Will Democrats be Held Accountable for Their Lies?

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (John Shinkle)

I once heard the late comedian Redd Fox quip, “A Lie is as good as the truth if you can get some fool to believe it!” Yeah pretty funny stuff.

Little did Fox know that he wasn’t the only one who held that philosophical view. As a matter of fact, of late, that Foxtonian pronouncement seems to be employed quite a bit by politicians who have apparently come to believe that they have little accountability for what they say and do.

Take for instance California Democrat Congressman Pete Stark who was just using the same old Democrat hyperbole that has become a Democrat tactic against the war and President Bush for the last 6 years when he said:

"You don't have money to fund the war or children," Stark said on the House floor. "But you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president's amusement."

(See video below)



Truth is Democrats have been saying this kind of nasty stuff about the President for a long, long time (that’s why Stark did it) why all the fuss about it now? 89% disapproval ratings in the polls and a new Democrat publicity campaign to boost Congress’ image that’s why all the fuss. A Democrat lead Congress has nothing to show for their promises to end the war in Iraq, the reason why the American people elected them the majority in Congress, but broken promises and lies.

Democrats would now have you believe that they didn’t know how the Senate and the House worked. They didn’t know that they couldn’t just ride into Washington with guns a blazin’ and demand that “ol’ Black Bart” George W. Bush end the war with their bright shiny new “Majority in Congress” badges. Democrats didn’t end the war as promised; no instead they funded the war several times a war which they voted the President authority for ! (Which makes it a legal war because Congress give authority for this war Rep. Stark)

Listening to Democrats now they didn’t know that the Senate was controlled by the minority and they didn’t know that without building bipartisanship nothing could get done even though Democrats spent the last 12 years in the minority blocking everything the Republicans attempted to do.

Nancy Pelosi didn’t know that a slim majority in the House wouldn’t allow her to push forward all the promised Democratic agenda items.
She didn’t know? (Sounds a lot like Iraq intelligence) Does she honest expect you to believe that? Do you honestly believe that Pelosi didn’t know after 12 years of being in the minority how the House worked? And then all of those insulting promises made to the America people just to get Democrats elected:

Pelosi vowed that five-day workweeks would be a hallmark of a harder-working Democratic majority. So far, the House has logged only one. Lawmakers plan to clock three days this week.

The speaker has denied Republicans a vote on their proposals during congressional debates -- a tactic she previously declared oppressive and promised to end. Pelosi has opened the floor to a Republican alternative just once.

Pelosi set a high standard for herself when she pledged to make this "the most ethical Congress in history" [instead] [s]he put Rep. William Jefferson (D-La.), who had $90,000 in alleged bribe money in his freezer, on the Homeland Security Committee. And The Washington Post reported during the weekend that she is helping chairmen raise money from donors with business before their committees.

As for the Americans who think that Democrat’s promises to end the war should be kept Congresswoman Pelosi says:

Activists who want to target congressional Democrats for lack of action on the war are misguided, the speaker argued. "I think it is a waste of time for them to go after Democratic members.

They ought to just persuade Republican members who are representing areas that are opposed to the war," she said. "We said we would change the debate; we would fight to end the war. We never said we had the veto pen or the signature pen."

What? No you didn’t Ms. Speaker, Democrats promised unequivocally that if they were elected the majority in Congress they would end the war according to anti-war activist Tina Richards.

I attended the MoveOn.org rally on Tuesday night where Speaker Pelosi and Leader Reid discussed how they were going to "end the war" and "bring our troops home" with the Levin-Reed Amendment.

When I asked if they meant all the troops, I was quickly told to, "shut up" and muscled aside by security. A fellow Marine Mom was treated in much the same manner and we couldn't get over how much like the Republicans the "Anti-Escalation" folks were acting.

Then when Senator Reid was asked directly about ending the war he danced around like he was a contestant on "Dancing with the Stars": (See below)

Ms. Pelosi to now say that the American people are fools and didn’t understand what you promised is absolutely outrageous.

You knew full well how the Congress operated when you made those promises Senator Reid and Congresswomen Pelosi the fact that you now can’t deliver on your promises is indicative of a lying and incompetence Democrat controlled Congress that said what it needed to say just to get elected. And don’t farther insult the people who elected you by telling them to go and persuade GOP lawmakers to end the war, that’s your job! That is why you were elected to the majority in Congress.

This is one insular isolated place where I agree with Cindy Sheehan, if Americans want change in our government the likes of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid must be extricated from the hallowed halls of Congress and replaced by good Americans who place the well-being of this nation over games of political gotcha and pandering to radical hate groups like moveon.org.

Rep. Stark is only the first Democrat from which we should hear the apology, “I’m sorry for what I said.” In the pass eight years Democrats have said a lot about the war and the President some true but mostly political hyperbole meant to hurt and harm the presidency, the war effort and to get Democrats elected to office.

If you didn’t know now you know. Democrats will not have the same impunity that they enjoyed in 2006 where they skillful made all Republicans liars and corrupt and Democrats agents of change even though they were apart of the same culture of corruption in the House and the Senate.

We now know that both Parties live with in that same culture Ms. Pelosi!

Corporate Democrats

Presidential Hopeful former Senator John Edwards

Who’s responsible for the hundreds of thousands of middle class jobs lost to America? Who is responsible for the out-sourcing of American jobs to foreign countries, and who’s responsible for the in-sourcing of illegal alien workers and just who’s responsible for the downsizing (termination) of thousands of jobs in America and the subsequent hardships that the American workers face, President Bush? Is he responsible for the aforementioned?

No, Bush is just the custodian of policies that were put in place before he became President in 2000 if you want to know who the culprit is; who screwed the American worker all you have to do is listen to the warnings of Ross Perot in the 1992 presidential elections.

Perot said that giant sucking sound that you hear is all of the jobs being sucked out of America if NAFTA is signed into law.

The "giant sucking sound" was United States Presidential candidate Ross Perot's colorful phrase for what he believed would be the negative effects of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which he opposed. The phrase, coined during the 1992 U.S. presidential campaign, referred to the sound of U.S. jobs heading south for Mexico should the proposed free-trade agreement go into effect.
Perot ultimately lost the election, and the winner, Bill Clinton, supported NAFTA, which went into effect on January 1, 1994.-- Wikipedia

Perot warned us we didn’t listen, we elected William Jefferson Clinton who in turn signed NAFTA and thereby unleashed a corporate windfall that has devastated the economic heartland of America. Bill Clinton is a Corporate Democrat.

Any ways, that’s what President hopeful John Edwards is saying these days. Edwards is speaking out against Corporate Democrats, politicians who put corporate interest before the interest of citizens and workers. He is speaking out against Democrats who already have the endorsement of big money corporations who will continue the work and legacy of Bill Clinton and George Bush. And Edwards also says that Senator Hillary Clinton is a Corporate Democrat too.

Is Edwards right? Are corporate Democrats to be feared as much as Republicans? Yes I think that he is absolutely correct.

Unfortunately the former Senator’s warnings will fall on the same hears that Ross Perot’s warnings fell on, the ears of an electorate that is confused about what is really important in America’s politics.

This is a America that is more concerned with dynasties and the possibly of electing the first U.S. female President than the more substantive issue of whether the candidates whom we are considering will continue to sell out this country to big money international corporations at the expense of the voters who voted them into office.

We are playing a game of Jeopardy, watching the economic, social, political, and military deconstruction of America. It’s like we are being asked whether we prefer death by: Islamic nuclear bomb, the gutting of our economic infrastructure by corporations or the complete devaluation of our constitution with made up and phony rights.

I’ll choose the Islamic nuclear bomb, Alex. That way it’s not as slow and painful as watching the economic life being drained from our country before our very eyes. The people of this country are slowly going into a fog and are losing all consciousness of what it was like to be America.

Before you slip to far into the ethers here’s the big money alliances that your front runners and Corporate Democrats are making:

Hillary Rodham Clinton

Through persistence and patience, Clinton has assembled what is probably the broadest CEO support among the candidates, ranging from Wall Street to Hollywood.

John Mack CEO, Morgan Stanley Winning over the longtime Republican sent a signal about Clinton's clout on Wall Street.

Sheryl Sandberg VP, global online sales, Google "I was always hoping she'd run for President. She's uniquely qualified."

Steve Rattner Managing principal, Quadrangle Group "I've been a longtime supporter of the Clintons. I knew I'd end up in her camp."

Steven Spielberg Co-founder, DreamWorks The mogul co-hosted a fundraiser at the home of News Corp. president Peter Chernin.

Haim Saban CEO, Saban Capital Group "I endorsed Hillary before Hillary decided to endorse herself. I'm on a mission."

James D. Robinson III General partner, RRE Ventures The former AmEx CEO likes her "breadth of experience, especially on the international level."

Barack Obama

The Illinois Senator has a solid base of business support in Chicago but has also fared well with Hollywood media moguls and has aggressively moved into Clinton's turf among East Coast financiers.

Oprah Winfrey Founder, Harpo Productions Her endorsement of Obama was the first ever forthe billionaire media powerhouse.

Penny Pritzker Chairman, Classic Residence by Hyatt "I've watched him dialogue with CEOs. Heads are nodding, people are excited."

David Geffen Co-founder, DreamWorks He endorsed Obama - but first took a public swipe at his old friends, the Clintons [whom he supported in the past].

Jeffrey Katzenberg Co-founder, DreamWorks "His sense of right and wrong, what's just and fair, is what's needed for these times."

James S. Crown President, Henry Crown & Co. The investor says his family, one of Chicago's wealthiest, "is solidly behind" the candidate.

Orin Kramer General partner, Boston Provident "We're tapping into people in business who haven't been involved in the process."

Why, there’s no difference between a Corporate Democrat and a Corporate Republican. And I thought that Democrats were the party of change!

Senator Harry Reid Takes Credit for Rush Limbaugh’s Idea

Senators Harry Reid and Charles Schumer: Who’s stealing ideas, not us.

In the most pathetic and buffoonish example of Democrat stupidity Democrat Senate leader Harry Reid stood in the well of the Senate and attempted to take credit for good that came out of something that he and his friends mean for evil.

A letter written and signed by 41 Democrat U.S. Senators to Mark Mays, CEO of Clear Channel Communications and Rush Limbaugh’s boss, was meant to censor Mr. Limbaugh.

It is the first time in the history of America that we have evidence in plain sight that elected officials attempted to use the power of the government to deprave a private citizen of his first amendment constitutional rights of free speech.

However Senator Reid wasn’t taking responsibility for that unconstitutional act, oh no, he was instead attempting to steal credit for a private citizen’s (who he and 40 of his ultra-partisan friends attempted to destroy) idea to turn what was meant for evil into something good.

Rush Limbaugh turned the unconscionable unconstitutional evil act of Harry Reid into a 2million dollar act of charity which Limbaugh then personally matched dollar for dollar making it a total gift of 4million dollars!

Really Senator Reid you don’t have to steal another man’s act of charity you and your accomplices are free to donation as much or even more than Rush did to charity. That would be 2million dollars each times 41 Democrat Senators. Just think that would be 82 million dollars to your favorite charity, Moveon.org, Senator!

Oh by the way the 40 other Democrats who signed this letter of Democrat disgrace are:

Senators; Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama, Richard Durbin, Charles Schumer, Patty Murray Daniel Akaka, Max Baucus, Joseph Biden, Barbara Boxer, Sherrod Brown, Robert Byrd, Benjamin Cardin, Tom Carper, Bob Casey, Kent Conrad, Christopher Dodd, Byron Dorgan, Dianne Feinstein, Tom Harkin, Daniel Inouye, Edward M. Kennedy, John Kerry, Amy Klobuchar, Mary Landrieu, Frank Lautenberg, Patrick Leahy, Carl Levin, Blanche Lincoln, Bob Menendez, Barbara Mikulski, Bill Nelson, Jack Reed jay Rockefeller, Ken Salazar, Bernie Sanders, Debbie Stabenow, Jon Tester Jim Webb Sheldon Whitehouse and Ron Wyden.

We’ll be waiting for an announcement of Limbaugh-like acts of charity from the Senators listed above. After all we all know that Democrats are more generous than Rush Limbaugh and the Conservatives. (See Reid Below)

Mainstream Media “Sandy Bergers” Hillary Clinton’s Corruption

Senator Hillary Clinton: Not fully revealed? (REUTERS/Jim Young)

“Sandy Berger” Media Protects Hillary Clinton

You know that if Hillary Rodham Clinton was a Republican the MSM would have called Dan Rather back to do the reporting on what is unfolding to be the biggest political campaign corruption story in American politics. But this is Hillary, the Democrats front runner, and what the media did instead of reporting this story was stuff this story down its collective trousers to take it out, make it disappear, to destroy it. “Sandy Berger” Media to the rescue once again!

First Hillary Clinton’s Senate Campaign scandal her former Campaign fundraiser director is indicted. Just how do you became a former Campaign fundraiser director? Why you get tossed under the bus by Hillary Clinton that’s how!

Present day even the left-wing Huffingtonpost reported on it just in case and to ensure that no one could say that they weren’t fair and balanced in their reporting of the news.

Even though, this is a story that you haven’t heard! And that’s largely because Hillary “Darth Vadar” Clinton did not what you to hear it so she used the “force” of her corrupt political network to hide it from the weak and feeble minded.

Incredibly what you didn’t know is right now as you read there is a complaint charging Hillary and the soon lovely first laddy Billy with campaign corruption. (See the 50 page complaint here)

Remember how just recently MSM reported that Hillary eclipsed Barak Obama in political fundraising? Everyone who follows the Clintons knows that having more fundraising dollars than Obama wasn’t the real story. Any reporter worth the Pulitzer would have asked how did Hillary get this money, in her usual way Illegally?

You should ask your network news and any other sources from which you inform yourself why you had to hear about the biggest story of these elections right here from a lowly internet blogger! Hat Tip to RC2 for bringing this one to my attention! (See the damning video below)

We Don’t Need No Triangulation

Senator Barack Obama

"We've had enough of ... triangulation and poll-driven politics, that's not what we need right now."--Senator Barack Obama

According to Barack Obama Hillary Clinton is another brick in the wall when it comes to American politics.

And America is tired of politicians who use under-handed politics to win.

Voting for Hillary would not bring the change that the country wants another Clinton Presidency would be just the same old brick after brick.

Apparently Obama would like Americans to make a distinction, if they truly desire political change and a new direction in America, you don’t put back into office someone who is partly responsible for the last 16 years of Clinton Bush policies.

Clinton has already reassembled retreads from her husband’s administration to advise her campaign, Madeline Albright and Sandy Berger being the most controversial.

Dynasties are spoken of by Monarchs and Kings not American Politicians and certainly not American Presidents yet strangely enough the Clinton campaign and the mainstream media has been floating the idea that putting Hillary into the White house would continue the Clinton Dynasty.

Dynasties are bad for America as a matter of fact the reason why the Founders crafted the separation of powers and a president instead of a king was to guard against dynasties.

That being said, Senator Obama’s reference to triangulation refers to Bill Clinton’s eight years as president in which Clinton made policy decisions by stealing the ideas of the opposing party to suck the air out of their opposition to him. The practice became known as ‘‘triangulation.’’

Presenting your opponents ideas as your own knocks the wind out of their adversarial intentions plus often times the act leaves opponents politically disorientated. Bill Clinton was very good at this tactic.

Obama seems to be calling for less deception,less Machiavellian tactics and less political manipulation which are the hall marks of the Clintonian methodology of politicking.

The Clinton campaign lashed back at Obama in typical “Politics of Personal Destruction” fashion by claiming that Obama’s comments abandoned the politics of hope and where little more then a attack against Hillary and the former President.

As for the Clinton Bush Dynasty Senator Obama stated,

‘‘George Bush may have perfected divisive special interest politics but he didn’t invent it,’’ Obama said. ‘‘It was there before he got into office and will be there after he leaves office, unless we decide we’re going to take our government back.’’

Senator Obama clearly wishes to be known as a leader for a new generation and a new kind of politics. Obama said he would stand up to special interests and take unpopular stands when necessary.

That kind of idealism is certainly not politics as usual nor is it another brick in the wall politics but hasn’t Senator Obama noticed that Hillary has already stolen his thunder.

News has it that she has raised more money than he, reversing the positive imaging that he was receiving from that news and now she is pandering to the women’s and minority’s votes.

I’d say welcome to the world of triangulation Barack. A world where Hillary Clinton’s campaign is in charge and has at least a 20% lead over you and if you have any dreams Clintonesta will triangulate them too!

SCHWARZENEGGER: Girlee Republican makes California Girlee State

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, before becoming Girlee Republican

You’re probably as tired of hyphenated Republicans as I am, i.e. Compassionate-Conservative or any of the sissy Democrat-wannabe Republicans in the House and Senate. I’m I right?

You’d probably give your eye-tooth for just a plain old Conservative one that will fight for Conservative values. You know like protect the borders, protect us from terrorism, protect the institution of marriage and keep down government spending.

What you don’t want is to choose someone who claims that they are a Republican but at the first time of testing he or she bulks at Conservative ideas.

That brings me to California’s Girlee Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger who signed legislation late Friday October 12, 2007 that makes California a Girlee State.

Apparently not willing to raise the ire of the strong homosexual lobby in "CHaLeefornya", Girlee Republican Governor Schwarzenegger signed legislation into law that will criminalize anyone who believes that homosexuality is wrong and expresses that view.

Liberals, always attempting to self authenticate their views often resort to Machiavellian tactics in order to force their left-wing authoritarian views into law or they give their views some undeserved and unmerited distinction (Al Gore’s Nobel Peace Prize, for Global warming?), have crafted AB 394 and SB 777 to force homosexuality on the unsuspecting majority of Californians who have already voted in 2000 that marriage remain as it always has been.

California’s Proposition 22 states: "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California" (approved on March 7, 2000 by a margin of 61 to 39).

What the Girlee Republican Governor and the radical California legislature did purposely by-passes the expressed vote of the people of California. It is an egregious act which damages democracy for the sake of the ideological gain of a small but powerful homosexual special interest group under the guise of “protecting the children who might be homosexuals.”

This site has been dedicated to showing Orwellian attempts employed by political operatives, attempts to change the American society through legal coercion and political fascism. But absolutely nothing that I’ve come across shows how this is being accomplish more clearly than what Governor Schwarzenegger and the California legislature has done to the people of California for the sake of California’s homosexual lobby.

This Oligarchy of homosexual fascist infiltrated the California state government by the election process and slowly and methodically began to infringe on the rights of the majority of Californians. What the homosexual lobby has done through the California state legislature and Governor Schwarzenegger is political tyranny.

If a group any group can declare by law that their ideology is right by using the political system to by-pass the peoples’ will in spite of and against the expression democratic vote of the people that is legal coercion, that is political fascism, that is tyranny and that is exactly what the homosexual lobby in California did through their state elected agents.

Agents of the homosexual lobby were able to control an already ultra liberal California legislature and move their agenda using a so-called Republican Governor to sign their political handy-work for the coup de grâce.

Astonishingly these provocateurs used the processes of democracy to thwart the very democracy that they pretended to represent through several bills designed to legalize homosexuality. The aforementioned bills AB 394 and SB 777 will take affect January 1 2008 in California and will virtually make it illegal for anyone in the state of California to believe that homosexuality is wrong.

Under these Orwellian laws the words, "Mom and Dad" as well as "husband and wife" have been banned from California schools that was signed by Schwarzenegger!

Under these same bizarre laws Schwarzenegger ordered public schools to allow boys to use girls’ restrooms and locker rooms, and vice versa, if they choose. That was signed by Schwarzenegger.

Schwarzenegger signed SB 777 (transsexual, bisexual, homosexual indoctrination of schoolchildren by requiring changes to all instruction and activities) and AB 394 (transsexual, bisexual, homosexual indoctrination of students, parents, and teachers via “anti-harassment” training). Signing the bills was a switch for Schwarzenegger, who vetoed nearly the same bills last year, in the midst of his reelection campaign.

SB 777 prohibits any “instruction” or school-sponsored “activity” that “promotes a discriminatory bias” against “gender” (the bill’s definition includes cross-dressing and sex changes) and “sexual orientation” (the bill’s definition includes bisexuality). Because no textbook or instruction in California public schools currently disparages transsexuality, bisexuality, or homosexuality, the practical effect of SB 777 will be to require positive portrayals of these sexual lifestyles at every government-operated school. Otherwise, “discriminatory” schools will be subject to intimidation and lawsuits by the State Department of Education.

Under SB 777, which will go into effect on January 1, 2008, the following could be eliminated from California public schools because they are deemed to have a “discriminatory bias”:

• Textbooks and other instruction that portray marriage as only between a man and a woman

• Textbooks and other instruction that say people are born male or female (and not in between)

• Textbooks and other instruction that leave out transsexual, bisexual, and homosexual historical figures

• Sex education and school assemblies that omit the option of hormone injections or sex changes

• Homecoming king and queen contests that allow only boys to run for king and only girls to run for queen

• Boys’ and girls’ bathrooms that separate biological boys from biological girls
The second sexual indoctrination bill that Schwarzenegger signed, AB 394, will promote transsexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality to students, parents, and teachers through school training programs against “harassment” and “discrimination.”

While SB 777 is about “instruction” and “activities” promoting various sexual lifestyles, AB 394 promotes these same lifestyles -- “gender” (transsexuality and sex changes) and “sexual orientation” (bisexuality and homosexuality) -- through publications, postings, curricula, and handouts to students, parents, and teachers.

AB 394 would promote these lifestyles all under the guise of “safety.” Yet current safety and nondiscrimination laws are sufficient, making this bill unnecessary.

AB 394 infringes on free speech. For example, because AB 394 fails to define “harassment,” a parent who says marriage is only for a man and a woman in the presence of a lesbian teacher could be found guilty of “harassment.” Similarly, a student who says you’re born either male or female could be reported as a “harasser” by a male teacher who wears women’s clothes.

In addition to signing the two school sexual indoctrination bills, Gov. Schwarzenegger signed AB 102, which awards married names to unmarried couples. AB 102 allows homosexual couples to hold themselves out as married by permitting them to choose the same surname upon registration of their “domestic partnership.” The bill awards unmarried couples married last names, such as “Mr. and Mr. Smith” and “Mrs. and Mrs. Jones.”

“Schwarzenegger and the Democrat politicians have created the public image of homosexual ‘marriages’ in California,”

In addition, Schwarzenegger signed AB 14, which requires more California businesses, as well as some churches and nonprofit organizations, to support and promote transsexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality.

AB 14 prohibits state funding for any program that does not support transsexuality, bisexuality, or homosexuality. This means state-funded social services operated by churches and other houses of faith, which provide essential services to children and adults, could dry up.

Negatively impacted will be religious-based day care, pre-school and after-school programs, food and housing programs, senior services, anti-gang efforts, job programs, and more. Throughout California, there are faith-based services that receive government funding that simply do not and will not accept transsexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality.

Infringing on matters of personal and religious conscience, AB 14 also forces every hospital in California -- even private, religious hospitals -- to adopt policies in support of transsexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality. Under AB 14, private country clubs, tennis clubs and racquet clubs will be forced to support these sexual lifestyles on their premises.

AB 14 also opens up nonprofit organizations to lawsuits if they exclude members that engage in homosexual, bisexual, or transsexual conduct. This certainly threatens the Boy Scouts, which is a membership organization as well as a nonreligious nonprofit. (Source: www.savecalifornia.com)

These laws are but the first installment of a new world order where George Orwell’s 1984 was actually a prophetic projection into the year 1994 where actually the brainwashing of the American people began. Orwell was just off by a decade. (Follow this link to the brainwashing centers)

If there is a moral it is, chose carefully your next Republican candidate for President. Make sure that, that person is a Conservative not a girlee or compassionate but someone who will fight for Conservative ideology!

The Nobel Peace Prize and Mocking Derision

Stewart Dimmock, David that stood up to the Global warming Goliath

I like Jonathan Martins’ opening sentence, “Conservatives reacted to the long-awaited news this morning that Al Gore has been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize with mocking derision.”

Martin blogs for the Politico about Conservatives (obviously from a Liberal prospective!) his remarks sound as foreign as Osama bin Laden calling the West to Islam. I don’t think he gets the subject that he’s reporting on.

First of all who was long-awaiting the Nobel Committee to bestow the Peace prize on Al Gore for Global warming? Does it make any sense to anyone who is not a Liberal that the “PEACE” prize would be hijacked to make a political statement about an unproven theory? (According to Britain’s High Court Anthropogenic Global warming is unproved and not held in scientific consensus.)

Liberal are always attempting to self authenticate their views by making their views law or by giving their views some undeserved and unmerited distinction.

And as for mocking derision that is not what Conservatives did. No, mocking derision is what the Nobel Committee did when they turned their collective noses up on the real peace efforts throughout the world for a poke-in-the-eye at everyone who doesn’t follow blindly the Piped Piper of CO2 emissions himself Albert Arnold Gore, Jr.

Through twisted logic the Oslo Committee attempted to justify their choice of Gore and the United Nations, International Panel on Climate Change, but their explain rung hollow in light of the many people who actually risked life and limb for the cause of peace in the world.

As the Opinion Journal points out what about the: Burmese monks whose defiance against, and brutalization at the hands of, the country's military junta in recent weeks captured the attention of the Free World.

Or Morgan Tsvangirai, Arthur Mutambara and other Zimbabwe opposition leaders who were arrested and in some cases beaten by police earlier this year while protesting peacefully against dictator Robert Mugabe.

Or Father Nguyen Van Ly, a Catholic priest in Vietnam arrested this year and sentenced to eight years in prison for helping the pro-democracy group Block 8406.
Or Wajeha al-Huwaider and Fawzia al-Uyyouni, co-founders of the League of Demanders of Women's Right to Drive Cars in Saudi Arabia, who are waging a modest struggle with grand ambitions to secure basic rights for women in that Muslim country.

Or Colombian President Àlvaro Uribe, who has fought tirelessly to end the violence wrought by left-wing terrorists and drug lords in his country.

Or Garry Kasparov and the several hundred Russians who were arrested in April, and are continually harassed, for resisting President Vladimir Putin's slide toward authoritarian rule.

Or the people of Iraq, who bravely work to rebuild and reunite their country amid constant threats to themselves and their families from terrorists who deliberately target civilians.

Or Presidents Viktor Yushchenko and Mikheil Saakashvili who, despite the efforts of the Kremlin to undermine their young states, stayed true to the spirit of the peaceful "color" revolutions they led in Ukraine and Georgia and showed that democracy can put down deep roots in Russia's backyard.

Or Britain's Tony Blair, Ireland's Bertie Ahern and the voters of Northern Ireland, who in March were able to set aside decades of hatred to establish joint Catholic-Protestant rule in Northern Ireland.

Or thousands of Chinese bloggers who run the risk of arrest by trying to bring uncensored information to their countrymen.

Or scholar and activist Saad Eddin Ibrahim, jailed presidential candidate Ayman Nour and other democracy campaigners in Egypt.

Or, posthumously, lawmakers Walid Eido, Pierre Gemayel, Antoine Ghanem, Rafik Hariri, George Hawi and Gibran Tueni; journalist Samir Kassir; and other Lebanese citizens who've been assassinated since 2005 for their efforts to free their country from Syrian control.

Or the Reverend Phillip Buck; Pastor Chun Ki Won and his organization, Durihana; Tim Peters and his Helping Hands Korea; and Liberty in North Korea, who help North Korean refugees escape to safety in free nations.(Source The Opinion Journal)

Or what about Cindy Sheehan, Cindy is more about peace in her little toe than Al Gore ever was! You may not agree with Ms. Sheehan but her decision to run against Nancy Pelosi alone is deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize!

No Jonathan, the only mocking derision concerning the Nobel Peace Prize is the derision the committee made by disregarding the real peacemakers when the committee overlooked peacemakers’ often dangerous, bitter and noble struggles for peace in order to hand the award to a movement that was not even in the peace category.

If the Nobel Prize Committee wishes to award environmental concerns they should open up a category for that purpose that would be appropriate.

But to take recognition from those who were rightly deserving of that recognition just to heap it upon those who are not, is the ultimate act of derisive mockery.

And Jonathan to report it as you did is devoid of all rational prospective my friend an act which itself is worthy of Conservatives’ mocking derision.

The Clinton’s Wrote The Book!

Hillary and Bill Clinton

"For 15 years, I've stood up against the right-wing machine," she said, as many in the crowd cheered.

"If you want a winner who knows how to take them on, I'm your girl."—Senator Hillary Clinton

You can learn a lot from those bright yellow books, Etiquette For Dummies, Suse Linux 9.3 for Dummies, Business Plans Kit For Dummies, Home Decorating for Dummies, DOS For Dummies Quick Reference, MCSE SQL Server 2000 Administration for Dummies or Guitar For Dummies.

However the book that we are all reading from collectively right now is Politics for Dummies by Bill and Hillary Clinton. It’s a political playbook on how to lie, laugh, deceive and equivocate yourself right into the White house while using the Media, Liberals and the Democrat party to get what you want.

It’s a work of diabolical brilliance. A must read for every Liberal politician that values winning above all else. If you don’t read the Clinton’s playbook then you are truly a dummy!

I can’t recall seeing such a cold, calculating unrelenting work of political campaigning that is so patently fake.

The L.A. Times wrote, “She runs a textbook front-runner's presidential campaign: methodical and focused.” They continue, “Clinton campaigning is a study in focus and Swiss-watch precision.” What they are trying to say is Clinton’s campaign is a slick well oiled con game.

Hillary’s campaign is so obviously staged that’s its hard to believe that anyone is taking her seriously yet she leads her closet Liberal Democrat competitor by 25.6%. I guess Liberals don’t mind lying politicians just as long as they are Democrat lying politicians. The whole Clinton campaign is based on deception and Democrats accept it. And I must say that speaks volumes about the Democratic Party.

But it’s all in the book! It’s everything you need to know about deceptive politicking in the 21st century. It’s Politics for Dummies. Its chapters include:

o The Politics of personal destruction (how to destroy all Republicans starting with Bush)

o Controlling the conversation (announce it and media will cover it, if you are Hillary)

o How to make appearances on Fox news when all other Liberals are afraid to.

o Never answer a question, say a lot, redefine and respond to your own created redefined questions (The media never says, “But you didn’t answer my question!”)

o If you can’t avoid answering a question say, “I’ll have to leave that others to decide or “I’m not going to talk about that right now”

o Every week release a proposal for things like health care, minimum wage increase, subsidizing retirement , or a $5,000 bond for every baby. That will steer the national conversation in areas that you want people talking about.

o Always cover both sides say something like, “If George Bush doesn’t end the war in Iraq , I will.” then later say, “We can’t guarantee what we’ll do (pull out troops) because we don’t know what we’ll find when we get there.”

In Politics for dummies by Bill and Hillary Clinton, Hillary rolls out political sound bites like the energizer bunny beats his drum, “Hillary’s Health Care Plan,” “Hillary will stop the genocide in Darfur,” “Hillary will give every Child $5,000 bond,” “Hillary will Stop the War, but maybe not because Hillary doesn’t know what she’ll find after Bush is gone” “Hillary will subsidized retirement accounts” “Hillary your girl to fight the nasty Republicans” “Hillary’s your girl to unite with the nasty Republicans”

"The time to begin bringing the troops home is now. If George W. Bush doesn't end this war before he leaves office, I will," Senator Hillary Clinton

In Politicals for Dummies, everyday it’s a new headline touting the Junior Senator’s plans for the country virtually projecting what she would do if she were to assume the role of first female President of the United States of America. (Is anyone else doing this?)

Remember when Senator Clinton announced her candidacy she said, “Let the conversation begin.”

What you didn’t know was that she intended to control all asspects of that conversation through her political manipulations and quite frankly its working brillantly.

Truly a woman for all seasons Hillary Clinton has emerged as the ultimate Bionic woman of politics, super strong, super slick and super impervious to criticisms. To learn how she did it you’ve got to read the book!

What the America people are witnessing is a remarkable politic machine at work in overdrive the Clintons may very well be the best politicians that the world has ever seen. (And I don’t mean that in a good way.)

Politics for dummies by Bill and Hillary Clinton buy yours today Liberal putzes already have! Hillary is looking for more Independents and Conservatives to buy her stuff! Are you buying any of it?

Remember if you need someone to fight the Conservatives she’s your girl, but she can also unite the country like no one else can. (Yeah, right!)

GORE: HOW YOU LIKE ME NOW?

Albert Gore, Jr., Nobel Peace Prize Winner

By awarding the Nobel Peace Prize for 2007 to the IPCC and Al Gore, the Norwegian Nobel Committee is seeking to contribute to a sharper focus on the processes and decisions that appear to be necessary to protect the world’s future climate, and thereby to reduce the threat to the security of mankind. Action is necessary now, before climate change moves beyond man’s control. -- The Norwegian Nobel Committee, Oslo, 12 October 2007

It’s purely political! It's High School politics, if we like you and if we like your cause we'll make you Prom King, (In this case Nobel Prize Winner) Its like that old saw, “You can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig!” Adding the Nobel Peace Prize to his Oscar doesn’t dress up Al Gore or lend him any more credibility on the contrary what the Norwegian Nobel Committee has done is forever discredited itself as a legitimate source of authenticating good and noble pursuits.

The Controversial topic of Global warming was just days ago deal a legal blow in Britain for being little more than political propaganda forced on unsuspecting school children. So what does this tribute mean coming from a body that has of late shown itself to be more concerned with validating politically correct views rather than recognizing real accomplishment.

What it means is that the Norwegian Nobel Committee has devalued the Nobel Prize not legitimized Al Gore or the controversy of Global warming.

The committee’s own statement, “By awarding the Nobel Peace Prize for 2007 to the IPCC and Al Gore, the Norwegian Nobel Committee is seeking to contribute to a sharper focus on the processes and decisions that appear to be necessary to protect the world’s future climate, and thereby to reduce the threat to the security of mankind.

Action is necessary now, before climate change moves beyond man’s control,” why it bestowed its prize on Albert Gore, Jr. is itself an admission of its part of colluding in the propaganda war which Global warming has become.

This award is the Norwegian Nobel committee’s way of lending a hand in pushing the world economies into a global taxation scheme where billions of dollars will be made from buying and selling carbon credits which will not end any real or perceived threat of Global warming at all.

We have always known that Europe and the Union Nations are co-conspirators in the Global warming controversy now Oslo Norway has joined the ranks of the elite who wishes to push the ideological concept of man-made Global warming on the masses.

In the face of 500 reputable scientists who say that there is no consensus on the theories which Al Gore promoted to enrich himself and his fellow investors the Norwegian body has politicized itself in a way that can not be repaired.

From now on and forever more the Noble Peace Prize will be synonymous with bad science, propaganda and controversy. Maybe that’s how Alfred Nobel would have liked it.

An Inconvenient Ruling

Britain’s High Court

British High Court judge Michael Burton ruled on Wednesday that Al Gore's Global warming documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" should only be shown in schools with guidance notes to prevent political indoctrination.

Judge Burton said the film should be accompanied by government guidance notes and to distribute it without them would breach education laws prohibiting the promotion of unbalanced political viewpoints.

Stewart Dimmock lorry truck driver and father of two brought the suit last month and wanted to block the government's pledge to send more than 3,500 secondary schools in England and Wales a DVD of the documentary to demonstrate the need to fight global warming.

Though the court did not ban the film as Mr. Dimmock originally petitioned the court to do still Mr. Dimmock see his efforts as a victory for education and science Dimmock said, "If it was not for the case brought by myself, our young people would still be being indoctrinated with this political spin."

In other news Al Gore’s theories are being disputed by scientists who wish to debate him on the issue. However Gore’s camp has issued a statement saying that the debate has shifted to how to solve the climate crisis, not if there is one. Meaning that Gore has already gotten the United Nations, Europe and now the Bush administration to sign on to a project which amounts to a Global fix which will cost citizens billions of dollars therefore the debate is over.

"The debate has shifted to how to solve the climate crisis, not if there is one," said Kalee Kreider. "It does not make sense for him to engage in a dialogue with them at this time."

In other words the propaganda of Global warming has already been accepted by world leaders no one involved in this movement is going to stop to question whether they are right about the theories of Global warming.

With the power of the U.N., the European Union and the Bush administration behind him it does indeed appear that the conversation is all but over.

Mr. Dimmock’s valet efforts saved British children from the indoctrination of Global warming only to be rewarded by the unpleasant reality that the rest of the world are not smarter than a fifth grader!

Sovereignty Lost!

The International Court of Justice in The Hague , the new U. S. Supreme Court

The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible.

So far as we have already formed engagements let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop.

Europe has a set of primary interests which to us have none or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns.

Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves by artificial ties in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics or the ordinary combination and collisions of her friendships or enmities. – President George Washington, Farewell Address 1776

How do you feel today? Cosmopolitan? International maybe? Do you feel any different than yesterday? Well you could be different depending on how the U.S. Supreme Court rules on a certain case today. The Court’s ruling could conceivably make you a citizen of the world while making itself a lower court answerable to a greater power.

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear the case Medellin v. Texas today, Wednesday, a case which will set the precedence that there is a higher law, a Court higher than the United States Supreme Court. And if that is true that would also mean that the U.S. constitution is no longer the Supreme law of the United States of America.

When I say that there is a higher law, I’m not referring to God although many in this nation might feel that the entity which I’m referring to is akin to God. What I am speaking about is the International Court of Justice in The Hague.

The Bush administration will be siding with Mexico and Internationalist against the state of Texas today in a test of American National Sovereignty against International One World government.

The case The People vs. Jose Medellin convicted Medellian and sentenced him with the death penalty. Medellin confessed in 1993 to participating in the rape and murder of two Houston teenagers. Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena were sodomized and strangled with their shoe laces. Medellin bragged about keeping one girl's Mickey Mouse watch as a souvenir of the crime.

Medellin and four others were convicted of capital murder and sent to Texas' death row. A juvenile court sentenced Medellin's younger brother, who was 14 at the time, to 40 years in prison.

Medellian is an Illegal alien and because he was not informed that he could seek help from the Mexican Consulate at the time of his arrest and subsequent sentencing the Mexican Government through the International Court is attempting to thwart U.S. law because they do not believe in the death penalty.

They will make this attempt today in the case before the U.S. Supreme Court, Medellin v. Texas. This is a case which the Bush administration intervened in to attempt to block state law at the request of the Mexican government after Mexico made its case before the International Court of Justice at The Hague (ICJ) and the ICJ found that Medellin was not informed of his right to contact the Mexican Consulate for legal assistance.

That, according to The Hague, was a violation of a 1963 treaty known as the Vienna Convention.

Also Medellin v. Texas not only could determine the fate of Jose Medellin but 50 other Mexican killers on death rows in the United States, including more than a dozen in Texas. All of them say they were not told of their right to contact Mexico for legal help.

[I]n 2004 the Mexican government obtained a ruling from the International Court of Justice on Mr. Medellin's behalf that state police had violated his right to access to consular officials from Mexico. Mr. Medellin, who was born in Mexico, has lived in the US since he was nine years old, although he was never a legal resident.

The judgment found that the Texas authorities failed to tell Mr. Medellin and 50 other death row inmates from Mexico of their rights under the Vienna Convention to seek advice from the Mexican consulate, or to inform consular officials about their cases.

President Bush issued a memorandum two months later that the US courts would implement the ICJ ruling. The Bush administration is expected to argue that the president's executive power over treaty provisions outranks state laws.

However, Texas argues that Mr. Bush's memo on the death penalty case would set a dangerous precedent for presidential power. The state argues that President Bush's action disregards earlier verdicts by an appeals court and the Supreme Court that Mr. Medellin was not entitled to invoke his rights as a Mexican citizen because he had not raised the issue at his original trial.

One other amazing fact need to be considered here as well, Houston, Texas where Jose Medellian was arrested and convicted of the wanton and brazen acts of sodomizing, gang raping and murdering two teenaged girls is a sanctuary city. (see list of sanctuary cities yours could be one!

That means that because Mexico and Illegal alien activists and Illegal alien supporters in this country influenced local law in the city of Houston, Houston officials by law and policy are required not to ask for country or place of origin of any person.

While this makes it easier for Mexican nationals to live freely and gain access to our American society it also makes it impossible to comply with 1963 Vienna treaty or any law that requires that Illegal Mexican nationals in this country be informed of their International Rights to be represented by the Mexican Consulate when they violate American law.

As sanctuary laws are presently followed they force officials to treat everyone the same, to treat everyone as Americans. To now demand that Mexican nationals get special treatment, because they are governed not by our laws but international laws further supports the reason why the American people rejected the President’s Comprehensive Immigrant Reform earlier this year and want the 20 to 60 million illegal aliens out of the country.

Finally, if the Supreme Court rules in favor of Medellin today Illegal Aliens will virtually have diplomatic impunity status in the United States of America giving another special interest group special privileges that the rest of us don’t have and at the same time it would make a mockery of our constitution, as well as itself as a court.

A ruling in favor of Medellin would hand over final authority in such matters to an international body and make that court superior to our own. I doubt that President George Washington (or any of the founding fathers) would approve!
(credit: worldnetdaily and the guardian)

HUBRIS

Senator Hillary Clinton (Photo by Kiichiro Sato/AP)


You were first lady in an administration in which your husband was dubbed the nickname Slick Willie because of the way he parsed meaning and manipulated language like a cheating husband caught in the act of infidelity (no reference to actuality intended.)

You sat by him when he pointed his bony finger in the faces of American viewers and bold faced lied that he did not have sex (in the oval office) with that woman… Ms. Lewensky, which he later recanted and pled guilty to lying to a grand jury. His law license was pulled and he disgraced this Nation as well as your marriage.

Yet you have the Hubris to drag him out and flaunt the former President in the faces of half of America (that will not vote for you) that is still doing damage control on little boys and little girls who believed that that they can imitate and do what the President did with that woman, Ms. Lewensky and still maintain plausible deniability like Slick Willie did.

[Sandy]Berger has admitted stealing documents from the National Archives in advance of the 9/11 Commission hearings in 2003. The documents, written by White House counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke, were a “tough review” of the Clinton administration’s shortcomings in dealing with terrorism, Clarke’s lawyer told the Washington Post.

On several occasions, Berger stuffed highly classified documents into his pants and socks before spiriting them out of the Archives building in Washington , according to investigators. On one occasion, upon reaching the street, he hid documents under a construction trailer after checking the windows of the Archives and Justice Department buildings to make sure he was not being watched.

Berger came back later and retrieved the documents, taking them home and cutting them up with scissors. Two days later, he was informed by Archive employees that his removal of documents had been detected.

“Berger panicked because he realized he was caught,” said a report by the National Archives inspector general, which also recounted his initial reaction. “Berger lied.”
Berger also lied to the public, telling reporters he made an “honest mistake” by “inadvertently” taking the documents, which he blamed on his own “sloppiness.”

Bill Clinton vouched for the explanation for Berger, who served as his national security adviser.

Now you bring back Sandy Berger as an advisor to your campaign. Berger who stole, lied and destroyed federally protected records from the National Archives all to protect you and your husband’s political image so that the American people would remain ignorant about your culpability regarding 9/11 and your subsequent mishandling of the terrorist threat to America.

Mrs. Clinton, need I point out again that Sandy Berger is a convicted theft, liar and a possible traitor to this Country.

The fact that anyone would have to tell you this speaks to either a profound and deep ignorance regarding right and wrong and/or an out of touch sense of pride that is unnatural in its blatant display of political HUBRIS!

At the very least the fact that you would even allow this to happen demonstrates that you don’t think to highly of the intelligence of the American people or you think that you can do anything that you want and you will not be held accountable for your actions.

One word describes this behavior Mrs. Clinton HUBRIS. But I must say that bringing Sandy Berger back into your campaign is indicative of the corruption that typified the co-Presidency of Bill and Hillary Clinton.

ILLEGAL

Illegal Aliens Expressing Contempt

The Federal government showed last week that they do know the meaning of the word.

ILLEGAL!

However you may find it interesting that even though they know the meaning of the word your government is confused with regards to its application. Your federal government using a federal jury on behalf of corporations; Sony BMG, Arista Records LLC, Interscope Records, UMG Recordings Inc., Capitol Records Inc. and Warner Bros. Records Inc found a single mother of two guilty of illegal downloading and ordered her to pay $222,000.00 for sharing 1,072 songs on the internet. Jammie Thomas’, 30 attorney claims attorney fees are automatically awarded in such judgments under copyright law, meaning Thomas could actually owe as much as a half-million dollars.

So our government gets it when it comes to illegal downloading, but not so much when it comes to illegal aliens.

As a matter of fact this whole Nation, America, is confused about its priorities. So much so that unknowingly we are in the last throes of our national freedoms and national sovereignty.

What? You must be saying, you’re crazy Al, you’ve been drinking too much of the Dick Cheney Kool-Aid.

No not really, but it has become all too apparent to the enemies of America that we are a confused nation. And now all of the enemies of America are working under the expectation that we have become a nation of confusion. In fact America’s enemies have begun to take advantage of a people who no longer know their history and their purpose in the world. Allow me to show you how.

Today’s Americans misguidedly and ignorantly believe that constitutional rights extend to everything from sexual preference to illegal behavior just as long as that illegal behavior is breaking this nations immigration laws. And this is a total misunderstanding of what the founding fathers intended or wanted for this nation.

For example there are federal judges, unscrupulous lawyers and tax payer funded non-profit organizations that are under the extremely ignorant belief that foreign nationals who knowingly and illegally enter into this country to comment identity theft, take advantage of our economy, abuse our social services and disrespect our social customs have the constitutional guaranteed right to do so and these just mentioned groups are teaching these foreign invaders that they have these rights.

In Massachusetts so-called advocacy groups work mighty along with attorneys and often time Federal courts to undermine U.S. sovereignty in the name of constitutional rights for Illegal Aliens.

Maria Elena Letona, executive director of Centro Presente, a Cambridge-based nonprofit aids illegal aliens, Joel Rodriguez, a trainer for the Alliance to Develop Power, aids illegals from Mexico and Honduras, Lee Siu Hin, national coordinator of the National Immigrant Solidarity Network aids illegals, Ali Noorani, executive director of the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition, or MIRA have been training illegals for years.

The Chelsea Collaborative, Agencia Alpha, all interfere with the governments efforts to identify and deport illegal aliens and Carol Rose, executive director of the ACLU of Massachusetts, says that “training sessions” designed to help illegals stay in this country are a form of constitutionally protected free speech.

Jorge, 26, a construction worker from Honduras, said he would like to help police, but doubted that he would open the door for them today because he has too much to lose.
Eight years ago, he clung to the sides of trains to get to the Mexican border, paid $1,500 for a boat ride across the Rio Grande, and then walked four nights to Houston. Eventually he made his way to Massachusetts and later paid $6,000 to smuggle his mother here.
Now he has a wife, two children, and one on the way. He earns $2,000 a month, 10 times what he made in Honduras.
"It's not that I don't trust [the police]," said Jorge. "If we didn't have the police here, this country would be like our countries.

In New Haven, Connecticut a well meaning but ignorant Yale law student helps:

Ten Hispanic immigrants filed a lawsuit on Wednesday against a Connecticut city, its mayor and police chief, and federal agents who led a crackdown on illegal immigration last year.

The suit filed in U.S. District Court in New Haven, Connecticut, claims the arrests violated the civil rights of nine workers and a 10th man who was stopped at a traffic light, including their right to due legal process, free speech and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures, according to court documents.

The plaintiffs, represented by Yale University law students, claim the U.S. Constitution protects the civil rights of all people in the United States. The attorneys would not discuss their clients' immigration status or their countries of origin.

Finally Federal Judge Charles Breyer blocks the enforcement of this nations immigration laws:

A U.S. federal court judge on Monday extended an order preventing the Department of Homeland Security from launching a new program to root out illegal immigrants in the nation's workforce.

Judge Charles Breyer of the U.S. District Court for Northern California, after a two-hour hearing, extended a temporary restraining order for 10 days while he prepares a decision on the legality of the department's efforts.
Breyer's order also blocked the Social Security Administration from sending out 140,000 letters to employers with employees whose names don't match their Social Security numbers.
An earlier order by the court blocking the government program was to expire on Monday.
Breyer raised a number of issues in the hearing, including the language and legality of the "no-match" letters, possible discrimination in firing illegal Hispanic workers and not other illegal employees, staffing and cost burdens for companies to comply with regulations, and responsibilities and liabilities for employers.

The AFL-CIO, American Civil Liberties Association and other labor and business groups, however, challenged the government in a lawsuit claiming that the rules could discriminate against immigrant employees and place an unfair burden on employers.

What does illegal file sharing and illegal aliens have in common you ask? In both cases your government sided with special interest and/or corporate interest against us the citizens of this country. In the case of file sharing a single mother is ordered to pay $222,000.00 to half a million dollars to record corporations.

In the case of illegal aliens taxpayers incur millions of dollars of court cost (along with all other related illegal alien costs) as special interest groups and attorneys use our courts and laws against us to help foreign nationals download millions of dollars of American benefits that they are not entitled to.

If Jammie Thomas is judged to owe record corporations half a million dollars for illegal downloading songs then why doesn’t it make sense to sue illegal aliens and/or Mexico, for encouraging illegal entry and illegally entering this country?

There are 12 to 20 million illegal aliens here (a conservative estimate) that number times $222,000.00 each would help begin to pay for the damage to our economic infrastructure that illegal foreign nationals have cause this country.

Illegal aliens should be arrested at every opportunity and each one sued like Jammie Thomas. Each one should have a half million dollar debt hanging over their heads for illegally downloading benefits out of our society. As well every non-profit including the ACLU should be sued and have a half a million dollar judgement against them and/or be disbanded for operating organizations that encourages breaking of American laws.

Our government protected corporate interest against a single American mother of two and found her guilty of illegal file sharing of music on the internet, so it ought to be able to protect the citizens of this country against illegal foreign nationals who come here to pillage and plunder our economy and social services.

Both acts, unauthorized downloading music and unauthorized entering this country, are ILLEGAL!

Now that we know that the government knows the meaning of the word illegal, would it be asking too much to have the government protect the America people instead of exploiting us on behalf of special interest and corporations.

And would it be asking too much to ask the government to protect American’s borders and enforce our immigration laws?

Senator Clinton brags:She Started The Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy

Hillary schmoozing with her Netroots vast left-wing cospirators

I couldn’t make this up even if I tried! As reported by Noel Sheppard of NewsBusters, Standing before the political hate group the YearlyKos (minions of the DailyKos hate conservatives blog) convention in Chicago , Senator Clinton claims that she is responsible for creating the left wing pseudo news organization Media Matters.

Media Matters was recently in the news themselves for attempting to smear Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly.

Move over Al Gore, (Inventor of the Internet) Clinton stated that she helped start Media Matters. As well she claims to have helped start, Center for American Progress.

‘[O]n August 4, while speaking at the YearlyKos convention in Chicago, the junior senator from New York boasted of "institutions that I helped to start and support like Media Matters and Center for American Progress." ‘

Ever wanting to be the a part of the National conversation Clinton ’s contribution to that conversation actually poisons the truth and blocks any real conversation that the American people might have.

Why would I say that? The former first lady accuses those who held her husband accountable for lying to the American people (President Clinton later admitted that he lied) “a vast right-wing conspiracy” and then she goes out and creates a vast left-wing conspiracy(fund by George Soros) to do the conspiring that she accused the right of doing? That’s Liberal Projectionism at its fineness.

First demonize the right and accuse them of conspirering against the left and then organize a conspiracy against the right the very thing that you falsely accused the right of doing you do.

This is straight Clintonseque, bold in-your-face deceit which Hillary knows she can get away with because she is aided and abetted by the same media that cut Moveon.org a break to preemptively smear General David Petraeus before they heard his report on Iraq just weeks ago.

Clinton thinks so little of your intelligence that she stands before her co-conspirtators in broad daylight and brags that it was she who helped start the conspiracy or the “assault on reason” if you will. (to borrow from one of her co-conspirators Al Gore’s projectionisms) (see video below)

Gore's Inconvenient Bias

Al Gore and Hurricane Katrina

Mr. Justice Burton is due to deliver a ruling on the case next week, but yesterday he said he would be saying that Gore's Oscar-winning film does promote 'partisan political views'.

Al Gore’s international campaign to spread his message of Anthropomorphic Climate change was dealt a blow in Britain and Mr. Gore’s views on Global warming are not going to be forced any more on unsuspecting 11 year-olds thanks to parent and lorry driver Stewart Dimmock.

Mr. Dimmock from Dover with children aged 11 and 14, said the former U.S. Vice-President's documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, is unfit for schools because it is politically biased and contains serious scientific inaccuracies and 'sentimental mush' and Mr. Dimmock took his complaint all the way to Britain’s Highest Court.

Dimmock attempted to get the video banned from the British school system after it was distributed with four other short films to 3,500 schools in February instead the High Court will have teachers warn pupils that there are other opinions on global warming and they should not necessarily accept the views of the film.

Justice Burton said that with that amended guidance he will not completely ban the film.

In February British Education Secretary Alan Johnson decided that DVDs of the film would be sent to all secondary schools in England, along with a multimedia CD produced by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs containing two short films about climate change and an animation about the carbon cycle.

David Miliband, who was Britain’s Environment-Secretary when the school packs were announced, said at the time: 'The debate over the science of climate change is well and truly over.'

[D]uring the three-day hearing, the court heard that the critically-acclaimed film contains a number of inaccuracies, exaggerations and statements about global warming for which there is currently insufficient scientific evidence.

For the closed minded and partisan in the United States as well as abroad the debate may be “well and truly over” but for the rest of us who believe in science over biased inaccurate and exaggerated political propaganda that is meant to brainwash the little children and child like Liberals, the debate, no the conversation has just begun.

More Democratic Deception!

Look at the news............the Democrats, with the
help of the MSM, are trying their damndest to
make President Bush's veto of the "child health-
care bill", look like the act of a heartless politician.

On the contrary........... Bush's move is exactly what
was needed in this case. The liberals won't be happy
until this country has socialized medicine, and will be
in the same sorry situation as the British and the
Canadians. I personally know people living under both
plans, and their horror stories are the type that inspire
hit movies.

This Democratic "plan" (with the help of some misguided
Republicans), is nothing more than a take-off
on "Hillary-care"............ the failed SOCIALIZED
medicine plan of the presidential 'wanna-be'.

If this ever becomes law, expect ALL medical expenses
to rise dramatically............ to cover the costs of all
those who will switch from private insurers to the
newly available "government" coverage. And of
course, all government expenses will skyrocket to
heights never before achieved under the tax and spend
Democrats.

Oh, they will justify the tax increases as "necessary"
to cover the rising cost of their bureaurocracy, which
would't be necessary in the first place, if they had
left the government out of the health-care industry.

Only Democrats believe that the government can do
everything better than the private sector. That is
why, every time Republicans gain control of the
the White House and Congress, it takes them years
to clean up the mess created by the liberal element.

If Democrats were really serious, they would allow
tax deductions for medical insurance premiums, and
for ALL medical expenses not covered by insurance.....
instead of starting a whole new government industry.
And they would save the billions needed to fund this
ridiculous "pie-in-the-sky solution".

brooklyn

Global Screwing: Who’s reality behind the Anthropomorphic Climate Change Scare?

President Bush:Comprehensive Global Warming?

Here’s what we know; there is no scientific consensus regarding anthropomorphic Climate change also known as global warming.

However there is consensus among world leaders and politicians on the subject, why?

What we also know is that if world leaders and politicians agree on anything (in this case global warming) you and I enviably will be forced by draconian laws to pay a price for that agreement even if it hasn’t been proven that man can significantly do anything that will effect climate change.

Let me state emphatically that there is no scientific consensus that man is the cause for the changes we see in the weather. What scientist are saying is that weather has always changed as long as the earth has existed (we all know that!) therefore what we are experiencing to date and what is being projected for the future may very well be out of human control! (Many of you need to know that!)

We all know what Al Gore’s interest in Global warming is. For Gore its Climate change for dollars but now George W. Bush is supporting Climate change and that portends of something hidden and sinister. It is likely that the unseen forces behind the Climate change scare are similar to the forces that are behind the illegal alien invasion of the United States of America. Who are these forces? Big Money Interest that’s who.

Just follow the money, oh you didn’t know? Regulating C02 has became a 30 billion dollar industry which is projected to produce even larger usuriously high profits. This is a scheme cooked up by lawyers and executives who are using your fears concerning man-made global warming to herd you toward a new world market that you know nothing about and that they control.

Yes this is One World government stuff and it is true and it is apart of an all too real threat to take control of Governments and industry making them subject to world marketeers they are already doing this to China and India. In order to make this plan work nation sovereignty must be striped away and it all started with the Kyoto Agreement.

Millions of unsuspecting people who are honestly concerned for the earth are being duped. They would be surprised to know that there is no philanthropic world movement lead by the European Union and the United Nations to save the planet from nasty carbon emitters.

The EU, lawyers and the United Nations have created a 30 billion dollar world carbon credits Ponzi scheme (much like the UN’s oil-for-food scam) that hasn’t reduced one iota of carbon emissions. What they plan to do is profits from the created market on which carbon registries keep track of businesses globally that give off greenhouse gases. Companies and Country will be assigned certain emissions allowances and if those allowances are surpasses the allotted allowances fees would be levied against the overages.

In addition to that Companies and Countries would be able to buy and sell carbon credits to one another to cover themselves in cases of exceeding their allotted carbon allowances.

The perpetrators of this fraud have launched Billions of dollars of trade and speculation on a carbon trading market and not one iota of reduction of carbon output affecting global warming will result from it but you must be made to accept and comply with the idea that all of this is happening to save the planet or you wouldn’t let them rip you off, or rip your country off of billions of dollars by fees and fines that will not go to stop greenhouse gases or C02 emissions.

Trading for carbon credits is big business in Europe, and could be the next lucrative energy venture particularly for lawyers, but Europe is not alone at least nine bills contemplating a domestic cap-and-trade market in CO2 and other greenhouse gases are now before Congress, and the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources already has held a roundtable with European officials and executives to discuss how the United States could adapt Europe's system deregulate U.S. utilities; because deregulation is the first step toward a wholesale trading market, A potential structural precursor to a market was in place, because the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change -- the international agreement that sparked the whole idea of a carbon-trading market.

In January 2005, just one month before the Kyoto Protocol went into force, the EU Emissions Trading Scheme was born.

Operating under the theory that who emits CO2 is less important than the total amount emitted, the EU's plan caps emissions by allocating a set number of free allowances -- each equaling the right to produce one metric ton of CO2 per year -- to each participating member state. The member states then may apportion those allowances among companies in select, heavily polluting industries, including the power, oil refining, steel, cement, pulp and paper sectors.

complex technology needed to set up such a market -- creating carbon registries, launching computer systems for each country and the EU that would interconnect and facilitate trading. There were also political issues related to how many emissions allowances each country would get.

the first phase of the ETS, as the emissions trading scheme is known, began in 2005 and ends this year. In the second phase, which runs from 2008 to 2012, the number of allowances will be ratcheted down, greenhouse gases in addition to CO2 will be capped and other industries, such as the petrochemical sector, will be subject to those caps. Also, while most allowances still will be distributed gratis, up to 10 percent may be sold to member states at auction.
Industries that exceed their caps are fined €40 ($54) in the first phase and €100 ($136) in the second -- per excess metric ton emitted. If companies have extra allowances to sell or need to buy more, they may trade via brokers, on exchanges such as Powernext in Paris or on a company-to-company basis.

INTERNATIONAL BIG MONEY FOR CLIMATE CHANGE

This all fits the patterns of corporate behavior; first attempt to persuade the masses to do what you want them to do by campaigning using scare tactics that there is a threat of global warming.

Second if that does or even if it doesn’t work big money then uses the politicians that they’ve corrupted to mandate by law the changes that they want. The masses will never go against the law after all “we are a nation of laws.”

So this push by the United Nations a body that never gets anything right, the European Union, George Soros influenced scientist and special interest groups and now President Bush has all the markings of International big money behind the scenes positioning themselves to profit from the stampeding herds when we all are forced to comply with laws to take our money.

I’m not exaggerating Canada has already started exacting Global warming taxation on its industry and you know the cost will be passed on to the consumer, could the United States be next? Anything to stop Global warming right? Only this scam is set up to make a few people very wealth off of your concern for Climate change not to stop Global warming. And you should know that when you are forced to pay your global warming taxes!

Make no mistake what we are seeing is Climate change for dollars, usurious taxation to fund big money’s new ventures and created huge profits for big money interest.

Why you didn’t think that they were going to pay for it did you? You are going to pay for it stupid!

Lies, Deceptions and Laughs

Democrats First Liars Club Minus One

"Everybody in politics lies, but they do it with such ease it's troubling," – David Geffen, Hollywood mogul and former Clinton backer(in reference to the Clintons)

One would think that after almost eight solid years of, “Bush lied and people died” Democrats would run not walk away from the legacy of lies which has became Democrat politics. In 2000 America rejected the lies of Al Gore, in 2004 America said no to the nuanced deceptions of John Kerry.

Hillary, Also Member of Democrat First Liars Club

So for the Democrats to even be considering offering the name that stands for admitted and convicted liar, “Clinton” again is as offensive to non-Democrats as Hillary Clinton’s finger nails on the chalkboard laugh that she displayed on Fox News with Chris Wallace.

It has occurred to me that Democrats and Muslims have something in common. And just what do they have in common?

The disturbing but god awful answer is they are both compelled to lie. Muslims are compelled by their religious text the Quran and the Hadith to lie to non-Muslims and Democrats are compelled by their hugely unpopular social agendas and political ambitions to lie to political opponents as well as to lie about their political opponents. (They also lie about non-Democrats or anyone who is in the way of whatever political agenda or the political candidate Democrats are hawking at the time.)

In Islam there are two forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, taqiyya and kitman. One of those circumstances is to gain the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.

Democrats also have two reasons for lying one to gain power and the second to keep power. Both of these reasons are used to justify Democrat’s lying, the method of choice which Democrats rely on heavily to defeat their political opponents.


After a Democrat President who admitted that he lied under oath, and as a result of Democrats lost the White house, one would think that Democrats would have learned from the errors of William Jefferson Clinton’s ways.

But no instead of changing to the contrary Democrats embraced lying as an ever evolving campaign strategy one which became more nuanced with the telling of each new lie, a political ploy for Democrat Presidential hopefuls and Congressional leaders.

Al Gore’s frivolous claim in a March 9, 1999, CNN interview, “During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet.” The truth was the Internet is an outgrowth of a Pentagon program established in 1969. In the 1980s, Gore supported legislation considered favorable to the Internet’s development. Gore’s 1980 support can hardly be described as initiative is was more like jumping on a moving train but this is but one example of a very long list of Gore lies.

Senator John Kerry lied that he couldn’t release his Military journal due to an agreement with Brinkley, which Brinkley refuted. The media did not press Kerry to release his journal.

Kerry has refused to open his military records to the public, as promised by him, only releasing them – and there’s doubt whether they’re complete – to the Boston Globe, L.A. Times and AP, the first two of which the inside his campaign Newsweek reporters observed were acting as a conduit for the Kerry campaign during its August 2004 efforts to counter the opposition of Vietnam Veterans. As the leading investigative reporter into Kerry’s claims, Thomas Lipscomb, wrote:

‘The strange case of the John Kerry military records, which he had promised to release publicly, is that three great news organizations conspired to withhold them from the public. Not only did Kerry not make his military records public as promised, but three of the largest news organizations in the world gave him protective coloration by withholding them. All the public received were summaries in the opinions of the three news organizations, which had already shown an appalling inability to analyze the Kerry military records.’


But now it has come full circle and for Democrats to attempt to reinstate the Clintons in the White house is like the criminal behavior that always returns to the scene of the crime.

Amazingly, Democrats do this straight faced as they speak of needing a change in Washington. Like exchanging dirty socks for the unwashed ones you wore yesterday (yes technically it is change and it can even be argued successfully as change in a court of law) everyone who is in smelling distance knows that wearing the unwashed socks from yesterday is not idea change.

Democrat’s current offering of their first choice for President of the United States Senator Hillary Clinton is hardly a change neither. But as usual Democrats are hoping that you are fooled and won’t notice that they are offering unwashed socks from yesterday, the unrepentant admitted and convicted liars former President Clinton and his former first lady Hillary.

The Clintons have pickup up where they’ve left off lying about who is funding their political campaign and receiving campaign financing from foreign interest, interests what wish to influence American politics which is felonious. (See below)



This is an on going phenomenon with the Clintons yet the partisans who support them apparently have no problem supporting the illegality and subsequent lying that is involved in keeping the Clintons well funded. (See below)



Finally, when asked by Chris Wallace why Senator Clinton and her husband were so “ultra-partisan” Senator Clinton laughed as if the answer was so obvious that even the vast right-wing conspiracy as represented by Fox News should know the answer.

Its lies, deceptions and laughs Chris the same old Democrat socks just a different day!