Going from reversing the Bush tax cuts to granting
80 BILLION dollars in tax cuts, in one felt swoop....
Obama has shown his desperation to gain the
Democratic nomination for president.
The man is a joke! A short time ago, he was talking
RAISING taxes and eliminating the Bush tax cuts,
in order to "balance the budget" and help the economy
grow. A child knows that economies don’t grow by
raising taxes on those who create the jobs. Big
corporations and those who invest in them, ARE
the basic machinery that builds strong economies.
Obama would have everyone believe, that granting a
mere $500 tax credit to "seniors making less than
$50,000 per year" is the elixir that will cure the
economic problems in the US.
As for his other plan, to simplify the tax code...........
GOOD LUCK!........ as they say in Brooklyn.....!!!
If I recall......... whenever the Republicans tried
to do just that, it was the Democrats who cried
foul!
Obama can do only one thing to make this a
better country. Resign from the race and let
qualified people take over.
brooklyn
Exploring Orwellian attempts of changing the American society through legal coercion,politically correct language and political Fascism
Tuesday, September 18, 2007
Barry Manilow Another Liberal Hater
I didn’t think that I’d be proven right so quickly. It was only yesterday that I blogged about Liberal haters and for all of you that said, “Oh Al come on you’ve got it all wrong its Neo-Cons who hate.” In a classic case of my bias is acceptable but yours is not Barry Manilow has crossed the line regarding what is acceptable in America.
Here’s why, I challenge you to think, when is the last time you heard or read that a Conservative refused to appear on a television or radio show because the host was black?
Better yet search your memory can you recall of a time that a Conservative publicly cancelled a scheduled television engagement because the host was homosexual or lesbian?
No you can’t you know why? Liberals have so successfully forced their issues on society and everyone knows that you put your life or career in jeopardy if you so much as have a private thought that is not in agreement with liberal doctrine and acceptance of Liberal ideas and causes. Don’t believe me?
Just ask former Grey’s Anatomy actor Isaiah Washington or General Peter Pace both men lost their jobs for expressing politically incorrect ideas. Ideas that were their truth, and truth for many Americans. Both men were forced to apologize for their own truth. You remember the force recantations both men gave for having their own personal truths.
Funny thing about truth, if you are former New Jersey Governor, James E. McGreevey, you can announce before your wife and the world that, your truth is that you are a gay American when the actual truth is what you really are is an adulterous malfeasant government nepotist who placed your unqualified gay lover on the State pay role so that you could play footsy at work while living a lie with your wife. (Some truth!)
McGreevey left office because of malfeasance in elected office not because he was a “gay American.” Whatever that means? Yet McGreevey knowing that it was politically correct to claim that he was gay offered that little tidbit of information in a blatant attempt to mitigate the circumstances that he faced while pandering to gays for sympathy and support.
It didn’t work though. A married Governor just can’t hire his unqualified lover so that they can have sexual encounters on government time no matter how patriotic he claims to be.
But least I digress to far Barry Manilow confirms all of my assessments of yesterday about Liberal Democrats and their unfounded and all consuming hate for Conservatives.
Barry Manilow is a Liberal Hater.
TMZ has learned that legendary singer Barry Manilow has pulled out of his scheduled appearance on “The View” tomorrow — because he strongly disagrees with host Elisabeth Hasselbeck’s conservative view! Paging Rosie O’Donnell!And on Barry’s own website he posts ;
In an exclusive statement to TMZ, Barry says, “I strongly disagree with her views. I think she’s dangerous and offensive. I will not be on the same stage as her.” Barry, taking a stand!
A message from Barry...Earth to Barry! You’re not speaking love you’re speaking hate! And the views that are dangerous and offensive in America Barry are the views which try to censor free speech and the free exchange of ideas that would be your views not Elisabeth Hasselbeck’s views!
Hey guys,
I wanted to let you know that I will no longer be on The View tomorrow as scheduled. I had made a request that I be interviewed by Joy, Barbara or Whoopi, but not Elisabeth Hasselback. Unfortunately, the show was not willing to accommodate this simple request so I bowed out.
It’s really too bad because I've always been a big supporter of the show, but I cannot compromise my beliefs. The good news is that I will be on a whole slew of other shows promoting the new album so I hope you can catch me on those.
Love,
Barry
Barry Your little passive aggressive attack against a 5’3” 105 lb Conservative woman is typical of the left’s attempts to stifle all Conservatives.
Further your transparent attempt to negatively define Elisabeth Hasselbeck is irreprehensible and will not be tolerated by fair minded people in America. We are on to the Democrats tactic of negatively defining Conservatives and conservative issues and we are not going to allow you liberals to continue to do it unscathed.
You don’t like Ms. Hasselbeck’s ideas so you aren’t going to be on the show, an opportunity to promote your new release? That is straight repressive neo-liberal fascism Barry. And not very smart business sense!
How would you like it if no show ever invited you to appear to promote your songs because you have an effeminate appearance? You would scream discrimination to the high heavens so why would you think that you can discriminate against a person with Conservative ideas Barry?
If the CD sales on your new release suffer from this episode it is your own doing. Barry you have relegated yourself to the company of the Dixie Chicks, a group that like you didn’t realize that it was their music not their political punditry that people supported.
The bottom line is Barry you owe Elisabeth Hasselbeck and fifty percent of the American people, who by the way have similar views to Ms. Hasselbeck (who voted to elect George Bush twice) an apology and until you do I don’t care how many other shows you appear on or where you appear in Vegas, until you apologize no one especially conservatives should patronize anything that you do!
You want to spread hate for Conservatives, Barry? Fine don’t expect anymore support from the group that you hate. Elisabeth Hasselbeck is a part of that group. So apologize before what’s left of your career is adversely affected.
And after you apologize to Ms. Hasselbeck and the half of America that is Conservative here is some sage advice for the future…
Shut up and sing!
Monday, September 17, 2007
The Key Words...............
Hillary is at it again. Her "welfare-healthfare"
program of thirteen years ago has been resurrected!
I guess she thinks that people have forgotten the
fiasco and would approve of it now.
Be careful my friends............. before you swallow
the worm and get hooked. Look at those "key words"
in her speech. Her "new approach" would require
every American to have health insurance, "with
federal assistance to help defray the cost".
Good God............ how stupid does she think the
American voter is? We all know that means
humongous tax increases on the top 45% of the
wage earners, in order to pay for all those families
that can’t afford the "ordered coverage". Add to
that, the new federal bureaurocracy needed to police
the entire program.... and the additional cost of
preventing and covering the graft and corruption
that will be built into it by it's originators.
Remember on election day folks............ a vote for
Hillary, is a vote for the poorhouse. Both she and
Obama have been courting the minority votes by
promising pie in the sky.............deserving or not...
..... just so they can both achieve their own selfish
aims. Obama to be the first black president of the
United States. And Hillary to be the first female
president........ not that her influence during her
husband’s administration didn’t almost destroy
the country.
I honestly don’t care, at this point in time, who the
Republicans nominate for President. He/she has
my vote. Not a difficult decision after listening
to the recent "opening salvos" in the Democratic
run for the nomination.
brooklyn
program of thirteen years ago has been resurrected!
I guess she thinks that people have forgotten the
fiasco and would approve of it now.
Be careful my friends............. before you swallow
the worm and get hooked. Look at those "key words"
in her speech. Her "new approach" would require
every American to have health insurance, "with
federal assistance to help defray the cost".
Good God............ how stupid does she think the
American voter is? We all know that means
humongous tax increases on the top 45% of the
wage earners, in order to pay for all those families
that can’t afford the "ordered coverage". Add to
that, the new federal bureaurocracy needed to police
the entire program.... and the additional cost of
preventing and covering the graft and corruption
that will be built into it by it's originators.
Remember on election day folks............ a vote for
Hillary, is a vote for the poorhouse. Both she and
Obama have been courting the minority votes by
promising pie in the sky.............deserving or not...
..... just so they can both achieve their own selfish
aims. Obama to be the first black president of the
United States. And Hillary to be the first female
president........ not that her influence during her
husband’s administration didn’t almost destroy
the country.
I honestly don’t care, at this point in time, who the
Republicans nominate for President. He/she has
my vote. Not a difficult decision after listening
to the recent "opening salvos" in the Democratic
run for the nomination.
brooklyn
The Haters who are the Moveon.org Democrats
"I fancied myself as some kind of god …, "If the truth be known, I carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which I felt I had to control, otherwise they might get me in trouble.Does Moveon.org speak for you? Apparently they speak for the hearts and minds of Haters who are the Democrat Party. Only Elizabeth Edwards, wife of Presidential hopeful John Edwards and ex-Democrat and now Independent Senator Joseph Lieberman has the honestly and class from the left to repudiate the vile and loathsome biased attack that Democrats planned and Moveon carried out against General David Petraeus before anyone had even heard word one of his testimony on Iraq.
"It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out." –George Soros, financial backer of Moveon.org and the Democrat Party
By Gosh, whatever happened to the fact that it is wrong to prejudge anyone or anything before hearing or seeing the evidence? Liberals use to be big on that; I guess prejudging is okay now huh?
Apparently when it comes to Democrat’s politics; bias, hate, prejudice and outright lies are acceptable if they will help Democrats win Congress or the Whitehouse thus Democrats are the New England Patriots of politics! With the Raiders’ Al Davis it use to be just win baby, but now with the Democrats and the Patriots it’s cheat, lie and videotape.
It’s not often that the Democrat Oligarchy tips its hand so that the rest of its mindless drones can see the workings of its political machinations but the Moveon.org ad which was aided and abetted by the New York Times (major discount for running the ad) is part and parcel of what has become a Democrat political staple which is to Negatively Define their Opponents or an issue that is not of their liking. This method is a part of the Democrat playbook of the politics of personal destruction.
It has worked on President Bush (low approval polling), Vice President Cheney, AG John Ashcroft, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, I. Scooter Libby, AG Alberto Gonzales or any person that Democrats disagree with and recently Democrats and Moveon.org tried to unsuccessfully to negatively define General David Petraeus and his report on Iraq before they even knew exactly what the General was reporting. It was a grand effort of Bushwhacking!
I call attempting to destroy the President’s credibility “Bushwhacking.” Whatever President Bush does or whomever Democrats perceives that he supports that person will be negatively maligned and attacked. Democrats and their attack arm moveon.org attempted to “Bushwhack” General Petraeus with their “General Betray Us” in the same manner which they attack anyone that they view as a threat.
Since election year 2000 Democrats have steadily reversed the saying speaking truth to power and turned politics upside down by speaking lies to the people, lies concerning President George W. Bush. Lies like Bush is dumb, however, in spite of that Democratic belief, Bush stole the presidency both in 2000 and in 2004 from all those smart liberals and Democrats, Bush deceived all those smart Democrats in Congress about the Iraq intelligence, Bush Lied to people who were smarter than he about WMD, etc, etc, etc. Pretty good for a dumb guy huh?
George W. Bush has been the target of a successful campaign of Democrat Bushwhacking so why not Bushwhack General Petraeus too? Why not? Because it’s wrong that’s why not. It was wrong when it was done to President Bush and it is wrong now when it was attempted against General Petraeus and moveon.org is wrong for doing it! Wrong, wrong, wrong and Democrats have gone to far and must be made to pay for their attacks against the General and the President!
This Organization, moveon.org, is funded in part by George Soros the billionaire with the God-complex. Yes Soros has actually said that he is the New Age Messiah and now he funds the vilest political hit group this side of al Qaeda.
Soros and A Partner Contributed $5 Million to MoveOn.org’s $15 Million Anti-Bush Ad Campaign. “MoveOn is now poised to be one of the Democrats’ most effective fundraising vehicles during this year’s presidential campaign. It has already raised millions to support candidates and fund ads such as the one criticizing Bush’s $87 billion commitment to rebuilding Iraq. In November, billionaire philanthropist George Soros and his business partner, Peter Lewis, pledged a $5 million matching grant – a dollar for every two raised by MoveOn members – to create a $15 million advertising campaign to defeat President Bush.” (Beth Fouhy, “MoveOn.org Becomes Anti-Bush Online Powerhouse,” The Associated Press, 1/10/04)You don’t even have to listen closely to recognize that all of the Democrat attacks against President Bush and his administration are just parroting George Soros’ views.
It’s a match made in hell; Soros, Moveon and Democrats so by extension if the Democrats win control of the Government Soros will be the shadow dictator through whom Hillary or Barak will receive their marching orders.
Soros Initially Pledged $15.5 Million In Soft Money To Liberal Activist Groups, Including $10 Million To America Coming Together, $3 Million To The Center For American Progress And $2.5 Million To MoveOn.org. “Soros, who has financed efforts to promote open societies in more than 50 countries around the world, is bringing the fight home, he said. On Monday, he and a partner committed up to $5 million to MoveOn.org, a liberal activist group, bringing to $15.5 million the total of his personal contributions to oust Bush. … Standing on the back deck, the evening sun angling into their eyes, Soros took aside Steve Rosenthal, CEO of the liberal activist group America Coming Together (ACT), and Ellen Malcolm, its president. They were proposing to mobilize voters in 17 battleground states. Soros told them he would give ACT $10 million. … Soros also promised up to $3 million to Podesta’s new think tank, the Center for American Progress.” (Laura Blumenfeld, “Soros’s Deep Pockets Vs. Bush,” The Washington Post, 11/11/03)It’s happening already, all of the Democrat front runners feel that they are beholden to Moveon; they’ve attended their gatherings, paid homage to them by participating in their functions and now they openly court their approval.
"This bold stand by three of the four presidential candidates in the Senate won't soon be forgotten," according to Eli Pariser, executive director of MoveOn.org's political action committee, which has forced Democratic candidates to veer far left to gain support of the party's small, but well-funded left-wing fringe.This attempt to demonize General Petraeus is the most blatant example of the politics of personal destruction to date. It is the same method that Democrats employed to win the Congress in 2006. Vile negative Democrat screed once exclusively held for President Bush has now spilled over into general attacks against anyone who stands in the way of Democrat hatemongers.
However the saddest thing is the politics of hate has taken its toll on our society creating a political and a social climate of hate. Democrats and Liberals who hate! So much so that Nobel Peace Prize winner Betty Williams wants to “kill George Bush”. Man now that’s HATE! So much so that a leftist Nobel PEACE Prize winner advocated killing the President of the United States, this is the result and danger of George Soros’ waging hate and the Democrat’s hateful politics of personal destruction.
Isn’t it obvious that every time that Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean, Charles Schumer, Hillary Clinton, Barak Obama speaks negatively of an opponent they are employing the George Soros’, moveon.org Democrat strategy of hatefully and negatively defining political opponents.
If any one of the Democrat Presidential candidates are elected as President of the United States voters are in essence handing over their government to hate and the man who financed it all, the Democrat Messiah, King and God, George Soros.
Friday, September 14, 2007
A Mindless and Spineless Bureaucratic Response
Two days ago I reported that Jessica Langston a High School student at Hobbton High School in Sampson County, North Carolina was prohibited from wearing a tee shirt emblemed with the American Flag on it in honor of the 6th anniversary of 9/11 to school.
Apparently this ban was the result of previous problems with other flags at the school and school administration did what all educators are trained to do, that is to unfairly punish the entire group for the sins of a few.
Rather than address individuals or small groups within the school community for wrong-doing the modern educator’s answer is to often ban an event, i.e. school dances, pep rallies, wearing of certain items of clothing, etc. I suppose that they employ this method so that no one feels isolated. In addition to that it is much simpler to blanket everyone with blame than to point out wrong doing individually.
Well School officials must have heard your dissatisfaction with their decision to ban the American flag, because they’ve rescinded the ban, but here is where it gets interesting.
These mindless and spineless Educrats didn’t only rescind the ban on the American flag; no they’ve rescinded the ban on all flags! Just to be fair huh?
They still don’t get it. In America the American flag is not on par with any other country’s flag.
Now here’s a wild guess. I bet the ban had something to do with Mexicans waving the Mexican flag on school campuses for the last two years! If the original ban of all flags came about when Mexican nationals where waving the Mexican flag all over America on school campuses in support of their national attempt to influence congress on Comprehensive Immigration Reform, and thereby almost causing national pride riots on school campus nation wide, then banning all flags is not an acceptable answer.
Here’s a question, just what sense did it make to ban all flags including the America flag because a national agitation group was attempting to make political hay?
And now that school officials have caught flack from you they’ve lifted the ban. But that is not all they’ve done.
No they lifted the ban on all flags equal to the American flag once again placing the American flag on par with other flags of other nations and once again demonstrating that in their mindless and spineless attempts to be all inclusive they have failed the fundamental test of truth and fairness.
The truth is no one that comes to this country from the country of their origin comes to this country because it is on par with their country no they came because this country is better than their country or else why would they come? Everyone to a person comes to this country looking for a better life and better opportunities.
If all countries where the same, as Educrats in their misguided attempt to teach with fake and sham demonstrations of political relativism, there would be no reason for people who are loyal to their own flags to be here taking advantage of American education and American largesse.
Maybe there is a lesson to be learn from this situation after all if people of other countries can come to this country to beg for our resources and still proudly wave the flag of their country of origin then just maybe Americans can get a clue and fly the American flag proudly and maybe that will do something to instill love for this country in the hearts of people who come here only to take from America.
There is also the outside chance that Superintendent Dr. L. Stewart Hobbs and the Principal of Hobbton High school, Mr. Wesley Johnson, would take a few minutes to reflect on the flag themselves and think about how blessed they are to be an American and maybe that will instill love for this country in these two men so that they never again place another flag equal to their own.
Apparently even foreign nationals who are here taking advantage of America’s benefits will not put any other flag equal with theirs so why do Americans?
You don’t need a Masters or a Doctorate to know that what brought the initial ban about just doesn’t make any sense!
Thursday, September 13, 2007
Only Fools and Charlatans Speak of Consensus regarding Global Warming
500 scientists have published evidence countering the theory of Man-Made Global Warming.
It is safe to say that theory of Man-Made Global Warming has been debunked.
A new analysis of peer-reviewed literature reveals that more than 500 scientists have published evidence refuting at least one element of current man-made global warming scares.No longer can the Warm-Earthers hide behind the façade that they are speaking from an enlightened scientific perspective when they spew their holier-than-thou platitudes regarding carbon emissions and stopping Western human progress to save the earth.
More than 300 of the scientists found evidence that 1) a natural moderate 1,500-year climate cycle has produced more than a dozen global warmings similar to ours since the last Ice Age and/or that 2) our Modern Warming is linked strongly to variations in the sun's irradiance.
"This data and the list of scientists make a mockery of recent claims that a scientific consensus blames humans as the primary cause of global temperature increases since 1850," said Hudson Institute Senior Fellow Dennis Avery.
Indeed the earth is worth saving however short of stopping the natural cycle of the earth and/or putting out the sun the temperature changes that we are experiencing are not going to be stopped just because someone bought some carbon credits or someone drives a bright shiny new Toyota Prius!
Wednesday, September 12, 2007
ABC just what country are we in?
The superintendent of schools in Sampson County calls the situation unfortunate, but says educators didn’t want to be forced to pick and choose which flags should be permissible.Here’s a pop quiz for you, You’re in a country named the United States of America, American tax payers pay your salary, American tax payers paid for the Schools that you are in charged of and the American tax payers created and paid for the system in which you work.
In America which flag should be allow to fly, wave or worn in the Public Schools?
Hard question? Then you must be a graduate of Hobbton High School of SAMPSON COUNTY, North Carolina. Or a graduate of any of the K12 schools of Sampson County which Superintendent , Dr. L. Stewart Hobbs, Jr. administrates.
What is a EdD good for if the person holding such a degree doesn’t know the difference between biting the hand that feeds it and biting every hand equally and fairly?
If it is not obvious to L. Stewart Hobbs, Jr. that the American Flag is the flag of this country, (his country I believe, I could be wrong)and it alone should be granted consideration above all others and it alone should be demonstrated twenty-four hours a day seven days a week and three hundred and sixty-fives days a year I’d say that that so-called EdD is not worth the paper it is written on and that Educator is not trained properly and should be recalled or dismissed at the very next school board meeting.
Did you hear that, Glenn Tart, Chairman, Telfair Simpson, Vice Chairman, Mary Brown, Nathan Gay, Doris Warren, G. H. Wilson and Roosevelt Wright of the Sampson county board of education?
If the school board and the citizens of Sampson county are not outraged then maybe they need to self examine.
This once was a proud and great country, but no more if this is an example of education in the public schools!
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
Bin Laden Has Answer to Wars End
Only two ways for the U.S. to end the war according to Bin Laden on this sixth anniversary of 9/11
In Osama Bin Laden’s latest video in which he takes full credit for the 9/11 devastation that 19 Islamists dealt to America, bin Laden claims that there are only two ways to end the war and neither way is under the control of General Petraeus, President Bush or the Democrats and Liberals.
Bin Laden says that one way to end the war is that Islamists kill every American in the United States and the World or the second way to end the war is that the United States of America submits to Islam!
There are two solutions to stopping it. One is from our side, and it is to escalate the fighting and killing against you. This is our duty, and our brothers are carrying it out.
The second solution is from your side. I invite you to embrace Islam. –Osama bin Laden
No matter what Democrats or Liberals say a withdraw from Iraq and troops coming home will not end the war.
Remember Osama started this war, he declared war on the United States in 1998 and only he can end it. You now know his conditions, die or convert neither option include the Democrats plan to bring the Troops home.
Who are you going to believe Osama bin Laden or Liberal Democrats?
Remember 9/11 of September
Friday, September 07, 2007
Thought You Might Be Interested...........
.......................in this forgotten bit of information
..........It was 1987! At a lecture the other day they
were playing an old news video of Lt.Col. Oliver
Northtestifying at the Iran-Contra hearings during
theReagan Administration.
There was Ollie in front of God and country getting
the third degree, but what he said was stunning!He
was being drilled by a senator; "Did you not
recently spend close to $60,000 for a home security
system?" Ollie replied, "Yes, I did, Sir." The senator
continued, trying to get a laugh out of the audience,
"Isn't that just a little excessive?" "No, sir," continued
Ollie. "No? And why not?" the senator asked."Because
the lives of my family and I were threatened,sir."
"Threatened? By whom?" the senator questioned."By
a terrorist, sir" Ollie answered."Terrorist? What
terrorist could possibly scare you that much?" "His
name is Osama bin Laden, sir" Ollie replied. At this
point the senator tried to repeat the name, but
couldn't pronounce it, which most people back
then probably couldn't. A couple of people laughed
at the attempt.
Then the senator continued. Why are you so afraid
of this man?" the senator asked. "Because, sir, he is
the most evil person alive that I know of", Ollie
answered. "And what do you recommend we do
about him?" asked the senator. "Well, sir, if it was
up to me, I would recommend that an assassin
team be formed to eliminate him and his men from
the face of the earth."
The senator disagreed with this approach, and that
was all that was shown of the clip.
By the way, that senator was Al Gore!
Also: Terrorist pilot Mohammad Atta blew up a bus
in Israel in 1986.The Israelis captured, tried and
imprisoned him. As part of the Oslo agreement
with the Palestinians in 1993, Israel had to agree to
release so-called "political prisoners." However, the
Israelis would not release any with blood on their hands.
The American President at the time, Bill Clinton,and
his Secretary of State, Warren Christopher,"insisted"
that all prisoners be released. Thus Mohammad Atta
was freed and eventually thanked the US by flying an
airplane into Tower One of theWorld Trade Center.
This was reported by many of the American TV
networks at the time that the terrorists were first
identified. It was censored in the US from all later
reports.
If you agree that the American public should be
made aware of this fact, pass this on.
brooklyn
..........It was 1987! At a lecture the other day they
were playing an old news video of Lt.Col. Oliver
Northtestifying at the Iran-Contra hearings during
theReagan Administration.
There was Ollie in front of God and country getting
the third degree, but what he said was stunning!He
was being drilled by a senator; "Did you not
recently spend close to $60,000 for a home security
system?" Ollie replied, "Yes, I did, Sir." The senator
continued, trying to get a laugh out of the audience,
"Isn't that just a little excessive?" "No, sir," continued
Ollie. "No? And why not?" the senator asked."Because
the lives of my family and I were threatened,sir."
"Threatened? By whom?" the senator questioned."By
a terrorist, sir" Ollie answered."Terrorist? What
terrorist could possibly scare you that much?" "His
name is Osama bin Laden, sir" Ollie replied. At this
point the senator tried to repeat the name, but
couldn't pronounce it, which most people back
then probably couldn't. A couple of people laughed
at the attempt.
Then the senator continued. Why are you so afraid
of this man?" the senator asked. "Because, sir, he is
the most evil person alive that I know of", Ollie
answered. "And what do you recommend we do
about him?" asked the senator. "Well, sir, if it was
up to me, I would recommend that an assassin
team be formed to eliminate him and his men from
the face of the earth."
The senator disagreed with this approach, and that
was all that was shown of the clip.
By the way, that senator was Al Gore!
Also: Terrorist pilot Mohammad Atta blew up a bus
in Israel in 1986.The Israelis captured, tried and
imprisoned him. As part of the Oslo agreement
with the Palestinians in 1993, Israel had to agree to
release so-called "political prisoners." However, the
Israelis would not release any with blood on their hands.
The American President at the time, Bill Clinton,and
his Secretary of State, Warren Christopher,"insisted"
that all prisoners be released. Thus Mohammad Atta
was freed and eventually thanked the US by flying an
airplane into Tower One of theWorld Trade Center.
This was reported by many of the American TV
networks at the time that the terrorists were first
identified. It was censored in the US from all later
reports.
If you agree that the American public should be
made aware of this fact, pass this on.
brooklyn
Thursday, September 06, 2007
ABC Free The Path to 9/11 DVD Now!
Do you believe in censorship? Think carefully before you answer because you may be supporting a Presidential Candidate who uses censorship to deal with all of those pesky little incriminating and politically damaging situations. And all of this coming up on the 5th anniversary of 9/11.
Just who I’m I talking about? I’m talking about someone that I have over 900 reasons to oppose from entering the Whitehouse again, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
The former first lady and Jr. Senator of New York (notice that I don’t say “from” New York) has developed a nasty habit of making incriminating and politically damaging situations disappear.
Case in point the made for TV drama, “The Path to 9/11” was schedule for release on DVD January 2007, that’s eight months ago, but it hasn’t been released yet.
The project, five hours and $40 million for ABC, received seven Emmy nominations and attracted a two-night audience of about 25 million viewers. But its Amazon page notes that it currently is "unavailable."The film tells the story of events that lead up to that infamous day in American history. And because the retelling of the story faulted the Clinton administration as well as the Bush administration Clinton Apparatchiks went wild that total blame for 9/11 wasn’t placed on President Bush!
First they attempted to stop the broadcasting of the show completely and when that didn’t work they attempted to have the network edit anything that suggested that President Clinton failed to kill or capture Osama bin Laden the 10 times that the opportunity presented itself.
So now that the edited version of the path to 9/11 broadcasted it is typical that the DVD be released for distribution but it hasn’t happen. Why?
Have you forgotten the Clinton’s long history of making evidence go away?
According to Charles R. Smith of Newsmax 500 FBI files (more like 900), including the file of former CIA Director Bob Gates, that landed inside the Clinton White House and the missing Whitewater files that disappeared down a wormhole in the D.C. universe, then somehow materialized again inside Hillary's reading room.
Of course no one knows what information was taken from those files. And then there’s the National Archives thief committed by Clinton crony and former National Security Advisor Sandy Burger. Mr. Burger entered the National Archives right in the middle of the 9/11 commission investigation of the events leading up to 9/11 and Burger stole and destroyed evidence that obviously he and the Clintons did not want the America people to see.
Then there is the fact that all of the records of Hillary Clinton as the first lady were recently sealed so that the America people would remain ignorant about events during her co-presidency with Bill Clinton.
As lawyers the Clinton’s know the importance of having evidence as well they know the advantage of the lack of evidence. The movie, the path to 9/11, puts in perspective the events surrounding 9/11 because these events do not reflect well on the Clinton administration it is believed that Hillary has put pressure on ABC preventing the release of the TV movie on DVD.
Ironically Fahrenheit 9/11, a Michael Moore anti-Bush movie, was release right in the middle of the 2004 Presidential elections without so much as a complaint from President Bush.
The American people should demand that that the Clintons no longer be allowed to censor, destroy, seal or steal evidence that is by rights the people’s property.
The American people should demand that ABC immediately release the made for TV movie, The Path to 9/11 to DVD.
Write ABC and demand that they free, “The Path to 9/11.” Stop the censorship, and end the Clinton control of the media and public information.
We refuse to go back to a time in America when a Clinton will look into the face of the America people and lied about the facts, manipulate records or destroy evidence. And the Clintons did destroy plenty of evidence concerning his Governorship, his Presidency and Hillary’s involvement in each as the co-Criminal-in-chief.
ABC free, “The Path to 9/11 now!
Wednesday, September 05, 2007
Don’t be fooled the problem is not Toys or China!
"If we will not endure a king as a political power we should not endure a king over the production, transportation, and sale of any of the necessaries of life."—John ShermanAccording to the AP the Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with Mattel Inc., announced late Tuesday that it is recalling about 700,000 Chinese-made toys that have excessive amounts of lead paint.
It would be too easy to lay this debacle at the feet of the Chinese but responsibility doesn’t belong there. Mattel and Corporations like it have for years outsourced American jobs to foreign countries to take advantage of less restrictive manufacturing laws and cheap almost slave labor.
Corporate pursuit of low wages and less regulations are the reasons that the American consumer is suffering from everything from tainted foods that have been exported to this country to high gas prices and finally to products that would not even be made in America because they do not meet United States standards.
Everything that is wrong in America today can be blamed on an out-of-control corporate environment that will do anything and everything for the sake of the bottom line. Profit!
Corporations control everything from the President to Congress as demonstrated by the Comprehensive Immigration reform drama. Corporations had their finger prints all over that deal! Corporations control all aspects of American life, from what you eat, what you drive, and how you’re entertained, yes corporations decided what Americans like or dislike. Corporations decide what it means to be an ipod wearing, fast food eating consumer driven American.
Whether it’s tainted pet food, ecoli laden lettuce or lead covered toys it is the corporations fault. Corporations are the reason that we are at war in Iraq (the Industial Military Complex or in one word "Haliburton") they are the blame for hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens marching in American streets demanding rights in a country that they are not citizens of. Corporations have left the safe shores of America for the siren calls of low wages and little to no regulations in India, China or wherever there is a somewhat stable government to operate from.
What can we do? The people of this country must decide whether or not we want control of our country back, for a fact, American life is infected by corporate influence at every level.
Corporations fund the homosexual movement, Corporations fund the stem cell movement, and Corporations fund the global warming movement. Look behind any movement meant to weaken the family and promote consumerism you will find corporate influence lurking in the shadows.
Until and unless the Sherman Act and anti-trust laws are reenacted in this country corporate power will be the down fall of this nation. We must reign in corporate power!
And you thought it was only about lead paint on toys, no the real toxic substance in this society today is unrestrained corporate wealth lust.
Uncontrolled corporate power is exactly the type of concentrated power and tyranny that the Founding Father attempted to protect the America people from by their theories of separation of powers. By contrast, it is the recent corporate monopolies in media, commerce and financial industries which looms as a very real threat which will put Americans under tyrannous corporate Global rule!
Whether it is toys, CD’s DVD’s, Automobiles, Gasoline, Movies, Music, News and Entertainment Corporations are hell bend on controlling the hearts and minds of the people of the world.
Of course they want your wallet too! And after the Presidential Elections the artificial lower gas prices will be lifted and when gasoline goes up to 4 to 5 dollars a gallon they will have your wallet too.
Tuesday, September 04, 2007
Can’t the United States act Unilaterally within its own borders?
Question can the U.S. Congress legislate without consulting with foreign powers?
No they can’t according to Mexican President Felipe Calderon. Calderon in his state of the union speech Sunday accused the United States of stepping up persecution and abuse of undocumented Mexican workers with a crackdown on illegal immigrants.
Calderon said, "I want to express again an energetic protest at the unilateral measures taken by the U.S. Congress and government which exacerbate the persecution and abusive treatment of undocumented Mexican workers,"
What?!? Protest the unilateral measures taken by the U.S. Congress and government? Protest to whom and on what grounds? It doesn’t make any sense! Unless the United States of America is no longer a sovereign nation.
Americans ought to be very concerned when a leader of a foreign country denounces America for doing what it’s always done for over two hundred years, that is, self govern!
What is the President of Mexico thinking? The U.S. Congress and the U.S. government must check with him and his government before laws are passed and or enforced in the United States that concern America’s interest?
According to Reuters News, Mexico was deeply disappointed at the U.S. Congress' failure to pass a comprehensive overhaul of immigration laws in June despite heavy lobbying by the Bush administration. It is also upset at the United States for building a security fence on parts of the border to keep illegal immigrants out.
"The Mexican government will continue to insist firmly ... on the need for an integral immigration reform and the categorical rejection of the building of a wall on our common border,"—Felipe Calderon, President of Mexico
Just what gives the President of Mexico the idea that he or any foreign government have any rights or demands of consequence on the U.S. government or the American people?
Do you know? In one word “NAFTA.” The North American Free Trade Agreement is the bases on which a foreign power can make demands on your government. How have we come to this? Just follow the timeline.
That and the North American Community Agreement (NACA) that was signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin. So realize that it is Big Business that is Corporate influence over your elected officials that is the cause of it all so don’t just go blaming the President of Mexico he’s just demanding what was agreed to in the North American Community Agreement that was signed by him George Bush and Paul Martin.
Oh I realize that our Government’s official position is that the NACA was not signed but the only problem with that is I recall seeing the signed document on-line back in 2005 before it was erased from all sources. I also remember seeing an article at that same time touting the signing of the Agreement that too has been sanitized.
So either I’m crazy or the government is lying and if I’m crazy well I’m not the only one because former Canadian Minister Paul Martin (a participant in the NACA) recalls that he President Bush and President Fox signed an agreement. Martin posted it for the world to see on his website.
Thus, on March 23, President Bush, President Fox and I signed the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America that establishes the way forward on our continental agenda for security, prosperity and quality of life. It is a partnership that respects the past but is devoted to building for the future, to ensuring that we as North Americans are able to continue to thrive in a world in which China and India have emerged as economic giants.Your government has gone to a awful lot of trouble to denied that President Bush signed an agreement, why they’ve even published a rebuttal called SPP myths vs facts they claim:
Myth: The SPP was an agreement signed by Presidents Bush and his Mexican and Canadian counterparts in Waco, TX, on March 23, 2005.The only thing is they couldn’t get all of the evidence. Several sources reported the signing which was not disputed or denied by the Bush administration until the American people realized that their President had entered the United States of America into a tri-lateral agreement without the consent of the people and the people’s Congress.
Fact: The SPP is a dialogue to increase security and enhance prosperity among the three countries. The SPP is not an agreement nor is it a treaty. In fact, no agreement was ever signed.
It was only after that realization that the Oligarchy (see a list of who’s behind NACA) which comprises the planning of the North American Community began to cover its tracks. They knowing that their actions were unconstitutional and that the American people were becoming aware of the treachery that was being acted out at the highest levels of American government began attempting to change perception by lying about the facts.
The facts are elitist academics, government officials and heads of corporations are planning and enacting economic goals that will further exploit people and resources in Canada, Mexico and the United States in the name of prosperity and security.
Constitutions, laws and governments will be superseded by a governing body that will neither be elected nor answerable to anyone.
You say that it isn’t true? Then you explain how an agreement that was not signed by anyone can be the bases upon which three countries are beginning to merger their borders, their commerce and their peoples.
Finally, that is why the President of Mexico can call the United States into account; he has an agreement signed by our President. An Agreement that Mexican Nationals will be able to enter into the United States and work under the Security and Prosperity Plan and the North American Community Agreement that wasn’t signed (according to the White house) but is being honored and enforced by your government.
This recent rash of arrest are meant to placate you and me but as you can see these arrest are not what Mexico agreed to and that is why President Calderon feels that he can protest them so vehemently! He has a signed agreement even if the United States doesn’t!
Friday, August 31, 2007
There is No Consensus Regarding Global Warming
I’m about to ruin your weekend if you are a Warm-earther, one who believes in the theory of Global warming in rejection of all scientific evidence that man and CO2 emissions are not the primary cause of Global warming.
Michael Asher reports that the much used data to support the claim that there is a consensus among scientist about Global warming and its causes is outdated.
When the research regarding the scientific consensus was recently updated by Medical researcher Dr. Klaus-Martin Schulte using the same data base and criteria as the original work that said there is a “consensus view” a different and surprising result occurred.
Of 528 total papers on climate change, only 38 (7%) gave an explicit endorsement of the consensus. If one considers "implicit" endorsement (accepting the consensus without explicit statement), the figure rises to 45%. However, while only 32 papers (6%) reject the consensus outright, the largest category (48%) are neutral papers, refusing to either accept or reject the hypothesis. This is no "consensus."Not only that, there isn’t a consensus that any form of Global warming naturally occurring or the theorized man-made Global warming will have the dire catastrophic results of world-wide destruction as once was thought.
These changing viewpoints represent the advances in climate science over the past decade. While today we are even more certain the earth is warming, we are less certain about the root causes. More importantly, research has shown us that -- whatever the cause may be -- the amount of warming is unlikely to cause any great calamity for mankind or the planet itself.In addition to this reversal in the scientific community regarding the theory of man-made Global warming there is a new study by the Belgium Royal Meteorological Institute that stated the effects of CO2 on world temperatures had been "grossly overstated". This study is supported by two additional but separate research studies: The first is by atmospheric scientist Stephen Schwartz, of Brookhaven National Labs. And the Second by Chinese researchers Lin Zhen-Shan and Sun Xian. Using a technique called Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD)
The factor all three of the above studies have in common? That CO2's role has been massively overstated. The political consequences of this are widespread-- is it worth spending trillions of dollars to reduce emissions of a gas that will have almost no effect over the next century, and essentially none at all after that?Finally there is not a consensus view about Global warming or its cause the only consensus is among politicians who use this issue to keep voters further divided on the issues.
Thursday, August 30, 2007
Sexually Deviancy according to Chris Matthews
Idaho Senator Larry Craig, cultural warrior of the right, stands naked tonight, exposed as both a sexual deviant and a world-class hypocrite. –Chris Matthews, Hardball
So just what is a sexual deviant these days? According to the politically correct and the cultural gatekeepers of our society one can engage in just about any kind or type of sexual activity and that sexuality is totally acceptable by today’s standards.
It’s like being chased around by Sam I Am with a plate of green eggs and ham, today it’s all GOOD!
In spite of that, I think I’ve found one sexual practice that even the most ardent of Democratic shills will call deviant. That practice is being homosexual while Republican!
Oh I know that Senator Larry Craig Republican from Idaho claims that he is not gay but he apparently likes skulking around known homosexual hang outs (Airport bathrooms listed on Craig’s list) and he apparently likes taking wide stances in restroom stalls and tapping this foot to the good Airport restroom piped in music such as the music which play in the Northstar Crossing section in the Lindbergh Terminal of the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport’s bathroom.(Do they even have music in those bathrooms?)
Airport police previously had made numerous arrests in that men’s restroom of the Northstar Crossing in the Lindbergh Terminal in connection with sexual activity.
“Walks like a duck, quacks like a duck,” but of course in Senator Craig’s case has a stance like a duck.
Everyone seems to have their own opinion of what perversion is these days. Some say the airport police should have better things to do than stake out restrooms.
For instance, Kenneth Sherrill, professor at Hunter College of the City University of New York says, "Police have far better things to do with their time than to arrest people for this, being 'sex police' in bathrooms strikes me as a perversion of rational law enforcement activities." A perversion of rational law enforcement activities? Ah come on professor!
According to the incident report, Sgt. Dave Karsnia was working as a plainclothes officer on June 11 investigating civilian complaints regarding sexual activity in the men’s public restroom in which Craig was arrested.
So Professor Sherrill if people complain to law enforcement concerning certain untoward acts in public places where children are known to frequent your most esteemed opinion is that police should ignore it? It doesn’t take a doctorate to know that that’s just plain stupid professor! Where this sort of activity is going on in public we do need a deterrent and arrest is as good as any.
Then there are those nasty little rumors that have been circulating around Washington D.C. for over 20 years about the Senator and not to mention those pesky homosexuals who are willing to come forward to say that they’ve had a quack or two with the Senator.
Not since Pagegate where Rep. Mark Foley (R-Fla.) was exposed for attempting to get to know samesex Congressional Pages have Democrats felt so free to attack a homosexual.
Not that there’s anything wrong with not being homosexual as Senator Craig claims that he is not! Whew!
Well, there may be a little something wrong with it, some homosexuals are calling Senator Craig a “self-hater” and they’re demanding that he “come out” and stop voting against their agenda. (But that’s another story)
What is of interest here is Chris Matthews’ choice of words. Matthews called what Senator Craig was arrested for and what consequently the Senator plead guilty to, sexual deviancy.
I hope that you are not missing any of this. Senator Craig was busted in an Airport restroom known for gay sexual activity while he was engaged in known actions that are solicitation for sexual activity with men and Chris Matthews finds that deviant?
Barney Frank are you going to take that? I suppose the only sexual deviants these days are Republicans who adapt the homosexual lifestyle, huh Chris? So for all of you Log Cabin Republicans out there Chris Matthews thinks that you are sexual deviants and world-class hypocrites.
Is that it Chris? Republican homosexuals are deviant but Democrat homosexuals are not deviant? That attitude is not very open-minded and tolerant Chris. I think that you should spend some time in sensitivity training Mr. Matthews your hate against homosexuals is showing and you of all people should know better!
It’s like Chris Matthews doesn’t like green eggs and ham if they’re served with a Republican, Sam I AM!
Wednesday, August 29, 2007
God as Bogeyman
Joe Carter’s “Theocracy in America” reports on CNN’s Christiane Amanpour’s 6 hour miniseries God’s Warriors.
God’s Warriors oh I get it, the, “more people have been killed in the name of religion than any other belief system,” argument which isn’t even remotely true. More people have been killed in the name of secular humanistic philosophies and practices than have been killed on behalf of religion.
In spite of that Amanpour takes her turn at the old Liberal scare that religion is bad and Christians are attempting to impose their beliefs on the government and on the society in general. She does this by lumping all three monotheistic faiths together as if to say, “see not one is different than the other they all commit acts of violence!”
As if there is no degree to acts of violence, for instance my use of violence to defend myself from your unwarranted attacks is not the same as your unprovoked attack against me. You understand what I mean.
Liberals used this Bogeyman as one of their initial reasons for opposing George W. Bush as well they use hatred of Western Judeo-Christian values as their main opposition against religion.
Where Amanpour and people like her show their ignorance about religion first, is in this simplistic act of broad brushing all religious belief with the same brush so to speak and second, to assume that an anti-religious secular worldview is superior to a faith based worldview.
If Amanpour’s point is that acts of violence disqualifies religion as a valid belief system or makes religion hypocritical then no human belief system would escape such a condemnatory and judgmental attack.
Amanpour could have just as easily done a miniseries entitled Science’s Warriors, or antireligious secular Humanism’s Warriors that could have produced enough hatred, violence and carnage that would put a stop to the ignorantly inane mantra that, “religion is bad, no religion is good.”
For instance according to Dinesh D'Souza the very best example of religious persecution in America is the Salem witch trials. How many people were killed in those trials? Thousands? Hundreds? Actually, fewer than 25.
Yet the witch trials are almost always referred to as proof of the greatest Christian malfeasance this country has ever seen. Secularist use the witch trials as an anti religion bogeyman
D’Souza points out, ‘Columnist Robert Kuttner gives the familiar litany, "The Crusades slaughtered millions in the name of Jesus. The Inquisition brought the torture and murder of millions more. After Martin Luther, Christians did bloody battle with other Christians for another three centuries."
In his bestseller "The God Delusion," Richard Dawkins contends that most of the world's recent conflicts - in the Middle East, in the Balkans, in Northern Ireland, in Kashmir, and in Sri Lanka - show the vitality of religion's murderous impulse.’
Yet D’Souza states that the problem with this critique is that it exaggerates the crimes attributed to religion, while ignoring the greater crimes of secular fanaticism.
D’Souza’s claim is that about 110,000 lives were taken in the greatest rebukes against Christianity the Crusades and the Inquisitions how does that compare to secular killing?
Communism has claimed more than 100 million lives. There as been 29M legal abortions performed in the United States, 1970-95. (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Vol. 47 No. SS-2). In addition to an estimated worldwide number of abortions numbering: 804M to 929M (1920-2006) in total.
Finally including abortions 1.7 Billion people have been kill by secular governments just in the 20th Century alone.
That’s 1.7 Billion secular killings compared to what secularist claim is religion’s evil historical 110,000 deaths in the Crusades and the Inquisitions. Even today’s Islamic killings can’t compare to the massive amounts of secular human slaughter.
The next time someone attempts to demonstrate how evil religion is "with all that killing in the name of God" just remember that the killing in the name of man is much greater and far less noble!
If people like Christiane Amanpour would tell the truth about man's killing man in the name of man, his government and his science she would have six days of miniseries not just six hours!
Tuesday, August 28, 2007
Jessee Lee Peterson
New Orleans Went Under.........................
A Black Man's Comments.
Carefully read the whole article. You'll be
amazed at this guy!!!
I don't know the man who wrote this, but I
looked at his picture and read it with my mouth
hanging open. He says things here that no
white man could ever write and keep his job
as a writer .
Say a hurricane is about to destroy the city you
live in. Two questions:
What would you do?
What would you do if you were black?
Sadly, the two questions don't have the
same answer.
To the first: Most of us would take our
families out of that city quickly to protect
them from danger. Then, able-bodied men
would ret urn to help others in need, as wives
and others cared for children, elderly, infirm
and the like.
For better or worse, Hurricane Katrina has
told us the answer to the second question.
If you're black and a hurricane is about to
destroy your city, you'll probably wait for the
government to save you.
This was not always the case. Prior to 40
years ago, such a pathetic performance by the
black community in a time of crisis would
have been inconceivable. The first response
would have come from black men. They would
take care of their families, bring them to safety,
and then help the rest of the community. Then
local government would come in.
No longer. When 75 percent of New Orleans
residents had left the city, it was primarily
immoral, welfare-pampered blacks that stayed
behind and waited for the government to bail
them out. This, as we know, did not turn out
good results.
Enter Jesse Jackson and Louis Farrakhan.
Jackson and Farrakhan laid blame on "racist"
President Bush. Farrakhan actually proposed
the idea that the government blew up a levee
so as to kill blacks and save whites. The two
demanded massive governmental spending to
rebuild New Orleans , above and beyond the
federal government's proposed $60 billion.
Not only that, these two were positioning
themselves as the gatekeepers to supervise the
dispersion of funds. Perfect: Two of the most
dishonest elite blacks in America , "overseeing"
billions of dollars. I wonder where that money
will end up.
Of course, if these two were really serious about
laying blame on government, they should blame
the local one. Responsibility to perform legally
and practically fell first on the mayor of New
Orleans . We are now all familiar with Mayor Ray
Nagin the black who likes to yell at President Bush
for failing to do Nagin's job. The facts,
unfortunately, do not support Nagin's wailing. As
the Washington Times puts it, "recent reports
show [Nagin] failed to follow through on his own
city's emergency-response plan, which
acknowledged that thousands of the city's poorest
residents would have no way to evacuate the city."
One wonders how there was "no way" for these
people to evacuate the city. We have photographic
evidence telling us otherwise. You've probably
seen it by now, the photo showing 2,000 parked
school buses, unused and underwater. How much
planning does it require to put people on a bus
and leave town, Mayor Nagin?
Instead of doing the obvious, Mayor Nagin (with
no positive contribution from Gov. Kathleen Blanco,
the other major leader vested with responsibility to
address the hurricane disaster) loaded remaining
new Orleans residents into the Superdome and the
city's convention center. We know how that plan
turned out.
About five years ago, in a debate before the
National Association of Black Journalists, I stated
that if whites were to just leave the United States
and let blacks run the country, they would turn
America into a ghetto within 10 years. The
audience, shall we say, disagreed with me strongly.
Now I have to disagree with me. I gave blacks too
much credit. It took a mere three days for blacks
to turn the Superdome and the convention center
into ghettos, rampant with theft, rape and murder.
President Bush is not to blame for the rampant
immorality of blacks. Had New Orleans ' black
community taken action, most would have been
out of harm's way. But most were too lazy,
immoral and trifling to do anything productive
for themselves.
All Americans must tell blacks this truth. It was
blacks' moral poverty not their material poverty
that cost them dearly in New Orleans . Farrakhan,
Jackson, and other race hustlers are to be
repudiated for they will only perpetuate this
problem by stirring up hatred and applauding
moral corruption. New Orleans , to the extent it is
to be rebuilt, should be remade into a
dependency-free, morally strong city where
corruption is opposed and success is applauded.
Blacks are obligated to help themselves and not
depend on the government to care for them. We
are all obligated to tell them so.
The Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson is founder and
president of BOND, the Brotherhood Organization
of A New Destiny, and author of "Scam: How the
Black Leadership Exploits Black America."
You are asked to keep this moving,,,,,,however,
you now have the information so do with it
as you will.
brooklyn
A Black Man's Comments.
Carefully read the whole article. You'll be
amazed at this guy!!!
I don't know the man who wrote this, but I
looked at his picture and read it with my mouth
hanging open. He says things here that no
white man could ever write and keep his job
as a writer .
Say a hurricane is about to destroy the city you
live in. Two questions:
What would you do?
What would you do if you were black?
Sadly, the two questions don't have the
same answer.
To the first: Most of us would take our
families out of that city quickly to protect
them from danger. Then, able-bodied men
would ret urn to help others in need, as wives
and others cared for children, elderly, infirm
and the like.
For better or worse, Hurricane Katrina has
told us the answer to the second question.
If you're black and a hurricane is about to
destroy your city, you'll probably wait for the
government to save you.
This was not always the case. Prior to 40
years ago, such a pathetic performance by the
black community in a time of crisis would
have been inconceivable. The first response
would have come from black men. They would
take care of their families, bring them to safety,
and then help the rest of the community. Then
local government would come in.
No longer. When 75 percent of New Orleans
residents had left the city, it was primarily
immoral, welfare-pampered blacks that stayed
behind and waited for the government to bail
them out. This, as we know, did not turn out
good results.
Enter Jesse Jackson and Louis Farrakhan.
Jackson and Farrakhan laid blame on "racist"
President Bush. Farrakhan actually proposed
the idea that the government blew up a levee
so as to kill blacks and save whites. The two
demanded massive governmental spending to
rebuild New Orleans , above and beyond the
federal government's proposed $60 billion.
Not only that, these two were positioning
themselves as the gatekeepers to supervise the
dispersion of funds. Perfect: Two of the most
dishonest elite blacks in America , "overseeing"
billions of dollars. I wonder where that money
will end up.
Of course, if these two were really serious about
laying blame on government, they should blame
the local one. Responsibility to perform legally
and practically fell first on the mayor of New
Orleans . We are now all familiar with Mayor Ray
Nagin the black who likes to yell at President Bush
for failing to do Nagin's job. The facts,
unfortunately, do not support Nagin's wailing. As
the Washington Times puts it, "recent reports
show [Nagin] failed to follow through on his own
city's emergency-response plan, which
acknowledged that thousands of the city's poorest
residents would have no way to evacuate the city."
One wonders how there was "no way" for these
people to evacuate the city. We have photographic
evidence telling us otherwise. You've probably
seen it by now, the photo showing 2,000 parked
school buses, unused and underwater. How much
planning does it require to put people on a bus
and leave town, Mayor Nagin?
Instead of doing the obvious, Mayor Nagin (with
no positive contribution from Gov. Kathleen Blanco,
the other major leader vested with responsibility to
address the hurricane disaster) loaded remaining
new Orleans residents into the Superdome and the
city's convention center. We know how that plan
turned out.
About five years ago, in a debate before the
National Association of Black Journalists, I stated
that if whites were to just leave the United States
and let blacks run the country, they would turn
America into a ghetto within 10 years. The
audience, shall we say, disagreed with me strongly.
Now I have to disagree with me. I gave blacks too
much credit. It took a mere three days for blacks
to turn the Superdome and the convention center
into ghettos, rampant with theft, rape and murder.
President Bush is not to blame for the rampant
immorality of blacks. Had New Orleans ' black
community taken action, most would have been
out of harm's way. But most were too lazy,
immoral and trifling to do anything productive
for themselves.
All Americans must tell blacks this truth. It was
blacks' moral poverty not their material poverty
that cost them dearly in New Orleans . Farrakhan,
Jackson, and other race hustlers are to be
repudiated for they will only perpetuate this
problem by stirring up hatred and applauding
moral corruption. New Orleans , to the extent it is
to be rebuilt, should be remade into a
dependency-free, morally strong city where
corruption is opposed and success is applauded.
Blacks are obligated to help themselves and not
depend on the government to care for them. We
are all obligated to tell them so.
The Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson is founder and
president of BOND, the Brotherhood Organization
of A New Destiny, and author of "Scam: How the
Black Leadership Exploits Black America."
You are asked to keep this moving,,,,,,however,
you now have the information so do with it
as you will.
brooklyn
Daniel Gross Knows Best! (He Thinks)
..............but does he?
I doubt it, because his rational is absurd!
If the Fed doesn’t cut rates, and soon, we
are all in trouble. In a tight money situation,
The harder it gets for business to expand,
the harder it will be for anybody to find
jobs....... further complicating an already
touchy situation with the housing market.
Builders have basically stopped producing,
because their inventories are not moving.
New buyers are losing their opportunity to
own homes, because mortgage money has
virtually dried up. Those who presently
have ARMs are going to be losing their
houses rapidly, as soon as rates start
going up further. But I am sure that Mr.
Gross is well insulated from that problem,
having been a loud-mouthed "newsman" for
quite some time............ at a probably very
hefty salary.
At least the Fed had more brains than Gross
and did Not raise rates again, further
exacerbating an already dangerous situation.
Hopefully, in the next couple of months, they
will see the wisdom of cutting both rates by
at least 50 basis points, in order to spur the
housing and mortgage markets. Which in
turn will spur the furniture, home furnishings,
and home improvement industries.
I would like to ask our resident expert, Mr.
Gross................"What is wrong with turning
the clock back" to a better time? Hopefully
to about 2002 -2003............. and not 2004 -
2005 (as Gross mentioned), when real estate
values were already falling? Weren’t you aware
of that Mr.Gross?
From his overall attitude, I would guess that
he is nearing retirement age, has plenty in
savings and investments, with a house fully
paid for, and lots of spare cash stashed away.
Of course he can’t relate to the rest of those
who are trapped with adjustable rate mortgages,
and in very real danger of losing the biggest
single investment that they have or could ever
make. But hell, it’s only their homes!
He refers to "zillionaires and conservatives" as
though it were a bad thing. How far from a
zillionaire are you Herr Gross?
brooklyn
I doubt it, because his rational is absurd!
If the Fed doesn’t cut rates, and soon, we
are all in trouble. In a tight money situation,
The harder it gets for business to expand,
the harder it will be for anybody to find
jobs....... further complicating an already
touchy situation with the housing market.
Builders have basically stopped producing,
because their inventories are not moving.
New buyers are losing their opportunity to
own homes, because mortgage money has
virtually dried up. Those who presently
have ARMs are going to be losing their
houses rapidly, as soon as rates start
going up further. But I am sure that Mr.
Gross is well insulated from that problem,
having been a loud-mouthed "newsman" for
quite some time............ at a probably very
hefty salary.
At least the Fed had more brains than Gross
and did Not raise rates again, further
exacerbating an already dangerous situation.
Hopefully, in the next couple of months, they
will see the wisdom of cutting both rates by
at least 50 basis points, in order to spur the
housing and mortgage markets. Which in
turn will spur the furniture, home furnishings,
and home improvement industries.
I would like to ask our resident expert, Mr.
Gross................"What is wrong with turning
the clock back" to a better time? Hopefully
to about 2002 -2003............. and not 2004 -
2005 (as Gross mentioned), when real estate
values were already falling? Weren’t you aware
of that Mr.Gross?
From his overall attitude, I would guess that
he is nearing retirement age, has plenty in
savings and investments, with a house fully
paid for, and lots of spare cash stashed away.
Of course he can’t relate to the rest of those
who are trapped with adjustable rate mortgages,
and in very real danger of losing the biggest
single investment that they have or could ever
make. But hell, it’s only their homes!
He refers to "zillionaires and conservatives" as
though it were a bad thing. How far from a
zillionaire are you Herr Gross?
brooklyn
How Ironic!
Funny, isn't it..................that Hillary Clinton of all
people should talk about honesty in office. It would
be a floor-rolling hoot, if it weren't so sad.
Hillary said................""I think we should set a
standard that the next Attorney General cares about
the rule of law more than he cares about protecting
the president. That the next attorney general….when
he takes an oath to uphold the constitution, he
actually means it, understands it, and will protect
and defend the Constitution of the United States."
I guess that doesn't apply to former Presidents and
First Ladies, when they occupied the Governor's
Mansions. Whitewater remains a "dirty name"
that both the Clintons shrink from. Convenient,
how all those documents that the investigating
committee needed to prove their guilt, mysteriously
disappeared and magically turned up just days
after the investigation closed, with no convictions.
Of course, lying wasn't a very large part of the
Clinton presidency either. From the foreign
contributions, to the Presidential Pardons granted
on his last day in office, Clinton was up to his
eyeballs in lies, deceit and graft. They didn't
nickname him "slick Willy" for nothing.
So................... Hillary. Get off the high horse,
admit that the Gonzalez persecution is just that.
You got what you wanted, now get back to your
campaign trail mud-slinging. But remember
................. you will NEVER see the White
House again. Clearly, you ARE the total
representation of the Democratic Party
............... a real jackass!
brooklyn
people should talk about honesty in office. It would
be a floor-rolling hoot, if it weren't so sad.
Hillary said................""I think we should set a
standard that the next Attorney General cares about
the rule of law more than he cares about protecting
the president. That the next attorney general….when
he takes an oath to uphold the constitution, he
actually means it, understands it, and will protect
and defend the Constitution of the United States."
I guess that doesn't apply to former Presidents and
First Ladies, when they occupied the Governor's
Mansions. Whitewater remains a "dirty name"
that both the Clintons shrink from. Convenient,
how all those documents that the investigating
committee needed to prove their guilt, mysteriously
disappeared and magically turned up just days
after the investigation closed, with no convictions.
Of course, lying wasn't a very large part of the
Clinton presidency either. From the foreign
contributions, to the Presidential Pardons granted
on his last day in office, Clinton was up to his
eyeballs in lies, deceit and graft. They didn't
nickname him "slick Willy" for nothing.
So................... Hillary. Get off the high horse,
admit that the Gonzalez persecution is just that.
You got what you wanted, now get back to your
campaign trail mud-slinging. But remember
................. you will NEVER see the White
House again. Clearly, you ARE the total
representation of the Democratic Party
............... a real jackass!
brooklyn
Senator Craig wasn’t Smoking in the Boys Room
Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho is 62 years old; married has three children and is a granddad. pleaded guilty this month to misdemeanor disorderly conduct after being arrested at the Minneapolis airport.
A Hennepin County court docket showed Craig pleading guilty to the disorderly conduct charge Aug. 8, with the court dismissing a charge of gross misdemeanor interference to privacy.
Roll Call, a Capitol Hill newspaper, which first reported the case, said on its Web site Monday that Craig was arrested June 11 by a plainclothes officer investigating complaints of lewd conduct in a men's restroom at the airport.
Now the good Senator is having regrets that he plead guilty to the charges and is saying that the police misconstrued his actions.
Senator Larry Craig’s Actions:
According to the incident report, Sgt. Dave Karsnia was working as a plainclothes officer on June 11 investigating civilian complaints regarding sexual activity in the men’s public restroom in which Craig was arrested.The Senator is now being outed by gays (blackmailed) because his voting record doesn’t reflect his sexual proclivities.
Airport police previously had made numerous arrests in the men’s restroom of the Northstar Crossing in the Lindbergh Terminal in connection with sexual activity.
Karsnia entered the bathroom at noon that day and about 13 minutes after taking a seat in a stall, he stated he could see “an older white male with grey hair standing outside my stall.”
The man, who lingered in front of the stall for two minutes, was later identified as Craig.
“I could see Craig look through the crack in the door from his position. Craig would look down at his hands, ‘fidget’ with his fingers, and then look through the crack into my stall again. Craig would repeat this cycle for about two minutes,” the report states.
Craig then entered the stall next to Karsnia’s and placed his roller bag against the front of the stall door.
“My experience has shown that individuals engaging in lewd conduct use their bags to block the view from the front of their stall,” Karsnia stated in his report. “From my seated position, I could observe the shoes and ankles of Craig seated to the left of me.”
Craig was wearing dress pants with black dress shoes.
“At 1216 hours, Craig tapped his right foot. I recognized this as a signal used by persons wishing to engage in lewd conduct. Craig tapped his toes several times and moves his foot closer to my foot. I moved my foot up and down slowly. While this was occurring, the male in the stall to my right was still present. I could hear several unknown persons in the restroom that appeared to use the restroom for its intended use. The presence of others did not seem to deter Craig as he moved his right foot so that it touched the side of my left foot which was within my stall area,” the report states.
Craig then proceeded to swipe his hand under the stall divider several times, and Karsnia noted in his report that “I could ... see Craig had a gold ring on his ring finger as his hand was on my side of the stall divider.”
Apparently if you are gay( as the Senator is suspected to be) you are expected to vote in line with what 2-4% of the United States population who are gay and who want Senatorial votes against the Federal Marriage Amendment, against Don't Ask Don't Tell, and against the Defense of Marriage Act. If one is gay and one is an elected Senator or Congressman you are expected to goosestep along with the rest of the politically correct homosexual agenda.
Finally, like Mike Foley Senator Larry Craig must resign! He has betrayed his sacred trust with the American people and the voters of Idaho. In addition to that, Senator Craig has exposed himself to radical fringe groups that are attempting to push their agenda on the America people one sick bathroom stocking perverted Senator or Congressman at a time.
Senator Craig obviously doesn’t have the moral turpitude to resign the Senate fortunately the people of Idaho can rid the government and the citizens of this country of this scourge by voting Senator Craig out of office in 2008. Senator Craig is an ex-Senator walking and deservingly so!
Monday, August 27, 2007
Mexico Deports Illegal Aliens
That’s right all you illegal alien activists if you lived in Mexico and not the United States of America Illegal Aliens are actually getting deported. The BBC reports on August 15, 2007 that illegal migrants mostly from Guatemala and Honduras who cross Mexico on their way to the United States got stuck in southern Mexico when a rail link to the US ceased operating.
According to BBC News the authorities said that around 350 people had been deported so far.
More deportations are planned but some of those who were stranded began walking along the now disused railway to continue their journey.
Wait a minute isn’t the Mexican Government attempting to pressure the United States on U.S. immigration matters? Yet the Mexican Government can deport foreign nationals who enter their country illegally? I hope the irony here isn’t lost on anyone!
I think the greatest hypocrisy is that an America company was providing train service in Mexico that was used by immigrants to reach the United States.
The Genesee & Wyoming Inc. that specialized in freight railroads in United States, Canada, Mexico, Australia and Bolivia was used by immigrants to hitch rides to the U.S. through Mexico.
I find it hard to believe that GWI’s corporate executives or its board of directors didn’t know that their railroad was being used to import human traffic, on their way to enter America illegally, as well as freight. And if they didn’t know I would call that egregious corporate negligence of the worst sort.
BBC reporter Duncan Kennedy tells what the train ride is like:
It is not until late into the night the train finally rumbles out of the darkness.
The migrants get to their feet. Back packs are secured to backs. This train will not stop.
The chaos starts almost immediately. As the train thunders by at up to 50km (30 miles) an hour a few seize the chance.
They make a grab for the ladders attached to the sides of the train's wagons. Some get a grip and haul themselves on. Others falter, their fingers loosened by the sheer speed of the train.
Ahead, I can see people stumble in the darkness. The ground is uneven and there are other migrants in the way of a clear run.
Some turn their backs to the train. The futility, the danger, too great.
Limbs have been lost in ventures like this. Lives, too.
It is crazy but it is also compelling. Fail to do this and the migrants' dreams of reaching America effectively end in this desolate field.
After the five minutes it takes for this long train to pass, its tail lights finally come into view.
For the scores left in the field, it is a frustrating time. Another long day in the sun awaits.
With the help of a local driver we chase after the train. Eventually, we find it as it slows to a point where we can get on. Even at this pace it is hard to clamber up the metal ladder to the top.
The train clangs back and forth as it sets off again. Thinking I was going to be thrown off, I was petrified before its wheels had made a single revolution. –Duncan Kennedy, BBC News
Is Mexico satisfied with being the passageway for the illegal immigrant invasion on the United States only if the system of American train service remains intact? I say to corporations like GWI get out and stay out of the business of transporting immigrates inadvertent or not.
Finally, if Mexico deports immigrants who don’t or can’t make complete trip into the United States illegally they have no business lecturing the U.S. on our immigration matters.
As for GWI if your railroad is or has ever actually aided and abetted the illegal entry into the United States you should suffer the harshest criminal penalties and sanctions for your activities.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)