Let the Controlling of the Conversation Begin!

Senator Hillary Clinton and former Senator John Edwards planning to further squelch speech in America

Well it’s a bit to late for that, that is Democrats have been attempting to control this American conversation for going on eight years. So much so that Hillary has picked up this theme for her campaign!


First by creating an absolutely toxic atmosphere around the President, Democrats have given license to the likes of Hugh Chavez and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to personally defame the President of these United States of America.

Democrat’s hatred and negativity toward President Bush has caused a Political Global Warming which is destroying the political landscape of this country as well as the politics of countries world-wide.

Now Democrats hypocritically wish to control all aspects of the Presidential debates. Presidential candidate and former one term Senator John Edwards; decided that he would not debate the issues as long as the debate was sponsored by the Congressional Black caucus and the Fox News network. Fox News being the operative word here.

Hillary Clinton, Barak Obama, Chris Dodd and Bill Richardson soon followed suit declaring, as their netroots moveon.org demanded, they would not debate on Fox News either!

You may have thought Good, Fox News is a Republican mouthpiece anyway and that's no place for the pristine ideologies of Liberalism. What you would not have expected is a fascist pattern of controlling speech or Liberal propaganda to be developing in the Democrat Party. Well it is!

As proof, here you have John Edwards and Senator Clinton once again attempting to exclude and limit the free expression of political debate in this country. If you listen carefully you can hear it as it was caught on video, Edwards whispers in Clinton’s ear that they must again limit debate. This time it has nothing to do with those nasty Fox News Conservatives, no, Edwards and Clinton want to prevent their fellow Democrats from debating.

Shades of Congressman Ron Paul! You remember the stink that Liberals attempted to create claiming that it was Republicans who were attempting to limit the Republican debate?

Just how could something that was sooo important to Liberals be repeated by Democrats? For months the liberal cry was Ron Paul, Ron Paul! And now Clinton and Edwards plot to do what they’ve accused the Republicans of doing? Hypocrisy!

You think that Democrats want to tell the truth? You think Al Gore tells the truth? What about John Kerry? Or maybe Hillary Clinton who David Geffen says lies better than the average politician.

This Political conversation that the Democrats plan to have with America is and will be full of deceptions and lies. Of course the greatest lie will be to project Democrat tendencies of lying on Republicans and thus far it’s working.

We’ve seen this all before the Clintonesque contrived parsing of terms the nuanced deception and the coy use of words, situation and politics all Democrat staples for campaigning and governing.

So as Hillary says, Let the conversation begin. Only every aspect of this conversation will be controlled by the Fascist netroots Liberal left and the Democrats who represent them; Hillary, Barak, Reid, Pelosi and John Edwards.

The thing is you won’t be seeing this conversation on Fox News now will you?

Democratic Debate Made No Sense

From left: Mike Gravel, former U.S. senator from Alaska, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Ct., former Sen. John Edwards of South Carolina., Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson., and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio made the observation of the night when he said that it made no sense to oppose the war and then turn around and vote for more money to fund it.

Out of the eight presidential hopefuls that spent the initial moments of their first Democratic presidential primary debate blaming President Bush for the war in Iraq four candidates; Sen. Christopher Dodd, Sen. Joe Biden, Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. John Edwards all voted to give President Bush authority to invade Iraq four years ago.

And all Democrats House and Senate apparently except for Rep. Kucinich voted yesterday on a war funding bill that will be sent to the President early next week. Kucinich’s point strikes at the heart of Democratic hypocrisy. Yes indeed, what sense does it make to fund the war and at the same time say that you are against it?

Such is the case with Democrats who live in the nuanced world of conflicting positions and politics. Sens. Obama, Clinton, Biden and Dodd all cast votes yesterday in favor of funding the war in Iraq yet they all blame the President for the war.

Remember four of the candidates voted initially to invade Iraq and four of them voted to fund the continuation of the war yesterday yet Democrats feel perfectly comfortable criticizing the President while disassociating themselves from any responsibility for their decision to give authority to invade Iraq or their votes yesterday to continue to fund the war.

Inconsistent, makes no sense? Well of course this kind of “I voted for the war before I voted against it,” is a Democrat political essential. This is a formula that Democrats have invented, John Kerry clumsily attempt to invoke it in his Presidential bid of four year ago. When pressed on the fact that he voted against funding equipment for the troops. In Kerry’s famous nuanced way of putting things he said, “I actually voted for the $87 billion before I voted against it.”

One has to wonder, why such blatant inconsistencies are so acceptable to Democrat partisans when any Republican who’d had made similar statements before the press would be dragged before a Senate Judiciary hearing.

But alas if you are a Democrat you may always change your mind, change your position and you may always repent.

For instance, you need a $400 dollar hair cut? And you want to pay for it from campaign donations?

Well I won’t advise it if you are a Republican but if you happen to be a Democrat and if your name happens to be John Edwards why go ahead and get that trim, no problem. If you are ever asked about it just say, "That was a mistake, which we remedied," and all is forgiven. See how easily Democrat sycophants look pass partisan wrong doing?

Or did you ever notice how Democrats are so impressed with the labyrinthine phrasing of a clintonesque statement, one that starts in one directing but is so convoluted with legalese that when completed it is in absolute contradiction of its original intent? Slippery answers, words, phases and clauses refined and redefined to the point of surreal absurdity an example would be some of the candidates’ answers to a question about the Supreme Court.

The candidates were asked about the Supreme Court ruling that upheld a ban on partial birth abortions, many of them claimed that they would not impose a litmus test on their own nominees to the high court. But contradictorily, some of them stressed their support for abortion rights, and said their appointees to the bench would reflect that. So much for not imposing a litmus test and very clintonesque I must say.

In another example Dennis Kucinich challenged Barack Obama at one point for once having said all options were on the table with respect to Iran. "You're setting the stage for another war," the Ohio lawmaker said.

In Obama’s best clintonesque he shot back, "I think it would be a profound mistake for us to initiate a war with Iran," Obama replied. "But have no doubt, Iran possessing nuclear weapons will be a major threat to us and to the region."

Thus Obama was able to leave all options on the table with only the impression that he had addressed Kucinich’s concern.

If this debate portends to be what’s in store for the American people, if the Democrats win, we will not have learned anything in the last eight years of partisan attempts to make George Bush into a liar. We could be headed back to being governed by a Democrat party that made lying depend on what the meaning of is, is!

And that friend just doesn’t make any sense!

Bar the Constitution and Democrats will Speak

DNC Chair Howard Dean

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;--United States Constitution

The head of the Democratic Party said Wednesday that the best way to get presidential candidates to talk frankly about issues is to lock out the media. —Reported by AP Press

You have to wonder how anyone above a fourth grade education can be a Democrat or a Liberal that supports Democrat politics. Don’t these guys know anything about the Constitution?

As reported by the AP press DNC Chairman Howard Dean speaking before the Mortgage Bankers Association asserted that a media lock out would be the answer to get Democrats to speak candidly about the issues. So does that mean everything that we hear in the media spoken by a Democrat is…less than forthright?

Bar the press says Dean and hold closed meetings and Democrats will say all of the things that they’ve been holding back. Yeah things like, “The war is lost” a la Democrat Majority Leader Harry Reid? I wonder what Senator Reid was really thinking?

"The media has been reduced to info-tainment," Dean said. "Info-tainment sells, the problem is they reach the lowest common denominator instead of forcing a little education down our throats, which we are probably in need of from time to time."

Of course, You probably get your information from ABC, CBS or NBC or maybe you’re a hard-core information junkie and plug in to cable news, CNN, or MSNBC. Like many Americans you probably subscribe to the Times newspaper in your area but according the DNC chair you’re not as smart as you think!

As a matter of fact you are being info-tained and you are the “lowest common denominator” who has an aversion to education.

Just remember that the next time you attempt to debate the issues with an opponent and you cite your mainstream media sources. Democrat National Chairman Howard Dean says that your sources are stupid and so are you!

Hey which mainstream media network is carrying tonights Democrat Presidential Debates?

Just thought I’d ask … You know there’s always Fox News!