You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.--Abraham LincolnIt’s a game of political punked. Ashton Kutcher would be so proud of Hillary Clinton’s use of political deception and manipulation to pull off the biggest punking ever . Kutcher only attempts to punk one victim at a time Senator Clinton in her own indomitable cold and calculating way is trying to punk a Nation.
And after the American people realize that they’ve fumigated the Whitehouse only to let the rats back in they wouldn’t be smiling into the camera laughing at the fact that they’ve been had. No I think the American people will actually be mad.
Oh yeah you’re being punked you gotta know that. When Hillary Clinton was in the Whitehouse she was to Bill Clinton what Dick Cheney is to George Bush. Hillary was the Darth Vadar of the Clinton administration. She was behind the destroyed Rose law billings, she was behind the travelgate firings, and she was behind filegate. All political scandals yet her role in them was always unclear. Ergo she was the Dick Cheney of the Clinton administration.
And the reason that you are so willing to let her back into the Whitehouse is that you’ve been duped, tricked, played, or punked by an elaborate roost which is only meant to confuse language and meaning so that the Clintons and the Democrats can get what they want. It’s really a work of diabolical beauty here’s how it works.
A STRATEGIC APPEARANCE ON FOX NEWS
Hillary’s strategic appearance on the Fox News network sends a message to her Democrat constituents that she and the former President Clinton are not afraid of the Fox News network like her fellow Democrats. She also wanted to show that she could go toe to toe with Chris Wallace or any conservative just like her husband did with Wallace almost exactly a year ago. (Transcript)
What made Clinton’s appearance interesting is that she shares the same penchant for using words and ideas to change what is real and actual into what she would like real and actual to be. The Clintons live in a world of “that depends on what is, is.” Meaning that everything is relative and can be redefine to her liking just like her husband’s, “I don’t have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinski.” which he later recanted and admitted he lied to the American people. Senator Clinton’s appearance on Fox News was nothing more than a political calculation that was meant to score symbolic political psychological points which she seem to have accomplished due to the hapless Chris Wallace’s interview.(See Senators Appearance on Fox)
In fact this whole Democrat campaign of Bush Bashing for the last six years has come right out of the Clinton playbook of the politics of personal destruction of which there are six principle components; Malign, Redefine, Redirect, Answer no Question, Admit nothing unless absolutely force to and stay on Talking Points.
For the truly partisan it doesn’t matter what Hillary does or says. These are the confused. They have been confused by their own political relativism these individuals can no longer distinguish from the manipulated reality of the Clinton formula of political of personal destruction and what is actual.
For these reality challenged individuals allow me to interpret what Hillary actually said.
WALLACE: Senator, talk about conservative hit jobs, right-wing conspiracies — why do you and the president have such a hyper-partisan view of politics?
Here is how Senator Clinton responded:
H. CLINTON: [busted out in laughter] Well, Chris, if you had walked even a day in our shoes over the last 15 years, I'm sure you'd understand.Because Senator Clinton is a trained attorney like her husband the Senator’s “is” may not be what your “is” is. I’m betting too that it doesn’t even closely resemble your “is.” So what exactly did the Senator say when Mr. Wallace asked her why she and her husband had a hyper-partisan view of politics?
But you know, the real goal for our country right now is to get beyond partisanship, and I'm sure trying to do my part, because we've got a lot of serious problems that we're trying to deal with.
This week I rolled out my American health choices plan. I'm going to work very hard to travel around the country, talk about why we need to tackle quality, affordable health care for every American.
We've got to deal with the economy and some of the problems that people are facing in the mortgage market and the fact that a lot of people are not getting ahead.
In the last six years, the average family income has dropped $1,000. That's not good news for our economy or for real hard-working people.
So what I'm focused on is coming forth with ideas that I believe are in the best interests of our country. And clearly, around the world, we've got to restore America's leadership. That starts with ending the war in Iraq and bringing our troops home, but there's a lot more to do.
And I think it would be great if we had a debate on the substance, that we really talked about what each of us will bring to the White House, because I'm excited by what I hear as I travel around America.
I think people are ready to start acting like Americans again. They want to roll up their sleeves. They want to tackle these tough problems, and I believe we can.
And I'm confident and optimistic that we can make progress together again starting January 20th, 2009.
This first question apparently caught the Senator off guard because she all but admits that she and her husband do in fact harbor hyper-partisan views of politics by her, “if you where only in our shoes…I’m sure you’d understand,” concession.
But not to be forced to admit outright that she and Bill Clinton are Hyper-partisans Hillary launched into the six points of the Politics of Personal Destruction; Malign, Redefine, Redirect, Answer no Question, Admit nothing unless absolutely force to and stay on Talking Points. Let’s take a look:
But you know, the real goal for our country right now is to get beyond partisanship—Hillary Clinton
Here the Senator redirects the question from her and Bill Clinton’s hyper-partisan view of politics without answering the charge and she artfully redefines the question to, in her opinion, the real goal for our country. The level of this manipulation of language is simply stupefying and those who practice it are void of any objective view of reality certainly a bad trait for the President of the United States to have wouldn’t you say?
If Senator Clinton had a true and honest view of herself she would not have offered her next statement, “and I'm sure trying to do my part.” Senator Clinton is trying to do her part to end partisanship? I guess the Senator’s refusal to vote to condemn the Moveon.org ad against General Petraeus instead her opting to vote on a Democrat bill designed to give Democrats cover who would not condemn Moveon.org was not partisan in her eyes, but to fair minded Americans it stunk of partisanship Senator Clinton!
The Question was, why do you and the president have such a hyper-partisan view of politics? At least answer the question Senator Clinton you owe the American people that much. You could at least be honest like Democrat National Chairmen Howard Dean and say that you hate Republicans and everything that they stand for.
But please don’t insult our intelligence with any more of your, redefines, redirects, talking points or none answers. If you and former President Clinton don’t have a hyper-partisan view of politics you should simply say that you don’t. Therefore an answer would have been, “Chris, the President and I don’t have a hyper-partisan view of politics at all.”
Unless of course you do, and if anyone thinks that America is going to go back to a White house full of Clinton lies, deceit and manipulations you probably also think that Sandy Berger, Clinton’s former National Security Advisor, was in the National Archives just to do research. You believe any of the above or anything that Senator Clinton says you’re as stupid as Senator Clinton and her husband think you are!
Just how stupid do the Clinton’s take Americans for? Why you’re so stupid that you’ve forgotten who Hillary Clinton really is.
Three major scandals in the Clinton Whitehouse have a direct link to Hillary Clinton, Travelgate, Filegate and the destruction of the Rose law firm’s billing records. What all of these instances have in common is manipulation of evidence.
In May 1993 seven longtime employees of the White House Travel Office were fired, after a brief investigated by the FBI. The White House said the action was due to financial improprieties in the office operation. It was believed and alleged that travelgate was orchestrated to allow friends of the Clintons to take over the travel business and that the involvement of the FBI was unwarranted. Heavy media attention forced the White House to reinstate most of the employees in other jobs and remove the Clinton associates from the travel role.
Investigations by the FBI and the Justice Department, the White House itself, the General Accounting Office, the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee, and the Whitewater Independent Counsel all took place over the subsequent years. Travel Office Director Billy Dale was charged with embezzlement but found not guilty at trial in 1995. First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton came under scrutiny for allegedly having played a central role in the firings and making false statements about her role in it.--Wikiedia
Filegate, arose in June 1996 around improper access in 1993 and 1994 to Federal Bureau of Investigation security-clearance documents. Craig Livingstone, director of the White House's Office of Personnel Security, improperly requested, and received from the FBI, background reports without asking permission of the subject individuals. Estimates range from 400 to 700 to 900 unauthorized file disclosures.
The incident caused a firestorm of criticism because many of the files covered White House employees from previous Republican administrations, including top figures such as James Baker, Brent Scowcroft, and Marlin Fitzwater. Under criticism, Livingstone resigned from his position. Allegations were made that senior White House figures including First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton may have requested and read the files for political purposes, and that the First Lady had authorized the hiring of the under qualified Livingstone.--Wikipedia
In 1988, Mrs. Clinton ordered the Rose Law Firm to destroy records relating to her representation of Madison.(1214) This was not a routine destruction of records. At the time, federal regulators were investigating the operations and solvency of Madison, in anticipation of taking over the institution. These Rose Law Firm records, which, after Madison's failure would belong to the RTC,(1215) would have been directly relevant to that investigation.
By ordering their destruction, Mrs. Clinton eliminated pertinent records and also exposed her firm to potential liability with respect to her representation. If such representation was proper, as Mrs. Clinton has claimed, her document destruction deprived the law firm of the records necessary to defend itself in a suit by federal investigators.
The Clinton penchant for destroying evidence even extends beyond their Whitehouse days in effort to keep the American people deceived about what really happened in the Clinton Whitehouse.
According to Wikipedia, On July 19, 2004, it was revealed that the U.S. Justice Department was investigating Berger for unlawfully stealing classified documents in October 2003, by removing them from a National Archives reading room prior to testifying before the 9/11 Commission. The documents were five classified copies of a single report commissioned from Richard Clarke, covering internal assessments of the Clinton administration's handling of the unsuccessful 2000 millennium attack plots.
When initially questioned by reporters, Berger claimed that the removal of the top-secret documents in his attaché-case and handwritten notes in his jacket and pants pockets was accidental. He later, in a guilty plea, admitted to deliberately removing the copies and cutting three up with scissors. Archive staff stated they witnessed Berger, on more than one occasion, stuffing into his pants and into his jacket papers he was illegally removing. One witness saw Berger stuffing into his socks papers from the archives.  Two of the copies were recovered by DOJ investigators and returned to the archives.
Berger eventually pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material on April 1, 2005.
It is believed that Berger destroyed primary evidence revealing anti-terrorism policies and actions, and that his motive was to permanently erase Clinton administration pre-9/11 mistakes from the public record.
Apparently this is a pattern with Hillary Clinton and her husband who are attorneys, if there is no evidence a matter can not be proven so they chose to manipulate, censor or destroy the evidence.
Yes censor, Hillary Clinton has even censored the media’s coverage of anything negative about her. The Clinton ability to control their political environment is uncanny and borders on fascism.
Senator Clinton’s entire political career has been a staged event meant to manipulate political opinion to get what she wants. She wants back into the Whitehouse and whether that means appearing on Fox News or rolling out a retread Government Mandated Health Care Plan, Senator Clinton’s campaign is about punking a Nation, that’s what she’s always done.
Didn’t you know, Hillary campaign for the Presidency of the United States of America is about imposing her views on America.
Still don’t get it? With the Clintons, Hillary in particular…
It’s about punking America Stupid!