Wednesday, June 30, 2010

But Mr. President you don’t have a Budget Now and your deficits are the Worst!

Next year when I start presenting some very difficult choices to the country I hope these folks who are hollering about deficits and debt step up cause I’m calling their bluff. And we’ll see how much of the political arguments that they’re making right now are real and how much of it was just politics.—President Barry Hussein Soetoro
The question at the G8 and G20 summit put to President Barry Hussein Soetoro was, “Are there steps that your administration can take now to build confidence that the U.S. will in fact meet its deficit reduction targets( goals) for the medium and long term,” the President careened along on a 4min 18 second long rambling fantastical response (because it wasn’t an answer) that had no basis in fiscal reality. (see 4:19min video)





Yeah right, Mr. President why don’t we start by first having your Democrat controlled Congress do the fiscally responsible thing and pass a budget resolution as required by The 1974 Budget and Impoundment Act, which requires that Congress pass a budget resolution by May 15 of each year. That might help give so idea of just how much deficit spending that we are doing presently.

Democrats have not passed a budget resolution yet and word is they are not going to this year because they don’t what the American people to know about the out of control spending deficits that has occurred under 18 months of the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration that makes President Bush’s entire 8 years look like fiscal restraint and fiscal responsibility. (see previous posts here and here)

Democrats are afraid that if the American people knew the truth about what the Soetoro policies are costing the American people Democrat political prospects in November, which already look bleak will sour even more.

"With the political season upon us, Democratic leaders believe it’s better to take a pass than to pass a budget," Ryan said in the weekly Republican address.-- Eric Zimmermann (see article)
Congressman Paul Ryan ranking Republican on the Congressional budget committee addresses the country in the Republican weekly address in which he alerts America about to fiscal irresponsibility of Democrats who are playing political games with our countries fiscal health. That includes the president. (see 3:20 min video)



Mr. President if you want to find some ass to kick. Or if you wish to call someone’s bluff why don’t you get your own party to pass a budget resolution as required by law. By my count, Democrats are 45 days out of compliance with the law. Seems to me that you don’t have to wait until next year, you can begin to have your party face some very difficult choices right now.

"This is a time to make tough choices, not run from them. To that end, Republicans on the Budget Committee have already identified $1.3 trillion in specific spending cuts we would implement right now to make Washington do more with less and help small businesses put people back to work."—Paul Ryan

Because Mr. president the answer to the question about what step you will take to build confidence in America’s ability to reduce deficit spending all rest on the fact that you can’t even get your own party to comply with the law and pass a budget resolution.

And if God sees fit to turn the Congress over to Republicans in November, anything that you say will be qualified by the fact that you don’t have a budget now and you couldn't get your own party to make the hard choices now because of your lack of leadership.

Mr. president your bluff has already been called! Thank you Mr. Ryan!

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Federal Court finds for Boy Scouts

A federal jury Wednesday decided that Philadelphia violated the Boy Scouts' First Amendment rights by using the organization's[ policy to protect boys from homosexuals] as a reason to evict them from their city-owned offices near Logan Square.-- Nathan Gorenstein
A seven-year long assault on one of the finest and upright institutions in the United States has ended with a Federal ruling in favor of the Boy Scouts of America. Yet that doesn’t mean that the unjust persecution of the Boy Scouts has ended. (see story)

Since its founding in 1910 as part of the international Scout Movement, more than 110 million Americans have been members of the BSA.
The BSA goal is to train youth in responsible citizenship, character development, and self-reliance through participation in a wide range of outdoor activities, educational programs, and, at older age levels, career-oriented programs in partnership with community organizations. For younger members, the Scout method is part of the program to inculcate typical Scouting values such as trustworthiness, good citizenship, and outdoors skills, through a variety of activities such as camping, aquatics, and hiking.

The Boy Scouts of America celebrated its one-hundredth anniversary on February 8, 2010. (source)

Who is attempting to destroy the Boy Scouts this symbol of American service and purity? Homosexuals are. Homosexuals backed by their corporation sponsors have attacked the Boy Scouts of America across this nation under the cloak of false discrimination claims. (305 major corporate sponsors of homosexuality)

A federal jury Wednesday decided that Philadelphia violated the Boy Scouts' First Amendment rights by using the organization's[ policy to protect boys from homosexuals] as a reason to evict them from their city-owned offices near Logan Square.

Because BSA enforces a very practical and sensible policy that homosexuals cannot be scouts or troop leaders. Homosexuals have taken to the raw tactic of attacking the scouts by bringing lawsuits against them. These are malicious and intimidating attempts to eviction Scout from buildings rented or leased from any city-owned or government owned offices because of Scout policy, a policy meant to protect young boys from the undue influence and pressures of homosexuality. In truth, these lawsuits, brought by homosexuals, are merely legal strong arm tactics mean to suppress differing opinion regarding their controversial sexuality.

Some of the traditional commitments between the boy scouts and cities where established well before homosexuals started their legal manipulations of society through the courts.

Undoubtedly, as is the practice with homosexual fanatics the unanimous verdict by a jury of six women and two men in Philadelphia will be challenged in the ongoing effort to changes social mores by judicial fiat in this country.

This ruling sets aside the city of Philadelphia order for the Boy Scouts to vacate their city-owned headquarters or pay $200,000 a year in rent unless the local Cradle of Liberty council renounced the national Scout policy. Such an order is in direct violation with the Scouts’ constitutional right of freedom of association under the first amendment.

Homosexuals have mis-characterized this argument for far too long. There is no right under the constitution for homosexuality. However, there are rights that protect us from tyrannous groups, like the rights found in the first amendment. In contrast, there are groups like homosexuals who would take away our freedoms of expression and association by whatever guise they cloak their tyrannous attempts.

The Philadelphia jury that found in favor of the Boy Scouts of America saw through the misrepresentations and false arguments of the homosexual agenda. May this be one in many victory for not only Boy Scouts of America but for the American people who disagree with the homosexualizing of our country and feel that their right to say it has been repressed by militant homosexuals using the courts against our own values of family, liberty and righteousness.

Monday, June 28, 2010

Where in the G20 world is Barack Hussein Obama?

My administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in government."—President Barry Hussein Soetoro
President [Barry Hussein Soetoro] gave the White House press corps the slip last night.

He’s done it again. How many times is this president going to give the White house press corps the slip before the people of the United States realize that there is a problem? What other president in the history of the United States of America has ever had to disappear with whereabouts unknown? (see previous post)

If one remembers, and I do, this is supposed to be the most ethical, transparent, open presidential administration in the history of the United States of America. So why does Barry Hussein Soetoro repeatedly vanish without explanation? What is this president hiding? Where is he going? Moreover, why isn’t the mainstream media concerned that the president has broken his transparency pledge?

So why in the middle of the G-8 and G-20 summits with his global counterparts is our president the only G8 and G20 leader can’t be accounted for hours? (see story)

Last night, the White House sent the press corps — which by agreement stays close to the president in order to report on any incident — back to Toronto, leaving the president 150 miles behind. In the wee hours of this morning, the crew of a dozen or so reporters and photographers in the press corps got back on a bus and returned to Muskoka for the day’s events.
It is highly unusual for the president to shun his permanent media detail that way, particularly at a high-profile event in a remote location. --Elizabeth Williamson

The last time the president pulled this type of a stunt he had no explanation and didn’t bother to offer one. Just what is this incessant need for privacy that only this president seems to have.

This president’s behavior portents of something very ominous and foreboding for this country, while he is sneaking around, we are losing our heritage for some misguided socialist “hope and change” agenda.

The media must demand a full accounting of this president’s sneak off time. The first time the media gave the president a free pass on his AWOL. If the media is negligent on this matter, once again they lose the remaining semblance of journalist credibility.

Friday, June 25, 2010

Reporter impugned Judge’s motives to protect Obama


Early Wednesday, June 23, 2010 shows oil continuing to gush from the broken wellhead, at the site of the Deepwater Horizon oil well in the Gulf of Mexico.

[District Judge Martin]Feldman, appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1983, has reported extensive investments in the oil and gas industry, including owning less than $15,000 of Transocean stock, according to financial disclosure reports for 2008, the most recent available. He did not return calls for comment on his investments.-- MICHAEL KUNZELMAN
Just what was Michael Kunzelman’s story about, more oil gushing into the Gulf of Mexico after a problem with the cap on the underwater gusher? Was it about the Tens of thousands of gallons of more oil gushing into the Gulf of Mexico on Wednesday after more incompetence from BP and the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration? Or was it about the recent Court decision to overturn the Obama administration order to end all new off shore drilling?

U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman in New Orleans overturned a moratorium [by the Government] on new drilling, saying the government simply assumed that because one rig exploded the others pose an imminent danger with no proof that such was the case.

Apparently, Mr. Kunzelman’s article is really about suggesting to our minds that Judge Feldman’s decision to overturn the Obama moratorium on new drilling has political implications bordering on judicial misconduct. (see article)

[District Judge Martin]Feldman, appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1983, has reported extensive investments in the oil and gas industry, including owning less than $15,000 of Transocean stock, according to financial disclosure reports for 2008, the most recent available. He did not return calls for comment on his investments.-- MICHAEL KUNZELMAN

Kunzelman feels that it is germane to his story to point out that a Republican president appointed the Judge. He pointed out that the judge, according of Kunzelman, has extensive investments in the oil and gas industry, including owning less than $15,000 of Transocean stock. And then Kunzelman suggested that the judge is hiding something because he did not return Kunzelman’s calls regarding his investments before Kunzelman’s story went to print.

Notwithstanding, this type of innuendo reporting is so interesting in a McCarthyism kind of way. However, where was this kind of "investigative reporting" in 2008 when laws suits were filed claiming that Barry Hussein Soetoro was not eligible to be president of the United States? Where was this kind of reporting when opponents of Health Care said that the president’s claims supporting health care reform were all lies. And where is this reporting now that the country of Mexico has joined a suit by Anarchists and conspirators who are attempting to undermine the United States of America.

Those co-conspirator America haters are frivolously claiming that Arizona’s law, which prevents foreign nationals of another country from invading a state of the United States of America, is somehow unconstitutional because it violates the rights of said foreign nationals who are invading this country illegally. Huh? (And our own Federal government is going to join these foreigners against itself? Huh?)

Yet there is no such investigative Pulitzer prize reporting when the country needs it? Instead, we get reporting which cast aspersions on a judge’s motives whose only concern could be the rule of law. Michael Kunzelman points out background information on judge Feldman in the likes that we haven’t seen since Dan Rather’s 60 minute hit pieces on president George W. Bush.

Frankly, I got the impression that investigative reporting was all but dead to the Liberal Progressive Media (LPM). I suppose the LPM will  find occasion to resuscitate it when we must know that Republican appointees are inappropriately using judicial authority to discriminate against the first Black president.

Feldman? I wonder if the judge is Jewish?

Mr. Kunzelman you may have missed the most important fact about judge Feldman. I guess no Pulitzer for you.

Hum… Kunzelman is that…

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Saint Nancy of ASinCity



The Pope and Pelosi


Nancy Pelosi has become very religious lately.

First, it was her audience with the Pope. A meeting which she attempted to totally misrepresent. It has to be some kind of sin to mislead about your meeting with the Pope, don’t you think? (see article)

After her meeting with the Holy Father this morning, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi released a statement highlighting the positive aspects of the meeting but ignoring the Pope’s correction of her support for legal abortion.--CNA

Then there was Pelosi’s self-styled ecumenical conference with Catholic Cardinals, Arch Bishops and Bishops where she instructed Catholics to supportillegal entry into this country.

And now Saint Nancy of asincity is doing God’s work by preaching the gossip of Climate Change legislation. (see 2:37mins video)





According to Pelosi’s gossip of Climate change, Climate change legislation has to be passed in order to establish a kingdom here on earth of cap and trade regulation, which will enslave the people until God, comes. Or until the taxman cometh. you see it really doesn’t matter to Saint Nancy of asincity which one.

“It is a defense, a security issue, a health issue, an environmental issue, it is an economic issue, and it is a moral issue for us to honor the obligation we have to pass this planet on to future generations intact. And, if you believe, as I do, that it is also that this is God's beautiful creation, we have a moral responsibility to preserve it.

“So, whatever achieves that result, Congress will work its will. We will have a legislative process that sees what options work, that can pass, that honor the principles that the President set forth and that many in the Congress have been advocating for a long time. As you may recall, I called this my flagship issue when I became speaker.”

“There is, as you may know about me, I am fairly agnostic about the means to the end in terms of what mechanism is used,” she said. “What we want, though, is to have a result.—Nancy Pelosi

In the Gossip according to Nancy of asincity the golden rule is, “The ends justify the means” if there is anything we know about Sister Pelosi is she is fairly agnostic about how she gets what she wants.

What is important to Democrat’s is that they pass Climate change legislation even to the detriment of the United States. They want this even after all that they have done to heap unsustainable debt on the backs of taxpayers and their children and their children’s children.

That's the gossip according to Saint Nancy of asincity and her Democrat Party.

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

If Obama fires Chrystal, it won’t be for anything the General did wrong


Barry Hussein Soetoro and Gen Stanley McChrystal

Even though he had voted for Obama, McChrystal and his new commander in chief failed from the outset to connect.—Michael Hastings
I read the Michael Hastings RollingStone article, “The Runaway General.” Frankly, I don’t see what all the brouhaha is all about.  And I seriously doubt that General Stanley McChrystal will be bending over to provide the president with an ass to kick.

There was that banter between the General and his aides about Vice president Biden, but it was really of no consequence. Then there is the reporting of General McChrystal’s impressions of president Barry Hussein Soetoro when he first meets him.

According to sources familiar with the meeting, McChrystal thought Obama looked "uncomfortable and intimidated" by the roomful of military brass. Their first one-on-one meeting took place in the Oval Office four months later, after McChrystal got the Afghanistan job, and it didn't go much better…Here's the guy [Soetoro] who's going to run his fucking war, but he didn't seem very engaged. The Boss was pretty disappointed."—Michael Hastings

Hastings article does not uncover an officer’s in subornation. On the contrary, the article is a candid and revealing look at the career of General Stanley McChrystal who is attempting to simultaneously wage a politically correct war both in Washington politics and in Afghanistan.

There is virtually no direct quotes from the General only the reporters quoting aides of the General. This is not enough to end this man’s career. There is no in subornation, there is no undermining of president Soetoro and there is no violating of the military code on McChrystal’s part.

This is a good and well-written article that truthfully shows warts and all, of the career of McChrystal. It also shows the misgivings that many soldiers have with rules of engagement and methods of war that McChrystal has implemented in Afghanistan.

Reports that McChrystal has criticized the president and his administration are greatly exaggerated.

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Traitors in the White house

Treason is attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family
President Obama swore to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.—Presidential Oath

If what Arizona’s Sen. Kyl is alleging is true and correct president Barry Hussein Soetoro and the Democrat Party are engaged in an ongoing conspiratorial act of treason against the United States of America for political advantage and gain. That act is called Comprehensive Immigration Reform. (see 1:23min video)




Sen. Kyl claims that the president is derelict in his duties and is willfully undermining the Constitution of the United States to enhance his and his Party’s political fortunes.

Not only is the president refusing to enforce federal law concerning the border. He and his administration are working directly against anyone or any state that attempts to keep the law.

Following is Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announces on foreign television that the Soetoro administration is planning to sue Arizona in an attempt to prevent Arizona from enforcing state and federal laws. (see 1:14 mins video)




Democrats are working directly against the Constitution of the United States of America. That is treason. Or as you might be used to hearing it described by its political correct name Comprehensive Immigration Reform.

Comprehensive Immigration Reform. Any time you hear the term it is probably being spoken by a traitor against the United States of America particularly if that term is spoken by someone from the White house.

And by the way there is nothing wrong with U.S. Immigration laws.   What is wrong is 40 million Mexicans leaving the Country of Mexico. 

It seems to my that the Country of Mexico is the one in need of Comprehensive Reform.

Monday, June 21, 2010

Under Democrats a Nation of Lawlessness

The politics are not complicated. Democratic leaders do not want to send members home to face their constituents after voting for a budget that would take the deficit to record levels. But the spending trajectory established by Barack Obama—and rapidly growing entitlements—leaves them little choice.-- Stephen F. Hayes
They refuse to enforce the Constitutional mandate to secure the border. They refuse to listen to the American people’s wishes on health care. They refuse to listen to the American people wishes to stop deficit spending. Any law that Democrats disagree with they simply disregard as unworthy to obey.

Such was the case with Democrat San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom who unlawfully disregarded California’s marriage laws and instituted his own law in San Francisco. [Newsom] instructed city employees to break the law by instituting homosexual mock weddings which resulted in a political and legal quagmire for the citizens of California.(see previous post)

San Francisco Gavin Newsom […] started defying the State law and began issuing illegal wedding licenses and performing illegal weddings in February 2004 as a prequel to the planned challenge of prop 22, Mayor Newsom’s open defiance of the law. [This act] was so blatant that even the liberal tilted California State Supreme Court had to keep up a veneer of legality by ruling against what Mayor Newsom had done and in addition they ruled that all the illegal marriages that Newsom and the city of San Francisco preformed where invalid.—Alaphiah

Likewise, Democrats have chosen to disregard a 1974 Act that requires Congress to pass a budget resolution by May 15 of each year because this is a political voting year and Democrats do not want you to know how bad they are deficit spending. (see article)

The 1974 Budget and Impoundment Act requires Congress to pass a budget resolution by May 15 of each year. Congress hasn’t done so yet in 2010.-- Stephen F. Hayes

Democrats are ushering an air of lawlessness in the United States by their blatant and lawless attempts to gain and hold power at the expense of the Constitution and rule of law.

Not passing a budget resolution as required by law in order to improve their political chances in November is not only criminal it is unconscionable. Yet we have this unscrupulous group of Democrat politicians in control of our government today.

Under Democrats America has become a lawless Nation.

Friday, June 18, 2010

Barbara Boxer all hair and the wrong “do”!





Sen Barbara Boxer (D-CA)

I can’t believe she just said that. “Please call me Senator”, Barbara Boxer’s (D-CA) statement about carbon pollution was so implausible, I had to replay it repeatedly in an attempt to find one shred of truth in the substantive part of it.

I’m going to put in the record Madam President a host of quotes from our national security experts who tell us that carbon pollution leading to climate change will be over the next twenty years the leading cause of conflict put our troops in harm’s way. And that’s why we have so many returning Veterans who want us to move forward and address this issue. –Senator Barbara Boxer

While it is true that she was intending to put a statement, containing quotes from progressive controlled national security experts into the Congressional report nothing after that is true. Carbon is not a pollutant. Carbon doesn’t lead to climate change. Climate change will not be the leading cause of conflict in the next twenty years, putting troops in harm’s way.

And returning Veterans in mass are not wanting Congress to pass climate change legislation

Senator Boxer is an example of what happens when an unscrupulous ideologue is in power. (see 34sec video)







Boxer is an example of Liberal Progressives creating fantastical realities from whole cloth. And because she and her Party are in control of all levers of government, they force us all through the looking glass. In other words, it's going to be a bad hair day for all of us.

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Pelosi Still Crazily Blaming Bush after all these years Part 2

Here’s what the president inherited he inherited a deficit when this president inherited from the Clinton administration four budgets that were either in surplus or in balance and he turned it into a massive deficit. He brought us to the brink of financial crisis he brought us to the brink of deep recession ignoring issues related to climate change…so it’s a continuation of those Bush policies in the Congress but they had their roots and the problems were caused during the Bush Administration—Nancy Pelosi
We have heard to the nth degree what President Soetoro thinks he inherited from the Bush administration. Our ears bled from the incessant whining from Soetoro and Democrats, “ What we inherited, what we inherited.” Sounding like schoolyard children tattling on one another.

Whatever one says about President Bush he did not practice the puerile pursuit of finger pointing. But was this because he inherited surpluses, balanced budgets and a world of peace from the Clinton administration?

According to Nancy Pelosi, that is just the case. But she is wrong.

Bush didn’t inherit a peaceful world from President Clinton on the contrary America was not at war but terrorist where at war with the United States even before Bush took office in 2000. Osama bin Laden declared war on America once in 1996 and again in 1998.

The Clinton administration and the Media chose to ignore the threat as Progressives teach us to ignore two year olds who throw tantrums. This even in light of continued and growing attacks against America and American interest.

Under the Clinton administration a series of terrorist acts were carried out against the United States on American soil and against American interest they included; the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center (WTC I); the 1996 attack on the U.S. military barracks Khobar Towers, in Saudi Arabia; the 1998 attacks on U.S. Embassies in Africa; the 1999 "Millennium" plot; and the 2000 attack on U.S.S. Cole.

This was the world which president Bush inherited from president Clinton who balanced the budget by decimating our militaries by take money from military families, reducing military ranks to anemic levels and stopping weapons development all the while the threat of terrorism was knocking at our door.

Bush didn’t say it but maybe he should have, he inherited an international crisis and mess from the Clinton administration. Mary Matalin GOP Strategist and former advisor to Vice president Dick Cheney tells CNN today what she experienced.

I was there, we inherited a recession from President Clinton and we inherited the most tragic attack on our own soil in our nation’s history. And President Bush dealt with it and within a year of his presidency within a comparable time, unemployment was at 5 percent. –Mary Matalin
(see 29sec. video)





September 11, 2001 didn’t occur in a vacuum. In context we have all of the terrorist attacks that I’ve mention above all occurring on Clinton’s watch and then we have the event, which emboldened terrorist to strike the U.S. it happened on October 3, 1993 during the Clinton presidency.

On October 3, 1993 Task Force Ranger raided the Olympic Hotel in Mogadishu to search for [Mohammed Farah] Aidid, [leader of one of the main rebel coalitions, and responsible for the murder of U.N. peacekeepers]. This led to a seventeen-hour battle in which eighteen U.S. soldiers were killed and eighty-four were wounded. Bodies of dead American soldiers were dragged through the streets of Mogadishu.

On October 7 President Clinton responded by withdrawing U.S. troops from Somalia. The hunt for Aidid was abandoned. By the late Spring of 1994, all of the remaining U.N. troops were withdrawn, ending UNOSOM-II. (source)

After this show of apparent defeat and weakness by a U.S. President Osama bin Laden or al Qaeda declared war on the United States of America. Thus the seeds of 9/11 were planted and grew from 1994 until they manifested September 11, 2001 and never did anyone hear President George W. Bush say or intimate that the 9/11 attacks were inherited by him from the previous administration. But they were.

Those of us who know the history know that al Qaeda declared war on the United States in 1996 and once again in 1998 and Osama bin Laden was indicted for terrorism by the U.S. District Court in 1998. Bush wasn’t elected until November 2000 and became President Noon January 20, 2001.

9/11/2001 didn’t just happen. It was a well thought out, planned and executed plot that was planned during the Clinton administration and it all culminated on the date of 9/11/2001.

According to the 9/11 commission report section 7.2 entitled The 9/11 Pilots In the United States the “9/11 pilots” were training as early as the mid1990’s and many of them trained in the United States in the early summer of 2000. –9/11 Commission Report pg. 223 (see source)

Al Qaeda declared war on the U.S. in 1998, they began training for 9/11 as early as 1990 and many of the pilots who carried out the plane crashes arrived in America early summer of 2000. Don’t you get it? The 9/11 pilots trained in the United States prior to Bush’s presidency but you never, ever heard [President Bush] say that he inherited 9/11!

I’ll say it, George W. Bush inherited 9/11 the cause for having to go to war in Afghanistan and subsequently Iraq from the Bill Clinton administration.

All of the money that Clinton saved by decimating the military readiness of this country is the reason we are at war now. Clinton simply kicked the can down the road for the next administration.

Clinton had several opportunities to capture or kill bin Laden but he didn’t. And all of the money that Clinton saved by weakening America’s ability to be militarily armed and ready to defend its self may have given the false impression of fiscal surpluses on paper but we all now know that the reality is we were left exposed to attack because of the Clinton policies of defunding our military and our CIA. And we are paying for it in the end.

Weakened military and CIA intelligence because of Bill Clinton policies resulted in a failure to detect the plotters of 9/11 as they went back and forth in the United States from 1990 to 2001. And then they end their mission by hijacking American planes and killed over 3,000 Americans.

Multiple terrorist attacks against the United States only progressively increasing in violence and death with each additional attack becoming grander in scale finally commentating in over 3,000 deaths on American soil on September 11, 2001.

America was not at war at the time of any of these terrorist attacks but terrorists were at war with us. America did not have troops deployed for war. (previous post)

But what is unconscionable, I think, is that Democrat[s] are allowed by the media and their constituents to disassociate themselves from their own personal choices to invade Iraq. Have we forgotten the –Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq— and the House and the Senate votes that authorized the war?

Yes, 9/11 happened on President Bush’s watch but he inherited it all from the ineffective and incompetent way William Jefferson Clinton dealt with terrorism Ms. Pelosi.

The credit/Banking crisis and the Wars are all results of Democrat failed policies though they happened on Bush’s watch. and these policies are the reasons that America is in the mess that we are in today Ms. Pelosi. Blaming Bush was a political strategy that worked well for Democrats in 2006 and 2008, but Bush is not here now and hasn’t been for a while Ms. Pelosi and you only get one bite at that apple.

It’s over and even though you have shut your hearing off and won’t listen or acknowledge what the American people are saying we are tired of the Bush Blaming, we are very tired of your excuses.

And since you are not listening to the American people we will be very glad to vote in enough Republican Congressmen to take away the Speaker of the House title from you in November and let you sit back down among your peers so you’ all can start listening to the American people again!

I must admit and it is sad to see that, Ms. Pelosi you and your Party are still crazy after all these years. But the American people are not, though you played us for fools. We know Democrats in Congress voted for and authorize the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. We know that Democrats caused the housing credit crisis and the result banking crisis and we know that everything that is fundamentally wrong with America is rooted in the ideology that Democrats espouse.

We don’t blame President Bush anymore, Like O.J. Simpson said upon his acquittal of murder, “Now I’m going to look for the real killers.”

And Ms. Pelosi so are we, so are we …

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Pelosi Still Crazily Blaming Bush after all these years



U.S. soldier’s body dragged through the streets of Mogadishu Somalia in 1993

Here’s what the president inherited he inherited a deficit when this president inherited from the Clinton administration four budgets that were either in surplus or in balance and he turned it into a massive deficit. He brought us to the brink of financial crisis he brought us to the brink of deep recession ignoring issues related to climate change…so it’s a continuation of those Bush policies in the Congress but they had their roots and the problems were caused during the Bush Administration—Nancy Pelosi
It was a political strategy that served its users well. It won Democrats major victories in 2006 and 2008. So one understands why Democrats are so reluctant to let go of their “Blame Bush” cash cow. Nevertheless, enough is enough.

Americans were appalled at the images of Somalians dragging dead U.S. soldiers bodies though the streets of Mogadishu in 1993 under President Bill Clinton. And in like fashion, Americans are equally as put off by the incessant and puerile finger pointing by Democrats by which they drag the name of George W. Bush through the partisan political streets of blame still after seventeen months of a totally Democrat controlled government. This government, Democrats vowed, would do away with all Bush policies. Democrats vowed to end the war and course correct America onto what Democrats called the right path. Americans are asking, “Are we there yet?”

No we aren’t and something is serious wrong. The Fantasy Island that Democrats promised the America people to get Democrats elected has not materialized and things in American have gotten worse. What’s the problem? That’s right you guessed it according to Nancy Pelosi (drag, drag)—it’s Bush’s fault!

Here’s what the president inherited he inherited a deficit when this president inherited from the Clinton administration four budgets that were either in surplus or in balance and he turned it into a massive deficit. He brought us to the brink of financial crisis he brought us to the brink of deep recession ignoring issues related to climate change…so it’s a continuation of those Bush policies in the Congress but they had their roots and the problems were caused during the Bush Administration—Nancy Pelosi

Really, Ms. Pelosi, as Bill Maher would say fact checker please!

Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi is the preeminent Bush basher par excellence. The president learned what he knows about Bush bashing from Pelosi and Pelosi would like to place total blame for everything on president Bush. That is if we allow her too like Chuck Todd of MSNBC did without so much as a challenge of Pelosi’s selective revisionism. Without a challenge, she would blame everything that is going wrong with Democrat overspending and everything wrong with a Democrat controlled White house and Congress on president Bush. She did just that in this MSNBC interview. (see 1:44min video)





But au contraire, mon ami. Not so fast Madam Speaker of the House there are some of us that have a proper understanding of what actually occurred during the Bush administration regarding the deficits, the war and the financial brink as you termed it, even if your hapless interviewer, Chuck Todd, did not.

President Bush took office in 2001 at a politically bitter and divided time in our nation made so by Democrats who advanced the lie that Bush stole the election, a charge debunked by approximately 52 of our nation’s independent investigative newspapers. Yet Democrats continue to use that false charge to this day.(see previous post)

Because of Democrat’s bogus and divisive claims, the Congress became unwork ably polarized and partisan during the Bush years. Republicans held a small majority because the Senate was split 50-50 with Vice President Dick Cheney representing the tied braking vote but RINO James Jeffords sabotaged Republicans by leaving the party in 2001 to keep Republicans from gaining control of the Senate thus Jeffords threw control of Senate over to Democrats.

That action was thwarted by providence because Democrat Senator Paul Wellstone died in October of 2002 bring the numbers back in line 49-49 the Senate fluctuated much of year Republicans establishing a one vote majority but Democrats managed to maintain control of the Senate becoming one up because of Jeffords switch when Republican Phil Gramm retired. In the House Republicans held an equally small advantage of 221-211 however they were in consistence flux as well.

Though Republicans had a small majority as represented by the 107th- 109th Congresses from 2002 to 2006, Democrats were able to exhort control virtually filibustering and or blocking almost every Conservative agenda item or appointment that the directionless and feckless Republican leadership attempt to advance, causing gridlock and ultimately earning the name of “Do Nothing Congress” for those years.

At the same time, Congress went on a pork barrel spending spree virtually packing President Bush’s every request to fund the war in Afghanistan that started October 7, 2001 with pork and special projects for Democrats and Republicans alike. Of course President Bush didn’t help his cause by asking for and getting passed through Congress his Medicare Bill in 2003.

However, Bush was not in complete control of this Congress’ spending as no president ever is. Constitutionally Congress is charged with fiscal responsibility for the nation not the president. Harry Reid became Majority Leader in 2001, Nancy Pelosi became Speaker of the House in 2002, and the Reid Pelosi Congress passed three bills, huge spending bills over president Bush’s veto marking the beginning of Democrat controlling Congress’s fiscal irresponsibility.

The $23 Billion dollar water projects measure, the $300 billion Farm bill and the $480 billion Medicare all passed by Democrat controlled Congress over the veto of President Bush.

The bill[Medicare] authorizes the projects but does not appropriate the money for them. Appropriation of funds will have to be taken care of in subsequent legislation. -- DAVID STOUT

In addition to that, Democrats in Congress continued the fair housing programs under Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae first introduce by a Democrat Presidential administration.

Listen to Nancy Pelosi’s and other Democrats' bizzaro worldview of the financial crisis and then see how their views compares with the truth. The truth is Republicans attempted to prevent this financial crisis but their efforts were blocked by Democrats. (see previous post)

Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, and the Democrats are responsible for Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, and the current credit crisis as shown in 2004 intakes when Republicans where attempting to regulate Freddie and Fannie against Democrat opposition. You have this against a backdrop of Nancy Pelosi crazily blaming the Bush administration on the floor of the House in 2008 for the very credit crisis that she, Barney Frank and Democrats caused. (see 7.15min. video worth viewing)





It is the responsibility of the Congress to watch out for the American people and control spending Ms. Pelosi. How dare you say that fiscal irresponsibility happened during Bush’s watch while you were the one along with your Democrat allies causing the financial meltdown. --Continued tomorrow

Tomorrow: 9/11 commission reveals who in America to blame for the attack

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Thanks for Reading my Blog Mr. President

Sounding reflective as he heads into a bruising electoral season, President Barack Obama told POLITICO columnist Roger Simon that the Gulf disaster “echoes 9/11” because it will change the nation’s psyche for years to come.— POLITICO STAFF
On May 27, 2010 I posted that the Gulf Oil spill was president Soetoro’s 9/11. Well apparently, the president agrees with me because on June 13, 2010 the Politico reported that the President believes that the Gulf Oil Spill is his 9/11. (see article)

Now I have no proof that the president actually read my blog…maybe he was briefed on it. (Lol)

But it goes to show while all the other Bloggers and Media were in their echo chamber comparing the Gulf Oil spill with hurricane Katrina, your favorite blogger was the only one that had the insight to recognize the catastrophe impact that this spill is having on the political and coastal landscape of the United States is equal to that of 9/11.

Now that I’ve gotten your attention, Mr. Soetoro let me tell you, I know you’re worried about the impact that the Gulf Oil spill will have on Democrats this November. You should be concerned too because your handling of this spill suggest to all of our minds that putting government in control of everything is not very effective or the right idea.

Remember Mr. president you and your Party were supposed to be smarter, cooler and better than Bush. I must say that it’s very disconcerting to see the government that is supposed to create jobs and fix health care, thrash about like one of the many birds drenched in oil and cast up upon a shore in the Gulf of Mexico. However, your inability to actually do something about our problems is frightening.

So Mr. president you’re speaking from the Oval Office tonight. No doubt, this will be an obvious attempt to reassure the American people that your administration and Democrats are doing everything humanly possible to stop the leak in the Gulf of Mexico.

You will no doubt be attempting to cover for your fellow Democrats for voting for your Health Care Reform. You though the American people would forget. But we didn’t forget.

And you will be attempting to assure the American people that stimulus 1, stimulus 2 and stimulus 3 (the additional $52 Billion dollars that you’ll be requesting tonight) are working. And of course, you will be finger pointing at the previous administration for your problems.

Mr. president here are some tips on having a successful teleprompter reading this evening.

When the teleprompter tells, you to fault the Bush administration on anything just refuse to read that line. That will show the American people that they didn’t elect a complete whining baby for president.

Bush blaming is old, pass√© and puerile. Any references to what you’ve inherited will only look like you really aren’t taking responsibility for what you’ve done to the economy since you’ve been in office these 18 months. Any finger-pointing Mr. president will only suggest that you really don’t intend to acknowledge your own deficit spending, your 1st and 2nd stimulus bills and the third one you’ll probably be requesting tonight.

By the way Mr. Soetoro if you requested a 2nd stimulus and now going to request a 3rd stimulus is it safe to say that the stimulus didn’t work?

How can we trust you Mr. president with the complex problems that we face in America if you can’t create the jobs that you’ve promised or plug the hole in the Gulf of Mexico?

Mr. president you and Global warming environmental Fascists want to shut down oil and coal but none of your alternatives can meet the needs of an America economy and American consumers who need energy for jobs and everyday living.

The bottom line Mr. president is that we all know that you do nothing that is apolitical.

Your Oval office speech tonight will be a partisan apology to cover for Democrats, a speech to make excuses for the policies that you’ve enacted which are not working or you feel you need to protect Democrats from recriminations from the America people for voting for your health care reform against our will.

You will be defending the apparent incompetence represented by 57 days of oil spilling in the Gulf of Mexico and your inability to stop it. You will also be defending your administration’s claims that they were involved on “day one” but you still haven’t been able to plug the hole.

Last, you will attempt to blame George W. Bush for the mess that you and Congressional Democrats made. But Mr. president Bush handed you a won war in Iraq you promised to end the war and bring the troops home. You didn’t.

You promised to close Guantanamo Bay prison. You didn’t
You escalated the Afghanistan war calling it the “good war.”

You’ve passed Health Care reform against the will of the American people and convinced Congress to go against the will of their constituents to pass Health Care. You’ve passed stimulus bills against the will of the American people, you’ve bailed out Wall Street and Banks against the will of the American people and you have not stop the greatest environmental disaster in American history.

You are right though Mr. president, this oil spill is your 9/11 you may not have been reading my pet goat to school children on April 20, 2010 but vacationing and golfing during your 9/11 Mr. president is totally unacceptable especially when you tell the American people that you have be focused on stopping this oil spill since day one.

One other thing Mr. president, if you need any further advice please come back often. I appreciate your followship.

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Fixing Blame!

It's sickening!!!

After being criticised for not being tough with BP, President
Obama became a man with his "kick butt" remark.
Very Presidential! Especially in light of the fact
that he still hasn't met with the CEO of BP. His lame excuse
was that he knew that he would get all the stock answers, and that things
would still have to work themselves out. I guess this president
has an inside track on "stock answers"
because that is what he
has been giving the American public since day one!

I am going to join the frey now, with my assessment of where
the blame lies! For starters, Obama's administration was lax
from the very start of this catastrophe.
Governor Jindal has
shown more leadership than Obama has and has instilled some measure of
confidence in the people of Louisiana. The disgusting response
to the Governor's request to build temporary dikes
to protect
the delicate marsh areas is so typical of an administration that is
"bass-ackwards" in just about everything that they do.
In the
midst of an environmental disaster in the making, why in hell
would we need an environmental study before proceeding with the
dikes?
Could any sane person believe that the dikes would be
more environmentally destructive than a billion gallons of crude oil?

This fixation with the environment, global warming, and cap and
trade
is just more left wing hysteria, in order to help the
socialist democrats push through even more federal regulation and
economic strangulation policies.


Let's take the gloves off and put the blame for this
fiasco squarly where it belongs.
Accidents do happen,
but in shallower waters, closer to our shores, there have never been insurmountable problems. Drilling in waters that are over one
mile deep, is a relatively new process................one that was
forced on BP and other oil companies,
because the environmentalists
and their lobbies are empty-headed nitwits!

They are now blaming BP for their own mistakes.
Compounding the problems, the "federal agencies" that were supposed
to be policing the equipment used for deep-water drilling, failed miserably
to do their job.
But, from the left, we hear that this is all
former President Bush's fault.
Do I need to remind anyone that President Obama has been in office for 18 Months now, and
"the buck stops there" Mr. Obama!!!!
You can't keep taking credit
as "The President" and then point fingers when you get the blame. You
have given new meaning to Hillary Clinton's jibe during the 2008 Presidential campaign
, "Who do you want answering that 3am phone call?"
In my mind, and in the mind of so many others..............there is no question now!

Friday, June 11, 2010

Pro-Palestinian Homosexuals ban Israeli Homosexuals or Gay Shame on Parade


A gay parade in Tel Aviv in 2004. City officials said it was the only place in the Middle East where 'you can be gay in public'

A delegation of gay residents of Tel Aviv has been banned from joining a gay pride march in Madrid because authorities in the Israeli city have not condemned the recent attack on the Gaza flotilla.-- Giles Tremlett
In a set back to the International Homosexual movement Israeli Homosexuals were shamefully banned by Pro-Palestinian Homosexuals from participating in Madrid Spain’s Homosexual, “Gay Pride” March and events because Israel’s government has not condemned the recent attack on the Gaza flotilla. (see story)

"After what has happened, and as human rights campaigners, it seemed barbaric to us to have them taking part," explained Antonio Poveda, of Spain's Federation of Lesbians, Gays, Transexuals and Bisexuals. "We don't just defend out [sic]own little patch."—Giles Tremlett

So let’s summarize, Spain’s Pro-Palestinian Homosexuals are demonstrating intolerance against Israeli Homosexuals because Pro-Palestinian Homosexuals feel that the government of Israel has violated human rights?

"It is shameful that [Spain's Federation of Lesbians, Gays, Transexuals and Bisexuals] should join with pro-Palestinian and fundamentalist groups which are not exactly tolerant with homosexuality,"—A member of the Tel Aviv group

So does this mean that it is acceptable for homosexuals to be intolerant and disapproving of other homosexuals because said homosexuals are not approving of the other homosexuals government?

So what kind of message does Spain’s Federation of Lesbians, Gays, Transexuals and Bisexuals send to the rest of us if they can openly discriminate against Israel’s Homosexuals for a perceived injustice that was not the fault of Israel’s homosexuals. If it was an injustice (and there is some question that is was) it was at the hands of the Israeli government not Israel’s homosexuals.

If a heterosexual were to discriminate against homosexuals like Spain’s homosexuals did against Israel’s homosexuals he or she would be called a homophobe.

What then are Spain’s homosexuals? Spain’s homosexuals are self-hating politically correct anti-Semites who bring shame to gay pride.

Gay Shame because there is no pride in homosexual on homosexual discrimination.

Thursday, June 10, 2010

No Mosque! No Mosque!

Protesting "Ground Zero" mosque in New York Sunday June 6, 2010
As many as 10,000 protesters from across the country – including family members who lost loved ones on Sept. 11, 2001 – took to the streets in New York City Sunday to fight construction of a 13-story Islamic mosque to be built just steps from Ground Zero where Muslim terrorists murdered 2,751 people in the name of Allah.-- Chelsea Schilling


Why would organizers of an Islamic mosque plan to open their doors on Sept. 11, 2011, ten years to the day after the most devastating Islamic terrorist attack against America? Moreover, why would the planners of this mosque choose the very site or as close to the site as possible where approximately 3,000 Americans died? Coincidental, I don’t think so! And neither does many other Americans. (see article)

Muslims say building a mosque on the site of the worst act of Islamic terrorism committed on U.S. soil is meant to improve Muslim American relations. Hum… Let me think about that for a moment. Nope that’s still the stupidest thing that I’ve ever heard.

Last Sunday 10,000 protesters from across the country took to the streets of New York to demonstrate what they feel is an appallingly insensitive act of disrespect for America and the Americans who died on September 11, 2001. Their message was if Muslims would like to improve relations with the people of the United States cease and desist plans to build a Mosque over the site that Islamists murdered approximately 3,000 Americans in a heinous act of jihad.

"It was almost obvious that something like this had to arise from the ashes of 9/11. In some way, this has the hand of the divine written over it. It's almost as if God wanted to be involved."—Daisy Khan, the Cordoba Initiative executive director

It is apparent that what Daisy Khan meant was it was only obvious to Muslims that a Mosque erected on or near the most infamous site of Islamic aggression against the United States of America would be inevitable. To most Americans who are just now realizing what it means when a mosque is placed over a site destroyed by Islamic aggression they are feeling betrayed and a little sick to the stomach.

It is Islam that […] destroys sacred sites and rebuilds them as mosques. It was (and remains) Islam's way of saying, "We have defeated you, we rule you, and our god is better than your god." --Doron Kescher (see previous post)

Building a mosque on the site of ground zero is an incredibly insensitive act on the part of Muslims. This is an act from which American and Islamic relations will not be able to recover.

This mosque is a further provocation against the U.S. This mosque is a passive aggressive act stealthily furthering jihad against the infidels of the United States of America.

It is what this mosque represents is why thousands of Americans took to the streets last Sunday. Americans have had enough. No more, enough is enough. No more with the advancing of the religion of jihad. No mosque! No mosque!

Wednesday, June 09, 2010

Using Civil Rights to commit Civil Wrongs

They gather on statehouse steps with signs and bullhorns, risking arrest. They attend workshops on civil disobedience and personal storytelling, and they hold sit-ins and walk out of class in protest. They're being warned that they could even lose their lives.—Russell Contreras
Anyone who lived through the late 50’s and the entire 1960s knows that the Civil Rights movement was a moral and righteous pursuit to get White America to live up to its highest ideas embodied in the American Revolution and Thomas Jefferson’s words written in the Declaration of Independence that, “All men are created equal.”

For roughly two hundred and fifty years,1619-1863, Africans who were brought to America unwillingly and forced to work as subhuman, property of slave master owners. Then approximately one hundred years, 1865-1965, after that Blacks were officially treated as an inferior Race by the government of the United States of America.

Fighting these injustices was the official work of the Civil Rights movement. These injustices where exclusive to Africans brought to the United States against their will and their posterity who were made to work as slaves for about two hundred and fifty years and treated as subhuman for another one hundred years of Jim Crow.

No other Race has this relationship with the United States of America, not Indians, not Chinese, not Mexican. No one.

Yet all peoples of the world have taken advantage of the suffering borne by Blacks in America. They have also benefited from the rights won by Blacks in the civil rights movement. Different Races of people in America and abroad, people of the world, have benefited from the elevated consciousness made possible by the struggle against the enslavement, mistreatment and discrimination of black people in America.
However, in the last 20 to 30 years the Civil Rights movement has been disgraced and cheapened by anti-American groups who study and exploit civil rights tactics in order to steal Rights from America, rights that they are not entitled.

[Mexican Nationals who are] Students [in America] fighting laws that target illegal immigrants are taking a page from the civil rights era, adopting tactics and gathering praise and momentum from the demonstrators who marched in the streets and sat at segregated lunch counters as they sought to turn the public tide against racial segregation.—Russell Contreras

Muslim terrorists, Mexican Nationals and Homosexuals have all exploited Civil Rights tactics to gain Rights, which they are not entitled.
Nothing better to illustrate my point than following article written by RUSSELL CONTRERAS, entitled “Student Immigrants Use Civil rights-era strategies” (see article) and(see below)




Student Immigrants Use Civil Rights

Sadly there are agents within our own government like Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Richard Lugar, R-Ind., that are aiding and abetting the continual criminal enterprise of illegal entry into the United States and the ill gotten gains of such illegality by giving Mexican Nationals Rights that were heretofore reserved for citizens of the United States.

The movement has gained attention of Congress. Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Richard Lugar, R-Ind., sent a letter to Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano in April, asking her to halt deportations of immigrant students who could earn legal status under DREAM, which stands for the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors act, and which they're sponsoring.

Last month, three illegal immigrant students demanding to meet with Arizona Sen. John McCain about DREAM were arrested and later detained for refusing to leave his Tucson office. High school and college students in Chicago and Denver walked out of class this year to protest Arizona's tough new law requiring immigrants to carry registration papers. In December, immigrant students staged a "Trail of Dreams" march from Miami's historic Freedom Tower to Washington, D.C., to raise support for DREAM.—Russell Contreras

By attaching themselves to the civil rights movement, groups from enemies of the United States who intends to destroy it, to the hordes of illegal Mexican Nationals who aim to exploit our economy and take American jobs while claiming some faux civil rights status.

Similar student immigrant groups have sprung up at the University of California at Los Angeles and the University of Houston.
By attaching themselves to the civil rights movement, Shabazz said, the immigrant students can claim the moral high ground and underdog status of the debate.—Russell Contreras

Americans have been so gullible to the ploys that our government has given Miranda rights to terrorists, Citizenship to anchor babies of Mexican Nationals and they have given Civil Rights to homosexuals who are not a racial group at all. Their only commonality is that they are confused by their sexuality. Assigning group status and civil rights to homosexuals is like assigning group status and civil rights to people who get confused by reading maps.

Not before the “homosexual movement” has civil rights been thought of as belonging to a behavior rather than based on Race. It is an absurdity, which has grown in favor with every propagandized generation.

What is also absurd is using Civil Rights to commit Civil Wrongs. But that is exactly what Mexican Nationals are doing when they use methods that Blacks who were Americans used to receive equal treatment, which was due them.

The difference is Mexicans and others who exploit civil rights in this country are asking for rights that are not due to them in this country. And that is just wrong!

Tuesday, June 08, 2010

Obama Kicking Ass over BP Oil Spill


Obama going gangsta on some ass over oil!

"I don't sit around just talking to experts because this is a college seminar; we talk to these folks because they potentially have the best answers, so I know whose ass to kick."—president Barry Hussein Soetoro
Heeding the calls to let his Black-side show and in an obvious staged demonstration of toughness the president of the United States dropped all pretenses at being professorial and let his raw gritty street side out. Well as best, he could!

No he didn’t pull a gun from his trousers and drop the “F” bomb √† la Bill Maher, but he did give the interviewer at MSNBC a stiff talking to about the Gulf oil spill, by golly!

In what is perhaps the funniest thing that the teleprompter has ever told president Soetoro to do, president Soetoro shows that he can be a kick ass kind of guy president. (see 27sec. video)




I was down there a month ago. Before most of these talking heads were even paying attention to the gulf. A month ago, I was meeting with fisherman down there standing in the rain talking about what a potential crisis this could be.
And I don’t sit around just talking to experts because this is a college seminar, we talk to these folks because they potentially have the best answers, so I know who’s ass to kick.—president Barry Hussein Soetoro

Don’t forget Mr. president on March 30th 2010 you called for expanded drilling in the Gulf just days before the spill. Not to mention that your administration give BP a safety award last year and were going to do the same this year but called it off because of the spill.

Now we find out that your administration was allegedly tied to BP and as a result of this reported cronyism, your administration was allegedly lax in the oversight of the company’s drilling operations. (see article)

So when Malia asks, “Daddy did you kick some ass about the oil spill yet?” You can tell her, “No honey because daddy would have to kick his own ass because this is his fault too!”

Now Mr. Spike Lee did the president “go off” enough for you! (If this weren’t so pathetic, it would be funny!)

Monday, June 07, 2010

Comprehensive Immigration Reform means Amnesty to Obama

Obama redefining U.S. as a Nation
Make no mistake our immigration system is broken. And after so many years of which Washington has failed to meet its responsibilities Americans are right to be frustrated, including folks along Border States.

But the answer isn’t to undermine fundamental principles that define us as a nation
–president Barry Hussein Soetoro
No matter how much one says it—It cannot be said enough discussing any subject with a Progressive Liberal is like stepping through an alternate Orwellian world full of doublethink and newspeak. For example, the term Comprehensive Immigrant Reform means Amnesty to Progressives like president Barry Hussein Soetoro. Not because I say it does but because they say it does. (see 1:25min video)



The first thing that one must do when speaking to a Progressive Liberal is reject how they frame the conversation or you will undoubtedly be caught up in an endless loop of attempting to argue reasonability from a frame work that is purely unreasonable.

First of all, U.S. immigration laws is not broken. You must reject that idea. U.S. immigration laws are not enforced. U.S. immigration laws have not been enforced for several presidential administrations. If our immigration laws where enforced for whatever reasons that they are not, there would not be the appearance that our laws are broken.

President Soetoro says that businesses that hire illegals must be held responsible yet when Arizona attempted to do that Soetoro's justice department hypocritically opposed Arizona's attempt to do what the president said needed to be done.(see article)

However if there is something broken it is a government that refuses to enforce its own laws. Therefore, one must reject the argument out-of-hand that U.S. immigration laws are broken.

Second enforcing immigration laws by either Federal government or State government will not undermine the fundamental principles that define us as a nation. The fundamental principles that define this nation are borders, language and culture. To the extent that we have allowed an Orwellian definition of what our fundamental principles are has done irreparable harm to this country.

The way to fix our broken immigration system is through common sense comprehensive immigration reform. And that means responsibility from government to secure our borders, something that we have done and will continue to do.
It means responsibility from businesses that break the law by undermining American workers and exploiting undocumented workers, they’ve got to be held accountable. It means responsibility from people who are living here illegally. They’ve got to admit that they’ve broke the law and pay taxes and pay a penalty and learn English and get right before the law. And then get in line and earn their citizenship. –president Barry Hussein Soetoro

Our fundamental principles have never been to condone illegality while fighting citizens of this country who are attempting to defend the constitution of the United States of American, but that is exactly what Progressive Liberals are doing.

Progressive Liberals, and president Barry Hussein Soetoro are protecting the continual criminal enterprise of human smuggling and human exploitation that is originating primarily from the country of Mexico. The Mexican government is a corrupt exploitative Oligarchy, which is using the United States as a release value which to export its poverty. The Mexican government is broken not U.S. immigration law. (see 1:45min video)



Lastly, changing U.S. laws ,thus making illegality legal, will not solve the fundamental problem which the U.S. and Mexico faces. The fundamental problem is that two broken governments have colluded and conspired to exploit the poverty-stricken people of Mexico. The countries of Mexico and the United States are in collusion to transfer Mexico’s poverty to the United States in exchange for lower labor costs in the U.S. and a voting-block of ignorant voters that will continue to keep the corrupt government of Progressive Liberals in power in the U.S. for decades.

When the president of the United States talks about comprehensive immigration reform he is in fact speaking about his and Mexico’s continual treasonous and seditious plan against this country to exploit the poor people of Mexico by making them low wage earners in the U.S. Overall this results in lowering the standard of living for citizens of the U.S. by driving down wages. In addition illegal alien entry into the U.S. attacks the fundamental principles of U.S. which are borders, language and culture which have historically have been identifiers of a nation throughout all of human history.

Without the fundamental principles of borders, language and culture no country has ever been able to survive.

Without borders, language and culture the United States will not survive that is what Comprehensive Immigration Reform will do to the United States, it will be the death of this country.

Friday, June 04, 2010

Bill Maher: Obama not a “Real Black president”

"I thought when we elected a black president, we were going to get a black president. You know, this [BP oil spill] is where I want a real black president. I want him in a meeting with the BP CEOs, you know, where he lifts up his shirt where you can see the gun in his pants. That's -- (in black man voice) we've got a 'motherfu**ing problem here?' Shoot somebody in the foot."—Bill Maher
HBO’s resident Racist and Bigot Bill Maher disrespected all black people with his Stereotypical description of a “Real Black president”

According to Maher Barry Hussein Soetoro is not a real black president because he doesn’t use violence to solve his problems, he doesn’t carry a gun hidden in his buggy clothes and he doesn’t cuss out people with whom he has a disagreement with. (see 1:48min video)





If anyone Republican would have even suggested only one of the many insulting things that Maher stated in his monologue, their career would have been over. And Black people would be protesting in the streets.

Or maybe “Real” Black people really do solve their problems through disrespect, guns and violence. If so there will be no protest from Black people. If so there will be no protest from Sharpen or Jackson.

Which means Maher will continue his racist and bigoted comments on HBO and no one will raise one syllable of a protest, which will confirm that Soetoro is not a real “Black President” and Black people know this. Or Black people really do settle their disputes in the manner which Maher described or Black people reality don’t mind racial stereotypes coming from racial leftist like Maher.

Thursday, June 03, 2010

Noonan: The Alternate Reality of Liberals



Peggy Noonan,Journalist and former Obama Girl?


I don't see how the president's position and popularity can survive the oil spill. This is his third political disaster in his first 18 months in office. And they were all, as they say, unforced errors, meaning they were shaped by the president's political judgment and instincts.—Peggy Noonan
Peggy Noonan supported and backed the presidency of Barry Hussein Soetoro during his campaign for the office and early on into his presidency. Actually it was worse than that Noonan was a certified Obama Girl. She loved her some Obama! So imagine my surprise when I see in her article, “He was supposed to be Competent” a less than favorable critique of the man whom she claimed would be good for America. (see article)

The president, in my view, continues to govern in a way that suggests he is chronically detached from the central and immediate concerns of his countrymen. This is a terrible thing to see in a political figure, and a startling thing in one who won so handily and shrewdly in 2008. But he has not, almost from the day he was inaugurated, been in sync with the center. The heart of the country is thinking each day about A, B and C, and he is thinking about X, Y and Z. They're in one reality, he's in another.—Peggy Noonan

Noonan like so many others who were beguiled by the imagery and deceptive language of the left are of late experiencing buyer’s remorse. She is only now seeing what true American patriots attempted to warn the country about all along about Barry Hussein Soetoro. We saw through the pretence of Liberal propaganda and recognized that though they, in particular Barry Hussein Soetoro, were saying the right things to get elected, the reality was, the Liberal intent and agenda was burrowed deep within the rhetoric and it suggested something different.

This difference is what Noonan is just now discovering after 16 months of Democrats controlling all aspects of government and a Democrat president governing as we warned that he would.

Noonan points out that to her, president Soetoro’s biggest selling points were that he intimated that he would govern with political judgment and instincts greater than the previous president and even greater than any president that we had ever seen.

Noonan is now finding that not to be the case. Noonan cites three examples which caused her thinking to evolve; the president’s handling of Healthcare Law, the president’s handling of the Illegal Mexican problem in this country and now the president’s mishandling of the Gulf oil spill.

She also is just now realizing that president Soetoro’s pre-election claims of bringing the country together are not happening as he said they would. If Noonan is honest she would see that this administration is purposely working to create Race, class and economic friction in the United States.

Noonan seems to be surprised that president Soetoro is governing like he is detached from the American people. She notes that it’s almost like he is in an alternate reality.

Yes Ms. Noonan that alternate reality is called Liberalism. One hears it every time this president speaks. Clearly he imagines the world without a strong and viable United States of America and for him that’s easy because he’s tried to make that the reality. Why you ask? To recompense for America’s past sins of course, he has so much as spoken those very words.

And every time he and/or a Clinton, a Pelosi, a Reid or a Schumer opens up their Liberal Progressive mouths they give evidence that they are working for the establishment of this alternative reality.

I feel sad for journalist and people like Peggy Noonan who were deceived and are just now identify the pathetic incompetence of president Barry Hussein Soetoro.

Imagine that, it took Noonan these three cataclysmic issues; Health Care, the Illegal Mexican Invasion and the Gulf oil spill for her to recognize that this president is incompetent and that president’s agenda is a danger to the United States of America.

Noonan gave us so many reasons why she thought Barry Hussein Soetoro should be president of the United States of America when he was campaign for the presidency.

I hope she spends just as much time recanting her misinformed opinions.

Yes Miss Noonan the president of the United States resides in an alternate reality from the majority of the American citizenry we get that, we already know that.

The question is, are you now ready to come in from the cold?