Thursday, January 22, 2009

Once, Twice, Three Times A President

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. administers the oath of office a second time in the Map Room of the White House on Wednesday, Jan. 21, 2009. White House.


You’ve probably heard President Obama being sworn on Tuesday and didn’t think too much of the fact that both Obama and Justice Roberts, Harvard Law grads couldn’t get the Presidential oath right. (see video)



Well this troubled the newly sworn in President’s White house counsel Greg Craig so much that he had the Chief Justice come back yesterday for a do over with the President in the map room of the White house before the witnesses of the press. (see story)
Craig, the White House lawyer, said in a statement Wednesday evening: "We believe the oath of office was administered effectively and that the president was sworn in appropriately yesterday. Yet the oath appears in the Constitution itself. And out of the abundance of caution, because there was one word out of sequence, Chief Justice John Roberts will administer the oath a second time."

The Constitution is clear about the exact wording of the oath and as a result, some constitutional experts have said that a do-over probably wasn't necessary but also couldn't hurt.
–Associated Press
Aren’t politics funny? For two years on the campaign trail Senator Obama spoke about how the Founding Fathers and the Constitution were flawed, he also promised repeatedly to fundamentally change America. Early in the campaign Obama refused to wear a U.S. flag pin on his lapel. And who can forget when he refused to put his hand over his heart to salute the flag when the National anthem was being played.

Then in the most important oath that president Obama will ever take, besides of course his marriage vows, a Freudian slip perhaps with the oath of office?

Could it be that President Obama subconsciously can’t bring himself to swear to protect and defend the very Constitution that he had been attempting to deconstruct all of his adult life?

You say but it was Justice Roberts that caused President Obama to slip up on the Presidential oath. That can be explained too.

The Supreme Court has had several law suits before it recently in conference regarding the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama’s Presidency.

Knowing this perhaps Justice Roberts subconsciously flubbed the oath knowing that there is a question pending that he was swearing in an illegitimate President.

The "natural born citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, reads, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President." Perhaps Justice Roberts had this on this mind.

What is even stranger is just how meticulously careful the Obama White house is regarding the proper administrating of the oath of office because the oath is in the Constitution. This is in stark contrast to the cloud that is over the Obama Presidency because he chose to enter office knowing that there is legitimate question about whether or not he is even eligible to be President.

Yet Obama has been negligent because he has failed to answer a law suit regarding his birth certificate and under Federal Court Rules, President Obama has admitted, according to law, that he was not a citizen of The United States of America and is deemed to have committed fraud.

So far Obama has refused to be as dutiful with proof that he is a “Natural Born” U.S. citizen in accordance to the Constitution. (see previous post)

The reality is, it doesn’t matter whether President Obama is sworn in once, twice or three times; until President Obama produces proof that he is eligible to be President he will forever be a usurper who has illegitimately obtained the Presidency and was illegally sworn in by Justice John Roberts. A true trivia question for the future. What Chief Justice swore in an illegitimate President?

And their subconsciousnesses knows it!

1 comment:

  1. Take the test.

    FIRST QUESTION: Who IS the actual and lawful 44th President of the USA?

    ANSWER: Joe Biden

    Biden was initially the Acting President for at least 5 minutes under either the Constitution’s Article 2 or the Constitution’s 20th Amendment, from 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, having already taken his Oath of Office and before Obama completed his ‘oath’ at approximately 12:05 PM, 1/20/09. Under the 20th Amendment if the President-elect shall have failed to qualify, or alternatively under Article 2 if the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term, being 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, which ability and/or qualification includes that he take the Article 2 oath “before he enter on the execution of his office,” then either the Presidency shall devolve on the Vice President under Article 2 or the Vice President shall act as President under the 20th Amendment. (The importance of the oath in ‘commencing’ an ‘Obama Presidency’ — rather than merely the 1/20/09 Noon time — is confirmed by the re-take of the ‘oath’ by Obama at the White House on 1/21/09 after the first ‘oath’ was NOT administered by Justice Roberts NOR recited by Obama in the words as required under Article 2.)

    This is significant because at such time that the Supreme Court finally rules on the merits on Obama’s disqualification as not being an Article 2 “natural born citizen” (clearly he is NOT), Biden’s automatic status (without needing to take a separate Presidential Oath) of being President would be predicated upon four different bases: First, having been Vice President under Article 2; second, having been Vice President-elect under the 20th Amendment; third, having been actual President in the hiatus before Obama took the ‘oath(s)’; and fourth, retroactively deemed President during the full period of the Obama usurpation so that the acts of the Federal Government under the usurpation can be deemed authorized and/or ratified by Biden’s legitimacy.

    SECOND QUESTION: Who will be the 45th President?

    ANSWER: Hillary Clinton

    One must assume that Bill and Hillary Clinton have been aware of all of the above. Biden’s wife recently “let the cat out of the bag” on the Oprah Show that both Biden and Hillary had considered alternatively Veep or Secretary of State, in either case, setting up Hillary to be President on a vote of the Democratic Congress if need be.

    THIRD QUESTION: Is Obama an unwitting victim of this troika or a knowing participant?

    ANSWER: Yet undetermined.

    ReplyDelete