Sin that's desperately seeking to be a Civil Right

Article 1 Section 7.5 of the California Constitution Upheld
Article 1 Section 7.5 of the California constitution states that "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." (see story)
This amendment was voted on and passed by the people of California and confirmed by the California State Supreme Court on Tuesday May 26, 2009 it is the law.

But nothing is enough for homosexuals short of getting what they want no matter what. And in the process homosexuals have disrespected the California voters by successfully overturning a perfectly valid ballot initiative, proposition 22 which defined marriage for California. Now homosexuals are disrespecting the Courts by protesting the California Supreme Court’s decision which ruled that the arguments which homosexuals brought against Article 1 Section 7.5 where fallacious arguments.



According to the bible and all major religions homosexuality is a sin but this it is no ordinary sin. No this is the only sin that has prominent attorneys defending it, state legislatures supporting it and courts protecting it.

None of the other sins; lying, adultery, stealing, lust, gluttony, greed, sloth, wrath, envy and pride have advocacy groups. The only one that does is homosexuality.

There should be no question in the church that homosexuality has established itself specifically as the paramount threat to the church in the 21st century and a threat to the world society in general.

And in the likeness of true Devil’s advocates former U.S. Solicitor General Theodore B. Olson and David Boies, who represented opposing sides in the 2000 Bush v. Gore election challenge, announced they have filed a lawsuit in federal court on behalf of two gay men and two gay women. Sin has never been so well represented.

Even so there is disagreement among homosexuals on how best to proceed.

The American Civil Liberties Union, Lambda Legal and other national organizations issued a statement saying they think the U.S. Supreme Court is not ready to rule in their favor on the issue of homosexual marriages.

“In our view, the best way to win marriage equality nationally is to continue working state by state, not to bring premature federal challenges that pose a very high risk of setting a negative U.S. Supreme Court precedent,” said Shannon Minter, legal director of National Center for Lesbian Rights. (see source)

What? What is this court watching for the right judges or the right time to bring a suit? And homosexuals even have a plan to work state by state through state legislatures and state courts this sounds like a well orchestrated and insidious national plan to infiltrate the social with homosexuality.

So what is the church’s plan to oppose this onslaught of immorality and perversion? The Church has none. Does the Church honestly think that doing nothing or continuing to act reactionarily will be enough to protect itself from the increased hostility it faces from homosexuals.

Who can forget the attacks against churches and synagogues when proposition 8 passed in California last year. Churches must realize that homosexuals will continue their assault against the church therefore there must be some proactive action from the church. If not homosexuals will turn sin into a civil right while at the same time they will turn the first amendment's constitutionally guaranteed right of religion into a crime.

Homosexuality is sin according to the major religions of Christianity, Judaism and Islam. The people of California knew that and voted yes on proposition 8 in spite of the millions of dollars that went into defeating prop 8 by homosexuals.

Homosexuals and their advocates have been brainwashing our children in public schools for decades now and this must stop.

No matter how homosexuals attempt to dress it up, homosexuality is Sin and the perversion that they call same-sex marriage is an abomination to humankind.

Homosexuals have declared war on normalcy and if the Church and Conservative values people continue in their pre 9/11 mentality homosexuals will successfully and completely corrupt our entire society.

The Church must be proactive in the culture war which they find themselves in, through no fault of their own. Nonetheless organizing, planning and getting involved in the society to a greater extent is the only way to address and successful thwart the national ambitions of homosexuals who intend to remake the nation into their own image.

Dr. King would not vote to confirm Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court

Judge Sonia Sotomayor

I look forward confidently to the day when all who work for a living will be one with no thought to their separateness as Negroes, Jews, Italians or any other distinctions.

This will be the day when we bring into full realization the American dream -- a dream yet unfulfilled. A dream of equality of opportunity, of privilege and property widely distributed; a dream of a land where men will not take necessities from the many to give luxuries to the few; a dream of a land where men will not argue that the color of a man's skin determines the content of his character;-- Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. –Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., I have a dream speech

Sonia Sotomayor is the very antithesis of what Dr. King lived and fought for. Dr. King fought for a color blind society one which character and ability would be the prerequisites of accomplishments for all Americans. It is because of Dr. King and people like him that a Sonia Sotomayor had the opportunity to succeed.

Yet in spite of Dr. King’s dream Barack Hussien Obama has presented Judge Sonia Sotomayor based on her Race and her gender. Not exclusively but nonetheless these are the key factors he used to select her and these are the key factors he used to tell her story. Sotomayor is being present as a historical first, the first Latina to be nominated to the Supreme Court that presentation is based on her Race and her gender.

“Judge Sotomayor is a liberal activist of the first order who thinks her own personal political agenda is more important than the law as written, [s]he thinks that judges should dictate policy and that one’s sex, race and ethnicity ought to affect the decisions one renders from the bench.”--Wendy E. Long, counsel to the Judicial Confirmation Network (see source)

In addition to that Sotomayor’s judiciary record is replete with using her personal race and gender to decide issues which have come before her. She has even stated on the record that this is her judicial philosophy she said:

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life,”—Sonia Sotomayor

That is an absolute racist statement, as racist as that of Bull Connor vintage. Conner the Racial Segregationist of Birmingham, Alabama who stated at the height of the civil rights battle, “ I say segregation today, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever!”

Sotomayor’s judicial rulings are institutionalizing her own brand of legal segregation, a new reversed segregation where minorities are favored and one in which whites are excluded and that’s reverse racism and that is what Sotomayor represents. One example of this is the case Ricci v. DeStefano.

Frank Ricci, a firefighter in New Haven , Conn. , worked hard, played by the rules, and earned a promotion to fire lieutenant. But the city denied him the promotion because he is not black. Ricci sued, along with 16 other whites and one Hispanic firefighter. After a 7-6, near-party-line vote by a federal Appeals Court to dismiss the lawsuit, the plaintiffs petitioned for Supreme Court review.

Ricci studied for eight to 13 hours a day to prepare for the combined written and oral exam in 2003 that he hoped would win him a promotion. He spent more than $1,000 buying the books that the city had suggested as homework and paying an acquaintance to read them onto audiotapes. (Ricci is dyslexic and learns better by listening.) And he got one of the highest scores.

But Ricci and other would-be lieutenants and captains with high scores did not get the promotions they expected. The reason was that -- because not enough black firefighters had done well enough to be eligible -- New Haven decided to discard the test results and make no promotions at all. (see source)

Sotomayor voted along with her partisan Liberals on the Federal Appeal Court denying White firefighters their civil rights based on no other fact than they were White.

This is not what Dr. King would have wanted. Yet Sotomayor and Barack Obama both have taken the advantages of the civil rights work that Dr. King made available to them and turned those advantages plus Dr. King’s work, into weapons to use against White people. That is reverse Racism!

“Personal experiences affect the facts that judges choose to see, [m]y hope is that I will take the good from my experiences and extrapolate them further into areas with which I am unfamiliar.

I simply do not know exactly what that difference will be in my judging. But I accept there will be some based on my gender and my Latina heritage.”--Judge Sotomayor 2001, lecture titled “A Latina Judge’s Voice.” (source)

Sonia Sotomayor does not possess the judicial temperament or the intelligence, according to people who know her, to be a Supreme Court Justice she is a judicial bully and is not fit to serve on the highest court of the land.

Sotomayor can be tough on lawyers, according to those interviewed. "She is a terror on the bench." "She is very outspoken." "She can be difficult." "She is temperamental and excitable. She seems angry." "She is overly aggressive--not very judicial.

She does not have a very good temperament." "She abuses lawyers." "She really lacks judicial temperament. She behaves in an out of control manner. She makes inappropriate outbursts." "She is nasty to lawyers. She doesn't understand their role in the system--as adversaries who have to argue one side or the other. She will attack lawyers for making an argument she does not like."-- Jeffrey Rosen, More Sotomayor, quoting Sotomayor's entry in the Almanac of the Federal Judiciary (see source)

Sotomayor is a Radical Liberal Racist Feminism who wears her race, gender and hatred of White people on her sleeve. For these reasons Republicans should filibuster the Sotomayor nomination. Sonia Sotomayor is unfit to sit on the Supreme Court.

Dr. King did not die so that minorities could reverse and advance Racism and Racial hatred against White people. Mr. Obama and Ms. Sotomayor should take note of that!

No Mr. Dionne Not Third Way this is Orwellian

E.J. Dionne

Bill Clinton tried to create a Third Way. President Obama is doing it. This is exciting, but also disconcerting.—E.J. Dionne

Liberals are obsessed with contradiction. I’m convinced that in order to be a Liberal one must possess the ability to suspend reality and replace it with some polar opposite to the truth, a flight over Bosnia or a Third Way if you will, which is a political philosophy that President Clinton was a disciple of.

According to Wikipedia The Third Way is a term that has been used to describe a political position which attempts to transcend left-wing and right-wing politics by advocating a mix of some left-wing and right-wing policies. Third Way approaches are commonly viewed as representing a centrist compromise between capitalism and socialism, or between market liberalism and democratic socialism.

This was what Bill Clinton was attempting to do with his trademark tactic of triangulation which was capturing the opponents’ best arguments and ideas then using those arguments or ideas as one’s own.

That is not what Barack Hussein Obama is doing and E.J. Dionne has got it all wrong in his article Obama and the limits of mastery. (see editorial)

Dionne contradictorily attempts to commend and condemn Obama at the same time for what he misinterprets as Obama using Clintonest techniques. Bill Clinton was a Centrist by definition by contrast Barack Hussein Obama is a radical Left-wing demagogue who is not looking for a Clintonest Third Way Obama is looking to fundamentally change America by Obama’s own words. Dionne is not even close on this one.

Dionne’s Liberalism is showing and it is absolutely confounding. It is perplexing how an individual can witness the actions of last 100 plus days and describe them as Obama building a new and enduring political establishment located slightly to the left of center. One doesn’t exclude Republicans or the far right as Dionne mischaracterizes them and land slightly left of center. If Dionne doesn’t see that then he is blinded by his own far left bias’.

Over the last week, the true nature of Obama's political project has come into much clearer view. He is out to build a new and enduring political establishment, located slightly to the left of center but including everyone except the far right.—E.J. Dionne

Dionne’s Ode to the “Liberal establishment,” and his slight displeasure at the bifurcated messaging that the Obama administration uses to manipulate the press to get its propaganda out, propaganda which the Obama administration uses to build, according to Dionne, its new and enduring political establishment are demonstrative of Dionne’s subjective partisanship.

Last Thursday afternoon, for example, the White House invited in journalists, mostly opinion writers, to sell them on the substance of the president's big speech on Guantanamo and the treatment of detainees.

Unbeknown to the writers until afterward, they had been divided into two groups, one more centrist with a sprinkling of moderate conservatives, the other more liberal. (I was in the liberal group.) The president made an unscheduled appearance at each briefing. As is his way, he charmed both groups.

The idea, as far as I can determine, was to sell the liberal group on those aspects of Obama's plan that are a break from George W. Bush's policies, and to sell the centrist group on the toughness of the president's approach and the fact that it squares with Bush's more moderate moves later in his second term.—E.J. Dionne

What Dionne just described is an Orwellian phenomenon known as doublethink which apparently Mr. Obama and Liberals engage in. For example, Eber-Liberal Reporter Elenor Cliff engages in double think all of the time. (see previous post) Double think as described in the George Orwell book 1984 by Winston Smith the novel's protagonist, described doublethink in this fashion:

"To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself. That was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word 'doublethink' involved the use of doublethink.' (see source)

Doublethink is the only way that Liberals of the Obama administration could justify holding two press conferences, tell each group different propaganda points while feeling no ambiguity or confliction about it at all. Doublethink is the only way that E.J. Dionne could see that the Obama administration's manipulating people and events through propaganda as good.

Dionne concludes that the ends justify the means in that he believes that the changes that Mr. Obama is attempting to affect are good for the country. Dionne’s only concern is that the Obama administration shouldn’t get too confident in their ability to manipulate people and events or too certain of their own moral righteousness.

So to Liberals using Orwellian language to manipulate people and events is acceptable.

Unbelievable! Fascism is just off stage waiting in the wings America. But sadly its subjective journalism by Liberal journalists like E.J. Dionne that will aide Fascism come through a Fascist dictator to take control over America.

It’s happening right before our eyes.

California Here We Come!

SCULLY: You know the numbers, $1.7 trillion debt, a national deficit of $11 trillion. At what point do we run out of money?

OBAMA: Well, we are out of money now.

Nobody will dispute the fact that California’s economy is in a mess and if you know anything about how American politics work you know that it is the State Assembly of California which controls California’s budget not its Governor. That is the case for all state and federal levels of government. It is State Assemblies or Congresses that controls State budgets. Now in California case Democrats have been in control of the State budget for decades ergo California’s decline from the Golden state to the folding state, as the state folds under years and years of additional state programs and additional cost which is symptomatic of what Democrats who are fiscally liberal do with the purse strings of a governmental budget.

We all witnessed the California Legislature’s desperate attempt to put up six ballot initiatives, 1A-1F in order to pass their mismanagement onto the backs of the tax payers of California but they were met with a resounding “NO” on all propositions except the one which tied legislator’s pay with a constitution mandate to submit a timely yearly balanced budget to the Governor which the California legislature has failed to do for years.

Even so, when Barack Hussein Obama was asked in a recent C-Span interview with Steve Scully of C-Span about California’s plight Mr. Obama remarked: “I think that what you're seeing in states is that anytime you got a severe recession like this, as I said before, their demands on services are higher. So, they are sending more money out. At the same time, they're bringing less tax revenue in. And that's a painful adjustment…” (see transcript)

Translation please: Let’s see more and more services, spending more and more money while eroding their tax base by driving business out of the state or causing businesses to fold under egregious tax burdens, liabilities and regulations is what Mr. Obama is saying happened to California.

But alas, California is not alone, no in fact California here we come. That is, here comes the rest of the Federal government because when Mr. Scully asked Mr. Obama when did he think the U.S. government would run out of money with all of the new reforms and spending placed on it by his administration and the Democrat controlled Congress Mr. Obama straightforwardly declared that the United States government is already insolvent and we are already out of money! (see 28sec. video and please excuse poor video quality)



That’s correct Americans your President has declared America, your Country insolvent! We’re out of money but that didn’t stop the Democrats from pushing through trillions of dollars of pork spending which they and Obama renamed stimulus. And that isn’t stopping Al Gore and Henry Waxman from attempt to put through Climate Change legislation that will further destroy our economy. (see story)

In Addition to that, the lack of money won’t stop the Health Care reforms that the Obama administration is going to implement. But don’t sit around waiting for the gold plated Congressional Health care that you were promised when Democrats were campaigning for the presidency, no, what you will end up with if this legislation comes to pass is the DMV version of Health care, long lines and a poorly managed federal system.

Following is the almost 33minute interview with Steve Scully in which about 13 minutes in Mr. Obama discloses to the American people that America is broke. (see 32:27min. video)



So allow me to ask, is this any way for an insolvent government to be acting, that is, spending money that we don’t have for partisan political objectives which are meant to keep the ones who wrecked the government in the first place, in power?

And don’t you buy for one second that it wasn’t Obama and the Democrats that wrecked this economy. No matter how much he and his fellow Democrats attempt to blame the Bush administration they’ve got a very large problem in selling that old dried out lie to the American people which is, it is Congress that controls the purse strings of the budget and when this economy went careening out of control Democrats were in control of both House of Congress for two years and Barack Obama was in the Senate voting for all of the measures that sent us spiraling in to fiscal chaos. Even if he claims that it wasn’t him. (see story)

Like an earthquake along the San Andreas fault a Democrat controlled State assembly as sent California falling off into the fiscal Pacific Ocean soon to the joined in the watery world of socialism by the rest of the Nation led by Barack Obama and a Democrat controlled Congress.

The CIA are Liars

Embattled Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi

Earlier this month, Pelosi told reporters that she had not been told that waterboarding had been used against terrorism suspects, even though it had been. When asked whether she was accusing the CIA of lying to her, she said "yes."--Associated Press (see source)

I have that on the best authority! So there is talk about instituting a truth commission, good! I say the very first task of that commission should be to investigate who in the CIA lied and misled Congress. I think that we should follow this no matter were it leads us and if it’s all the way to the top echelons of government will so be it.

We can’t just have charges of government corruption hanging about and just move on. If the CIA is lying or has lied to Congress these are criminal acts and must be investigated immediately.

Ms. Pelosi says that she stands by her statements that the CIA misled and lied to Congress so something must and should be done about it. (see 1:23min video)


What? Does Pelosi think that everyone can just resume their lives and act as if these claims were never made? No way! If the CIA misled and lied to Congress and if this has been a continual occurrence as Ms. Pelosi claimed then the people responsible should be held accountable.

What is going on with the political elitist in Washington D.C., why is it that no one wants to be held accountable for their actions? Several weeks ago Alren Specter abandoned the Republican Party because he felt that it was beneath him to answer to his Republican constituents for his anti-Republican behavior. Specter said in so many words that his political career was much to important than to have his fate decided by the lowly Republican electorate in some lowly Republican primary and so he bolted to the Democrat Party to avoid any accountability for his actions.

I have traveled the State, talked to Republican leaders and office-holders and my supporters and I have carefully examined public opinion. It has become clear to me that the stimulus vote caused a schism which makes our differences irreconcilable.

On this state of the record, I am unwilling to have my twenty-nine year Senate record judged by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate.
Not prepared to have that record decided by that jury, the Pennsylvania Republican electorate.—Alren Specter

Likewise last week the Speaker of the House claimed that the CIA lied to her and in addition the CIA has an ongoing practice of misleading Congress. These are serious charges and if true could jeopardize America’s national security.

Creating Orwellian Worldview calls for an immediate investigation of Ms. Pelosi’s allegations and if they are found true persons who perpetrated such acts must be appropriately charged and convicted in a court of law.

We can’t simply move on. This matter is crucial to the security of our nation. If the CIA are liars and have been misleading Congress as Ms. Pelosi claimed then maybe they’ve been lying to the White House too.

And if so maybe it was corrupted CIA Intel that the White House based its decision to go to war with Iraq on (weapon of mass destruction et. al.) If all of the above is true then Ms. Pelosi has done this Nation a service for exposing the CIA as liars.

No we can not just simply move on, we must first stop this agency from undermining our government and then convict all of those in the CIA who had a part in this treasonous enterprise of lying to the White House and to Congress.

The American people should not allow this matter to rest until we receive a full accounting of CIA activities regarding these charges.

This should be the first case for the truth commission that Ms. Pelosi has advocated and apparently is fond of.

Tell that to Democrats Mr. Obama

In what the media has described as “a major rebuke” and “a potentially serious setback” to President Barack Obama, the US Senate voted 90-6 to withhold funds the White House had requested for shutting down the Guantánamo Bay prison camp at the US military base in Cuba. [… ] Only six Democrats voted in favor of the funding. The vote followed a similar action by the US House of Representatives last week. -- Tom Eley

Question which political Party controls the White House, both houses of Congress and can do whatever they want because their political opponents do not have sufficient numbers to stop them? That’s right the Democrat Party.

So when Barack Hussein Obama spoke yesterday regarding the shutting down of Guantánamo Bay prison camp who was he speaking to? Surely he wasn’t attempting to convince Republicans because Republicans can’t stop him and his fellow Democrats from doing anything that they want to do. Democrats could pass a bill into law requiring the American people to register with the government if they attend church more than twice in one month and Republicans couldn’t stop it because Republicans don’t have the numbers in Congress to stop them.

So why was Obama justifying his executive order to close Guantánamo prison yesterday and to whom was he justifying the closure too? On January 22, just after his inauguration, Obama issued an arbitrary executive order to close the Guantánamo prison within one year without any kind of plan of what to do with the enemy combatants contained there.

To this day Mr. Obama still doesn’t have a closure plan for Guantánamo so the Democrats in the House of Representative and the Senate withheld money that Obama requested for the closure of Guantánamo. Apparently Democrats are afraid that the inexperienced Obama might release terrorists inside of the United States. (see here and here) (see 26sec. video)



You see this is a Democrat pissing contest. This has nothing to do with Republicans or the Bush administration though Obama, as he always does, attempted to blame the Bush administration. Following is an excerpt of Obama’s justification in which he responds to the fears of his fellow Democrats regarding his determination to close the terrorist detainee camp and bring terrorists to U.S. soil and allow enemy combatants of an on-going war access to ACLU attorneys and a broken legal system that allowed him, a constitutionally ineligible person, to become president of the United States of America.

If the courts couldn’t protect the constitution from a usurper to the presidency of the United States of America how are the courts going to protect the American people from ACLU lawyered up terrorist? They aren’t! (see 2:32min video)



You see this is a Democrat fight. The most Liberal Senator in the U.S. Senate and now the most Liberal president that the United States has ever had is attempting to convince Moderate to Conservative Democrats to buy his argument that the Bush administration violated the rights of enemy combatants.

However, that is not the case, because we are at war. And nowhere in the annuals of human history does a nation at war release combatants who are captured on the battlefield during the war that they are currently fighting. When a war is over is the time when prisoner release is normally negotiated. And it is absolutely unheard of for a nation to grant an enemy combatant, someone that is sworn to destroy it, the same rights as it’s citizens by granting that enemy access to that nations resources, their attorneys and their court system while they are engaged at war with the combatant. Yet that is the preposterous argument that Obama is attempting to advance but even his own Party isn’t buying it.

Mr. Obama you closed Guantánamo for all the wrong reasons. You did it to show up the Bush administration but instead you’ve shown just how you politicize everything that you do.

Even Democrats agree Mr. Obama you had no plan you just capriciously ordered Gitmo closed without considering the impact of your decision. That kind of governing makes America less safe Mr. Obama.

What President Bush did made us safe for almost eight years. What you’re doing Mr. Obama makes America less safe. I only hope we don’t pay with American lives for your politicizing!

What’s next for Kali-forn-ya

Girlee-nator Arnold Schwarzenegger

Propositions 1A-1F, a Democrat controlled state Assembly and a RINO Governor’s attempt to push the job that they wouldn’t do on the people of California.

The California Assembly wouldn’t restrain spending. Therefore California’s out of control spending is but a forewarning of where national Democrats that control Congress are taking the rest of the nation. As California goes so goes the nation. (see story)

Yet surprisingly the Girlee-nator Arnold Schwarzenegger is a politician without a base. Schwarzenegger did an Arlen Specter on the Republicans of California his advisers told Arnie that to be a successful politician in the state of California one needed to be a Democrat so Arnold shook off Republicans like a bad B-movie and immediately went out and backed NO on proposition 8 and then he backed 6 propositions to increase the taxes on Californians.

Needless to say the Girlee-nator’s switch didn’t quite have the affect that he was hoping for. The people of California said Yes to proposition 8 and No to his tax increases. So much for Party desertion, I suggest that the next time that Arnie shares crib notes with the Lincoln Chafee fraction of the Republican Party he does it as a true Democrat not a Democrat wanna-be under a smoking tent.

What’s next for Kali-Forn-ya? Well it’s become pain-stakingly obvious that Democrats or Semi-Democrat Republicans are not going to fix what is wrong in California. No 1940 rethread Democrat ex-Governor Jerry Brown or no Democrat San Francisco Mayor and law breaker, Gavin Newsom is going to stop California spending.

What California needs is a real Republican Governor someone with no connections to the Kennedys, a Governor who will exercise real fiscal restraint at a time of fiscal crisis.

Finally what California needs is to vote out all Democrat State Assemblymen and women. Democrats have run the Golden State into the ground and if California is going to recover it will need to show the nation that it realizes that putting Democrats in control of government leads to egregious deficit spending.

In California’s case billions of dollars but in our Nations case Barack Obama and a Democrat controlled Congress have spent trillions in a matter of 100 days. Democrats have spent more than all U.S. Presidents combined and more that was spent in both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars under President Bush. Democrat sources have President Bush spending $940 billion for six years in both the wars and Katrina

“In just one month, the Democrats have spent more than President Bush spent in seven years on the war in Iraq, the war in Afghanistan and Hurricane Katrina combined.”—Mitch McConnell (R) on Friday, February 27th, 2009 in a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference

By comparison in the first 100 days of an Obama administration and Democrat controlled Congress they have spent $3.44 Trillion dollars! (see source)

What's next for California? Well if Californians wish to fix their problems they should opt for change! That would mean voting Democrats out and Republicans in

The Alchemy of Words

Doctor Barack Obama

What was it that Barack Obama was doing at Notre Dame? Was he there for a commence speech? Not according to the news media. According to the news media Obama was facing the difficult topic of abortion head on. (see story)

You see Liberals have discovered the science of transforming lead into gold. Give them your bolts of gold thread and they will weave you an invisible tapestry of whole cloth. It seems that Liberals make a lot of things out of whole cloth these days.

Homosexual marriage, the CIA lied and abortion all made out of whole cloth. The fact that these things are even a debate speaks to the nonsensical state in which we find our culture. A culture where a former religious Catholic College can come out to the world as a flaming Liberal College by inviting the most Liberal President in the history of the United States to speech at its 2009 commencement.

And then to further prove that they are down with the popular culture Notre Dame conferred an honorary degree on Obama like it had no more value than a tattoo. However like a tattoo Notre Dame and Barack Hussein Obama will be etched on each others lives forever.

What that means is these two names are now inextricably linked so if one or the other falters the other will be apart of that event. For example when Mr. Obama is found to be constitutionally ineligible to be president of the United States of America Notre Dame will be remembered as the Liberal College that conferred an honorary degree on him. Isn’t that special!

But I digress. Obama was at Notre Dame because he takes great pleasure at thumbing his nose at traditional values and Christianity (need I remind you of the National Day of Prayer?). It is Obama’s mantra that the United States is no longer a Christian nation. It is also Obama’s goal to fundamentally change the constitutional traditions of America he has said as much.

Therefore, Obama was at Notre Dame to help the University usher in a change for the University. A change from a religious University to one of a Secular Liberal University much in the same way that he sees the transformation of America from a religious society to that of a secular Liberal one. Notre Dame has been on this road for some time now. Inviting Obama was Notre Dame’s coming out of the closet they are no longer a religious institution Notre Dame is Secular Liberal College.

The University created no small controversy with its choice of Obama there were many arrest before the commencement as well as this protest during Obama’s speech. (see video)



The center of controversy is Mr. Obama’s support for abortion and the destruction of embryos for stem cell research two issues that are diametrically opposed to traditional Christianity. Following is 3mins of Mr. Obama’s speech where he attempts to create out of whole cloth a moral parity between people who are for the preservation of life and people who are for abortions. (see 3:40min video)



Following is the transcript of Obama’s Orwellian attempt to use language to change reality. You see with Obama is all about words. He attempts to use them like magical spells. This speech was about Obama superceding religion, superceding Catholicism, superceding tradition and superceding Notre Dame.

This speech was about superceding the arguments against abortion and meeting those challenges head on at Notre Dame. Obama’s intention for going and speaking there was simply to give moral parity to those who value life and those who feel they have the right to destroy it.

OBAMA TRANSLATED

…when we open up our hearts and our minds to those who may not think precisely like we do or believe precisely what we believe -- that's when we discover at least the possibility of common ground.

Of course this doesn’t apply to Liberals this is a one way invitation for those who are not Liberal to abandon their beliefs to see the good in abortions and abortionist.

That's when we begin to say, "Maybe we won't agree on abortion, but we can still agree that this heart-wrenching decision for any woman is not made casually, it has both moral and spiritual dimensions.

This is a Non Sequitur following a true statement. Obviously we don’t agree on killing babies. And Mr. Obama is wrong on one point every year this society gets more and more casual regarding abortion. Regarding his statement that abortion as a heart-wrenching decision, that’s true, but it means nothing if we fail to discuss why having an abortion is heart-wrenching. Abortion is heart-wrenching because it takes a life.

So let us work together to reduce the number of women seeking abortions, let's reduce unintended pregnancies. (Applause.) Let's make adoption more available. (Applause.) Let's provide care and support for women who do carry their children to term. (Applause.) Let's honor the conscience of those who disagree with abortion, and draft a sensible conscience clause, and make sure that all of our health care policies are grounded not only in sound science, but also in clear ethics, as well as respect for the equality of women." Those are things we can do. (Applause.)

Tucked neatly away in this bouquet of things we can agree with and do is a thorn. When Mr. Obama says …draft a sensible conscience clause what he is actually doing is throwing a bone to pro-lifers while coyly slipping in the fact that he will use science and the law to establish the right to federally funded and back abortions. Oh but he’ll add a sensible conscience clause just in case a woman should happen to disagree with abortion.

Now, understand -- understand, Class of 2009, I do not suggest that the debate surrounding abortion can or should go away. Because no matter how much we may want to fudge it -- indeed, while we know that the views of most Americans on the subject are complex and even contradictory -- the fact is that at some level, the views of the two camps are irreconcilable. Each side will continue to make its case to the public with passion and conviction. But surely we can do so without reducing those with differing views to caricature.

See Obama doesn’t want to open his mind and he really doesn’t want to find common ground he doesn’t even think that the debate can or should go away. And pro-lifers don’t want to fudge its only Obama and people who think like him who want to pretend that pro and con abortion arguments are both valid.

Open hearts. Open minds. Fair-minded words. It's a way of life that has always been the Notre Dame tradition. (Applause.) Father Hesburgh has long spoken of this institution as both a lighthouse and a crossroads. A lighthouse that stands apart, shining with the wisdom of the Catholic tradition, while the crossroads is where differences of culture and religion and conviction can co-exist with friendship, civility, hospitality, and especially love." And I want to join him and Father John in saying how inspired I am by the maturity and responsibility with which this class has approached the debate surrounding today's ceremony. You are an exemplar of what Notre Dame is about. (Applause.)

Here Obama blows smoke up the end of Notre Dame because they have invited the very antithesis of what they believe to speak to the graduating class of 2009. Obama knows that his presence there plus the degree that they conferred on him means that Notre Dame has already began to abandon the religious and traditional values that up until now has made the University one of the premiere Catholic Universities in the United States of America.

Obama is this generation’s symbol for secular social change. Notre Dame has embraced secular social change and has deserted its traditional religious Catholic moorings.

Or as those at Notre Dame would say, “We are ND!” Yeah but not Knute Rockne’s Notre Dame, one of tradition, no this is Barack Obama’s Notre Dame one of open minds about abortions and stem cell research.

Nice. Notre Dame has changed from one of the premiere Catholic Universities in the country into a run-of-the-mill secular liberal University. Like we don’t already have enough of them!

Notre Dame's Last Temptation of Obama

Protester arrest prior to Barack Obama's appearance at Notre Dame

"[Catholic institutions] should not honor those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles."-- Catholics in Political Life, statement approved by USCCB 2004

Notre Dame has sold its soul.
He is a man who boasts that America is no longer a Christian nation. Whenever he speaks at a Christian facility Christian are asked to cover their symbols of faith while his symbols are put up. (see story) (see previous post)

He is using the government to experiment with embryonic stem cells (a practice that destroys life now in order to possibly save it in the future), and he is using government funding to pay for abortions around the world. (see story)

He is the President of the United States of America who has not yet given proof that he is eligible to be President under Article II, U.S. Constitution which states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”

His birth certificate, College records and other documents that identify who he is, document that any of us would show to get a job, are under lock and key and have been since he began his political career. (see sourceand here)

In spite of all of the above the Administrators of Notre Dame surrendered their souls to the last temptation of Barack Hussein Obama on last Sunday and the name Notre Dame will forever be linked with the name Obama. They invited this icon of the world to speak to its graduates in its 2009 commencement address and in addition they conferred an honorary degree upon him. (see story)

And be not conformed to this world: but be you transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.—Romans 12:2 AKJV

Christian scripture recorded an instance where Jesus Christ was tempted of Satan while Christ was in the wilderness on a 40 day fast. Satan asked Christ to bow down and worship him. If Christ would pay such homage Satan would give Christ all of the kingdoms of the world.

Today receiving the kingdoms of the world is equivalent to being politically correct and being accepted by the world.

How best for Notre Dame to be hip and cool than to invite the hippest, coolest iconic symbol of the world OBAMA and bestow on him the blessings of the Catholic Church, an honorary degree from one of the most prestigious Catholic Universities in America!

That is exactly what the administrators of Notre Dame did in inviting Obama and in doing so many rank and file Catholics believe that this is the spiritual equivalent of putting a face piercing and a tattoo on the body of Christ. Sure it may look cool but is it really appropriate?

Anti-Christian forces in America have gotten a powerful ally in Barack Hussein Obama, a man who bows to Saudi Royalty yet he dismisses the National Day of Prayer in this country. Anti-Christian forces have and are depending on the continual silence of Christians while they advanced anti-Christian themes in the society.

As you know all that it takes for evil to prevail is for good men and women to do and say nothing. Yet even the Vatican remains silent on Notre Dame’s invitation to Obama. (see story)

That is completely astonishing because the Church has already had this controversy. In 2004 when the Church was debating Presidential contender John F. Kerry’s stated stance on abortion the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops issued a statement that neither Catholics nor Catholic Institutions should honor those who act in defiance of Catholic fundamental moral principles.

Obama’s overt stances on abortion, stem cell research and Christianity in America are not in keeping with the Church’s teachings and are in fact in defiance of the Churches teachings. To confer an honorary degree on Obama has aligned Notre Dame with the World while it shows unequivocally that Notre Dame has forsaken the teachings of the Church.

Obama represents a benchmark of choosing in all faucets of American life. Whether we will remain faithful to and choose that what we have been taught and know to be true or whether we will sell out our traditions to follow after what is popular.

Notre Dame chose the latter of the two.

"You are a baby killer," one man continued to yell, at which point the crowd broke into a deafening chant:"We are N.D."-- Carol E. Lee

They shouted back, "No, not him! Give us Barabbas!" Now Barabbas had taken part in a rebellion.—John 18:40 NIV

Obama attempted to frame the abortion and stem cell research controversies in his address as, we will just have to agree to disagree. Which means that Obama refuses to see abortion or destroying life via destroying stem cells as a violation of God's laws he only sees it as one of two opposing political opinions. Christians have their opinion and he and abortionist have theirs. That's called relativism.

During Obama's address a lone protest rose up, one man yelled,"You are a baby killer!" but the Notre Dame crowd would have none of it. Just as the Crowd shouted down Ponitus Pilot who offered to release Christ that Crowd demanded that a Revolutionist be released instead, this Notre Dame crowd drowned out the alone voice with the chant, "We are ND!"

It seems that Notre Dame wanted their abortionist just as those who opposed Christ wanted Barrabbas! But don't be fooled there was more than 1 protester! (see story)

Nancy Pelosi’s flight over Bosnia

Nancy Pelosi

So -- so let's get this straight. The Bush administration has conceived a policy, the CIA comes to the Congress, withholds information about the timing and the use of this subject.

They -- we later find out that it had been taking place before they even briefed us about the legal opinions and told us that they were not being used.
This is a tactic, a diversionary tactic to take the spotlight off of those who conceived, developed and implemented these policies, which all of us long opposed.

My action on it was further to say: We have to change the majority in Congress. We have to win the White House so that we can change it. –Nancy Pelosi

So let’s get this straight according to Democrat partisan and Uber-Liberal Nancy Pelosi on the topic of what she knew about waterboarding and when she knew it, it's all Bush’s fault because it was the president’s policy to illegally torture and in addition to that the CIA was complicit in it because it lied to Congress about this subject?

Do we have it now Ms. Pelosi?

And then there’s that little matter of why we're even speaking about this subject anyway. Ms. Pelosi claims that this is a tactic, a diversionary tactic to take the spotlight off of those who conceived, developed and implemented the policies of torture, which by the way she and Democrats has always opposed.

I was fighting the war in Iraq at that point, too, you know, saying to my members the intelligence does not support the imminent threat that they are conceding.—Nancy Pelosi

And what did Ms. Pelosi do about it? Well she’s not bragging or anything like that but after she fought the Iraq war she took control of Congress for Democrats and after that she put Democrat Barack Obama in the White House so that she could implement a truth commissions in order to stop the illegal practice of torture and bring the perpetrators of these human rights violations of the Bush administration to justice. (Why Pelosi's a legion in her own mind)

Sound quite remarkable doesn’t it? Almost as remarkable as then Sen. Hillary Clinton’s fantastic recollection of her own heroics in the skies over war torn Bosnia where Sen. Clinton’s plane took on sniper fire and when the Senator’s plane landed she had to hurry Chelsea to safety from the bullets flying everywhere you remember don’t you? In case you’ve forgotten Sen. Clinton had a camera crew aboard which captured for all posterity the accuracy of her memory of those events as well as captured Sen. Clinton’s heroics. (see 1:56min video)



Well unfortunately we don’t have a camera crew to verify the veracity of Congresswoman’s Pelosi’s heroic claims of fighting the Iraq war and capturing Congress and the White House for Demcrats. And we don't have footage covering whether or not she was briefed on waterboarding. But what we do have are the CIA documents and various witnesses that report that Ms. Pelosi was briefed regarding the technique of waterboarding in 2002.

These sources also report that Pelosi never so much as showed the slightest discomfort with the techniques nor did she complain about the techniques to any one, as did Congresswoman Jane Harman who wrote a letter of concern to CIA officials when she received the same CIA briefing on Enhanced Interrogation Techniques.

The sheer hypocrisy screams at us. Pelosi was down with waterboarding right after 9/11 when everyone else was. But when the acts at Guantanamo Bay brought torture into the forefront of the American lexicon Democrats found that they could use this subject to beat George Bush and Republicans about the head with so they, Pelosi included, began to back away from their original support of these techniques as well they threatened to prosecute the Bush administration for the very practices that Democrats were aware of and condoned.

This is why it is so important that Pelosi is able to say that she wasn’t briefed and that she knew absolutely nothing about the practice. You see, her calls to prosecute the Bush administration over these so called torture techniques would appear to be unreasonably partisan and they would be exposed as the hypocritical ploy that they are if it holds that she knew about waterboarding all along. It would seem even to the most partisan Democrat that she is simply lying and using waterboarding and the subject of torture as just another Democrat attempt to score political points.

The evidence from the CIA and Pelosi’s own contradictory statements are so compelling that an usually partisan and Democrat supportive media is asking enough questions that Pelosi’s story is ever evolving from a emphatic she wasn’t ever briefed about waterboarding period into a more unsure she was told about a briefing by someone who was briefed about the subject but that person did not tell her what the briefing was about. (yeah right!) (see here )

Following is a remarkable nineteen minute news briefing with question and answer session with the Congresswoman. In it Ms. Pelosi attempts to blame former president Bush the CIA and her incompetent staff for not briefing her and for outright lying or misleading her about waterboarding.

Which only begs the question, if Ms. Pelosi was so easily misled about the Iraq war and waterboarding by a President and his administration which she totally disrespected and apparently distrusted then what’s to say that she has ever gotten anything correct? (see transcript) (see 19:34 min video)



Never before has a public official been as busted as Hillary Clinton who bald faced lied about taking sniper fire over Bosnia. Come on Hillary we have the video. Now Nancy Pelosi wants to call the CIA liars and assert that this controversy is all some vast Right-wing conspiracy.

Well last I checked Congresswoman the Republicans are out of power and are in somewhat of a condition of disarray. It would be nice if they could pull something like this off but they would need mainstream media's support which is squarely in the Democrat’s camp.

No I’m thinking that you’ve been caught in a web of your own making Ms. Pelosi.

Ms. Pelosi you were for torture before you were against it. And now you’re simply considering prosecuting Bush aides with your so called independent truth commission for “the log that is in your own eye.” Ms. Pelosi, people are noticing your hypocrisy!

Not to mention that the story that you were never briefed regarding waterboarding has just as much credibility as Clinton’s sniper fire over Bosnia story. In fact that Bosnia lie may have just been what cost Clinton the Democrat nomination to be president.

Who knows what your little “tay da tay” with the CIA will cost you Ms. Pelosi!

Jon Stewart on Nancy Pelosi

Comedian Jon Stewart

Jon Stewart does in 3 minutes and 28 seconds what a full Congressional hearing on Enhanced Interrogation Techniques would not be able to do. Stewart shows Nancy Pelosi for the total liar and fraud that she is.

Democrats are just as responsible for waterboarding or any of the so called enhanced interrogation techniques approved by attorneys and officials of the Bush administration. (see video)

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart	M - Th 11p / 10c
Waffle House
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Economic Crisis Political Humor

Oh it is to laugh! Pelosi knew. They all knew! This sudden outrage against torture from Mr. Obama and Democrats and these calls for hearings and investigations are purely partisan post Bush bashing.

And of course Democrats are going to find people like former FBI agent Ali Soufan, who appeared Wednesday before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee investigating torture allegations. Soufan boosted Democrats’ claims that waterboarding and other harsh interrogation tactics didn’t work. (see story)

Soufan’s testimony, like former CIA Officer Mary McCarthy who leaked classified information to the media about existence of secret CIA prisons used by the Bush administration while she was yet in the service of the Bush administration, shows the constant undermining that Bush administration faced. These Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearings are but an extension of anti-Bush sentiment plus they are an attempt to discredit Bush policies even to the present day.

The bottom line is Democrats demanded to be treated as co-equals to the Bush presidency and President Bush acquiesced to accommodate their wishes. Democrats were briefed on all the major Bush decisions and Ms. Pelosi was briefed on waterboarding as she now confesses due to CIA records that prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that she was briefed as early as 2002.

A Democratic source acknowledged yesterday that it is almost certain that Pelosi would have learned about the use of waterboarding from Sheehy. Pelosi herself acknowledged in a December 2007 statement that she was aware that Harman had learned of the waterboarding and had objected in a letter to the CIA's top counsel.
"It was my understanding at that time that Congresswoman Harman filed a letter in early 2003 to the CIA to protest the use of such techniques, a protest with which I concurred," Pelosi said in the Dec. 9, 2007, statement.—Paul Kane (see source)

Congresswoman Jane Harman was also briefed, as Congresswoman Pelosi was, but unlike Pelosi who claims that she couldn’t do anything about what she knew, Harman wrote a letter in protest of the use of the techniques in 2003. At the very least Pelosi could have added her name to that letter it’s done all the time in Congress. However Pelosi didn’t even do that!

If Democrats go ahead to pursue Bush administration attorneys who gave legal advice regard the use of waterboarding and other information gathering techniques then every Senator and Congress man or woman who were briefed on these techniques but did or said nothing are equality at fault and should receive the same treatment as any former Bush aide.

And perhaps that is why Ms. Pelosi has gone to the extreme of looking like a total laughingstock in her denials and her downgraded partial denials stating that she knew nothing about enhances interrogation techniques being used by the CIA. Pelosi knew and she’s lying as Jon Stewart so aptly pointed on in 3minutes time!

Who made the Swine Flu? No, WHO made the Swine Flu!

Outrageous! Forget everything that you’re hearing about the so called Swine Flu it is not an influenza that originated in swine or any animal for that matter this is a genetically concocted “reassortant” virus that was made by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC and the World Health Organization WHO.

This is a hybrid virus made to order by the WHO and the CDC so that their “boy who cried wolf” scenarios for a worldwide pandemic could be realized.

Impossible you think, but it’s not. According to CIDRAP In 2004 the CDC launch experiments designed to combine the H5N1 virus or the avian influenza virus and human flu viruses to then see how the resulting hybrids affect animals. The goal was to assess the chances that such a "reassortant" virus will emerge and how dangerous it might be. —Alaphiah (see previous post)

I posted the above on April 28, 2009 and just recently Scientist Adrian Gibbs, 75, who collaborated on research that led to the development of Roche Holding AG’s Tamiflu drug, said in an television interview with Bloomberg news that he intends to publish a report suggesting the new strain may have accidentally evolved in eggs scientists use to grow viruses and drugmakers use to make vaccines. Gibbs said he came to his conclusion as part of an effort to trace the virus’s origins by analyzing its genetic blueprint. (see story) (see 6:56min.video)



Gibbs is careful not to say emphatically that this new Swine flu concoction is a man-made virus but as I originally reported this virus has many unusual and unnatural characteristics; it is a new “reassortant” virus (meaning that it is made up of a combination of H5N1 Avian flu virus strain, a human flu virus strain and the Swine flu virus strain), this virus has not yet been isolated to animals and this it is not a seasonal virus.

And on top off all of that, as I have written before, in 2004 the CDC launch experiments designed to combine the H5N1 virus or the avian influenza virus and human flu viruses to then see how the resulting hybrids affect animals. The goal was to assess the chances that such a "reassortant" virus will emerge and how dangerous it might be. (see source)

According to the same report the World Health Organization (WHO) was also "pleading" for laboratories to do the exact same research that the CDC was doing, if successful WHO could provide some evidence to back up the agency's warnings about the risk of a flu pandemic, according to the CP report.

But really, does anyone expect the WHO or the CDC to actually come out and take full responsibility? And if it is determined that either organization or both are the cause for this outbreak, believe me we will never know because they are the ones doing the investigating.

Unless there is some sort of independent scientific investigative body appointed and unless scientist like Adrian Gibbs are protected and supported the WHO and the CDC will remain unchecked and we may never know the truth about the origins of the Swine flu.

Anti-Carrie Prejean Forces TRUMPED

Miss California Carrie Prejean

They were like gathering maggots readying to feast on the carcass of freedom of speech. Yes, all of the usual offended suspects were hovering about like Africanized Killer Flies ready to lite on the pile of manure that they’ve created from politically correct speech and the protected Classism of the homosexual agenda.

Thrust at the center of this social harmonic convergence otherwise known as Barack Obama’s hope and change is Miss California, Carrie Prejean as she was vying for the title of Miss USA. (see story)

Ms. Prejean was asked the most patently transparent self-serving, agenda driven and political motivated question in the history of the Miss USA pageant. The infamous Perez Hilton question was meant to hoist the rainbow flag up to overshadow the Miss USA pageant by making Mr. Hilton’s sexual preference an issue thus helping to ushering in a new social harmonic convergence. In Hilton’s vblog right after the pageant he bragged that his question was the question that stole the entire show.

Hilton and his fellow homosexual activists have begun a blitz campaign to legalize homosexuality throughout the United States by courts and by state legislature. They are also attempting to convert the World via the United Nations; this is the coming social harmonic convergence.

Jose Arguelles define the planetary harmonic convergence as: “the point at which the counter-spin of history finally comes to a momentary halt, and the still imperceptible spin of post-history commences.”

The social harmonic convergence that homosexuals are attempting to usher in will be the end of traditional history and the beginning of a post historical world a world where truth and falsehood are indistinguishable one from the other.

What better place to fire off a salvo than the Miss USA pageant?

Since Barack Hussein Obama and the Super Majority controlled Democrat Congress are in power homosexuals feel that this is their time. They feel that this is their moment to force homosexuality on the unwilling Ninety-seven percent of the population that isn’t homosexual and as well they want to use the fascist arm of government to force homosexuality on those who would oppose them.

When Ms. California did not allow Perez Hilton to unfurl homosexuality in all of its ignominious glory onto the Miss USA pageant stage by a politically correct supportive response of, “Yes, all states should be like Vermont.”

Hilton began to launch a controversy that only seems to have backfired now. I’m quite sure that it was the equivalent of sure everybody’s doing it so why not, is undoubtedly the answer that Hilton wanted to hear. A bit of advice for Hilton if you don't want to hear the answer then don't ask the question!

But that was not the case. Ms. Prejean spoke from a tradition that is deeply rooted in the historical and cultural condition of the anthropological condition. However, because she did all of the usual offended suspects sprung into action to attempt to defame, demean and discredit her.

These Africanized Killer Flies went dumpster driving through the past life of Ms. Prejean and came up with a picture that they thought would be enough to tarnish the beauty’s witness and possibility strip her of the title Miss California. All for expressing an opinion that is shared by all of the annuals of human history the state of California , Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. That opinion simply is marriage is the uniting of a man and a woman. (see 57sec. video)




Thank God we are not England where there is no freedom of speech. If we were there, there might have been a different outcome.

Fortunately conditions have not yet devolved in the United States into the official banning of speech like that of Home Secretary Jacqui Smith’s Britain. Smith recently released a list of 16 people banned from the U.K. among them was American talk show host Michael Savage who was named among England’s undesirables.

"It's the same answer the president of the United States gave. It's the same answer many people gave. She gave an honorable answer. She gave an answer from her heart, and I think for that she has to be commended."—Donald Trump in support of Miss California’s keeping her title.

Donald Trump the owner of the Beauty franchise, Miss USA ruled yesterday that circumstances surrounding Miss California did not warrant relieving Prejean of her crown as many anti-Carrie Prejean forces were agitating for. (see 4:47min video)



Keeping Miss California was the right thing to do Mr. Trump you are to be commended for doing the right thing. Yet we live in a time that doing the right thing is not always a foregone conclusion. The anti-Carrie Prejean forces were “Trumped” for now. However this is only the beginning of the homosexual social harmonic convergence.

Look, the recent activities that you see in states like Iowa and Vermont, these things combined with the use of the Miss U.S.A. pageant by Hilton to promote the homosexual agenda are indicative of the fact that we are at the point at which the counter-spin of history finally comes to a momentary halt, and the still imperceptible spin of post-history commences.

This will surely happen if there are not more Carrie Prejeans who will stand for truth and speak truth to power. For truth is the ultimate eternal beauty. Carrie Prejean possesses this beauty what about you?

Pelosi: Lying works for Democrats

Embattled Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi

Three things are now clear about House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s recent comments about what she knew and when she knew it concerning the CIA’s use of Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EITs), including water-boarding:

First, it is no longer possible to doubt that Pelosi knew as of September 4, 2002 that the CIA included water-boarding among its tools for interrogating high-value terrorists like al Qaeda operative Abu Zubaydah.

Second, there are additional documents in CIA and congressional records that will remove any remaining doubt that Pelosi knew water-boarding and other EITs were being used and that further deadly terrorist attacks were thereby prevented from taking place in this country.

[Third], the vast majority of Americans know the nation must first be preserved if the Constitution is to be protected.-- Examiner Editorial (see source)

Calling Nancy Pelosi a liar is of no consequence. And calling Pelosi a liar while being supported with CIA documentation and evidence that she knew about waterboarding has the same affect as calling a dog, Canis lupus familiaris or Canis lupus domesticus one simply receives the same response. Well duh!

Democrats expect Democrats to lie. Oh they dress it up a bit they call it being nuanced à la mode de Al Gore or John Kerry. Or they may call it well thought out answers like Mr. Obama is credited with giving. But whether it’s Obama, Gore, Kerry or Pelosi Democrats consider everyone else stupid enough to con, as you know, lying to someone is the ultimate insult to the person(s) that is being lied to intelligence.

And that is the point isn’t it, Democrats in political office don’t think the rest of us are really that smart or they wouldn’t constantly and continually bald face lie to us.

"In that or any other briefing...we were not, and I repeat, were not told that waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation techniques were used. What they did tell us is that they had some legislative counsel...opinions that they could be used, but not that they would."—Nancy Pelosi

So why did Nancy Pelosi go to Baghdad on a unusual surprise visit instead of being here in the United States answering questions about why she lied about not knowing anything about waterboarding and why did she lie about not being briefed on the tactic of waterboarding before it was used.

Oh I guess I answered my own questions didn’t I? It‘s highly unusual for a Congresswomen to make a surprise trip to a war zone for no apparent reason unless that Congresswomen is blatantly attempting to change the discussion and duck questions back at home about lies she’s told about her knowledge of waterboarding!

What Ms. Pelosi was engaging in is a little maneuver called redirecting the news cycle. You see a little “surprise visit to Baghdad ” is a trick intend to have your focus redirected from the fact that Ms. Pelosi was caught in bald face lies about “enhanced interrogation techniques” or waterboarding and naturally the media fell for it.

Her actions were to have the public focused on her “lone efforts” to fix the Middle East instead of the coming controversy over Democrats in Congress, herself included, who were also briefed and approved of waterboarding at the time that it was instituted, meaning that any investigation of Bush officials who approved these torture techniques would have to include Democrats who also knew of them and approved also.

Intelligence officials released documents this evening saying that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) was briefed in September 2002 about the use of harsh interrogation tactics against al-Qaeda prisoners, seemingly contradicting her repeated statements over the past 18 months that she was never told that these techniques were actually being used.—Paul Kane (see source)

Pelosi’s assertions, that she didn’t know, contradicts a recently released White House and Senate committee reports that cited CIA records to claim that senior members of Congress in both parties were briefed on the waterboarding, which had already been done to detainee Abu Zubaydah. (see report)

So who are we to believe the White House, the CIA or Nancy Pelosi? Here’s Nancy Pelosi answering reporter’s rare questions, of a Democrat, regarding the inconsistencies in her statements about not knowing about waterboarding. Notice how Pelosi first attempts to shut the reporter down by attempting to divert the conversion. Unsuccessful in that attempt Pelosi proceeds with a 10 minute opaque statement meant to Octopus ink her way out of danger by a black cloud of nonsensical blame Bush denials.(see 10:57min video)



Democrats have gotten themselves in quite a pickle. By calling for the prosecution of the Bush administration for using torture techniques they’ve exposed themselves as approving of those very same techniques when it was politically acceptable to do so. Following radio and television pundit Glenn Beck explains. (see 5:50min. video)



The deception and finger pointing of Democrats is astonishing especially when Democrats continued to demand of President Bush that they be considered an equal power with the presidency in the final 2 years of the Bush administration. Attempting to be bi-partisan the Bush administration acquiesced to Democrat’s demands and included them in on intelligence, waterboarding was just one such instance.

To say now that Democrats didn’t know anything about torture being used is an outright bald face lie. But hey, lying is working for the Democrats.

Right Congresswomen Pelosi?

Fundamentally redefining Funny in America

The annual black-tie dinner drew an astonishing cast of Hollywood A-listers. Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore were there. Singers Sting and Jon Bon Jovi had seats. And a virtual who's who of film and TV stars mixed it up with the smattering of journalists in attendance. --Rich Schapiro

With the rise of Jon Stewart as the premier “Journalist” from which most Democrats get their news it’s not at all surprising that the annual White House Correspondents' Association black-tie dinner would be dominated by Hollywood A-listers, film and TV stars only to be mixed up with a smattering of journalist according to Rich Schapiro. (see story)

There is a saying that, “Many a truth is said in jest.” However to an administration and it’s supporting media devotees who have been practicing Orwellian tactics of redefinition of truth it is probably more fitting to say that “Many a redefinition of truth is said in jest,” under the Obama administration! But isn’t that what Mr. Obama promised when he promised to fundamentally change the United States of America?

Interestingly, following is 16 minutes of an Obama standup routine. What is interest is Mr. Obama’s acknowledgement through comedy of some of the White Houses biggest gaffes to date and many of its concerns. (see 16:31min video)




And then there is the White House Correspondents’ Association choice for entertainer, Comedienne Wanda Sykes. Ms. Sykes’ mischaracterization of Rush Limbaugh’s “I hope Obama fails,” Is classic mischaracterization in order to make a point that could not otherwise be made. Sykes clumsily and unfunnily attempted to equate Limbaugh’s statement with the thought that Limbaugh’s statement advocates for America’s failure. It did not, any more than Democrats promoting and wishing for George Bush’s failure as president was equal to wishing for America’s failure. (see 1:12min video)

"I think Rush Limbaugh was the 20th hijacker but he was just so strung out on OxyContin he missed his flight," Sykes said. "He needs a good waterboarding - that's what he needs." –“Comedienne” Wanda Sykes

Could someone please explain why an event that is supposed to be for the media and journalism was only attended by a smattering of journalist but was well attended by a full on complement of Hollywood A-listers? (see WHCA site)

And what, no jokes about Obama’s birth certificate, I would have thought that an Illegal Alien in the White House, that’s essentially what Mr. Obama is, with no one in the media doing anything to investigate and report that story would be the biggest joke on America in American history.

But I suppose that my sense of humor is a lot different from Mr. Obama’s who said very subtly at the end of his routine about 15:09 minutes in, that Journalism at best is an approximation of the truth. (I don’t think the journalist in the room understood the implication because they laughed)

We look to you for truth even if it is always an approximation –Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, speaking about the media at the 2009 WHCAD

Hum, that explains why the Obama administration always corrects reporting that the media does. For example White House press secretary Robert Gibbs correction on what you, I and the media heard Vice president Joe Biden said commenting on the Swine flu (see video)



Now that’s funny Mr. Gibbs! Nothing like telling us what our lying eyes and ear have seen and heard, jeez and we have four more years of this Orwellian subterfuge?

Republicans didn’t leave Specter, Specter left Republicans. But Democrats did!

I have traveled the State, talked to Republican leaders and office-holders and my supporters and I have carefully examined public opinion. It has become clear to me that the stimulus vote caused a schism which makes our differences irreconcilable.

On this state of the record, I am unwilling to have my twenty-nine year Senate record judged by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate. I have not represented the Republican Party.—Alren Specter (D) Pennsylvania

Political expediency can prove to be very tricky maneuvering. Alren Specter left the Republican Party for the self ascribed reason that his political career was much too important to allow Republicans in the Republican primary to decide his highly esteemed political fate.

Translation; For years I, Alren Specter have been an unfaithful Republican voting against Republican interest whenever I felt the need to express my liberal leanings. My latest backstabbing antic? I am one of only three Republicans to vote passage for the Obama $838 Billion Dollar Stimulus package, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe were the other two RINO’s who voted for it. Without our votes Mr. Obama never would have been able to put the country into trillion dollars of debt.(see story)

So just because I hardly ever vote to uphold the Republican Party some lame Pennsylvania Republicans are trying to hold me accountable for my treachery but I won’t let them to it. I won’t I say! And because I’m too damned important to allow Pennsylvania Republican voters to decide my fate I’m telling Republicans to kiss off! (see video)



Well how quickly the worm turns. After being formally welcomed by Mr. Obama and the White House to the Democrat Party and after being promised by Senate Majority leader Harry Reid that he would maintain his overall seniority in the Senate Senator Arlen Specter was stripe of his seniority by vote of the remaining Democrat Senators giving Specter what amounts to the seniority of a freshman Senator. (see story)

Now far be it from me to gloat but after years of poking Republicans in the eye with his consist undermining of Republican positions. Then to top it off after being faced with his political mortality as a consequence for his own reckless political caucusing Specter lied when he said the Republican Party left him. The Party didn’t leave him, Specter is a political user he used the Republican Party to exact his own brand of “guess which Party I belong to.”

By Sunday, on NBC's "Meet the Press," Specter was asked about Reid's assurance. "That's an entitlement. I've earned the seniority," Specter said. "I will be treated by the Democrats as if I'd been elected as a Democrat."--David Paul Kuhn

A funny thing happened on the way to the front of the Democrat seniority line Tuesday night, the Democrats in the Senate voted to strip Specter of his seniority. Specter has served in the Senate for twenty-nine years. The vote, as stated before, left him with the power of a freshman.

The all important, all mighty, the center of the American Senate, Arlen Specter now is the equivalent of a Democrat freshman with dim to no chance of winning the Democrat primary.

And Democrats say that there is no God! Well my faith is renewed! Republicans didn’t leave Specter he left them. But Democrats, they left Specter as well they should have.

Specter left the Republican Party to save his political career only to have Democrats deliver what will enviably be the final coup de grace to twenty-nine years of political treachery.

I’d say that there is a God Mr. Obama and He answers prayers! And don't worry Mr. Obama on the National Day of prayer, I prayed a special prayer for you too!