"Everybody in politics lies, but they do it with such ease it's troubling," – David Geffen, Hollywood mogul and former Clinton backer(in reference to the Clintons)One would think that after almost eight solid years of, “Bush lied and people died” Democrats would run not walk away from the legacy of lies which has became Democrat politics. In 2000 America rejected the lies of Al Gore, in 2004 America said no to the nuanced deceptions of John Kerry.
So for the Democrats to even be considering offering the name that stands for admitted and convicted liar, “Clinton” again is as offensive to non-Democrats as Hillary Clinton’s finger nails on the chalkboard laugh that she displayed on Fox News with Chris Wallace.
It has occurred to me that Democrats and Muslims have something in common. And just what do they have in common?
The disturbing but god awful answer is they are both compelled to lie. Muslims are compelled by their religious text the Quran and the Hadith to lie to non-Muslims and Democrats are compelled by their hugely unpopular social agendas and political ambitions to lie to political opponents as well as to lie about their political opponents. (They also lie about non-Democrats or anyone who is in the way of whatever political agenda or the political candidate Democrats are hawking at the time.)
In Islam there are two forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, taqiyya and kitman. One of those circumstances is to gain the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.Democrats also have two reasons for lying one to gain power and the second to keep power. Both of these reasons are used to justify Democrat’s lying, the method of choice which Democrats rely on heavily to defeat their political opponents.
After a Democrat President who admitted that he lied under oath, and as a result of Democrats lost the White house, one would think that Democrats would have learned from the errors of William Jefferson Clinton’s ways.
But no instead of changing to the contrary Democrats embraced lying as an ever evolving campaign strategy one which became more nuanced with the telling of each new lie, a political ploy for Democrat Presidential hopefuls and Congressional leaders.
Al Gore’s frivolous claim in a March 9, 1999, CNN interview, “During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet.” The truth was the Internet is an outgrowth of a Pentagon program established in 1969. In the 1980s, Gore supported legislation considered favorable to the Internet’s development. Gore’s 1980 support can hardly be described as initiative is was more like jumping on a moving train but this is but one example of a very long list of Gore lies.
Senator John Kerry lied that he couldn’t release his Military journal due to an agreement with Brinkley, which Brinkley refuted. The media did not press Kerry to release his journal.
Kerry has refused to open his military records to the public, as promised by him, only releasing them – and there’s doubt whether they’re complete – to the Boston Globe, L.A. Times and AP, the first two of which the inside his campaign Newsweek reporters observed were acting as a conduit for the Kerry campaign during its August 2004 efforts to counter the opposition of Vietnam Veterans. As the leading investigative reporter into Kerry’s claims, Thomas Lipscomb, wrote:
‘The strange case of the John Kerry military records, which he had promised to release publicly, is that three great news organizations conspired to withhold them from the public. Not only did Kerry not make his military records public as promised, but three of the largest news organizations in the world gave him protective coloration by withholding them. All the public received were summaries in the opinions of the three news organizations, which had already shown an appalling inability to analyze the Kerry military records.’
But now it has come full circle and for Democrats to attempt to reinstate the Clintons in the White house is like the criminal behavior that always returns to the scene of the crime.
Amazingly, Democrats do this straight faced as they speak of needing a change in Washington. Like exchanging dirty socks for the unwashed ones you wore yesterday (yes technically it is change and it can even be argued successfully as change in a court of law) everyone who is in smelling distance knows that wearing the unwashed socks from yesterday is not idea change.
Democrat’s current offering of their first choice for President of the United States Senator Hillary Clinton is hardly a change neither. But as usual Democrats are hoping that you are fooled and won’t notice that they are offering unwashed socks from yesterday, the unrepentant admitted and convicted liars former President Clinton and his former first lady Hillary.
The Clintons have pickup up where they’ve left off lying about who is funding their political campaign and receiving campaign financing from foreign interest, interests what wish to influence American politics which is felonious. (See below)
This is an on going phenomenon with the Clintons yet the partisans who support them apparently have no problem supporting the illegality and subsequent lying that is involved in keeping the Clintons well funded. (See below)
Finally, when asked by Chris Wallace why Senator Clinton and her husband were so “ultra-partisan” Senator Clinton laughed as if the answer was so obvious that even the vast right-wing conspiracy as represented by Fox News should know the answer.
Its lies, deceptions and laughs Chris the same old Democrat socks just a different day!
