Monday, February 14, 2011

A Message to the SCOTUS: Stop Avoiding the Eligibility Issue

A veteran attorney who has pursued a lawsuit challenging Barack Obama's presidential eligibility since he was elected is telling the U.S. Supreme Court that if its members continue to "avoid" the dispute they effectively will "destroy the constitutional rule of law basis of our legal system." –Bob Unruh, Worldnetdaily
It is the 3,000 lb gorilla in the middle of American politics. Is Barry Hussein Soetoro eligible to be president of the United States of America? And if he isn’t, why is everyone who has a sworn duty to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States allowing an illegitimate Usurper to continue his personal quest to undermine the fundamental principles of a Constitution-based federal republic form of government rather than protect the constitution, which is their sworn oath to do? (see story)

What is absolutely true and in the words of former President Clinton’s U.S. counter terrorism official Richard Clarke. Our government has failed us. Moreover, it is continuing to fail us on the must import constitutional question to come about in the history of the United States of America. Is Barry Hussein Soetoro Constitutionally qualified to be Commander-in-Chief of this nation?

It is on this question, which the fate of our nation turns. This question will determine whether we will continue on as a Constructional-based federal republic or whether we will devolve into something, which exists only in the mind of a man and his likes that have obvious penis envy of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Trotsky.

Media, Senators, Congressmen and Congresswomen, Judges and Justices all have played along with and are complicit in capitulating to one man’s and one Party’s assault on the very framework which distinguishes this nation from Communists, Socialists, Religious and Banana Republic disasters that consider themselves governments.

May I remind you that this nation, a constitutional republic, is a state where the head of state and other officials are representatives of the people and must govern according to existing constitutional law that limits the government's power over all of its citizens. And this is a good thing.

The fact that a constitution exists that limits the government's power makes the state constitutional. That the head(s) of state and other officials are chosen by election, rather than inheriting their positions, and that their decisions are subject to judicial review makes a state republican.—Wikipedia (source)

When a man or Oligarchy chooses to work outside of or above the constitutional charter this is a bad thing. This is the very thing that is alleged of Barry Hussein Soetoro regarding his failure to clear up the questions concerning his eligibility or lack thereof.

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.—Article 2 Section1, U.S. Constitution

This is also the case if the surrounding powers, the Legislative and the Judiciary, branches that are both aware of a possible gross Constitutional violation, but chose to ignore the constitutional violation on grounds that it is much too uncomfortable to deal with.

It is no secret that this president holds the constitution in contempt. He views it as a Negative restrictive antiquated document that is against tyrannical government. (hear 1:45min audio)

Negative Constitution

As radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the constitution.

At least it’s been interpreted and the Warren Court interpreted it in the same way that—that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, says what the states can’t do to you, says what the federal government can’t do to you but it doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.

And that hasn’t shifted.–Barry Hussein Soetoro

President Soetoro has said that the Constitution is flawed and everything that he is doing indicates that he and his presidency are engaged in changing what he believes are the constitution’s flawed orientation of “negative liberties.” Soetoro wishes to change what he considers negative into that of “Positive Subjugation” of your thoughts and your actions. (see 1:29min video)

This president believes that the Constitution can be interpreted many ways. As a result, he is in the process of stacking the court with politicos who will interpret the constitution in-line with his beliefs rather than the principle of considering the Founders' intent. (see :21sec video)

It is also true that this president holds the present Conservatives on the Supreme Court and its current 5 to 4 Conservative make-up in contempt. It is my personal belief that he has already co-opted a major Conservative on the Court thereby almost ensuring that the court will not hear any eligibility questions until a Conservative president appoints a true Conservative to replace any liberal or compromised Conservative. (see 2:09 min video)

Soetoro shows contempt for Supreme Court Justices

We must know whether Chief Justice Roberts and the Supremes are still committed to the principle of considering the Founders' intent when ruling on constitutional issues. Or we must know whether they share the president’s views that the founders and the document, which they passed on to us, are flawed and outdated.

Thereby giving certain citizens the right to disregard all or part of the constitution as this president has chosen to do regarding immigration laws, violating person sovereignty and rights by unconstitutional attempting to force Americans to buy healthcare and by disregarding Article 2 section 1 of the eligibility cause of the Constitution.

If the Supreme Court continues to avoid the eligibility issue, they will be responsible for an Egypt like response to what people will perceive as a totally corrupt government.


  1. Anonymous1:09 PM

    The whole birther nonsense is stupid and a distraction from real issues. Birthers are the 9/11 truthers of the conservative movement, an embarrassment best kept in the closet.

  2. Anon,
    Thank you for your opinion. However there are Tens of Thousands of Americans that believe that nothing is more important than the rule of law and up holding our constitution.

    The fact that you find those things unimportant doesn't make them any least important for Americans to ensure that no one attempts to be above the law or the constitution.

    If it is determined that Democrats and Liberals deliberately violated the constitution how will you feel?

  3. Anonymous8:07 AM

    I would hope there are more than tens of thousands of Americans that believe in our Constitution.

    But being a birther has nothing to do with the Constitution and everything to do with paranoid schizophrenia and wild conspiracy theories. The whole birth certificate thing belongs in the same basket as the 9/11 truth movement, UFO conspiracies, gold fringed flag nonsense, and Holocaust denial. I believe the birther movement is secretly funded by Obama and the Democrats to make conservatives look nuts.

    Obama should lose reelection because he is a bad president, not because of some fringe lunacy about Kenyan birth that do not pass the laugh test.

  4. Anon,
    Your contempt for the American people notwithstanding, Soetoro will not be re-elect because he chooses not to be. His choice to withhold all information about his past which includes his birth certificate will be enough to end his political career.

    The fact that he's a bad president is icing on the cake.