What the president as done, he was robbed the American people of their right to be represented in this matter of granting children of illegal aliens amnesty. By by-passing Congress and unilaterally granting children of illegal aliens amnesty the president stole from the American people in several ways.I have not heard a cogent explanation on either side why what president Barry Hussein Soetoro did regarding the children of Illegal Aliens by unilaterally granting them immunity is wrong so I will give one here.
First imagine that your family was out of money and no one could come up with a solution or a job. You decide to take matters in your own hands. You decide that you will rob your neighbors to take what they have to get your family money. So you do, you rob your neighbors and problem solved! Your family now has money.
See anything wrong in this little scenario? Of course you do. You realize that the ends do not justify the means. In other words yes, you have money now but it is wrong to rob your neighbors to take what is not your and to take what they have to get what you want. Simple ethics right?
Yet, that is exactly what president Soetoro has done. He has robbed the American people to get what he wants, which is votes from the illegal alien community and votes from those who support them.
Let me explain. Democrats have been creating an illegal alien crisis in America for years by partial and non-enforcement of America’s laws. As a consequence there are upwards of 40 million Mexican and Latin American nationals in the United States of America. All this is pending on the hope that they will vote as Democrats.
That being said Congress is the body that represents the people of the United States and they are the constitutional body that is assigned to making America’s laws. By design making a law is a process so that no one person can impose his or her will on the America people. This is so because the Senate and the House are representatives of the people. They are supposed to examine debate and vote on each law for the benefit of the American people. This is supposed to be a thorough process not some willy-nilly desperate attempt to get votes.
What the president as done, he was robbed the American people of their right to be represented in this matter of granting children of illegal aliens amnesty. By by-passing Congress and unilaterally granting children of illegal aliens amnesty the president stole from the American people in several ways. First he stole our right to be represented in this decision and second by giving upwards of 800,000 children of illegal aliens job permits president Soetoro has stolen jobs from the poor and middle class in a time when jobs are scarce in the American economy.
Just as the example above the problem seems to be solved but the ends does not justify the means. You don’t steal from the American people just so you can advance your political prospects with a segment of the populace, yet that is what the president has done.
If stealing is wrong and no one will dispute that it is not wrong. Then stealing from the American people is wrong. The president has stolen this decision from the American people and he wishes that we only look at the results of what he did. If that is the case we all can go rob a bank tomorrow and pay our bills and buy what we want and feel good about ourselves because that is where his act logically takes us
That is what Democrats and the president are advocating when they tout his executive order to grant amnesty to children of illegal aliens. They are advocating that we should feel good that the president has stolen from the American people. However, it’s wrong to steal and it’s wrong for the president to grant amnesty to hundreds of thousands of children of illegal aliens by by-passing Congress. That is an act of theft from the American people!
Just as you or I would be answerable to our neighbors if we were to steal from them to get our own family money this president will be answerable to you and I in November for stealing from us to advance his own political cause.
If the president's act is allowed to stand, then when a president not of your liking does the same thing, for instance, by granting Christians the right to have the cross on public lands just remember you thought unilateral executive orders were a great thing when used for something that you agree with!
