Thursday, February 17, 2011

The Hot and Cold of the Global Warming Argument

According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become "a very rare and exciting event".

"Children just aren't going to know what snow is,"
—Charles Onians, The Independent
Can two completely contradictory things be the same? Is darkness and light the same? Is life and death the same?

And what do you call someone who would argue an issue from selective and anecdotal information while totally disregarding scientific evidence and other factual evidences because the evidence doesn’t support his or her already formulated conclusions?

Instead of continuing the back and forth of name calling of such a person as, biased, partisan, ignorant, Al Gore, Robert Kennedy, Jr., Barry Hussein Soetoro or Erza Klein I will not resort to such name calling. I will merely present evidence why Global warming, or its recent Orwellian Newspeak name “Climate Change,” is not caused anthropegenically.

First, I think that we can all agree that climate has always changed. It is therefore my contention that there is next to nothing that man can do to change climate or prevent climate from changing.

Recent evidence suggest that the heavy snowfalls which Europe and the United States are experiencing is not irregular in nature but quite normal though some are attempting to argue otherwise.

Some climate alarmists would have us believe that these storms are yet another baleful consequence of man-made CO2 emissions. In addition to the latest weather events, they also point to recent cyclones in Burma, last winter's fatal chills in Nepal and Bangladesh, December's blizzards in Britain, and every other drought, typhoon and unseasonable heat wave around the world.-- ANNE JOLIS (source)

Anne Jolis reports in the Wall Street Journal article, “The Weather isn’t Getting Weirder” that there is no evidence that there is an intensifying weather trend due to Global warming.

The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project is the latest attempt to find out, using super-computers to generate a dataset of global atmospheric circulation from 1871 to the present.

As it happens, the project's initial findings, published last month, show no evidence of an intensifying weather trend. "In the climate models, the extremes get more extreme as we move into a doubled CO2 world in 100 years," atmospheric scientist Gilbert Compo, one of the researchers on the project, tells me from his office at the University of Colorado, Boulder. "So we were surprised that none of the three major indices of climate variability that we used show a trend of increased circulation going back to 1871."

In other words, researchers have yet to find evidence of more-extreme weather patterns over the period, contrary to what the models predict. "There's no data-driven answer yet to the question of how human activity has affected extreme weather," adds Roger Pielke Jr., another University of Colorado climate researcher. –Anne Jolis

To the contrary Erza Klein writing for the Washington Post attempted to assure his readers that the recent snow storms in Washington D.C. and the rest of the country where in fact predicted by Climate Change scientist and where accounted for in the theory of Climate change in his article, “No, the snow does not disprove global warming.”

Klein cites a 2009 report by the U.S. Global Change Research Program, which used an unproven theory to explain how overall increased Global warming produces more precipitation in the atmosphere thereby producing greater oxymoronic Global warming snowstorms. (see article)

The only thing wrong with Mr. Klein’s selective citation is it does not explain how it contradicts and how it completely disregards the original hypothesis of Global warming by the originators of the theory of Global warming. The climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia, are the originators of the theory of Global warming and according to them as they stated in the year 2000, because of Global warming snow would be completely eliminated within a few years.

Global warming, the heating of the atmosphere by increased amounts of industrial gases, is now accepted as a reality by the international community. Average temperatures in Britain were nearly 0.6°C higher in the Nineties than in 1960-90, and it is estimated that they will increase by 0.2C every decade over the coming century. Eight of the 10 hottest years on record occurred in the Nineties.

However, the warming is so far manifesting itself more in winters, which are less cold than in much hotter summers. According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become "a very rare and exciting event".

"Children just aren't going to know what snow is," he said. –Charles Onians

Incidentally, Mr. Onians article pronounced snowfalls as things of the past. (see article)

So which is it? According to the originators of the theory of Global warming, winters should have gotten increasingly less colder starting at least seven years ago as the planet got progressively warmer. So the contradiction that we now face is does Global warming eliminate snow or does it’s pseudonym Climate Change create snow?

My thinking is this, after The climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia was exposed as fraudulent in its claims and proofs regarding Anthropogenic Global warming it is hard to imagine that any reputable person would still irrationally support the tainted science of Global warming. What is fascinating is it doesn’t seem to bother our former Vice-president, or our current president or even a reporter for the Washington Post who all continue in their support of this fraudulent science.

Moreover who can forget how environmental attorney Robert Kennedy, Jr. excoriated people who did not agree with him that Global warming was, in his mind, causing less snowfall in Washington D.C. in 2008.

With tawdry language, Kennedy berated Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, John Stossel, Sen. Jim Inhofe, Sen. John Cain and Gov. Sara Palin for not believing as he believed, in the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming. And he falsely accusing them of being shills for the Mobil-Exxon corporation.(see article)

In all, proponents of the debunked theory of anthropogenic C02 induced Global warming have done more to hurt modern science and education than the harm they claim teaching Creationism might do.

Yet in spite of the snow and other scientific evidences that the theory of anthropogenic Global warming or its new name, Climate Change are false and disproved Global warming alarmist persist with their false claims.

To the Global warming alarmist snow equals heat, lack of storms equals increase of storms, increases in polar bear populations means that polar bears are dying due to Global warming and round earth is flat earth.

What is more, they persist in teach these Global warming fallacies to your children as facts.

No comments:

Post a Comment