Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Is It Alive?

Former Senator Walking Arlen Specter

Senator or mad scientist? No just a “Former Senator Walking,” meaning that the good people of Pennsylvania should do the country a favor and recall Arlene Specter at best but at the very least Pennsylvanians need to look for a Republican challenger for the Senate seat in their state, Arlen Specter’s seat.

Specter who first gain notoriety by chairing the Senate Judiciary Committee and making it harder for Republican judicial nominees than present chairman Patrick Leahy, D-VT ever could is again show his lack of understanding of what it means to be a Republican.

In a complete act of senility or rather general political incompetence Arlen Specter is attempting to dig up and revive the Immigration bill.

That’s right the one bill that split President Bush from the base of the Republican Party, the one issue that will guarantee Republican disaster in 2008 Senator Specter has dug it up like a dog retrieving a buried bone. Like a dog returning to his own vomit Senator Specter is on the verge of offering a new immigration reform package.

Not only is Specter waving this corpse of a bill around in the faces of Republicans, he like Mary Shelley’s Dr. Victor van Frankenstein, is doing patch work surgery on this monstrosity of Immigration reform in an attempt to revive it from the dead.

The Senate Judiciary Committee’s senior Republican said on Thursday that he is on the verge of offering a new immigration reform package, making significant changes that could win over recalcitrant members from both parties.

Specter believes that cutting out the controversial “Z visa” program, which would have granted the nation’s 12 million illegal immigrants immediate citizenship will make his bill appealing to Republicans. Removing the Z visa would stop conservatives from seeing this bill as “amnesty.” But he would leave intact the family reunification standard that this spring’s defunct immigration bill partially replaced with a skills-based system.

Family reunification is Democrat speak for if a Mexican national manages to sneak into the United States and if he or she establishes his or her self, once the United States grants these Illegal aliens some type of legal status through Senator Specter’s proposed bill the Mexican national would have the right to legally bring in Mexican family members, mothers, fathers, children, and various other immediate family members. This would result in exponential Hispanic population growth, 20 million illegals would multiple into 80 million and up in a matter of years.

Specter’s efforts are meant to remove the illegal status of 12 to 20 million Mexican nations who are in this country illegally. Specter wishes them to be no longer perceived as fugitives from justice. The Senator has admitted that this is an attempt to bring Mexican nationals who are in this country illegally out of the shadows so that they will no longer have to fear deportation which is the normal consequence of their illegal act.

Senator Specter you are so gone this next election cycle and believe me you will not be missed!

Monday, July 30, 2007

Did Oprah sink Hillary’s Presidential Bid

Oprah Winfrey and Hillary Clinton

It’s Star Wars but not in a galaxy far away, no its happening right here on planet earth during the campaign for the 2008 elections! David Geffen, Jeffrey Katzenberg, Oprah Winfrey, Steven Spielberg, and George Soros all are attempting to use their "Force" to influence events around who the next Democratic Presidential nominee will be, its big Liberal money and insidious politic manipulation which will be the determinate in choosing who will carry the Presidential banner for the Democrats.

Clinton or Obama, Obama or Clinton, will Hillary’s negatives be to stifling for Democrat support? Will Obama’s inexperience prevent Democrats from embracing his candidacy?

The most influential and popular woman in TV has said that Barak Obama is her guy and is putting all the force of her endorsement behind his candidacy.

While other Hollywood illuminates are aligning behind their political choice Democrats are polling to see if the Democrat front runner has any dreaming chance of winning the Presidency.

Two in five people recently polled by The New York Times hold an unfavorable view of Hillary Clinton and of those with an unfavorable view, 71 percent have a "strongly unfavorable" view, while those with a favorable view aren't as passionate.

In another recent poll, more than half of respondents said they wouldn't consider voting for Clinton in the November 2008 election.

In the recent Times poll, for instance, 46 percent said they would definitely vote for her or consider voting for her, while 34 percent said they would definitely not vote for her.

If Clinton still has high negative numbers once the primaries start in January, Democratic voters in primaries and caucuses might vote against her even if she is their preferred nominee. Out of the White House for eight years, Democrats are hungry for a winner. They don't want a candidate who can't deliver the general election. –J. Patrick Coolican, Las Vegas Sun

Will Oprah’s endorsement cause Hillary the black vote and the women’s vote? One thing is for curtain, with such high negatives Hillary can ill afford to lose these two voters blocs and remain a viable candidate.

Can a Oprah endorsement deliver a presidential nominee and are Hillary’s negatives so impacting that Democrats will jettison her if they feel that her candidacy in 2008 will cause them to lose the White house?

With no more Bush to kick around Democrats will be forced to look at their own faults for a change. They may even come to the conclusion that the “anybody but” meme, is fitting for someone who Democrats wouldn’t even vote for in their own primaries.

“Anybody but Clinton,” now that would be ironic wouldn’t it? Maybe that’s the message that Oprah has already sent.

Friday, July 27, 2007

Partisan Nation

Republican vs. Democrat Protestors

Whose side are you on? You’re either with us or you’re with the terrorists. Terrorists in this case would be the Democrats or the Republicans depending upon which party you are affiliated with.

If you are a Democrat the Republicans are the terrorist and if you are a Republican the Democrats are the terrorist. Why? Because you are an Ultra-Partisan and this is a Partisan Nation. It doesn’t matter who’s to blame for it the reality of it is we are at war with ourselves. A very acrimonious “Uncivil” war if you will.

We are in the midst of a partisan war in our nation’s capitol but unlike the war in Iraq Democrats have no intentions of cutting and running, no, Democrats have launched this war and they are in it to win it!

Leaders are instructing Democratic lawmakers to blitz their states with anti-Bush messages as the Senate gears up for an all-night debate on Iraq withdrawal, according to an internal memo provided to The Politico by a Democratic official.—Mike Allen, The politico

You remember the all night Senate debates which were designed to draw attention to the fact that Democrats wanted troops to withdrawal from Iraq don’t you? Of course you do.

Would it surprise you if I told you that it was a staged political partisan event meant to weaken Republican support for the war in Iraq? Naw you wouldn’t be surprised.

According to the Politico Senator Harry Reid’s office issued the following, “We need every Senator’s help throughout the next two days to amplify our message and highlight Republican obstructionism,” says the memo from the Senate Democratic Communications Center, part of the office of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.). “This is a caucus-wide effort and your help is needed.”

It’s not like the Democrats didn’t employee the same obstructionist methods for twelve years when they were in the minority. In fact they are so successful at it that the 109th Congress was named the “Do nothing Congress.” And guess who named them that? That’s right the Democrats did!

But according to a George Washington University Battleground Poll the American people are tired of all of this partisan wrangling and are growing cynical about government and politicians of both Parties.

U.S. voters are growing cynical about politics as the newly Democratic Congress has been unable to fulfill promises made. Promise which got Democrats elected into the majority of both houses of Congress.

A new direction was promised by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. But with their highly charged brand of partisan and divisive politics they have not been able to deliver on their promises sadly it has been more of the same strident and off-putting polarization with nothing being accomplished.

In the Battleground Poll 71 percent of those surveyed saying their member of Congress put partisan politics ahead of voters' actual concerns.

93 percent of voters' surveyed said members of Congress put partisan politics first.

A record 70 percent said the country was on the wrong track and the bipartisan poll found that 52 percent of the 1,000 likely voters surveyed disapproved of the job Democrats were doing in Congress this year.

Republicans measured a 61 percent disapproval rating. The same number said they disapproved of President George W. Bush's job performance, though 57 percent said they approved of him as a person.

In electoral matchups Democrats were only supported by 49 percent saying they would vote for the Democratic candidate for president if the election were held today, while 38 percent said they would vote for the Republican candidate.

In congressional races, 47 percent said they would vote for the Democrat, while 40 percent said they would vote for the Republican.

But respondents preferred leading Republican candidate Rudy Giuliani over leading Democrat Hillary Clinton 49 percent to 44 percent. Clinton tied with likely Republican candidate Fred Thompson at 46 percent each.

Democrat Barack Obama fared better against Republicans, beating Giuliani 52 percent to 42 percent and beating Thompson 56 percent to 35 percent.
The survey had a margin of error of 3 percent.

Partisan politics has divided this nation into two polar opposes and depending on which side you vote from determines who you blame for the worst Congressional relations in American history.

This perhaps is the worst Congress ever it is not what the Democrats promised but ironically it is a different direction, a direction that only worsens with every partisan fight.

If only we could replace our troops in Iraq with the representatives in Congress who want to fight Partisan wars.

You think we’d be winning in Iraq then? Pelosi, Reid, Clinton and Murtha want to command the troops from Washington D.C. why don’t they take their fighting acumen to the front lines?

We’d surely win the war then wouldn’t we? Clinton did say she was in it to win it. Just think if that attitude was used deployed when thinking about our troops in Iraq.
Not only would we be able to bring our service people home, we would be able to bring them home victorious!

To bad the furious fighting that has engulfed D.C. can not be transferred to the battle grounds of Iraq along with the slogan, “The United States of America is in it to win it!”

And after we’ve won we bring the boys home victorious!
One thing’s for certain there should be a lot of incumbent Senators and Congresspersons looking for work after 2008 because Americans are tried of nothing but partisanship all of the time.

We didn’t vote anyone into office to make fellow Americans the enemy. And when you target the President and your colleagues from across the aisle that is exactly what you’ve done.

If fighting is what you do best do it on your own time or enlist. We need people who will stop at nothing to win this war. Sounds like a job for our Congressional leaders and a few of the Presidential candidates.

Thursday, July 26, 2007

What if the Troops would come Home Tomorrow?

A new CBS News/New York Times poll out Monday shows that most Americans want to see U.S. troops start coming home from Iraq.

Here’s a thought, what if America stop fighting would the war stop? Think about it a minute all of you who wishes the war to end. Would the war end if the United States brought the troops home?

Democrats promise to end the war, Hillary Clinton has promised as much Gov. Bill Richardson said he could get all the troops out of Iraq in five months. Sen. Christopher Dodd claimed he could do it in seven months, while Sen. Joe Biden was insistent that it would take a full nine months to a year. So if Liberal’s dreams were realized and U.S. troops were brought home what would happen? REMEMBER…

War was declared on America first in 1996 and again in 1998 by Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden has been indicted for terrorism by the U.S. States District Court.
The indictment states that beginning in 1993, Al Qaeda began
training Somali tribes to oppose the United Nation's humanitarian
effort in Somalia. In October, members of Al Qaeda participated in an
attack on U.S. military personnel where 18 soldiers were killed and 73
others wounded in Mogadishu. In another reference, the indictment
noted that an unnamed "co-conspirator" transported weapons and
explosives from Khartoum to Port Sudan for transshipment to the Saudi
Arabian peninsula.

The indictment noted that Al Qaeda, Bin Laden's international terrorist group, reached an agreement with Iraq not to work against the regime of Saddam Hussein and that they would work cooperatively with Iraq, particularly in weapons development and forged alliances with the National Islamic Front in Sudan and with the government of Iran and with its associated group Hezballah to "work together against their perceived common enemies in the West, particularly the United States." (That’s right true believers evidence filed in U.S. District Court has al Qaeda, Osuma bin Laden and Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq working cooperatively!)

It is important to note that although bin Laden is under indictment for agreeing to cooperate with Iraq in terrorist pursuits, by the Clinton administration, there are those who oppose the war in Iraq claiming that there is not any connect between bin Laden, terrorism and Iraq. (I guess all the, ‘What are we doing in Iraq’ nonsense is pure ignorance, now isn’t it?)

But remember before the United States had one boot on the ground, before Congress gave President Bush the authority to go to war in Iraq and before Congress voted to fund one single dollar for the war in Iraq there were multiple acts of war committed against the United States and American interest.

Under the Clinton administration a series of terrorist acts were carried out against the United States on American soil and against American interest they included; the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center (WTC I); the 1996 attack on the U.S. military barracks Khobar Towers, in Saudi Arabia; the 1998 attacks on U.S. Embassies in Africa; the 1999 "Millennium" plot; and the 2000 attack on U.S.S. Cole.

Multiple terrorist attacks against the United States only progressively increasing in violence and death with each additional attack becoming grander in scale finally commentating in over 3,000 deaths on American soil on September 11, 2001.

America was not at war at the time of any of these terrorist attacks. America was at peace. America did not have troops deployed for war.

So my question is if Liberals and Democrats get what they want and the troops come home will the war end? What I suspect will happen is Iraq will become another Darfur were ultra-Liberal rights groups will cry about the human devastation and atrocities being committed there but will do little else to lift a finger to help!
It is likely that at least 100,000 people have died from violence [of war], disease and other conditions related to forced displacement, [ethnic cleansing] and insufficient access to humanitarian assistance. The toll of death and displacement continues to rise. Those left homeless are still at risk: camps are poorly protected, and women and girls are frequently the targets of sexual attacks when they venture from the camp to find firewood and food for their animals.
While Darfur is a trendy slogan for Hollywood types to pitch while wearing a cute “Save Darfur” button no one not the United Nations or anyone else in the world is doing anything about the human casualties caused by Islamist killing and the religion of death that is spreading there.

Remember America didn’t start the war with terrorism and unless the one who started the war against the United States calls for its end this war will not end. Just ask Solomon Rushdie who is still under a 1989 Islamic fatwas which is a death warrant, Rushdie wrote a book and Islam has been warring against him for 18 years.

Rushdie has been in hiding for 18 years. I suspect that Islam’s war against Rushdie will not end until he dies.

If Democrats were able to bring the troops home tomorrow I suspect that the war would not end. America would just go into hiding like Rushdie and the war would not end until America dies.

It seem to me someone ought to be singing give peace a chance to Osama bin Laden maybe a camp Casey right outside the cave of bin Laden right outside the Afghanistan Pakistan border.

Cindy you up for a little plane ride?

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Hate? You’ve got to be kidding,it’s subversion of American laws Stupid!

Hillary Clinton before the NCLR

The nation's largest Hispanic advocacy group [The National Council of La Raza] says it must come up with a strategy to combat "a wave of hate" its leaders say came from talk radio's efforts to sink the Senate's immigration bill.

Orwellian Machavellianism is the telling of carefully constructed lies for the manipulation and deception of the political masses. Lying with hopes that the lies which you’re promoting will be forced on the masses politically.

Liberals have become quite adapt at this technique; Roe vs. Wade, Separation of Church and State, Homosexual Marriage, the President lied about Iraq are just a few of carefully constructed lies that Liberals have deceived the masses with and thereby have forced political changes or are forcing political changes into the laws that govern us forcing their liberal beliefs on half of the country that is not supportive of their beliefs.

Using this same pattern of ideological fascism Hispanics and organizations that promote Mexican nationals who, illegally enter into the United States, are now attempting to use Orwellian Machavellianism to reinvent the facts surrounding the 12 to 20 million illegal aliens who have disrespected the sovereignty of this Nation by entering into this country illegally.

Hispanics are calling the fact that Americans told their own Congress, an American Congress, and a Congress that is sworn to up hold the constitution of these United States, to up hold the rule of law. Americans don’t want their immigration laws violated and to call that desire“a wave of hate”is simply unconscionable. Can you believe the audacity? The out right blatant lie, that the National Council of La Raza is attempting to introduce? This would be a total redefinition of an act of patriotism, defining patriotism as a wave of hate. Hispanics join a long line of Liberals and liberal organizations who have redefined right by calling it wrong purely for self serving purposes.

Stung by the collapse of the immigration bill in the Senate last month, NCLR leaders and members at the group's annual convention in Miami Beach, which began yesterday, say they will have to start a campaign to register and mobilize voters, to warn against crossing the line in the debate and to force lawmakers to take a clear stand on what they are willing to tolerate. – Stephen Dinan, The Washtimes

Our nation has allowed for such redefinitions in the name of tolerance and progressive ideology these lies are the only way that liberal ideologies would ever be accepted in a sane rational society. These redefinitions are classic Orwellian deception a Liberal political staple.
George Orwell coined the term doublethink in his classic novel 1984. Doublethink is the power to hold two completely contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accept both of them.

"To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself.

Just what is it about illegality that NCLR, Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama doesn’t understand? Americans are not against Hispanics, Immigrants or workers. The operative word here is “illegal” and no amount of ignoring the fact that Mexican nationals are breaking American immigration laws is going to stop American’s demand for justice and obedience to the law.
NCLR's convention continues today with addresses by the two leading Democratic presidential candidates, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois.

With Hispanics already considered a key swing voting group, both Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama are trying to win those voters for themselves in the primaries and for Democrats in the general election.

If Sen. (s) Clinton, Obama and the NCLR have no regard for the laws of this country then those Senators are not fit to be considered to be President of these United States of America. As well the NCLR should be brought up on charges of subverting the laws of this country and disbanded forthwith.

As should any group that willingly lies to the American people in attempt to place it’s ideology above the laws and the people of this country.

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

The Wassup Democrats

(L-R) Former U.S. Senator Mike Gravel (D-AK), U.S. Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT), former U.S. Senator John Edwards (D-NC), U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY), U.S. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL), New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, and U.S. Senator Joe Biden (D-DE). (Chris Keane/Reuters)
Cooler than an ice cold bottle of Budweiser in a snowman’s hand Democrat Presidential hopefuls debated for the YouTube, Moveon.org, netroots radicals.

It was an electronic digital sock puppet show, it was Kukla, Fran and Ollie; it was Sesame Street on anabolic steroids and it was so fitting that the very first question to these candidates, who would be President of the United States of America was WASSUP?

Panning from the candidates on the stage and mounted flat screen TV monitors from which YouTubers asked questions, questions which were scatter all over the political spectrum like shot from a shotgun and as eclectic as furniture at a garage sell.

The first Hip-hop, YouTube, pop-Presidential debate was underway.
Shawn Jackson from Ann Arbor, Mich. Questioning Democratic hopeful via YouTube (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
To Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York a question was, Are you feminine enough? Referring of course to the question that former Sen. John Edwards wife has recently raised regarding the Senate’s apparent ducking of feminist issues. "I couldn't run as anything other than a woman," responded Sen. Clinton.

Her answer drew a challenge from former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, who said he was the best advocate for women on the debate stage. "I have the strongest, boldest ideas," he said.

Yeah, I always suspected that John Edwards was more of a woman that Hillary! Thank you for confirming that Mr. Edwards!

Sen. Obama was asked whether he felt that he was down with the homies and whether he was representin’ or not (as a Blackman). The University of Kansas student wanted to know if Sen. Obama felt that he was authentically black enough. (What to be President?) Obama said, "You know, when I'm catching a cab in Manhattan -- in the past, I think I've given my credentials." What!?! Senator you should have had a much better answer for this instance.
Senator Hillary Clinton
What a huge missed opportunity to point out that you don’t speak Ebonics as well as Hillary and her salmon color jacket was a bit ghetto however you’re the only candidate running who will inevitably be called nigger if you win! Not even Hillary is black enough to boast of that.

A gay female couple appeared on the screen, asking if the candidates would allow them to be married. Sen. Dennis Kucinich said yes; Sen. Chris Dodd and John Edwards said no but that they support civil unions for gay couples.

"The honest answer is I don't [support gay marriage]," said Edwards. "But I think it's wrong for me as the president of the United States to use my faith to deny anyone their rights."

Finally went asked whether any of the Senators would work their job for minimum wage, which goes from $5.15 per hour to $5.85 on Tuesday, former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel responded: "Oh, yes, I would.”

Now come on who you kidding Mr. Gravel? Just last June in a 244-181 vote, Democrats and Republicans alike killed a bid by Reps. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, and Lee Terry, R-Neb., to get a direct vote to block the COLA, which is automatically awarded unless lawmakers vote to block it.

The Senate has not indicated when it will deal with a similar measure. In essence the house just voted itself a $4,400.00 raise that would increase their salary to $170,000 a year. Yet these supposed supporters of the proletariat haggled over $0.70 an hr raise in the minimum wage for you and me.

So let’s recap, Lesbians asking about gay marriage. Two unrelated parents with sons in Iraq asking about ending the war, a question about minimum wage and a snowman asking about global warming I’d say yep that’s the Democratic platform in a nutshell.

I guess that’s WASSUP with the YouTube Democrats… Jeez God they can’t be serious can they?

Monday, July 23, 2007

Senator Feingold I got your censure right here!

US Senator Russ Feingold (C), D-WI, At left is US Senator Ken Salazar, D-C); at right is US Senator Patrick Leahy, D-VT. (AFP/GettyImages/File/Joshua Roberts)
Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wisc., weekend perform on Meet the Press was weak partisan and pathetic and he really needs a new Schick. Every time I look around he’s talking about censuring the President as if we don’t know that what this tactic really amounts to is Democrats once again showing disdain for anything that they don’t like.
At the White House, spokesman Trey Bohn said, "We realize that Senator Feingold does not care much for the president's policies."
Bohn said Bush wants to work with Feingold and other Democrats on such matters as supporting U.S. troops, improving energy choices and securing health care and tax cuts for families. "Perhaps after calls for censure and more investigations, Congress may turn to such things," Bohn said.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Feingold's proposals showed the nation's frustration. But Reid said he would not go along with them and said the Senate needs to focus on finishing spending bills on defense and homeland security.

How much is it going to take to show Senator Feingold and Democrats like him that America is not interested in your little private political war with the President? This Congress has the lowest approval rating in history and instead of sucking it up and doing the peoples business Feingold insist on the politics of personal destruction once again!

Gee Russ can’t you give it a break? The America people are look for some positive cooperative governing. You, your Party and your colleague’s tactics have run the course with these negative attacks “all the time” strategy and the American people are tired of it!

Senator Reid is wrong that Senator’s Feingold’s proposal for censuring President Bush shows the nation’s frustration, Democrats do not speak for the American people. 85% of the American people disapprove of the Democrat controlled Congress!

However in a once in a life time occurrence Senator Reid is right about one thing and that is not going along with you Senator Feingold because as he rightly stated the Senate needs to focus on finishing spending bills on defense and homeland security.

Senator Feingold who we need to censure are partisan politicians who forget that other American politicians are not the enemy. Who we need to censure are partisans who attempt to sabotage our government especially at a time of war. That Senator Feingold is bordering on treason.

And that sounds a lot like you! You are the one who is in need of censure Senator Feingold or maybe your constituents back home in Wisconsin will do us the tremendous favor of recalling you or better yet electing someone in your place who knows the difference between partisan politics and governing a nation!

Friday, July 20, 2007

Sen. Reid was on a Cot during All Night Senate Session

The Big Sleeper Senator Harry Reid(AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

It was billed as an all night Senate debate on withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq. Democrats called this very symbolic session to identify with the troops who often stay up all night defending this country.

"How many sleepless nights have our soldiers and their families had?" --Sen. Dick Durbin,D-Ill

Senator Harry Reid was the architect of this thinly veiled stunt meant to peel away and entice weak Republican Senators into supporting Liberal demands to cut and run from Iraq.

After Senator Reid’s careful staged midnight address which was meant to show the world that he as Senate majority leader would be up all night in this must important gesture of self-sacrifice against the war.

After all it was the least that a Senator could do to simultaneously support the troops and at the same time protest against the war, but mysteriously the Senator suddenly went AWOL. Was he kidnapped by an American al Qaeda sleeper cell?

In the greatest disappearing act since Captain Joseph Hazelwood, left the wheelhouse of the Exxon Valdez Senator Reid just disappeared.

You remember Captain Hazelwood? Who sometime after 11 pm, departed the wheel house of the Valdez and was in his stateroom at the time of the accidental oil spill, which was one of the largest manmade environmental disasters ever to occur at sea. Hazelwood left Third Mate Gregory Cousins in charge of the wheel house and Able Seaman Robert Kagan at the helm the Valdez hit Prince William Sound's Bligh Reef and spilled an estimated 11 million gallons of crude oil.

So where was Senator Reid? Well according to Las Vegas Sun writer Lisa Mascaro sometime after midnight after the Senators midnight address he retired to his Senate office to a waiting secret cot then he stripped out of his trousers, then his shirt and tie, before settling into his cot for a snooze. On the Senate floor, others carried the all-night debate on the war in Iraq.

Apparently all the other cots were props but one was not. Senator Reid’s cot which was sequestered in the Senator’s private privileged office held the majority leader gently as he lay there dreaming. Perhaps dreaming of the brave fighting soldiers in Iraq?

A worker lays out a cot for U.S. Senators in the Lyndon B. Johnson room, just off the Senate floor, in the U.S. Capitol Building in Washington July 17, 2007. U.S. Senate Democrats, hoping to raise pressure on President George W. Bush and his fellow Republicans to pull troops from Iraq, have scheduled an around-the-clock war debate starting on Tuesday which is expected to last overnight. REUTERS/Jason Reed (UNITED STATES)

In one of the biggest staged Democrat political stunts to date Senator Harry Reid, like the disciples Peter, James and John who disappointed their Lord because they rather sleep than watch with Him for one hour, was sleep. And because of it Reid’s hypocrisy stinks up the whole Senate!

Senate Reid: Sleep would be divine

No one forced Senator Reid to Stage this all night debate so if he wasn’t ready to follow though with his own program he shouldn’t have called it! But to pretend that he was up all night when he wasn’t is simply outrageously disgraceful!

Senator Reid did not do an all nighter, Senator Reid got his sleep. This is but another example of Liberals attempting to have it both ways.

Democrat Senators voted to give the President authority for this war and they have repeatedly voted to fund it and now that Code pink and Cindy Sheehan have gained some traction with the racial anti-protect America left Democrats all of a sudden Senate Democrats are ready for a precipitous withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq for no other reason than votes in 2008!

Anything for votes hey Dems? …Just as long as it doesn’t interfere with your beauty sleep huh Senate Reid?

Thursday, July 19, 2007

This is the Congress that Democrats built

Senators Reid, Schumer and Durbin

Just what did they think? The saying goes you sow the wind you reap the whirlwind. Here’s another, you make the bed you lie in it.

The politics of personal destruction were only supposed to affect George Bush. All of the negative politics were only supposed to reflect badly on George Bush. All the blame from everything from the 2000 elections to Katrina and Rita was to only mire George Bush. ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, Air America, the New York Times, etc, etc, etc were suppose to poison the political atmosphere only against George Bush.

So why does a Democrat controlled Congress have the lowest approval rating of any Congress in the history of Zogby polling?

Maybe it’s because Harry Reid can’t open his mouth without some overtly negative diatribe against George Bush. Nor can John Kerry, neither can Chuck Schumer or Nancy Pelosi nor any of the Democrats.

It’s the negativity stupid! Democrats have been serving up a steady stream of blame, shame and who outed Valerie Plame.

Liberal bias has incessantly brow beat us with the topics of Gitmo, Abu Ghraib and anti-Patriot act all negativity all the time. A culture of corruption, where are the weapons of mass destruction, he lied and people died, the war is lost and the surge has failed.

All night anti-war congressional visuals and 500 to 1000 congressional investigations, Cindy Sheehan and camp Casey it’s all just too much, too much negatively. Negatively overload, danger , danger Will Robinson, can’t we just all get along?

Now divine justice, or Karma or the chickens are coming home to roost, or the cows are coming home or what goes around comes around. In other words the hate that was meant for Bush only is now being visited upon the Democrat Controlled Congress.

So this is the house that Democrats built, almost eight years of unadulterated vitriol against President George W. Bush, clich├ęs not withstanding the hate that they intended solely for him is now being directed back at its source unto a partisan hateful lying political Democratic Controlled Congress.

Pelosi and Reid built this city on hate of the other and now 85% of the American people are in a foul discontented mood regarding the entire Congress.

Let’s be clear this national malaise that is felt regarding Congress is a direct result of the politics of negativity and Democrats are the architects and the constructers of this house of hate so it is all but fitting that they should live in the house that they’ve created.

Democrats fooled the American people in 2006 with the politics of hate and lies but for 2008 nobody is going to believe the “us against them” politics of hate.

The Presidential candidates will need to bring something more substantial than Bush bashing every time, all the time! 2008 candidates will have to bring positive insights and answers to the many problems which face America.

A new direction, yeah this time we need a new direction not the broken promise of a new direction which Democrats gave in 2006.

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Why are these men smiling: They’re going to a slumber party!

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev., left, shares a laugh with Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., right, and Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

A "circus, a "mockery,""Kabuki theater," a "carnival" and a "charade," Democrats have said. Not only that, but "a colossal waste of time." Given the increasingly geriatric nature of the chamber as a whole, the Senate in all-night session amounts to "elder abuse."
Those were Democrats talking about the last all-night Senate session four years ago. Then, they were in the minority and forced by Republicans to make good on their threat to filibuster judicial nominations.

“Clay pigeon” Majority leader Harry Reid and the wacky Democrat controlled Senate are up to more Senate tricks! Well it’s supposed to be an all night debate signifying the sacrifice that our soldiers in Iraq make. You know the soldiers in the theatre of war are often up all night defending this country (are there any beds in fox holes?) and some brilliant Senator said, Hey I know, let’s do a all night debate like the soldiers stay up all night in Iraq.
"How many sleepless nights have our soldiers and their families had?" --Sen. Dick Durbin,D-Ill

So the Democrats patted themselves on the back and immediately ordered 100 beds just in case the hard work of emulating the soldier’s vigilance in fighting the war might get too tiresome. Now you all know why this hair-brained Democrat controlled Congress has an approval rating of a dismal 14%!

Workmen prepare to set up sleeping cots in a room off the Senate Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, July 17, 2007, as the Senate prepared for an all night session to debate the war in Iraq. (AP Photo/Dennis Cook)
The last time that the Senate staged an all night debate Democrats called it; a circus, a mockery, Kabuki Theater, a carnival, a charade a colossal waste of time and elder abuse.

Workmen set up sleeping cots in a room off the Senate Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, July 17, 2007, as the Senate prepared for an all night session to debate the war in Iraq. (AP Photo/Dennis Cook)
So to avoid looking foolish like the last time that the Senate debated all night long Democrats ordered plenty of beds. I guess someone has to do the hard work that Americans won’t do, aye Senators?

Workmen set up sleeping cots in a room off the Senate Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, July 17, 2007, as the Senate prepared for an all night session to debate the war in Iraq. (AP Photo/Dennis Cook)

Pillow fight anyone? Next time how’s about a Senate overnight fieldtrip to Baghdad?

Hey Senator Reid was this your bright idea?

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

The Bush administration does the work that Carter and Clinton couldn’t do.

U.S. nuclear envoy Christopher Hill, right, speaks to journalists on disarming Pyongyang's nuclear program. (AP Photo/Greg Baker)
You’ve probably missed the latest accomplishment by the Bush administration so allow me to go over it with you!

Democrats have been harping that this President’s world policies are diplomatic failures. They also claimed that the United States is not safer than before President Bush was elected into office.

As you know Democrats believe that they can diplomatically solve all of the world’s ills. If you listen to New Mexico’s Governor Bill Richardson who is running for the Democrat nomination for President of the United States, you’d think that all we need to do is talk to the terrorist who declared a fatwa against the United States in 1998 and they will lay down their suicide bombs in 2007 and sing “Kum Bi Ya” with us. Democrat Senators actually believe this and they are calling for a diplomatic end to the war on terror and the war in Iraq.

And just where has this method worked before for Democrats? Maybe Democrats remember the great success that Presidents Carter and Clinton had with their Diplomatic efforts with North Korea. The carrot and sticks approach to diplomacy that the Clinton administration used to detour North Koreas’ nuclear proliferation obviously worked right?

That’s why the North Koreans tested nuclear bombs in October 2006, bombs that were never supposed to be developed under the Carter/Clinton negotiations but under the Bush administration North Korea have at last closed down its nuclear reactors.

Really, the Carter, Clinton policy of negotiating with unscrupulous ideologues and terrorists is what failed policy is. Liberals should acknowledge that!

It spite of that Democrats are offering all types of sage advice about diplomacy to the President and this Country regarding the war in Iraq. Democrats wish to negotiate with terrorist who are Islamic zealots that have no loyalties to anything but their own interpretation of Qur’an, Hadith and Sharia.

And that doesn’t leave a lot to negotiate with, because in Islam it is permit able to lie to people who are not of your faith so if the highest standard, the highest moral value in Islamic frame of reference permits one to lie to non Muslims, in negotiations, how would the party with which you were negotiating with know whether or not any agreement reached would be binding?

Bottom line is there is no negotiating with fanatics who get mad and riot over cartoons, who purposely kill fellow adherents of their own faith by suicide bomb, who destroy their own religious places of worship and who issue fatwas or murder warrants on whomever they feel gives the slightest offense against their religion.

The Carter and Clinton negotiations with North Korea produced nuclear proliferation because the North Koreans took advantage of the naivety of the Doctrine of Carrots and Sticks negotiations as outlined in the Congressional Record by Senator John McCain.

In contrast the North Koreans have shut down their nuclear reactors under the Bush doctrine. That should be a lesson to even the most ardent or ignorant Liberals!

Just another fine example of Conservative ideology doing the job that Liberalism won’t do!

Monday, July 16, 2007

Let the Controlling of the Conversation Begin!

Senator Hillary Clinton and former Senator John Edwards planning to further squelch speech in America
Well it’s a bit to late for that, that is Democrats have been attempting to control this American conversation for going on eight years. So much so that Hillary has picked up this theme for her campaign!

First by creating an absolutely toxic atmosphere around the President, Democrats have given license to the likes of Hugh Chavez and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to personally defame the President of these United States of America.

Democrat’s hatred and negativity toward President Bush has caused a Political Global Warming which is destroying the political landscape of this country as well as the politics of countries world-wide.

Now Democrats hypocritically wish to control all aspects of the Presidential debates. Presidential candidate and former one term Senator John Edwards; decided that he would not debate the issues as long as the debate was sponsored by the Congressional Black caucus and the Fox News network. Fox News being the operative word here.

Hillary Clinton, Barak Obama, Chris Dodd and Bill Richardson soon followed suit declaring, as their netroots moveon.org demanded, they would not debate on Fox News either!

You may have thought Good, Fox News is a Republican mouthpiece anyway and that's no place for the pristine ideologies of Liberalism. What you would not have expected is a fascist pattern of controlling speech or Liberal propaganda to be developing in the Democrat Party. Well it is!

As proof, here you have John Edwards and Senator Clinton once again attempting to exclude and limit the free expression of political debate in this country. If you listen carefully you can hear it as it was caught on video, Edwards whispers in Clinton’s ear that they must again limit debate. This time it has nothing to do with those nasty Fox News Conservatives, no, Edwards and Clinton want to prevent their fellow Democrats from debating.

Shades of Congressman Ron Paul! You remember the stink that Liberals attempted to create claiming that it was Republicans who were attempting to limit the Republican debate?

Just how could something that was sooo important to Liberals be repeated by Democrats? For months the liberal cry was Ron Paul, Ron Paul! And now Clinton and Edwards plot to do what they’ve accused the Republicans of doing? Hypocrisy!

You think that Democrats want to tell the truth? You think Al Gore tells the truth? What about John Kerry? Or maybe Hillary Clinton who David Geffen says lies better than the average politician.

This Political conversation that the Democrats plan to have with America is and will be full of deceptions and lies. Of course the greatest lie will be to project Democrat tendencies of lying on Republicans and thus far it’s working.

We’ve seen this all before the Clintonesque contrived parsing of terms the nuanced deception and the coy use of words, situation and politics all Democrat staples for campaigning and governing.

So as Hillary says, Let the conversation begin. Only every aspect of this conversation will be controlled by the Fascist netroots Liberal left and the Democrats who represent them; Hillary, Barak, Reid, Pelosi and John Edwards.

The thing is you won’t be seeing this conversation on Fox News now will you?

Friday, July 13, 2007

Former Senators Walking

Senator Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader

Republicans need Conservatives who will fight for Republican ideas. Twelve Senators voted against Conservatives on what was the biggest issue that has come along in quite some time concerning Conservatives and Americans, Cloture on the Immigration bill, showing an all to apparent disconnect between Conservatives and the Senators who were elected to represent Conservatives.

Also it most be said that some of these twelve Senators are personally responsible for the 2006 defeat of a Republican controlled Senate because of their extreme individualism bordering on maverickism.

Over the years it has become painfully apparent that some of these Senators are uncomfortable with Conservatism. For example Senator Olympia Snowe is a Lincoln Chaffe Republican in the worst tradition of Conservatism. She and Republican Senators like her should either change their Party affiliation or step down or be removed so that a Conservative can do the job that these American Senators won’t do.

In light of the hyper-partisanship of the Democrat Party if Conservatives are not as enthusiastic and committed to their ideas this country will be ripped away from its traditional moorings in the span of two Presidential administrations.

If any of the follow are your Senator(s) please help by looking for a Conservative in your state to run against these politicians and support that person against these incumbents. We must do all that we can to strengthen the Party that Bush, McCain, Specter and Lott has decimated.

Bring Conservatism back to the Republican Party and finish the sweep of 2006! It’s time for a new direction within our Party, its time for pride in the things that Conservatives stand for.

If Democrats can have pride in homosexuality, abortion, refusing to protect America and hating Republicans, we certainly can have pride in fighting to protect America and American values, marriage, families, life, liberty and happiness with none of the perversions that Liberals attempt to attach to these ideas!

Defeat these former Senators walking and give them what they really want, the ability to support Liberal ideology! Of course they’ll do it on their own dime!

AZ Sen. Jon Kyl

AZ Sen. John McCain III

FL Sen. Melquiades Martinez

ID Sen. Larry Craig

IN Sen. Richard Lugar

ME Sen. Olympia Snowe

MS Sen. Chester Lott Sr.

NE Sen. Charles Hagel

NH Sen. Judd Gregg

PA Sen. Arlen Specter

SC Sen. Lindsey Graham

UT Sen. Robert Bennett

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Oh Now You Want to Fight Sen. Specter?

Ex-Senator Walking Arlen Specter
Sen. Arlen Specter co-sponsored Sen. Kennedy’s S 1639: A bill to provide for comprehensive immigration reform and for other purposes. And he voted yes for cloture which would have move the Illegal Immigration Amnesty Bill closer to becoming citizenship for illegal aliens.

Specter mistakenly thought that his alliance with the Democrats against the American people on illegal immigration would indemnify him from Democrat disrespect, rancor and rank partisanship on the judiciary committee where he seats.

Sen. Specter was wrong! Democrats didn’t forget the most important thing to a Democrat, which is oppose everything that Republicans do.

Apparently Democrats made Sen. Specter some quid-pro-quo promises in exchange for his vote on amnesty that they’ve gone back on. And obviously Sen. Specter thought that years of vacillating between Conservative and Liberal ideas would earn him street creds for the Democrat gangstas on Capitol Hill.

I’m reminded of the old joke of the monkey that hitched a ride across a river on the back of an alligator. The monkey thought better of it but the alligator promised that he would deliver the monkey to the other side safe and wouldn’t eat him.

On that promise the monkey hopped on the alligators back and they were off. About the center of the river there was no turning back the alligator tossed the monkey up in the air and snapped him into his mouth. The monkey cried out, but alligator you promised not to eat me! To which the alligator replied, what did you expect monkey, eating you is in my nature!

So now Sen. Specter wants to fight Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) for breaking promises they made regarding Judge Leslie Southwick, President Bush’s pick for the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Southwick is a judge with an exemplary record and the American Bar Association rated him unanimously well qualified, the highest possible rating.

But alas, qualifications are not what Democrat look for. Democrats look for whether a Republican appointee can pass a liberal litmus test. It’s all very partisan and Sen. Specter shouldn’t act so surprised it has always been the Democrat’s way or the highway which is the reason that a Democrat should not and must not occupy the Whitehouse.

Senator Specter, Republicans will fight this fight for Judge Southwick because this is the right fight and the right time. And yes Republicans are looking for leadership and Republicans are looking for a Republican almost any Republican who is willing to fight for Republican principles and ideology much like Democrats fight for liberal ideology and use liberal ideology against a judge of Judge Southwick’s caliber.

That being said Sen. Specter Republicans remember too! We remember all of the Senators who tried to force amnesty for illegal Mexican nationals onto law. We remember that you Sen. Specter have been questionable as a Republican for years. And you and Republican Senators like you are primarily responsible for the disunity in the Republican ranks that aided in the 2006 Democrat sweep into Congressional power.

And though we will support conservative ideas no matter who promotes them, Sen. Specter, you shouldn’t confuse Republican support for Judge Southwick for support for you.

As far as I’m concerned Sen. Specter you are an ex-Senator walking and though we will fight this fight along with you Sen. Specter you have shown that you are not a reliable fighter for conservative ideas therefore we will be looking for a Conservative to oppose you in the primaries when you run for re-election to the Senate.

Just consider this fight the first fight in the last troughs of your career Sen. Specter. Republicans are looking to move in a new direction a direction in which Republicans will naturally fight for Conservative ideas not only when it’s politically expedite.

As many Conservatives, you and President Bush must have just realized Senator Specter, it is in the nature of Democrats to break their promises to Conservatives just as it is permitted in Islam for Muslims to lie to unbelievers.

What did you expect Senator?

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Sooooo Sorry, Mr.Wilson!

Oh ye who protest too much thine

Please account for the THREE different
stories, that ye doth told before THREE
separate committees, UNDER OATH!

Doth not that show that both ye and
thy espoused, are the biggest F*****g
liars on the face of the earth?


You’re as stupid as they think if you believe Democrats will end the war!

Democrats Celebrate the Lie that Sweep Them into Power

"Everybody in politics lies,but [the Clintons] do it with such ease, it's troubling."-- David Geffen

If you think Democrats are going to end the war you’re as stupid as they think.
It’s all to get your vote, you remember that the Democrats promised that if you voted them into power in 2006 into both houses of Congress they would end the war in Iraq. That was just an empty promise so that they could gain power. Cindy Sheehan is so upset that she’s declared herself an Independent and has vowed to run against Nancy Pelosi!

All of a sudden Democrats who you elected to control both houses of Congress can’t get enough votes to force the President to withdraw troops. They’ve got plenty of excuses but no action.

But here’s the sad truth, they knew before hand that the Senate is set up to protect minority Senator’s rights therefore a small majority cannot change anything. They couldn’t have told you that before the 2006 elections because you would have thought, well why should I vote Democrats in to power?

Think about it, for the twelve years the Democrats were the minority they effectively obstructed a Republican controlled Congress from passing any substantial and meaningful legislation. So much so that the Republican lead Congress was named, “The Do Nothing Congress.”

Democrats knew before the elections that a small majority would not be able to keep the promises that they made to the American people but they campaigned on false promises anyway hoping that you didn’t know. And you gave them both houses of Congress in 2006 and you don’t even understand how big of a fool you’ve been played for.

Democrats are not going to stop the war that’s why Sheehan is so hopping mad! And even though the leading Democrat Presidential candidates say that they will and even though it is recently popular for Democrats and Republicans alike to call for the end of the war they know full well that they are not going to. Its election time and they’re just telling you what they think you want to hear.

Just listen to Hillary or Senator Clinton bifurcate on the subject:
"If we in Congress don't end this war before January 2009, as president, I will,"—Senator Hillary Clinton
But in a newspaper interview Senator Clinton said: WASHINGTON, March 14 (UPI) -- U.S. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., says she would keep a reduced but significant military force in Iraq if elected president.

In an interview with The New York Times, Clinton said there were "vital national security interests" that would require U.S. troops to remain in Iraq.

She said the troops should be used to fight "al-Qaida, deter Iranian aggression, protect the Kurds" and provide some support to the Iraqi military.

Senator Obama agrees with Senator Clinton. But both are campaigning on ending the war.

You do know that the Clintons where infamous for this kind of stuff. Saying one thing and then doing another. Some might call it bait and switch, some might call it politics but why don’t we just call it as it is, LIES!

Have you learned anything from eight years of a Clinton administration? I bet you still think that Bill didn’t have sex with that woman…Ms. Lewenski!

All this Democrat talk about ending the war is just to blow smoke up your rear. Everyone who is saying it is using the issue to get reelected or elected as President.

Cindy Sheehan knows it.

Maybe she’s not as stupid as she looks… and what’s your excuse?

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Bleeding out Bush

President "I'll see you at the bill signing" Bush

I told you so just doesn’t do it. There is no satisfaction in seeing Democrats and some Republicans cut off of the political head of President Bush in grisly Paul Johnson, Nick Berg, Eugene Armstrong or Daniel Peal like fashion.

I warned the President June 5, 2007 to stop with the amnesty for illegal aliens and get ready for the assault on his Presidency.

Then again I wrote June 13, 2007 that if the President didn’t stop with his divisive amnesty push when Democrats came for him he would be all alone and politically isolated. He didn’t listen and now he’s in more trouble than a U.S. military road caravan in Iraq!

What I mean is several newspapers across the country run this headline early yesterday morning: “Congress Returns, Ready to Battle Bush,” a reference to Congress coming back from the 4th of July break ready to declare war against the Bush administration, but one can hardly find that headline today because MSM editors preferred a more negative anti-Bush headline: “Bush Fires First Shot At Congress” The Bush Fires First headline soon replaced Congress Returns to Battle... in order to cast as negative a light on the President as possible.

The fact is Congress has been planning this fight for weeks and maybe even months. Congress planned to attack the President on the war, on the firing of U.S. attorneys, the commutation of former aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby's prison sentence and the President’s claim of executive privilege in the summer as I warned in my previous two posts. Sorry to say, I was right.

What does all of this mean? If you were stout enough to watch any or all of the Islamic extremist beheadings of the Americans I mentioned above you saw the most gruesome act of human cruelty ever to be recorded. Americans bled out like slaughtered animals to the chant of Allah akbar, Allah akbar after their murderers cut off their heads!

Democrats likewise are chanting, “the Iraq war”, “the Iraq war” as they bleed out the remaining political capital of a politically inept President who handed the Democrats his own head on a platter in the most backward political maneuver in recent memory by join with Democrats to attempt to grant amnesty to 12 to 20 million illegal Mexican nationals.

Even if President Bush thought that he was right about amnesty, (and I don’t believe that he was) for the political well-being of his Party and the country he should have had the political acumen to put his own wants aside for the good of his Party’s unity.

Now all that is left of Bush’s Presidency is an up coming embattled 17 months of Democrats attacks against his weaken lame duck Presidency. One which he has demonstrated very little political skill and know how. If Republicans intend to win the White house in 2008 they had better find a candidate who knows politics and who knows how to do political combat because the Democrats are bringing it!

It‘s the Democrat’s intent to politically decapitate the Bush administration and, as well, all politically elected Republicans holding office while chanting, “The Iraq war, the Iraq war!

All the while Democrats hope that this political ham-fisted President will just bleed out the rest of his remaining 17 month term unable to effective govern or help his Party politically in 2008! Not to worry Liberals all of the President’s political capital ran out at the bill signing.

You say what bill signing? That’s exactly my point!

Aren’t politics great! Politics akbar!

Monday, July 09, 2007

Live Earth or Global Brainwashing?

Former Vice President Al Gore, right, and his wife Tipper Gore cheer during the Live Earth concert in Washington. (Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images)

But why is he [Gore] actually organising them? To make us aware of the greenhouse effect? Everybody's known about that for years. We are all fucking conscious of global warming.'—Bob Geldof, Organiser of Live Aid and Live8

So just why did Al Gore organize a world-wide event spanning seven continents and featured performances at nine climate change locations, with more than 100 of the biggest names in music, at cities in Australia, Germany, China, Japan, South Africa, England, Brazil and the United States?

Live Earth - the biggest musical event ever and a creation of former Vice President Al Gore, who got a standing ovation when he thanked the stadium audience for helping "launch this global effort" - was meant to call attention to the planet's "climate in crisis."
"I'm here to, you know, save the Earth, one beer at a time," – Zoe Delohery, a Live Earth Concert Attendee
Gore’s multi-continental was meant to rise awareness concerning polluting the Earth yet The Rock stars that Gore utilized didn’t mind at all polluting the event with foul language. It was like, “Clean up the F’ing Planet damn it!” (Makes a good slogan don’t you think?)

According to Mike Collett-White, of Reuters Canada, Al Gore’s concerts were designed to “ pressure leaders to sign a new[Kyoto like] treaty by 2009 that would cut global warming pollution by 90 percent in rich nations and more than half worldwide by 2050.

So what’s wrong with Al Gore attempting to affect world politics and policies through mass group indoctrination?

Big business has been lobbying Congress for years manipulating policies and affecting U.S. laws. The Bush-Kennedy Immigrant law is just a recent and more blatant example of this type of activity.

Gore and his partners hope to achieve a kind of Mass Social conditioning through his world-wide Live Earth concerts. Which purpose is intended to drive a global demand for legislation and Global policies for regulating carbon emissions. If that happens Gore stands to profit handsomely by selling carbon credits. He already has a company set up for this propose.

How many people have been taken in by Gore’s Inconvenient Global scheme? We know movie and music stars looking for the next big social movement have been suckered in. Leonardo DiCaprio to Madonna have lent their pop prestige to the Gore Global deception.

After counting what carbon impact his concert had on Global warming Mr. Gore will be asking you to reduce your carbon output by 90% The only way to do that is to turn-in your newly bought i-phone, disconnect from the electricity grid and buy a Totoya Prius to live in.

Al Gore’s Global warming movement has remade the progressive movement into a regressive anti-modernity movement of which the Unabomber, Theodore Kaczynski, would have been proud to be a part of. Dr. Kaczynski’s manifesto, Industrial Society and Its Future, warned of the dangers of modern technology much like Gore’s book, An Inconvenient Truth warns about the dangers of industrial and private carbon emissions.

The only difference between these two sociopaths is that Gore’s efforts are purely for his own profit. Dr. Kaczynski on the other hand was really concerned about the environment.

Musicians including Bob Geldof, Roger Daltrey and the Pet Shop Boys pointed out that a concert highlighting climate change had itself generated huge carbon emissions.
Matt Bellamy, front man of the rock band Muse, called the event "private jets for climate change." Rock band Ra diohead refused to even appear.
Among the excesses were private jets used to fly performers to far- flung places like Johannesburg, where glitterati like Joss Stone and UB40 played.
Pussycat Dolls Kimberly Wyatt and Nicole Scherzinger getting it on for Live Earth

London's Wembley Stadium had headliners like Madonna, whose jet-setting, multi-home lifestyle produces more greenhouse gases annually than 14,000 people in Malawi, the African home of her son.

The New Jersey event alone churned out tons of greenhouse gases and created truckloads of trash.

After the shows are over, the Daily Mail estimates that there will be about 1,025 tons of garbage left - which will probably end up in landfills.

Since the 2000 elections celebrities have been attempting use their fame to influence public elections and policy. Barbara Streisand and Ben Affleck are two that come immediately to mind.

Finally it remains to be seen if Mr. Gore’s Global efforts will change the world for his good and the good of his company. We will see if Live Earth will be the group social brainwashing that Mr. Gore wanted or just a huge need for Global clean-up after the party!

Friday, July 06, 2007

Wrong war Congress!

"If we will not endure a king as a political power we should not endure a king over the production, transportation, and sale of any of the necessaries of life."—John Sherman

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi thought that the 2006 elections was a mandate giving them the authority to wage war against the Bush White house but a 14% approval rating of a Democratic Controlled Congress is a clear indication that what Congress is doing is not what the people wanted. The people wanted this Congress to protect their interest against real enemies of the people not Democrat’s own political enemies.
The White House on Thursday pushed back against congressional investigations of administration activities, saying lawmakers should spend more time passing laws to solve domestic problems.
Last week, in a constitutional showdown with Congress, the Bush administration claimed executive privilege and rejected demands for White House documents about the firings of eight U.S. attorneys. The House and Senate judiciary committees have set a deadline of 10 a.m. Monday for the White House to explain its basis for the claim.
This Democrat Controlled Congress has waged war against the war in Iraq, they have waged war against the Patriot Act, which is meant to protect Americans against terrorist acts, they have waged war against individuals and cabinet members in the Bush administration in an attempt to either embarrass or obstruct the Bush administration’s conducting of the country’s business.

This Democratic controlled Congress was on the wrong side of the recent immigration fight, which they lost, if not for Republicans Senators and a few Democrats who are up for re-election in 2008, President Bush, Democrats and a few Republican Senators would have sold American citizenship to 12 to 20 million illegal aliens at the behest of big business in this country.
It is time for the American people to get off the defense and take the offense against corporate power, the way it was done in the consumer, environmental and worker areas from 1965 to 1975 and beyond, and move to new frontiers of subordinating the big corporations to the rights and necessities of real people. –Ralph Nader
While Democrats are waging a political war against the Bush administration, the Bush administration is selling the country out to special interest and big business without one peep from a Congress that have launched an all out assault against the Bush Presidency, but it is the wrong war Congress!
The White House has received a flurry of inquires since Democrats took control of Congress in January, and has turned over some 200,000 pages of documents.

"They've launched over 300 investigations, had over 350 requests for documents and interviews, and they have had over 600 oversight hearings in just about 100 days," Stanzel said. "So that's about six oversight hearings a day."
Wrong war Congress! Why haven’t you asked one question regarding the North American Community a project that is threatening the sovereignty of the United States of America, why? Why haven’t you launched even one investigation, requested one document or conducted one interviewed on a Bush official on their complicity in a plan to bypass Congress and the American people in a scheme hatched up by international corporate interest for corporate security and corporate prosperity?

I’m betting that you haven’t and you won’t investigation the Security and Prosperity Partnership, the North American Community Plan or the Council of Foreign Relations.

I’m betting that you won’t investigate the following Companies who are complicit in orchestrating the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act or the plan for the North American Community. The follow government agencies and companies are:

1) U.S. Commerce Department
2) U.S. Transportation Department
3) U.S. Labor Department
4) The National Security Council
5) Merck
6) Federal Express Corporation
7) General Motors Corporation
8) Ford
9) UPS
10) Lockheed Martin Corporation
11) General Electric Company
12) Campbell Soup Company
13) Chevron Oil
14) Kansas City Southern Industry
15)Mittal Steel USA
16) New York Life Insurance Company

Instead of warring against the Bush administration for political advantage this Congress should be warring against the enemies of the people foreign and domestic. Congress knows who they are because it’s been reported to them in detail.
And if the enemy of the people is shown to be international corporations with a global agenda to make usurious profits while driving down the wages of middle class Americans Congress should be warring against these unaccountable and unscrupulous rogues not the peoples government.

However when Congress is bought and paid for by these corporate powers the peoples rights are left exposed and subsequently taken away by the very government that is supposed to protect our rights.
Until the Congress wage against the enemies of the people, Congress is waging the wrong war at the wrong time!

Thursday, July 05, 2007

Gore’s Live Earth a Concert for Suckers


The Ipsos Mori poll of 2,032 adults - interviewed between 14 and 20 June - found 56% of Brits believed scientists were still questioning climate change [there is no consensus on Global warming]. And also there was a feeling the problem [Global warming] was exaggerated to make money.

Bob Geldof, Organiser of Live Aid and Live8 is wondering why is Al Gore has organized LIVE EARTH. Geldof’s question is, [W]hy is he [Gore] actually organising them? To make us aware of the greenhouse effect? Everybody's known about that for years. We are all fucking conscious of global warming.

And then there’s the Artic Monkeys, a rock band that believes that having a global concert to promote the ideology of Global warming/Climate change is a bit, hypocritical. "It's a bit patronising for us 21 year olds to try to start to change the world, especially when we're using enough power for 10 houses just for (stage) lighting. It'd be a bit hypocritical," said, Arctic Monkeys drummer Matt Helders.

Don’t worry your 21 year-old head about that Matt. Al Gore is away ahead of you on the energy that will be expended to propagate the world with the message of Global warming/Climate change. After the shows, the organisers, with the help of accountancy group PricewaterhouseCoopers and an army of consultants, will calculate the volume of carbon emissions created and will then "offset" the difference.

Carbon offsetting means investing in carbon-reducing initiatives such as planting trees or making donations to renewable energy projects.
So there you are Matt! Snoppy Dogg and Shakari will get to Jet to their propective Live Earth venue and then be driven by stretch Hummer limo to the concert site and Al Gore will plant a tree to offset the carbon foot print that his concert will produce there’s no hypocricy in that now is there?

In fact Live Earth takes place this Saturday in seven cities -- Sydney, Tokyo, Shanghai, Hamburg, London, Johannesburg and New York -- and organisers hope for a television audience of two billion because their broadcasting to China.

Let’s see seven cities times multiple pop musical acts at each location… Mr. Gore should be able to replace the Amazon rain forest with all of the trees he’ll have to plant to offset the carbon emissions that his world-wide concert is going to create.

It doesn’t matter anyway, the British have it right, this Live Earth event is about making money for Al Gore and his business partners, our climate has been constantly changing since Earth began and anyone who needs a concert to be made aware of that is what a phrase that is credited to P.T. Barnum stated, "There's a sucker born every minute."

And Gore has selected the biggest big top, a world wide big top on 07/07/2007 which to prove P.T. Barnum was right.

Tuesday, July 03, 2007

Pardon My "French"!!!................but....

but there seems to be no end to the outright BALLS
of the Democrats. I just can’t believe that former
President (hide the cigar) Clinton, has the colossal
gall to be critical of President Bush’s proposed
pardon of the railroaded I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.

On August 11, 1999, Clinton commuted the
sentences of 16 members of FALN, a violent
Puerto Rican nationalist group that set off 120
bombs in the United States mostly in New York City
and Chicago, convicted for conspiracies to
commit robbery, bomb-making, and sedition, as
well as for firearms and explosives violations.

In March 2000, Bill Clinton pardoned Edgar
and Vonna Jo Gregory, owners of the carnival
company United Shows International, for
charges of bank fraud from a 1982 conviction
(the couple were already out of jail, but the prior
conviction prevented them from doing business
transactions in certain states).

First Lady Hillary Clinton's youngest brother,
Tony Rodham, was an acquaintance of the
Gregorys, and had lobbied Clinton on their behalf.

Clinton issued 140 pardons as well as several
commutations on his last day of office
(January 20, 2001).[11] When a sentence is
commuted, the conviction remains intact, but the
sentence can be altered in a number of ways. Some
controversial actions include the following:

Carlos A. Vignali had his sentence for
cocaine trafficking commuted, after serving
6 of 15 years in federal prison.

Almon Glenn Braswell was pardoned of his
mail fraud and perjury convictions, even
while a federal investigation was underway
regarding additional money laundering and
tax evasion charges.[12] Braswell and
Carlos Vignali each paid approximately
$200,000 to Hillary Clinton's brother,
Hugh Rodham, to represent their respective
cases for clemency. Hugh Rodham returned
the payments after they were disclosed to the

Braswell would later invoke the Fifth Amendment
at a Senate Committee hearing in 2001, when
questioned about allegations of his having
systematically defrauded senior citizens of
millions of dollars.

Marc Rich, a fugitive, was pardoned of tax evasion,
after clemency pleas from Israeli prime minister
Ehud Barak, among many other international
luminaries. Denise Rich, Marc's former wife, was
a close friend of the Clintons and had made
substantial donations to both Clinton's library
and Hillary's Senate campaign. Clinton agreed to a
pardon that required Marc Rich to pay a
$100,000,000 fine before he could return to the
United States. According to Paul Volcker's independent
investigation of Iraqi Oil-for-Food kickback schemes,
Marc Rich was a middleman for several suspect Iraqi
oil deals involving over 4 million barrels of oil.[14]

Susan McDougal, who had already completed her
sentence, was pardoned for her role in the
Whitewater scandal; McDougal had served 18
months on contempt charges for refusing to testify
about Clinton's role.

Dan Rostenkowski, a former Democratic
Congressman convicted in the Congressional
Post Office Scandal. Rostenkowski had served
his entire sentence.

Melvin J. Reynolds, a Democratic Congressman
from Illinois, who was convicted of bank fraud,
12 counts of sexual assault, obstruction of justice,
and solicitation of child pornography had his
sentence commuted on the bank fraud charged
and was allowed to serve the final months under
the auspices of a half way house. He had served
his entire sentence on child sex abuse charges
before the commutation of the later convictions.

Roger Clinton, the president's half-brother, on
drug charges after having served the entire
sentence more than a decade before. Roger Clinton
would be charged with drunk driving and
disorderly conduct in an unrelated incident within
a year of the pardon.[15] He was also briefly
alleged to have been utilized in lobbying for the
Braswell pardon, among others.