“I don't think it's healthy to dismiss proper skepticism Science grows and improves in the light of criticism. There is a fundamental uncertainty about climate change prediction that can't be changed.”-- John Beddington, Chief Scientific Adviser to the British governmentDenier was the strongest pejorative that Global warming alarmist can muster from their repertoire of insults for those who don’t agree with their alarmist’s theory concerning Anthropogenic Global Warming or (AGW). An Insult which was meant to quash any questioning or open debate over the ideology of AGW or its most recent manifestation man-made Climate Change.
The term Denier is supposed to evoke all of the images of crazes and half loons who would go half cocked denouncing the fact that the Holocaust actually happened. An event which is historically noted that 6 million Jews died and of which evidence still remains. Only the craziest of hate filled racists would deny such a reality.
Therefore if one were to disagree with the scientific consensus, that man is the cause of the recent increase in earth’s temperature, then one is as crazy as Iran’s president Mahoud Amadinejad, a rabid holocaust denier.
One observation that has become increasingly clear is that recently disclosed evidence is showing that the crazies and the half loons are not those who are asking questions about the validity of the science surrounding the theory of AGW. No as recent disclosures show, i.e. emails and the lack of scientific research to support AGW’s various claims, the purveyors of AGW are the ones who have gone to extraordinarily lengths and crazed tactics to establish a non-scientific theory as scientific fact.
Lord Christopher Monckton, Chief policy advisor to the Science and Public Policy Institute and former policy advisor to the British government for years has been attempting to have an open and honest debate regarding the claims of AGW alarmists. Thusly, a debate with Lord Monckton has been avoided by AGW chief spokespersons. It seems no one who supports the theory of AGW is happy to have that debate. (see 6:05min video)
Even though Lord Monckton has issued a request to ‘one and all’, instead of debating the issue Demagogues and Ideologues continue to advance this unproven theory is if they have not been exposed for the frauds that they are. (see 1:24min video)
Chief of these Ideologues is U.S. president Barry Hussein Soetoro who single handedly brokered a deal in Copenhagen that transfers the wealth of the West to non-Western societies in the name of AGW.
Though they couldn’t get the deal that they wanted because China wouldn’t agree to put cap and trade restrictions on their economy, therefore nations didn’t sign a binding agreement to impose U.N. sanctions and penalties on themselves if carbon emission exceeded a certain amount. The U.S. president still convinced industrial nations to start paying $30 billion dollars in tax payers money to U.N. coffers that supposedly will be used to offset AGW. US taxpayers will begin to start payments this year.
In the accord
• Agreement that “deep cuts in global emissions are required according to science”
• A pledge of $30 billion from industrialized countries to poor nations over the period 2010 to 2012 to start in 2010
• A further pledge of an estimated $100 billion per year from industrialized countries to poor nations starting after from 2020
• “Long co-operative action” needed to keep the global temperature increase below 2C
• Rich countries should submit proposals for economy-wide emission reduction targets for 2020 to the UN by January 31
• By the same date, developing countries should produce plans to cut the rate of growth of their emissions
• There should be international monitoring of any emission cuts in developing countries that are funded by rich countries
• A reassessment of the accord by 2015 to check whether emission reductions are on track to keep the temperature increase below 2C
• Consideration in 2015 of strengthening the goal to 1.5C (source)
So the question goes begging, if “scientific proof” of AGW is proving to be an international sham to exhort money from the people of the world then why in the world did president Soetoro commit US tax dollars to a unproven cause at best and at worst a complete fraud and sham?
The answer, because he is an Ideologue. And Ideologues will follow the “consensus” of their ideology whether it is right or wrong. That is what an Ideologue does. The Ideology which drives AGW is the same that drives Barry Hussein Soetoro; transferring wealth from the rich to the poor, in this case rich industrial nations to poor non-industrial nations.
After all of the current revelations showing that the theory of AGW is based on scientific corruption and greed and assuming that president Soetoro knew this but stood before Congress, the Supreme Court and the World in his first State of the Union Address in spite of evidence contrary to his opinion and declared that there is overwhelming scientific evidence that AGW is real, which he did, that act would make him an unapologetic Ideologue.
His demagoguery was blatant and so evident that he drew laughs from the Congress, Nancy Pelosi laughed, Joe Biden laughed and finally president Soetoro had to laugh himself at such a ridicules claim. Further proof that he is an Ideologue.
Given that he is an Ideologue then he will continue to defend this claim knowing that it is unbelievable and knowing that it is wrong. That is what Ideologues do! (see 14sec. video)
Note to Whitehouse spokesperson Robert Gibbs (another Ideologue); climate change as forwarded by a so-called consensus in the scientific community states that temperatures would rise to elevated levels off of the charts. Originally they did not promote any theory of Global cooling. (see 1:25min video)