Comprehensive Immigration Reform means Amnesty to Obama

Obama redefining U.S. as a Nation

Make no mistake our immigration system is broken. And after so many years of which Washington has failed to meet its responsibilities Americans are right to be frustrated, including folks along Border States.

But the answer isn’t to undermine fundamental principles that define us as a nation –president Barry Hussein Soetoro

No matter how much one says it—It cannot be said enough discussing any subject with a Progressive Liberal is like stepping through an alternate Orwellian world full of doublethink and newspeak. For example, the term Comprehensive Immigrant Reform means Amnesty to Progressives like president Barry Hussein Soetoro. Not because I say it does but because they say it does. (see 1:25min video)



The first thing that one must do when speaking to a Progressive Liberal is reject how they frame the conversation or you will undoubtedly be caught up in an endless loop of attempting to argue reasonability from a frame work that is purely unreasonable.

First of all, U.S. immigration laws is not broken. You must reject that idea. U.S. immigration laws are not enforced. U.S. immigration laws have not been enforced for several presidential administrations. If our immigration laws where enforced for whatever reasons that they are not, there would not be the appearance that our laws are broken.

President Soetoro says that businesses that hire illegals must be held responsible yet when Arizona attempted to do that Soetoro's justice department hypocritically opposed Arizona's attempt to do what the president said needed to be done.(see article)

However if there is something broken it is a government that refuses to enforce its own laws. Therefore, one must reject the argument out-of-hand that U.S. immigration laws are broken.

Second enforcing immigration laws by either Federal government or State government will not undermine the fundamental principles that define us as a nation. The fundamental principles that define this nation are borders, language and culture. To the extent that we have allowed an Orwellian definition of what our fundamental principles are has done irreparable harm to this country.

The way to fix our broken immigration system is through common sense comprehensive immigration reform. And that means responsibility from government to secure our borders, something that we have done and will continue to do.
It means responsibility from businesses that break the law by undermining American workers and exploiting undocumented workers, they’ve got to be held accountable. It means responsibility from people who are living here illegally. They’ve got to admit that they’ve broke the law and pay taxes and pay a penalty and learn English and get right before the law. And then get in line and earn their citizenship. –president Barry Hussein Soetoro

Our fundamental principles have never been to condone illegality while fighting citizens of this country who are attempting to defend the constitution of the United States of American, but that is exactly what Progressive Liberals are doing.

Progressive Liberals, and president Barry Hussein Soetoro are protecting the continual criminal enterprise of human smuggling and human exploitation that is originating primarily from the country of Mexico. The Mexican government is a corrupt exploitative Oligarchy, which is using the United States as a release value which to export its poverty. The Mexican government is broken not U.S. immigration law. (see 1:45min video)



Lastly, changing U.S. laws ,thus making illegality legal, will not solve the fundamental problem which the U.S. and Mexico faces. The fundamental problem is that two broken governments have colluded and conspired to exploit the poverty-stricken people of Mexico. The countries of Mexico and the United States are in collusion to transfer Mexico’s poverty to the United States in exchange for lower labor costs in the U.S. and a voting-block of ignorant voters that will continue to keep the corrupt government of Progressive Liberals in power in the U.S. for decades.

When the president of the United States talks about comprehensive immigration reform he is in fact speaking about his and Mexico’s continual treasonous and seditious plan against this country to exploit the poor people of Mexico by making them low wage earners in the U.S. Overall this results in lowering the standard of living for citizens of the U.S. by driving down wages. In addition illegal alien entry into the U.S. attacks the fundamental principles of U.S. which are borders, language and culture which have historically have been identifiers of a nation throughout all of human history.

Without the fundamental principles of borders, language and culture no country has ever been able to survive.

Without borders, language and culture the United States will not survive that is what Comprehensive Immigration Reform will do to the United States, it will be the death of this country.

Bill Maher: Obama not a “Real Black president”

"I thought when we elected a black president, we were going to get a black president. You know, this [BP oil spill] is where I want a real black president. I want him in a meeting with the BP CEOs, you know, where he lifts up his shirt where you can see the gun in his pants. That's -- (in black man voice) we've got a 'motherfu**ing problem here?' Shoot somebody in the foot."—Bill Maher

HBO’s resident Racist and Bigot Bill Maher disrespected all black people with his Stereotypical description of a “Real Black president”

According to Maher Barry Hussein Soetoro is not a real black president because he doesn’t use violence to solve his problems, he doesn’t carry a gun hidden in his buggy clothes and he doesn’t cuss out people with whom he has a disagreement with. (see 1:48min video)





If anyone Republican would have even suggested only one of the many insulting things that Maher stated in his monologue, their career would have been over. And Black people would be protesting in the streets.

Or maybe “Real” Black people really do solve their problems through disrespect, guns and violence. If so there will be no protest from Black people. If so there will be no protest from Sharpen or Jackson.

Which means Maher will continue his racist and bigoted comments on HBO and no one will raise one syllable of a protest, which will confirm that Soetoro is not a real “Black President” and Black people know this. Or Black people really do settle their disputes in the manner which Maher described or Black people reality don’t mind racial stereotypes coming from racial leftist like Maher.

Noonan: The Alternate Reality of Liberals

Peggy Noonan,Journalist and former Obama Girl?

I don't see how the president's position and popularity can survive the oil spill. This is his third political disaster in his first 18 months in office. And they were all, as they say, unforced errors, meaning they were shaped by the president's political judgment and instincts.—Peggy Noonan

Peggy Noonan supported and backed the presidency of Barry Hussein Soetoro during his campaign for the office and early on into his presidency. Actually it was worse than that Noonan was a certified Obama Girl. She loved her some Obama! So imagine my surprise when I see in her article, “He was supposed to be Competent” a less than favorable critique of the man whom she claimed would be good for America. (see article)

The president, in my view, continues to govern in a way that suggests he is chronically detached from the central and immediate concerns of his countrymen. This is a terrible thing to see in a political figure, and a startling thing in one who won so handily and shrewdly in 2008. But he has not, almost from the day he was inaugurated, been in sync with the center. The heart of the country is thinking each day about A, B and C, and he is thinking about X, Y and Z. They're in one reality, he's in another.—Peggy Noonan

Noonan like so many others who were beguiled by the imagery and deceptive language of the left are of late experiencing buyer’s remorse. She is only now seeing what true American patriots attempted to warn the country about all along about Barry Hussein Soetoro. We saw through the pretence of Liberal propaganda and recognized that though they, in particular Barry Hussein Soetoro, were saying the right things to get elected, the reality was, the Liberal intent and agenda was burrowed deep within the rhetoric and it suggested something different.

This difference is what Noonan is just now discovering after 16 months of Democrats controlling all aspects of government and a Democrat president governing as we warned that he would.

Noonan points out that to her, president Soetoro’s biggest selling points were that he intimated that he would govern with political judgment and instincts greater than the previous president and even greater than any president that we had ever seen.

Noonan is now finding that not to be the case. Noonan cites three examples which caused her thinking to evolve; the president’s handling of Healthcare Law, the president’s handling of the Illegal Mexican problem in this country and now the president’s mishandling of the Gulf oil spill.

She also is just now realizing that president Soetoro’s pre-election claims of bringing the country together are not happening as he said they would. If Noonan is honest she would see that this administration is purposely working to create Race, class and economic friction in the United States.

Noonan seems to be surprised that president Soetoro is governing like he is detached from the American people. She notes that it’s almost like he is in an alternate reality.

Yes Ms. Noonan that alternate reality is called Liberalism. One hears it every time this president speaks. Clearly he imagines the world without a strong and viable United States of America and for him that’s easy because he’s tried to make that the reality. Why you ask? To recompense for America’s past sins of course, he has so much as spoken those very words.

And every time he and/or a Clinton, a Pelosi, a Reid or a Schumer opens up their Liberal Progressive mouths they give evidence that they are working for the establishment of this alternative reality.

I feel sad for journalist and people like Peggy Noonan who were deceived and are just now identify the pathetic incompetence of president Barry Hussein Soetoro.

Imagine that, it took Noonan these three cataclysmic issues; Health Care, the Illegal Mexican Invasion and the Gulf oil spill for her to recognize that this president is incompetent and that president’s agenda is a danger to the United States of America.

Noonan gave us so many reasons why she thought Barry Hussein Soetoro should be president of the United States of America when he was campaign for the presidency.

I hope she spends just as much time recanting her misinformed opinions.

Yes Miss Noonan the president of the United States resides in an alternate reality from the majority of the American citizenry we get that, we already know that.

The question is, are you now ready to come in from the cold?

Maybe It's Me!!!

I just don't get it!

Why did it take so long for this country to realize that the
illegal alien situation will only get worse, unless we adopt
some of Mexico's own rules. Only now,
when the polls show that fully 58% of US citizens do
not think that a baby born to an illegal immigrant is entitled
to citizenship, has this subject taken center stage. This in
itself is probably one of the biggest loopholes in the immigration
"law".

Why should a baby, get immediate US citizenship,
when it is born to an illegal alien? This is not what our
founders intended nor foresaw. The only reason that child
would be born here, is an illegal one to begin
with. Women who are ready to deliver, come over the border and
have the child, sometimes just hours after arriving here,
for one purpose, and one purpose only. That child becomes their
"anchor baby".....giving them a "right" that they do not
deserve.

Deliberately intending to acquire a right by illegal
means, does not earn those parties those rights.....
regardless of how much the "bleeding heart liberals" want it to be so.

What we need now, is an ammendment to our Constitution that
specifically states that only children born to American
citizens are entitled to become instant US citizens.
Enough of the shinanegans, pandering for votes and all the
other crap! Forget all the protests by both the
illegals and their ACLU, and MOVE-ON cronies, and stand
for what this country is really all about. We are a country of laws
.......our laws ...by the people, of the
people and for the people.

Let's remind our politicians and particularly the Mexican government,
that we won the Mexican-American war, and will not permit
them to take America by fraud, because they couldn't take it
militarily!!! We will tolerate no Mexican flags at protests,
no burning of the American flag, and no more 'polital correctness'.
If you don't belong here legally, get the hell out!

It is time, and it is right.......... or this country
is doomed!

Unconscionable Incompetence or God sending a message?

President Soetoro writing in the Sand?

The last time someone of great import squatted down to write in the sand His message was, “Let him without sin, cast the first stone.”

Last Friday President Barry Hussein Soetoro, someone who thinks he is of great import, squatted down and stuck his finger in the sand at Grand Isle, Louisiana. Just one of many beaches where oil from the worst oil drilling disaster in the history of the United States is lapping up onto shores and beaches of America. My guess is, if president Soetoro wrote anything in the sand he wrote, “This is Bush’s Fault.”

Most of us remember the kind words of support that Senator Soetoro had for his predecessor who had to cope with the human devastation and political fallout of hurricane Katrina. Soetoro called President Bush’s efforts to get relief aid to the victims of Katrina, “unconscionable incompetence.”

It is funny how someone who was so judgmental about President Bush’s efforts is now facing his own “Katrina” like disaster and the only words that come to mind are the same words used by then Senator Soetoro, “unconscionable incompetence.” Kind of makes one a believer in universal Karma doesn’t it?

Or even God.

Speaking of God, Progressives are saying that this oil spill is God’s way of telling America not to drill for oil. If you listen to Progressives God’s not happy with coal either. Ted Turner is a Progressive who has been attempting to get Good green laws passed in Congress. He says that God prefers new energy alternatives like solar, wind power and geo-thermo energies opposed to dirty old oil and coal. (see 1:22min video)

“I’m not a real religious person, but I’m somewhat religious. And I’m just wondering if God is telling us he doesn’t want us to drill offshore. And right before that we had that coal mine disaster in West Virginia where we lost 29 miners,” as well as repeated mining disasters – “seems like there’s one over there every week” – in China.
“Maybe the Lord’s tired of having the mountains of West Virginia, the tops knocked off of them so they can get more coal. I think maybe we ought to just leave the coal in the ground and go with solar and wind power and geo-thermals where it’s applicable.”—Ted Turner

This oil spill began on April 20, 2010. And the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration would have us to believe that they were working to plug the hole since, “day one!” If so, that’s 47 days of futility. Surprising, I must say especially coming from someone who promised the world that his election as president would cause lower ocean levels. (see 30sec. video)



Yes, yes this is our moment America…this is our time. But I can’t quite shake the metaphor of this disaster, black crude oil lapping up on America’s shores (because Daddy can’t plug the hole in the ocean).

Like the 40 million illegal Mexican nationals lapping up on America’s shores, America’s classrooms, America’s hospital emergency rooms, in front of America’s Home Depots and marching, protesting in America’s streets. Lapping ever lapping like sticky black goo because Daddy can’t plug the hole at our borders.

And I wonder maybe God is sending us a message that he no longer approves of our Constitution. Maybe God intended for a world without borders.

Or maybe it’s just the alternative; Daddy can’t plug either hole because of his unconscionable incompetence!

Either way the fact that president Soetoro can’t plug either hole are both arguments in my thinking for Karma or God or the alternative, unconscionable incompetence—President Soetoro’s own unconscionable incompetence!

To which, I have to ask, are we still the ones we’ve been waiting for?

Oh yes, Mr. President here are more of your own words from the gulf states, border states and all states beyond that are affected by both spills—Plug the DAMN holes!

Mr. Obama do you regret calling for expanded drilling?

Thank you, Mr. President. I want to follow up on something -- exchange you had with Chip. Leaving aside the existing permits for drilling in the Gulf, before -- weeks before BP, you had called for expanded drilling.

Do you now regret that decision? And why did you do so knowing what you have described today about the sort of dysfunction in the MMS?—Jackie Calmes (source)

President Barry Hussein Soetoro isn’t attending press conferences these days. So when he did on May 27, 2010 the press had plenty of questions.

However the best question I think came from New York Times reporter Jackie Calmes. Calmes took note that in recent days, subsequent of the oil spill in the gulf of Mexico, the president excoriated the government agency MMS (The Minerals Management Services) and MMS’s relationship with Big Oil. But before that Calmes reminds the president that he called for expanded drilling in the gulf. So based on his knowledge that the government agencies involved in the oversight of oil rigs were so dysfunctional why then did he come out for expanded oil drilling March 30 2010?

As you will see the president did not answer Calmes’ question (see 2min video)




You see, the overall problem is Democrats and this president want to point fingers at either BP or the previous administration. Calmes brings attention to the fact that on March 30, 2010 President Soetoro called for increased drilling in the Gulf of Mexico not to mention that the Soetoro administration was in the process of awarding BP a safety award for drilling safely in the gulf, by the way, that award ceremony was cancelled by the Soetoro administrstion when the explosion and leak occurred in the gulf. But it must also be noted that the Soetoro administration did award that safety award to BP the year before. 

The President even touted the safety of oil rig drilling even in the middle of hurricane Katrina. (see 18sec. video)




The facts are the president continued the favorable treatment to the oil companies where oil companies received new drilling contracts months into president Soetoro's own administration.  In fact his administration awarded oiling contracts as late as May 2010 to Big Oil.   So for the president or Nancy Pelosi to attempt to finger point at the Bush administration is simply ludicrous! (see previous post)

Follow is a 9:57 min segment of the May 27th News Conference which shows the entire Jackie Calmes exchange. The exchange starts about 4 mins into the president’s remarks. (see 9:57 min video)




As you know president Soetoro appoint Ken Salazar Interior Secretary who appointed the recently fired Elizabeth Birnbaum as head of MMS. President Soetoro lauded Birnbaum earlier this year.

The question is Mr. President, You came out for off shore drilling, and you had your people in place in the government agencies that were charged to oversee these oil rigs. So if you are saying now that MMS was dysfunctional or in a cozy relationship with big oil then why didn’t you stop it? They were your people and questionable behavior between government and Big Oil continued to happen on your watch Mr. president.

Sorry Mr. President and Ms. Pelosi there is not a Republican in sight to blame for the worst ecological disaster in the history of America. Only Barry Hussein Soetoro and Democrats are to blame. And no matter how you spin it Ms. Pelosi George W. Bush is not to blame either! Sorry.

I am an Illegal Immigrant in Mexico

Hector Vazquez, 36, of Honduras

"There (in the United States), they'll deport you. In Mexico they'll probably let you go, but they'll beat you up and steal everything you've got first."-- Hector Vázquez

Hector Vázquez is an illegal immigrant from Honduras in the country of Mexico. According to Vázquez Mexico’s President Felipe Calderon is a hypocrite. As you know Calderon was recently in the United States castigating the state of Arizona for passing a law that mirrors U.S. Federal law. Both are laws, by the way, which the Mexican President strongly disagrees with.

There are two immediate reasons that Calderon is a hypocrite; one his country treats illegal aliens much worse than his citizens who are illegally in the United States. And two Calderon’s citizens, here illegally, are treated better, economically, lawfully and health care wise in the U.S. than they are treated in Calderon’s own country.

But of course if the president of Mexico is that concerned about how 40 million of his people are treated in a foreign land, well he can always call them back home and provide for their needs.

Mexico's Foreign Ministry said [Arizona’s] law "violates inalienable human rights" and Democrats in Congress applauded Mexican President Felipe Calderón's criticisms of the law in a speech he gave on Capitol Hill last week.

Yet Mexico’s […] law requires local police to check IDs. And Mexican police freely engage in racial profiling and routinely harass Central American migrants, say immigration activists.-- Chris Hawley

In Mexico, according to Chris Hawley's article Activists blast Mexico's immigration law , illegal immigrants receive terrible treatment from corrupt Mexican authorities as reported by people like Hector Vazquez. (see article)

"The Mexican government should probably clean up its own house before looking at someone else's," said Melissa Vertíz, spokeswoman for the Fray Matías de Córdova Human Rights Center in Tapachula , Mexico.

In one six-month period from September 2008 through February 2009, at least 9,758 migrants were kidnapped and held for ransom in Mexico — 91 of them with the direct participation of Mexican police, a report by the National Human Rights Commission said. Other migrants are routinely stopped and shaken down for bribes, it said. -- Chris Hawley

Mexico’s own immigration laws have been draconian and more severely enforced than both the U.S. Federal law and the newly adapted Arizona law at any given point. For the Mexican President to stand next to the U.S. president and condemn a state of the United States of America for passing a law that may or may not have the potential to do what Mexico is already doing is unconscionable.

The United States has already came through its civil rights era whereas the country of Mexico is still presently an active illegal immigrate, civil rights and human rights violator. This is a factor which does not make Mexico’s President a reputable lecturer on civil rights violations to anyone.

In 2008, Mexico softened the punishment for illegal immigrants, from a maximum 10 years in prison to a maximum fine of $461. Most detainees are taken to detention centers and put on buses for home.

Mexican law calls for six to 12 years of prison and up to $46,000 in fines for anyone who shelters or transports illegal immigrants. The Supreme Court ruled in 2008 that the law applies only to people who do it for money.-- Chris Hawley

Hawley further reports that Melissa Vertíz, spokeswoman for the Fray Matías de Córdova Human Rights Center in Tapachula, Mexico, states that in one six-month period from September 2008 through February 2009, at least 9,758 migrants were kidnapped and held for ransom in Mexico — 91 of them with the direct participation of Mexican police, a report by the National Human Rights Commission said. Other migrants are routinely stopped and shaken down for bribes.

Beltrán Rodríguez had arrived in Mexico with 950 pesos, about $76, enough to last him to the U.S. border. But near Tierra Blanca , Veracruz , he says municipal police had detained him, driven him to a deserted road and taken his money. He had been surviving since then by begging.

Abuses by Mexican authorities have persisted even as Mexico has relaxed its rules against illegal immigrants in recent years, according to the National Human Rights Commission.-- Chris Hawley

Hector Vázquez is an illegal immigrant from Honduras in the country of Mexico and like most of the other migrants in Mexico who are Central Americans who are simply passing through on their way to the United States Hector knows that unlike in Mexico once an illegal alien is in the United States he doesn’t have to worry about his civil rights being violated.

Whether he’s in Arizona or in San Francisco California Hector knows he’s never going to be mistreated like he could be mistreated in Mexico.

Obama’s Daughter Knows who to Blame

Headed for another Vacation?

“Did you plug the hole yet, Daddy?”

That’s the first thing that president Barry Hussein Soetoro said his daughter asked him Wednesday morning. Subsequently it has been reported Wednesday night that all efforts to “Top Kill” or plug the hole with mud have halted and the catalytic spill continues. Efforts have failed. No, sweetie Daddy didn’t plug the hole. (see article)

Whether it’s fences along the U.S. border or blown oil platform leaks Daddy doesn’t seem to have the ability to plug the damn holes.

Maybe Daddy can plug the hole in public perception. Daddy’s good at that. Wouldn’t want the public to think that he and his administration were not on the Gulf Oil spill problem since “Day One!” (see 1:51min video)




That’s it Daddy take the responsibility assure the American people that your administration is in charge and British Petroleum Oil Corporation is at fault and that your administration was on top of this disaster from day one.

But wait, is that James Carville I hear? Democrat Strategist par excellence. What? Carville you say that the president wasn’t on top of this disaster from day one? You say that he and his administration were not in control and they could be doing more? Let’s listen (see 5:05min video)



People are dying, you say Mr. Carville. Well the president is focused on this situation like a laser beam . See just take a look at his Wednesday agenda:

This morning, President Obama will meet with the NCAA men’s basketball champion Duke Blue Devils at the White House to honor their 2009-2010 championship season in the Rose Garden.

Keeping up the sports theme, the president and the vice president will take a photo with the U.S. World Cup soccer team and former President Bill Clinton, who is chairing the 2018 World Cup bid, on the North Portico. The White House has previously announced that Vice President Biden and Jill Biden will attend the World Cup in South Africa next month.

Afterward, the president will a private have lunch with President Clinton in the Private Dining Room.

In the afternoon, the President will deliver remarks on the BP oil spill and the conclusions of his ordered 30-day safety review and hold a press conference in the East Room.

The president will announce standards to strengthen oversight of the industry and enhance safety, a first step in a process that the independent Presidential Commission will continue, a White House official says.

In the meantime, the moratorium on permits to drill new deepwater wells will continue for a period of six months. In addition, the planned exploration off the coast of Alaska in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas will be delayed pending the Comissions review and the August lease sale in the Western Gulf will be cancelled. The lease sale off the coast of Virginia will also be cancelled due to environmental concerns and concerns raised by the Defense Department.

After taking questions from press, the President will then receive a briefing in the Situation Room on the 2010 hurricane season forecast and an overview of the federal government’s national hurricane preparedness. The briefing will be led by DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano, FEMA Administrator Craig Fugate and NOAA Administrator Dr. Jane Lubchenco, as well as five FEMA Regional Administrators.
In the afternoon, Mr. Obama will hold a bilateral meeting with President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf of Liberia in the Oval Office.

Later in the afternoon, the President, the Vice President and First Lady Michelle Obama will host a reception in honor of Jewish American Heritage Month in the East Room.

Afterward, in the evening, the First Family will travel to Chicago, Illinois for a four-day Memorial Day weekend vacation. The Obamas have not been back to their hometown all together as a family for more than a year. -Sunlen Miller (source)

Presidents are never really off the clock, even when they go on vacation. But President Obama's decision to skip the traditional Memorial Day ceremony in Arlington while on his second vacation since the BP oil spill began has some wondering what the schedule says about his priorities. –FoxNews.com

I’m guessing Daddy will be thinking about the worst oil spill in the history of the United States while you ‘all are on vacation in Chicago today sweetie even though the efforts to stop the oil leak failed and as Mr. Carville says, “People are dying!”

Did you know sweetie that Daddy has already played more rounds of golf than his predecessor, George W. Bush played in 8 years of his presidency? Go tell that to one of your Fahrenheit 9/11 friends.

Maybe when Daddy gets back from golfing you might ask again, “Daddy did you plug the hole?” He’ll probably say, “Why yes dear right after my third mulligan.”
That sounds about right for this administration. Just a Blackberry™ away!
Yeah right!

Gulf Spill is Obama’s 9/11

Underwater shot of the Greatest Oil Disaster in History

The Obama administration is facing a rising tide of anger against its handling of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and acknowledged on Sunday that it did not have the technical capabilities to step in and fix the gusher on its own.

Under scrutiny, the White House delivered mixed messages about BP’s role in the Gulf of Mexico disaster.-- Stephanie Kirchgaessner and Anna Fifield (source)

The Progressive Barry Hussein Soetoro administration was supposed to usher the United States of America into the 21st century by doing everything better, cleaner, smarter, more ethical and more transparent than the previous administration or (for that matter) any administration in the history of our country. Remember “We are the ones we’ve been waiting for,” said an arrogant and dismissive candidate for the presidency.

So imagine the angst that the Soetoro administration must be feeling right now because president Soetoro announced in March 2010 that his administration would condone drilling for oil off of the East Coast of America, coincidentally and in close proximity to that announcement on April 20, 2010 America experienced the greatest eco-environmental oil disaster in the history of United States of America in the Gulf of Mexico.

The sense of helplessness may turn into a big political problem for Barack Obama, elected president on a promise that he would be more competent and responsive in times of national crisis than his predecessor, George W. Bush.
An editorial in The Times-Picayune, a New Orleans newspaper, castigated the administration on Sunday for appearing “timid” in its dealing with BP since the rig explosion.-- Stephanie Kirchgaessner and Anna Fifield

First, it’s like president Soetoro flew planes into his own ideological twin towers of one finding and using new clean sustainable energy sources and two regulating companies that cause needless harm to our environment.

No doubt the president has angered those on the left by announcing that drilling would be an integral part of his administration’s energy plan.

Crude gushing into the Gulf of Mexico and washing ashore in Louisiana is exposing how ill-prepared the U.S. has been to respond to a major offshore oil spill.

In the fight to limit environmental damage from the month-old spill—which is on track to rival the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster in size—BP PLC executives, government officials, and scientists are learning as they go, even though the industry has been drilling in the Gulf for decades and has 77 rigs operating there, according to ODS-Petrodata, a research firm.-- JEFFREY BALL, STEPHEN POWER and NEIL KING (source)

Second, it doesn’t bode well for the president that he continued the previous administration’s relationships and practices with big oil by sticking to very slack safety regulation enforcement. It’s not so easy to finger point when your administration was found doing the same things that the previous administration did in relations to big oil.

It is reported that oil companies received permission to drill oil starting in January 2009 and continued to receive permission to drill for offshore oil as late as May 2010 by the New York Times. Uh Mr. president were you not inaugurated in January of 2009? (see previous post)

The Huffington Post reports that the under president Barry Hussein Soetoro the United States faces the greatest oil spill in history. What is worse than this oil spill, as disastrous as it is, is the Soetoro administration’s response to it. The Soetoro administration’s response is being called the most inept response to a disaster made by any previous administration.

This present administration’s response is being said to be worse than even the Bush administration response to the Katrina and Rita hurricanes. (see story)

No matter how the Soetoro administration attempts to blame British Petroleum for this spill as Bill Maher said Barry Hussein Soetoro owns this disaster. It happened on his watch, it happened because of his support for drilling, it happened because of the lax oil drilling policies of the Soetoro administration and it happened because British Petroleum or BP was receiving special treatment because of cronyism and favoritism given by the Soetoro White house.

This is the greatest environmental disaster in the history of the United States of America and it would be reported that way if Bush were still president.

Bush is not president, Barry Hussein Soetoro is, and this oil spill, this eco-environmental disaster, this eco-system terrorism is like 9/11 to our environment.

This oil spill is Barry Hussein Soetoro’s 9/11!

Under Obama a Nation of (Cherry Picked) Laws

John Morton, assistant secretary HLS for U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement or Non-Enforcement

I don't think the Arizona law, or laws like it, are the solution—John Morton, assistant secretary of homeland security for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

So who died and made John Morton King?

Under the presidency of Barry Hussein Soetoro the United States of America has officially become a lawless Nation. When John Morton assistant secretary of homeland security for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement can openly and without any fear of reprisal or retribution pick and chose laws that he doesn’t like and then chose to disregard a validly implemented law, that act is the essence of lawlessness. (see article)

So do we now live in a country where anyone in the United States can chose to disregard a law with which they disagree, like the 40 million illegal aliens who illegally inhibit the United States. Or is that right reserved just for the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration?

Charles Krauthammer calls the notion that the Soetoro administration can simply disregard a law which it disagrees with and then work directly against it lawlessness (see 1:35min video)




Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL), the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, today appeared on America Live with Megyn Kelly to express his view that if director of ICE John Morton cannot enforce the immigration law, then he should not have the job. (see 6:21min video)




Comprehensive Immigration Reform means Barry Hussein Soetoro intends Amnesty for 40 million illegal Mexican Citizens. It means that Barry Hussein Soetoro intends to change U.S. law in order to appease the illegal Mexican population in the United States and the Mexican Government.

Comprehensive Immigration Reform means that the illegals who voted in the 2008 election will do it again in 2012 but this time as sham citizens of an usurper president.

All to the detriment of U.S. citizens.

What does Ground Zero and Jerusalem have in common?

It is Islam that […] destroys sacred sites and rebuilds them as mosques. It was (and remains) Islam's way of saying, "We have defeated you, we rule you, and our god is better than your god." --Doron Kescher

Ground Zero in New York City (as it is called) and Jerusalem in Israel both have something in common. They have both been sacked by Islam. Further they will have even more in common shortly, a memento of the occasion.

Jerusalem has a Mosque erected on the Jewish Temple Mount and on 9/11/11 ten years after Islam destroyed the twin towers in New York City, doors will open to a Mosque and Islamic cultural center which is being built as close to Ground Zero as Muslims could get it. Coincidence?

It is Islam’s practice to erect a mosque on opponent’s holy sites which have been destroyed. That is why Haram a-Sharif or the Dome of the Rock sits on the ruined Jewish Temple mount. Following a brief period of Persian rule, Jerusalem was captured in 638, six years after the death of Muhammad, by the Muslim Caliph Umar. Soon after his occupation of the city, Umar cleansed the Temple Mount , built a small mosque and dedicated the site to Muslim worship.

Later the Dome of the Rock was constructed meant to permanently send the message that Islam’s Allah is greater than the Jew’s Adonai. (source)

Why? It is a custom in Islam to show up their defended foe. It is Islam's way of saying, "We have defeated you, we rule you, and our god is better than your god."

Countless Islamic shrines in the Middle East, Asia Minor and India are built on someone else's holy site. Prominent examples include the aforementioned Haram a-Sharif or Dome of the Rock (Jerusalem), the Blue Mosque of Sultan Ahmet I (Istanbul), and the (former) mosque at Ayodhya (India). Even Islam's holiest shrine - the Kabba in Mecca - is an older pagan shrine.—Doron Kescher (source)

Approxiately 3,000 people were murdered in and around the twin towers on 9/11/01 and most Americans consider ground zero sacred ground. That is exactly why there is a push by Muslims to place a Mosque there. (see article)

Placing a Mosque at ground zero is an “in-your-face” gesture to Americans that Islam did this and Islam will eventually rule in the United States and there is nothing you can do about it.

The proposed construction of a mosque in the center of one of Christianity's holiest sites in Nazareth was a deliberate attempt by the Islamic community to lord over their Christian neighbors.—Doron Kescher (source)

For centuries we have watched Islam destroy relics and places of worship of other religions and claim them as Islam’s own by offering up prayers and praises to Allah in Mosques built on the very sites which were destroyed or taken by Muslims.

There is no difference between what is happening in New York at the scene of the greatest terrorist act perpetrated on American soil and what has occurred throughout the world where Islam is concerned.

Throughout the world Islam has destroyed foes and then it builds a monument to itself on the spot to forever commemorate that Allah has given victory over Islam’s enemies.

Surprisingly not very many Americans are aware of what it means to have a Mosque built so close to the site of 9/11. There are a few who are protesting this heartless insensitivity by Muslims by not nearly enough. (see article)

As controversy surrounds the construction of a 13-story mosque just two blocks from Ground Zero, FOX News has learned that an effort to place a second mosque close to the hallowed site in New York City is in its advanced stages.

The Masjid Mosque has raised $8.5 million and is seeking an additional $2.5 million to begin construction. While it apparently has not settled on a final location, it has told donors it plans to build very close to where 3,000 people were killed in the September 11 terror attacks.

In fact, the website appealing for donations boldly states that it plans to “build the 'House of Allah' next to the World Trade Center. Help us raise the flag of 'LA ILLAH ILLA ALLAH' in downtown Manhattan."—Ed Barnes

To further exploit the American peoples’ ignorance a 2nd Mosque is planned near ground zero as if one was not enough. Muslims have committed crimes against humanity throughout by razing other culture’s relics and holy sites. (see article)

There are two Mosques being constructed near ground zero with the first Mosque scheduled to open its doors on 9/11/11. They will probably pray to Allah and thank him for the ignorance of the American infidels who have allowed for such a great victory against themselves.

We couldn’t stop two planes from crashing into the twin towers on 9/11/01. However Americans should consider this a do over. Surely we can stop two Mosques from figuratively crash landing on the memories of those who died and crash landing on the site made holy to Americans by the loss of approximately 3,000 innocent American lives?

What does Ground Zero and Jerusalem have in common? Monuments to terrorism! Once the doors open at the Islamic cultural center called the Cordoba House in New York at ground zero on 9/11/11.

What? No Apology?

President Soetoro and his Mexican mouthpiece

If somebody do that without permission we send back them—Mexican President Felipe Calderon, speaking about people in Mexico without legal authority

The President of Mexico, Felipe De Jesus CALDERON Hinojosa made three very Public speeches when he visited the United States of America last week, one on the White house lawn, another in front of a joint session of Congress and another in an interview with Wolf Blitzer of CNN News. Not in one of those speeches did the Mexican president apologize for the impact that 40 million illegal Mexican invaders are having on the laws and the economy of the United States of America. What, no apology?

Not once did the Mexican President apologize for exporting Mexico’s problems to America. Not once did the Mexican President apologize for an over abundance of Mexican citizens in this country.  Illegal Mexicans in this country drive down American wages and take American jobs. Not once did the Mexican President apologize for an out of control drug war where law enforcement, political figures and news media personalities are being brutally butchered and murdered. This war is spilling over across the borders of the United States.

Not once did the Mexican President apologize for Mexicans making Arizona the number two kidnapping capital in the world second only to Mexico City and not once did the Mexican President apologize for producing a book that instructs Mexican people on how to evade or manipulate U.S. law, but no apology given. (see book)

What we did get is disrespect covered over in the language of the left. Even though the full emphasis of the immigration problem rests squarely on Mexico president Calderon and his counterpart president Soetoro continues to attempt to make Mexico’s illegal immigration problem into a United States exclusive problem.
How do they do this? By stealing and co-opting language of the civil rights, words like Racial Profiling, Discrimination human Rights, core values, and the like, Mexico and disloyal self-hating Americans attempt to twist the facts by using words that do not apply to the reality of illegal alien invasion that is now happening in the United States.

The facts are Mexico has not kept up with the 21st Century. Mexico has no industrial infrastructure with which to support its people, Mexico’s government is not providing for nor protecting its own people therefore Mexico is exporting tens of millions of Mexican citizens to the United States therefore making Mexico’s problems the United States problems.

And in the complete co-opted language of the civil rights movement Mexicans and self-hating U.S. Citizens attempt to disguise the fact that upwards of 40 million Mexicans are presently in the United States breaking American immigration law.

Following are three examples of the disrespect that Mexican Calderon displayed to the American people. First in this joint statement with the first post-American president Barry Hussein Soetoro, Calderon disrespects the people of Arizona and the laws of the United States of America as does president Soetoro does. (see 28:30min video)



Second watch as Democrats give treasonous applause to a foreign president who disrespects a state in this country and advocates the changing of U.S. laws to accommodate foreign interest. This is just cause to vote every Democrat in the House and Senate out of office in 2010 and 2012! (see 3:28mins video)




Third see President Calderon explain to CNN’s Wolf Blitzer how Mexico’s draconian laws regarding immigration were conveniently recently changed, but if you are in Mexico illegally in the president’s own words,” If somebody do that without permission we send back them” (see7:16min video)





According to Felipe Calderon just 1 short year ago Mexico’s immigration law changed, isn’t that convenient. The reality of the matter is Mexico only changed their law because they want access to America by any means necessary. Mexico had recently come under scrutiny by Americans who knew that Mexico was being hypocritical by demanding rights in America that they weren’t willing to give themselves thus the law change.

Mexico is a broken down corrupt third world country that is in a drug cartel civil war. It’s people are fleeing the country because the inept leadership of that country has done nothing in the last 50 years to improve the quality of life for the Mexican people.

Mexico’s President came to the United States because he knows that you know that his country is failing. Yet he is here to insult your intelligence and convince you that 40 million Mexicans in America is your problem not his.

The President of Mexico in a grant act of hypocrisy came to this country to lecture Americans on how to treat his people. President Calderon delivered a message for the Barry Hussein Soetoro a message that should seal a one term presidency for Soetoro.

Democrats Skip Constitution Duties for Political Advantage

Democrats will likely skip the annual task of writing a budget for the U.S. government this year amid lawmakers’ unwillingness to endorse a plan sure to include huge deficits.—Brian Faler

How much are Democrats spending? They don’t want you to know. In fact Democrats are willing to disregard the Constitution rather than reveal before the November elections just how much they are abusing spending.

Brian Faler in his article, “Democrats unlikely to pass budget in Face of Spiraling Deficits” would lead us to believe that keeping a constitutional mandate like presenting an annual budget is equivalent skipping a meal or some menial task like electing to forego cleaning out rain gutters this year. In other words submitting an annual budget is much more than an “annual task” it is law—Constitutional law. (see article)

Even though the media isn’t reporting it—it is a big deal. It’s a huge deal. Besides making a mockery of our constitution Democrats are making a travesty of our electoral process by keeping information from the American people that would help decide which Party would be best to make our economy better.

The U.S. Constitution (Article I, section 9, clause 7) states that "[n]o money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time."

Each year, the President of the United States submits his budget request to Congress for the following fiscal year, as required by the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921. Current law (31 U.S.C. § 1105(a)) requires the president to submit a budget no earlier than the first Monday in January, and no later than the first Monday in February. Typically, presidents submit budgets on the first Monday in February.

The Budget and Accounting Act of 1921 required the President to submit to Congress an annual budget for the entire federal government.

Instead of proudly displaying what their big government programs are costing Americans. Democrats are hoping that the American people will vote uninformed, about the cost of Democrats running this country like it was Greece, in November’s elections.

They’re hoping that those uninformed votes will translate into votes for Democrats. Congressman John Boehner asks the question, “Where’s the budget,” in this interview. (see 1:09mins video)






Terence P Jeffery in his article “Obama Defeats FDR (in Spending Other People’s Money)” writes, When calculated by the average annual percentage of the Gross Domestic Product that [Barack Obama] will spend during his presidency, Obama is on track to become the biggest-spending president since 1930, the earliest year reported on the OMB’s historical chart of spending as a percentage of GDP. When calculated by the average annual percentage of GDP he will borrow during his presidency, Obama is on track to become the greatest debtor president since Franklin Roosevelt. (see article)

According to Jeffery president Soetoro will outspend and out-borrow the previous administration of George Bush. Bush was routinely pilloried in the media and by Democrats for his spending.

It is unconscionable that in a time of worldwide fiscal crisis Democrats would continue to play politics with the U.S. economy by holding the budget hostage so they won’t look quite as bad to the American people before the November elects.

Democrats have made a multi-trillion dollar debt bed that all of us will have to sleep in, only they prefer the lights out so we, the American people, can’t see the bed. So much for President Soetoro’s empty rhetoric about the disinfectant of Sunlight shining on government making what’s done in the Washington dark exposed to the American people.

And don’t bother to give me that tired “Republicans did it too” line. Republicans were voted out of power in 2006 for their indiscretions remember that? This administration and this Congress promised to be the most ethical, the most transparent government in the history of America remember that?

If now they wish to say, Hey we are no better than Republicans, then by all means say it. Why don’t Democrats use that line as a slogan for the November elections? Keep Democrats in power, we’re not submitting a budget and we’re no better than the Republicans!

Not that catchy but for once it would be something honest coming from a Democrat.

And now a Word from our Holy Lady of the Congress

Sorry that is not the sign of the Cross Ms. Pelosi

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said she has told Catholic cardinals, archbishops and bishops that she wants them to speak from the pulpit for immigration reform and tell Catholics who oppose it that reform “is a manifestation of our living the gospels.” -- Nicholas Ballasy

“Hail Nancy full of disgrace the Catholic Church is not with you, Amen.”

According to the Pope Nancy Pelosi shouldn’t be receiving communion which means that she is not in good standing with the church. Last year the Pope issued an edict that any Catholic who supported abortion should not receive Holy Communion. I’m certain he told her so in their face to face meet last year in February. The Pope’s comments came last year as he was addressing the problem of politicians who claimed they are Catholic but support legislation that is immoral and anti-religious.

This conflict between the Church and American politicians became noteworthy after the election year of 2008 as many American politicians who claimed that they were Catholic openly challenged the Church’s teachings on abortion. Nancy Pelosi is one such American politician.

The Pope meant to break the Church’s years of silent regarding Catholic’s in politics who openly defy the Church’s moral imperatives. Recently Catholic politicians who would run for political office made it a practice to simply ignore or misrepresent Church’s teachings which they disagreed with in order to justify supporting immoral political positions related to the social issues of the day. (see article)

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has to be aware that she is not in good standing with the Church made even clearer after her meeting with the Holy Father last February 2009. Yet she disregarded the Papal rebuke and published her own rebellious version of what happened between her and Pope Benedict XVI.

"It is with great joy that my husband, Paul, and I met with his Holiness, Pope Benedict XVI today. In our conversation, I had the opportunity to praise the Church's leadership in fighting poverty, hunger and global warming, as well as the Holy Father's dedication to religious freedom and his upcoming trip and message to Israel. I was proud to show his Holiness a photograph of my family's papal visit in the 1950s, as well as a recent picture of our children and grandchildren."—Nancy Pelosi

It is against that background that Nancy Pelosi spoke at the Catholic Community Conference on Capitol Hill on May 6, Pelosi specifically referenced illegal immigrants in America , saying as a practical matter, “we can’t say to people, 12 million of you, ‘go back to wherever you came from or go to jail.’” Pelosi further instructed the conference saying she wants them to speak from the pulpit for immigration reform and tell Catholics who oppose it that reform “is a manifestation of our living the gospels.” (see story)

The cardinals, the archbishops and the bishops come to me and say we want you to pass immigration reform. And I say but I want you to speak about it from the pulpit. I want you to instruct your… whatever the communication is …the people who oppose immigration reform are sitting in those pews and you have to tell them that this is a manifestation of our living the Gospels.
Our patron saint of San Francisco Saint Francis of Assisi he said preach the Gospel, sometimes use words. We need the words to be said because it isn’t being picked up automatically—Nancy Pelosi

(see 2:22min video)





This is even a new low for Pelosi. Pelosi is a Liberal Progressive. Liberal Progressives usually champion so-called, “separation of church and state.” Yet Pelosi is so desperate she is attempting to gain a political advantage using religion.

Think about it, she is willing and has the impertinence to first show her face at a Catholic conference knowing full well she is not in good standing with the leader of the Catholic Church.

Then in spite of her open defiance against the church’s teachings Pelosi lends rebellious council to the Church’s holy men as if she is an authority of what the manifestation of the gospels is. Who does Nancy Pelosi think she is “Our Holy Lady of Congress”?

This is blasphemy. It is an outrage. To think that Nancy Pelosi would stoop to using the gospels of Jesus Christ which have been officially rejected by the American political class, especially by Liberal Progressives who support homosexuality and abortion in open defiance of the gospels, and then to attempt to employ the same gospels that Progressives abhor in a scheme to manipulate believers to vote against voter’s own interest is simply blasphemous!

Nancy Pelosi is not in good standing with her church and neither is she or Democrats in good standing with the American people.

Therefore Nancy Pelosi should be defrocked by the American people of her self-appointed position as “Our Holy Lady of Congress” as soon as the American people can cast our ballots before these Liberal Progressive Democrat swine in November.

This is a Joke, Right?????

I find it hard to believe that
President Calderon of Mexico has the giant cojones to criticize
the immigration laws of the United States.

He has found sympathy from the morons that are governing
our contry, from the Department of Homeland Security, right
up to the "Chief Moron".

When you actually take the time to think about it, nobody
in the Obama White House has one ounce of experience at ever running any
kind of a business. So it is no surprise that they can't
understand the very simple terminology in the Arizona Illegal Immigrant
Law . Remember........... these are the people
who questioned Sarah Palin's qualifications of leadership. The
voters fell for the "teleprompter king's" rhetoric, and look what we got
stuck with.

My whole point about Calderon's "complaint" is that
Mexico's illegal immigrant policy is severe.......... in terms of the
type of punishment and it's degree. If you are an unfortunate
immigrant, coming up from Central America, and enter Mexico illegally,
you will have all the time in the world to regret it.
So in light of Mexico's policy, does Calderon have
any right in the world to criticize us???

I am supplying a link here, which everyone should
click on and read in it's entirety. Then you will understand
part of the frustration of Arizona, and the rest of the border state,
with the Federal Government's lack of compassion and overall intelligence.

http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/how-mexico-treats-illegal-aliens/blog-316781/

I say Radical You say Islam, Radical…

Osama bin Laden and AG Eric Holder: Perhaps a name Holder can’t say

I mean the thing is that- and I get frustrated and there was part of me that was hoping this was not going to be anybody with ties to any kind of Islamic country because there are a lot of people who want to use this terrorist intent to justify writing off people who believe in a certain way or come from certain countries or whose skin color is a certain way. I mean they use it as justification for really outdated bigotry. –Contessa Brewer, MSNBC comments on her disappointment when the terrorist Faisal Shahzad was captured

Say Radical Islam Eric come on you can do it.

I mean, like I think Attorney General Eric Holder gets frustrated and stuff and  there is a part of him that is hoping that he will never have to say the phrase Radical Islam. You know something like MSNBC’s Contessa Brewer’s problem with like everyone thinking that Middle Easterners are bad and stuff.

Like everybody is just going to blame them for terrorism and things. Because there are a lot of people who want to use that guy Faisal, I think that’s his name, because he was born in the Middle East and has ties there.  And like he even did some terrorist training there.  

People will automatically use the fact that he allegedly attempted to bomb Time Square with hundreds of people around as a reason to justify writing off people who believe a certain way or come from certain countries or whose skin color is a certain way.

Like I mean they use those things as justification for really outdated bigotry. Just because some people with ties to any kind of Islamic country are trying to kill us. (hear 43sec. audio)






I’m thinking that’s why AG Eric Holder had such a hard time testifying before the House Judiciary Committee on last Thursday. Apparently he gets frustrated when the term “radical Islam is used. (see 2:06min video)

In testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on 5/13/2010, US Attorney General refuses to use the term "radical Islam."






Interestingly Contessa Brewer and Eric Holder sound strikingly similar. Almost like the two were infected by the same diseased ideology… Progressivism.

Why can’t little Eric Read?

AG Eric Holder

That is certainly one of the concern that I have that you will end up in a situation where people are racially profiled. And that could lead to a wedge drawn between certain communities and law enforcement.

Which leads to the problem of people in those communities not willing to interact with people in law enforcement, not will to share information, not willing to be witnesses when law enforcement needs them. I think you need to think of the collateral consequences of such a law.—Attorney General Eric Holder, ThisWeek

Question, did Attorney General Eric Holder Read the Arizona Immigration Law before he attacked it? Here’s AG Holder on ABC’s ThisWeek Sunday News raising concerns about Arizona’s law. (see 1:06min video)



After hearing the Attorney General’s concerns about the Arizona Immigration law some in the media began to get suspicious and began to ask questions. Had the President or his Attorney General even read the law that they were attacking?

It certainly didn’t seem like it to those of us who read the law because what the president and his AG were saying didn’t even come close to what the law actually is. What they were saying was “Weapons of Mass Destruction” wrong!

Brit Hume of Fox News asks the question how could the president and his Attorney General get it so wrong? I don’t know Brit they seem like a couple of bright guys maybe they’re getting their News from the cable’s CNN or MSNBC or maybe they’re being informed by broadcast News of ABC, CBS, NBC or 60 minutes. (see 2:48min video)



I know what to do, let’s call the AG before a congressional hearing and ask him if he’s read the Arizona law. Or if he didn’t read it where did he get his information from. He’ll tell us.

Congressman Ted Poe will you asked the AG if he’s read the Arizona law before he went on ABC’s ThisWeek to raise concerns about it, or if he’s read it any time since?

We would like to know since Mr. Holder probably made the over 40 million illegal aliens in this country fearful about Arizona and we wouldn’t want illegals to think that entering the United States illegally is a violation of law subject to being arrested and deported back to the country that they are a citizen of, now would we. (see 3:44min video)

Congressman Ted Poe (R-TX) questioning Attorney General Eric Holder about his knowledge of Arizona Senate Bill 1070 (commonly known as the Arizona Immigration Law).



Pitiful just pitiful, oh I see Mr. Holder you haven’t read the law. And the reason that you didn’t is because it’s your staff’s fault for not briefing you and putting the law before you before you went on national television and made wild accusations and categorically false statements about Arizona and Arizona Senate Bill 1070.

In addition to that I’ve also heard the wild accusations and categorically false statements that your boss, the president is making about Arizona and its Immigration law. I’m betting he hasn’t read the law either.

Below is linked copy of the law for all of you other Liberal misinformed haters who quote chapter and verse of what your ill-informed president says about everything. Obviously you don’t know to check things out for yourselves.
(Arizona Senate Bill 1070)

Now the next time someone jumps up and shouts, “You Lie!” When Soetoro is speaking you ‘all will know that someone has probably read something that Barry Hussein Soetoro just didn’t have time to read before Soetoro popped off about it before the nation! Or the alternative may well be that neither little Barry nor little Eric can read!

Three fingers of blame point back at Obama in Oil Spill

President Soetoro doing what he does best
"I have to say, though, I did not appreciate what I considered to be a ridiculous spectacle during the congressional hearings into this matter.

You had executives of BP and Transocean and Halliburton falling over each other to point the finger of blame at somebody else.

The American people could not have been impressed with that display, and I certainly wasn't." —president Barry Hussein Soetoro

I call it the paradox of finger pointing at the finger pointers. In a holier-than-thou sermon last Friday which was meant to be an update to the American people regarding the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico president Barry Hussein Soetoro pontificated on the evils of companies finger pointing at one another and not owning up to their corporate responsibilities.

However in the midst of the president’s homily if one listened closely one could hear the faintest mea culpa also in a speech which resonated largely in, “do as I say, but don’t finger point as I do” tones.

Yet unbelievably, president Barry Hussein Soetoro admitted that he is responsible for the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. That’s right he did. Did he say I’m responsible for the oil spill in the Gulf? No he didn’t. But would you expect a man who has spent his entire presidency up until now finger pointing at “the previous administration” to willingly and openly except responsibility for anything?

So why do I say he admitted guilt? Because he did in the only way he knows how to, hidden in plain sight in language said and unsaid. Once you understand the double speak which he and his fellow Democrats employ and once you know the facts, it’s quite easy to decipher what he meant from what he said. What he said was the following:

"For too long, for a decade or more, there has been a cozy relationship between the oil companies and the federal agency that permits them to drill. It seems as if permits were too often issued based on little more than assurances of safety from the oil companies. That cannot and will not happen anymore. To borrow an old phrase, we will trust but we will verify."—president Barry Hussein Soetoro

(see 2:16min video)




Now when we decipher the president’s statement we first find a Barry Hussein Soetoro finger point at both the previous administration and the Clinton administration. And maybe even beyond that. He chooses to do that with a carefully laid beginning premise. He says, “For too long, for a decade or more…”

So when we do the math the administrations that the federal agency was under which permitted drilling in the time frame of a decade or more included at least two administrations before his administration. This is a finger point!

Secondly this is a man that receives daily briefings regarding global situations by the best intelligence on the planet. He has the whole of government agencies as well as the intelligence agencies; the NSA, the HLS, the CIA, and the FBI at his disposal yet instead of making a detailed factual time and date statement regarding the “cozy relationship” between oil companies and the federal agency which allowed them to drill with no or easily obtained permits, the president chooses to say the words, “It seems…”

It seems? It seems as if permits were too often issued based on little more than assurances of safety from the oil companies? Why wouldn’t president Soetoro know definitively whether or not permits were issued based on his allegations? Hum?

It is my contention that the president does know exact dates and times yet he chose to use wording that would distance him from any blame in this matter on the one hand, while on the other hand only accepting Executive responsibility. Executive responsibility is taking responsibility for the actions of one’s subordinates while absolving oneself from any personal responsibility.

It would be like a Captain of a ship handing over the bridge to his first officer and in the Captain’s absence the ship is ran aground. The Captain would be held responsible even though technically he didn’t cause the ship to go aground.

Third the president said, “That cannot and will not happen anymore. To borrow an old phrase, we will trust but we will verify."

This statement is dripping with ambiguity referring to the issuing of permits without proper scrutiny based on the cozy relationships between the oil companies and the federal agency’s, in charge of oversight, actions--actions done under previous administrations. Furthermore because all of this happened, for too long, or for a decade or more I (Barry) was not here. All of this is meant to convey the unspoken message that, “these deals for drilling didn’t happen on my watch.”

But also if one looks closely we see president Soetoro assuming some responsibility for the future when he says, “That cannot and will not happen anymore…we will trust but we will verify.”

So from all of this the impression that we are supposed to come away with is under the Soetoro administration things will change from the way the oil companies and the government previously did business before the Soetoro administration.

But not so fast Mr. president. Let’s take a look at the facts. Let’s do a little trust but verify!

It is reported that oil companies received permission to drill oil starting in January 2009 and continued to receive permission to drill for offshore oil as late as May 2010 by the New York Times. Uh Mr. president were you not inaugurated in January of 2009?

The [MMS] agency since January 2009 has approved at least three huge lease sales, 103 seismic blasting projects and 346 drilling plans. Agency records also show that permission for those projects and plans was granted without getting the permits required under federal law.-- IAN URBINA, The New York Times (see article)

Five request for drilling from oil companies dates ranging from 5/4/10 to 5/12/10 and five approvals for drilling in the Gulf of Mexico dates ranging as late as 5/10/10 to 5/12/10 (see source)

And let’s not forget in March of 2010 the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration announced that it was going to open offshore areas that had never been opened for drilling before. (see article)

And Mr. president you did this knowing or you should have known that there were problems with the government agency in charge of oversight of the oil companies because a May 27, 2009 letter from Ken Abbott a scientist of BP outlined his concerns if drilling for oil were permitted in the Gulf of Mexico. (see letter)

This is a responsibility that all of us share. The oil companies share it, the manufacturers of this equipment share it, the agencies in the federal government in charge of oversight share that responsibility. I will not tolerate more finger pointing or irresponsibility.—president Barry Hussein Soetoro

And it is well that you shouldn’t tolerate any more finger pointing Mr. Soetoro because even the hard core progressives know that no matter how you attempt to parse words and craftily blame others with your high and condescending paternal lashing out we all know that you’re the blame for this crisis.

He [President Soetoro] owns this now [Gulf Oil catastrophe]. It was only a few weeks ago he came out for offshore drilling.—Bill Maher (source)

So go ahead and preach at us like old crazy drunk Uncle Joe who thought he was fooling everybody but wasn’t fooling anyone. This Catastrophe is your Katrina. It happened on your watch. It was warned about under your administration and it was you sir who called for drilling offshore for oil.

If there was an Oil man in the Whitehouse and this same disaster happened on his watch he would be catching holy hell right about now for the greatest oil spill and ecological disaster in U.S. history.

Funny thing about pointing fingers Mr. president you point one and there’s three pointing back at you. But in this case I’m willing to bet there’s about 308 million fingers or more pointing at you Mr. president.