Gott ist tot--Friedrich Nietzsche
According to Austin Cline, Regional Director for the Council for Secular Humanism and a former Publicity Coordinator for the Campus Freethought Alliance, when Friedrich Nietzsche wrote those words, Nietzsche didn't mean the death of a literal god, but the death of the shared cultural belief in a god in Europe.
Certainly the empirically driven scientific method has not failed but thanks to Mr. Gore and the corporate interest that used the name of science attempting to force a multi-trillion dollar global tax scheme upon the world’s people, science has been forever knocked off of its pedestal of unquestionability .
Forever forward when one hears something presented as a scientific fact, one will be forced to ask, “Who’s behind the science and what is their motive?” Al Gore made apolitical science political.
There is no longer just science, Gore has introduce a virulent strain of hard Left wing science by which crazed manifesto writing eco-terrorist live and die by. (see articles here and here)
[Eco-terrorist James] Lee said at the time that he experienced an ‘‘awakening” when he watched former Vice President Al Gore’s environmental documentary ‘‘An Inconvenient Truth.”-- msnbc.com
Therefore, cultural belief that all science is above reproach as well as the belief that science should be regarded as the final authority in all things is dead.
God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?
—Nietzsche, The Gay Science, Section 125, tr. Walter Kaufmann
—Nietzsche, The Gay Science, Section 125, tr. Walter Kaufmann
Matt Patterson’s article “Meltdown of the climate ‘consensus’” summarizes the tale of two scientific bodies that were and remain at the center of attempting the most cataclysm paradigm shift in recent history, “The Global Warming” scare.
Patterson explains how The United Nations’ IPCC and the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia attempted to fraudulently convince the world’s populace of the claim that if a world tax was not allowed, we would all die. These two “scientific bodies” presented this conclusion as a consensus of scientific fact supported by all legitimate scientists. (see article)
The “evidence” and argument was if mankind did not change the way we consume energy mankind would be the cause of the plant’s destruction was based on bogus science. It was all based on Left wing political science not empirical science.
Was science even a real concern for the IPCC? In January, the Sunday Times of London reported that, based in large part on the fraudulent glacier story, "[IPCC Chairman] Rajendra Pachauri's Energy and Resources Institute, based in New Delhi, was awarded up to 310,000 pounds by the Carnegie Corp. . . . and the lion's share of a 2.5 million pound EU grant funded by European taxpayers."
Science is Dead and Al Gore invented partisan political science to replace it. It’s all about money now. Thus making everything we know subject to one’s political subjective point of view instead of objective empirical research.
Wissenschaft ist tot!
