Wednesday, October 29, 2008


“[A]s radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution.”—Sen. Barack Obama
Ah, that’s what every American wishes to do break away from the essential constraints that are placed upon us by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution. And I suspect that this is the change that Sen. Obama has been talking about, along with redistributing wealth, in his campaign for Change and if elected no one should be surprised if a President Obama sees fit to break away from those essential constraints change the Constitution and take your money. (see story)(see video)

Actually that’s what Sen. Obama is already doing, why he’s even running for president knowing that he is an illegitimate candidate. He knows that his candidacy is unconstitutional and he knows that we know it too but if one is going to break away from the essential constraints placed upon us by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution what better way than to desecrate the Constitution with an ineligible Democratic presidential candidate.

And speaking about Sen. Obama’s words here’s more Obama on the Constitution:
I think that we can say that the Constitution reflected an enormous blind spot in this culture that is carried on until this day and the framers had that same blind spot.

And I don’t think that the two views are contradictory to say that it was a remarkable political document that paved the way for where we are now and to say that it also reflected the fundamental flaw of this country that continues until this day.
–Barack Hussein Obama (listen to recording)

The question is do you think that a President Obama will attempt to fix the fundamental flaw of the Constitution? What is interest about Sen. Obama is that he can hold two completely contradictory ideas in his mind at the same time and believe in them both. He just said that he believes that the constitution is fundamentally flawed and in the same sentence that it is a politically remarkable document. I’d say that that is a bit of Orwellian doublethink:

"To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself.

That was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed.”
—George Orwell, 1984

Above is how Sens. Obama and Sen. Biden think. That explains how he and Sen. Biden could say the most radical things and then completely contradict themselves.

When forced to be accountable for their words Obama and Biden strike out at the offending party, Joe the Plumber, Barbara West, CBS News or FoxNews with such venom and harmful intent that careers are destroyed and lives are ruined. (see story) (see video)

CBS3 discusses Biden ban on them:

FoxNews discusses an Obama administration black list on media that they don’t like:

Barbara West and Joe Biden interview that named Obama a Marxist and got West banned from the campaign:

If Sen. Obama is lying and planning a Fascist Marxist takeover of this government once he is inaugurated it will be almost impossible to impeach him or remove him with a Democrat controlled Congress and a dysfunctional state and federal judiciary.

Obama would have done it with words, just words and we must stop him with votes.