Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Put out the Sun. It causes Climate Change according to Scientists

[N]ew findings point to cosmic rays and the sun — not human activities — as the dominant controller of climate on Earth.
The research, published with little fanfare this week in the prestigious journal Nature, comes from über-prestigious CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, one of the world’s largest centres for scientific research involving 60 countries and 8,000 scientists at more than 600 universities and national laboratories.

CERN is the organization that invented the World Wide Web, that built the multi-billion dollar Large Hadron Collider, and that has now built a pristinely clean stainless steel chamber that precisely recreated the Earth’s atmosphere.
-- Lawrence Solomon
I find it highly ironic that the organization that actually invented the internet is taking away Al Gore’s second invention, Anthropogenic Global Warming, or for you that are politically correct, Climate Change. Will Gore have to concede the Nobel Peace Prize, The Oscar and the Emmy he won at the height of his global warming hoax? We all know that Gore isn’t very good at conceding.

However, In a recent development CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research has published new findings, which point to the sun, not human activities as the dominant controller of climate on Earth. (see article)

I realize that this bit of News must be unsettling for all those settled minds out there, which were told that the science regarding Global Warming is settled.
However, look at it this way, all of the global tax dollars that Global Warming alarmists where attempting to collect from the peoples of the world can still be collected and used to build a giant Sun blotter to block out the rays of the Sun. Either a giant Sun Blotter or they can simply build a catapult to launch cats into Sun or moon, whichever they prefer. (I do not wish any harm upon our furry little feline friends)

The hypothesis that cosmic rays and the sun hold the key to the global warming debate has been Enemy No. 1 to the global warming establishment ever since it was first proposed by two scientists from the Danish Space Research Institute, at a 1996 scientific conference in the U.K. Within one day, the chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Bert Bolin, denounced the theory, saying, “I find the move from this pair scientifically extremely naive and irresponsible.”

He then set about discrediting the theory, any journalist that gave the theory cre dence, and most of all the Danes presenting the theory — they soon found themselves vilified, marginalized and starved of funding, despite their impeccable scientific credentials.-- Lawrence Solomon

The point is this. The science concerning Global Warming is not settled science and it never was. Also just because Al Gore was willing to sell out his legacy as Vice president of the United States and his credibility doesn’t mean that anything he said or is now saying about the subject is true. Unless of course he said, ‘My fellow Americans I lied about Global warming in order to enrich myself by playing off of the credentials of a once legitimate American politician.’

Second, this proves that whoever is paying an unscrupulous scientist can get whatever results they want. Scientists are people too. And if you offer them millions of dollars of funding to find Global warming they will inevitably come up with the hockey stick model and proclaim that based on the best scientific research we have today, all evidence suggest that man is the cause of Global Warming. In addition, they will stand behind those false claims, like NASA scientist Dr. James Hanson.

Third Global warming is a political scheme to raise taxes on the collective peoples of the world for the benefit of those who needed an apparent benign looking super revenue source of money and power. Those Liberals who support Global warming or Climate change do so at their own peril.

Why now, why has this information not come out before? It hasn’t come out until now because Global-warming alarmists attempted to kill the information.

The global warming establishment sprang into action, pressured the Western governments that control CERN, and almost immediately succeeded in suspending CLOUD. It took Mr. Kirkby almost a decade of negotiation with his superiors, and who knows how many compromises and unspoken commitments, to convince the CERN bureaucracy to allow the project to proceed. And years more to create the cloud chamber and convincingly validate the Danes’ groundbreaking theory.

Yet this spectacular success will be largely unrecognized by the general public for years — this column will be the first that most readers have heard of it — because CERN remains too afraid of offending its government masters to admit its success. Weeks ago, CERN formerly decided to muzzle Mr. Kirby and other members of his team to avoid “the highly political arena of the climate change debate,” telling them “to present the results clearly but not interpret them” and to downplay the results by “mak[ing] clear that cosmic radiation is only one of many parameters.”-- Lawrence Solomon

It is clear that science like every other manmade institution is corrupted by man, it is not the objective presenter of scientific facts that we have been taught it is. To the contrary, in the hands which science lies today, it has become a schoolyard bully.

It crushes those who disagree with its theories. Lay person, Historian and Scientist alike, all who enjoy recanting science’s persecution by the Church, must now realize that we have a modern and different story of science persecuting fellow scientists and citizens because they would not bend a knee at the altar of corrupt Politco-Science and it’s fake god of Anthropogenic Global warming-Climate change.

The CERN study and press release is written in bureaucratese and the version of Mr. Kirkby’s study that appears in the print edition of Nature censored the most eye-popping graph — only those who know where to look in an online supplement will see the striking potency of cosmic rays in creating the conditions for seeding clouds.

CERN, and the Danes, have in all likelihood found the path to the Holy Grail of climate science. But the religion of climate science won’t yet permit a celebration of the find.—Lawrence Soloman

See graph below.

CERN Graph

When science is corrupted by politics and money there is no truth in it. Global warming is such an instance of politics and money’s corrupting influences on science. Thus this corruption has Invented a new science, Politico-Science. When a Liberal speaks of science, Politico-Science is the science, of which they speak. Science that is for sale. Like Alice’s restaurant , you can get anything you want from Politico-Science, for a price.

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Finally Someone worthy of Obama’s Blame

I can’t help feeling that national politicians and national journalists alike have dropped the ball on jobs. Some 25 million Americans are unemployed or underemployed — that’s more than 16 percent of the work force — but jobs haven’t been nearly high enough on the national agenda.

When Americans are polled about the issue they care most about, the answer by a two-to-one margin is jobs. The Boston Globe found that during President Obama’s Twitter “town hall” last month, the issue that the public most wanted to ask about was, by far, jobs.
—Nicholas D. Kristof

In Fred Barnes' article entitled, “Obama’s Enablers” (see article), Barnes made the point, because of the progressive media’s coddling of the first Affirmative Action president Mr. Soetoro has not been challenged to do anything constructive about status of jobs in America. My thought is why would they? Barry Hussein Soetoro is their construct. They made him. They created the whole story line up about how smart and capable he is. Mr. Soetoro is the progressive media’s man they aren’t going to purposely hurt or harm the face of progressivism in America.

Then unexpectedly I find NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF of the New York Times, admitted that he along with his fellow progressive journalists have been more interested in keeping up the war against Republicans rather than asking this Administration about its failed policies regarding jobs. (see article).

Mr. Kristof article is entitled, “Did we Drop the Ball on Unemployment?” Kristof a little slow on the up take as the president and most progressives are. It has been about jobs since day one. As I posted back in June 22, 2009, It’s the Jobs stupid!

For some in the progressive media to get it finally this is better late than never. However, for the Obama administration it seems that jobs are only a political concern. The president had 2 ½ years to work on joblessness in America he chose not to.
According to both Mr. Barnes and Mr. Kristof, the progressive media is complicit in the lack of the president’s focus regarding jobs.

Had a republican been elected 2008 the media would have cited all of the wrong things in the administration and its lack of job creation.

Instead, the progressive media is at fault for the mess that American is in because they chose to support candidate Barry Hussein Soetoro. Rather than report unbiased on questionable practices omitting from this president and his cabinet, this media has bowed at the feet of Soetoro.

The progressive media is simply not doing its job. Yes Mr. Kristof you and the progressive media dropped the ball on jobs since 2009. In addition, you are enablers of a president that has done nothing for the middle class and the joblessness in America.

The American people are all not that stupid Mr. president. We all know this current economic crisis is a result of your failed economic policies Mr. Soetoro. We also know that the progressive liberal media dropped the ball on reporting on the lack of jobs and they have enabled your presidency with a free pass not to fixing the economy.

Monday, August 29, 2011

Irene: the unserious crisis that Obama didn’t let go to waste

I found it quite interesting that we were getting weather updates from the president. Why would the Commander-in-Chief man the 24-hour weather channel to tell the American people that hurricane Irene could be an historic hurricane? Could it have anything to do with his abysmal approval rating and the fact that his administration’s philosophy is, “Never let a serious crisis go to waste.” (see

The fact is Politicians and the Media hyped hurricane Irene for political expediency. Toby Harnden outlines the strange relationship between press and politicians in his article, “Perfect Storm of Hype: Politicians, the media and the Hurricane Irene apocalypse that never was.” (see article)

In a picture of the sublimely absurd coverage, reporters looking for something disastrous to report about Irene positioned themselves in the worse possible ways in order to get their story. Follow Tucker Barnes reporting in Ocean City, Maryland reports on Hurricane Irene brown sea foam. (see 3:16 video)

At the same time president Obama by-passed the emergency personnel in his cabinet and took matters into this own hands. One paper reported that the president actually took control of the hurricane command center. (see story)

Then again, from Martha’s Vineyard the president took to warning the American people of, in the president’s words, the historical hurricane Irene. (see 3:29min video)

Why does the president feel the need to be the Weatherman-in-Chief? Three reasons immediately come to mind. Number one, this is an attempt to make this hurricane a crisis á la Rahm Emanuel. Number two this is an attempt to play off of hurricanes Rita and Katrina. The president is attempting to show that unlike the Bush administration his administration is responding rapidly to a hurricane.

Finally number three the president is polling at abysmal sub-Bush poll numbers. Therefore, Barry is looking for someone in the media to say that his poll numbers shot up because of this handling of the Irene hurricane crisis.

So allow me to ask, what do you think of the president’s handling of the hurricane Irene crisis? Believe me this poll question is coming.

Friday, August 26, 2011

The Fire Ed Schultz the Petition

On August 18, 2011 Creating Orwellian Worldview demanded that Ed Schultz be fired from MSNBC (see Open Demand to MSNBC for the Firing of Ed Schultz)

Below is the petition. If you are tired of politics of personal destruction, if you detest the slandering and libeling of an opponent because the other side disagrees with their opponent’s policies, please follow the link and sign the petition which will be forwarded to MSNBC for the removal of Ed Schultz.

Please note this is not an effort to censor honest political discussion and disagreement. We support all honest and open debate and discussion. No this is an effort to stop blatant acts of political sabotage and defamation such as what Ed Schultz engaged in. This is an effort to clean up our political discourse. In other words, you cannot yell fire in a crowded theatre and likewise you cannot attempt to end a politician’s campaign by slander and libel because you hate your political opponent.

Thank you
Creating Orwellian Worldview

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Obama: All his Job talking

He’s wearing America out with all his job talking. The Bee Gees got nothing on Barry. I couldn’t understand the Bee Gees and neither can I understand all of the president’s job talking, here why.

Mr. Soetoro knew that economy was bad when he ran for office. He and the Democrats talked about president Bush like Bush had three legs. They accused Mr. Bush of giving tax breaks to the wealth, running an unfunded war and signing unfunded prescription medicine bill into law.

When Barry became president, he told a reporter that America was out of money and was running in deep deficits and what did he and a Super Democrat majority in the Senate and House do, create jobs? No. Cut spending? No. they force through Congress the greatest social spending spree in the history of the republic. Barry didn’t stop the war as he promised he increased it, still unfunded.

Oh he talked about jobs the whole time but that’s all he did about jobs. Job talking, he wore the job talk out but didn’t produce the jobs that he was talking about. (see7:16min video)

Job Talking from Alaphiah on Vimeo.

In addition to that he and congress begun to spend unprecedented amounts of money the likes, which no one had ever seen.

February 2009
$275 Billion Stimulus Package – Homeowners Bailout
The Obama Administration handed out a $275 billion mortgage stimulus plan, designed to assist more than 9 million American homeowners in refinancing their home loans or averting foreclosure. Of the $275 billion stimulus, $75 billion was allotted for direct spending for keeping people in their homes, and $200 billion came in the form of additional help for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (See above, in the July 2008 entry, for more information on the first economic stimulus package that was awarded to these mortgage giants.)

March 2009
$30 Billion Stimulus Package – AIG Bailout
The federal government intervened once again to help insurance giant AIG, this time in the form of a $30 billion loan from TARP funds. (See above in the September-November 2008 entry, for more information on other AIG bailouts.)

March 2009
$15 Billion Stimulus Package – Small Business Loans
The Obama Administration introduced a $15 billion economic stimulus venture aimed at the small business lending market to get money flowing into small business lines of credit again.

March 2009
$1 Trillion "Toxic Asset" Program – Banks Bailout
The Obama Administration launched a public-private economic stimulus venture (involving the U.S. Treasury and FDIC) to try to get toxic assets off the balance sheets of banks so that they can return to normal lending practicesMarch 2009.

March 2009
$22 Billion Stimulus Package – Automakers Bailout
The Obama Administration extended another $22 billion in loans to Chrysler and GM, this time, with strings attached, including the firing of General Motors Chairman Rick Wagoner.

April 2009
$1 Trillion Stimulus Package – G-20 World Leaders Stimulus
The leaders of the 20 most powerful countries in the world (representing 85% of global economic production) convened in London and agreed to $1 trillion in economic stimulus funds, as well as tighter global financial regulations. (source)
Those nasty Bush tax cuts that Barry is always downing, as president he extended those tax cuts to the “wealthy.” He did stop the war as he promised. He signed into law several unfunded big money programs and just made the economy worst. A further look at the president’s spending:

January 20, 2009
President Obama sworn into office
• President tells the American people in his Inaugural Address: “Those of us who manage the public's dollars will be held to account, to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in the light of day, because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government.”
• Debt Held By Public = $6.31 trillion

February 17, 2009
President Signs into Law the Spending Stimulus
• The stimulus adds $821 billion in new spending according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
• The White House promises this infusion of spending and borrowing would keep unemployment rate below 8%. As millions of Americans are painfully aware, that promise was broken.
• Debt Held by Public = $6.48 trillion
February 26, 2009
President Issues FY2010 Budget
• The President’s budget adds $2.7 trillion in new debt in FY2010 and imposes $1.4 trillion in new taxes.
• Debt Held by Public = $6.58 trillion
March 11, 2009
President Signs FY2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act
• The massive spending bill includes 8,696 earmarks at a cost of $11 billion.
• The spending bill adds $19 billion in new spending above the baseline – an 8.6% spending increase.
• Debt Held by Public = $6.66 trillion
April 29, 2009
Congressional Democrats Pass FY2010 Budget
• The Congressional Democrats’ budget calls for a $2 trillion debt increase in 2010, and another 8.9% increase in non-defense discretionary spending.
• The reconciliation process is abused to later pave the way for health care overhaul to be jammed into law.
• Of note: this is the last time Congressional Democrats will bother budgeting.
• Debt Held by Public = $6.85 trillion
February 2, 2010
President Issues FY2011 Budget
• The President’s budget more than doubles the debt; pushes the FY2011 deficit to a new record of $1.6 trillion; drives spending to a new record of $3.8 trillion in fiscal year 2011; and raises taxes by more than $2 trillion through 2020, under the administration’s own estimates.
• Debt Held by Public = $7.85 trillion
March 23, 2010
President Signs Health-Care Overhaul Into Law
• The massive new law adds $1.4 trillion in new spending over the next decade, and over $2.5 trillion once the law is fully implemented.
• Despite sluggish economic growth and high unemployment, the law imposes over $500 billion in new tax hikes. CBO Director Elmendorf would later testify that the law would reduce employment by roughly half a percent – a reduction of approximately 800,000 jobs.
• Debt Held by Public = $8.18 trillion
April 15, 2010
Congressional Democrats Decide Not to Do a Budget for FY2011
• The 1974 Budget Act requires Congress to pass a budget each year by April 15.
• In an unprecedented budget failure, House Democrats not only failed to pass a budget – they opted to not even propose a budget.
• Debt Held by Public = $8.39 trillion
July 21, 2010
President Signs Financial Regulatory Overhaul Into Law
• In addition to heightened regulatory uncertainty, the massive new law adds $10.2 billion in new spending.
• Debt Held by Public = $8.69 trillion
February 14, 2011
President Issues FY2012 Budget
• The President’s budget yet again calls for the doubling of the debt in five years, and tripling the debt in ten years.
• The President’s budget spends $47 trillion over the next decade, imposes over $1 trillion in new tax hikes, and fails to address the drivers of the debt.
• Debt Held by Public = $9.45 trillion
April 13, 2011
President Delivers Speech on Deficit Reduction
• The President appears to abandon his own budget by offering a ‘framework’ that calls for additional tax increases, defense spending cuts, and Medicare price controls – yet lacks sufficient detail to back-up claims of deficit reduction.
• Debt Held by Public = $9.65 trillion
April 15, 2011
House Passes FY2012 Budget Resolution
• The House-passed budget cuts $6.2 trillion in government spending over the next decade, saves Medicare, strengthens the social safety net, lifts the crushing burden of debt, and spurs economic growth and job creation.
• Senate Democrats fail to meet their legal requirement to pass a budget by April 15.
• Debt Held by Public = $9.68 trillion
April 18, 2011
S&P Issues Credit Warning on U.S. Debt
• The rating agency sets off the latest alarm bells, warning of lawmakers of unsustainable fiscal course.
• President Obama has still not proposed a credible budget; Senate Democrats have still not proposed any budget.
• Debt Held by Public = $9.68 trillion
May 13, 2011
Medicare and Social Security Trustees Issue Warning of Looming Insolvency
• According to the programs’ own trustees, the unsustainable future of Medicare and Social Security threatens the health and retirement security of America’s seniors.
• President Obama and Congressional Democrats continue to engage in a partisan campaign to attack efforts to save and strengthen these critical programs – while offering no serious solutions of their own.
• Debt Held by Public = $9.67 trillion
May 25, 2011
Senate Unanimously Rejects President’s FY2012 Budget; Vote is 97-0
• While the President’s plan to accelerate our nation toward bankruptcy is unanimously rejected, the stunt on the Senate floor reveals the bankruptcy of Senate Democrats’ ideas.
• Senate Democrats have still not proposed any budget.
• Debt Held by Public = $9.72 trillion
June 23, 2011
CBO Director Further Discredits President’s Fiscal Record
• In testimony before the House Budget Committee, CBO Director Doug Elmendorf responds to questions on the President’s ‘Framework’: “We don’t estimate speeches. We need much more specificity than was provided in that speech for us to do our analysis.”
• Debt Held by Public = $9.74 trillion
July 8, 2011
Unemployment Hits 9.2%; Day 800 Since Senate Democrats Last Passed A Budget
• A devastating jobs report that shows the unemployment rate at 9.2% coincides with the 800th day since Senate Democrats last thought the federal government needed a budget.
• Debt Held by Public = $9.75 trillion
July 11, 2011
Senator Conrad Gives Budget Speech on Senate Floor
• On Day 803 since the Senate last passed a budget, Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad takes to the Senate floor to deliver a speech about the Senate Democrats’ non-existent budget resolution.
• Senator Conrad makes the case for imposing over $2 trillion in new taxes, but provides no actual budget resolution and no credible details.
• Debt held by Public = $9.75 trillion
July 15, 2011
President Holds Press Conference: “We’re Running Out of Time” to Deal with Debt
• President Obama tells reporters: “I've got reams of paper and printouts and spreadsheets on my desk, and so we know how we can create a package that solves the deficits and debt for a significant period of time. But in order to do that, we got to get started now.”
• The American people have still not seen any “paper” or “printouts” of what specific spending cuts the President supports. The American people have still not seen any “spreadsheets” from the White House to corroborate their claims of having offered a deficit reduction plan.
• While it’s long past time for Washington “to get started now” on tackling our debt problems, President Obama has still not proposed a credible budget, and Senate Democrats have still not proposed any budget.
• Debt Held by Public = $9.75 trillion

He’s like the Bee Gee with all his job talking is all jive. In addition, in September in his big speech on the economy he’ll ask for another stimulus package to spend on, yes you guessed it, creating jobs.

Monday, August 22, 2011

Obama’s Arab Downgrade

A new Zogby poll, “Arab Attitudes, 2011,” has revealed that President Obama’s charm offensive in the Arab world has failed. After he promised to restore America’s international reputation, not only does the Arab world hate America more under Mr. Obama than it did under President George W. Bush, it even hates Mr. Obama - personally - more than it detested the swaggering unilateralist cowboy from Texas. —Michael Prell
S & P’s downgrade was a historic first for governmental fiscal irresponsibility under president Obama. Obama is the first and only president, which the country's credit rating has been downgraded. Michael Prell is a former adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In his article, “Obama made them hate us” Prell, describes a phenomenon he termed ‘Weak horse’ diplomacy. In short, the ‘Arab spring’ is more like the Arab Downgrade. (see article)

According to Prell because of president Barry Hussein Soetoro’s weak foreign policy the Arab world has downgraded president Soetoro below that of what they graded former president Bush. Just like the financial crisis the Soetoro, administration did not understand the depth of the hate for America and they did the wrong things to deal with the Arab world. Oh yes and the president made relations with the Arab world worst.

Open Demand to MSNBC for the Firing of Ed Schultz the Follow-up
On Thursday August 18, 2011, Creating Orwellian Worldview posted an open request for the firing of MSNBC’s Ed Schultz. (see previous post) That post generated request for an actual petition. Upon further discussion a petition was conceived and is now posted if you would like to read it and sign it please follow the link below:

If you value fairness and truth in elections please sign the petition so we may forward it to MSNBC.

Thank you
Creating Orwellian Worldview

Friday, August 19, 2011

Joe Wilson’s back. With proof, Obama did lie!

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced on Tuesday that it has awarded $28.8 million to 67 community health centers with funds from the Obamacare health reform law. [...]Andrews said that grant recipients will not check the immigration status of people seeking services.--Matt Cover
You recall that September 2009 speech before Congress where the President stated that if Healthcare became law illegal aliens would not be covered? December 24, 2009 late during the night, Democrats without one single Republican vote pass Healthcare. President Soetoro signed it into law.

Only one thing, Joe Wilson was right Barry Hussein Soetoro was lying; illegal aliens will be covered by the Healthcare law that Democrats passed. (see articles here and here)

Congressman Wilson interviewed with Fox News (see 6:07min video)

Below is the Pew Institution report showing demographically that illegal’s are in the targeted area that the Soetoro Department of Health and Human Services released a grant of 28.8 million dollars to 67 community health centers with funds from the Obamacare health reform law.

PEW Hispanic Center A Portrait of Unauthorized Immigrants inthe United States

As Congressman Wilson brought to the attention of the American people in 2009, “You Lie!” Mr. Soetoro, you lie.

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Open Demand to MSNBC for the Firing of Ed Schultz

Ed Schultz Just Ended his own Career

What is it with Liberals that they have to make up lies to defeat their foes? Not since Dan Rather’s attempt to pass forged documents attempting to prove that President Bush did not attend National Guard Service have we seen such blatant election tampering. Rather attempted to affect the 2004 elections Ed Schultz is attempt to do the same in the 2012 elections. We haven’t seen such blatant disregard for truth and election tampering as Schultz is involved in, since Rather.

As CBS fired Dan Rather, we demand that MSNBC fire Ed Schultz. At the very heart of journalism is a requirement for truth. When a journalist knowingly defrauds and deceives the people, he or she is responsible to inform that is a breach of fiduciary responsibility to the public.

Watch as Schultz with apparent forethought and malice uses an edited video to give the impression that newly declared presidential candidate Gov. Rick Perry used a racist innuendo to refer to president Barry Hussein Soetoro. (2:31minvideo)

To add emphasis to his claim Schultz compounds his libelous disparage by saying that Governor Perry’s reference to a black cloud of debt was rather a reference to president Soetoro. Schultz actually says this!

This type of yellow journalism must not stand. It is race baiting of the worse kind.
Therefore, Creating Orwellian Worldview calls for and demands the immediate firing of Ed Schultz.

Currently Washington politics and politicians are exacerbating racial hatreds in this country, as evident in the recent epidemic of race mob beatings in Milwaukee and Philadelphia. Someone who advocates racial hatred as Schultz does openly must be permanently removed from the air.

MSNBC must do the right thing by removing an obvious contributor to the racial divide in this country. We demand the firing of Ed Schultz post-haste!

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

A Day on the (Illegal) Taxpayer funded Campaign Trail with President Obama

I get it. The president is not on a taxpayer funded campaign tour and Vice president Joe Biden didn’t compare the Tea Party to Terrorists. Oh yeah and HLS Secretary Janet Napolitano believes that she’s enacting homegrown terrorists policies to protect against Timothy McVeigh.
Comedian Dick Gregory made this observation when explaining CIA agents who had been captured during the war. His remark was, “How can you tell an “ex-CIA operative from a CIA operative.” Mr. Gregory explained, “You can tell because when a CIA operative is caught he is then an ex-CIA operative.”

Hmm, that’s sort of like when is a Taxpayer funded Bus Campaign swing that violates American election laws, not a Taxpayer funded Bus Campaign swing? Answer, when the White house says that it is not a Taxpayer funded Bus Campaign swing. The White house said that what is really happening is Official White house business. A three state poll so to speak. The president is Busing through Minnesota, Iowa and Illinois to listen to the American people. And to get an idea of what the people are thinking…in this election year.

It’s interesting that the president is fighting against his political rivals on this trip also. He is defending his failed policies and he is attacking the Republican candidates who are running for his office. Sound suspiciously like campaigning to me.

There are election laws prohibiting a candidate from using an office for reelection purposes. Apparently, all of American’s lawyers are busy doing other things to concern themselves. No time to protect the electorate processes of the United States. Anyone? Anyone?

And of course if the White house says that this is not a campaign tour who are we to question authority?

We might as well take advantage of the opportunity and ask the president a few questions. For instance, Mr. president about what Vice president Biden said about the Tea Party. He compared them to terrorists. Are you going to let him get away with that?(see 3:01min video)

I get it. The president is not on a taxpayer funded campaign tour and Vice president Joe Biden didn’t compare the Tea Party to Terrorists. Oh yeah and HLS Secretary Janet Napolitano believes that she’s enacting homegrown terrorists policies to protect against Timothy McVeigh.

And of course, the $2.2 million dollar taxpayer big black buses that the president is using, his big government entourage and his time campaigning through 3 states, none of it is really being used campaigning. It’s all being used doing government business in bitter clinging bible and gun clutching middle America.

I believe that!

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Obama Desperately Following Sarah

"I know you're frustrated. And I'm frustrated too" —president Barry Hussein Soetoro, on bus tour in Minnesota, attempting to separate himself from the chaos he’s created in Washington
The saying goes, “imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.” Sarah Palin’s idea to tour America by bus apparently captured the fancy of decision makers in the White house. They have instructed their boss to ditch Air Force One and the Limo nicknamed, “the Beast” for a while to follow Palin’s example of connecting with rural America. (Rural Americans, you know those bitter clingers to bibles and guns that Liberal Politicians only need and pay attention to around election time.)

So, for three days this week starting Monday before his Martha Vineyard vacation the president will bus through three states, Minnesota, Iowa and Illinois. He won those states in 2008 but indications are they need shoring up now. (see 5:06min video)

Here’s an Orwellian dilemma, the tricky part is that this excursion is fully funded by taxpayer’s dollars unlike Palin’s. So how does the president keep afoul of campaign violations, not using his official office to campaign, while “connecting with the American people”?

On a trip tinged with campaign-season politics, Obama lambasted what he described as the "brinkmanship" in the capital. He said the country's "broken" politics are exacerbating its economic problems.—

The Orwellian answer is don’t call it campaigning. Just brand your desperately following Sarah Palin bus tour an “official White House three-state tour to talk about jobs and the economy.” All the while, of course, the president partisanly blames Republicans for the state of both the economy and jobs. Hmm, attacking Republicans by thinly veiled rebukes to Congress in general, is that really, official White house business?

But the White House pitched the trip as a purely official visit, and a chance for the president to hear from Americans about the economic climate.--

So what if it isn’t official business. What if it really is campaigning what you going to do sue the Soetoro administration? By the time, you’re able to do anything the buses will be pulled into Washington and Soetoro will be on to the next scandal. That is exactly the point with this administration. They take every policy, every law, and every act to the edge of constitutional definition. And there is no controlling legal authority to do anything about it.

This bus tour is a possible violation of campaign laws. No other president in history has been so willing to use so many issues to test the constitutionality of the presidency.

For example, in pronouncing that he would not defend, the constitution in both defending American’s borders and the DOMA law this president has repeatedly shown a propensity to pick and choose which laws he will obey and which he will break. That is living outside the boundaries or above the law.

This act of riding around the country campaigning in taxpayers funded buses is but the latest, “In yo’ Face, wha cha gonna do about it” challenge to the American people by the Soetoro administration.

Our answer should be, ‘we will downgrade you to unemployed in 2012 as you downgraded our economy Mr. president.’

Monday, August 15, 2011

The Democrat Party is Broken

“Many Americans are hurting badly right now. Many have been unemployed for too long. Putting these men and women back to work, and growing wages for everyone, has got to be our top priority.” —president Barry Hussein Soetoro 2011
Special Note: Standard and Poor is under tremendous secret political pressure from the Soetoro administration to reverse the AA+ downgrade back to that of AAA. Look for that reversal in the coming days.

President Barry Hussein Soetoro has looked into the mirror of American politics and can’t distinguish whether that line he sees on this face is a scar or a crack in the mirror.
Impetuously and due to his well-documented narcissism, he concludes that there couldn’t be anything flawed in himself so the mirror must be broken.

Thus, the president’s pronouncement that our politics are broken amid the fact that his political worldview is crumbling all around him yet he lifts his skinny skeletal arm and points his worn and boney finger of blame at yet another American institution, which he supposes, requires his brand of fundamental change, America’s politics. (see article)

This assessment comes from a man who starting from his sudden appearance on the scene in 2004 has pretentiously told us that America is broken and then pronounced that he is here to fix it fundamentally.

Well, Mr. president our system of politics was here before you got here and it will be here long after you leave. The latter, of course, depends on whether the majority of Americans realize by now that what you have been doing is worsening America’s political, social and economic condition. Anyone who is not blinded by partisan politics can see that America is worse under Soetoro than it was under Bush or any other president thus far.

What you misrepresented in 2008 as hope and change Mr. Soetoro was merely partisan politics of the highest order. It was the government takeover of healthcare industry disguised as providing healthcare for every American. It was a homosexual coming out parade in military uniform disguised as the lie to end unfair military treatment. It was historic partisan unsustainable trillion dollars spending to further ensconce liberal programs and policies and embed them deep within the federal government to bring fundamental change to America socially and legally. You managed all of this, by bypassing the electoral system and implementing your reforms by bureaucratic stealth and legal manipulation rather than the conventional way of open political debate.

When the American people begin to realize what you and your Party were up to in 2010 the America people sent their representatives to Congress to stop your corrupting of the American system of government. You reacted with vile and venomous epithets; Racists you called us, Homophobes you called us, Astroturf you called us, Tea Partiers you called us and you told us we were trying to continue the policies of George Bush, therefore in essence labeling us by the name you hate the most, George W. Bush.

Mr. president I don’t know if you’ve noticed but your failed Utopian European Big government dreams aren’t working in Europe. So I’m sure by the reaction in our markets that what you have already done with your unprecedented spending and reforms are not going to work in America either.

If I may be so bold it is not our politics that are broken no they worked very well in spite of your Party’s manipulation of our elections and our election laws. However, what is broken is the Democrat Party and their partisan brand of politics that places Democrats and Party about everything else.

Since Al Gore conceded that Bush won the presidential campaign of 2000, but took his concession back upon advice of his Democrat partisans, Democrats have began an uncivil war in American politics. And because of those actions Democrats have waged political war on America ever since: Chadgate, charges that the Supreme court gave Bush the election, charges that Bush stole the election, charges that Bush waged an illegal war, Democrats voting to go to war and then lied saying they were deceived. Charges that Bush lied people died, Charges that Bush lied about WMDs, Democrats pronouncing that America lost the war, Democrats attempt to sabotage the war efforts to defeat Bush in 2004, Democrats especially this president vilifying Bush in the 2008 elections even though Bush wasn’t running and couldn’t defend himself. And it goes on ad infinitum.

Democrats have shown themselves to be unworthy of a political system based on both honesty and integrity. In addition, Democrat’s repeated general misinterpretations and misrepresentation of Constitution and laws, which govern the United States, tell a much different story than that of the president’s view that America’s politics are broken. What the facts suggest is there is a broken component of American politics but not the system itself.

The president has look in the mirror of American politics and mistaken the scar on this face and that on his Party and projected it upon the mirror as a crack.

No sir our Politics are not broken, at least not in the since which you speak. However, one element in our system is broken beyond repair and that is your Party sir, the one that spawned your dysfunctional presidency sir.

The Democrat Party is Broken! Thank you Mr. president for making that undeniably clear to American before the 2012 elections. I think this revelation will be that best thing for Americans to know regarding the 2012 elections.

Friday, August 12, 2011

“America is not what it once was” You’re right Mr. President, you are Right!

Mr. Obama has racked up more than $4 trillion in debt. His massive spending stimulus has failed and made the jobless situation worse. Before his stimulus package was passed in February 2009, the unemployment rate stood at 7.8 percent. Today it is at 9.1 percent - and rising. —Jeffery Kuhner
You remember that cute little girl three and a half years ago who asked then presidential candidate Sen. Barry Hussein Soetoro why he was running for president? In summary Mr. Soetoro lamented that he was running for president because, “America is no longer what it could be, what it once was.” (see 2:48min video)

The false promise that Mr. Soetoro was presenting at that time was that he was going to fix all that was wrong with America. Fast forward to 2011 following the benefit of a Democrat controlled House of Representatives starting in 2006 that combined with Democrats winning control of the Senate in 2008 plus Soetoro’s presidency in 2008 Democrats had total control of the government and could have enacted anything that they wanted without any Republican help.

However, instead of working on the deficit, debt or jobs Democrats instead worked to dismantle Don’t Ask Don’t Tell and then they institutionalized the Orwellian titled, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or as it is better-known Obamacare. (see story)

America’s economy is in free-fall. Growth is anemic. The stock market is collapsing. Real unemployment - combining the high jobless rate with rampant underemployment - is higher than 16 percent. Manufacturing is dead. Deficits, debt and government spending are at record levels. Our credit rating has been downgraded for the first time in history. The trade deficit has exploded to the highest in years. A possible Great Depression haunts the land. Primarily one man is to blame: President Obama.--Jeffrey T. Kuhner

After Democrats ran what the president called an already out of money and functioning in deep deficits economy further into a historical credit downgrade they then had the temerity to blame the America people for their mess. In essences, Democrats blamed Tea Party-Americans for sending Republicans to Congress to end the out of control spending of the President and his Party.

[Obama] has run up three consecutive trillion-dollar-plus budget deficits, an orgy of spending unrivaled in our history. The result: Nearly 2 million private-sector jobs have been wiped out, the U.S. dollar has eroded, investor and business confidence has been shattered, and America is no longer the world’s economic superpower. Washington has become a financial colony of China.—Jeffrey T. Kuhner

The Sen. Soetoro was correct, America is no longer what it could be, what it once was. Only this change to America’s financial fate is at the hand of Democrats and their president Barry Hussein Soetoro.

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Downgrade Obama 2012©™

If this president were a White man named Bush he would be receiving all of the criticism warranted for a political executive that has allowed the greatest economy in known history to be downgrade from it’s AAA rating to that of an AA+.
If this president were a White man named Bush he would be receiving all of the criticism warranted for a political executive that has allowed the greatest economy in known history to be downgrade from it’s AAA rating to that of an AA+.

He would be called incompetent and stupid. He would be the butt of SNL jokes. David Letterman, Jay Leno and Jon Stewart would be serving his ineptitude up on a platter for late night and cable laughs.

Awkwardly, because this president resides in black skin our expectations of him are naturally lowered. Lower even than that of former president Bush. One would think to be roundly criticized, as Bush was there must have been the highest expectations for his presidency. Why else would Bush be held to such a high standard?

As for the first Black president, we must cut him some slack. We must expect less. We most blame his environment, “What he Inherited,” rather than judge his inability to fix the problems that he was hired to fix. Incidentally, he identified these same problems before he was hired. And these are the problems he vowed to have the answers for. He vowed to cut the deficit in half by his first term but the reality is he will have increased the deficit by 4 times if not higher by the end of his only term.

Sadly we let deep political thinkers like Woody Allen, Barbara Streisand and other Hollywood elite shame us into voting for an unqualified Black man for no other qualification other than he is Black.

I want to be one of the first to offer up the slogan for Republicans to use in campaign 2012. “Downgrade Obama 2012.” This slogan is for tee shirts and bumper stickers alike. Every website and blog should wear it proudly.

Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden were correct after all. They both warned that our Affirmative Action president was not ready for the job. But the perfect storm of hate Bush, White guilt and Liberal agenda deception allowed a radical partisan inexperienced community organizer to be elected to what used to be the most powerful elected office in the world.

Sadly we let deep political thinkers like Woody Allen, Barbara Streisand and other Hollywood elite shame us into voting for an unqualified Black man for no other qualification other than he is Black.

Well we did it. We made history America. For the first time in the history of American government a political Party and their president has demolished the credit rating of the United States government. They have had the good faith and credit of the United States downgraded. And for 2012, one downgrade deserves another.

Downgrade Obama 2012!

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Big Democrat Astroturf Labor Machine Fails in Wisconsin

John Gill, 45, of Menomonee Falls, voted for Darling and questioned the opposition's anti-GOP rhetoric, which went far beyond collective bargaining.
"This was all supposed to be about the workers' rights, so to speak. But that has not been brought up one time. It's all been misleading, the attack ads, things like that," Gill said. "The one reason they started this recall, they didn't bring up once."
Nowhere is Orwellian and Machiavellianism seen more clearly as what has been transpiring in the State of Wisconsin. Liberals using misleading words and imagery in order to cinch government backed Big Union control over the electoral processes of the state of Wisconsin. Thankfully, those efforts failed.

Liberals billed it as a Democrat backlash against the Conservative sweep of 2010 when Conservatives won both houses of the Legislature and the State Governorship in Wisconsin. What it turned out to be as one Wisconsiner described it, “[A] lot of people didn't get their way, threw a crybaby fit and decided to have a recall.” (see article)

Fueled by millions of dollars from national labor groups, the attempt to remove GOP incumbents served as both a referendum on Walker's conservative revolution and could provide a new gauge of the public mood less than a year after Republicans made sweeping gains in this state and many others.—Scott Bauer

The whole union backed movement was actually Democrat Astroturf funded by the high end of the Democrat Political Party and its political ally Big Democrat Labor Unions. They were attempting to overthrow the fair elections of the people of Wisconsin by employing strong-arm community organizing tactics.

It was also a weather vane for the upcoming 2012 elections and had Democrats managed to win, they would have been touted it as a National repudiation of Conservatives and Republicans.

The Wisconsin Democrat Big Union effort, a coalition of national union groups, caused spending of $31 million dollars in that state attempting to unseat the Republican majority in Wisconsin. They attacked six Republican seats using a nationally organized Democrat effort. Out of six Republicans, Democrats only managed to recall two Republicans this by any measure was an utter failure.

Democrats lost much more than face in this obvious recall rebellion against the voters of Wisconsin. This episode has national implications for the 2012 elections. Although, Liberals are known to act out in this type of riotous behavior when they lose, unfortunately for them it produced next to no results.

Next week two Wisconsin Democrat incumbents face recall. It will be interesting to see if they can weather the recall storm that their National Party has created.

Tuesday, August 09, 2011

Liberal Word Play Exposed

Creating Orwellian worldview requires changes in meaning. In this case Patriots and Conservative citizens became Terrorist by Liberal’s definition. Every so often though political discourse becomes so outrageous that even the purveyors of the outrage most stop to assess the nonsense that they speak. So was the case with the Liberals who spouted the Tea Party Terrorist meme.

Democrats and Progressive media began to march in lockstep to the ridiculous with their attacks against the Tea Party. These attacks where indirectly intended for the enemies of Liberals, anyone and everyone who is a Conservative. The Morning Joe show captures Liberals reconciling themselves to the reality that their concerted efforts to demonize the Tea Party were just a bit over the top. (see 9:17min video)

Visit for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

The Liberal propaganda machine is exposed. This is a typical Liberal method of demonization of their foes. Messaging is what Liberals do best. All fair-minded people recognize that this is but an example of how Liberals message. We all should be aware that Liberal memes are propaganda meant to deceive.

Monday, August 08, 2011

Obama on the Downlow: US Credit Rating Lowered

S&P decided to lower the AAA rating, held by the United States for 70 years, to AA+ after a bipartisan debt deal signed into law this week failed to assuage concerns about the nation’s growing spending. -- Zachary A. Goldfarb
Democrats prevented the spending cuts needed to avert the lowering of the U.S. credit rating. Thus, for the first time in America’s history the U.S. good faith and credit is called into question under president Barry Hussein Soetoro and the Democrat controlled Senate. Democrats were wrong and House Republicans were right. (see story)

Typically, the term “on the downlow” is reserved for guys who sneak around, and hide abnormal activities from girlfriends. Therefore, the term, I think, is an appropriate metaphor to explain the story of why the full faith and credit of the United States of America has been downgraded from AAA to AA+ for the first time in the history of the United States of America under president Barry Hussein Soetoro and Democrats. (see 9:30min video)

Lowering the nation’s rating to one notch below AAA, the credit rating company said “political brinkmanship” in the debate over the debt had made the U.S. government’s ability to manage its finances “less stable, less effective and less predictable.” It said the bipartisan agreement reached this week to find at least $2.1 trillion in budget savings “fell short” of what was necessary to tame the nation’s debt over time and predicted that leaders would not be likely to achieve more savings in the future.-- Zachary A. Goldfarb

First, to explain, guys on the downlow lie to their girlfriends or wives. Usually these heels keep up a façade that life within the relationship is complete normal, likewise, the president and his Party have for 2 ½ years been keeping up appearances with the American people. They’ve been pretending to look out for the interests of the American people. Instead, Democrats were looking out for their own Partisan special interest agenda. (S&P Report on Obama Down Grade below)

Standard and Poor Down Grade of US Credit Rating 2011

In other words because Democrats controlled both branches, the Legislative and the Executive, at the beginning of the Barry Soetoro presidency Democrats pushed the greatest Liberal social spending agenda upon Americans in the last 50 years. 1) Repeal of "don't ask, don't tell" policy was approved by both the Democrat controlled House and the Senate,

2) the DREAM Act, a false immigration reform written to make it easier for young Mexicans illegally in this country to go to college, got through the Democrat controlled House and came within a few votes of overcoming a filibuster, gaining sufficient support so that advocates of this unconstitutional and anti-American measure could incredibly argue for including a version of it in any comprehensive immigration reform measure.

3) Trillions of dollars of spending in Obamacare

4) The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, otherwise known as “stimulus II” a 3.27 Trillion dollar hit on taxpayers.

5) $275 Billion Stimulus Package – Homeowners Bailout The Obama Administration handed out a $275 billion mortgage stimulus plan

6) $30 Billion Stimulus Package – AIG Bailout The federal government intervened under Obama once again to help insurance giant AIG

7) $15 Billion Stimulus Package – Small Business Loans The Obama Administration introduced a $15 billion economic stimulus venture

8) $1 Trillion "Toxic Asset" Program – Banks Bailout The Obama Administration launched a public-private economic stimulus venture

9) $22 Billion Stimulus Package – Automakers Bailout The Obama Administration extended another $22 billion in loans to Chrysler and GM Had the president kept his campaign promises to cut in half the deceit in his first term and focus on job creation Americans AAA rating would still be intact.

Instead, the President and Democrats squandered almost 2 years of his presidency passing and signing Obama care. (see previous post)

Jobs and deficit should have been priorities numbers 1 and 2 from the very beginning of the Soetoro presidency, though he gives them lip service they were not. In this election year that talk about jobs will dominate Washington discussion. In addition, instead of halving the deficit, as he promised, the president’s policies and agenda have increased the deficit by four times. To put that in perspective, Bush with all of his spending doubled the deficit in eight years.

Soetoro’s spending in 2 ½ years has remarkably not tripled but quadrupled the deficit. That’s eight years under Bush doubled, to two and a half years under Soetoro quadrupled.
What is so incredible regarding the recent national discussion about the National deficit is that Republicans offered three plans, The Ryan Road map, The Cut Cap and Balance and finally the Boehner Plan all plans that would have addressed Standard and Poor ‘s concern about the U.S. deficit spending.

Democrats in government and media lied and excoriated Republicans saying that Republicans were Tea Party Republicans, terrorists, hostage takers, highjackers, crazes, unreasonable, Wahabees, suicide bombers, holding a gun to the head of the American people. When it was the Republican’s plans that would have prevented the reduction in American’s good faith and credit.

In other words, Democrats were fighting like babies, resisting taking the medicine of spending reductions from Democrat historic spending, which they racked up under president Soetoro. Republicans attempted to cut the credit card of irresponsible spending only to have Big baby Democrats spit the epithet terrorists in the faces of Republicans who were offering the medicine of solutions. Solutions, which would have prevented the historical downgrade from AAA to AA+

That is the low down, downlow of president Soetoro and Democrats. They pretended that raising the debt ceiling was what was going to protect Americans credit rating while lambasting Republicans as villains who were attempting to destroy the good faith and credit of the United States. While now we see that it was Republicans all the time who were the adults, who were attempting to save our credit rating.

Democrats like angry rebelling adolescences were crying, “I hate you,” at Republican parents who were attempting to set parameters for the national family. Democrats in both media and government mischaracterized the whole argument to get what they wanted the raising of the debt ceiling without cutting deficit spending.

To which S&P said enough of the childishness you are grounded America.

Friday, August 05, 2011

Democrats Hate Americans: Call them Terrorists

Unfortunately, Obama cowered under his seat during the D.C. horror movie and now plans to try to hide behind his Supercommittee. But the Tea Party slashers roaming the corridors of the Capitol have feasted without resistance on delicious victims and will only grow bolder. —Maureen Dowd
Who are Tea Party members if not Americans? Then why do Democrats hate Americans and the Representatives that these Americans send to Congress?

Who could forget the day room scene in the movie, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest? A scene of pajama clad psychiatric patients in various stages of dementia or mental illness. We are witnessing the national expansion of the Cuckoo’s Nest mental institution day room as Progressive Liberals in both media and government lose all sense of reality based mental well-being because of their rabid hate of the Tea Parties or better yet their indirect odium waged at Conservatives as represented by Tea Parties.

Progressive Liberal revulsion of Conservatives is obviously the root from which these full-blown Progressive media and Progressive politicians launch their full-frontal attacks against Americans. These attacks are meant to demonize Liberal’s detested self-made enemies, Tea Party/Conservatives. With time, the over-the-top mischaracterizations of Tea Party-Americans have gone from simply outrageous to seriously delusional to extremely hallucinatory. (see 10:13 min video)

In the beginning, Tea Party-Americans were simply mischaracterized by Progressives as Tea Party crazies à la Christine O’Donnell and Sharron Angle.

More recently, however the mentally unstable Progressive Left has gone insanely mad in their concerted efforts to malign Tea Party-Americans by bombarding them with shock and awe language typically reserved for enemies of the United States not fellow Americans and political rivals.

One of the most extremely hallucinatory attacks on the Tea Party came from Maureen Dowd in a article she posted with the NYT called, “Washington Chainsaw Massacre” in this piece one has to wonder where in the mind of Dowd does fantasy end and reality begin. Obviously, she doesn’t think that Tea Party-Americans are the syfy monsters, which she conjures up from her mind of remembrance or does she?

They were like cannibals, eating their own party and leaders alive. They were like vampires, draining the country’s reputation, credit rating and compassion. They were like zombies, relentlessly and mindlessly coming back again and again to assault their unnerved victims, Boehner and President Obama. They were like the metallic beasts in “Alien” flashing mouths of teeth inside other mouths of teeth, bursting out of Boehner’s stomach every time he came to a bouquet of microphones. (Conjuring that last image on Monday, Vladimir Putin described America as “a parasite.”)—Maureen Dowd

Dowd’s disturbing images suggest someone who is devoid of all rational cognitive processes. Does she really think that Republicans who were sent to Washington in the 112th Congress to stop the multi-trillion dollars spending binge of president Barry Hussein Soetoro and the 110th and 111th Democrat Controlled Congresses are like SyFy monsters or are Dowd’s surreal and crazy imagines met to invoke visceral passions of her fellow Progressives? Does she really intend to push Liberal fanatics further toward delusionary mischaractizations, regarding Tea Party-Americans?

Yet Dowd is not alone. She and the rest of Progressive media have signed what seems to be a blood oath before Satan promising to attack collaboratively Tea-Party Americans as monsters, terrorist and hostage takers. For example:

Thomas Roberts, host of MSNBC’s “The ED Show,” 8/3/11:

“Democrats are very worried their leaders will buckle to political hostage-taking of the Republicans just like they did with the debt ceiling earlier.”

Rev. Al Sharpton, host of “MSNBC Live,” 8/2/11:

“The possibility of a disastrous default was held hostage to the extreme conservative ideology of choking the federal government.”

Dylan Ratigan, host of MSNBC’s “The Dylan Ratigan Show,” 8/2/11:

“We are, in many ways, forced to lead our show with the political, pro-wrestling shenanigans with the threat of a hostage crisis that could bring our country to the brink.”

Eugene Robinson, Washington Post columnist and MSNBC political analyst on MSNBC’s “Rachel Maddow Show,” 8/1/11:

“One of the reasons the president was so set on getting something that at least takes us past the election is that they did see, Aha, gee, they are going to hold us hostage on the debt ceiling again in the next few months.”

Chris Matthews, host of MSNBC’s “Hardball,” 8/2/11:

“What we saw — what I saw, at least, was one guy with a knife and the other trying to avoid being cut. It was a thug attacking a victim. It was a mugging.”

Lawrence O’Donnell, host of MSNBC’s “The Last Word,” 8/1/11:

“The president’s instincts were good on how to handle the Somali pirates when they took hostages, but here the president knew he was dealing with a hostage-taking, and he never came out and said, ‘Ok, here are the limits.’”

Laura Flanders, host Grit TV on MSNBC’s “The ED Show,” 8/1/11:

“The problem we are facing is not a handful of Tea Party hostage-takers. The problem in the country is the headlock that a few corporate interests and some very wealthy elites have put on our revenues.”

Hilary Rosen, Democratic strategist, on CNN’s “Piers Morgan Tonight,” 8/3/11:

“They took John Boehner hostage. They forced to do a plan that was unrealistic politically, and then the grown-ups in the Senate — Sen. Mitch McConnell and Sen. Harry Reid — had to kind of takeover and come up with a compromise and force it on the House.”

Michael Lind, policy director of the Economic Growth Program at the New America Foundation writing in Salon magazine, 8/2/11:

“The debt ceiling crisis is the latest case in which the radical right in the South has held America hostage until its demands are met.”

Editorial page, The New York Times, 7/31/11:

“The deal would avert a catastrophic government default, immediately and probably through the end of 2012. The rest of it is a nearly complete capitulation to the hostage-taking demands of Republican extremists.”

Fareed Zakaria, CNN host, on “Anderson Cooper 360,” 7/29/11:
“So, instead of accepting some compromise that can get through the democratic process, what they’re saying is we’ll blow up the country if you don’t listen to us. We’ll hold hostage the credit of the United States, the good standing of the United States and we’ll blow it up.”

Dana Milbank, columnist for The Washington Post, 8/3/11:
“But the Federalist Papers make no mention of the sort of hostage situation that unfolded in recent weeks. The Founders were silent on the rights of a small group of lawmakers, claiming they received marching orders from God, to bring the nation to the edge of default. The Constitution doesn’t specifically mention negotiating walkouts, Satan sandwiches and deeming budgets into law without votes.”

Ruth Marcus, columnist for The Washington Post, 8/3/11:

“Welcome to the new Washington normal: endless rounds of legislative carjacking … One side wanted the car, had a gun and wasn’t afraid — certainly not afraid enough — to use it. The other had a child in the back seat.”

Source Paul Conner, The Daily Caller

Even the Progressive-in-Chief uses the violence imagery of Republican’s with guns against the heads of the American people

Not too long ago in the 2004 elections the American people threw Democrats out of power in Congress for the first time in about 50 years prior to that. Subsequent to those events Democrats in the minority held Congress up to the extent that during the years of 2004-2008 Congress was called the, “Do Nothing Congress.”

One might even say the Democratic minority in Congress held a gun to the head of the American people and prevented Congress from doing it’s work. They could have being called jihadists, or hostage takers, or extremists, or terrorist, or Hobbits or for that matter they could have being called any of the violent or demeaning adjectives that Conservative Republicans and Tea Party-Americans are called today.

They weren’t. And maybe that’s because they didn’t have an opposing Progressive media and opposing Progressive Liberal politicians to defend against or libel or slander them.

However what we have today is an extreme form of Projection Psychosis where Liberals and their Media cohorts are looking at their own reflections in a mirror. And they are pointing their collective fingers and are shouting terrorist, terrorist, terrorist. Ironically, to borrow from the late Michael Jackson the terrorist in the mirror is not Tea Party-

Americans, the man in the mirror is Liberals’ own reflected image.
But Progressive Liberal projection psychosis will not allow Liberals to see that. The hostage taking terrorist monsters are really projections of themselves. They are the hostage taking terrorists that they accuse Tea Party-Americans of being.

Finally if Democrats believe, as they say, that Americans who participate in Tea parties are terrorists, the Democrats that harbor such ill-will toward citizens of the United States should voluntarily leave any held political office immediately. If you fail to leave Americans will use the bullet of the ballot to drive you from office in 2012. That’s everyone, including the president, who uses the metaphor of a gun to describe the normal work of dissent in Congress. Remember, every Democrat in 2006 the President, Harry Reid and all other Democrats voted in lockstep against raising the debt ceiling.

Thursday, August 04, 2011

Obama the Destroyer

The fact is, he's good at dismantling. He's good at critiquing. He's good at not being the last guy, the one you didn't like. But he's not good at building, creating, calling into being. He was good at summoning hope, but he's not good at directing it and turning it into something concrete that answers a broad public desire. —Peggy Noonan
Peggy Noonan made a salient observation about president Barry Hussein Soetoro the other day. No not that he is a loser, although that was an impactful statement within itself. But a more apropos recognition is that Soetoro is a destroyer. That is the point that captured my attention in her opinion piece, “ They’ve Lost that Lovin’ Feeling.” Noonan observation was that the president is good at dismantling and at critiquing or as he would put it, "Fundamentally Changing." In other words, what this president is most adept in is tearing down or destroying. Equally, he excels in negative criticism. Some might call that Ultra-partisanship since his most biting criticisms are always reserved for the other Party.

Now no one has to tell you that, you already know that. You have seen him in action. You have listened to his speeches. You have heard him railing against his enemies, the Conservative Republicans. He has said that he wants to fundamentally change America.

When one thinks about it, Soetoro’s whole hope and change, shtick is about fundamentally changing America. What else could he have possibly meant than to fundamentally or completely destroy the traditional moorings of the country? Soetoro means to push the country away from the Constitutional Republic that America currently is into a totally and radically changed America. But into what?

I believe that president Soetoro wants to destroy the wealth of America and spread that wealth around the third world. It this some warrantless charge?

Obama father in 1965 wrote a very interesting paper in the East Africa Journal about African Socialism. And what he proposed is that to target the rich and the powerful. He said first of all you can confiscate their land. You can use the state to appropriate their land. And second, he said you should tax them. Tax them to what amount? He said to no upper limit, up to 100%.

So here is a guy who was okay with 100% tax rates. Meaning identify the rich and take everything that they’ve got. And while this seems a little bit crazy underneath it is the anti-colonist assumption that if your rich you have gotten rich through greed, through selfishness, through exploitation. So it is as if I came to your house and stole your furniture. Well what is the proper tax rate for me? 100% because it’s not my furniture.

I think by looking at Obama’s father’s paper, which by the way Obama knows all about but is never mentioned in any of his own writings, by looking at his father’s paper you can get an idea of what Obama is doing when he targets the rich.

He keeps saying the rich don’t pay their fair share. Even though rich people in this country today the top 10% are paying about 70% of the income taxes. But evidently, for Obama that’s not enough. Maybe he like his father wants to see a tax rate that goes up to 100%. So Obama’s father is a very interesting guide to what the son is doing in the White house.—Dinesh D’Souza

In Dinesh D’Souza book, “The Roots of Obama’s Rage” Mr. D’Souza describes a man with a hidden agenda. It is an agenda hidden in plain sight. According to Mr. D’Souza president Soetoro writes about his vision for America in the book , “Dreams from My Father”. As Mr. D’Souza describes it, the president is attempting to weaken America by draining America’s wealth and assigning that wealth to the third world. D’Souza explains in the following interview. (see 12:10mins)

Barack Obama Sr.’s paper, “Problems Facing Our Socialism”

PPM41 080411 Bhobama Article 1965

Is Barry Hussein Soetoro a destroyer? Will he destroy America with his goal to fundamentally change it?

Did Peggy Noonan have it right? Are the president’s best attributes his abilities to dismantle and criticize?

What America needs the most is a reformer. Someone who can take this broken ship of state and guide it by the principles that once made it a great country. The very last thing America needs is a destroyer, a criticizer a partisan divider.

If Noonan’s critique is correct, Barry Hussein Soetoro is a destroyer. His presence in the White house could indeed be an ominous indication of the end of American greatness because we Americans allowed the dreams of our founding fathers to be replaced by the dreams of Barack Hussein Obama Sr. the father of Barry.

Wednesday, August 03, 2011

Obama’s Thriller

As the folks in the White House begin looking toward President Barack Obama’s presumed re-election campaign in 2012, there is one statistic that might worry them more than any other: Little more than a third of white voters currently think the president is doing a good job. —Peter Brown(source)
Barry Hussein Soetoro is the most singular polarizing President in American history. That is according to several polls one released by the Gallup organization and one issued by the Pew research organization. (see article) and (here)

Soetoro’s embrace of fringe special interest groups and strident “in yo face” political strong arm tactics have left the majority of Americans feeling that he hates White people, Christians, Patriots, Republicans, Conservatives, the Tea Parties (Liberal code word for Conservatives) and the Constitution of the United States. (see 3:32min video)

Homosexuals, Blacks, Illegal Aliens and pimply faced college students are the preferred coalition of the Obama campaign. Like the herky-jerky Michael Jackson dance, the Soetoro campaign efforts are aimed to cobble together special interest zombies from their heretofore balkanized hyphenated sub American designations so that they might dance in the choreographed reelection dance of 2012 for Soetoro.

That data point is hidden in the crosstabs of the myriad polls that show a very polarized nation that gives the president a middling job approval rating overall.
Mr. Obama’s job approval rating remains in the mid-to-high-40s overall only because he gets a thumbs up from more than 90% of blacks and gets majority support from Hispanics.—Peter Brown

However for the majority of Americans the treatment from this president and his Party leaves them standing against a wall of rejection and totally unimpressed with this president’s choices of everything from music to healthcare reform to homosexual marriages and to gays serving openly in the military.

Are the Soetoro disenfranchised xenophobes or racists? And why do they feel hated by the president? No they are not xenophobes or racists Zogby is reporting that people on the left are leaving president. It is also reported that Independents are deserting the president. And finally people that backed him in 2008 are no longer willing to back him.

Polls are showing that Americans realize the mistake that they made in 2008 electing a Progressive Liberal and wish to correct their error in 2012. (see poll here)

One would have to conclude that the problem isn’t the people. Instead, the problem is the radical progressivism of the president and his Party. Now that the American people have seen for themselves what progressivism does to a country they have rejected progressivism.

Liberals, Independents, former Soetoro backers and Conservatives alike have rejected the president’s ideology. A man who would take it upon himself to fundamentally change the United States of America something that no U.S. president is elected to do has lost the confidence of the American people for repeatedly acting outside of his constitutional authority.

Therefore, the president is marshalling a coalition of minority special interest groups with the expressed intentions of fundamentally changing the United States by the use of these groups.

The majority of Americans have good cause to think that the Soetoro administration hates them. Everything that this administration has done suggest that it does. From its refusal to prosecute the New Black Panthers on federal voter intimidation charges because the victims were White. To refusing to protect the United States’ borders from the government sanctioned invasion of Mexican nationals. To the suing of Arizona when the state attempted to enforce legal laws protecting itself from an illegal invasion. All these acts have Americans wondering if this president hates this country.

This president has done more to divide this nation than any other president in the history of America. This president is the anti-Lincoln.

Tuesday, August 02, 2011

One sided Compromise

Speaking on the floor of the Senate Saturday, Marco Rubio (R-Fl.) said, "If we had a billion dollars for every time I heard the words 'Tea Party extremist,' we could solve this debt problem."

Proving his point about the vitriolic name-calling of conservatives so prevalent now, New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman began his most recent piece, "Watching today's Republicans being led around by an extremist Tea Party":
--Noel Sheppard
Everyone who follows Creating Orwellian Worldview already understands the Liberal’s plan to defame Conservatives, the Tea Parties, Fox News and Republicans.
Liberal politicians and liberal pundits in the Progressive media alike use defamation has their principle tactic against all who they perceive to be on the Right as Noel Sheppard reports regarding a Thomas Friedman NYT article. (see article)

It is the strategy of the Progressive Daily Kos Leftists to demonize the Right thereby dehumanizing the people on the Right so that Progressive hatred of the Right and it’s institutions is justified in their minds.

Liberal Progressives are consumed by a 21st century slave master's mentality. One which human beings are looked at as less than human. Slave masters were able to justify all manner of brutal inhuman treatment of their “slaves.” This is how Liberals look at Conservatives and Conservative causes, less than.

Therefore Liberal Progressives attempt to brutally dehumanize the Fox News network, Conservatives, The Tea Parties, Christians, using insults, ridicule, derision, disrespect, slander and Libel.

The President sets himself apart as the only president in recent history that has used these Liberal Progressive tactics so brazenly against the oppose Party. By his own doing he is not the president of the people of the United States of American. He has set himself up as the president of only the Progressive Left of this country. To which he has intimated openly in front of partisan gatherings that Republicans are the enemy.

If the U.S. defaults for the first time in it’s history it will because an Uber-partisan Black president and his ultra-partisan Party burned bridges of bi-partisanship for 2 ½ years forcing through their historic massive Progressive spending agenda and told Republicans to go pound sand as they were doing it.

Even in a time when there is the need for bi-partisan cooperation and collaboration in Washington D.C. in light of the looming Debt crisis Democrats continue to use inflammatory language and unkind references to describe Republicans. (see 5:09min video)

Noel Sheppard refers to Sen. Marco Rubio’s speech regarding the debt ceiling debate that was given on the Senate floor. In that speech Sen. Rubio spoke about the vitriol with which Liberals assault Conservatives. Also in this clip Democrat Sen. Kerry took offense and tried to justify the fact that the president voted against raising the debt limit when he was a Senator about 8mins in video. (see 14:02min video)

What is underlining in this debt debate or any debate in Washington is the continued guerrilla word warfare Liberals have engaged in against Republicans.

Rusty Weiss reports at Big Journalism that the Progressive Media, the president and Democrats march in Lockstep with their current meme that the Tea Parties are terrorists.

Democrats continue to demand compromise of Republicans who are in fact compromising when Democrats themselves are failing to compromise at all.

Liberals asks for compromise before the cameras but are continuously plotting to defeat their Republicans counterparts. Liberals have turn this argument into much more that an argument about the debt ceiling.

To Liberals this is, as everything to them is, this is about defeating Republicans. That is the reason why the Progressive media and Liberal politicians alike have turned this debate upside down to argue that Republicans will not compromise.

The truth is, it is Liberal Democrats who are the insurgent non-compromising ones in this debate, they are ones holding up progress in this crisis that we all face.

If the U.S. defaults for the first time in it’s history it will because an Uber-partisan Black president and his ultra-partisan Party burned bridges of bi-partisanship for 2 ½ years forcing through their historic massive Progressive spending agenda and told Republicans to go pound sand as they were doing it.

If Democrats want compromise they should try it. Try compromising on the excessive gains in spending which increased U.S. debt by four times. Democrats put that spending in place in the last 2 1/2 years. Democrats did this in spite of the president's campaign promise to cut the deficit in half during his first term in office.

If Democrats really want to compromise then start by honoring the president's campaign promise to cut the deficit in half in his first term, that's a start.

The other thing Democrats should do is stop burning bridges of bipartisanship. They can do that by ending the smear jihad that they wage against Conservatives and Conservative causes.

Monday, August 01, 2011

Obama says Deal?

On Sunday July 31, 2011, president Barry Hussein Soetoro announced that Congress has come to terms preventing the United States from defaulting on its debts. Although Congress hasn’t voted on anything yet the president, it seems, couldn’t wait to rush to the podium with the good news. (see 4:13min video)

Following is a Speaker of the House John Boehner’s apparent successful PowerPoint presentation given to his Republican caucus.

3 7-31-11 Debt Framework Boehner

Blogger Chris Cillizza sees this agreement as a win for America. (see story)

"Reductions of the magnitude now being proposed, if adopted, would likely lead Moody's to adopt a negative outlook on the AAA rating," the credit rating agency said in a new report. "The chances of a significant improvement in the long-term credit profile of the government coming from deficit reductions of the magnitude proposed in either plan are not high."-- Peter Schroeder

Moody's Investors Service sees the agreement as too little too late. Not enough cuts. $2.2 trillion dollars according to Associated Press over 10years doesn’t realistically keep pace with U.S. spending. (see story)

Remember Democrats want compromise, which means they want business as usual, meaning in this case that Democrats want spending to continue as usual.

According to Moody, this deal may be enough to give the illusion of success for politicians however; the reality is this deal may not be enough to keep the U.S. AAA credit rating.