Friday, February 26, 2010

Obama’s Dead Fish Presidency

Soetoro, Michele, Valerie Jarret and Rahm Emanuel

Obama relies on five people, four of whom are Chicagoans. They are Rahm Emanuel, his chief of staff, David Axelrod and Jarrett, his political advisers, and Michelle, while the fifth kitchen cabinet member is Robert Gibbs, his chief spokesman, who comes from Alabama. -- Christina Lamb
The Barry Hussein Soetoro presidency which is known for its excessive propensity to finger point is getting some fingers pointed back at it as Democrats attempt to assess what’s gone wrong with their opportunity to transform America into the world-wide example of Progressive Left-wing politics as they had hoped this bright young clean African-American without a Negro dialect would do.

Many are blaming his advisors referred to as the “Chicago Mafia” by many. That would also include a writer for the Timesonline, Christina Lamb, in her article entitled, Obama’s ‘Chicago mafia’ blamed for paralysis at the top.

It’s was so nonconventional and refreshing to see someone not blaming the Republicans or George Bush for the Democrat’s self inflicted troubles I had to read Ms. Lamb’s thoughts to why the Greatest presidency ever in the history of the United States (according to the president and his sycophants) was not living up to that billing presently.

Ms. Lamb identifies several sources for the failures that have marked the Barry Hussein Soetoro presidency they are; his advisors, his tactics, his strident partisanship, his unbelievably, his lack of executive experience and his miscalculation of the American people. (see article)
The president consults them on everything. Military commanders were astounded when they participated in Afghanistan war councils and referred to them as the “Chicago mafia”. It was this group that inserted into Obama’s Afghan surge speech the deadline of July 2011 as a date to start withdrawing—Christina Lamb
It seems that the president and his Democrat allies mistook the hatred of George Bush that Democrats had fermented for eight straight years as a mandate to come in and fundamentally change America. Democrats successfully made George Bush a Voodoo Doll which they stuck all of pins of Liberal hate into. However, Bush was just a characterization of Democrat’s larger hate which is the hatred of Conservatism.

Ms. Lamb suggests that Democrats mistakenly thought their own hate was indicative of how the entire country was feeling therefore they could come into office and remake America entirely under their idea of a socialist progressive agenda.

Ms. Lamb notes that it was the Scott Brown victory in Massachusetts was the only thing that gave Democrats pause or president Soetoro would have his health care bill signed into law by now.

Whether it is the dead fish tactics of Rahm Emanuel who advises the president or whether it’s the disdain for the American people and American traditions Ms. Lamb notes that more and more Democrats are looking at the source of the paralysis in Washington.

This paralysis starts where it has started for the last nine years with Democrats. Now they have the White house and Congress and are exposed to the disinfection of Sunlight.
Last week a prominent Democratic senator resigned after criticising both government and Congress. Evan Bayh from Indiana, who had never lost a race and was expected to be re-elected in November, complained that the party’s recent loss of the Senate seat of the late Ted Kennedy should have been seen as a wake-up call.

“Moderates and independents even in a state as Democratic as Massachusetts just aren’t buying our message,” he said.

“They don’t believe the answers we are currently proposing are solving their problems.”—Christina Lamb
In criticizing both government and Congress Ms. Lamb means the Democrat President and the Democrat controlled Congress!

In other words in spite of all of the lofty rhetoric and the political misdirection and finger pointing the America people now have a clear and unobstructed view of just who is the problem in Washington D.C. They are the reason that Evan Bayh departed and they are the reason for the bitter partisan rancor that we witness in are government.

They are Democrats no matter how much they finger point at Republicans, Democrats are the Dead Fish, Chicago Mafia, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barry Soetoro problem not Republicans.

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Stop crying about reconciliation?

An answer to Sen. Harry Reid

Today the Ultra-Partisan Barry Hussein Soetoro meets with Republicans to: a) show them up in front of America like he did the Supreme Court b) force them to accept that there will be his health care reform or there will be political blood c) get something about health care televised on CSPAN d) put the focus and blame on Republicans where Democrats all know it belongs or e) all of the above

A funny little thing happened just days before the great Soetoro vs. Republicans health care debate. It was leaked to the Soetoro press that if there is no agreement reached in the televised on CSPAN health care meeting Democrats will precede with the nuclear option. (Nuclear Option renamed “Reconciliation”  like Global warming was rename to Climate Change ) So no crying you Republicans.

Apparently, Sen. Harry Reid has forgotten about Democrats who cried like big babies about reconciliation in 2005 when Republicans were in the majority. Listen to him misrepresent the case as if Republicans did this kind of stuff all of the time. (see :24sec video)

The fact of the matter is Republicans considered the “Nuclear Option”, as it was called in 2005, when Democrats who used the filibuster in the unprecedented way of preventing president Bush’s nominations to fill court vacancies. Until this time the filibuster was never used to block court appointments.

It was Sen. John McCain and the gang of thirteen that thwarted Republican efforts to put a stop to Democrat’s misuse of the filibuster. Republicans were talking about using the nuclear option or changing the Senate rules that required 60 votes for confirmation to require only 51 votes, a bare majority, to approve Bush’s judicial nominations.

Needless to say Democrats went absolutely apoplectic at the notion that Republicans would change the Senate rules to prevent Democrats from abusing the Senate rules. (Irony noted) Democrats from Barry Hussein Soetoro to Joe Biden to Hillary Clinton and to Harry Reid all cried to the sympathetic media attempting to turn public sentiment against the Republicans. (see 4:54min cryfest)

One of the chief criers Sen. Harry Reid in just 5 short years later and now in power, is himself considered using the “nuclear option” redubbed “reconciliation” if the outcome of the President’s meeting with Republicans today isn’t total capitulation to the president’s demands of Democrat Universal Health Care Plan, which is not so universal not to mention that it costs $950 billion dollars which we don’t have. And will only cover 31 million Americans out of approximately 300million Americans. So much for universal health care coverage and so much for cost savings.

But it’ll be really heavy on the nuclear option or reconciliation hypocrisy! If Democrats use the method that they railed against so condemningly in 2005 against George Bush and his weak Congressional majority then Democrats are no better than Republicans.

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Police break law aid and abet Homosexuals harass Church Service

Homosexuals protest Chicago’s holy Name Cathedral CHICAGO, 1-10-2009

Police refused to interrupt the demonstration, despite laws that prohibit protesting near places of worship while services are ongoing.—James Tillman
Outrageous! If you ever get arrested breaking the law in Chicago just threaten to sue each police officer personally. That should make the police drop everything and stand idly by just to watch you commit your crime and then allow you to go home without being arrested. Oh you think that wouldn't happen?

That's exactly what Chicago police did when homosexuals protested a Mass held at Chicago's Holy Name Cathedral. Homosexuals were in violation of the Chicago Municipal Code which states that someone is punishable for disorderly conduct whenever he "pickets or demonstrates on a public way within 150 feet of any church, temple, synagogue or other place of worship while services are being conducted."

Last Valentine’s day February 14, 2010 a Chicago Catholic Church and its parishioners were celebrating marriage renewals. That’s when they were purposely targeted by the Chicago branch of the Homosexual hate group, the Gay Liberation Network (GLN). (see story) (see 2:56min video)

Since the 1970’s Homosexuals have inappropriately used the civil rights movement—a movement that was created by Blacks who are descendants of slaves and sufferers of White Supremacy and Jim Crow laws which denied Blacks of humanity and civil rights. Homosexuals took the language and the experience of the Black Civil rights movement and created a whole new genre of never before seen “rights” regarding homosexuality.

In its over 30 years of creating and expanding on the right to be homosexual, somewhere in the redefinition of rights, homosexuals mostly through their advocacy groups have became militant bigoted haters who will stop at nothing to push the homosexual agenda of normalization of homosexuality at all levels of society.

Incidentally that is why “Don’t ask, Don’t tell” the policy that regulates homosexual conduct in the military is being challenged under a Democrat president and Democrat controlled Congress. If the military can be co-opted by the homosexual movement then it is reasoned by homosexuals and their advocacy groups that they can infiltrate the entire social structure, political, business, and public of America.
The Chicago Municipal Code states that someone is punishable for disorderly conduct whenever he "pickets or demonstrates on a public way within 150 feet of any church, temple, synagogue or other place of worship while services are being conducted."

When Doherty asked an officer why they were permitting the protest to continue immediately outside the cathedral, she recounts, he "said that the organizer of the protest currently has 20 lawsuits pending against the city of Chicago and he tends to name officers personally as defendants in his civil suits."
For this reason, says Doherty, he went on to say that "unless the Commander gave explicit instructions to move the protestors to the other side of the street, he intended to do nothing."—James Tillman
If homosexuals can break laws under the pretence of civil rights and if homosexuals can hatefully attack, threaten and bully churches and synagogues with impunity all the while spewing the very hate that they accuse their opponents of then there is a double standard in law where homosexuals are considered to have greater rights than everyone else. Not equal rights.

If they can do all of this while police who are sworn to uphold the law stands by because they are threaten and afraid of being named in a law suit then America has been changed we are no later a nation of laws. America is officially a hope and change Non-Constitutional Oligarchy.

But I suspect every day you are slowly coming to that realization on your own. Just as I have.

Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Obama still pretending Global Warming is real

There is a futility in argument when a person concedes the point but does not concede the argument. And that is the place where Global warming Alarmists find themselves. They argue in the name of science for a cause that, by their own admission, is not based on science—Alaphiah (source)
Who could have missed the Great Global Warming recantation Prof. Phil Jones the preeminent Global warming expert who agreed that there has not been any significant global warming since 1995? Prof. Phil Jones is like the father of the current global warming movement. Without him all of the new green movement is built on nothing. (see article)

A recantation of this magnitude is history changing. For example if Martin Luther would have recanted at the Diet of Worms in the 1500’s there would have been no Protestant Church.

Prof. Jones’ recantation of global warming is just as important and devastating to the Global Warming movement as Luther’s recantation would have been to Christianity. However, after the bottom has fallen out of the arguments supporting Anthropogenic Global Warming the Obama administration is moving forward lemming like, progressing over a cliff of global warming lies and fake science. (see 2:50min video)

President Soetoro’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrator, Jane Lubchenco is in denial as is her boss and all of those who support or who have ever supported the global warming hoax.

I can’t believe that any rational intelligent person can still believe in Global warming. The proponents of this fallacy even changed the name of Global warming to Climate Change to obfuscate the fact that the Earth really wasn’t warming and the Carbon induced warming which they original claimed would destroy the world was all based on false science. (source)
As I have written previously on this subject; Bret Stephens’ “Global Warming as Mass Neurosis” explains that Global warming is not science and that its proponents offer religious like claims about Global warming which are to be believed by faith in spite of the physical evidence that the Earth is actually cooling.

Stephens offers three reasons why Liberals blindly follow Global warming propaganda.

Ideological convenience, theological replacement, and Munchausen syndrome

According to Stephens, global warming is a hodge-podge of all Left leaning Ideological beliefs conveniently wrapped up into and ultimately resulting in a cataclysmic eco- disaster.

Then Stephen seems to suggest that global warming allows the Liberal to replace belief in God and God’s judgment on the earth and man with an animist paganism which ironically has nature pronouncing judgment on man via itself.

Lastly Munchausen syndrome according to the Cleveland clinic, is a type of factitious disorder, or mental illness, in which a person repeatedly acts as if he or she has a physical or mental disorder when, in truth, they have caused the symptoms. People with factitious disorders act this way because of an inner need to be seen as ill or injured

Likewise, Global warming proponents have an unhealthy need to see the earth as injured by mankind (more correctly that would be Munchausen syndrome by proxy). So they have created the perfect multi-symptom conflicted affliction in which the phenomena of cooling or heating, storms or lack of storms, floods or droughts are all symptomatic of Global warming. (source)

What is most disturbing is against a preponderance of evidence, no carbon induced warming since 1999, colder global temperatures in spite of elevated carbon in the atmosphere, these fanatics persist in their attempts to change the very essence of human existence based on their erroneous belief. Those who espouse this errant idea of Global warming cling to it like Al Gore clung to the hope that Chads and recounts would change the outcome of the 2000 U.S. elections.—Alaphiah (source)
Like everything else about the Soetoro administration global warming was all pretend. For this administration to continue to support it in light of the truth that anthropogenic global warming was made up is a reflection of a pretend presidency.

Monday, February 22, 2010

There can be no True Bipartisanship

Rosie O'Donnell and Janeane Garofalo are examples of the far leftwing Liberal wing-nuts that control Washington D.C. Their opinions of Conservatives are interchangeable with and could have been advanced by any of the Leftwing Liberals in power.

The only thing is Obama, Reid or Pelosi can’t directly tell the American people how they reality feel so close to elections. But over the last year we did witness the blatant disrespect and undiluted hate that Democrats displayed toward Conservatives and Conservative ideas. Conservatives were depicted as Nazis, Astro-turf, birthers, racists, homophobes, and bitter clingers of guns and bibles.

O’Donnell and Garofalo add a few more choice pejoratives as they spew hate in their assessments of Conservatives Elisabeth Hasselbeck, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and their “fans.” (listen to 5:09min recording)

Democrat Liberals, who are in control of Washington, have major hate issues to reconcile before there can be any bipartisanship. Until Democrats end their hate of Conservatives (politicians or citizens) there can be no bipartisanship in Washington D.C. there can be no bipartisanship between Liberals and Conservatives.

Friday, February 19, 2010

It’s Obama’s Unpopular Programs Stupid

Senate Majority Leader Democrat Harry Reid holding on for dear life

White House aides have said recently that the president will spend more time on the road, part of an effort to position him above the Washington fray and perhaps a signal that he intends to play a bigger role in helping candidates from his party who are facing tough contests—JAMES HOHMANN & MARIN COGAN
What we have here is a failure to communicate… and listen. The American people have been attempting to communicate to the Democrat President and his Democrat controlled Congress that we don’t want their out-of-control spending, their big nanny-state government or do we want their programs of fundamental changing America.

What are Democrats doing in response to the multiple messages of New Jersey, Virginia and Massachusetts that the American people sent to Washington Democrats?

They are going to send out President Barry Hussein Soetoro with their same message promoting yet again the same failed programs, Stimulus, Health Care and more Stimulus, programs which the American people have already rejected. But this time on a Barry Soetoro, “Save the Senate Tour” because someone in the Whitehouse thinks that if only we "bitter clingers" with our bibles and guns would hear it again from the Speechify-er-in Chief then maybe we would understand that what the Democrats are doing is for our own good. Tucker Carson of the CATO Institute explains. (see 1:01min video)

So what is the president going to say in Searchlight Nevada campaigning for Sen. Harry Reid? Hello Nevada I’m Barry Hussein Soetoro remember me? I’m the one that has single-handedly killed your economy by telling people not to come here and spend their money in Nevada! Now would you vote for Harry Reid because I really need him. Yeah that ought to go over well for Reid who is already trailing any Republican with a pulse.
“The fate of Congress’s Democratic members and Obama are inextricably tied; there’s no question about that,” said Neil Newhouse, a GOP strategist. “And for those Democratic members who want to put distance between themselves and President Obama in an effort to save their own hides, they just need to look back to how successful that was for Republicans in 2006 and 2008. Which is to say: Good luck with that.” (source)
The trouble for Democrats is they put their trust in a smooth talking Socialist that came in and immediately launched an unapologetic socialist agenda which was meant to Europeanize America forever. But last I looked Europe as problems of its own!

In any event the American people have had a whole year in which to size up all of the talk of president Soetoro to the actual reality. And judging by president Soetoro’s job approval rating and tanking poll numbers I would say the American people have heard what the president has been saying quite well.
But the president on the other hand isn’t listening to the people.

Lou Dobbs discusses president Soetoro's messaging versus the president's programs and the striden partisanship of the president and his Party. (see 3:28min Video)

It's a failure of communication. It’s not that the American people aren’t communicating, no it’s just that Democrats and the president hear you but they believe that they know better than you do.

So in November you can communicate another message—the message of, “Can you hear us now…that you’re out of office!” And again in 2012!

Thursday, February 18, 2010


Disgraced Global Warming Alarmist Professor Phil Jones

Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.
And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.
— Jonathan Petre
He is the scientist behind the whole notion of man-made global warming, he is Professor Phil Jones, former director of the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research and he has been force to admit that raw data that is crucial to the theory of climate change is missing and he has admitted that there has not been any global warming for the past 15 years. (see story)

According to Jonathon Petre reporter, Colleagues of Professor Phil Jones say that the reason Professor Jones has refused Freedom of Information requests to produce his data supporting the claims of man-made global warming is that he may have actually lost the relevant papers. Has the dog eaten the professor’s papers? (see source)

The only thing man-made about global warming is the science.
The findings prove that the world experienced a Medieval Warm Period between the ninth and 14th centuries with global temperatures significantly higher even than today.—Robert Matthews, Science Correspondent (see source)
Since 2003 Scientist have been attempting to show that the world was warmer in medieval times than now, thus disproving the theory of man-made global warming but these voices were silenced or ridiculed by scientist like professor Jones. Those alarmists were and are wrong!

Global Warming is Dead!

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Sen. Rockerfeller:Obama not believable on Energy

The face of Obama Budget Dr. Peter Orszag

So what are my signals that I am meant to read, where am I meant to…other than his words? We met with him yesterday and he said, “Oh I am, you know, for clean coal.” and he says it in speeches but he doesn’t say it in here. He doesn’t say it in the actions of Lisa Jackson and he doesn’t say it in the minds of my own people and he is beginning to be not believable to me.

So I want you to put me at rest or put me away
—Sen. Jay Rockerfeller
Senator Jay Rockerfeller has the same problem that we all have these days—believing our president Barry Hussein Soetoro. Sen. Rockerfeller’s plight is that he represents a coal producing state and our president has campaigned on a green agenda and has stated that he will be responsible for putting coal producing companies in bankruptcy.

Sen. Rockerfeller ‘s questioning of Dr. Peter Orszag, president Soetoro’s budget director is an interesting coming of understanding for Sen. Rockerfeller. The Senator realizes that the leader of his Party intends to gut the middle class jobs in his state West Virginia. (see 6:35min video) Well worth watching

Unfortunately Sen. Rockerfeller all that you have is president Soetoro’s word, that clean coal jobs will be protected in West Virginia however his word and $5.00 will buy you a coffee Grande at Starbucks.
So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted.—Barry Hussein Soetoro
The president enjoys the phrase, “What I also said is…” So in keeping with his duplicity this is what he also said about coal producing states. (see 3:57min video)

Sen. Rockerfeller if it has taken you this long Sir to realize that the leader of your Party can’t be believed I doubt that you will be very effective in saving your constituents jobs and coal businesses.

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Bayh Bye to Re-election Bid

Sen. Evan Bayh,(D-IN)

Mr. Bayh, 54, made his decision even after entreaties by President Obama and White House aides, including the chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, who urged him to run.
In his remarks, Mr. Bayh expressed frustration at what he described as an increasingly polarized atmosphere in Washington that made it impossible to get anything done.
The poison partisan politics of Barry Hussein Soetoro and the Democrat Party is taking its toll on less partisans of the Democrat Party. Sen. Evan Bayh who expressed frustration at the increasingly polarized atmosphere in Washington should be a reality check for Democrats who spent an entire year pushing a partisan agenda though the Congress only to be opposed by fellow Democrats while Republicans sat on the sidelines for the most part because they did not have adequate numbers with which so stop any of the Democrat marquee agenda items, Health Care Reform, Global Warming/Cap and Trade energy legislation and 2nd stimulus package renamed a jobs bill. (see story)

Bayh’s announced retirement is as shocking as the Scott Brown victory in Massachusetts earlier this year. (see 4:32min video)

 “For some time, I have had a growing conviction that Congress is not operating as it should,” he said. “There is much too much partisanship and not enough progress. Too much narrow ideology and not enough practical problem solving.”—Sen. Evan Bayh
Democrats have been in control of Congress since 2006 but prior to that they waged a bitter partisan war against Republican President George W. Bush and the Republican Party starting in 2000 when Bush was forced to defend his win in a controversial and hard fought post-election fight with Democrat candidate Al Gore. The Gore initiated political battle divided the country down ideological and political lines.

In 2008 Democrat Barry Hussein Soetoro was elected president. Soetoro was noted as the most far left ideologue ever to be elected president in the United States of America. Soetoro pushed an ultra partisan agenda for the first year of his presidency often blaming George W. Bush for any perceived wrong in government.

It is apparent that the great harm that the country suffered in the subsequent eight years of high partisan political wrangling has impeded the working of government to Sen. Bayh’s displeasure.

Bayh’s announcement (see min 1:38min video)

Bayh cited two recent examples of the Senate not stepping up as possible reasons for his decision to retire – the voting down of a bipartisan commission to deal with the federal deficit and the stymied attempt to craft a jobs bill. Though Bayh would not say anything against Democrats directly both situations were under Democrat control. Democrats outnumber Republicans in voting outcomes and Majority Leader Harry Reid killed the bipartisan effort to create a jobs bill.

Democrats only fool themselves if they attribute Sen. Bayh’s departure to anything other than the last eight years of partisan poison that they have produced.

President Soetoro and Democrats should take note otherwise Sen. Bayh wouldn’t be the only Democrat saying bye-bye in 2010 and 2012.

Monday, February 15, 2010

Scientist: Check that Global Warming Consensus Please

“The temperature records cannot be relied on as indicators of global change,” said John Christy, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, a former lead author on the IPCC.-- Jonathan Leake
In its last assessment the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said the evidence that the world was warming was “unequivocal” wrote Jonathan Leake reporter for the Timesonline UK.

The IPCC warned that greenhouse gases had already heated the world by 0.7C and that there could be 5C-6C more warming by 2100, with devastating impacts on humanity and wildlife. However, new research, including work by British scientists, is casting doubt on such claims. Some even suggest the world may not be warming much at all. (see story)

This new report is helping to bring a dramatic conclusion to the scientific farce known as Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW). The fact that the errand hypothesis of AGW is being disproved day by day and has helped morphed it into the all encompassing and ambiguous phase called Climate Change.

Global Warming’s change to Climate Change should have been the first indicator that something was not quite right. To give a particular scientific phenomenon the same name and characteristics as a phenomenon that is normal and reoccurring in nature at both the historical and seasonal levels doesn’t make for good scientific unbiased observable quantifying.

Instead what it does is obscure the facts which we now know probably was the intent all along.

What is more, in light of other recent disclosures of scientific malfeasance regarding global warming, this new report shows us that AGW advocates were willing to dispel and destroy the factual evidence of no global warming or the lack thereof pressuring their peers and the public into group think and P.C. thinking also referred to as consensus. This group think has permeated the sociality at all levels —even at the scientific level.
Terry Mills, professor of applied statistics and econometrics at Loughborough University, looked at the same data as the IPCC. He found that the warming trend it reported over the past 30 years or so was just as likely to be due to random fluctuations as to the impacts of greenhouse gases. Mills’s findings are to be published in Climatic Change, an environmental journal.—Jonathan Leake
Yet there are those that still insist that AGW is real although almost everything that previously supported this claim has been disproved as either bad science or no science at all.

According to Leake, Kevin Trenberth, a lead author of the chapter of the IPCC report that deals with the observed temperature changes, said he accepted there were problems with the global thermometer record but these had been accounted for in the final report.

But according to the report ,”Surface Temperature Records: Driven by Deception?” written by Joseph D’Aleo and Anthony Watts adjustments were not made or were made poorly. (source pg 34)

Leake also reported that , The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts has recently issued a new set of global temperature readings covering the past 30 years, with thermometer readings augmented by satellite data.

Dr Vicky Pope, head of climate change advice at the Met Office, said: “This new set of data confirms the trend towards rising global temperatures and suggest[s] that, if anything, the world is warming even more quickly than we had thought.”

Is this some sad attempt to keep the AGW scare going by unflagging climate change scaremongers?

For instance the argument that Antarctica is gaining ice, made by Patrick Michaels, senior fellow in environmental studies at the Cato Institute is placed in the skeptics column by Skeptical Science website, a global warming alarmists site.

This is laughable as Skeptical Science performs so called “scientific” acrobatics to avoid Ockham’s Razor.
"The amount of ice surrounding Antarctica is now at the highest level since satellites began to monitor it almost 30 years ago. It’s simply too cold for rain in Antarctica and it'll stay that way for a very long time. The bottom line is there is more ice than ever surrounding Antarctica."—Patrick Michaels
Ockham's Razor is the principle proposed by William of Ockham in the fourteenth century: ``Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate'', which translates as ``entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily''. In many cases this is interpreted as ``keep it simple'' or "the simplest solution is usually the correct one"

What Skeptical Science does is construct a complicatedly opaque argument which conclusion is, “the amount of ice surrounding Antarctica is now at the highest level since satellites began to monitor it almost 30 years ago.” With of course a few caveats, addendums and theretofores.
“Antarctic sea ice has shown long term growth since satellites began measurements in 1979. This is an observation that has been often cited as proof against global warming. However, rarely is the question raised: why is Antarctic sea ice increasing?” –Skeptical Science’s violation of Ockham Razor (source)
When the issue of AGW was originally raised it was presented as a consensus. No argument, no questions but in the end we find that there was no science—no creditable science.

Now that the truth is coming out we all understand that consensus is not science. Those who have said so have done a great deal of damage to science.

Friday, February 12, 2010

It’s the Big Tent Socialism Stupid!

Noemie Emery’s article, “Democrats inflicting themselves with wedge issues” and Michael Barone’s article, “With absolute power, Team Obama grows stupid” both attempt to diagnosis the problems ailing the Democrat agenda.

Emery starts out by illustrating good and great politicians and then contrasts those politicians against the “I’m the Greatest” wannabe, president Barry Hussein Soetoro. And no the irony was not lost on me. Emery doesn’t consider president Soetoro either a good or a great politician.

Good politicians, like Ike and JFK (and yes, our Bill Clinton), use the landscape around them to shape coalitions that sustain them in power. Great politicians, like Reagan and Franklin D. Roosevelt, refashion the landscape, creating realignments that survive them by decades.

Obama, by contrast, has done something different: He first formed, and then shredded, his own coalition, creating wedge issues that splintered his party, with no help from opponents at all.—Noemie Emery

Barone begins by slamming the Soetoro Chicago inner circle. He notes that they were brilliant campaigners but have turned out to be mere amateurs at governing.

How could such smart people do so many stupid things? That question, or variations on it, is being asked in Washington and around the country about the Obama administration.

The same people who directed the campaign that defeated Hillary Clinton and routed John McCain, a campaign that raised far more money and attracted far more volunteers than any before it, have within a year come up with a legislative program that is crashing in ruins and that, to judge from recent polls, has left the Democratic party weaker than I have seen it in almost 50 years of closely following politics.

The 2008 campaign was an impressive achievement. So, in a negative way, is the 2009 legislative program that has left the Democrats in such woeful shape in 2010.—Michael Barone

So just what has happened to the righteous wind at the back of president Soetoro? Just where is the love, that swept him into power just one short year ago? Democrats are now scratching their heads and they want to know.

What is true is, president Barry Soetoro government can be summed up in two areas. Barry Hussein Soetoro himself is an Ideologue who surrounds himself with Ideologues. And second, he promotes a radical socialist agenda as policy by which he means to change America. In other words it’s the Big Tent Socialism Stupid!

It’s the people that this president chooses to work in his administration; it’s the way that this president is going about conducting the affairs if this country and it’s the policies that this president is promoting. It’s all wrong for America and the American people see it.

Emery relays a story of a Soetoro government under fire from all sides of the liberal spectrum. According to Emery, the Associated Press writes of "Democrat-vs.-Democrat anger" in all sorts of venues. (This is like Thunderdome under the Big Tent)

The House of Representatives Democrats at odds with Senate Democrats. Senate Democrats at odds with the White House and the and Daily Kos radicals angry at everyone, this is the failing Big Tent concept that ridiculously many establishment Republicans believe they need in order to be a viable Party. (No wonder they lost in 2008).

This is even more reason that RNC chairman Michael Steele should consider some kind of rubric to define what a Conservative is so that “Progressive Conservatives” like Meghan McCain, Compassionate Conservatives or Maine Conservatives can be exposed for the frauds that they are and can be stopped from harming the Party similar to what Democrats are experiencing (see story)

Barone on the other hand believes that Democrats troubles are embedded in the Chicago clique that surrounds the president. In Barone’s opinion the president would have better served himself and the country had he availed himself to the wisdom of the Washington establishment instead of the small town Chicago politics which he brought to Washington. (see story)

Team Obama failed to realize they were no longer running in Chicago or in the Democratic primaries or facing an electorate fed up with Republicans. And, more important, they failed to realize that vastly expanding government goes deeply against the American grain -- and against the basic appeal of their successful campaign.—Michael Barone

What I believe is, president Soetoro overestimated himself and his ability to sell his message of hope the American people aren’t watching too closely has I change their system of government to a non-Constitutional Socialist model.

I also believe that he misread the American people. Soetoro believed that he could say anything and the America people would accept it just because he said it. He also thought that he could completely topple the figurative political statue of George W. Bush in the square of public opinion and the American people would climb upon it and while hitting it with shoes they would howl, wail and ululate. He was wrong on all counts.

Now that the American people see that the message of hope and change is in actuality a message of government control, lost of freedoms, gross deficit spending and of course blaming the previous administration, the American people have rejected the rhetoric because for the first time they see the reality.

The reality is, as Joe Biden said on the campaign trail in 2008 Barry Hussein Soetoro wasn’t ready to lead and as Hillary Clinton warned us we needed someone ready to lead on day one. They were both warning us that Barry Hussein Soetoro would not be even a good president let alone a great president. We should have listened.

What we voted for in spite of their warnings was a piped piper with a melodious message of hope and change when we needed a seasoned conductor who could conduct this symphony which is America.

Barry Hussein Soetoro has been attempting to change the sheet music of America during the concert presentation. That is not just a rookie mistake that is an indication of someone completely out of touch with reality. That is why the president is failing, he is out of touch with American reality. On the contrary he envisions a new Utopian European socialist hybrid American country.

The American people finally see that president Soetoro is not attempting to fix what is wrong with America he is attempting to fundamentally change America into something that it was never intended to be.

Democrats if you want to know what is wrong with the Soetoro presidency, it is the president’s vision of America. It’s the Big Tent Socialism Stupid!

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Obama Would Drive Republicans into the Sea

When a sitting president calls for bipartisanship by the opposition – he really means surrender. And if they block his proposals, its "obstinacy" and not political views they hold as strongly as he holds his. — Mark Knoller
Mark Knoller’s, “Obama Says Bipartisanship, But What He Wants Is GOP Surrender,” is a complete deconstruction of the Barry Hussein Soetoro pretense for bipartisanship. (see article)

"Despite the political posturing that often paralyzes this town, there are many issues upon which we can and should agree, he said.

It was more a plaintive plea than a political observation. His top legislative priorities are going nowhere and he's searching for a way to get them out of lockup. --Mark Knoller

Knoller get’s it. Democrats, their leader and Spokesperson-in-Chief, president Soetoro declared jihad on their political rivals the Republican Party after the 2000 election which George W. Bush won. For eight continuous years Democrats unrelentingly battered and beat up on the hapless George Bush.

So extreme and vile was their hatred for Bush that Democrats would have preferred that America lose the Iraq war than let Bush receive credit for winning it. They did in fact declare the war lost several times. Everyone from Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to the late Congressman John Murtha on the Democrat side of the aisle called the war lost.

This goes to show that Democrats were willing to jeopardize the safety and security of the Nation and give aid and comfort to the enemies of America in order to destroy President Bush. If the war was lost, they thought, it would put President Bush in the worst possible light and ensure his defeat in 2004.

Bush won in 2004 and Democrats continued to undermine his presidency until the day that Barack Hussein Obama was inaugurated. It should be noted that during president Soetoro’s whole campaign he berated and belittled George W. Bush as most Democrats did. And as a result of their combined efforts they won the presidency and a super majority in the Congress in 2008.

It is on that background that we must understand the context of president Soetoro’s call for bipartisanship, the only thing more disingenuous then president Soetoro’s call for bipartisanship between Democrats and Republicans is Palestinians’ demand on Israel requesting land for peace.

Hamas's 1988 charter calls for replacing the State of Israel with a Palestinian Islamic state in the area that is now Israel, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip.(source)

Mark Knoller notes that president Soetoro’s call for bipartisanship is really a request for Republicans to give up their principles, and their beliefs to surrender to Soetoro’s legislative ideology.

Mr. Obama said he "won't hesitate to embrace a good idea from my friends in the minority party." But he wants his way. He wants his energy policy enacted along with his jobs bill, his financial regulatory reform and his health care plan.

And if the opposition continues to block his objectives, he said he "won't hesitate to condemn what I consider to be obstinacy that's rooted not in substantive disagreement but in political expedience."—Mark Knoller

What that means is in the president’s mind Republicans shouldn’t exist just as Israel shouldn’t exist according to Islamic leaders like the late Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Adinemadjab.

Who could ever forget the 2000 President Clinton summit between Palestine ’s Yasser Arafat and Israel ’s Ehud Barak which was meant to produce peace in the Middle East.

According to Palestine

Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered the most substantial concessions and far reaching proposals, going beyond all the long-standing Israeli "red lines", especially as regards Jerusalem . The US team called Barak "courageous" for these offers. When these terms were later revealed in Israel , people were stunned at the extent of the concessions Barak offered and it is unclear whether the Israeli public were prepared to support the deal.

However they were never given the opportunity to endorse or reject the proposals; Arafat rejected them out of hand.

The details were not disclosed formally, but according to media reports Barak's offer included:
• Israeli redeployment from 95% of the West Bank and 100% of the Gaza Strip
• The creation of a Palestinian state in the areas of Israeli withdrawal
• The removal of isolated settlements and transfer of the land to Palestinian control
• Other Israeli land exchanged for West Bank settlements remaining under Israeli control
• Palestinian control over East Jerusalem, including most of the Old City
• "Religious Sovereignty" over the Temple Mount , replacing Israeli sovereignty in effect since 1967

In return Arafat had to declare the "end of conflict" and agree that no further claims on Israel could be made in the future. Despite the considerable concessions by Israel , Arafat chose not to negotiate, not to make a counter-offer but to just walk out. (source)

The issue is this reader, Democrats, like an Islamic nation state, fundamental goal is to have it all. Every point of concession that Israel or Republicans make would make them incrementally smaller and weaker.

Republicans in bipartisan negotiations with President Soetoro will be expected to concede their principles giving more and more ground when, as example, this health care bill is already written by far left ideologues.

True bipartisanship would call for the scrapping of this bill and both Parties craft a bill from the ground up. As it is presently written ideologues in the Democrat Party, Pelosi and Reid, whose ultimate goal is to impose Liberal ideology on the Western world to the exclusion of Conservative principles, wrote this bill so this bill has a Liberal makeup intrinsically.

In other words bipartisan efforts to the president and Democrats actually means, come join us forcing left wing policies on the people of the United States. And if the people don’t like it they’ll have us both to blame.

Soetoro brought the subject of bipartisanship up so if he is serious about it and he is not just trying to get some political advantage by calling for bipartisanship when he really doesn’t want it then he has to lead. And as a show of leadership he should be ready to make the first substantial concessions. Republicans wish to start from scratch, the president should do that.

Soetoro and Democrats are the ones faced with the deficit of trust so the onus is on them to make Republicans feel that this is not some kind of trick.

If the president is unable or unwilling to do this then we all know that his true motives were not to work in a bipartisanship way after all. His true motives were to put Republicans at a disadvantage and in the worst light possible.

Under the pretense of bipartisanship the president actually wanted to push Republicans into the Sea.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Obama: Republicans in the Room quick turn on CSPAN

After months of seeing Obama try to muscle legislation through with only Democratic votes, Republicans are wary of his new overture.

The election of Republican Scott Brown in Massachusetts changed the balance of power in the Senate, forcing the president to recalibrate.
Ambush, setup, waylay, bushwhack , trap, snare, gob, maw or recalibrate. Oh did I mention that Democrat Uber-Partisan President Barry Hussein Soetoro is scheduling a meeting with Republicans to(as Soetoro says) find bipartisan solutions with which to get his signature Legislation, Health Care, passed.

In an effort to put Republicans on the spot on health care, President Obama said he will invite them to the White House for a televised meeting later this month to try reignite the push for a bill. -- Kara Rowland (source)

However, Soetoro has spent a whole year depleting his trust capital with acts that could be perceived as anti-American. Not to mention that he has committed harsh partisan acts that could only be described as anti- Republican. At this early juncture in his presidency Soetoro has lost trust with the people. It’s a matter of trust president Soetoro and you have none. But let’s go back to the beginning shall we…

Contrary to the promises of bipartisanship president Soetoro has acted out as a strident partisan. And in spite of multiple promises that all Health Care negotiation would be bathe in the bright sunlight of transparency instead it was forged in the deep darkness of the Congressional netherworld. At one point as many as three to four bills circulated in those underground caverns where they were guarded and kept safe from view by the mythological three-headed dog Cerberus. (This is probably the same dog that guards the president’s long form birth certificate and the rest of any identifying documents that he has guarded and on lockdown.)

Here’s what we know, president Soetoro is in a crisis by his own words he is in a deficit of trust. After one year of seeing the Democrat attempt to force their agenda on America and after a year of hearing the president go on incessantly attempting to show us that he was the smartest person in the room on every topic, Americans have drawn the conclusion based on the Democrat agenda and their talking head president (who by the way doesn’t keep his campaign promises) that conclusion is, we don’t trust him or his Party. Most Americans believe the president’s health care summit is just for show. A show to show-up Republicans. (see story)

It is clear that if Democrats could have they would have forced all of their political agenda items through Congress to be signed by their Uber-partisan president. Whether it would have been Health Care Reform or Global Warming legislation.

They tried it— armed with their Super majority in Congress and a presidential spokes mouth. They relegated Republicans to the sidelines and they jammed their partisan issues into the faces of the America people all without Republican participation for the most part.

Soetoro’s numbers are only 44% of the America people believe that he is doing a good job, which means that the American people have heard all of the hype but they have seen none of the hope that was promised in the change.

What is true is Republicans didn’t have numbers in Congress to stop Democrats from getting their prized agenda items through. It was Democrat’s fellow Democrats who stopped Health Care Reform not Republicans.

Nevertheless a Democrat controlled Congress and the President’s favorability poll numbers have tanked. Soetoro’s numbers are only 44% of the America people believe that he is doing a good job, which means that the American people have heard all of the hype but they have seen none of the hope that was promised in the change.

Soetoro who is noted for wanting to spread the wealth around has taken on a new tact, now he wishes to spread the blame around for the failure of his ideas and his policies, in essence his whole government. So that alone explains the about face.

Instead of excluding the Republicans as Democrats have done for the entire first year of the Soetoro presidency now Democrats want to craftily draw Republicans in so that Republicans can share some of the blame that Democrats have heaped on themselves.

Ergo Soetoro calls for a Bipartisan Health Care summit.

A bipartisan meeting where he controls all aspects of the meeting and the agenda then he invites in CSPAN why? Why to attempt to shift blame to Republicans. That way in November voters will have no discernable difference between the two Parties which to base their voting decisions on.

Democrats say they want to resolve remaining differences between the House and Senate versions of their own legislation in advance of the meeting. That may mean Obama wants to emphasize contrasts with Republicans, not probe for common ground.— RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR

This ploy is so obvious that it is the only thing transparent in the Soetoro administration. It’s the political version of the rope-a-dope employed by Barry Hussein Ali. This Health care monstrosity is a Democrat vehicle down to its chassis now for Republicans to add on to it would be like Toyota sending their recalled vehicles into GM for repair.

And if Republicans refuse to play along or if there is no agreement reached Soetoro and his media sycophants will begin the Bush blame game. However, this time they will place blame on Congressional Republicans in general. And it’ll all be recorded on CSPAN.

What should Republicans do?

First thing, Republicans should have nothing to do with legislation that was already written without them—start the process over. Any legislation that Democrats crafted by themselves is flawed and filled with untrustworthy legislation.

Second Republicans should ask to see the president’s health care ideas. He has been touting this thing for a year surely he has something to show the people and Republicans in writing. Enough with the talk lets see what the president has if anything.

Third thing Republicans should go over the president’s ideas with a fine tooth comb in the truest bipartisan spirit. Exposing those ideas to the disinfectant of sunlight.

Fourth after and only after Republicans have seen the president’s ideas they should present theirs in the same fashion and spirit that the president presents his.

Fifth Republicans should have a say in the format and structure of the meeting and demand equal assess to presenting their ideas. They are not reporting to or answering to the president. The Congress is not subservient to the President in our system.

The Legislative and Executive branches are co-equal branchs one is not above the other Republicans should not allow the president to act as if he is above them.

Starting from scratch is not an option, Democrats say. But Republicans say they can't see the House and Senate Democratic bills as a beginning. For one thing, both would raise taxes.— RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR

And if the Democrats don’t want to start from scratch then they didn’t want to work bipartisanly now did they.

Remember Democrats could not get their own Party to pass this bill without $100-$300 million dollars in added federal aid for Medicaid recipients, a bribe of the Senator of Louisiana Mary Landieu and the Corn Husker kickbacks worth a permanent exemption from the state share of Medicaid for the state of Nebraska for Sen. Ben Nelson and the Flordia Flim-flam, a deal to grandfather Medicare Advantage enrollees in Florida – apprx $5 Billion for Florida Sen. Bill Nelson (source)

Therefore Republicans should not allow the president to aim the CSPAN cameras on them while he and Democrats direct this production and make this film all about blaming Republicans.

And now lights, camera, action!

Tuesday, February 09, 2010

Deciphering Obama’s Prayer Breakfast Confessions

"Now, I am the first to confess I am not always right. Michelle will testify to that. But surely you can question my policies without questioning my faith, or, for that matter, my citizenship.

Challenging each other's ideas can renew our democracy. But when we challenge each other's motives, it becomes harder to see what we hold in common. We forget that we share at some deep level the same dreams – even when we don't share the same plans on how to fulfill them."
—president Barry Hussein Soetoro
President Barry Hussein Soetoro had a lot on this mind at the National Prayer Breakfast February 4, 2010. He thought that he’d confess the fact that he’s not always right. Something that he apparently thought his religious audience would like to hear, but certainly not at all what he really believes. (see 1:03min video)

President Soetoro elected to miss the first prayer breakfast of his presidency last year. Maybe because it was a little too much prayer for his liking or maybe a little too religious for his taste. Or maybe he was still trying to earn his Muslim street cred, whatever the case Soetoro first year in office had very little resemblance of a president that was living by Christian values.

And then suddenly after one year of hiding his light under a bushel the president closed out his first year by announcing at the end of the SOTU address that he was going to promote homosexuality in the Armed Forces.

If nothing else Mr. Soetoro’s prayer breakfast confess gives us insight into his concept of right and wrong, concepts evidently not born out of the Christian tradition as far as I can tell.

In president Soetoro’s world, the politics which drive his policies are not connected to his faith. And the fact that he is ineligible to serve as president of the United States of America (or at least the fact that half of the populace thinks so) doesn’t bother him. He thinks that you shouldn’t be concerned about that very small constitutional matter either.

Also, in president Soetoro’s world his ideas are suspended in space completely separate from his motives. Soetoro knows that if his motives were ever known Americans would realize that we and this president have absolutely very little in common other then we all live in this country together.

Soetoro knows that only at the most fundamental level does he and Americans have anything in common. Again that fundamental level is we all live in this country together.

President Soetoro knows that he and Americans don’t share the same dreams. His dream is to fundamentally change America we on the other hand wish to change what’s wrong with America, Soetoro included.

President Soetoro realizes that his means justifies the ends philosophy is different from most Americans. He also believes that Americans are not smart enough to discern between his methods and his goals.

Unfortunately for the president Americans are smart enough and we are not particularly endeared with either his methods or his goals.

Finally, what’s so fascinating about Soetoro’s acknowledgement is that he is aware of the controversy surrounding his ineligibility. He knows that Americans are concerned about his ineligibility yet he does nothing to alleviate the questions that hundreds of thousands of Americans have.

All that the president would have to do is show legitimately concerned citizens that he is in fact eligible to be president and this problem goes away. And that doesn’t require prayer at all, just doing.

Otherwise there is an old saying in Tennessee and in Texas that I heard from President Bush which is, fool us once… shame on you …fool me can’t get fooled again!

Without proof that you are eligible to serve Mr. president you are but a one term president who has just started his lame duck period. And no amount of prayer can or will change that!

Monday, February 08, 2010


“I don't think it's healthy to dismiss proper skepticism Science grows and improves in the light of criticism. There is a fundamental uncertainty about climate change prediction that can't be changed.”-- John Beddington, Chief Scientific Adviser to the British government
Denier was the strongest pejorative that Global warming alarmist can muster from their repertoire of insults for those who don’t agree with their alarmist’s theory concerning Anthropogenic Global Warming or (AGW). An Insult which was meant to quash any questioning or open debate over the ideology of AGW or its most recent manifestation man-made Climate Change.

The term Denier is supposed to evoke all of the images of crazes and half loons who would go half cocked denouncing the fact that the Holocaust actually happened. An event which is historically noted that 6 million Jews died and of which evidence still remains. Only the craziest of hate filled racists would deny such a reality.

Therefore if one were to disagree with the scientific consensus, that man is the cause of the recent increase in earth’s temperature, then one is as crazy as Iran’s president Mahoud Amadinejad, a rabid holocaust denier.

One observation that has become increasingly clear is that recently disclosed evidence is showing that the crazies and the half loons are not those who are asking questions about the validity of the science surrounding the theory of AGW. No as recent disclosures show, i.e. emails and the lack of scientific research to support AGW’s various claims, the purveyors of AGW are the ones who have gone to extraordinarily lengths and crazed tactics to establish a non-scientific theory as scientific fact.

In 2007, the most comprehensive report to date on global warming, issued by the respected United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, made a shocking claim: The Himalayan glaciers could melt away as soon as 2035…
[T]he claim was rubbish, and the world's top glaciologists knew it. It was based not on rigorously peer-reviewed science but on an anecdotal report by the WWF itself.—Margaret Wente (source)

Lord Christopher Monckton, Chief policy advisor to the Science and Public Policy Institute and former policy advisor to the British government for years has been attempting to have an open and honest debate regarding the claims of AGW alarmists. Thusly, a debate with Lord Monckton has been avoided by AGW chief spokespersons. It seems no one who supports the theory of AGW is happy to have that debate. (see 6:05min video)

Even though Lord Monckton has issued a request to ‘one and all’, instead of debating the issue Demagogues and Ideologues continue to advance this unproven theory is if they have not been exposed for the frauds that they are. (see 1:24min video)

Chief of these Ideologues is U.S. president Barry Hussein Soetoro who single handedly brokered a deal in Copenhagen that transfers the wealth of the West to non-Western societies in the name of AGW.

In the agreement, a commitment of $30 billion from industrialized countries over the period 2010 to 2012 was decided, as 'fast start funding' for adaptation, emissions reductions, research and capacity building in developing countries, including funding to prevent deforestation.

Mobilization of financing for the needs of developing countries beyond the year 2020 is also addressed in the agreement and is estimated at $100 billion per year from 2020. (source)

Though they couldn’t get the deal that they wanted because China wouldn’t agree to put cap and trade restrictions on their economy, therefore nations didn’t sign a binding agreement to impose U.N. sanctions and penalties on themselves if carbon emission exceeded a certain amount. The U.S. president still convinced industrial nations to start paying $30 billion dollars in tax payers money to U.N. coffers that supposedly will be used to offset AGW. US taxpayers will begin to start payments this year.

In the accord

• Agreement that “deep cuts in global emissions are required according to science”
• A pledge of $30 billion from industrialized countries to poor nations over the period 2010 to 2012 to start in 2010
• A further pledge of an estimated $100 billion per year from industrialized countries to poor nations starting after from 2020
• “Long co-operative action” needed to keep the global temperature increase below 2C
• Rich countries should submit proposals for economy-wide emission reduction targets for 2020 to the UN by January 31
• By the same date, developing countries should produce plans to cut the rate of growth of their emissions
• There should be international monitoring of any emission cuts in developing countries that are funded by rich countries
• A reassessment of the accord by 2015 to check whether emission reductions are on track to keep the temperature increase below 2C
• Consideration in 2015 of strengthening the goal to 1.5C (source)

So the question goes begging, if “scientific proof” of AGW is proving to be an international sham to exhort money from the people of the world then why in the world did president Soetoro commit US tax dollars to a unproven cause at best and at worst a complete fraud and sham?

“The global warming movement proposed a complex set of international agreements involving vast transfers of funds, intrusive regulations in national economies, and substantial changes to the domestic political economies of most countries on the planet.”—Walter Russell Mead

The answer, because he is an Ideologue. And Ideologues will follow the “consensus” of their ideology whether it is right or wrong. That is what an Ideologue does. The Ideology which drives AGW is the same that drives Barry Hussein Soetoro; transferring wealth from the rich to the poor, in this case rich industrial nations to poor non-industrial nations.

After all of the current revelations showing that the theory of AGW is based on scientific corruption and greed and assuming that president Soetoro knew this but stood before Congress, the Supreme Court and the World in his first State of the Union Address in spite of evidence contrary to his opinion and declared that there is overwhelming scientific evidence that AGW is real, which he did, that act would make him an unapologetic Ideologue.

His demagoguery was blatant and so evident that he drew laughs from the Congress, Nancy Pelosi laughed, Joe Biden laughed and finally president Soetoro had to laugh himself at such a ridicules claim. Further proof that he is an Ideologue.

Given that he is an Ideologue then he will continue to defend this claim knowing that it is unbelievable and knowing that it is wrong. That is what Ideologues do! (see 14sec. video)

Note to Whitehouse spokesperson Robert Gibbs (another Ideologue); climate change as forwarded by a so-called consensus in the scientific community states that temperatures would rise to elevated levels off of the charts. Originally they did not promote any theory of Global cooling. (see 1:25min video)

Simply ridiculous!

Sunday, February 07, 2010

The "Primo-Pol's Polls"

Looks as though the "state-of-the-union" numbers bounce has
all but evaporated.

I had previously commented on the sickly state of the speech
that President Obama gave. Saying it was nothing more than a
re-hash of a dozen other speeches,
bit by bit. I was quite
surprised to see such a bounce in his numbers in the days
immediately following the speech, and even more shocked that
it carried through to this past week.

But NOW, it looks as though the bloom is once again off the
so to speak. His numbers are really tanking now.

Of course, it might not have anything to do with the fact that
his past is coming back to haunt him, in the name of Sarah Palin.
She was absolutely stunning as the keynote speaker at the "Tea
Party Convention"
............. a grim reminder of what he is up
against once more. The BIG difference is that in the past year,
Ms Palin has become very astute and tuned into the issues of the
, and it is now much more difficult for the lame-stream media
to paint her as some kind of out-of-touch hick!

Actually.........side by side comparison of Sarah Palin and
President Obama
, shows that there is no contest at all. She whips
his butt, hands down! She has more common sense, more principle,
and certainly more tact
in not only her manner, but her ideas and
her ability. She has actually run things for years, while he was
"making nice" to build a political future, as a politician. I will
admit that he has accomplished his goal very nicely. He managed
to con an entire country,
and is now in the process of dismantling
not only the United States control of the internet, but our very
He would dismantle a health care system that is the
envy of the world, a security and stock market system that has built
this country into the most viable investment machine ever known.

No one will question that we have our faults, but by and large this
country has no equal on this earth. Letting this faux president stay
at the helm is the biggest mistake in the history of mankind. What
we need is competent leaders.........not former organizers, backed
up and advised by even less qualified morons.

It is very ironic that the far left demonized former President Bush;
accused him of awarding no-bid contracts for our defense, of having
lobbyists in his cabinet, of bringing us into Iraq on false pretenses,
and accused him of war crimes. Now, the shoe is on the other foot,
and THIS so-called president is awarding no-bid contracts to his cronies,
has more lobbyists than Bush had, expanded the war in Afghanistan, and
is certainly setting himself up to be accused of war crimes.

So, what goes around comes around.

My biggest dispute with President Obama is his constant reference to
the "inherited deficits" that seem to be the focal point of ALL his
speeches. I guess that was a phrase that they just couldnt delete
from the teleprompter
. Damn these computers!

It is true that when Obama took office, he inherited a 1.6 trillion
So where did the rest come from? Oh yes...... the "Stimulus
Plan" that was no stimulus at all. It was a big payoff to the unions,
and his home state, and all the earmarks that went to the democratic
senators states..... for their support. Then, they have the unmitigated
gall to try to stuff that "health care reform" down our throats
, even
though it was clear that nobody wanted it. Actually, I guess Sarah
Palin has the far left democrats to thank for her popularity. She was
one of the most influential people to speak out against it, initiating
a response that has only just begun, and will culminate in 2012

My warning to ALL the liberal politicians in the Senate and the House. BE AFRAID very afraid.
We are coming for you, starting THIS NOVEMBER
won't be dissuaded from our mission, to figuratively "tar & feather" you. If it were up to me,
I would literally have most of
you tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail, as many of our
forefathers did prior to the American Revolution.

So Mr President. Enjoy your "good" poll numbers now, because they are going to sink like a rock!

Friday, February 05, 2010

From “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” to Brokeback Military

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen
"Whatever we once were, we're no longer a Christian nation.”—Barry Hussein Soetoro
As the Military begins to move from “Don’t ask, don’t tell” to take your Christian White Anglo-Saxon American values and go to hell. One thing that becomes quite apparent, and that is president Soetoro is right; we are no longer a Christian nation. (see 17sec. video)

President Soetoro has pressed the reset button on a classic cultural war in America. Sensing that his domestic policies are in serious jeopardy Soetoro fell back to a stock Liberal ideology which is meant to stir up his base—homosexuality.

It is absolutely fascinating to see the big lumbering politically correct imps dance around this political fire all adorned with four stars atop their shoulders. Complete with higher echelons of the Armed Services, Secretary of Defense Bob Gates in tow they are ready to serve up the head of John the Baptist to Obama of the 40 veils. And as they do the very pillars of Western culture are being devastated like the earthquake ravaged Island of Haiti.

Soetoro has initiated this culture war to take the pressure off of his failed economic policies and to redirect attention to something else. He wants attention on anything else rather than his Health Care reform, his failed Stimulus (number 1), no jobs creation, high unemployment numbers, a stimulus number 2 called jobs creation and decisions which he has made that have compromised our national security; i.e. closing Gitmo and moving the terrorist trial to New York City.

President Soetoro’s Utopian dream of a government of hope and change is rapidly becoming a government of disaster and failure. So he’s pushed the reset button to something more titillatingly distracting; how to recreate the pup tent scene over and over again in the U.S. Military.

The strategy here is quite simple, create a diversion and have Americans all riled up concerning a social issue that Soetoro feels that he can win on. Why do Liberals believe that they can win on homosexuality?

Two top Pentagon officials told Congress on Tuesday that they are moving ahead with plans to dismantle the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy against homosexuals serving openly in the armed forces — drawing a sharp rebuke from Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who accused Defense Secretary Robert Gates of trying to usurp Congress’s authority over the military.

“The question before us is not whether the military prepares to make this change, but how we best prepare for it,” Gates said in his opening statement to the Senate Armed Services Committee session. “We’ve received our orders from the commander in chief and are moving out accordingly.” – JEN DIMASCIO & JOSH GERSTEIN (source)

Because they have change the language and framed the argument in such an Orwellian way that if one opposes homosexuality one loses the argument just by stating your opposition. For instance take the example of Gen. Peter Pace former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who lost his job for making a self evident statement regarding homosexuality in the military. The Chairman stated that homosexuality is immoral. (see 1:24min video)

Notice how biased the Liberal Media Elite is treating the story (see 1:43min video)

Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!—Isaiah 5:20

The point is, because homosexual advocates and the Liberal Media Elite have successfully dismissed Judeo-Christian values in our culture by calling immorality morality and morality immorality, Americans have become hopelessly confused on the issue of morality and immorality in recent years. Homosexual advocates did this to normalize the aberrant behavior of homosexuality and put it on par with heterosexuality.

In like fashion, the advocates of illegal aliens use these same tactics of confusing the language in promoting rights under our Constitution for citizens of the country of Mexico. Rightful these invaders of our country are called illegal aliens. However ironically the provocateurs of Orwellian speak force us to contradictorily call these immigration law breakers, of all things, “immigrants”. Orwellian Worldview in practice!

It is because of this confusion in language made by homosexual advocacy and the Liberal Media elite that Gen. Pace had to apology for telling the truth and apologetically walk back a true and accurate statement he made while defending President Clinton’s Don’t ask, don’t tell policy.

Contrarily due to these same advocates and media people current Chairman Admiral Mike Mullen can misstate the case against “Don’t ask and don’t tell” and get away with it because he is promoting their cause.

"It is my personal belief that allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly would be the right thing to do. No matter how I look at this issue I cannot escape being troubled by the fact that we have in place a policy that forces men and women to lie about who they are in order to defend their fellow citizens."—Adm. Mike Mullen

The hypocrisy is astounding Gen. Peter Pace was rebuked for voicing his personal belief and lost his job. Adm. Mike Mullen is lauded as a hero for voicing his personal belief in support of homosexuality.

Not only that, Adm. Mullen misstated the case. The policy is not asking for homosexuals to lie about their depravity. The policy is— what it is, an agreement to overlook certain personal foibles within the ranks with a wink, wink. In other words we won’t ask and you don’t tell.

And of course we all understood that there are homosexuals serving in the military. But the larger issue is not about any of this. The larger issue is what we all should be concerned about.

What the larger issue is, is that this is but one more step to force the homosexual agenda into the main stream of the Western society. This is about legitimizing homosexually and giving this aberrant behavior the same status as heterosexuality. That is the reason president Soetoro ignited this political firestorm, and that is the reason that this sudden switch in the government’s opinion on “Don’t ask, don’t tell” is so important.

The bottom line is the acts which the president, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff are taking to change this policy are wrong. Homosexuality is wrong. Those actions will put America on parallel with such infamous biblical societies as Sodom and Gomorrah.

And in the immediate future changing this policy will obscure the ability of our children to tell right from wrong if the government condones wrong by making it legitimate. Why that's apparently already the case if grown men; Adm. Mullen and the president do not know right from wrong!

I’m sure the inhabitants of the societies of Sodom and Gomorrah saw nothing wrong with their practices. Not only that, they didn’t have big 42” flat screen TV’s, cable with 1000 channels and the internet.

God really should apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah when America goes Brokeback Military.