Saturday, March 24, 2007

Democrats Are Hawks

Politicalchickens Now

Democrats want to fight! No not in Iraq when it comes to defending this country Democrats are Dovish.

Democrats would rather switch than physically fight, which is good for Osama bin Laden because that is exactly what he said is the only thing to end his terrorist war against the United States.

According to bin Laden America needs to switch to Islam before he stops warring against us, maybe that’s the Democrat’s plan, withdrawn U.S. troops from Iraq and surrender to Islam when we are attacked on American soil again. After all that will stop the war! And stopping the war is the only thing that matters right war protestors?

In spite of that Democrats are PoliticalHawks. They love political violence; subpoenas, Congressional hearings, filibusters, bombastic anti-Republican press conferences, going after Karl Rove (Democrats love going after Karl Rove), Dissing the Bush Administration, hijacking the U.S. electoral process by accusing their opponents, the Republicans, of cheating or disfranchising Democratic voters and causing general electoral Chad chaos.

Democrats love the smell of political chaos in the morning probably just as much as Robert Duvall’s character Lieutenant Colonel Bill Kilgore in the movie Apocalypse Now loved the smell of napalm in the morning.

In fact a Democrat will go out of his or her way to set a political road bomb if they think that they can cause some political blowback for President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and Karl Rove. (Democrats love blowing up Karl Rove)

Politicalhawks soiling for a fight, setting dates for pulling out the troops from Iraq, they’re attaching pork amendments to the war budget in order to force a budget show down with the White house and holding Valerie Plame hearings even though it has been legally established that Ms. Plame was not a covert CIA agent (her cover had been blow by Russia years before) and no one in the White house leaked her name and finally they’re issuing subpoenas for White house aides to force a Constitutional show down with the White house. Democrats are Politicalhawks and litigation, politics, and Congressional hearings are their theatre of warfare. And they want to fight!

What’s so paradoxical about this whole scenario is the Republican Hawks who vote for war in Iraq and who talked about building Democracy in the Middle East have been reduced to Politicalchickens Republican don’t what to fight the Democrats they wish to be friends. The Republican theme is “Can’t we all just get along?” ala Rodney King.

Republicans didn’t fight to retain their majority control of the Senate and the House of Representatives. (Not really) Like politicalchickens many of them sided with the strong Democrat caucus. Even though Democrats unified against Republicans for the 16 years that Republicans had the majority in Congress, weak-kneed Republicans are still as fractured as they have always been. They’ve lost their majority because they were too chicken to unify and fired back when Democrats attacked the White house or their fellow Republican colleagues. Republicans are mavericks, independents and even liberals. Republicans are politicalchickens!

Republicans have been called chickenhawks for having a strong war stance though they have not actually been warriors themselves. Whether that is the case or not, the term is a political weapon used by Democrats to diminish Conservative credibility regarding the war.

The term politicalchickens hardly will be used by Democrats because it is not in their interest to do so, but as Democrats became increasingly Hawkish in their politics and as they increase their hold on the politics of this Nation it should became apparent to all that Democrats are Politicalhawks and Republicans are Politicalchickens.

The reality of it is, whether in war or politics Hawks usually carry the day. That is as it should be! My prediction is that the Hawks will win the Presidential election in 2008. It’s the survival of the fittest, who needs weak ass Leaders?

Let the chickens peck around in the farmyard. There is plenty of vermin that only a Hawk will be able to deal with. At this point it is not important to me what party affiliation the Hawk holds, my only question is can you fight… then let’s roll!

Friday, March 23, 2007

When Qualifications Don't Matter

Senator Hillary Clinton


It’s obvious, when you’re a Democrat! And when you are a Woman!

“Reporting for duty!” Was presidential hopeful senator John Kerry's opening remarks to the 2004 Democratic National Convention.

Kerry's hope was to parlay his war home movies, shot on location, and medals received in Vietnam (but later thrown over the fence or put though the fence...)into a successful Presidential bid.

America needed someone with Commander-in-Chief experience in this time of war and John Kerry who made himself over in the image of John Fitsgerald Kennedy thought that it should be him.

President George W. Bush on the other hand was vilified for his service in the National Guard. He has been called everything from a deserter to a chickenhawk his distracters feel that since the President did not actually serve in a battle theatre he doesn't have the moral authority to send U.S. Troops into war.

So the war about the war was clearly who has the credentials to lead America and command our troop in war.

If these arguments were so significant and are so significant today then why does Democratic front runner Senator Hillary Clinton receive a free pass on the crucial question of whether she is qualified to lead America in a time of war? Come on Democrats you know that ain't fair everyone has to be treated equally!

John Kerry paraded around his war veteran qualifications, George Bush was excoriated for his qualifications, but if there is a Democratic Nominee for the President of the United States and that nominee is Senator Hillary Clinton are we simply supposed to forget that for eight years we argued about who was qualified and who was not?

Is Senator Clinton campaign based on political affirmative action? She doesn't have to be qualified she only has to be a woman? The first woman to possibly be elected President so nothing else matters?

Will no one in the media even raise the question of her apparent lack of qualifications? I'm sorry but if for eight long years Democrats ridiculed Republicans for George W. Bush's military experience I don't see how these same Democrats who were so concerned that a qualified individual lead America can consciously back a candidate who obviously is not qualified. What would that campaign slogan look like, “Hell she ain't qualified but at least she is a Woman!”

I guess the Democrats weren't kidding when they said that they'd elect anybody but Bush, that anybody qualified or not, that anybody is named Hillary!

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Democrats Reintroduce Legislation Meant to Deny Constitutional Speech

U.S. Congressman John Conyers


In France they have hate speech laws. In America Democrat Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) has reintroduced hate speech legislation now that Democrats have been unleashed and control the agenda in the Congress.

You remember the Muhammad Cartoon riots? PHILIPPE VAL, editor of Charlie Hebdo a France newspaper published those cartoons and because of Frances hate speech law Val faces imprisonment for six months and a fine of thousands of euros if he is found guilty of hate speech violations against Muslims.

You might be wondering what about freedom of the press, or what about freedom of speech. Wrong country those freedoms are particular to America or at least they are for now. You see if the Democrats and John Conyers backed by homosexual activist have their way anyone who says anything outside of the politically correct accepted views regarding homosexuality will face court sanctions resulting in jail time and fines just like Philippe Val faces today.

What did you think the Ann Coulter row was all about? It was about controlling the free expression of words and ideas. If Ms. Coulter can be silenced or made to restrict her choice of words to appease influential government lobbying groups as homosexual activists no one will be safe from these oppressive word and thought police who disguise their Draconian legislation as if it were some sort of helpful anti-hate speech policy.

Democrats intend to control speech, thought and behavior by their effort to place the John Conyers backed bill into law in the United States similar to the way that speech is controlled in Europe.

Of course the homosexual lobby will trot out all of the false arguments. Ones like this law is needed to prevent hate crime against homosexuals, hate speech results in violence against homosexuals and they will attempt to argue that there is an unrelenting and under-addressed problem of violent hate crimes committed against homosexuals none of this is true, however the only way to persuade the public and manipulate public opinion is to create images of hateful violence against homosexuals where there is none.

That way no matter how Draconian or how unconstitutional the law that Representative Conyers and the homosexual lobby proposes people will allow it because they have been deceived into believing that allowing Democrats to strip away constitutional rights of freedom of speech is somehow justified because of falsified threats of violence against homosexuals.

One thing that is for certain whether in Europe or America socialist Liberals in power will always use the law to oppress people.

Philippe Val will learn his fate today. He printed cartoons that depicted violence being perpetrated in the name of Islam. Those who practice political correctness in France are persecuting Mr. Val a journalist that was doing his job of freely publishing the truth. In a complete miscarriage of justice Mr. Val is being labeled a criminal that engaged in acts of hate speech.

If Representative John Conyers, the Democrat party, left-wing Liberals and homosexual activist have their way anyone who disagrees with them about homosexuality will be like Philippe Val, on trial for hate speech in America. A country, ironically, that does have constitutional guarantees of freedom of press and freedom of speech.

Just think we’ll finally be like Europe, something to look forward to right?

Democratic Operative Outed

Senator Hillary Clinton



A Democratic operative who worked for a digital consulting firm with ties to rival Sen. Barrack Osama was involved in what is perhaps the most brilliant political statement in any campaign to date.

Philip de Vellis, a strategist with Blue State Digital, acknowledged in an interview with The Associated Press that he was the creator of the video, which portrayed Senator Hillary Clinton as a Big Brother figure and urged support for Obama’s presidential campaign.

Senator Obama’s campaign maintains that they had nothing to do with the video was attacked themselves by a copy cat version of the video featuring Senator Obama as a Big Brother figure. It ends with Obama donning a Chicago Bears cap while humming the Monday Night Football theme.


The original ad portrayed Clinton on a huge television screen droning to Democratic Zombies in a stark, futuristic hall. A female athlete tosses a hammer at the screen, destroying Clinton's image with an explosive flash. Then this text: "On January 14th the Democratic primary will begin. And you will see why 2008 isn't going to be like '1984.'"

While it is yet to be learned who in the Clinton camp is responsible for the Obama video there seems not to be the same interest to discover the author of the copy cat version.

Mr. de Vellis resigned his job on Wednesday with Blue State Digital, and I wouldn’t put it pass the Clintons to pick him up on their Campaign.

After all he does specialize in their kind of propaganda. And you have to admit it was brilliant and groundbreaking work!

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

1984!


Democrat front runners are now accusing one another of being fascists. In two cleaverly edited t.v. ads that Apple Computer made to introduce the MacIntosh, Senator Clinton supporters and Senator Obama supporters have used the images of Big Brother via George Orwell’s classic 1984 to suggest that the other is a fascist.

Classic! I've been trying to warning you of the impeding Democratic Liberal Neo-Fascist movement one in which Democrats when in office will began to legislate Dracoian totalitarian laws all meant to transform America into the blithe that Europe has become.

Now thanks to Al Gore's invention, the Internet, we can all imagine what it would be like to have Big Sister Clinton and Big Brother Obama droning to the masses of zombie like Democrat followers in the made for Internet clips of Hillary and Barak, 1984.

Some creative geniuses have put the MacIntosh to the task of showing you life with a Democratic President either Hillary or Obama. Let me add that it doesn’t matter who the Democrats offer up as their presidential candidate because it is the party that has been coopted by the fringe radical Liberal neo-fascists who intend to force a neo-progressive agenda of government control of thought, speech and human action on Americans.

One of these video clips shows Senator Clinton ever the pabulum-spewing neo-fascist and the other shows Senator Obama as a silly cap wearing light-weight neo-fascist whose only appeal is that he is a Democrat. The makers of these clips have invoked the word fascist upon one another though the magic of video editing without even mentioning the word. Thereby defining the Democrat party, their own party, as Fascists!

To which I agree. In the Democratic party there is plenty of fascism to go around no matter who the front runner is.

It is indeed nice that Democrats notice their own trending toward fascism! Maybe they can prevent the other Democrat drones from electing either one of these fascist Dictators to power. Maybe they will rid their party of the Moveon.org, George Soros fascist elements that will be the ruination of our Country.

Here’s hoping!

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Whom do you believe?


Is it a matter of perception or is it a matter of bias? I’ve come across two polls of the Iraqi people one which Iraqis say that their lives are better now that Saddam as been deposed and one poll which indicates that the Iraqi people feel that their lives are worst since the United States lead invasion.

In an article written in USA Today by Susan Page and Omar Salih it is reported that very dire conditions permeates the United States efforts to change Iraq.

The USA Today article cites a poll sponsored by them, ABC News, the British Broadcasting Corp., and ARD, a German TV network. This poll is reported to be face-to-face interviews with 2,212 Iraqis. What it reports is that life in Iraq is unraveling and on the whole worst than when Saddam was President. Jobs gone and schools closed. Marriages delayed and children mourned. Pretty dreadful yes?

But contrasting that bleak scenario is an article printed in the United Kingdom Times written by Marie Colvin who cites a poll by Opinion Research Business, a respected British market research company that funded its own survey of 5,019 Iraqis over the age of 18.

This poll found that most Iraqis believe that life is better for them now than under Saddam and yes there are hardships but they are optimistic that with the United States’ help their lives will see immeasurable improvement!

This poll also states that contrary to what is being told to most Westerners there is no civil war in Iraqi!

What is indeed interesting is the radical Liberal left effort and enormous amount of energy spent demonizing the Fox News Network as being biased for Conservatives. Yet Conservatives see ABC News as part of a Liberal cabal. One in which most mainstream broadcast stations, most major print news media, USA Today being one, and most cable news are apart of.

On the other hand no political group has identified the United Kingdom Times and the Opinion Research Business Corporation as having an agenda regarding American politics, however the left certainly will target them after this poll is published!

So again it is a matter of whom do you believe? After all that Americans have seen of their media in the last eight years, it’s refusal to print the Muhammad Cartoons, and it’s blatant partisan efforts to affect U.S. elections it would be hard for fair minded Americans to take the USA Today poll at face value.

That is the reality which all American media faces when fact finding and reporting the news is replace by their own agenda driven reporting which would rather see hopelessness than accomplishment because of purely partisan biased goals.

I’m thinking that the Opinion Research Business Corporation poll is worthy of our attention, the USA Today poll…um not so much!

Monday, March 19, 2007

Democrats Cut and Run from News Debates


"Any candidate of either party who cannot answer direct, simple, even tough questions from any journalist runs a real risk of losing the voters."-- Roger Ailes, Chairman Fox News


Cut and Run tactics mixed with Fascist control and you have the new Democratic Party.

Afraid that they will not have the cover of their normal mainstream media allies, NBC, CBS, ABC, and their cable media cohorts; Democrats take Representive John Murtha's advise to heart by redeploying it's Presidential candidates from the Iraq of American media, Fox news.

Yes Democrats show us exactly what they'd do if they were in charge of protecting America. When Democrats are involved in conflict that they perceive they can't control they simply cut and run.

Fox a network that prides itself on “fair and balanced” reporting is view by Liberals as a mouth piece for Conservatism. Imagine fair and balanced is viewed as negative to Liberals? So does that mean that only views that sustain Liberal world view and ideology are a positive force for good in the world?

Think about how biased and closed minded that sounds! Isn't being biased and closed minded what Liberals normally accuse Conservatives of being? Well now Liberals are the ones demonstrating those characteristics.

Nevada Democratic Party officials said on Friday they were canceling a presidential debate co-sponsored by Fox News, following a joke chairman Roger Ailes made about Democratic candidate Barack Obama.

The joke by Ailes came during a speech to the Radio and Television News Directors Foundation First Amendment Dinner on Thursday night and -- while playing on similarity between Obama's name and Osama Bin Laden -- appears to be directed more at President Bush than senator Obama but that don't matter to biased closed-minded Liberals.

"It's true that Barack Obama is on the move," Ailes said during the speech. "I don't know if it's true that President Bush called Musharraf and said 'Why can't we catch this guy?'


My only hope is that the total irony of this is not lost on any of us. First Mr. Ailes was speaking and receiving an award at a First Amendment Dinner, for my Liberal readers that's a dinner recognizing works in freedom of speech a constitutional guaranteed right.

Second Mr. Ailes told a joke. What is with Liberals and jokes? Since John Kerry told his joke about President Bush every Conservative or perceived Conservative that tells a joke has to do ten our Fathers, ten hail Marys, recite the act of contrition and get down on their knees and self flagellate before the mainstream media.


Let's be clear this is nothing more than an attempt by Presidential hopeful John Edwards and top Fascist Democrat strategist to control information. The plan is, if they can demonize Fox News then no Liberal will listen to any other source than Moveon.org or it's affiliates ABC,CBS,NBC, MSNBC, CNN,and other main stream media groups that does the bidding of the far left socialist Fascists.

Democrat strategy is about controlling debate. You remember how Democrats tore down the Bush administration about hurricane Katrina don't you? Well when the Republican majority said okay lets investigate what when wrong regarding Katrina.

Because Democrats can't control the debate they boycotted any efforts to form a select-committee to investigate, even though House Republicans structured the new panel along the same lines as other select committees that investigated issues such as Iran-Contra, the Kennedy assassination, and Pearl Harbor, including breakdowns that reflect the existing partisan ratios in Congress.

Since 1946, the House used this select committee model 41 times to investigate a host of issues, usually while Democrats controlled the majority. I'm telling you if Democrats can't propagandize it's cut and run from any debate for them.


This is radical fringe leftist politics. It seemed to work well in the 2006 mid-term elections that swept the Republican majority out of Congress so now radicals who control the Democrat party, Nevada State Democratic Party Chairman Tom Collins and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, are using a full court press to ensure that Democrats are protected from any point of view that is not their own.

What does this all mean? It's about defining and controlling the debate. I have been reporting on a disturbing trend of Fascist tendencies in the Liberal movement.

Liberals tend to attempt to control thought, speech and action ergo all of the fake hate speech legislation promoted by Liberals and Liberal attempts to demonize any one who thinks or speaks out of line with current political correct standards crafted by Liberals in order to usher in the social change which they envision.

A change from a Democratic Constitutional Republic into a mob-rule mind controlled Democracy one which people are controlled by mass media and government which will be working for a powerful oligarchy of wealthy social political Liberal Fascists.


Fox news is not the demon here but anyone who would attempt to keep journalist from reporting, is the threat to constitutional guarantee of freedom the press.

Just think if the White house announced that it wasn't going to allow news organizations into the press corps which it felt were hostile to the President. If you think that would be wrong then you can not in good conscious fairly support Democrats pulling out of any debate that is partial sponsored by a news organizing that they do not like.

The cut and run tactics which Democrats are employing in regards to these Presidential debates are the exact oppose of the American idea of freedom of the press and should not be tolerated by open-mind free men and women anywhere.

But then cut and run is what Democrats do best when they can't control the debate!

Friday, March 16, 2007

Valerie Plame in Wonderland



I haven’t seen so much fantasy since Alice followed the white rabbit down the rabbit hole. Valerie Plame is on Capitol Hill and all fantasy has broken out! Congressional Democrats madder than the Mad Hatter are holding hearings featuring Plame the so-called outed CIA operative. According to Plame senior officials at the White House and State Department "carelessly and recklessly" blew her cover to discredit her diplomat-husband. That is a bald-faced lie that has factually been disprove by years of Special Prosecutor investigation.

Mind you, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has spent many years and millions of dollars probing the White house like a colorectal surgeon using the force of the courts but, much to the mortification of the Conservative-hating Democrats, he found no evidence of wrong doing in the Whitehouse nor could he find anyone in the White house that could be charged will outing Valerie Plame.

Not the President, not the Vice President, not Karl Rove. Nobody! Yet the Dan Rather media and the “off with their heads” Democratic controlled Congress are still trying to go against all evidence and create a White house connection and Leak case in the minds of the American people.

This would be laughable if it wasn’t so obvious an attempt of purely politically motivated and figmentatory delusion in the minds of Democrats who are crazed with Conservative hatred, enough hatred to disregard all reality based facts in order to stage a Congressional mock trial of the Bush administration complete with the flame of the hate Bush outing conspiracy, Valerie Plame.

However in reality the facts are these, Richard Armitage outed Valerie Plame by mentioning her to Robert Novak this has all been factually confirmed.

Armitage a Colon Powell state department protégé who was an anti-Bush force in the government. (Lord knows there are plenty of them!) Which is why you haven’t heard Democrats scream for Armitage’s blood (and you won’t) because he is one of theirs!

What is so funny about this whole tea party is that the Democrats had this build up bubbling to the surface as how Valerie Plame’s outing was going to destroy the Bush White house.

So when the fact that it was Armitage who “Leaked” the name, rather than anyone in the White house, became apparent instead of acknowledging that fact, the corrupt left wing media and Democrats continued this charade of Plame outed and Congressional hearings with which to excoriate an all ready vindicated White house for something that it didn’t do.

Not only that, Valerie Plame’s name wasn’t even leaked, the term “leaked” was a pejorative only meant to enflame the Democrat left wing whackos, thus driving them all into a cartoon riot jihad against Conservatives. And it worked!

How do I know that Valerie Plame’s name wasn’t leaked as she is claiming on Capital Hill today? Because that would mean that Patrick Fitzgerald is the most incompetent Special Prosecutor in American History or he is a Bush loyalist who put the interest of his relationship with the Bush administration over the interest of the American people and the country since he spent so much time and money and did not indict Karl Rove! Come on, you gotta indict Karl Rove. If Plame’s name was leaked then Fitzgerald is complicit in the leak case because he didn’t indict on evidence (because there wasn’t any) that clearly linked the White house to the crime.

To be sure, Democrats will use these hearings as their own partisan indictment against the President for quote unquote, leaking the name of a covert secret agent in order to strike back at her husband Joseph Wilson IV for speaking against the war.

But on the other side of the look glass people of integrity will see this as another attempt to unfairly discredit President Bush by a partisan hateful Democratic controlled Congress, which always places politics above the good of this country.

What this hearing represents is one of many trips down the rabbit hole that Democrats will lead this country down and on the other side resides a magical kingdom of late rabbits, games of croquet and tea parties. None of which are real but for Democrats it’s not what’s real that matters, its how one feels makes it real.

And right how Democrats feel that someone in the White house is guilty of a whole bunch of things, so it must be real, right? We feel it or believe it so it’s real.

Yeah and humans are the cause of global warming, Republicans stole the 2000 and 2004 elections and the government caused the twin towers to fall!

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Global Warming Cabal Issues Death Threats Against Foes


Shut up! If you don’t we’ll kill you! That is the latest argument in support of Global warming. I must say that I’m not surprised even the message boards can get violently toxic, toxic enough to warrant feelings of dread and alarm. It seems that the Neo-Fascist Liberals who support Global Warming don’t intend for their goose egg to be anything but golden.

As more credible scientist break away from the Globe Warming meme Liberals are becoming wildly desperate. Desperate enough to kill. Just think the noble green environmentalist with high brow arguments regarding water ratios, temperature variations, polar cap melting’s, polar bear endangerment, Celsius and Fahrenheit degrees of change over hundreds of years are reduced to shut up or we’ll kill you!

For instance Timothy Ball, a former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg in Canada, has received five deaths threats by email since raising concerns about the degree to which man was affecting climate change.

One of the emails warned that, if he continued to speak out, he would not live to see further global warming.

I always knew that Global warming supporters were smart. Yes threaten to kill your opposition should win the argument every time.

You don’t even need any lawyers for that, heck lawyers are wussies anyway and people are becoming resistant to their lies. Yeah you need some real muscle to win the Global Warming debate some heavy email death threats ought to do it.

Next time I’m in a debate with any Global Warming Jihadists (GWJ) I’m going to be careful. I won’t make any cartoons about Al Gore or flush his book,Earth in the Balance, down the toilet.

And I’m definitely open to letting Global Warming Jihadists win arguments now since I know that human life as no value to them.

Hey what if we made it known that terrorists don’t believe in Global warming I bet the GWJs would kill all terrorists! Imagine we win the war on terrorism!

Hey, it could happen!

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Russia Controls Iran's Nuclear Future


Now we know why the little mad puppet Mahmoud Ahmadinejad can wag his little scrawny finger in the face of the world and threaten nuclear holocaust against everyone, Russia has been the hand in the back of this little mannequin. Russia is building Iran’s nuclear reactor.

Just think this whole threat to world peace could be resolved if Russia would stop helping Iran build it’s nuclear threat.

Ironically, Russia has stopped for the moment but why? Because Russia values world peace? Is it because Russia is a good and noble Country?

No Russia who is the enabler for the Iranian President has stopped temporarily building because they didn’t get paid.

That’s right is all about the benjamins, all it took was for Iran not to show Russia the money and look mah, no Iranian Nuclear reactor.

This convoluted scenario is interesting because Russia is on the U.N. Security Council the same one that is negotiating or rather pleading with Iran to halt its nuclear ambitions and Russia openly supports Iran in the United Nations but if that wasn’t conflict of interest enough Russia is building the very nuclear reactor that the U.N. Security Council is supposed to be voting whether to sanction Iran for.

Such is what the United States has to put up with. The whole world has gone mad and they in turn blame the United States for their own insanity.

All of this clamor for war would be over tomorrow if Russia would tell Ahmadinejad, “We are not going to continue to build a nuclear reactor for you with which to threaten the world.” Russia does that and it’s over! No more hate and death to America, No more Islamic jihad, no more little bearded puppet acting as if he is in control of the strings.

No more I smell sulphur; I smell sulphur because without the threat of Iran Venezuela President Hugo Chavez suddenly loses his sense of smell.

The world should be putting tremendous pressure on Russia to discontinue building nuclear facilities in Iran. If Russia stopped building Iran’s nuclear reactor that act alone would bring peace and stability back to the Middle East.

Frankly it’s time for Russia, China, France, and Germany to stop exploiting the situation in the Middle East which is their indirect sideswipe at America.

If Middle Eastern terrorist are successful and America is defeated when America is gone none of them, Russia, China, France or Germany are as strong as America and a terrorist turn against them would not take long to defeat them too!

These countries are playing a dangerous game of one-upmanship against the U.S., a game which results will not benefit them as they intend if the U.S. is defeated by terrorism.

Russia must be convinced to stop aiding and abetting terrorist Iran, whether their motive is to make money or to indirectly come against the U.S. in revenge, for their cold war defeat, somehow Russia has to be convinced that their actions make the world less safe for everyone.

Monday, March 12, 2007

If You Didn’t Come to Fight You Might as well Resign!


"And so this department has been so political that I think for the sake of the nation, Attorney General Gonzales should step down," == Charles Schumer

When there is a change of leadership in the animal kingdom all of the threats to the new leadership are eliminated. Lions are notorious for this behavior.

January 20, 1993 Bill Clinton was sworn in as 42 President of the United States. February 11 of that same year President Clinton nominates Miami prosecutor Janet Reno for the post of Attorney General and on March 23 1993, something was done that was never done in the history of America.

At Attorney General Reno’s first news conference she announces the firing of 93 federal prosecutors, that’s all U.S. Attorneys in the nation. Reason? The administration wanted to eliminate any threat to its leadership. The official reason stated by AG Reno was the administration wanted to put in its own people. Clinton wanted Attorney Generals who were loyal to him and his administration.

So is the law of the jungle so is the law in politics.

Democrats have found a measure of success in chipping away that the Bush administration; they couldn’t get the President in two electoral attempts so they are doing the next best thing which is pulling away at those who support the president. That is what behind this partisan Democrat call for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to step down.

They’ve been relatively successful at it too, they managed to sack John Ashcroft, split away Colin Powell, remove Tom Delay, neutralize Karl Rove, demonize Dick Cheney and now they are howling for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’ to resign.

This is a ploy, a roost that weak kneed Republicans just haven’t seemed to figure out.

These days Republicans stand around watching as the Democrats in Nazi like fashion come for their colleagues and these liverless Republicans say nothing. They do not consider the fact that when the Democrats finish going after their colleagues then Democrats will turn and come for them. You didn’t get the message of the 2006 elections Republicans? When Democrats come for you there will be no one left to fight for your sorry excuse of a political hide.


Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said Attorney General Gonzales repeatedly has shown more allegiance to President Bush than to citizens' legal rights since taking his job in early 2005.

What a laugh! What a spectacular partisan statement in light of history. President Clinton in an unprecedented move fires 93 United States Attorneys to sure up loyalty to his administration and Janet Reno the ultimate Clinton boot licker watches the FBI burn down a compound in Waco Texas killing David Korech and his followers, children among them and not one investigation into why and how it happened, yet Schumer continues the plan yes he continues the meme. Resign!

The plan is make the White house, a humpty dumpty White house, one that will have a great fall for lack of key support around President Bush.

President Bush you didn’t learn anything from the Clinton presidency did you? You tried to work with holdouts from his administration only to be sabotaged every step of the way. You were sabotaged by Senior Advisors and Clinton holdover, Richard Clark, you where even sabotage by the CIA’s Mary McCarthy, a senior analyst just to name two.

When you finally fired a few U.S. Attorneys because they would not carry out your administration’s goals you waited until Democrats could turn the firings into political hay. That sir was not smart!

What you should have done from the outset is fire everyone who was connected with Bill Clinton. Oh it’s too late for you but here’s hope that perhaps another Republican administration will not be so trustingly naïve.

Resign, resign, resign…If someone doesn’t get a grip in the Republican Party quick, I think that resigning might not be a bad idea for all!

Sunday, March 11, 2007

There goes the Food Chain


"Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men."
-- Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.



Like a different people moving into a homogeneous neighborhood cloned animals are scheduled to be introduced into the global food chain before 2012. That’s less then 5 years from now.

Immediately a couple of questions come to mind. What are the risks to humans and why must we eat cloned animals.

To answer the second question first, this is (pardon the pun) projected to be a cash cow for researchers and companies that hold the patents for the technologies that create cloned animals and the products that derive from them.

This technology started with the cloning of a sheep named Dolly in the United Kingdom in 1996. Dolly has since died (which I will speak about later) but one of the scientist who was a member to the team that created Dolly, Professor Ian Wilmut, feels that it is ashamed that his country didn’t profit from this technology.

Professor Wilmut told BBC News: "I think that it is very difficult for a small country like this to develop fully something which does have great international value, because once that's recognised the science will move elsewhere.
"And in a sense, that's a compliment to the science: the technology was very important and is now being exploited commercially in Japan and the United States, all sorts of different countries."


To answer the question, “Why must we eat cloned animals?” Professor Wilmut gives us a clue suggesting that no matter what the benefits are that producers of this technology will point to justify this experimentation, touting those benefits as progressively good for humanity; the bottom line is always the bottom line.

In other words, some people will make a great deal of money from the ability to create animals and depending on how this is accomplished cost will be significantly cut by cloning therefore the potential for enormous profit making will ensue. Simply put some people are going to get extremely rich! That is the reason why you and I the consumer must eat cloned animals; we’ll be forced to eat them to enrich the holders of the patents of cloning technologies.

The most important question is, “What are the risks from consuming these animals?”

Unless there has been some ultra-secret experimentations there is not a great body of information regarding the affects that eating cloned animals has on the human physiology. So how could any government body judge these animals safe for consumption? They can’t.


But in 2006 the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) concluded that products from cloned animals were safe for human consumption that’s only ten years after Dolly was cloned. Where are the findings which support such a conclusion?

There are none. It is the same as it ever was, money trumps everything. In this case money even trumps the health of the species, Homo sapiens. Our health and safety are both being compromised by science corporations that lobby our government. These same corporations are poised to profit richly off of you and me consuming cloned animals.

In an related instance some 7 to 9 years ago there was no scientific data on the affects that genetically altered corn would have on human beings despite that scientist of StarLink, an international corporation created a genetically alter corn produce that generated its very own, built-in pesticide but after the fact it was found that this scientific creation caused allergy symptoms and asthma in humans.

StarLink corn was introduced in 1998,
but by the year 2000 it was all mixed up in our food supply. StarLink developer Aventis CropScience argued that growers weren't isolating it, as they were supposed to, which led to pollen drift, grain processors inadvertently mixed StarLink corn with regular corn at mills and in grain elevators.


After what only God knows will be the repercussion for their scientific hubris and their incursion into our natural crop bank scientist backed by corporate moneys now turn to the animals that humans depend upon.

Interesting enough made in the U.S.A. no longer just applies to items that we call durable goods that term can and does apply to the animals our scientist can create.

For instance a calf, named Dundee Paradise, was born on a farm near Wolverhampton after being created by scientists in the US.
The Holstein calf is not itself a clone Dundee Paradise began life in a US laboratory, where scientists created an embryo from a normal bull and the clone of a prize-winning dairy cow.

She was then flown to the UK as an embryo and implanted into a cow on a farm near Wolverhampton.

The UK government is only now attempting to understand the impact that such an animal will make on their country, presently they have no laws regulating cloned animals for consumption. As well they have no scientific data on which to base their decisions however they are expected to make a decision soon because animal cloning is on the verge of widespread commercial use and it is expected to spread within the global food chain within 5 yrs. All of this is due to the fact that Science Corporations influence governments around the globe?

This brings me back to the sheep Dolly, a Finn Dorset named after the country-western singer Dolly Parton.

Dolly was euthanized at the age of 6-years-old though typically sheep live 11 to 12 years of age. She was reportly the first mammal to be cloned with DNA taken from an adult cell.

Six years into Dolly’s life she was diagnosed as having arthritis, a condition usually expected in older animals.
It was not clear whether the cloning process led to the arthritis, but research in 1999 suggested that Dolly might be susceptible to premature ageing -- a possibility raised after a study of her genetics. A study might I remind you is again after the fact.

In the light of Dolly’s death Professor Wilmut said that Dolly's arthritis showed that cloning techniques were "inefficient" and needed more work.
Yet in spite of the lack of science and data regarding what cloning will do to the animals that we are supposed to eat or what will happen to us after we consume them there seems to be no stopping cloned animals entering into the human food supply.

Science has already damaged our crops to what extent we don’t know yet. Ironically we are once again on the verge of science unleashing an unknown quantity into the global food supply.

Are we really so enamored with science and scientist that we will allow them to continue experimenting on us unquestioned?

If these experiments go awry as StarLink corn’s developer Aventis CropScience experimentations already have just what are we suppose to eat?
I don’t think we are even supposed to question. I think they expect us to follow along like sheep while we are being economically shorn,sheared and fed food that will make us all mad.

Why else would profit be placed above the health and welfare of an entire species?

Saturday, March 10, 2007

The Fascistly Confused World of Robert Wright



“The day should come when people don’t pronounce this word” Robert Wright, in reference to controlling thought and speech by limiting people’s choice of expression. Regarding Ann Coulter’s use of the word faggot.

I could call Robert Wright an Evil Punk Sissy but I won’t because I’m better than that.

But if I did I know that he wouldn’t mind because he uses those kind of pejoratives all of the time. Wright refers to Ann Coulter as an Evil Witch

Now speaking of persecuted groups Witches have been slain, burned at the stake and drown down through the centuries just because they were witches so how dare Robert Wright pick on the Witches. Does Wright think that civil rights or gay rights are any more important than Wicca rights?

I demand that everyone immediately denounce Robert Wright for hate speech which enables the continued discrimination against witches. Wright should be stigmatized and ostracized for such hate speech.

Because of him young teenage witches will now all be beat up at school and they will be forced to comment suicide because of Robert Wright’s hateful characterization of witches as being something evil. Something Ann Coulter like!

Furthermore, to relate witches to evil is way beyond the pale! If anyone would call gays evil Wright would have a baby! (or maybe abort a baby) Wright must apologize for this outrageous statement or we should boycott any company that he works for.

Wicca rights will suffer if people don’t realize that Witches like Blacks deserve the same rights as everyone else.

Why would Robert Wright even think that he is the arbiter of First amendment freedom of speech? He is just as bad as those who he attacks. But I will say this; Wright does have a specific agenda. That agenda is to control people by stigmatization and ostracization that is his stated goal. He stated was much in his debate with Mickey Kaus.

To be sure Wright’s attacks against Ann Coulter are carefully constructed tactics of the homosexual agenda which are meant to neutralize anyone who opposes what the supporters of homosexuality believe.

If one is debating or talking about anyone who opposes homosexuality on the bases of religion or ideology one would simply neutralize and marginalize that person by falsely characterize them as racist or homophobic or bigoted, or religiously stupid but you never, never debate them on the issues. This has been a long standing tactic of the homosexual agenda.

What Robert Wright wishes to do is draw false parallels between Homosexuality and the Black experience of subjugation, oppression and dehumanization in America. Only the very ignorant can do this and Wright is well up to the task. Where in the gay experience in America did gays go through slavery?

I’m not being recklessly careless in my assessment of Wright. Wright has shown himself as a single-minded fascist who is determined to force his world view on America thereby forcing everyone to speak and think as he would have you too.

Words like raghead, nigger and faggot would be banned in Robert Wright’s world only to be alluded to as the r-word, the n-word or the f-word. (I thought we already had an F-word) But Wright feels perfectly free to hatefully call Ann Coulter an evil witch?

By Robert Wright’s morality all things are determined by him. He determines what the slurs are, he determines what hate is, and he determines by a bindery quality who can and who can not have access to the society. That’s Fascism!

According to Wright all pejorative words are equal. But if he meant that why would he use prerogatives when he refers to his perceived enemies? So not only is Wright a hypocrite he’s not very intelligent. As an example a British Fag is not equal to an American Fag but in Wright’s assault against the freedom of speech he would ban them both.

Wright argument is that you are either with him and his views or against him. And where have we heard that argument before? You ridiculed it then and you should do the same now that Robert Wright speaks it.

In essence Wright’s views are like Senator John McCarthy only Wright is less intelligent in the way that he presents his desire to label people just as McCarthy would have labeled people communist, Wright would label them as racist, bigots, homophobes, and haters. But his desire is the same as Senator McCarthy’s, Wright intents to socially and economically blacklist anyone who he deems is evil.

Robert Wright is a classic example of a Liberal Neo-Fascist that wishes to subjugate Americans to his prejudices as he loftily talks about ideas of eliminating hate speech and concepts of equality for all.

The only worrisome thing is Wright feels perfectly comfortable using Abu Ghraib like tactics to bring about the world of love and equality that he envisions. A world in which we will be less free not more free!

Friday, March 09, 2007

Rosie O’Donnell America’s Moral Compass



The Vatican has the Pope and America has Rosie. Since taking over the morning program talk program, “The View” Rosie has established herself as America’s moral authority on everything from the war in Iraq to Donald Trump’s handling of the Miss America Contest.

If you want to know right from wrong Rosie’s view is definitely what America thinks. She even does miracles. As you know Rosie, the American sage, is openly lesbian, and everyone knows that if you’re born that way you can’t change.

But the miracle worker that Rosie is, she has managed to change her once long time lesbian lover Ann Heche into a heterosexual, what a truly wondrous accomplishment.

Rosie hasn’t run out of sagious insights either. According to her, the show American Idol has sinned. Yes it appears that America’s top show is racist, sexist and the newest “–ist” just made up by Rosie “weight-iest”

According to Rosie, weight-iest is the discrimination against the class of people of weight. Wait a minute…can Rosie sang? I’d swear if I didn’t know better maybe Rosie has a secret American Idol dream, it sounds like she wants to be the next American Idol.

Either she wishes to be on the American Idol show or she’s campaigning to be the new spokesperson for people who are discriminated against by weight-o-phobic skinny people.

Meanwhile America’s self appointed moral compass has me doing something that I thought that I would never do. What is it that Rosie has me doing? Why agreeing with Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden through a 1998 Fatwa in which he declared war on the United States of America said in so many words that America was morally depraved and only submission to Islam would help America.

So, if Rosie is the best that we’ve got to direct America’s morality then I agree with bin Laden America is morally the arm pit of the world.

The only bright spot may be Rosie’s apparent knack for turning Lesbians into heterosexual women, that feat alone just might be a thing that would help me put up with her extraordinary need to dominate others with her opinions.

In any event watching Barbara Walters melt into obscurity under the volume and shadow of what is Rosie is like watching oxygen being sucked out of room by a Bisol vacuum cleaner.

All the while I’m just waiting for the show to be renamed, “Rosie’s View and Moral Opinion show.” Might as well call it what it is!

Hey it could happen, Rosie’s one moral compass that works miracles and on top of that she’s inventing new classes of people that we didn’t even know that we were discriminating against.

Hey maybe she should get Katie's job, CBS's ratings couldn't get any worst!

Now that’s what being American’s moral compass is all about!

Thursday, March 08, 2007

I’m not afraid of Faggots I’m afraid of Fascists!


Italian Fascist dictator Benito Mussolini






“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
Voltaire, (Attributed); originated in "The Friends of Voltaire", 1906, by S. G. Tallentyre (Evelyn Beatrice Hall)
French author, humanist, rationalist, & satirist (1694 - 1778)


Fascists, the other “F” word, are people who believe that they should control every aspect of ones life. Presently the Liberal Left is in the middle of a move of repressive anti-first amendment freedom of speech oppression, a move where the tyrannical Liberal fascists and despots, wish to impose his and her values upon the once free people of United States of America. These Liberal Fascists intend to accomplish the striping away of first amendment rights by imposing hate speech legislation on the people of the United States. Meaning that what the Neo-Fascist deems as hate speech is hate speech.

Had these totalitarian rulers been around in the 1960’s Lenny Bruce would have never used the word Nigger in his stand up act. Bruce used that word quite a bit in his comedy act. What’s more, he didn’t do one day of penitence. Just think of all of the people who would have lost their jobs or would been censured by these America ruling Neo-Fascists had they been in power then.

What is so interesting is the word Nigger, or its various forms; Nigga, Negro, Niggra, Niggerboy, My Nigga, don’t seem to bother the Neo-Fascist, in fact, the only words that seem to raise the ire of the Liberal Neo-Fascist are words that reference Homosexuals.

Homosexuals and only Homosexuals are protected by today’s Liberal Neo-Fascists. No one is going to counseling for saying Nigger or Nigga. No one is accused of hate speech when they use the word Nigger either. But what’s really interesting is if you look at a music video or if you listen to any rap music on any given day you will, in fact, hear the word nigger or its dim nigga five hundred times a day. And nobody is threatened by the Liberal Neo- Fascist in anyway. No lost of job, no censorship and no economic sanctions.

Ann Coulter, Isaiah Washington and Tim Hardaway have recently run afoul of the Liberal Neo-Fascists because in America they did something very unusual. These three people said something that the totalitarian dictators of speech did not like. Ann Coulter used the word Faggot, Isaiah Washington commented on someone’s homosexuality and Tim Hardaway said that he hated Gay people.

These occurrences happened after the fact that, Howard Dean is on record speaking to a group of Democrats in which he stated emphatically that he hates Conservatives, “I hate everything about them,” he said. Dean said that he hates Conservatives and he didn’t have to go to one day of counseling and Dean definitely didn’t have to apologize to anyone.

Not only that, Democrats have absolutely poisoned the political atmosphere in the last eight years with the grosses of hate speech targeted at President George Bush and his family and Vice President Dick Cheney and the Cheney family.

Republicans hatefully are referred to as Repugs and Puks. Bush and Cheney should die or be bomb or worst as all Republicans should, but not one of the tyrant Neo-Fascists has disapproved of the vitriol hate speech that Democrats tend to used in chatrooms, websites, message boards, psuedo-news cable shows, network News or network Current event programming for eight long hate filled years.

Because of the climate of hate that Democrats have created World Fascist Dictators can come to this country and stand in the well of the United Nations and use hate speech against the United States of America and the President of the United States and Neo-Fascists say nothing.

Further more World Fascist Tyrants can hatefully call for the United States and Israel to be wiped from the face of the map and the Neo-Fascists who rule in America will still say nothing.

There is only one group that American Neo-Fascists are concerned with. There is only one orientation with which they care to protect. That is Homosexuals.

That’s not fair. All hate speech should be treated the same. If someone says something hateful against a Republican or Conservative it should be treated the same as if someone said something hateful against gays.

One thing is for certain, first amendment rights should not be restricted for the political social advantage of a specially protected group. Nor should these rights be reserved for a certain few. First amendment rights should be fairly applied to everyone equally.

As present situations continue a homosexual fascist is much more frightening than a faggot and the phobia that I’ll be suffering from will be that of homosexual Fascists forcing everyone to comply with their beliefs through threat of jail or lost of employment. It’s already happening in Europe and we’re seeing the beginning of it in America with every forced acceptance of the homosexual agenda's imposition of hate speech laws in America.

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Entrapment!



We know who leaked Valerie Plame’s name to Robert Novak. It was Richard Armitage a State Department big mouth who worked for General Colin Powell.

Richard Armitage and Robert Novak have both confirmed this! What we didn’t know was that special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald knew that it was Richard Armitage who leaked Valerie Plame’s name at the very beginning of this case but he continued his investigation under the guise that SOMEONE IN THE WHITEHOUSE LEAKED THE NAME!

So why is the media still pretending that the Scooter Libby conviction for lying to the grand jury is somehow connected to the White house leaking the name of an undercover CIA agent?

And why is Howard Dean, Joe Wilson, John Edwards and other Democratic liars attempting to take victory laps as if this case proved that President Bush and Vice President Cheney leaked Valerie Plame’s name to anyone.

Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald investigate was a sham which should have been called off the second that he discovered that Richard Armitage not President Bush or Vice President Cheney leaked the name of Plame early in his investigation. Everyone knows that this investigation was a failed attempt to affect the 2004 elections.

In addition to that, apologies should be issued all around from every media source and every Bush hating Democrat who falsely accused the White house of leaking Plame’s name.

What this case is indicative of is the total psychosis that Liberals have regarding destroying the Bush administration. What is also revealed is the naughty little Democrat plan to ensure that no other Conservative administration is elected in America ever again.

What Americans should associate the Valerie Plame case with is how hate of Conservatives by Liberals allowed Liberals to lie on an American President and his administration, and how a special prosecutor used his power to create an atmosphere of libel and slander against President Bush and Vice President Cheney.

It turns out that the so-called lies that Scooter Libby told were not to cover for Vice President Cheney. Mr. Libby just didn’t know and couldn’t remember who he heard the information about Valerie Plame from. And for that he was indicted and now convicted.

Libby’s conviction doesn’t vindicate Joe Wilson, Valerie Plame, Patrick Fitzgerald or any Liberal who said that the President and the Vice President leaked Plame’s name. Libby’s conviction is the result of Liberals on a witch-hunt against the Whitehouse.

In the 1692 Salem witch-hunts the prevailing question was 'Are you a witch? How long have you been in the snare of the devil? Confess!

In the 2007 Whitehouse witch-hunt the prevailing question was “Did you leak Valerie Plame’s name to retaliate against her husband, Joe Wilson who spoke negatively against the war.” How long have you been in the snare of Dick Cheney? Confess!

Even though Fitzgerald knew that it was Richard Armitage who leaked Plame’s name Scooter Libby was dunked into the pool of the jury to see if he would drown or float thus proving that he was the snitch. Libby drowned.

The pool of the jury convinced Libby. And just as many innocent women died in the witch trials falsely accused of being witches, the reputation of the White house as been falsely besmirched and Libby has been tried and convicted in a case which is supposed to represent but has nothing to do with the outing of Valerie Plame!

This is not a victory neither is this a proud moment for Liberals. This is entrapment, Salem witch-hunt style!

Monday, March 05, 2007

Mad Human Disease?



To increase profits global corporations colluded with scientist and began to feed bovine herbivores their own kind. This cannibalistic practice caused Bovine spongier encephalopathy, a chronic, degenerative disorder affecting the central nervous system of cattle, better known to you and me as Mad Cow Disease.

In keeping with scientific progress scientist of StarLink, an international corporation created a type of genetically altered corn that generated its very own, built-in pesticide which caused allergy symptoms and asthma. This StarLink corn was detected in bags of World Food Program corn, designated to be shipped to poor people in Guatemala.

Because of StarLink's genetically altered corn U.S. factories shut down and supermarkets pulled corn chips, taco shells, and grits off the shelves after more than 300 different kinds of corn products were found tainted with StarLink corn, which is supposed to be used only for animal feed and to manufacture ethanol. People were getting sick, which cost StarLink developer Aventis CropScience hundreds of millions of dollars.

StarLink corn was introduced in 1998, but by the year 2000 it was all mixed up in our food supply. Aventis argued that growers weren't isolating it, as they were supposed to, which led to pollen drift, grain processors inadvertently mixed StarLink corn with regular corn at mills and in grain elevators. It seems that no one knew the scientific creation was so dangerous.


Incidently millions of bees are dying throughout the United States and Europe to a mysterious ailment. Could this have something to do with the corrupted pollen in the food chain caused by genetic experimentation? Scientist don't know.

Now a California-based company, Ventria Bioscience, has been given preliminary approval to grow rice containing human genes on more than 3,000 acres in Kansas.

Reportedly the first genetically altered food crop containing human genes is set to be approved for commercial production.

The laboratory-created rice produces some of the human proteins found in breast milk and saliva.

U.S. developers say they intend to ship this rice to children in the Third World.

This rice is reportedly the first mingling of human-origin genes and those from plants. The U.S. Department of Agriculture has already signalled it plans to allow commercial cultivation.

The rice's producers have been given preliminary approval to grow it and the company plans to harvest the proteins and use them in drinks, desserts, yoghurts and muesli bars.

Now not only do consumers have to be wary of hamburgers we also have to be concerned about rice infused with human genes.

And you're wondering why bees are dying world-wide? Can you say... Human spongier encephalopathy?

Global warming Theory Implodes as Scientific Evidence Gathers


With a wealth of data now in, Dr. Allegre has recanted his views. To his surprise, the many climate models and studies failed dismally in establishing a man-made cause of catastrophic global warming. Meanwhile, increasing evidence indicates that most of the warming comes of natural phenomena. Dr. Allegre now sees global warming as over-hyped and an environmental concern of second rank.



In what is one of the most stunningly derailing developments in the argument supporting the theory of Global warming, one of the first to sound the alarm about the dangers of global warming, Dr. Claude Allegre a noted geochemist has change his assumptions about global warming which states that by burning fossil fuels, man increased the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere which, for example, has raised the global mean temperature.

With a wealth of data now in, Dr. Allegre has recanted his views. To his surprise, the many climate models and studies failed dismally in establishing a man-made cause of catastrophic global warming. Meanwhile, increasing evidence indicates that most of the warming comes of natural phenomena. Dr. Allegre now sees global warming as over-hyped and an environmental concern of second rank.

Dr. Allegre's break with what he now sees as environmental cant on climate change came in September, in an article entitled "The Snows of Kilimanjaro" in l' Express, the French weekly. His article cited evidence that Antarctica is gaining ice and that Kilimanjaro's retreating snow caps, among other global-warming concerns, come from natural causes. "The cause of this climate change is unknown," he states matter of factly. There is no basis for saying, as most do, that the "science is settled."

Fifteen years ago, Dr. Allegre was among the 1500 prominent scientists who signed "World Scientists' Warning to Humanity," a highly publicized letter stressing that global warming's "potential risks are very great" and demanding a new caring ethic that recognizes the globe's fragility in order to stave off "spirals of environmental decline, poverty, and unrest, leading to social, economic and environmental collapse."

Since then, governments throughout the western world and bodies such as the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have commissioned billions of dollars worth of research by thousands of scientists.

It is time to end this catastrophic waste of money and human researches on the farce known as Global warming. Spend no more money on this unproved theory that is unraveling right before our eyes. Now that Scientist are coming forward, who supporters of this unproven theory can no longer dismiss out of hand as paid for by big oil interest, a real discussion can now begin about real environmental concerns.

There is always the theory of Global cooling if you must continue to scare up money for pop-science pursuits.

Saturday, March 03, 2007

Martians to sign Koyoto Treaty?






Simultaneous warming on Earth and Mars suggests that our planet's recent climate changes have a natural—and not a human- induced—cause, according to one scientist's controversial theory.

Yes this is either proof that there are Martians, and on top of that they're driving cars and their factories are emitting greenhouse gases or this indicates that it is the sun that is the main cause for the phenomena that we call global warming and man has very little to do with it!

In 2005 data from NASA's Mars Global Surveyor and Odyssey missions revealed that the carbon dioxide "ice caps" near Mars's south pole had been diminishing for three summers in a row. That's right, just like earth's.

Global warming on Mars! I suppose those Martians driving those gas guzzling SUVs will have to give them up now. Hey I wonder if the Martian Government will attempt to legislate Draconian laws that will force the Martian people to conserve energy now? If they don't maybe our worldleaders will pass a law demanding that Martians join the Koyoto Treaty.

That's right true believer, the Mars cycle of global warming matches the Earth global warming cycle according to scientist Habibullo Abdussamatov, head of the St. Petersburg's Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory in Russia, he says the Mars data is evidence that the current global warming on Earth is being caused by changes in the sun.

"The long-term increase in solar irradiance is heating both Earth and Mars," he said.


Blasphemy! Off with his scientific credentials and his head! Everybody knows and agrees that Earth's greatest scientist Al Gore proved beyond a shadow of a doubt with his film “An Incontinent Truth” that global warming is caused by man-made emissions into the earth's atmosphere. He received an Oscar for it so it's got to be real! It's got to be truth, right? Yeah let's see Habibullo Abdussamatov's Oscar and maybe we'll believe him!

I don't really know what all the fuss is about anyway because even if Al Gore and popular opinion is correct there is nothing that we can do about global warming anyway.

That's right, we are told daily that we can't do anything about the world's problems. We can stop teen's having sex so just give them condoms, We can't stop illegal drug use so just issue needles and make weed legal, We can't define marriage, as it has always been defined, so just let everyone marry. We can't stop illegal aliens from over running our borders so just issue them credit cards. And we can't win the war so let's just pull our troops out of the Middle East as soon as possible.

So even if Al Gore is right and man IS causing global warming there is nothing that we can do about it because people are going to use fossil fuels and drive big cars and run factories, and use the drugs they want, and have sex with whomever that want and marry whomever that want and enter this country whenever they want and refuse to win a winnable war and there is not a damn thing that anyone can do about it!

I suggest that we issue gas masks, condoms, make everyone citizens and marry whoever the hell we want because you can't do nothing about it anyway, no, the little things can't be solved so why would one think that we can save a whole planet?

We can't do it! So I say do what we've always done, issue needles to the drug addicts, condoms to the sexual perverted and gas masks to the rest of us and then legislate a law that requires us to start taking shallow breathes during the drugged up teenaged homosexual illegal alien sex that we all will be having!

That'll solve the problem!

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

We don't SAY screw you, we just do!









How Orwellian is that? The thought police down in Florida are not working on stopping the flow of illegal aliens from entering the country. No they are doing the next best thing. They're working on making it illegal for you the American citizen to refer to illegals, who illegally enter into the United States of America, as "Illegal Aliens." Now that's shades of 1984 isn't it!

For all of you who don’t want the government to tell you what to do you ought to love this one.

You heard it right, state legislator Sen. Frederica Wilson, D-Miami finds the term illegal alien offensive so she is going to ban the term, “Illegal Alien,” by law.

Now even to the most Liberal, "open-minded", hate Bush Democrat this has got to be nuts! This, Senator Wilson, is a band-aid on Melanoma.

So let me ask, is the state senator's answer to the illegal alien problem to simply not talk about it in proper terms because speaking about it truthfully would offend her personal sensibilities?

Well, do you want to know what offends my sensibilities Senator? Pretending that we still live in America when its obvious that we really live in a providence of Oceania and any time that Big Brother wishes to impose it’s Draconian will on American citizens it can and will!

It is so obvious that citizens did not send Frederica Wilson to the Florida State legislature to write laws that would cause the demise of the American Government and the American way of life, but that is exactly what she is doing with this attempt to change language without changing the actual problem which threatens American security and sovereignty.

I have a name change suggestion, why don’t we change Senator Frederica Wilson title to unemployed and why don’t we run her out of town on a rail tarred and feathered like they used to do when citizens esteemed America.

Either that or we just wait around for one of these not to bright legislators to figure out how to make it illegal to call ourselves Americans for fear that it might offend Europe and the third world.

Jeez is it still legal to fly a U.S. flag…

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Oscar Equals Excellence or Stupidity?






How many ways can one say that Liberals are stupid? You could say that they supported John Kerry for the Presidency a man who fought in the Vietnam War before he protested against it and who was a no nonsense and decisive Senator from Massachusetts voted to fund the war against terrorism before he (that’s right!) voted against it!

Or think of all the stupid Liberals who are supporting Hillary Clinton for President a woman who a fellow Liberal, David Geffen has characterized as a liar, stating that, "Everybody in politics lies, but they (the Clintons) do it with such ease, it's troubling."

Liberals, who are obviously as sexist, as they are stupid, support Hillary only because she is a woman. I’m not even going to mention the big brouhaha that Liberals made about a Presidential Candidate’s Military experience in the last eight years. Now military experience will no longer be a consideration because an affirmative action candidate, one Senator Clinton, is already known not to be qualified to be President based on her lack of military experience. That’s right the closest that Hillary comes to military experience is her draft dodging husband’s hate for the armed services.

But alas stupid Liberals don’t even care about her latest flap where Senator Clinton and former president Bill Clinton have operated a family charity since 2001, in which Senator Clinton has failed to list on annual Senate financial disclosure reports on five separate occasions to the senate ethnics committee.

Now according to a Clinton spokesperson five years of none reporting Clinton finances is negligence, I would say negligent in the least or fraud on the American people at most, but never the less it is an “Inconvenient Oversight.” Jeez talk about a culture of corruption!

Speaking of inconvenience I have an inconvenient truth to share with you.

It seems like tinsel town last Sunday awarded its highest honor for a documentary to a fictionmentary. That right! The Oscar when to a fraud!

The main point of the movie is that, unless we do something very serious, very soon about carbon dioxide emissions, much of Greenland’s 630,000 cubic miles of ice is going to fall into the ocean, raising sea levels over twenty feet by the year 2100.

But the former vice-president’s film exaggerates the rise by about 2,000 percent. Mr. Gore give the Oscar back please!

The reason that I call for Mr. Gore to give back his Oscar is his film represented that,

According to satellite data published in Science in November 2005, Greenland was losing about 25 cubic miles of ice per year. Dividing that by 630,000 yields the annual percentage of ice loss, which, when multiplied by 100, shows that Greenland was shedding ice at 0.4 percent per century.



But “Was” is the operative word. In early February, Science published another paper showing that the recent acceleration of Greenland’s ice loss from its huge glaciers has suddenly reversed.

That’s right you who are inconveniently stupid!

Nowhere in the traditionally refereed scientific literature do we find any support for Gore’s hypothesis. Instead, there’s an unrefereed editorial by NASA climate firebrand James E. Hansen, in the journal Climate Change — edited by Steven Schneider, of Stanford University, who said in 1989 that scientists had to choose “the right balance between being effective and honest” about global warming — and a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that was only reviewed by one person, chosen by the author, again Dr. Hansen.



So all of the stupid arguments regarding global warming that you’ve trotted out in defense of Al Gore’s latest invention, man-made global-warming, show you for the pitiful stupid lemmings that you are.

How fitting that Hollywood’s highest award for works of fiction in film was awarded Sunday night to Liberal’s greatest work of fiction to date, man-made Global warming.

Just as Science published a paper showing that ice lose of the glaciers in Greenland are reversing we all need to step back from any actions, legislative or otherwise, that have been motivated by Mr. Gore’s work of fiction and reverse anything that was put in law as a result of Liberal Global warming stupidity.

Our first act? Reversing the awarding of an Oscar to Al Gore!

Friday, February 16, 2007

The Great American Inquisition




It has begun! No one in America will be able to freely speak his or her mind ever again. What I’m I referring too?

Tim Hardaway, former Miami Heat Basketball player in an interview stated that he hated Gay people and for that he most die!

In fact his death is being planned even now, a very slow painful social and economic death. Hardaway’s comments have broached the holy grail of western society his remarks are blasphemous and he must be made to pay by hoisting his cold dead impaled body high on a public stake so that no other independent free thinking individual will be courageous enough to speak against the power of homosexuality.

Right now Hardaway must be feeling a lot like the little boy in the Hans Christian Anderson tale, “The Emperor’s New Clothes.” In that story only one little boy had the honesty to say what he really saw and for that his father originally chided him. But as people began to think on it they began to realize that the little boy was right. The whole town, no, the whole kingdom had been sold a “bill of goods.” They had been lead to accept something that wasn’t true and they all went along with it because everyone else did.

Right now a powerful homosexual lobby has convinced Americans that homosexuality is equal to heterosexuality that homosexuality is a constitutional guaranteed right, and that homosexuality is a viable alternative to heterosexuality.

Somehow people believe that homosexuality is the same as racial identity and that disapproving of homosexuality is the same has being racially bigoted. None of this is true!

Humans are the only species on earth that are attempting to incorporate a practice that is totally contrary and detrimental to its own survival into its lifestyle. All other species instinctively know that sex is important to continue the species into perpetuity but not humans. Humans seem to believe that only immediate self-gratification is the important thing.

No one would think to start a lobby for more cancer or a lobby for more HIV AIDS because we know that the ultimate outcome for these diseases is the end of life.

The fact that there is a lobby to support and condone a sexual practice that introduced HIV AIDS into our society and to think that this lobby is now attacking anyone who would have the courage to stand up against political correctness and say at the risk of his own social and economic suicide that the practice of homosexuality is wrong is an indication that we have lost freedom of speech it this country.

In a country where girls go wild, pornography out grosses mainstream films and latest film genre is bestiality with horses to be outraged at something that a former basketball player said is quite an incongruity.

Tim Hardaway will be ostracized, condemned, and socially destroyed because he spoke what was true for him. In a world that preaches acceptance and tolerance wouldn’t it be wrong to judge him, wouldn’t it be wrong to exclude him, wouldn’t it be wrong to put him on the rack and pinion of political correctness and torture Mr. Hardaway for his beliefs?

Or must Tim Hardaway stand before the political correct council like Martin Luther was forced to do. Luther was summons before the diet of Worms to renounce his beliefs as Hardaway is being asked to do before the media.

“Mr. Hardaway, will you now renounce your statements concerning gays or shall we burn you to the stake and excommunicate you!”

To which Tim Hardaway may reply:

I cannot change my beliefs either to the Media, Homosexual Lobby or to the Politically Correct, because it is clear as day they have frequently erred and contradicted each other. Unless therefore, I am convinced by my own free and independent mind. . . I can and will not retract . . . Here I stand . . . I can do no other. So help me God, Amen!!

Or you can force him into political correct compliance to which he would say:

"Yes, I regret it. I'm sorry. I shouldn't have said I hate gay people or anything like that." "That was my mistake."

Yeah, can’t have anyone with different opinions running around out there now can we!

What ever happened to, “I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to say it.”?

You never heard that? I guess you’ve been to busy between all of the masturbation and the “Monica Lewinski” deskbottom interning.

Monday, November 20, 2006

ARE WE THERE YET?

November 1, 2005 Majority Leader Bill Frist discovered that the Democrats had declared war on the Republicans.

Accusing Republicans of ignoring questions about pre-war intelligence, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid forced the Republican-controlled Senate into an unusual closed session today, igniting anger from GOP leaders.

Speaking to reporters in the hall outside the Senate chamber, Majority Leader Bill Frist shot back, charging the Senate "has been hijacked by the Democratic leadership."

Frist said the Democratic Party leadership did not warn him in advance of the move, which Republicans called a "political stunt."
"It means from now on, for the next year and half, I can't trust Senator Reid," the Tennessee lawmaker said.

That was merely a warning shoot that proved to be the down fall of Republican leadership in Congress. And not only for the next year and a half Mr. Frist but since the Democrats successfully took official control of both houses of Congress you and America will not be able to trust Democrats for years to come only now Democrats have the power to enforce their wishes on America.

Mr. Frist your inept leadership and Republican political ineffectiveness is the cause that Democrats were able to control Congress and the House for the last 6 years by which they now officially have taken control of the legislative bodies which they have only owned by deviant political machinations up until now.

How did the Democrats do it? The Democrats promised a new direction for America and with that promise and their plan to wrest power away from Republicans by creating a culture of dissatisfaction they now control both houses of Congress.

As a child I remember riding along in the back seat of our automobile as we traveled cross country. I could see all kinds of things, various cows either standing or laying down, all kinds of different car license plates representing the different states from which each car started its journey from and trees and plenty of scenic countryside.

I had no control of where we were going but as I remember it the trips always felt like they lasted for years and the only thing that I wanted to know is if we had arrived at our designation.

So now that Republicans are in the minority and Democrats are leading the country in a new direction I for one will be looking at the various bills and proposals that Democrats will put forth. I for one will be checking each and every liberal social cause that has now been embolden because Democrats control both houses of Congress and I will take note of the social engineering that will be attempted by Liberals because of Democrats new found power.


Democrats failed to describe were they planned to take America in clear concise language they used only the broadest of terms. I for one will have to consistently call out from the back seat and ask, “Are we there yet?” “Are we there yet?” Why? Because the left has not proven that they have the slightest idea of what they are doing and where they are going to lead America.

The only thing that the Left has proven is that they have learned how to play politics with the American Moderates and the American Libertarians with the politics of hate and complaint.

However in order to lead, America Democrats will need much more than the politics of hate and complaint. They will need love for this Country and a vision of good for the American people.

What Liberals have shown in the last 6 years of politics in America is not the ability to show love for this Country what Liberals have shown is not a vision of good for the American people.

What Liberals have shown is the willingness to do and say anything to undermine American so that Leftist views can be forced on the American people.

The same lesson that was learned by Senator Bill Frist will be the same lesson that all of America will soon learn that is Democrats can’t be trusted and as for Nancy Pelosi’s promise in which she said,
“The American people voted to restore integrity and honest in Washington, D.C. And the Democrats intend to lead the most honest, most open, and most ethical Congress in history.”
My only question is…


Are we there yet?

Thursday, November 09, 2006

What happened?

Republican got their hats handed to them and it’s like Republicans don’t even know what hit them.

So let’s lay this out on the table and examine this defeat.

First Democrats were impassionedly set against Conservatives. There is a lot to be said about passion. Democrats made no bones about their hate for Conservatives and it worked for them.

Second organization, Democrats were organized under Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid they kept their caucus together and they had a goal, defeat the Republicans. And it worked for them.

Speaking of the Democrats plan, Howard Dean should be credited for his 50 state plan to organize the “get out to vote effort” because of it Democrats were victorious.

Fourth Democrats were smarter than Republicans, Democrats successfully prevented President Bush and a Republican control Senate and Congress from passing any meaningful legislation while they were planning their take over of the legislative branch of government. This also worked for them.

The fifth thing that worked for Democrats where the Republicans themselves. Democrats had so decimated the Republican leadership with a campaign of smear that the rudderless Republicans were sitting ducks who could be picked off one by one. Ashcroft, Delay, Foley, Cunningham, Rumsfeld, etc…

Sixth because the Republicans were cluelessly rudderless Democrats controlled the public discourse and defined the Republicans at will. Republican became corrupt homosexual pedophiles that were brilliant political election manipulators that where as incompetent as they were dumb.

Seventh Bill Frist!
Eighth Denny Hastert !
Ninth John McCain !!
Tenth Democrats proved to be real politicians were Republicans only were posers.
Eleventh Democrats were at a consist state of war with the Republicans but Republicans weren’t at war with the Democrats. It is the same scenario that will be played out between al Qaeda and the United States if Democrats fail to realize the seriousness of the terrorist threat.

Last by not least the reason that Republicans were defeated is President Bush.

Republicans worked hard for this defeat and by George we’re going to regret every last minute of it!

Tuesday, November 07, 2006

Democrats 9,000 Lawyers this ain’t your Mother’s Election

Democrats are going to put more Versace suits on the ground than the U.S. has boots on the ground in Iraq. Gone are the days when local mom and pop pollsters tally votes and turn in the result to the local authorizes.

Since 2000 Democrats have moved the American election process into the courts where the peoples control over their election process is lessened.

On Saturday and Sunday, hundreds of the 7,000 lawyers who are working on the election for the Democratic National Committee will board planes for Arizona, Florida, Maryland, Missouri, Ohio and 13 other states.

The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the N.A.A.C.P. and the People for the American Way Foundation will jointly have 2,000 lawyers fanning out across 20 states.

The Republican National Committee is shipping out 150 lawyers on Monday to help hundreds of local lawyers in Florida, Michigan, Missouri, Tennessee and other states answering phones and working at polling stations policing against voter fraud.

This new face of American elections can only get uglier and we have no one to blame but ourselves for allowing the democratic process to be co-opted by insurgents in suits with briefcases.

What are we doing? This is not progress for Democracy this is reversion, this is devolution, and this is a downward move on the ladder of political descendancy.

If we don’t trust the process or each other it won’t be long until we are at each others throats. This is truly a signal that the beginning of the end is near.

We are fast becoming the Disunited States of America a country that’s political parties have been politically divorced in a hateful political disputed separation.

When voting today take your lawyer, who knows whether or not you’ll have to sue to vote.

Hey Ma I don’t think that America is a country for the people by the people any more and we’re definitely not in Kansas any more either!

This is supposed to be a nation of laws not lawyers.~Jeez!