Democrats Retreat from Retreat

Rep. John Murtha, the face of Democrat cut and run

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a Political Party cut and run from their policy of cut and run but Democrats seem to have accomplished this.

I came across an editorial that I’d thought I’d share with you. You know that Democrats have been calling for the immediate withdraw of U.S. forces from Iraq. Don’t win it just end it and all of that kind of John Murtha like patriotism.

I found this editorial on examiner.com it was originally published in the Washington D.C. examiner newspaper and is entitled, “Regaining their senses on Iraq.”

Regaining their senses on Iraq? Who’s senses Democrats? Yes the author was referring to Democrats as if all of the Code Pink, Camp Casey, Anti-war protest and Congressional Democrats opposition to the war was crazy and now Democrats have regained their senses about the whole thing.

And then there was this caption under a picture of Sen. Carl Levin which read, Democrats, such as Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan, are injecting some much-needed realism into their party’s debate on the war.

“Clearly, there is momentum there, we visited forward operating bases in Mosul and Baghdad. In these areas, as well as a number of others in Iraq, the military aspects of President Bush’s new strategy in Iraq ... appear to have produced some credible and positive results.” Sen. Carl Levin

Whoa wait just a Cindy Sheehan minute, Regain their senses, injecting some much-need realism, it sounds to me that one party has been talking crazy about the war and now they’ve are going to be reasonable?

This is simply stunting. Democrats and liberals spent years souring Americans against the war and the President and now they are coming back to reality?

You see it was never about ending the war in Iraq, no with Democrat Party Elites it was always about ending and or damaging the Bush Presidency now seeing that he has less than 16 mos. left in an increasingly irrelevant Presidency and with most of his political advisors vanquished Democrats believe that they can finally tell you how they really feel about Iraq.

Remember Democrats planned to come back from their August break ready to roadside bomb the Bush administration with fresh criticisms about the war and now Democrats and the Republicans that they were able to persuade join their IED attacks are panicking that they will have to “Refocus” their planned assault in the face of a positive report coming from Army Gen. David H. Petraeus who's report accessing the Iraq war is due September 11 2007.

There have already been leaks that there are very positive developments in Gen. Petraeus’ surge therefore Democrats will need to prepare their own unique interpretation of what that means to their bid for the White house and hopeful increase in Congressional power.

Be assured that you won’t be hearing voices like Rep. John Murtha or Sen. “The War is Lost,” “The surge has failed” Harry Reid. Democrats will attempt to put up voices that are more connected with reality meaning that because the positive news coming out of Iraq is so inconvertible that even the staunchest of Democrat defeatists will be forced to retreat from their campaign of retreat.

Even Democrat Presidential hopefuls are now saying that it is possible to win in Iraq. A fact that was always true too bad Democrats didn’t pronounce it more.

Ironically Democrats will still get their wish to cut and run but it will only be cutting and running from their own negative assessments of America’s ability to win in Iraq and of course they will have to cut and run from their own policy of cut and run from Iraq and put their efforts into more positive pursuits such as concentrating with the rest of the country on winning in Iraq.

Is Karl Rove’s announcement to quit a cut and run?

Mr. Bush, right, followed by Mr. Rove, center, and then-White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card, left, exiting the worldstage

Effective August 31, 2007 Karl Rove will bow out of the position which he as held since 2001, adviser to the President of the United States of America.

Because he was apart of the Bush administration Democrats made him a target as they’ve done with all members of the Bush administration. And you do know that the President’s approval rates are directly a result of Democrat efforts to make everything about President Bush unpopular.

So Rove was made a target as all of the Republicans are made targets by Democrats who refused to believe that Americans rejected them in 2000 and 2004 so they declared their very own war of personal destruction against Republicans; John Ashcroft, I. Scooter Libby, Donald Rumsfield, Alberto Gonzales, Tom Delay and Karl Rove. (Just to name a few)

Democrats claim that they hate Republicans and everything that Republicans stand for so they feel totally and perfectly justified in attempting to bring down or dismantling the Bush administration.

We know that all of the negatively had it’s genesis with the Democrats and that they have projected their own corruption on the Republican Party. Democrats had 49 years of corruption controlling both house of Congress before the little twelve year Republican blip on the political radar screen.

Don’t get me wrong Randy “Duke” Cunningham was corrupted and got what he deserved but if everyone in Congress got what he or she deserved I’m willing to bet that more Democrats would be looking for work in 2008 and 2010 than Republicans!

Which brings me to my point, Democrats have been hunting and hounding Karl Rove since the President won 2000 because, again as they have stated, they hate Republicans and everything that they stand for. I believe that if Mr. Rove is leaving because Democrats have successfully made him a target, a negative for the Bush administration, then he is leaving for the wrong reason. Because as long as there is a Republican that will resist the Liberalization of America that person will be hated and despised by the left.

Liberals are like misguided delinquent teens that hate and despise their parents for raising them, feeding them, clothing them and attempting to give them morals with which to live a better life.

It is absolutely stunning that Liberals can spend almost eight years making Republicans polarizing figures and then turn around and claim that a Republican such as Mr. Rove is a polarizing figure!

Thus if Mr. Rove is leaving because Democrats have made him a polarizing figure then the Democrats have won. The terrorist have won!

It’s too bad that Democrats didn’t use their abilities to demonize against the enemies of this country; bin Laden, Hussein, Chavez, Ahmadinejad and terrorist. Had Democrats treated the enemies of this country like they treated Republicans we might have had a better go in Afghanistan and Iraq.

That instead of a valued Presidential adviser quitting his post under the steady drumbeat of Democrat negativity, just think maybe it would have been our enemies who are on the battle field of Iraq that would have decided to up and quit.

If just only half the Democrat's negatively was directed against our enemies; al Qaeda, terrorists and Islamic extremists maybe the suicide bombers would have decided that their deaths would be pointless and they would rather spend more time with their families and maybe just maybe it would be terrorists who would have resigned from the field of battle.

But because we have allowed one Party to totally politicize everything so that they might gain some sort of political advantage we have condoned the cutting off of our collective nose to spite our face.

Thus a valued political adviser is quitting because the other political Party ginned up enough hate to drive him away from serving America.

Whether you agreed with the politics of Karl Rove or not do we really want politics in America reduced solely to the politics of hate?

That’s intolerance and I will not support anyone or any Party that claims to be accepting of all things but hateful of White Protestant males and or Christians, or Conservatives or Republicans.

If you hate any of the above you are neither tolerant nor are you good for America.

And if Mr. Rove is leaving because of your intolerance he is cutting and running!

Democrats Cut and Run from News Debates

"Any candidate of either party who cannot answer direct, simple, even tough questions from any journalist runs a real risk of losing the voters."-- Roger Ailes, Chairman Fox News

Cut and Run tactics mixed with Fascist control and you have the new Democratic Party.

Afraid that they will not have the cover of their normal mainstream media allies, NBC, CBS, ABC, and their cable media cohorts; Democrats take Representive John Murtha's advise to heart by redeploying it's Presidential candidates from the Iraq of American media, Fox news.

Yes Democrats show us exactly what they'd do if they were in charge of protecting America. When Democrats are involved in conflict that they perceive they can't control they simply cut and run.

Fox a network that prides itself on “fair and balanced” reporting is view by Liberals as a mouth piece for Conservatism. Imagine fair and balanced is viewed as negative to Liberals? So does that mean that only views that sustain Liberal world view and ideology are a positive force for good in the world?

Think about how biased and closed minded that sounds! Isn't being biased and closed minded what Liberals normally accuse Conservatives of being? Well now Liberals are the ones demonstrating those characteristics.

Nevada Democratic Party officials said on Friday they were canceling a presidential debate co-sponsored by Fox News, following a joke chairman Roger Ailes made about Democratic candidate Barack Obama.

The joke by Ailes came during a speech to the Radio and Television News Directors Foundation First Amendment Dinner on Thursday night and -- while playing on similarity between Obama's name and Osama Bin Laden -- appears to be directed more at President Bush than senator Obama but that don't matter to biased closed-minded Liberals.

"It's true that Barack Obama is on the move," Ailes said during the speech. "I don't know if it's true that President Bush called Musharraf and said 'Why can't we catch this guy?'

My only hope is that the total irony of this is not lost on any of us. First Mr. Ailes was speaking and receiving an award at a First Amendment Dinner, for my Liberal readers that's a dinner recognizing works in freedom of speech a constitutional guaranteed right.

Second Mr. Ailes told a joke. What is with Liberals and jokes? Since John Kerry told his joke about President Bush every Conservative or perceived Conservative that tells a joke has to do ten our Fathers, ten hail Marys, recite the act of contrition and get down on their knees and self flagellate before the mainstream media.


Let's be clear this is nothing more than an attempt by Presidential hopeful John Edwards and top Fascist Democrat strategist to control information. The plan is, if they can demonize Fox News then no Liberal will listen to any other source than Moveon.org or it's affiliates ABC,CBS,NBC, MSNBC, CNN,and other main stream media groups that does the bidding of the far left socialist Fascists.

Democrat strategy is about controlling debate. You remember how Democrats tore down the Bush administration about hurricane Katrina don't you? Well when the Republican majority said okay lets investigate what when wrong regarding Katrina.

Because Democrats can't control the debate they boycotted any efforts to form a select-committee to investigate, even though House Republicans structured the new panel along the same lines as other select committees that investigated issues such as Iran-Contra, the Kennedy assassination, and Pearl Harbor, including breakdowns that reflect the existing partisan ratios in Congress.

Since 1946, the House used this select committee model 41 times to investigate a host of issues, usually while Democrats controlled the majority. I'm telling you if Democrats can't propagandize it's cut and run from any debate for them.


This is radical fringe leftist politics. It seemed to work well in the 2006 mid-term elections that swept the Republican majority out of Congress so now radicals who control the Democrat party, Nevada State Democratic Party Chairman Tom Collins and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, are using a full court press to ensure that Democrats are protected from any point of view that is not their own.

What does this all mean? It's about defining and controlling the debate. I have been reporting on a disturbing trend of Fascist tendencies in the Liberal movement.

Liberals tend to attempt to control thought, speech and action ergo all of the fake hate speech legislation promoted by Liberals and Liberal attempts to demonize any one who thinks or speaks out of line with current political correct standards crafted by Liberals in order to usher in the social change which they envision.

A change from a Democratic Constitutional Republic into a mob-rule mind controlled Democracy one which people are controlled by mass media and government which will be working for a powerful oligarchy of wealthy social political Liberal Fascists.


Fox news is not the demon here but anyone who would attempt to keep journalist from reporting, is the threat to constitutional guarantee of freedom the press.

Just think if the White house announced that it wasn't going to allow news organizations into the press corps which it felt were hostile to the President. If you think that would be wrong then you can not in good conscious fairly support Democrats pulling out of any debate that is partial sponsored by a news organizing that they do not like.

The cut and run tactics which Democrats are employing in regards to these Presidential debates are the exact oppose of the American idea of freedom of the press and should not be tolerated by open-mind free men and women anywhere.

But then cut and run is what Democrats do best when they can't control the debate!