Friday, October 31, 2008

Heil Barack!!!!!!

Much like Hitler, sensing victory in the air,
the Obama campaign has started revealing it's
"new order".

Heil!!!!.......... from this day forward, we
have the right to prevent any First Amendment
rights from being exercised! And if you don't
like it,........... TOUGH!

First, Biden didn't like a tough question from
a TV reporter, so she and her station were banned
from any further interviews or from following the

TODAY........ we hear that the New York Post, The Washington Post, and The Dallas Herald, HAVE BEEN
from the Obama campaign airplane. Ostensibly
to make room for "other" media.
Just so happens that
"other" media is quite a bit more friendly to Obama,
"incidentally, did you know that most of them are
Who said this campaign wasn't all about race?

This my friends is the pre-cursor to what we can expect
from an Obama presidency
. He is just too impatient to
even wait for the final outcome. He has not only
measured the Oval Office for new drapes, he has already
started dictating "our rights" as he sees them under his
socialist agenda.

Animal farm, move over......... the pigs are comin' to town!

The Scary Orwellian World of Nancy Pelosi

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi
"Elect us, hold us accountable, and make a judgment and then go from there. But I do tell you that if the Democrats win, and have substantial majorities, Congress of the United States will be more bipartisan," –Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi
Whoa buddy. How does Nancy Pelosi sleep at night? At a Mountain View appearance at Google which she used to advance the Democrats’ agenda, Pelosi was asked about the trouble of having one Party holding sway over all three branches of our government, the Executive, Legislative and Judiciary. (see story)

Remember Pelosi and Democrats thought that one Party rule of a Republican president and Republican controlled Congress was quite a problem before the 2006 mid term elections yet in the 2006 elections Democrats gained the majority in both house of Congress and therefore spilt power with the Republican executive branch establishing a Democrat legislative majority that notwithstanding, she responded to the questioner, "Elect us, hold us accountable, and make a judgment and then go from there. But I do tell you that if the Democrats win, and have substantial majorities, Congress of the United States will be more bipartisan."

Now that is the most ridiculous and insulting statement that I’ve heard coming from a politician since Democrat Senate leader Harry Reid and Democrat Congressman John Murtha both declared that the Iraq war was lost earlier this year.

Pelosi is asking for more of the same. After winning the majority in Congress in 2006 she’s asking American to elect more Democrats in 2008? Who among us have forgotten the promises that Democrats made in 2006 that if they were elected the majority in Congress in 2006 they would change the direction of American and they would end the war in Iraq. Who has forgotten the top 100 broken promises made by Democrats simply to get them elected?
At the beginning of the 110th Congress, the new majority came to power full of promises for a bipartisan working relationship and a landmark pledge to create the “most honest, most open, and most ethical Congress in history.”

Unfortunately, the first six months of Democratic control have been marked by long string of broken promises. Contrary to the pledges they made to the American people, the leaders of the current majority have delivered a more closed, intellectually-dishonest, and ethically ambivalent House of Representatives.

By decree instead of open debate, Democrats have attempted to weaken our national defense and legislate retreat from the Global War on Terror; impose the largest tax increase in American history; propose the most indiscriminate, wasteful spending this Congress has seen in decades; craft multi-billion dollar slush funds for secret earmarks; make gas prices worse by raising taxes and increasing regulation; and cut Medicare at a time when our seniors are enjoying large savings in their prescription drug medicines.

This is the wrong direction for the American people.
—House Democrats’ Top 100 Broken Promises
By Pelosi’s own standard of holding them accountable, because Democrats were voted in the majority in both the House and the Senate in 2006 and because Democrats did not keep their promises instead they have been holding partisan hearings that have created partisan wars and gridlock in the Congress resulting in the lowest approval rating for Congress in American history, Democrats should be held accountable right now for their failure to keep their promises and be summarily dismissed from their seats in Congress not rewarded with additional seats!

But in the Orwellian world of Nancy Pelosi Democrat failure should be rewarded with more Democrats that would result in a Democrat supermajority and imbalance in the Congress and that according to Speaker Pelosi would make Congress more bipartisan. What?

Oh, that’s right! If more Democrats are added then the checks and balances of an evenly divided Congress that is representative of the American people would be removed and Democrats will not need to negotiate with the half of Congress that is Republican. For that matter they wouldn’t have to work with Republicans at all if they have substantial majorities they would then just run roughshod over Republicans and do whatever they wished to do and that in Congresswoman Pelosi’s opinion is bipartisanship.

Congresswoman we have already had years of failed Democrats influence and two years of failed Democrat leadership in the Congress. Speaker Pelosi, Congress’s approval rating is at an all time low and nothing is getting done and you want the American people to continue down that failed road of Democrats control?

All I can say is that I wish Cindy Sheehan well in her bid to unseat you in your reelection race in San Francisco this year. Also I hope that John Murtha and a host of cut and ran Democrats will be voted out of office also.

But to ask the American people to vote in more Democrats when you have clearly shown that Democrats in leadership are a fiasco to this nation and the world’s economy, because we know that it was Democrats who made Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac possible through the failed policies of the Carter and Clinton administrations.

It was the failed leadership of Democrats like you, Christopher Dodd, Barney Frank and Maxine Waters who prevented Republicans from putting regulation on Fanny and Freddie that may have prevent the housing and credit crisis that we are experiencing world-wide today.

No, Democrats don’t deserve additional seats in Congress, they don’t even deserve the majority in Congress based on their performance since they came into power.

And if we use your criteria of, “Elect us, hold us accountable, and make a judgment and then go from there.” Then 2008 will be a very bad year for Congressional Democrats because in the judgment of the American people this is the worst Congress in history and you have the worst record of leadership of any Congress ever.

If America holds you accountable for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and if America holds you accountable for the top 100 broken promises that you made in 2006 to gain power then there will not be a Democrat majority in Congress after 2008.

That is if Americans don’t already share in the Nancy Pelosi Orwellian world of delusion!

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Stop Obama’s Mockery of our Democracy

Obama and Mock Presidential Seal
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. –The Presidential Oath of Office
Barack Hussein Obama cannot faithfully take the Presidential Oath of Office because all of his adult life he has been working to attack and destroy the Constitution and the very principles which are represented therein.

We have seen warning signs of this in Obama’s very brief national political career; his refusal to wear a flag pin and his refusal to put hand over heart in respect to America as the Star Spangled Banner is sung. (see videos)
Obama doesn’t honor America’s symbols

No flag pin

No flag salute

Both of these acts unwittingly expose a dark deep opposition to America and American values as these values are presently. Such sentiments lend themselves over quite easily to the themes of change. Change meaning that Barack Obama intends to change America into something that is was never intended to be.
This change is something that America has not seen ever before on American soil.

We get a very clear picture of this change in a recent discovered audio interview of Barack Obama on WBEZ, a Chicago public radio station. In that interview Obama is heard to say that in his opinion the Warren Supreme Court was not radical enough for his taste in that it did not break free from the Founding Fathers’ vision of America and the Constitution which they wrote. (see video)

And uh, to that extent, as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical.

It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution — at least as it’s been interpreted, and Warren Court interpreted it in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties: [It] says what the states can’t do to you, says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf.

And that hasn’t shifted, and one of the, I think, the tragedies of the civil-rights movement was because the civil-rights movement became so court-focused, uh, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change. And in some ways we still suffer from that.
--Barack Obama (see story)
This admission is absolutely startling, and to think that an unvetted person as Barack Obama a person which the American people know very little to nothing about is days away from, if he is elected, taking an oath that he does not believe in and in all likelihood will not keep.

In Steven G. Calabresi’s Obama’s ‘Redistribution Constitution’ Mr. Calabresi makes this point:
This raises the question of whether Mr. Obama can in good faith take the presidential oath to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution" as he must do if he is to take office. Does Mr. Obama support the Constitution as it is written, or does he support amendments to guarantee welfare?

Is his provision of a "tax cut" to millions of Americans who currently pay no taxes merely a foreshadowing of constitutional rights to welfare, health care, Social Security, vacation time and the redistribution of wealth? Perhaps the candidate ought to be asked to answer these questions before the election rather than after.
—Steven Calabresi (see story)

Sen. Obama has already stated that his choice of judges will not be based on whether or not his picks will uphold the rule of law and the Constitution his choices will be based on whether or not a judge will be biased in favor of special interest groups.
"[W]e need somebody who's got the heart, the empathy, to recognize what it's like to be a young teenage mom.
The empathy to understand what it's like to be poor, or African-American, or gay, or disabled, or old. And that's the criteria by which I'm going to be selecting my judges."
—Barack Obama
That leads me to my final point. President Bush failed to fill vacancies and appoint judges to the lower federal courts. Democrat for eight years prevented those appointments.

If Barack Obama is elected he will undoubtedly fill the two vacant seats of the most important lower federal court the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the seats of two older Clinton appointees who will retire, and most likely the seats of four older Reagan and George H.W. Bush appointees who may retire as well.

According to Calabresi, in addition Obama will shift the balance on 12 other federal appeals courts. Nine of the 13 will probably swing to the left if Mr. Obama is elected (not counting the Ninth Circuit, which the left solidly controls today).

Circuit majorities are likely at stake in this presidential election for the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh and Eleventh Circuit Courts of Appeal.

That includes the federal appeals courts for New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia and virtually every other major center of finance in the country.

On the Supreme Court, six of the current nine justices will be 70 years old or older on January 20, 2009. There is a widespread expectation that the next president could make four appointments in just his first term, with maybe two more in a second term. Here too we are poised for heavy change.

In essence we could see very systemic changes to the American society by law that 60’s radicals could have only dreamt of. This will be changing America not by blowing it up with William Ayers’ bombs but by imploding America onto itself and its Constitution by using the judiciary, executive and the legislative branches to break away from the essential constraints that were placed on us by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution.

That is the significant change of which Obama speaks about and if you were dull enough to missed the tell-tell signs of a flag pin not being worn or a missing hand over the heart in honor of America, if Obama is elected and when laws are enacted to subvert the very Constitution and the ideology of the Founding Fathers that gave America existence pray that it is not to late to do something to save America from the change that you’ve allowed to happen.

Because you have allowed an unknown political demagogue with a radical hidden agenda for changing America into his image of a socialist nation to forever destroy freedom in the benevolent name of redistributing wealth to the poor.

Pray that he who you held up as the Messiah is not that one who is supposed to came in the image of the Messiah offering world peace and prosperity but in reality he ushers in a new millennium like nothing that we’ve ever seen before or ever wish to see.

Or do the right thing and disregard Sen. Obama’s highfalutin rhetoric for change and ask Sen. Obama to first prove his citizenship by producing original birth certificate and unseal all college records so that we may see just who it is that is attempting to change America.

We can’t vote for Barack Obama if we don’t know if he is Constitutional qualified to be president. If he isn’t his election to the presidency would be a mockery of this very democracy and the sacred trust that each of us have been given to be ever vigilant and guard this democracy from those who would seek to destroy it but call their actions change.

These people most be resisted and turned back to the abyss from which they came. This is a huge task and Americans must do this in under a week.

So on November 4th 2008 vote to Stop the Mockery of our Democracy!

Wednesday, October 29, 2008


“[A]s radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution.”—Sen. Barack Obama
Ah, that’s what every American wishes to do break away from the essential constraints that are placed upon us by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution. And I suspect that this is the change that Sen. Obama has been talking about, along with redistributing wealth, in his campaign for Change and if elected no one should be surprised if a President Obama sees fit to break away from those essential constraints change the Constitution and take your money. (see story)(see video)

Actually that’s what Sen. Obama is already doing, why he’s even running for president knowing that he is an illegitimate candidate. He knows that his candidacy is unconstitutional and he knows that we know it too but if one is going to break away from the essential constraints placed upon us by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution what better way than to desecrate the Constitution with an ineligible Democratic presidential candidate.

And speaking about Sen. Obama’s words here’s more Obama on the Constitution:
I think that we can say that the Constitution reflected an enormous blind spot in this culture that is carried on until this day and the framers had that same blind spot.

And I don’t think that the two views are contradictory to say that it was a remarkable political document that paved the way for where we are now and to say that it also reflected the fundamental flaw of this country that continues until this day.
–Barack Hussein Obama (listen to recording)

The question is do you think that a President Obama will attempt to fix the fundamental flaw of the Constitution? What is interest about Sen. Obama is that he can hold two completely contradictory ideas in his mind at the same time and believe in them both. He just said that he believes that the constitution is fundamentally flawed and in the same sentence that it is a politically remarkable document. I’d say that that is a bit of Orwellian doublethink:

"To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself.

That was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed.”
—George Orwell, 1984

Above is how Sens. Obama and Sen. Biden think. That explains how he and Sen. Biden could say the most radical things and then completely contradict themselves.

When forced to be accountable for their words Obama and Biden strike out at the offending party, Joe the Plumber, Barbara West, CBS News or FoxNews with such venom and harmful intent that careers are destroyed and lives are ruined. (see story) (see video)

CBS3 discusses Biden ban on them:

FoxNews discusses an Obama administration black list on media that they don’t like:

Barbara West and Joe Biden interview that named Obama a Marxist and got West banned from the campaign:

If Sen. Obama is lying and planning a Fascist Marxist takeover of this government once he is inaugurated it will be almost impossible to impeach him or remove him with a Democrat controlled Congress and a dysfunctional state and federal judiciary.

Obama would have done it with words, just words and we must stop him with votes.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008


Are you Standing like Sen. Obama or like Gov. Richadson, Sen. Clinton and unknown pictured person

No you don’t! According to Judge R. Barclay Surrick no American citizen does. As reported by Jeff Schreiber of the American’s Right blog, in an order and memorandum that came down at approximately 6:15 p.m. on last Friday regard civil case No. 08-cv-04083, Philip Berg's lawsuit challenging Illinois Sen. Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility to serve as president of the United States, was dismissed by the Hon. R. Barclay Surrick on grounds that the Philadelphia attorney and former Deputy Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania lacked standing.

The Judge simply found that Mr. Berg or any citizen for that matter did not have the right to ask a potential employee, a candidate for president of the United States, for documentation such as a drivers license or in this case a birth certificate to show that your potential employee is qualified for the job. Only a Democrat controlled Congress has that right according to Judge Surrick’s ruling.

According to Mr. Schreiber, ‘the question running to the heart of the standing doctrine is whether or not the plaintiff indeed has a personal stake in the outcome of the… matter being adjudicated.’
[A] plaintiff wishing to have standing to sue must show (1) a particularized injury-in-fact, (2) evidence showing that that the party being sued actually caused the plaintiff’s particularized injury-in-fact, and (3) that adjudication of the matter would actually provide redress.-- Jeff Schreiber, American’s Right
So it comes down to this, Barack Obama is demanding that you employ him yet he has refused to comply with your qualifications for the job. You ask him to produce documentation but you discover that all his documentation is under protective seal, his college records and his birth certificate, you must just take him at his word that he is eminently qualified… Are you going to hire him?
When it came to Philip Berg’s personal stake in the matter at hand, Surrick compared his action with those of Fred Hollander—the man who, earlier this year, sued Sen. John McCain in New Hampshire on grounds that, born in the Panama Canal Zone, he was not a natural born citizen—and held that Berg’s stake “is no greater and his status no more differentiated than that of millions of other voters.”

The harm cited by Berg, Surrick wrote, “is too vague and its effects too attenuated to confer standing on any and all voters.”
—Jeff Schreiber

Then you find out that Sen. McCain had a similar suit against him, Hollander v. McCain, which Judge Surrick made reference to in his decision of which was like this case dismiss but unlike this case Sen. McCain did in fact produce his original birth certificate.
Let’s review the facts reported by the Post:
1. Sen. McCain wrote in his autobiography that he was born in the Panama Canal.
2. A citizen filed suit in Federal Court, and asked to see Sen. McCain’s birth certificate.
3. Citing a procedural error, the Dept. of Homeland Security refused to provide it.
4. But John McCain’s campaign volunteered to show a hard copy to a reporter anyway, and that document named the hospital where McCain was born.
5. There is also a newspaper clipping confirming his birth.
6. Roberta McCain, the Senator’s 96-year-old-mother, provided further verification when she told a story about giving birth to her son.
Now let’s look at the facts of Barack Obama’s situation (as I understand them):
1. Sen. Obama wrote in his memoir that he was born in Hawaii (or did he go that far?).
2. Thousands if not millions of citizens have asked to see Sen. Obama’s birth certificate. None of those people to my knowledge have yet filed a lawsuit.
3. Sen. Obama dodged the request for months…
10. Sen. Obama has yet to show a hard copy of his birth certificate (not even the short COLB form) to a reporter.
11. No newspaper clippings have been produced verifying Sen. Obama’s birth.
12. Although the Senator’s mother is no longer living, his maternal grandmother (in her 80s) is alive and lucid by all accounts; yet she has been made “unavailable” by the Senator’s campaign.
13. Questions remain unanswered about the authenticity of Sen. Obama’s birth certificate and thus the facts related to his birth.—(excerpt)
texasdarlin blog
Yet this issue remains unresolved just days away from the Presidential elections but it is not over by any means. At least nine other lawsuits state and federal have been filed asking State Secretaries of State to enforce verification that Sen. Obama is eligible to be placed on their State ballot by confirming that he is “natural born,” a United States citizen by birth and does meet the Constitutional requirements to be President of the United States. (see story)and (here)
A lawsuit in Honolulu in the First District Court is seeking a court-order to open Obama’s secret birth records.

Obama has thus far neglected a Freedom of Information request for the records at two hospitals in Hawaii.

Lawsuits in Washington and Georgia are seeking state Superior Courts to force the states’ Secretary of State, as the chief state elections officer, to perform their state constitutional duties to require original certifying birth records from Mr. Obama that would verify his birth in Hawaii.

The latest suits have been filed in state and federal courts in Hawaii, Washington, California, Florida, Georgia, New York, and Connecticut to compel Obama to release his birth records.

Lawsuits in Washington and Georgia are seeking state superior courts to force the states’ secretary of state, as the chief state elections officer, to require Obama to produce original birth records from Hawaii, or else decertify him as a candidate for the presidency.
This is an example of vaulted copy of a Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth about the time Senate Obama would have been born. (example)

This is a copy of a birth certificate which Sen. Obama posted on his fight the smears blog. (Obama’s post)

Not the same are they?

The people of the United States whom Sen. Obama is asking to employ him are asking for the original vaulted copy of Sen. Obama’s birth certificate to make a determination if Sen. Obama is qualified for the job which he is interviewing for.

If Sen. Obama cares to be employed by American November 4, 2008 our requirement is that he has all of this documentation in to us by November 3rd or we will have to hire someone who has complied with all of our requirements.

And yes we did have the Standing to do this! (petition Congress)

Monday, October 27, 2008

Poor "Baby" Biden!!!

I feel so sorry for Senator Biden. The much vaunted "experienced" candidate for VP under Barack Obama, just can't handle the heat!

Barbara West of WFTV interviewed him, and asked a simple question. His defensive response was, "are you serious"?

How can you handle the position of VP, a "heartbeat away" from
the presidency, when you can't respond to a simple, honest question?

This is just further proof of the elitist attitude of the Obama
campaign, and the personal attitude of Obama himself.

As "punishment" for having the gall to ask a question that Biden didn't like, the Obama campaign is banning WFTV from any further

I guess they feel that is going to help them in the polls!

This is just a simple example of what this country will be like, when idiots vote for the Obama/Biden ticket!

Michele Obama: The White man’s just trying to keep a Black man Down

Michelle "Black Power" Obama?
Accusing API of colluding with American internet bloggers in an effort to bring down her husband, Mrs Obama said she decided to call API because of what she termed, API’s help to spread rumours created by American bloggers and other racist media outlets in their efforts to damage a black man’s name—Africanpress
Michele Obama exploded with what was probably not meant to be heard by Americans and played a major Race card on the African Press International or API, accusing API of colluding with American internet bloggers in an effort to bring down her husband, in essence Mrs. Obama was calling for Black people to stick together even if there is a perceived wrong being committed. (see story)

According to the African press When API told her that [their] online news media was only relaying what the American Bloggers and other media outlets had discovered through their investigations, Mrs Obama was angered and she came out loud with the following: “African press International is supposed to support Africans and African-American view,” and she went to state that, “it is strange that API has chosen to support the racists against my husband.

Michelle “For the first time in my adult lifetime I am really proud of my
country” Obama is upset because the African Press International is reporting that Barack Hussein Obama’s birth is in question and multiple lawsuits have been filed asking the Courts for Obama’s original birth record.

According to Mrs. Obama the only people questioning her husband’s citizenship status are racist and they are only asking because Barack Obama is Black.

Mrs. Obama characterized her husbands opposition as evil people who are out to stop her husband from getting the presidency, according to API.

Finally API accuses Mrs. Obama of threatening API to write only good stories about her husband if they wished to earn an invitation to her husband’s inauguration ceremony when he is installed as the next President of the United States of America next year.

Tomorrow: One case against Obama dismissed and others are filed.

Friday, October 24, 2008

The Colin Powell Litmus Test

Colin Powell on Meet the Press
"I would have difficulty with two more conservative appointments to the Supreme Court, but that's what we'd be looking at in a McCain administration."—Colin Powell

With Conservatives like Colin Powell who needs Liberals? Colin Powell opened his mouth and removed all doubt in his interview with Tom Brokaw. Powell says he assessed the both the Moderate to Liberal John McCain’s campaign remember Conservatives were dismayed that Sen. McCain won the Republican nomination on Sunday’s Meet the Press with Tom Brokaw. McCain only had tepid support from Conservatives until Sen. McCain selection Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate. (see transcript)

Powell said he also assessed the Ultra Liberal Barack Obama’s campaign and based on his assessments he is endorsing Sen. Barack Obama for President. (see story)

Humm... I think we should all take a closer look at Colin Powell’s reasoning. Mr. Powell is supposed to be a Republican that generally denotes a Conservative but lately not so much! Conservatism and the Republican Party stands for certain unmistakable principles and philosophies. So let’s assess Mr. Powell’s Conservative reasons why he’s supporting the ultra Liberal Barack Obama. Let see if Mr. Powell truly supports Conservatism and the Republican Party.

Powell said that the number one concern is the economy. Now interesting enough it was the failed policies of the Carter and Clinton administrations that created the laws with which Banks where force to make loans to unqualified buyers.

In addition it was two quasi-government agencies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with the aid and support of Democrats including Barack Obama that cause the international economic crisis. This information is well known and well documented Democrats including Barack Obama caused the meltdown of global markets and Powell supports that?

Number two the President is going to have to make decisions quickly as to how to deal with Iraq and Afghanistan. Democrats give the President the authority to wage war in Iraq and then claimed that they didn’t know what they where doing, that they were fooled.

Barack Obama said we should have never gone into Iraq only Afghanistan. Also Democrats and Barack Obama said the Iraqi war was lost and the surge would not work.

However we did go into Afghanistan first defeated the Taliban there before we turned our sights on Iraq. Under the leadership of President Bush in spite all of the political nay saying and the undermining from Democrats including Barack Obama we have won in Iraq.

Democrats were wrong! They were wrong about the surge and they were wrong to wage a partisan war on a President while he was attempting to protect America from its enemies. And Powell supports that?

Number three the President is going to have to reach out to the world Why? I’m not sure Colin Powell understands it but two things are happening: Half of the world has latch on to the economic tit of the United States and is attempting to suck us dry with the help of American Corporations. The other half of the world is attempting to destroy the entire Western economic model.

Either way the plan is to supplant America as the economic super power of the world. What is needed now is a President who is someone that will put America first.

Someone who will stop American Corporation from selling out America for the bottom line and someone who will strengthen America from the inside out and not attempt to give away America’s tax money by spreading Americans wealth around overseas to end world poverty. All foreign aid and moneys going to countries that do not respect America must stop until America is respected and we get back on our feet. John McCain says that he will put America first.

Number four the President is going to have to talk to our enemies President Clinton talked to North Korea, had this whole carrot and stick approach going and negotiated a non nuclear agreement with them. And right under the Clinton administrations noises the North Koreans obtained nuclear weapons.

Now that’s not to say that a President John McCain won’t talk to our enemies but he has the experience that a Barack Obama doesn’t have in dealing with world leaders. Barack Obama has that field trip that he took this summer when he stopped over in Germany, the Middle East and Europe for a week.

Number Five the President is going to have to convey a new Leadership and a new image of America Leadership is something that one earns and a President a campaign does not make. John McCain Graduated from Annapolis, Lead men in our Armed Forces, has been a Leader in the Senate for over 20 years. And Senator Obama…has lead his campaign.

And who says we need a new image anyways?

Number six the President is going to have to be a steadying influence for the American people in the coming crisis What crisis? If there is a coming crisis we’ve seen the cut and run courage of the Democrat Party no thank you! If there is a coming crisis Joe Biden and Colin Powell we need John McCain and the Republican Party at the helm.

Number seven the President is going to have to focus on education I understand that unrepentant terrorist and friend and neighbor of Sen. Obama, William Ayers is focusing on education. As I understand it he's teaching many of the radical anti-American principles that he believes to the people who will be teaching our children. Maybe an Obama administration would fund that or better yet make Mr. Ayers Secretary of Education.

Number eight the President is going to have to show leadership in energy, global warming and the environment Read the paper Mr. Powell there is no global warming! Wouldn’t it be nice to have a leader who would just say that? And let’s drill for oil in American as we work on alternative fuels. Sen. McCain is for drill what about your man?

Number nine the President is going to have to show leadership in respect to poverty alleviation and helping the needy people of the world. Well Mr. Powell Barack Obama is already in collusion with the United Nations to siphon off U.S. tax payers moneys with a global tax created to bring economic parity in the world. In 2007 the only bill that Senator Obama sponsored in his entire career in the Senate S.2433. That bill could be sign by him if he were elected President and he could use it to redistribute America’s taxpayers wealth to the world.

Number ten the President can’t be apart of a Political Party that is moving to the right I’m a Conservative Mr. Powell and I know for a fact that the Republican Party is not moving to the right. The nomination of John McCain should be evidence enough of that. It’s your own movement further to the left that you are mistaking as movement of the Republican Party.

Number eleven the President has to pass a test of experience, judgment confidence that one would be a good president Okay Obama has run a what, 6 month campaign for President and given that he has no other experience to talk about, you base your assessment particularly on the last two weeks as you said, and Obama is passed your test? Boy talk about low expectations!

Number twelve the President or his Party’s approach can not be narrow If by not being narrow you mean all of the foreign internet money that Sen. Obama is illegally receiving into his campaign. If you mean the endorsements from Hamas and other American hating terrorist groups then you’re right Sen. Obama campaign is wide open.

Number Thirteen the President cannot appoint Conservatives to the Supreme Court This is the one thing that invalidates you Mr. Powell as someone who is a Conservative or a Republican. If you are concerned that the Supreme Court of the United States could be a Conservative leaning Court after decades of Liberal leaning decisions you are no Conservative sir and further you are no Republican.

Number Fourteen the President cannot select a running mate that is not connected with the old boys network in Washington D.C. the President must select someone who is totally incompetent but totally connected to the same old insider politics of D.C.
I caught your slight of Gov. Palin Mr. Powell. Its true Gov. Palin isn’t apart of the Washington elite and her experience isn’t the same as those who have absolutely messed this country up. If you haven’t noticed Congress has the lowest approval rating in history Mr. Powell, Joe Biden, and Barack Obama are apart of that.

At least Sen. McCain is offering real change in Gov. Palin and not the recycled change that Sen. Obama is offering with a washed up old insider like Sen. Biden. With Obama and Biden we will get the some old failed policies of the inbred Washington elite. America doesn’t what that! We’ve seen what Democrats will do when put in leadership of the Congress and it ain’t pretty!

Number Fourteen the President can not rise questions about an opponent’s character because that’s inappropriate unless of course the person in question is President Bush. Oh, please Mr. Powell President Bush has been hammered by Liberals and Democrats for eight solid years and never once did you come to his defense!

Number sixteen the President must be able to inspire, be incisive, and speak with highfalutin rhetoric That certainly wraps up all of the credentials of your pick Mr. Powell

Number seventeen the President must be a transformational figure. Ronald Reagan was one. But how could anyone be compared to Reagan before they get the job? That’s like comparing a Pop Warner Quarterback to John Elway a Hall of Famer.

Number eighteen the President must not be old school but must be down with the new generation So why don’t we elect Ludicris or Paris Hilton oh yeah Barack Obama is kinda like Ludicris and Paris Hilton combined the first Black Pop-culture President, Yea BoooY!

Mr. Powell this interview says more about you than it does about McCain or Obama. I’m afraid I won’t be basing my choice on the musings of a washed up old RINO who picked race over country even though you deny it.

What anyone would have to know about you Mr. Powell is contained in the eighteen points that I’ve extracted out of your Litmus test, your reasons why you endorse Sen. Barack Obama and Mr. Powell you are no Republican.

Monday Michelle Obama: 'We can't let the White man keep a Black man Down and out of the White house'

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Obama adds Insult to Injury In Biden Flap

Obama and Biden once foes
"I think that Joe sometimes engages in rhetorical flourishes," Obama said. –
Vos es non ut lumen ut vos reputo Sen. Obama! No you’re not as smart as you think you are.

In attempting to mitigate the fallout and play us all as fools behind his running mates weekend prophecy of impending doom, if Obama is elected president of the United States, Sen. Obama insulted all of our intelligences and gave us the Obama Rosetta Stone unlocking how he manipulates language and understanding in his on-going attempt to deceive us, as he goes all the way to the White house. The media reported that Sen. Obama clarified Sen. Biden’s prediction. Yeah he did, like mud! It’s really quite interesting. Follow along as we break his methodology down. (see story)

Sen. Biden said:
"Mark my words. It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy," said Biden to a roomful of donors. "The world is looking.

We're about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America."

"Remember I said it standing here, if you don't remember anything else I said," Biden continued. "Watch, we're going to have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy."
(see video)

There is no mistaking whom Sen. Biden is talking about correct? He was talking about the world testing Barack Obama if Obama is elected president, oh but according to Sen. Obama you’ve got it all wrong. Here’s how Sen. Obama reinvents what Sen. Biden said and thusly reinvents history.

In a called news conference Sen. Obama says, “The next administration will face international challenges regardless of who is elected president.”

That is not what Sen. Biden said or meant. However this is a method that Sen. Obama always employees against this opponents ‘Make the other side share in your negative.’ That’s Obama's first rule. But everyone knows that Sen. Biden was referring to you Sen. Obama. Mayor Rudy Giuliani is also clear on this. Sen. Biden was talking about you and you only Sen. Obama. (see video)

So even though Sen. Biden said specifically that Barack Obama would be tested, Obama comes out and says that it is the next president that will be tested. So, according to Obama, it really doesn’t matter who you elect in this case the negative is on both sides so that lessens the negative for Obama if McCain is view equality as negative. Nice job Barack.

Second is of course blame the Bush administration. Barack said, ‘the key reason the next president will face such threats is because of the damaging policies of the past eight years.’ Well how does Obama know that, the threats have not been named and Biden specifically said that the world wanted to see what Barack Obama was made of, so what does the policies of the past eight years have to do with that?

To a Democrat everything because they have based their entire presidential campaign on defeating George W. Bush in absentia, one would swear that President Bush was running for a third time and you’d be right.

Democrats and Obama have waged this entire campaign on defeating George Bush and they’ve gotten away with it for entirely far too long.

This Democrat Control Congress is a do nothing Congress with the lowest approval rating in the history of Congress. The Democrat promised that if they were elected the majority in 2006 they would change (there’s that word again) they would change the direct of America.

Well after their victory celebration in 2006 the only thing that has changed under the Democrats watch is unemployment has soared along with gas prices, international markets have almost collapsed, the banking industry in on the verge of bankruptcy and the American people are about to elect the foxes that created this Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac international crisis and put them in charge of the American hen house.

So Second blame Bush.

Third make up stuff, Obama said, "We have to be careful. We have to be mindful that as we pass the baton in this democracy that others don't take advantage of it -- that is true, whether it's myself or Senator McCain, it's been true throughout history."

It has not be true that throughout history that the world was waiting to challenge a newly elected American President. That Sen. Obama is a lie. Also it is not true that Sen. Biden said that the world was waiting to test Sen. McCain has you have intimated that is also a lie.

So Third make stuff up and lie some more.

One can see this pattern throughout the Obama campaign tactics and methodology employed when needed to create relativity between you and your opponent which shall be exploited to take away any advantage your opponent might have, number one.

Second blame Bush. This is an interchangeable method with method number one.

Third Make stuff up and lie, lie, lie.

And lastly always give the appearance that you know what you’re saying or that you know what you are doing even though you haven’t the foggiest notion.

What Joe Biden said is that you Sen. Barack Hussein Obama if you were elected president you would be tested by America’s enemies. He didn’t say either John McCain or Barack Obama nor did he mean that; he didn’t say Gov. Sarah Palin he said you Sen. Obama.

You know Sen. "Government" it is bad enough that you treat Democrats like dummies because they hang on your every word but to presume that you can just reinvent what Joe Biden said and we all just say, ‘Yeah Sen. Obama said that Sen. Biden said both administrations will be tested no matter who is president.’ That is an insult to thinking people everywhere.

Senator this is just one more example of how you play the electorate for fools and your accomplices in the media fail to hold you in account for the truth.

Oh yeah Sen. Government, and what about President Clinton’s former Secretary of State Madeline Albright who confirmed that what your Vice-president pick said was fact the world is waiting to test you Sen. Obama and if you are elected, god forbid, you won’t have president Bush to blame, the blame, sir, will be all yours.

By the way this is the second time that we've been warned that there is an imminent threat if you recall while Colin Powell was endorsing Barack Obama on Meet the Press last Sunday he too stated that an imminent crisis is looming. (see video)

America you've got to vote for McCain to prevent a coming disaster under a Obama administration!

I have this on highest authority; Vice president nominee Joe Biden, former Clinton Secretary of State Madeline Albright and Obama supporter Gen. Colin Powell.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Are Americans voting for another 9/11?

Vice president candidate Joseph Biden
Joe Biden warned that America 's enemies would test Barack Obama with an international crisis within six months if he's elected president

"Mark my words," Biden told donors at a Seattle fund-raiser Sunday night.

"It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We're about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America.

"Watch. We're going to have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.

"And he's going to need help . . . to stand with him. Because it's not going to be apparent initially; it's not going to be apparent that we're right."
--CARL CAMPANILE in Belton , Mo. , and GEOFF EARLE
Shocking! According to Sen. Joseph Biden a vote for Barack Hussein Obama is a vote for another 9/11! You can’t make this kind of stuff up. (see story)

In a somewhat cryptic statement made at a Seattle fund-raiser on Sunday night. Vice President running mate Joe Biden guaranteed an attack on America if his running mate and top of the ticket, Barack Obama is elected. According to Biden this event will be staged by enemies of America to test the inexperienced Obama and it will be so explosive that the America people will question their selection of Sen. Obama as president and will lose faith when President Obama does not seem to be acting in America’s best interest. (listen to statement)

Incredibly, Biden warns that people should support the Obama administration wherever transpires.

Interestingly, had Democrats called for the same loyalty for President Bush and worked with him when America when to war with Iraq (on Democrats’ approval) the country would not be so irreparably divided now.

Biden who was selected by Sen. Obama for his foreign policy experience said, "I've forgotten more about foreign policy than most of my colleagues know, so I'm not being falsely humble with you…I promise you, you all are gonna be sitting here a year from now going, 'Oh my God, why are they there in the polls? Why is the polling so down? Why is this thing so tough?' We're gonna have to make some incredibly tough decisions in the first two years. So I'm asking you now, I'm asking you now, be prepared to stick with us. Remember the faith you had at this point because you're going to have to reinforce us." (see story)

In a related CNN interview former Secretary of State Madeline Albright was asked whether Sen. Biden’s statements were hyperbole or true. According to Ms. Albright Sen. Biden’s warnings are statements of fact. (see video)

Just what has set Sen. Biden at Red Alert, last week for the first time in American history both presidential campaigns received security briefings and it seems that, that is what sent Sen. Biden and the Obama campaign in a panicked tizzy. (see story)
For the first time in American history, the FBI is already vetting members of the next administration in an effort to make sure that whether John McCain or Barack Obama is the next president, their staffs will be ready to handle any national security threats.
Though no specific threats are evident at this time, some members of the intelligence community say terror groups love to target countries during transition periods.
If it is the case that a security briefing has the wheels coming off of the Obama campaign then we need to elect a team who our enemies know that at day one they will be ready to defend America therefore they need not be tested and that team is John McCain and Sarah Palin!

The wheels are coming of the Obama campaign and panic is afoot and that doesn’t inspire much hope for peace and happiness.

With such a dire apocalyptic 9/11 prophecy coming from the Obama campaign itself can you really afford to vote for Sen. Obama, someone who Hillary Clinton said (and our enemies must agree)is not ready and to inexperienced to answer that 3am phone call?

No you can’t. And if you don’t wish to go through what Sen. Biden has factually stated according to Madeline Albright you must use your vote to protect America and vote for Sen. John McCain.

I'm sure Joe Biden approves of this message!

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Proposition 8: Fighting California’s Orwellian Government Court takeover

Four Justices on the California Supreme Court felt that their prejudges out weighted the Constitution and the legal and Constitutional cast votes of 4 million Californians and these judges created out of whole cloth an Orwellian oddity, legal homosexuality.

Chief Justice Ronald George writing for the 4 person majority on a split 4-3 court admitted in this opinion that there is and was no basis for their ruling in California Constitutional law he wrote:
First, we must determine the nature and scope of the “right to marry” –a right that past cases establish as one of the fundamental constitutional rights embodied in the California Constitution. Although, as an historical matter, civil marriage and the rights associated with it traditionally have been afforded only to opposite-sex couples…”—Justice Ronald M. George
Then Justice George goes through what dissenting Justice Marvin R. Baxter called legal jujitsu to contort legal reasoning in order to justify the 4 majority’s decision to go against what historically civil marriage has always been understood to be in California Constitutional law, a relationship between a man and a woman.

Justice George then reaches outside of the Constitution and the Court’s own rightful authority to invent an abomination to law, tradition and society, homosexual marriage. This is the heart of the issue of California’s Proposition 8!
[A] bare majority of this court, not satisfied with the pace of democratic change now abruptly forestalls that process and substitutes, by judicial fiat, its own social policy views for those expressed by the People themselves.

Undeterred by the strong weight of state and federal law and authority, 4 the majority invents a new constitutional right, immune from the ordinary process of legislative consideration.

The majority finds that our Constitution suddenly demands no less than a permanent redefinition of marriage, regardless of the popular will.
--Marvin R. Baxter, Justice in dissent
Thomas Jefferson knowing that this day was inevitable for the United States of America wrote in his Bill establishing Religious Freedom in Virginia:
[T]he opinions of men are not the object of civil government, nor under its jurisdiction; that to suffer the civil magistrate to intrude his powers into the field of opinion and to restrain the profession or propagation of principles on supposition of their ill tendency is a dangerous fallacy, which at once destroys all religious liberty, because he being of course judge of that tendency will make his opinions the rule of judgment, and approve or condemn the sentiments of others only as they shall square with or differ from his own; that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; and finally, that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself; that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate; errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them. —Thomas Jefferson, Bill Establishing Religious Freedom in the State of Virginia, 1786
Jefferson argued that opinions, including those of religion, but nevertheless men’s opinions should not be the object of civil government.

In other words whatever your opinion is on homosexuality, it should not be made a government matter. However that is exactly what proponents if homosexual rights and homosexual marriage have done they have used government courts to impose their opinions on the rest of society.

Yet in one of their latest Orwellian styled commercials against proposition 8 they say exactly the oppose when they claim that we should keep government out of all of our lives and vote no on proposition 8. In fact a vote YES on 8 would keep government out of our lives!(see video)

This commercial is so Orwellian in its assault against truth and reasoning that we need to deconstruct it.

It’s four points that 1) proponents of proposition 8 are using scare tactics, 2) the courts ruling will not affect church tax status, 3) the courts ruling will not affect teaching in schools 4) and the statement to keep government out of our lives are all patently false.

First no scare tactics are being used. Proponents of 8 point to the fact that Massachusetts the first state in which the courts imposed legal homosexual mock marriages has in fact implemented many of the anti-traditional family measures that proponents of 8 warn against.

In New Jersey's anti-discrimination laws require those offering goods, services, and facilities to the general public to allow any accommodation, service, benefit, or privilege to an individual without discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. The state of New Jersey granted legal status to homosexual civil unions in February. (see post)

Second, homosexuals are already going after bible publishers with law suits attempting to get any negative connotation of homosexuality removed from the bible therefore it’s well within reason to anticipate law suits based on hate speech and hate crimes legislation against churches that preach directly from the scriptures concerning homosexuality.

Third, according to Fox News and the San Francisco gate; First-graders in San Francisco took a field trip to City Hall to celebrate the marriage of their lesbian teacher on Friday, but opponents of same-sex marriage in the state say the field trip was an attempt to “indoctrinate” the students, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

The field trip was suggested by a parent at the Creative Arts Charter School, and the school said the trip, where students tossed rose petals on their teacher and her wife as they left City Hall, was academically relevant.

"It really is what we call a teachable moment," said Liz Jaroslow, the school’s interim director, according to the newspaper. She said same-sex marriage had historic significance. "I think I'm well within the parameters."

Well within what parameters? The California Court’s ruling that homosexual mock marriages are legal that’s what parameters!

I would say that what is being taught in California’s schools has already changed.(see here) and (here)

Fourth, proposition 22 which the California Supreme Court struck down was the attempt of the people to keep the government out of our lives and proposition 8 only reinstates what the government courts struck down.

California’s government court’s ruling which created homosexual mock marriages is government intrusion into our lives not the people’s proposition 8!

Finally Newt Gingrich lays out what this all means so clearly that not even the most confused Liberal could misunderstand. They may not agree but the Orwellian veil is now removed from this matter. (see video)

All the Presidential candidates agree on this one matter, Homosexual mock marriages are not good for America. (see video)

Proponents of homosexuality have used Orwellian language transfused will legalities to create legal arguments to justify and give legitimacy to an age old taboo.

In two thousand years of human history there has not been legalized homosexuality mandated and promoted by the government yet in the 21st century four judges; Ronald M. George, Carlos R. Moreno, Kathryn Mickle Werdegar and Joyce Kennard made it so just as Jefferson said that they would make, “[their] opinions the rule of judgment” thus these four judges condemned the sentiments of 4 million California voters because the voters beliefs regarding homosexuality did not square with their own beliefs about homosexuality.

Proposition 8 is a vote against judicial tyranny and judicial oligarchy. Let the People’s will stand against Government intrusion vote YES on Proposition 8!

Monday, October 20, 2008

It’s Turncoat Time!!!!!!!!

Most politicians will say or do anything if it means
something to them personally, and Colin Powell is certainly
no exception.

I never regarded him as a “real” Republican,
because his heart just never seemed to be in anything that he
did for the Bush administration. I always wondered what
President Bush saw in him. But I guess his position was kind
of a “thank you” for his help during the first Gulf War, and for his half-hearted attempts at the UN, to get them involved
in the current Iraq War.

Now, just one day after endorsing Obama, surprise, surprise, we find out that Obama will have a place on his staff for the once respected Colin Powell.

Well, I can’t say that I am disappointed, nor am I personally
surprised, since I always felt that it would come to pass.

For a so-called Washington “outsider”, Obama had it all figured out from the start. That Chicago political machine sure gave him good training in the art of deception and
and maybe even circumventing the system.

Where were you Born Senator Obama that’s the question?

A visitor from another planet or another country?
"Contrary to the rumors you have heard, I was not born in a manger, I was actually born on Krypton and sent here by my father, Jor-el, to save the planet Earth." –Sen. Barack Obama (see video)

Senator Obama speaking at the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner quipped that he wasn’t even born on this planet. Ironically, the real place of the Senator’s birth is in question.

Philip J. Berg, Democrat and Attorney at law, filed suit to make the Democrat Party accountable to the American people for putting up a fraudulent candidate, Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. Mr. Berg suit filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania claims that evidence shows that Sen. Barack Obama was not born in America which would make him ineligible to run for President.

The same reason that Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is ineligible to be President. Schwarzenegger was born in Thal, Austria and constitutionally only a natural born citizen of the United States may be President. (see story)
If elected, his selection to the presidency would cause a crisis within the U.S. Constitution.

"If we can't enforce our constitution, especially a candidate for president, we're in real trouble in this country, more trouble than you really want to believe
—Philip Berg
Mr. Berg’s suit alleges that Sen. Obama’s relatives state that they attended his birth in Kenya Africa. After his birth his mother, Stanley Ann Durham Obama took the baby to Hawaii and registered the birth there. (see 10:52 mins interview)

Mr. Berg’s a known Clinton supporter claims that he filed suit to prevent Democrats from making the mistake of giving Republicans something that they could use against Democrats, something that could possibly throw the election to Republicans because of a flawed candidate. (see story)

But because the Courts failed to act on Mr. Berg’s motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and for Expedited Discovery the Democrat Convention has come and gone and Barack Obama is the Democrat nominee the court failure to act can now allow them to rule that the motion is moot.

Mr. Berg had hoped to have his case resolved before the Democrat primaries ended because he felt that if the Court ruled in his favor Democrats would have the strongest candidate with which to defeat Republicans in Sen. Hillary Clinton.

However it seems that the Courts which are so willing to ruling in instances that do not concern them are not so anxious to involve themselves in a case meant to protect the constitution of the United States of America instead it seems that they are willing to waiting until after the elections when the damage will be done and a non-natural born citizen could be elected.

According to Mr. Berg such an occurrence would irreparably breech the Constitution and would show the world that the United States can no longer live up to or enforce its own Constitution.

Mr. Berg’s suit is only asking that Sen. Obama show his original birth certificate, a certified copy of his Oath of Allegiance Proceeding and the Oath administered.

There are records of a “registry of birth” for Obama, on or about August 8, 1961, in the public records office in Hawaii which his mother filed upon arriving to Hawaii with the new born Obama. Though Obama refuses to show his original birth certificate several questionable copies have appeared on the internet claiming to be proof positive that Senator Obama was born in Hawaii.

However Wayne Madsen, Journalist with Online Journal as a contributing writer and published an article on June 9, 2008 stating that a research team went to Mombassa, Kenya, and located a Certificate Registering the birth of Barack Obama, Jr. at a Maternity hospital, to his father, a Kenyan citizen and his mother, a U.S. citizen.

If Atty. Berg's suit is successful Sen. Obama would be disqualified and exposed as the fraud that he is and the Democrat Party would be exposed as the rabid radical partisan Party that it is. They are a Party that would stop at nothing including putting a non citizen into the Office of President which is in total opposition to the Constitution of the United States of America in order to win the Presidency.

This is an American concern not a Republican or Democrat concern. With only days remaining until election day I call on all Americans to implore Sen. Obama to show his birth certificate that he will not bring shame on the American election system and enter the White house, if he is election under the taint that he the first Black President candidate has fraudulently entered into office.

According to Mr. Berg this suit is not going away if Obama were to win the presidency and this case where taken to the Supreme Court Democrats would not only be responsible for the world-wide economic crisis, but if Sen. Obama had to be removed from the Presidency Democrats would be responsible for destroying Democracy in America.

Since the American government is too inept to ensure that the constitution is up held it is incumbent on the American people to petition the DNC to force Sen. Obama to show proof of birth.

We must write the Court and demand that they act to protect American Democracy and we must write to Obama campaign and tell them that we will not vote or sent money to a campaign that is in question when Sen. Obama could easily put this controversy to rest by producing proof that his is actually eligible to be President of the United States of America.

If the American people allow a non-citizen, an illegal alien to become President of the United States of America we will become the laughingstock of world governments and will have no moral authority to represent Democracy in the world.

The American people must call on the DNC, the Obama campaign and the courts because it is up to the people to stop this injustice seeing that our government in the form of the courts will not act.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Who's a Racist??????

I've been called racist. So what?

I said from the beginning of the Democratic battle
between Obama and Clinton, that he was getting 90%
of the black vote
, only because he is black (or at
least that is his claim, if you don't count the 50%
white and the 37 1/2% Arab).

Anybody who heard me say that, immediately accused
me of being racist. Well, here's a cute turn of
Let's for the sake of political correctness
say, here it is, right from the horse's mouth!
Copy and paste this to your address bar..........

Anybody who can actually listen to this, and still
say that this contest between Obama and McCain, isn't all
about race
, has his head at the opposite end of that
horse's mouth.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Senator Government’s little sumthin’, sumthin’ from Joe’s Pockets and Yours

Senator Government and Joe Wurzelbacher
"Your new tax plan is going to tax me more, isn't it?" the blue-collar worker asked.

After Obama responded that it would, Wurzelbacher continued: "I've worked hard . . . I work 10 to 12 hours a day and I'm buying this company and I'm going to continue working that way. I'm getting taxed more and more while fulfilling the American Dream."
Joe Wurzelbacher was perhaps the most important name in Wednesday night’s presidential debate (after of course the name “Senator Government” which Senator McCain accidentally referred to Sen. Obama as) because the controversy surrounding his question to Senator Obama earlier that day made it to prime time. (see story)

Joe a blue collar worker, a plumber has worked hard to position himself and if everything goes according to his hopes he will become a small business owner. Small business owners are the engines on which the United States economy runs yet Joe has figured out that under an Obama administration his hard work would be punished not rewarded.

Under an Obama administration Joe’s hard earned money would be taken from him and given to someone else in Sen. Obama’s new trickle-up theory of economics.
"My attitude is that if the economy's good for folks from the bottom up, it's gonna be good for everybody. I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody." —Senator Barack Obama (see story)
(see video)

Neil Cavuto Interview:

To say that Sen. Obama believes in redistributing wealth is to say that the Pope believes in prayer. It is true that Sen. Obama has been warning us since he’s been in this race that what he intends to do is raise taxes to make everything fair if he is elected President. (see video)

Democratic Primary Debate:

So what’s a little redistribution of wealth and tax increase on the wealthy you say? Did you take a look at Joe? Joe is a working man and like most of us has struggled to provide for his family. Judging by Joe’s profession he didn’t have the good fortune to attend Harvard Law School.

But here’s just how serious Sen. Government is about redistributing wealth, our wealth.

In September of 2000 the United Nations came up with a scheme which they call the Millennium Goals in which they have given themselves authority and power over all sovereign nations and in addition to that they will levy a world tax upon all nations. (see site)

Of course they dress up this one world government system by calling it a way to help the poor by redistributing wealth of rich countries like the United States by means of a global tax.

And isn’t it a coincidence that the only legislation that Sen. Obama has sponsored in the 4 years that he’s been in the Senate in 2007 he sponsored S.2433 it provides that the President of the United States will subject the United States to the United Nations Power. So in essence the wealth of the people of the United States will be taxed without representation and given to the people of the world. ( I’m not making this up!) (and here)
Obama's Global Poverty Act is the "international community's" foot in the door.

The U.N. Millennium declaration called for a "currency transfer tax," a "tax on the rental value of land and natural resources," a "royalty on worldwide fossil energy production — oil, natural gas, coal . . . fees for the commercial use of the oceans, fees for the airplane use of the skies, fees for the use of the electromagnetic spectrum, fees on foreign exchange transactions, and a tax on the carbon content of fuels."

Co-sponsors of S. 2433 include Democrats Maria Cantwell of Washington, Dianne Feinstein of California, Richard Durbin of Illinois and Robert Menendez of New Jersey.

GOP globalists supporting the bill include Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and Richard Lugar of Indiana.
–Investor’s Business Daily
So when Sen. Obama says that when he is president things will change this subjection to the U. N. and this Global taxation of the American people is exactly what he is talking about. (see article)

Hey Joe you damn right your taxes are going to go up under an Obama administration but what Sen. Obama didn’t tell you and what most of the millions of ignorant people who will vote for him don’t know is that Sen. Government is planning a massive redistributing of wealth from America to the people of the world.

And you thought that he was just making an idle speech in Germany earlier this year, no he was connecting to his constituents the people of the world and when he is president, if the American people are so foolish to allow that, he will connect you “Joe tax payer” to pay for all of the world’s ills.

My advice to Americans is to learn what the second amendment of the Constitution means!

And if it means anything McCain won that debate!

(see Joe's full question below)

Thursday, October 16, 2008

The Case for the National Identity Card!

One word............ACORN!!!!!!!!!!

If there ever was a time to take a serious look at
the necessity for a National Identity Card, THIS
is it. How this country ever allowed these shenanigans
to go this far, is unfathomable.

What is the problem with Americans knowing exactly
who their neighbors are?
Only the far left wacko
organizations such as the UCLU (UN-AMERICAN
Civil Liberties Union) has an objection
, together with
illegal aliens, drug lords, felons, and others who for
whatever reason, don’t want their identities known.

Most of the country FAVORS the ID card. It would
have your name, photo, and either finger-print or retina
scan on it. It would be impossible to fraudulently duplicate
or alter it without detection.

I guess that is what the whining liberals don’t like about it. It would certainly put a rapid end to voter fraud worries......... but then, how would they steal elections?

The far left attempted to steal the 2000 election, first by
demanding recount after recount, and then claiming “fraud”, because they didn't get the results they wanted.
Again in 2004 we saw the same lame attempts and claims, only to have Divine intervention provide a landslide victory for President Bush.

Had we had the card in 2006, I truly wonder if the Democrats would today have such a strangle hold on the Congress. I don’t trust the far left liberals, and I certainly don’t trust ACORN............... an obnoxious organization, backed by
Barack Obama, taught by him, defended by him, and
as it appears, to the tune of $800,000, FINANCED by him.

Why all the tender loving care? Did he actually BUY registrations
from them? Only my theory, but it should be investigated.

With a Democratically controlled Congress..... FAT CHANCE!

The Mickey Mouse President?

Sen. Barack ACORN Obama
Mickey Mouse tried to register to vote in Florida this summer.

Orange County elections officials rejected his application, which was stamped with the logo of the nonprofit group ACORN
.-- Richard Danielson, Times Staff Writer

I smell a RAT! America should smell a RAT too. (see Mickey’s signed voter registration card below)

Signature: Mickey Mouse

Question: Sen. Obama you've just stole the U.S. election what are you going to do now?

Answer: "I'm going to change the United States and take Joe the Plumber to DizzyWorld!"

As Barack Obama proceeds to dishonor America’s most sacred trust, the vote and turn the vote into some trivial “Mickey Mouse” corrupt Chicago-styled nation wide scavenger hunt for bodies; dead or alive, citizens or non-citizens, people real or fraudulently made up, and yes even Mickey Mouse. I have to wonder if Americans are so nil that they would just allow someone of Obama’s questionable national origin to desecrate one of the holiest institutions of American freedom.

Obama acts as if the lifeblood of American politics can be dallied with so easily and contaminated on his way to swearing in on the Bible or Qur’an or whatever his choice is. It’s good that there is no pledge of allegiance ceremony at the swearing in. It might be difficult for America’s parents to explain to America’s youth why the newly elected president refused to stand and put his hand over his heart in respect of what the flag represents.

That notwithstanding, where is the American outrage? The vote is being stolen right under our collective noses and we are walking right up to November 4th like sleepwalking zombies ready to hear the words which are the fruits of ill gotten gains, “President elect Barack Hussein Obama.”

When those of us like the McCain campaign attempt to sound the alert about voter fraud the Obama campaign mischaracterizes them to neutralize the truth. Obama says that McCain’s concern about voter fraud is, “a starkly political maneuver to deflect attention from the reality of the suppression strategies pursued by national, state and Republican Party committees.” The Obama campaign condemns the reports of voter registration fraud but has called the charges leveled by the McCain campaign “completely transparent and false.” Huh? Transparent and false? (see story)

Oh is that so Senator Obama?

According to Senator Obama’s campaign, talk about ACORN and voter fraud is but the rantings of a campaign that is desperately grasping at straws in a losing effort and nothing more.

ACORN has Cowboys starting line-up voting in Nevada and Darrell Nash voting multiple times

If the above Obama counter charges are true then, according to the Wall Street Journal what about the Michigan Secretary of State who told the press in September that Acorn had submitted "a sizeable number of duplicate and fraudulent applications." And earlier this month, Nevada's Democratic Secretary of State Ross Miller requested a raid on Acorn's offices, following complaints of false names and fictional addresses (including the starting lineup of the Dallas Cowboys). And also Nevada's Clark County Registrar of Voters Larry Lomax said he saw rampant fraud in 2,000 to 3,000 applications Acorn submitted weekly.

Sen. Obama what about officials in Ohio who are investigating voter fraud connected with Acorn, and Florida's Seminole County which is withholding Acorn registrations that appear fraudulent? New Mexico, North Carolina and Missouri are looking into hundreds of dubious Acorn registrations. Wisconsin is investigating Acorn employees for, according to an election official, "making people up or registering people that were still in prison."

Then there's Lake County, Indiana, which has already found more than 2,100 bogus applications among the 5,000 Acorn dumped right before the deadline. "All the signatures looked exactly the same," said Ruthann Hoagland, of the county election board. Bridgeport, Connecticut estimates about 20% of Acorn's registrations were faulty. As of July, the city of Houston had rejected or put on hold about 40% of the 27,000 registration cards submitted by Acorn.

That's just this year. In 2004, four Acorn employees were indicted in Ohio for submitting false voter registrations. In 2005, two Colorado Acorn workers were found to have submitted false registrations. Four Acorn Missouri employees were indicted in 2006; five were found guilty in Washington state in 2007 for filling out registration forms with names from a phone book.

This brings us to Mr. Obama, who according to the Wall Street Journal got his start as a Chicago “community organizer” at Acorn’s side. In 1992 he led voter registration efforts as the director of Project Vote, which included Acorn. This past November, he lauded Acorn's leaders for being "smack dab in the middle" of that effort. Mr. Obama also served as a lawyer for Acorn in 1995, in a case against Illinois to increase access to the polls.

During his tenure on the board of Chicago's Woods Fund, that body funneled more than $200,000 to Acorn. More recently, the Obama campaign paid $832,000 to an Acorn affiliate. The campaign initially told the Federal Election Commission this money was for "staging, sound, lighting." It later admitted the cash was to get out the vote.

$832,000 dollars paid from the Obama Campaign to ACORN this year for voter fraud at worst or registering voters at the very least connects Obama to ACORN not in the past but now, in this election.

We’ve seen ACORN’s miserable record and we can no longer give them the benefit of the doubt. They are a continuing criminal enterprise funded by tax payer’s money to undermine democracy.

That sentiment applies to Sen. Obama too. We’ve heard all of the lies, double talk, changing of the subject to blame the Bush administration, attacks against the McCain campaign and enough is enough!

As Gov. Palin has declared it is time that Sen. Obama reign in ACORN. (see story) It is time that Sen. Obama disavows and repudiates ACORN. And while ACORN is under suspicion of voter fraud Sen. Obama must call on ACORN to immediately cease and desist Nationally any and all efforts in the 2008 election to “get out the vote.”

Or else Sen. Obama and ACORN would have managed to make this election nothing more than a “Mickey Mouse” election.

And should he win Sen. Obama’s creditability would be nothing more than that of a Black “Mickey Mouse” President who gained the Presidency undeservedly by stealing the 2008 election!