First, Defendants argue that a federal lawsuit is not the proper vehicle to challenge a candidate’s qualifications for office. Rather this task is reserved for the electorate and the United States Congress. In other words, Plaintiffs’ claims are preempted under federal law. Second, Defendants assert that the Tennessee Democratic Party has the right to nominate whomever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who is not qualified for the office. -- Democratic National Committee, Tennessee Democratic Party, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and Chip Forrester’S Motion to Dismiss, Case 2:12-cv-02143-STA-cgcThe Western Center for journalism is reporting that The Democrat National Committee and the Democrat Party of Tennessee have admitted that Barry Hussein Soetoro is not eligible to be President of the United States of America. (see story)
According to the story Democrats use the patented arguments, the American people have, no standing and the like however they have newly asserted that even if Mr. Soetoro is not qualified they have the right to nominated an unqualified person to be president if they so chose.
In numerous previous lawsuits questioning the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama, Democrats have maintained that voters, not the Constitution, should be the final arbiters of presidential eligibility. Though a disgraceful assertion on its face, such mindless rambling was about all that desperate Democrat attorneys had in their arsenals, apart from the perpetually employed “plaintiffs lack standing” defense.-- Doug Book (see motion below)
Democrats continue to prove that they have no respect for the constitution, this country or Americans. They only are concerned with gaining and keeping power whether gotten illicitly or not.
