You’ve probably heard President Obama being sworn on Tuesday and didn’t think too much of the fact that both Obama and Justice Roberts, Harvard Law grads couldn’t get the Presidential oath right. (see video)
Well this troubled the newly sworn in President’s White house counsel Greg Craig so much that he had the Chief Justice come back yesterday for a do over with the President in the map room of the White house before the witnesses of the press. (see story)
Craig, the White House lawyer, said in a statement Wednesday evening: "We believe the oath of office was administered effectively and that the president was sworn in appropriately yesterday. Yet the oath appears in the Constitution itself. And out of the abundance of caution, because there was one word out of sequence, Chief Justice John Roberts will administer the oath a second time."Aren’t politics funny? For two years on the campaign trail Senator Obama spoke about how the Founding Fathers and the Constitution were flawed, he also promised repeatedly to fundamentally change America. Early in the campaign Obama refused to wear a U.S. flag pin on his lapel. And who can forget when he refused to put his hand over his heart to salute the flag when the National anthem was being played.
The Constitution is clear about the exact wording of the oath and as a result, some constitutional experts have said that a do-over probably wasn't necessary but also couldn't hurt. –Associated Press
Then in the most important oath that president Obama will ever take, besides of course his marriage vows, a Freudian slip perhaps with the oath of office?
Could it be that President Obama subconsciously can’t bring himself to swear to protect and defend the very Constitution that he had been attempting to deconstruct all of his adult life?
You say but it was Justice Roberts that caused President Obama to slip up on the Presidential oath. That can be explained too.
The Supreme Court has had several law suits before it recently in conference regarding the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama’s Presidency.
Knowing this perhaps Justice Roberts subconsciously flubbed the oath knowing that there is a question pending that he was swearing in an illegitimate President.
The "natural born citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, reads, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President." Perhaps Justice Roberts had this on this mind.
What is even stranger is just how meticulously careful the Obama White house is regarding the proper administrating of the oath of office because the oath is in the Constitution. This is in stark contrast to the cloud that is over the Obama Presidency because he chose to enter office knowing that there is legitimate question about whether or not he is even eligible to be President.
Yet Obama has been negligent because he has failed to answer a law suit regarding his birth certificate and under Federal Court Rules, President Obama has admitted, according to law, that he was not a citizen of The United States of America and is deemed to have committed fraud.
So far Obama has refused to be as dutiful with proof that he is a “Natural Born” U.S. citizen in accordance to the Constitution. (see previous post)
The reality is, it doesn’t matter whether President Obama is sworn in once, twice or three times; until President Obama produces proof that he is eligible to be President he will forever be a usurper who has illegitimately obtained the Presidency and was illegally sworn in by Justice John Roberts. A true trivia question for the future. What Chief Justice swore in an illegitimate President?
And their subconsciousnesses knows it!
