We need somebody who's got the heart, the empathy, to recognize what it's like to be a young teenage mom. The empathy to understand what it's like to be poor, or African-American, or gay, or disabled, or old. And that's the criteria by which I'm going to be selecting my judges.—Mr. Barack ObamaAfter listening to the criteria that Mr. Obama says he will use in his selection process to name the next Supreme Court Justice to replace the retiring Justice David Souter, I could think of no better candidate than Hilton Perez. (see 3:17min video)
Perez, judge of recent Miss USA pageant fame possesses all of the attributes that Mr. Obama and his Liberal colleagues have described as the perfect candidate for the job.
Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee says that he would like to see more people from outside the traditional judiciary circles, somebody who has had some real-life experience, not just as a judge. (see source)
Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, a Judiciary Committee member who last week defected from the Republican to the Democratic Party, suggested someone not a lawyer, if that person had the right credentials.
"I would like to see somebody with broader experience," Specter said. "We have a very diverse country. We need more people to express a woman's point of view or a minority point of view, Hispanic or African American ... somebody who's done something more than wear a black robe for most of their lives."
Duh, that’s Hilton Perez all over, okaaay! Mr. Obama has said that he wouldn’t nominate someone who doesn’t believe in the right to privacy. That interesting because the Constitution doesn’t delineate a right to privacy, that “right” has been inferred into the Constitution by Liberal thinking Judges of the type that Mr. Obama says he would select to the Court.
Besides we all know that the “right to privacy” is code for Abortion rights and Homosexual rights both “rights” that are not found in the Constitution either.
That’s the irony, these two rights are “rights” that could not exist without the phantom constitutional “right to privacy.” And that is why a certain type of Justice must be selected if one is a Liberal like Obama.
I would not appoint somebody who doesn't believe in the right to privacy. […] I taught constitutional law for 10 years, and I -- when you look at what makes a great Supreme Court justice, it's not just the particular issue and how they rule, but it's their conception of the court.Whoever Mr. Obama and his Democrat controlled Congress places on the highest Court of the land that Justice will be a “Perez Hilton” selection.
And part of the role of the court is that it is going to protect people who may be vulnerable in the political process, the outsider, the minority, those who are vulnerable, those who don't have a lot of clout.—Mr. Barack Obama (source)
Whatever the name, whomever the person Mr. Obama and his Democrat allies have already told America that their nominee will not be a tradition nominee one who is blind to everything but the law. Meaning that there can be no favoritism in a Justice, Mr. Obama says that his very first criteria for the person that he selects is the ability to show favoritism.
Ergo whoever Mr. Obama selects that person will be a “Hilton Perez” Justice. Now image this if you are unfortunate enough to appear before an Obama stacked Court and you should say something that is not in keeping with the Court’s worldview then you will be called a Bitch from the bench and Obama’s pick will immediately run out of the courtroom to video blog the reason why you didn’t win your case before his or her court. (see 2:25min video)