Thursday, January 31, 2013

A Voice for the 2nd Amendment

“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."--Benjamin Franklin
Henson Ong an American Citizen and a Legal immigrant expresses what many so-called American citizens have apparently forgotten. (see 5:10min video)

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Talk of Jobs conspicuous by its Absence

Where is all of that high-falutin talk of Jobs, where is the president’s jobs council, and where is the president poetic rhetoric about solar, wind and air?

Absent from the market square of ideas that’s where they are. Replacing them are the absurdities that will only further weaken an already fragile U.S. economy.
What are the topics that presently consume the media and the government today? Think about it, I’ll give you a moment. Time’s up! Okay if you said advancing Homosexuality, if you said an unconstitutional assault against the 2nd amendment, if you said granting 40 million illegal foreign nationals amnesty and U.S. citizenship, if you said implementing more usurious taxes on the rich (and everyone else) and if you said implementing new bogus and costly federal regulations under the guise of Climate Change you would be absolutely correct.

What is not being discussed by media or government is the fact that the current administration has done nothing on the topic of jobs. If you recalled the president promised to make jobs his number one priority. He stated emphatically that neither he nor his administration would rest until they solved the jobs problem in America. He made such promises in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 but in 2013 not so much.

This president and this media have pivoted to an all out full frontal assault on the American people and their constitution. With a radical hard left manifesto to fundamentally change the United States into the economic mess that Greece and Spain are. This president has only focused on social issues and only those that divide us. Yet no one has had the temerity to ask the question, “ Mr. President what about the good green shovel ready jobs that you promised America?”

I don’t relish being the bearer of bad tidings America but the fact of the matter is there are no “good” jobs and there will be no “good” jobs in the near future according to a new report published by Richard Vedder, Christopher Denhart, and Jonathan Robe entitled “Why are Recent College Graduates Underemployed?” (see below)

Why are Recent College Graduates Underemployed? by



This Report highlights the following:

• About 48 percent of employed U.S. college graduates are in jobs that the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) suggests requires less than a four-year college education. Eleven percent of employed college graduates are in occupations requiring more than a high-school diploma but less than a bachelor’s, and 37 percent are in occupations requiring no more than a high-school diploma;

• The proportion of overeducated workers in occupations appears to have grown substantially; in 1970, fewer than one percent of taxi drivers and two percent of firefighters had college degrees, while now more than 15 percent do in both jobs;

• About five million college graduates are in jobs the BLS says require less than a high-school education;

• Comparing average college and high-school earnings is highly misleading as a guide for vocational success, given high college-dropout rates and the fact that overproduction of college graduates lowers recent graduate earnings relative to those graduating earlier;

• Not all colleges are equal: Typical graduates of elite private schools make more than graduates of flagship state universities, but those graduates do much better than those attending relatively non-selective institutions;

• Not all majors are equal: Engineering and economics graduates, for example, typically earn almost double what social work and education graduates receive by mid-career;

• Past and projected future growth in college enrollments and the number of graduates exceeds the actual or projected growth in high-skilled jobs, explaining the development of the underemployment problem and its probable worsening in future years;

• Rising college costs and perceived declines in economic benefits may well lead to declining enrollments and market share for traditional schools and the development of new methods of certifying occupation competence.

No one is talking about jobs America. Granting amnesty to 40 million citizens of Mexico and Latin America will only exacerbate the strain on an already hopeless job market. All the other talk of guns, homosexuality and climate change is just white noise to prevent you from thinking about our failed leadership and the real crisis this country faces.

Where is all of that high-falutin talk of Jobs, where is the president’s jobs council, and where is the president poetic rhetoric about solar, wind and air?

Absent from the market square of ideas that’s where they are. Replacing them are the absurdities that will only further weaken an already fragile U.S. economy.

Source of report and statistics:

Thursday, January 24, 2013

What difference does it make at this point?

With all due respect, the fact is, we had four dead Americans–was it because of a protest or because of guys out for a walk one night and decided to go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator.

Now honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this but the fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information. The I.C. has a process, I understand, going with the other committees to explain how these talking points came out. But, you know, to be clear, it is, from my perspective, less important today, looking backwards
—Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State
What difference at this point does it make? At what point Ms. Clinton? Oh, you mean the point, which you and the Obama administration stalled out the investigation into the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Glen Doherty, Sean Smith and Tyrone Woods. That point?

First, stalling until after the reelection of Barry Hussein Soetoro? Or do you mean after the point of your alleged “fall and concussion” dragging out your testimony over weeks. Was it your intentions to run the clock out on Benghazi making any question regarding the tragic events stale dated, irrelevant and moot?

The fact is the administration had real time Intel and seven hours to react to the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya however someone in the White house decided against attempting to save the lives of Americans that is the point.

The difference is Ms. Clinton the American people care about who left four Americans to die in Benghazi and apparently, no one in the Democrat Party, The White house or the State Department under your authority does. (see 2:09min video)



The fact is the Soetoro administration lied to the American people repeatedly telling Americans that the attack on the American Consulate was caused because of an Internet video. The administration knew all along and at the beginning, that it was a terrorist attack.

We all know what happened Ms. Clinton. Americans were left to die in Benghazi by the Soetoro administration. What difference does this make at this point? Apparently, none Ms Clinton, four American died while the White house stood idly by and did nothing.

It doesn’t matter why the Consulate was attacked what matters is why the Soetoro administration decided not to respond to the attack. Ms. Clinton’s appearance before the House committee did not produce the answer that question.

Ms. Clinton’s appearance was a smoke screen meant to give the look of answering the question without actually answering the questions of Benghazi.

Why didn’t the Soetoro administration go to the aid of Americans? Ms. Clinton’s answer… At this point what difference does it make?

The president was reelected, Hillary Clinton assumed blame but will receive any consequences and mid-managers were fired as scapegoats instead of the president and Ms. Clinton facing the blame for their incompetency.

To answer your question Ms. Clinton, apparently it makes no damn difference at all, no difference at all.

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Obama's Second Inaugural Address: Unity through Duplicity

In Orwellian worldview, Peace is War. It is the same in this president’s doublethink language. Unity is war against the GOP
Words mean something. The only problem is getting people to agree to their meaning. According to the American Bar Association, there were 1,116, 967 licensed attorneys in June of 2006. The number rose to 1,128,729 by the end of 2006, and grew to 1,143,358 by the end of 2007. Number of lawyers for each state in those years can be found on "Lawyers By State" on the ABA Website.

Attorneys spend a significant amount of time massaging words and meaning into duplicitous bifurcated forks in the road that lead either to confusion or to improbability. Rarely does an attorney use words to lead to truth. Ultimately, words are tools used to persuade to an attorney’s point of view not for pursue of truth.

That is why I prefer most anyone other than an attorney for President.

This opinion may seem a bit overbroad, and forgive me if you are the exception to the paradigm. You may be someone who uses your skills of persuasion to champion truth. However even you must admit that you were taught to argue both sides of an argument whether right or wrong.

In fact right or wrong does not exist for must attorneys. For many attorneys all things are relative or as each one perceive his or her understanding of what is real.

In our litigious society, all is relative. Nothing is, as it seems. A simple constitutional matter such as governmental mandated healthcare, unconstitutional on its face can be declared both unconstitutional and constitutional according to Chief Justice John Roberts and made the law of the land in a surreal judgment that all but guaranteed the reelection of Barry Hussein Soetoro.

Which brings me to my point, the president in this inauguration speech spoke of unity. In fact he quoted the Declaration of Independence, “"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."”

He continued, “Today we continue a never-ending journey, to bridge the meaning of those words with the realities of our time. For history tells us that while these truths may be self-evident, they have never been self-executing;”

Thereafter the president laid forth an agenda not for all Americans but the same agenda that he and his fellow progressives attempted to push forward in this first four years as president. And though in his second inaugural address he cloaked his Partisanship with the “royal we” throughout the speech he was really speaking to his Progressive base as reported by Tom Curry of MSNBC (see article).

Peter Baker of the NYTimes reports that the President was laying out a Liberal vision for America. (see article)

Michael Kinsley of Bloomberg describes the President’s speech as giving a Liberal’s definition of Rights (see article)

And David Corn of Mother Jones saw the president’s speech as a direct appeal to his sycophants to help him move his agenda this second term (see article)

To the uninformed or to the already Liberal minded person what they heard was a call for unity. However, to others the president’s speech was an in-yo-face promise to jam the rest of the Progressive agenda down the throats of dissenting Americans who do not share the same values or vision was Barry Hussein Soetoro and the Progressive Left.

Even at his moment of swearing on Lincoln’s bible President Soetoro became the anti-Lincoln. In president Lincoln's, second inaugural Lincoln sought to bind the wounds of our nation at the end of a divisive Civil War. President Lincoln said, “One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war.” He further remarked, “Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away.”

“Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether."

“With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.”


In contrast, President Soetoro inaugural address was a call to his Progressive constituents for a continuation if not an escalation of the Progressive ideological war against Conservatism and the GOP. This would be the equivalent of Lincoln calling on the North to completely destroy the South.(see full address)

This is the attitude that the president will promote over the next four years as he advances the ideologies of the Left, Global Warming, redistribution, homosexuality, illegal aliens voting in U.S. elections, voter fraud and voiding first and second amendment rights.

All of this he will attempt to do duplicitously as he speaks of unity just as he did in his first four years. He may well succeed this time because the majority of Americans do not understand that what the president says means something totally different to him than it does to them.

In Orwellian worldview, Peace is War. It is the same in this president’s doublethink language. Unity is war against the GOP (see previous post)

Friday, January 18, 2013

Democrats use Jedi Mind Tricks on the American People Regarding Guns

He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security—Benjamin Franklin
The American people are perhaps the most manipulated people in the world. Corporations spend billions upon billions of dollars a year telling Americans what to think, what to eat, what to wear, etc.

Corporations use words, ideas and images as if they were rapid-fire bullets shot from assault rifles. Corporations target and hunt children, adolescents and adults as if we are deer in open season.

I don’t have to tell you that! You see the commercials every day. You go to the movies that are social conditioning centers, which transmit the latest social values to the unsuspecting moviegoer.

Therefore, it isn’t surprising that our politicians have picked up on the secret of how to get the American people to buy into any political propaganda they might use as if it is the gospel truth.

Case in point, do you really think that the recent discussion about eviscerating the 2nd amendment of the Constitution of the Untied States of America is about saving children?

Did you see the children that the president shielded himself with in a well thought-out visual message meant to convey the idea that he wasn’t really single-handedly pre-empting the Constitution by executive order. No what he was really doing is making it safer for our children.

The many acts that our president employs are stagecraft. They are methods they are tricks to persuade you to buy into your own enslavement. If you will willingly lay down your resistance to governmental tyranny or if you will compliantly accept unconstitutional acts from your elected representatives then where will be no need to restrain you physically. Yet!

To best describe what the president and Democrats are doing I refer to George Lucus’ Star Wars. The Characters of the Jedi Knights use a thought control devise which was based on suggestion.

The Knight would suggest an idea to a likely candidate and the unsuspecting low brow would mindlessly comply with the Jedi’s thought suggestion. Much like we see coming from the White house and media today.

The White house makes a statement the media unquestioningly repeats it and the sycophants and supporters of the Democrat Party mindlessly pick up such transmissions or statements as truth.

It’s like, “These aren’t the droids you are looking for.” When the droids or fact are indeed the ones we are looking for and they are stand right there in our faces. Nevertheless, because of the suggestion to the contrary we fail to see the droids.

And it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.—Barry Hussein Soetoro



Now to make this crystal clear. When the president was first running for office in 2008 he, describe a segment of American working-class voters in Pennsylvania and the Midwest as “bitter clingers” people who had lost all hope in government and had only their religion and guns to cling. This is the reason that the president wants to separate Americans from their guns. He wants Americans dependent on Government and less free. (listen 1:39min clip)



So how best does a tyrannical government pry guns and religion from the hands of these “bitter clingers”? Democrats believe the answer is that they enact laws designed to do what is normally not done. For instance in the Patient’s Affordable Health Care law Democrats added conditions that violate some Americans’ religious principles. Thereby forcing Americans to choose between their faiths or to accept the law.

In addition, Democrats are creating conflict within the society by weakening parts of the Constitution, which they disagree by selective enforcement or non-enforcement. Also,they use instances of gun violence as these instances occur in our society to promote a false notion that the 2nd amendment needs to be repealed or in the very least fixed. (see 23 executive orders regarding guns)

23 Executive Orders Regarding Violating the 2nd Amendment by



This proposed disarmament and /or regulation of the American people is exactly the wrong thing to do. The founding fathers realized the corrupting affect of government would eventually manifest in America. Government corruption is happening or has happened in every other government known to man. They also knew that the only way to protect American people from a government that would attempt to enslave them is to have the right to keep and bear arms and they believe that right should not be infringed upon or “regulated”.

Yet Democrats tell Americans they are proposing gun control measures not to violate the Constitution but rather to protect the American people from gun violence.

That brings me back to founding father Benjamin Franklin who said, “He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security.”

Democrats would have Americans willingly give up the Constitutional right to protect themselves be it from gangs, robbers or a tyrannical government.

This is the Jedi mind trick; “You really don’t need to protect yourselves from a government that is operating outside of the Constitution” is the suggestion to the weak-minded sycophants of the Democrat Party.

The Government then signs executive orders to strip the American people of their God given and Constitutional enumerated right to keep and bear arms. The sycophants applaud on cue and repeat the Gov. Andrew Cuomo rant, “No one needs 10 bullets to kill a deer!” That statement Governor is a non sequitur.

The Constitutional right to keep and bear arms un-infringed has absolutely nothing to do with hunting. However, it has everything to do with freedom. That is what this national discussion is about, freedom. It is not about false measures or laws that will not prevent gun violence or save one child. Moreover, this discussion is not about hunting.

Controlling America’s guns is about an agenda to change the Constitution by popular consensus rather than by the legislative process. The legislative process is the only legal way outlined within the Constitution for change not executive order and not popular consensus.

The current discussion of “Gun Control” is designed to trick your mind into thinking that the government is saving children when in fact the opposite is occurring. Actually, government is striping the children of their right to live free under a Constitution.

These are the facts you are looking for. Please disregard the Government Jedi mind trick on guns!

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Why Conservatives and Republicans are hated By Liberals and Democrats

Simply stated Liberals hate Conservatives for what Conservatives represent. The stable home life, do your homework, pick up after yourself mentality. Whereas Liberals self identify with “others” who make the Parent group look kind of square, kind of old and out dated.
You’ve seen dramatizations of rebellious teens conflicting with parents who have worked hard to provide a home, food and a constructive environment for their offspring. Some of you are probably experiencing such a family crisis now.

The teen most often is conflicted between values that his or her parents attempt to teach and values, which the teen has picked up from outside influences such as friends, the media, teachers, etc.

Wanting to be accepted by those who are outside of the familiar sphere the teen often lashes out at the people who care about them the most, their parents. This causes what might be described as the “generation gap.” The so-called “gap” is the wall erected by a teen who is now attempting to cut off family influences so that he or she many appear to be like friends, media, teachers and the rest of those who represent pop culture or popular influences.

If one were to apply this logic to Conservatives and Liberals, the parallels might surprise you if you haven’t thought about it before. In the “Beaver Cleaver” 1950’s and back, everyone in the United States was “Conservative.” Over all America was religiously conservative. I refer to this as the Parent group.

In the late 50’s into the 1960’s there started a cultural revolution. The young begin to reject the parent group and split off from Conservative values. While Conservatism remained stationary this splitter group moved left. I call this new movement “Liberals.” The Adolescent group.

What we see in today’s politics is the logical conclusion of adolescents rejecting parents. If you’ve ever heard an adolescent scream, I hate you, I hate you, I hate you, to a parent and if you understand what is behind that immature sentiment, then you know what the dynamic between today’s Liberals and Conservatives is.

Simply stated Liberals hate Conservatives for what Conservatives represent. The stable home life, do your homework, pick up after yourself mentality. Whereas Liberals self identify with “others” who make the Parent group look kind of square, kind of old and out dated.

Liberals or the adolescent group self identify with anyone other than the parent group. For example in a resent sale of his Channel One broadcast cable network Progressive Liberal and inventor of Global warming Al Gore had a choice to sell his network to either Conservative up and coming cable TV entrepreneur Glenn Beck or Sharia Law promoter and Islamic Owned cable TV network al Jazeera. (see story)

Gore chose al Jazeera. He claimed al Jazeera was more philosophically aligned with him than America loving, American born and raised Conservative Glenn Beck. Al Jazeera is owned by the Saudis who represent Big Oil and world domination through Islam. Gore is more aligned with big oil and Islam than a Conservative American patriot? (see story)

Might I note that Glenn Beck supports American values and the preservation of America. Again Beck is “Conservative.” Whereas al Jazeera is promoting the total worldwide Arab domination of the religion of Islam and Sharia Law.

Al Gore’s Liberal Progressivism or his allegiance to the adolescent group would have him align himself with the enemies of freedom rather than help the purveyors of freedom and American values protect America. This is simply astonishing!

This hate of Conservatives is manifested in the president and the Left. They are radicalized to the point that they would see America destroyed rather than see Conservatives maintain American values for all posterity.

The vehement vitriol seen spewing forth from the Left is the same anger that adolescents display when they are enraged because their parents insist that family values are more important than being like those influences outside of the parent group.

That said I attribute the partisanship demonstrated in our politics today as a direct result of the Left rejecting Conservativism and moving to extreme Leftwing positions. So extreme in fact that Al Gore would sell an American network to enemies of America who are avowed to destroy America and establish suppressive Islamic Sharia Law worldwide.

Monday, January 14, 2013

Continued: Obama and Democrats want to impose UN Gun Control on America

Last post I explained Democrats current effort to, “never let a good crisis go to waste” this effort is currently known as the “Gun Crisis.” I believe the Democrats’ effort is part and parcel of a broader United Nations initiative to regulate small arms globally. (see previous post)

The President supports the UN effort. He did not want you to know but now that the tragic Sandy Hook elementary massacre has created the opportunity of “crisis” Democrats are using the emotional value of Sandy Hook to attack the 2nd amendment.

Fundamentally changing the constitution is what the President promised he would do if given the chance. And this “crisis” lends itself to the anti-Constitutionalists that abhor both the 1st and the 2nd amendments.

As promised last post following are the Documents which show the United Nations’ efforts to supersede laws of sovereign nations by implementing global gun regulation. Also you will find letters from both Democrats and Republicans addressing the President’s support of the UN’s efforts and warning him against violating the U.S. Constitution.

UN CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM & STRENGTHENING OF LEGAL INSTITUTIONS MEASURES TO REGULATE FIREARMS

UN Justice Reform & Strengthening of Legal Institutions Measures to Regulate Firearms by



DEMOCRAT LETTER RE: 2ND AMENDMENT

Democrat Letter to President Obama rejecting WH plans to support UN measures requiring Gun Control by



REPUBLICAN LETTER RE: 2ND AMENDMENT

Republican Letter to the President re: 2nd Amendment Rights by



UN REPORT OF THE SECRETARY GENERAL ON SMALL ARMS

UN Report of the Secretary General on Small Arms by



UNODA FACTSHEET ON GLOBAL GUN REGULATION

UNODA Factsheet on Global Gun Regulation by

Friday, January 11, 2013

UN is behind Gun Control like they're behind Climate Change

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety—Benjamin Franklin
You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before —Rahm Emanuel
They’re back! Like huge global poltergeists the UN is the spirit behind the newest U.S. crisis “Gun Control.”

If one remembers, the UN was and is the force behind the other world-wide crisis “Global warming.” Global warming or its more acceptable upgrade “Climate Change” is a plot and ploy to control and regulate carbon emissions globally.

One thing that is for certain the UN is for global control without representation. In other words the United Nations is attempting to be world government at the expense of the United States Constitution or as equally important, at the expense of any sovereign country’s right to govern itself as it’s people see fit.

With respect to the man-made crisis of gun control we now see playing out in media and in Washington D.C. we are witnessing the Rahm Emanuel dictum of never let a crisis go to waste.

What I mean is the president has been a supporter of gun control since his Illinois State Senate days. In addition he has supported the 2007 UN treaty on regulating small arms but could not publicly support it until he won the 2012 election.

Now that the elections are over and in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre the president feels at ease to let his true intentions be known.

Fortunely for him he can lead where he’s most comfortable, from behind, as the media and his political allies stoke the passions of the hard Left creating crisis to do what normally would not be permitted to do. And that is the president that the hard Left intent to enact the most draconian unconstitutional gun control measures in the history of the United States of America.

This effort will coincide with the UN measure to regulate small arms world-wide and voilĂ ! There you have it a Global ban on guns, all guns. Of course Democrats will say that they are simply regulating munitions and arms for the safety of the citizens of the United States however as one of our founders once said, “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

Wild conjuncture or speculation on my part, let’s see!

Twelve Democratic senators have joined 45 Republicans in a fast growing movement to halt progress on an Obama-backed United Nations effort that could bring international gun control into the United States and slap America's gun owners with severe restrictions. (reported in Washington Whispers)

Forbes magazine reports:

While the terms have yet to be made public, if passed by the U.N. and ratified by our Senate, it will almost certainly force the U.S. to:

1. Enact tougher licensing requirements, creating additional bureaucratic red tape for legal firearms ownership.

2. Confiscate and destroy all “unauthorized” civilian firearms (exempting those owned by our government of course).

3. Ban the trade, sale and private ownership of all semi-automatic weapons (any that have magazines even though they still operate in the same one trigger pull – one single “bang” manner as revolvers, a simple fact the ant-gun media never seem to grasp).

4. Create an international gun registry, clearly setting the stage for full-scale gun confiscation.

In short, overriding our national sovereignty, and in the process, providing license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights. (Forbes)

The United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA)

The UN a Global force for preempting national sovereignty (UNODA)
United Nations treaty that is supported by Obama would undermine U.S. Sovereignty Global Gun Control

More proof Obama and the hard Left supports gun global gun control UN Treaty has Obama Support

US Lawmakers are against the international UN treaty for now but they’ve been turned in the past. They can’t be trusted. (Congress against)

Democrats doing what they do best. Using Crisis to govern

Next the Treaty and related documents:

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Conservativism The Last Life Boat for America

The bottom line is Democrats won the presidential election by tapping into the lowest element of the American people, the debased, deluded and the Narcissists among us.
58% of Americans say that America is headed in the wrong direction according to a current Rasmussen poll. (see report)

Nothing new. Americans have been feeling that way for a long time. A year prior to the 2012 presidential elections 73% of Americans thought that the county was headed in the wrong direction. (see Politico).

Also around the same time a Washington Post poll suggests that Americans disapprove of what is transpiring in their country (see WP poll)

Yet with all of that, uncertainly the President was reelected. How is that explained?

I think I know. Psychiatrist Keith Ablow believes that a new analysis of the American Freshman Survey, which has accumulated data for the past 47 years indicates that America as produced a generation of deluded Narcissists (see article)

Who has been in control of America’s Education, Media and Politics for the last oh fifty years? Why the Liberal Progressives have. From K-12 to Undergrad to PhD degree Liberal progressive ideology has been the dominate force in our education, our media and our politics.

If Americans are deluded, Narcissists Liberal Progressives are responsible. Case in point, Jon Ward’s assessment in the Huffington Post entitled “Republican Party Path Back From 2012 Elections Require Shift in Culture, Not just Tactics” (see article)

Ward describes Democrats as in touch with the deluded Narcissists who reelected the president and Republicans not in touch and needing to learn how to get in touch.

Of course, Mr. Ward would not agree with my assessment of what he said in his article but that is exactly what he meant! (He wouldn’t agree what that statement either!)

The bottom line is Democrats won the presidential election by tapping into the lowest element of the American people, the debased, deluded and the Narcissists among us. America is the Titanic it has hit an iceberg of delusion and Narcissism if Psychiatrist Keith Ablow is believed. The last lifeboat floating is Conservativism.

Delusional Narcissists wish to destroy Conservativism because Conservativism turns the light of truth on their madness. That is why Liberal Progressives are demanding that the very last lifeboat, Conservativism, be turned so that it will ram into the same iceberg that is sinking an already disabled delusional Narcissist America.

Conservatives should resist because as 58% of Americans know America is headed in the wrong direction. America has crashed into the iceberg of delusion and Narcissism and is sinking fast. Conservatism is the last best hope for America, no the World!

Monday, January 07, 2013

Sandy Hook thought police

To be fair before a single six-year-old or a high school student is suspended or expelled for drawing a gun on paper, writing about a gun, pointing a finger like a gun shouldn’t all violent content be removed from elementary, secondary and college campuses in America? That would only be fair.
What should be done to a 6-year-old who points his finger at someone and says pow? (see article)

What should be done to a teen who upon reflection writes a poem about the mass murders of Sandy Hook school in Connecticut? In her ruminations, she suggests that she can understand why mass murderer Adam Lanza would make the awful choices that he made.

For thinking in-depth about a tragedy that happened in Newtown, Connecticut 17-year-old San Francisco high school senior, Courtni Webb was suspended and is facing “possible expulsion from school. (see article) (see 1:41min video)



Our society stands at the start of an era of Orwellian “Thought Control.” It has crept up upon us on little cat’s feet. No one could have told Americans 40 years ago that we would one day be repressing student’s thoughts rather than educating students about subjects and events around him or her, yet we are doing the unthinkable now.

American Educators have fought so hard in the last 40 years to allow such concepts as homosexuality to take root in the spirits and psyche of American’s children. They have done this in the spirit that everything is relative or acceptable so why is the mere thought of using a gun reviled by the same people who virtually teach unfettered sexuality as if there are no consequences to wrong sexual choices.

The 6-year-old, who attends Roscoe R. Nix Elementary School in Silver Spring, made a gun with his hands, pointed it at another student and said "pow," according to Robin Ficker, the boy's attorney. He was given a one-day suspension, with a conference on the matter planned for Jan. 2, the day students return to school from winter break.—Matt Connelly



Today in some minds, a child cannot point a finger, write a poem or hold a pencil in the likeness of a gun. Gun ownership is not illegal on the contrary gun ownership by citizens is a Constitutional right. The first amendment says, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Look up the word “infringed” sometime you may be surprised it means unobstructed in any way.

Therefore, one would think that Educators would understand that Zero tolerance with respect to guns theoretically violates the spirit of Constitutional law. If not they should understand at the very least that suppressing language and thought on any subject is fundamentally at the heart of what tyrannous depot dictatorships do.

In the 60’s and 70’s the Left made it their business to push the envelope where controversial subject matter was concerned. Lenny Bruce, Richard Pryor and George Carlin said things that challenged establishment belief systems.

The 60’s and 70’s where eras of radical social change in all aspects of human understanding. However, now that Liberal Progressive thought dominates the culture and Liberal Progressive values are in full control Liberals in turn are attempting to close the door behind them. In other words, Liberals are attempting to repress thoughts and ideas they disagree with.

If this had happened to them in the 60’s and 70’s sexual, promiscuity and Liberal Progressivism would not be established today. Nor would these concepts be unofficially promoted today by Educators while gun ownership is demonized.

Yet it is even worst. The very thought of a gun is punishable by suspension or expulsion or both. We see such instances in newspaper daily. So effectively, a child’s education can be terminated if he or she thinks of a gun. A child can think about pornography, gang banging, sexual promiscuity or homosexuality, all they desire, just don’t think of a gun.

The hypocrisy cries out against Educators from the Society’s hyper violent Movies, hyper violent video games and hyper violent and misogynistic Music.

Are schools presently allowing violent Movies to be played on campus? Do they allow violent and misogynistic music to be listened to on campus? Do they have books in their libraries that make mention of violence and picture guns on their pages. Do undergrads spend hours playing violent video games on campus?

To be fair before a single six-year-old or a high school student is suspended or expelled for drawing a gun on paper, writing about a gun, pointing a finger like a gun shouldn’t all violent content be removed from elementary, secondary and college campuses in America? That would only be fair.

If you say no, movies, video games and music should not be banned “Zero tolerance” from schools then why are you allowing the same unjust thought control to be acted out against innocent school children who write the word gun or point a finger? These children not only think about all our societies social ills that movies, video games and music represent but they also think about a first amendment right which is not morally or legally wrong to think about, write about or mimic.

Mass murder by any means is repugnant. However, what is even more repulsive to the American idea is to violate rights that are guaranteed in the Constitution. And among those rights are freedom of speech and the right, which says, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

If you are a decision maker in a school you might think about those two fundamental rights before you suspend, expel or falsely detain a student because he or she pointed a finger and made the sound pow.

If that action falls under your zero tolerance policy then so does books and film in your library as well as student’s talking about the latest video game or newest movie or song.

To be fair you must rid your libraries of all content with the word gun written therein or that has any pictures of a gun. All magazines and films must be examined and if guilt of showing a gun or referring to one you must destroy it. Just as you did with all the books that use the word Nigger.

Then if a child is heard speaking about a song, game or movie with violent content that student or students must be suspend and or expelled.

In the name of Zero tolerance you must do all of the above to be consistent of course. Or some parent may see your blaring inconsistency and hypocrisies and then sue you and your school for violations of Constitutional rights and equal protection under the law.

As the litigious society, that we are it could happen. No, believe me it will happen.

Friday, January 04, 2013

Filmmaker Oliver Stone acknowledges that America is under Orwellian Rule

Oliver Stone and Peter Kuznick belong to the Liberal Democrat Progressive mind trust. They say president Barry Hussein Soetoro is ushering in an era of repressive government tyranny not yet seen in the United States of America.
Since 1998, this blog has been attempting to alert you dear reader of the dangers of Orwellian Worldview as it has been employed against the people of the United States of America. I am somewhat saddened that it has taken notables in the film and entertainment industry this long to see this reality. However, it is just now that some on the Left are catching on to the fact that there are tyrannous overtones in the way that the U.S. government is choosing to function under a Liberal Progressive administration.

Filmmaker Oliver Stone is one such person who has come to the realization that we are no longer living as free people in America. Americans, according to Stone and his collaborator Historian Peter Kuznick, now realize that the American people are just as imprisoned today as the Japanese were when they were rounded up and interned in America during WWII. (see article)

You also cover Pearl Harbor, which of course led to the internment of Japanese American citizens. I do not think a lot of people acknowledge that once again underreported aspect of really what that meant. When you look at the surveillance grid in America today it almost seems like it is an open-air internment camp, where they do not need to intern people anymore because we have this grid set up in place. What do you guys think about that?—Russian Times



Liberals have done great harm to the United States of America due to their untethering of the United States from it’s traditional Democratic Republic Constitutional moorings with their Liberal Progressive ideologies (see 14:48min video)



Democrats have successfully polarized politics so much so that the average Democrat or Liberal Progressive will not listen to truth. They will only give credence to views coming from their fellow Liberal Democrat Progressives.

Oliver Stone and Peter Kuznick belong to the Liberal Democrat Progressive mind trust. They say president Barry Hussein Soetoro is ushering in an era of repressive government tyranny not yet seen in the United States of America.

They say there is no comparison in American annuals to what this president is doing. Soetoro is unprecedented as a president not only in skin color but also by anti-American, anti-Constitutional ideology.

These are not Conservative men so how can you or anyone blindly disregard their warnings. Have we become so Partisan that we no longer can be objective?

Yes and we can thank Al Gore for that! (see previous post)

Wednesday, January 02, 2013

White men can’t Jump or Deal if they belong to the GOP

Senate minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Speaker of the House John Boehner


Apparently, the saying is true White men can’t jump. Rather than calling the president’s bluff concerning going over the fiscal cliff the GOP let it be known that they prefer not to jump. However what they also revealed is they cannot negotiate or deal with Liberal Progressive Democrats either.

Senate minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Speaker of the House John Boehner are go-along-to get-along (GATGA) elected Republican representatives. In other words, as it has been for years, there is a certain self-hating element in the Republican Party that agrees more with Liberal Democrats than they agree with Conservative Republicans and Conservative Americans.

The above description is hardly the worst I can say about Misters McConnell and Boehner but I’ll just let actions speak for these two political Neanderthals and you decide if I’m correct in my assessments.

In 2008, Conservative Americans sent Representatives to the Congressional House to stop Obamatax, government run-away spending and higher taxes. What the Washington establishment did, through the establishment Republicans or as I have named them the GATGA Republicans, was immediately dub the people’s Conservative Representatives “Tea Party” Representatives in a move to both ostracize and contain the Conservative movement.

However, what is most frustrating is how GATGA Republicans “got played” concerning the “Fiscal Cliff” and “Debt Ceiling” manufactured crisis. Yes that’s correct I said manufactured crisis.

The Senate-White House compromise grudgingly passed by the House is a Beltway classic: The biggest tax increase in 20 years in return for spending increases, and all spun for political purposes as a "tax cut for the middle class." But taxes on the middle class were only going up on January 1 because the politicians had set it up that way, manufacturing a fake crisis. The politicians now portray themselves as scrambling heroically to save the day by sparing the middle class while raising taxes on small business, investors and the affluent.—The WSJ



According to the WSJ Republican leadership has signed on to the biggest tax increases in 20 years in return for spending increases, and all spun for political purposes as a "tax cut for the middle class." But taxes on the middle class were only going up on January 1 because the politicians had set it up that way, manufacturing a fake crisis. (see article)

In other words, GATGA Republicans allowed and are complicit in what Liberal Progressive Democrats, the President, the Senate and the Media, falsified as protections for the “middle class” when in actuality they intended all along to raise taxes on everyone. And yes that means taxes are being raised on the middle class in the form of payroll taxes and other surtaxes.

Again, taxes are being raised on everyone while the president will be permitted to keep up the facade that he is fighting for the middle class and that he didn’t increase taxes on this group of taxpayers.

According to Sophie Quinton of the National Journal, The payroll tax cut won’t be extended for another year, meaning that working Americans will see their paychecks reduced in 2013. (see article)

Although Ms. Quinton couched the tax increase on the middle class in “Good News” it is nevertheless a tax increase one which employers are already defending themselves telling employees not to blame them when paychecks are less due to the payroll tax increase that Democrats allowed to expire.

Yes, I can remember the promise that the president made now about Obamatax he said not one cent of your taxes would be raised if it were passed. Well taxes will be raised because of Justice John Roberts' and president Soetoro’s healthcare taxes and these are only the beginning of the vast array of taxes that will be rolled out on the middle class starting in 2013.

Coming soon, Carbon taxes!