Monday, February 28, 2011

Lawrence O’Donnell is Dan Rather

Governor, I want you to listen to that last line of that Republican attack ad against President Obama one more time.

The Republican Party is saying that the President of the United States has bosses that the union bosses this President around, the unions boss him around. Does that sound to you like they are trying to consciously or subconsciously deliver the racist message that, of course, of course a black man can't be the real boss?
-- Lawrence O’Donnell
I think it fair to say that most Liberals consider themselves smarter than they consider Conservatives. Throughout our national dialogue in whichever venue if there is a Liberal versus a Conservative the Liberal will attempt to take the high ground by suggesting that his or her case is based on reason, science or the general good and wellbeing of all existence.

All the while, the Liberal will assume the Conservative’s position is based on ignorance, hate and a general superiority complex with bigoted or xenophobic tendencies. Interestingly, it is the Left that often uses this type of stereotyping against the Right. However, it is also true that this type of stereotyping is a key element of the Left's agenda.

Case in point MSNBC’s host Lawrence O’Donnell on his show, The Last Word (Even the show’s name is indicative of Liberal arrogance and superiority)demonstrates the comprehension of an I.Q. of 55 while attempting to make the case that the Republican Party is racist. (see story)

Wow, I hadn't thought about the racial overtones—Former Gov. Jennifer Granholm

O’Donnell attempted to drag former Governor Jennifer Granholm (D-MI) into a race baiting assault against Republicans based on a political commercial that the RNC ran in which the RNC tied the president directly to the Union unrest seen throughout the country. Notice how Gov. Granholm was completely taken aback at O’Donnell's suggestion of racism. Ironically, there was no racism nor was there any hint of racism in the ad that O’Donnell used to base his claim of Republican racism.

The only racism evident was O’Donnell’s own for seeing racism where there was none. Former Gov. Granholm stepped back from O’Donnell’s idiotic claim of Republican racism exclaiming that she had not entertained such a foolish thought until O’Donnell forced it upon her. (see 1:52min video)

Visit for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

What is true is O’Donnell took a statement, which he perceived to be racist totally out of context. Because he did that, it allowed his already dubious thinking to project into the ad meaning that is clearly his own heartfelt interpretation. Had O’Donnell done a few seconds more investigative work by viewing the 31-second ad in its full context he could have come to a better understanding of what the ad really said rather than make up his own convoluted meaning.

Families are struggling, state budgets have run dry and the Federal debt is skyrocketing. But Obama and the Union Bosses are standing in the way of economic reform. Intimidating taxpayers, leaving classrooms empty they made this mess let’s clean it up. Stop Obama and his Union Bosses today!—The RNC

The ad clearly did not childishly accuse the president of being subservient to the Union Bosses. The ad’s meaning was the president is working in concert with Union Bosses. As shown by the first reference to president Soetoro and the Union Bosses, “Obama and the Union Bosses” (see :31sec video)

This pattern of misinterpretation and misrepresentation seems to be a staple of Lawrence O’Donnell , President Barry Hussein Soetoro and the Left wing.
Since the Left’s ascension to power in the United States, the world has been in economic , social and political freefall. Our descent into utter world chaos is a direct product of thinking like Lawrence O’Donnell’s thinking.

O’Donnell see racism when there is none as Al Gore saw Global warming when there was none and president Barry Hussein Soetoro hyped hope and change when there was neither hope in radical Progressive Liberal ideology nor is there the utopian change of sustainable equality for all.

The truth is not all ideas are the same nor are all ideas equal, neither are all ideologies the same. There are right ideas and wrong ideas. Also, there are good ideologies and there are evil ideologies. Nevertheless, this is what is true, there will always be someone who sows the seeds of hate among people.

Lawrence O’Donnell did this very thing. He is such a person. By taking what he perceived to be true, Republican racism against president Soetoro, he broadcast his misconception to his small audience. Because O’Donnell put on air that mistaken belief, a belief that is actually in his heart but not borne out by the facts of the full RNC ad, that is the summation of insidiousness and darkness. That is the act of propagating the lie of his heart rather than representing the truth.

We have a special name for people (especially so-called reporters) who purposely engage in such acts, we call them…Dan Rather.

Friday, February 25, 2011

Just as the World is Rejecting Despots Chicago Elects One

A Political Strongman: A political leader who controls by force;
Muhammad Hosni Sayyid Mubarak, Muammar Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi and King Abdullah bin Abdul-Aziz are Despots. Mubarak and Gaddafi are in the process of being disposed. King Abdullah has promised first $10.7 then $22 and now $37 billion dollars in benefits to the Saudi people attempting to ward off the uprisings that his fellow Strongmen or dictators Mubarak faced in Egypt and Gaddafi faces in Libya.

John Kass of the Chicago describes the Mayor-elect Rahm Emanuel as a Strongman in this article, “The city wanted a strongman — and it got one” But quite frankly reading the article one could hardly tell if Kass was praising Emanuel and the City of Chicago or condemning them both. (see story)

What Tuesday's victory prevents is outside examination of the City Hall books. That lack of scrutiny is what Mayor Richard Daley wanted, after two decades of spending Chicago into near-bankruptcy with all that cronyism and favoritism. —John Kass

Kass seemed to be condemning Chicago for being the cesspool of political corruption that it is known to be and equally reproachful of Rahm Emanuel for being just the strongman who can fill Mayor Richard Daley’s corrupt shoes.

Emanuel's victory completes an interesting switcheroo, with Rich Daley announcing his retirement, Rahm stepping down as White House chief of staff, and mayoral brother Billy Daley stepping into Rahm's old job.—John Kass

Nevertheless, Chicago’s election of Emanuel is proof of two things. À la Bill Maher, Americans are stupid and second the election of Emanuel was a foregone conclusion. As the Venezuela dictator, Hugo Rafael Chávez Frías was “elected”4 times in Venezuela’s sham elections so too Chicago’s elections are corrupt as any of the other fake Democracies around the world.

What is true is since the 2008 presidential elections American elections are as corrupt as any sham government in the world. That is how a Rahm Emanuel is Mayor-elect of the city of Chicago and that his how a constitutional ineligible Chicagoan is president of the United States of America.

[Once, when a pollster made him angry, Emanuel sent him a dead fish.] All of Washington knows the tale of the dead fish: how he delivered one, Corleone style, to a polltaker he didn't like—Howard Fineman

Chicago has just elected its own dictator. When the rest of the world is revolting against their Strongmen, Chicago has gotten the Despot it wanted. Dead fish and all.

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Thought Police must Die

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar —attributed to Sigmond Freud
And sometimes a drawing is just a drawing.

An eleven-year-old boy was taken from his home a couple of night ago, arrested, handcuffed, his mug shot was taken and he was jailed. Police charged the little eleven-year-old with interfering with staff and students at an Educational facility, a third degree misdemeanor an apparent trumped up charge to justify police’s Fascist intrusion into the home and the unlawful arrest and detention of a child.

What did the little boy do? Months ago while sitting at his desk the little student drew a stick figure picture of a “kid” holding and firing a gun at other stick figure drawings, the other stick figures had the caption teachers written above them. (see article)

It is simply outrageous and utterly inappropriate that the community of Arvada Colorado is sitting back acceptingly watching the beginning of State Fascism rise up in their midst. (see 2:33min video)

There is simply no justification for the police state tactics of Arvada police or the Orwellian thought control demonstrated by teachers and school administrators. There is nothing that can defend the taking of a child from his home at night. And equally, there is nothing that can defend treating that child like a common criminal. The last I checked there are no laws against drawing stick figures, there are no laws against drawing a gun and there are no laws against drawing a stick figure shooting another stick figure or stick figure on stick figure crime.

In a more rational time, the parents of this child would not be hiding in the shadows of shame. Instead, they would be suing everyone from teacher to teacher’s union. They would be suing school administrators and every police from arresting officer to booking officer.

In a more rational time, the parents of the little eleven-year-old would be suing the police chief, the city mayor, and the state governor for this malicious injustice and the trauma, which has been inflicted on their child.

This already troubled little 11 year old student purportedly suffers from Attention Deficit Disorder therefore he was told by his therapist, Dr. Patrick Bacon to draw pictures as a substitute for disrupting the sixth grader’s class.

As a substitution for acting out in class the little 11 year-old student followed this physician’s instructions and drew a picture of stick figures. According to reports he was about to throw the picture away when his teacher saw the picture and sent him to the principal’s office.

The school was aware that the boy was in treatment, determined he was not a threat, notified his parents and sent him back to class. His mother, "Jane" was shocked when Arvada Police showed up at their home later that night.-- Julie Hayden

How is it that mindless drones have replaced educators and government officials in Arvada Colorado. How is it that pliant governmental subservient parents have come to a point that government can intrude into their homes in the darkness of night and abscond with their children on trumped up charges and nothing is being done.

In the Tom Cruise film, Minority Report set in the year 2054 there exists a pre-crimes division where precrime police would violently arrest citizens for future crimes not yet committed as foretold by three Procogs.

In Arvada Colorado October 2010, we have witnessed one of the first unconstitutional precrime arrest in American’s history as a Constitutional Republic. We have also witness the violation of a little 11 year-old boy and his family’s constitutional and civil rights. And no one not even they breathe a word against a Fascist State government’s inappropriate violation of their rights.

The stick figure art may have been puerile and somewhat primitive. The subject matter may have been undesirable but what was complete inappropriate and questionable was the adult reaction to the little drawn out expressions of a sixth grader who is diagnosed with A.D.D. and who drew pictures as prescribed by his therapist.

This is but one more instance that the Thought Police are well and functioning in 2011. They are in our schools, they are on the police forces and they are in our government. Down with the Thought Police, all Thought Police must die!

The only thing that is inappropriate in this story is that there is no outrage from the American people. We are losing our Freedoms right before our eyes because apparently no one realizes what it means when a little eleven-year-old sixth grade boy is dragged from his home at night and is handcuffed, booked and imprisoned because he drew a picture of a stick figure with a gun shooting other stick figures.

Freedom of thought and freedom of expression have just been outlawed de facto in our life time, in our country and the American people apparently don’t care.

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

After over two years of hopelessness people want change, any Republican beats Obama

At this moment -- 57% of the way through a first term with only 628 days left until the 2012 presidential election – [President Soetoro] can only tie any conceivable Republican candidate. -- Andrew Malcolm
Anybody but Obama? Anybody but Obama. It’s being to look like it. Barry Hussein Soetoro ascended the presidency on a Liberal Progressive political wave equaling the hurricane force of Rita and Katrina combined. President Soetoro began the most Liberal Progressive deconstruction of American values since FDR’s New Deal. Next, he began institutionalizing the Liberal Progressive agenda. An agenda that Democrats had wanted to implement for over 50 years but couldn’t because the government had not been fully corrupted yet. However like a perfect storm Democrats took control of both houses of the Legislative Branch in addition Democrats took control of the the Executive Branch creating the conditions which to push through spending and unconstitutional laws the likes that have never been seen in America.

The New Deal is a series of economic programs implemented in the United States between 1933 and 1936. They were passed by the U.S. Congress during the first term of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, President of the United States, from 1933 to 1936. The programs were responses to the Great Depression, and focused on what historians call the "3 Rs": relief, recovery, and reform. That is, relief for the unemployed and poor; recovery of the economy to normal levels; and reform of the financial system to prevent a repeat depression. The New Deal produced a political realignment, making the Democratic Party the majority (as well as holding the White House for seven out of nine Presidential terms from 1933–69), with its base in liberal ideas, big city machines, and newly empowered labor unions, ethnic minorities, and the white South.—Wikipedia

Sensing that the time was right president Soetoro forced through the Democrat controlled Congress every political utopian Socialist dream that Democrats have been working to implement.

This February, after the invisible "Recovery Summer" and Democrats' historic midterm election shellacking, any Republican ties Obama at 45-45.
At this same calendrical point in George W. Bush's first term, the Republican led any Democrat 47-39. --Andrew Malcolm

Because of president Soetoro’s and Democrat’s Fascist use of power, the most Progressive Socialist agenda in the history of the United States of America has been rejected. Democrats are being rejected and the Democrat president is more unpopular at this point in his administration than his predecessor was. At this point, any Republican can beat Soetoro. (see article)

Barry Hussein Soetoro has damaged the country and his presidency virtually by his own doing. After two years of false promises of jobs, failed policies and unconstitutional activity and after two years of attempts to change America into an extra-Constitutional country Americans have had enough.

All of this without aid from the media or the Democrat politicos Americans realize that anyone but president Barry Hussein Soetoro would protect the Constitution and serve the American people.

The more things change the more things stay the same. To whit anybody but Soetoro, anybody but Obama.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Oh no she didn’t just go there!

"You have to cozy up to the birthers. You have to coddle Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann. You have to deny human causes of climate change. And that's not who Chris Christie is."—Cynthia Tucker
Why would a Liberal think that he or she has any knowledge relative to how Conservatives think and behave? I have witnessed nothing but gross mischaracterizations daily of Conservative ideology and Conservative thought coming from Liberals who believe themselves to be experts in politics and punditry.

Case in point Liberal Cynthia Tucker offers her skewed opinion on whether Governor Chris Christie will run for president in 2012. No, she didn’t just go there! (see 1:26min video)

First of all Ms. Tucker have, you even heard of Chris Christie? If you had you would know that one of the appealing aspects of Gov. Christie is he is his own man. Furthermore, Gov. Christie has established himself within the Conservative framework not as a Liberal. Everyone knows if Gov. Christie were a Democrat he would have had to blow to the Unions in his State like president Obama bows to every foreign dictator that he meets.

Secondly, you seem to think that American citizens who have substantiated proof that this president is the most deviously secretive president in the history of the United States of America are crazy.

It is common knowledge that this president has hidden his records from Kindergarten to his time as a Chicago state legislator. He has hidden his original passport as well as his birth certificate and you believe that people who question the president’s hidden past are crazy. No people who take any politician at face value are the crazy ones. Trust but verify, must be our model in order to keep politicians honest. Moreover, when we come across a politician, like president Soetoro, who refuses to allow us to verify we must apply the disinfectant of sunshine on what that person has hidden in the shadows.

I don’t know if Gov. Christie will run for the presidency in 2012 however, I do know this he has started a federal political action committee to evaluate the possibilities. What I know is you have no dreaming idea of what a Conservative believes or thinks Ms. Tucker.

Senator John McCain showed his long form birth certificate when birthers on the left claimed that McCain was not a natural born citizen. Obviously, you don’t remember that. The least that president Soetoro can do is be as much of a man as Sen. McCain.

And since there are leftwing birthers as well as birthers on the right it is only fair that president Soetoro appease the “crazies” on the right like McCain appeased leftwing birthers by showing his long form.

Finally, Ms. Tucker being a leftwing Soetoro sycophant and intimating that Conservatives are crazy is like the Leftwing’s rant that Bush went to war for oil.

Boy, don’t we all wish that there were some truth to that!

Monday, February 21, 2011

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei: Egypt is about the rejection of the United States by Islam

Sen. Soetoro reading the Post-American World by Fareed Zakaria on the 2008 campaign trail.
"The main problem in the Muslim world is the presence of the United States. It is the biggest problem. We need to address that. It is necessary to remove the US from the Islamic world,"-- Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei revealed the truth regarding Egypt and the present unrest in the Islamic world, which is the recent overthrow of the Egyptian government, was a direct rejection of the U.S.A. by the Muslim world. These developments beg the questions did president Barry Hussein Soetoro know beforehand of these hostilities and how much did he know about the coming Islamic advance on the Western world. (see article)

Moreover recent political unrest has went viral in foreign governments Iran, Algeria, Yemen, Morocco, China and domestically in Wisconsin USA. They all have the same political instability in common. However, do they share something else, perhaps something yet unconsidered.

On Sunday, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called on Muslims to "remove" the US from the Islamic world in the middle of an explosion of Islamic unrest in the Middle East. Coincidence?

Then is it also chance that the Progressive Liberal agenda detonated across the American political landscape over the last two years? In addition, is there a common catalyst that is driving this worldwide cataclysmic political change as well as this current domestic upheaval? (see article)

Moreover, what about the last two years in the United States, We’ve witnessed Homosexual advancement not by the American people but by the U.S. government over the objections of the American people. There has been U.S. government backed illegal immigration lawsuits and politicking by special interests illegal alien lovers and their government backers. In addition, we have seen forced Obamacare legislation made law over the utter objections of the American people now declared unconstitutional by the courts. We have also seen trillion dollar spending and bailouts in just the past two years the likes that took the previous administration eight years to spend.

All of the above separately or collectively could have been cause for massive street protest in the United States yet Conservatives did not resort to such tactics. However what did cause an uprising in the Wisconsin streets of that state’s capital were the president Barry Hussein Soetoro’s back Union’s objection of Wisconsin state government’s attempt to regain in control of its budget. To which we can only conclude that president Soetoro is against the state of Wisconsin just as he is against the state of Arizona.

Moreover, the Wisconsin Union backed street protest look very similar to those in Egypt, Iran, Algeria, Yemen, Morocco and China leaving one to ask the question is there a common denominator among all of the protests?

Ayatollah Khamenei said the Egyptian uprising was anti-American. He has also stated that all similar Islam events are for the removal of American influences from the Middle East. I’m willing to say the Wisconsin uprising is anti-American as well.

Since president Soetoro has said that he is backing the Egyptian, uprisings, which the Ayatollah claimed are anti-American, and since the president has said he is backing the Union uprisings in Wisconsin which are anti-government, it is not difficult to see what the foreign and domestic political unrest both have in common.

What do you think?

Friday, February 18, 2011

Obamacare equals 800k jobs lost

“But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it away from the fog of the controversy” -Nancy Pelosi
What happened to the promises of the Democrats’ Health care law lowering cost, enabling consumers to keep the doctors they like and oh yes creating jobs? Well it was passed so now we can find out what’s in it. And what’s in it is nothing like what was promised by the president or the Democrats.(see story)

CBO Director Dr. Doug Elmendorf naturally couldn’t warn us before Democrats forced this monstrosity of a bureaucratic nightmare through but now that it is firmly ensconced into American law making it almost impossible to completely reverse we find out that none of the Democrat promises about this law were true.

To Whit instead of creating jobs as promised Obamacare will destroy jobs. (see 1:13min video)

According to Dr. Elmendorf Obamacare will kill 800,000 jobs. No wonder Democrats had to pass it before we could find out what was it in. (see :10 sec. video)

Thursday, February 17, 2011

The Hot and Cold of the Global Warming Argument

According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become "a very rare and exciting event".

"Children just aren't going to know what snow is,"
—Charles Onians, The Independent
Can two completely contradictory things be the same? Is darkness and light the same? Is life and death the same?

And what do you call someone who would argue an issue from selective and anecdotal information while totally disregarding scientific evidence and other factual evidences because the evidence doesn’t support his or her already formulated conclusions?

Instead of continuing the back and forth of name calling of such a person as, biased, partisan, ignorant, Al Gore, Robert Kennedy, Jr., Barry Hussein Soetoro or Erza Klein I will not resort to such name calling. I will merely present evidence why Global warming, or its recent Orwellian Newspeak name “Climate Change,” is not caused anthropegenically.

First, I think that we can all agree that climate has always changed. It is therefore my contention that there is next to nothing that man can do to change climate or prevent climate from changing.

Recent evidence suggest that the heavy snowfalls which Europe and the United States are experiencing is not irregular in nature but quite normal though some are attempting to argue otherwise.

Some climate alarmists would have us believe that these storms are yet another baleful consequence of man-made CO2 emissions. In addition to the latest weather events, they also point to recent cyclones in Burma, last winter's fatal chills in Nepal and Bangladesh, December's blizzards in Britain, and every other drought, typhoon and unseasonable heat wave around the world.-- ANNE JOLIS (source)

Anne Jolis reports in the Wall Street Journal article, “The Weather isn’t Getting Weirder” that there is no evidence that there is an intensifying weather trend due to Global warming.

The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project is the latest attempt to find out, using super-computers to generate a dataset of global atmospheric circulation from 1871 to the present.

As it happens, the project's initial findings, published last month, show no evidence of an intensifying weather trend. "In the climate models, the extremes get more extreme as we move into a doubled CO2 world in 100 years," atmospheric scientist Gilbert Compo, one of the researchers on the project, tells me from his office at the University of Colorado, Boulder. "So we were surprised that none of the three major indices of climate variability that we used show a trend of increased circulation going back to 1871."

In other words, researchers have yet to find evidence of more-extreme weather patterns over the period, contrary to what the models predict. "There's no data-driven answer yet to the question of how human activity has affected extreme weather," adds Roger Pielke Jr., another University of Colorado climate researcher. –Anne Jolis

To the contrary Erza Klein writing for the Washington Post attempted to assure his readers that the recent snow storms in Washington D.C. and the rest of the country where in fact predicted by Climate Change scientist and where accounted for in the theory of Climate change in his article, “No, the snow does not disprove global warming.”

Klein cites a 2009 report by the U.S. Global Change Research Program, which used an unproven theory to explain how overall increased Global warming produces more precipitation in the atmosphere thereby producing greater oxymoronic Global warming snowstorms. (see article)

The only thing wrong with Mr. Klein’s selective citation is it does not explain how it contradicts and how it completely disregards the original hypothesis of Global warming by the originators of the theory of Global warming. The climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia, are the originators of the theory of Global warming and according to them as they stated in the year 2000, because of Global warming snow would be completely eliminated within a few years.

Global warming, the heating of the atmosphere by increased amounts of industrial gases, is now accepted as a reality by the international community. Average temperatures in Britain were nearly 0.6°C higher in the Nineties than in 1960-90, and it is estimated that they will increase by 0.2C every decade over the coming century. Eight of the 10 hottest years on record occurred in the Nineties.

However, the warming is so far manifesting itself more in winters, which are less cold than in much hotter summers. According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become "a very rare and exciting event".

"Children just aren't going to know what snow is," he said. –Charles Onians

Incidentally, Mr. Onians article pronounced snowfalls as things of the past. (see article)

So which is it? According to the originators of the theory of Global warming, winters should have gotten increasingly less colder starting at least seven years ago as the planet got progressively warmer. So the contradiction that we now face is does Global warming eliminate snow or does it’s pseudonym Climate Change create snow?

My thinking is this, after The climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia was exposed as fraudulent in its claims and proofs regarding Anthropogenic Global warming it is hard to imagine that any reputable person would still irrationally support the tainted science of Global warming. What is fascinating is it doesn’t seem to bother our former Vice-president, or our current president or even a reporter for the Washington Post who all continue in their support of this fraudulent science.

Moreover who can forget how environmental attorney Robert Kennedy, Jr. excoriated people who did not agree with him that Global warming was, in his mind, causing less snowfall in Washington D.C. in 2008.

With tawdry language, Kennedy berated Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, John Stossel, Sen. Jim Inhofe, Sen. John Cain and Gov. Sara Palin for not believing as he believed, in the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming. And he falsely accusing them of being shills for the Mobil-Exxon corporation.(see article)

In all, proponents of the debunked theory of anthropogenic C02 induced Global warming have done more to hurt modern science and education than the harm they claim teaching Creationism might do.

Yet in spite of the snow and other scientific evidences that the theory of anthropogenic Global warming or its new name, Climate Change are false and disproved Global warming alarmist persist with their false claims.

To the Global warming alarmist snow equals heat, lack of storms equals increase of storms, increases in polar bear populations means that polar bears are dying due to Global warming and round earth is flat earth.

What is more, they persist in teach these Global warming fallacies to your children as facts.

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Make me wanna holla and feel-up with both of my hands

The whole thing was over in a matter of minutes and was a completely professional experience.
Or it was, until a male TSA agent walked behind us and hollered: "Hey, I thought she was mine! I was gonna do her!"
-- Amy Sullivan
Well this is living! Marvin Gaye who sung about intercity Blues had no idea that we’d all be receiving sexual healing inside our near-the-city airports. Who among us wakes up every morning and after the morning rituals of hygiene and breakfast bolts out of the door to work where hundreds of women are lined up before you? And your job is either to scan anatomically correct female images all day or to glide your lecherous fingers up and down the nether and frontal regions of the female body?

Not your job description? Well one might think it is the job description of some employed with the TSA.

Although countless stories have been reported on the TSA’s “work” to keep America’s air travel safe, there always remains an undertone that some TSA agents‘ benefits packages just might extend beyond healthcare and retirement.

Case in point, Amy Sullivan reports an instance in which she felt uncomfortable about being one TSA agent’s e-scanner centerfold du jour. So she opted out of the full body scan and was reassigned to the full body pat down “safety procedure.” (see story)

After receiving her examination from a female TSA agent a male agent, obviously disappointed, walked by and hollered, aloud so everyone could hear, that someone had taken something that belonged to him.

Yes someone else patted down Amy when he thought that he was going to be the one to “protect Americans from terrorists.”

Me thinks this agent enjoys his job a little too much. And he should be reassigned to the all male pat down line immediately! Or he could be fired and be made to find a real job.

I’m not so certain though, to what his employment skill set would transfer to. Perhaps a job in a meat market…it’s just a thought!

What I am certain about is Amy’s situation probably happens hundreds of times a day in airports all around the country, done in a more discreet manner to be sure.

Knowing that this is the case leads me to borrow yet again from Marvin Gaye to say... When I get that feeling I think TSA.

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Leave Barry Hussein Soetoro Alone!

"I feel that everybody has a learning curve, and I feel that the reason why I was willing to step out for him was because I believed in his integrity and I believed in his heart," —Oprah Winfrey, Kingmaker and Presidential Motherfigure
Oprah Winfrey made Barry Hussein Soetoro president. So naturally in the closest feelings that she can muster to mimic maternal instincts Oprah came to the aid of her ideological spawn.

Ironically, the smartest woman in the world doesn’t realize that she just confirmed everyone’s suspicions about her little man-child. That suspicion is he is not qualified to be president.

Vice-president Joe Biden, when he was running for president himself told us that Soetoro wasn’t ready to be president. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told us when she was running for president against president Soetoro that Soetoro wasn’t ready for that 3 am call as president. Therefore, when Oprah says that, “I feel that everybody has a learning curve.” We all already know what she means. (see 30sec. video)

The fact that Oprah waited two years into Soetoro’s presidency to defend him indicates that Soetoro has been screwing up royally and it doesn’t look like he’s going to stop or recover. Therefore, he’s in need of a mother hen to remind us all of how hard the job of the presidency is and he just needs some time to figure it all out.

So which is it Oprah? Either Soetoro is the smartest president that the United States has ever had or he needs you to come and explain to the American people that the job is very very hard.

According to you Ms. Winfrey, you only backed Soetoro because of his personal characteristics; his integrity and his heart. Too bad for the American people you didn’t base your choice for the leader of the free world on higher standards and more tangible qualifications like experience, ability and loyalty to the American people and to America.

Nevertheless, Ms. Winfrey if you are concerned with what the American people think about you and the man that you backed for president. If you are concerned with how we hear your plead for respect for Soetoro.

The following clips show how you sound to Americans Ms. Winfrey. Following is how you sound to Americans who feel that they have been disrespected by everything that this person, Soetoro has done since he became president two years ago. (see 2min video)

(see 1:52min video)

(see 1:11min video)

(see 2:12min video)

As usual, you have it all wrong Ms. Winfrey for it is you and people like you who are the ones who should be showing Americans respect. The first act of respect Americans require is respect for the constitution.

president Soetoro must show that he is eligible for the office he now occupies. Americans have been asking for such proof since before Soetoro was elected and he has refused to show it. Otherwise everyday he remains in the Whitehouse Soetoro and his supporters including you show America and the American people the grosses form of disrespect.

Monday, February 14, 2011

A Message to the SCOTUS: Stop Avoiding the Eligibility Issue

A veteran attorney who has pursued a lawsuit challenging Barack Obama's presidential eligibility since he was elected is telling the U.S. Supreme Court that if its members continue to "avoid" the dispute they effectively will "destroy the constitutional rule of law basis of our legal system." –Bob Unruh, Worldnetdaily
It is the 3,000 lb gorilla in the middle of American politics. Is Barry Hussein Soetoro eligible to be president of the United States of America? And if he isn’t, why is everyone who has a sworn duty to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States allowing an illegitimate Usurper to continue his personal quest to undermine the fundamental principles of a Constitution-based federal republic form of government rather than protect the constitution, which is their sworn oath to do? (see story)

What is absolutely true and in the words of former President Clinton’s U.S. counter terrorism official Richard Clarke. Our government has failed us. Moreover, it is continuing to fail us on the must import constitutional question to come about in the history of the United States of America. Is Barry Hussein Soetoro Constitutionally qualified to be Commander-in-Chief of this nation?

It is on this question, which the fate of our nation turns. This question will determine whether we will continue on as a Constructional-based federal republic or whether we will devolve into something, which exists only in the mind of a man and his likes that have obvious penis envy of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Trotsky.

Media, Senators, Congressmen and Congresswomen, Judges and Justices all have played along with and are complicit in capitulating to one man’s and one Party’s assault on the very framework which distinguishes this nation from Communists, Socialists, Religious and Banana Republic disasters that consider themselves governments.

May I remind you that this nation, a constitutional republic, is a state where the head of state and other officials are representatives of the people and must govern according to existing constitutional law that limits the government's power over all of its citizens. And this is a good thing.

The fact that a constitution exists that limits the government's power makes the state constitutional. That the head(s) of state and other officials are chosen by election, rather than inheriting their positions, and that their decisions are subject to judicial review makes a state republican.—Wikipedia (source)

When a man or Oligarchy chooses to work outside of or above the constitutional charter this is a bad thing. This is the very thing that is alleged of Barry Hussein Soetoro regarding his failure to clear up the questions concerning his eligibility or lack thereof.

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.—Article 2 Section1, U.S. Constitution

This is also the case if the surrounding powers, the Legislative and the Judiciary, branches that are both aware of a possible gross Constitutional violation, but chose to ignore the constitutional violation on grounds that it is much too uncomfortable to deal with.

It is no secret that this president holds the constitution in contempt. He views it as a Negative restrictive antiquated document that is against tyrannical government. (hear 1:45min audio)

Negative Constitution

As radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the constitution.

At least it’s been interpreted and the Warren Court interpreted it in the same way that—that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, says what the states can’t do to you, says what the federal government can’t do to you but it doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.

And that hasn’t shifted.–Barry Hussein Soetoro

President Soetoro has said that the Constitution is flawed and everything that he is doing indicates that he and his presidency are engaged in changing what he believes are the constitution’s flawed orientation of “negative liberties.” Soetoro wishes to change what he considers negative into that of “Positive Subjugation” of your thoughts and your actions. (see 1:29min video)

This president believes that the Constitution can be interpreted many ways. As a result, he is in the process of stacking the court with politicos who will interpret the constitution in-line with his beliefs rather than the principle of considering the Founders' intent. (see :21sec video)

It is also true that this president holds the present Conservatives on the Supreme Court and its current 5 to 4 Conservative make-up in contempt. It is my personal belief that he has already co-opted a major Conservative on the Court thereby almost ensuring that the court will not hear any eligibility questions until a Conservative president appoints a true Conservative to replace any liberal or compromised Conservative. (see 2:09 min video)

Soetoro shows contempt for Supreme Court Justices

We must know whether Chief Justice Roberts and the Supremes are still committed to the principle of considering the Founders' intent when ruling on constitutional issues. Or we must know whether they share the president’s views that the founders and the document, which they passed on to us, are flawed and outdated.

Thereby giving certain citizens the right to disregard all or part of the constitution as this president has chosen to do regarding immigration laws, violating person sovereignty and rights by unconstitutional attempting to force Americans to buy healthcare and by disregarding Article 2 section 1 of the eligibility cause of the Constitution.

If the Supreme Court continues to avoid the eligibility issue, they will be responsible for an Egypt like response to what people will perceive as a totally corrupt government.

Friday, February 11, 2011

Will there be Revolution in American like Egypt?

Sen. Soetoro reading the Post-American World by Fareed Zakaria on the 2008 campaign trail.
And I think if we continue, doc , to ignore the plight of the poor in this country. If we continue to ignore the plight of the weak working class, if the gap between the have gots and the have nots continues to widen in this country. I don’t think that kind of upraising is a far-fetched idea. —Travis Smiley
Just how close is America from an Egypt like revolution? Travis Smiley and Professor Cornell West speculated the possibilities of Americans revolting against their government and the economic power establishments in America just like what is going on in Egypt in a recent radio interview.

What is so interesting about this February 6, 2011 radio conversation is there is a Black man who is the Leader of America. The American Oligarchy and Plutocracy of which professor West advocates overthrow are both lead by a Black man, president Barry Hussein Soetoro.

The Soetoro stimulus and bailouts that funneled trillions of dollars into the pockets of Bankers and the political upper class left homeowners and the poor stranded. Because of Soetoro’s policies, the poor will remain so or get poorer while the rich get richer in spite of the Soetoro false claims that he is working for the poor.

What is absolutely true is president Soetoro is a devotee of 1960’s radical Saul Alinsky. Alinsky advocated using the poor and middle class [as pawns] to achieve power. President Soetoro has done as his philosophical leader and mentor has taught him to do. He used the poor by promising fidelity to them only to continue policies that keep his fellow Oligarchs and the Plutocrats in power.

Alinsky advises his followers that the poor have no power and that the real target is the middle class: "Organization for action will now and in the decade ahead center upon America's white middle class. That is where the power is. ... Our rebels have contemptuously rejected the values and the way of life of the middle class. They have stigmatized it as materialistic, decadent, bourgeois, degenerate, imperialistic, war-mongering, brutalized and corrupt. They are right; but we must begin from where we are if we are to build power for change, and the power and the people are in the middle class majority."

But that didn't stop Alinsky and his followers from using the middle class for their own purposes. They counted on the guilt and shame of the white middle class to get what they wanted. In order to take over institutions and get power, the middle class had to be convinced that they were somehow lucky winners in "life's lottery."

Alinsky's radicals found a perfect vehicle for their destruction of the American system and more particularly for taking and maintaining power. That instrument was the Democratic Party. (source)

Not satisfied that they have established a Saul Alinsky radical Protégé at the very pinnacle of Western civilized power the radical left as represented by Travis Smiley and professor Cornell West still anticipate a day when America will be rioting in the streets like Egypt. It would not be at all surprising if the one who occupies the White house shares both men’s vision for this country. (hear 1:42min audio)

I think the millionaires and billionaires [unintelligible] don’t recognize that their New World Order is in deep jeopardy, when you look at the precious Egyptian people. Let us see how this unfolds. I stand with the precious brothers and sisters in Egypt, I tell you.—Professor Cornell West

The Left has been calling for a revolution in this country for years. they look to Egypt with envy of what could be here in the United States if they get their way.

May that possibility never be. It is up to Americans at the polls in 2012 to beat back the Socialist who presently controls our government and our media . Or in the very near future, we may all walk like the Egyptians.

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Ronald Reagan was my president. President Obama, you’re no Ronald Reagan

People are trying--Republicans in particular, obviously--trying to appropriate Ronald Reagan for their own political purposes now. –Andrea Mitchell
No Miss Mitchell Republicans aren’t attempting to appropriate President Ronald Wilson Reagan. Democrats and the Democrat president are attempting to appropriate Ronald Reagan for Democrats’ political purposes.

Here Senator Barry Hussein Soetoro praises Reagan as a singular political figure above Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton (see 1:11min video)

During the Democrats 2008 presidential debates, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton accuses candidate Soetoro of being a Reagan “lover”, which has a very subtle undertones that Soetoro Progressive Liberalism is questionable under Democrat’s strict standards. (see 3:20min video)

I got to--whoa, whoa, whoa. Republicans are not, I think, trying to appropriate Ronald Reagan. Ronald Reagan was a Republican. Conservatives aren't trying to appropriate him. He was a conservative. –Peggy Noonan

Former California State Representative Willie Brown and Andrea Mitchell on Meet the Press with David Gregory attempted to redefine President Reagan as Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was redefined to make Dr. King palatable for Democrat consumption. The only probable was Peggy Noonan who was speechwriter for president Reagan in addition to working with him was there. Noonan put a stop Brown and Mitchell redefinition nonsense. (see 3:21min video)

Let’s be clear president Soetoro’s “admiration” for Reagan is solely for Reagan’s ability that transformed America after the dismal failure of the Democrat presidency of James Earl Carter, Jr. Soetoro views himself as a Reaganesque type of singular figure who will transform America again. But this time into his own vision of what America should be.

Perhaps more surprising is that there is a new claimant to the Reagan throne this year: President Barack Obama. Having once routinely derided Reagan as, in the words of Democratic greybeard Clark Clifford, an “amiable dunce”, the liberal establishment is now seeking to embrace him.

Obama first tried to grab Reagan’s mantle three years ago when he cited the Gipper as a way of taking a shot at the Clintons by saying that the Republican had “changed the trajectory of America” in a way that Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton had not.-- Toby Harnden (source)

Soetoro’s vision for American is not what Reagan’s vision for American was. It is the exact polar opposite of Reagan’s small government limited government vision. Yet in Soetoro’s the ends justifies the means world Soetoro is attempting to channel Ronald Wilson Reagan’s transformative powers to transform American into something that would be an anathema to Reagan, big Fascist overreaching government.

To wit, it is Democrats who are misappropriating Ronald Wilson Reagan not Republicans Ms. Mitchell.

Wednesday, February 09, 2011

Obama against Forced Healthcare reform before he was for it

"If a mandate was the solution, we can try that to solve homelessness by mandating everybody to buy a house. The reason they don’t have a house is they don’t have the money.” –Barry Hussein Soetoro
It’s the classic John F. Kerry I was for it before I was against it. Not only did the District Court in Florida rule that Obamacare is unconstitutional, the president when he was Senator running for office thought the individual mandate was unconstitutional too.

So why did president Barry Hussein Soetoro waste two years of the country's time campaigning for a law that he knew was unconstitutional? In the words of former president Bill Clinton, "Because [he] could."

Not only did president Soetoro think an individual mandate to buy health insurance was wrong he said so repeatedly. (see 23sec video)

(see 1:02min video)

See Judge Roger Vinson’s ruling below.

Health Care Ruling by Judge Vinson

Why would the president of the United States take the country through a constitutional battle when he knows the law, which he signed, is unconstitutional.

Perhaps it’s for the same reason he refuses to clear up the constitutional issues regarding his eligibility. This president holds the U.S. constitution in contempt.

Tuesday, February 08, 2011

Joe Manchin Lied to be elected Senator of West Virginia

In a 47-51, party line vote with two Senators Lieberman (CT) and Warner (VA) abstaining Democrats proved that there is no such animal as a Conservative Democrat.

The utter failure of the Republican Party's ability to politic like Democrats in order get votes from the other side notwithstanding, not one Democrat voted to repeal Obamacare even if their constituencies demand its repeal.

Sen. Claire McCaskill (MO) voted with Democrats against 71% of her fellow Missourians who cast ballots against Obamacare last August. Sen. Ben Nelson’s (NE) state is 2-to-1 against Obamacare yet he voted with Democrats blocking Obamacare’s appeal.

Joe Manchin represented himself as a conservative to be elected Senator of West Virginia over his Republican challenger John Raese. West Virginians now know that had they elected a Republican they would have been one vote closer to repealing Obamacare. (see article)

A Rasmussen Reports poll of West Virginia likely voters in August, 2010 showed 69% of the state opposed to Obamacare, with 80% of those "strongly opposed" and almost twice as many supporting the state suing to block the law's health insurance mandate as opposing such a lawsuit.-- Ross Kaminsky

(see 31sec video)

So now, it’s on to 2012 where voters will get to replace RINOs and all Democrats that faked Conservatism with new actual Conservative Republican representatives.

Sen. Joe Manchin will be vulnerable in 2012 he has to run for reelection as President Barry Hussein Soetoro voters should make the partisan Senator one and done.

Monday, February 07, 2011

Katie Couric your Multicultural fantasies do not work

It’s not unusual that the Radical left wing wishes to embark on totally crazy and destructive ideas that have already failed in the world. What is unusual is these Radical Lefties are now in charge of Media and government with power to actually put their counterproductive ideas into practice.

In case you didn’t notice the hope and change of the Barry Hussein Soetoro presidential campaign was actually about embedding Radical Leftwing ideologies so deeply within the American psyche and laws that it would be virtually impossible to extricate all of them.

Case in point, there is not an anti-Muslim sentiment in America. Our government has worked hard to successfully prevent that, however there is a well deserved anti-terrorists response to Islamists after Islamists have made it unmistakably clear since 1998 that they are at war with America and Western civilized cultural. These extremists vow that they will work to the death to destroy America and the Western way of life by replacing them with Islam.

Katie Couric ignorantly feels that these radicalized extremist are equivalent to American Blacks of the 50’s and 60’s. Couric’s feelings are that radical Muslim extremists only need the ambassadorship of television with similar programming that Americans viewed such as “Little House on the Prairie” or the “Cosby Show” in order to teach the Islamophobes and American bigots (who she imagines are against Muslims) that they are wrong to have such feeling. Couric wishes to teach Americans that Muslims are no different in their American experience from Blacks and they are exactly the same as Blacks of the civil rights era who were attempting to integrate into the American idea.

As I previously stated there is no anti-Muslim sentiment in America. Especially when compared to the unwarranted racial hatred that Blacks endured in over 300 years as slaves and former slaves in this country. Blacks were never funded by foreign African governments to infiltrate this country with a religious agenda to bring this country under the control of an African religion. In addition, there were never any sleeper cells of Blacks waiting to detonate nuclear dirty bombs in the name of some African deity.

Therefore, to compare any aspect of the Black civil rights struggle with an Islamic jihad against the Western world is completely mad, or as you say crazy, Ms. Couric, yet you and your media cohorts insist in doing exactly that! (see 1:49min video)

Just as Global Warming is a made up catastrophe advanced by the left in order to support their go green agenda, so too is Couric’s pretense that there is anti-Muslim feelings made up. The Left’s phony threats are used in attempts to herd all Americans into certain desired behaviors, which the left deems important. Couric is now attempting to suggest to the American mind that problems, which Muslims bring with them, are not Muslim problems but instead are problems that American Racists have with Muslims.

Katie Couric wishes to convince Americans of our bigotry rather than look at the evidentiary facts gathering around the world. These are facts, which point to proofs, which suggest that problems with Muslims and Islam are systemically found in Muslims and Islam. There is no unwarranted hate in the world against Muslims rather there is a reasonable response to Radicalism that has threatened to destroy everything that is not like it, such threats are the sum and total of hate and bigotry.

The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, David Cameron realizes that Muslims who are extremists are the problem.

David Cameron has criticised "state multiculturalism" in his first speech as prime minister on radicalisation and the causes of terrorism.
At a security conference in Munich, he argued the UK needed a stronger national identity to prevent people turning to all kinds of extremism. –BBC News (source)

(see 2:21min video)

However, what people of the world are now realizing, as the governments of Britain and Germany are, is that the Couric Multicultural paradigm does not work. Britain, France and Germany have been attempting to integrate Muslims into their societies for several years now to the effect that Britain and Germany have publically concluded that the practice of Multiculturalism that Couric touts does not, has not and will not work. Multiculturalism fails not because of Western bigotry but rather because of Islamic intolerance of Western customs and beliefs.

Chancellor of Germany of Germany Angela Merkel is another world leader who berates Katie Couric’s Multiculturalism.

Attempts to build a multicultural society in Germany have "utterly failed", Chancellor Angela Merkel says.

She said the so-called "multikulti" concept - where people would "live side-by-side" happily - did not work, and immigrants needed to do more to integrate - including learning German.— BBC News (source)

(see 1:40min video)

Couric should be made to renounce her ignorance regarding Islam. She should then be forced to actually report the truth about Islamic intolerance and bigotry. Without Islamic intolerance and Islamic bigotry Muslims can get along anywhere in the world. The reason that they aren’t getting along with the rest of the world is a direct result of Islam’s fanaticism, not anyone else’s.

The follow Muslim stoning of a male and a female for the alleged act of adultery is the reality of Islam that Couric wishes on America. (see 2:50min video)

I’m sure all Americans would agree with me Ms. Couric no Muslim Little House on the Prairie TV show or no Muslim Cosby show could cover up the intolerance of Islam and Muslims who practice such atrocities.

Friday, February 04, 2011

Does the Obama administration incite hate against Conservative Judges?

Earlier today, Judge Roger Vinson ruled that the health reform legislation passed last year is unconstitutional. Not surprisingly this evoked a harsh reaction from the administration—David Whelan
I don’t like the fact that under the present president the third Branch of our government has became increasingly polarized and increasingly politicized. Justice is supposed to be blind and there is supposed to be the rule of law in this country.

But no more. Not since the Obama justice department dismissed a case where clear violations of voter intimidation was won by U.S. Attorneys yet the case was dropped before judgment why, because the defendants who were the intimidators where Black and the voters being intimidated were White.

Dismissing the case against the New Black Panthers is a clear indication that under the Obama administration, justice is no longer blind and the rule of law no longer applies in America.

Then there was last year’s State of the Union Address the president attacked the Supreme Court as Democrats applauded and jeered the Supremes (see :27sec video)

Incredible! What kind of country is this if our most important issues are decided by numbers and partisan appointment rather than by the Constitution? What do I mean by that?

Well if you want a favorable ruling on homosexuality, you try your case before a homosexual judge in San Francisco. You want favorable rulings on the constitutionality of Obamacare you get two Progressive Liberal appointed judges, one in Virginia and the other in Michigan, to rule that your law is constitutional.

If a judge rules against your health care law or if a judge rules against your immigration, policy he or she is deemed your enemy. Therefore, you and your media cohorts do everything you can to call in to question that judge’s appointment, motives and politics. (see here and here)

Under the presidency of Barry Hussein Soetoro America has become a nation of partisans and lawbreakers in the highest echelons of our government. No longer is our country defined by the constitution. instead, there are Progressive Liberals in office who are attempting to rewrite the constitution by Court order, by bureaucratic policy implementation or by an imperial presidency.

We now live in a country in which the law is decided by whether a judge is Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative. And if that law is appealed to the Supreme Court for ruling on its constitutionality, the result is determined by numbers like a 5 to 4 split. Cases are now decided by each judge’s personal political view rather than what the constitution means and whether the meaning and intent of the Constitution is violated.

Ironically just weeks after the president’s call for national civility in our political discourse, a call spurred on by the failed assassination attempt on U.S. Congresswoman Gabrielle Gifford. The murder of a Federal judge and the wounding of 12 people in which six people were murdered, it is against this backdrop that the Soetoro administration issued a political attack against Judge Roger Vinson in the Northern District of Florida.

Judge Vinson ruled that Obamacare, which forces American citizens to buy health care, is unconstitutional. And in response, the Soetoro administration in a show of blatant contempt against the court’s ruling began to incite hatred against the court by falsely labeling the court’s ruling an act of judicial overreaching and activism. (see article)

This nation has had a Congressman shot in the head and a Federal Judge murdered. In response to those horrific events, the President called for civility. I find in unconscionable that this president’s administration would disregard its own call for a civil discourse and put another Federal Judge at risk by calling the judge a wild out of the mainstream activist.

Today, a judge in Florida issued a decision in a case filed by 25 Republican Attorneys General and Governors striking down the Affordable Care Act. This ruling is well out of the mainstream of judicial opinion. Twelve federal judges have already dismissed challenges to the constitutionality of the health reform law, and two judges – in the Eastern District of Michigan and Western District of Virginia – have upheld the law.

In one other case, a federal judge in the Eastern District of Virginia issued a very narrow ruling on the constitutionality of the health reform law’s “individual responsibility” provision and upheld the rest of the law. --Stephanie Cutter (source)

Who knows if there are another wide-eyed Progressive Liberal out there like Jared Lee Loughner who would be angered by the White house characterization of Judge Vince and his ruling? The Soetoro administration is clearly attempting to incite hatred against Judge Vince. In the name of Gabrielle Gifford and all who were wounded and murdered in Arizona, Democrats must stop this politics of personal destruction. Democrats must cease fomenting hate against Conservatives and Republicans.

Does the Soetoro administration foment hate against Conservative judges? In a word, YES!

Thursday, February 03, 2011

111-222-733 equals repeal Obamacare

Our democracy cannot allow a president to exercise the unholy power of picking and choosing winners and losers, of choosing who must follow his flawed laws and who gets a free pass. If any American deserves a waiver from Obamacare, then all Americans do. --Dr. Milton R. Wolf
It was a disaster created behind closed doors. It is an iceberg with the promises of hold costs down, letting people keep their current health insurance if they like it and allowing grown children to remain on parent’s plans until 25. All of these things showed above the waterline while the true consequences of Obamacare remain hidden.

The truth is the consequences are so severe that president Soetoro has issued first 111 waivers, then 222 waivers and now a total of 733 waivers, which permit his friends and supporters the ability to opt out of his signature achievement. This is the health care law that the president, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid unconstitutionally forced on the rest of Americans. (see story)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Two of the central promises of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul law are unlikely to be fulfilled, Medicare's independent economic expert told Congress on Wednesday.

The landmark legislation probably won't hold costs down, and it won't let everybody keep their current health insurance if they like it, Chief Actuary Richard Foster told the House Budget Committee. His office is responsible for independent long-range cost estimates. (source)

Now we are told by a health care chief actuary that Obamacare will not hold costs down as promised and in addition many Americans will not be able to keep their current health insurance if they care to again as promised.

Fox Business News medical contributor Dr. Marc Siegel discuss why the health-care law will cause a rise in health costs (see 3:46min video)

Finally Democrat’s last line of defense is shredded because we now know that repealing Obamacare will not add to the deficit (see article)

There was no reason to pass this law except for the fact that Democrats wanted to pass it and could. Likewise, there is absolutely no reason for this critically flawed law to remain on the books. Everything about it is a lie and a detriment to the American people.

733 friends and allies of the president have been granted special clemency by the president from participating in Obamacare, which by any measure is unfair to the rest Americans. If Obamacare is not good for friend of Soetoro like SEIU and others, it is not good for the rest of us.

Wednesday, February 02, 2011

Rachel Maddow lash out at Bachmann backfires

“Michele Bachmann is not the national spokesperson for the Republican Party. She is unlikely anytime soon to be chosen to be the spokesperson for her party. But tonight, inexplicably, a national news network decided that they would give Michele Bachmann a job that her own party never did.” —Rachel Maddow
What is Democrat and Liberal sycophant Rachel Maddow’s recent concern with the integrity of the Republican Party? It seems that since Rep. Michelle Bachmann’s CNN appearance, which Bachmann gave an outstanding Tea Parties response to the President’s State of the Union Address (which eclipsed the president) Maddow and others have been looking for the slightest peculiarities in attempts to discredit the core message of Rep. Bachmann.

Congresswoman Bachmann pointed out via visual aids what the “official Republican” response failed to show. President Barry Hussein Soetoro’s administration has don’t far worse than the previous administration and has in fact exacerbated America’s fiscal down turn by its reckless enactment of social fiscal policies which will serve to kill job growth and saddle the economy thus the American people with more astronomical debt.

In typical Liberal fashion Maddow ,with ad hominem parody of the skewed camera angles which were produced by and were solely the fault of CNN, attempted to minimize Rep. Bachmann for looking off camera. Then Maddow hoping to get some opposite Party assistance in her attack against Bachmann brought in the biggest Republican spokesperson that her obvious limited political gravitas could muster, in her words, “the immediate former Communications Director for the Republican National Committee, Doug Heye.”

Mr. Heye immediately self deprecated and suggested if he were the best that Maddow could do then she was not very well politically endowed.
Nevertheless, Mr. Heye from his lowly political estate was able to defend and counter Maddow’s attacks against Bachmann, Tea Parties, Conservatives and Republicans (see 7:53min video)

Visit for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

If Maddow is the new MSNBC standard-bearer for anti-Conservative propaganda in place of Keith Olbermann, she should really select her guests more carefully. I’m sure it is not MSNBC’s intentions that their viewers be accidently exposed to the truth.

Whatever Maddow intended it apparently backfired. Mr. Heye showed why Liberals generally prefer not to have Conservative guest.

Tuesday, February 01, 2011

SNL Complicit in CNN’s attempted Sabotage of Bachmann and the Tea Party’s Message

In the tradition of lampooning everything, Conservative SNL attacked Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann’s response to the President’s State of the Union Address last Saturday night. SNL represented that Congresswoman Bachmann’s core message was not properly conveyed. But it was. Those who were listening to the case that Rep. Bachmann presented got a clear picture of the duplicitous nature of the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration, that is why SNL felt the need for a second attempt to discredit the message.(see 4:11min video)

What is ironic is Rep. Bachmann was only seen by a very limited audience because of CNN’s limited viewership. SNL’s decision to give the Tea Parties response a much broader audience must be seen as a tactical error for Progressive Liberals because according to Breitbart TV the “technical difficulties” which SNL made fun of were actually a result of a CNN plot to sabotage Congresswoman Bachmann.

Breitbart reports that CNN had originally agreed to use the live feed set up by Tea Party Express, which had a teleprompter running on the lens in which Rep. Bachmann was delivering her speech. However, when Rep. Bachmann left the camera set-up and sat in the House chamber to hear Pres. Obama's speech, CNN set up a camera of their own, just off to the side of the main, tele-prompter/camera. Thus, when CNN provided their network feed it ended up skewed and off-kilter creating the effect, which SNL made light of.

Now in later developments CNN is blaming Fox News saying it was a Fox News camera that took the shot. So we are to believe that a rival News agency set up their camera on a CNN set and CNN used that camera to broadcast the Bachmann response over the CNN network. Interesting.

Had CNN or Fox News honored the agreement with Rep. Bachmann and used the Tea Parties' camera that was already set up for the shot their broadcast would have matched the original broadcast that on-line viewers the night of the speech saw. (see 7:01 min video)

What happened to the president’s call for political civility in our national discourse SNL and CNN? These unwarranted and false political attacks against Conservatives must cease. SNL as well as CNN must simply desist in their partisan hatchet jobs against Conservatives.

SNL and CNN owe Rep. Bachmann, the Tea Parties, Conservatives and Americans an apology. Fair minded Americans should write, email, tweet and press until SNL and CNN discontinue their discriminatory practices.