Thursday, January 31, 2008

Don’t Worry McCain Can’t Win

McCain and Martinez: Amnesty buddies

Don’t worry, don’t worry calm down, Senator John McCain will not be President of the United States of America! You can quote me.

Think about it all of Senator McCain’s victories have been at the hands of non-Conservatives (even the Florida victory) which means that voters who voted for him have an alterative candidate to fall back on.

Most of the voters that voted for Sen. McCain in the primaries were non-Conservatives and they view McCain as an alterative to Conservatives so in a head to head race McCain vs. any Democrat, non-Conservatives will vote for the real choice, a Democrat, 90% of the time. McCain loses!

That places McCain in a dilemma because a dispirited Republican vote will be suppressed if he is the Republican nominee. Why? Conservatives don’t trust John McCain that is a fact, so all of a sudden the numbers just aren’t there.

McCain loses to any Democrat even to a Dennis J. Kucinich. Why, because despite what the Liberals say they are the ones who vote along straight party lines. As well Liberals tend to vote for special interest such as Global warming, fetal stem cells and for the race or sex of their candidate.

On the other hand it is conservatives who normally vote for principle so any Democrat will get a Liberal vote but not any Republican will get a Conservative vote, again McCain loses.

Oh I know what the polls are saying but that is only idle talk like, what if the Cowboys would have beaten the N.Y. football Giants they would be in the Superbowl. In reality the Cowboys lost 21-17 and John McCain will lose to any Democrat!

So throw out the thought that McCain has the best chance to win as a Republican that is simply balderdash!

Now allow me to explain the dynamics that are in play in this election. You feel defeated and somewhat betrayed but you can’t quite identify just how McCain is winning without any Conservative support. Allow me to explain.

The explanation is, if you are a conservative you are being punished and there is an attempt to destroy your Party. How could I know that?

Let’s start at the beginning George W. Bush for all Liberal accounts was not supposed to win the Presidency in 2000 and 2004 (I know that you’ve heard that a thousand times) but you Conservatives backed him and because of your support he won.

Remember the Dubai Ports deal? Very powerful Saudis where supposed to buy interest in U.S. Ports but you Conservatives came against it and stopped it.

Then there was the Comprehensive Immigration Plan back by our Globalist Republican President George W. Bush. Conservatives rose up against their Party leaders and said no and you stopped it and cost corporate interest a lot of money.

Also no one is more vocal against the North American Community Plan than conservatives. A plan where Global elitist including President Bush plan to erase internal continental borders for one border that outlines the outer North American Continent and in the process blurring the national sovereignty of Canada, the United States and Mexico. Conservatives are the ones questioning this plan.

Conservatives have weaken terrorism, they have slowed the Liberal agenda, they have changed the course of the moral decline that much of the world hates the United States for and hold us in contempt for. We had become a laughingstock because a U.S. President was involved in untoward behavior in the very house that belongs to the people.

Osama bin Laden himself cited Bill Clinton’s behavior as one of the reasons that he declared jihad against America! I bet you didn’t know that!
Who can forget your President Clinton's immoral acts committed in the official Oval office? After that you did not even bring him to account, other than that he 'made a mistake', after which everything passed with no punishment.

Is there a worse kind of event for which your name will go down in history and remembered by nations?
--Osama bin Laden, In open letter to America

Truth is you conservatives have become too pesky, too powerful and you hinder the Liberal’s socialist progress for that you must be stopped.

So to guarantee that no one more Conservative than George Bush would win the Republican nomination and consolidate conservative power and momentum a plan was enacted to destroy the Republican Party from within.

But who could enemies of Conservatives get to perform such an act. Just who wears the Conservative title but would not object to working at odds against Conservative principles?

His name is John McCain. McCain is a wolf in sheep’s clothing doing the bidding of unseen forces he is being used to stop the progress of Conservativism in the Republican Party.

Therefore you don’t have to worry he was never intended to be President, the same people who support McCain now will support either Hillary or Obama in the general election in an effort to deal Conservativism a final fatal Coup d’├ętat.

McCain is merely a tool that is being used to that end. He, Liberals, Moderates, Progressives, Socialist and Compassionate Conservatives all have combined efforts to crush the Conservative movement that has dominated Presidential elections in this country the last 8 years.

So don’t worry this fight is not about electing John McCain this fight is about stopping Conservatives.

And because Conservatives don’t realize the real natural of this fight I’m afraid they are at a disadvantage.

Right now Conservatives should be fighting to elect someone who best represents their ideas. Someone who is willing to fight and do what it takes for the ideas of Conservativism to prevail or there is always the alternative. Don’t fight. Allow McCain to win the Republican nomination and watch him get grubbed by either Hillary or Obama.

Then watch Hillary or Obama set in motion an agenda that will end Conservativism in America.

Remember you heard it from me Sen. McCain doesn’t have a snowball’s chance of becoming President.

It may already be too late but if Conservatives were smart they’d back a Conservative that does have a chance or will at least represent their principles. And by the way Rudy is no Conservative either he says so!

You decide!

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Where’s the Recount?

Sen. John McCain exalts in Florida victory

It was the state of Florida that put the word Chad in the political lexicon, in not its finest hour I must say!

The 2000 election year in Florida will be forever remembered as one of the biggest fiascos in modern American election history. Confused geriatric voters that meant to vote for Al Gore but accidentally voted for George W. Bush or so they claimed.

Recounts, court decisions and allegations of election fraud forever seared into memory that Florida presidential politics are perhaps the worst in America. Which begs the question, has Florida become a third world Banana Republic?

This election result causes us to remember a time when Butterfly ballots and Florida State Supreme Court intervention brought the electoral process in the United States to its lowest point in American modern politics. Such is the questionable Florida election process that we have all come to dread and expect.

Many of us while not approving were not disappointed by Fox News who called early the Florida elections for Sen. John McCain. Many of us got the outcome that we expected not the one we had hoped for. An outcome that we don’t trust, in fact for many of us there will never be trust for any election result in the state of Florida ever again.

If New York was ground zero on 9/11 2001, Florida was ground zero on 11/8 2000 the day after elections when thousands began their ascension down on the orange juice state to count Chads in the Florida political heat. A day after the 11/7 Election Day in which the 2000 Presidential Elections resulted in the recount of six million votes in 67 counties in an election process that was described as bizarre and susceptible to manipulation.

So isn’t it more than ironic that in the state that made Diebolt an American election necessity Sen. John McCain would prevail as the anti-Conservative Candidate in the 2008 Republican Florida elections for nominee to be President.

Sen. McCain won among the Geriatric, Independent and Illegal Alien supporters in Florida to which the main stream media will foist the designation of Republican front runner on his diminished 5’ 9” frame.

Governor Romney won among Conservatives but in Florida that’s not enough, in Florida winning among Conservatives in a Republican election is not enough.

Apparently the dynamics which threw the 2000 elections into utter chaos and turmoil are still at play in Florida and at the risk of sounding a little like sour grapes I look at the exit polling which shows McCain wins once again on the strength of the anti-Conservative vote.

So-called Moderates, Independents, Illegal Alien supporters and a demographic of voters who were confused by the butterfly ballot in 2000, are a virtual coalition of the anti-Conservative vote.

Governor Romney will live to fight anew another day but Florida will forever remain the state that couldn’t tell a Republican from a Democrat on the ballot in 2000 and apparently they still can’t!

…And where is the recount?

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Stand up and Fight!

Presidential hopefuls Governor Mitt Romney and Sen. John McCain

But I know what it takes to stand your ground and defeat Republicans and I have a track record that proves that.

Nobody else has been through it in the way I have been through it. And I think it’s going to be important to have somebody who will be ready immediately in the campaign to stand up and fight back.
Hillary Clinton

Where are the fighting Republicans?

Listening to the Democrats one would think that all they do is fight. Hillary makes the claim that she has been fighting for 35 years. Here’s Sen. Clinton’s ad demonstrating that she’s a fighter:

Barack claims that he’s a fighter too. He has fought against Conservative ideas. So we know who is fighting against Republicans what we don’t know is who is fighting for Conservative ideas.

Will Senator McCain fight for Conservativism? Will Governor Romney? That’s the problem we don’t know. Though Sen. McCain is supportive on the war there is little else that he is willing to fight for that is important to Conservatives. Romney is a recent born again Conservative that just found Ronald Reagan as his spiritual guide to Conservativism.

While McCain can be described as Conservative on national defense and Romney seems to be an Economic Conservative the question is which one of these men will appoint the strict constructionists judges that are needed to protect the integrity of our Constitution?

According to McCain Judge Sam Alito wears Conservativism on his sleeve and is an example of someone that he wouldn’t appoint as a judge. If that’s the case Judge Alito is who we should be considering for President, as Conservatives, not John McCain.

Because what Conservatives, what Republicans need right now is someone who is not afraid to be a Conservative what we need is someone who is not afraid to proudly demonstrate that fact. Conservatives need not be ashamed, of any of our values if Hillary and Obama can wear their beliefs on their sleeves, and they do, we certainly are entitled.

Hillary and Obama proudly confess their allegiance to Liberalism they don’t care who knows that they hold disdain for Conservatism. They boast of their life long fight against Conservatism. Never do you hear Conservative politicians making claims that they are fighting against the wrong ideas of Liberalism.

Too often John McCain Republicans are to often ready to forsake conservative principles to get along with Liberal Democrats who hate them and everything that they stand for, to borrow a sentiment from Democrat National Chairman Howard Dean.

So as Florida considers which Republican should carry the banner for the Republican Party one thing is certain, there is no prefect candidate but you must remember that George W. Bush came to Washington D.C. stating that he was a uniter and for that he was demonized and made a polarizing figure because Democrats don’t unite with Republicans they fight them.

Congressman Barney Frank speaking on behalf of the Clinton campaign says that Barack Obama would not be the right Democrat to lead his Party because Senator Obama doesn’t know the fights of the 90’s. Democrats and Liberals are still fighting the 90’s fights they are like the Southern Jefferson Davis Confederates who will not acknowledge that the North won the Civil war so they’re still fighting the Civil war.

As long as the Democrats are fighting the fights of the 90’s Republicans need someone who will not appease them. Republicans need a skillful politician that is able to communicate Conservative ideas and idealism, someone who is able to put voice to the ideas of Ronald Reagan. like Barak Obama so rightly recognized Ronald Reagan was able to speak to the hearts and minds of the American people and inspire Americans to put America first.

George Bush was woefully lacking in this regard, John McCain is no better a communicator and less of a committed Conservative.

Conservatives are about preserving the ideas and institutions that make this country uniquely E Pluribus Unum, out of many one, one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

The Change that Liberals are offering is a Balkanizing Multi-cultural special interest divided heavy regulated nation that is contradictory to the American ideas of freedom and unity.

In my opinion John McCain doesn’t represent nor does he fight for Conservativism, John McCain betrays Conservativism.

What we most need now is someone who can articulate Conservative ideas and who is willing to stand up and fight for those ideas.

If Floridian Republicans fail to stand up and fight for the candidate that will most benefit the Conservative cause our country will definitely fall back in the wrong direction.

A bridge to the 20th Century! Fighting the old fights of the 90’s a la Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party.

Monday, January 28, 2008

Clinton Fading from Inevitable

Senator Clinton fading

Employing innuendo and half-truths against Sen. Barack Obama, Sen. Hillary Clinton and her husband, the former President, have introduced the politics of personal destruction to the Democratic presidential campaign. They bear responsibility for cheapening the tone of the contest.

Sen. Clinton began distorting Obama's record in Monday night's debate and yesterday began airing a television attack that twists a recent Obama statement about former President Ronald Reagan to the point of clear inaccuracy. Bill Clinton, meanwhile, has wrongly accused Obama both of injecting race into the debate and of running a negative campaign against his wife.
--Daily News
You think that Democrats lying is something new? Then you must be a partisan because for almost 8 years Democrats have relentlessly attacked George Bush and the Republican Party with lies and deceit but it didn’t matter because partisan Democrats believed that Republicans deserve to be lied on and have their record and words distorted.

But what is new is Democrats lying on one another and distorting Democrat words with the perfidy that they usually reserve for Republicans.

Barack Obama just devastated the Democrat field in South Carolina with 55% of the vote in spite of the Clinton campaign’s lies. These are lies that are normally reserved for Republicans and using them against a fellow Democrat poses a major problem for the Clinton campaign because if the Clinton’s win the Party’s nomination they have already shown that they are willing to say and do anything, right or wrong, true or false.

What this means that everything that they say is now cast in doubt. They will not be able to draw honest and principled Independents, Moderates and Liberal John McCain Republicans.

Who is going to believe anything that the Clinton’s say except the hard left partisan Clinton supporter. That means that only those who care nothing about anything except getting Hillary elected for whatever unfathomable reason that they may have, whether it’s because she’s a woman or because she’s a woman. (There’s really no other reason to vote for her) will vote for her.

Hillary’s fade from inevitability comes because the stark reality is her followers can no longer nod their heads collectively and blame Bush, the Republicans and the vast right wing conspiracy for Clintonesque politics of personal destruction.

Because her attacks have targeted fellow Democrats the partisan Democrat zombies that usually hang on her every word are now waking from their lockstep sleepwalk and are questioning Bill’s and Hillary’s truthfulness.

There are some that will never question a Democrat like the rabid Ultra-partisan Eleanor Clift who tries desperately to convince herself that Clinton tactics and lying are actually good for Democrat politics. And there are some like the Los Angeles Times Opinion page that at least raises the question about the Clinton’s and their unscrupulous campaigning.

One thing everyone is willing to acknowledge and that is the Clintons have damaged Democrat politics by exposing Democrat tactics that would normally go unquestioned if those tactics were used against Republicans according to Ronald Brownstein.
Well, that’s not how I heard it, Bob, But if that were the case, you know, we all have to compare and contrast our records. That’s legitimate. You know, the idea that somehow someone’s record, someone’s words are off-limits, I’ve never—I’ve never seen that in American politics, to be, you know, reflective of my experience.

And I think it’s important that we draw these contrast. You’ll have to look at exactly what was said, but that’s up to the commentators.
– Sen. Hillary Clinton, To Face the Nation
In her interview on to Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer Sen. Clinton said, “You know, the idea that somehow someone’s record, someone’s words are off-limits, I’ve never—I’ve never seen that in American politics, to be, you know, reflective of my experience.”

Another lie Hillary the facts are your records as first lady of Arkansas and your records as the first lady of the United States of America are locked up safe and sound until 2012 by order of President Clinton. So that puts your record and words off-limits while you send your dumpster divers to dig up Sen. Obama’s Kindergarten essays. Do you think that's fair Hillary?
The lack of access is emerging as an issue in Hillary's presidential campaign: she cites her years of experience as First Lady as one of her prime qualifications to be president. Like other Democratic candidates, she has decried the "stunning record of secrecy" of the Bush administration; her campaign Web site vows to bring a "return to transparency" to government.

But Clinton's appointment calendar as First Lady, her notes at strategy meetings, what advice she gave her husband and his advisers, what policy memos she wrote, even some key papers from her health-care task force—all of this, and much more documenting her years as First Lady, remains locked away, most likely through the entire campaign season.
-- Michael Isikoff , NEWSWEEK
After all of the hype of the Clinton campaign we have seen Hillary for ourselves and judged that she is not inevitable she is not even certain to win the Democrat nomination.

If Democrats sign off on Hillary and accept her as their nominee they are making the statement that they approve of her lies, her deceit and her rapist husband. That statement is that the Democrat Party has selected another loser for the third consecutive presidential election and like Hillary the Democrat Party is fading fast into political irrelevance.

Judge the lies and deceit for yourself!

Friday, January 25, 2008

Stimulus transfers Banking and Business debt to Taxpayers

President Bush and Congress complicit in this scheme

My Daddy use to say that there ain't no free government cheese someone's got to pay for it! Likewise there isn't any free government $600 to $1200 dollar checks someone has to pay for them. You ever thought who?

Call me cynical but I found it somewhat disconcerting that the government has to give Americans money in the form of $150 billion dollars of tax refunds and tell Americans to go spent that money shopping in order for the economy to be stimulated.

Aren’t economies supposed to be based on something like, I don’t know, productively? When is consumer spending equal to factory and industrial production of real goods?
What? Is there nothing being produced in America anymore? Are there no jobs from which people can receive adequate salary compensation, we need the government to dole out money like writing checks on an empty checking account because jobs that paid living wages were outsourced to minimize corporate cost while maximizing corporate profits?

That brings us to the question are we so far under government and corporate control that big daddy government has to give us each an allowance and tell us to run along and go to the movies and buy some popcorn?

Am I the only one? Who else is raising this question?

To stimulate the economy the president and congress just voted for $300 to $1200 dollar tax cuts for 117 million families. Now I would be the last person to speak against tax cuts but when these particular tax cuts are tied to the welfare of the economy I’m thinking “house of cards” time and it’s about to all come tumbling down.

Does anyone want to know what’s in the package, how it will work and why the U.S. economy is in such disrepair? This can’t be good. Here on one hand the government is speaking about competing in Global Market economies and on the other hand it is doling out dollars to prop up a U.S. economy that has no economy infrastructure other than spending money at restaurants and Wal-Mart.

It’s like shopping is the only thing what fuels the U.S. economy. Is that true, is the consumer the economic stimulus that fuels our economy? Do you know how crazy that is? Is that why at the beginning of the Iraq war the president admonished us all to continue with our normal lives go shopping and go to the mall?

Maybe you’ve noticed a pattern like me that at every change of Presidential leadership someone decides to siphon off money from the U.S. economy and send the country into a recession. Who are the forces behind this? It happened in 2001 when Clinton was leaving the White house and it is once again happening as Bush is exiting. Maybe they think that we would be too busy with politics to notice.

Now the question is who would be best to lead in this kind of economic crisis? Conventional wisdom would favor the Democrats. The only problem is neither Hillary nor Barack has ever had any executive or business experience. And as Hillary has said on several occasions you need someone who would know what to do the first day that they enter into the White house. Unfortunately that would not be her! Hillary ruled herself out by her own standard of competence.

The only candidate that has the executive and business experience needed to lead in this crisis is Republican Governor Mitt Romney. He is the only one who has run a successful multi-million dollar business and he alone has executive experience as Governor of Massachusetts.

This is not an endorsement of Governor Romney but seeing how most voters are determining their vote based on the candidate’s sex, race or likeability I thought that I would mention that if most American really knew what we face as China, Russia, the EU and Islamic terrorist have joined in attempting to dismantle the U.S. economy, meaning no jobs, no homes and recession. This is happening now no matter what some of the other candidates are promising you.

Maybe Americans should rethink and select a serious candidate with credentials rather than the fairly tale of the first female or black president. (To borrow a term from Bill Clinton)

You want to know how bad it really is? President Bush and a Democrat controlled Congress just sat down together and agreed to give American money that we don’t have to go spend in an economy that is in collapse because of economic policies that have allowed corporations and banks to rip off Americans in sub-prime mortgages and other deceptive business and banking practices.

So you the taxpayer/consumers are being put on the hook to cover the debt that is being passed to you from defaulting banks and corporations because you the consumer/taxpayers could not pay the usurious balloon adjustable interest rates connected to your teaser sub-prime loans.

Banks and business are not going to suffer these losses you the tax payer are going to pay for it.

And because the Government, Banks, and Corporations think that you are stupid it comes in the form of a $600 to $1200 dollar tax refund that you will pay back with interest in stealth taxes which will bail out mortgage companies and banks and business by allowing them to pass on the losses to the American taxpayer/consumers.

You ever seen the Matrix? The human energy cells that the machines derived their power from? That’s you! And Soylent green, that’s you too!

Isn’t it great to be an American! Vote wisely.

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Clintons make elections Race and Sex Wars and then Sleep

Bill and Hillary Sleeping at the Reagan Funeral

Bill Clinton said Wednesday he expects blacks to vote for Barack Obama and women to vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton, and the dynamic may cause his wife to lose the South Carolina Democratic presidential primary Saturday.-- CHARLES BABINGTON

Who injected race and sex into the 2008 presidential elections? Well it wasn’t Barack Obama. On the contrary Obama has been doing everything that he can to minimize race as a factor in this election.

While he's awake President Clinton is in South Carolina fighting for every black vote that he can get. And in apparent acts of desperation Bill and Hillary Clinton have played both the race and the sex card in order to split the vote and attempt to give Hillary an advantage according to Dick Morris. (More White people than Black people)
So why is he (President Clinton) making such a fuss over a contest he knows he's going to lose?
Precisely because he is going to lose it. If Hillary loses South Carolina and the defeat serves to demonstrate Obama's ability to attract a bloc vote among black Democrats, the message will go out loud and clear to white voters that this is a racial fight. It's one thing for polls to show, as they now do, that Obama beats Hillary among African-Americans by better than 4-to-1 and Hillary carries whites by almost 2-to-1.

But most people don't read the fine print on the polls. But if blacks deliver South Carolina to Obama, everybody will know that they are bloc-voting. That will trigger a massive white backlash against Obama and will drive white voters to Hillary Clinton.
Dick Morris

Mr. Clinton also attended the Martin Luther King birthday on Monday where he fell asleep right in the pulpit. Not the first time the Clintons have fallen asleep at an important event they used President Ronald Reagan’s funeral to catch up on some much needed rest too. (see picture above)

And then tired of a hard month of dissing Barack Obama, well you know running down your wife’s competition can take a lot out of you, Mr. Clinton fell asleep at the Martin Luther King birthday celebration. (maybe he and Mrs. Clinton suffer from severe Sleep Apnea)

Apparently President Clinton thought it a great idea to grab some shut-eye and have a dream of his own at the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. celebration on Dr. King’s birthday right behind Dr. King’s son Martin Luther King III.

After all Martin III is not the speaker that his daddy was and Mr. Clinton hasn’t campaigned this hard since he whipped George H.W. Bush, H. Ross Perot and then Bob Dole in his own presidential campaigns. So get some rest Bill!

Am I the only one getting the distinct feeling that we are boring the Clintons! Please, someone just wake Mr. and Mrs. Clinton coronate Hillary and get it over with!

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Chris Matthews was right

Liberal Pundit Chris Matthews
"[T]he reason she's a U.S. senator, the reason she's a candidate for president, the reason she may be a front-runner is her husband messed around."—Chris Matthews on Senator Hillary Clinton

Mea Culpa, Mea Culpa was Chris Matthews’ forced confession. His sins were that he dared to state the obvious and he dared to tell the truth.

Matthews is the ultra Liberal talk show pundit who normally lands on the correct side of Liberal issues but alas this time he got it terribly wrong. He told the truth.

There is really no accounting for Matthews’ sudden fit of veracity, Tourette syndrome temporary madness or perhaps early Alzheimers can’t tell, but whatever the malady that caused his superfluity of truthfulness Liberals are enraged at him.

Liberals are best known for nodding in mindless unison to any lie just as long as the lie begins or ends with the name George Bush.

Matthews is reported to have said that the only reason that Hillary Clinton is a U.S. senator, a candidate for president or even the front-runner for the Democrat nomination is that her husband the former president Bill Clinton is a philanderer. Matthews’s statement clearly intimating that Senator Clinton political good fortune is due to total unmerited sympathy not a result of any political acumen on her part is something intuitively known by all but apparently considered sacrilege to speak.

But we have recently seen the power of the sympathy vote! In New Hampshire where Hillary demonstrated the “I almost had a tear” speech, women rallied to her cause because apparently they thought they were supporting a sister in distress thus lifting Senator Clinton from a predicted dire two digit defeat in New Hampshire to a historical comeback victory over Senator Obama. Little did they know that Mrs. Clinton was following her scripted campaign agenda which called for her to show a more human side because the polls said that a softer side was a winning formula and did it ever work! Were women ever suckered?

So now National Organization for Women, Feminist Majority and National Women's Political Caucus have sent a joint letter of complaint to NBC News President Steve Capus regarding Matthews’ comments yet these hypocrites never ever defended a single woman that Bill Clinton abused. And believe me there were multiple opportunities for these so-called women’s rights organizations to do so. NOW, Feminist Majority or National Women’s Political Caucus could have defended any of the many women that were assaulted by Bill Clinton why didn't they?

According to JT Thompson of the Hillary project feminist have not been so quick to defend women’s rights when those rights were violated by Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Eileen Wellstone: a 19-year-old English woman who said Clinton sexually assaulted her after she met him at a pub near Oxford where the future President was a student in 1969. It was this rape that caused Clinton to be quietly expelled from Oxford and the loss of his Fulbright Scholarship.

In 1972, a 22-year-old woman told campus police at Yale University that she was sexually assaulted by Clinton while he was a law student at the college. No charges were filed, but retired campus policemen contacted by Capitol Hill Blue confirmed the incident

In 1974, a female student at the University of Arkansas complained that then-law school instructor Bill Clinton groped her and forced his hand inside her blouse. She complained to her faculty advisor who confronted Clinton, but Clinton claimed the student ''came on'' to him. The student left the school shortly after the incident. Reached at her home in Texas, the former student confirmed the incident.

Juanita Broaddrick: a gubernatorial campaign volunteer said Mr. Clinton raped her during a nursing-home-operators convention in Little Rock in April 1978.

From 1978-1980, during Clinton's first term as governor of Arkansas, state troopers assigned to protect the governor were aware of at least seven complaints from women who said Clinton forced, or attempted to force, himself on them sexually.

Gennifer Flowers: In 1992, Flowers claimed she had a 12 year affair with Bill Clinton. Although this was a consensual relationship, he lied to the American people on national television that he was not having an affair.

Flowers was smeared in the media after going public of the affair. "These are the people that literally went out to destroy my life and were very successful in many aspects," reported Flowers. "[Hillary] was the general who gave the directives to her troops to go out and search and destroy."

Sally Perdue: a former Miss Arkansas who said she had a four-month affair with him in 1983. After coming forward, she had her car window smashed, and shotgun shells left on the driver's seat.
Sandra Allen James: a former Washington, D.C., political fund-raiser who said Mr. Clinton invited her to his hotel room during a 1991 campaign trip, pinned her against the wall and put his hand under her dress.

Christy Zercher: an airline flight attendant on Mr. Clinton's 1992 campaign plane, who said Mr. Clinton exposed himself and grabbed her breasts and made explicit remarks about oral sex. A video shot on board the plane by ABC News shows an obviously inebriated Clinton with his hand between another young flight attendant's legs.

German Clinton Float

Carolyn Moffet: a legal secretary in Little Rock in 1979 said, "I was escorted there [Mr. Clinton’s hotel room] by a state trooper. When I went in, he was sitting on a couch, wearing only an undershirt. He pointed at his penis and told me to suck it. I told him I didn't even do that for my boyfriend and he got mad, grabbed my head and shoved it into his lap.

Elizabeth Ward Gracen: a former Miss Arkansas and Miss America who won the crown in 1982, told friends she was forced by Clinton to have sex with him shortly after she won her state crown.

Elizabeth received threatening phone calls, and her belongings were ransacked while Elizabeth was on vacation in St. Martin by 3 men in suits (according to a witness). Her manager Vincent Vento said these intimidating phone callers said "You should really keep your mouth shut about Bill Clinton and go on with your life. You could be discredited. You could have an IRS investigation."

Paula Jones: in a hotel room in 1991, Jones claimed Bill Clinton dropped his pants, exposed himself, and asked for sexual favors from her. In 1994, she filed a lawsuit against Bill Clinton. The case was settled out of court, and Jones was awarded $850,000.

Kathleen Willey, a one-time White House aide, who accused him of groping her. During a November 1993 interview at the White House when, she testified under oath in federal court, Mr. Clinton was "very forceful" in the unwanted sexual advance -- kissing her on the mouth, touching her breasts and putting his hands under her dress.

After coming forward with her allegations, Kathleen Willey had the tires on her car mysteriously punctured with dozens of nails and her cat suddenly disappeared.

Monica Lewinksy – an intern who had an affair with President Clinton while in the oval office. Bill Clinton publicly denied under oath having a sexual relationship with Miss Lewinksy, but was later forced to admit that he did have an "inappropriate relationship", after tape recordings were released during a trial as evidence of the affair. Clinton’s perjury lead to an impeachment trial.

Linda Tripp -- close confidante to Monica Lewinksy was vindictively fired from government service In January 1998 the last day of the Clinton administration, for being a whistle blower.

Tripp gave surreptitiously recorded tapes to then-Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr in exchange for Immunity from prosecution. Tripp disclosed to Starr that she was aware of the relationship between Lewinsky and President Clinton, that Lewinsky had executed a false affidavit denying the relationship that was submitted to the federal court in Arkansas in the Jones v. Clinton lawsuit, and that Lewinsky had attempted to suborn Tripp's perjury in the Jones v. Clinton suit to conceal the Clinton-Lewinsky relationship as well as Tripp's knowledge of the Kathleen Willey incident from the federal court.

As Tripp explained, she was being solicited to commit a crime to conceal evidence in the Jones civil rights case.[5]

Tripp also informed Starr of the existence of a navy blue dress that Lewinsky owned that was impregnated with Clinton's semen. During their friendship, Lewinsky had shown the dress to Tripp and said she intended to have it dry-cleaned; Tripp convinced her not to.

Kim Gandy, NOW's president, said last night that "Chris Matthews is a repeat offender when it comes to sexist attitudes toward women politicians. . . . I wasn't really looking for an apology. I was looking for a behavior change, and for him to treat female politicians the same way as male politicians."

Well if Chris Matthews is a repent offender Ms. Gandy, he’s not the only one. And where was NOW or any of the so-called feminist organizations when Bill Clinton was offending repeatedly? Hypocrites!

Finally I noticed that no one said that Matthews was lying only that his remarks were nasty.

It’s ironic that Hillary Clinton who at worst is complicit in several of Bill Clinton’s cover-ups of his abuse of women or she is at best an enabler of her husband’s wantonly criminal behavior is being defended by National Organization for Women, Feminist Majority and National Women's Political Caucus on behalf of women’s rights.

Rights that Mrs. Clinton herself violated every time she stood by her man against women that he had violated. Chris Matthews was right Hillary would never have gotten where she is if it wasn’t for her appearing to be a victim in Bill Clinton’s a long sorted sexual predatory career. A career where she more often than not was not a victim but Bonnie to his Clyde!

And you want to let this, back into the White house?

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Great News....... or is it?

Great News from the Federal Reserve Bank.
A three-quarter point cut in the federal funds
and the prime rates.

Would be a great help in reducing the massive
consumer debt on the books at high interest
rates, if it weren't for the "sacred-cow" of the
credit world.............. the thieving credit card

There are still millions of middle and lower
class people, who are being forced to pay 25%
and even up as high as 29.5% interest on their
credit cards................... in spite of the fact that
they have never been late paying, and have always
paid at least the minimum payment due.

WHY??????? Simple answer is that the "powers
that be" at the banks, decided in their infinite wisdom
............. that YOU, might be carrying just a little more
debt than they think you should. And so, they are
anticipating a default by the cardholder, even without
proof that it will happen.

If the White House and our do-nothing Democratic
Congress, really want to help this country get out of
it's massive debt..................... FORCE the banks to
bring the credit card interest down to a justifiable rate
............ one that is realistic in today's interest rate scenario
............... and one that is morally right!

So long as the banks can keep favor with Congress,
and are free to rake in massive profits on the backs
of those who can least afford it.....don't expect any
miracles. What we need is some legislation that will
protect the public, instead of our elected officials, and
those who keep them in power.


Something Evil Comes this Way

This year, for the first time, expatriate Democrats can cast their ballots on the Internet in a presidential primary for people living outside the United States.--JESSICA BERNSTEIN-WAX
It portends to be the end of American elections as we know them and I wouldn’t call it ironic that the news is coming out of Mexico City. What’s being reported will have consequences that will undoubtedly have world-wide implications on American elections.

What is being reported is Americans Abroad Can Now Vote Online. But the truth is only Americans who are Democrats can vote online, that’s right Democrats only, just read the article. What this means is now Mexico and Europe will be able to taper online with American elections starting in 2008.

Sounds just about right huh? After all American elections are about getting as many people to vote as possible right? Just as long as they are Democrats and it doesn’t matter whether they are illegal aliens, felons or so called expatriate Democrats (better known as Mexican and European voters) if you help the Party’s plan of advancing homosexuality, tax increases and making America less safe at home and abroad then vote online even if you left the country because George Bush was elected in 2000 and re-elected in 2004.

In the 2000 Presidential elections China and Europe would have given their eye’s tooth to affect the outcome for Democrats.

In the 2004 elections Terrorist and Europeans would have voted for Democrats if they were allowed.
U.S. citizens wanting to vote online must join Democrats Abroad before Feb. 1 and indicate their preference to vote by Internet instead of in the local primaries wherever they last lived in the United States. They must promise not to vote twice for president, but can still participate in non-presidential local elections.
So it’s an honor system, Democrats must promise not to vote twice for president… Yeah right!

Hey you think Democrats were complaining about the Clinton campaign cheating in the Nevada primary last weekend? This ability to vote on-line is just ripe for corruption. How could the Congress allow it? Oh yeah Democrat controlled Congress with RINO’s like John McCain making sure that we have equal and “fair” elections.

Didn't it occur to anyone that one Party shouldn't be able to vote online if the other Party can not? For this incompetence alone Congress should be disbanded!

And everyone knows that a fair election is an election won by Democrats right? In America we only call for recounts if a Republican wins.

Muslims have riots over cartoons and teddy bears, what will it take for Americans to take exception at the corrupting of American elections, Osama bin Laden casting a vote for his favorite Democrat candidate?

Are there any Republicans out there? There may not be after 2008 with Democrat’s latest innovation in stealing elections, world participation in America’s electoral process.

My, what will they think of next?!?

Oh yeah and will someone please logon for Alex Baldwin, Kim Basinger, Eddie Vedder, and Robert Altman who all promised to become expatriates if George Bush won in 2000.

I’m sure they don’t want to miss this election being that they’re out of the country!

Monday, January 21, 2008

Dead Campaign Walking

Senator McCain wife Cindy and Sen. Joe Lieberman

Once considered the favorite in a multi-candidate field, McCain capsized last year, his campaign plummeting as he defended a plan to give illegal immigrants an eventual path to citizenship, angering a GOP conservative base that had never fully trusted the senator, especially after he broke with President Bush on tax cuts. A raft of senior aides abandoned ship, and more were laid off as McCain ran out of money. -- Libby Quaid, AP writer

John McCain is a man without a Party! Funny how that works. You spend a political career disassociating with the Party that you supposedly represent to curry favor with the opposition Party and come your quest to become President you can’t find a Party to support you. Independents and Democrats aren’t going to support you in the 2008 Presidential election; they’ve got their own candidate and well the Party that you’ve betrayed is looking for a Conservative. Mavericks need not apply!

Sure McCain won New Hampshire and South Carolina but that was only on the strength of Independent and Democrat votes. Are Independents and Democrats going to support McCain in a contest against an Obama or Hillary candidate for President? One word answer… NO!

The one thing that Independents, Democrats and Republicans all agree on is that absolutely no one is going to vote for Senator John McCain for President in the upcoming 2008 Presidential elections. Nobody! John McCain has allowed himself to be used as a tool by the enemies of Conservatives to fracture the Party. Outside of that function McCain serves no useful purpose to anyone.

McCain is the choice of Independents and Democrats for the Republican Party kind of like Democrats where the favorite Party of the enemies of America in 2000 and 2004. You do remember bin Laden chiming in on our 2004 elections attempting to dissuade Americans from voting for President Bush. Same thing! Independents and Democrats are attempting to dissuade Republicans from voting for a Conservative candidate to lead the Republican Party ergo McCain’s primary wins in New Hampshire and South Carolina.
In New Hampshire, McCain's fate was determined by independent voters, who helped McCain win the state over Bush eight years ago. While he was neck-and-neck with Romney among Republicans, more than a third of independents backed McCain, compared with a quarter for Romney, according to exit surveys for The Associated Press and the television networks.

McCain's main challenge is to re-assure the right. He is still weak among Republicans and conservatives, obviously major vulnerabilities in a GOP nomination fight. He only tied Huckabee among Republicans in South Carolina; his margin came from a 39-22 percent victory over Huckabee among the 19 percent of voters who were independents.
He won overwhelmingly among liberal and moderate voters, but lost self-identified conservatives
.-- Rich Lowry
John McCain had no chance of winning the Republican nominee last summer his campaign was written of as a “fare thee well” Senator McCain because McCain had completed a Liberal trifecta of back stabbing in the Republican Party.

McCain-Feingold, the gang of 14, and McCain-Kennedy, one poke after another from McCain in the eye of his nemeses, Conservatives. If John McCain has shown anything in his long career of insider politics, he demonstrates that he has a propensity to make deals with political enemies who have sworn to destroy the Conservative Party.
Amongst grassroots conservatives, John McCain's name is an expletive -- and for good reason -- because he has made a name for himself by knifing conservatives time and time again for the amusement of his liberal pals in the mainstream media. --John Hawkins
So it is not beyond reason to ask the question did John McCain make a secret deal with his Liberal allies. A deal that would cause disruption within the Republican Party and guarantee that no Conservative would receive the nomination from the Republican Party?

Was Senator McCain encouraged to running in spite of the fact that he has zero Conservative backing? Encouraged by those whose plan is to win the White house for Liberals and if not win then place a Liberal Manchurian Candidate in the White house who will do the bidding of Liberals at the code words “This is Ted Kennedy McCain Listen.”

John McCain would be a Liberal “sleeper” in the White house much like the sleeper terrorist cells that are undoubtedly waiting for their cues which are presently embedded in America now.

McCain’s campaign is like “Weekend at Bernie’s” so you’ve got to be asking who’s propping him up? If not Conservatives who?

That is the point! With no Republican or Conservative backing we shouldn’t even be wasting time even considering the Maverick.

Sooo just who is so inclined to prop up Sen. McCain as a potential Republican candidate for President if Conservatives and Republicans aren’t? Where’s McCain’s base?

That’s exactly my point a dead campaign walking!

Friday, January 18, 2008

The Sacred Cow of Global warming is in the Freezer


Dr Hansen said we have about 10 years to put into effect the draconian measures needed to curb CO2 emissions quickly enough to avert a dangerous rise in global temperature.

Otherwise, the extra heat could trigger the rapid melting of polar ice sheets, made far worse by the "albedo flip" - when the sunlight reflected by white ice is suddenly absorbed as ice melts to become the dark surface of open water.

The glaciers and ice sheets of Greenland in the northern hemisphere, and the western Antarctic ice sheet in the south, both show signs of the rapid changes predicted with rising temperatures. "--
Steve Connor, Science Editor quoting Dr. James Hansen
One would never eat a sacred cow even if it meant that one would be saved from starvation. Likewise, one would never accept any scientific evidence countering the theory of anthropomorphic global warming because global warming has became the politically correct sacred cow of the warm-earthers, those who believe in the theory of global warming based on pseudo-scientific economically driven politics.

In spite of Al Gore’s and Dr. James Hansen’s dire warnings of imminent catastrophic consequences of global warming there has not been overall temperature change in the global ambient temperature since 1998.

And now the playground for global warming advocates has frozen over. Oh you didn’t know? Greenland the place that everyone goes to see the melting and receding glaciers is frozen over.

Greenland had recently become to the Arctic Circle what Disneyworld is to Florida, one giant tourist attraction, everyone goes to Greenland to say, I have seen with my own eyes the affects of global warming on the melting glaciers of Greenland.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has gone to Greenland! She went last Memorial day 2007. And as I just mentioned she came back a born again warm-earther. She believes, she believes!

Yet recent evidence is suggesting that the Global is actually cooling rather than warming. That would throw a wrench in the Global warming theory because CO2’s and other green house gases effects are supposed to heat the earth not allow it to cool!

Green house gases trap heat into the earth’s atmosphere and according to Al Gore, James Hansen and the United Nations’ IPCC this trapped heat will cause the earth to become warmer until the heat reaches biblical cataclysm proportions.

Uh question? Where is the cold coming from? If heat is trapped in the Earth’s atmosphere, and we know that it is, because Al Gore’s film, “An Inconvenient Truth” (which he won an Oscar for) told us so.

Why are scientists saying that by 2012 the earth will be in a global cooling trend? Here and here. And why is Greenland freezing over?

One would think that if heat is trapped in the Earth’s atmosphere there would not be any room for cold would it?

This is my wish if there is a trend of global cooling and it is proven to happen as predicted. My wish is for everyone who propagated Global warming be stripped of any office of leadership or awards that they may have and have acquired. And that anyone associated with this farce should be fired from any job that depends on credibility and/or scientific knowledge that they claim to have.

Also any money that they made from claims of global warming should be confiscated.

As a matter of fact all of their worldly possessions should be confiscated and they should be shamed before the world as charlatans and fools never to be listened to or given a place of prominence ever again.

Thursday, January 17, 2008

Democrats Offer Affirmative Action Candidates: None qualified

Affirmative Action babies Obama, Edwards and Clinton

Senator Clinton wrongly assessing the surge in spite of her experience

So I give you tremendous credit for presenting as positive a view of a rather grim reality. And I believe that you, and certainly the very capable people working with both of you, were dealt a very hard hand.

And it's a hand that is unlikely to improve, in my view.
[Y]ou have been made the de facto spokesmen for what many of us believe to be a failed policy.

Despite what I view as your rather extraordinary efforts in your testimony both yesterday and today, I think that the reports that you provide to us really require the willing suspension of disbelief.
–Sen. Hillary Clinton, Questions General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker on Iraq at Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing
Democrat front runners have a lot in common even though they take great pains to draw artificial distinctions between themselves.

Distinctions like Race, experience or who really is for change.
Yet the glaring reality is they each have something in common. What that is, is they are all unqualified to be President of the United States.

The bar has been significantly lowered to allow for this crop of Democrat Affirmative Action Babies; a Black, a woman and a rich lawyer trying to pass himself off as a populist. The bar had to be lowered to allow them to present themselves as worthy choices.

Also it gives you, the voter, chance to entertain the notion that one of them is worthy of your vote, or as Senator Clinton put it, to believe that any one of the Democrat front runners are qualified to be President requires the willing suspension of disbelief.

Clinton said that in regards to General Petraeus’ testimony before Congress regarding the surge of American troop in Iraq. Then Clinton dressed General Petraeus down as a surrogate for the Bush administration failed Iraqi policy before Democrats knew that the surge would work. No one in his or her right mind would dire say that the surge is not working now!

But since one of the major candidates is making experience her main platform stance lets take a look at their qualifications. Timothy Noah of Slate says that Senator Clinton claim of experience is not what it seems and Christopher Hitchens reminds us of what an absolute mess the Clintons put the country through the first time they were in the White house.

First the qualified Democrat candidates have already dropout of contention leaving in effect a Democrat process that is the equivalent of a High school Prom King and Queen contest. “Is Hillary likable?” She’s a woman so vote for her.

The most experienced and qualified among the major candidates seeking the Democratic nomination were Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware and Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut. They have now dropped out. If Democrats really wanted experience they’d bring back Biden or Dodd!

What Democrats have left are Affirmative Action Candidates.
Edwards [the rich lawyer/populist] served a single term in the Senate. Obama [the Black] served eight years in the Illinois state Senate and is halfway through his first term in the U.S. Senate.

Clinton [the woman] is about to begin her eighth year in the U.S. Senate. Going by years spent as an elective official, Obama's 11 years exceeds Clinton's seven, which in turn exceeds Edwards' six.
—Timothy Noah

If Mrs. Clinton receives the Democrat nomination it won’t be that she’s the best qualified though she is running on her experience. Instead Democrats who vote for Senator Clinton will do it for other reasons. They will vote for her because they like her, she’s a woman, she’s a Democrat, she’s white or she is a candidate of dynasty.

Some Democrats will vote for Senator Obama because he is a charismatic speaker, he’s black and he’s not Hillary.

And some Democrats will vote for Senator Edwards because he’s not Hillary or Obama.

This year Democrats aren't really running on real experience. To be President this year it only matters that you like them, you really like them! That is how unsubstantive Democrats are today. Oh and it doesn’t hurt if you’re a women, a black or a $500.00 dollar haircut candidate.

Anyone can be the Prom King or Queen (President) under Affirmative Action because it's only a High School popularity contest anyways.

So goes the Republic under Liberals and Democrats!

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

And Now a Civil Rights Lesson From the Great Senator Hillary Clinton…

Apparently President Lyndon Johnson had the Dream

“I would point to the fact that that Dr. King’s dream began to be realized when President Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, when he was able to get through Congress something that President Kennedy was hopeful to do, the president before had not even tried, but it took a president to get it done.”

“That dream became a reality, the power of that dream became real in people’s lives because we had a president who said we are going to do it and actually got it accomplished.”
—Hillary Rodham Clinton
Maybe we’ve all got it terribly wrong. Instead of celebrating Dr. Martin Luther King’s birthday this coming Monday, January 21, 2008 maybe we should instead be celebrating President Lyndon Baines Johnson’s Birthday who was born on August 27, 1908.

After all it took Senator Hillary Clinton to remind us all of the real history of the Civil Rights movement and that the heavy lifting of the movement would not have been accomplished if not for the White man who was the President and in the process she almost caused a race riot within the Democrat Party.

And then the good Senator intimated that maybe she is the White woman who would best fulfill the legacy of President Lyndon Johnson’s civil rights accomplishments. Lard knows that she just recently single-handedly, “…liberated us to actually let women be human beings in public.” With her ‘I almost had a tear’ speech in New Hampshire. (what a megalomaniacal narcissist)

I suppose to Senator Clinton all that civil rights stuff was just a Black man dreaming until a White man actually did something about it, right Mrs. Clinton?

So according to Sen. Clinton, Sen. Obama is a Black man with false hopes dreaming about becoming President of the United States of America but it will take a White woman to actually become what a dreamer can’t become.

Apparently other white people think so too. That’s why they are polling for Senator Clinton 41 percent to 27 percent for Senator Obama. And Likewise blacks are polling for Senator Obama 66 percent to 16 percent who say they will vote for Senator Clinton. Thank you for bring the country together Mrs. Clinton! As only a Clinton could!

And why is it that someone always has to explain what Hillary intended to say? Are we going to have 4 years of… “Welcome to the 112th press conference of the month, I’d like to begin by saying that President Clinton did not mean what you thought she said, what she actually said was…”

Every time I look around someone is explaining what Hillary Clinton said! Life shouldn’t have to be so complicated. It doesn’t have to be, does it?

Heck, now I’ve got to take down all of my Dr. King pictures and replacing them with someone who actually did something for civil rights, President Lyndon Baines Johnson!

Then I’ve got to change my vote from the Black guy who just sounds good to the White lady that will actually get the job done.

Is that what you’re attempting to say Hillary? If not I’m sure someone will contact me and put me right.

Can somebody play another race card I think Senator Clinton just played her last!

In the meantime you decide what she was attempting to say:

Tuesday, January 15, 2008

John McCain won’t be the Republican Nominee

The Real McCain is not a Republican

The Real John McCain should be an ex-Senator walking. He shouldn't even be considered as a Presidential hopeful. Republicans will never forget what he and eleven other so-called Republicans did joined by President Bush to attempt to force, Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act, or Amnesty for illegal aliens on America.

Sens. Bennett, (UT), Craig (ID), Graham (SC), Gregg (NH), Hagel (NE), Kyl (AZ), Lott (MS), Lugar (IN), Martinez (FL), Snowe (ME) and Specter (PA) all thought that they would, see us at the bill signing, as President Bush so ugly and arrogantly put it.

But the bill signing never occurred. Thanks in large part to 35 Republican Senators who were joined by 28 Democrat Senators who listened to their constituency rather than the corporate and special interest groups that that were really behind the CIRA.

But the damage was done President Bush, John McCain, Lindsey Graham and the other 10 Republican Senators learned nothing from the 1996 Republican Congressional defeat and they went on to fracture any remaining cohesion that was left in the Republican Party on this single issue.

Proving that the President and these Senators are not fully committed to Conservative ideas and were not smart enough to see that it would take a united Republican effort to stave off Democrat attempts to force their Liberal agenda on America now that Democrats were in the majority in both houses of Congress.

So Sen. John McCain will not be the Republican nominee, because he is not a Republican in the true sense of the word. John McCain is a Republican in name only, a RINO. That is why Independents, Democrats and the mainstream media like him and project him to win the Republican Michigan primary.

The enemies of Conservatives would love nothing better than a phony Republican to be the nominee of the Republican Party. If the Democrat candidate should happen to lose, no problem the fraudulent Republican John McCain would be President and he would ensure that no conservative agenda would go forward.
McCain supports amnesty for illegal aliens, was behind the Gang of 14, is a gun grabber, opposed the Bush tax cuts, ran roughshod over the Constitution with McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform, opposes a Constitutional amendment to protect marriage, was rumored to be considering switching parties multiple times, talked with John Kerry about being his Vice-President, lines up with the global warming alarmists, wants to close Gitmo, wants to coddle captured terrorists -- you can go on and on with this.

In other words, we're talking about a man who could fairly be called a Rockefeller Republican, a Country Club Republican, a RINO, or just a toweringly arrogant, out of touch D.C. insider who seems to assume that any position he takes is right solely because he happens to hold it. However, what John McCain cannot fairly be called is a conservative.
-- John Hawkins
After all of the above one wonders how any informed Republican could consider voting for McCain. McCain has confounded Republican interest too many times and there is one reason that he will not be the Republican nominee even if Independents and Democrats make him successful tomorrow.

That reason is Republicans will not vote for McCain. Why? In one word TRUST.

Republicans can not trust John McCain to fight for Conservative values and Conservative ideas. The reason that Conservatives lost both the House and the Senate in 2006 was because Republicans deserted Conservative values and Conservative ideas.

John McCain was one of the irresponsible Republican majority that squandered away the majority while they were kowtowing to Democrats and corrupting themselves.

The 1996 Republican majority put their own wants and desires above the good of the Republican Party and consequently was swept from power in the 1996 mid-term elections. John McCain always puts his wants and desires above the good of the Party.

Republicans did a number of things wrong but primarily they did not hold on to the core values of social conservatism, small government, and constitutional ism.

John McCain’s stance on illegal immigration has put him on the wrong side of all three of the core values that I’ve just mention.

McCain is willing to poke Republicans in the eye at every opportunity because he feels that he alone has a better way is the reason that he has endeared himself to the enemies of Conservatives while earning him the title of Maverick because many times he alone has caused Republican causes to fail.

Michigan’s primary is an open primary. Meaning that they do not prevent Independents or Democrats from voting in the Republican primary, if McCain should happen to win it wouldn’t be because conservatives voted for him.

People who vote for and support McCain are like McCain they aren’t Conservatives either.

Monday, January 14, 2008

Pay No Attention to the Snow in Baghdad the Planet is getting Warmer

Playing in Baghdad snowfall

'Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!' -- The Wizard of Oz

There has been no increase in Global temperatures since 1998! That’s 7 years of flat temperature contradicting the dire predictions of the imminent and the immediate threat of Global warming.

According to David Deming, South America this year experienced one of its coldest winters in decades. In Buenos Aires, snow fell for the first time since the year 1918. Dozens of homeless people died from exposure. In Peru, 200 people died from the cold and thousands more became infected with respiratory diseases. Crops failed, livestock perished, and the Peruvian government declared a state of emergency.

Unexpected bitter cold swept the entire Southern Hemisphere in 2007. Johannesburg, South Africa, had the first significant snowfall in 26 years. Australia experienced the coldest June ever. In northeastern Australia, the city of Townsville underwent the longest period of continuously cold weather since 1941. In New Zealand, the weather turned so cold that vineyards were endangered.

Last January, $1.42 billion worth of California produce was lost to a devastating five-day freeze. Thousands of agricultural employees were thrown out of work. At the supermarket, citrus prices soared. In the wake of the freeze, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger asked President Bush to issue a disaster declaration for affected counties. A few months earlier, Mr. Schwarzenegger had enthusiastically signed the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, a law designed to cool the climate. California Sen. Barbara Boxer continues to push for similar legislation in the U.S. Senate.

In April, a killing freeze destroyed 95 percent of South Carolina's peach crop, and 90 percent of North Carolina's apple harvest. At Charlotte, N.C., a record low temperature of 21 degrees Fahrenheit on April 8 was the coldest ever recorded for April, breaking a record set in 1923. On June 8, Denver recorded a new low of 31 degrees Fahrenheit. Denver's temperature records extend back to 1872.

Recent weeks have seen the return of unusually cold conditions to the Northern Hemisphere. On Dec. 7, St. Cloud, Minn., set a new record low of minus 15 degrees Fahrenheit. On the same date, record low temperatures were also recorded in Pennsylvania and Ohio.

Extreme cold weather is occurring worldwide. On Dec. 4, in Seoul, Korea, the temperature was a record minus 5 degrees Celsius. Nov. 24, in Meacham, Ore., the minimum temperature was 12 degrees Fahrenheit colder than the previous record low set in 1952. The Canadian government warns that this winter is likely to be the coldest in 15 years.

Oklahoma, Kansas and Missouri are just emerging from a destructive ice storm that left at least 36 people dead and a million without electric power.

Oh and we mustn’t forget that for the first time in 100 years there was snow fall in Baghdad!

But in spite of all of the evidence ‘Warm Earthers,’ promoters of the theory of anthropogenic caused global warming, are warning you to not believe the facts, do not look at the snow on the ground, do not acknowledge that there has been no global warming since 1998 and do not look behind the curtains at the real reasons that they want you be believe in the farce that is known as Global warming!

They’ve even acknowledged that they have a problem with the facts on the ground but they want you to believe them anyways not your lying eyes!
Climate change is still nudging up temperatures in the long term even though the warmest year was back in 1998 and 2008 has begun with unusual weather such as a cool Pacific and Baghdad's first snow in memory, experts said.-- Alister Doyle, Environment Correspondent
So called Global warming experts now acknowledge that the planet is actually getting colder but they what you to have faith in them anyways, just believe in Global warming!

Read their latest mumbo-jumbo attempting to half heartedly refute the fact that it is getting colder globally not warmer!

They are attempting to explain the facts away. The facts are they were wrong. Al Gore is wrong. There is no such thing as anthropogenic caused global warming with catastrophic consequences.

The fact is everything that we are experiencing is a normal natural occurrence called climate change. Climate change has happened since the world began and it will continue to happen whether or not man is on the planet. But you wouldn’t pay for something that you have no control over or something that you didn’t cause so that’s why you’re being duped with all of this Global warming nonsense.

There are only two inevitabilities death and taxes. Pay no attention to the snow on the ground or the colder world-wide temperatures, proponents of Global warming are attempting to establish a world tax on the environment via the Global warming scare.

And that my friend would be catastrophic!

Friday, January 11, 2008

Hillary the Great Liberator

Senator Clinton: Liberating Women everywhere

"Maybe I have liberated us to actually let women be human beings in public," said Clinton, the former first lady, reflecting on a memorable moment of emotion the day before she gained her own New Hampshire victory. --Dana Wilkie
Before Hillary Rodham Clinton women where emotional repressed slaves in public life thanks to their dominate male repressors. But Senator Clinton is working to change hundreds of years of world-wide male domination while reversing the ugly notion that big girls don’t cry!

Buoyed by her surprise win in New Hampshire, which wasn’t supposed by be a surprise at all because after all she is the candidate of inevitability, Hillary Clinton is proving the fact that Americans are gullible to the ways of Clintonian politics.

What the Clintons are infamous for doing is polling for results. They poll people to see what the people want to hear and then they tell the people exactly they want to hear. The people's own polled results back at them.

Senator Clinton will tell you that she listened to the people and that’s why she won in New Hampshire . That is absolutely the case. The Polls showed that Hillary’s image was too strident and too combative. What the people wanted was a more vulnerable, open and sincere soft side. And boy did she deliver!

Now that doesn’t mean that she IS more vulnerable, open, sincere and soft but that’s what you said you wanted and in order to win in New Hampshire that's what Hillary gave you! Only thing is it was all scripted. It was all an act!

Dick Morris a former Clinton adviser says that Hillary Clinton is a control freak and that everything that she does is planned. If Mr. Morris can be trusted then that one moment of quivering voice and welled up eyes was for the benefit of all of you that said that you wanted a more vulnerable Hillary and judging by Hillary’s victory she gave you just what you wanted. You've been played!

Now being the narcissist that she is she has beset and dubbed herself with the mantle of Liberator of all womankind. She is claiming that because of herself, Hillary Rodham Clinton, all women everywhere at whatever stage or station have been released from the bonds and restrictions of not being allow to be human beings in public. Ladies you can now remove your Burkas.

If you’re the head of a major corporation and you are a woman, if things aren’t going quite right just cry a little.

If you’re in command in the armed forces and you're under heavy fire just let it out! Go on cry a little.

If you’re a woman and you are the President of the United States and Europe just sabotaged your economy, Iran just launched nuclear missiles from technology acquired from Russia at Israel and the United States. In addition to all of that, a dirty bomb is ignited in the United States, what do you do? You now have the right to do the human thing,cry a little.

You’ve been freed to be an emotional woman at a time of great stress by Senator Clinton.

Now that’s progressive feminism if I’ve ever seen it! And we all have Hillary Clinton to thank! Hillary the Great Liberator!

Thank you Senator Clinton! And now excuse me I’m feeling a little misty right now.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Global Starvation?

Corn grows in a farm field near Seneca, Illinois. Upcoming shortages?

"If we will not endure a king as a political power we should not endure a king over the production, transportation, and sale of any of the necessaries of life."—John Sherman

You’re probably like me extremely concerned over who will be in charge of this country’s future. You’re probably equally concerned about the war in Iraq, whether there will be another terrorist attack against America, the reality or the fallacy of Global warming, rising gas prices, or the general corrupting of our culture and you probably want to know who is responsible for corrupting it. Right?

As you think on those things here’s another thing to consider, and its ramifications are far more immediate than Global warming, there is an upcoming crisis with the world food supply and nobody really want you to know. Rising demand for grain to make fuel, food and livestock feed has helped push the prices of corn and soybeans to record prices.
A new crisis is emerging, a global food catastrophe that will reach further and be more crippling than anything the world has ever seen. The credit crunch and the reverberations of soaring oil prices around the world will pale in comparison to what is about to transpire, Donald Coxe, global portfolio strategist at BMO Financial Group said at the Empire Club's 14th annual investment outlook in Toronto on Thursday. --Alia McMullen, Financial Post
Who is responsible you ask? Well just who is responsible for shutting down manufacturing in the United States of America for cheap manufacturing sites throughout the world.

Oil used to be pumped from American oil wells but now wells were built in the Middle East enriching some Americans but also enabling the mind boggling wealth that we see in the Middle East, wealth that has enabled terrorist and terrorism against America. Who is the primary cause, the prime movers behind terrorism attacking America today?

Lost your job lately? Was it outsourced to India, China or another cheap labor rich country? Again who’s at fault for what ails America.

Terrorism, Mad Cow disease, Genetically Modified Food, The Health Care Crisis, Poisoned pet food, lead tainted products and toys are all the doing of corporate decisions to maximize profits and minimize corporate cost and now a food shortage?
"The greatest challenge to the world is not US$100 oil; it's getting enough food so that the new middle class can eat the way our middle class does, and that means we've got to expand food output dramatically," -- Donald Coxe, global portfolio strategist at BMO Financial Group
Donald Coxe believes that the sharp rise in raw food prices in the past year will intensify in the next few years amid increased demand for meat and dairy products from the growing middle classes of countries such as China and India as well as heavy demand from the biofuels industry. And at the centre of the imminent food catastrophe is corn - the main staple of the ethanol industry.

So as you worry about whether Hillary’s tears were real, or if Brittney is wearing panties, or any of the hundred thousands of inconsequential things that we are constantly bombarded with there is a rather focusing reality about to come into affect when you can’t get your Whopper or when there is nothing to prepare at the Aujourd’hui, the most elegant restaurant in Boston because there is no food.
It is time for the American people to get off the defense and take the offense against corporate power, the way it was done in the consumer, environmental and worker areas from 1965 to 1975 and beyond, and move to new frontiers of subordinating the big corporations to the rights and necessities of real people. –Ralph Nader
There is no corporate exit plan to free America from the addiction of foreign oil which they created. Yet we denigrated an American President for having no exit plan out of a war that corporations caused by the wealth that they funneled into the Middle East by their oil exploits.

If corporations had not began using the Middle East as the oil center of the world Islam would not be funding world-wide terrorism with their oil profits. They would have remain powerless tribes running around in the desert cutting one another’s throats rather than buying nuclear facilities now which will allow them to wage an Islam threat against the world.

Likewise if we allow the ethanol industry burn up all the corn to fuel our cars what is the plan to feed the world?

Someone, no, everyone really needs to get our priorities straight before we allow corporate greed to do to food what it’s done to oil and jobs and health care, and…!

Wednesday, January 09, 2008

Hillary stars in the Crying Game in New Hampshire: McCain wins too!

Clinton and McCain’s fairy tale ending in New Hampshire

Just like the movie, the Crying Game, what a surprise ending! Watered by tear power Hillary Rodham Clinton becomes something that she wasn’t in Iowa… a winner.

Not since Paris Hilton cried her way out of jail have we seen the mighty affects of the tear. Senator Clinton showed that not only can crying get you out of jail, but in New Hampshire a planted question and a staged cry is worth one upset political win over the front runner Barack Obama! You cry girl!

In the words of former President Bill Clinton the New Hampshire primaries was the stuff of fairy tales. Recently President Clinton described the whole Obama campaign as a fairy tale claiming that no one is holding Mr. Obama to any standard of truth. But excuse me Mr. President in that case your wife’s whole campaign is a fairly tale because she’s running on your record and she is calling it her experience!
“Second, it is wrong that Senator Obama got to go through 15 debates trumpeting his superior judgment and how he had been against the war in every year, numerating the years, and never got asked one time, not once, ‘Well, how could you say, that when you said in 2004 you didn’t know how you would have voted on the resolution?

You said in 2004 there was no difference between you and George Bush on the war and you took that speech you’re now running on off your website in 2004 and there’s no difference in your voting record and Hillary’s ever since?’ Give me a break.

“This whole thing is the biggest fairy tale I’ve ever seen.” …
-- Former President Bill Clinton.
Speaking of fairy tales John McCain with virtual no National Republican support because of his contrarian positions in the Senate, positions that often put him at odds with Republicans won in New Hampshire too.

McCain’s gang of fourteen which prevented Republicans from stopping Democrat filibusters of President Bush judicial nominees plus the McCain-Kennedy Immigration Reform Bill which is believed to be amnesty for illegal aliens by almost everyone except John McCain are the reasons that McCain has virtually no National support among Conservative Republicans, and are the reasons that he won in the blue state of New Hampshire but won’t win anywhere that there is a Conservative majority.
McCain-Kennedy would establish a worker visa program that would allow employers to temporarily hire foreign citizens to fill jobs that cannot be filled with U.S. laborers. That is not a bad idea.

However, the act proposes to allow individuals unlawfully here to stay and sign up for the program by paying a $1,500 fine. That is a bad idea. It is, in effect, an amnesty--which undercuts the rule of law by rewarding those who have acted wrongly and will only encourage further illegal entry.—
James Jay Carafano, Ph. D., Janice L. Kephart, and Paul Rosenzweig, the Heritage Foundation
McCain has very little money and virtually no Conservative Republican support so to have both Senator Clinton and Senator McCain win in New Hampshire reflects on the Liberal politics there not on the political viability of either Clinton or McCain.

Enjoy this moment in time Senators Clinton and McCain, a moment when reality is suspended by the blue state politics of New Hampshire, a moment when even John McCain can dream that he could be the President of the United States of America. And then before too long awake to the realities that this is a long campaign trail and not every primary will offer up fairy tale endings where the front runner loses a double digit lead in the polls and is defeated by crocodile tears.

Nor will the fairy tale ending of a rogue politician, who pokes his finger in the eye of his party at every opportunity that he gets, winning the day, will happen again somewhere out of the blue state of New Hampshire. And in the immortal words of fairy tale the Wizard of Oz:

Somewhere, out of the blue state, way far away.
There are Republican voters that won’t let John McCain carry the day.
Somewhere, out of the blue state, skies are blue.
And the dreams that John McCain dare to dream
Really won’t come true.

And in the words of former President Bill Clinton, Give me a break! This thing is the biggest fairy tale that I’ve ever seen.