Monday, April 30, 2012

If I were Devil and if I wanted America to fail, I’d vote for Democrats

Two videos one by Paul Harvey the other by Free Market America (FMA) strikingly paint a picture of a depraved American society and Government. Harvey first penned his sonnet in 1965. Free Market America inspired by Harvey’s verse tells the story of the results of Liberal Progressives in power and the failure of their policies and the failure of their ideologies.

Barry Hussein Soetoro is the face of Liberal Progressivism. He has failed partly for his incompetence, partly because of his hubris, partly for his strident partisanship and partly for the Liberal Progressive agenda that he has advanced on America for the last three plus years.

Note how Harvey and FMA capture the spirit of degradation that envelops America (see 3:12min video)

FMA captures the deprivation of the Soetoro administration and the administration’s policies. (see 4:39min video)

Seems to me if I was the Devil and if I wanted America to fail, I’d vote for Democrats.

Friday, April 27, 2012

There is no Far Right

Liberals must be corrected when they attempt to create cognitive parities of relativity between the left and the right. There is none actually. It is the left that has had to attack the right to establish it’s leftist foothold in a society that was once predominately Conservative. There is no right wing. There is only the left wing’s attack on Conservatism and Conservatism has always been the baseline majority view in this country.
To radical left-wing liberal progressives there is an equal corresponding but opposite right-wing counterpart to the organization and exploits of the progressive movement. There is not. There is only the radical left wing all else is the propaganda of the left, which is meant to end Conservatism.

If you lived through the 50’s and 60’s as I have you know that the United States was a conservative country, you have probably heard the references to the Beaver Cleaver era of the 50’s, cookie cutter conservatives living in cookie cutter neighborhoods living cookie cutter lives.

Nevertheless, the 60’s and 70’s introduced a movement away from conservatism; this movement termed liberalism separated itself from conservatism and began its journey to the left. As liberalism continued its movement further from Conservatism, it became radicalized extreme and Progressive.

Conservatism has not moved from its original position. It remains where it always was, the natural starting point for U.S. culture and society. The movement has always been on the Liberal side. It’s akin to sitting in a car that unnoticed to you, is rolling backwards however, you looking out the window, and your perception it’s the landscape is moving. That is your perception until of course the car comes to an abrupt halt. Realizing the car’s movement is new information to you and with this new information you are allowed to refocus and understand that what you first supposed was entirely incorrect.

Read the history of the United States through the 50’s through present day. History will confirm that the social and moral movement in America has always been toward Liberalism not Conservatism. That is irrefutable fact.

As the left separated from Conservatism, it found that it was beneficial for their purposes to call Conservatism the Right. Moreover, the further that the progressive liberal left strayed away from conservatism they projected that movement on Conservatism. Their story is Conservatism moved to the right or the extreme right, which of course, is not true.

What is true is some Conservatives began to move left by indentifying with left issues. Therefore leaving Conservatism these left indentifying conservatives began to identify themselves as fiscal-conservatives, compassionate-conservatives or some form of hyphenated conservative.

These ersatz conservatives have given the left the cover of calling conservatives that have remained the same over the years the “far right” or extreme.

Again, read history the movement has always been away from the traditional conservative moorings of our society and Constitution. It is not conservatives moving further right, conservatives haven’t moved. It’s leftists who have moved to extreme progressive positions and then project their movement back on conservatives.

Liberal Progressives are unabashed in their claims that they want to change American. (To move America forward they say) Conservatives state that they want America to live out the true meaning of its creed of the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness. A comparative look at both positions clearly indicates that only one side has moved but sad to say they have moved not in a progressive forward way, they have in fact moved in a regressive backward way.

Progressives are the car that is rolling backwards. They are looking out from the window believing that the conservative landscape is moving. However, that movement is only an illusion, a misconception.

Liberals are regressing our society back into ideologies that have failed in the past, Marxism, Leninism, Stalinism and Trotskyism. The aforementioned ideologies didn’t work in the pass and will not work today.

Liberals must be corrected when they attempt to create cognitive parities of relativity between the left and the right. There is none actually.

It is the left that has had to attack the right to establish it’s leftist foothold in a society that was once predominately Conservative. There is no right wing. There is only the left wing’s attack on Conservatism and Conservatism has always been the baseline majority view in this country.

We all see and have seen that the problems that plague this country increase in synchronization with the advancement of Liberal Progressive ideology. That fact is not indicated any clearer than by the current Liberal Progressive presidential administration.

There is no right wing. There is no extreme right or any of the pejoratives epithets that the radical left uses to broad brush Conservatives. There are only the Conservative roots that have always been the center of this nation. The term right wing is an invention of the left wing to put the left in resistance to the heart of this country, Conservatism.

There is only the radical Liberal Progressive agenda and their attempt to turn America against it’s founding principles.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Pelosi Again: The Democrat Plan outwit the American People

Just 15 months after taking a thumping in the 2010 midterm elections, House Democrats have seized on the current anti-Washington fervor and are confident they can win the 25 seats they need to regain control of the House. -- Deirdre Walsh
Ever so stealthily as if on little cat’s feet Nancy Pelosi is planning to pull off another one of the greatest coups in U.S. history in just under 200 days when she and Democrats recapture the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2012 elections.(see article)

Democrat’s plans are materializing right now as you read this but low key and under the radar. In fact, if you’ve noticed Congress has done nothing since the American people sent Republicans into the House to dissuade and dislodge Democrats who were involved in the Healthcare insurgency before the 2008 elections.

Between 1932 and 2012, Democrats have controlled the House of Representatives for 61 years in comparison Republicans having controlled it for 13 years between that time span. That’s 82% of the time between 1932-2012 that Democrats have been responsible for what has went right or wrong in this country.

More than 50 of Los Angeles' most influential political fundraisers and consultants quietly met Monday night at media mogul Haim Saban's Beverly Hills home to hear former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi outline the Democrats' plan for taking back the U.S. House of Representatives, The Hollywood Reporter has learned.-- Tina Daunt

(see article)

Yet as everyday Americans are concerned with subjects as; prolonged national joblessness, national home foreclosures, our national economy in almost fatal distress and a failed Democrat presidency. Democrats are concerned with only two things. Power and how they are going to get it back!

Democrats have done nothing to promote the public weal since they mandated the unconstitutional healthcare law by the unscrupulous tactics of jumping the fence, vaulting with pole and parachuting over procedure and precedence to deliver the bastardy law just as Pelosi promised.

Now once again the coils of the silent Pelosi Democrat Boa Constrictor are surreptitiously winding around the U.S. capitol while sleeping elected Republicans go about their business-as-usual schedules. Zombie like as if 2008 laurels will be enough to preserve their apparent fragile hold on the House of Representatives. Wake up, where is the Republican plan to increase their hold on the House or at least keep it? (see article)

Nowhere to be mentioned, however, like the nightmarish cinema dream creations of Wes Craven, Pelosi has been able to transgress "the boundaries between the imaginary and real." She toys with the American people’s perceptions of what is real and what is not real. All the while Republicans stand by mesmerized as if they are turned into stone by gazing into her eyes.

Finally, the ultimate act of Democrat political mysticism will be the Democrat High Priestess ascending again where she once was. Her plan is to rule once again from the heights of the House Chamber. If this political resurrection is accomplished Democrats will have successfully realigned their political Harmonic Convergence into the unholy alliance, which give birth to Obamacare. The American political trinity of Democrat controlled House, Democrat controlled Senate and if Republicans fail to regain the White house a Democrat controlled Executive office all to do the work of the ghosts of Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky and Alinsky yet again on the American people.

The Republican establishment is functioning as if they are completely unaware of the imminent catastrophe that is about to befall America if Democrats regain control of Legislative and the Executive branches. You dear reader and dear citizen might want to write or call your representative to wake up your Congressman or woman or Senator. Do it now. Let them know that they must prevent Nancy Pelosi from ever again becoming Speaker of the House.

Not only do we need both Houses of Congress to turn back the scourge of Pelosi’s progressivism in our government we need the presidency too. This is your warning. You have been warned. If Nancy Pelosi is Speaker of the House after November 2012, if Harry Reid is still the Senate Majority Leader and if Barry Hussein Soetoro is still the president of the United States after November 2012 you have no one to blame but yourselves.

God preserve the Nation and the Constitution

Monday, April 23, 2012

The Church must Vote This November

“In clear violation of our first amendment rights president Obama with his radical pro-abortion and his extreme secularist agenda now seems intent on following a similar path [of Hitler and Stalin]. Now things have come to such a pass in our beloved country that this is a battle. We could lose. But before the awesome judgment seat of almighty God this is not a battle where any believing Catholic may remain neutral. This fall every practicing believer must vote” -- Bishop Daniel R. Jenky
In the bravest homily or sermon preached in this young 21st century, Bishop Daniel R. Jenky of the Diocese of Peoria, Illinois challenged President Obama's Health and Human Services mandate. A mandate, which forces all Churches to provide birth control to employees as part as health care insurance, Bishop Jenky calls on all believers (not only the Catholic Church) to vote this November in line with true biblical faith. (see 1:10 min video)

All people of faith in this country must put aside their differences whether doctrine, creed or rite and vote for the preservation of religious freedom in this country. A freedom that this present administration is threatening with it’s draconian anti-religious policies.

Friday, April 20, 2012

If you are a White Conservative Protestant Male it sucks to be you

If you are a White Conservative Protestant Male in America or the World it sucks to be you.

We live in a society that has spent the last forty years tearing down the image it refers to as "the White man.” The White man was the hated Establishment in the nineteen sixties. He was the oppressive and often surreal Omni-present “The Man” in the seventies but from the eighties on he has become this image of an over privileged silver spoon in mouth incompetent racist who has gotten everything he owns by theft or repression or both.

The American media has devoted huge unfair amounts of time mis-characterizing white men in order to achieve what it believes is creating a more equitable stake in the American dream for women and minorities. Often Progressive pony-tailed self-hating Latte drinking White men are at the forefront of this political war to emasculate White Conservative Protestant Males.

What that means to purveyors for this new social equality for all, is the white man has to be debased in order for women and minorities to be elevated.

Therefore, in politics, education, business, media and society at-large anything that produces negative views of the White Conservative Protestant Male (WCPM) is valued whereas any wholesome constructive productive and familial images are repressed.

This is never more event as in the presidential campaign pitting a man of African and White mixed race (who identifies as Black) against a White man who questionably represents Conservative values. The fact that he isn’t really Conservative doesn’t matter to anti-WCPM objectors. The fact that these haters of White Conservative men previously rejected Sen. John McCain in the 2008 presidential elections show that anti-WCPM haters group all White men into the same category. They are not in the least discerning when it comes to distinctions such as Compassionate Conservative, Moderate Conservative, RINO, Fiscal Conservative or any of the hyphenated conservative distinctions that have much more in common with Progressive liberals than with actual Conservatism.

George W. Bush and John McCain spent inordinate amounts of time and efforts to be liked and even accepted by progressives and liberal only to have such efforts scorned and ridiculed by the Left. No such effort has been put forward by Barry Hussein Soetoro rather he has pushed his hard left wing agenda above any attempt at bi-partisanship. He has demanded that Conservatives accept his Ideological beliefs or he will enact them without their approval. And he has done just that, Soetoro has enacted either by executive order or partisan legislation the most left wing policies in the last fifty years. He has done this largely against the wishes of a still majority conservative electorate with hopes that Conservatives are so fragmented and disheartened, he will be re-elected by the cobbled together super partisan special interests minority groups that his far left policies have catered to.

The president’s belief is the current progressive liberal education, business, and media complex has created so much hatred for the Conservative Protestant White man and his family that no Conservative White man can hope to win a presidential election in America again.
That is why the president has waged war on Ann Romney through his surrogates in the progressive liberal media. That is also why throughout his presidency there are tinges of racial tensions created with the president’s remarks, initially regarding the “stupidity” of White police in the Cambridge incident involving Black Professor Henry Louis Gates in 2009. Or the president’s remarks in the more recent Trayvon Martin incident involving a media reported “White Hispanic” and a Black teen.

The deconstruction of the White Conservative Protestant Male in this society is undeniably evident from the White house to the school house the message that is being communicated by progressive liberals is that White Conservative Protestant Men are no longer welcomed as major contributors to this society.

As the president told Republicans, “Sit in the back,” which is an obvious reference to the days that Blacks sat in the back of buses in the South. (see story)

In a society that is supposed to be inclusive of all and tolerate of all beliefs, all ideologies and all orientations the message being communicated to White Conservative Protestant men is, “It sucks being you.” For all of you who don’t have sons that look like Trayvon Martin. It sucks for them as well if they are raised with Conservative Protestant values.

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Whose letting the Extreme Weather out?

We must know for certain that the recent extreme weather are acts of mother nature or are man-made acts meant to force the American people into a global warming new world order.
What if the United States government had the means to control weather and what if the government decided that it wanted to force America into Global warming/Climate Change treaties, which most Americans are opposite to right now. Do you supposed that the U.S. government would unleash violent storms against American citizens to convince the citizenry that the violent storms of Global warming are real therefore we must join the United Nations multi-trillion dollar carbon regulatory cap and trade and world tax scheme.

Is it possible that the freakish number and the freakish nature of tornadoes that recently touched down in the state of Texas and parts of the mid-West are a part of a larger U.S. Government and United Nations scheme to make the United States acquiesce to world taxation, peer pressure. This is taxation, which the European Union and the United Nations are ready to implement as soon as the United States is on board.

As outlandish as the just mentioned scenario sounds to some, is it possible. First of all the motive is there. Regulating carbon through the cap and trade system would be a multi-trillion dollar windfall for whoever controlled such trading system. Second, some scientists in the United States have stated a goal of weather control by the year 2025. They have been working on the prospect since the Vietnam war. Moreover, they have had some successes with attempts.

Before you rule out the possibility consider that this present administration and a Democrat controlled Congress forced a universal health care bill on the American people knowing that their actions could be unconstitutional. Nevertheless, the Democrat speaker of the house, Nancy Pelosi vowed that Democrats would use any means necessary to achieve their goal of passing health care and they did do everything necessary to pass the law.

So why wouldn’t they do whatever it takes to get the American people to agree to a global warming treaty with the European Union and the United Nations?

We know that the Government has the motive. However, does it actually have the means to scare the America people enough that we accept a global carbon tax? Well if the government has, the means to control weather it would be feasible would it not?

Take a look at the following four part series entitled, Weaponizing Weather, then see if whether you think the dozen or so tornadoes that wreaked havoc in the state of Texas and the mid-West were simply acts of nature due to global warming or were they acts of men due to greed and want of control over other men.

Remember we have a president who is pro-global warming policies. So much so, that he credited Texas’ wild fires in 2011 to Global warming. He said in a reference to the GOP front-runner, Texas Gov. Rick Perry at the time, "You've got a governor whose state is on fire denying climate change. It's true." The comments came as wild fires ravished Texas at one of four events for his reelection campaign Sunday, September 25, 2011, at the start of a three-day trip to the West Coast and Mountain West. (see reference) The president never aided Texas in that state’s state of emergency (see story)

Up to a dozen tornadoes skipped through the densely populated Dallas-Fort Worth area in Texas on Tuesday, April 4 2012, ripping apart homes and tossing tractor-trailer trucks into the air, but there were no reports of serious injuries or deaths. National Weather Service meteorologist Jesse Moore said that 10 to 12 tornadoes touched down during a massive storm that brought chaos from high winds, rain and hail to the nation's fourth most populous metropolitan area.

Many of the 6.3 million area residents were forced to scramble for safety as the storm bore down during the early afternoon, when schools and workplaces were open. Hundreds of homes and businesses were damaged, some of them extensively.

First video of the tornado attack on Texas (see 1:24min video)

Directly following the four part series Ben Livingston in a 14min video makes the fascinating claim that it was his job as a meteorology Engineer in the military to manipulate weather for warfare purposes. He claims that he did it for the Vietnam War and that President Johnson was aware of this technology and approved of it. But first Weather Warfare (see 10:16min video)

Part 1

Part 2 (see 10:20min video)

HAARP emits ELF waves into the atmosphere and is being used for weather modification.

Part 3 (see 10:22min video)

HAARP ELF waves causes earthquakes, chemtrails, rain and floods

Part 4 (see 9:48 min video)

Operation POPEYE used in the Vietnam War, Hurricane Katrina was weapon used against U.S.

(see 14:56min video)

Ben Livingston claims it was his job as a meteorology Engineer to use weather as a weapon

It is the responsibility of Americans to make certain that we remain vigilant against a government that would attempt to rob it’s people of their freedoms and prosperity.

We must know for certain that the recent extreme weather are acts of mother nature or are man-made acts meant to force the American people into a global warming new world order.

Monday, April 16, 2012

Obama Stimulus Money going to the Matrix

“[T]his is but a brief moment in history “ when the U.S. had pre-eminent military, economic and political power, will not last. “This is just a period, a few decades this will last, and I think all of us who are Americans should think about this and ask ourselves how do we wish this moment to be judged 50 years for now.” —William Jefferson Clinton former President of the former United States of America
What is the Matrix?

In 2010, 350 million dollars of stimulus money went to companies in the state of Michigan, President Barry Hussein Soetoro and Vice president Joe Biden both took credit for infusing the state with federal dollars to save and/or create jobs for Americans.

However the reality is, several companies the money went to are owned by foreign interests and several of the jobs created are not going to Americans those jobs are going to foreign workers. (see 2:37min video)

If this weren’t so frightening, it would be funny. The fact that foreign countries have so positioned themselves in this country so that Americans and America cannot benefit themselves without strengthening also the very countries that we compete against serves only to further weaken United States.

Foreign countries like economic leeches are embedded in almost every aspect of the U.S. economy, which will virtually make the recovery of the middle class impossible.

In fact, it’s looking more evident that there is a plan set in place by the U.S. Congress and the Executive branches, which will forever prevent the United States from ever dominating the world’s economy again.

After all it was William Jefferson Clinton who told a group he was speaking before in Australia in 2002 that;

“[T]his is but a brief moment in history “ when the U.S. had pre-eminent military, economic and political power, will not last. “This is just a period, a few decades this will last, and I think all of us who are Americans should think about this and ask ourselves how do we wish this moment to be judged 50 years for now.”

It is clear that the present president and vice president are not looking out for American’s interests though they pretend to.

There is something happening to America. Our politicians have sold the American people out to foreign interests. That explains decades of U.S. jobs being outsourced to other countries and the subsequent economic booms in those countries. What is also evident is that three hundred fifty million dollars of taxpayers’ money, money which we were told was to stimulate the American economy and money that was going to create American jobs, is going to foreign companies and foreign workers.

America has been sold out by Obama, Biden and the rest of the U.S. government. President Clinton knew that America was being sold out in 2002. That is why he could say with certainty that American’s pre-eminence in military, economic and political power will not last.

The die is cast if the American people make the same mistake they made in 2008 and elect leaders who are anti-American we will be that much closer to former president Clinton’s vision for America.

A vision that current president Barry Hussein Soetoro shares with Clinton and the entire Democrat Party. It is a vision that changes pre-eminence into post-constitutional and post-capitalistic America. Such a vision is already here only hidden by the pretense that blinds Americans to the real world. This world is a world of people being used as batteries hidden behind a fa├žade of the progressive Matrix, which is being advanced by Socialist Democrats who are in power and their progressive Republican comrades.

What is the Matrix? The Matrix is the United States. It has been taken over by Socialist Progressives, the machines who will feed off the economic life force of Americans by sucking off American jobs to send them to other countries. They will feed off our economic life force by continuing to giving American jobs in America to foreign workers.

Finally, Socialist Progressive Democrats will continue feed off our economic life force by continuing to grow government and find new ways to employ new taxes on an already weakened U.S. middle class.

Like in the movie the Matrix, we need a savior to deliver us from the Mr. Smith that presently occupies the White house and the Democrat Mr. Smiths that occupy Congress. Will the American people be that savior in 2012?

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Report: Obamacare will create deficits not save money as promised

"But we have to pass the [health care ] bill so that you can find out what is in it." —Nancy Pelosi, Democrat and former Speaker of the House
If governments and laws were people, “The Patient protection and Affordable Care Act” (ACA) signed into law by president Barry Hussein Soetoro would be a bastard son born to a single Party in a two Party government. If governments were religion (ACA) or Obamacare would be sin because it was brought forth in partisan iniquity, and in political sin did it’s mother (Nancy Pelosi) conceive it.

Who could forget the infamous words of former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi as she and her Democrat controlled Congress gave birth to the bill known as Obamacare. The bill, which no one was able to see until it, was voted into law and signed by the most partisan president in the history of the nation. Neither the Democrat controlled Congress nor the President took the time to read the bill in order to ensure that what was in it is for the best interest of the American people. (see :05sec video)

So now that we are able to peer down into Obama’s and Pelosi’s Pandora’s Box, the Healthcare law, we can see that truly the devil is in the details of this unsustainable and negatively fiscal impacting law.

Government Economist Charles Blahous, who serves as public trustee overseeing Medicare and Social Security finances for the Soetoro administration, suggested that federal accounting practices under this administration have obscured the true fiscal impact of Obamacare. Mr. Blahous newly released fifty-two paged report, The Fiscal Consequences of the Affordable Care Act (see below) is being untruthfully and unmercifully attacked by the Soetoro administration because it attempts to give a truthful picture of the fiscal impact that Obamacare will have on the American economy. (see story)

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) signed into law by President Obama in 2010 will significantly worsen the federal government’s fiscal position relative to previous law. Supporters argued that this comprehensive health care reform would deliver a much-needed correction to the government’s unsustainable fiscal outlook and would benefit the country’s overall fiscal situation. However, between now and 2021, the ACA is expected to add as much as $530 billion to federal deficits while increasing spending by more than $1.15 trillion.— Charles Blahous


The Fiscal Consequences of the Affordable Care Act 1

With nothing more than what can be described as unbelievable temerity the Soetoro administration is defending an over 2,000-page law that no one in the administration probably still haven’t read against a economic report that that they probably haven’t put in a honest effort to investigate.

Following is Mr. Blahous’ basic explanation showing why obamacare will add at least $340 billion to the deficit, not reduce it has the president promised. (see report) (see 2:53min video)

Inevitably, the American people will have to decide whom they are going to believe, a government that forced an unconstitutional law on it by any means necessary. As Nancy Pelosi said, “We’ll go through the gate. If the gate’s closed, we’ll go over the fence. If the fence is too high, we’ll pole vault in. If that doesn’t work, we’ll parachute in but we're going to get health care reform passed.”

Does that sound like a government one can trust? This law is not only unconstitutional, it is the second greatest lie propagated against the America people. The first is the presidency of a foreign student who’s education was partly funded by William Ayers’ mother and father, Mary and Thomas Ayers.

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

The IRS Just as Powerful, Just as Strong, Just as well Funded

We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to secure the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that is just as powerful, just as strong and just as well funded. —Presidential Candidate Barry Hussein Soetoro
The Hill has reported Monday that the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration has stealthy diverted one-half a billion dollars to the IRS to transform the civilian government agency into the armed national security force that candidate Soetoro said he needed to secure his national security objectives. (see story)(see :21sec video)

According to The Hill, the money is only part of the IRS’s total implementation spending, and it is being provided outside the normal appropriations process. The tax agency is responsible for several key provisions of the new law, including the unpopular individual mandate. (see related story)

Congressional Leaders have been warning for two years that 16,500 IRS agents would be added to the roles of the IRS under Soetoro and those agents would be armed to enforce Obamacare. It is highly suspect that when one queries the subject of 16,500-armed IRS agents, pages on the subject are removed throughout the internet however in contrast several pro Soetoro factcheck sites are posted to refute the claims of several thousand armed IRS agents. Highly curious I must say!

“This is a command society now and medicine is right at the forefront of this….16,500 armed bureaucrats coming to make this program work – if it was a good program and everybody liked it, you wouldn’t need 16,500 thugs coming with their guns and putting you in jail if you didn’t follow all the rules,”—Congressman Paul Ryan

Only sites that will speak in general terms are allowed to remain on the net. (see example)

The Supreme Court is presently deciding the constitutionally of Obamacare. However according to the Hill the Soetoro administration is not waiting for such a ruling it is presently laying ground work for enforcement of Obamacare by the IRS.

It should be apparent to even the blindest partisans supporting the administration Barry Hussein Soetoro’s plan is to use the government attack dog, the IRS, to bully the American people to comply with his healthcare law whether or not the law is found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

The Obama administration has plowed ahead despite the legal and political challenges.

It has moved aggressively to get important policies in place. In addition, according to a review of budget documents and figures provided by congressional staff, the administration is also burning through implementation funding provided in the healthcare law.

Presidential candidate Soetoro called for a civilian national security force to enforce his objectives. The IRS certain could fill that order.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has transferred almost $200 million to the IRS over the past two years and plans to transfer more than $300 million this year, according to figures provided by a congressional aide.

After all the IRS is just as powerful, just as strong and just as well funded as any other U.S. governmental organization. They certainly are the most feared civilian government agency.

Monday, April 09, 2012

Continuing Democrat Voter Fraud in the USA

Why are Democrats opposed to voter identification? Democrats know that if voters were required to show identification when voting that action alone would cut precipitously into the number of fraudulent Democrats casting votes in U.S. elections.

In fact, Democrats have worked feverously making lax voters laws by instituting motor voter laws thereby allowing any non-citizen to register to vote. Democrats have also organized and supported vote by mail, which makes U.S. elections highly susceptible to high volumes of voter fraud.

The irony is the United States has sent former Democrat president Jimmy Carter to monitor against voter fraud in newly formed democracies throughout the world. Yet this country won’t lift a finger to end it’s own fraud infested elections by simply requiring anyone who votes in a U.S. election to identify themselves. I’m reminded of that biblical scripture in which Jesus foretells that his enemies would challenge Him with the derisive, “physician heal thy self!”

In the 2008 elections in which president Barry Hussein Soetoro was elected, community organizing groups like ACORN were not only accused of but they were caught in various voter fraud endeavors. Though caught in many cases red-handed in the ongoing enterprise of committing voter fraud those incidents were largely glossed over by the Soetoro supporting media.

In one of the most blatant of voter intimidation acts in recent memory the New Black Panthers camped outside of voter polls in Philadelphia armed with nightsticks intimidating white voters at the polls. The case originally prosecuted by the Eric Holder justice department however in an apparent change of mind the case against the New Black Panthers was abruptly halted by AG Holder.

Holder is reported saying that his Justice department will not prosecute any blacks for violations of voter laws because that would demean his people. His people? Is he referring to the people of the United States of America? No Eric Holder is a racist he meant only Black people.

With that known, it is now understandable that Holder has been working to negate the votes of legitimate Americans by knowingly allowing voter fraud, not only he but also the entire Democrat Party. Such activities have resulted in virtually anyone voting in U.S. elections posing as anyone. Why one could pose as the AG Eric Holder himself. (see 3:06min video)

No doubt, Democrats are relaying on this type of voter fraud to win again in 2012 as they did in 2008.

Hum, maybe there is a need for citizens armed with nightsticks to stand outside of minority voting polls to ensure that only registered U.S. citizens vote in U.S. elections. Do you think Jimmy Carter would take the job?

Friday, April 06, 2012

The President’s Alternate Liberal Progressive view on the Supreme Court

He was the farthest left-wing partisan in the U.S. Senate. Rather than vote for a Maverick who would have given them direct access to the presidency Progressives voted an inexperienced person of questionable origin and questionable loyalty to this country and its constitution into the White house.

Barry Hussein Soetoro has the nation split yet again down partisan lines. Some believe that he knew exactly what he was saying when he threatened the Supreme Court over his unconstitutional health care law. (In addition, if Justice Elena Kagan secretly communicated last Friday’s vote to the president she should immediately be made to recuse herself and in addition, whatever mechanism that is in place to remove a justice from the court should be employed again her.) Others believe that the president’s remarks regarding the court were so astonishing ignorant that it is unbelievable that he was a law student perish the thought that he was a senior law lecturer at the University of Chicago (He was never law professor as the lying narrative advances)

His provably false remarks weren’t aimed at Supreme Court justices, but rather at uninformed Americans, especially liberals (is there any other kind?). The most divisive president in history is setting up yet another straw man for his re-election campaign, one that fits directly into his strategy to divide and conquer.

Joseph Curl’s article “Divide and conquer” opines that the president is so deviously political that he is purposely manipulating all his liberal sycophants at the Supreme Court’s expense (see story)

Author and Commentator Ann Coulter believes that the president’s comments were made out of startling ignorance. Every first year law student should know of the case Marbury vs. Madison which formed the basis for the exercise of judicial review in the United States under Article III of the Constitution. If this president could may his statement against the court in light of this case, if he isn’t ignorant of the case then the alternative is he is intellectually dishonest.

"Liberals are often trying to push this idea that judicial review means overturning any act of Congress, or rather judicial activism. Judicial activism is anything when the Supreme Court doesn’t obey what the Constitution says, like when they invent rights to abortion, rights to gay, and rights for criminals to go free if a specific Miranda warning hasn't been read to them."—Ann Coulter

Nevertheless Coulter finds the president’s remarks perfidious (see 1:51 video)

I believe that Liberals have created an alternative view of reality. It is a psychosis, a derangement of personality, a loss of contact with reality causing deterioration of normal social functioning.

The president is such person. He keeps saying he has belief that an unconstitutional law with be upheld by those whose responsibility is to judge whether laws are constitutional and reject laws that are not. To say that he has belief and certainty that the court will uphold an unconstitutional law is remarkably out of touch with reality.

Either the president is out of touch with reality or he believes that he can create his own reality by speaking things, which be not, as though they were. If he believes he has the power to create his own reality that would explain why he says that things that he does.

The president’s alternate view on the court is that the court will adhere to his will to his words. This president believes that all of the world will bend to his will.

Which also means that president Soetoro believes his word preempts the Constitution. We’ll all see if the court holds that same view.

Wednesday, April 04, 2012

Obama Looking for Lapdogs on the Supreme Court

Those fact s notwithstanding, what is so striking about the president’s remarks is how apparent it has become to all citizens of the United States, to all Chicago thuggery and to all prison inmates across this country that this presumed president is attempting to make the Supremes his bitches. That is why he chastises them so often and so publicly.
Apparently Barry Hussein Soetoro is doing his job so well as the presumed president of the United States of America (presumed because his legitimacy is still in question) that he has time to tell a legitimate body of government ( his appointments excluded) how to conduct it’s affairs. (see story)

You would think that a Constitutional lecturer (Soetoro was never a law Professor) would know that the Supreme Court is an equal branch to the Legislative and the Executive branches of the United States government. The Supremes’ job is to decide whether laws within a case or cases brought before it comply with the Constitution of the United States of America.

Justices are supposed to be fair and unbiased judges of constitutionally. They are not supposed to be swayed by the partisan carping of a politically insecure president, be he legitimate or be he not. Nor should the court be ideologically influenced hence their lifetime appointments.

The reality is both of the president’s Supreme Court appointments Sonia Sotomeyer and Elena Kagan were placed on the court for their progressive ideological views rather than their judicial acumen or their commitment to Constitutional principles. For example, Justice Kagan who was the solicitor general for the Soetoro administration when they were beginning to plan their defense of this health care law is in clear conflict of interest yet she hasn’t the legal ethics to recuse herself from the case. Seems these days judges or justices are selected for their ideological fealty rather than unbiased dedication to law or the constitution.

Moreover, in the media there is continued talk about a partisan split on the court between Progressive and Conservatives. If what the media reports is true then the house of the United States has fallen, it is a political and social house divided. Justices Sotomeyer’s and Kagan’s primarily function on the court is to fortify that ideological breach rather than adjudicate constitutionally.

Those fact s notwithstanding, what is so striking about the president’s recent remarks regarding the Supreme court is how apparent it has became to all citizens of the United States, to all Chicago thuggery and to all prison inmates across this country that this presumed president is attempting to make the Supremes his bitches. That is why he chastises them so often and so publicly.

This president shows unprecedented contempt for the Supreme Court. That fact was on full display for the nation to see January 2010 when the president dressed the Justices down in a national viewed bi-cameral meeting. What had the court done? It ruled in a way that presumed president didn’t agree with.

In a 5-4 ruling, in the Citizens United v. FEC case the court ruled to strike down a key campaign-finance provision. The presumed president’s response;
"With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections.

Well, I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities." --President Barry Hussein Soetoro
In a nearly unprecedented move, the presumed president lambasted the Supreme Court embarrassing the Justices before the whole country. Now he’s done it again. On Monday April 2 2012, he virtually threatens the court. The president sent a message via the media to the court that if they do their job they would be the ones acting unconstitutionally. That message was also meant for his partisans who are already gearing up to attack the court if the court’s ruling is not what Soetoro supporters want.

The presumed president’s unveiled threats against the Supreme court were so brazen that an Appellate court has responded ordering the administration to answer whether it believes that the Supreme court is within its constitutional role to rule on the constitutionality of the health care law. (see story)

The presumed president’s remarks in their entirely are below:

"I actually continue to be confident that the Supreme Court will uphold the law. And the reason is, because in accordance with precedent out there, it's constitutional.
"That's not just my opinion by the way. That's the opinion of legal experts across the ideological spectrum, including two very conservative appellate court justices that said this wasn't even a close case."

"I think it's important -- because I watched some of the commentary last week -- to remind people that this is not an abstract argument. People's lives are affected by the lack of availability of healthcare, the inaffordability of healthcare, their inability to get healthcare because of preexisting conditions.

"The law that's already in place has already given 2.5 million young people healthcare that wouldn't otherwise have it. There are tens of thousands of adults with preexisting conditions who have healthcare right now because of this law. Parents don't have to worry about their children not being able to get healthcare because they can't be prevented from getting healthcare as a consequence of a preexisting condition. That is part of this law.
"Millions of seniors are paying less for prescription drugs because of this law. Americans all across the country have greater rights and protections with respect to the insurance companies, and are getting preventive care because of this law.

"So, that's just the part that's already been implemented. That doesn't speak to the 30 million people who stand to gain coverage once it's fully implemented in 2014.
"And I think it's important, I think the American people understand and I think the justices should understand that in the absence of an individual mandate, you cannot have a mechanism to ensure that people with preexisting conditions can actually get healthcare.
"So there's not only an economic element to this and a legal element to this but there's a human element to this, and I hope that's not forgotten in this political debate. Ultimately I'm confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically-elected Congress.

"And I'd just remind conservative commentators that for years what we've heard is the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint. That an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law. Well, this is a good example, and I'm pretty confident this court will recognize that and not take that step."

"I'm confident this will be upheld because it should be upheld. And again, that's not just my opinion, that's the opinion of a whole lot of constitutional law professors and academics and judges and lawyers who've examined this law, even if they're not particularly sympathetic to this particular piece of legislation or my presidency."

The president’s remarks are political sophistry at its absolute worst. His words reek of the scent of healthcare snake oil sold for medical cures by a roadside huckster. This unconstitutional healthcare law is the lemon that the lemon laws were enacted to enforce against.

The American people were sold a lemon in Obamacare. We all know it. The American people want nothing more than to take this lemon back to the dealer and get our money back. We’ve had enough of roadside hucksters telling the American people to swallow the snake oil of Obamacare. We’ve had enough of the government telling us that what they tell us to do is for our own good whether we like it or we want it or not.

According to the founders of this country, our government was instituted in a triad form for the purpose of checks and balances. When two branches of our government act unconstitutionally as the Congress and the President has in passing Obamacare, the Judiciary was designed to check them for the sake of the American people.
That is why the Supremes will strike down Obamacare, it is unconstitutional, and we all know it.

Finally, if we no longer have a government that will protect and defend the constitution we have disappointed Benjamin Franklin and the rest of America’s founders. Though it’s taken over two hundred years to lost it we have shown that we could not keep what the founders bequeathed to us when they gave us a constitutional republic. That is if we let stand any unconstitutional law, which Progressives in both the Democrat and Republican Parties including the president put forth.

No matter what the president says, Obamacare is unconstitutional. The Supremes must strike it down. We all know that it is. What we don’t know is whether there is remaining an American institution that will uphold the Constitution of the United States of America in the way that it is intended to be protected and defended.

Monday, April 02, 2012

Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayer and Kagan the Supreme Legislature of the United States of America

At this time, the whole of the American government under Barry Hussein Soetoro is acting extra-Constitutionally. The president and his entire Party must be removed from office starting this November and continuing until every Democrat and Moderate Republican pays for what they have done to America.
No longer can the 9 Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States be called a court if they do what some experts contemplate them doing.

Experts believe, by reason of questioning that certain partisan justices posed regarding ‘severability’ the third day of the health care hearings, the court is about to strike down only part of the Obama health care law as unconstitutional while they leave parts of the law in place.

If these Justices do that, they will in fact become a supreme legislative body instead of a court. They will create new legislative scenarios in which the monstrous health care law that a Democrat congress created behind closed doors, will be forced to morph. Obamacare the over 2,000-page law was not read in Congress nor was it read by anyone in the White house before the president signed it. If the Liberal wing of the court plus so-called Conservatives Kennedy and Roberts (as rumored) decide to only strike down part and not all of the healthcare law, that act will be a pure political act. By that act the court will change the oversize law into separate little stand-alone laws that will need new infusions of taxpayer moneys to survive if the mandate is struck down alone.

Needlessly to say this was not the intent of the healthcare law. Democrats, including the president, repeatedly told the American people that the health care law’s intent was to bring down health cost and cover all Americans. The law will not accomplish either goal in its original form or in whatever form the Supreme Legislature of the United States chop it into if Ginsburg and her posse have their way.

Where is the money going to come from? According to every reputable source, the United States is out of money. If this Court does anything besides strike down this complete unconstitutional law, they could conceivably be responsible for bankrupting America. All of this because the court attempted to placate left wing Democrats who forced through the President’s 2,000 plus page law. (see stories here and here)

I have never been more disturbed than in the three days of last week listening to the arguments before the Court regarding the unconstitutionality of the health care law, a law incidentally which was passed only by Partisans of the Democrat Party. When the bill was in Congress Democrats controlled both the Congress and the Presidency. Passing this bill was a strict partisan act.

What has become apparent; not only to me, but also to everyone watching this important case is that there is a subjective and partisan wing on the Supreme Court what will adjudicate only by partisan ideology and nothing more. It is apparent that these partisans can do no more than view the cases before them ideologically. It is clear that objectivity is beyond the scope of the present Supreme Court.

Because of Progressives and Democrats, this is no longer a nation of laws. The constitution is no longer in effect. The Democrat Party as corrupted the courts, the congress and the presidency.

In addition, the weak Conservative appointments, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy ensure the Progressive Democrat destruction of America. Experts that know the court are warning that these men are susceptible of “going along to get along” with the Liberal bloc on the court.

For these justices this case will not be decided by the constitution or the law. This case will be decided by opinion; this is why, the court’s so-called liberal wing –Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan—indicated by their questioning that they would uphold most of the healthcare law even if the individual mandate is deemed unconstitutional. That would be disastrous for the country.

What that means is various parts of the Obamacare law will be enacted upon the American people in a weakened economy therefore the Supreme Court will be responsible for the economic fallout which will inevitably ensue.

All of this will occur because partisans on the court will not have done their jobs by completely striking down an unconstitutional law. They instead will cut the baby up as Solomon threatened to do in the biblical account. One must note that Solomon was wise enough not to actually cut a baby in half. No one is accusing the partisans on this court of having Solomonic Wisdom.

At this time, the whole of the American government under Barry Hussein Soetoro is acting extra-Constitutionally. The president and his entire Party must be removed from office starting this November and continuing until every Democrat and Moderate Republican pays for what they have done to America.