Monday, December 24, 2007

The Politics of Nepotism and Fear

Bill Clinton campaigning for Hillary in New Hampshire

How we meet those challenges will determine whether our grandchildren will even be here fifty years from now at a meeting like this listening to the next generation's presidential candidates," Clinton told several hundred voters gathered in the gym of the Holderness School here.

The three "very, very profound challenges" facing the country, Clinton said, were growing inequality between rich and poor, terrorism and other sectarian violence, and global warming. And only Hillary Clinton, he said, had the vision, the plans and the record of getting results to respond the right way. He urged his audience to vote for her for the sake of themselves and their children. "This is your life," he said. "This is about you."
-- Alec MacGillis reporting on Bill Clinton speech 2007 HOLDERNESS, New Hampshire

Not since Sean Comb’s (P Diddy, Puff Daddy or whatever he’s calling himself these days) 2004 “Vote or Die” campaign to get the Democrat vote out have we seen such a foreboding warning and a dreadfully tacky campaign strategy. Vote for Democrats or the World will end? or Save the World Elect my Wife Come on you’ve got to be kidding!

Well Sean Diddy here we are in 2007 on the eve of Christmas, by the way Merry Christmas to all, and as well we are on the eve of election year 2008 so electing George W. Bush didn’t kill us as you predicted it would.

Bill Clinton’s pretty good at the politics of scare too Sean, in 2002 he predicted the end of America’s military, economic and political power in 50 years, (Lord knows he did everything in his power to make it so!)

Now on the campaign trail stumping for Hillary in New Hampshire the former President let it be known that if America doesn’t vote for his wife this elect in 50 years no one is going to be around.

So let’s see vote Democrat or Die, or the other snappy slogan vote for Hillary if you want your grandchildren to be here fifty years from now.

Hum both very compelling but I’m not convinced that Hillary or the Democrats can save us. They’ve been crying about saving Darfur for what going on 10 years now and have yet to lift a finger to stop the genocide by Islamic extremist against women, children, and Christians there.

In fact I can’t think of one place on earth that Liberals have made it a safer place to live. Almost everywhere you look where there are liberal policies in place Islam is over running these countries. The Netherlands, Europe or you name it Liberalism has not protected people from Islamic extremist. Just ask the people of Darfur!

Bill Clinton is right about this one insular isolated point and that is, some very, very profound challenges are on the horizon for the world family and we do need to put in place leadership that will act in the correct way to meet those challenges.
The United Nations will not save us just ask the people of Darfur.

The World Court will not save us just ask the people of Darfur

The Europeans will not save us just ask the people of Darfur

Bill Clinton did not save us just ask the people of America

Finally no matter what Bill or Chelsea or her mother thinks about Hillary, no matter how many people she tries to find to like her on that desperately looking for someone to like me helicopter tour the fact is more people say that they will not vote for Hillary than any other candidate and Liberals are no better at solving the world’s problems than Conservatives.

Liberals successfully painted the 109th Republican lead Congress as the “do nothing Congress” only to take to reigns of the 110th Congress and become the Democrat lead “do nothing Congress” the sequel.

Liberals accused Conservatives of cronyism and nepotism for the last 7 years now in an act of sheer hypocrisy or stupidity ( I can’t figure out which) the Clinton’s ask you to elect his family member to be President of the United States based on the fact that she was one of his henchmen in the Clinton administration and did I mention the fact that she is his wife.

And if that wasn’t good enough and if there was any doubt in your mind about the nepotism and fear that the Clintons are using in this campaign, Bill makes an appearance on Charlie Rose and says, (Bill Clinton voice) "Vote for my wife, she’s the best!”

Well he didn’t use those exact words but any student versed in the language of Clintonese knows exactly what Bill was saying. See for yourself:

The politics of Nepotism and fear are not a very attractive campaign strategies but these days it’s looking like that's all that Hillary has to offer. Vote for Hillary or die! Merry Christmas!

Friday, December 21, 2007


Don Aitkin, PhD, Professor, social scientist, retired vice-chancellor and president, University of Canberra, Australia, Just one of the signatories and one of the 400.

"Skepticism is the first step towards truth."-- Denis Diderot, philosopher

This is not Sparta where 300 of her bravest warriors faced down the all powerful Persian Empire. This is the 21st Century where once again a small number of brave men must face down a Babylonian Army of United Nations countries hell bent on conquering the known world.

This time not battle readied warriors but men disciplined in the sciences fight for the freedom of mankind against the Babylonian hordes who champion the Bali roadmap.

They have no Oscars, they have no Nobel peace prizes for Global warming, to give them false credibility, but what they do have is science.

These are not United Nations lackeys attempting to pedal mistake ridden hypotheses to support made up minds (It’s a consensus, the debate is over) and wild overstated claims of impeding doom for the earth and her people as we know them.

Doom that is, if we don’t acquiesce and capitulate to regressive horse and buggy restrictions on modern technology coupled with sizable penalties that each person on the planet will be forced to pay in taxes for emissions of greenhouse C02 gases that any cow, bear in the woods or Alaskan Caribou can and does emit with a simple belch or by passing flatulence on the open tundra.

No these are 400 scientists from various disciplines and from around the world and according to them the United Nations is leading the world in the wrong direction.

According to them, "Attempts to prevent global climate change from occurring are ultimately futile, and constitute a tragic misallocation of resources that would be better spent on humanity's real and pressing problems," stated in a letter signed by 100 of the scientists. The December 13 letter was released to the public late Thursday.

These scientist thought it necessary to publish such a letter and then issue a report because they felt reputable scientist who do not agree and are not in consensus with the European, United Nations, Al Gore politically correct version of Global warming are being persecuted in some cases, as well, many of them are being demonized in general.

This new committee report, a first of its kind, comes after the UN IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri implied dismissively that there were only “about a dozen" skeptical scientists left in the world. Wrong Mr. Pachauri 400 scientist to date and their numbers are growing not shrinking!

Former Vice President Gore has claimed that scientists skeptical of climate change are akin to “flat Earth society members” and similar in number to those who “believe the moon landing was actually staged in a movie lot in Arizona.”

So Mr. Gore scientist that don’t agree with your highly esteemed and highly credible scientific knowledge are ignorant and crazy?
About 300 years ago, a Flat Earth Society was founded by those who did not believe the world was round. That society still exists; it probably has about a dozen members. --Dr R.K. Pachauri, Chairman of the IPCC, when asked on February 20 about criticisms of accepted global warming theory
So what was Al Gore doing in Bali denouncing his own country? Gore was doing what he once accused President George Bush of doing concerning the Iraq war. Only Gore’s own words apply to him much more appropriately.

"Gore lied to us" - "He betrayed this country!"
"He played on our fears! He’s attempting set America in the direction of an ill-conceived foreign treaty in Bali Indonesia. Such a treaty is dangerous to the people who inhabit the earth; a treaty pre-ordained and planned to scare people regarding Global warming and Global calamity."

"It is not a minor matter to take the loyalty and deep trusting feelings of the American people about Global warming and trifle with them. The truth shall rise again!"

The truth must rise again for all of our sakes Mr. Gore. No to Kyoto 2 and let Kyoto 1 die in 2012! And long live the 400!
Please see video:

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Global Stupidity caused by pseudo-scientific mumbo jumbo

Professor David Deming

Nothing creates cognitive dissonance in the mind of a true believer.—David Deming,Geophysicist and adjunct scholar with the National Center for Policy Analysis, and associate professor of Arts and Sciences at the University of Oklahoma.

Contributing writer brooklyn thinks that it is a waste of my time to post the truth about Global warming. That very well may be true but I just had to share this article with you dear readers.

Professor David Deming’s December 19, 2007 Washington Times article entitled “Year of Global Cooling.” Deming cites that contrary to Oscar winning and Nobel peace prize winning (did I leave any of his accomplishments out?) Global Scientist Albert A. Gore, Jr.’s dire assessments of a Global meltdown of biblical proportions there is actually record low temperatures being set all over the world. (Imagine that!)

I guess that Bali roadmap is another invention of the Global Scientist emeritus Al Gore Jr.

According to Professor Deming, Since the mid-19th century, the mean global temperature has increased by 0.7 degrees Celsius. This slight warming is not unusual, and lies well within the range of natural variation. Carbon dioxide continues to build in the atmosphere, but the mean planetary temperature hasn't increased significantly for nearly nine years. Antarctica is getting colder.

Neither the intensity nor the frequency of hurricanes has increased. The 2007 season was the third-quietest since 1966. In 2006 not a single hurricane made landfall in the U.S.

Why doesn’t the fact that for two straight hurricane seasons hurricanes have decreased instead of increased, since Global Scientist Al Gore made his dire forecasts about hurricanes increasing in strength and size because of Global warming, give people pause?

Doesn’t that prove that Al Gore was wrong at least in this instance. And doesn’t the fact that Mr. Gore is wrong open the possibility to reasonable people that he just might be inconveniently wrong about his whole scientific theory? (BTW were did Mr. Gore get his degree in Science?)
The voluminous evidence now strongly suggests that unless we act boldly and quickly to deal with the underlying causes of global warming, our world will undergo a string of terrible catastrophes, including more and stronger storms like Hurricane Katrina, in both the Atlantic and the Pacific.—Al Gore, 2006 An Inconvenient Truth
David Deming says that, “Nothing creates cognitive dissonance in the mind of a true believer.” So maybe you’re right brook. The loonies out there that promote this Global warming farce will not listen to science nor will they listen to reason.

And now the U.N. is involved attempting to make money from the Global warming scare they can't afford to admit that they are wrong. If exposing this Global warming fraud wasn’t so crucial because this is one of the schemes that Europe plans to use to destroy the U.S. economy it would be a waste of time. But that has to be told too!

So who are you going to believe Al Gore or the fact that it’s actually getting colder around the Global? Thank you Professor Deming!

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

American Fascism is from the Left

Radio Host Michael Savage, 2007 TALKERS Magazine Freedom of Speech Award Recipient

Senator Paul comments on Fascism

“When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.”-- Sinclair Lewis, American Writer, 1885-1951
Senator Ron Paul and Sinclair Lewis are wrong as all Liberals on the Left are wrong when they attempt to equate fascism to good decent American Christian patriots.

If fascism is defined as a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often

Then fascism is already in America but this Fascism is wrapped in the cloak of civil rights and it is carrying a perverted interpretation of the U.S. Constitution by which to forcibly suppress criticism of all of the Left’s favorite causes; homosexuality, abortion, illegal aliens, the persecution of Christianity, and the dismantling of Judeo-Christian values that have served Western society so well for the last 200 years.
First They Came for the Jews

First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me.
Pastor Martin Niemöller
If one opposes any of these favorite causes of the Left, Fascist Liberals will use the full force of government to either suppress you by law suit or drive your voice from the public square by sabotage or appealing to some fake discrimination violation.

This is no longer America where freedom of speech and religion can be practiced this is George Orwell’s 1984 where Big Brother is a homosexual illegal alien aborter pornographer terrorist who uses faux civil rights claims with which to suppress other’s freedoms of dissent.

These American fascist are law makers, school administrators, lawyers, judges, union members, special interest groups, front groups and teachers who use the force of the law to implement their personal worldview on the majority of the American citizenry by imposing Draconian laws that continues to force the agenda of eradicating freedoms from America. Among the freedoms that they attack is the freedom of religion to replacing it with freedom from religion.

They are attempting to eradicate Christianity and replace it with homosexuality. These American fascist are even eradicating American citizens in the womb by abortion (From 1973 through 2000, more than 39 million legal abortions occurred in the United States alone)—Information Please and replacing the little aborted American babies with 40 million illegal aliens who transgress American borders and sovereignty to do the work that those aborted Americans didn’t get a chance to do. We continue to hear that we don’t have workers this said to justify illegal aliens in this country but did anyone ever stop to consider why?

The reason that there is a shortage of American workers is the natural consequences of year upon year of the American genocide called Roe vs. Wade.

All that American fascist really had to do was falsely portray killing babies as a civil right and they knew that they would be able to force Americans to accept this horrific American holocaust.

All that American Fascist had to do was portray homosexuality as a civil right and they knew that they would be able to force Americans to accept the Sodom and Gomorrah of the yearly Gay pride parades and the San Francisco renowned Folsom Street Fair.

It was portraying homosexuality as a civil right that got homosexual marriage legalized in Massachusetts and Governor Arnold Schwarznegger to sign into California law AB 394 and SB 777 to force homosexuality on the unsuspecting majority of Californians who have already voted overwhelmingly in 2000 that marriage remain as it always has been between a man and a woman.

Governor Schwarzenegger’s new Fascist laws will force California schools to stop using the words mother and father and husband and wife come January 2008. The Fascist Governor of California has forced every California school to become a homosexual-bisexual-transsexual indoctrination center and will prosecute anyone who speaks against homosexuality with a special "hate crimes" Penal Code statute. Schwarzenegger’s fascist laws will be implemented under the color of anti-discrimination.

Finally ironically Fascist are attempt to remove Michael Savage, who was named in March as the recipient of the TALKERS Magazine Freedom of Speech Award for 2007, from broadcasting where Mr. Savage speaks his mind on the important cultural issues of the day.
First they came for the Christians and I did not speak out because even though I’m a Christian I thought it better to turn the other cheek.

Then they came for Conservatives and I did not speak out because even though I’m a Conservative I thought only Liberals march, protest and fight for their rights.

Then they came for President Bush and I did not speak out because they managed to isolate President Bush with all that negativity and anti-Christian Conservatism plus I was afraid.

Then they came for Michael Savage and I did not speak out because Michael speaks his mind and I think that we should all just try to get along.

Then they came for me the quiet unassuming Conservative Christian who just wants to get along and would rather only to pray then fight for my God, Country and Family and there was no one left to fight for me there was no one left to speak for me, there was no one left to pray for me! --Alaphiah as adapted and paraphrase from the late Pastor Martin Niemöller
An Islamic front group the Council on American-Islamic Relations has targeted Mr. Savage using faux civil rights tactics employed corrupted and adapted by homosexual right groups.

Tactics which are used to falsely accuse Mr. Savage of hate speech with the intentions of damaging his ability to speak freely.

The Federal government has named CAIR an unindicted co-conspirator in sponsoring terrorism. Companies that are supporting CAIR’s boycott of the Michael Savage show are unwillingly supporting terrorism when they support CAIR. Companies like AutoZone, Citrix, TrustedID, JC Penney, OfficeMax, Wal-Mart, and AT&T all support CAIR’s boycott of the Savage Nation.
Federal prosecutors named CAIR, along with the Islamic Society of North America and the North America Islamic Trust, an unindicted co-conspirator in the recent case involving the now-defunct Muslim charity the Holy Land Foundation and its alleged financial ties to the Palestinian terrorist group turned terrorist government Hamas. Also coming to light via the Dallas trial was a 1991 memo put out by the Egyptian Islamist organization the Muslim Brotherhood citing a strategy to subvert the West using mainstream Islamic front groups such as CAIR.

CAIR tried to sue Andrew Whitehead, the founder of the organization Anti-CAIR, in 2005 for libel. The lawsuit was based on objections to statements posted at the Anti-CAIR Web site, including Whitehead's labeling CAIR a "terrorist supporting front organization." But after Whitehead's lawyer responded with a series of discovery requests and documents that, had they become part of a trial, almost certainly would have exposed CAIR's shady background, the organization agreed to settle out of court. To this day, Whitehead has made no changes to the Anti-CAIR Web site, which may indicate that none of the libel charges made by CAIR could be substantiated.
At the time the case was settled, some predicted that CAIR's litigiousness would taper off, but the group seems simply to have shifted tactics. Now, mounting boycotts or pressuring employers to drop political commentators whom they label "anti-Muslim" are CAIR's preferred routes.

This is Fascism in America it didn’t come wrapped in the stars and stripes carrying a cross it came wrapped in the rainbow flag carrying the star and crescent.

Two very strange bedfellows indeed but when attempting to bring down the entire Western civilization homosexuals and Muslims have a lot in common and nothing to be proud of!

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

U.N. Set to Tax World on the Air that we Breath

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon at the UN climate conference in Bali.
[T]here has been no net global warming since 1998. [T]he current temperature plateau follows a late 20th-century period of warming is consistent with the continuation today of natural multi-decadal or millennial climate cycling. --Signatories of an open letter on the UN climate-conference
That is what the United Nations consensus In Bali, Indonesia amounts to, taxing the world for the air that we breathe! In an open letter to the United Nations reputable scientist and experts expose this UN climate conference as taking the World in entirely the wrong direction.

Since the beginning of time on this planet the climate has been changing. It has gone through been at least four major ice ages in the Earth's past. Outside these periods, the Earth seems to have been ice-free even in high latitudes according to Wikipedia.
The present ice age began 40 million years ago with the growth of an ice sheet in Antarctica. It intensified during the late Pliocene, around 3 million years ago, with the spread of ice sheets in the Northern Hemisphere, and has continued in the Pleistocene. Since then, the world has seen cycles of glaciation with ice sheets advancing and retreating on 40,000- and 100,000-year time scales. The most recent glacial period ended about ten thousand years ago. –Wikipedia
For millions of years before men inhabited the earth the climate changed and if man so happens to eradicate himself from the face of the earth the climate will continue to change. Climate will continue to change with or without the influence of man.

Not since a consensus calling for the crucifixion of Jesus Christ has a mob been so wrong about a subject.

Global warming or Climate change as it is being called currently is not about cleaning the environment as one might expect from all of the misinformation an propaganda that we are being fed by the purveyors of this grandiose scheme of world taxation. The Bali conference entitled the Bali roadmap is not going to clean one iota of CO2 from the atmosphere that’s not what Global warming/Climate Change movement is designed to do.

The movement is designed to create a multibillion dollar European regulating and carbon trading industry from which recently formed companies and world bodies like the U.N. will profit handsomely from. Global warming is new multi-billion dollar revenue streams in the 21st Century. This will happen by the implementation of a world carbon taxes that they plan to collect from you and me.

You may think now that you don’t have a problem paying for the carbons that you emit into the environment but have you even been told how much you will be required to pay?

This scheme is like charging every human being on the planet for the air that we breathe. Would you willing pay a tax for something that every being on this planet has be entitled to since this planet’s beginning? Many of you didn’t realize that all this talk about Global warming/Climate change is really about Global taxation. Any time you hear the term Global warming you should think Global taxation or if you hear the term Climate change you should think, U.N. taxes world on the air that we breathe!

What the U.S. is about to agree to in the Kyoto 2 Bali roadmap is $180 taxes per U.S. resident, or $720 annually for a family of four and that’s just what they are telling us now.

You can be certain that these numbers are low end numbers so that you won’t be scared way from supporting the Global warming measures and scared into doing something about a body of people who derive no authority from you who plan to enslave you with a tax that will soon be implemented world-wide.

Al Gore’s Global warming campaign is not what it seems. It is a European C02 trading scheme that is modeled from the Europe’s desire to once again colonize the world. Once again in the spirit of King George Europe is attempting to tax America and this time with a Benedict Arnold by the name of Gore who is helping them in this taxation without representation on America scheme. It is a campaign to enslave the world community under a new tax system levied for the profit of Europe the United Nations and companies like Mr. Gore’s company that make money trading in carbon futures.

President Bush and the U.S. Congress is already giving in to the pressure of the United Nations and multi national corporations that have shown nothing but contempt for the United States of America.

Agreeing to the draconian measures of CO2 emissions that are outline in the Kyoto 2 agreement in Bali or any of the Global initiatives is not good for America because emissions will not be reduced only now we will be charged for emitting CO2 into the atmosphere. By the way there is disagreement as to whether C02 is even a pollutant!

The American people must take note of this and demand that President Bush and Congress protect America from those who intend on taxing the American people without representation.

The American people should demand that our government does not sign any treaty or agreement that calls for a tax on the American people without allowing the American people to vote whether they wish their government place them under the control of foreign interest be it Europe the United Nations or any of the companies set to profit from the Global warming/Climate change scare.

In the words of the signatories of the Dec. 13th letter to the Bali road map conference:
Attempts to prevent global climate change from occurring are ultimately futile, and constitute a tragic misallocation of resources that would be better spent on humanity's real and pressing problems.
The following are signatories to the Dec. 13th letter to the Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations on the UN Climate conference in Bali:
Don Aitkin, PhD, Professor, social scientist, retired vice-chancellor and president, University of Canberra, Australia

William J.R. Alexander, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Civil and Biosystems Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa; Member, UN Scientific and Technical Committee on Natural Disasters, 1994-2000

Bjarne Andresen, PhD, physicist, Professor, The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Geoff L. Austin, PhD, FNZIP, FRSNZ, Professor, Dept. of Physics, University of Auckland, New Zealand

Timothy F. Ball, PhD, environmental consultant, former climatology professor, University of Winnipeg

Ernst-Georg Beck, Dipl. Biol., Biologist, Merian-Schule Freiburg, Germany

Sonja A. Boehmer-Christiansen, PhD, Reader, Dept. of Geography, Hull University, U.K.; Editor, Energy & Environment journal

Chris C. Borel, PhD, remote sensing scientist, U.S.

Reid A. Bryson, PhD, DSc, DEngr, UNE P. Global 500 Laureate; Senior Scientist, Center for Climatic Research; Emeritus Professor of Meteorology, of Geography, and of Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin

Dan Carruthers, M.Sc., wildlife biology consultant specializing in animal ecology in Arctic and Subarctic regions, Alberta

R.M. Carter, PhD, Professor, Marine Geophysical Laboratory, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia

Ian D. Clark, PhD, Professor, isotope hydrogeology and paleoclimatology, Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa

Richard S. Courtney, PhD, climate and atmospheric science consultant, IPCC expert reviewer, U.K.

Willem de Lange, PhD, Dept. of Earth and Ocean Sciences, School of Science and Engineering, Waikato University, New Zealand

David Deming, PhD (Geophysics), Associate Professor, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Oklahoma

Freeman J. Dyson, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Institute for Advanced Studies, Princeton, N.J.

Don J. Easterbrook, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Geology, Western Washington University
Lance Endersbee, Emeritus Professor, former dean of Engineering and Pro-Vice Chancellor of Monasy University, Australia

Hans Erren, Doctorandus, geophysicist and climate specialist, Sittard, The Netherlands

Robert H. Essenhigh, PhD, E.G. Bailey Professor of Energy Conversion, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University

Christopher Essex, PhD, Professor of Applied Mathematics and Associate Director of the Program in Theoretical Physics, University of Western Ontario

David Evans, PhD, mathematician, carbon accountant, computer and electrical engineer and head of 'Science Speak,' Australia

William Evans, PhD, editor, American Midland Naturalist; Dept. of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame

Stewart Franks, PhD, Professor, Hydroclimatologist, University of Newcastle, Australia

R. W. Gauldie, PhD, Research Professor, Hawai'i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology, School of Ocean Earth Sciences and Technology, University of Hawai'i at Manoa

Lee C. Gerhard, PhD, Senior Scientist Emeritus, University of Kansas; former director and state geologist, Kansas Geological Survey

Gerhard Gerlich, Professor for Mathematical and Theoretical Physics, Institut für Mathematische Physik der TU Braunschweig, Germany

Albrecht Glatzle, PhD, sc.agr., Agro-Biologist and Gerente ejecutivo, INTTAS, Paraguay

Fred Goldberg, PhD, Adjunct Professor, Royal Institute of Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden

Vincent Gray, PhD, expert reviewer for the IPCC and author of The Greenhouse Delusion: A Critique of 'Climate Change 2001, Wellington, New Zealand

William M. Gray, Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University and Head of the Tropical Meteorology Project

Howard Hayden, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of Connecticut

Louis Hissink MSc, M.A.I.G., editor, AIG News, and consulting geologist, Perth, Western Australia

Craig D. Idso, PhD, Chairman, Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, Arizona

Sherwood B. Idso, PhD, President, Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, AZ, USA

Andrei Illarionov, PhD, Senior Fellow, Center for Global Liberty and Prosperity; founder and director of the Institute of Economic Analysis

Zbigniew Jaworowski, PhD, physicist, Chairman - Scientific Council of Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection, Warsaw, Poland

Jon Jenkins, PhD, MD, computer modelling - virology, NSW, Australia

Wibjorn Karlen, PhD, Emeritus Professor, Dept. of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, Sweden

Olavi Kärner, Ph.D., Research Associate, Dept. of Atmospheric Physics, Institute of Astrophysics and Atmospheric Physics, Toravere, Estonia

Joel M. Kauffman, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Chemistry, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

David Kear, PhD, FRSNZ, CMG, geologist, former Director-General of NZ Dept. of Scientific & Industrial Research, New Zealand

Madhav Khandekar, PhD, former research scientist, Environment Canada; editor, Climate Research (2003-05); editorial board member, Natural Hazards; IPCC expert reviewer 2007

William Kininmonth M.Sc., M.Admin., former head of Australia's National Climate Centre and a consultant to the World Meteorological organization's Commission for Climatology Jan J.H. Kop, MSc Ceng FICE (Civil Engineer Fellow of the Institution of Civil Engineers), Emeritus Prof. of Public Health Engineering, Technical University Delft, The Netherlands

Prof. R.W.J. Kouffeld, Emeritus Professor, Energy Conversion, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

Salomon Kroonenberg, PhD, Professor, Dept. of Geotechnology, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

Hans H.J. Labohm, PhD, economist, former advisor to the executive board, Clingendael Institute (The Netherlands Institute of International Relations), The Netherlands
The Rt. Hon. Lord Lawson of Blaby, economist; Chairman of the Central Europe Trust; former Chancellor of the Exchequer, U.K.

Douglas Leahey, PhD, meteorologist and air-quality consultant, Calgary

David R. Legates, PhD, Director, Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware

Marcel Leroux, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Climatology, University of Lyon, France; former director of Laboratory of Climatology, Risks and Environment, CNRS

Bryan Leyland, International Climate Science Coalition, consultant and power engineer, Auckland, New Zealand

William Lindqvist, PhD, independent consulting geologist, Calif.

Richard S. Lindzen, PhD, Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology, Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

A.J. Tom van Loon, PhD, Professor of Geology (Quaternary Geology), Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland; former President of the European Association of Science Editors

Anthony R. Lupo, PhD, Associate Professor of Atmospheric Science, Dept. of Soil, Environmental, and Atmospheric Science, University of Missouri-Columbia
Richard Mackey, PhD, Statistician, Australia

Horst Malberg, PhD, Professor for Meteorology and Climatology, Institut für Meteorologie, Berlin, Germany

John Maunder, PhD, Climatologist, former President of the Commission for Climatology of the World Meteorological Organization (89-97), New Zealand

Alister McFarquhar, PhD, international economy, Downing College, Cambridge, U.K.

Ross McKitrick, PhD, Associate Professor, Dept. of Economics, University of Guelph

John McLean, PhD, climate data analyst, computer scientist, Australia

Owen McShane, PhD, economist, head of the International Climate Science Coalition; Director, Centre for Resource Management Studies, New Zealand

Fred Michel, PhD, Director, Institute of Environmental Sciences and Associate
Professor of Earth Sciences, Carleton University

Frank Milne, PhD, Professor, Dept. of Economics, Queen's University

Asmunn Moene, PhD, former head of the Forecasting Centre, Meteorological Institute, Norway

Alan Moran, PhD, Energy Economist, Director of the IPA's Deregulation Unit, Australia
Nils-Axel Morner, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Paleogeophysics & Geodynamics, Stockholm University, Sweden

Lubos Motl, PhD, Physicist, former Harvard string theorist, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

John Nicol, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Physics, James Cook University, Australia

David Nowell, M.Sc., Fellow of the Royal Meteorological Society, former chairman of the NATO Meteorological Group, Ottawa

James J. O'Brien, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Meteorology and Oceanography, Florida State University

Cliff Ollier, PhD, Professor Emeritus (Geology), Research Fellow, University of Western Australia

Garth W. Paltridge, PhD, atmospheric physicist, Emeritus Professor and former Director of the Institute of Antarctic and Southern Ocean Studies, University of Tasmania, Australia

R. Timothy Patterson, PhD, Professor, Dept. of Earth Sciences (paleoclimatology), Carleton University

Al Pekarek, PhD, Associate Professor of Geology, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Dept., St. Cloud State University, Minnesota

Ian Plimer, PhD, Professor of Geology, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide and Emeritus Professor of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia

Brian Pratt, PhD, Professor of Geology, Sedimentology, University of Saskatchewan

Harry N.A. Priem, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Planetary Geology and Isotope Geophysics, Utrecht University; former director of the Netherlands Institute for Isotope Geosciences

Alex Robson, PhD, Economics, Australian National University Colonel F.P.M. Rombouts, Branch Chief - Safety, Quality and Environment, Royal Netherland Air Force

R.G. Roper, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology

Arthur Rorsch, PhD, Emeritus Professor, Molecular Genetics, Leiden University, The Netherlands

Rob Scagel, M.Sc., forest microclimate specialist, principal consultant, Pacific Phytometric Consultants, B.C.

Tom V. Segalstad, PhD, (Geology/Geochemistry), Head of the Geological Museum and Associate Professor of Resource and Environmental Geology, University of Oslo, Norway

Gary D. Sharp, PhD, Center for Climate/Ocean Resources Study, Salinas, CA

S. Fred Singer, PhD, Professor Emeritus of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia and former director Weather Satellite Service

L. Graham Smith, PhD, Associate Professor, Dept. of Geography, University of Western Ontario

Roy W. Spencer, PhD, climatologist, Principal Research Scientist, Earth System Science Center, The University of Alabama, Huntsville

Peter Stilbs, TeknD, Professor of Physical Chemistry, Research Leader, School of Chemical Science and Engineering, KTH (Royal Institute of Technology), Stockholm, Sweden

Hendrik Tennekes, PhD, former director of research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute

Dick Thoenes, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Chemical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands

Brian G Valentine, PhD, PE (Chem.), Technology Manager - Industrial Energy Efficiency, Adjunct Associate Professor of Engineering Science, University of Maryland at College Park; Dept of Energy, Washington, DC

Gerrit J. van der Lingen, PhD, geologist and paleoclimatologist, climate change consultant, Geoscience Research and Investigations, New Zealand

Len Walker, PhD, Power Engineering, Australia

Edward J. Wegman, PhD, Department of Computational and Data Sciences, George Mason University, Virginia

Stephan Wilksch, PhD, Professor for Innovation and Technology Management, Production Management and Logistics, University of Technolgy and Economics Berlin, Germany
Boris Winterhalter, PhD, senior marine researcher (retired), Geological Survey of Finland, former professor in marine geology, University of Helsinki, Finland

David E. Wojick, PhD, P.Eng., energy consultant, Virginia

Raphael Wust, PhD, Lecturer, Marine Geology/Sedimentology, James Cook University, Australia

A. Zichichi, PhD, President of the World Federation of Scientists, Geneva, Switzerland; Emeritus Professor of Advanced Physics, University of Bologna, Italy

Monday, December 17, 2007

Barack Puts the Cackle in Her Place

Carolyn Washburn

When asked a question that was obviously meant to embarrass him in the Democrat Debates held on December 13, 2007 in Johnston, Iowa Barack Obama had the wherewithal to snap back a zinger and give the Cackle a pop right between the eyes!

The infamous Hillary cackle was in rare form when CAROLYN WASHBURN, moderator for the "DES MOINES REGISTER" (the register who incidentally has endorsed the Clinton candidacy): poised this question to Senator Obama,

[Senator Obama] [w]ith relatively little foreign policy experience of your own, how will you rely on so many Clinton advisors and still deliver the break from the past that you're promising voters?
With laughter spilling from the audience and Senator Clinton egging it on with the mocking remark, “I want to hear that!”

Senator Obama delivered a brilliant unexpected and what seemed to be a totally inspired reply. In fact, Obama’s answer was something that Senator Clinton didn’t want to hear! Obama quipped, “Well, Hillary, I’m looking forward to you advising me, as well.”

Whether anyone realizes it or not this somewhat innocuous counterstrike not only turned the tables on Senator Clinton in the debate that night, it has also set off a chain reaction of questions like why aren’t all those former Clinton advisors working for Mrs. Clinton?

Answer. Because they refused too! They don’t want to work for Hillary! You won’t hear Senator Clinton laughing about that.

Senator Obama you missed pointing that little item out but hey no one can think of everything.

That’s the reason for advisers in the first place! Now will someone advise Senator Clinton to give up her nails on the chalkboard cackle!

Friday, December 14, 2007

Merry Christmas Congressman Jim McDermott

Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA)

He believed in Saddam Hussein over President Bush. He even flew over to Iraq to confer with Saddam before the war, which earned him the name in the House of Representatives “Baghdad Jim” and now he supports the Prophet Muhammad and Ramadan over Christianity and Christmas. Who is this American hero?

Why is none other than Seattle Washington’s finest, Representative for the 7th District Congressman Jim McDermott.

Congressman McDermott says that his no vote on a Resolution to recognize the importance of Christmas and Christianity to the United States of America was simply a protest against a veto that he was anticipating by President Bush on a children’s health care insurance bill. Yeah right!

McDermott was joined by 8 other Democrats who apparently had their own reasons to vote no against Christmas or maybe they shared McDermott views. Who knows?
The Christmas measure was approved 372-9 on Tuesday night. Democrats cast all the no votes. Beside McDermott, the other dissenting votes came from Reps. Gary Ackerman and Yvette Clarke of New York; Barbara Lee, Pete Stark and Lynn Woolsey of California; Diana DeGette of Colorado; Alcee Hastings of Florida; and Bobby Scott of Virginia.

Ten lawmakers, including Republican Mike Pence of Indiana, voted "present." Forty lawmakers were absent for the vote.
– Matthew Daly

The resolution is as follows:
Recognizing the importance of Christmas and the Christian faith. (Introduced in House)
1st Session
H. RES. 847

Recognizing the importance of Christmas and the Christian faith.

December 6, 2007
Mr. KING of Iowa (for himself, Mr. AKIN, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. BAKER, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CARTER, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. DAVID DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. FEENEY, Mr. FORTENBERRY, Ms. FOXX, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. GINGREY, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. HAYES, Mr. HERGER, Mr. ISSA, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. JORDAN of Ohio, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. KLINE of Minnesota, Mr. KUHL of New York, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California, Mr. MCCAUL of Texas, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. POE, Mr. SALI, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. TERRY, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky, and Mrs. DRAKE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs


Recognizing the importance of Christmas and the Christian faith.

Whereas Christmas , a holiday of great significance to Americans and many other cultures and nationalities, is celebrated annually by Christians throughout the United States and the world;
Whereas there are approximately 225,000,000 Christians in the United States, making Christianity the religion of over three-fourths of the American population;

Whereas there are approximately 2,000,000,000 Christians throughout the world, making Christianity the largest religion in the world and the religion of about one-third of the world population;

Whereas Christians identify themselves as those who believe in the salvation from sin offered to them through the sacrifice of their savior, Jesus Christ, the Son of God, and who, out of gratitude for the gift of salvation, commit themselves to living their lives in accordance with the teachings of the Holy Bible;

Whereas Christians and Christianity have contributed greatly to the development of western civilization;

Whereas the United States, being founded as a constitutional republic in the traditions of western civilization, finds much in its history that points observers back to its roots in Christianity ;

Whereas on December 25 of each calendar year, American Christians observe Christmas , the holiday celebrating the birth of their savior, Jesus Christ;

Whereas for Christians, Christmas is celebrated as a recognition of God's redemption, mercy, and Grace; and

Whereas many Christians and non-Christians throughout the United States and the rest of the world, celebrate Christmas as a time to serve others: Now, therefore be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
(1) recognizes the Christian faith as one of the great religions of the world;
(2) expresses continued support for Christians in the United States and worldwide;
(3) acknowledges the international religious and historical importance of Christmas and the Christian faith;
(4) acknowledges and supports the role played by Christians and Christianity in the founding of the United States and in the formation of the western civilization;
(5) rejects bigotry and persecution directed against Christians, both in the United States and worldwide; and
(6) expresses its deepest respect to American Christians and Christians throughout the world.
But what we do know is that when a resolution was voted on to honor Ramadan and Muslims no one voted against it. Not a single protest against Islamic terrorist and terrorism which by the way declared war on the United States, or Islamic terrorist and Islamic insurgents who fight against our American troops in Baghdad. Even though terrorism is mentioned in the very resolution honoring Ramadan and Muslims!

The resolution is as follows:
1st Session
H. RES. 635
Recognizing the commencement of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month of fasting and spiritual renewal, and commending Muslims in the United States and throughout the world for their faith.

September 5, 2007
Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas (for herself, Mr. MEEKS of New York, and Mr. ELLISON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs


Recognizing the commencement of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month of fasting and spiritual renewal, and commending Muslims in the United States and throughout the world for their faith.

Whereas since the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, threats and incidents of violence have been directed at law-abiding, patriotic Americans of African, Arab, and South Asian descent, particularly members of the Islamic faith;

Whereas, on September 14, 2001, the House of Representatives passed a concurrent resolution condemning bigotry and violence against Arab-Americans, American Muslims, and Americans from South Asia in the wake of the terrorist attacks;

Whereas it is estimated that there are approximately 1,500,000,000 Muslims worldwide;

Whereas Ramadan is the holy month of fasting and spiritual renewal for Muslims worldwide, and is the 9th month of the Muslim calendar year; and

Whereas the observance of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan commences at dusk on September 13, 2007, and continues for one lunar month: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That--
(1) during this time of conflict, in order to demonstrate solidarity with and support for members of the community of Islam in the United States and throughout the world, the House of Representatives recognizes the Islamic faith as one of the great religions of the world; and
(2) in observance of and out of respect for the commencement of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month of fasting and spiritual renewal, the House of Representatives acknowledges the onset of Ramadan and expresses its deepest respect to Muslims in the United States and throughout the world on this significant occasion.
What we do know is Rep. McDermott co-sponsored the Ramadan resolution and voted to honor the Muslim holy month of Ramadan and Muslims but would not vote to honor the day of Christmas!

Way to go Baghdad Jim! And in spite of your excuses, In the great American tradition, Merry Christmas to you Rep. McDermott and may the God of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ bless you this holiday season.

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Me Thinks that Al Gore and the U.N. Protest for Global Warming to Much!

Lord Christopher Monckton and Albert A. Gore

He’s probably still in his white tie and tails, you’ve got to savor every moment of your Nobel Peace prize experience you know.

I’m still trying to figure out the connect between peace prize and global warming I guess after all of the draconian carbon emission regulations that the United Nations is planning to put in place and after all carbon emitting life forms are put to death on earth there will be peace on earth and good will toward the non emitting carbon objects that are left.

You suppose that was what the Oslo committee meant when they gave Al Gore and the IPCC of the United Nations the Nobel Peace Prize?

The U.N. is meeting in Bali this week in a two fold effort to drum up support for or to shame countries into supporting the Kyoto 2 agreement because Kyoto one is about to expire. An agreement that will have the affect of transferring the wealth of developed nations to the poorer third world nations in a convenient tax all disguised as concern for an environmentally safe planet.
The voluminous evidence now strongly suggests that unless we act boldly and quickly to deal with the underlying causes of global warming, our world will undergo a string of terrible catastrophes, including more and stronger storms like Hurricane Katrina, in both the Atlantic and the Pacific.—Al Gore, An Inconvenient Truth
Has it come to anyone attention that we have gone through two hurricane seasons since Al Gore made the ominous and dire predictions that a string of terrible catastrophes, and more, stronger storms than Hurricane Katrina, would manifest in both the Atlantic and the Pacific oceans?

Oh it’s not hard to track Al Gore’s exaggeration footprint about Global warming. Gore alone has emitted so much inaccurate information and fearmongering regarding Global warming that he ought to be checked for whatever steroids gives one the super human ability to create false scenarios and mislead the world about Global warming.

After Gore tests positive for this rhetoric enhancement steroid (he’s got to be on something to say what he does) he should be stripped of his Nobel peace prize and written out of the Oslo records or maybe even do some prison time for giving false testimony before the world about Global warming.
Now, the scientific community is warning us that the average hurricane will continue to get stronger because of global warming. A scientist at MIT has published a study well before this tragedy [Hurricane Katrina] showing that since the 1970s, hurricanes in both the Atlantic and the Pacific have increased in duration, and in intensity, by about 50 %.

The newscasters told us after Hurricane Katrina went over the southern tip of Florida that there was a particular danger for the Gulf Coast of the hurricanes becoming much stronger because it was passing over unusually warm waters in the gulf. The waters in the gulf have been unusually warm. The oceans generally have been getting warmer. And the pattern is exactly consistent with what scientists have predicted for twenty years.
– Al Gore, speech at the Sierra Summit, September 9, 2005
Lord Christopher Monckton is a UK climate researcher, Albert A. Gore is a…a, truth is I don’t know what Al Gore is but on the subject of Global warming who are you going to believe?

Monckton told the United Nations group that has gathered in Bali Indonesia that "Climate change is a non-problem. The right answer to a non problem is to have the courage to do nothing," Monckton told participants.

"The UN conference is a complete waste of our time and your money and we should no longer pay the slightest attention to the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,)" Monckton added.

Not only that, the latest reports show that Climate warming is naturally caused and there is no human influence or cause. And get this CO2 is not a polluent!

Now think about it. Has the United Nations or Al Gore ever done anything right? Well there you go, we would be foolish to sign a Kyoto 2 agreement (Kyoto expires in 2012) which is a ruse hidden in false concern for the planet.

Global warming is but an environmental oil-for-food scandal meant to enrich the United Nations and those who assist them in this latest attempt to monetary shakedown the United States. They intend to levy a world carbon tax which will be used to fund another needless world bureaucracy and enrich Al Gore and his Halliburton like carbon credit business partners.

I don’t know how many ways or how many times we have to sound the warning Global warming is a scam and you’re the sucker if you allow the U.N. or Al Gore to convince you to submit to taxation to save the planet.

The American people ought to know by now that no matter how much money bureaucrats take from them it will never be enough, it will enrich only a small group of individuals and you will never get the promises that they take your money for.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Hillary Clinton always wanted to be a Kindergarten Cop

Move over Arnold, Hillary’s wearing the badge now and she’s busting those naughty little ambitious Kindergarten dreamers according to Stuart Taylor Jr.’s “Honesty: Hillary's Glass House.”

Yeah it seems that Hillary busted Barack Obama for having the dream in Kindergarten of one day becoming the President of the United States. Bad, bad Obama!

He probably didn’t know that those Clintonistas would go rummaging through his kindergarten dreams and papers to discover all of his deep dark secrets. And of course Obama didn’t know that they’d find his Kindergarten teacher to testify against him but they did!

And apparently it’s true while all the other kids were playing and finger painting Barack Obama was sitting over in a corner plotting and planning to one day become the leader of the free world!

Yes that’s right America the dirt that the Clinton campaign is dishing is that Obama’s been planning running for office since kindergarten, I can see him now organizing on the playground and giving mock campaign speeches from the wooden railing of the sandbox.

I guess Hillary has Obama dead to rights Sen. Obama made the statement that he had not been planning to run for President like some people (an obvious reference to Sen. Clinton) but oh contraire Senator Obama, Senator Clinton’s crackerjack team of mudslingers (investigators) have your kindergarten teacher saying that you laid out the plans to become the chief executive of this country when you were but six years old!

They’ve even got your detailed strategy written down in an essay entitled “I want to become President” by Barack Obama.
In kindergarten, Senator Obama wrote an essay titled 'I Want to Become President.' "Iis Darmawan, 63, Senator Obama's kindergarten teacher, remembers him as an exceptionally tall and curly haired child who quickly picked up the local language and had sharp math skills. He wrote an essay titled, 'I Want To Become President,' the teacher said." [AP, 1/25/07 ]
So the Clintonistas’ point is, you lied Senator Obama, when you said you haven’t been planning to become President therefore you’re in no position to judge anyone who has been planning on running for the presidency (like Hillary) if you yourself have been planning to do so.

But wait a minute if the Clintonistas are going to use that kind of logic then they have no business judging someone who lied because Hillary has been lying at least since she was in kindergarten. Or so it seems!

But let’s just deal with some well document lies that we can prove. According to Stuart Taylor Jr. of the National Journal there are a number of Hillary Clinton lies that would disqualify her from ever calling someone else a liar. (If we apply the same logic that Sen. Clinton is attempt to use against Sen. Obama)

Hillary lied about Gennifer and Monica, she lied about travelgate, she lied about the $100,000 windfall profit she made on insider trading on cattle futures, she lied about removing the files from the dead Vicent Foster’s office, she lied about whitewater which resulted in columnist William Safire to write on January 8, 1996, that "our first lady ... is a congenital liar." And she lied about the existence of a vast right-wing conspiracy.

Yeah Sen. Obama may have wanted to become President since he was in kindergarten, but I’m pretty sure that what Sen. Clinton wanted to become is a liar for at least that long!

And her second choice must have been becoming a Kindergarten Cop!

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Natural Heir to the Presidency, is that even Constitutional?

The Regal Mrs. Clinton

Albert Hunt of reports that even the best laid plans can go awfully wrong. Senator Hillary Clinton was supposed to be the undisputed Democrat frontrunner at this point in the campaign for the Democratic nomination for President of the United States but a few things have gone wrong on Senator Clinton’s way to the coronation ceremony in 2009.

The Clinton organization had a clear plan A: It envisioned the candidate[Hillary Clinton], as the choice of the party establishment and natural heir to the presidency, to so dominate 2007 that she would be able to corner, not have to capture, the nomination. It worked perfectly for most of the year.--Albert R. Hunt

Apparently there are concerns about Senator Clinton, 60, D-New York. The concerns are that she is devious, calculating and a divisive figure in American politics.

These concerns are coming from Democrats and are the results of polls and focus groups that are favorable to Sen. Clinton and that are moderated by Democratic pollster Peter Hart. Despite the fact that, Democrats are become more willing to raise questions concerning Senator Clinton’s character yet most of them felt inextricably tied to the Clinton plan to coronate Hillary to complete the Clinton dynasty and vote for a candidate just because that candidate is a woman.

There has been a phenomenal amount of effort by the Clinton campaign to present Hillary Clinton as the inevitable legatee of the Democratic nomination to be President. As well as that Senator Clinton, her husband the former President, Bill Clinton and her campaign have all played the sexism card though out this campaign hoping to gain some sort of advantage playing on fact that Senator Clinton is a woman.

There are a significant amount of women who say that they will vote for Senator Clinton for no other reason than the fact they want to see a woman president.

Clinton was clearly a hit among Drnach's mainly young, single, professional and white guests. "It's mostly the gender," admitted one of them, Jill Cartwright, a law student. "Just as a woman, I feel that a woman can represent my interests better - no matter how liberal or progressive a man is."Guardian Unlimited
Which is exactly the kind of reverse sexism and gender identification that the Clinton campaign is depending upon to ensure the inevitability of their candidate.

“Natural heir”, “mostly the gender,” who needs military experience or the experience of governing a city or a state? Or the experience of running a business, meeting a payroll or any of the qualifications that one would normally associate with selecting someone to be the most powerful executive politician in the free world.

No other experience is needed other than the fact that Hillary Clinton was married to a President and that Hillary Clinton is a woman. Contrary to Bill Clinton’s claims that his wife’s experience is not fairly covered in the media, apparently dynasty and the novelty of being the first are the only two factors needed that make one eminently qualified to be President of the United States of America in the 21st Century. Besides the fact constitutionally you must be born a United States citizen and at least 35 years of age of course!

I’m thinking after Hillary let’s just keep the dynasty alive Laura Bush in 2012!

Monday, December 10, 2007

Waterboarding and Liberal Hypocricy

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi

Is “waterboarding” torture? Oh in 2002 it wasn’t! As reported by Joby Warrick and Dan Eggen of the Washington Post. Just ask Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi who was given a virtual tour in 2002 of the CIA's overseas detention sites and the harsh techniques interrogators had devised to try to make their prisoners talk, waterboarding included.

Did Pelosi or other Democrats decry the techniques as violating the Geneva Convention or as inhumanity cruel then? No. Why? It wasn’t politically expedient to do so then and Liberals do nothing unless it is politically expedient!

In fact no objections were raised by the bipartisan panel that was briefed on interrogation techniques used by the CIA. Instead, at least two lawmakers in the room asked the CIA to push harder according to Warrick and Eggen, "The briefer was specifically asked if the methods were tough enough," said a U.S. official who witnessed the exchange.

Liberals and Democrats now seize on waterboarding as a symbol of the worst excesses of the Bush administration's counterterrorism effort. Why? Political expediency.

Before waterboarding became the evil with which to beat Republicans over the head with, the CIA gave key legislative overseers about 30 (count them)that’s 30 private briefings, some of which included descriptions of that technique and other harsh interrogation methods, according to interviews with multiple U.S. officials with firsthand knowledge.

Any queasy stomachs then? Only one, other than that no formal objections were raised by the lawmakers briefed about the harsh methods during the two years in which waterboarding was employed, from 2002 to 2003, said Democrats and Republicans with direct knowledge of the matter.

The lawmakers who held oversight roles during the period included Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) and Sens. Bob Graham (D-Fla.) and John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), as well as Rep. Porter J. Goss (R-Fla.) and Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan).
"In fairness, the environment was different then because we were closer to Sept. 11 and people were still in a panic," said one U.S. official present during the early briefings. "But there was no objecting, no hand-wringing. The attitude was, 'We don't care what you do to those guys as long as you get the information you need to protect the American people.' "-- Warrick and Eggen, Washington Post

It’s like the 2004 Presidential election when a President with military experience was of the utmost importance. Democrats nominated as Senator John Kerry as their Presidential hopeful based on his Vietnam War experience against incumbent George Bush who flew fighter Jets for the National Guard.

This year because none of the leading candidates have any war experience to speak of, its funny how experience in the armed services is not a factor any more. One would think it would be because we are still in the midst of a war that was declared against the United States in 1998. If it were still a factor Republicans Duncan Hunter or John McCain would be the only candidates qualified to be President. So conveniently there is absolutely no talk, none whatsoever, about military experience of the Presidential candidates this year! What a difference a political term makes.

So in 2002 waterboarding good. Now that waterboarding can be used as a political tool against the Republicans, waterboarding is evil! Likewise in 2004 military experience was important now that the leading Liberal Presidential candidates don’t have any military experience, military experience is of no importance. Liberals are sooooo pathetically hypocritical.

Warrick and Eggen reports that, ‘Only after information about the practice began to leak in news accounts in 2005 -- by which time the CIA had already abandoned waterboarding -- did doubts about its legality among individual lawmakers evolve into more widespread dissent. The opposition reached a boiling point this past October, when Democratic lawmakers condemned the practice during Michael B. Mukasey's confirmation hearings for attorney general.’ Opportunistically the subject would be used as a political tool from this point on.

Democrats have been doing this type of convenient political opportunism and distancing themselves from policies that they knew of, where involved in and had full knowledge for years hoping that the American people would not blame them for Democrat complicity in the whole political process. Most recently you may remember Senator Dick Durbin’s claim that as one of the Democrats on the Senate Intelligence Committee he knew that there were no Weapons of Mass Destruction and he knew that the American people were being lied to. (see it for yourself)

Sen. Durbin’s wild claim that he knew that the American people were being lied to because he sat on the senate intelligence committee doesn’t add up.

Why? Durbin the Illinois Democrat claimed that he knew that the American public was being misled into the Iraq war but remained silent because he was sworn to secrecy as a member of the intelligence committee. Durbin was not the only Democrat on that committee.

Let’s do the math there were 9 Democrats and 8 Republicans on that committee. If all nine Democrats on the Intelligence committee felt as Sen. Durbin then 9 Democrats to 8 Republicans stops the recommendation from going to the full Senate to be voted on. The resolution to go to war with Iraq is stopped in committee never to have reached the senate floor.

Now do the math, only four Democrats Durbin and three others voted against the recommendation based on the same evidence that Senator Durbin saw and 5 Democrats along with the 8 Republicans voted for it.

Sorry Senator Durbin your opinion wasn’t even held by the majority of Democrats who were the majority on the Intelligence committee! Had it been, had a majority of Senators felt that the American people were being lied to Sen. Durbin, Democrats could have done like you and voted against sending the resolution to the full Congress.

And subsequently Congress would not have given the President authority to go to war with Iraq. But once again Democrats use convenient political opportunism to try distance themselves from the decision to go to war. How pathetic!

Conversely, what Senator Durbin statement does is unwillingly support the Bush administration’s assertion that the Senate had the same information regarding the war as the administration did with which to base their decisions.

Mr. Durbin, lied when he said that half the Democrats on the intelligence committee voted against the war over concerns of the White House's case for war. In addition what Mr. Durbin doesn’t tell you is that there were nine Democrats on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and five of them voted for the measure as did all eight Republicans to send recommendation to the entire body to vote for use of armed force against Iraq, Liberal deception and hypocrisy as usual once again.

If as Senator Durbin contends, the White House’s case for war was not good then why did five Democrats vote to recommend to the Senate for war?

Think about it, if nine Democrats vote as Durbin did they out number eight Republicans and the authority for war in Iraq never gets out of committee. The fact is Democrats had the power to prevent this war all along from the very beginning.

So whether its waterboarding as torture, WMD or any subject Democrats depend on the public’s ignorance of the facts to dupe the unsuspecting into believing that they are better than Republicans who would stoop so low as to torture or go to war under false pretenses.

The truth of the matter is Liberal Democrats are equally as responsible for all of the so called atrocities that they blame their Republican counterparts for. The difference between the two is that Democrats believe that the American people are fools.

Why else would you lie and attempt to deceive the American people in everything from the 2000 elections were stolen to “Bush lied us into war.”

Why else would you fraudulently campaign, planting questions and the like, base your entire campaign strategy to defeat Republicans on deceiving the American people about everything if your whole Party weren’t corrupt hypocrites?

You wouldn’t but Liberal Democrats are.

Sunday, December 09, 2007

Is There a Choice?

For those of us concerned with the illegal immigration
issue, Numbers USA has made it easier to understand.
They have compiled a graphic list of ALL candidates,
both Democratic and Republican, and their present stand
and record on immigration in general.

This is truly worth a visit............ if for no other reason
than curiosity. And an absolute MUST, if you plan on
voting come November '08.


Friday, December 07, 2007

No Religious Test a Conservative Values Test

Presidential candidate Mitt Romney

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.—Article XI section 3 U.S. Constitution

I only have one question for Mitt Romney or any of the Conservative candidates and it has nothing to do with religion.

Will the Conservative nominee fight for and protect Conservative values against the likes of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Hillary Clinton and Howard Dean? The just mentioned are Liberals who fight for Liberal Democrat values and have sworn to destroy Conservative values.

That’s all that really matters.

Former Governor Romney obviously felt compelled by his recent poll standings to address questions about his Mormon religion though he did not speak about the Mormon faith in great detail he did offer what I believe to be some understanding about what is happening to America. Romney offered this quote from President and founding father John Adams:
In John Adams' words: 'We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our constitution was made for a moral and religious people.'
Freedom requires religion just as religion requires freedom. Freedom opens the windows of the soul so that man can discover his most profound beliefs and commune with God. Freedom and religion endure together, or perish alone.
– Mitt Romney
Our constitution was made for a moral and religious people. Though the American government was purposely designed to be a secular government, a government based on law, it was equally and purposely designed to be an instrument in the hands of moral and religious people. I’ll have plenty to say about this in upcoming weeks.

The next important thing that our constitution was made for was to prevent any and all forms of tyranny as the founders saw tyranny in their day and in the past they wanted to prevent any tyrannous entity from taking control in America.

Obviously there are those who wish to make this a test about Mitt Romney’s religious beliefs and confessions. I will say this. Any man or woman who would curse his or her mother is not fit to live.

Likewise, if the Constitution is the father of this country’s government, religion is its mother. Those who have contemptuously mocked, spit at and derided the value of religion, and its significance, to this country you are not fit to live here.
Something else Romney points out, in his words, that Radical violent Islam seeks to destroy us. An emerging China endeavors to surpass our economic leadership. And we are troubled at home by government overspending, overuse of foreign oil, and the breakdown of the family.

Governor Romney these are merely symptoms of a much larger and insidious problem in America that problem is corporate power. Every problem that America has can be traced back to the tyranny of corporate power. Corporate power as I use it here is the tyrannous power that Corporations weld over every facet of American life, no… over lives on the entire planet.

If you or any of your rivals were to say that you understand the grave dangers that face this country and the world and would do nothing about the corporate menace that has created radical Islam, how has corporations created radical Islam you ask? By injecting billions of oil dollars into the middle east making adherents of that faith so unimaginably wealthy that they can fund jihad against the rest of the world.

Whereas before oil revenues they are running around in the desert shouting, “Allah akbar” only fighting one another, I would say that you and the rest of the Presidential candidates offer nothing that will save America from the imminent danger in which we find ourselves if you don’t speak to how you would reign in corporate power.

The only test that is constitutional and the only test that I am interested in Mr. Romney is whether or not you are righteously fearless enough to take on the real enemies of freedom and democracy, unrestrained and unbridled corporate power.

If you or the other Presidential candidates fail this one challenge then it really doesn’t matter what religion you are because…

We haven’t got a prayer!

Stop corporate tyranny now!

Thursday, December 06, 2007

Is this Intelligence?

Former CIA Director George Tenet
"This was a final shot to those who, in the past several years, spread a sense of threat and concern in the world through lies of nuclear weapons," President of Iran Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
You’ve probably heard that a U.S. intelligence report released Monday concluded that Iran had stopped its weapons program in late 2003 and shown no signs since of resuming it, representing a sharp turnaround from a previous intelligence assessment in 2005.

Well nothing could make the enemies of the United States happier except of course if a Democrat were to be elected into the Whitehouse. The enemies of America have been openly supporting and campaigning for a Democrat candidate since 2000 but that’s another story.

The story here is one of “Wagging the Dog.” You see there are those in government specifically the state department and mainstream media who have accused President Bush of planning to go to war with Iran. You know, they believe that the Bush administration is setting the stage for such a confrontation. Here, and here.

Which is really stupid when you think about it because President Bush knows that the biggest enemies that he and America faces are those enemies in his own government, it took him eight years to figure it out but all the leaks and undermining of his policies clearly indicate that there is a very strong anti-Conservative strain in the high echelons of government that Mr. Bush failed to rid himself of early on in his Presidency. Bush could have avoided a lot of destruction to his government by cleaning house of all Clinton loyalists.

It was a like contingency of pro-Clinton anti-Bush forces that released this report as a pre-emptive strike against the President, virtually cutting him off at the knees, attempting to insure that he would not be able to go war with Iran even if it were necessary for America to do so. Now why would I make such a claim?

You remember that about two weeks ago in the news some in the state department were assigned duty in Iraq which drew vehement protest from those assigned.
"It's one thing if someone believes in what's going on over there and volunteers, but it's another thing to send someone over there on a forced assignment, and I'm sorry but basically that's a potential death sentence,"—Jack Croddy, a senior Foreign Service officer
There are anti-war, anti-conservative, anti-Bush forces in the State Department that are not supportive and don’t believe in what’s going on “over there” in Iraq and they have been leaking crucial information attempting to punish President Bush and defeat his effort to win in Iraq. In fact they have done everything in their power to impede or destroy America’s ability to defend itself.
Starting in 2002 CIA director George Tenet told the President that it was a slam dunk that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction a comment that launched a war. Later Tenet threw this statement into controversy by denying that he said it when that wasn’t believed he then claimed that his comments were taken out of context.

Unfortunately George Bush trusted Tenet because he was there from terrorisms beginning. Tenet was CIA Director for Bill Clinton as well as a member of the Clinton’s advisory team concerning terrorist Obama bin Laden. Consequently they did nothing to prevent terrorism.

Presently, in 2005 the NIE said that, “Iran currently is determined to develop nuclear weapons" and do so "despite its international obligations and international pressure." This was a "high confidence" judgment meaning that the National Intelligence Estimate a comglomarate of all United States .
As recently as 2005, the consensus estimate of our spooks was that "Iran currently is determined to develop nuclear weapons" and do so "despite its international obligations and international pressure." This was a "high confidence" judgment. Opinion Journal
What this current report is intended of doing is to prevent the President from attacking Iran. This is State Department bureaucrats attempting to run the country from the comfort of their cubicles.

The NIE is not dependable intelligence reporting and remember these are the same people who originally said that Iran was gearing up for nuclear weaponry.
Either they were wrong when they said Iran was preparing nukes in 2005 or they are wrong now! Either way they are not to be trusted and this report should be held in suspicion.

The final proof of that is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad trusts this report. Since when is an intelligence report published in such a way to cripple the U.S.’s ability to protect itself and at the same time give credence to it’s enemies?
That’s exactly how this report was released, this is a bureaucratic attempting to reign in an American President from the delusional misgivings that those in the State Department imagine about him. The State Department has once again put America at risk.

The next Republican President is going to have some excessive cleansing out of moles and disinfectant midlevel bureaucrats in order to gain control of this government.
President Bush did not do that. That was the number one failing of the Bush administration and it cost him dearly!

Wednesday, December 05, 2007

Darfur is Waiting

It has been the rallying cry for the Liberal Left for years, “Save Darfur” but what has the Left actually done about Darfur ?

2.5 million refugees, 61 percent said they had seen a family member killed before their eyes in violence blamed on Sudanese forces and government-backed Arab militias accused of a scorched-earth campaign against African villagers.

As many as 200,000 to 400,000 innocent people have been killed and more than 2.5 million more have been driven from their homes. These refugees now face starvation, disease, and rape, while those who remain in Darfur risk torture, death, and displacement.

What has the United Nations done to stop the violence? What have the high profile Movie stars and peace activist done to stop the killing?

Let Darfur be a warning to all people. If a nation or a state needs protection against violence, murder, genocide or injustice do not wait on Liberals or their institutions to do anything to fight against the persecutors. Liberals will make a country like Darfur a cause celebre but they will not wage war to save you. They will not lift a actual finger to help.


Most liberals perform their fighting virtually by lawsuits or by legislating their wishes on the rest of us. Sadly, opposition against America’s effort to protect itself against terrorism combined with the lack of absolutely any physical effort to save the people of Darfur from years of war, torture, displacement and death is evidence that liberals will rarely do anything but issue platitudes and wear buttons to protest the injustices of the world.

Let someone actually do something and that person becomes a warmonger, do something and one is accused of, “Lying us into war” or some such excuse employed to stop any real effort to stop injustices in the world.

If the victims of the world wait on help from Liberals they will get meetings, resolutions and world condemnation directed against their slaughterers but no real help for countries like Darfur.

Liberals are better apt at resisting real attempts to help. They resisting the war effort in Iraq even with the knowledge that a victory there means freedom and safety for hundreds of thousands of Iraqi people who have been suffering the rule of a cruel sadistic dictator. Liberals talk the talk but rarely walk the walk when it comes to protecting victims of warring aggressor nations.

Darfur is waiting like the people of Iraq, the victims of al Qaeda and the fatalities of Osama bin Laden under President Bill Clinton were left waiting for someone to do something, anything as outlined in chapter 4 of the 9-11 commission report.

Under President Clinton according to the 9-11 report his administration planned to capture Osama bin Laden in 1998 but as Liberals often do they waited and then cancelled the effort because doing something meant consequences.

Ultimately that decision give way to September 11, 2001 and Clinton advisor Richard Clarke’s subsequent testimony before the 9-11 commission which he said that he and the government failed the American people.
On May 20,[1998] Director Tenet discussed the high risk of the operation with Berger and his deputies, warning that people might be killed, including Bin Laden. Success was to be defined as the exfiltration of Bin Ladin out of Afghanistan. A meeting of principals was scheduled for May 29[,1998] to decide whether the operation should go ahead.

The principals did not meet. On May 29,[1998] "Jeff" informed "Mike" that he had just met with Tenet, Pavitt, and the chief of the Directorate's Near Eastern Division. The decision was made not to go ahead with the operation. "Mike" cabled the field that he had been directed to "stand down on the operation for the time being." He had been told, he wrote, that cabinet-level officials thought the risk of civilian casualties-"collateral damage"-was too high.
9-11 commission report
Under Liberals tragedies like Darfur and 9/11 are destined to occur because of the Liberal propensity to wait and do nothing.

Nothing, that is, but castigate anyone and everyone who acts against the evils that Liberals only seem to be able to protest about.

Darfur is waiting!

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

Stoop so Low? You’ve got to be Kidding!

Former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich

Dr. Robert Reich is the nation's 22nd Secretary of Labor for the Bill Clinton administration and self described friend of the Clintons assesses his old friend’s campaign performance to date on his blog.

What’s so interesting is Reich’s tone. Why is it that Liberal’s always assume their positions to be condescendingly superior to that of their opponents? Dr. Reich’s whole premise is contained in the thought that Senator Clinton’s attacks on Barack Obama is a different behavior for her and beneath her dignity. As if Democrats don’t negatively attack their opponents with false charges and inaccurate allegations.

Perhaps Dr. Reich has been unconscious for the last eight years. Had he been awake he would know that it is not beneath a Liberal to lie on an opponent nor is it beneath Democrats to deceived the electorate with empty promises so that they can (shall I say it?) win control of Congress.

That aside, Reich concerns himself with Hillary Clinton’s stridency and the inaccuracy of her charges against Barack Obama.

First Reich says that Hillary’s attack on Obama’s Social Security plan is wrong and deceptive. Reich calls Obama’s plan a progressive solution to the Social Security problem and Senator Clinton’s plan irresponsible. Dr. Reich says that Senator’s Clinton’s charges that Obama’s plan would “raise taxes” compared to her plan (which she claims won’t) is a lie.

Senator Clinton also claims that her health care plan covers more people than Obama’s plan. Another lie according to Reich.

Equally Reich believes that Senator Clinton’s attacks on Obama’s courage are disingenuous he writes :

I just don’t get it. If there’s anyone in the race whose history shows unique courage and character, it's Barack Obama. HRC’s campaign, by contrast, is singularly lacking in conviction about anything. Her pollster, Mark Penn, has advised her to take no bold positions and continuously seek the political center, which is exactly what she’s been doing.
Dr. Reich’s overall premise is that Liberals, particularly Hillary Clinton, are above rancor and lying on their opponents which Dr. Reich is simply wrong. Democrats; Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin, Al Gore, John Kerry, Bill and Hillary Clinton ARE the personification of political rancor and lying.

Furthermore, the negative and false attacks that are being employed by Senator Clinton against Senator Obama are nothing new, she has been doing exactly that to Republicans for the last fifteen years or at least that is what she has been bragging about to anyone that will listen.

Stoop so low? You’ve got to be kidding!