The Justice Department has concluded that the Obama administration can lawfully pay the community group Acorn for services provided under contracts signed before Congress banned the government from providing money to the group.—CHARLIE SAVAGEThe Eric Holder Justice Department has not failed to error on the side of the enemies of the United States of America whether those enemies are either foreign or domestic. Khalid Sheik Mohammed mastermind of 9/11 was set to be sentenced in a Congressional approved military tribunal. President Barry Hussein Soetoro stopped that preceding to have his Justice department weigh in to this most critical trial for America.
AG Eric Holder set the trial’s venue in New York City near the site of the 9/11 act of war, giving enemy combatants full rights of the citizens whose country they intended to destroy.
ACORN long suspected of voter fraud and other nefarious acts of criminality was caught red headed in the act of conspiracy to aid and abet criminal activity. On video tape no less and so evident that On October 1, 2009 president Soetoro signed a law prohibiting taxpayer money to go to the organization. That includes taxpayer money that was authorized by previous legislation.
[O] n Oct. 1, President Obama signed into law a spending bill that included a provision that said no taxpayer money — including money authorized by previous legislation — could be “provided to” the group or its affiliates.—Charlie SavageHowever when a Housing and Urban Development Department lawyer asked the Justice Department whether the new law meant that pre-existing contracts with Acorn should be broken Holder Justice Department acting assistant attorney general David Barron found a way to preempt an Obama signed law and continue payments to ACORN. (see story)
This is exactly why so many people are so pissed off at attorneys and why I personally never want to see one as president of the United States of America. Too many attorneys seem to lose the sense of right and wrong seeking that fanciful fantasy third way; Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, David Barron and Barry Hussein Soetoro all attorneys by training all see things unlike you and I do. Sex is not Sex, Bullets over Bosnia, Terrorists are not Terrorists, a presidential order doesn’t mean what it says and the Constitution is a defective document according to these lawyers.
According to Charlie Savage David Barron essentially cancels out a presidential order based on his interpretation of one phrase, “provided to.” Savage reports that it was Barron’s interpretation that [t]he new law “should not be read as directing or authorizing HUD to breach a pre-existing binding contractual obligation to make payments to Acorn or its affiliates, subsidiaries or allied organizations where doing so would give rise to contractual liability,” Mr. Barron wrote.
Huh? The order says …no taxpayer money — including money authorized by previous legislation — could be “provided to” the [ACORN] group or its affiliates.
This wording could have easily been interpreted to mean the exact opposite of what David Barron interpreted it to mean. With officials in our government like these who needs enemies?
Barron was a Harvard law professor who wrote legal arguments against President Bush’s claims of executive power many of the executive powers that his boss Barry Hussein Soetoro is now using. He also wrote about his support of the Boumediene decision, the case which granted Guantanamo detainees habeas corpus.
ACORN is facing voter fraud charges in multiple states, they were caught red headed nationally encouraging criminal activity and they are known by many as a continuing criminal government funded enterprise.
One would think that any contract that they have with the government would be breached by charges of criminality at the very less or at the most a signed presidential federal law would be enough to break any ties that the government would have with a continuing criminal enterprise, but not so with the Eric Holder Justice Department.
It is clear to everyone except criminals and the Barry Hussein Soetoro administration that the Federal government should immediately sever all ties and halt all funding of ACORN. That was apparent by president Soetoro’s signature on a law that made it unlawful to pay taxpayer money to ACORN from present or previous legislation.
But to David Barron words don’t have meaning, at least the meaning that you and I understand. To Barron a law that makes it unlawful for the government to pay taxpayer money to ACORN doesn’t real mean that.
And to Barron protecting the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic apparently doesn’t really mean that either. If it did Barron would have been looking for an interpretation that prevents the government from continuing funding to ACORN rather than the interpretation that he came up with.
