Monday, August 23, 2010

Amy you ignorant partisan slut




Amy Sullivan, TIME magazine writer, author and Democrat Partisan


Yes, I realize that the above parody of SNL’s Dan Aykroyd’s and Jane Curtain’s infamous attempted at comedic verbal pratfall is not newsworthy but I am making a point.

The point is Amy Sullivan cannot expect to be taken seriously if she does the same thing with her Times.com article entitled, “Are One-Quarter of Americans Freakin' Morons?”

Personal insults aside Ms. Sullivan entire thesis is if 1 out of 4 Americans say they do not believe President Barry Hussein Soetoro’s confession of Christian faith that makes one-fourth of the U.S. population morons because they are choosing to ignore facts, evidence, and the president's own profession of faith. (see article)

Okay, even if your accusation that, Americans are ignoring facts, evidence and the president’s personal profession, is true Ms. Sullivan, calling Americans stupid for not believing what a politician says about himself or any other subject is not a winning argument even though it might seem it is to the Liberal mind, especially if that politician is Barry Hussein Soetoro.

Nevertheless, first let’s just examine this issue from a rational point of view. First, most Americans believe that politicians as a whole are unethical unprincipled liars. This is a nonpartisan belief.

[I]n a poll taken in 1997 by Fox News and Opinion Dynamics, 55% agreed that people who go into politics cannot remain honest.
In 2010, 55% told Gallup interviewers that the honesty and ethical standards of members of Congress were low or very low, the only time a majority has given that response since the question was asked first in 1976. Only 9% described them as high. A new Fox News Opinion Dynamics poll found that most people thought that elected officials were more interested in power and wealth (67%) than in public service for their constituents (14%).—Karlyn Bowman (source)

Also, according to the leftwing Huffington Post since Democrats have been in control of the government a majority of Americans poll that they don’t trust the government and they don’t believe that government can fix what is ailing America.

Public confidence in government is at one of the lowest points in a half century, according to a survey from the Pew Research Center. Nearly 8 in 10 Americans say they don't trust the federal government and have little faith it can solve America's ills, the survey found.-- LIZ SIDOTI (source)

Therefore, Ms. Sullivan if I were to use your faulty reasoning I could say that 80% of Americans are idiots for not trusting the Soetoro administration and the Democrat controlled Congress.

Then there is this bit of troubling information 68% of Americans believe that the current administration and government doesn’t care what Americans think. (source). Only a puny 23% believe that this current government has the consent of the governed. (source)

In Gallup's 2009 polling just 19% said the honesty and ethical standards of bankers were high; 12% felt that way about business executives, and 9% about stockbrokers. Stockbrokers were tied with members of Congress. Both ranked only slightly above HMO managers (8%) and car salesmen (6%), who took last place in the poll.

In fact, dissatisfaction with our current government runs deep in America. Americans are cynical of the President, Congress, politicians; poor leadership; corruption and abuse of power. Americans view these identified problems as more dangerous to America’s well-being than issues of Illegal alien invasion, healthcare problems, disaster relief, federal budget deficit, gas prices, war and poverty.

The only issues viewed more crucially than “dissatisfaction with current government” are the Economy and Unemployment/Jobs, which president Soetoro has claimed for over 19 months he could fix. (source)

Second, we know that President Soetoro has gone to extraordinary lengths, lengths which no other U.S. president in history has taken to conceal information about his origins and his past. Thus creating for himself a cloud of suspicion.

No other president while in office has put independent verifiable documentation off limits preventing the American people to see for themselves whether the president claims about himself are true or not. What is most troubling is the size and scope of this hidden information. Everything from kindergarten records to Chicago State Legislative records and everything in between is hidden from public view. As journalist, Tom Brokaw and talk show host Charlie Rose opined, “We don’t know who Barack Obama is.” (see previous post)

Sure, the president has released a very limited amount of carefully selected information; an invalidated certificate of live birth (COLB) and a just released new passport. The Soetoro COLB was invalid because it was physically altered. The document said right on its face “Any Alterations Invalidate this Certificate” yet the brain trust of the Soetoro administration thought that they could pass an Invalid document with a big bold black lineout as proof he was born in Hawaii. (see document)

Obviously, it worked on Ms. Sullivan and people like her, the three-fourths non-morons.

As a freshman, he quickly became friends with Mohammed Hasan Chandoo and Wahid Hamid, two wealthy Pakistanis

In 1981, Obama transferred from Occidental to Columbia. In between, he traveled to Pakistan - a trip that enhanced his foreign policy qualifications, he maintained in a private speech at a San Francisco fundraiser last month. Obama spent “about three weeks” in Pakistan, traveling with Hamid and staying in Karachi with Chandoo’s family, said Bill Burton, Obama’s press secretary.-- ADAM GOLDMAN and ROBERT TANNER (source)

It was reported that after one such trip, perhaps this one in 1981, Barry Soetoro (Soebarkah) officially became Barack Hussein Obama. Forsaking the name that he “was known as” in his formative years.

Soetoro’s new passport undoubtedly raises the question, “What happened to the old passport?” The passport which he made multiple trips to Africa and the trip to Pakistan in 1981. Not to mention that travel to Pakistan was restricted to Americans in 1981 so how did Mr. Soetoro manage to take that trip. He didn’t take those trips on his bright shiny new passport that was just release. The one which claims he was born in Hawaii, now would he?

Nevertheless, the White House insist on insulting to our intelligence by showing a new passport so that the president's supports will swoon and ignorantly claim that they’ve seen the passport. Uh one problem it is not his original passport but his new presidential passport with all of the information on it that confirms the Soetoro narrative of born in Hawaii, U.S. citizen and the like. You may see this propaganda on the White house website.

Katie Johnson the president’s personal secretary states that she filled out the paperwork for his “new presidential passport” when she first arrived as his secretary. Thus dashing Obamabots hopes of, “see here is the ‘holy grail’ this proves he was born in Hawaii.” No this proves that he as a new passport and it is possible that we will never know the truth.

In addition, at the same time the president’s deceased mother’s passport, a passport that could give vital information on the president was destroyed, how convenient! (source)

This is what this administration does they release bits and pieces of information in attempts to mollify questions rather than completely clarify questions. Such a practice will undoubtedly satisfy those who have a desire to suspend all disbelief regarding Barry Hussein Soetoro but to those who believe that verification is an integral part of the trust process the president’s actions only serve to foster doubts about all of his professions. The secrecy which surrounds Barry Hussein Soetoro will dog him to his grave, and much before that. Barry Hussein Soetoro’s hidden life will limit him to only one term as president.

He successfully managed to hide these warning signs with the aid of a partisan media and in the middle of a nation hate George Bush diversion in 2008. Bush wasn’t running in 2008 but Democrats had eight years of hate invested in George W. Bush and they weren’t going to let that hate go to waste so they ran against Bush in absentia and won. Now that there is clearly no George Bush to “hate on” in 2012 President Soetoro will have to run on all of the things that he has hidden from full view of the American people, i.e. who he is, what he has done (both past and present), and why he has done it. Yet, I’m sure he’ll try to inject George Bush’s name wherever he can.

Then there are the questions of Mr. Soetoro’s personal veracity. Here I could point to so many things that the president has not been truthful on i.e. where Mr. Soetoro was born, his actual age, his connections with known terrorist and subversives like William Ayers. I could also raise issues concerning the problems with his truthfulness regarding his connects with Dr. Khalid al Mansour who is an Islamic Supremacist, a Black Nationalist and an advisor to one of the richest men in the world. Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Alsaud who ranks 19 on The World's Billionaires in 2008, a Muslim advised by Dr. al Mansour a Muslim who also advises Barry Hussein Soetoro.

One point of importance Prince bin Talal Alsaud’s stated goal is the Islamification of the entire world. All the just mentioned are subjects are made opaque by this president’s campaign of obfuscation and/or bald face lies of which the Liberal Elite Media and Soetoro supporters are complicit.

Finally, Ms. Sullivan there's quite a peculiar practice in Islam that is not sanctioned in Christianity, that practice is called lying. You see Ms. Sullivan in Islam one is permitted to lie in order to defeat the Infidels.
The practice is called Al-taqiyya. Under al-taqiyya and dissimulation […] words used for a practice of Muslims blatantly lying to non-Muslims. All but some of the most fundamental Muslims consider the act of Al-taqiyya or lying to non-Muslims to be a good work. This is very important when one remembers that, in Islam, salvation is determined by good works. This means that a Muslim lying to a non-Muslim is that Muslim doing a good work to earn salvation.

It is almost equivalent to a Christian accepting Jesus as his savior. One of the big differences is that a Christian only needs to accept Jesus as his savior once to become saved forever but a Muslim must do his good works consistently and repeatedly to earn his salvation with the except of the greatest work of dying while fighting non-Muslims.

This is particularly important when one realizes that the only work which can guarantee salvation for a Muslim is to wage war against and kill non-Muslims or at least support those who do wage war against and kill non-Muslims. It is only logical that to lie in support of a war against non-Muslims could guarantee salvation for a Muslim because it would be considered supporting the war. This is a very powerful motivation for any Muslim to lie to any non-Muslim for any reason but especially when concerning any war or military effort against non-Muslims. (source)
Therefore, it is not entirely unfeasible that if Mr. Soetoro is a Muslim, he could be engaging in the practice of al-taqiyya. That is, he could be claiming to be Christian to first gain the presidency and second to implement his plans for fundamental change of the United States before anyone realized what he is doing. So when one-fourth of the population have their doubts about the so called “evidence” that the president is a Christian let me remind you of the sayings of two great men, Jesus Christ and Abraham Lincoln.

From their fruits ye shall know them; do men gather from thorns grapes? or from thistles figs? so every good tree doth yield good fruits, but the bad tree doth yield evil fruits. A good tree is not able to yield evil fruits, nor a bad tree to yield good fruits. Every tree not yielding good fruit is cut down and is cast to fire: therefore from their fruits ye shall know them. –Jesus Christ, Matthew 7: 16-20



***

You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.-- Abraham Lincoln, (attributed)16th president of US (1809 - 1865)

All of this could happen, that is a Muslim agent who is bent on the Islamification of the United States could be operating in the Whitehouse right now because of smart people like you Ms. Sullivan.

Christians know what Christian activities look like and nothing of that has been demonstrable in Barry Hussein Soetoro has anything to do with Christian beliefs or Christian activities. Ms. Sullivan you wouldn’t know this because you or not a Christian or if you are not a very good one.  Moreover, you must have forgotten the fundamental principal of the founding fathers and of the 1960’s and that is why you call one-fourth of the population morons.

That principle? Government no matter who’s it is, cannot and should not be trusted.

During the turbulent days of the 1960s hippies frequently utilized the term 'establishment' when referring to the government and 'unelected ruling authorities'. It was a matter of the government, the media and powerful corporations being in cahoots which was creating a threat to the whole of American society.-- A.O. Kime (source)

Your bashing of a quarter of Americans was just wrong Ms. Sullivan. However, what is true is blind Partisanship will make one a moron much quicker than questioning a dubious politician, his doubtful claims and his unconstitutional agenda, Ms. Sullivan.

Friday, August 20, 2010

Where are the Jobs in a Summer of Recovery?


Union members hold up "I want to work" placards as they join a protest of several thousand people demanding jobs outside City Hall in Los Angeles on August 13, 2010.

As the summer heats up, it is becoming clear that it could quite possibly be the most active season yet when it comes to recovering our economy. There are Recovery Act-funded projects breaking ground across the country that are creating quality jobs for Americans and economic growth for businesses, large and small.
This summer is sure to be a summer of Economic Recovery.-- Ron Sims, the White House Blog
This is the death of the American Dream. Near 10% joblessness and no hope or change, propaganda can rescue this economy. President Barry Hussein Soetoro and Vice President Joe Biden announced this as the Summer of Economic Recovery; instead, millions of Americans have been out of work for more than 99 weeks and counting. They know we all know this is the end of American Exceptionalism; this is the end of the American middle class, as we know it. (see story)

Andrew Klavan gives a unique informative and comparatively witty look at president Soetoro’s Summer of Economic Recovery and the War. (see 4:30min video)




Though corporations, especially in the banking sector, are posting healthy profits, they are not hiring new workers. At the same time, government cuts are sweeping through city and state governments alike, threatening tens of thousands of jobs and slicing away at services once thought vital. Schools, street lighting, libraries, refuse collection, the police, fire services and public transport networks are all being scaled back.

America appears to be a society splitting down the centre, shattering the middle class that long formed the cultural bedrock of the country and dividing it into a country of haves and have-nots.-- Paul Harris

Democrats spent $787 billion dollars on a stimulus package that to date has not stimulated the U.S. economy.

Thursday, August 19, 2010

Dr. Laura, the Progressive Liberal Democrat Terrorists have Won

Dr. Laura Schlessinger
Well, I'm here to say that my contract is up for my radio show at the end of the year and I have made the decision not to do radio anymore. The reason is: I want to regain my First Amendment rights. I want to be able to say what's on my mind, and in my heart, what I think is helpful and useful without somebody getting angry, some special interest group deciding this is a time to silence a voice of dissent, and attack affiliates and attack sponsors.—Dr. Laura
Why is Dr. Laura quitting her radio show? Dr. Laura has been terrorized by Liberal terrorists, you think I’m exaggerating? I’m not. Liberal terrorism has embedded itself into the American culture and it is as real as Islamic terrorism.

Dr. Laura told Larry King that she is quitting her radio show because, “[Liberal terrorists] try to silence you. They try to wipe out your ability to earn a living and to have your job. They go after affiliates. They send threats to sponsors.” That sounds like terrorism to me! (see 4:09min video)



You know, when I started in radio, if you said something somebody didn't agree with and they didn't like, they argued with you. Now, they try to silence you. They try to wipe out your ability to earn a living and to have your job. They go after affiliates. They send threats to sponsors.—Dr. Laura

What is totally amazing is just at this time the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the case United States of American vs. Xavier Alvarez found that the constitution protected speech to the extent that Xavier Alvarez can lie about receiving the Congressional Medal of Honor, in violation of the Stolen Valor Act (the Act), 18 U.S.C. § 704(b), (c). yet where is the constitutional protection of freedom of speech for Dr. Laura Schlessinger?
[t]he constitutional right of free expression is powerful
medicine in a society as diverse and populous as
ours. It is designed and intended to remove governmental
restraints from the arena of public discussion,
putting the decision as to what views shall be
voiced largely into the hands of each of us . . . .

. . . We cannot lose sight of the fact that, in what otherwise
might seem a trifling and annoying instance
of individual distasteful abuse of a privilege, these
fundamental societal values are truly implicated.—written in The 9th Circuit of appeals stolen valor opinion
Now if the 1st amendment of the Constitution can protect a liar why can’t it protect a Conservative talk show host who is a good and decent person?

Well one reason Dr. Laura’s 1st amendment rights where not protected by the courts is while some terrorists use airplanes, some use the courts but in this particular case, these terrorists used economic terrorism. These terrorist target one’s ability to earn a living by threatening those who sponsor a Conservative talk show.

Yes, but I don't ha[ve] the right to say what I need to say. My First Amendment rights have been usurped by angry, hateful groups who don't want to debate. They want to eliminate.

So, that's why I decided it was time to move on to other venues where I could say my piece and not have to live in fear anymore that sponsors and their families are going to be upset, radio stations are going to be upset, my peeps, as I call them, are going to be upset. –Dr. Laura


These terrorists have done it to Rush Limbaugh, to Michael Savage, to Glenn Beck, and to anyone who has an opinion contrary to their agenda. You would think that sponsors would know this by now, some do but as you know terrorism works by inducing fear and sponsors are fearful that Liberal terrorists will hurt their business.

Most of Conservative talk radio lives in constant fear that one misspoken word will be the cause of an untimely demise to their radio show. The fact that any Conservative talk show is on the air in this climate of Liberal terrorism is a tribute to the professionalism and skill of each of and everyone of Conservative talk radio’s hosts.


Dr. Laura lived in consist fear for the sake of her sponsors and radio family a burden that no one should have to bear in a country that boast itself to be a free country.

What is so ironic is some of those who make up the Liberal terrorists group attacking Dr. Laura are attempting to defend the rights of Muslims to build an Islamic Mosque near ground zero on the basis if the 1st amendment. Moreover, at the same time others in that terrorist’s network are fighting to deprive Dr. Laura of her 1st amendment right of freedom of speech.

Who will fight for Dr. Laura? Who will fight for Conservatives in this country? Martin Niemoeller's message,”First they came for the Jews” comes to mind, please allow me this adaptation of this very powerfully poignant and famous thought:
First they came for the conservatives, and I did not speak out--
because I was not a conservative;
Then they came for the Christians, and I did not speak out--
because I was not a Christian;
Then they came for the tea party, and I did not speak out--
because I was not a tea party member;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out--
because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me--
and there was no one left to speak out for me.
Only you and I are left to fight for Dr. Laura and Conservative talk radio. Sure, we’re going to vote out the Liberal Democrat insurgency this November but we have to do more. It’s time for action What will you do?

If we do nothing or if we quit the terrorists win. The Progressive Liberal Democrat terrorists win if we do nothing.

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Radical Islam is behind building Ground Zero Mosque and Obama Knows


Raheel Raza, Muslim Canadian Congress Board Member and author Their Jihad not my Jihad

[H]ow is building a Mosque in the very place where Muslims murdered so many other Americans would create any kind of respect?—Raheel Raza
Those who argue for the building of the Ground Zero Mosque argue two points, which Bill O’Reilly identifies. These are the same points which president Soetoro strongly advocated during an iftar (special evening meal observed by Muslims during Ramadan) which he hosted last Friday night, one point is “Freedom of Religion” and the second point, Muslims argue is that a Mosque near ground zero would show respect for the victims of 9/11.

First, attempting to wrap the Constitution around the “Ground Zero” Mosque is a transparent attempt to force a hidden agenda upon the American people. Attempting to make this a constitutional issue is a tactic as old as putting applesauce on the same spoon as carrots so baby won’t spit out the carrots.

The issue here is not “Freedom of Religion” neither is the issue intolerance by non Muslim Americans. The issue is whether Muslims will show the same sensitivity to American feelings by avoiding this particular affront to American sensibilities as such deference has been afforded Muslims over the years as they live, work, worship and have built over 2,000 Mosques all over America.

Raheel Raza a Moderate Muslim, a Muslim Canadian Congress Board Member and author of the book “Their Jihad not my Jihad” spoke to Bill O’Reilly and illustrates that this push for a ground zero Mosque is the effort of Radical Islamists and ignorant bleeding heart White Liberals with hidden agendas. (see 4:16 min video)



O’Reilly asked Ms Raza if the arguments of Constitutional right of religion and good will are justification for building a Mosque near ground zero Mr. Raza answer is perhaps the most profound answer one will ever hear on this subject.

Well no as a Muslim I am not buying that at all, how is building a Mosque in the very place where Muslims murdered so many other Americans would create any kind of respect?

What I am hearing from people especially those who are victims and who are family of the victims is that this is very hurtful and it is very painful and as a Muslim I read in my holy book the Quran that we should not… we should be very sensitive toward people of other faiths especially when we are living in lands that are not Muslim lands and these are our neighbors and our colleagues and the people we care about.

We don’t show our caring about them by being intolerant.

Ah, building a Mosque or a place of worship in the particular spot across the street from ground zero is a slap in the face of all Americans. I mean New Yorkers have experienced this pain and the people who are behind this project are themselves Americans and New Yorkers. I can’t begin to imagine how they would even conceive an idea. That building a Mosque there, which is an exclusive place of prayer for Muslims, would in any way build tolerance and respect.

Major Bloom…Mayor Bloomberg and other bleeding heart White Liberals like him don’t understand the battle that we Moderate Muslims are faced with in terms of confronting Radical Islam and Islamization and political Islam in North America. Which, has only grown since 9/11 because of political correctness and people because of their politically invested agendas not speaking out against issues like this. -- Raheel Raza


You are right Ms. Raza Michael Bloomberg is a bleeding heart White Liberal who apparently doesn’t understand that he is being played like a one string fiddle by those who are sponsoring this Mosque. (see 1:34min video)




I am positive that large sums of money are behind this Bloomberg interpretation of what America stands for. This Bloomberg speech is a kiss on the check of America so that Bloomberg can receive his thirty pieces of silver for a Mosque built across the way from ground zero in lower Manhattan.

America, Bloomberg is another leader selling America out while feigning American values and Constitutional concerns.

As Ms. Raza so aptly put it, Bloomberg is bleeding heart White Liberal who doesn’t understand the battle that we all are in. Americans, Moderate Muslims and the world are in the same battle. We are faced with confronting Radical Islam, Islamization and political Islam in North America all of which is introduced under the Trojan cover of a religion and in this case a building .

Bloomberg and President Soetoro would pull this Trojan deception into our gates and command us all to go to sleep and dream dreams of constitutional bliss while Trojan doors slowly open and unleash stealth jihad upon us that strikes us while we dream.

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Obama Approves of “Islamic Head Stone” over the graves of 3000 Americans


US President Barack Obama (2nd R) and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan (L) take off their shoes as they visit the Blue Mosque with Muslim clerics Emrullah Hatipoglu (R) and Mustafa Cagrici (L) in Istanbul, Turkey, 07 April 2009

President Barack Obama on Friday endorsed a controversial plan to build a mosque and Islamic center just blocks from ground zero in Manhattan, despite the strong objections of conservatives, the ADL and those who lost loved ones in the Sept. 11 attacks.

“Ground zero is, indeed, hallowed ground,” Obama said at a White House dinner celebrating the Muslim holiday of Ramadan. “But let me be clear: As a citizen and as president, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country. That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances.”
-- Abby Phillip (source)
IT’S AMERICA’S TURN TO BE OFFENDED

We are told that the world is offended because of America. We have a president who has travelled around the world apologizing for America. Now at an Islamic dinner held at the White House celebrating the Muslim holiday of Ramadan the president openly hailed the building of a Mosque at ground zero despite the affront that such a Mosque would be to the American people.

However, let it be known from this day forth that offense runs both ways. Just as the world can be offended because of America, America can be offended because of acts of terrorism against it from the only religion that has openly declared jihad on the United States, Islam.

Yes, we are a tolerant people even toward those who consider themselves our enemies, presently there are over 2,000 Mosque in the United States of America. In addition, it is estimated there are approximately 2.8 million Muslims in the United States of America that practice Islam (see source)

Islamic Mosques are here and Muslims practice their faith here because America, unlike all Muslim countries around the world, is tolerant of all religious faiths. Actually, America is tolerant to a fault because it is even tolerant of that religion which has declared war on America. Moreover, let’s all be clear Islam has declared war on the United States of America twice. Once in 1996 and again in 1998. (see previous post)

War was declared on America first in 1996 and again in 1998 by Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden has been indicted for terrorism by the U.S. States District Court.—Alaphiah

America doesn’t need a lecture from a president of questionable allegiance about our traditions and Constitutional principles. Most of us know them better than he. We don’t have to be reminded about Islam’s role in the world. We see Islam’s abuses and intolerance of women, Christians and Jews every day. (see 1:28min video)



We don’t need Barry Hussein Obama to tell us that Islam has a right to build a Mosque near ground zero. We all know that Islam is attempting to use our very own Constitution against us in order to place a memento near ground zero to commemorate the 3,000 American Infidels that they killed in the name of their god on September 11, 2001. Let me be clear, it is no coincidence that Muslims scheduled the opening of the “Ground Zero” Mosque on September 11, 2011. This is “In yo Face” Jihad.

It is Islam’s practice to erect a mosque on opponent’s holy sites which have been destroyed. That is why Haram a-Sharif or the Dome of the Rock sits on the ruined Jewish Temple mount. Following a brief period of Persian rule, Jerusalem was captured in 638, six years after the death of Muhammad, by the Muslim Caliph Umar. Soon after his occupation of the city, Umar cleansed the Temple Mount , built a small mosque and dedicated the site to Muslim worship. Later the Dome of the Rock was constructed meant to permanently send the message that Islam’s Allah is greater than the Jew’s Adonai. (source)
Why? It is a custom in Islam to show up their defended foe. It is Islam's way of saying, "We have defeated you, we rule you, and our god is better than your god." (source)

Mr. President, this is not a question of American denying a group religious freedom, even to suggest that is a blatant attempt to mischaracterize this insult to the 3,000 dead Americans at ground zero. On the contrary, Islam is practiced freely in America as evidenced by the over 2,000 Mosque presently here and the nearly 3 million Muslims that practice their faith in America.

This is a question of whether a religion that has declared Jihad on the United States will farther insist on offending U.S. citizens by insisting that they build an “Islamic Head Stone” over the graves of 3,000 dead Americans.

I AM OFFENDED AT THE THOUGHT OF AN “ISLAMIC HEAD STONE” OVER THE GRAVES OF 3,000 DEAD AMERICANS!

Here’s a thought, Americans take tremendous efforts attempting to avoid offending others. Those efforts are reflected in our laws as well as our customs. It is time for others to do the same.

It is time for Islam to do the same. It is time for Muslims to note that building a Mosque, an “Islamic Head Stone”, at ground zero is offensive to Americans and in the tradition of a country that is sensitive to others concerns Muslims should not only hear our concern but they should attempt to avoid the affront to Americans’ sensibilities that this particular Mosque will cause.

I know, that is what Americans would do. What will Muslim do?

Monday, August 16, 2010

Every Last Iota of a Cracker I Hate It!

I hate White people all of them. Every last iota of a cracker I hate it! —King Samir Shabazz, Head of the Philadelphia New Black Panther Party
In defense of Dr. Laura Schlessinger and all Adult thinking people in America

I received a phone call from a Black Liberal friend who knows that I write this blog. He wanted to alert me of Dr. Laura Schlessinger’s most recent travail with the archaic notion of freedom of speech in America.

According to my friend, Dr. Laura said the word Nigger. After a lingering pause, my friend obviously waiting for my response, I said half jokingly, “…and then she killed someone?” but to my friend this was no laughing matter. So I asked, did Dr. Laura call someone a Nigger or did she simply say the word? He said that he didn’t hear it himself he just heard Al Sharpen talking about it on CNN. “You can turn to it and see yourself,” he said.

I told him that a T.V. wasn’t available to me right at the moment but I would look into it and get back to him. He said, “You’re good at researching on the net I’m sure you can find it.” First, I assured him that Dr. Laura is a good person and a consummate professional. I said that I’m sure that this was a complete misunderstanding. I thanked him for the “heads-up” and then we hung up.

I did query the subject. I think I put in Dr. Laura and the word “Nigger” and sure enough, the net was on fire with flames of condemnation, which were threatening to lap up the career of Dr. Laura.

The fact that she dare to said “the Word” the “N-Word” the Mother of all negative epithets was enough to get the Shirley Sherrod NAACP types all riled up, my friend included.

Media Matters website, the conspicuously Left Wing radical creation of Hillary Clinton and George Soros, posted a story of how they heroically were able to ferret out the original tapes of the “Niggergate” show after of course the sinister Dr. Laura show attempted to hide the evidence of Dr. Laura’s blatant racism. So I listened to Media Matters unedited “Full Audio” of the incident. (hear 6:42min audio)





Now as I see it Dr. Laura was attempting to have an intelligent Adult conservation with a caller who obviously is caught in a conundrum of her own making. The caller, identified as Jay, chose to marry into an interracial situation while apparently she harbors latent racial attitudes and resentments herself. The underlying problem is Jay doesn’t have the psychological makeup or maturity to handle an interracial marriage and all of the things that come along with that marriage.

And as an aside Jay asked the question, “Is it ever okay to say the word Nigger?” Which is a completely different subject but let’s examine that.

Jay is Black woman who is married to a White man. She is complaining about the “racial attitudes” of her family and friends. And now she is suggesting that there are words in the American lexicon that are strictly off limits? And to whom are these words off limits? Only to White people. So just what are these words?

Well after a brief survey I’ve come up with a list of seven words and phrases that White people in President Barry Hussein Soetoro’s America can under no circumstances utter, no matter the context, they are:
1. Nigger
2. Colored
3. Boy
4. Nappy Headed Ho, or Hos
5. Slavery or Slave
6. Picking Cotton, or in the field picking cotton
7. Coon

I’m sure that other ethnicities have words or phrases that are banned from usage by White people. You’re free to email me with your choices. (TPFIC)

Now that it's made absolutely clear that in a free country like America that there are ineffable words for the “Whiteman,” let it also be known that in President Soetoro's America we can all happily go about our business of voter intimidation of White people and advocating hatred of White people. All while advocating for the killing of White people and their Cracker White babies while the Soetoro Justice Department stands by and lends its support. (see 1:19min video)





There is too much serious business going on in the Black community to be out here sliding through south street with white dirty Cracker whore cunts on our arms. And we calling ourselves Black men with African garb on. What the hell is wrong with you Black man?—King Samir Shabazz

Dr. Laura you have my apologies for blatant double standard and the attitude of racism that was unfairly thrust upon you. King Samir Shabazz and your caller Jay are the reasons why we cannot advance pass racial difference in America.

I also apologize to you for the puerile thinking of some Blacks who think it is perfectly fair to have exclusive right to use the word Nigger. These Blacks believe that they have the right to use racial pejoratives, calling White people Crackers, while the mere mentioning of the word Nigger by a White person in any context is an offense and affront to the dead cold body of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. This is wrong.

As your caller, Jay demonstrated Blacks are just as cowardice as anyone else when it comes to frank discusses regarding race. (see 2:11 min video)





I know that you were forced to apologize for saying the sacred “word,” a word that is above every other word (unless of course a Black person uses it.) What is ashamed is that Eric Holder was correct. There are cowards among us who are afraid to talk about race in an adult and mature way.

Those cowards are the President, Mr. Holder and all Black people who subscribes to the hate the White man mentality.

Dr. Laura what has happened to you is a prime example why there is no honest talk about Race in this country.

All the opposition that is now lined up against you are the cowards that prevent open and honest discussion about race in this country. And they are not White neither! They are Black! These racial cowards and bigots are Black.

Friday, August 13, 2010

The Constitution is no longer in effect and we didn’t even know it

"Action should be taken by the Senate and should be taken by the House," he said. "They should serve notice on him and say, 'Mr. President, we love you but we want to tell you something. You're under a cloud of suspicion. We can't continue running this country with you in charge under this cloud. Now either you clear it up or you resign from office.'"—Maj. Gen Jerry Curry, Ret. Relaying what Congress should say to President Soetoro
Our public servants and military personnel all take an oath to protect and defend our Constitution. However, what if everyone from the President on down failed to keep their oath. What if no one carried out the oath to protect and defend our Constitution, would the Constitution still be in effect?

The answer is no. If the Constitution is not enforced, it is no longer in effect and for all intent and purposes, this is no longer the United States of America. For example, the non-enforcement of United States borders is in direct contradiction of the Constitutional mandate to protect every State against Invasion.

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion—Article III Section IV, U.S. Constitution

The Barry Hussein Soetoro administration has sued Arizona, a state that was attempting to protect and defend the Constitution. Soetoro, his justice department and Federal Judge Susan Bolden all violated their oaths to protect and defend the constitution by preventing the State of Arizona from doing so.

The Obama administration’s successful block of Arizona’s Constitutional right to protect itself from invasion, in addition the Federal government’s refusal to protect Arizona from illegal alien invasion means that the Constitution is no longer in effect. This means that we have entered an era of soft tyranny, an age when an Oligarchy issues rulings and judgments against the principles of the Constitution as Federal Judges Susan Bolden and Vaughan Walker have recently done. Therefore, the Constitution is invalidated.

"It shouldn't be the lieutenant colonels, sergeants and generals in the Army. It should be the congressman and senators on both sides of the issue asking this man to step up to the plate" to provide proof [of eligibility.]—Maj. Gen Jerry Curry, Ret.

Never is it so evident that the Constitution is no longer in effect as in the case of the ineligibility of Barry Hussein Soetoro. This man has hidden from the American people all of the vital records that would either confirm or deny his legitimacy. In effect, the United States government is operating as an illegitimate power in the world. (see article)

Lately, I find myself wondering, what would an illegitimate government look like?

Might it be one where – when the speaker of the House is asked for the constitutional authority that permits government-mandated health care – her response is: "Are you serious? Are you serious?"

Perhaps it would be a government where, when citizens demand to see evidence that the nation's highest elected official meets the qualifications set down in the Constitution to hold that office, all three branches of government spend public money to deny those concerned citizens that right.

Could it be a government that passes laws prohibiting criticism of its supporters and their "lifestyles" – and mandates criminal punishments against those who speak out – even when those "lifestyles" are socially destructive? –Craige McMillan, What would an Illegitimate government look like?

For the last 18 to 19 months from the U.S. Government it has been, “In yo face” of the American people. It has been, “You have no standing” to the American people.

By these examples it has been proven that if an Usurper actually illegitimately seized the highest elected office in the nation there is nothing that anyone in America can do about it if the person who as seized illegitimate power has a partisan Congress to aid and abet in a coup d’état of the United States of America.

This is particularly disturbing when there is evidence that president Soetoro was exploring ways to get rid of or getting around Article II of the Constitution as early as 2006. Sarah p. Herlihy a lawyer in a firm, which Soetoro was a member wrote a treatise-depicting article II of the Constitution as archaic and unfair to limit the presidency to only natural born citizens of the United States. All indications are that Ms. Herlihy wrote this on Soetoro’s behalf. (see below)

Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement Sarah p. Herlihy Feb 22 2006


Retired Maj. Gen Jerry Curry says that if president Soetoro had anything going for him in term of decency and honesty and the kind of whatever it takes to be a good American and be a good public servant, if he has any of that stuff, he would throw it all out of the window and say, 'Look folks. I'm an American citizen. I am native born. Tell me what you want to prove it and I will give it to you.

Honor, decency, honesty, patriotism, loyalty and trustworthiness, General Curry those traits may be typical of someone in the military but I don’t think you’ll find many in our government that we can count in those categories. Below are the oaths that are being broken by the president, his administration, Federal courts and our Congress.

If the border laws are not being enforced and If the Second Article of the Constitution isn’t being enforced we are living in days that the Constitution is no longer in effect. I bet that you didn’t even notice.

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President—Article II Section 1 U.S. Constitution

Following are the oaths that the president, the attorneys of the justice department and judges Susan Bolden and Vaughan Walker have violated or are violating on a daily basis.

Oath of office of the President of the United States of America :

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

Oath of office of the Congress of the United States of America :

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.*

*Note: This oath is also taken by the Vice President, members of the Cabinet, and all other civil and military officers and federal employees other than the President.

General Oath of Office for Federal Judges of the United States of America :

I do solemnly swear (or affirm), that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent on me, according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the Constitution, and laws of the United States. So help me God. *±

*In the United States , federal judges are required to take not just one, but two oaths. (see below)
± Oath of Office
USUS Oath of Office

###

Oaths of Office for Federal Judges of the United States of America :

I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as (Judge or Justice) under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.

I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

Military Oath

I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.[1]

All of these broken oaths and no one to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America which means that the Constitution is no longer in effect.

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Bankrupt and didn’t know it: No, some did know it and Democrats didn’t Care

Well, we are out of money now. We are operating in deep deficits—president Barry Hussein Soetoro, Saturday, May 23, 2009
Laurence Kotlikoff’s Bloomberg article, “U.S. Is Bankrupt and We Didn’t Even Know It” is not accurate. (see article) Just after 4 months in office president Barry Hussein Soetoro interviewed with C-SPAN’s Steve Scully and told Scully that the United States of America was running in deficit. In Soetoro’s words, “…we are out of money now.” That was May 23, 2009. (see 3:02min video)



According to Mr. Kotlikoff what the Obama administration and the Democrat controlled Congress have been doing is not only wrong, Democrat policies are worsening America’s present and future.

Let’s get real. The U.S. is bankrupt. Neither spending more nor taxing less will help the country pay its bills.
What it can and must do is radically simplify its tax, health-care, retirement and financial systems, each of which is a complete mess. But this is the good news. It means they can each be redesigned to achieve their legitimate purposes at much lower cost and, in the process, revitalize the economy. –Laurence Kotlikoff

If what is needed to fix the economy is simplification in all areas the Obama administration and Democrat Congress has done the exact opposite.
Democrats have used the American fiscal crisis to advance the most radical and costly social agenda in the History of the United States. They have introduced stealth tax increases on the middle class as well as punitive tax increases on the so-called wealthy.

Democrats have passed 2,074 pages of complicated and deceptive health-care policies and have made a total and complete mess of U.S. business, financial and retirement sectors. Democrats have this country bankrupt now. You and I may be unaware of just how devastated the American situation is, but Democrats have been prophesying the demise of America for a long, long time.

[T]his "brief moment in history" when the US had pre-eminent military, economic and political power, would not last.

"This is just a period, a few decades this will last, and I think that all of us who are Americans should think about this and ask ourselves how do we wish this moment to be judged 50 years from now," –Former President Bill Clinton (see story)

And as I’ve said, 4 months into his presidency Barry Hussein Soetoro told America that we were effectively bankrupt but instead of being fiscally responsible and instead of pushing an immediate austerity national program Democrats went on the largest expansion of government and the most costliest government spending program in the history of the United States.
After Obama’s Global Warming win in the House of Representatives he moved immediately to hawk his universal health care reform. What this means to the American people is a mountain of debt so insurmountable that it is breaking the back of the U.S. economy by an unbearable weight on taxpayers at a time that the American people suffer the highest unemployment rate since 1948, the American economy can ill afford the grandiose socialist schemes of the Obama Democrat Party at this time.

It is the weight of both Iraq and Afghanistan wars, the $700billion dollar bailout, the $787billion dollar stimulus package, $161billion Global warming cap and trade taxes(if the Democrat controlled Senate passes their version of the global warming bill too) , $1.6trillion dollars of taxes for Obama Health Care reforms (if Congress gives Obama what he wants). In addition because Democrats mismanaged the first $787billion dollar bailout there is even talk of a second multi-billion dollar bailout all new taxes on an unemployed and underemployed American people. It's beginning to appear that they don't care about the consequences of their actions!

These new taxes would be more taxes levied on the American people than any other time in American history and more taxes imposed upon the American people than by any other President and Congress in the history of this country.—Alaphiah (source)
Congress did pass a second$26 Billion dollar stimulus bill that they deceptively called a jobs bill.

The president and Democrats knew before they forced through the most costly spending program in the history of the United States. They did this in the middle of the greatest financial depression since the great depression. Some of their irresponsible spending includes but is not limited to:

• $50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts
• $380 million in the Senate bill for the Women, Infants and Children program
• $300 million for grants to combat violence against women
• $2 billion for federal child-care block grants
• $6 billion for university building projects
• $15 billion for boosting Pell Grant college scholarships
• $4 billion for job-training programs, including $1.2 billion for “youths” up to the age of 24
• $1 billion for community-development block grants
• $4.2 billion for “neighborhood stabilization activities”
• $650 million for digital-TV coupons; $90 million to educate “vulnerable populations”
• $145 billion for “Making Work Pay” tax credits
• $83 billion for the earned income credit
• $150 million for the Smithsonian
• $34 million to renovate the Department of Commerce headquarters
• $500 million for improvement projects for National Institutes of Health facilities
• $44 million for repairs to Department of Agriculture headquarters
• $350 million for Agriculture Department computers
• $88 million to help move the Public Health Service into a new building
• $448 million for constructing a new Homeland Security Department headquarters
• $600 million to convert the federal auto fleet to hybrids
• $450 million for NASA (carve-out for “climate-research missions”)
• $600 million for NOAA (carve-out for “climate modeling”)
• $1 billion for the Census Bureau
• $4.5 billion for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
• $850 million for Amtrak
• $87 million for a polar icebreaking ship
• $1.7 billion for the National Park System
• $55 million for Historic Preservation Fund
• $7.6 billion for “rural community advancement programs”
• $150 million for agricultural-commodity purchases
• $150 million for “producers of livestock, honeybees, and farm-raised fish”
• $2 billion for renewable-energy research ($400 million for global-warming research)
• $2 billion for a “clean coal” power plant in Illinois
• $6.2 billion for the Weatherization Assistance Program
• $3.5 billion for energy-efficiency and conservation block grants
• $3.4 billion for the State Energy Program
• $200 million for state and local electric-transport projects
• $300 million for energy-efficient-appliance rebate programs
• $400 million for hybrid cars for state and local governments
• $1 billion for the manufacturing of advanced batteries
• $1.5 billion for green-technology loan guarantees
• $8 billion for innovative-technology loan-guarantee program
• $2.4 billion for carbon-capture demonstration projects
• $4.5 billion for electricity grid

And the latest addition to this insanity:
$300 million for electric “golf carts” (source)

On May 23, 2009 the president told us that America was bankrupt and then when on the greatest spending spree in the history of the United States of America.
SCULLY: You know the numbers, $1.7 trillion debt, a national deficit of $11 trillion. At what point do we run out of money?

OBAMA: Well, we are out of money now. We are operating in deep deficits, not caused by any decisions we've made on health care so far. This is a consequence of the crisis that we've seen and in fact, our failure to make some good decisions on health care over the last several decades.

So we've got a short-term problem, which is we had to spend a lot of money to salvage our financial system, we had to deal with the auto companies, a huge recession which drains tax revenue at the same time it's putting more pressure on governments to provide unemployment insurance or make sure that food stamps are available for people who have been laid off.

So we have a short-term problem and we also have a long-term problem. The short-term problem is dwarfed by the long-term problem. And the long-term problem is Medicaid and Medicare. If we don't reduce long-term health care inflation substantially, we can't get control of the deficit.
Sorry Mr. Kotlikoff we are bankrupt and Democrats knew and didn’t care. After all their motto is, “Never let a serious crisis go to waste…it's an opportunity to do things you couldn't do before” – Rohm Emanuel

Yeah like bankrupt America!

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

California Republican Congressman Bilbray Creates Birth Certificate Controversy

KENYANS IN KISUMU (WESTERN KENYA)CELEBRATE ON NOV. 5,2008 OBAMA'S VICTORY!

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President—Article II Section 1 U.S. Constitution
One of the greatest lessons that I learned from the 2008 presidential elections was that Democrats would rather elect a constitutionally ineligible foreign-born enemy of this country and its constitution rather than elect a Republican. Even if that Republican was a “Republican in name only” and even if that Republican self ascribes himself as a Maverick, which is code for “I screw Republicans over all the time just like you Democrats.”

I fully expect the usual suspects the Lindsey Grahams, the Susan Collins, the Olympia Snows and the Scott Browns to stab Republicans in the front (so often it’s not the back anymore) but what I didn’t expect is someone that I supported and voted for to stab Republicans in the back.

Yet stabbed in the back, is exactly how I felt when I read reported in Worldnetdaily.com that Rep. Brian Bilbray (R-CA) made the claim that there's no need for the president to have been born in the United States – or to have two parents who are U.S. citizens – to be a "natural born citizen" and be eligible for the Oval Office. (see article)

I didn’t believe it. I, I, couldn’t believe it. So I dropped what I was doing logged on to Congressman Bilbray’s website and found his Washington phone number and before I knew it, my fingers were dialing. (Bilbray’s website)

A young man answered the phone and after I identified myself as one of Congressman Bilbray’s constituents, I expressed my consternation about what I read on the WND site. The young man who later identified himself as Joe Williamson (after I asked his name) launched into a run-on sentence defense of the Congressman’s position without so much as taking a breath or letting me get another word in edgewise.

I was told that the Congressman’s office had seen the birth certificate that the State of Hawaii released and that they had seen Congressional record that proved that Barry Hussein Soetoro was a citizen.

After Mr. Williamson concluded his defense, I told him that he had not seen an original birth certificate of Mr. Soetoro. I told him that up until this point, I supported Mr. Bilbray and voted for him but I now was officially withdrawing my support.

Mr. Williamson then volunteered someone who he identified as the person who was actually handling this topic for Mr. Bilbray and asked if I would like to speak with him. I consented and the phone was handed off.

When the next man spoke, I asked to whom I was speaking. He identified himself as Jeff Post. I expressed my dismay to Mr. Post about the article in WND and the conversation that I had just had with Mr. Williamson. Mr. Post who sounded very young (they both sounded twenty-something), I asked his age. Twenty-five he answered. And then Mr. Post began to express the conviction that Mr. Bilbray’s office investigated the birth certificate matter and they had information and thus concluded that the president is a citizen. I told Mr. Post also, that Mr. Bilbray had just lost a supporter and that I would be blogging about our conversation then ended the call.

I sat there for a minute not believing that after two years of investigating this topic myself how a Republican U.S. Congressman and his staff would be so ignorant about the Constitutional requirement to be president of the United States. How could they be so ignorant about the over one million dollar effort of Barry Hussein Soetoro. It was an effort to keep the American people from knowing the truth about his citizenship status.

Below are some but not all of posting that cover two years of investigation of the president’s ineligibility:

Army Officer refuses to show Proof of Birth until CIC shows his

NPR and the Nigerian Observer reported in 2008 Obama Kenyan Born

I am an American I have the right to debate and disagree

Ask and Tell Military Hero Faces Government Wrath

Obama again shows he’s obsessed with “Birthers”

Pelosi is at the center of Obama’s eligibility Question

Na na na na na you have no Standing!

Obama eyes One term rather than release sealed Birth Certificate

Say it Loud, “I’m a Birther and Proud!”

Stupid is as stupid does!

Obama’s Original Birth Certificate has been Destroyed

Why Obama’s Birth Certificate Matters

Obama a One Term President without a Birth Certificate

Great will be the fall of the house of Obama

I have the Right to know if Barack Hussein Obama is Constitutionally eligible to be POTUS

Justice Roberts promised publicly to hear Obama’s eligibility

He’s Doing the Job that the Judiciary and the Legislative Branches wouldn’t do!

The Obama Constitutional Crisis is Here!

Omerica

Once, Twice, Three times a President

And now an Usurper

Obama is investigator, judge and jury; Finds Himself Not Guilty

Schwarzenegger Next?

Scandal plagued Obama should show Birth Certificate and fire Emanuel

December 15, 2008

Conmander-in-Chief

An Obama Presidency a National Security Risk?

Democrats and Obama Knowingly Are Causing Constitutional Crisis for Change

What is most disappointing is one would think that we would not have to explain to a so called Republican why the Birth Certificate matter is so relevant to Americans who value the Constitution. But for the sake of Rep. Bilbray, Mr. Williamson, Mr. Post and all of you that don’t know how important this matter is allow me to explain once again.

The question has to do with Mr. Soetoro’s eligibility to serve as president of the United States. According to the Constitution Mr. Soetoro would have had to be a Natural born citizen not a naturalized citizen. So what does that mean?

Before the Constitution, the closest reference we have to Natural Born Citizen is from the legal treatise “the Law of Nations,” written by Emerich de Vattel in 1758. In book one chapter 19,

§ 212. Of the citizens and natives.

“The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.

The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it.

The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”
(source)

We know by Mr. Soetoro own admission that his father was not a citizen of the United States of America therefore he is a foreigner who owes his allegiance to another country as demonstrated by his constant tampering in Kenya’s (his father’s born country and perhaps his) electoral matters.

WND reported the Obama administration spent $23 million of U.S. taxpayer money to support the "Yes" vote ratifying the new Kenyan constitution, which coincided with Obama's Aug. 4 birthday.-- Jerome R. Corsi

President Soetoro just gifted Kenya 23 million U.S. taxpayers’ dollars, money to affect the outcome of a Kenyan vote. (see story)

Clearly Mr. Soetoro has a dual allegiance that is exactly what the Founding Fathers for over two hundred years where attempting to prevent but just recently have failed due to the Soetoro presidency.

This is explained quite thoroughly by the following post entitled, PROOF – OBAMA’S ACKNOWLEDGED DUAL CITIZENSHIP MEANS NEVER ELIGIBLE TO BE POTUS – INFO ALWAYS IN PLAIN SIGHT –Hillaryandme.com

Also from John M. Yinger’s The Origins and Interpretation of the Presidential Eligibility Clause in the U.S. Constitution: Why Did the Founding Fathers Want the President To Be a "Natural Born Citizen"

Is found two extraordinary reasons why the Constitutional requirement, “Natural Born Citizen” was intended.

1. The John Jay Letter where Mr. Jay wrote, “Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen (emphasis in the original).(5)”
2. Madison's Convention Notes where it is written: the ministers of foreign powers would have and make use of, the opportunity to mix their intrigues & influence with the Election. Limited as the powers of the Executive are, it will be an object of great moment with the great rival powers of Europe who have American possessions, to have at the head of our Governmt a man attached to their respective politics and interests. (source)

Unfortunately it is as the Founders feared. A president who is not a Natural born citizen as president Soetoro, has interest in his homeland as Mr. Soetoro has demonstrated by sending American tax dollars there to affect voting in Kenya’s constitution as I stated above. This dual allegiance is not good for the United States. If we can even say, because there is a question, that this president has allegiance to this country at all.

Here is what we know and is not disputed, president Soetoro’s history; school records, passport and birth certificate all of the information would lift the cloud of suspicion from his presidency are sealed so that Americans cannot see who is really in their House. President Soetoro has spent a small fortune to keep the American people from knowing his secret life.

Finally we have some disloyal and some ignorant politicians on both sides of the aisle who are aiding and abetting this president and his Party’s destruction of the constitution.

Brian Bilbray and his staff fit in that category somewhere, either disloyal to the constitution, ignorant of what the Constitution means or ignorant of the danger that an Usurper poses for this country. Either one of these choices are of no use to the Republican Party at this most crucial time in our history. (see article)

We need real social-fiscal Republicans to replace the Trent Lott, George Bush, John McCain clueless Republicans with Republicans who know how to protect and defend the Constitution and aren’t afraid to do it.

If Bilbray doesn’t correct this PR disaster he should expect no welcoming treatment from citizens who are determined to rid our country of the Soetoros, Pelosis and Reids.

We can and will add Bilbray to that list when we take out the trash in 2012 and 2014!

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Austerity Obama Style


King Juan Carlos, Michelle and Sasha Obama

The timing of this lavish European vacation could not have come at a worse moment, when unemployment in America stands at 10 percent, and large numbers of Americans are fighting to survive financially in the wake of the global economic downturn. It sends a message of indifference, even contempt, for the millions of Americans who are struggling just to feed their families on a daily basis and pay the mortgage, while the size of the national debt balloons to Greek-style proportions. -- Nile Gardiner
Are you dreading your personal financial situation? Are you making all of the sacrifices that President Obama and Vice President Biden are calling for but you still feel like you need to get away and clear your head from all of the pressures of no money and possible insolvency? Don’t fret we all have to face hard times together. As president, Barry Hussein Soetoro told us we all have to have some skin in the game.

Michelle Obama and daughter Sasha returned from Spain on Sunday, a vacation at a lavish hotel on the Mediterranean coast that triggered her first controversy since becoming first lady. I'm told she made the trip because she promised one of her closest friends, a longtime Chicago pal who just lost her father, she would spend time with her.—Lynn Sweet (source)
(see 1:02min video)




But you want to take a trip to Spain to take Spanish lessons. Too audacious? What about taking some friends to Spain, you know, to help a fellow grieving friend mourn the recent death of a family member.

Does that still sound somewhat pretentious, well that’s because you don’t think like the president and his wife. To them, in the middle of the greatest depression since the great depression, going on vacation is not out of the question. But not just a vacation, no a 5day $300,000 fully staffed, secret serviced, air force two, 40 person “entouraged” jaunt to Spain and the island of Majorca.

In fact, Michelle Obama will have enjoyed not one, not two but eight vacations by the end of this summer. These include a trip to Los Angeles in June, a visit to the Florida’s oil-hit Gulf Coast next weekend and a ten-day trip to Martha’s Vineyard later this month according to the United Kingdom Online News source, the Mail Online. (source)

According to another U.K. News organization the Telegraph Michele Obama is vacationing lavishly in Europe while the rest of us who have skin in the game, to borrow a term from president Soetoro, are suffering the jobless recovery of the Soetoro administration.

The timing of this lavish European vacation could not have come at a worse moment, when unemployment in America stands at 10 percent, and large numbers of Americans are fighting to survive financially in the wake of the global economic downturn. It sends a message of indifference, even contempt, for the millions of Americans who are struggling just to feed their families on a daily basis and pay the mortgage, while the size of the national debt balloons to Greek-style proportions.-- Nile Gardiner (source)
(see 1:10min)




So while the rest of us who have skin in the game tighten our belts the president and his wife live it up in the White House as if they are King and Queen of America.

Monday, August 09, 2010

Democrat’s Unscrupulous Plan to Demonize Republicans

Portrait of Niccolò Machiavelli by Santi di Tito

Keith Olbermann: So, there are two goals here in the midterms that we’ve been able to identify so far on the part of the Democrats, which is, one, is to equate the Republicans to the Tea Party and to equate there Republicans to the previous Republicans who occupied the White House, which would be Bush.

Howard Dean: Right. Exactly
With all of this contrived talk about Tea Parties and Racism we get an actual look into the soul of Democrat depravity à la Democrat Super partisan Keith Olbermann and Uber-Democrat partisan Howard Dean as they discuss how Democrats plan to wage war against Republicans coming up until this November.

And what do we find? We find that calling the Tea Party Racists is nothing at all but a plot of Democrats to demonize Tea Parties. Since Democrats had such grand success in turning the entire world against George W. Bush, they think that employing the very same strategy will work against everyone that they perceive as an enemy or a threat, i.e. Tea Parties and Republicans.

Keith Olbermann: So, there are two goals here in the midterms that we’ve been able to identify so far on the part of the Democrats, which is, one, is to equate the Republicans to the Tea Party and to equate there Republicans to the previous Republicans who occupied the White House, which would be Bush.

Howard Dean: Right. Exactly

(see 8:32min video)


Charges of Tea Party Racism are phony. The effort to connect Republicans to Bush is a desperate attempt by Democrats to continue deceiving the America people. And the hatred that Democrats contrived against George W. Bush was the epitome of evil. Those who continue to benefit from its residual effects are the embodiment of sheer wickedness and corruption.

Democrats continue to show that they believe that there is no relevance for morality in political affairs. They continue to show that they believe that craft and deceit are justified in pursuing and maintaining political power.

Calling the Tea Party movement Racists, the Bush Bashing and the attempts to link all Republicans with President Bush who they’ve completely demonized Democrats are simply demonstrating Machiavellian traits in their quest to maintain power November 2010.

Remember Democrats will do anything and everything to get what they want. (see :15sec video)



Any characterization of Republicans, Bush or Tea Parties by Democrats should be totally ignored and rebuked as as lies.

Friday, August 06, 2010

Post-Traumatic First African-American President Syndrome?

Unprecedented spending and debt, nonexistent shovel ready jobs, persistent high rates of unemployment, and setbacks on terrorism hardly qualify as achievements.--Mike Bates
Are you highly critical of the president? Do you find that you don’t thank him nearly enough? Are you not giving him the credit that he deserves? Well it just might be that you are suffering from, “POST-TRAUMATIC FIRST AFRICAN-AMERICAN PRESIDENT SYNDROME or PTFAAPS!”

That’s right America, like, who knew that there was such a thing? But apparently, there is, according to Progressives. One progressive in particular coined the term. Liberal commentator and MSNBC contributor Karen Hunter said she is the one who named the disorder.

Apparently, “post-traumatic first African-American president Syndrome” is the diagnosis if we Americans don’t give Barry Hussein Soetoro his props. Progressives are all in a tizzy because they think Soetoro is not getting the credit that they think that he deserves. (see article)

Is this really a problem? Well CBS Harry Smith seemed concerned he even asked Mr. Soetoro if he felt he’s getting the credit that he thinks he deserves. (see: 29sec video)



No, no, no Mr. Soetoro it’s not the economy or your radical progressive agenda, no sir you’re not getting the credit that you think you deserve because Americans are suffering from PTFAAPS, Karen Hunter explains. (see 2:19min video)



See we are all the victims of “post-traumatic first American-American president Syndrome. “ Whew! I’m glad someone cleared that up. I knew something was wrong but I didn’t think it was I, my neighbors or my fellow citizens. I thought it was the lousy way the president and his progressive administration is running the country into the ground.

Unprecedented spending and debt, nonexistent shovel ready jobs, persistent high rates of unemployment, and setbacks on terrorism hardly qualify as achievements.--Mike Bates

After all this administration is spending more money than Americans, who are yet unborn can repay. It getting so bad that Democrats will willingly repeal Roe vs. Wade because we need all the help we can get to pay back this massive debt that the Soetoro administration and Democrats are compiling against future generations of Americans.

Must I mention that it’s coming upon election season? And one strategy that Democrats are considering to help them win in November is keeping everything that they have done in the last 18 months on the down low?

So how will Democrats talk about their many questionable accomplishments over the last 18 months? There is the passage of Healthcare, There was the takeover of AIG, the bailout of Goldman Sachs and banks, there is the 863 billion dollar stimulus vote and there is the takeover of the auto industry. Will Democrats proudly tout all of their “accomplishments” to the American this fall? Or do they have another tactic in mind?—Alaphiah

So I ask you, how does one get the credit that one thinks one deserves Mr. Soetoro if everything that one has done has been against the will of the American people? The American people are so peeved at what your Party has done, forcing your progressive agenda on Americans, that your Party doesn’t even want to talk about what you’ve done in the last 18 months. Not to mention Mr. president that you said that you think you deserve and would give yourself an incomplete for the last 18 months. (Soetoro gives himself an incomplete)

Maybe Mr. president the American people are holding you to your campaign promises that you didn’t keep. (see 1:47min video)



Remember you promised Mr. president the most ethical, most open and transparent presidency in the history of the United States. You promised that every bill would be shown to the American people before you signed it into law. Instead, what we got were empty promises. You passed your health care bill before anyone read it, you and Congress included. In fact, Nancy Pelosi told us that the bill had to be passed before we could know what was in it, of course breaking your campaign promise again. (see :10sec video)



So Mr. president maybe you are getting the credit that you deserve. Mind you, it may not be the credit that you wish or you want, but it is the credit that you deserve.

Thursday, August 05, 2010

The Gentleman from New York goes Wild


The Gentleman from New York


Why is that vein popping out from the Gentleman from New York, Representative Anthony Weiner’s head? In a most grandiloquent display in which the Gentleman from New York appeared he was “fit to be tied”, the Gentleman lambasted Republicans on the floor of the House of Representatives for the failure of H.R. 847, the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act to pass. (see 1:52min video)



Those dirty Republicans, right? Well not exactly, upon closer inspection and a little math not so fast Mr. Weiner.

There are presently 433 members in the House of Representatives at the time of this vote. The break down is 255 Democrats in majority and 179 Republicans in the minority with 2 vacancies.

The passage of the bill in question required a 2/3rds majority or 288 yes votes to pass which means that all 255 Democrats would have to vote yes.

In addition, they would also need 33 Republicans to join them. This would be very doable except that among other things Democrats made this 111th Congress a virtual North against the South battleground experience, largely due to their ongoing national efforts to demonize all Republicans.

Instead of creating an atmosphere of mutual respect and diplomacy in the Congress as true leadership would do. Democrats have chosen to foster an “us against them” partisan divide so vast and so full of vitriol that they believe they most excoriate Republicans at every political opportunity, hence the Gentleman from New York’s floor demonstration.

However, here’s the reality of the situation, Democrats did not have 255 Democrats to vote yes on this bill. Four Democrats voted no and Seven Democrats didn’t bother to vote at all. Therefore, only 243 Democrats out of 255 voted for this bill, so not all Democrats agreed with this bill’s passage. What’s more, twelve Republicans did vote yes to pass this bill. (Final vote count)

So once again, the Gentleman from New York attempted to make a partisan war out of something that his own party did not fully support. Why would the Gentleman from New York do such a thing?

Because Anthony Weiner, Mr. and Mrs. U.S. Citizen, is no Gentleman, Anthony Weiner is a Nancy Pelosi partisan who places party, agenda and ideology even above what is good for the United States of America.

You should remember this about Democrats in November!