Tuesday, October 13, 2009

The Twisted reality of Global Warming

An Endangered Polar Bear?

I can’t believe that any rational intelligent person can still believe in Global warming. The proponents of this fallacy even changed the name of Global warming to Climate Change to obfuscate the fact that the Earth really wasn’t warming and the Carbon induced warming which they original claimed would destroy the world was all based on false science.

What is most disturbing is against a preponderance of evidence, no carbon induced warming since 1999, colder global temperatures in spite of elevated carbon in the atmosphere, these fanatics persist in their attempts to change the very essence of human existence based on their erroneous belief. Those who espouse this errant idea of Global warming cling to it like Al Gore clung to the hope that Chads and recounts would change the outcome of the 2000 U.S. elections.

Speaking of Al Gore, who has made millions from the Global warming scare and who is set to make millions more when President Soetoro and the U.S. Congress passes Global warming laws based on his Emmy, Oscar and Nobel Peace Prize awarded work for creating a global environment in which a lie can be accepted for an Inconvenient Truth. These days Gore is neatly sequestered behind a wall of political correctness which doesn’t allow anyone to question anything about his theory of Global warming.

And we all know that a thing or theory that can’t be questioned is not science it is dogma.

Environmental journalist and director of the documentary Not Evil Just Wrong Phelim McAleer attempted to get Mr. Gore to answer a question regarding a Court ruling in Great Britain where the Court ruled that his film An Inconvenient Truth could not be show in the public schools of Britain without the disclaimer warning children that Gore’s film exaggerated claims and was highly partisan in its presentation. (see 3:23 min video)

Mr. Gore lied and was protected by the organizers of the conference of environmental journals where he was speaking.

What the British Court actually ruled was Gore’s film, An Inconvenient Truth, exaggerated alarmist climate claims and represented Gore’s partisan political views on the subject and if shown to students in the British school system the film would have to be accompanied with a disclaimer warning students as such.

But how does a liar like Gore interpret the court’s ruling? Gore states, “The ruling was in favor of the movie by the way the ruling was in favor of showing the movie, Inconvenient Truth that was really the bottom-line on that.”

But that’s not the truth Mr. Gore the inconvenient truth is reported in the London Evening Standard, among other papers as such:

A controversial documentary on climate change which has been sent to thousands of schools has been criticised by a High Court judge for being 'alarmist' and 'exaggerated'.

Justice Burton said former US vice-president Al Gore's film, An Inconvenient Truth, was 'one-sided' and would breach education rules unless accompanied by a warning.

Despite winning lavish praise from the environmental lobby and an Oscar from the film industry, Mr Gore's documentary was found to contain 'nine scientific errors' by the judge. –The London Evening Standard (see source)

Even still environmental reporters can’t seem to bring themselves to report unbiasedly on the subject of Global warming even when faced with evidence that the earth is cooling in spite of raising CO2 levels. (see previous post)

Such admission would destroy the Global warming theory and reporters like Paul Hudson are aware of this. In his report What Happened to Global Warming Hudson’s own bias is readily seen thoughout his report. (see story)
This headline may come as a bit of a surprise, so too might that fact that the warmest year recorded globally was not in 2008 or 2007, but in 1998.

But it is true. For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures.

And our climate models did not forecast it, even though man-made carbon dioxide, the gas thought to be responsible for warming our planet, has continued to rise.
–Paul Hudson
Even though Hudson started out with this admission he spent the rest of his entire article attempting to breathe life into the failed theory of global warming. To the unbiased eye it was a twisted and failed attempt.

The theory of Global warming is an International fraud and scandal meant to put an international carbon tax on the people of the world. How else would you go along with a tax on the air that you breathe?

That’s right Global warming is an elaborate scheme to tax the air that you breathe. If you allow it you are truly deceived by those who have twisted reality in the name of Global warming.