The polar bear "already is the most protected (animal) in the world and needs no additional protection," maintained Hopper. He noted the number of polar bears have more than doubled since the late 1960s from 12,000 to about 25,000 across the Arctic region from Alaska to Greenland.-- H. JOSEF HEBERTYou’ve heard the latest right? How special interest managed to get government to cave in to their politically correct cause.
It’s the would’ve, could’ve, should’ve world of far left thinking and it has the Interior Department putting the already highly protected Polar bear under the protective umbrella of the Endangered Species Act on Wednesday. (See here)
There is no danger to Polar Bears and the bear’s numbers are increasing however there could be a danger a half century away based on unfounded computer generated projections that are in dispute so what does the Interior Department do?
Using the corrupt science of global warming Secretary Dirk Kempthorne of the Interior Department bowed to the pressures of special interest groups in the face of evidence that shows that global warming is actually good for Polar bears.
That’s right the polar bear population is actually increasing and has in fact doubled since the late 1960’s from 12,000 bears to 25,000. Those are the facts but because some discredited global warming computer models projected that someday maybe 50 years out the bear could possibly be in danger the Interior Department has caved to it’s trial lawyer friends who hope to use this new protection as a way to impose global warming laws on the United States by the Endangered Species Act.
This is no more that politics posing as science and corrupted science gone wild.
The alarm about the future of polar bear decline is based on speculative computer model predictions many decades in the future. And the methodology of these computer models is being challenged by many scientists and forecasting experts. U.S. Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works(See here)And(here)
Polar bear’s numbers have doubled; it is already one of the most protected animals on earth so one must conclude that is new policy is not about saving one single solitary bear. On the contrary, It is a brazen attempt to impose global warming laws by stealth into the American legal system.
This is but another example of corrupted science and radical far left politics that will reject facts for “sniper fire over Bosnia” thus proving again that it is science that is endangered not Polar bears.
