Biden is Classic Obama

Sens. Joseph Biden and Barack Obama

Who is supposed to represent change from the same old politics, isn’t Barack Hussein Obama supposed too? So why did Sen. Obama select for his running mate the ultimate Washington insider and the most antithetical to change Senator in the U.S. Senate Joseph Biden?

Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. born November 20, 1942 and has been in the Senate longer than John McCain. And you think John Forbes Kerry was an attack dog, Biden is a rabid Democrat old line attack dog in the fashion of Hillary Clinton and Howard Dean combined!(see story)

It’s Classic Obama, Obama is forever on both sides of every issue he was against troop pull out before he was for it, he is for change and now not so much for change by selecting Sen. Joseph (talk too much) Biden! (see videos)

NEVER SAID WITHDRAW TROOPS



BARACK OBAMA SAYING HE OPPOSED WAR FROM THE BEGINNING



Sen. Obama is a living breathing walking contradiction and with the selection of Sen. Joseph Biden that makes Obama’s message of change and his Presidential campaign a walking living contradiction too!

Is Obama for change or is he not for change? Well yes and no, what he said was he is for change but what he also said is Sen. Joe Biden, who represents everything wrong and partisan in Washington politics, is his pick for Vice President. Huh?

Pretty good for a bright clean articulate (Negro)African-American right Sen. Biden? (see video)

Obama's house story larger than McCain's

Sen. Obama and Political backer and house buyer Tony Rezko

Democrat Barack Obama Thursday depicted John McCain as rich, out of touch and less a foreign-policy expert than he claims…

Speaking to supporters, Obama chided McCain for an interview he gave to the Politico Web site where he said he didn't know how many homes he owns.

"If you're like me, and you've got one house, or you are like the millions of people who are struggling right now to keep up with their mortgage so they don't lose their home, you might have different perspective," Obama said.-- BETH FOUHY, AP News

It’s not how many you own, It’s about who owns you!

It's a case of the pot calling the kettle gold! It's the uber-Liberal Wealthy Elitist calling the maverick wealthy statesman Rich! (see story) How in the world does Barack Obama comment on anyone’s wealth and house situation when Obama made 4 million dollars last year and his Chicago home and land deal is in question? (see video)



This is a subject that Obama should have steered clear of. But instead Obama reopens the door on his own house buying ignorance by attempting to play gotcha with the fact that Sen. McCain did know how many houses that he owns.

But I ask you what’s worst Sen. McCain not knowing about his own property (which his wife manages) or Sen. Obama’s “bone headed” house and land deals with the indicted and now convicted political influence man, Tony Rezko?

Sen. Obama has reminded voters of questions about the shady company that he keeps. Characters that have put Sen. Obama were he is, Tony Rezko is Obama’s main fundraiser and next door neighbor is prime example of Obama’s bad judgment in people who influence him. (see video)



Tony Rezko was recently convicted and now we wait to see if there will be blowback on his political protégé, Senator Barack Hussein Obama.



It's Paper and glue and in this case calling someone rich and out of touch sticks back to you Sen. Obama! You now must hope that nothing from your political mentor, Tony Rezko sticks back to you too!

Jeez what a fiasco!

Beyond Diplomacy: That’s above Obama’s pay grade too!

"Russia in this case will have to react and not only through diplomatic protests,"-- The Russian Foreign Ministry

What do you suppose Russia means by that statement? The United States and Poland just signed an agreement for missile defense and Russia is intimating war but back to that in a moment.

Presumptive President of the United States of America Barack Hussein Obama did not even waiting for the January 20, 2009 inauguration. And the McCain campaign is accusing a key Obama advisor of presumptive covert diplomacy with Syria a country that the United States considers a terrorist supporting regime.

Though this is highly irregular it is in keeping with the senator’s promise to meet with enemies of the United States without preconditions.



Without preconditions, Sen. Obama is not even letting the little precondition that he is not yet President, get in the way of his zeal to get to know our enemies.

Obama hasn't hung drapes in the White house yet, nevertheless his foreign policy adviser Daniel Kunzler spoke with Syria high ranking foreign minister last month on Sen. Obama’s Middle East and European world tour according to the New York Sun,which is wrong on so many levels that Sen. Obama can do no less than to disassociate himself from Kunzler.(see here)

When Obama stated that he would talk to America’s enemy without precondition I’m sure that every one assume that he meant when and if he were elected President not before, truly acting above his paid grade.

This brings me back to Russia, Russia’s deputy chief of general staff Colonel-General Anatoly Nogovitsyn warned that Poland has become a “target for attack” by signing the deal with the United States.

Interesting enough the U.S. didn’t complain once even though it was Russia that built the nuclear facilities that gave Iran the abilities to threaten the Western world with nuclear proliferation.

Poland says that it now needs protect because of Iran’s new found threat. Iran did announce last week that its missile capabilities can now reach Israel.(see story)

And then there was that little Russian incursion into the Republic of Georgia that the whole of Europe is concerned about.

New oil money, withholding oil from European nations, supporting and assisting terrorist regimes, and violating Democratic sovereign nations Russia is making all of the wrong moves and they say that they are going to do more than just talking and diplomacy about missiles in Poland.

Hey if Russia feels that the defense shield pact that the United States signed with Poland is beyond diplomacy would that mean that this situation is above Sen. Obama pay grade too?

And what about Iran, if Iran is bent on world domination does Sen. Obama think that he can diplomatically negotiate Iran out of world conquest?

The message of the [Islamic] Revolution is Global, and is not restricted to a specific place or time. Have no doubt… Allah willing, Islam will conquer what?

It will conquer all the mountain tops of the world. – Mahmoud Ahmadinejab, President of Iran

All of these hostile regimes are committed to world conquest and they are not in the mood to talk which makes me to believe that the job of the Presidency would be way above the Obama pay grade!

Obama builds Political Strawman about Patriotism

"These are the judgments I've made and the policies that we have to debate, because we do have differences in this election. One of the things that we have to change in this country is the idea that people can't disagree without challenging each other's character and patriotism.”—Sen. Barack Obama

How dare a Democrat attempt to dress someone down for questioning his or her political rival’s character and patriotism. For almost 7 years President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and any Republican in political office have had their character impugned by Democrats, their motives questioned by Democrats and their patriotism questioned by Democrats.

Sorry Barack the one thing that a Democrat can’t do is chide someone, anyone for questioning you and your Party when your Party viciously and brutally attacked a sitting President for almost 8 straight years for no other reason then he is a Republican. (see video)



But let's get it straight John McCain did not question your character nor did he question your patriotism, (There you go putting words in Sen. McCain's mouth again) McCain questioned your judgment and even you seem to believe that, judgment can be called into question.



Only the audacity of Democratic hypocrisy would stand before Veteran of Foreign Wars as Sen. Obama did having never worn the uniform or fought for his country and blatantly accuse John McCain of questioning his patriotism. (see story)

Sen. McCain like almost every other Democrat that has campaigned against you in the Democratic primaries, Sen. Clinton included, questions the fact that a man that only served in the Senate for a total of 143 working days is experienced enough to lead this great country! What’s that 4 months and some change?

However there are those who do question your patriotism because of your actions. I don’t know how the Veterans of Foreign Wars allowed you to escape when you besmirched one of their own, Sen. McCain is a War Veteran and POW.

A simple look at the record will ensure that no Veteran will vote for someone who disrespects the Flag, the American Anthem and an honored war veteran like Sen. McCain.

Sen. Obama you do this country a disservice when you pretend offense when there was none given. It seems that Sen. Clinton isn’t the only one with fantasies of coming under gun fire.

The difference between you and Sen. McCain is Sen. McCain has actually come under gun fire and you, Sen. Obama, only image that an honored war veteran took pot shots at your patriotism.

Sen. Obama your PATRIOTISM speaks for itself! (see follow videos)

Citizen concerned about Obama's Patriotism



Sen. Obama practices his own form of patriotism



Sen. Obama once again showing that you don't have to show patriotism to be a patriot



Like I said Sen. Obama your patriotism speaks for itself!

Those Lying Christians at Saddleback!

Rick Warren
Pastor Rick Warren started Saturday evening’s Civil Forum by assuring America that Sen. McCain was safely tucked away in a cone of silence therefore he would not be able to hear the questions given to Sen. Barack Obama.



Given that both men were going to be asked the same questions the “cone of silence” would insure that McCain would not receive an unfair advantage by hearing the questions and answers given to Sen. Obama and then unfairly tailor his responses to win favor with this obvious closed-minded judgmental group of lying Christians.

But according to the New York Timesdespite the Christian’s assurances, they lied and set Sen. Obama up for defeat. According to the New York Times Sen. McCain was not in a cone of silence but instead he wasn’t even in the building he was in a motorcade on his way to the forum where he listened in to Sen. Obama’s hour long interview.

Senator John McCain was not in a “cone of silence” on Saturday night while his rival, Senator Barack Obama, was being interviewed at the Saddleback Church in California.

Members of the McCain campaign staff, who flew here Sunday from California , said Mr. McCain was in his motorcade on the way to the church as Mr. Obama was being interviewed by the Rev. Rick Warren, the author of the best-selling book “The Purpose Driven Life.”-The New York Times

So once again George Bush is a liar and Christians are liars! Rick Warren and his Saddleback Church are liars and are discredited and Sen. McCain didn’t actually beat Sen. Obama in Saturday night’s civil forum Sen. McCain cheated.

So much for the integrity of Rick Warren and his Saddleback church, Christians, Sen. McCain and by inference the entire Republican Party but according to William Kristol if these claims are false and if this is propaganda put out by an Obama camp that sensed that their candidate suffered a defeat in Saturday nights forum, then Obama’s people clearly have indicated that they feel that Obama lost Saturday night!

But apparently it wasn’t propaganda, apparently Senator McCain was not in a cone of silence and Pastor Warren’s explanation was not clear about the situation as seen in the video above when a CNN reporter asked about the cone of silence. What a fiasco!

At the very least even a rank political amateur should have known that any perceived advantage in this highly partisan contest would be viewed by the other side as cheating or exploded as if it were cheating.

Warren owned both candidates and the American people a truthful explanation of Senator McCain's whereabouts as soon as he knew that his statement about a cone of silence was not correct.

Instead he allowed the facts to be leaked out giving the appearance of "sour grapes" by the Obama campaign.

Obama was exposed as faith impostor or was he since his side can now say that Sen. McCain cheated and apparently Rick Warren and his Saddleback Church was exposed too!

How could such a catastrophic mistake be made, one which voided out the whole purpose of the event? And one which puts Warren's ministry's credibility in question.

Let's see how the Pastor answers those questions in upcoming days.

From Brokeback to Saddleback

Barack Obama, right, and John McCain, left, wave with Pastor Rick Warren during the Saddleback Forum in Lake Forest, Calif

And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.—Romans 12:2

How does one reconcile views held by the world and views held by people of faith and values? Or is that even possible or should that even be desired?

The presidential campaign took a brief turn to court Evangelicals this weekend and Sen. Obama and McCain both must feel that they need this vote.

First for definition sake the world or worldly views are views that are semi to anti-religious views. Views that attempt to bring faith and values into compromise with what is acceptable today or views that would totally eradicate faith and values completely if possible.

Faith for purposes of definition is belief that God’s word is represented by uncompromised biblical teaching and righteous living based on the principles of those biblical teachings and values.

Which brings us to Pastor Rich Warren who undertook the task this weekend of bring Sens. Barack Obama and John McCain before the Christian community at his Saddleback Church to assess which worldview most govern either of these men.

What is important to note is that Democrats decided to invent the perfect candidate after losing the 2004 Presidential elections. What was decided is that Democrats needed to appeal to people of faith since they believed that they were perceived as a godless Party representing abortion, homosexuality and other anti-traditional family values. I blogged about this phenomenon back in 2006.

Naw get serious! To strategize silly, [Democrat] party leaders believe that they lost the value vote and if they are going to win the Congress back in 2006 and the White House back in 2008 they had better learn how to make Jesus do what they want him to. You know, they need to talk like they have the same values as Conservatives when in fact they really deplore Conservative values.

This is pure Orwellian- Machiavellian fascist politics at it’s ultimate, let’s see how it works.

The Democrats now realize that they can't win by narrowing their appeal to their base they realize that they must reach out to those that they have up to now demonized and belittled, Christians.

So they have paid people to listen to Rush, to learn not only what Christians care about but also what Christians were being told.

What they found is that there was a growing God-gap between them and the voters, particularly “middle to [lower-class] economic white voters,” who see the Democrats as Godless and hostile to traditional values and “anti-religious”; they’ve also found that married women, who are increasingly voting Republican, place moral values at the top of their list of concerns; and that Bush had managed to win 64 percent of non-college, nonunion white voters in 2004, 41 percent of whom attend church at least once a week.

The most significant finding was that voters were making choices based more on their faith than on their physical needs, said House Democratic Caucus Chairman James Clyburn (D-S.C.).

So what’s the fix? How are Democrats going to win in 2006 and 2008 they believe that all that they must do is change the way that they speak about religion.--Alaphiah

Even though Sen. Obama is the Democrats answer to the faith and values problem, in a San Francisco meeting where he was pandering to the irreligious he spoke candidly about what he considered to be small town religious America he said, “You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them...And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not.

And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

Its interesting isn’t it how Sen. Obama expresses disdain for people who exercise their Constitutional 1st and 2nd amendment rights as well as a desire to protect this nation’s borders, culture and language.

Yet with Pastor Warren and the Saddleback Church Sen. Obama attempted to put his best foot forward the only thing is the Senator’s best foot forward was an obvious fraud and true people of faith and values could tell it.

Obama’s performance was a dismal failure; no person of faith and values believes that Sen. Obama’s version of faith and values is remotely akin to traditional American values.

Bryon York of National Review Online viewed the Saddleback Forum as a clear win for Sen. McCain (see here)

Sen. Obama’s brokeback Democrat values did not fool the congregants at Saddleback Church and they should not fool any true believer because Democrat’s faith, is premeditated, phony and faked.

Why do I say that? Because Democrats as I point out above made up their emphasis on faith in 2006 only to win the 2006 Congressional elections and the 2008 Presidential elections that was Democrat strategy and Sen. Obama is simply the manifestion of that plan.

The “What I said is, That’s what I said from the start, What I’ve also said”s of Barack Obama

Boy talk about trying to keep what Sen. Obama says straight. In an interview with journalist Jon Ralston Sen. Obama deflects the reporters attempt to get the senator to come down on one side of the issue of drilling for oil. It seems that Senator Obama has deference for both sides of every issue.

Interesting enough the Senator at one point in the Ralston interview chided Ralston for putting words in his mouth. The interviewer was simply quoting an earlier Obama position, one which the Senator stated himself. (see video)




At one point Obama says,“Jon don’t put words in my mouth or anticipate what I’m going to do” That’s interesting Senator Obama, Ralston was only saying what you said previously on a different occasion and you consider that putting words in your mouth?

No Senator putting word in someone’s mouth is what you did to Sen. John McCain when you all but called him a racist who would attempt to scare the American people with the fact that you are Black.

"Nobody thinks that Bush and McCain have a real answer to the challenges we face. So what they're going to try to do is make you scared of me," Obama said. "You know, he's not patriotic enough, he's got a funny name, you know, he doesn't look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills." –Barack Obama (See Video)

Senator McCain hasn’t said any such thing yet you presume to put those words into McCain’s mouth.

It’s no wonder they call you the presumptive Democrat nominee Senator Obama. Here’s a suggestion why don’t you find a position on a subject and try to stick with it and Mr. Ralston won't have to try so hard to understand where you stand and what you support and neither will the American people!

Obama Qualified maybe, but not even he believes he’s experienced

Barack Obama is constitutionally qualified to be President or is he? He’s over 35-years-old but there is question whether the Senator is a Natural Born Citizen of the United States of America and Senator Obama isn’t releasing his birth certificate. (see story)

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.—Article II United States Constitution

The fact that there is question about Senator Obama’s U.S. citizenship aside another question arises. That question originated in Democrat circles and nonetheless it is important to note. (see video)



What is being questioned is Senator Obama’s experience. Everyone from Senator Obama’s main rival Senator Hillary Clinton to grassroot Democrats are questioning whether a Senator who has only spent only an abysmal 143 working days as a Senator has the experience to be President of the United States of America.

Just how much Senate experience does Barack Obama have in terms of actual work days? Not much.

From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to the time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he logged 143 days of experience in the Senate.

That's how many days the Senate was actually in session and working.

After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief, Leader of the Free World, and fill the shoes of Abraham Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan.-- Cheri Jacobus

But that’s not all! There is someone questioning the Senator’s experience that even he can’t refute. Who might that be? Himself!

In 2004 just after the Senator won his senate seat he was asked by a reporter whether he would run for the office of President in 2008 this very election. The just elected senator replied:

"You know, I am a believer in knowing what you are doing when you apply for a job, and I think that if I were to seriously consider running on a national ticket I would essentially have to start now, before having served a day in the Senate.

Now there are some people that might be comfortable doing that, but I am not one of those people. "—Senator Barack Obama (see video)

Only 143 working days in the Senate since he declared his candidacy, the question is what, between Senator Obama’s winning his senate seat in 2004 and saying that he is not experienced enough to be President and wouldn’t be experienced enough in 2008 to be President, has now changed. Senate Obama owes American voters an explanation why someone who said himself that he is not ready to lead this nation is wasting the American people’s time.

Senator in 2004 you said that you were a believer in knowing what you are doing when you apply for a job. With only 143 working days in the Senate how could you possibly know what you are doing in the Senate not to even mention knowing what to do as President? Were you lying in 2004 Senator Obama or are you lying now?

Obama’s Darfur Solution to Russia

Sen. Obama in Hawaii

RUSSERT: He's 42 years old, he's a former law professor. He is Mr. Putin's campaign manager. He is going to be the new president of Russia. And if he says to the Russian troops, you know what, why don't you go help Serbia retake Kosovo, what does President Obama do?

OBAMA: Well, I think that we work with the international community that has also recognized Kosovo, and state that that's unacceptable. But, fortunately, we have a strong international structure anchored in NATO to deal with this issue. --The New York Times

Senator Obama wants to say that he told us so concerning Russia’s war on Georgia. Obama claims that he was been warning the world for months about Russian aggression however when asked directly in an hypothetical by the late Tim Russert in the Democrat primary debates held earlier this year what he would do if Russia helped Serbia to invade Kosovo Senator Obama gave the Darfur response.(see video)

As many as 200,000 to 400,000 innocent people have been killed and more than 2.5 million more have been driven from their homes. These refugees now face starvation, disease, and rape, while those who remain in Darfur risk torture, death, and displacement.

What has the United Nations done to stop the violence? What have the high profile Movie stars and peace activist done to stop the killing?

Let Darfur be a warning to all people. If a nation or a state needs protection against violence, murder, genocide or injustice do not wait on Liberals or their institutions to do anything to fight against the persecutors. Liberals will make a country like Darfur a cause celebre but they will not wage war to save you. They will not lift a actual finger to help.—Alaphiah

(see video)



What is the Darfur solution? What has the United Nations or any European country done to stop the 5years of murder and ethnic cleansing in Darfur? NOTHING! Oh they’ve condemned the violence, in fact they’ve passed three resolutions against the violence so after five years of the international body doing nothing for Sen. Obama to offer NATO as an answer against Russian aggression is laughably ignorant.

The 21 year Sudanese civil war between the Arab Muslim Khartoum government in the north and the black African Christian rebels in the south has spurred the world's greatest humanitarian crisis since the Rwandan genocide in 1994 and the World community is doing literally nothing about it. (see here)

1500 reported killed in the Russian Georgia Battle. Russia has bombed Georgia and has taken Georgian territory in blatant acts of war and aggression. Sen. Obama told Tim Russert that if he were President his answer to the situation would be to hide behind NATO yet he criticized the Bush administration’s handling Russian relations.


Can we expect any Liberal to actually respond to aggression in the world? If the U.N.'s response to Darfur and Sen. Obama response to the Russian attack against Georgia is any indication all we can expect from Liberals or a Democrat President is talk.

And frankly Sen. Obama there are some situations that we can’t just talk our way out of.

Back to the U.S.S.R.

From left: Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov, President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin (AP Photo/ RIA Novosti, Vladimir Rovionov, Presidemtial Press Service )

They’ve built Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Payment for that work and oil revenues on the global free market has not only made the middle east flush with wealth Russia is now regaining it’s status as a superpower and what better way to demonstrate their renewed oil generated power than by punishing the pro Western state of Georgia for all the world to take note.

Iran expects its first Russian-built nuclear power plant in the southern port city of Bushehr to come on stream in early 2009, reported Press TV.—Business Intelligence

The United States often credits President Ronald Regan for bringing down the Soviet Union by an escalation of military spending thus defeating the U.S.S.R. and ending the cold war between the Soviet Communist and America.

You think that the breakup of the Soviet Union, years of economic down turn and lose of world esteem might have been a little embarrassing for Russia?

Do you think that Russia regaining its economic strength would be good for America or the Western world?

The excuse for the Russian attack is South Ossetia, a breakaway province bordering Russia that Georgia claims as its own but whose heavily Russian-speaking population is supported by Moscow in its bid for independence.

But the more likely cause is Moscow's determination to demonstrate to Georgia and Ukraine, another pro-Western member of the old U.S.S.R., that the West, especially Washington, can't help them. And that membership in NATO is a no-no.—John Farmer, The Star-Ledger

Well considering that it is Russia and China that opposes the United States on the United Nations Security Council continually and it is Russia that is propping up Iran we could be right in the midst of Cold War II and not even aware of it.

How did the Georgian war begin? According to the Council on Foreign Relations Russia started it;

This “war”—and I think that is a more appropriate term than “conflict”—began in earnest at the end of last week when the Georgians responded to shelling from the Russian-controlled part of South Ossetia into their own portion of the province and maybe into Georgian territory proper. But this was only the spark that produced the big fire.

The confrontation has been building for several months, and one might even say for several years. The big increase in tension came in April when the Russians announced that they would upgrade their relations with the two breakaway provinces of Georgia—Abkhazia and South Ossetia. They followed that by increasing the troop contingent that they had in those provinces, essentially a peacekeeping force.

They increased military pressure, shooting down Georgian drones and sending Russian aircraft over Georgian territory. The expectation of many observers was that they were looking to exert a kind of pressure that would cause the Georgians to respond in some way that would then make it possible for Russian forces to come in and strike.-- Stephen Sestanovich, CFR senior fellow for Russian and Eurasian studies (see here)

Georgian Deputy Prime Minister Giorgi Baramidze believes that Russia started this war too: (See Video about 6 mins)



Whether it’s Cold War or Oil Wars Russia has halted its military action in Georgia for now with a message to the world.

Economy strength is back in Russia and boy how lucky we are.

There’s No Such Thing as “Moderate Islam”!

I had my doubts about the muslim religion, so I tried to
educate myself. What I found out is not only chilling,
but damning of both the so-called “religion”, and it’s
maniacal founder, Muhammad!

I could probably fill dozens of pages, but it just seems
easier and more accurate to give you a website that will
truly open the eyes of not only the “tolerant” but the
“forgiving”.

Don’t believe the spin you hear from the muslim apologists,
that Islam is a “peaceful religion”. In actuality, it
preaches death to all who are not devout muslims, no
exceptions!!!! It not only condones, but actually encourages terrorism and the murder of wives, sisters and daughters, for
the simplist “infractions” of tyrannical and archaic “muslim
Law”..... presently called "honor killings".

This is a bunch of BS, and cannot and will not be tolerated
in the United States. For your sake, and the sake of your
children, grandchildren and their descendants, educate
yourself before it is too late. There is nothing in this
false religion that preaches love...........only hate, death
and destruction. This is Islam’s big bone of contention with
Christians and Jews....... who’s religions are built on love.

In the words of Islam’s founder:........‘They say we are terrorists? They are right—of course we are. That is what we
do for a living’ — Khalid Shaikh Muhammad

Read this and weep!!!
http://www.islamundressed.com/B-Diary%20of%20Muhammad.htm

The Messiah is an Empty Suit

Or the Messiah has no Clothes

“America is …, uh, is no longer, uh … what it could be, what it once was. And I say to myself, I don’t want that future for my children.”—Democrat presumptive nominee Sen. Barack Obama

Not since the little boy in Hans Christian Anderson’s fairly tale, “The Emperor has no Clothes” has a child brought about such enlightenment for the village.

We of this village, the village of the United States of America can now see what asking the right question can do to open unsuspecting eyes to the truth.

That is just what a 7 year old little girl in Elkhart Indiana did last week when she asked a question of Sen. Barack Obama on Obama's campaign stump. This little girl’s question exposed Sen. Obama for the empty suit that he is. I’m even now more resolute in knowing that Sen. Clinton had it wrong. On the contrary Sen. Clinton it takes a child to raise a village particularly if the village is given over to false worship.

In Anderson’s fairy tale two huckster tailors come to the village with sophistic tales of invisible looms and golden thread all to make an invisible suit for the Emperor to wear.

As the story goes anyone who did not see the visible cloth that the golden thread produced or the suit that they tailored from the invisible cloth were too stupid to live in the village and certainly too stupid to advise the Emperor, so everyone in the village pretended to see the pretend invisible suit.

These two peddlers would have gotten clean away with their farce too had it not been for a little boy that cut through all the pretence and said what he saw. “THE EMPEROR HAS ON NO CLOTHES” The little boy shouted when the Emperor paraded down the middle of the village with his ignorance showing adored in nothing but underwear and lies.

The whole village and even the Emperor himself had allowed highfalutin words to dazzle them into a group psychosis making the whole village susceptible to the wiles of the two predatory conmen.

In like fashion, Sens. Clinton’s and Obama’s campaigns to be the Democrat nominee for President of the United States of America has paralleled Anderson’s fairly tale. Both campaigns where filled complete with sophistry and highfalutin words of a failed America woven into an anti-American tapestry like so much invisible cloth.

So naturally their candidacies begged the question why do you what to be President?

But only a 7-year-old little girl was smart enough to ask it. When this question, elegant for its simplicity, was asked of the presumptive Democrat nominee, Sen. Barack Obama, Obama sputtered out perhaps the most appallingly revealing answer he said, “America is …, uh, is no longer, uh … what it could be, what it once was. And I say to myself, I don’t want that future for my children.”

Doesn’t make any sense does it? But oh contraire it does!

Sen. Obama the Democrat Party and the Senator’s wife have been weaving this dark dank picture of America for going on 7 years now. America the war monger, America the immigrant hater, America the homophobic, America the Global polluter, America the racist, America the sexist, America the greedy, America the imperialist, America the vast right-wing conspirator, etc.

When Sen. Obama, Democrats or Sen. Clinton, for that matter look at America they see the worst of what America has been and even the worst of some things that we have not been.

That is their reality or they could not possible say the things that they say about America. What is so breathe takingly ironic is that Sen. Obama for all intents and purposes will be the first openly Black man to be voted as nominee of a major American political Party a historic feat and tribute to the change that America has undergone.

Yet the Senator has looked right passed this historical time in American history to complain about an unjust America, a figment of his own deluded hatred for this Country.

How could the first openly Black presumptive nominee of a major political Party in the United States of America miss the gravity and the historic important of this time, his time, the time that he, his wife and his followers have been waiting for?

How could Sen. Obama tell a 7-year-old little girl that he’s running for President basically because America sucks and he doesn’t want that for his children?

I think twenty years of sitting in Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s Church of Black Liberation Theology combined with the normal ideology of Democrat’s hate America first is woven right into the very fabric of who Barack Hussein Obama is.

He could not have answered that 7-year-old’s question any other way. For Sen. Obama to look past all of the progress that America has made, progress that is responsible for his political rise and success is indicative of the self deluded blindness and emptiness of his political views.

For Sen. Obama politically, there is no balm in Gilead, there is no rose of Sharon. And as for he who would presume to speak to the people of the world as he did in Germany, a 7-year-old little girl has revealed to that world that the Messiah has no clothes.

The Fraud that Al Gore took the initiative to create

Former Vice President, Nobel Peace Prize winner and Oscar winner Albert A. Gore,Jr.

PERSONAL ENERGY ETHICS PLEDGE

As a believer:
-that human-caused global warming is a moral, ethical, and spiritual issue affecting our survival;
-that home energy use is a key component of overall energy use;
-that reducing my fossil fuel-based home energy usage will lead to lower greenhouse gas emissions; and
-that leaders on moral issues should lead by example;
I pledge to consume no more energy for use in my residence than the average American household by March 21, 2008.”

Al Gore won’t sign it. Sen. Jim Inhofe has asked anyone who advocates going green to sign a personal pledge that they wouldn’t consume more energy than the average American household.

Movie and Rock Stars, Actors and Actresses, anyone of fame and fortune that has told us to turndown the heat, raise the thermostat or over inflate our tires please sign a pledge that you madam and you sir will do the same.

Any takers? 506 days and Al Gore won’t sign. Why because he uses what has been reported as up to 20 times more energy in this residence than the average American household.

Gore has been criticized for excessive home energy usage at his residence in Tennessee. His electricity usage is reportedly 20 times higher than the average American household.—U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works

So mister "Global warming" is doing his part to ensure that we all die from anthropogenic global warming but he’s doing nothing to end his exorbitant use of energy.

What Mr. Gore plans to do is pay for the privilege of polluting by buy carbon offset credits. Now that wouldn’t make the air any cleaner in fact Gore’s offset credits won’t do anything for the environment at all. But he buys the privilege to say that he’s doing his part.

Sen. Jim Inhofe makes this all too apparent in this Senate hearing concerning Global warming. Remember Gore is supposed to be answering a, "Yes, No" question. (See video)



Personal hypocrisies aside there is just isn’t a man-made catastrophe Global melt down about to happen in fact every global warming commercial that you see should be taken off the air and the sponsors should be sued for mental cruelty and causing public panic.

And those carbon credits that Al Gore is hawking, The Financial Times of London says that is all a fraud. But you knew that didn’t you? (See story)and (here)

A recent investigation by the Financial Times found widespread profiteering and fraud in carbon trading, the main mechanism for greenhouse gas reduction proposed by the Kyoto treaty. Many schemes will produce only limited reductions in greenhouse gases and will have little or no effect on global warming.--Harry Nielsen

Going Green, oh that only means taking your green. So companies that are so positioned to do so will take your money for absolutely no services in return.

Senator Inhofe does every American a service by exposing the whole Global warming/Go Green movement as the fraud that it is. (See video)



The inconvenient truth is the Earth is getting colder not hotter and CO2 can not scientifically be linked to Global warming or climate change. (and here)

Pelosi says use your imagination to get gas and oil

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi

STEPHANOPOULOS: But why not allow votes on all that? When you came in as Speaker you promised in your commitment book "A New Direction for America," let me show our viewers, you said that “Bills should generally come to the floor under a procedure that allows open, full, fair debate consisting of full amendment process that grants the Minority the right to offer its alternatives.” If they want to offer a drilling proposal, why can't they have a vote?

PELOSI: They'll have to use their imagination as to how they can get a vote and then they may get a vote. –NewsBusters, transcript of Interview on “this week”

One question very simply posed by former Clinton White house aide and now “This week” news show host George Stephanopoulos to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi last Sunday on "this week."

If Mr. Stephanopoulos ask this question once he asked it a million times, Speaker Pelosi if you are right why don’t you allow a straight up or down vote in Congress on drilling oil as the American people want.

Mr. Stephanopoulos even showed the Speaker of the House her own words where she said that under her leadership the House would be run ethically and fairer than under Republican control prior to 2006.

A New Direct for America

Regular order for legislation

Bills should generally come to the floor under a procedure that allows open, full and fair debate consisting of a full amendment process that grants the Minority the right to offer its alternatives, including a substitute.--Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (See document)(See video about 8mins)

Clearly if the Congresswoman’s position was correct surely that would be born out by a Democrat majority House of Representatives would show the American people’s interest.

So why won’t the Speaker of the House allow a vote on whether America should be able to drill for oil in America to decrease American dependency on foreign oil?

Congresswoman Pelosi’s answers were insultingly stupefying and opaquely serpentine even for a Democrat. And like a political Fairy Godmother she pronounced, "They'll have to use their imagination as to how they can get a vote and then they may get a vote."

Then continuing in typically Democrat fare the Congresswoman blamed President Bush as the reason that she did not allow a vote for drilling for oil. Ridiculous! (See video about 7mins)



It is a further insult to the American people’s intelligence that 7 years of Democrats attempts to sabotage the Bush administration and Republicans at the risk of losing the Iraq war thereby making the world less safe could be understood in any way that what Democrats were really attempting to accomplish was to save the planet and make the world safer.

Congresswoman Pelosi and the Democrat majority should be ashamed of themselves and they should rush back to Congress and do their jobs like the Republicans who are fighting for the American people.

Something to think about in November I must say!

Yet More Deception from Pelosi!

The 'Politico' reports that Nancy Pelosi is
secretly advising Democratic Congressmen, who
are coming up for re-election, to "support"
off-shore drilling, if it will get them elected.

I guess she figures if she can keep the Democratic
majority in both houses of Congress, they will be
free to continue doing exactly as they please and
"screw you"!

NICE Nancy!!!!!!!............. lie to the people
again. You got some sweetheart deal there. Tell
the people what they want to hear, and slam it to
them later........... as you did with Election '06.

Anybody who votes these lying, good-for-nothing
maggots back into office this year, is a fool at
best. It's as though you are telling them that
"it hurts".......... but, "do it again, I like it"!

It depends on what ready is

President Bill Clinton

Bill Clinton regrets some things he said - and didn't say - on the campaign trail. But one thing he still can't bring himself to utter: Barack Obama is ready to be President.-- MICHAEL McAULIFF, DAILY NEWS

"You can argue that nobody is ready to be president. You can argue that even if you've been vice-president for eight years, that no one can be fully ready for the pressures of the office." —Former President William Jefferson Clinton

When asked point blank just days ago whether or not Democrat presumptive nominee and Senator Barack Obama was ready to be the President of the United States of America, former President Bill Clinton answered in his own erstwhile yet indomitable, that depends on what is, is, fashion. (see story) (Play video)



The former President said, “You can argue that nobody is ready to be president.” The former President when on to say that he felt that Obama would beat McCain.

So let me see if I understand this, the Democrat Party is willing to put forward candidates (Hillary Clinton included) who are not ready to be President thinking number one that the American people are stupid enough to elect them (which was disproved in the Democrat primary) and number two Democrats don’t have to believe in the credentials of their candidates they only want to win.

Yesterday was the third day that House Republicans called the nation’s attention to the fact that Democrats in control of Congress have been a political disaster and that Nancy Pelosi and her Democrat Majority would rather be vacationing rather than voting on a resolution for the oil crisis in America. (See story)

And now Bill Clinton can’t quite bring himself to answer a simple yes or no question about the quality and readiness of the candidate that the Democrats have all but chosen to be their nominee to be President.

I guess you can argue that no Democrat should be elected to office locally or nationally but I guess that doesn’t matter because apparently what matters to Democrats is only that they win no matter what they promise. Like in the 2006 elections when they promised a new direction and all we got was partisan warfare from Democrat which caused legislative gridlock and more of the same politics.

Now they have put forward a candidate that promises new hope and change, the only thing is he’s not qualified to produce either!

Not one honest Democrat, if you can find such a thing, is willing to say that Sen. Barack Obama is ready to be President of the United States of America. But you can find plenty who says that he’s not. (play video)



If the Democrat’s greatest icon of the twentieth century William Jefferson Clinton can’t bring himself to say that Senator Obama is ready to be President why do Democrats think that they have any chance with Independents and Republicans? And they need crossover from both to win this election.

Only the rabid ultra partisans who value Party over country will vote for Barack. Only the ignorant who are enthralled with the idea of , “The first Black President” will vote for Barack. Only the enemies of America who want change, they want to see America changed and unmoored from the traditions that once made this country uniquely great, will vote for Barack.

Will Bill Clinton vote for Barack Obama?

Yes, because Bill Clinton is all of the above. In President Clinton’s own words, “The Constitution sets qualifications for the president, and then the people decide who they think would be the better president. I think we have two choices. I think he [Obama] should win, and I think he will win.”

That classic Clinton nondirect response was to the question, “Do you think that he[Sen. Obama] is qualified?” Not exactly a ringing endorsement of the man who potentially could lead your country but it’ll have to do because to anyone on knows how to interpret Clintonese the President’s answer was NO! No, Barack Hussein Obama is not ready and he is not qualified but Democrats have to win.

That my friend was Clinton’s true response layered underneath all of his pretense.

Depending of course on what is, is!

Pelosi’s on Vacation: Republicans working for the People

Leader of the Democrat controlled House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi

While their colleagues returned home for vacation, a small group of conservative Republicans took to the House floor Monday to protest Speaker Nancy Pelosi's refusal to hold a vote on offshore oil drilling.-- JOHN RILEY / The Dallas Morning News (See story)

Its lights out in the U.S. House of Representatives because the Democrat lead Congress is on a 5 week vacation.

However not everyone has gone home. There are some who feel a sense of duty to the American people. These few would be Republicans who knowing the dire need to relieve the American People at the gas pump have decided to stay and fight on behalf of the American people.

With no C-Span cameras to record the Republican protest against Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s shut down, House Republicans have resorted to hall way interviews to bring attention to the fact that the Democrat leadership in Congress left Washington D.C. leaving the people’s business undone. (see video about 8mins)



Republicans have vowed to keep their protest up on behalf of the American people until Democrats return to Congress and complete the unfinished work that their job requires.

The more things change the more they remain the same

Democrats making a stink that Iraqi government took vacation in 2007

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and the Democrats adjourned the House and turned off the light and killed the microphones, but Republicans are still on the floor talking gas prices.

Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and other GOP leaders opposed the motion to adjourn the House, arguing that Pelosi's refusal to schedule a vote allowing offshore drilling is hurting the American economy.

They have refused to leave the floor after the adjournment motion passed at 11:23 a.m. and are busy bashing Pelosi and her fellow Democrats for leaving town for the August recess.—CBS News as reported by The Politico 2008(See here)

Lawmakers divided over whether to keep U.S. troops in Iraq are finding common ground on at least one topic: They are furious that Iraqi politicians are considering a lengthy break this summer.—Associated Press 2007

May 3, 2007 Democrats blasted the Bush Administration and the Iraqi parliament because the Iraqi parliament voted to take a summer break even as U.S. troops fought in the desert heat in Iraq.(See here)

Democrats said that while American soldiers were suffering in the desert heat fighting for freedom in Iraq it was unacceptable for the Iraqi parliament to vacation.

However, how quickly events can change in a year’s time. Sectarian violence is down in Iraq and Shia government and Sunni militia are joining U.S. efforts in defeating insurgent al Qaeda in Iraq. In addition to those things, the U.S. led surge is working and has brought defeat to al Qaeda and stability to the region even if the presumptive Democrat nominee can not admit it!

Now amid record gas prices and Americans facing economic hardships our Congress has voted to go on vacation leaving an all important vote to drill for oil abandoned by this historically low single digit voter approval rated Democrat led, “Do nothing Congress.”



Ironically it was Republicans who attempted to force the Congressional Democrats to do the right thing and vote for the people’s interests but instead Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi turned off the lights, C-Span cameras, adjourned and left the Republicans in the dark to vainly fight for the rights of the people. (See here)

Apparently this is the change that the Democrats promised the American people. In one years time Democrats criticized the Iraqi parliament for taking a vacation while America soldiers suffered, only to turn around in a year’s time and do absolutely nothing to fulfill 2006 campaign promises to change America and work for the people.

Instead on some of the most important issues of the day, energy and oil prices, Democrats adjourn to leave the American people suffering in spite of the fact that Democrats could have remained and fought for the people as a few Republicans attempted to do.

The more things change the more they remain the same. Apparently America that’s the only change that you can believe in coming from a Democrat!

The Dems Trip Out (UP)!

Well, my friends. It's time to thank all those who
voted the "do-nothing" Democrats into control of
Congress in '06. I would like to say that you got
what you deserve, but unfortunately, it affects the
rest of us too!

Whatever made you think, with their past miserable
record, that any of those pie-in-the-sky promises that
they made to you prior to the 2006 elections, would ever
be kept. They did their best to smear the Republicans,
and then they come into power and thumb their noses at
all of us.

Now........... to add insult to injury, they leave on
vacation (5 weeks yet), and tell us all to buzz off.
Of course, they don't have to worry about the cost of
gasoline or any other costs, since they are pretty well
taken care of, BY US, with great salaries, awesome health
benefits (the best that our money can buy), very generous
penisons (even better than Wall Street), and all the graft
they can take!

I am more than pissed at these gross animals. They lie
through their teeth, and turn out to be 100 TIMES WORSE
than the representatives we had before election day '06.
They NEVER represent us the way we want them to, as
demostrated very strongly by their refusal to even vote
on lifting the offshore drilling ban. It's as though
they are telling us, "you put us in control, so shut the
hell up!".

If they think that "more air in your car's tires, conservation,
wind power, solar power, and biofuels......... are going
to cure this country's energy problems....... they are far
more naive than I ever gave them credit for.

ALL those ideas are light years away from being practical,
and even making a dent in our problems. They claim that
lifting the offshore drilling ban will not help bring down
the cost of oil for about ten years. But experts in the
field say that if we tap where we KNOW there is oil, we can
start benefiting in as little as ONE year. Who knows
better.......the oil wildcats or the Congress. I will grant
that the Congress has the edge on wind power, but that is all.

Fellow voters......... REMEMBER THIS TRECHERY come election
day........ and throw the bums out. Keep throwing them out
unless they vote the way we want them too. They are supposed
to be OUR representatives, not the lobbies that throw millions
into their re-election campaigns.

You can check their voting records online. Go, and anybody
who isn't in your corner, VOTE AGAINST. Start with Menendez
in New Jersey.......... for trying to destroy the Immigration
Bill........... he hasn't listened to ONE WORD from any of us.

Obama Launches Preemptive Racist Strike

Sens. McCain and Obama: Not campaigning in perfect Harmony

Launching a Preemptive Racist Strike against Republicans the presumptuous presumptive Democrat nominee Barack Hussein Obama attempted to scare his audience with a tale of Republican racism by using racism of his own to do it! (See here)

Obama said, "[…] So what they're going to try to do is make you scared of me, You know, he's not patriotic enough, he's got a funny name, you know, he doesn't look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills."

That’s an outlandish political charge. The last I checked Sen. McCain has affirmed to wage a respectful campaign to the chagrin of may Republicans. (See here)

This is not the first time Sen. Obama has invoked this racist dialogue into the campaign. He originally projected racism onto Republicans June 2008 And in his Berlin speech before 200,000 people of Germany the Senator began by saying, “I know that I don’t look like the Americans who’ve previously spoken in this great city.

The journey that led me here is improbable. My mother was born in the heartland of America , but my father grew up herding goats in Kenya . His father – my grandfather – was a cook, a domestic servant to the British. “ (Speech Transcript)

It seems to me that Sen. Obama has racism on his mind and that he is attempting to project onto the Republicans his own inadequacies.

After all Sen. Obama did attend the Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s Black Liberation Theology Church for many, many years and raised his family in that anti-White atmosphere where anti-White and anti-American messages were normally spoken. (See related Fox news discussion below)




In addition to that how ironic that Sen. Obama’s own Party, the Democrat Party used race against him when Sen. Hillary Clinton her husband and surrogates all attempted to defeat Obama by scaring Democrats regarding Sen. Obama’s race in their Democrat primaries. (See here)and (here)

Using sex, race against each other

At the same time, each has used the issue against the other. Mr. Obama’s advisers suggested that Mrs. Clinton was playing the sex card last fall after a brutal debate where several male contenders criticized her.

Mrs. Clinton’s advisers and former President Bill Clinton suggested that black candidates like Mr. Obama had done well in South Carolina because of support among African-Americans there.

For Sen. Obama to continually attempt to invoke Racism where it isn’t is a slap in the face of every American. First look to your own Party Sen. Obama. People of the world look at the Democrat Party they are the new purveyors of Racism and they are using a Black candidate to promote it.

Sen. Obama it is time that you face the reality that you and your Party are the only ones stuck on Race and when you lose in November as Sen. Clinton said you will, (She told Gov. Bill Richards that you can’t win) it will not be because you are an inadequate Black male as Senator Clinton supporter Harriet Christian says.

No instead, you will lose because you are an inadequate Democrat candidate. One in a long line of inadequate Democrats who have attempted to became President of the United States of America but have failed.

You can’t blame Republicans for your inadequacies, neither should you attempt self-filing racist prophesies.

The only racism evident so far is not coming from John McCain, or the Republicans. The only racism thus far has emanated from you Senator Obama and the Democrat Party.

Following is Keith Olbermann’s commentary on the Democrat Party’s overt Racism following years of Geraldine Ferraro's racist comments. It seems to me Sen. Obama Democrats are the racist, yourself included.