Friday, September 28, 2007


George Soros

You ever heard of the term short selling? As I understand it, short selling is a way of manipulating money markets or a way of profitting from the decline in price of a security.

To profit from the stock price going down, short sellers can borrow a security and sell it, expecting that it will decrease in value so that they can buy it back at a lower price and keep the difference. The short seller owes his broker, who usually in turn has borrowed the shares from some other investor who is holding his shares long; the broker itself seldom actually purchases the shares to lend to the short seller.[1]

The lender of the shares does not lose the right to sell the shares. While the shares are lent, two investors have a right to sell the same shares. This has happened in 2007 in the UK with dramatic results, when shares in a Bank, Northern Rock, were £12 in February 2007 and £2 in September. Short sellers made over £1 billion in about seven months.

You ever heard of Black Wednesday?
On Black Wednesday (September 16, 1992), George Soros became immediately famous when he sold short more than $10 billion worth of pounds, profiting from the Bank of England's reluctance to either raise its interest rates to levels comparable to those of other European Exchange Rate Mechanism countries or to float its currency.

Finally, the Bank of England was forced to withdraw the currency out of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism and to devalue the pound sterling, and Soros earned an estimated US$ 1.1 billion in the process. He was dubbed "the man who broke the Bank of England."

The Times October 26, 1992, Monday quoted Soros as saying: "Our total position by Black Wednesday had to be worth almost $10 billion. We planned to sell more than that. In fact, when Norman Lamont said just before the devaluation that he would borrow nearly $15 billion to defend sterling, we were amused because that was about how much we wanted to sell."
Apparently money markets are manipulated by “investors” all the time for profit. One simply has to put money in the right place or one would use an elaborate trading mechanism to influence certain outcomes one could profit enormously.

So what if these practices were applied to politics. Could governments, people and politics be manipulated? And what if someone thought to use money to manipulate political outcomes, an idea that the founding fathers had in mind?

I don’t think so! Finally, Have you ever considered that everything that you believe politically is the result of someone manipulating public opinion with millions of dollars to influence your thinking? For instance what if “Global Warming” was a roost meant to manipulate, or what if opposition against Guantanamo Bay terrorist jails was orchestrated. What if one man is behind the opposition to the White house would that mean anything to you?

Who would do such a thing? György Schwartz would. György or George Soros as you know him (family name changed to prevent persecution for being Jewish) is behind much of the political manipulation which is causing the political upheaval we are now experiencing in the United States.

How many people, for instance, know that James Hansen, a man billed as a lonely "NASA whistleblower" standing up to the mighty U.S. government, was really funded by George Soros' Open Society Institute , which gave him "legal and media advice"?

Remember the Illegal Alien rallies that have filled the streets of America on May 1 for the last two years? George Soros' OSI had money-muscle there, too, through its $17 million Justice Fund. The fund lists 19 projects in 2006. One was vaguely described involvement in the immigration rallies. Another project funded illegal immigrant activist groups for subsequent court cases.

Open Society Institute cash backed terrorist-friendly court rulings.

Last year's Supreme Court ruling abolishing special military commissions for terrorists at Guantanamo was a Soros project

OSI gave support to Georgetown lawyers in 2006 to win Hamdan v. Rumsfeld — for the terrorists.

OSI also gave cash to other radicals who pressured the Transportation Security Administration to scrap a program called "Secure Flight," which matched flight passenger lists with terrorist names. It gave more cash to other left-wing lawyers who persuaded a Texas judge to block cell phone tracking of terrorists.

It's all part of the $74 million OSI spent on "U.S. Programs" in 2006 to "shape policy."

OSI partners with the Tides Foundation, which funnels cash from wealthy donors who may not want it known that their cash goes to fringe groups engaged in "direct action" — also known as eco-terrorism.

Also George Soros has a great influence in a secretive organization called "Democracy Alliance" whose idea of democracy seems to be government controlled solely of Democrats.

Whatever you think of Republicans or President G. W. Bush one thing is for certain the founding fathers never meant for our government to be controlled by secret agendas and well funded political action groups.

The most dangerous man in America is named George but not Bush. George Soros is the anathema of what America is supposed to be. And if you are a Democrat your party has by taken over by George Soros, you have been manipulated and used in Soros’ plan to change America’s government into his own image of what a government should be.

George Soros is a master of Manipulation. That is why Democrats must be defeated! Original Source information

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Secret Internal Poll and Memo Leaked: Democrats won’t Win?

Senators Clinton and Obama

Did you see the poll? No you didn’t. Google it you won’t find it. It was leaked to the Washington Post along with an internal memo did you see any of it printed in the Post?

Nope? You know why? Because it’s about Democrats stupid!
The survey by the Democratic pollsters Lake Research indicated that both Mrs Clinton and Barack Obama, second in the Democratic race, trailed Rudy Giuliani, the Republican front runner, in 31 swing congressional districts.
You can bet your last money that if this story had George Bush on it anywhere Katie Couric would be standing on the desk of the CBS nightly news with megaphone in hand exclaiming, “Hey Dan we finally get that killer story on Bush!”

The story did make print in the United Kingdom. It printed in the UK’s paper the Telegraph that’s where I found it.
"We're not commenting on this poll," said Daniel Gotoff, co-author of the memo accompanying the Lake Research poll. "It was leaked and obviously not by us."
The poll suggests that neither Hillary Clinton nor Barak Obama can win in a general election and that has Democrats worried.

The secret Democrat poll also indicates that generically Democrats have higher popularity than Republicans, (The media and Democrats have worked for 8 years to make that happen) however when the names Clinton or Obama are add to the question that changes significantly in critical swing states and among Independents Senator Clinton has "high negatives" among voters but the assessment of Senator Obama that his "image is soft, and one-fifth of voters do not gave a firm impression of him" was a surprise.

This story is really a twofer, yes this is a reality check for many Liberals. Liberals have that tendency of waking up the morning after an election to ask the question, “What happened I thought we were winning.” This story is as much about Liberal self deceit as it is about Liberal media not reporting any negatives about Democrats.

The reality of it is, Hillary Clinton can’t win in the General election(She can’t even raise as much money as Obama now) Democrats have been whispering about it all along but were willing to see if the Clinton spin Machine could defeat the Republicans (Democrats are willing to compromise anything to win.) Apparently Democrats thought that the negatives that they’ve created about the Republicans would be enough to cover even Senator Clinton they are now reassessing those views.
Frank Luntz, a leading Republican pollster, said: "This poll reveals what grassroots Democrats have been concerned about. Hillary is their choice ideologically but not necessarily politically and they're afraid she could lose.
"Democrats want to win more than anything else and they will compromise on policy to achieve electability." Mrs Clinton, he said, prompted a series of perceptions that could damage her.
The big problem with Liberals is that their campaigns are based on deceit so much so that they often are victims of their own deception. I’m thinking 2000 and 2004 when liberal were in this euphoric state thinking that no one would vote for George Bush.
How ironic that the actual reality in 2008 is that no one will vote for Hillary or Obama, no one except maybe the hard left and George Soro’s minions.

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Supreme Court could put 2008 Democrat Elections in Jeopardy

The Supreme Court said on Tuesday it would rule on whether U.S. voters must show a government-issued photo identification at the polls, a divisive issue ahead of next year's national elections. – James Vicini
What could possibly keep Democrats from voting in the all important 2008 Presidential elections? Photo I.D.s that’s what! That’s not me talking that’s what Democrats believe.

Democrats have challenged, all the way to the United States Supreme Court, a state of Indiana requirement which requires all voters to show photo I.D.

Apparently Democrats walk around and/or drive without any photo identification and asking a Democrat for photo I.D. would cause an undue hardship on voters in the upcoming 2008 Presidential elections.

Preposterous you think! You think that I’ve gone over the deep end? No but that is exactly what lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Indiana Democratic Party will be arguing before the Supreme Court as they attempt to make a case that such a requirement on voters in American elections would cause an unfair burden on the right to vote, especially on the elderly, poor, disabled or homeless.

It’s just like the ACLU and Democrats to think about all those unprotected voting groups out there who are without identification. I’m just wondering why their most important unprotected voting group, people who are in this country illegally, are not named! (Wink, wink)

The ACLU had better discuss this with my HMO, one of the largest in my state; because they now require that I show a photo I.D. before they will administer treatment or medicine and if I have to be seen by a doctor I am now required to show I.D.

That requirement began within the last 5 years or so and being the curious sort that I am when I first noticed that my medical card was no longer enough for identification, a card which they issued, I enquired as to the reason why? A very busy clerk answered that the hospital wanted to ensure that it was me who was receiving medical care. Hmmm?!?

Now I don’t know the living arrangement of people who share my HMO but I do see and have seen quite a few elderly, disabled and people who appeared to be around the same income level as myself and in the 5 years that this requirement has been enforced I haven’t heard anyone claim that showing photo I.D. has placed an undue burden on anyone seeking medical treatment.

What’s interesting is that a party that believes that Government can reform the health care system in this country a huge undertaking no doubt and one which would require identifying the elderly, poor and homeless in this country is opposed to making sure the citizens of this country are ensured of their rights to vote and those rights are protected by showing a photo I.D. when participating in the electoral process.

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Hillary Clinton Confuses a Dumbed Down America

Senator Hillary Clinton
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.--Abraham Lincoln
It’s a game of political punked. Ashton Kutcher would be so proud of Hillary Clinton’s use of political deception and manipulation to pull off the biggest punking ever . Kutcher only attempts to punk one victim at a time Senator Clinton in her own indomitable cold and calculating way is trying to punk a Nation.

And after the American people realize that they’ve fumigated the Whitehouse only to let the rats back in they wouldn’t be smiling into the camera laughing at the fact that they’ve been had. No I think the American people will actually be mad.

Oh yeah you’re being punked you gotta know that. When Hillary Clinton was in the Whitehouse she was to Bill Clinton what Dick Cheney is to George Bush. Hillary was the Darth Vadar of the Clinton administration. She was behind the destroyed Rose law billings, she was behind the travelgate firings, and she was behind filegate. All political scandals yet her role in them was always unclear. Ergo she was the Dick Cheney of the Clinton administration.

And the reason that you are so willing to let her back into the Whitehouse is that you’ve been duped, tricked, played, or punked by an elaborate roost which is only meant to confuse language and meaning so that the Clintons and the Democrats can get what they want. It’s really a work of diabolical beauty here’s how it works.


Hillary’s strategic appearance on the Fox News network sends a message to her Democrat constituents that she and the former President Clinton are not afraid of the Fox News network like her fellow Democrats. She also wanted to show that she could go toe to toe with Chris Wallace or any conservative just like her husband did with Wallace almost exactly a year ago. (Transcript)

What made Clinton’s appearance interesting is that she shares the same penchant for using words and ideas to change what is real and actual into what she would like real and actual to be. The Clintons live in a world of “that depends on what is, is.” Meaning that everything is relative and can be redefine to her liking just like her husband’s, “I don’t have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinski.” which he later recanted and admitted he lied to the American people. Senator Clinton’s appearance on Fox News was nothing more than a political calculation that was meant to score symbolic political psychological points which she seem to have accomplished due to the hapless Chris Wallace’s interview.(See Senators Appearance on Fox)

In fact this whole Democrat campaign of Bush Bashing for the last six years has come right out of the Clinton playbook of the politics of personal destruction of which there are six principle components; Malign, Redefine, Redirect, Answer no Question, Admit nothing unless absolutely force to and stay on Talking Points.

For the truly partisan it doesn’t matter what Hillary does or says. These are the confused. They have been confused by their own political relativism these individuals can no longer distinguish from the manipulated reality of the Clinton formula of political of personal destruction and what is actual.

For these reality challenged individuals allow me to interpret what Hillary actually said.

WALLACE: Senator, talk about conservative hit jobs, right-wing conspiracies — why do you and the president have such a hyper-partisan view of politics?

Here is how Senator Clinton responded:
H. CLINTON: [busted out in laughter] Well, Chris, if you had walked even a day in our shoes over the last 15 years, I'm sure you'd understand.

But you know, the real goal for our country right now is to get beyond partisanship, and I'm sure trying to do my part, because we've got a lot of serious problems that we're trying to deal with.

This week I rolled out my American health choices plan. I'm going to work very hard to travel around the country, talk about why we need to tackle quality, affordable health care for every American.

We've got to deal with the economy and some of the problems that people are facing in the mortgage market and the fact that a lot of people are not getting ahead.
In the last six years, the average family income has dropped $1,000. That's not good news for our economy or for real hard-working people.

So what I'm focused on is coming forth with ideas that I believe are in the best interests of our country. And clearly, around the world, we've got to restore America's leadership. That starts with ending the war in Iraq and bringing our troops home, but there's a lot more to do.

And I think it would be great if we had a debate on the substance, that we really talked about what each of us will bring to the White House, because I'm excited by what I hear as I travel around America.

I think people are ready to start acting like Americans again. They want to roll up their sleeves. They want to tackle these tough problems, and I believe we can.

And I'm confident and optimistic that we can make progress together again starting January 20th, 2009.
Because Senator Clinton is a trained attorney like her husband the Senator’s “is” may not be what your “is” is. I’m betting too that it doesn’t even closely resemble your “is.” So what exactly did the Senator say when Mr. Wallace asked her why she and her husband had a hyper-partisan view of politics?

This first question apparently caught the Senator off guard because she all but admits that she and her husband do in fact harbor hyper-partisan views of politics by her, “if you where only in our shoes…I’m sure you’d understand,” concession.

But not to be forced to admit outright that she and Bill Clinton are Hyper-partisans Hillary launched into the six points of the Politics of Personal Destruction; Malign, Redefine, Redirect, Answer no Question, Admit nothing unless absolutely force to and stay on Talking Points. Let’s take a look:

But you know, the real goal for our country right now is to get beyond partisanship—Hillary Clinton

Here the Senator redirects the question from her and Bill Clinton’s hyper-partisan view of politics without answering the charge and she artfully redefines the question to, in her opinion, the real goal for our country. The level of this manipulation of language is simply stupefying and those who practice it are void of any objective view of reality certainly a bad trait for the President of the United States to have wouldn’t you say?

If Senator Clinton had a true and honest view of herself she would not have offered her next statement, “and I'm sure trying to do my part.” Senator Clinton is trying to do her part to end partisanship? I guess the Senator’s refusal to vote to condemn the ad against General Petraeus instead her opting to vote on a Democrat bill designed to give Democrats cover who would not condemn was not partisan in her eyes, but to fair minded Americans it stunk of partisanship Senator Clinton!

The Question was, why do you and the president have such a hyper-partisan view of politics? At least answer the question Senator Clinton you owe the American people that much. You could at least be honest like Democrat National Chairmen Howard Dean and say that you hate Republicans and everything that they stand for.

But please don’t insult our intelligence with any more of your, redefines, redirects, talking points or none answers. If you and former President Clinton don’t have a hyper-partisan view of politics you should simply say that you don’t. Therefore an answer would have been, “Chris, the President and I don’t have a hyper-partisan view of politics at all.”

Unless of course you do, and if anyone thinks that America is going to go back to a White house full of Clinton lies, deceit and manipulations you probably also think that Sandy Berger, Clinton’s former National Security Advisor, was in the National Archives just to do research. You believe any of the above or anything that Senator Clinton says you’re as stupid as Senator Clinton and her husband think you are!

Just how stupid do the Clinton’s take Americans for? Why you’re so stupid that you’ve forgotten who Hillary Clinton really is.


Three major scandals in the Clinton Whitehouse have a direct link to Hillary Clinton, Travelgate, Filegate and the destruction of the Rose law firm’s billing records. What all of these instances have in common is manipulation of evidence.

In May 1993 seven longtime employees of the White House Travel Office were fired, after a brief investigated by the FBI. The White House said the action was due to financial improprieties in the office operation. It was believed and alleged that travelgate was orchestrated to allow friends of the Clintons to take over the travel business and that the involvement of the FBI was unwarranted. Heavy media attention forced the White House to reinstate most of the employees in other jobs and remove the Clinton associates from the travel role.

Investigations by the FBI and the Justice Department, the White House itself, the General Accounting Office, the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee, and the Whitewater Independent Counsel all took place over the subsequent years. Travel Office Director Billy Dale was charged with embezzlement but found not guilty at trial in 1995. First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton came under scrutiny for allegedly having played a central role in the firings and making false statements about her role in it.--Wikiedia

Filegate, arose in June 1996 around improper access in 1993 and 1994 to Federal Bureau of Investigation security-clearance documents. Craig Livingstone, director of the White House's Office of Personnel Security, improperly requested, and received from the FBI, background reports without asking permission of the subject individuals. Estimates range from 400 to 700 to 900 unauthorized file disclosures.

The incident caused a firestorm of criticism because many of the files covered White House employees from previous Republican administrations, including top figures such as James Baker, Brent Scowcroft, and Marlin Fitzwater. Under criticism, Livingstone resigned from his position. Allegations were made that senior White House figures including First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton may have requested and read the files for political purposes, and that the First Lady had authorized the hiring of the under qualified Livingstone.--Wikipedia

Record Destruction
In 1988, Mrs. Clinton ordered the Rose Law Firm to destroy records relating to her representation of Madison.(1214) This was not a routine destruction of records. At the time, federal regulators were investigating the operations and solvency of Madison, in anticipation of taking over the institution. These Rose Law Firm records, which, after Madison's failure would belong to the RTC,(1215) would have been directly relevant to that investigation.

By ordering their destruction, Mrs. Clinton eliminated pertinent records and also exposed her firm to potential liability with respect to her representation. If such representation was proper, as Mrs. Clinton has claimed, her document destruction deprived the law firm of the records necessary to defend itself in a suit by federal investigators.

The Clinton penchant for destroying evidence even extends beyond their Whitehouse days in effort to keep the American people deceived about what really happened in the Clinton Whitehouse.

According to Wikipedia, On July 19, 2004, it was revealed that the U.S. Justice Department was investigating Berger for unlawfully stealing classified documents in October 2003, by removing them from a National Archives reading room prior to testifying before the 9/11 Commission. The documents were five classified copies of a single report commissioned from Richard Clarke, covering internal assessments of the Clinton administration's handling of the unsuccessful 2000 millennium attack plots.

When initially questioned by reporters, Berger claimed that the removal of the top-secret documents in his attaché-case and handwritten notes in his jacket and pants pockets was accidental. He later, in a guilty plea, admitted to deliberately removing the copies and cutting three up with scissors. Archive staff stated they witnessed Berger, on more than one occasion, stuffing into his pants and into his jacket papers he was illegally removing. One witness saw Berger stuffing into his socks papers from the archives. [13] Two of the copies were recovered by DOJ investigators and returned to the archives.

Berger eventually pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material on April 1, 2005.
It is believed that Berger destroyed primary evidence revealing anti-terrorism policies and actions, and that his motive was to permanently erase Clinton administration pre-9/11 mistakes from the public record.

Apparently this is a pattern with Hillary Clinton and her husband who are attorneys, if there is no evidence a matter can not be proven so they chose to manipulate, censor or destroy the evidence.

Yes censor, Hillary Clinton has even censored the media’s coverage of anything negative about her. The Clinton ability to control their political environment is uncanny and borders on fascism.

Senator Clinton’s entire political career has been a staged event meant to manipulate political opinion to get what she wants. She wants back into the Whitehouse and whether that means appearing on Fox News or rolling out a retread Government Mandated Health Care Plan, Senator Clinton’s campaign is about punking a Nation, that’s what she’s always done.

Didn’t you know, Hillary campaign for the Presidency of the United States of America is about imposing her views on America.

Still don’t get it? With the Clintons, Hillary in particular…

It’s about punking America Stupid!

Monday, September 24, 2007

At Columbia Free Speech Only For Some

A small group of protesters gather outside Columbia University on Sunday, Sept. 23, 2007 to protest plans for Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to speak on campus (AP Photo/John Smock)

Columbia President Lee Bollinger said it was a question of free speech and academic freedom, he was speaking of the invitation to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to speak at the University of Columbia.

But how soon we forget in the fall of 1998 then Columbia University President George Rupp wasn’t so interested in free speech and the chance to hear the other side. And who was the voice that Columbia University was attempting to silence, the Conservative voice that's whose. The voice of Conservativism in America!
No Place at the Table In November of 1998, Columbia University President George Rupp dispatched a team of security guards to keep students interested in a conservative conference from meeting on campus. Participants in Accuracy in Academia's "A Place at the Table: Conservative Ideas in Higher Education" learned that only liberals have a place at Columbia's table when their meeting was kicked off-campus and forced to reconvene in a park.

This, despite the fact that a contract had been signed, the meeting space had been paid for, and the event had been planned three months in advance. A mob of activists protested the event, which featured Ward Connerly, and shouted down author Dinesh D'Souza as he attempted to speak in an alcove overlooking Morningside Park.

Chanting "Ha! Ha! You're Outside, We Don't Want Your Racist Lies," demonstrators held up signs bragging of their accomplishment, which read ACCESS DENIED and WE WIN: RACISTS NOT ALLOWED AT COLUMBIA. "This is an alcove where homeless people sleep and piss," student Franklin Amoo stated. "I'll do whatever needs to be done [to stop the conference] in order to make sure they know their sentiments are not shared."

Salmon Rushdie, Khalid Muhammed, and Angela Davis have all spoken on the New York campus without "security" concerns trumping free speech rights. Yet the only instance of a conservative event on the campus in recent memory elicits a ban handed down by the school's president, who happens to be an outspoken advocate of racial preferences.

Conservatives were banned from Columbia University and forced to speech at a near by park. As you liberals gather to hear Ahmadinejab’s lies remember it was you who once bragged;
Regarding Conservatives who are Americans, yet you let the President of Iran who supports the killing of U.S. soldiers, his country’s weapons have been recently found in Iraq. His country has been discovered recently as training terrorist to kill American Soldiers in Iraq and he has personally called for the destruction of Jews.

Yes I guess Columbia President Lee Bollinger was right you would invite Hitler to speak if you could even he deserves free speech the only group that is not deserving of free speech on the campus of Columbia University are Conservatives.

More Liberal hate and now I understand why Columbia invited Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. They’ve got something in common just like him Columbia hates America too!

Friday, September 21, 2007

Iraq is bin Laden’s War according to a Muslim Cleric

Osama bin Laden in Camoflage

“Brother Osama. How many wars and how much bloodshed have occurred in the name of Al-Qaeda? How many innocents, old men, children are killed in the name of Al-Qaeda? Are you happy to meet God carrying this heavy burden on your shoulders?-- Sheikh Salman ibn Fahad Al-Oudah, Islamic scholar

Can you believe it? A Muslim criticizing Osama bin Laden? No wait a Muslim scholar actually blaming Osama bin Laden for the war. What?!? I thought that the war was Bush’s fault. That’s what Democrats, Liberals and anti-war agitators would have you and me to believe.

According to Harry Reid and all the rest of the hate America first Democratic Party the President was walking around in the oval office one morning in 2003 and said, “You know I really feel like invading the Middle East, I know let’s put thousands of American and Iraqi lives at risk and start a war!”

As nonsensical as that sounds that is the perspective that we’ve gotten from Democrats every day for the last 4 years that the war against terrorism as been waged. Liberals, Democrats and their allies in the American media have spent as much time and resources to undermine the Bush administration’s fight to protect America against the attacks of bin Laden as it costs to fight a war.

By the way just how much money do you suppose has been spent to undermine the Bush administration, millions? Anti-Bush Billionaire George Soros and has spent over 15 million alone (that’s a low estimate) and that doesn’t account for the millions spent in the media, reporting negative and biased stories against the President and against the effort to keep America safe. So I must say that when an Islamic cleric declares that it is actually Osama bin Laden who is responsible for the whole thing that is certainly different from what we’ve been hearing wouldn’t you say?

Right now a Democrat Controlled Congress is attempting to appease its base of constituents by pushing through legislation that would help al Qaeda and injure America’s ability to protect itself. Democrats call their attempts ending the war but Osama bin Laden claims that there are only two ways to end this war. One, every American is killed by a Muslim or two, America converts to Islam.

It light of bin Laden’s threat nothing that the Democrats propose is going to end the war unless of course their legislation calls for America’s all out surrender to al Qaeda and/or their legislation would have to declare that the National religion of America is now Islam. Only those two things would end the war against America.

There might be one other thing that might end the war. I admit that it is such an obscure possibility it is hardly worth mentioning but here goes. what if Liberals and Democrats alike take from the example of Sheikh Salman ibn Fahad Al-Oudah and rightly place blame for this war on Islamic extremists, al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden.

That act alone would dishearten the Islamic extremists who look to the American media and the Liberal Democrats for solace and support. By blaming America for a war that in reality is the fault of Osama bin Laden Democrats and their allies have actually prolonged the war.

Al Qudah wrote in this open letter to bin Laden:
“The image of Islam is not the one it used to be. The world is talking of Muslims killing non-Muslims. Even the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) did not kill hypocrites who were mentioned in the Qur’an for fear of people describing the Prophet as a man who kills his companions,”
Only more talk like this from Muslims and Democrats alike will end the war not blaming an American President that has attempted to protect us from this threat!

Thursday, September 20, 2007

Sour Grapes Become Raisins!

Withered by age and adversity, the once
mighty Dan Rather has taken the first step
into oblivion, or should I say to becoming a
total fruitcake?

The mighty talking head, who once ruled
the nightly news, has finally cracked! This
$70 MILLION lawsuit over the forged Bush
military records, is something that only an
egotistical has-been would bring against CBS.

The case seems to be totally without merit,
since CBS says It was, after all............ ALL
Dan Rather’s story. He got the "tip" about
the "letters", he did the interviews personally,
he organized the "facts", he had total
hands-on control from start to finish. Only
after it blew up in his face, did he involve
his producers and CBS.

He claims that CBS wrote and forced him to
read on-air, the apology that he finally made
to the American people. He still claims the
story is true, in spite of tons of evidence to
the contrary. This man has a serious ego

He has yet to apologize to President Bush,
who was the INTENDED injured party.

Are we supposed to feel sorry now, for the
man who ruled the newsroom with an
unforgiving iron fist? Anyone whom I have
heard speak of Rather, who had worked with the
man, had nothing good to say about him.
His vindictiveness carried from the first
unfavorable incident with an assistant, right up
to the firing or banishment to "TV News Siberia"

Now it is Rather’s turn to be swept out of the
media, and relegated into the discredited talking-
head heap. Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.

As an aside.......... I DO remember the 2000
elections...... when CBS prematurely called
Florida for Gore. Rather was exuberant, as he
almost shouted with glee........"WE won"!

Is that the way an "impartial, respected" news
anchor calls the election results? His mind-set
was so strong in wanting the Democrats to
take the White House, that impartiality didn’t
enter into his reporting. He reported OPINION,
rather than news.

He was incompetent when he was on top! Why
is anyone surprised now?


No, Do Taze Congress Bro!

by Kurt Francom

It seems like everywhere John Kerry goes some body’s getting negative attention like that University of Florida student Andrew Meyer who was subdued by Campus police because he wouldn’t give up the mic.

Just think if Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi would get tazed every time they said something negative. “The war is lost!” Zzzzzzz. Now what did you say Harry?

Or what if Hillary got tazed every time she was asked a question and she when off on one of her tangents without ever answering the question. Zzzzzzzz. A little taze to put her back on the subject and if she comes up with that I can’t remember Schick a taze or two should be employed to jog her memory.

And here’s some news since the Democrats have taken control of Congress they have sunk to a historic 11% approval rating according to a Reuters/Zogby poll. What that means is at least 89% of Americans would taze the members of Congress if given the opportunity.
A paltry 11 percent rated Congress positively, beating the previous low of 14 percent in July.-- John Whitesides, Political Correspondent
11% that’s an all time low! America you have just tazed Congress! Zzzzzzzzzz! And John Kerry’s apart of this tazing too!

I can just hear those Senators and Congressmen pleading, “But we didn’t do nothing, don’t taze us American Bros!

Yes, that’s the point and yes we know you haven’t done nothing but divided the nation with your politics of hate! So like Andrew Meyer you, Democrat lead Congress, have to go!

All Democrat incumbents and Republicans who have allied themselves with Democrats have to go.

Come elections in 2008 Americans are going to the polls and we are going to be voting like a University of Florida Campus police with a tazer. Our message is the same message given to Andrew Meyer, your time is up and if you are a Conservative hating Democrat or a Republican who is not a Conservative you’ve got to go!

Speaking of Andrew Meyer I thought you might want to see what the hate that Democrats have bred is doing to political discourse in this country. See below:

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Get on Their Cases!!!!!!

These Senators Still Waffling on Vote on
DREAM Amnesty

We've made a big dent in the number of
Senators willing to take their political
futures in their hands and vote yes........
Let's finish the job. They know that any
who vote FOR Amnesty, will definitely
be "EX-Senators Walking"!



President Bush and retired federal judge Michael Mukasey

Democrats let it be known that if the President sent former solicitor general Theodore Olson's name for consideration to be Attorney General there would be a fight.

But really, when is that different from any other day? Democrats have been fighting with this President since he declared his intent to run for the office almost eight years ago. There is nothing that this President could do that Democrat would agree with short of pack up his cowboy boots and head down to the Crawford Ranch to never be seen or heard of ever again.

Oh there is one thing he could do. He could always let Democrats make all of his decisions after all that is why the American people elected him twice; you know to get all weak in the knees every time a Democrat accused him of being too Conservative or every time a Democrat accused him of selecting too Conservative of an Attorney General.

Democrats seem to still be unclear of the fact that the American people rejected their candidates for President and their national political platforms twice in the last eight years. But what is abundantly clear is that Democrats want to control the politics of United States of America and they are hell bend on doing that if elected or not!

However what is most disappointing is that this Whitehouse is yet to develop the political acumen needed to answer the Democrats and apparently it never will. To bad, with all the talk about Bush’s brain and how smart Karl Rove is he didn’t come up with a way negate the constant and continual barrage of anti-Conservatism levied at the Bush administration. The Whitehouse has learned nothing because right now would be an excellent time for a political fight over who should be Attorney General. Why?

Because it would give the Whitehouse the much need momentum that it needs for the President’s final days in power and it would keep the Democrats off balance by diverting their attention from the steady drum beat of attempted dismantling of the Bush administration by Congressional investigative hearings and hardball politics.

Democrats have already announced that they are not even going to consider President Bush’s Nomination for Attorney General retired federal judge Michael Mukasey until the Whitehouse complies with its request for information regarding the firing of eight U.S. attorneys early this year. The one has absolutely nothing to do with the other but since the Whitehouse so willingly played into their hands by offering a candidate for Attorney General less offensive to Democrat’s sensibilities they can continue to press on the offensive keeping President Bush on his heeds.
Two Senate Democrats warned Monday that the Judiciary Committee would delay confirmation of President Bush’s choice for attorney general unless the White House turned over documents that the panel was seeking for several investigations.
But if the Whitehouse had the backbone to defy Democrats and select the best Conservative for the job the Democrats would get to hold their hearings on the confirmation of let’s say Theodore Olson or anyone that they deem too conservative and provided that the microphones worked Democrat would expose themselves to all fair minded Americans for the partisan haters that they are and we would be reminded once again why these political miscreants shouldn’t be elected to high political office.


What Democrats realize and what so-called conservatives in the Whitehouse and Senate don’t is that this is a life and death fight to establish whose political ideology will reign in America that is why Democrats fight.

Democrats were so terrified in 2000 and 2004 because they though that conservatives would use their elected power and political advantage to once and for all destroy liberalism in America. Needless to say they were overjoyed when Conservatives didn’t understand what to do with political power and they were ecstatic when conservatives ignorantly misused political power for self enrichment and gain rather than destroying their political foes.

Make no mistake Democrats will not make the same error. When they come into power all vestiges of Conservatism will be rooted out burned and destroyed.

Unlike their conservative political enemies Democrats understand that one does not let a vanquished foe live. Democrats will kill Conservativism if they come into political power and will enact the most liberal in-your-face agenda for social change this side of Roe vs. wade.

Unfortunate for the American people and fortunately for the Democrats President Bush never quite figured out how to spend his political capital for social change.

If Democrats happen to win the Whitehouse in 2008 they will not make the same mistake.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Oh How Desperate They Have Become!

Going from reversing the Bush tax cuts to granting
80 BILLION dollars in tax cuts, in one felt swoop....
Obama has shown his desperation to gain the
Democratic nomination for president.

The man is a joke! A short time ago, he was talking
RAISING taxes and eliminating the Bush tax cuts,
in order to "balance the budget" and help the economy
grow. A child knows that economies don’t grow by
raising taxes on those who create the jobs. Big
corporations and those who invest in them, ARE
the basic machinery that builds strong economies.

Obama would have everyone believe, that granting a
mere $500 tax credit to "seniors making less than
$50,000 per year" is the elixir that will cure the
economic problems in the US.

As for his other plan, to simplify the tax code...........
GOOD LUCK!........ as they say in Brooklyn.....!!!
If I recall......... whenever the Republicans tried
to do just that, it was the Democrats who cried

Obama can do only one thing to make this a
better country. Resign from the race and let
qualified people take over.


Barry Manilow Another Liberal Hater

Barry Manilow and Rosie O’Donnell

I didn’t think that I’d be proven right so quickly. It was only yesterday that I blogged about Liberal haters and for all of you that said, “Oh Al come on you’ve got it all wrong its Neo-Cons who hate.” In a classic case of my bias is acceptable but yours is not Barry Manilow has crossed the line regarding what is acceptable in America.

Here’s why, I challenge you to think, when is the last time you heard or read that a Conservative refused to appear on a television or radio show because the host was black?

Better yet search your memory can you recall of a time that a Conservative publicly cancelled a scheduled television engagement because the host was homosexual or lesbian?

No you can’t you know why? Liberals have so successfully forced their issues on society and everyone knows that you put your life or career in jeopardy if you so much as have a private thought that is not in agreement with liberal doctrine and acceptance of Liberal ideas and causes. Don’t believe me?

Just ask former Grey’s Anatomy actor Isaiah Washington or General Peter Pace both men lost their jobs for expressing politically incorrect ideas. Ideas that were their truth, and truth for many Americans. Both men were forced to apologize for their own truth. You remember the force recantations both men gave for having their own personal truths.

Funny thing about truth, if you are former New Jersey Governor, James E. McGreevey, you can announce before your wife and the world that, your truth is that you are a gay American when the actual truth is what you really are is an adulterous malfeasant government nepotist who placed your unqualified gay lover on the State pay role so that you could play footsy at work while living a lie with your wife. (Some truth!)

McGreevey left office because of malfeasance in elected office not because he was a “gay American.” Whatever that means? Yet McGreevey knowing that it was politically correct to claim that he was gay offered that little tidbit of information in a blatant attempt to mitigate the circumstances that he faced while pandering to gays for sympathy and support.

It didn’t work though. A married Governor just can’t hire his unqualified lover so that they can have sexual encounters on government time no matter how patriotic he claims to be.

But least I digress to far Barry Manilow confirms all of my assessments of yesterday about Liberal Democrats and their unfounded and all consuming hate for Conservatives.

Barry Manilow is a Liberal Hater.

TMZ has learned that legendary singer Barry Manilow has pulled out of his scheduled appearance on “The View” tomorrow — because he strongly disagrees with host Elisabeth Hasselbeck’s conservative view! Paging Rosie O’Donnell!

In an exclusive statement to TMZ, Barry says, “I strongly disagree with her views. I think she’s dangerous and offensive. I will not be on the same stage as her.” Barry, taking a stand!
And on Barry’s own website he posts ;
A message from Barry...
Hey guys,
I wanted to let you know that I will no longer be on The View tomorrow as scheduled. I had made a request that I be interviewed by Joy, Barbara or Whoopi, but not Elisabeth Hasselback. Unfortunately, the show was not willing to accommodate this simple request so I bowed out.
It’s really too bad because I've always been a big supporter of the show, but I cannot compromise my beliefs. The good news is that I will be on a whole slew of other shows promoting the new album so I hope you can catch me on those.
Earth to Barry! You’re not speaking love you’re speaking hate! And the views that are dangerous and offensive in America Barry are the views which try to censor free speech and the free exchange of ideas that would be your views not Elisabeth Hasselbeck’s views!

Barry Your little passive aggressive attack against a 5’3” 105 lb Conservative woman is typical of the left’s attempts to stifle all Conservatives.

Further your transparent attempt to negatively define Elisabeth Hasselbeck is irreprehensible and will not be tolerated by fair minded people in America. We are on to the Democrats tactic of negatively defining Conservatives and conservative issues and we are not going to allow you liberals to continue to do it unscathed.

You don’t like Ms. Hasselbeck’s ideas so you aren’t going to be on the show, an opportunity to promote your new release? That is straight repressive neo-liberal fascism Barry. And not very smart business sense!

How would you like it if no show ever invited you to appear to promote your songs because you have an effeminate appearance? You would scream discrimination to the high heavens so why would you think that you can discriminate against a person with Conservative ideas Barry?

If the CD sales on your new release suffer from this episode it is your own doing. Barry you have relegated yourself to the company of the Dixie Chicks, a group that like you didn’t realize that it was their music not their political punditry that people supported.

The bottom line is Barry you owe Elisabeth Hasselbeck and fifty percent of the American people, who by the way have similar views to Ms. Hasselbeck (who voted to elect George Bush twice) an apology and until you do I don’t care how many other shows you appear on or where you appear in Vegas, until you apologize no one especially conservatives should patronize anything that you do!

You want to spread hate for Conservatives, Barry? Fine don’t expect anymore support from the group that you hate. Elisabeth Hasselbeck is a part of that group. So apologize before what’s left of your career is adversely affected.

And after you apologize to Ms. Hasselbeck and the half of America that is Conservative here is some sage advice for the future…

Shut up and sing!

Monday, September 17, 2007

The Key Words...............

Hillary is at it again. Her "welfare-healthfare"
program of thirteen years ago has been resurrected!
I guess she thinks that people have forgotten the
fiasco and would approve of it now.

Be careful my friends............. before you swallow
the worm and get hooked. Look at those "key words"
in her speech. Her "new approach" would require
every American to have health insurance, "with
federal assistance to help defray the cost".

Good God............ how stupid does she think the
American voter is? We all know that means
humongous tax increases on the top 45% of the
wage earners, in order to pay for all those families
that can’t afford the "ordered coverage". Add to
that, the new federal bureaurocracy needed to police
the entire program.... and the additional cost of
preventing and covering the graft and corruption
that will be built into it by it's originators.

Remember on election day folks............ a vote for
Hillary, is a vote for the poorhouse. Both she and
Obama have been courting the minority votes by
promising pie in the sky.............deserving or not...
..... just so they can both achieve their own selfish
aims. Obama to be the first black president of the
United States. And Hillary to be the first female
president........ not that her influence during her
husband’s administration didn’t almost destroy
the country.

I honestly don’t care, at this point in time, who the
Republicans nominate for President. He/she has
my vote. Not a difficult decision after listening
to the recent "opening salvos" in the Democratic
run for the nomination.


The Haters who are the Democrats

George Soros

"I fancied myself as some kind of god …, "If the truth be known, I carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which I felt I had to control, otherwise they might get me in trouble.

"It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out."
–George Soros, financial backer of and the Democrat Party
Does speak for you? Apparently they speak for the hearts and minds of Haters who are the Democrat Party. Only Elizabeth Edwards, wife of Presidential hopeful John Edwards and ex-Democrat and now Independent Senator Joseph Lieberman has the honestly and class from the left to repudiate the vile and loathsome biased attack that Democrats planned and Moveon carried out against General David Petraeus before anyone had even heard word one of his testimony on Iraq.

By Gosh, whatever happened to the fact that it is wrong to prejudge anyone or anything before hearing or seeing the evidence? Liberals use to be big on that; I guess prejudging is okay now huh?

Apparently when it comes to Democrat’s politics; bias, hate, prejudice and outright lies are acceptable if they will help Democrats win Congress or the Whitehouse thus Democrats are the New England Patriots of politics! With the Raiders’ Al Davis it use to be just win baby, but now with the Democrats and the Patriots it’s cheat, lie and videotape.

It’s not often that the Democrat Oligarchy tips its hand so that the rest of its mindless drones can see the workings of its political machinations but the ad which was aided and abetted by the New York Times (major discount for running the ad) is part and parcel of what has become a Democrat political staple which is to Negatively Define their Opponents or an issue that is not of their liking. This method is a part of the Democrat playbook of the politics of personal destruction.

It has worked on President Bush (low approval polling), Vice President Cheney, AG John Ashcroft, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, I. Scooter Libby, AG Alberto Gonzales or any person that Democrats disagree with and recently Democrats and tried to unsuccessfully to negatively define General David Petraeus and his report on Iraq before they even knew exactly what the General was reporting. It was a grand effort of Bushwhacking!

I call attempting to destroy the President’s credibility “Bushwhacking.” Whatever President Bush does or whomever Democrats perceives that he supports that person will be negatively maligned and attacked. Democrats and their attack arm attempted to “Bushwhack” General Petraeus with their “General Betray Us” in the same manner which they attack anyone that they view as a threat.

Since election year 2000 Democrats have steadily reversed the saying speaking truth to power and turned politics upside down by speaking lies to the people, lies concerning President George W. Bush. Lies like Bush is dumb, however, in spite of that Democratic belief, Bush stole the presidency both in 2000 and in 2004 from all those smart liberals and Democrats, Bush deceived all those smart Democrats in Congress about the Iraq intelligence, Bush Lied to people who were smarter than he about WMD, etc, etc, etc. Pretty good for a dumb guy huh?

George W. Bush has been the target of a successful campaign of Democrat Bushwhacking so why not Bushwhack General Petraeus too? Why not? Because it’s wrong that’s why not. It was wrong when it was done to President Bush and it is wrong now when it was attempted against General Petraeus and is wrong for doing it! Wrong, wrong, wrong and Democrats have gone to far and must be made to pay for their attacks against the General and the President!

This Organization,, is funded in part by George Soros the billionaire with the God-complex. Yes Soros has actually said that he is the New Age Messiah and now he funds the vilest political hit group this side of al Qaeda.
Soros and A Partner Contributed $5 Million to’s $15 Million Anti-Bush Ad Campaign. “MoveOn is now poised to be one of the Democrats’ most effective fundraising vehicles during this year’s presidential campaign. It has already raised millions to support candidates and fund ads such as the one criticizing Bush’s $87 billion commitment to rebuilding Iraq. In November, billionaire philanthropist George Soros and his business partner, Peter Lewis, pledged a $5 million matching grant – a dollar for every two raised by MoveOn members – to create a $15 million advertising campaign to defeat President Bush.” (Beth Fouhy, “ Becomes Anti-Bush Online Powerhouse,” The Associated Press, 1/10/04)
You don’t even have to listen closely to recognize that all of the Democrat attacks against President Bush and his administration are just parroting George Soros’ views.

It’s a match made in hell; Soros, Moveon and Democrats so by extension if the Democrats win control of the Government Soros will be the shadow dictator through whom Hillary or Barak will receive their marching orders.
Soros Initially Pledged $15.5 Million In Soft Money To Liberal Activist Groups, Including $10 Million To America Coming Together, $3 Million To The Center For American Progress And $2.5 Million To “Soros, who has financed efforts to promote open societies in more than 50 countries around the world, is bringing the fight home, he said. On Monday, he and a partner committed up to $5 million to, a liberal activist group, bringing to $15.5 million the total of his personal contributions to oust Bush. … Standing on the back deck, the evening sun angling into their eyes, Soros took aside Steve Rosenthal, CEO of the liberal activist group America Coming Together (ACT), and Ellen Malcolm, its president. They were proposing to mobilize voters in 17 battleground states. Soros told them he would give ACT $10 million. … Soros also promised up to $3 million to Podesta’s new think tank, the Center for American Progress.” (Laura Blumenfeld, “Soros’s Deep Pockets Vs. Bush,” The Washington Post, 11/11/03)
It’s happening already, all of the Democrat front runners feel that they are beholden to Moveon; they’ve attended their gatherings, paid homage to them by participating in their functions and now they openly court their approval.
"This bold stand by three of the four presidential candidates in the Senate won't soon be forgotten," according to Eli Pariser, executive director of's political action committee, which has forced Democratic candidates to veer far left to gain support of the party's small, but well-funded left-wing fringe.
This attempt to demonize General Petraeus is the most blatant example of the politics of personal destruction to date. It is the same method that Democrats employed to win the Congress in 2006. Vile negative Democrat screed once exclusively held for President Bush has now spilled over into general attacks against anyone who stands in the way of Democrat hatemongers.

However the saddest thing is the politics of hate has taken its toll on our society creating a political and a social climate of hate. Democrats and Liberals who hate! So much so that Nobel Peace Prize winner Betty Williams wants to “kill George Bush”. Man now that’s HATE! So much so that a leftist Nobel PEACE Prize winner advocated killing the President of the United States, this is the result and danger of George Soros’ waging hate and the Democrat’s hateful politics of personal destruction.

Isn’t it obvious that every time that Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean, Charles Schumer, Hillary Clinton, Barak Obama speaks negatively of an opponent they are employing the George Soros’, Democrat strategy of hatefully and negatively defining political opponents.

If any one of the Democrat Presidential candidates are elected as President of the United States voters are in essence handing over their government to hate and the man who financed it all, the Democrat Messiah, King and God, George Soros.

Friday, September 14, 2007

A Mindless and Spineless Bureaucratic Response

Hobbton High School

Two days ago I reported that Jessica Langston a High School student at Hobbton High School in Sampson County, North Carolina was prohibited from wearing a tee shirt emblemed with the American Flag on it in honor of the 6th anniversary of 9/11 to school.

Apparently this ban was the result of previous problems with other flags at the school and school administration did what all educators are trained to do, that is to unfairly punish the entire group for the sins of a few.

Rather than address individuals or small groups within the school community for wrong-doing the modern educator’s answer is to often ban an event, i.e. school dances, pep rallies, wearing of certain items of clothing, etc. I suppose that they employ this method so that no one feels isolated. In addition to that it is much simpler to blanket everyone with blame than to point out wrong doing individually.

Well School officials must have heard your dissatisfaction with their decision to ban the American flag, because they’ve rescinded the ban, but here is where it gets interesting.

These mindless and spineless Educrats didn’t only rescind the ban on the American flag; no they’ve rescinded the ban on all flags! Just to be fair huh?

They still don’t get it. In America the American flag is not on par with any other country’s flag.

Now here’s a wild guess. I bet the ban had something to do with Mexicans waving the Mexican flag on school campuses for the last two years! If the original ban of all flags came about when Mexican nationals where waving the Mexican flag all over America on school campuses in support of their national attempt to influence congress on Comprehensive Immigration Reform, and thereby almost causing national pride riots on school campus nation wide, then banning all flags is not an acceptable answer.

Here’s a question, just what sense did it make to ban all flags including the America flag because a national agitation group was attempting to make political hay?

And now that school officials have caught flack from you they’ve lifted the ban. But that is not all they’ve done.

No they lifted the ban on all flags equal to the American flag once again placing the American flag on par with other flags of other nations and once again demonstrating that in their mindless and spineless attempts to be all inclusive they have failed the fundamental test of truth and fairness.

The truth is no one that comes to this country from the country of their origin comes to this country because it is on par with their country no they came because this country is better than their country or else why would they come? Everyone to a person comes to this country looking for a better life and better opportunities.

If all countries where the same, as Educrats in their misguided attempt to teach with fake and sham demonstrations of political relativism, there would be no reason for people who are loyal to their own flags to be here taking advantage of American education and American largesse.

Maybe there is a lesson to be learn from this situation after all if people of other countries can come to this country to beg for our resources and still proudly wave the flag of their country of origin then just maybe Americans can get a clue and fly the American flag proudly and maybe that will do something to instill love for this country in the hearts of people who come here only to take from America.

There is also the outside chance that Superintendent Dr. L. Stewart Hobbs and the Principal of Hobbton High school, Mr. Wesley Johnson, would take a few minutes to reflect on the flag themselves and think about how blessed they are to be an American and maybe that will instill love for this country in these two men so that they never again place another flag equal to their own.

Apparently even foreign nationals who are here taking advantage of America’s benefits will not put any other flag equal with theirs so why do Americans?

You don’t need a Masters or a Doctorate to know that what brought the initial ban about just doesn’t make any sense!

Thursday, September 13, 2007

Only Fools and Charlatans Speak of Consensus regarding Global Warming

Former Vice President Al Gore (right) and fellow Warm-Earther Richard Branson

500 scientists have published evidence countering the theory of Man-Made Global Warming.

It is safe to say that theory of Man-Made Global Warming has been debunked.

A new analysis of peer-reviewed literature reveals that more than 500 scientists have published evidence refuting at least one element of current man-made global warming scares.

More than 300 of the scientists found evidence that 1) a natural moderate 1,500-year climate cycle has produced more than a dozen global warmings similar to ours since the last Ice Age and/or that 2) our Modern Warming is linked strongly to variations in the sun's irradiance.

"This data and the list of scientists make a mockery of recent claims that a scientific consensus blames humans as the primary cause of global temperature increases since 1850," said Hudson Institute Senior Fellow Dennis Avery.
No longer can the Warm-Earthers hide behind the façade that they are speaking from an enlightened scientific perspective when they spew their holier-than-thou platitudes regarding carbon emissions and stopping Western human progress to save the earth.

Indeed the earth is worth saving however short of stopping the natural cycle of the earth and/or putting out the sun the temperature changes that we are experiencing are not going to be stopped just because someone bought some carbon credits or someone drives a bright shiny new Toyota Prius!

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

ABC just what country are we in?

Dr. L. Stewart Hobbs Jr. with plant operations director Anthony Vann in background

The superintendent of schools in Sampson County calls the situation unfortunate, but says educators didn’t want to be forced to pick and choose which flags should be permissible.
Here’s a pop quiz for you, You’re in a country named the United States of America, American tax payers pay your salary, American tax payers paid for the Schools that you are in charged of and the American tax payers created and paid for the system in which you work.

In America which flag should be allow to fly, wave or worn in the Public Schools?

Hard question? Then you must be a graduate of Hobbton High School of SAMPSON COUNTY, North Carolina. Or a graduate of any of the K12 schools of Sampson County which Superintendent , Dr. L. Stewart Hobbs, Jr. administrates.

What is a EdD good for if the person holding such a degree doesn’t know the difference between biting the hand that feeds it and biting every hand equally and fairly?

If it is not obvious to L. Stewart Hobbs, Jr. that the American Flag is the flag of this country, (his country I believe, I could be wrong)and it alone should be granted consideration above all others and it alone should be demonstrated twenty-four hours a day seven days a week and three hundred and sixty-fives days a year I’d say that that so-called EdD is not worth the paper it is written on and that Educator is not trained properly and should be recalled or dismissed at the very next school board meeting.

Did you hear that, Glenn Tart, Chairman, Telfair Simpson, Vice Chairman, Mary Brown, Nathan Gay, Doris Warren, G. H. Wilson and Roosevelt Wright of the Sampson county board of education?

If the school board and the citizens of Sampson county are not outraged then maybe they need to self examine.

This once was a proud and great country, but no more if this is an example of education in the public schools!

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Bin Laden Has Answer to Wars End

Only two ways for the U.S. to end the war according to Bin Laden on this sixth anniversary of 9/11

In Osama Bin Laden’s latest video in which he takes full credit for the 9/11 devastation that 19 Islamists dealt to America, bin Laden claims that there are only two ways to end the war and neither way is under the control of General Petraeus, President Bush or the Democrats and Liberals.

Bin Laden says that one way to end the war is that Islamists kill every American in the United States and the World or the second way to end the war is that the United States of America submits to Islam!

There are two solutions to stopping it. One is from our side, and it is to escalate the fighting and killing against you. This is our duty, and our brothers are carrying it out.

The second solution is from your side. I invite you to embrace Islam.
–Osama bin Laden

No matter what Democrats or Liberals say a withdraw from Iraq and troops coming home will not end the war.

Remember Osama started this war, he declared war on the United States in 1998 and only he can end it. You now know his conditions, die or convert neither option include the Democrats plan to bring the Troops home.

Who are you going to believe Osama bin Laden or Liberal Democrats?

Remember 9/11 of September

Friday, September 07, 2007

Thought You Might Be Interested........... this forgotten bit of information

..........It was 1987! At a lecture the other day they
were playing an old news video of Lt.Col. Oliver
Northtestifying at the Iran-Contra hearings during
theReagan Administration.

There was Ollie in front of God and country getting
the third degree, but what he said was stunning!He
was being drilled by a senator; "Did you not
recently spend close to $60,000 for a home security
system?" Ollie replied, "Yes, I did, Sir." The senator
continued, trying to get a laugh out of the audience,
"Isn't that just a little excessive?" "No, sir," continued
Ollie. "No? And why not?" the senator asked."Because
the lives of my family and I were threatened,sir."

"Threatened? By whom?" the senator questioned."By
a terrorist, sir" Ollie answered."Terrorist? What
terrorist could possibly scare you that much?" "His
name is Osama bin Laden, sir" Ollie replied. At this
point the senator tried to repeat the name, but
couldn't pronounce it, which most people back
then probably couldn't. A couple of people laughed
at the attempt.

Then the senator continued. Why are you so afraid
of this man?" the senator asked. "Because, sir, he is
the most evil person alive that I know of", Ollie
answered. "And what do you recommend we do
about him?" asked the senator. "Well, sir, if it was
up to me, I would recommend that an assassin
team be formed to eliminate him and his men from
the face of the earth."

The senator disagreed with this approach, and that
was all that was shown of the clip.

By the way, that senator was Al Gore!

Also: Terrorist pilot Mohammad Atta blew up a bus
in Israel in 1986.The Israelis captured, tried and
imprisoned him. As part of the Oslo agreement
with the Palestinians in 1993, Israel had to agree to
release so-called "political prisoners." However, the
Israelis would not release any with blood on their hands.

The American President at the time, Bill Clinton,and
his Secretary of State, Warren Christopher,"insisted"
that all prisoners be released. Thus Mohammad Atta
was freed and eventually thanked the US by flying an
airplane into Tower One of theWorld Trade Center.

This was reported by many of the American TV
networks at the time that the terrorists were first
identified. It was censored in the US from all later

If you agree that the American public should be
made aware of this fact, pass this on.


Thursday, September 06, 2007

ABC Free The Path to 9/11 DVD Now!

Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman,Convicted Mastermind behind the first bombing of the WTC

Do you believe in censorship? Think carefully before you answer because you may be supporting a Presidential Candidate who uses censorship to deal with all of those pesky little incriminating and politically damaging situations. And all of this coming up on the 5th anniversary of 9/11.

Just who I’m I talking about? I’m talking about someone that I have over 900 reasons to oppose from entering the Whitehouse again, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The former first lady and Jr. Senator of New York (notice that I don’t say “from” New York) has developed a nasty habit of making incriminating and politically damaging situations disappear.

Case in point the made for TV drama, “The Path to 9/11” was schedule for release on DVD January 2007, that’s eight months ago, but it hasn’t been released yet.
The project, five hours and $40 million for ABC, received seven Emmy nominations and attracted a two-night audience of about 25 million viewers. But its Amazon page notes that it currently is "unavailable."
The film tells the story of events that lead up to that infamous day in American history. And because the retelling of the story faulted the Clinton administration as well as the Bush administration Clinton Apparatchiks went wild that total blame for 9/11 wasn’t placed on President Bush!

First they attempted to stop the broadcasting of the show completely and when that didn’t work they attempted to have the network edit anything that suggested that President Clinton failed to kill or capture Osama bin Laden the 10 times that the opportunity presented itself.

So now that the edited version of the path to 9/11 broadcasted it is typical that the DVD be released for distribution but it hasn’t happen. Why?

Have you forgotten the Clinton’s long history of making evidence go away?

According to Charles R. Smith of Newsmax 500 FBI files (more like 900), including the file of former CIA Director Bob Gates, that landed inside the Clinton White House and the missing Whitewater files that disappeared down a wormhole in the D.C. universe, then somehow materialized again inside Hillary's reading room.

Of course no one knows what information was taken from those files. And then there’s the National Archives thief committed by Clinton crony and former National Security Advisor Sandy Burger. Mr. Burger entered the National Archives right in the middle of the 9/11 commission investigation of the events leading up to 9/11 and Burger stole and destroyed evidence that obviously he and the Clintons did not want the America people to see.

Then there is the fact that all of the records of Hillary Clinton as the first lady were recently sealed so that the America people would remain ignorant about events during her co-presidency with Bill Clinton.

As lawyers the Clinton’s know the importance of having evidence as well they know the advantage of the lack of evidence. The movie, the path to 9/11, puts in perspective the events surrounding 9/11 because these events do not reflect well on the Clinton administration it is believed that Hillary has put pressure on ABC preventing the release of the TV movie on DVD.

Ironically Fahrenheit 9/11, a Michael Moore anti-Bush movie, was release right in the middle of the 2004 Presidential elections without so much as a complaint from President Bush.

The American people should demand that that the Clintons no longer be allowed to censor, destroy, seal or steal evidence that is by rights the people’s property.

The American people should demand that ABC immediately release the made for TV movie, The Path to 9/11 to DVD.

Write ABC and demand that they free, “The Path to 9/11.” Stop the censorship, and end the Clinton control of the media and public information.

We refuse to go back to a time in America when a Clinton will look into the face of the America people and lied about the facts, manipulate records or destroy evidence. And the Clintons did destroy plenty of evidence concerning his Governorship, his Presidency and Hillary’s involvement in each as the co-Criminal-in-chief.

ABC free, “The Path to 9/11 now!

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Don’t be fooled the problem is not Toys or China!

"If we will not endure a king as a political power we should not endure a king over the production, transportation, and sale of any of the necessaries of life."—John Sherman
According to the AP the Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with Mattel Inc., announced late Tuesday that it is recalling about 700,000 Chinese-made toys that have excessive amounts of lead paint.

It would be too easy to lay this debacle at the feet of the Chinese but responsibility doesn’t belong there. Mattel and Corporations like it have for years outsourced American jobs to foreign countries to take advantage of less restrictive manufacturing laws and cheap almost slave labor.

Corporate pursuit of low wages and less regulations are the reasons that the American consumer is suffering from everything from tainted foods that have been exported to this country to high gas prices and finally to products that would not even be made in America because they do not meet United States standards.

Everything that is wrong in America today can be blamed on an out-of-control corporate environment that will do anything and everything for the sake of the bottom line. Profit!

Corporations control everything from the President to Congress as demonstrated by the Comprehensive Immigration reform drama. Corporations had their finger prints all over that deal! Corporations control all aspects of American life, from what you eat, what you drive, and how you’re entertained, yes corporations decided what Americans like or dislike. Corporations decide what it means to be an ipod wearing, fast food eating consumer driven American.

Whether it’s tainted pet food, ecoli laden lettuce or lead covered toys it is the corporations fault. Corporations are the reason that we are at war in Iraq (the Industial Military Complex or in one word "Haliburton") they are the blame for hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens marching in American streets demanding rights in a country that they are not citizens of. Corporations have left the safe shores of America for the siren calls of low wages and little to no regulations in India, China or wherever there is a somewhat stable government to operate from.

What can we do? The people of this country must decide whether or not we want control of our country back, for a fact, American life is infected by corporate influence at every level.

Corporations fund the homosexual movement, Corporations fund the stem cell movement, and Corporations fund the global warming movement. Look behind any movement meant to weaken the family and promote consumerism you will find corporate influence lurking in the shadows.

Until and unless the Sherman Act and anti-trust laws are reenacted in this country corporate power will be the down fall of this nation. We must reign in corporate power!

And you thought it was only about lead paint on toys, no the real toxic substance in this society today is unrestrained corporate wealth lust.

Uncontrolled corporate power is exactly the type of concentrated power and tyranny that the Founding Father attempted to protect the America people from by their theories of separation of powers. By contrast, it is the recent corporate monopolies in media, commerce and financial industries which looms as a very real threat which will put Americans under tyrannous corporate Global rule!

Whether it is toys, CD’s DVD’s, Automobiles, Gasoline, Movies, Music, News and Entertainment Corporations are hell bend on controlling the hearts and minds of the people of the world.

Of course they want your wallet too! And after the Presidential Elections the artificial lower gas prices will be lifted and when gasoline goes up to 4 to 5 dollars a gallon they will have your wallet too.

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

Can’t the United States act Unilaterally within its own borders?

Mexican president, Felipe Calderon

Question can the U.S. Congress legislate without consulting with foreign powers?

No they can’t according to Mexican President Felipe Calderon. Calderon in his state of the union speech Sunday accused the United States of stepping up persecution and abuse of undocumented Mexican workers with a crackdown on illegal immigrants.

Calderon said, "I want to express again an energetic protest at the unilateral measures taken by the U.S. Congress and government which exacerbate the persecution and abusive treatment of undocumented Mexican workers,"

What?!? Protest the unilateral measures taken by the U.S. Congress and government? Protest to whom and on what grounds? It doesn’t make any sense! Unless the United States of America is no longer a sovereign nation.

Americans ought to be very concerned when a leader of a foreign country denounces America for doing what it’s always done for over two hundred years, that is, self govern!

What is the President of Mexico thinking? The U.S. Congress and the U.S. government must check with him and his government before laws are passed and or enforced in the United States that concern America’s interest?

According to Reuters News, Mexico was deeply disappointed at the U.S. Congress' failure to pass a comprehensive overhaul of immigration laws in June despite heavy lobbying by the Bush administration. It is also upset at the United States for building a security fence on parts of the border to keep illegal immigrants out.

"The Mexican government will continue to insist firmly ... on the need for an integral immigration reform and the categorical rejection of the building of a wall on our common border,"—Felipe Calderon, President of Mexico

Just what gives the President of Mexico the idea that he or any foreign government have any rights or demands of consequence on the U.S. government or the American people?

Do you know? In one word “NAFTA.” The North American Free Trade Agreement is the bases on which a foreign power can make demands on your government. How have we come to this? Just follow the timeline.

That and the North American Community Agreement (NACA) that was signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin. So realize that it is Big Business that is Corporate influence over your elected officials that is the cause of it all so don’t just go blaming the President of Mexico he’s just demanding what was agreed to in the North American Community Agreement that was signed by him George Bush and Paul Martin.

Oh I realize that our Government’s official position is that the NACA was not signed but the only problem with that is I recall seeing the signed document on-line back in 2005 before it was erased from all sources. I also remember seeing an article at that same time touting the signing of the Agreement that too has been sanitized.

So either I’m crazy or the government is lying and if I’m crazy well I’m not the only one because former Canadian Minister Paul Martin (a participant in the NACA) recalls that he President Bush and President Fox signed an agreement. Martin posted it for the world to see on his website.
Thus, on March 23, President Bush, President Fox and I signed the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America that establishes the way forward on our continental agenda for security, prosperity and quality of life. It is a partnership that respects the past but is devoted to building for the future, to ensuring that we as North Americans are able to continue to thrive in a world in which China and India have emerged as economic giants.
Your government has gone to a awful lot of trouble to denied that President Bush signed an agreement, why they’ve even published a rebuttal called SPP myths vs facts they claim:
Myth: The SPP was an agreement signed by Presidents Bush and his Mexican and Canadian counterparts in Waco, TX, on March 23, 2005.

Fact: The SPP is a dialogue to increase security and enhance prosperity among the three countries. The SPP is not an agreement nor is it a treaty. In fact, no agreement was ever signed.
The only thing is they couldn’t get all of the evidence. Several sources reported the signing which was not disputed or denied by the Bush administration until the American people realized that their President had entered the United States of America into a tri-lateral agreement without the consent of the people and the people’s Congress.

It was only after that realization that the Oligarchy (see a list of who’s behind NACA) which comprises the planning of the North American Community began to cover its tracks. They knowing that their actions were unconstitutional and that the American people were becoming aware of the treachery that was being acted out at the highest levels of American government began attempting to change perception by lying about the facts.

The facts are elitist academics, government officials and heads of corporations are planning and enacting economic goals that will further exploit people and resources in Canada, Mexico and the United States in the name of prosperity and security.
Constitutions, laws and governments will be superseded by a governing body that will neither be elected nor answerable to anyone.

You say that it isn’t true? Then you explain how an agreement that was not signed by anyone can be the bases upon which three countries are beginning to merger their borders, their commerce and their peoples.

Finally, that is why the President of Mexico can call the United States into account; he has an agreement signed by our President. An Agreement that Mexican Nationals will be able to enter into the United States and work under the Security and Prosperity Plan and the North American Community Agreement that wasn’t signed (according to the White house) but is being honored and enforced by your government.

This recent rash of arrest are meant to placate you and me but as you can see these arrest are not what Mexico agreed to and that is why President Calderon feels that he can protest them so vehemently! He has a signed agreement even if the United States doesn’t!