whether Sarah Palin has ever been to Iraq pushed Obama aides Saturday to accuse the McCain campaign of outright lies, distortions and distractions to the American people.

Since Republican presidential nominee John McCain tapped the Alaska governor to be his running mate on Aug. 29, questions about her experience have been fueled by her relatively brief tenure in office, as well as a dearth of foreign travel.
Palin made a well-documented trip to Kuwait and Germany last year to visit U.S. troops, and over time, the governor and her staff have revealed she also visited Canada and Mexico. Meanwhile, her aides clarified that a purported visit to Ireland was little more than a refueling stop during her trip to the Middle East.

So now, the Obama campaign is splitting hairs over the “honesty” of the information originally released by the McCain campaign, concerning Sarah Palin’s trips.

In his continuing effort to derail this dynamo to the White House, Obama is questioning her honesty.........hmmmmmmmmmm.

Let’s see now......................

OBAMA'S "NOT EXACTLY'S"

1.) Selma Got Me Born - NOT EXACTLY, your parents felt safe enough to have you in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965. (Google' Obama Selma ' for his full March 4, 2007 speech and articles about its various untruths.)>

2.) Father Was A Goat Herder - NOT EXACTLY, he was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.

3.) Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter - NOT EXACTLY, he was part of one of the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had.

4.) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom - NOT EXACTLY, your cousin Raila Odinga has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya It is the first widespread violence in decades. The current government is pro-American but Odinga wants to overthrow it and establish Muslim Sharia law. Your half-brother, Abongo Obama, is Odinga's follower. You interrupted your New Hampshire campaigning to speak to Odinga on the phone.

Obama's cousin Odinga in Kenya ran for president and tried to get Sharia muslim law in place there. When Odinga lost the elections, his followers have burned Christians' homes and then burned men, women and children alive in a Christian church where they took shelter.. Obama SUPPORTED his cousin before the election process here started. Google Obama and Odinga and see what you get. No one wants to know the truth.

5.) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian - NOT EXACTLY, she does her daily Salat prayers at 5 AM according to her own interviews. Not to mention, Christianity wouldn't allow her to have been one of 14 wives to 1 man.

6.) My Name is African Swahili - NOT EXACTLY, your name is Arabic and 'Baraka' (from which Barack came) means 'blessed' in that language. Hussein is also Arabic and so is Obama.

Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. If elected, he would be the first Arab-American President, not the first black President. Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother's side and 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro from his father's side. While Barack Hussein Obama's father was from Kenya , his father's family was mainly Arabs.. Barack Hussein Obama's father was only 12..5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father's birth certificate even states he's Arab, not African Negro). From....and for more....go to.....

http://www..arcadeathome.com/newsboy.phtml?Barack_Hussein_Obama_-_Arab-American,_only_6..25%_African

7.) I Never Practiced Islam - NOT EXACTLY, you practiced it daily at school, where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31 years, until your wife made you change, so you could run for office. 4-3-08 Article "Obama was 'quite religious in islam'" http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=60559

8.) My School In Indonesia was Christian - NOT EXACTLY, you were registered as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces (check your own book).

February 28, 2008. Kristoff from the New York Times a year ago: Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it'll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset." This is just one example of what Pamela is talking about when she says "Obama's narrative is being altered, enhanced and manipulated to whitewash troubling facts."

9.) I Was Fluent In Indonesian - NOT EXACTLY, not one teacher says you could speak the language.

10.) Because I Lived In Indonesia , I Have More Foreign Experience - NOT EXACTLY, you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and couldn't even speak the language. What did you learn, how to study the Koran and watch cartoons.

11.) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs - NOT EXACTLY, except for Africa (surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have never been anywhere else on the planet and thus have NO experience with our closest allies.

12.) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion - NOT EXACTLY, you were quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya and no mention of struggle to identify - your classmates said you were just fine.

13.) An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office - NOT EXACTLY, Ebony has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.

14.) A Life Magazine Article Changed My outlook on Life - NOT EXACTLY, Life has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.

15.) I Won't Run On A National Ticket In '08 - NOT EXACTLY, here you are, despite saying, live on TV,
> that you would not have enough experience by then, and you are all about having experience first.>

16.) Voting "Present" is Common In Illinois Senate - NOT EXACTLY, they are common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO-VOTES.

17.) Oops, I Mis-voted - NOT EXACTLY, only when caught by church groups and Democrats, did you beg to change your mis-vote.

18.) I Was A Professor Of Law - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.

19.) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.

20.) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill - NOT EXACTLY, you didn't write it, introduce it, change it, or create it.

21.) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass - NOT EXACTLY, it took just 14 days from start to finish.

22.) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill - NOT EXACTLY, your bill was rejected by your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation - mainly because of your Nuclear donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.

23.) I Have Released My State Records - NOT EXACTLY, as of March, 2008, state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, exposing all the special interests pork hidden within.

24.) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess - NOT EXACTLY, you were part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens . You failed to mention anyone else but yourself, in your books. >

25.) My Economics Bill Will Help America - NOT EXACTLY, your 111 economic policies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, and even YOU voted against your own bill. >

26.) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois - NOT EXACTLY, even your own supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part.

27.) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year - NOT EXACTLY, they were not YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by a fellow Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office.

28.) No One on my campaign contacted Canada about NAFTA - NOT EXACTLY, the Candian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your campaign had with them.

29.) I Am Tough On Terrorism - NOT EXACTLY, you missed the Iran Resolution vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction of Israel .

30.) I Want All Votes To Count - NOT EXACTLY, you said let the delegates decide.

31.) I Want Americans To Decide - NOT EXACTLY, you prefer caucuses that limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote, and only operate during small windows of time.

32.) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate - NOT EXACTLY, you passed 26, most of which you didn't write yourself.

33.) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics - NOT EXACTLY, you used tactics to eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you.

34.) I Don't Take PAC Money - NOT EXACTLY, you take loads of it.

35.) I don't Have Lobbyists - NOT EXACTLY, you have over 47 lobbyists, and counting.

36.) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad - NOT EXACTLY, your own campaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one afternoon.

37.) I Have Always Been Against Iraq - NOT EXACTLY, you weren't in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time.

38.) I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care - NOT EXACTLY, your plan leaves us all to pay for the 15,000,000 who don't have to buy it

God help us if we just sit idly by and let this person become our next president. It would be suicidal for us to do nothing to prevent this from happening. Copy and paste this and send it to everyone that you know. It's time that the "Silent Majority" takes a stand. Please get out to vote on Election Day, if you care about our country.

The “Ladies” of the View

What a misnomer............ !

To anyone who saw the hatchet job that those rejects
from real life tried to do, remember what I write here.

Joy, who was her usual “lovely” self, was bed enough,
but I was totally surprised by the way that Barbara
Walters attacked McCain, without even giving him a
chance to respond. She pressed and pressed, in an
obvious attempt to rattle him into possibly saying
that could be misconstrued later.

I, along with thousands of others, took note that at no
time did she look McCain in the face, but rather had her
eyes riveted on the monitor that was facing her. That
made it obvious that this entire “interview” was a left-
wing set-up, in order to make him look as bad as possible
to the viewing audience.

Her unwarranted attacks on Sarah Palin were also quite
vehement and irritating. At no point, did she allow
John McCain a moment to gather two thoughts together,
and I guess that was her intention. Barbara, you gave
away your liberal position within the first three minutes
of the interview.

To pretend to host an “interview” and then have the
audacity to spring onto the attack without warning is both
despicable and typical of the left. Had it not been for
Cindy McCain putting Walters in her place, with a lot more
class than Barbara could ever have, the interview might
have been a total disaster. Manufactured, of course.

My analysis of that fiasco is that the ones to get hurt the
most are the “Witches of Viewick” and not Senator John
McCain nor Governor Sarah Palin. Any viewers with
intelligence could see right through this oh so obvious
plan, whether hatched by Barbara Walters or ABC.

And speaking of ABC, Charles Gibson tried real hard to
throw a few curve balls at Sarah Palin during her interview.
I think that she hit them right back at him. Particularly
the ones concerning the non-existent “Bush Doctrine”

Democrats Deceptive on Drilling!!!!!

The Dems are doing everything they can to shift
the blame for their no-action Congress onto the
Bush administration and the Republicans in general.

Now they are accusing the Republicans of not being
cooperative in speedily passing their “new” energy
bill. They have taken the original intention of the
bill and added all kinds of earmarks and windfall
programs to it. Why can’t we just have the “drill
here, drill now” legislation that the voters want?
All they really have to do is lift the Federal ban
on offshore drilling.

Their thinly disguised "new" plan to allow offshore drilling
is merely a rehash of their previous crap. They keep
saying “let the oil companies drill in the areas in which
they already hold leases”................... hello!!!!.... every
time they try, the liberal Democratic-backed “green
groups” file suits through their closest ally, the ACLU.
The “Gorites” got a stronger grip on the Congress, since
the “inventor of the internet” managed to pull off the
biggest coup in history, by getting the Nobel Peace Prize
for something that he really knows nothing about. This
“green hysteria” ignited the volcano, that just might
blow the Dems right back where they were four years
ago.

Face it!!! Our (well, maybe yours, because I didn’t vote
for any of these phonies) elected Democratic Congressmen and
women, headed up by “Captain” Harry Reid and “First Mate”
Nancy Pelosi, couldn’t care less about you and me. For them,
it’s still all about “me”, power, and the ship of state, and let the
public be damned. For all their pre-election hype, they are just
yesterdays warmed-over milk-toast.

I hope that the sheep who in ‘06, followed the advice of the labor
unions, Wall Street, and the Environmentalists, with the
help of the MSM, will finally admit that they made an
enormous mistake in 2006, and fix the congress. This time,
not with partisan “revenge-seekers”, but with honest, caring
public servants, who truly represent the will of the people.

Change is coming, and let’s hope it's in the public's best interest!

Would Jesus Organize for ACORN

ACORN or the “Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now” is a radical 60’s style “In Your Face” group that Barack Obama proudly claims association with. Though Sen. Obama worked with other groups primarily it is this group that Obama cut his “community organizer” chops with.

Investigative reporter Stanley Kurtz in his, “Inside Obama’s ACORN” shows us a better picture of what Sen. Obama did as a community organizer as he also helps us to understand the workings of the political action group, ACORN. (see article)

What is interesting to me is that several Democrats have made the claim that Jesus was a community Organizer in answer to Republican Vice President hopeful Sarah Palin’s remark that Democrat look down on her experience as a small town mayor so she equated her experience to that of a community organizer only her job had responsibilities.

This remark drew the ire of Obama supporters who like Congressman Steve Cohen wants to make it plain that organizing for the community should in no wise be looked down upon because Jesus the Christ himself was a community organizer. Cohen makes this observation on the floor of Congress: (see video)



In his article Mr. Kurtz lays out that Sen. Obama was a trainer of ACORN leadership as well Obama trained members in techniques of direct political action, which is protesting and storming meetings. Yet a recent look at the organization shows some startling lack of organization and ethics. (see video)





ACORN seems to be less than discriminatory in their hiring practices too. (see video)




And once hired ACORN doesn’t seem to want to pay workers wages which is ironic because one of ACORN’s main political action items is to fight for higher worker’s wages. (see video)




Instead of the small army of reporters, lawyers and investigators that have descended on the small Alaskan town of Wasilla to attempt to find something to damage Gov. Sarah Palin if there is a real story, and there is, that story is how the political Jesus, Barack Hussein Obama has turned the political water of community organizing for ACORN into the political wine of running to be President of the United States of America.

Some unbelieving skeptics should look into this miracle.