Whose letting the Extreme Weather out?

We must know for certain that the recent extreme weather are acts of mother nature or are man-made acts meant to force the American people into a global warming new world order.

What if the United States government had the means to control weather and what if the government decided that it wanted to force America into Global warming/Climate Change treaties, which most Americans are opposite to right now. Do you supposed that the U.S. government would unleash violent storms against American citizens to convince the citizenry that the violent storms of Global warming are real therefore we must join the United Nations multi-trillion dollar carbon regulatory cap and trade and world tax scheme.

Is it possible that the freakish number and the freakish nature of tornadoes that recently touched down in the state of Texas and parts of the mid-West are a part of a larger U.S. Government and United Nations scheme to make the United States acquiesce to world taxation, peer pressure. This is taxation, which the European Union and the United Nations are ready to implement as soon as the United States is on board.

As outlandish as the just mentioned scenario sounds to some, is it possible. First of all the motive is there. Regulating carbon through the cap and trade system would be a multi-trillion dollar windfall for whoever controlled such trading system. Second, some scientists in the United States have stated a goal of weather control by the year 2025. They have been working on the prospect since the Vietnam war. Moreover, they have had some successes with attempts.

Before you rule out the possibility consider that this present administration and a Democrat controlled Congress forced a universal health care bill on the American people knowing that their actions could be unconstitutional. Nevertheless, the Democrat speaker of the house, Nancy Pelosi vowed that Democrats would use any means necessary to achieve their goal of passing health care and they did do everything necessary to pass the law.

So why wouldn’t they do whatever it takes to get the American people to agree to a global warming treaty with the European Union and the United Nations?

We know that the Government has the motive. However, does it actually have the means to scare the America people enough that we accept a global carbon tax? Well if the government has, the means to control weather it would be feasible would it not?

Take a look at the following four part series entitled, Weaponizing Weather, then see if whether you think the dozen or so tornadoes that wreaked havoc in the state of Texas and the mid-West were simply acts of nature due to global warming or were they acts of men due to greed and want of control over other men.

Remember we have a president who is pro-global warming policies. So much so, that he credited Texas’ wild fires in 2011 to Global warming. He said in a reference to the GOP front-runner, Texas Gov. Rick Perry at the time, "You've got a governor whose state is on fire denying climate change. It's true." The comments came as wild fires ravished Texas at one of four events for his reelection campaign Sunday, September 25, 2011, at the start of a three-day trip to the West Coast and Mountain West. (see reference) The president never aided Texas in that state’s state of emergency (see story)

Up to a dozen tornadoes skipped through the densely populated Dallas-Fort Worth area in Texas on Tuesday, April 4 2012, ripping apart homes and tossing tractor-trailer trucks into the air, but there were no reports of serious injuries or deaths. National Weather Service meteorologist Jesse Moore said that 10 to 12 tornadoes touched down during a massive storm that brought chaos from high winds, rain and hail to the nation's fourth most populous metropolitan area.

Many of the 6.3 million area residents were forced to scramble for safety as the storm bore down during the early afternoon, when schools and workplaces were open. Hundreds of homes and businesses were damaged, some of them extensively.

First video of the tornado attack on Texas (see 1:24min video)



Directly following the four part series Ben Livingston in a 14min video makes the fascinating claim that it was his job as a meteorology Engineer in the military to manipulate weather for warfare purposes. He claims that he did it for the Vietnam War and that President Johnson was aware of this technology and approved of it. But first Weather Warfare (see 10:16min video)

Part 1



Part 2 (see 10:20min video)

HAARP emits ELF waves into the atmosphere and is being used for weather modification.



Part 3 (see 10:22min video)

HAARP ELF waves causes earthquakes, chemtrails, rain and floods



Part 4 (see 9:48 min video)

Operation POPEYE used in the Vietnam War, Hurricane Katrina was weapon used against U.S.



(see 14:56min video)

Ben Livingston claims it was his job as a meteorology Engineer to use weather as a weapon



It is the responsibility of Americans to make certain that we remain vigilant against a government that would attempt to rob it’s people of their freedoms and prosperity.

We must know for certain that the recent extreme weather are acts of mother nature or are man-made acts meant to force the American people into a global warming new world order.

Let’s Face It Al Gore Lied about Global Warming

CO2 is not a pollutant. Life on earth flourished for hundreds of millions of years at much higher CO2 levels than we see today. Increasing CO2 levels will be a net benefit because cultivated plants grow better and are more resistant to drought at higher CO2 levels, and because warming and other supposedly harmful effects of CO2 have been greatly exaggerated. Nations with affordable energy from fossil fuels are more prosperous and healthy than those without -- WILLIAM HAPPER, professor of physics at Princeton, WSJ

Global Warming or Climate Change was the Cause Du Jour earlier this decade. Progressives made the issue a highly charged partisan battle between themselves who they envisioned as the Renaissance enlightened against Conservatives whom they characterized as knuckle dragging disbelieving flat earth deniers who hates science.

When President Barry Hussein Soetoro discusses the subject of Global warming he can still be heard using the negative epithets of the left against people who did not acquiesce to the group psychological herding employed by the Left against free independent thinking people.
However in spite of the Left’s best efforts to force the idea that manmade Global warming due to CO2 emissions is real on Americans the evidence continues to prove the Left is wrong. (see article)

The lack of any statistically significant warming for over a decade has made it more difficult for the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and its supporters to demonize the atmospheric gas CO2 which is released when fossil fuels are burned.—William Happer

In spite of overwhelming evidence that CO2 has absolutely no direct causative effect on Global warming the Obama administration is proceeding with it’s plans to cut carbon emissions at the expense of the constitution and jobs thereby putting the economy farther at risk. (see story)

"The overreaching that EPA continues to do is going to create a tremendous burden and hardship on the families and people of America," said Senator Joe Manchin, a Democrat from West Virginia.

Since 1998, there has been no discernible increase in earth’s temperatures as related to CO2 emissions. Therefore, the complete theory of man-made climate change has been absolutely debunked by the facts. Only the agenda driven subversives of society and the mindless acolytes of the Left continue to promote the non-science of climate change. Only their sheer ignorance continues to allow them to demean and defame people who disagree with their agenda.

CO2 is not a pollutant. Life on earth flourished for hundreds of millions of years at much higher CO2 levels than we see today. Increasing CO2 levels will be a net benefit because cultivated plants grow better and are more resistant to drought at higher CO2 levels, and because warming and other supposedly harmful effects of CO2 have been greatly exaggerated.—William Happer

Global warming or Climate change was never about the weather. The Global warming scare was and remains an agenda to deceive free people to willingly accept an international regulatory body’s authority (the UNIPCC) above their own country’s authority. Further, the ultimate goal of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is to force a Carbon tax on Americans in order to create a revenue stream.

There has indeed been some warming, perhaps about 0.8 degrees Celsius, since the end of the so-called Little Ice Age in the early 1800s. Some of that warming has probably come from increased amounts of CO2, but the timing of the warming—much of it before CO2 levels had increased appreciably—suggests that a substantial fraction of the warming is from natural causes that have nothing to do with mankind.—William Happer

Professor Happer ends his article, “Global Warming Models Are Wrong Again” by saying, “The most important component of climate science is careful, long-term observations of climate-related phenomena, from space, from land, and in the oceans. If observations do not support code predictions—like more extreme weather, or rapidly rising global temperatures—Feynman has told us what conclusions to draw about the theory.”

So I took interest in what the late Richard P. Feynman noted American physicist had to say about errand theory. Feynman said, “It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong”

Yes, Professor Feynman the theory of Global warming or Climate change is wrong. Someone please tell the President and Progressives that they are on the wrong side of science with respect to the issue of Climate change. Suddenly the knuckle dragging disbelieving flat earth deniers who hated science are not of the Right, no suddenly that ilk is of the Left.

An Inconvenient Ruling

Britain’s High Court

British High Court judge Michael Burton ruled on Wednesday that Al Gore's Global warming documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" should only be shown in schools with guidance notes to prevent political indoctrination.

Judge Burton said the film should be accompanied by government guidance notes and to distribute it without them would breach education laws prohibiting the promotion of unbalanced political viewpoints.

Stewart Dimmock lorry truck driver and father of two brought the suit last month and wanted to block the government's pledge to send more than 3,500 secondary schools in England and Wales a DVD of the documentary to demonstrate the need to fight global warming.

Though the court did not ban the film as Mr. Dimmock originally petitioned the court to do still Mr. Dimmock see his efforts as a victory for education and science Dimmock said, "If it was not for the case brought by myself, our young people would still be being indoctrinated with this political spin."

In other news Al Gore’s theories are being disputed by scientists who wish to debate him on the issue. However Gore’s camp has issued a statement saying that the debate has shifted to how to solve the climate crisis, not if there is one. Meaning that Gore has already gotten the United Nations, Europe and now the Bush administration to sign on to a project which amounts to a Global fix which will cost citizens billions of dollars therefore the debate is over.

"The debate has shifted to how to solve the climate crisis, not if there is one," said Kalee Kreider. "It does not make sense for him to engage in a dialogue with them at this time."

In other words the propaganda of Global warming has already been accepted by world leaders no one involved in this movement is going to stop to question whether they are right about the theories of Global warming.

With the power of the U.N., the European Union and the Bush administration behind him it does indeed appear that the conversation is all but over.

Mr. Dimmock’s valet efforts saved British children from the indoctrination of Global warming only to be rewarded by the unpleasant reality that the rest of the world are not smarter than a fifth grader!

Only Fools and Charlatans Speak of Consensus regarding Global Warming

Former Vice President Al Gore (right) and fellow Warm-Earther Richard Branson

500 scientists have published evidence countering the theory of Man-Made Global Warming.

It is safe to say that theory of Man-Made Global Warming has been debunked.

A new analysis of peer-reviewed literature reveals that more than 500 scientists have published evidence refuting at least one element of current man-made global warming scares.

More than 300 of the scientists found evidence that 1) a natural moderate 1,500-year climate cycle has produced more than a dozen global warmings similar to ours since the last Ice Age and/or that 2) our Modern Warming is linked strongly to variations in the sun's irradiance.

"This data and the list of scientists make a mockery of recent claims that a scientific consensus blames humans as the primary cause of global temperature increases since 1850," said Hudson Institute Senior Fellow Dennis Avery.

No longer can the Warm-Earthers hide behind the façade that they are speaking from an enlightened scientific perspective when they spew their holier-than-thou platitudes regarding carbon emissions and stopping Western human progress to save the earth.

Indeed the earth is worth saving however short of stopping the natural cycle of the earth and/or putting out the sun the temperature changes that we are experiencing are not going to be stopped just because someone bought some carbon credits or someone drives a bright shiny new Toyota Prius!

There is No Consensus Regarding Global Warming

Gore lecturing on Global Warming


I’m about to ruin your weekend if you are a Warm-earther, one who believes in the theory of Global warming in rejection of all scientific evidence that man and CO2 emissions are not the primary cause of Global warming.

Michael Asher reports that the much used data to support the claim that there is a consensus among scientist about Global warming and its causes is outdated.

When the research regarding the scientific consensus was recently updated by Medical researcher Dr. Klaus-Martin Schulte using the same data base and criteria as the original work that said there is a “consensus view” a different and surprising result occurred.

Of 528 total papers on climate change, only 38 (7%) gave an explicit endorsement of the consensus. If one considers "implicit" endorsement (accepting the consensus without explicit statement), the figure rises to 45%. However, while only 32 papers (6%) reject the consensus outright, the largest category (48%) are neutral papers, refusing to either accept or reject the hypothesis. This is no "consensus."

Not only that, there isn’t a consensus that any form of Global warming naturally occurring or the theorized man-made Global warming will have the dire catastrophic results of world-wide destruction as once was thought.

These changing viewpoints represent the advances in climate science over the past decade. While today we are even more certain the earth is warming, we are less certain about the root causes. More importantly, research has shown us that -- whatever the cause may be -- the amount of warming is unlikely to cause any great calamity for mankind or the planet itself.

In addition to this reversal in the scientific community regarding the theory of man-made Global warming there is a new study by the Belgium Royal Meteorological Institute that stated the effects of CO2 on world temperatures had been "grossly overstated". This study is supported by two additional but separate research studies: The first is by atmospheric scientist Stephen Schwartz, of Brookhaven National Labs. And the Second by Chinese researchers Lin Zhen-Shan and Sun Xian. Using a technique called Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD)

The factor all three of the above studies have in common? That CO2's role has been massively overstated. The political consequences of this are widespread-- is it worth spending trillions of dollars to reduce emissions of a gas that will have almost no effect over the next century, and essentially none at all after that?

Finally there is not a consensus view about Global warming or its cause the only consensus is among politicians who use this issue to keep voters further divided on the issues.

Anthropomorphic Social Change

NSCAT scatterometer image of Greenland

The conversation of climate change in this country and the world is an extraordinary effort in changing social attitudes by social engineering. The green movement along with its special interest and government co-conspirators is attempting to change your mind regarding how you live your life and ,as well, they intend to get into your wallet.

The whole topic of anthropomorphic climate change has been a farce from the very beginning. From Al Gore’s Inconvenient Truth Alive Earth World Concerts to the Greenland glacier meltdown consensus, where everyone but deniers agree that man is the cause of global warming and because of the popular consensus everyone is expected to believe in the unproven conjecture of anthropomorphic climate change (ACC).

But what if I told you that latest scientific studies refute the theories of Greenland glacier meltdown? You are probably so thoroughly brainwashed that no amount of scientific proof will change your mind.

However, according to a Danish study researchers from Aarhus University Greenland's glaciers have been shrinking for 100 years. Do you understand the implication of this? If this is the case then to connect the phenomenon of Greenland glacier melt with anthropomorphic climate change is morally and criminally wrong. Criminally wrong when proponents of climate change intend to profit at the expense of sheeplessly conditioned followers of the hype of global warming (GW).

And then there are the cataclysmic and dire forecast of monster storms in the Atlantic, FrankenStorms, hurricanes caused by ACC but where are these storms now?

During the active 2005 hurricane season, the usual doom-and-gloom prophets blamed the storms on global warming (GW). "Nature's wrath," we were told, "hath been unleashed". Aided by a complaisant media, we were told this was our wakeup call, come to punish us for our SUV-driving ways.--Dailytech.com

Once again proponents of Global warming are wrong so far.

Finally if you are a person that does not believe in ACC you could be threaten with death or the total destruction of your creditability and livelihood as Marlo Lewis was by Michael T. Eckhart, president of the American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE).

Eckhart an apparent global warming fanatic wrote to Lewis in an e-mail,

"Take this warning from me, Marlo. It is my intention to destroy your career as a liar. If you produce one more editorial against climate change, I will launch a campaign against your professional integrity. I will call you a liar and charlatan to the Harvard community of which you and I are members. I will call you out as a man who has been bought by Corporate America. Go ahead, guy. Take me on."

Eckhart seriously needs to take a chill pill! Why are these GW fanatics so emotionally disturbed regarding their defense of climate change?

The July 27-29 2007 U.S. Senate trip lead by Senator Barbara Boxer to Greenland to investigate fears of a glacier meltdown revealed an Arctic land where current climatic conditions are neither alarming nor linked to a rise in man-made carbon dioxide emissions, according to many of the latest peer-reviewed scientific findings. Recent research has found that Greenland has been warming since the 1880's, but since 1955, temperature averages at Greenland stations have been colder than the period between 1881-1955.

Did you get that GW fanatics? In Greenland current climatic conditions are neither alarming nor linked to a rise in man-made carbon dioxide emissions and according to many of the latest peer-reviewed scientific findings. Recent research has found that Greenland has been warming since the 1880's

Let’s see the glaciers have been warming since the 1880’s that would put the any melting of Greenland glaciers outside of the timeline for the claim of anthropomorphic CO2 emissions climate change. Humm, seems like the internet is not the only invention of former vice President Al Gore.

In spite of the apparent debunking of human caused global warming liberal minions will continue to buy their Priuses while defending the junk science of global warming they will do this in spite overwhelming evidence that yes climate is changing as it has done since the inception of earth and weather but as in the begin as it is now man is not the cause of weather change.

So those of us who believe in facts will continue to be threatened, defamed or financially ruined by GW fanatics like Michael Eckhart. So much for scientific method and reason for the left!

Live Earth or Global Brainwashing?

Former Vice President Al Gore, right, and his wife Tipper Gore cheer during the Live Earth concert in Washington. (Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images)

But why is he [Gore] actually organising them? To make us aware of the greenhouse effect? Everybody's known about that for years. We are all fucking conscious of global warming.'—Bob Geldof, Organiser of Live Aid and Live8

So just why did Al Gore organize a world-wide event spanning seven continents and featured performances at nine climate change locations, with more than 100 of the biggest names in music, at cities in Australia, Germany, China, Japan, South Africa, England, Brazil and the United States?

Live Earth - the biggest musical event ever and a creation of former Vice President Al Gore, who got a standing ovation when he thanked the stadium audience for helping "launch this global effort" - was meant to call attention to the planet's "climate in crisis."

"I'm here to, you know, save the Earth, one beer at a time," – Zoe Delohery, a Live Earth Concert Attendee

Gore’s multi-continental was meant to rise awareness concerning polluting the Earth yet The Rock stars that Gore utilized didn’t mind at all polluting the event with foul language. It was like, “Clean up the F’ing Planet damn it!” (Makes a good slogan don’t you think?)

According to Mike Collett-White, of Reuters Canada, Al Gore’s concerts were designed to “ pressure leaders to sign a new[Kyoto like] treaty by 2009 that would cut global warming pollution by 90 percent in rich nations and more than half worldwide by 2050.

So what’s wrong with Al Gore attempting to affect world politics and policies through mass group indoctrination?

Big business has been lobbying Congress for years manipulating policies and affecting U.S. laws. The Bush-Kennedy Immigrant law is just a recent and more blatant example of this type of activity.

Gore and his partners hope to achieve a kind of Mass Social conditioning through his world-wide Live Earth concerts. Which purpose is intended to drive a global demand for legislation and Global policies for regulating carbon emissions. If that happens Gore stands to profit handsomely by selling carbon credits. He already has a company set up for this propose.

How many people have been taken in by Gore’s Inconvenient Global scheme? We know movie and music stars looking for the next big social movement have been suckered in. Leonardo DiCaprio to Madonna have lent their pop prestige to the Gore Global deception.

After counting what carbon impact his concert had on Global warming Mr. Gore will be asking you to reduce your carbon output by 90% The only way to do that is to turn-in your newly bought i-phone, disconnect from the electricity grid and buy a Totoya Prius to live in.

Al Gore’s Global warming movement has remade the progressive movement into a regressive anti-modernity movement of which the Unabomber, Theodore Kaczynski, would have been proud to be a part of. Dr. Kaczynski’s manifesto, Industrial Society and Its Future, warned of the dangers of modern technology much like Gore’s book, An Inconvenient Truth warns about the dangers of industrial and private carbon emissions.

The only difference between these two sociopaths is that Gore’s efforts are purely for his own profit. Dr. Kaczynski on the other hand was really concerned about the environment.

Musicians including Bob Geldof, Roger Daltrey and the Pet Shop Boys pointed out that a concert highlighting climate change had itself generated huge carbon emissions.
Matt Bellamy, front man of the rock band Muse, called the event "private jets for climate change." Rock band Ra diohead refused to even appear.
Among the excesses were private jets used to fly performers to far- flung places like Johannesburg, where glitterati like Joss Stone and UB40 played.
Pussycat Dolls Kimberly Wyatt and Nicole Scherzinger getting it on for Live Earth



London's Wembley Stadium had headliners like Madonna, whose jet-setting, multi-home lifestyle produces more greenhouse gases annually than 14,000 people in Malawi, the African home of her son.

The New Jersey event alone churned out tons of greenhouse gases and created truckloads of trash.

After the shows are over, the Daily Mail estimates that there will be about 1,025 tons of garbage left - which will probably end up in landfills. --GINGER ADAMS OTIS, NYPOST.COM

Since the 2000 elections celebrities have been attempting use their fame to influence public elections and policy. Barbara Streisand and Ben Affleck are two that come immediately to mind.

Finally it remains to be seen if Mr. Gore’s Global efforts will change the world for his good and the good of his company. We will see if Live Earth will be the group social brainwashing that Mr. Gore wanted or just a huge need for Global clean-up after the party!

Gore’s Live Earth a Concert for Suckers

AL GORE
The Ipsos Mori poll of 2,032 adults - interviewed between 14 and 20 June - found 56% of Brits believed scientists were still questioning climate change [there is no consensus on Global warming]. And also there was a feeling the problem [Global warming] was exaggerated to make money.

Bob Geldof, Organiser of Live Aid and Live8 is wondering why is Al Gore has organized LIVE EARTH. Geldof’s question is, [W]hy is he [Gore] actually organising them? To make us aware of the greenhouse effect? Everybody's known about that for years. We are all fucking conscious of global warming.

And then there’s the Artic Monkeys, a rock band that believes that having a global concert to promote the ideology of Global warming/Climate change is a bit, hypocritical. "It's a bit patronising for us 21 year olds to try to start to change the world, especially when we're using enough power for 10 houses just for (stage) lighting. It'd be a bit hypocritical," said, Arctic Monkeys drummer Matt Helders.

Don’t worry your 21 year-old head about that Matt. Al Gore is away ahead of you on the energy that will be expended to propagate the world with the message of Global warming/Climate change. After the shows, the organisers, with the help of accountancy group PricewaterhouseCoopers and an army of consultants, will calculate the volume of carbon emissions created and will then "offset" the difference.

Carbon offsetting means investing in carbon-reducing initiatives such as planting trees or making donations to renewable energy projects.
So there you are Matt! Snoppy Dogg and Shakari will get to Jet to their propective Live Earth venue and then be driven by stretch Hummer limo to the concert site and Al Gore will plant a tree to offset the carbon foot print that his concert will produce there’s no hypocricy in that now is there?

In fact Live Earth takes place this Saturday in seven cities -- Sydney, Tokyo, Shanghai, Hamburg, London, Johannesburg and New York -- and organisers hope for a television audience of two billion because their broadcasting to China.

Let’s see seven cities times multiple pop musical acts at each location… Mr. Gore should be able to replace the Amazon rain forest with all of the trees he’ll have to plant to offset the carbon emissions that his world-wide concert is going to create.

It doesn’t matter anyway, the British have it right, this Live Earth event is about making money for Al Gore and his business partners, our climate has been constantly changing since Earth began and anyone who needs a concert to be made aware of that is what a phrase that is credited to P.T. Barnum stated, "There's a sucker born every minute."

And Gore has selected the biggest big top, a world wide big top on 07/07/2007 which to prove P.T. Barnum was right.

Climate Scientist don't have to be right they only have to be believed

Dr. George Kukla

Based on the record revealed in ocean and lake sediments, the most likely scenario over the next few thousand years is for the volume of ice in the polar regions to slowly grow, gradually dropping sea level and increasing the polar/equatorial temperature differential.

In the 1970s, leading scientists claimed that the world was threatened by an era of global cooling.
And Congress sprung into action by 1975, the first of numerous bills, such as the "National Climate Program Act of 1975," was introduced to establish a co-ordinated national program of climate research, monitoring, prediction and contingency-planning analysis. Much congressional testimony spoke of the inadequacy of climate research and the need for preparedness.

In September, 1979, President Jimmy Carter signed the National Climate Program Act into law, in aid of predicting future climate and combating global cooling. that act has now been enlisted in the effort to counter global warming.

Wait a minute the National Climate program Act which was signed into law by Jimmy Carter in 1979 to combat global cooling is being used in 2007 to combat global warming?

"Lucy you’ve got some ‘splaining to dooo!"

Who was the crackpot that advanced the theory of global cooling in the 1970s?
Why is was none other than George Kukla, micropalentologist and Special Research Scientist at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, a pioneer in the study of solar forcing of climate changes.

He was the lead author of the scientific paper that first supported Milutin Milankovic's theory of glacial cycles by investigating the stratigraphy in deep-sea sediment cores from the southern Indian Ocean. In the cores were clear imprints of Milankovic's proposed cycles.

In his paper he wrote, "We are certain now that changes in the Earth's orbital geometry caused the ice ages. The evidence is so strong that other explanations must now be discarded or modified." Prior to joining Columbia in 1971, he had published landmark studies in Czechoslovakia, where he was a member of the Czechoslovakian Academy of Sciences.

Okay now that we've established that he is a fanatic and a denier, why is he saying that the earth is cooling in 2007 not getting warmer as Al Gore claims?

New evidence! In a paper that Dr. Kukla only recently published, he states that he now knows that period of warming always precedes an ice age. That makes the current period of global warming a mere blip that constitutes additional indication of the ice age to come.

Also Dr. Kulka said, "I feel we're on pretty solid ground in interpreting orbit around the sun as the primary driving force behind ice-age glaciation (global cooling). The relationship is just too clear and consistent to allow reasonable doubt, it's either that, or climate drives orbit, and that just doesn't make sense."

Whoa! This is another the sun is causing climate change nut? He'd better not be right because who’s going to refund my carbon credits? Any way there is a popular consensus and everybody believes in anthropogenic climate change as created by manufactured CO2 emissions is the cause of global warming.

Politicians and environmentalists these days convey the impression that climate-change research is an exceptionally dull field with little left to discover. We are assured by everyone from David Suzuki to Al Gore to Prime Minister Stephen Harper that "the science is settled." At the recent G8 summit, German Chancellor Angela Merkel even attempted to convince world leaders to play God by restricting carbon-dioxide emissions to a level that would magically limit the rise in world temperatures to 2C.-- R. TIMOTHY PATTERSON, Financial Post

But what does Dr. Kukla believe? Based on what we've learned this decade, says George Kukla, those scientists [of the 1970s] - and he was among them -- had it right. The world is about to enter another Ice Age.

Warming or Cooling if it is the sun that is the cause for climate change I’ve lost all trust for scientists, politicians, environmentalists and proponents of climate change. Apparently it is only climate change for tax payer's dollars! Al Gore that's not right!

What you gonna do, rise (tax us of) enough money to put out the sun? Get the science right before you go making any draconian laws or raise taxes usuriously to prevent something that may not be in your power to prevent!

How Did a Rocket Scientist Get so Dumb?

Michael Griffin, NASA

How, because of Global warming stupid! Al Gore is a Glodal warming Rockstar. How did he get that way? He learned a very valuable lesson from the Clintons, learn what people care about and tell the people what they want to hear, whether its inconviently true or not!

Dr. Michael Griffin is a Rocket Scientist whom some people have implied is ignorant, how did he get that way? Why one simply learns what is true, state what is true and partisans will not want to hear it and they will call it ignorant!

Let me explain, recently Dr. Griffin has come under fire for a couple of statements that he’s made about global warming. Dr. Griffin said, that he is not sure that Global warming is a problem we [human beings] must wrestle with.

“I have no doubt that … a trend of global warming exists. I am not sure that it is fair to say that it is a problem we must wrestle with. To assume that it is a problem is to assume that the state of Earth's climate today is the optimal climate, the best climate that we could have or ever have had and that we need to take steps to make sure that it doesn't change.

First of all, I don't think it's within the power of human beings to assure that the climate does not change, as millions of years of history have shown. And second of all, I guess I would ask which human beings — where and when — are to be accorded the privilege of deciding that this particular climate that we have right here today, right now is the best climate for all other human beings. I think that's a rather arrogant position for people to take.” – Dr. Michael Griffin, NASA, chief administrator

Makes sense to me! The Second thing that Dr. Griffin said was, “Nowhere in NASA's authorization, which of course governs what we do, is there anything at all telling us that we should take actions to affect climate change in either one way or another.” (Original NPR transcript)

So just what is going on here? Well, Michael Griffin is the Chief Administrator at The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and statements such as these are just shocking coming from someone in his position.

James Hansen, an advocate for Global warming/climate change, expressed shock at Griffin's comments.
Asked his response, Hansen said: "I almost fell off my chair."
"It was a shocking statement because of the level of ignorance it indicated with regard to the current situation," Hansen said. Humm…shocking? Ignorance?

Congress does not like Dr. Griffin either. Why? Because congress wants to turn The National Aeronautics and Space Administration into The National Climate Change/Global Warming and Researching Other Stuff Administration (NCCGWROSA)

Rep. Bart Gordon, chairman of the Science and Technology committee in the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives, said this about NASA’ budget which Dr. Griffin submitted to Congress,
"Based on NASA's own five-year budget plan, the agency will be unable to start any of the new Earth observations initiatives recommended by the National Academies for the foreseeable future. That's not going to get us where we need to be in our understanding of climate change."

What? What are new Earth observations initiatives? In plan language it’s using all of the governments resources (even NASA’s) to convince the American people that the climate is changing.

But, Rep. Gordon shouldn’t the budget of The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) an agency of the United States federal government, responsible for the nation's public space program be spent on the exploration of space?

And in addition to the space program, NASA is also responsible for long-term civilian and military aerospace research. Did you know Rep. Gordon that since February 2006 NASA's self-described mission statement is to “pioneer the future in space exploration, scientific discovery, and aeronautics research.”

So Rep. Gordon, do you understand that neither is it stated or implied in NASA’s mission nor was it ever intended that NASA be the nation’s pop science laboratory for the advancment of the theories of Global warming aka climate change? Rep Gordon it’s not NASA’s job to advance the cause of Global warming!

Yet when NASA’s chief administrator tells you that in truth, all of a sudden that administrator is ignorant, kind of dumb, a denier.

But nothing could be further from the truth, Dr. Griffin is a rocket scientist with a M.B.A., he earned his PhD in aerospace engineering from the University of Maryland, he was head of the space department at Johns Hopkins University's Applied Physics Laboratory, he was a veteran aerospace executive who has held a variety of senior-level positions at the Pentagon, at NASA and in industry. And now he’s top Administrator at NASA but you don’t trust him.

Instead you trust Al Gore a man with absolutely no real scientific back ground and for all of Gore's later fascination with science and technology, he often struggled academically in those subjects. The political champion of the natural world [and now Global warming,] received that sophomore D in Natural Sciences 6 (Man's Place in Nature) and then got a C-plus in Natural Sciences 118 his senior year.

The self-proclaimed inventor of the Internet [Gore’s exact words on that subject were, "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet."] avoided all courses in mathematics and logic throughout college, though he did score high on the math portion of the SAT. In addition to that Gore’s high school math grades had dropped from A's to C's as he advanced from trigonometry to calculus in his senior year.

Gore took the religious studies courses while also working full time as a journalist at the Nashville Tennessean, and after getting off to a strong start with an A-minus in Ethics, he failed to complete any of the three courses he took in the fall of 1971, and those incompletes eventually lapsed into F's. He returned for another semester in the spring of 1972, when two more incompletes turned into F's. Two years later, he enrolled in law school and spent three semesters there taking heavy course loads while still working at the newspaper. He performed satisfactorily, with a high grade of 81 in Legal Writing and a low grade of 69 in Civil Procedures II.

Partway through the spring semester in 1976, he decided to run for an open seat in Tennessee's 3rd Congressional District. His mother, Pauline Gore, herself a lawyer, tried to persuade him to remain in school while running, but he withdrew, turning away for good from the academic life, while beginning a political career in which he increasingly took on the characteristics of a scholar. -- David Maraniss and Ellen Nakashima, Washington Post Staff Writers Sunday, March 19, 2000

Dr. Michael Griffin is a legitimate rocket scientist, unlike Al Gore, a pretend academic, and a Global warming Rockstar, and unlike Gore Dr. Griffin’s opinion can be trusted. When Dr. Griffin was being recommended for the job of top NASA administrator congress was enthralled with him.

Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., an influential member of the Senate Appropriations Committee who knows Griffin because of his work at Johns Hopkins in Baltimore, said the president made “an outstanding choice.”

In a statement issued by Mikulski she said Griffin “has the right combination of experience in industry, academia and government service. He has a proven record of leadership and a passion for science and exploration. I welcome his nomination.”

House Science Committee Chairman Sherwood Boehlert, whose committee has called on Griffin to testify as an expert witness on NASA issues, also endorsed Dr. Griffin at the time his nomination.

"We are extremely pleased that the president has nominated Mike Griffin to be NASA Administrator,” Boehlert said in a statement. “Dr. Griffin has long been a resource to the Science Committee, both as a public witness and in providing private counsel. He has broad expertise, knows NASA inside and out, and is an imaginative and creative thinker and leader. He is also known for his candor and directness. We look very forward to working with Dr. Griffin at this critical time for NASA."

Finally, the insanity of it all is that Dr. Michael Griffin is charged with making ignorant statements regarding Global warming, when it is Mr. Gore who is pushing unproven popular science on college campuses across America claiming that the science is settled and there is total agreement throughout science with his prescribed theories on Global warming.

And so a rocket scientist got dumb because he didn’t forsake his candor and academic training to follow along blindly and obediently with world opinion of 170 nations who agreed that the climate is changing and that is a serious problem with enormous repercussions. And Al Gore is a Global warming Rockstar because he is championing this cause whether it’s right or wrong!

If I’m taking a class on global warming I’m sitting in Dr. Michael Griffin’s class, I’m pretty sure that Al Gore doesn’t have the credentials to teach one.

An Inconvenient Change

Speaker Pelosi, CNN’s Anderson Cooper, and Mr. Paul Pelosi, Global warming tour

"This trip for us began in Greenland where we saw first-hand evidence that climate change is a reality," Pelosi said. "There is just no denying it. We saw the impact on the local people there, on their hunting, their fishing, their economic survival.
"And it wasn't caused by the people in Greenland. It was caused by the behavior in the rest of the world."
"The science is clear, the challenge is undeniable," Pelosi said. "We have to work together, though, to reach a solution."

How did you spend Memorial Day? I hope that you remembered the countless Americans that gave their lives for this country. I was with family and friends and we discussed the sacrifice that families all over this great country had made and are making because of love ones who have paid the ultimate price for this country in past wars and presently in Iraq.

Nancy Pelosi took a delegation of politicians to Greenland this Memorial Day during Congress’ holiday break for the purpose of changing the way we discuss the subject of Global warming in this country. And the Speaker of the house made a monumental discovery during this trip which was in her own words, “climate change is real.”

What is profoundly ironic about Ms. Pelosi’s epiphany is that many had dubbed this trip the Global warming tour; and one would have thought that Ms. Pelosi would have come back extolling dangers of Global warming and the fact that Global warming is real, but she didn’t. Pelosi and her delegation used the tax payer’s dime to come back with the very important message that the climate is changing, imagine that! I’m guessing that we all knew that Ms. Pelosi.

Pelosi joined by Reps. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Hilda Solis (D-Calif.), Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin (D-S.D.), Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.), John Larsen (D-Conn.), Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), and the token Republican David Hobson of Ohio on the trip.

Rep. Hobson was there so that Ms. Pelosi could boast of a bi-partisan delegation, what Pelosi is hoping is that you don’t realize that she has change the topic of Global warming into that of climate change.

Most Democrats won’t notice because… well they’re Democrats, but this Orwellian redefinition, this shift of topic is, number one, an admission that the shill warnings of the earth burning to a crisp were lies! And second this reorientation is meant to keep the momentum of all the little global warming sycophants while trying to establish the cause on science rather than emotion.

As more scientist come out against Al Gore’s “Michael Moorish” attempt to affect the outcomes of social change on environmental issues by film and DVD, the left senses that it needs a change in direction in order to remain believable even to their committed.

The fact is the left is no longer comfortable attempting to sale the theory that human emissions of CO2 is the cause of global warming and that it is under human power to stop it, now that many more reputable scientist are taking issue with flawed models and flawed theories.

``We do not understand the natural internal variability of climate change the Arctic was as warm or warmer in 1940,the evidence so far suggests that the Greenland ice sheet is actually growing on average. Alpine glaciers have been retreating since the early 19th century, and were advancing for several centuries before that. Since about 1970, many of the glaciers have stopped retreating and some are now advancing again. And, frankly, we don't know why." --Richard Lindzen, MIT Alfred P. Sloan professor of meteorology”

Link

The fact that media and popular opinion is driving this discussion on the left is disturbing especially because it is the left that accuses their opponents of being “deniers” as if people who disagree with global warming advocates have something in common with people who hate Jews and deny that the holocaust really happened.

``Most media reports ignore the evidence for cooling and focus instead on records from land stations, which indicate a 1°F increase in surface temperatures during the 20th century. What they fail to report is that this increase was measured mostly in and around urban centers, and therefore indicates urban—not global—warming.

Also left unreported is the fact that 90 percent of this 1°F urban warming occurred before 1940. If carbon dioxide emitted by industries and cars was causing this warming, should not most of the increase in temperature have occurred after 1940, when industries and cars became more plentiful and, consequently, carbon emissions increased significantly?

Even more interesting, but also left unreported, is the fact that from 1946 until 1975, while industrialization expanded and carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere increased, urban surface temperatures actually cooled. At the time, many in the media feared a new ice age.

Such facts throw into question the belief that global warming exists and that industrialization is affecting the earth's temperature. Nevertheless, the New York Times recently stated: "Human activity is the dominant force behind . . . global warming."

Dr. Fred Singer, professor of environmental sciences and former director of the National Weather Satellite Service, explains that climate change is a natural phenomenon, which has been going on for hundreds of millions of years. Ice core samples from the Arctic, for example, show an 18ºF temperature variation during the last 160,000 years. Dr. Singer further notes that solar activity greatly affects the temperatures and the climate on earth.

But most reports in the media ignore the existence of dissenting views such as Dr. Singer's. According to Scientific American, "few scientists doubt the atmosphere is warming." Time magazine bluntly claims: "Scientists no longer doubt that global warming is happening."

Link


Ms. Pelosi no one is denying that the climate is changing in fact let us agree that it is a fact that the climate is changing and that has been a reality since the earth was formed.

And no one is denying that the earth is getting warmer and/or cooler depending on where one is on the planet.

What we disagree about is allowing you to increase our tax burden in the name of Global warming or Climate change to attempt to fix a phenomenon that is beyond the control of humankind to fix or control in any meaningful way.

And some of us, perhaps just a few resent that you would attempt to insult our intelligence with dishonest political ploys meant to stampede the electorate toward self taxation in order to support your pop political causes

Global Warming Cabal Issues Death Threats Against Foes

Shut up! If you don’t we’ll kill you! That is the latest argument in support of Global warming. I must say that I’m not surprised even the message boards can get violently toxic, toxic enough to warrant feelings of dread and alarm. It seems that the Neo-Fascist Liberals who support Global Warming don’t intend for their goose egg to be anything but golden.

As more credible scientist break away from the Globe Warming meme Liberals are becoming wildly desperate. Desperate enough to kill. Just think the noble green environmentalist with high brow arguments regarding water ratios, temperature variations, polar cap melting’s, polar bear endangerment, Celsius and Fahrenheit degrees of change over hundreds of years are reduced to shut up or we’ll kill you!

For instance Timothy Ball, a former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg in Canada, has received five deaths threats by email since raising concerns about the degree to which man was affecting climate change.

One of the emails warned that, if he continued to speak out, he would not live to see further global warming.

I always knew that Global warming supporters were smart. Yes threaten to kill your opposition should win the argument every time.

You don’t even need any lawyers for that, heck lawyers are wussies anyway and people are becoming resistant to their lies. Yeah you need some real muscle to win the Global Warming debate some heavy email death threats ought to do it.

Next time I’m in a debate with any Global Warming Jihadists (GWJ) I’m going to be careful. I won’t make any cartoons about Al Gore or flush his book,Earth in the Balance, down the toilet.

And I’m definitely open to letting Global Warming Jihadists win arguments now since I know that human life as no value to them.

Hey what if we made it known that terrorists don’t believe in Global warming I bet the GWJs would kill all terrorists! Imagine we win the war on terrorism!

Hey, it could happen!

Martians to sign Koyoto Treaty?

Simultaneous warming on Earth and Mars suggests that our planet's recent climate changes have a natural—and not a human- induced—cause, according to one scientist's controversial theory.

Yes this is either proof that there are Martians, and on top of that they're driving cars and their factories are emitting greenhouse gases or this indicates that it is the sun that is the main cause for the phenomena that we call global warming and man has very little to do with it!

In 2005 data from NASA's Mars Global Surveyor and Odyssey missions revealed that the carbon dioxide "ice caps" near Mars's south pole had been diminishing for three summers in a row. That's right, just like earth's.

Global warming on Mars! I suppose those Martians driving those gas guzzling SUVs will have to give them up now. Hey I wonder if the Martian Government will attempt to legislate Draconian laws that will force the Martian people to conserve energy now? If they don't maybe our worldleaders will pass a law demanding that Martians join the Koyoto Treaty.

That's right true believer, the Mars cycle of global warming matches the Earth global warming cycle according to scientist Habibullo Abdussamatov, head of the St. Petersburg's Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory in Russia, he says the Mars data is evidence that the current global warming on Earth is being caused by changes in the sun.

"The long-term increase in solar irradiance is heating both Earth and Mars," he said.

Blasphemy! Off with his scientific credentials and his head! Everybody knows and agrees that Earth's greatest scientist Al Gore proved beyond a shadow of a doubt with his film “An Incontinent Truth” that global warming is caused by man-made emissions into the earth's atmosphere. He received an Oscar for it so it's got to be real! It's got to be truth, right? Yeah let's see Habibullo Abdussamatov's Oscar and maybe we'll believe him!

I don't really know what all the fuss is about anyway because even if Al Gore and popular opinion is correct there is nothing that we can do about global warming anyway.

That's right, we are told daily that we can't do anything about the world's problems. We can stop teen's having sex so just give them condoms, We can't stop illegal drug use so just issue needles and make weed legal, We can't define marriage, as it has always been defined, so just let everyone marry. We can't stop illegal aliens from over running our borders so just issue them credit cards. And we can't win the war so let's just pull our troops out of the Middle East as soon as possible.

So even if Al Gore is right and man IS causing global warming there is nothing that we can do about it because people are going to use fossil fuels and drive big cars and run factories, and use the drugs they want, and have sex with whomever that want and marry whomever that want and enter this country whenever they want and refuse to win a winnable war and there is not a damn thing that anyone can do about it!

I suggest that we issue gas masks, condoms, make everyone citizens and marry whoever the hell we want because you can't do nothing about it anyway, no, the little things can't be solved so why would one think that we can save a whole planet?

We can't do it! So I say do what we've always done, issue needles to the drug addicts, condoms to the sexual perverted and gas masks to the rest of us and then legislate a law that requires us to start taking shallow breathes during the drugged up teenaged homosexual illegal alien sex that we all will be having!

That'll solve the problem!