It's Happening!!!!

It didn't take long for the threatened Arizona
boycott to backfire on the few states that
have espoused it. Already, with almost 70% of the
nation solidly behind Arizona, more and more states
are promising to support the state with conferences
and vacation trips. In addition, those states
are contemplating similar legislation, and a majority of their
residents, are planning on voting with their pocket-books
to give California and the rest of the whiners a taste
of their own boycott medicine.

I knew that this would happen!!! You would have had
to be a complete idiot to think that the "silent
majority" was going to let this pass by unchallenged.

Can't wait to see how this plays out.......
in the "lame-stream media", and in the States. I have
a feeling that the whole thing is going to quietly die down,
when the bleeding hearts come to grips with the reality of life
and forget about all this political correctness, and the
politicians realize that it will hurt them far more than the few
hispanic votes that they will gain.

They forget that in that 70% in favor of the Arizona law, there
are most of the hispanic-American citizens and legal residents.
They too want the protection from the illegals and dope
smugglers.

University Of California San Diego condones the hatred of Jews

This ain’t your Mother’s or Father’s college education! No what you’ll find on University of California college campuses these days is the Muslim Student Association, the Hezbollah Student Association and “Hitler Youth” week celebrations all in the name of diversity and inclusion no doubt.

David Horowitz a guest speaker of the Young Americans for Freedom on the campus of the University of California San Diego on May 10, 2010 was challenged by a young female Muslim Jew-hater and supporter of the eradication of all Jews, regarding what the student attempted to characterize as misrepresentation about who is actually funding the Muslim Student Associations (MSA) on University of California Campuses.

It has became the anti-Conservative,the anti-America radical's (in this case Muslims) strategy to show up at Conservative meetings or guest appearances and attempt to either interrupt the meeting or shout down the guest speaker or attempt to make politically correct but bogus points during the question and answer period after the speech. (So much for freedom of speech, the freedom to associate and live and let live!)

Jumanah Imad Albahri is just such an anti-Conservative, anti-America radical. She attempted to make hay with what she thought was a false claim she found it in literature of Mr. Horowitz. It was literature that by her own admission was not a part of the discussion.

I was reading your literature, I found that much more interesting than your talk, and I found some interesting things about the MSA which is an organization that is very active on campus and it is hosting our annual “Hitler Youth” week (you should come out to those events).

If you could clarify the connection between the MSA and Jihad terrorist networks because last I checked we had to do our own fundraising and we never get help from anyone.

So if you can clarify the connection between UCSD’s MSA or if don’t have such information if you could connect other MSA‘s on UC’s because the connection wasn’t too clear in the pamphlet, so if you could just clarify. --Jumanah Imad Albahri, Student at University of California San Diego

But instead of showing up Mr. Horowitz as Ms. Albahri intended to do Mr. Horowitz was able to expose the Muslim Student Association, which is an approved organization of the University of California, as an anti-Jewish hatred organization that advocates the malicious genocide of Jews. See Ms. Albahri’s startling confession of that fact. (see 3:29min video)



Remember when college was about pledging the right Sorority or Fraternity? Or maybe you remember when college was about preparing yourself for a career that would earn you prestige and a better life. Today’s college it seems especially in the University of California system is about educating tomorrow’s Hezbollah and tomorrow’s Muslim Jew killers. It is an outrage that the University of California would condone Jihadist groups and hate groups on it's campuses.

Thus far UC's have allowed this appalling bigotry on it's campuses under the pretense of diversity and then the UC turns a blind eye to the haters and potential murderers that it is educating. UC students who will one day no doubt use the UC's education which they've received to kill Jews.

No this ain’t your mother’s and father’s college education you can tell by the lack of America flags on the Campuses of the University of California System.

Be Careful, "Mexifornia"!

I can't believe the outright stupidity of some
of the people of California!!! Whoever the "brain" of
the planned boycott of Arizona is, he or she is not the
brightest bulb in the box.

If this illegal immigration problem were strictly
local, I could understand what they are trying to
do. However, the entire country is riled up
over a situation that the Obama administration has no intention
of addressing......at least not until after the
mid-term elections....... and for obvious
reasons.

With more than 70% of the country squarely behind Arizona
and it's hard-working and dedicated legal residents,
California is risking the ire of the entire country.
Obviously the "open border" advocates of the "Sunshine State" did
not do their homework, or for that matter, didn't even attend class.

Don't be so hasty my left-wing friends. Oh ye
that wields the "sword of revenge", may cut off thine own testicles!
What you are proposing to use against the people of Arizona is dangerous.
The vast majority of this country, who support Arizona,
it's Governor, and it citizens, might not just stand by while
you attempt to blackmail that state into "submission".

It will be from people like myself and the average working
person in the rest of the country, that will come a boycott
of California.....starting with the Pelosi Vineyards and your wine
business in general. From there, it will be an easy step to boycott the
entertainment business based in California, and on and on and on.

If I were a California politician or even a resident,
I would give very careful consideration before participating in such
folly. We are, after all............one nation under
God......and it is OUR NATION, not Mexico's!!!!

If you choose to divide it with vote-pandering to the Hispanic
community by coming to the "aid of the illegals"... and
making false claims of "racism"....DO SO AT YOUR PERIL.
You are already drowning in red ink, you may also drown in your wine.

I side with Arizona!!!!

40 Million Mexican Revolutionaries inside the Belly of the Beast

We see ourselves, all of us here, as the Northern Front of a Latin America revolutionary movement. There are more than 40 million of our people north of the Rio Grande. That means to them (U.S. citizens)that’s 40 million potential revolutionaries north of the border inside of the belly of the beast.—Ron Gochez, History teacher Sanchee High School in California

AND YOU SO NAÏVELY THOUGHT THIS WAS ABOUT MISGUIDED U.S. LAWS

We are no longer speaking about Comprehensive Immigration Reform what we are really speaking about according to California High School History teacher Ron Gochez is Revolution!

According to Gochez White people are frail and racist and deserve to have their country overrun by what Gochez considers that rightful owners of this country, Mexicans. That is not surprising considering the source but what is surprising is that there are people in our government that share Gochez’s beliefs. People in our White house and Congress share Mr. Gochez’s beliefs.

According to Gochez there are 40 million Mexicans in the United States not just the official 12 million that the Barry Hussein Soetoro will admit to. And these 40 million invaders are posed to make vast improvements to the United States. And when these revolutionaries are done with the United States the United States will be just as well governed as Mexico or Columbia, or Venezuela. (see 4:55min video)

We see ourselves, all of us here, as the Northern Front of a Latin America revolutionary movement. There are more than 40 million of our people north of the Rio Grande. That means to them (U.S. citizens)that’s 40 million potential revolutionaries north of the border inside of the belly of the beast.

So when you think about why they (U.S. citizens) want to keep us out, of all people, that’s why. Because they know that we now know the truth, they know that we, “La Raza” we’re professionals, we’re educators, we are revolutionary students, what does that mean?

We are not just a regular culture anymore we are a culture of revolutionary spirit and that’s the fear!

So that being said I want to leave you with this, as a revolutionary and with revolutionary concepts let’s be clear about one thing our enemy is not the minutemen, our enemy is not the minutemen because the minutemen are not the ones who have killed over 4,600 people at this border.

But our enemy is the same enemy as Hugo Chavez, as Hugo Chavez has, our enemy is the same enemy that has kept Africa poor, our enemy is the same enemy that has kept Asia poor, our enemy is Capitalism and Imperialism.-- Sanchee H.S. history teacher Ron Gochez, La Raza Rally at UCLA

Ron Gochez’s sentiments are not new. These intentions have been underlining the illegal Mexican invasion of the United States for over the last 20 years no matter what official or unofficial U.S. government positions have been.

"We're going to take over all the political institutions of California. California is going to be a Hispanic state and anyone who doesn't like it should leave. If they [Anglos] don't like Mexicans, they ought to go back to Europe." -- Mario Obledo, former California secretary of health and welfare and co-founder of Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF)

Recently Liberals in the Democrat Party have planned to use the 40 million revolutionaries that are inside the belly of the beast to advance their political agenda of Liberalism. Like mutual parasites the Mexican revolutionaries and the Liberal Democrats feed off of one another.

Democrats’ plans are to use illegal Mexican invaders in this country to swell Democrat ranks thereby corrupting the election process of this country while taking and maintaining power. All the while the illegal Mexican invaders use the Liberal Democrat non-enforcement of borders in their quest of “Reconquista”, or taking back land which they claim that was stolen from them.

But let’s not forget the actual history between the two countries:

1821: Spain accepts Mexican independence.
1836: Texas breaks free of Mexican rule.
1846-48: Mexico loses much of its territory in the Mexican-American War. Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo signed.
1867: American Union Army assists Mexico’s Benito Juarez, a democratic reformer, removes France from Mexico.
1910: Mexican Revolution.
1914: U.S. Marines enter Veracruz.
1916: U.S. chases Pancho Villa out of New Mexico.
1938: Mexico nationalizes PEMEX. Cardenas and Roosevelt sign Good Neighbor Policy.
1942: Mexico supports U.S. in WWII. Relations generally stable during postwar years.
1960s: Tourism industry thrives, Mexican nationalism rises.
1971: U.S. imposes 10 percent tariff on all imports, hurting Mexico, which sends almost 70 percent of its exports to the U.S.
1980s: Mexico supports nationalist movements in Nicaragua and El Salvador. U.S. drug war creates mutual tensions.
1992: North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) signed. U.S. moves plants to Mexico to exploit cheap labor.
1995: Devastating Mexican peso devaluation.
2003: Mexican population in U.S. reported to have increased 10 percent in just three years, mostly as a result of illegal immigration. (source)

Even so Mexican agents have infiltrated the government of our country and are speaking seditiously against the United States and on behalf of Mexico to the detriment of U.S. interests. Take note of what’s happening in California as Mexican descendants in publicly held offices speak similar to Ron Gochez:

Art Torres, California Democratic Party chairman, at the Latino Summit Response to Prop 187 at U.C. Riverside (Jan. 14, 1995):
"Power is not given to you, you have to take it! People say to me when I was on the Senate floor, when I was in the Senate, why do you fight so hard for affirmative action programs. And I tell my white colleagues: because you're gonna need them. Remember, 187 is the last gasp of white America."

Antonio Villaraigosa, former speaker of the California State Assembly and present Los Angeles City Council member-elect, discussing Prop 187 with a KABC-TV, Los Angeles reporter (July 29, 1999):
Reporter: "What happens to the will of the people?"

Villaraigosa: "Well, the will of the people is something all of us have to respect, but when the will of the people is unconstitutional, the will of the people is null and void."

Mario Obledo, former California secretary of health and welfare and co-founder of Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), interviewed on radio station KIEV, Los Angeles (June 17, 1998):

"We're going to take over all the political institutions of California. California is going to be a Hispanic state and anyone who doesn't like it should leave. If they [Anglos] don't like Mexicans, they ought to go back to Europe."

Gloria Molina, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, speaking at the 1997 Southwest Voter Registration Education Project:

"We demand to be counted. And what we know as well is that the big giant that they keep talking about is awakening. And he's pretty angry about what's going on. Ya basta! [Enough!] This community is no longer going to stand for it. … And our vote is going to be important. But I gotta tell you that a lot of people are saying, 'I'm going to go out there and vote because I want to pay them back.'"

Pay who back?

Fabian Nunez, California assemblyman, at the Latino Summit Response to Prop 187 at U.C. Riverside (Jan. 14, 1995):

"Each of you, get ten people to go with us on that march in Washington, D.C., and I guarantee you just as we mobilized 150,000 to the streets of Los Angeles on October 16, we will mobilize 1 million people and bring Washington to a standstill, and those rednecks that are out there making decisions for the betterment of their communities will think twice before they push forward anti- immigrant legislation against our community."

State Sen. Nell Soto, D-Ontario, June 25, 2003, San Bernardino Town Hall meeting to discuss SB60, the bill that would grant driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, responding to critics who say the legislation promotes illegal immigration:

"Guess what?" Soto said. "The immigrants are already here. I welcome them. I hope they keep coming."

Do any of these quotes strike anyone as marginally racist or irresponsible?

'Since We Stole It, Let Them Steal It Back'

On June 17, I watched an incredible exchange during the legislative hearing over the Matricula Consular card (SB522) introduced by Manny Diaz, D-San Jose. The bill would require every state public officer or employee to accept, for identification purposes, the card as equivalent to a California driver’s license or ID card issued by the DMV.

Statements in favor included MALDEF, La Raza, the League of California Cities, the City of Los Angeles, and The Friends Committee on Legislation.
When the speaker stated "Opposition to the Bill?" a clearly audible "Oh God, same jerks" could be heard by all.

Statements opposed included several law enforcement and police organizations and the Federation of Americans for Immigration Reform (FAIR). Yeh Ling-Ling, the executive director of the Diversity Alliance for a Sustainable America (DASA), stated:

"It frightens me to see that our government is accepting ID cards issued by foreign governments. For example, in the land of my ancestry, China, the level of fraudulent documents is very high. Let’s say from the Philippines, Vietnam, Cambodia, where I lived, with money you can buy basically anything. Including documents.

"After the bombings [Sept. 11], I urged Congress to protect our borders. Very few congressional members listened. After the bombings, where thousands of people died, people were saying, it was unthinkable. Please, think of the list of what Mexico has been trying to do. What Mexican-American leaders, what many of them, have said. Mario Obledo said in 1998, quote, ‘eventually we are going to take over all the political institutions of California.’

"They said publicly that they are going to use immigration to control the Southwest, retake the Southwest, and eventually, take over the entire U.S. So please listen to those statements carefully."

Interruption by State Sen. John Vasconcellos, D-San Jose: "Since we stole it from them, why do you say it’s unfair to steal it back from us?"

Yeh Ling-Ling: "I’m sorry?"
Vasconcellos: "We stole it from them in the first place."
Yeh Ling-Ling: "Exactly what do you want to have happen?"
Vasconcellos: "I found your testimony (shaking his head, putting his glasses down) … I don’t want to debate you."
Yeh Ling-Ling: (with a questioning look) "Exactly?"
Vasconcellos: "I don’t want to debate you. I’ve listened to what you’ve had to say, period."

Since nobody in the chamber voiced any objection to Vasconcellos’ remarks, the reasonable inference is, yes, the Left is moving even further left, and American legislators like Vasconcellos believe that since Mexico was stolen by the U.S., there really isn’t anything to debate.

It should be noted as well that Ling-Ling has been confronted by other California Democrats while delivering similar testimony. Recently, during a hearing on SB60 (driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants), Sen. Nell Soto castigated Ling-Ling in a manner similar to Vasconcellos’, stating that her remarks were "blatantly racist," had no place at a legislative hearing and "really insulted the intelligence of some of us here."

Ling-Ling, whose group is based in Oakland, responded from the audience: "They were quotes, OK, from Mexican-American leaders."
What could Soto say? It was an embarrassing moment for SB60 backers.-- Patrick Mallon

40 Million plus illegal Mexican revolutionaries are in the United States (the belly of the beast) according to High School teacher Ron Gochez positioning themselves for “Reconquista” the taking back of U.S. land for Mexico and they have agents within the U.S. government aiding and betting them in this act of sedition against the United States of America. What Liberal Democrats call this very serious problem, this anti-America act, they call it Comprehensive Immigration Reform.

My question is what do you call it?

Kagan’s qualifications as nonexistent as a Birth Certificate

President Obama and Vice President Biden present Elena Kagan for nomination to the Supreme Court

Kagan's supposed academic achievements are being touted as the primary justification for putting someone who has never been a judge on the nation's highest court.

Now the fact that Kagan is more or less an academic nonentity would be of merely academic interest if she possessed unrelated but compelling qualifications for ascending to the nation's highest court. But what else, exactly, has she done?—Paul Campos

Paul Campos is a professor of law at the University of Colorado at Boulder. In his article The Next Harriet Miers? He absolutely slays the phony Liberal narrative that Elena Kagan is a brilliant legal scholar who makes up for a lack of jurist experience with unsurpassed legal scholarship.

Therefore according to linear Liberal logic Kagan is worthy of being nominated and confirmed for the Supreme Court only because president Soetoro says so. Not because of any deserving scholarly works or experience. This is starting to sound strangely familiar to the president’s own eligibility problems.

According to Professor Campos there is no there there in Kagan’s legal academic scholarship. Campos recounts a career of nearly 20 years since Kagan became a law professor in which Kagan’s academic writings are so scant he was able to read everything that Kagan had ever published in one day. (see article)

Yesterday, I read everything Elena Kagan has ever published. It didn't take long: in the nearly 20 years since Kagan became a law professor, she's published very little academic scholarship—three law review articles, along with a couple of shorter essays and two brief book reviews. Somehow, Kagan got tenure at Chicago in 1995 on the basis of a single article in The Supreme Court Review—a scholarly journal edited by Chicago's own faculty—and a short essay in the school's law review.—Paul Campos

I’m beginning to think that we are approaching that mysterious mystical Barry Hussein Soetoro birth certificate argument where we argue about the long vaulted copy of Soetoro’s birth certificate which no one has seen yet Obama sycophants argue to the death that based on a document that they have not seen Soetoro was born in Hawaii.

In like fashion Campos reveals that the narrative that Liberals are building about Kagan’s legal academic prowess is based on an academic record which isn’t there to support the claim that Kagan is brilliant.

At best we can only say that Elena Kagan is an Obama crony who is less deserving of a Supreme Court nomination than Harriet Miers was.  And we all have accepted that Miers though educated was not qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice. But neither is Elena Kagan.

Thanks for that insight Professor Campos.

I can’t believe that Liberals are that Stupid about Arizona

Enforcing U.S. Law as it should be

Attorney General Eric Holder said Sunday that the Justice Department was considering a federal lawsuit against Arizona's new immigration law.

"We are considering all of our options. One possibility is filing a lawsuit," Holder told NBC's "Meet the Press." Possible grounds for the lawsuit would be whether the Arizona law could lead to civil rights violations, he said.—CNN

Say the word Arizona when you speak to a Liberal or Progressive, the latest name which they answer to these days, and immediately their eyes roll back into their heads and they beginning to regurgitate the whole 1960’s civil rights “we shall overcome” mantra like that has anything to do with the illegal alien invasion that is transpiring in this country.

Our country is being overrun by illegal invaders also known as the aforementioned illegal aliens.

Illegal Invaders or Mexican Nationals or Citizens of the Sovereign country of Mexico have and are illegally crossing America’s border which is a federal violation of American law.

Yet these lawbreakers in a topsy-turvy logic and truth defying attempt are calling this gross violation of American sovereignty their constitutional civil right. They are also calling their illegal presence in the United States their constitutional guaranteed civil right. Both are outrageous and outlandish lies.

Oh I understand why Mexicans would leave the hell hole called Mexico, nothing to be proud of there. But what I can’t understand is why Americans would accept all of the lame claims on American rights from citizens from another country who are obviously here to exploit the sickly U.S. economy.

Oh yeah I understand all of that immigrant baloney that illegal invader anarchists shovel at us but actual immigrants come via U.S. immigration law not via Arizona/Mexico, Texas/Mexico or California/Mexico borders over and through fences.

Now Liberals that occupy the highest echelons of American government are hell bent on defying all reality. The Barry Hussein Soetoro administration’s Justice Department under AG Eric Holder has announced that it is considering suing Arizona on behalf of Mexico, Mexican Illegal invaders and Mexican Illegal invader anarchists who wish to violate the U.S. Constitution. (see article)

So let’s get this clear. The American federal government is considering suing Arizona a state of the United States of America because Arizona has decided to uphold the constitution of the United States of America, something that the president of the United States has sworn to do but has chosen not to do. The president has ignored his responsibility to uphold the constitution since his inauguration. (see 1: 31 min video)





We are no longer a nation of laws since the inauguration of 2009 we have officially become a nation of liars. Every word that the government speaks through Barry Hussein Soetoro is meant to obfuscate reality. There is nothing but deceit in what Soetoro and his chosen henchmen say.

[T]hose living illegally in the United States would have to pay a penalty and any taxes they owe, learn English and "make themselves right with the law" before starting the process of gaining U.S. citizenship.—CNN

When Soetoro speaks about Comprehensive Immigration Reform he is really speaking about amnesty for 20 million illegal Mexican invaders who have broken U.S. law primarily because their own country Mexico no longer functions as a legitimate Nation. So instead of Mexicans fixing their own country they come here thereby bringing the same dysfunction to the United States that they have in Mexico.

Oh it will not happen overnight, but it has already begun. The president of the United States has called for amnesty for illegal invaders of a foreign nation. He is presenting Mexico’s multiple problems as if they are the problems if the United States of America. Mexico’s problems are the United States’ because Mexico, Liberals and unnamed powers have made Mexico’s problems which are our secondarily seem to be our primary problems.

So instead of looking to fix why it is that Mexicans are fleeing Mexico we call each other names pejoratives like racists and bigots because those of us who see what is actually going on will not simply accept the popular narrative that what is wrong is our immigration laws.

We understand that changing our laws and thereby making illegality legal by the waving of the Congressional magic wand the problem of illegal invasion into this country will not be solved. What is faulty with that line of non-reasoning is that Mexico is still the problem and no matter how much or how many laws we change here until the economy and the government in Mexico are fixed they will continue to illegally invade the United States.

Unless of course the people of the United States foolishly allow their government to change the law thus legalizing the illegal invasion of the United States by Mexican Nationals.

I don’t believe that the American people are that stupid. Just because the Barry Hussein Soetoro government does doesn’t mean that we are all that stupid.

If Democrats and Liberals are allowed to continue to misinform about this great Mexican illegal invasion they will bring irreparable harm to the country that was once the greatest example of freedom that the world has ever seen.

Democrats and Liberals can only do this if you and I are as stupid as they think we are.

Elena Kagan Obama's Nominee? No way!

Elena Kagan Obama’s nominee for the Supreme Court?

Kagan's views continue to bump up against each other in media coverage of her pending nomination because we lack definitive evidence of what she really believes. Perhaps her views will become clearer during her confirmation process in the Senate, and perhaps, if confirmed, she will make an excellent justice.

But, for a president to appoint someone to a lifetime position, wouldn’t it be preferable to know what she believes on the biggest issues of the day—and how she arrived at those conclusions? If Obama does nominate Kagan, as he likely will, he will be taking a very big risk.—Paul Campos

According to sources Elena Kagan will be president Barry Hussein Soetoro nomination to the Supreme Court today. She is an ideal nominee for president Soetoro because she is somewhat of a stealth nominee. (see article)

Kagan like Soetoro, before he was elected president, is not well known outside of the circles in which she orbits. However there are some things known about her. She has just not had a great many published works which she has expressed a political philosophy. (president-elect nobody knows.)

Kagan fought to have the ROTC removed from the campus of Harvard when she was Dean of Harvard Law school. She fought it all the way to the Supreme court citing, in her opinion that the military discriminated against homosexuals with “Don’t ask Do tell” military policy. A policy mind you that president William Jefferson Clinton endorsed by signing into law.

Kagan fought all the way to the United States Supreme Court to deny students their Constitutional rights. In the litigation of Rumsfeld v. FAIR, Elena Kagan filed amicus briefs with the Third Circuit Court and the United States Supreme Court to institutionalize discrimination against the military and students who wish to serve which, as mentioned above, the Supreme Court struck-down.
Harvard Law School Dean Elena Kagan, believes the military should be banned from campus. In a 2005 letter about military recruiting, Kagan arrogantly called the military's recruiting policy "discriminatory," "deeply wrong," "unwise," and "unjust.".-- Patrick X. Coyle (source)

And then there is that speculation that Kagan’s nomination by president Soetoro is a bone thrown to the gays and lesbians to beat back their concern that Soetoro has not moved quickly enough to infuse the culture with homosexuality. (Kagan first homosexual supreme?)

An issue that is causing consternation among gays because either the White house or Kagan are treating Kagan's alleged homosexuality as something to be proud of. That issue is being quashed by the White house until they get their nominate seated on the Court.

In fact the general public knows very little about Kagan’s views and that will make it very difficult for those in the Senate who oppose the political philosophy behind the nominating of Kagan.

What is known about Kagan is the most leftist president in the history of the United States of America wants her on the Supreme Court to represent his political philosophy. That prospect alone should give Conservatives the will to fight for a more acceptable nominee.

However it is my contention that we need diversity of a different sort on the Court. A diversity that has nothing to do with who you sleep with or what color your skin is or who your ancestors were.

We need regional diversity on the Supreme Court. We need a Justice that can relate to everyday people not just the elitists on the East coast. Didn’t president Soetoro say that he would nominate such a person? Someone who could relate to everyday people? He did. He did say that, and if he meant it Elena Kagan is not that person.  Therefore she should not be his nominee.

Forget liberal vs. conservative justices. The Supreme Court is way out of regional alignment: It's heavily tilted toward the Northeast corridor and could become even more so as President Barack Obama prepares to fill an upcoming vacancy.
Five of the nine justices have strong ties to Boston, New York and central New Jersey. Chief Justice John Roberts is a Midwesterner raised in Indiana, but he went to college and law school at Harvard and has spent his entire professional life in Washington.-- Mark Sherman (source)

Kagan hails from that cookie cutter academia elitist circle of privilege that very few attain to. Her judgments would come from a life experience that has no real connection with common people.

Diversity on the court often is measured by gender, ethnicity, religion and race, and the current candidates are being assessed by those measures. But there could be some value, both in the politics of the nomination and a familiarity with issues a new justice might bring, in choosing someone who lives far from Interstate 95, the principal north-south route along the Eastern Seaboard.
"The impetus to appoint someone from the West is a really good one. –Mark Sherman

If the president was serious about his own criteria for selecting a Justice for the Supreme Court then he couldn’t possibly nominate Kagan. The president said he wanted a nominee who understood the "practical day-to-day" implications of rulings, someone who had judicial "empathy."

Kagan is a Manhattan-born Eastern who was educated, works and travels in political elitists circles.

Today once again we’ll see if the president’s words mean anything. And if Kagan is nominated against the president’s own criteria she should be opposed on the very grounds that the president established. She was not and will not be in touch with everyday American people. Those are the very principles that this president laid out for his criteria in selecting a nominee.

Bomb Suspect Nearly Got Away due to Political Correctness

Bombing suspect and alleged terrorist Faisal Shahzad

I mean the thing is that- and I get frustrated and there was part of me that was hoping this was not going to be anybody with ties to any kind of Islamic country because there are a lot of people who want to use this terrorist intent to justify writing off people who believe in a certain way or come from certain countries or whose skin color is a certain way. I mean they use it as justification for really outdated bigotry. –Contessa Brewer, MSNBC

Why did Faisal Shahzad, the failed New York City Car Bomber, almost fly out of the United States on board a jetliner headed for the United Arab Emirates? I’ll tell you why—it’s because of people who think like Contessa Brewer, News anchor for MSNBC, that’s why.

Brewer, like most Liberals, want their fake scenarios about life to be true and validated rather than accept evidence that they just might be wrong about their beliefs and their view of the world.

So Ms. Brewer was “so hoping” that a White Christian Militiaman Bible believing anti-President Soetoro Timothy McVey type would have been apprehended for this attempted terror attack on New York City. But instead Ms. Brewer’s worst fears were confirmed.

For months on end the President, his administration and his Party have been attempting to create this narrative that it is American Conservatives who are a threat to America and not Muslims. So naturally Ms. Brewer being loyal to that narrative the president created would hope that the suspect, when caught, wouldn’t be anyone with ties to any kind of Islamic country because her fear, like the president’s fear, was that people would then blame terrorism on Islamists and or Muslims and in Ms. Brewer’s mind that would be unfair.

To Liberals like Ms. Brewer to blame Islamists and Middle Easterners for terrorism is out dated bigotry. Granted to blame every Middle Easterner for terrorism would be extreme but no more extreme than for someone to hope that a car bomb in the middle of New York City was not an act of terrorism and then for that person to hope that the terrorist that commit such a vile act of terrorism would be an American instead of someone who had connections with terrorist in the middle east or someone who (using Ms. Brewers’ words) came from certain countries or whose skin color is a certain way.

Check out how the Liberal Elite Media and others hyped up the possibility that this failed act of terrorism could be some “mad” tea party fanatic who dislikes president Soetoro’s health care law. Also hear Ms. Brewer own words as she hopes for a different reality.(see 2:35mins video)






Because the President has himself encouraged this type of thinking Faisal Shahzad could repeated go back and forth to Pakistan and receive terrorist and bomb making training while Americans pull of their shoes, open their laptops, and place them on conveyor belt x-ray devices before they themselves receive full body scans before each flight to Mayberry USA.

So now that Attorney General Eric Holder and Soetoro administration doesn’t want to appear completely inept they want to pretend that they had the guy in their sights all along (see 1:12min video)

The Pakistani-American who has confessed to trying to blow up a car bomb in New York’s Times Square was only caught ‘at the last second’, authorities have admitted.
In scenes that could have come straight from a Hollywood film, Faisal Shahzad managed to give authorities the slip and board a flight out of the U.S.—UK Daily Mail

Huh? That’s not even what the Liberal Elite Media is reporting Eric they are even saying that Faisal Shahzad almost got away (see 1:37mins video)






It’s not at all farfetched to surmise that political correctness and message manipulation conditioned the airline employees so that they didn’t what to seem like they were racial profiling or discriminating so they allowed Faisal Shahzad on the plane just like they thought president Soetoro and people like Ms. Brewer would have wanted. He probably didn’t even have to take off his shoes.

So he almost got away. Thanks president Soetoro, thanks Contessa Brewer, thanks Janet Napolitano, thanks Eric Holder, thanks Mayor Bloomberg and thanks Liberal Elite Media for the job of convincing Americans that terrorists are just like us.
Just how close was he from getting away? They had to call the airplane off from the runway back to the gate (see 1:27min video)

Emirates 202 carrying Times Square Bomb Suspect is recalled to gate at JFK moments before takeoff. Audio from liveatc.net.






Another near miss for this administration, they just missed disaster from the underwear bomber, now averting near tragedy with the car bomber and he almost got away. It makes one wonder. Where’s all of that smart government that Liberal are so fond of talking about?

Mexico heal thyself from your own Immigration Bigotry

Felipe Calderon President of Mexico and illegal alien entry anarchist for the U.S. but not for Mexico

Mexican President Felipe Calderon denounced as "racial discrimination" an Arizona law giving state and local police the authority to arrest suspected illegal immigrants and vowed to use all means at his disposal to defend Mexican nationals against a law he called a "violation of human rights."-- Jerry Seper

Mexico’s illegal alien law is much more draconian than anything in the United States of America. Under the Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony, punishable by up to two years in prison. And get this Mexicans who help illegal immigrants are considered criminals. (see article)

The Mexican law mandates that federal, local and municipal police cooperate with federal immigration authorities in order to arrest illegal aliens exactly if not more than what the Arizona law requires.

But the legislation, signed April 23 by Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, is similar to Reglamento de la Ley General de Poblacion — the General Law on Population enacted in Mexico in April 2000, which mandates that federal, local and municipal police cooperate with federal immigration authorities in that country in the arrests of illegal immigrants.
Under the Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony, punishable by up to two years in prison. Immigrants who are deported and attempt to re-enter can be imprisoned for 10 years. Visa violators can be sentenced to six-year terms. Mexicans who help illegal immigrants are considered criminals.

Under Mexican law illegal aliens in their country are considered criminals and Mexico enforces this law. So tell me how is anyone from Mexico going to call an American bigoted or racist when Mexico racial profiles for illegal aliens and treats illegal aliens far worse than anything than Americans would.

The law also says Mexico can deport foreigners who are deemed detrimental to "economic or national interests," violate Mexican law, are not "physically or mentally healthy" or lack the "necessary funds for their sustenance" and for their dependents.

Every country in the world protects its citizens and its borders even Mexico does. So why would American illegal alien entry anarchist want to keep America’s borders porous and why would these anarchist attempt to change American law to accommodate 20 million criminals who have broken American immigration law?

"Mexico wants people to come to the United States and to send their money home," he said. "They want to make their problems our problems — that's their foreign policy. President Calderon should spend more time focusing on problems in his own country instead of criticizing Arizona for doing what Mexican law requires its own to do."

Mexico is a broken country politically and economically that is why Mexico is attempting to use America to solve its economic and social problems. Arizona is the only state that so far is willing to attempt to protect itself and the United States from the Mexican illegal alien invasion.

Mexico would not tolerate such an illegal alien invasion and neither should the United States.

Bill Maher Confusing Truth with Lies but that’s Comedy

Comedian Bill Maher

"I could certainly criticize oil companies and I could criticize America in general for not attacking this problem in the '70s. Brazil got off oil in the last 30 years; we certainly could have."—Bill Maher

Bill Maher has made a career of saying things that sound good to those who believe in political correctness. But good doesn’t necessarily translate into true. Maher knows the pattern well, just say something snippy and anti-Bush, there will be very little fact checking on what you’ve said.

So imagine the sheer irony when Maher goes on his usual Liberal holier-than-thou rant (this time directed at president Soetoro) and then Maher makes a statement to punctuate his disdain for Soetoro’s apparent betrayal of Liberal ideology regarding drilling oil. He claims that Brazil has been oil independent for nearly 30 years.

I believe they did. I believe they in the ’’, they had a program to use sugar cane ethanol. And I believe that is what fuels their country. –Bill Maher

Only this time Maher was called on his statement about Brazil being oil independent by George Will. (see 8:23min video)




Apparently shaken by the fact that his veracity was questioned Maher asked for a judge to fact check his assertion. Politifact.com obliged Mr. Maher and found his statement about Brazil’s oil situation wasFALSE.

Yes, I think he should. You know, he, he owns this issue now, because it was only a few weeks ago that he came out for offshore drilling. And, I would say philosophically this is, you know, the problem I think a lot of people on the Left have with the country and have for many years is that there’s no one that really represents our point of view. There’s two parties who want to fight the war on terror with an army in Afghanistan. There’s two parties who want to drill offshore. Where is the other side on this?

So, you know, I could certainly criticize oil companies, and I could criticize America in general for not attacking this problem in the ’’. I mean, Brazil got off oil in the last 30 years, we certainly could have. But it is very disappointing, I think, for this President to be taking a position, as he has, and I guess he’s backpedalling now on it, I hope. I mean, I hope there’s a flip-flop I can believe in there.—Bill Maher

Funny thing about comedians who attempt to venture into politics, in comedy the truth and lies are virtually interchangeable. However too often when a comedian attempts to became political he or she tends to rely on comedic wit. Unfortunately he or she falls back into the practice of interchanging truth and lies as they would normally do in their act.

I’m guessing that Maher’s confusion was due to the fact that he was out of place.

Maher is more at home on HBO interchanging the truth with lies. There he doesn’t have to worry about anyone questioning the facts in his monologue. There the only judge that he faces are the ones who don’t check facts they only laugh at how wittily Maher interchanges the truth with lies.

It's quite funny isn't it?

Arizona has done nothing wrong; Illegal Aliens have

Governor Jan Brewer of Arizona

Angered by Arizona's crackdown on illegal immigrants, protesters took to the streets on Saturday to denounce the new law and call on President Barack Obama to act urgently on immigration reform at May Day rallies across the United States.-- Jill Serjeant

Mexico needs Comprehensive Immigration reform not the United States. We need only to enforce the existing laws that the government under president Barry Hussein Soetoro has refused to enforce.

On a weekend that was supposed to see American Streets spillover with anti-American and anti-Arizona protests that was not the case. Instead it has been a brutal disappointment for anti-Americanist who attempted take advantage of Arizona’s illegal alien law (which protects Arizona from an illegal alien invasion) by attempting to get millions of people into the streets. What illegal alien anarchists intended was to use Saturday May 1, 2010 to rally illegal aliens and illegal entry anarchists all across the United States against the laws and constitution of this country.(see article)

But instead of the hoped for images of massive millions of illegal alien-entry anarchists marching through the streets of American what actually happened was very low turnouts across the nation and a News cycle which focused on a real new terrorist threat, a bombing attempt in New York City and the now catastrophic foreign British Petroleum oil spill in the gulf of Mexico. (see articles here and here)

Arizona law attempts to wean Mexicans and the country of Mexico off of the full supple America tit. And as one might expect Mexicans are throwing a hurricane Katrina size tantrum because the Diary Cow which they stole has warned them that it will not forever give free U.S. government milk to foreign goats that should be grazing on their own Mexican grass.

Angered by a controversial Arizona immigration law, tens of thousands of protesters - including 50,000 alone in Los Angeles - rallied in cities nationwide demanding President Barack Obama tackle immigration reform immediately.-- SOPHIA TAREEN

There is nothing broken about American immigration law. Let me repeat, there is nothing broken about American immigration law. What is broken is the entire country of Mexico!

Mexico is not providing for its people, the Mexican government is not protecting its people from out of control lawless drug cartels and Mexico’s economy is so non-existent that it has resorted to stealing from the United States’ economy. Mexico is broken not American’s immigration law.

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer gives the reasons why this law is constitutional and necessary for the safety of Arizona while she beats back the lies that illegal entry anarchists have told about this bill. (see 5:16min video)




But blame not only rest with Mexico. In America we have a broken federal government which consists of a broken presidency, a broken Congress and a broken Judiciary. America’s federal government is also corrupt. America’s federal government is broken and corrupted by liberalism. If liberalism is not halted dead in its destructive tracks Liberalism will be the ruination of America.

Any time the American president, American politicians and any American citizen can openly advocate for breaking American law as illegal alien entry anarchists have done then it is true something is broken. Two things are broken Mexico and the U.S. Federal Government.

The reason that immigration is the problem that it is—is because the president, congress and the judiciary are not doing their jobs. The federal government which Barry Hussein Soetoro presides over is broken not immigration laws and not the immigration system. The federal government has willfully violated its own law by neglecting the law’s enforcement and then by calling their own neglect to enforce “broken immigration law” or a “broken immigration system.”

It is not either of the two. What it is, is a failure of U.S. federal government and as a result of that failure the federal government is broken and can only be fixed by replacing the entire federal government complex starting by removing every Liberal Democrat and every Liberal Conservative first.

Arizona has given America the key to its salvation. According to sources Mexicans are the fastest growing minority in the United States. That statistic is based purely on illegality and illegal entry into this country.

Any comprehensive reform is only a cover for the broken Mexican government and the broken U.S. federal government. First fix Mexico and then fix the U.S. federal Government which refuses to enforce its own immigration laws. That is the reform that we need.

Arizona is doing that, they are doing what is right. Arizona has done nothing wrong. Illegal alien entry anarchists are wrong.

Whether that includes the president of the United States of America (and it does) the Congress both Democrats and Republicans who support illegal alien entry into the United States, they are all illegal alien entry anarchists and they are enemies of the constitution when they support comprehensive immigration reform, or in plain language, amnesty for over 20 million illegal aliens.

And the chain reaction that will ensue when 20 million illegals are eligible to vote and invite 20 million more of their family and friends into the United States based on laws that would allow them to under the comprehensive plan.

Right now only the state of Arizona has chosen to do what’s right and stand against misguided popular opinion. Only the state of Arizona is fighting for America. Arizona is right no matter what the president or what the media says, Arizona is right.

If we can no longer determine between right and wrong as a nation then we are truly a nation that is lost.

Are we lost?

Arizona: Just Doing the Job that the American Government wouldn't Do!

Entering America via Mexico/Arizona border bypassing Ellis Island

Gov. Jan Brewer of Arizona signed the nation’s toughest bill on illegal immigration into law on Friday. Its aim is to identify, prosecute and deport illegal immigrants.-- RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLD

One might say that Arizona is doing the job that the Federal government wouldn’t do and one would be absolutely correct.

Arizona has defined the debate with respect to what kind of country America is. And they have done it with their new law on illegal entry. Arizona law enforces the existing Federal law—law which is meant to protect the borders of this country from illegal entry into this country. (see article)

Not since Sodomites attempted to rape angels in the biblical account of Sodom and Gomorrah have we seen such open defiance against what is good and what is right as we see with Mexicans in this country illegally and their supporters.

Here is what the new Arizona law has done; it has helped to define what illegal entry into the United States is, it has restructured the illegal alien debate into only two categories; individuals who are and who advocate lawless (law breakers) opposed to individuals who are lawful. And as a bonus it also forces us to address the meaning of the word illegal. (see Arizona bill SB 1070)

If one is an illegal alien or an illegal immigrant by definition one is a violator of the law.  If the government chooses to ignore violators of the law then the government is broken not the law.

If you are against Arizona ’s illegal entry law you are advocating lawless. And you clearly don’t believe that American is a nation of laws. If you support Arizona ’s illegal entry law you are lawful and you believe in law and order.

Arizona ’s illegal entry law like the Federal illegal entry law is intended to protect the American people. Federal illegal entry law is not presently being enforced purely for political advantage.

Democrats all but encourage illegal aliens to vote in American elections so that Democrats can gain and retain political power. This explains why the president of the United States would come out against a fair and just law as he did when he came out against Arizona’s illegal entry law. (see 2:51min video)

The law was to take effect 90 days after the legislative session ends, meaning by August. Court challenges were expected immediately. -- RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLD

The reason the president opposes the Arizona illegal immigrant law is Arizona intends to enforce their law unlike the Federal government’s negligence with respect to its own federal illegal entry law.

When you hear someone speaking against Arizona and its illegal entry law that person is a lawless person. What that means is that person is speaking on the side of lawlessness and he or she supports the open breaking of laws. When you hear someone speaking in support of what Arizona has done with its illegal entry law that person is speaking on the side of lawfulness.

Today there exist two types of people in our country those who support and advocate for breaking the law as the president is doing and those who support and advocate for abiding by the law.

For example imagine that anyone who chooses could access to your banking accounts and as a result of that access they could take money out of your account any time they wanted to.

In addition to that the account intruder or thief began to pass your account information to their family and friends and they all began to take money out of your account.

Now imagine that when you found out about this illegal access to your account you changed your account to restrict access to your account.

Because you did that the thieves began to stigmatize you calling you greedy, uncaring, selfish and a dirty Capitalist.

A scenario like what’s above is presently occurring in this nation.

America is all of our account because we are Americans. As Americans citizenship is our access code and no one else should be able to illegally gain access our account.

Yet Mexican Nationals who are citizens of Mexico have gained illegal access to our account and they have passed out our access code to their family and friends.

When Americans in Arizona changed the access code to their state in order to prevent the illegal access to their account they are being demonized as racist, xenophobic, unjust, racial profilers, haters and the like.

None of the above is true. Arizonians are not racist because they wish to stop citizens of another country from invading this country and robbing us of our assets while they bring the problems of the lawlessness of Mexico to our communities.

Mexican illegal entry into America is not to be confused with the Ellis Island legal immigration process no matter how many people march in the streets on May the first, no matter how many pejorative that illegal Mexican nationals and their supports hurl at America citizens because Americans want the end of illegal entry into this country.

Arizona has defined the issue of illegality in this country. We now know who supports lawlessness and who supports the law. Anyone who cast aspersions on Arizona is an enemy to the Constitution, an enemy to law and order and an enemy to the American people.

America doesn’t need an overhaul of its immigration laws what American needs is its present laws to be enforced. If you believe that the system is broken you have no further to look than Washington D.C. that’s where the system is broken because the Federal government refuses to enforce its immigration laws.

Arizona has shown us the way to fix it, which state is next?

Economist: Stimulus didn’t help

Obama fails to deliver on his promises
These numbers are way too low. The government fakes the analytical process to keep them low. According to some Federal Reserve officials, the real unemployment rate is 16%! (Source)

About 73% of [the National Association for Business Economics] surveyed said employment at their company is neither higher nor lower as a result of the $787 billion Recovery Act

What does Barry Hussein Soetoro do better than blaming George W. Bush or wink, wink blaming the previous administration? That’s right the president takes undeserved credit better than any other president in the history of the United States of America. Can anyone say Nobel Peace Prize.

According to Associated Press writer Julie Pace the president will soon be traveling to Iowa, Illinois and Missouri, in an attempt to take credit for an economy that he says is improving. (see article)

NABE conducted the study by polling 68 of its members who work in economic roles at private-sector firms. About 73% of those surveyed said employment at their company is neither higher nor lower as a result of the $787 billion Recovery Act, which the White House's Council of Economic Advisers says is on track to create or save 3.5 million jobs by the end of the year.-- Hibah Yousuf, CNN Money

Although there are some who say that the economy is showing some signs of improving there are others that say that nothing that the president has done had anything to do with an slightly improved economy. (see article)

But that won’t stop the president from saying that he brought the country from the brink when he knows that the only things that will restore the nation’s economy are jobs-jobs that have not been produced nor will they be.

The $787 billion dollar stimulus was supposed to keep unemployment under 8%. Unemployment reached over 10% and is presently at 9.7% and now economist say that the stimulus did next to nothing to help the economy.

The recovery is picking up steam as employers boost payrolls, but economists think the government's stimulus package and jobs bill had little to do with the rebound, according to a survey released Monday.-- Hibah Yousuf

It is absolutely critical for the Soetoro administration that voter’s perception of the Soetoro administration’s role in fixing the economy is favorable to the president. This is necessary so that Liberals can maintain and increase their political power even if perception is not reality.

The reality is the stimulus package was never meant to create or save jobs. The $787 billion dollars was meant to fund the 2010 and 2012 elections and keep Liberal Democrats in power. I suppose that we will  see how effective Democrats will be in propagandizing the apparent economic up turn starting in November.

Why that’s Incredibly Racist Mr. President!

It will be up to you to make sure that young people, African Americans, Latinos and women who powered our victory in 2008 stand together once again.—president Barry Hussein Soetoro

Why is the president of the United States of America practicing racial and sexual based politics? Barry Hussein Soetoro is clearly using sex, race and age as tactics to divide the country along racial, gender and age lines. (see 2:42min video)



I can count at least three forms of profiling or discrimination in Mr. Soetoro’s plea to get out the vote; age discrimination, racial discrimination and sexual discrimination. This president is clearly a divider and not a uniter.

If George Bush ever would have videoed a request for all White man and women over 30 to vote for him the media would have had a feeding frenzy. But because Barry Hussein Soetoro represents himself as a Black man he is held to a lower standard and can get away with a blatant racist request and suffer no ill affect which a White man would have suffered for the same offense.

That’s unbelievably Racist Mr. president! You should be called on it and held to the same standard that any White man would be held to!

With Republicans like Snowe who needs Democrats?

Maine's Own Sen. Olympia Snowe

"I'm optimistic that maybe the Democrats won't go forward with the bill as it is. Over the next few days, hopefully, something will change to make that possible. I don't see why it would be impossible because frankly I think that there isn't that much of a gap."—Sen. Olympia Snowe, discussing Democrat Financial Reform Legislation

She is solely responsible for the Health Care Reform Law. Without her vote the bill doesn’t get out of the senate finance committee and we wouldn’t be facing this Liberal Democrat Europeanization of America via Health Care law.

Now Democrats want to permanently bailout the financial institutions which incidentally they demonized as the bad guys responsible for the global financial meltdown (but were only to big to fail), and now who is it that Democrats look to so that they can proceed with the one Republican vote need to put their plans into action? Why the Senator from Maine Olympia Snowe that’s who.(see story)(and here)

By gosh with Republicans like Sen. Snowe who needs Democrats?

While eyes are fixed on some of the most vocal Republican opponents of Sen. Chris Dodd's financial overhaul bill to see if the measure will be opened up to debate today, Maine Sen. Olympia Snowe's voice could be the most important.
Snowe, a moderate who has crossed party lines before, is being heavily courted by the Democrats to provide the precious 60th vote needed to start debate.

There’s nothing wrong with just talking about it right? That’s what Snowe said about health care. And just look what the Uber-Liberal Republican Senator from Maine has wrought on America. It was her vote and her vote alone that moved the health care bill out of committee and into your homes. Thank you Sen. Snowe. And thank you Maine. (see article)

Once again, the Democratic majority is courting Maine’s two senators for help in passing a pending bill, this one to overhaul and tighten regulation of the financial system.
Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins stand nearly alone in the poisonous atmosphere of a polarized Senate in which bipartisanship has almost vanished. They more than most of their Republican colleagues have sometimes broken ranks and voted with the Democrats. –Bangor Daily News

Now the Democrats wish to stick it to America again who is the “Republican” that Democrats seek most? Sen. Snowe of course. If a key Democrat would “break ranks” at crucial times like Pelosi or Reid would have their necks. Liberals call Republicans that vote against Party interest independent thinking but Democrats that do the same are traitors unless of course they’ve gotten permission in some backroom deal to vote contrary to the Party line.

In this highly partisan atmosphere where it is crucial that each political camp stand up for its core values why is it that an Olympia Snowe or a Susan Collins or a Lindsey Graham or a John McCain can be persuaded to vote against America’s interest by voting for Liberal policies instituted by Democrats?

Oh these fake Republicans will rationalizes it by saying that they’re just being bi-partisan or they’re just voting for the right thing when in fact what they’re doing is not only betraying a Party but they are betraying a nation.
With Republicans like Snowe, Collins, Graham and McCain or any RINOs for that matter who need’s Democrats!

UPDATE
Although the bill did not pass to the full Senate on a 57 to 41 vote blocking it yesterday . According to Washington post staff writers, Brady Dennis and Shailagh Murray, Sen Reid is prepared to call further votes Today, Wednesday and beyond in order to keep up the pressure on waffling Republicans Sens. Olympia J. Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, Sen. Scott Brown (Mass.), and Sen. Charles E. Grassley (Iowa).(see article)

All References to Kenya being Scrubbed by U.S. ‘Ministry of Truth’ Media

Official Seal of president Barry Hussein Soetoro

And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale—then the lie passed into history and became truth. ‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.’ And yet the past, though of its nature alterable, never had been altered.

Whatever was true now was true from everlasting to everlasting. It was quite simple. All that was needed was an unending series of victories over your own memory. ‘Reality control’, they called it: in Newspeak,‘doublethink’.—George Orwell, 1984

In 2008 NPR printed that Senator Barry Hussein Obama was born in Kenyan Africa. In 2010 NPR is scrubbing history straight out of George Orwell’s 1984. (see article)

They weren’t the only ones. So did the Nigerian Observer and this other unnamed news source reported the same account in 2008.

NPR refuses to tell just what documentation or evidence provided the reason for the change.

But the records were altered shortly after the WND story was posted, and NPR ombudsman Alicia Shepard has explained, "I would hope they would correct factually inaccurate information since Obama was born in Hawaii."

She explained further, "I have looked into it. Someone writing a summary of a story that aired on NPR incorrectly wrote that the story said Barack Obama was born in Kenya. The story said Obama's father was from Kenya."
However, she declined to explain what documentation or evidence provided the reason for the change. –Bob Unruh

As soon as all the corrections which happened to be necessary in any particular number of ‘The Times’ had been assembled and collated, that number would be reprinted, the original copy destroyed, and the corrected copy placed on the files in its stead.

This process of continuous alteration was applied not only to newspapers, but to books, periodicals, pamphlets, posters, leaflets, films, sound-tracks, cartoons, photographs—to every kind of literature or documentation which might conceivably hold any political or ideological significance.

Day by day and almost minute by minute the past was brought up to date. In this way every prediction made by the Party could be shown by documentary evidence to have been correct, nor was any item of news, or any expression of opinion, which conflicted with the needs of the moment, ever allowed to remain on record.

All history was a palimpsest, scraped clean and reinscribed exactly as often as was necessary. In no case would it have been possible, once the deed was done, to prove that any falsification had taken place.—George Orwell, 1984

This kind of Overt Orwellian ‘bring the past up to date’ scraping clean history and reinscribing it to serve Barry Hussein Soetoro is a willful suspension of disbelief in order to uphold an ideological based deception over the American people.

George Orwell warned about the methodology that Fascist would use to oppress and enslave people way back in 1949. Yes fifty-one years later but nevertheless changing history is what is happening in order to prop up this questionable administration.

Obama influenced UK elections

British Conservative Leader David Cameron, centre, speaks during a televised debate with Nick Clegg of the Liberal Democrats, left, and Labour Leader Gordon Brown.

NICK CLEGG, the Liberal Democrat leader who until a few days ago was little known to voters, is now the most popular party leader since Winston Churchill, a new Sunday Times poll reveals.

Following his decisive victory in last week’s television debate, Clegg has surged to a higher approval rating than Tony Blair at the peak of new Labour’s popularity. –Jonathan Oliver and David Smith, Timesonline

In a historic first and obviously influenced by the 2008 United States election campaign and debates, the UK broadcasted their very first election debate between their three political Parties, The Labor Party, the Conservative Party and the Liberal Party

With the election called for 6th May, Britain broadcasted their first ever live television debate between the three Parties on April 14, 2010.

Three men; Gordon Brown representing Labor, Nick Clegg representing Liberals and David Cameron representing Conservatives—three White men. Begs the question are there no qualified women in Europe or are their no qualified minorities in Europe?

If one remembers Europe was so concerned that America elect a Black man regardless of the absence of political pedigree and regardless of the absent of political experience.

That aside, note the eerily similar issues facing the UK as face the United States. Is this a coincidence or is there some controlling force that has orchestrated similar problems of illegal immigration, unemployment, bank bailouts, auto industry bailouts in both countries? (see 1hr36min video)

UK election debate April 14, 2010




Liberal Party Nick Clegg has casted himself as the UK’s White Barack Obama, an outsider candidate for hope and change. Because he has done that he has become the Liberal media’s darling. (see article)

What is interesting is Clegg improves on the hope and change theme that sweep Soetoro into office. Clegg’s claim is he represents “hope married to credibility” and “change that you can trust” suggesting that the hope and change that America bought in its 2008 election was neither credible nor trustworthy.

This debate sounded like it was cut right from the American debate. This indicates that we are closer to a one world government than we’ve previously imaged. If the Brits back virtually unknown Nick Clegg who has cast himself as the UK hope and change candidate that I think would be more than a coincidence that would be a mirror Liberal government of which the United States is attempting to throw off.

I don’t know if the United States can throw off the Liberal Progressive nightmare that is our present government, but I’m thinking that an Europe in it’s current weakened state will find it virtually impossible to escape Liberalism if it chooses as America did.

Gordon Brown not listening to the people of Europe

UK MP Nigel Farage

Here's UK MP Nigel Farage giving Barry Hussein Soetoro friend and cohort Prime Minister Gordon Brown an hear full from the European people.

Farage tells a smiling Brown that he is disregarding the European people and doing whatever he wishes (sound familiar?) see 3:38min video)




It is a coincidence that Europe's Prime Minister and the United States president are both pushing radical agenda's against their people's will?

Gordon Brown Channeling Obama

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and U.S. president Barry Hussein Soetoro

Mr. Speaker once again it’s nothing to do with policy. He is incapable of dealing with the big issues which face this country.

And let me say what this chancellor is achieving. This chancellor is leading the rest of world in taking us out of recession. This chancellor has taken action the conservative body refuses to support.

What happen when we had to deal with the banks? What would the conservative have done? Nothing! What would have done when we were helping mortgage holders, nothing! What would they have done when we were helping the unemployed? Nothing! What is their policy? It is to do nothing. That is not the basis on which to ask for an election!—Gordon Brown

This is the stuff that international conspiracies are made of. Unlike our American Congress the MPs in the British Parliament can openly and honestly debate their Prime Minister regarding their failed government.

President Barry Hussein Soetoro knows nothing about debating the issues that he so cavalierly says he’d be happy to debate. The staged controlled Republican health care summit was a sham not a debate because president Soetoro controlled everything.

You wish to see real debate take a look that the British Parliament and watch real debaters. But here's an unexpected warning something is eerily familiar with what the Blair government is doing and with what the Soetoro government is doing.

Notice how Prime Minister Gordon Brown answers back critics citing programs that seem to have come straight out of the Barry Hussein Soetoro play book for America. (see 5:34min video)

Now this is the only party that wants an election when they’ve got no policy to deal with the recession, They want an election but they’ve got no policy to help home owners, They want an election but they’ve got no policy to help the unemployed. This is a Party that is talk, talk and talk but nothing to do with action.—Gordon Brown

If one didn’t know any better one would think that what Democrats are imposing on this country by way of their health care law, their unpaid for unemployment benefits and their other social restructuring imposed laws—laws that the dying European government are imposing on its people as well.

The only differences seems to be there is enough political resistance in the British political class to oppose these failing policies where there is no such resistance to speak of in the United States Congress. The other difference is that Gordon Brown doesn’t have George W. Bush to blame for his troubles.

Britain seems to be in serious political and economic trouble but it seems that they are only surpassed in this fate by America under the leadership of Barry Hussein Soetoro.

Barry Hussein Soetoro will be historically noted as the president who presided over America’s declined.