Safe Schools Czar

Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings

Vetting: (a) The process of investigating the character, credentials and abilities of a prospective candidate for consideration of a job offer or position.
(b) A process of which the Obama White house is not familiar with

Kevin Jennings remember that name.

A teacher was told by a 15-year-old high school sophomore that he was having homosexual sex with an "older man." At the very least, statutory rape occurred. Fox News reported that the teacher violated a state law requiring that he report the abuse.

That former teacher, Kevin Jennings, is President Obama's "safe school czar." It's getting hard to keep track of all of this president's problematic appointments. Clearly, the process for vetting White House employees has broken down. –The Washington Times

White House vetting has broken down? A teacher abrogated his duty to report a statutory rape because it was homosexual in nature and he winds up as President Barry Soetoro’s Safe Schools Czar instead of in jail? Is this White House purposely going out looking for the very worst people to occupy the president’s cabinet and serve in senior advisory capacities just to piss off the American people? To say that the vetting process has broken down is an understatement. There is no White House vetting system, is more of the reality.

Contrary to Gwen Ifill’s assertion, the Obama administration never had a vetting process. They only have a radical agenda to place the most polarizing radical ideologues in government by any means necessary.

What was Ifill’s assertion? Only that the Barry Soetoro administration would put forward an ethical and elite vetting process, Ifill of PBS fame once opined that the Obama White house’s vetting process was going to be the most strict and highest order of vetting that was every done by a United States White house. (see previous post)

But from the very start and continuing throughout the Obama vetting process has allow through persons of unscrupulous character, dubious credentials and questionable abilities thereby putting the Democrat Liberal agenda before what was best for the American people.

Each name -- Clinton, Daschle, Holder, Axelrod, Emanuel -- must meet tough new vetting standards put in place by the Obama transition. So is this the toughest screening process in presidential history?—Gwen Ifill, PBS

The following video shows Ifill attempting to make the case that the Obama vetting process would be the best in the history of the United States of America. (see 9:15min video attention to the first 2;30mins)

For an administration that has promised to shun the very appearance of impropriety to bring Adolfo Carrion into the administration on the heels of the none vetting of Gov. Bill Richards, Sen. Hillary Clinton, Timothy Geithner, Eric Holder, Tom Daschle, and Nancy Killefer shows that President Obama never intended to run an ethical administration. He just said [that] he would because he knew that is what you wanted to hear.—Alaphiah

The Obama non-vetting process has let through a Secretary of the Treasury that didn’t paid his taxes, a Secretary of State that Obama himself said had no experience and who lied about being shot at in mid air over Bosnia. The Obama vetting process has allowed a myriad of others to pass who were either morally or ethically challenged.

The latest casualty of the White house non-vetting was the Green Czar Van Jones who the White house now claims didn’t fill out the complete vetting documentation. Jones resigned after revelations began to surface about him which would have been vetted by someone interviewing employees to work at a Popsicle stand.

Now there is the president’s Safe School Czar, Kevin Jennings, a homosexual advocate who promotes homosexuality in schools from K through 12 and in addition he has utter contempt for Christianity. Kevin Jennings is supposed to promote safety in schools but he has encouraged a minor to pursue a homosexual relationship with an older man which the 15 year-old met in a bus station restroom(see story)

Peter LaBarbera, president and founder of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality give a detailed account of Kevin Jennings work . (see 10:03mins video)



Carter Clews and Don Todd report on Kevin Jennings (see 6:13mins video)



And finally Dr. Robert George From American Principles in Action speaks out against Kevin Jennings. (see 1:45 mins video)



Kevin Jennings is but another in a long line of Barry Soetoro’s radical appointments to his administration. Jennings is a direct threat to the nation’s youth as Czar of Safe Schools.

Soetoro’s choices are worsening as he puts America at risk with every decision that he makes . Kevin Jennings is a homosexual ideologue who has infiltrated the highest echelons of government to advance the homosexual agenda on children K-12 in our public schools.

This campaign to teach our children homosexuality is but another sad saga in the Barry Soetoro vision for America.

It is a vision that is outside of the constitution and so insidious that we have to be reminded daily that there are changes happening just below the radar that will effect each American, Men and Women. And from Kindergarteners and High schoolers our children are being indoctrinated and our men and women are being deceived.

Kevin Jennings should not be allowed anywhere near kids and he should not be in the White House advising the president on safety issues concerning our schools.

What do you think?

Jailcare!

Two things every American should know about Health Care Reform proposed by President Barry Soetoro and Democrats. If you chose not to buy Health Care Insurance you would face legal action from the Internal Revenue Service, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. That would be in the form of a mandated penalty as high as $1,900 dollars for non-compliance.

Americans who fail to pay the penalty for not buying insurance would face legal action from the Internal Revenue Service, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.

The remarks Thursday from the committee's chief of staff, Thomas Barthold, seems to further weaken President Barack Obama's contention last week that the individual mandate penalty, which could go as high as $1,900, is not a tax increase. —Carrie Budoff Brown (see source)

If you chose simply not to pay the penalty then you could be charged with a misdemeanor and could face up to a year in jail or a $25,000 penalty. America, Obamacare just transformed into Jailcare!

Working on behalf of the American people Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) received confirmation that this was indeed the Democrat’s plan in the form of a handwritten note from Joint Committee on Taxation Chief of Staff Tom Barthold (see note)and (see story)

Under questioning from Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.), Barthold said the IRS would "take you to court and undertake normal collection proceedings."

Ensign pursued the line of questioning because he said a lot of Americans don't believe the Constitution allows the government to mandate the purchase of insurance.

"We could be subjecting those very people who conscientiously, because they believe in the U.S. Constitution, we could be subjecting them to fines or the interpretation of a judge, all the way up to imprisonment," Ensign said. "That seems to me to be a problem."

The president still insists that nobody’s talking about government taking over health care.

“Nobody Is Talking About Government Take-Over Of Healthcare”—President Barry Soetoro



Huh…Mr. President yes somebody is! Somebody also talking about putting Americans in jail if we don’t buy health care under your plan!

John Stossel goes Michael Moore on Obamacare and Destroys it

ABC's John Stossel


Show of hand how many of you saw Fahrenheit 9/11 and came out of the theatre thinking, “Boy no way I’m I going to vote for Bush!” Come on let me see those hands… Umm that many. Well I thought so. By the way Bush won in 2004 despite Moore’s best efforts. So Democrats ran against Bush again in 2008 where they were finally able to defeat him.

So now that we know that you’re into that documentary kind of genre you won’t mind spending 6mins taking a look at ABC’s John Stossel’s look at Health Care Reform. You know the Health Care Reform that Democrats are getting ready to force through just before they force though the bogus Climate Change legislation, now would you? Alright then here you go (see 6:43 min video)



Next time a bloke attempts to argue Obama Health Care with you know that the models which this concept are based on are failing miserably. Canadian and British public Health Care both are atrocious and worst by far then anything we have right now in America.

As a matter of fact it would be better to do nothing rather than do what Barry Soetoro and Democrats want to do with Health Care in this country.

Look we’ve seen the handy work of Barry Soetoro and Democrats. What they are proposing and what they have done to date is not good for America.

Government run Medi-Cal and Medicaid are going under. Government run Frannie Mae and Frankie Mac caused the greatest financial crisis since the great depression. The United States Post Office is incompetently run and the DMV is well the DMV.

Now government through an inexperienced politician, Barry Soetoro, who became president under dubious means at the hands of scandal ridden ACORN wants to take over one third of the economy which health care represents and force every American under a Government controlled system?

I don’t think so. Since July Soetoro has been talking like he had a Health Care Plan but after nearly three months of taking about it the Soetoro administration has not produced a plan. Some believe that the plan is probably locked away in the same vault in Hawaii where Soetoro stores his Birth Certificate.


Free the Health Care bill Mr. Soetoro so that we may read it. And if you think that you are going to get Americans to junk their system for one that models after Canada’s or European Union’s socialist models then you’ve go a fight on your hands Mr. president. If you fight it as poorly as your decision to send troops into Afghanistan and fail to support them with enough supplies and men to win then you will lost this fight too as you’re losing in Afghanistan.

And don’t forget you and your Party have elections to lose or win in 2010 and 2012!

They never sang praises to President Bush

President Barry Soetoro in the classroom with our children

Sounds strange because it is. Fact is you can’t name a time in U.S. history when school children were taught to sing a song to a U.S. president. Go ahead name just one… I didn’t think so.

Students did not sing praises to President Bush but they are being encouraged to singing praises to President Barry Soetoro.

September 8, 2009 the Barry Soetoro administration created a national controversy with an intended speech to the children of America. While we don’t know what the original speech would have been. And we’ll never know what President Soetoro originally intended to say because his speech was reconfigured due to parent protest all across the nation, many Soetoro supporters are now claiming that the speech was harmless and parents overreacted by keeping their children home. But I don’t think so.

What we do know is that President Soetoro intended to have the students thinking about him this school year. That fact was in the curriculum that was released by the Department of Education, children were instructed to write a letter explaining how they could help the president. Teaches were instructed to hold the children accountable to their goals to help the president throughout the year. That idea too was change when parents protested. (see previous post)

Parents and School administrators had the right to be concerned because any learned person knowledgeable regarding propaganda techniques used in Stalinist and Red Communism recognized the techniques that the Soetoro administration was attempting to employ on our children. Those same techniques were used in Nazi Germany as well. (see 2:57mins video)



Weird and strange right? Well follow are your and my children in America being indoctrinated in much the same way today. (see 2:25min video)



Just an isolated incident? I don’t think so. (see 3:17min video)



This indoctrination is happening all across America to the young minds that are not aware that they are being used as political pawns for change. (see 3:09min video)



These haunting and unbelievable videos are demonstrative of a phenomenon happening in the schools all across America. Seemingly innocuous activities full of subliminal messages that children are not mature enough to cope with.

Some are suggesting that Soetoro’s September 8 speech was totally harmless and even appropriate. For those who say that they are wrong on both counts. Everything that Soetoro does has an ulterior motive because he is trained in the methods Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, which is a rule book for how to undermine the government by stealth.

They never sang praise to President Bush or to any other U.S. president for that matter. You should be concerned. You should be very concerned!

Kill Republicans Save the World

Jonathan Freedland

Copenhagen is that last chance. If successful, it could see rich countries promise not only to cut their emissions but to stump up cash for poor nations to pay for the changes they'll need to protect their towns and villages from those effects of climate change already under way and too late to reverse (think houses on stilts on easily flooded sandbanks in Bangladesh).

Developing countries would not have to cut their own emissions right away, but they would have to plan now for a low-carbon future, one consistent with keeping the planet below that two-degree mark.—Jonathan Freedland

Like a bad episode of Sci-fi TV serial Heroes, “Kill the Cheerleader Save the World” Global warming fanatics like Jonathan Freedland still intend to advance their Sci-fi theories of anthropogenic global warming in spite of the facts. (see story)and (here)

The facts are that their discredited theories that CO2 emissions are the cause of globing warming are fundamentally wrong. So they know that the only way to completely rid themselves of any real rational debate and keep the Al Gore hysteria of global impeding doom alive is to kill all Republicans to save the World. Or as Freedland puts it, “defeat the Republican headbangers [or] our planet is doomed”

What is so totally amazing is how the rest of the world is “all up in the business” with respect to American policy. Freedland unconventionally ties America’s battle concerning Health Care Reform with the total destruction of the Earth via global warming. And he blames a Republican bogeyman when Democrats have super majorities in both houses of Congress. Republicans can do nothing to stop Democrats from passing any policy or bill that Democrats want to pass therefore Freedland’s piece is just an overstated hit piece against Conservatism in America.

His remedy is of course the destruction of those dread “headbanging” Republicans to save the world. His reasoning is if Barry Soetoro can’t defeat the Republicans on health care reform then Soetoro doesn’t have a chance with regards to cap & trade in up coming Copenhagen Global warming talks in October (see related story).

Oh and by the way, what “headbanging” Republicans? Please tell me who, I’d like to support at least just one headbanging Republican in my life time!

The facts are these, there has been no, I repeat no global warming since 1998 The globe is actually cooling. And the coup de grâce CO2 emissions are not linked to global warming! One other thing Cap & Trade and other policies surrounding CO2 emissions are gateway policies meant to subject the USA to World government and the World economy (see previous post)

Barack Obama will renew his commitment to green America's economy and join international action on global warming in a speech to the United Nations climate change summit on Tuesday.

The appearance is a chance to offer much needed assurances to nearly 100 world leaders that the president can deliver on his promise for early action on climate change – now that the issue has taken second place to health care in the Senate.—Suzanne Goldenberg

This is the point, for the global internationalist elite to continue with their plans for the total restructuring of the world economic system, by transferring U.S. taxpayer’s wealth to third world nations and Europe, those who oppose the economic change must be totally defeated at all cost.

With all of President Bush’s faults the one thing that he did do was he prevented the abduction of the U.S. economy thru the job killing Kyoto agreement or any like fake international agreement that would undermine U.S. economic power as Cap and Trade and the other Carbon emissions scams are fundamentally designed to do.

Global warming scammers have an ally in President Barry Soetoro who has said that it is his purpose to bankrupt companies that produce American’s energy independence. He also believes in the disproved and discredited Sci-fi theories of global warming (see 3:58min video)



Jonathan Freedland is the Guardian's policy editor and has been a columnist for the paper since 1997. He served for four years as the Guardian's Washington correspondent and US affairs remain a keen interest, along with British politics and the Middle East. Freedland believes in global warming, cap and trade and all of the CO2 emissions propaganda that would aide in the transfer U.S. economic power to the E.U. and the third world.

Freedland sees it as the mission of every Global warming CO2 Fundamentalist to completely destroy Republicans in order to get their worldwide global warming mandates through.

According to Freedland the only thing that has prevented this transfer of U.S. taxpayer’s money to the world thus far has been former president Bush and Republicans. So he is very much in favor of Barry Soetoro’s mandate to have the United States join in Global warming scheme to rip-off of the American taxpayer.

We all know that President Soetoro doesn’t mind taxing the American people for things that are important to his agenda of fundamentally changing America. After all he was willing to give ACORN 80Billion dollars!

The truth is Mr. Freedland even if you and your allies succeeded in ridding the World of all Republicans that would not Save the World. It is your cap & trade global warming initiatives that are destroying the world in the name of “greening” and environmentally friendly policies.

Your policies are wealth transferring scams that are meant to take from the American taxpayer thereby making this country a third world nation. All of this and your bogus green initiatives will not prevent or reduce any CO2 emissions nor make a new green economy viable enough to replace support and sustain America in the custom that we are accustomed to.

George… Look deep into My Eyes, A Tax is what I say it is

George, the fact that you looked up Merriam's Dictionary, the definition of tax increase, indicates to me that you're stretching a little bit right now. Otherwise, you wouldn't have gone to the dictionary to check on the definition. —President Barry Soetoro

Undoubtedly the funniest interview segment that Barry Soetoro has done to date, the George Stephanopholus interview on Sunday 20, 2009, entitled the “Health Care Blitz on every channel except Fox,” had to be hands down funniest. In it President Barry Soetoro attempted to replace Merriam’s Dictionary with his own Orwellian Worldview and definition of what a tax is. I gleefully yelled at the television screen; No, you lie, you lie, you lie as the president straight faced called George Stephanopholus and Merriam’s Dictionary a lie. (see transcript)

According to the president anyone who uses a reputable source of meaning, one that has been in use for centuries on end, that person is stretching the truth. Sooo does that make the president the only authority for meaning now, the divine LOGOS? Watch out next there’ll be a “Meaning of Words” Czar.

In this one interview President Soetoro showed God and everyone watching, why no one can win an argument with a Liberal Democrat. Democrats make up language and definitions like thick rope bridges stretched out over wide canyons of misinformation only to burn the bridges behind them as they run across so that no one else can get any footing (understanding) or join them across on the other side of a conversation for a reasonable and logical conclusion to a debate. (see 2:37mins video)



Simply Amazing!

So should one bring their own rope or ladder (a dictionary) a Liberal Democrat will either cut it in two or kick it off the side of the cliff before everyone can arrive at a truthful conclusion to an argument. Exactly the method president Soetoro demonstrated by cutting Stephanopholus off on last Sunday.

Here are snippets of the exchange where President Soetoro does his level best, “That depends on what is, is” impression of Bill Clinton!

STEPHANOPOULOS: ...during the campaign. Under this mandate, the government is forcing people to spend money, fining you if you don't

How is that not a tax?

OBAMA: Well, hold on a second, George. Here -- here's what's happening. You and I are both paying $900, on average -- our families -- in higher premiums because of uncompensated care. Now what I've said is that if you can't afford health insurance, you certainly shouldn't be punished for that. That's just piling on.
If, on the other hand, we're giving tax credits, we've set up an exchange, you are now part of a big pool, we've driven down the costs, we've done everything we can and you actually can afford health insurance, but you've just decided, you know what, I want to take my chances. And then you get hit by a bus and you and I have to pay for the emergency room care, that's…

STEPHANOPOULOS: That may be, but it's still a tax increase.

OBAMA: No. That's not true, George. The -- for us to say that you've got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase. What it's saying is, is that we're not going to have other people carrying your burdens for you anymore than the fact that right now everybody in America , just about, has to get auto insurance. Nobody considers that a tax increase.

OBAMA: No, but -- but, George, you -- you can't just make up that language and decide that that's called a tax increase. Any...

STEPHANOPOULOS: Here's the...

OBAMA: What -- what -- if I -- if I say that right now your premiums are going to be going up by 5 or 8 or 10 percent next year and you say well, that's not a tax increase; but, on the other hand, if I say that I don't want to have to pay for you not carrying coverage even after I give you tax credits that make it affordable, then...

STEPHANOPOULOS: I -- I don't think I'm making it up. Merriam Webster's Dictionary: Tax -- "a charge, usually of money, imposed by authority on persons or property for public purposes."

OBAMA: George, the fact that you looked up Merriam's Dictionary, the definition of tax increase, indicates to me that you're stretching a little bit right now. Otherwise, you wouldn't have gone to the dictionary to check on the definition. I mean what...

Lost in all of that Barry Soetoro bull? Here’s a general translation of what he said.

Translation: Obama: How is that not a tax? Well, hold on a second, George. Your perception of reality is serious skewed. Almost like a Republican!
Here’s what I want you to believe, people like you and I pay on average of $900 dollars [annually] on higher Health Care premiums because of stiffs who are uninsured. Now what I've said is if someone is a poor stiff then we should all be responsible for paying for poor stiffs.

On the other hand, the way we intend to hide that cost from the tax payer is to bamboozle them with phony tax credits, we've set up an exchange scam, and you are now part of a big pool to make it so confusing no one will understand that government is taking their money.

But if someone who is not a poor stiff exercises their God given freedoms to decide and doesn’t want government to take their money, then that person is hit but a bus you and I have to pay for their healthcare expense just like they were a poor stiff.

But, we’re going to prevent that freedom of choice by making people pay for themselves. That may sound like a tax to you but it isn’t. It’s just allowing people to be responsible for themselves. You know like making people carry their own burdens. It’s like auto insurance everybody is forced by the government to have auto insurance and nobody realizes that, that is a tax!

And George for us to say that every American has got to take responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase. What it's saying is, is that we're not going to have other people carrying your burdens for you anymore than the fact that right now everybody in America , just about, has to get auto insurance. Nobody considers that a tax increase.

Huh? Well Mr. President the Associated Press did a fact check of your statement against the language of the Democratic bills in both the House bill and the Senate Finance Committee proposal and they say for you to mandate that Americans carry Health insurance and for you to fine Americans if they don’t do it, that is a tax. (see story)

Memo to President Barack Obama: It's a tax. Obama insisted this weekend on national television that requiring people to carry health insurance — and fining them if they don't — isn't the same thing as a tax increase. But the language of Democratic bills to revamp the nation's health care system doesn't quibble. Both the House bill and the Senate Finance Committee proposal clearly state that the fines would be a tax.

And the reason the fines are in the legislation is to enforce the coverage requirement.

"If you put something in the Internal Revenue Code, and you tell the IRS to collect it, I think that's a tax," said Clint Stretch, head of the tax policy group for Deloitte, a major accounting firm. "If you don't pay, the person who's going to come and get it is going to be from the IRS."-- Ricardo Alonso-zaldivar, AP News

It all sounds like Obama hopnosis to me! And by the way hopnosis by definition is Barry Soetoro’s attempts to redefine reality on his word alone. Redefinitions above the facts and completely separate from any traditional meaning such as those found in a dictionary!

A Lie by any other name is just as Untruthful, Deceptive, False or Misleading

I like Charles Krauthammer’s work. Even more than that I respect him as a thinker and political analyst,. but I was a little put off by his attempt to finagle the word “Lie” in his article, “Does Obama Lie? No, but Obama implies, misdirects, and misleads.”(see article)

According to Webster Dictionary a lie is: 1 : to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive
2 : to create a false or misleading impression

It seemed to me Mr. Krauthammer go lost in a concept as writers sometimes do and instead of proving his point, after reading his article I said out loud, “My God Mr. Krauthammer just lost an argument with himself!

His original premise was flawed. He was arguing against the very definition of the very word that he was attempting to nuance. It was like arguing that water, in its natural form, is not wet.

What does the word “lie” mean if it doesn’t mean to misdirect and mislead? Therefore if Barry Soetoro Obama misdirects and misleads then by definition he lies! It’s just that simple.

Mr. Krauthammer gave examples of just how the president implies, misdirects and misleads which I thought where classic. But what I can’t figure out why Krauthammer didn’t see himself undermining his own argument, for example Soetoro’s statement broken down;

(1) “I will not sign (a plan),” he solemnly pledged, “if it adds one dime to the deficit, now or in the future. Period.”

Wonderful. The president seems serious, veto-ready, determined to hold the line. Until, notes Harvard economist Greg Mankiw, you get to Obama’s very next sentence: “And to prove that I’m serious, there will be a provision in this plan that requires us to come forward with more spending cuts if the savings we promised don’t materialize.”

Krauthammer remarks that Mankiw states, (t)his apparent strengthening of the pledge brilliantly and deceptively undermines it. What Obama suggests is that his plan will require mandatory spending cuts if the current rosy projections prove false.

Umm… if a statement is deceptively undermined by a second statement wouldn’t that mean that even if the original statement was true the second statement would create a false impression?

But this is what I consider the funny part, Krauthammer calls Obama’s use of language a “bait and switch.” Bait and Switch is a term synonymous with fraud for most people. And fraud is the intentional perversion of truth in order to induce another to part with something of value or to surrender a legal right. Like attempting to bamboozle the American people into allow government to take over their health care! But the coup de grâce is the Mankiw translation of what Obama’s “I will not sign (a plan), pledge” really meant. I thought this was classic!

“Translation: I promise to fix the problem. And if I do not fix the problem now, I will fix it later, or some future president will, after I am long gone. I promise he will. Absolutely, positively, I am committed to that future president fixing the problem. You can count on it. Would I lie to you?”

It’s all enough to make a person jump to one’s feet and shout-out “You Lie!” Oh yeah it did make someone jump to their feet and do exactly that.

Sorry Mr. Krauthammer everyone is off of their game every once in a while. You usually bring your "A" game and I must admit that attempting to nuance or parse what Obama and Democrats do with language is a Herculean task that most of us are not up to.

If to lie means to misdirect and mislead, among other things, then the answer to your question is Yes! He does lie. As proven by your own article “Does Obama lie?”

Apocalypse Now Nancy

Former Government Disrupter turned Government Fascist

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety—Benjamin Franklin

Apparently Nancy Pelosi loves the smell of inciting racial hatred and racial fears every morning, afternoon and evening.

In one of the darkest, dank, cryptic, foreboding and apocalyptic warnings ever to be given by an elected official, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi choked out a dread warning of impeding violence which apparently will be sparked by yours and my first amendment rights to freedom of speech.

It was as mysterious as foreboding and as bizarre a warning against debate and disagreement as anyone could ever remember. It’s as if in Pelosi’s Orwellian worldview dissent against Democrat radical leftwing leadership is different than the dissent demonstrated against George W. Bush and Republicans. It’s like now Pelosi believes that dissent and debate will somehow spark some kind of violence.

Pelosi’s answer to divert the coming calamitous disaster is for everyone to voluntarily give up their first amendment rights for the safety of the country. You think that I’m exaggerating? (see 1:17min video)



What was Pelosi suggesting? Some believe that the subtext of this, a most ominous dirge, was Democrats again playing the race card. We already know that Democrats are attempting to float the idea that any opposition to President Barry Soetoro is only because he is Black. According to Pelosi’s thinking no one could be opposing Soetoro because of his radical leftist governing.

Not to mention that opposition to Soetoro could be opposition to an un-constitutional usurper who is acting out like a Fascist Megalomaniac, someone who believes that he is divinely ordained to fundamentally change the mistakes that he sees with the forming and shaping of America. The truth is there is plenty to oppose this president about none of which is because he is Black.

Democrats are the ones that have encouraged radical rhetoric and radical disrupters up until now. Democrats are the ones that have presented that type of activity as completely American and part of the American expression when Republicans were in leadership but now Democrats are in leadership and now they don’t like it. Here is Pelosi encouraging such behavior against President Bush and Republicans. (see 2:52min video)



Pelosi and Democrats for the pass eight years have been the sole instigators of caustic speech that has eaten away at the very foundations of the Democratic process and the office of the presidency. (see 7:07mins video)



Congresswoman Pelosi was quite a disrupter during the Bush administration. So much so that she was asked to apologize for inflammatory and hateful language that she used against President Bush.

"Nancy Pelosi should apologize for her irresponsible, dangerous rhetoric," DeLay, R-Texas, said. "She apparently is so caught up in partisan hatred for President Bush that her words are putting American lives at risk."

Pelosi did not back down, even when asked if her comments would undermine Bush's abilities as commander in chief.

"His activities, his decisions, the results of his actions are what undermines his leadership, not my statement," Pelosi said. "My statements are just a statement of fact."-- Ted Barrett and Sean Loughlin, CNN

Pelosi remained defiant after calls for her to tone down her rhetoric. She stood by her characterizations of the president as being incompetent and said that the president should be blamed for U.S. troops dying. (see story)

Do Democrats think that Newton’s Third law doesn’t apply to them? Wasn’t it Rev. Jeremiah Wright who so infamously claimed that America’s chickens would come home to roost? Didn’t Democrats think that eight years of disruption of government and Bush bashing wouldn’t come back home to them?

Did Liberals not think for a second that all of the Karma that they expended to vilify George W. Bush and Republicans would not manifest itself back in the same way that it was projected at others?

Or was Pelosi warning entirely something else altogether? What you ask?

Well this is just a thought but there is a court case filed in the Santa Ana District Court, Case SACV09-00082-DOC. District Court Judge David O. Carter promises to hear the facts of the claim that Barry Soetoro is ineligible to be president of the United States of America.

If this case where actually heard and if facts where disclosed that Pelosi and Democrats plotted to place an unconstitutional person in the White House wouldn’t those events be something that might incite the cataclysmic violent reaction that Pelosi, Janet Napolitano and Democrats have been hinting at?

What else could it be? What is it that would have an elected representation issue such a grave and somber warning of impeding cataclysmic violence?

Of course we don’t know if these cases will go to trial and we don’t know what the outcomes will be, but it seems to me that Democrats are telegraphing by their warnings that there is some grave and serious cause for the American people to be very alarmed about. Something that has either transpired or is transpiring in their government.

Disturbingly, Pelosi by her warning has suggested that there is a reason that the American people should be highly upset even to the point of violence except for the fact that we don’t know it yet. However Pelosi’s warning suggest that once it is known there will be a justified cause for violence.

It’s either that or Nancy Pelosi just loves the smell of inciting racial hatred and racial fears in the morning, afternoon and evening.

Polite Liars and their Discredited House

Rep. Peter Stark (D) CA

Whereas on September 9, 2009, during the joint session of Congress convened pursuant to House Concurrent Resolution 179, the President of the United States, speaking at the invitation of the House and Senate, had his remarks interrupted by the Representative from South Carolina, Mr. Wilson; and

Whereas the conduct of the Representative from South Carolina was a breach of decorum and degraded the proceedings of the joint session, to the discredit of the House: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives disapproves of the behavior of the Representative from South Carolina, Mr. Wilson, during the joint session of Congress held on September 9, 2009.

So is the reprimanding of Representative Joe Wilson Republican of South Carolina.

There are seven words that you can’t say on television, that’s the old George Carlin comedy shtick. And apparently there are six things that Congressman and women can’t do in the House they are the following:

• call the President a “liar.”
• call the President a “hypocrite.”
• describe the President’s veto of a bill as “cowardly.”
• charge that the President has been “intellectually dishonest.”
• refer to the President as “giving aid and comfort to the enemy.”
• refer to alleged “sexual misconduct on the President’s part.”

Even if some or all of the above is true you just can’t say it, unless of course, you are a Democrat and unless the president that you are calling a liar is President Bush.

Last year Democrat Rep. Peter Stark of California called President Bush a liar and a murderer on the floor of the House but did he get the same resolution of disapproval that Rep. Joe Wilson received days ago for Wilson’s shout-out to President Obama? Of course not!

What Rep. Stark got was a warm and friendly reminder that he had broken the House rule by the Chairwoman of the House. (see 2:40mins video)



What are we to conclude except that Democrats again took this occasion to show how hypocritical and partisan they can be?

No reprimand for Democrat Peter Stark who called Republican president Bush a liar and a murderer but a reprimand for Republican Joe Wilson who shouted out “You Lie!” in the middle of a speech given by Democrat president Barry Soetoro. A speech that was full of lies!

This House of Representatives is discredited, but not by Joe Wilson this House is discredited by their invited polite liar and their hypocritical members who voted to reprimand Joe Wilson when just a year ago calling the president a liar was in fashion on the floor of the House and the most that one could get for such an offense was a gentle reminder from the Chairman that one had broken the rule.

One has to wonder just how many times was George Bush called a liar on the floor of the House.

Pelosi is at the center of Obama’s Eligibility Question

Nancy Pelosi and Barry Soetoro exchange conspiratorial pleasantries at DNC Presidential Nomination?

Nancy Pelosi was responsible for vetting Barack Obama’s eligibility to be President of the United States of America. That’s what I said, if Barry Soetoro (Obama) isn’t properly vetted it is primarily the fault of Nancy Pelosi. Instead of making sure that a constitutionally eligible candidate was presented to the American people from the Democrats, Pelosi the DNC and the Democrat Party set in motion a conspiracy to steal the Presidency and deceive the American people.

This is a remarkable claim; allow me to lay out the details and when I have finished if the evidence matches my claim you will see that either the entire Democrat Party is complicit in one of greatest political coup d'états in the history of the Western Civilized world or the CIA’s nemesis, Nancy Pelosi, along with Barry Soetoro conspired together to deceive the American people by knowingly having Soetoro pose as a Constitutionally eligible candidate when they knew that he was not.

First I posted December 05, 2008 that the Democrats were staging a Constitutional Crisis by selecting and running an illegible candidate to be president. My post: the entire Party knew directly or indirectly that Obama was not qualified to be president and knowingly defrauded the constitution and the American people by aiding and abetting Obama in his fraudulent pursuit of the presidency”

This issue has been going on since before the Democrat National Convention and was filed in August of 2008. Hillary Clinton supporter and attorney Philip Berg filed suit asking someone, anyone to take responsibility and protect the American people and the U.S. constitution from possible fraud.

Berg’s suit named Barack Obama, Howard Dean and the entire DNC his petition asked to enjoin the Democratic National Committee from nominating Obama. The petition stated that is was feared that if Obama were nominated as the Democrat Presidential candidate his questionable citizenship would at some point cause a constitutional crisis.

Do not be fooled they all knew well before the Democrat nomination process and well before the November 4 general elections that there was a major constitutional problem with Obama running but they did nothing!—Alaphiah (see previous post)

I also posted December 22, 2008 that, Isn’t it a coincidence that an associate lawyer in a Chicago-based firm whose partner served on a finance committee for then Sen. Barack Obama has advocated for the elimination of the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a president is be a "natural-born" citizen, calling the requirement "stupid" and asserting it discriminates, that it is outdated and undemocratic.

A paper was written in 2006 by Sarah Herlihy, just two years after Obama had won a landslide election in Illinois to the U.S. Senate. Herlihy is listed as an associate at the Chicago firm of Kirkland & Ellis. A partner in the same firm, Bruce I. Ettelson, cites his membership on the finance committees for both Obama and Sen. Richard Durbin on the corporate website.(see story) and (see paper) (see previous post) and here on August 18, 2009

Now let me bottom line this. We know that as early as 2006 the Soetoro camp was attempting to strategize around the Constitutional eligibility issue by talking the statue down by calling it, "stupid," discriminatory, outdated and undemocratic this is a documented fact.

Attorney Philip Berg filed suit in Pennsylvania District Court August 21, 2008 and served the DNC before Barry Soetoro was nominated as the Democrat candidate for President. The DNC, it’s top echelon and others knew as early as August 2008 (if not before) that legitimate questions were being raised concerning Barry Soetoro’s eligibility.

Then as reported by J.B. Williams in the Canadian Free Press the DNC, upon nominating Barry Soetoro as their candidate for president, mysteriously produced two certifications of Soetoro one saying that he met all requirements and was legally qualified to serve as president and one that completely excluded the language which stated that Soetoro was legally qualified. (see source)

According to Williams the DNC withheld the certification that said that Soetoro was legally qualified and sent out the certification that excluded that language to the 50 states.

"THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."

Williams cites the fact that two certifications exist is suspicious enough not to mention that the DNC would elect to send out the certification which excludes the language that Soetoro is legally eligible to serve as president instead of the language that certifies that Soetoro is legally qualified.

Both original documents are signed by Nancy Pelosi, DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond and Colorado Notary of Public Shalifa A. Williamson. They are dated August 28, 2008.

CERTIFICATION WITH LEGALLY QUALIFIED IN IT.



CERTIFICATION WITHOUT “LEGALLY QUALIFIED” IN IT



Nancy Pelosi’s signature affixed to these documents places her in the middle of this conspiracy. Pelosi knew either by the Berg suit filed naming the DNC as a plaintiff in Soetoro’s eligibility suit or by the actions of whomever thought it necessary to duplicate the DNC’s certification of Soetoro and thereby leaving off the wording “legally qualified” on the copies that the DNC sent to the 50 states.

In comparison John McCain only had one certification which reads that he is legally qualified to be president of the United States of America.

John McCain’s Certification

Click Doc. to enlarge

In conclusion Nancy Pelosi the DNC and the Federal Election Commission all knew that Barry Soetoro was not eligible or legally qualified to be president of the United States of America as shown by the DNC’s act of duplicity producing two certifications one stating that Soetoro was legal and the other excluding that language.

Pelosi signed both originals. She knew!

2 Million March on Washington

Conservative Grassroots 2million strong at the Nation’s Capitol

"You want socialism? Go to Russia!"—Susan Clark, protestor

Up to two million people marched to the U.S. Capitol Saturday, carrying signs with slogans such as "Obamacare makes me sick" as they protested the president's health care plan and what they say is out-of-control spending.

The line of protesters spread across Pennsylvania Avenue for blocks, all the way to the capitol, according to the Washington Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency.

People were chanting "enough, enough" and "We the People." Others yelled "You lie, you lie!" in reference to Rep. Joe Wilson and "Pelosi has to go," referring to California congresswoman Nancy Pelosi.—Mail Foreign Service

It was originally reported in the Daily Mail two days ago that up to two million people marched on the U.S. Capitol and then without explanation the Daily Mail adjusted the number down to 1 million.

It is unclear whether the change in the estimate is the Daily Mail succumbing to political pressures because they were being used to reference that fact that upwards of 2 million people were in attendance in Washington.

What is suspicious is the Daily Mail made no mention why the number was changed. and adjusted down. (see story)

Other sources did record the Daily Mail's original report. (see here and here)

2 million people are a significant number because if that number stands it would be larger than other significant Marches on Washington: It would be larger than; the October 16, 1995 1 Million Man March with a reported 400,000 people. It would be bigger than the October 12, 1996 Illegal Aliens Rights March - First national march in D.C. for equal rights for Illegals. With a reported 500,000 people. With their slogan, “Today We March, Tomorrow We Vote” (see source) (That? You thought the election of Obama legitimate?)

And it would be bigger than the April 30, 2000 homosexual Millennium March on Washington controversial LBGT political rally with a reported 200,000 to 1 million people.

Marchers overran Washington Saturday to protest big government, out of control government spending and the irresponsible way that Democrats have used the full power of the presidency plus control of both houses of Congress to impose an ultra- partisan agenda on the American people

The American people come out in full force. to protest tax policies, along with growing resentment over the economic stimulus packages and bank bailouts.

Obama media and the White House attempted to completely ignore that a significant number of the American people are not happy with the Barry Soetoro administration and the direction which it is taking America.

The Barry Soetoro administration ignores the American people at its own peril. Barry has all but lost the support that put him in office. The far left alone will not be enough to sustain his radical plans to fundamentally change America.

2010 promises to be an explosive political charged year. If the political activity of Conservatives in the march on Washington is any indication, the fundamental change that was promised will be a fundamental change in the Congress in 2010 and then more of the same in 2012 in the Senate and then change in the White House in 2012 too!

With respect to Decorum, You Lie Mr. President!

In an astonishing admission the White House’s policy change let it be known without a doubt that Congressman Joe Wilson’s concerns had merit. Congressman Wilson was right, you lie Mr. President. Last Friday night the White House publicized that it is backing a provision that would require proof of citizenship before someone could enroll in its proposed Health Care plan. That is huge! It is proof that one lone courageous voice speaking truth to power can in fact make a difference.

Minus Joe Wilson’s voice President Barry Soetoro and Democrats would have been allowed to continue the farce that illegal aliens would not benefit from government imposed public health care.

Democrats intended to allow coverage for illegals the same way they enforce American borders, through non-enforcement of the law. Though there are laws against illegal entry into this country those laws aren’t enforced therefore 40 million illegals live, work and vote in America.

Penny Starr, Senior Staff Writer of CNSNews.com reports, Robert Rector, senior fellow on domestic policy at The Heritage Foundation, told an audience at the National Press Club in Washington.

Title II, Subtitle C, Section 246 of the House health care bill (H.R. 3200) stipulates “no federal payment for undocumented aliens.” The Senate bill states that beneficiaries of federal health care programs must be a citizen or national or an alien lawfully admitted to the United States.

But neither bill has a provision for verifying citizenship status, according to these experts. (see source)

That is exactly like Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution which reads:

“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President…”

Because the Constitutional statute has no provision for verifying citizenship status, it is possible for a person who is not a natural born citizen of the United States to become president. Possible because there is not a clearly defined remedy outlined in law to prevent that person from taking office. But we wouldn’t go there right now.

Yet after accepting the apology of Congressman Joe Wilson the White House virtual admitted that the Congressman was right. After all of the Liberal pundits pronouncements that the President was right and after all of the so called proofs that these pundits produced the White House undermined all of that by announcing that they will back legislation that will have specific language that would require proof of citizenship before someone could enroll in a plan selected on the exchange.

According to Mike Viqueira the bullet points sent by the White House:

• Undocumented immigrants would not be able to buy private insurance on the exchange. Those who are lawfully present in this country would be able to participate.
• Undocumented immigrants would be able to buy insurance in the non-exchange private market, just as they do today. That market will shrink as the exchange takes hold, but it will still exist and will be subject to reforms such as the bans on pre-existing conditions and caps.
• Verification will be required when purchasing health insurance on the exchange. One option is the SAVE program (Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements) which states currently use to make sure that undocumented immigrants don't participate in safety-net programs for which they are ineligible.
• There would be no change in the law that requires emergency rooms to treat people who need emergency care, including undocumented immigrants. There is already a federal grant program that compensates states for emergency room costs associated with treatment of undocumented immigrants, a provision sponsored by a Republican lawmaker. (see source)

This all would not have come into being without the lone true voice of Congressman Joe Wilson apparently the only person in Congress that knows a lie when he hears it and the only one brave enough to say it when it counts!

Kudos Congressman! I for one am sending you money to fight the George Soros funded attacks against you. I would hope that readers would do that too!

Oh but that was not the only lie you told Mr. President. Following is a Standard Newswire fact check of your speech full of lies:

WASHINGTON, Sept. 10 /Standard Newswire/ --

CLAIM: "...[N]othing in this plan will require you or your employer to change the coverage or the doctor you have. Let me repeat this: nothing in our plan requires you to change what you have."

FACT: This marked an important change in the President's language last night. He used to say, "If you like your health-care plan, you keep your health-care plan." By now using the word "require," the President's admitting that they can't guarantee Americans will keep their health plan. After both the Associated Press, ABC News and others have thoroughly debunked this claim, it's not surprising the White House has made this shift. But the point is that no one knows for sure how many employers will drop their coverage altogether if their plan goes into effect. Experts at the Lewin Group estimate the number could be more than 100 million Americans. And $500 billion in Medicare cuts will obviously reduce the quality of care America's seniors receive.

CLAIM: "The plan will not add to our deficit...I will not sign a plan that adds one dime to our deficits -- either now or in the future. Period."

FACT: According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, the House Democrats' bill would increase the deficit by $239 billion over 10 years. And a recent study by the Lewin Group found that "[i]n the second 10 years...the proposal would add an estimated $1 trillion to the federal deficit."

CLAIM: "(I)t will slow the growth of health care costs for our families, our businesses, and our government."

FACT: As the Associated Press has reported, the Democrats' plan will increase costs, rather than lower them: "Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Elmendorf warned lawmakers the legislation that he has seen so far would raise costs, not lower them."

CLAIM: "f you come to me with a serious set of proposals, I will be there to listen. My door is always open."

FACT: The Hill reported yesterday, that the President has not met with House Republicans since April, and when Republican Leaders asked for a meeting to discuss health care in a May 14 letter, the President ignored the request. The Politico reported on the President' response on June 5, saying, "he makes no mention of the request to meet in the letter," which he signs off by stating, "Thank you again for sharing your thoughts with me and I look forward to further discussions on this critically important issue." But those "further discussions" simply didn't happen. The facts are clear: blame for the lack of bipartisanship in the current health care debate lies squarely at the feet of Washington Democrats.

CLAIM: "I will not stand by while the special interests use the same old tactics to keep things exactly the way they are."

FACT: This is an interesting assertion considering the President also said last night: "Our overall efforts have been supported by an unprecedented coalition of doctors and nurses; hospitals, seniors' groups and even drug companies." So what special interests is he talking about when the White House seems to have struck back room deals with so many of them?

CLAIM: "We've estimated that most of this plan can be paid for by finding savings within the existing health care system -- a system that is currently full of waste and abuse."

FACT: The massive $1.6 trillion House bill's cost is NOT mostly "paid for" through savings in the existing health care system -- not by a long shot. In fact, the House bill includes more than $800 billion in new tax increases during a severe economic downturn on families and employers to "pay for" most of the massive price tag.

And, the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that even with these tax increases, coupled with other "pay fors" in the bill such as cuts to Medicare, the House bill still has a revenue shortfall that will add $239 billion to the federal deficit over a ten year period. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce wrote in an open letter to Congress raising concerns about a $534 billion small business tax in July: "Even with some exemptions, this provision will kill many jobs. Market forces and employer autonomy should determine what benefits employers provide, rather than Congress."

CLAIM: "And one more misunderstanding I want to clear up -- under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions, and federal conscience laws will remain in place."

FACT: During his quest for the presidency, now-President Obama declared that everyone deserves access to reproductive health care that includes abortion, and vowed that this "right" would be at the heart of his health care reform plan if elected president. President Obama has never retracted this vow, and the health care reform bill moving through the House would help him make good on it if enacted into law. As written, it would allow the U.S. Secretary of Health & Human Services (HHS) to include abortion as a benefit in the government-run health care option.

Many Democrats dispute this, pointing to the recent adoption of an amendment sponsored by Rep. Lois Capps (D-CA) that would prohibit federal dollars from being used to fund abortion. But under this amendment, the HHS Secretary is explicitly authorized to pay for elective abortions under the government-run insurance plan.

Some have also suggested that the government-run plan would not result in government-funded abortions because it will be subject to the "Hyde Amendment," but this argument is misleading as well. The Hyde Amendment is not a government-wide applied law, but a rather provision included in the annual HHS Appropriations bill, which bans federal funding of elective abortions. According to a memo produced by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, the government-option will not be funded through the appropriations process. For this reason, it will not be subject to the Hyde Amendment.

The truth of the matter is that the HHS Secretary will be allowed to include abortion as a benefit in the government-run health care plan under the legislation currently moving through the House. Moreover, FactCheck.Org has stated that the "House bill would allow abortions to be covered by a federal plan and by federally subsidized private plans."

CLAIM: "Now, there are also those who claim that our reform efforts would insure illegal immigrants. This, too, is false. The reforms I am proposing would not apply to those who are here illegally."

FACT: The non-partisan Congressional Research Service confirms in a report that there is no mechanism included in the bill to verify that individuals are U.S. citizens or legal immigrants before they receive government benefits. Furthermore, Republicans offered two amendments in the Ways and Means, and Energy and Commerce Committees that were rejected by Democrats. The first would have prevented illegal immigrants from being automatically enrolled into Medicaid and the second would have required better screening for applicants for federally-subsidized health care to ensure they are actually citizens or legal immigrants. (source)

Defending the 787Billion Dollar Mistake with the Economy

President Barry Soetoro will claim today to that he has pulled the Economy back from the brink. A claim that he and his administration has been making since July 11, 2009. So he won't be saying anything new today. He's just attempting to stave off critics of his failed economic policies. In fact it is same old talking points that he's been using since July.

You want to know what he's going to say later today? Take a look below at this weekly address it'll be approximately the same minus the brief foreign affairs business at the beginning. (see 7:57min video)



By now it should be plain even to the White House that Barry has a credibility problem with the American people. We no longer believe his claims. He has claim against all evidence to the contrary that he’s improved the economy with the 787 Billion dollar stimulus bill (also called the Recovery and Reinvestment Act) of which a little less than 20% has been spent so far.

Mostly all of it spent on government expansion not private sector jobs. The site Pro Publica keeps track of the stimulus spending (see here)


Sen. Chris Dodd (D) Connecticut who was instrumental in creating and passing the stimulus bill now doesn't believe that it is working in his state or nationally. He believes that Congress may have to pass another stimulus bill. (see1:37min video)



President Soetoro promised that if the stimulus bill was passed by Congress he would be able to save or create 3 to 4 million jobs but instead since the stimulus bill was pass America has lost around 2.1 million jobs. (see1:35min video)



Sen. Mitch McConnell(R) and Senate minority leader declared President Soetoro's Stimulus bill a failure and a mistake that is creating massive deficits and a failed economy. (see 1:21min video)



When the president attempts to reassure the American people today that his stimulus policies are working but need more time to work you should know that he is already behind his own deadline for creating 3 to 4million jobs. That and he has not spent any money to this point to create a private sector job.

If there are no jobs being created it would be truthfully hard to say that there is any real sign of recovery. (see previous post)

Today's speech is supposed to be a major speech on the economy. But it will be nothing new. In fact it is very troubling that the president will attempt to continue to push his failed policies as if they are working.

Spending more money on the Democrat pipedream of Universal Health Care will not get us out of this deficit. Nor will the out of control spending which Democrats have passed since Barry Soetoro was elected help get us out of this deficit.

We need a fiscal responsibility that Democrats and Barry Soetoro have already proven they lack. In addition to that we need honestly and integrity restored to government.

The public no longer trusts Democrats and the man who hides information about his birth from the American people to do the right thing. We also believe that your vision and your policies Mr. Soetoro are not good for America, we believe they are leading America in the wrong direction.

And frankly we're getting tired of seeing and hearing from the president every-single-day! The American people need a Martha's vineyard vacation break from the president of the United States.

You can start off by leaving our health care alone, leaving our children alone and leaving our Constitution in tack.

Na na na na na you have no Standing!

Bill Clinton appointed U.S. District Judge David O. Carter

“Na na na na na you have no Standing” has been the legal argument that President Barry Soetoro, his attorneys and now the attorneys of the U.S. Justice Department, have used to have dozens eligibility suits dismissed throughout the country.

As legally profound and convincing as that argument is on September 8, 2009 in a California Federal Court, Judge of the Central District David Carter has for the first time since this issue has been brought up has scheduled a case to be heard on its merits. Image that someone in black robes has finally said okay let’s get to the bottom of this controversy once and for all. That ought to make all of the anti-birthiers happy.

The first case was filed before Barry Soetoro received the Democrat’s nomination to be the Democrat candidate for the presidency. It was filed in Philadelphia by attorney Philip Berg a Hillary Clinton supporter who feared that if Sen. Soetoro received the Democrat Nomination Republicans would be able to use the fact that there was were questions surrounding the birth of Sen. Soetoro however Sen. John McCain never raised those questions. Democrats in the DNC all knew of the questions regarding a lack of a birth certificate because they were served notice by Mr. Berg in fact all of the major players knew but no one did anything about it for whatever reason(s).

Then Philadelphia District Judge R. Barclay Surrick dismissed the case on a technicality as every judge following him has done until now.

Subsequently dozens of cases have been filed challenging Barry Soetoro’s eligibility and if dismissed they are always dismissed on a technicality and never on the merits of the case. Not one case was ever dismissed the case on its merits.

Even the Supreme Court dismissed an eligibility case that came before it on a technicality rather than hearing the case on its merits.

Not so with Judge David Carter who has tentatively scheduled a trial for Jan. 26, 2010, for a case that challenges Barack Obama's eligibility to be president based on questions over his qualifications under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution. (see story)

Still the trial is not guaranteed. Carter has ordered a hearing Oct. 5 on a motion to dismiss and ordered arguments submitted on the issue of discovery as filed by Dr. Orly Taitz.

If the case survives that challenge, according to worldnetdaily.com’s Dr. Jerome Corsi, a pretrial hearing has been scheduled for Jan. 11 and the trial for two weeks later.

In the government’s motion to dismiss, government lawyers did not directly rebut the fact of the case. Instead, the federal attorneys argued that the suit is inherently flawed because such disputes can't be resolved in court and because the dozens of plaintiffs can't show they are directly injured by Obama's presence in office. (see source)

Effectively if one follows the logic of this nonsensical argument it goes, no citizen in the United States of America can sue a person that becomes President by illegitimate and unconstitutional means because a citizen can not prove that they were directly harmed by said person becoming president. It’s the old Na na na na na you have no standing technicality ruse.

For now Judge Carter is going through the motions that he will be the first to allow the actual facts to come before him through discovery and argument and that is all that people of a free country who still believe in the rule of law can ask for.
Pray for the safety of Judge David Carter and Attorney Orly Taitz!

Obama in Role of Illegitimate Lecturer-in-Chief

President Barry Soetoro Scolding the Nation on Health Care

"Instead of honest debate, we have seen scare tactics" and ideological warfare that offers no hope for compromise.

Well, the time for bickering is over, the time for games has passed. Now is the season for action."—President Barry Soetoro

Project much Mr. President?

Whether it’s the nation’s school children or the Congress or the American People President Barry Soetoro enjoys talking down to people. Soetoro scolded Congress and the American people like we were all school children on the first day of school.

All I hear is that Democrats need to regain the debate on health care and that was what your speech was about wasn’t it, regaining the debate? If so, with all of the misinformation, scare tactics and ideological warfare that Democrats engage in, how dare you get up on your soapbox and wash your hands before the American people like you're Pontus Pilot and you're above the fray. Don't pretend that you had nothing to do with any of the rancor and bickering that your policies and your Party has produced around the subject of health care and all the other policies and laws that you’ve introduced since January 20th.

And when Soetoro went to set the record straight as has become his custom I was screaming that the television Liar! But surprising this time I wasn’t the only one Rep. Joe Wilson, R-S.C., shouted out "You lie" when the president said illegal immigrants would not benefit from his proposals. Wilson perhaps the only honest man in Congress knows like you and I know that what Obama said in not true. There are upwards of 40 million illegal aliens in America already enjoying the privileges of citizenship. (see story) (see38sec. video)



Barry has been doing nothing if he hasn’t been working to included Illegals into receiving Health Care.

And now, Obama and Congress are not only preparing to implement that dramatic funding increase, but also to remove current restrictions prohibiting illegal immigrants from exploiting SCHIP to receive benefits.

That prohibition originated in 1996 as part of the successful welfare reform effort, and was applied to SCHIP when it was created one year later. For his part, Obama himself sponsored a bill to remove the illegal immigrant prohibition while he was still in the Senate, and supposedly "moderate" Senate Finance Committee Max Baucus (D - Montana) told reporters that he also favors ending the ban.

Accordingly, Obama and the new Congress appear dead-set on forcing already-strapped American taxpayers to fund health benefits for illegal immigrants. --CFIF (see source)

The president enjoys saying that nobody’s talking about providing Health Care for Illegal Aliens and that nothing in his proposal or the bills written provides for Illegals receiving Health Care. But his argument can be described as a sin of omission.

What I mean by that is Illegals will receive Health Care just like they enter into this country. There is no provision in the Constitution or our laws that allows Illegal Entry into this country but Mexicans and others are doing it, as a matter of fact it is against the law to enter this country without going through the proper process but you wouldn’t know it by the lack of enforcement of the laws and the border.

Yet 40 million illegals have crossed our borders and the Federal government has done nothing about it. In actuality the Feds have made it harder to enforce laws regarding illegals by making it virtually impossible to ask for identification of suspected illegals that would be called racial profiling to illegal alien rights activist.

If the Fed can’t or won’t stop illegals from entering the country they certainly aren’t going to deny them health care. They’ll just look the other way as they do with everything else regarding illegals everyone knows this therefore the President was in fact lying.

Even if it is written law that illegals will not receive health care benefit they will just disregard the law as they do with illegal entry. That’s the dirty little secret that Rep. Wilson called the president on last night. We all know that illegals will get health care and no matter how Soetoro attempt to dispel the truth we all know he is lying.

It comes down to a matter of trust Mr. president we don’t trust a word you say no matter how you say it. We’ve seen what Democrats do with power. They stuff good bills with pork, they try to pass bad bills that are ruinous for the country, they lie about legislation, they attempt to propagandize our children and they call Republicans A**holes.

No more with your lies and lectures! Like you said president Soetoro instead of honest debate from Democrats, all we have seen are scare tactics" and ideological warfare that offers no hope for compromise. Then Mr. president, you come out on your bully pulpit to attempt to browbeat the American people with your Health Care plan—a plan that we don’t want.

Well, the time for bickering is over, the time for the games from Democrats has passed. Now is the season we begin to take our country back from Democrat Liberal partisans who stand before the American people and lie so bald facedly that Congressmen forget all sense of decorum and rise to their feet and call a liar a liar!

Hey it’s good enough for the Brits, Democrats want to be like the Brits don’t they?

Obama: Speechifying Nothing

president Soetoro will give a rare Bicameral Address

One plain fact should outweigh all the words of Barack Obama and all the impressive trappings of the setting in which he says them: He tried to rush Congress into passing a massive government takeover of the nation's medical care before the August recess-- for a program that would not take effect until 2013!—Thomas Sowell

This is the Speechifying Presidency but whatever President Barry Soetoro’s pontifications are on Wednesday night regarding Health Care Reform the fact of the matter is he tried to hoodwink and bamboozle the nation with a rush to passing this bill already.

We all know that he originally demanded that Congress have the Health Care Reform bill on his desk to sign before Congress’ August recess. What you didn’t know is that even if Congress would have been totally successful in accomplishing that task Democrats have written the bill so that the actual reform doesn’t start until 2013—2013?!? (see story)

Wait you mean this is like the Stimulus package that Congress rushed through in a record 2 days? That bill incidentally sat on president Soetoro’s desk for 3 days after Congress passed it because the president was on vacation. But weren’t we told that the stimulus bill had to be passed immediately or the whole economic engine of the United States would melt down?

Yeper that’s right! That’s exactly what they told us.

Is it just me, or does anyone else detect a pattern emerging here?

We were told that the stimulus bill would immediately jump start the economy and that it would create 3 to 4 million jobs by this month. In reality we have lost 6million jobs with 2.1 million of them lost since the stimulus was signed into law.

I’m sorry but this president has already attempted to sneak this bogus Health Care bill by the American people once already purely on his popularity and ability to speechify nothing.

Soetoro’s speech to both Houses of Congress Wednesday night will be a bouquet of words and in the end his words will signify nothing — nothing that we don’t already know and nothing new.

The president’s words will just be a long drawn out sermon (he enjoys lecturing and sermonizing us) and when it’s all over America will ask what did he say and we’ll scratch our heads and say, “I don’t know but he sho’ did say it good!”

Democrats lost the fight over Health care this summer, they know it and that’s the reason for tonight’s speechifying. . Health Care is technically dead. The president’s rare bicameral trip to Bethany on Wednesday night is an attempt to roll away the stone and call Lazarus from the dead.

The only reason that we are still discussing this dead bill is that after Congress got an earful from their constituents back home this summer they are still determined to pass some sort of Health Care agenda over the objections of the American people.

Yet there are ultra partisans like Jonathan Cohn of the New Republic who believes that one good bicameral officious browbeating will be enough to break the Blue Dogs away from the recent memories of Doghouses which they found themselves in back home this summer. They believe that one good speech will be enough to breathe life back into their beloved Health Care Reform.

Somehow, though, health reform is not dead. Despite all of the setbacks and all of the missed opportunities--despite this train wreck of a month--the situation remains remarkably similar to what it was before the recess.

Significant health care legislation is likely to pass, particularly if Obama manages to give a good speech on Wednesday night.—Jonathan Cohn, the New Republic (see source)

One good speech, huh?

It’s been over four days and by this time this bill stinketh! If this bill is passed in this manner, over the objections of the American people, it will not be a victory for president Soetoro and his Democrat cohorts. And contrary to what Democrats are hoping for Soetoro’s speech will not be the miraculous moment when Health Care walks out from its grave to be accepted by the American people to which the president orders Congress to loose it of its bandages.

No, if Congress and president Soetoro passes Health Care Reform and sign it into law it will be more like a “Weekend at Bernie’s” moment. One in which Democrats will pretend that they have a victory while in reality they will be actually carrying around the dead weight of their betrayal against the American people. That is, of course, until the 2010 and 2012 elections sweep out the stench of a Democrat Congress that betrayed the American people over a bogus Health Care bill that will further hurt and endanger the American economy and that is no fix for the present Health Care System.

We know all of the arguments and in this case to even do nothing is better than what the Democrats and the president are presently proposing. We know there is no rush because the bill is written to begin in 2013.
This speech will mainly be a plea to Blue Dogs who alone stand in the way of Barry Soetoro’s plans. If Democrats value their majorities in both houses of Congress they’d better heed my warning and tonight President Soetoro its best to let sleeping Blue Dogs lie.