Effectively the president lied about this own mother’s death in order to endear himself with the voting public. Liberals now have mixed feelings that they didn’t allow for the vetting of Barry Hussein Soetoro in 2008. They are now simply confused. Attempting to defend their own collusion in the Soetoro 2008 election in addition to defending the newly uncovered lies in the autobiography of face of Democrat Party can’t be easy.
To say that Democrats are liars is never enough because the ignorant Liberal will retort, “Bush lied and people died.” The so-called opened minded but ill-informed Independent will offer that both sides lie.
Those ridiculous assertions aside let’s look at the facts. The elder statesman, William Jefferson Clinton of the Democrat Party is a convicted liar (perjurer), the Democrat inventor of Global warming, Al Gore lied frivolously and unnecessarily about everything during his 2000 bid for the presidency. Not to mention his now debunked claims predicting a global carbon fueled catastrophe. The Democrat 2004 presidential nominee John Forbes Kerry lied about the nature of his Vietnam service. In addition, he lied about what he did with his medals upon his return to the states. When confronted about his lies by veterans who were there in Vietnam then he lied and said he was swiftboated.
Democrat presidential contender Jon Edwards is a lying philanderer all while his wife was dying of cancer, Democrat minority leader Nancy Pelosi is a psychotic liar, Democrat Senate Leader, Harry Reid is a self-important political apparatchik and liar.
All of the above notwithstanding the Democrat president of these United States, Barry Hussein Soetoro is a delusional liar. Biographer David Maraniss has uncovered 38 factual discrepancies in the president’s autobiography, “Dreams from my Father.” Mr. Maraniss has chosen to typify the Soetoro lies as literary devices. However, you know that a Republican would not be given the same benefit of the doubt in today’s highly partisan Democrat media complex.
Listen to Soledad O’Brien’s panel and Ben Smith discuss Maraniss' discovery and attempt to comfort themselves in the knowledge that they have been supporting a serial liar who as lied himself into the highest political office in the world. (see 2:41min video)
The president implied that his mother died because of healthcare insurance refusing to pay for her treatment. He used that claim repeatedly in the 2008 elections. We now know that claim and at least 37 others were lies. The mother’s healthcare was paid for.
Effectively the president lied about this own mother’s death in order to endear himself with the voting public. Liberals now have mixed feelings that they didn’t allow for the vetting of Barry Hussein Soetoro in 2008. They are now simply confused. Attempting to defend their own collusion in the Soetoro 2008 election in addition to defending the newly uncovered lies in the autobiography of face of Democrat Party can’t be easy.
As a result, the Democrat Media Complex is complicit in Soetoro a Democrat candidate achieving the presidency without the proper media vetting. Soetoro was in effect allowed to lie on this mother’s grave to win in 2008 thus counting Soetoro in a long list of Democrat political liars.
As Maraniss concluded the America’s composite president wrote a book of literature in his autobiography Dreams from my Father. Any other person the media would be calling it a book of lies. James Frey’s A Million Little Pieces was exposed for the fraud it is by Oprah Winfrey because she featured it on her book club. Winfrey featured Soetoro’s book Dreams from my Father as well.
Oprah we await your rebuke of the president’s autobiography since you featured it on your book club because the president's book is a work of fiction just as much so as A million Little Pieces is.
Boy! President Barry Hussein Soetoro and Democrats really think you are stupid. That’s right Democrats have acted as if the American people are stupid.
Former DNC chairman Howard Dean revealed how Democrats have been trained in a method called, “The Pivot.” It is method which Democrats refuse to answer a legitimate question and turn the conversation back to negative assertion against Republicans. Everyone in the Democrat party uses this ploy, the president, Nancy Pelosi, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Harry Reid, David Axelrod, Bill Clinton and White House senior adviser David Plouffe all refuse to answer questions directly. Here’s Howard Dean explaining how it works. (see 1:43min video)
Now compare what Dean says about “the Pivot” to how David Plouffe conducts himself with Fox News’ Chris Wallace two Sundays ago, Father’s day, regarding the White house security leaks and White house cover-up or Executive privilege concerning the administrations’ gun running program called fast and furious. Incidentally the Washington Post has given this Plouffe performance 4 Pinocchio’s (see 17:22min video)
The whole Democrat political Party is based on deception and lies. From the high cheek bones Cherokee claims of Elizabeth Warren to the claims that Barry Hussein Soetoro made that he was born in Kenya. That’s right Soetoro himself claimed he was born in Kenya. The false allegations of the Soetoro administration are becoming so outrageous that the administration has been called out for their false claims ( see story)
Now Democrats in total are training their lying efforts on Mitt Romney regarding his business experience. Vice president Joe Biden has lied about Gov. Romney’s work that he outsourced jobs (among others) and the Washington post gave Biden 2 Pinocchio’s for his efforts.
Here’s hoping that Americans are not as stupid as Democrats believe.
First, Defendants argue that a federal lawsuit is not the proper vehicle to challenge a candidate’s qualifications for office. Rather this task is reserved for the electorate and the United States Congress. In other words, Plaintiffs’ claims are preempted under federal law. Second, Defendants assert that the Tennessee Democratic Party has the right to nominate whomever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who is not qualified for the office. -- Democratic National Committee, Tennessee Democratic Party, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and Chip Forrester’S Motion to Dismiss, Case 2:12-cv-02143-STA-cgc
The Western Center for journalism is reporting that The Democrat National Committee and the Democrat Party of Tennessee have admitted that Barry Hussein Soetoro is not eligible to be President of the United States of America. (see story)
According to the story Democrats use the patented arguments, the American people have, no standing and the like however they have newly asserted that even if Mr. Soetoro is not qualified they have the right to nominated an unqualified person to be president if they so chose.
In numerous previous lawsuits questioning the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama, Democrats have maintained that voters, not the Constitution, should be the final arbiters of presidential eligibility. Though a disgraceful assertion on its face, such mindless rambling was about all that desperate Democrat attorneys had in their arsenals, apart from the perpetually employed “plaintiffs lack standing” defense.-- Doug Book (see motion below)
Democrats continue to prove that they have no respect for the constitution, this country or Americans. They only are concerned with gaining and keeping power whether gotten illicitly or not.
"President Obama must be defeated in the coming election. He has failed to advance the progressive cause in the United States” —Roberto Mangabeira Unger
He’s not a Right-wing Conservative. He is a Left-wing Academic Progressive who taught the president at Harvard. He is Brazilian scholar and politician, Roberto Mangabeira Unger and he accuses the president of abandoning America's workers while pushing a policy of "food stamps."
Hey wait a moment didn’t the left-wing media want Newt Gingrich’s head when Gingrich remarked that Soetoro is the “Food Stamp” president?
Do you remember that “Blackberry” that the president carries? The one, which he was supposed to give up because all presidents’ communication is supposed to be monitored. Did you know Soetoro is the first president what was allowed free and unfettered communication because he demanded that he be allow to keep his own personal Blackberry without government monitoring. Well according to David Remnick, Professor Unger communicated with the president on that Blackberry during the 2008 election yet he kept his distance because he feared that his far-left leaning would be conferred on the presidential candidate. It should have been. Yet the president isn’t hard left enough for professor Unger’s taste so the professor is calling for the president’s defeat. (see article) (see 6:01min video)
According to David Remnick's book "The Bridge: The Life and Rise of Barack Obama." Unger continued to correspond with Obama via BlackBerry going into the presidential campaign, Remnick reported, though Unger said he never became Obama's "friend" and kept his distance from the then-candidate out of concern that Unger's own "leftist" leanings might do "harm" to Obama. –foxnews.com
Soetoro has not fulfilled the progressive agenda to the radical left’s satisfaction he needs a second term to complete what Russian president Putin wants and the radical left wing wants. If you thought that Soetoro attacks on the family and the constitution are radical, you haven’t seen anything yet if Soetoro is reelected.
What the president as done, he was robbed the American people of their right to be represented in this matter of granting children of illegal aliens amnesty. By by-passing Congress and unilaterally granting children of illegal aliens amnesty the president stole from the American people in several ways.
I have not heard a cogent explanation on either side why what president Barry Hussein Soetoro did regarding the children of Illegal Aliens by unilaterally granting them immunity is wrong so I will give one here.
First imagine that your family was out of money and no one could come up with a solution or a job. You decide to take matters in your own hands. You decide that you will rob your neighbors to take what they have to get your family money. So you do, you rob your neighbors and problem solved! Your family now has money.
See anything wrong in this little scenario? Of course you do. You realize that the ends do not justify the means. In other words yes, you have money now but it is wrong to rob your neighbors to take what is not your and to take what they have to get what you want. Simple ethics right?
Yet, that is exactly what president Soetoro has done. He has robbed the American people to get what he wants, which is votes from the illegal alien community and votes from those who support them.
Let me explain. Democrats have been creating an illegal alien crisis in America for years by partial and non-enforcement of America’s laws. As a consequence there are upwards of 40 million Mexican and Latin American nationals in the United States of America. All this is pending on the hope that they will vote as Democrats.
That being said Congress is the body that represents the people of the United States and they are the constitutional body that is assigned to making America’s laws. By design making a law is a process so that no one person can impose his or her will on the America people. This is so because the Senate and the House are representatives of the people. They are supposed to examine debate and vote on each law for the benefit of the American people. This is supposed to be a thorough process not some willy-nilly desperate attempt to get votes.
What the president as done, he was robbed the American people of their right to be represented in this matter of granting children of illegal aliens amnesty. By by-passing Congress and unilaterally granting children of illegal aliens amnesty the president stole from the American people in several ways. First he stole our right to be represented in this decision and second by giving upwards of 800,000 children of illegal aliens job permits president Soetoro has stolen jobs from the poor and middle class in a time when jobs are scarce in the American economy.
Just as the example above the problem seems to be solved but the ends does not justify the means. You don’t steal from the American people just so you can advance your political prospects with a segment of the populace, yet that is what the president has done.
If stealing is wrong and no one will dispute that it is not wrong. Then stealing from the American people is wrong. The president has stolen this decision from the American people and he wishes that we only look at the results of what he did. If that is the case we all can go rob a bank tomorrow and pay our bills and buy what we want and feel good about ourselves because that is where his act logically takes us
That is what Democrats and the president are advocating when they tout his executive order to grant amnesty to children of illegal aliens. They are advocating that we should feel good that the president has stolen from the American people. However, it’s wrong to steal and it’s wrong for the president to grant amnesty to hundreds of thousands of children of illegal aliens by by-passing Congress. That is an act of theft from the American people!
Just as you or I would be answerable to our neighbors if we were to steal from them to get our own family money this president will be answerable to you and I in November for stealing from us to advance his own political cause.
If the president's act is allowed to stand, then when a president not of your liking does the same thing, for instance, by granting Christians the right to have the cross on public lands just remember you thought unilateral executive orders were a great thing when used for something that you agree with!
"This is not amnesty. This is not immunity. This is not a path to citizenship. It is not a permanent fix
and these are not the droids you are looking for!”
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!—Isaiah 5:20
We live in a time that our political leaders are redefining what is good and true by word games. They are redefining what is right and what is wrong. Case in point our president gave amnesty to children of illegal aliens in order to gain the vote of Hispanics. Just a few weeks prior to this he gave his support to homosexual coupling in order to appease the homosexual lobby in this country and ensure that those who support homosexuality would vote for him.
In both of these instances, Barry Hussein Soetoro justified what he did as first evolving on the issue of homosexuality and in regards to amnesty as it being simply, “The right thing to do!” (You’ll be hearing that phrase quite a bit in the next few days.
Nevertheless, is it really the, “Right thing to do?” Not according to the president who said earlier in his administration that because of the law he could not single handily, give illegal aliens amnesty. (see 5:14min video)
What is wrong with the president’s support of homosexuality and his granting of amnesty to children of illegals is he is one man who is attempting to force his political will on the American people using un-constitutional methods. Why would I say this? In both cases, his support for homosexuality and his Executive Order to grant amnesty for children of illegals this president has actually traversed the law of the land that he swore on the Jefferson Bible to uphold when he swore to protect and defend the Constitution.
"Where they won't act, I will,"—Barry Hussein Soetoro, Dictator-in-Chief
First, he announced at the beginning of his administration that he would no longer enforce the law of the land, DOMA or the Defense of Marriage Act, which is federal law. Second, he completely bypasses Congress to give amnesty to upwards of 15 million illegal people in this country.
Whether you agree with the president’s decisions or not, what you cannot agree with is the way he has acted outside of his scope of power to impose his personal beliefs on the American people. He did this by ordering the government not to enforce DOMA and by instructing, the government to only partially enforce immigration law.
In addition to that, regarding immigration he has decided that he alone has the power to grant amnesty.
"Last month, when I addressed a joint session of Congress about our jobs crisis, I also said that I intend to do everything in my power to act on behalf of the American people, with or without Congress. " -- Barry Hussein Soetoro, Dictator-in-Chief
The ends justify the means is what president Barry Hussein Soetoro means when he says, “This is the right thing to do,” regarding his recent decision to grant amnesty to illegals. What this means is the president, his administration, the Democrat Party violates the Constitution at will, and afterwards they tell us that they did it for our own good.
In fact, they say, it is good that the Constitution is ignored or outright violated because Barry Hussein Soetoro and the progressive left have your best interest in mind.
Listen no amount of justification can explain away that this president has imposed a soft tyranny on the people of the United States by selectively choosing which laws he will enforce and by creating unconstitutional policy by executive order. By his actions, this president has stepped outside of the bounds of powers that the constitution granted and invented an extra-constitutional presidency and government.
Therefore, the government of president Soetoro is illegitimate. Mr. Soetoro’s forcing of an un-Constitutional Healthcare law upon the American people is wrong. He does it while telling us to, “eat our peas.” His refusal to prosecute violators of laws when he disagrees with those laws is also wrong. In addition his insulting explanations to the American people why his multiple violations of the constitution is for our own good are all evidence that Mr. Soetoro believes that he has the power to redefine good and evil, right and wrong, constitutional and what is not constitutional by his own authority. This is simply wrong!
The Founders set up our government in the form of three branches to attempt to prevent someone from attempting to change America by his own authority otherwise called tyranny. The only thing that they didn’t anticipate was the possibility that all three branches could be corrupted at the same time.
Well, this is that time. The whole political structure of the United States is corrupt. If it weren’t, such a man as Barry Hussein Soetoro would never be allowed to do the un-constitutional things he does. One simply doesn’t govern by fiat and tell the American people that it is the, “Right thing to do,” while the Supreme Court and Congress sit in silence voiding their own oaths to protect and defend the Constitution. Moreover, by their silence they willingly or unwillingly give their consent to a tyrant who has taken unto himself extraordinary constitutional powers.
Indeed this is a time of woe for the United States under the tyrannical rule of Barry Hussein Soetoro.
One thing I’ve come to realize is that any positive action for radical social change will have to be focused on the white middle class, for the simple reason that this is where the real power lies. Today, three fourths of our population is middle class, either through actual earning power or through value identification…
If we just give up and let the middle classes go to the likes of Agnew and Nixon by default, then you might as well call the whole ball game. But they’re still up for grabs — and we’re gonna grab ‘em. —Saul Alinsky, 1972 Playboy interview
I’m about to rip the heart out of the entire 2012 president Barry Hussein Soetoro campaign for re-election. After this, there will be no justifiable reason to vote for him. He says the reason to election him is because he’ll fight for the middle class and Gov. Romney won’t. Now let’s look at the record!
First, let’s stipulate that all of president Barry Hussein Soetoro’s talk of the middle class is a tactic, which he learned from his political mentor Saul Alinsky. To Soetoro and Alinsky the middle class is an ends to a means. They are a political tool by which to gain and keep power. (read Rules for Radicals) The middle class has no other meaning, other than, one needs middle class support in order to make radical social change in America.
Hum, Hope and Change that is what the 2008 election was about, wasn’t it? And didn’t Soetoro appeal to the middle class in order to win in 2008. And isn’t he continuing the same tactics even now for 2012?
So in light of the $787million stimulus package, $700 billion dollars bank bailouts the $17 billion dollar auto industry bailout and the passage of his Big Phrama Obamacare law $1.76 trillion over 10 yrs all, which president Soetoro approved and supported just how has the middle class fared under his presidency? (see 1:34min video)
Posing to be a friend of the middle class, the president’s policies have actually decimated the middle class with the greatest lost in wealth for the middle class in recent history.
The recent economic crisis left the median American family in 2010 with no more wealth than in the early 1990s, erasing almost two decades of accumulated prosperity, the Federal Reserve said Monday.-- BINYAMIN APPELBAUM,NYTimes
While president Barry Hussein Soetoro was, golfing more that Tiger Woods on the PGA circuit and Michele was jetting to luxurious international vacation to luxurious international vacation the middle class was taking it in the shorts in the president’s first term. But look It’s election season and all that you ‘all are supposed to remember, according to president Soetoro, is Mitt Romney is out of touch with the middle class.
Okay… but it is on the “president of the middle class” watch that the middle class as suffered greater than any time since the Great Depression. (article) In fact according to Roger Selbert one-third of the nation is either unemployed, underemployed, underwater on their one greatest asset (their homes),insolvent/bankrupt, on food stamps, unemployment or disability payments, or otherwise dependent on government. In Selbert’s words, “the diminishing of the middle class is daunting, but most disturbing is the diminishing of its prospects.” (see story)
Families’ income also continued to decline, a trend that predated the crisis but accelerated over the same period. Median family income fell to $45,800 in 2010 from $49,600 in 2007. All figures were adjusted for inflation.
“It fills in details to a picture that we already knew was quite ugly, and these details very much underscore that,” said Jared Bernstein, an economist at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities who served as an adviser to Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. “It makes clear how devastating this has been for the middle class.”-- BINYAMIN APPELBAUM,NYTimes
It doesn’t matter that Soetoro is doing a lousy job we all are supposed to be afraid of Romney. Democrats love to trout out that old saw that Republicans are the KKK or the Devil or worst yet ghosts. To which Democrats’ eyes are supposed to bugle out of their heads, their bodies are supposed to shake contort uncontrollably and they are supposed to turn as white as snow with fear. Republicans are the Bogeyman, Mitt Romney is to be feared. Don't vote for him, do listen to him and don’t look at him.
How crazy has the president gotten? This isn’t 2008 when he didn’t have a record and he could just say anything and the bobble headed Obamabots would nod in unison and say in one voice, “It’s Bush’s fault!”
The fact is the last four years are Soetoro’s policies, his ideas and his administration. The failure of the economy is not Romney’s fault or Bush’s fault, the failure of the middle class is Barry’s fault.
He used the middle class to get what he wanted, the presidency, without a flipping idea of what to do with it once he got it. Hillary warn us and so did Biden but we didn’t listen. We were so mesmerized by an “articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy” that we didn’t care that he didn’t know what he was doing. We only cared that he could wax eloquent in front of a teleprompter.
Now he’s asking for a do over, four more years to fix what he messed up. Yet I seem to remember in 2010 the president said, "we can't have special interests sitting shotgun. We gotta have middle class families up in front. We don't mind the Republicans joining us. They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back." (source)
So wait, the president and Democrats were driving this economy from 2009 to 2012 with the middle class in mind (yeah right) and he told Republicans to get it the back and let he and Democrats put their policies in place. Oh so the last four years isn’t Bush’s fault after all.
According to the president he and Democrats have taken the middle class on a ride and guess what, the middle class is worse off than at any other time in the recent past.
That is why I say, "With a friend like president Soetoro, the middle class doesn’t need to be afraid of a bogeyman" or Gov. Romney for that matter because they have Barry and his anti-middle class record over the last four years! Middle class be afraid be very afraid!
David Axelrod is a stupid man for thinking that the America people are stupid enough to accept his Howard Dean tactic of not answering a question and pivoting a question against Republicans.
Howard Dean has gone all around the world teaching socialists this Democrat technique of non-responsive answer (see 1:43min video)
Now compare David Axelrod with Dean. When asked by a CNN anchor about the president’s statement regarding private sector jobs. The president said that the private sector is doing fine. Axelrod’s use of the Howard “Dean pivot” of not answering the question and talking about what he wants to talk about is what Democrats are trained to do. (see 8min video)
Incredible! In eight minutes Axelrod failed to give a straight answer. Does he really believe that the American people are so stupid that we wouldn’t notice his refusal to answer the question. And are we so ignorant that we wouldn’t notice his combative disposition? Laughingly today’s Democrats believe that they can get away with this type of nonsense.
This is a favorite non-response tactic of Democrats, the president, his DNC chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Axelrod. They all use it. They don’t answer questions asked and they all ways pivot a question around to say something negative against Republicans no matter what the question is.
A reporter can ask, “Mr. Axelrod is the president going to celebrate the 4th of July?” And of course Axelrod would use a non-responsive answer such as; “The president is working very hard to ensure that all holidays are treated equally. “ He’ll go further to say, “No one’s holiday will not be recognized by this administration. Unlike the Republicans, If a Republican were president he or she would not recognize Kwanza or the Muslim fast of Ramadan.”
See how that works. As Howard Dean teaches, one never answers a question and one should all ways pivot the conversation back to the Republicans with some negative comment.
It’s no wonder the political discourse in this nation is so decimated. Democrats have blown up all lines of communication while simultaneously blaming Republicans for all of the ills of the country.
The American people are supposed to be too stupid to see what Democrats are doing. Axelrod gives a fine example. Are the American people going to allow this manipulation of political discourse? The American people don’t want this scorned earth kind of politics neither do we want this childishness in our politics.
We can end Democrat’s “politics of pivot” by electing Mitt Romney for president and we can further end Democrats’ deceptive talking points by electing Republicans to the House of Representatives and to the Congress this November! Let's turn this "pivot" back around against Democrats!
To answer the question Mr. Axelrod, no, the private sector is not doing fine as the president said. The president should know the poor condition of the economy and he is wrong for saying otherwise.
President Obama played a big card Thursday, authorizing Mrs. Clinton to tentatively endorse European proposals that rich nations come up with $100 billion a year over the next decade to help poor nations fight climate change. story
Facts are the torpedoes that have sunk the apocalyptic forebodings of Global Warming. According to that “settled science”, the terrain of the earth should be in a catastrophic state changed by anthropogenic emissions of carbon into the earth’s atmosphere.
Here are fifteen irrefutable facts about Global warming that “settled scientists” and their spokes person Al Gore don’t want you to know:
Fact 1
No one knows how much of the current global warming is due to natural phenomenon or manmade.
Fact 2
We are currently in a period of natural warming that began in 1850 as we emerged from a 400 hundred year old cooling trend called the Little Ice Age.
Fact 3
97% of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere comes from the oceans and plants.
Fact 4
Greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere are made up of 90% water vapour, 4% Carbon Dioxide, 4% methane, 2% fluoride compounds and nitrous oxide.
Fact 5
Top estimates put water vapour as high as 95% of greenhouse gasses of this 95% 99.999% is natural and not attributed to manmade causes.
Fact 6
Carbon Dioxide accounts for 0.04% of the earth’s atmosphere.
Fact 7
Manmade Carbon Dioxide is only 0.117% of the total Carbon Dioxide in the air and contributes 0.0047% of Carbon dioxide total in the atmosphere.
Fact 8
Reducing Manmade Carbon Dioxide by 30% in accordance with the Kyoto Protocol has been estimated to lower earth’s temperature by 1/20th of 1 degree by 2050 a negligible effect...
Fact 9
Most of the global warming trend of the last 150 years occurred before 1940 the period since is by enlarge when human activity increased its Carbon Dioxide production from smoke stacks and automobiles.
Fact 10
The net global warming since 1940 is a tiny 0.2 degrees C.
Fact 11
There has been no acceleration since modern global warming began in 1850.
Fact 12
Between 2007 and 2008 global temperatures dropped between 0.59% and 0.75% degrees C virtually enough to offset the entire global warming of the last century this despite increased levels of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere.
Fact 13
This came after nine years of none global warming since 1998, which was a direct contradiction to IPPC forecasts.
Fact 14
Past global temperature records show no historical correlation between temperature levels and Carbon Dioxide despite the claims of Al Gore and the IPPC.
Fact 15
Carbon offsetting does not work, trees release all their Carbon Dioxide when they die the net effect is negligible.data collected from squidoo 101 global warming facts
The impact of anthropogenic carbon emissions on the planet is minute in comparison to the natural occurrences of carbon emissions. What is more, anything that man proposes to do to affect anthropogenic carbon emissions will have virtually no effect on global warming or our planet.
In reality, what was proposed by the Kyoto agreement to solve global warming was and is a fraud. In like fashion, the current efforts to halt Climate change are fraudulent global tax scams invented to produce new revenue streams for unelected unaccountable United Nations officials and International profiteers, many based in Europe, that have been long awaiting American politicians to commit the American people to this Global tax scheme.
The only thing that has saved the American people from indentured servitude to the U.N. and International profiteers was George W. Bush’s unwillingness to sign the Kyoto agreement. That and the downturn in the U.S. economy before Barry Hussein Soetoro became President. President Soetoro a long known proponent of Global warming would have sold the American people out as soon as he were elected had the economy been in a better state.
As it is, he has already committed the U.S. to 100 million dollars in promises to carbon reductions via the Copenhagen agreements made in 2010.
In spite of the mounting evidence contradicting Al Gore’s claims of global destruction the average Americans live their lives as if anthropogenic affects on climate actually measurably effects the climate one way or the other. Not realizing that the proposed fixes are not intended nor can the fixes actually correct the problem of Climate change. All that they are meant to do is raise money by transferring the wealth from industrialized countries for the pockets of corrupted U.N. officials and their International profiteer cronies.
The facts are that the dire predictions of global warming catastrophe have not come true. Either will they in the fashion that they were predicted because the original claims where based on false theories and false evidence. For example in the last 15 years there has been a global cooling trend, did you know that? Following are some of the failed predictions of Global warming.
• A global cooling trend has developed despite the IPCC's climate model predictions and the immense human CO2 emissions over the last 15 years (a 1.7 times increase over the 15-yr period ending in 1996) . Catastrophic, dangerous, unequivocal, accelerating and unprecedented global warming are non-existent as of April 2012. In summary, the data strongly and irrefutably suggest that human CO2 emissions are not a powerful greenhouse gas and that, instead, natural climate forces are the likely primary drivers of global temperature changes.
• Global climate modeling failure is the rule rather than the exception in regards to the computer simulations that EPA & IPCC bureaucrats and policymakers rely on. New research regarding a regional climate in the U.S. substantiates the failed predictive capability of global climate models. As a result, these global climate models guarantee massive amounts of government investments being wasted on erroneous climate change impacts, such as more droughts in the southwest U.S...
• Accelerating global sea level rise from melting glaciers is not happening as predicted. The retreat of Greenland's glaciers is not a major contributor to sea level increases and there exists no empirical evidence that this will change by year 2100.
• Tide gauge station analysis confirms global sea level rise is modest and not dangerously accelerating as long predicted by the IPCC's climate models and its "experts."
• Connect the dots climate model failure is not a 'roll of the dice' - it is a known, glaring global warming prediction bias that is significantly robust. Since this is a 'known known,' as a precautionary principle decision, James Hansen et al. should be retired from NASA's climate modeling research unit.
• "Tipping point" global warming is not supported by the evidence; it's not even remotely plausible per the empirical data from the tropics; the world is not going to end from human-caused boiling oceans; and, NASA's James Hansen is possibly crazy, with fame, fortune and the drooling love of the MSM press lapdogs.
• The impact of climate change on health appears to be of little significance, according to health research experts, and, of course, contrary to the UN's highly publicized hysteria published by it climate politics agency, the IPCC.
• Climate change effects of increasing levels of CO2 and global warming will enhance agriculture output for many crops, such as winter wheat. In addition, IPCC climate modeling, 'guesstimating,' for global warming impacts has little basis in actual science.
• EU scientists prove, using tide gauge station data, that the long predicted catastrophic sea level rise has not happened despite the global warming that has taken place since the Little Ice Age end.
• The extreme climate change risk promulgated by the big global insurance companies and their scientific minions has proven to be without merit when the actual empirical evidence is closely scrutinized.
• Climate modeling failure is the standard operating procedure for the immensely expensive virtual simulations that the IPCC and associated climate agencies have poured billions into. They remain unable to provide accurate predictions that policymakers can rely on. data collected from C3 Headlines
As with all things, this president all is illusion and deception. His brokered accord at Copenhagen was a non-binding agreement that will cost the American people $31.1 billion to $36.1 billion of the $100 billion dollar Global warming annual pledge. That’s up to $36.1 billions annually from 2013 to 2020-- pg6 Delivering on U.S. Climate Finance Commitments
Using that same scale the U.S. would be responsible for about a third of the promised $50 billion dollar start up money that started in 2010 through 2012 Obama has committed the United States to about $336.8 billion dollars of global warming debt over an eleven year period. Remember president Obama took credit for the accord and authorized payments to the global warming fatalists (see 2:37min video)
No matter the evidence Global warming proponents will continue the farce of global warming not to save the planet no they will continue because of the money.
Like soylent green is people, global warming is money.
"I get frustrated when I talk to evangelical friends or students and they ask, 'How can you be a Christian and a Democrat?'" --Valerie Cooper, religious studies professor, University of Virginia
Who contradicts God, rebel against him and then claim to be a Christian? Democrats do of course. President Barry Hussein Soetoro sent holy tremors throughout the Christian community a few months ago regarding his devolution on homosexual coupling. As every believer knows, one doesn’t evolve when contradicting the word of God one simply devolves. When one leaves, the highest estate of agreement with truth there is only one way to go that is down.
Not since William Jefferson Clinton’s oral sex in the oval office gave license to kindergarteners thru twelve graders throughout the United States to have oral sex anywhere even classrooms has a president’s sexual views impacted the United States of America so much.
Democrat presidents have lowered America’s moral standards single handedly. You probably won’t remember this but Osama bin Laden listed Bill Clinton’s Oval office activities as one of the reasons that al Qaeda declared war on the United States. He stated such in an open letter to America.
Who can forget your President Clinton's immoral acts committed in the official Oval office? After that, you did not even bring him to account, other than that he 'made a mistake', after which everything passed with no punishment. Is there a worse kind of event for which your name will go down in history and remembered by nations?—Osama bin Laden full text of letter
Now president Soetoro is forcing Christians to select between himself and God. That’s right, since the president has devolved he expects Christians to follow his logic and reasoning rather than what they know to be scripturally true. The question is will Christians follow the president like a third of heaven followed Lucifer out of the heavenly realm into that lower estate. (see article)
To the president’s chagrin, not all Democrats or Black Christian ministers are so easily tempted. (see 5:10min video)
For example, the Rev. Keith Ratliff Sr. of the Maple Street Missionary Baptist Church in Des Moines resigned his post as president of the NAACP in the Iowa/Nebraska branch. Rev. Ratliff resigned as branch president and a national board member in the wake of the national organization’s decision to endorse homosexual coupling. (see story)
The DNC's faith outreach director, the Rev. Derrick Harkins, said the party has strong relationships with religious groups. But as evidence of their concerns, critics point to the public debate that followed Obama's endorsement of gay marriage, a decision the president said was based in part on his Christian faith.-- RACHEL ZOLL
Democrats are attempting to convince the Christian community that they know better than God does. President Soetoro is attempting to convince the Christian community that partisan politics transcends religious beliefs and convictions.
Any Christian that has an inkling of trouble deciding whether they are going to support the president or not, had better check the condition of his or her faith, Christian scripture states that in the last days many Christians will be deceived.
“The day is coming when you will see the sacrilegious object that causes desecration standing where he should not be…In fact, unless the Lord shortens that time of calamity, not a single person will survive. But for the sake of his chosen ones he has shortened those days.—Mark 13:14,20
Democrats use language as an instrument of deception. Saying that he evolved regarding homosexual coupling, the president attempted to suggests that all who don’t approve of homosexual coupling are social Neanderthals.
I’m sure the Rev. Ratliff would disagree with the president. Rev. Ratliff as any and every one who is a Christian realizes that no one can serve two masters. Either God is true or the president’s devolution is true. Either scripture is true when it says, “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh”—Gen. 2:24 Or the president is correct when he contradicts the word of God and says that homosexuals should legally couple with government backing.
Christians, who knows if these aren’t the final days. In addition, who knows that this issue is not the judgment used to separate the sheep from the goats. This certainly could be that judgment and those who chose wrong will be assigned to the goats.
When asked why she is so confident the Supreme Court will uphold the health care law, Pelosi says, "Because I know the Constitution."
Nancy Pelosi is many things. What most comes to mind is she is a far left-wing ideologue. She is also a ruthless politico. What Pelosi isn’t is a frivolous and idle threat maker. Last week Pelosi was asked her opinion regarding what the Supreme Court would do with respect to Obama at the end of this month. Confidently Ms. Pelosi predicted a Supreme Court six to three vote upholding the Affordable Care Act also known as Obamacare. (see min video)
"This bill is ironclad, it is ironclad. Nobody was frivolous with the Constitution and the health of the American people in writing the bill. So, that’s where my confidence springs from, the merit of the bill and the nature of the Constitution. The makeup of the court, well, we’ll see."—Nancy Pelosi
Listen I don’t think Ms. Pelosi is conjecturing. I would venture to guess that Ms. Pelosi knows something. It has been long speculated that Democrats had possibly turned a conservative justice on the court.
The court is traditionally seen to have a five to four split conservative out numbering liberals. Liberal know that they can depend on the liberal bloc of Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayer and Kagan leaving Justices, Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Kennedy, and Scalia as usually conservative.
In addition, the weak Conservative appointments, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy ensure the Progressive Democrat destruction of America. Experts that know the court are warning that these men are susceptible of “going along to get along” with the Liberal bloc on the court.--Alaphiah
Ms. Pelosi seems to be signaling that she knows at least two conservatives that will vote against conservative principles and uphold Obamacare. I have already named Chief Justice John Roberts and justice Anthony Kennedy as the possible justices who may be susceptible to liberal influences (see previous post)
This bodes as very bad news for conservatives. If this is the case and Pelosi is, correct this adds an element of alarm for the upcoming elections. If president Soetoro were reelected, he would only have to add one justice to tilt the court seven to three liberal in ideology and make-up.
In any event, knowing that Pelosi rarely speaks frivolously the larger question is, is the court so compromised right now that this type information is being advanced to fellow partisans in the Democrat Party by someone in the court?
We’ll know soon enough whether Pelosi’s inside information is correct. What we won’t know is to what extent have Democrat managed to corrupt the court.
[O]ne cannot be a fiscal conservative “only.” One will always spend on cost of the liberal social issues, which one supports. At best, a more appropriate name for a “Fiscal Conservative” who is not a Democrat is a RINO. And a Democrat who claims to be a “Fiscal Conservative” is simply running for office in a conservative majority election.
When someone self designates as a Fiscal Conservative that person is attempting to state that, he or she is fiscally responsible. That person is further stating that while he or she holds to principles of fiscal restraint and best fiscal practices they reserve the right to range from socially compassionate, socially moderate or just plain socially liberal in other areas and views. Usually two types of persons identify as such, a Liberal who attempting to pass himself or herself off as a Conservative. Another is Liberal who is attempting to win in a Conservative election.
However, my friends I’m sorry to pull back the veil of illusion but there is no such thing as a fiscal conservative. It is absolutely impossible to be a fiscal conservative and here’s why.
Progressives are identified by their issues homosexuality, healthcare, abortion, global warming/climate change/the green movement, open borders and all other social net causes. Without exception, everything on the progressive agenda has tremendous cost involved. Therefore, it is impossible for a fiscal conservative to support any or all of the progressive agenda without supporting the cost those agenda items incur. If you identify as a Fiscal Conservative it is more than likely that you identify with one, some or all of the progressive agenda.
We now know that in the last decade entitlement spending or the progressive agenda outpaced national security cost plus the Iraq and Afghanistan wars combined by 65% to 19% respectively. That’s right about 65 percent of federal expenditures over the last ten years have gone toward entitlements not defense or war.(see chart below) (see article)
What that means is that “Bush’s Wars” did not get the economy in this mess. Rather it was the out of control entitlement spending typically associated with Democrats. And what that means to this argument is if you are a “Conservative” but you lean toward Liberal social issues you cannot, I repeat you cannot be a fiscal conservative because your issues whatever they are, are going to be funded, actually they have been for a decade and at an astronomical rate of expenditure. These are the costs that are bankrupting the country.
Therefore, one cannot be a fiscal conservative “only.” One will always spend on cost of the liberal social issues, which one supports. At best, a more appropriate name for a “Fiscal Conservative” who is not a Democrat is a RINO. And a Democrat who claims to be a “Fiscal Conservative” is simply running for office in a conservative majority election. Both these individuals will vote for Liberal social issues in turn those issues will have to be funded therefore cancelling out any conservative claim.
Either one should embrace Conservatism fully or one should drop the pretense of Conservatism altogether. Just stop perpetrating if you support Liberal causes you are going to fund them. Again, there is no such thing as a fiscal conservative.
Otherwise, we continue on this road of fiscal suicide while the biggest spender in the history of American government points his bony finger at Conservatives and falsely state that he’s just cleaning up the mess that they, the Conservatives, made. And the deficits were here when he got here. (Notice how convenient he can lump all Conservatives in one pile.)
With the prospect of fiscal Armageddon upon us, we can ill afford to give any quarter to the big spenders of the left. Neither to those who hide themselves in titles such as Fiscal Conservative while at the same time they embrace the issues of the left that have made this once great nation a debtor nation because of the excess social spending of the Left.
President Barry Hussein Soetoro represented that he was born in Kenya Africa. So he is a Birther! That's right all of the ridicule that was heaped upon anyone that raised this issue was and is undeserved. So called birthers were doing nothing more than the president did himself, saying that he was born in Kenya.
Follow is a dynamic look at the subject as only award winning movie maker Molotov Mitchell can present it.
That's right the president himself represented in a 1991 bio that he was in fact born in Kenya!!!(see 4:16min video)
