Stimulus transfers Banking and Business debt to Taxpayers

President Bush and Congress complicit in this scheme

My Daddy use to say that there ain't no free government cheese someone's got to pay for it! Likewise there isn't any free government $600 to $1200 dollar checks someone has to pay for them. You ever thought who?

Call me cynical but I found it somewhat disconcerting that the government has to give Americans money in the form of $150 billion dollars of tax refunds and tell Americans to go spent that money shopping in order for the economy to be stimulated.

Aren’t economies supposed to be based on something like, I don’t know, productively? When is consumer spending equal to factory and industrial production of real goods?
What? Is there nothing being produced in America anymore? Are there no jobs from which people can receive adequate salary compensation, we need the government to dole out money like writing checks on an empty checking account because jobs that paid living wages were outsourced to minimize corporate cost while maximizing corporate profits?

That brings us to the question are we so far under government and corporate control that big daddy government has to give us each an allowance and tell us to run along and go to the movies and buy some popcorn?

Am I the only one? Who else is raising this question?

To stimulate the economy the president and congress just voted for $300 to $1200 dollar tax cuts for 117 million families. Now I would be the last person to speak against tax cuts but when these particular tax cuts are tied to the welfare of the economy I’m thinking “house of cards” time and it’s about to all come tumbling down.

Does anyone want to know what’s in the package, how it will work and why the U.S. economy is in such disrepair? This can’t be good. Here on one hand the government is speaking about competing in Global Market economies and on the other hand it is doling out dollars to prop up a U.S. economy that has no economy infrastructure other than spending money at restaurants and Wal-Mart.

It’s like shopping is the only thing what fuels the U.S. economy. Is that true, is the consumer the economic stimulus that fuels our economy? Do you know how crazy that is? Is that why at the beginning of the Iraq war the president admonished us all to continue with our normal lives go shopping and go to the mall?

Maybe you’ve noticed a pattern like me that at every change of Presidential leadership someone decides to siphon off money from the U.S. economy and send the country into a recession. Who are the forces behind this? It happened in 2001 when Clinton was leaving the White house and it is once again happening as Bush is exiting. Maybe they think that we would be too busy with politics to notice.

Now the question is who would be best to lead in this kind of economic crisis? Conventional wisdom would favor the Democrats. The only problem is neither Hillary nor Barack has ever had any executive or business experience. And as Hillary has said on several occasions you need someone who would know what to do the first day that they enter into the White house. Unfortunately that would not be her! Hillary ruled herself out by her own standard of competence.

The only candidate that has the executive and business experience needed to lead in this crisis is Republican Governor Mitt Romney. He is the only one who has run a successful multi-million dollar business and he alone has executive experience as Governor of Massachusetts.

This is not an endorsement of Governor Romney but seeing how most voters are determining their vote based on the candidate’s sex, race or likeability I thought that I would mention that if most American really knew what we face as China, Russia, the EU and Islamic terrorist have joined in attempting to dismantle the U.S. economy, meaning no jobs, no homes and recession. This is happening now no matter what some of the other candidates are promising you.

Maybe Americans should rethink and select a serious candidate with credentials rather than the fairly tale of the first female or black president. (To borrow a term from Bill Clinton)

You want to know how bad it really is? President Bush and a Democrat controlled Congress just sat down together and agreed to give American money that we don’t have to go spend in an economy that is in collapse because of economic policies that have allowed corporations and banks to rip off Americans in sub-prime mortgages and other deceptive business and banking practices.

So you the taxpayer/consumers are being put on the hook to cover the debt that is being passed to you from defaulting banks and corporations because you the consumer/taxpayers could not pay the usurious balloon adjustable interest rates connected to your teaser sub-prime loans.

Banks and business are not going to suffer these losses you the tax payer are going to pay for it.

And because the Government, Banks, and Corporations think that you are stupid it comes in the form of a $600 to $1200 dollar tax refund that you will pay back with interest in stealth taxes which will bail out mortgage companies and banks and business by allowing them to pass on the losses to the American taxpayer/consumers.

You ever seen the Matrix? The human energy cells that the machines derived their power from? That’s you! And Soylent green, that’s you too!

Isn’t it great to be an American! Vote wisely.

Clintons make elections Race and Sex Wars and then Sleep

Bill and Hillary Sleeping at the Reagan Funeral

Bill Clinton said Wednesday he expects blacks to vote for Barack Obama and women to vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton, and the dynamic may cause his wife to lose the South Carolina Democratic presidential primary Saturday.-- CHARLES BABINGTON

Who injected race and sex into the 2008 presidential elections? Well it wasn’t Barack Obama. On the contrary Obama has been doing everything that he can to minimize race as a factor in this election.

While he's awake President Clinton is in South Carolina fighting for every black vote that he can get. And in apparent acts of desperation Bill and Hillary Clinton have played both the race and the sex card in order to split the vote and attempt to give Hillary an advantage according to Dick Morris. (More White people than Black people)

So why is he (President Clinton) making such a fuss over a contest he knows he's going to lose?
Precisely because he is going to lose it. If Hillary loses South Carolina and the defeat serves to demonstrate Obama's ability to attract a bloc vote among black Democrats, the message will go out loud and clear to white voters that this is a racial fight. It's one thing for polls to show, as they now do, that Obama beats Hillary among African-Americans by better than 4-to-1 and Hillary carries whites by almost 2-to-1.

But most people don't read the fine print on the polls. But if blacks deliver South Carolina to Obama, everybody will know that they are bloc-voting. That will trigger a massive white backlash against Obama and will drive white voters to Hillary Clinton.—Dick Morris

Mr. Clinton also attended the Martin Luther King birthday on Monday where he fell asleep right in the pulpit. Not the first time the Clintons have fallen asleep at an important event they used President Ronald Reagan’s funeral to catch up on some much needed rest too. (see picture above)


And then tired of a hard month of dissing Barack Obama, well you know running down your wife’s competition can take a lot out of you, Mr. Clinton fell asleep at the Martin Luther King birthday celebration. (maybe he and Mrs. Clinton suffer from severe Sleep Apnea)

Apparently President Clinton thought it a great idea to grab some shut-eye and have a dream of his own at the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. celebration on Dr. King’s birthday right behind Dr. King’s son Martin Luther King III.

After all Martin III is not the speaker that his daddy was and Mr. Clinton hasn’t campaigned this hard since he whipped George H.W. Bush, H. Ross Perot and then Bob Dole in his own presidential campaigns. So get some rest Bill!



Am I the only one getting the distinct feeling that we are boring the Clintons! Please, someone just wake Mr. and Mrs. Clinton coronate Hillary and get it over with!

Chris Matthews was right

Liberal Pundit Chris Matthews

"[T]he reason she's a U.S. senator, the reason she's a candidate for president, the reason she may be a front-runner is her husband messed around."—Chris Matthews on Senator Hillary Clinton

Mea Culpa, Mea Culpa was Chris Matthews’ forced confession. His sins were that he dared to state the obvious and he dared to tell the truth.

Matthews is the ultra Liberal talk show pundit who normally lands on the correct side of Liberal issues but alas this time he got it terribly wrong. He told the truth.

There is really no accounting for Matthews’ sudden fit of veracity, Tourette syndrome temporary madness or perhaps early Alzheimers can’t tell, but whatever the malady that caused his superfluity of truthfulness Liberals are enraged at him.

Liberals are best known for nodding in mindless unison to any lie just as long as the lie begins or ends with the name George Bush.

Matthews is reported to have said that the only reason that Hillary Clinton is a U.S. senator, a candidate for president or even the front-runner for the Democrat nomination is that her husband the former president Bill Clinton is a philanderer. Matthews’s statement clearly intimating that Senator Clinton political good fortune is due to total unmerited sympathy not a result of any political acumen on her part is something intuitively known by all but apparently considered sacrilege to speak.

But we have recently seen the power of the sympathy vote! In New Hampshire where Hillary demonstrated the “I almost had a tear” speech, women rallied to her cause because apparently they thought they were supporting a sister in distress thus lifting Senator Clinton from a predicted dire two digit defeat in New Hampshire to a historical comeback victory over Senator Obama. Little did they know that Mrs. Clinton was following her scripted campaign agenda which called for her to show a more human side because the polls said that a softer side was a winning formula and did it ever work! Were women ever suckered?

So now National Organization for Women, Feminist Majority and National Women's Political Caucus have sent a joint letter of complaint to NBC News President Steve Capus regarding Matthews’ comments yet these hypocrites never ever defended a single woman that Bill Clinton abused. And believe me there were multiple opportunities for these so-called women’s rights organizations to do so. NOW, Feminist Majority or National Women’s Political Caucus could have defended any of the many women that were assaulted by Bill Clinton why didn't they?

According to JT Thompson of the Hillary project feminist have not been so quick to defend women’s rights when those rights were violated by Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Eileen Wellstone: a 19-year-old English woman who said Clinton sexually assaulted her after she met him at a pub near Oxford where the future President was a student in 1969. It was this rape that caused Clinton to be quietly expelled from Oxford and the loss of his Fulbright Scholarship.

In 1972, a 22-year-old woman told campus police at Yale University that she was sexually assaulted by Clinton while he was a law student at the college. No charges were filed, but retired campus policemen contacted by Capitol Hill Blue confirmed the incident

In 1974, a female student at the University of Arkansas complained that then-law school instructor Bill Clinton groped her and forced his hand inside her blouse. She complained to her faculty advisor who confronted Clinton, but Clinton claimed the student ''came on'' to him. The student left the school shortly after the incident. Reached at her home in Texas, the former student confirmed the incident.

Juanita Broaddrick: a gubernatorial campaign volunteer said Mr. Clinton raped her during a nursing-home-operators convention in Little Rock in April 1978.

From 1978-1980, during Clinton's first term as governor of Arkansas, state troopers assigned to protect the governor were aware of at least seven complaints from women who said Clinton forced, or attempted to force, himself on them sexually.

Gennifer Flowers: In 1992, Flowers claimed she had a 12 year affair with Bill Clinton. Although this was a consensual relationship, he lied to the American people on national television that he was not having an affair.

Flowers was smeared in the media after going public of the affair. "These are the people that literally went out to destroy my life and were very successful in many aspects," reported Flowers. "[Hillary] was the general who gave the directives to her troops to go out and search and destroy."

Sally Perdue: a former Miss Arkansas who said she had a four-month affair with him in 1983. After coming forward, she had her car window smashed, and shotgun shells left on the driver's seat.
Sandra Allen James: a former Washington, D.C., political fund-raiser who said Mr. Clinton invited her to his hotel room during a 1991 campaign trip, pinned her against the wall and put his hand under her dress.

Christy Zercher: an airline flight attendant on Mr. Clinton's 1992 campaign plane, who said Mr. Clinton exposed himself and grabbed her breasts and made explicit remarks about oral sex. A video shot on board the plane by ABC News shows an obviously inebriated Clinton with his hand between another young flight attendant's legs.

German Clinton Float

Carolyn Moffet: a legal secretary in Little Rock in 1979 said, "I was escorted there [Mr. Clinton’s hotel room] by a state trooper. When I went in, he was sitting on a couch, wearing only an undershirt. He pointed at his penis and told me to suck it. I told him I didn't even do that for my boyfriend and he got mad, grabbed my head and shoved it into his lap.

Elizabeth Ward Gracen: a former Miss Arkansas and Miss America who won the crown in 1982, told friends she was forced by Clinton to have sex with him shortly after she won her state crown.

Elizabeth received threatening phone calls, and her belongings were ransacked while Elizabeth was on vacation in St. Martin by 3 men in suits (according to a witness). Her manager Vincent Vento said these intimidating phone callers said "You should really keep your mouth shut about Bill Clinton and go on with your life. You could be discredited. You could have an IRS investigation."

Paula Jones: in a hotel room in 1991, Jones claimed Bill Clinton dropped his pants, exposed himself, and asked for sexual favors from her. In 1994, she filed a lawsuit against Bill Clinton. The case was settled out of court, and Jones was awarded $850,000.

Kathleen Willey, a one-time White House aide, who accused him of groping her. During a November 1993 interview at the White House when, she testified under oath in federal court, Mr. Clinton was "very forceful" in the unwanted sexual advance -- kissing her on the mouth, touching her breasts and putting his hands under her dress.

After coming forward with her allegations, Kathleen Willey had the tires on her car mysteriously punctured with dozens of nails and her cat suddenly disappeared.

Monica Lewinksy – an intern who had an affair with President Clinton while in the oval office. Bill Clinton publicly denied under oath having a sexual relationship with Miss Lewinksy, but was later forced to admit that he did have an "inappropriate relationship", after tape recordings were released during a trial as evidence of the affair. Clinton’s perjury lead to an impeachment trial.

Linda Tripp -- close confidante to Monica Lewinksy was vindictively fired from government service In January 1998 the last day of the Clinton administration, for being a whistle blower.

Tripp gave surreptitiously recorded tapes to then-Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr in exchange for Immunity from prosecution. Tripp disclosed to Starr that she was aware of the relationship between Lewinsky and President Clinton, that Lewinsky had executed a false affidavit denying the relationship that was submitted to the federal court in Arkansas in the Jones v. Clinton lawsuit, and that Lewinsky had attempted to suborn Tripp's perjury in the Jones v. Clinton suit to conceal the Clinton-Lewinsky relationship as well as Tripp's knowledge of the Kathleen Willey incident from the federal court.

As Tripp explained, she was being solicited to commit a crime to conceal evidence in the Jones civil rights case.[5]

Tripp also informed Starr of the existence of a navy blue dress that Lewinsky owned that was impregnated with Clinton's semen. During their friendship, Lewinsky had shown the dress to Tripp and said she intended to have it dry-cleaned; Tripp convinced her not to.

Kim Gandy, NOW's president, said last night that "Chris Matthews is a repeat offender when it comes to sexist attitudes toward women politicians. . . . I wasn't really looking for an apology. I was looking for a behavior change, and for him to treat female politicians the same way as male politicians."

Well if Chris Matthews is a repent offender Ms. Gandy, he’s not the only one. And where was NOW or any of the so-called feminist organizations when Bill Clinton was offending repeatedly? Hypocrites!

Finally I noticed that no one said that Matthews was lying only that his remarks were nasty.

It’s ironic that Hillary Clinton who at worst is complicit in several of Bill Clinton’s cover-ups of his abuse of women or she is at best an enabler of her husband’s wantonly criminal behavior is being defended by National Organization for Women, Feminist Majority and National Women's Political Caucus on behalf of women’s rights.

Rights that Mrs. Clinton herself violated every time she stood by her man against women that he had violated. Chris Matthews was right Hillary would never have gotten where she is if it wasn’t for her appearing to be a victim in Bill Clinton’s a long sorted sexual predatory career. A career where she more often than not was not a victim but Bonnie to his Clyde!

And you want to let this, back into the White house?

Great News....... or is it?

Great News from the Federal Reserve Bank.
A three-quarter point cut in the federal funds
and the prime rates.

Would be a great help in reducing the massive
consumer debt on the books at high interest
rates, if it weren't for the "sacred-cow" of the
credit world.............. the thieving credit card
companies.

There are still millions of middle and lower
class people, who are being forced to pay 25%
and even up as high as 29.5% interest on their
credit cards................... in spite of the fact that
they have never been late paying, and have always
paid at least the minimum payment due.

WHY??????? Simple answer is that the "powers
that be" at the banks, decided in their infinite wisdom
............. that YOU, might be carrying just a little more
debt than they think you should. And so, they are
anticipating a default by the cardholder, even without
proof that it will happen.

If the White House and our do-nothing Democratic
Congress, really want to help this country get out of
it's massive debt..................... FORCE the banks to
bring the credit card interest down to a justifiable rate
............ one that is realistic in today's interest rate scenario
............... and one that is morally right!

So long as the banks can keep favor with Congress,
and are free to rake in massive profits on the backs
of those who can least afford it.....don't expect any
miracles. What we need is some legislation that will
protect the public, instead of our elected officials, and
those who keep them in power.

brooklyn

Something Evil Comes this Way

This year, for the first time, expatriate Democrats can cast their ballots on the Internet in a presidential primary for people living outside the United States.--JESSICA BERNSTEIN-WAX

It portends to be the end of American elections as we know them and I wouldn’t call it ironic that the news is coming out of Mexico City. What’s being reported will have consequences that will undoubtedly have world-wide implications on American elections.

What is being reported is Americans Abroad Can Now Vote Online. But the truth is only Americans who are Democrats can vote online, that’s right Democrats only, just read the article. What this means is now Mexico and Europe will be able to taper online with American elections starting in 2008.

Sounds just about right huh? After all American elections are about getting as many people to vote as possible right? Just as long as they are Democrats and it doesn’t matter whether they are illegal aliens, felons or so called expatriate Democrats (better known as Mexican and European voters) if you help the Party’s plan of advancing homosexuality, tax increases and making America less safe at home and abroad then vote online even if you left the country because George Bush was elected in 2000 and re-elected in 2004.

In the 2000 Presidential elections China and Europe would have given their eye’s tooth to affect the outcome for Democrats.

In the 2004 elections Terrorist and Europeans would have voted for Democrats if they were allowed.

U.S. citizens wanting to vote online must join Democrats Abroad before Feb. 1 and indicate their preference to vote by Internet instead of in the local primaries wherever they last lived in the United States. They must promise not to vote twice for president, but can still participate in non-presidential local elections.

So it’s an honor system, Democrats must promise not to vote twice for president… Yeah right!

Hey you think Democrats were complaining about the Clinton campaign cheating in the Nevada primary last weekend? This ability to vote on-line is just ripe for corruption. How could the Congress allow it? Oh yeah Democrat controlled Congress with RINO’s like John McCain making sure that we have equal and “fair” elections.

Didn't it occur to anyone that one Party shouldn't be able to vote online if the other Party can not? For this incompetence alone Congress should be disbanded!

And everyone knows that a fair election is an election won by Democrats right? In America we only call for recounts if a Republican wins.

Muslims have riots over cartoons and teddy bears, what will it take for Americans to take exception at the corrupting of American elections, Osama bin Laden casting a vote for his favorite Democrat candidate?

Are there any Republicans out there? There may not be after 2008 with Democrat’s latest innovation in stealing elections, world participation in America’s electoral process.

My, what will they think of next?!?

Oh yeah and will someone please logon for Alex Baldwin, Kim Basinger, Eddie Vedder, and Robert Altman who all promised to become expatriates if George Bush won in 2000.

I’m sure they don’t want to miss this election being that they’re out of the country!

Dead Campaign Walking

Senator McCain wife Cindy and Sen. Joe Lieberman

Once considered the favorite in a multi-candidate field, McCain capsized last year, his campaign plummeting as he defended a plan to give illegal immigrants an eventual path to citizenship, angering a GOP conservative base that had never fully trusted the senator, especially after he broke with President Bush on tax cuts. A raft of senior aides abandoned ship, and more were laid off as McCain ran out of money. -- Libby Quaid, AP writer

John McCain is a man without a Party! Funny how that works. You spend a political career disassociating with the Party that you supposedly represent to curry favor with the opposition Party and come your quest to become President you can’t find a Party to support you. Independents and Democrats aren’t going to support you in the 2008 Presidential election; they’ve got their own candidate and well the Party that you’ve betrayed is looking for a Conservative. Mavericks need not apply!

Sure McCain won New Hampshire and South Carolina but that was only on the strength of Independent and Democrat votes. Are Independents and Democrats going to support McCain in a contest against an Obama or Hillary candidate for President? One word answer… NO!

The one thing that Independents, Democrats and Republicans all agree on is that absolutely no one is going to vote for Senator John McCain for President in the upcoming 2008 Presidential elections. Nobody! John McCain has allowed himself to be used as a tool by the enemies of Conservatives to fracture the Party. Outside of that function McCain serves no useful purpose to anyone.

McCain is the choice of Independents and Democrats for the Republican Party kind of like Democrats where the favorite Party of the enemies of America in 2000 and 2004. You do remember bin Laden chiming in on our 2004 elections attempting to dissuade Americans from voting for President Bush. Same thing! Independents and Democrats are attempting to dissuade Republicans from voting for a Conservative candidate to lead the Republican Party ergo McCain’s primary wins in New Hampshire and South Carolina.

In New Hampshire, McCain's fate was determined by independent voters, who helped McCain win the state over Bush eight years ago. While he was neck-and-neck with Romney among Republicans, more than a third of independents backed McCain, compared with a quarter for Romney, according to exit surveys for The Associated Press and the television networks.

McCain's main challenge is to re-assure the right. He is still weak among Republicans and conservatives, obviously major vulnerabilities in a GOP nomination fight. He only tied Huckabee among Republicans in South Carolina; his margin came from a 39-22 percent victory over Huckabee among the 19 percent of voters who were independents.
He won overwhelmingly among liberal and moderate voters, but lost self-identified conservatives.-- Rich Lowry

John McCain had no chance of winning the Republican nominee last summer his campaign was written of as a “fare thee well” Senator McCain because McCain had completed a Liberal trifecta of back stabbing in the Republican Party.

McCain-Feingold, the gang of 14, and McCain-Kennedy, one poke after another from McCain in the eye of his nemeses, Conservatives. If John McCain has shown anything in his long career of insider politics, he demonstrates that he has a propensity to make deals with political enemies who have sworn to destroy the Conservative Party.

Amongst grassroots conservatives, John McCain's name is an expletive -- and for good reason -- because he has made a name for himself by knifing conservatives time and time again for the amusement of his liberal pals in the mainstream media. --John Hawkins

So it is not beyond reason to ask the question did John McCain make a secret deal with his Liberal allies. A deal that would cause disruption within the Republican Party and guarantee that no Conservative would receive the nomination from the Republican Party?

Was Senator McCain encouraged to running in spite of the fact that he has zero Conservative backing? Encouraged by those whose plan is to win the White house for Liberals and if not win then place a Liberal Manchurian Candidate in the White house who will do the bidding of Liberals at the code words “This is Ted Kennedy McCain Listen.”

John McCain would be a Liberal “sleeper” in the White house much like the sleeper terrorist cells that are undoubtedly waiting for their cues which are presently embedded in America now.

McCain’s campaign is like “Weekend at Bernie’s” so you’ve got to be asking who’s propping him up? If not Conservatives who?

That is the point! With no Republican or Conservative backing we shouldn’t even be wasting time even considering the Maverick.

Sooo just who is so inclined to prop up Sen. McCain as a potential Republican candidate for President if Conservatives and Republicans aren’t? Where’s McCain’s base?

That’s exactly my point a dead campaign walking!

The Sacred Cow of Global warming is in the Freezer

Greenland

Dr Hansen said we have about 10 years to put into effect the draconian measures needed to curb CO2 emissions quickly enough to avert a dangerous rise in global temperature.

Otherwise, the extra heat could trigger the rapid melting of polar ice sheets, made far worse by the "albedo flip" - when the sunlight reflected by white ice is suddenly absorbed as ice melts to become the dark surface of open water.

The glaciers and ice sheets of Greenland in the northern hemisphere, and the western Antarctic ice sheet in the south, both show signs of the rapid changes predicted with rising temperatures. "--Steve Connor, Science Editor quoting Dr. James Hansen

One would never eat a sacred cow even if it meant that one would be saved from starvation. Likewise, one would never accept any scientific evidence countering the theory of anthropomorphic global warming because global warming has became the politically correct sacred cow of the warm-earthers, those who believe in the theory of global warming based on pseudo-scientific economically driven politics.

In spite of Al Gore’s and Dr. James Hansen’s dire warnings of imminent catastrophic consequences of global warming there has not been overall temperature change in the global ambient temperature since 1998.

And now the playground for global warming advocates has frozen over. Oh you didn’t know? Greenland the place that everyone goes to see the melting and receding glaciers is frozen over.

Greenland had recently become to the Arctic Circle what Disneyworld is to Florida, one giant tourist attraction, everyone goes to Greenland to say, I have seen with my own eyes the affects of global warming on the melting glaciers of Greenland.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has gone to Greenland! She went last Memorial day 2007. And as I just mentioned she came back a born again warm-earther. She believes, she believes!

Yet recent evidence is suggesting that the Global is actually cooling rather than warming. That would throw a wrench in the Global warming theory because CO2’s and other green house gases effects are supposed to heat the earth not allow it to cool!

Green house gases trap heat into the earth’s atmosphere and according to Al Gore, James Hansen and the United Nations’ IPCC this trapped heat will cause the earth to become warmer until the heat reaches biblical cataclysm proportions.

Uh question? Where is the cold coming from? If heat is trapped in the Earth’s atmosphere, and we know that it is, because Al Gore’s film, “An Inconvenient Truth” (which he won an Oscar for) told us so.

Why are scientists saying that by 2012 the earth will be in a global cooling trend? Here and here. And why is Greenland freezing over?

One would think that if heat is trapped in the Earth’s atmosphere there would not be any room for cold would it?

This is my wish if there is a trend of global cooling and it is proven to happen as predicted. My wish is for everyone who propagated Global warming be stripped of any office of leadership or awards that they may have and have acquired. And that anyone associated with this farce should be fired from any job that depends on credibility and/or scientific knowledge that they claim to have.

Also any money that they made from claims of global warming should be confiscated.

As a matter of fact all of their worldly possessions should be confiscated and they should be shamed before the world as charlatans and fools never to be listened to or given a place of prominence ever again.

Democrats Offer Affirmative Action Candidates: None qualified

Affirmative Action babies Obama, Edwards and Clinton
Senator Clinton wrongly assessing the surge in spite of her experience

So I give you tremendous credit for presenting as positive a view of a rather grim reality. And I believe that you, and certainly the very capable people working with both of you, were dealt a very hard hand.

And it's a hand that is unlikely to improve, in my view.
[Y]ou have been made the de facto spokesmen for what many of us believe to be a failed policy.

Despite what I view as your rather extraordinary efforts in your testimony both yesterday and today, I think that the reports that you provide to us really require the willing suspension of disbelief. –Sen. Hillary Clinton, Questions General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker on Iraq at Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing

Democrat front runners have a lot in common even though they take great pains to draw artificial distinctions between themselves.

Distinctions like Race, experience or who really is for change.
Yet the glaring reality is they each have something in common. What that is, is they are all unqualified to be President of the United States.

The bar has been significantly lowered to allow for this crop of Democrat Affirmative Action Babies; a Black, a woman and a rich lawyer trying to pass himself off as a populist. The bar had to be lowered to allow them to present themselves as worthy choices.

Also it gives you, the voter, chance to entertain the notion that one of them is worthy of your vote, or as Senator Clinton put it, to believe that any one of the Democrat front runners are qualified to be President requires the willing suspension of disbelief.

Clinton said that in regards to General Petraeus’ testimony before Congress regarding the surge of American troop in Iraq. Then Clinton dressed General Petraeus down as a surrogate for the Bush administration failed Iraqi policy before Democrats knew that the surge would work. No one in his or her right mind would dire say that the surge is not working now!

But since one of the major candidates is making experience her main platform stance lets take a look at their qualifications. Timothy Noah of Slate says that Senator Clinton claim of experience is not what it seems and Christopher Hitchens reminds us of what an absolute mess the Clintons put the country through the first time they were in the White house.

First the qualified Democrat candidates have already dropout of contention leaving in effect a Democrat process that is the equivalent of a High school Prom King and Queen contest. “Is Hillary likable?” She’s a woman so vote for her.

The most experienced and qualified among the major candidates seeking the Democratic nomination were Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware and Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut. They have now dropped out. If Democrats really wanted experience they’d bring back Biden or Dodd!

What Democrats have left are Affirmative Action Candidates.

Edwards [the rich lawyer/populist] served a single term in the Senate. Obama [the Black] served eight years in the Illinois state Senate and is halfway through his first term in the U.S. Senate.

Clinton [the woman] is about to begin her eighth year in the U.S. Senate. Going by years spent as an elective official, Obama's 11 years exceeds Clinton's seven, which in turn exceeds Edwards' six.—Timothy Noah

If Mrs. Clinton receives the Democrat nomination it won’t be that she’s the best qualified though she is running on her experience. Instead Democrats who vote for Senator Clinton will do it for other reasons. They will vote for her because they like her, she’s a woman, she’s a Democrat, she’s white or she is a candidate of dynasty.

Some Democrats will vote for Senator Obama because he is a charismatic speaker, he’s black and he’s not Hillary.

And some Democrats will vote for Senator Edwards because he’s not Hillary or Obama.

This year Democrats aren't really running on real experience. To be President this year it only matters that you like them, you really like them! That is how unsubstantive Democrats are today. Oh and it doesn’t hurt if you’re a women, a black or a $500.00 dollar haircut candidate.

Anyone can be the Prom King or Queen (President) under Affirmative Action because it's only a High School popularity contest anyways.

So goes the Republic under Liberals and Democrats!

And Now a Civil Rights Lesson From the Great Senator Hillary Clinton…

Apparently President Lyndon Johnson had the Dream

“I would point to the fact that that Dr. King’s dream began to be realized when President Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, when he was able to get through Congress something that President Kennedy was hopeful to do, the president before had not even tried, but it took a president to get it done.”

“That dream became a reality, the power of that dream became real in people’s lives because we had a president who said we are going to do it and actually got it accomplished.”—Hillary Rodham Clinton

Maybe we’ve all got it terribly wrong. Instead of celebrating Dr. Martin Luther King’s birthday this coming Monday, January 21, 2008 maybe we should instead be celebrating President Lyndon Baines Johnson’s Birthday who was born on August 27, 1908.

After all it took Senator Hillary Clinton to remind us all of the real history of the Civil Rights movement and that the heavy lifting of the movement would not have been accomplished if not for the White man who was the President and in the process she almost caused a race riot within the Democrat Party.

And then the good Senator intimated that maybe she is the White woman who would best fulfill the legacy of President Lyndon Johnson’s civil rights accomplishments. Lard knows that she just recently single-handedly, “…liberated us to actually let women be human beings in public.” With her ‘I almost had a tear’ speech in New Hampshire. (what a megalomaniacal narcissist)

I suppose to Senator Clinton all that civil rights stuff was just a Black man dreaming until a White man actually did something about it, right Mrs. Clinton?

So according to Sen. Clinton, Sen. Obama is a Black man with false hopes dreaming about becoming President of the United States of America but it will take a White woman to actually become what a dreamer can’t become.

Apparently other white people think so too. That’s why they are polling for Senator Clinton 41 percent to 27 percent for Senator Obama. And Likewise blacks are polling for Senator Obama 66 percent to 16 percent who say they will vote for Senator Clinton. Thank you for bring the country together Mrs. Clinton! As only a Clinton could!

And why is it that someone always has to explain what Hillary intended to say? Are we going to have 4 years of… “Welcome to the 112th press conference of the month, I’d like to begin by saying that President Clinton did not mean what you thought she said, what she actually said was…”

Every time I look around someone is explaining what Hillary Clinton said! Life shouldn’t have to be so complicated. It doesn’t have to be, does it?

Heck, now I’ve got to take down all of my Dr. King pictures and replacing them with someone who actually did something for civil rights, President Lyndon Baines Johnson!

Then I’ve got to change my vote from the Black guy who just sounds good to the White lady that will actually get the job done.

Is that what you’re attempting to say Hillary? If not I’m sure someone will contact me and put me right.

Can somebody play another race card I think Senator Clinton just played her last!

In the meantime you decide what she was attempting to say:

John McCain won’t be the Republican Nominee

The Real McCain is not a Republican


The Real John McCain should be an ex-Senator walking. He shouldn't even be considered as a Presidential hopeful. Republicans will never forget what he and eleven other so-called Republicans did joined by President Bush to attempt to force, Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act, or Amnesty for illegal aliens on America.

Sens. Bennett, (UT), Craig (ID), Graham (SC), Gregg (NH), Hagel (NE), Kyl (AZ), Lott (MS), Lugar (IN), Martinez (FL), Snowe (ME) and Specter (PA) all thought that they would, see us at the bill signing, as President Bush so ugly and arrogantly put it.

But the bill signing never occurred. Thanks in large part to 35 Republican Senators who were joined by 28 Democrat Senators who listened to their constituency rather than the corporate and special interest groups that that were really behind the CIRA.

But the damage was done President Bush, John McCain, Lindsey Graham and the other 10 Republican Senators learned nothing from the 1996 Republican Congressional defeat and they went on to fracture any remaining cohesion that was left in the Republican Party on this single issue.

Proving that the President and these Senators are not fully committed to Conservative ideas and were not smart enough to see that it would take a united Republican effort to stave off Democrat attempts to force their Liberal agenda on America now that Democrats were in the majority in both houses of Congress.

So Sen. John McCain will not be the Republican nominee, because he is not a Republican in the true sense of the word. John McCain is a Republican in name only, a RINO. That is why Independents, Democrats and the mainstream media like him and project him to win the Republican Michigan primary.

The enemies of Conservatives would love nothing better than a phony Republican to be the nominee of the Republican Party. If the Democrat candidate should happen to lose, no problem the fraudulent Republican John McCain would be President and he would ensure that no conservative agenda would go forward.

McCain supports amnesty for illegal aliens, was behind the Gang of 14, is a gun grabber, opposed the Bush tax cuts, ran roughshod over the Constitution with McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform, opposes a Constitutional amendment to protect marriage, was rumored to be considering switching parties multiple times, talked with John Kerry about being his Vice-President, lines up with the global warming alarmists, wants to close Gitmo, wants to coddle captured terrorists -- you can go on and on with this.

In other words, we're talking about a man who could fairly be called a Rockefeller Republican, a Country Club Republican, a RINO, or just a toweringly arrogant, out of touch D.C. insider who seems to assume that any position he takes is right solely because he happens to hold it. However, what John McCain cannot fairly be called is a conservative.-- John Hawkins

After all of the above one wonders how any informed Republican could consider voting for McCain. McCain has confounded Republican interest too many times and there is one reason that he will not be the Republican nominee even if Independents and Democrats make him successful tomorrow.

That reason is Republicans will not vote for McCain. Why? In one word TRUST.

Republicans can not trust John McCain to fight for Conservative values and Conservative ideas. The reason that Conservatives lost both the House and the Senate in 2006 was because Republicans deserted Conservative values and Conservative ideas.

John McCain was one of the irresponsible Republican majority that squandered away the majority while they were kowtowing to Democrats and corrupting themselves.

The 1996 Republican majority put their own wants and desires above the good of the Republican Party and consequently was swept from power in the 1996 mid-term elections. John McCain always puts his wants and desires above the good of the Party.

Republicans did a number of things wrong but primarily they did not hold on to the core values of social conservatism, small government, and constitutional ism.

John McCain’s stance on illegal immigration has put him on the wrong side of all three of the core values that I’ve just mention.

McCain is willing to poke Republicans in the eye at every opportunity because he feels that he alone has a better way is the reason that he has endeared himself to the enemies of Conservatives while earning him the title of Maverick because many times he alone has caused Republican causes to fail.

Michigan’s primary is an open primary. Meaning that they do not prevent Independents or Democrats from voting in the Republican primary, if McCain should happen to win it wouldn’t be because conservatives voted for him.

People who vote for and support McCain are like McCain they aren’t Conservatives either.

Pay No Attention to the Snow in Baghdad the Planet is getting Warmer

Playing in Baghdad snowfall

'Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!' -- The Wizard of Oz

There has been no increase in Global temperatures since 1998! That’s 7 years of flat temperature contradicting the dire predictions of the imminent and the immediate threat of Global warming.

According to David Deming, South America this year experienced one of its coldest winters in decades. In Buenos Aires, snow fell for the first time since the year 1918. Dozens of homeless people died from exposure. In Peru, 200 people died from the cold and thousands more became infected with respiratory diseases. Crops failed, livestock perished, and the Peruvian government declared a state of emergency.

Unexpected bitter cold swept the entire Southern Hemisphere in 2007. Johannesburg, South Africa, had the first significant snowfall in 26 years. Australia experienced the coldest June ever. In northeastern Australia, the city of Townsville underwent the longest period of continuously cold weather since 1941. In New Zealand, the weather turned so cold that vineyards were endangered.

Last January, $1.42 billion worth of California produce was lost to a devastating five-day freeze. Thousands of agricultural employees were thrown out of work. At the supermarket, citrus prices soared. In the wake of the freeze, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger asked President Bush to issue a disaster declaration for affected counties. A few months earlier, Mr. Schwarzenegger had enthusiastically signed the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, a law designed to cool the climate. California Sen. Barbara Boxer continues to push for similar legislation in the U.S. Senate.

In April, a killing freeze destroyed 95 percent of South Carolina's peach crop, and 90 percent of North Carolina's apple harvest. At Charlotte, N.C., a record low temperature of 21 degrees Fahrenheit on April 8 was the coldest ever recorded for April, breaking a record set in 1923. On June 8, Denver recorded a new low of 31 degrees Fahrenheit. Denver's temperature records extend back to 1872.

Recent weeks have seen the return of unusually cold conditions to the Northern Hemisphere. On Dec. 7, St. Cloud, Minn., set a new record low of minus 15 degrees Fahrenheit. On the same date, record low temperatures were also recorded in Pennsylvania and Ohio.

Extreme cold weather is occurring worldwide. On Dec. 4, in Seoul, Korea, the temperature was a record minus 5 degrees Celsius. Nov. 24, in Meacham, Ore., the minimum temperature was 12 degrees Fahrenheit colder than the previous record low set in 1952. The Canadian government warns that this winter is likely to be the coldest in 15 years.

Oklahoma, Kansas and Missouri are just emerging from a destructive ice storm that left at least 36 people dead and a million without electric power.

Oh and we mustn’t forget that for the first time in 100 years there was snow fall in Baghdad!

But in spite of all of the evidence ‘Warm Earthers,’ promoters of the theory of anthropogenic caused global warming, are warning you to not believe the facts, do not look at the snow on the ground, do not acknowledge that there has been no global warming since 1998 and do not look behind the curtains at the real reasons that they want you be believe in the farce that is known as Global warming!

They’ve even acknowledged that they have a problem with the facts on the ground but they want you to believe them anyways not your lying eyes!

Climate change is still nudging up temperatures in the long term even though the warmest year was back in 1998 and 2008 has begun with unusual weather such as a cool Pacific and Baghdad's first snow in memory, experts said.-- Alister Doyle, Environment Correspondent

So called Global warming experts now acknowledge that the planet is actually getting colder but they what you to have faith in them anyways, just believe in Global warming!

Read their latest mumbo-jumbo attempting to half heartedly refute the fact that it is getting colder globally not warmer!

They are attempting to explain the facts away. The facts are they were wrong. Al Gore is wrong. There is no such thing as anthropogenic caused global warming with catastrophic consequences.

The fact is everything that we are experiencing is a normal natural occurrence called climate change. Climate change has happened since the world began and it will continue to happen whether or not man is on the planet. But you wouldn’t pay for something that you have no control over or something that you didn’t cause so that’s why you’re being duped with all of this Global warming nonsense.

There are only two inevitabilities death and taxes. Pay no attention to the snow on the ground or the colder world-wide temperatures, proponents of Global warming are attempting to establish a world tax on the environment via the Global warming scare.

And that my friend would be catastrophic!

Hillary the Great Liberator

Senator Clinton: Liberating Women everywhere

"Maybe I have liberated us to actually let women be human beings in public," said Clinton, the former first lady, reflecting on a memorable moment of emotion the day before she gained her own New Hampshire victory. --Dana Wilkie

Before Hillary Rodham Clinton women where emotional repressed slaves in public life thanks to their dominate male repressors. But Senator Clinton is working to change hundreds of years of world-wide male domination while reversing the ugly notion that big girls don’t cry!

Buoyed by her surprise win in New Hampshire, which wasn’t supposed by be a surprise at all because after all she is the candidate of inevitability, Hillary Clinton is proving the fact that Americans are gullible to the ways of Clintonian politics.

What the Clintons are infamous for doing is polling for results. They poll people to see what the people want to hear and then they tell the people exactly they want to hear. The people's own polled results back at them.

Senator Clinton will tell you that she listened to the people and that’s why she won in New Hampshire . That is absolutely the case. The Polls showed that Hillary’s image was too strident and too combative. What the people wanted was a more vulnerable, open and sincere soft side. And boy did she deliver!

Now that doesn’t mean that she IS more vulnerable, open, sincere and soft but that’s what you said you wanted and in order to win in New Hampshire that's what Hillary gave you! Only thing is it was all scripted. It was all an act!

Dick Morris a former Clinton adviser says that Hillary Clinton is a control freak and that everything that she does is planned. If Mr. Morris can be trusted then that one moment of quivering voice and welled up eyes was for the benefit of all of you that said that you wanted a more vulnerable Hillary and judging by Hillary’s victory she gave you just what you wanted. You've been played!

Now being the narcissist that she is she has beset and dubbed herself with the mantle of Liberator of all womankind. She is claiming that because of herself, Hillary Rodham Clinton, all women everywhere at whatever stage or station have been released from the bonds and restrictions of not being allow to be human beings in public. Ladies you can now remove your Burkas.

If you’re the head of a major corporation and you are a woman, if things aren’t going quite right just cry a little.

If you’re in command in the armed forces and you're under heavy fire just let it out! Go on cry a little.

If you’re a woman and you are the President of the United States and Europe just sabotaged your economy, Iran just launched nuclear missiles from technology acquired from Russia at Israel and the United States. In addition to all of that, a dirty bomb is ignited in the United States, what do you do? You now have the right to do the human thing,cry a little.

You’ve been freed to be an emotional woman at a time of great stress by Senator Clinton.

Now that’s progressive feminism if I’ve ever seen it! And we all have Hillary Clinton to thank! Hillary the Great Liberator!

Thank you Senator Clinton! And now excuse me I’m feeling a little misty right now.

Global Starvation?

Corn grows in a farm field near Seneca, Illinois. Upcoming shortages?


"If we will not endure a king as a political power we should not endure a king over the production, transportation, and sale of any of the necessaries of life."—John Sherman

You’re probably like me extremely concerned over who will be in charge of this country’s future. You’re probably equally concerned about the war in Iraq, whether there will be another terrorist attack against America, the reality or the fallacy of Global warming, rising gas prices, or the general corrupting of our culture and you probably want to know who is responsible for corrupting it. Right?

As you think on those things here’s another thing to consider, and its ramifications are far more immediate than Global warming, there is an upcoming crisis with the world food supply and nobody really want you to know. Rising demand for grain to make fuel, food and livestock feed has helped push the prices of corn and soybeans to record prices.

A new crisis is emerging, a global food catastrophe that will reach further and be more crippling than anything the world has ever seen. The credit crunch and the reverberations of soaring oil prices around the world will pale in comparison to what is about to transpire, Donald Coxe, global portfolio strategist at BMO Financial Group said at the Empire Club's 14th annual investment outlook in Toronto on Thursday. --Alia McMullen, Financial Post

Who is responsible you ask? Well just who is responsible for shutting down manufacturing in the United States of America for cheap manufacturing sites throughout the world.

Oil used to be pumped from American oil wells but now wells were built in the Middle East enriching some Americans but also enabling the mind boggling wealth that we see in the Middle East, wealth that has enabled terrorist and terrorism against America. Who is the primary cause, the prime movers behind terrorism attacking America today?

Lost your job lately? Was it outsourced to India, China or another cheap labor rich country? Again who’s at fault for what ails America.

Terrorism, Mad Cow disease, Genetically Modified Food, The Health Care Crisis, Poisoned pet food, lead tainted products and toys are all the doing of corporate decisions to maximize profits and minimize corporate cost and now a food shortage?

"The greatest challenge to the world is not US$100 oil; it's getting enough food so that the new middle class can eat the way our middle class does, and that means we've got to expand food output dramatically," -- Donald Coxe, global portfolio strategist at BMO Financial Group

Donald Coxe believes that the sharp rise in raw food prices in the past year will intensify in the next few years amid increased demand for meat and dairy products from the growing middle classes of countries such as China and India as well as heavy demand from the biofuels industry. And at the centre of the imminent food catastrophe is corn - the main staple of the ethanol industry.

So as you worry about whether Hillary’s tears were real, or if Brittney is wearing panties, or any of the hundred thousands of inconsequential things that we are constantly bombarded with there is a rather focusing reality about to come into affect when you can’t get your Whopper or when there is nothing to prepare at the Aujourd’hui, the most elegant restaurant in Boston because there is no food.

It is time for the American people to get off the defense and take the offense against corporate power, the way it was done in the consumer, environmental and worker areas from 1965 to 1975 and beyond, and move to new frontiers of subordinating the big corporations to the rights and necessities of real people. –Ralph Nader

There is no corporate exit plan to free America from the addiction of foreign oil which they created. Yet we denigrated an American President for having no exit plan out of a war that corporations caused by the wealth that they funneled into the Middle East by their oil exploits.

If corporations had not began using the Middle East as the oil center of the world Islam would not be funding world-wide terrorism with their oil profits. They would have remain powerless tribes running around in the desert cutting one another’s throats rather than buying nuclear facilities now which will allow them to wage an Islam threat against the world.

Likewise if we allow the ethanol industry burn up all the corn to fuel our cars what is the plan to feed the world?

Someone, no, everyone really needs to get our priorities straight before we allow corporate greed to do to food what it’s done to oil and jobs and health care, and…!

Hillary stars in the Crying Game in New Hampshire: McCain wins too!

Clinton and McCain’s fairy tale ending in New Hampshire

Just like the movie, the Crying Game, what a surprise ending! Watered by tear power Hillary Rodham Clinton becomes something that she wasn’t in Iowa… a winner.

Not since Paris Hilton cried her way out of jail have we seen the mighty affects of the tear. Senator Clinton showed that not only can crying get you out of jail, but in New Hampshire a planted question and a staged cry is worth one upset political win over the front runner Barack Obama! You cry girl!

In the words of former President Bill Clinton the New Hampshire primaries was the stuff of fairy tales. Recently President Clinton described the whole Obama campaign as a fairy tale claiming that no one is holding Mr. Obama to any standard of truth. But excuse me Mr. President in that case your wife’s whole campaign is a fairly tale because she’s running on your record and she is calling it her experience!

“Second, it is wrong that Senator Obama got to go through 15 debates trumpeting his superior judgment and how he had been against the war in every year, numerating the years, and never got asked one time, not once, ‘Well, how could you say, that when you said in 2004 you didn’t know how you would have voted on the resolution?

You said in 2004 there was no difference between you and George Bush on the war and you took that speech you’re now running on off your website in 2004 and there’s no difference in your voting record and Hillary’s ever since?’ Give me a break.

“This whole thing is the biggest fairy tale I’ve ever seen.” … -- Former President Bill Clinton.

Speaking of fairy tales John McCain with virtual no National Republican support because of his contrarian positions in the Senate, positions that often put him at odds with Republicans won in New Hampshire too.

McCain’s gang of fourteen which prevented Republicans from stopping Democrat filibusters of President Bush judicial nominees plus the McCain-Kennedy Immigration Reform Bill which is believed to be amnesty for illegal aliens by almost everyone except John McCain are the reasons that McCain has virtually no National support among Conservative Republicans, and are the reasons that he won in the blue state of New Hampshire but won’t win anywhere that there is a Conservative majority.

McCain-Kennedy would establish a worker visa program that would allow employers to temporarily hire foreign citizens to fill jobs that cannot be filled with U.S. laborers. That is not a bad idea.

However, the act proposes to allow individuals unlawfully here to stay and sign up for the program by paying a $1,500 fine. That is a bad idea. It is, in effect, an amnesty--which undercuts the rule of law by rewarding those who have acted wrongly and will only encourage further illegal entry.— James Jay Carafano, Ph. D., Janice L. Kephart, and Paul Rosenzweig, the Heritage Foundation

McCain has very little money and virtually no Conservative Republican support so to have both Senator Clinton and Senator McCain win in New Hampshire reflects on the Liberal politics there not on the political viability of either Clinton or McCain.

Enjoy this moment in time Senators Clinton and McCain, a moment when reality is suspended by the blue state politics of New Hampshire, a moment when even John McCain can dream that he could be the President of the United States of America. And then before too long awake to the realities that this is a long campaign trail and not every primary will offer up fairy tale endings where the front runner loses a double digit lead in the polls and is defeated by crocodile tears.

Nor will the fairy tale ending of a rogue politician, who pokes his finger in the eye of his party at every opportunity that he gets, winning the day, will happen again somewhere out of the blue state of New Hampshire. And in the immortal words of fairy tale the Wizard of Oz:

Somewhere, out of the blue state, way far away.
There are Republican voters that won’t let John McCain carry the day.
Somewhere, out of the blue state, skies are blue.
And the dreams that John McCain dare to dream
Really won’t come true.

And in the words of former President Bill Clinton, Give me a break! This thing is the biggest fairy tale that I’ve ever seen.

Why the thought of a Mike Huckabee Presidency Scares me

Presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee


In the last eight years we have witnessed often times vicious and unrelenting attacks against the President of the United States of America because he was a compassionate Conservative who claimed Christianity as his faith of choice. And for the most part President George W. Bush did not defend himself against this onslaught of overt negativity and as a result both Conservatism and Christianity suffered under his presidency.

It should be clear to all that we now live in a post Christian age in the United States of America one which our Fore Fathers would find almost impossible to recognize if they were here among us today. Moreover this is an age of anti-Christianism and free floating situation ethics, values and meaning.

Therefore it has become increasingly difficult to tell the difference between Senators and Congressmen who are Democrat or Republican.

For the most part until some Republican Senators and Congressmen developed some backbone buoyed by the public up rising against the compassionate Conservative’s Comprehensive Immigrations Reform plan most Congressional Republicans were acting like wannabe Democrats. Nobody was fighting for Conservative ideas. Nobody!

Yet in contrast, Democrats were on a steady drumbeat of using our government, our courts, our schools and the marketplace of ideas to advice their agenda of replacing the American idea with a socialist agenda. And calling that agenda progressive in a completely Orwellian redefining of the America idea where Democrat socialist control of the America people is redefined as freedom.

Therefore anytime you hear a Liberal Democrat speak of freedom they are really speaking of the socialist reform that they plan to establish in American by Fascist means.

If there is one thing that was learned from the Bush administration that is that present Washington politics are not about reuniting people. If anyone says that they can reunite this country in this election they are a liar! If that was the case and it could be done George W. Bush would have done it. Lord knows he tried.

He had a successful track record as the Governor of Texas where he was able to work bi-partisanly with Democrats. He thought that he could do the same thing in Washington D.C. Democrats and Liberals had other ideas.

Furthermore Democrats don’t want the country united around Conservative ideas they want to unite around abortion, homosexuality, illegal aliens granted amnesty, socialized medicine, etc.

George Bush went to the Democrats with heart in hand (inviting Teddy Kennedy to the White house for movies and the like) but what did he receive in turn? Democrats gut him and his Presidency like a fish. And then they set out mockingly to purposely make his Presidency the worst Presidency in modern times. But they failed, no Presidency was worst than Jimmy Carter’s.

Nevertheless, according to Democrats George Bush was the dumbest, most incompetent, most ridiculous fool to ever be elected to the office of president of the United States of America. And Democrats reveled in fact that they could speak both mockingly and dismissively of a Conservative and of a Christian.

This much is apparent the next President of the United States of America if that person should happen to be a Republican and a Conservative must have the political acumen to deal with forces from within and without the government that are saboteurs, underminers, and treasonous.

The next President must be a Nationalist above all else one who will fight for America and American ideas as embodied in the Constitution opposed to this movement to place opinion and special interests above Constitutional meaning.

Mike Huckabee has identified himself as a Christian in his campaign to become President of the United States of America. In a post-Christian era it is virtually impossible for a Christian to be elected President in America.

We have seen the extent to which Liberals, Atheist, Homosexuals, non-Religious Jews and some orthodox Jews will go defeat and void out Christianity in this Country. A Mike Huckabee would be soundly defeated by those converging forces in apocalyptic fashion.

If Governor Huckabee were to win the Republican nomination all of the political hounds of hell would be unleashed against him and if he, like President Bush, chose to turn the other cheek all the cheeks would be immediately slapped from his political face!

One very important thing is often lost in the story of Jesus. And that is Jesus was really a fighter for what he believed. If need be he would over turn a few tables to make his point. At another time he counseled his followers to pick up the sword. Jesus showed that he would even die for what he believed.

What scares me about a Mike Huckabee Presidency is that with all of the forces aligned against someone who claims to be a Christian Governor Huckabee would not have the wisdom of Solomon or the fighting spirit of David (or for that matter the fighting spirit of Jesus) to stand against the onslaught that would surely befall him once the media began it’s ridicule of the Christian faith as it would be bound to do as it did for the eight years of the Bush administration.

Once Huckabee was identified as the Republican nominee all media hell would break out again him and he wouldn’t know how to fight back thus the Democrat nominee would be ensured the Presidency. What we need most is someone who will fight for this Nation and this Nation’s values as I said before a Nationalist.

Huckabee would be easy target practice for the Conservative and Christian hating American Leftist and that scares me the most!

Global Warming: Scientific Delusion or Big Politic Economics

Professor Oleg G. Sorokhtin

The latest data, obtained by Habibullah Abdusamatov, head of the Pulkovo Observatory space research laboratory, say that Earth has passed the peak of its warmer period, and a fairly cold spell will set in quite soon, by 2012. Real cold will come when solar activity reaches its minimum, by 2041, and will last for 50-60 years or even longer.--Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin

What is Global warming other than scientific delusion and big politic economics? It has be explained as C02 emission trapped inside the earth’s atmosphere which prevents the heat that the sun radiates on the earth from escaping thus causing a green house effect were heat is trapped inside the earth’s atmosphere causing the ambient tempetures of the earth to increase to record proportions.

[Greenhouse effect or] the hothouse theory, As we know [it], [is] hothouse gases, in particular, nitrogen peroxide, warm up the atmosphere by keeping heat close to the ground. Advanced in the late 19th century by Svante A. Arrhenius, a Swedish physical chemist and Nobel Prize winner, this theory is taken for granted to this day and has not undergone any serious check.--Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin

This theory has become so politicized that there is very little truth in the socio-political movement now identified as Global warming.

Almost everything that you think you know about Global warming is a lie promoted by politico-economic forces using the latest mass psychological ploy with which force the herd into a direction of their choosing. Remember 2007 was supposed to be the warmest year on earth ever, since record was kept of these things! Well it wasn’t!

THE STARK headline appeared just over a year ago. "2007 to be 'warmest on record,' " BBC News reported on Jan. 4, 2007. Citing experts in the British government's Meteorological Office, the story announced that "the world is likely to experience the warmest year on record in 2007," surpassing the all-time high reached in 1998.—Jeff Jacoby

I’m sure Al Gore and the United Nation’s IPCC are looking their Nobel Peace prizes over for the last time as they consider returning the fraudulently won awards. They have just as much right to a Nobel Prize as Marion Jones has the right to keep the Olympic records and medals that she won while being amped up on steroids. Gore and his associates’ “inconvenient truth” is plain for all to see, they lied about Global warming. These men used more faulty scientific data with which to promote Global warming than George Bush used faulty Intel on WMDs that lead to the Iraq war!

That means that every TV or radio commercial, every so called expert, every ex-politician, every world leader, every rock or movie star and every school teacher that promotes Global warming as an inevitable man-made disaster that can be affect and changed by the green movement has been deceived or is a willing participant in what is going to be the greatest farce and rip-off of the world community to date.

Earth is now at the peak of one of its passing warm spells. It started in the 17th century when there was no industrial influence on the climate to speak of and no such thing as the hothouse effect. The current warming is evidently a natural process and utterly independent of hothouse gases.--Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin

So why are Russian Scientists warning of an impending Global Cooling? Don’t you get it? It’s all out of the control of man. Yes a clean environment is always desirable, however the recent Global warming scare and all of the efforts that are linked to it are not meant to clean the environment, that’s what they want you to believe, the real purpose of the Global warming scare is to put a tariff on the Global economy by which a select few will make billions upon billions of dollars from taxes that you will be force to pay for the air that you breathe.

Russian Scientists have an Inconvenient Truth of their own. They say that;

The real reasons for climate changes are uneven solar radiation, terrestrial precession (that is, axis gyration), instability of oceanic currents, regular salinity fluctuations of the Arctic Ocean surface waters, etc. There is another, principal reason—solar activity and luminosity. The greater they are the warmer is our climate.--Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin

You should be wondering how one can get a refund on inappropriate Oscar and Nobel peace prize awarding. At the very least you should be preparing yourself to resist, by force if need be, the planners of this world-wide scam which is meant to enslave the world by making all industry and all people subject to a world-wide taxation system all controlled by Europe. The Global warming scare is the 21st Century economic re-colonization of the world by Europe under the false pretense of caring for the planet.

Carbon dioxide cannot be bad for the climate. On the contrary, it is food for plants, and so is beneficial to life on Earth. Bearing out this point was the Green Revolution—the phenomenal global increase in farm yields in the mid-20th century. Numerous experiments also prove a direct proportion between harvest and carbon dioxide concentration in the air.

Carbon dioxide is not to blame for global climate change. Solar activity is many times more powerful than the energy produced by the whole of humankind. Man’s influence on nature is a drop in the ocean.--Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin

According to Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin, Merited Scientist of Russia and fellow of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Earth is unlikely to ever face a temperature disaster.

We have no reason to panic about allegations that ice in the Arctic Ocean is thawing rapidly and will soon vanish altogether. As it really is, scientists say the Arctic and Antarctic ice shields are growing. Physical and mathematical calculations predict a new Ice Age. It will come in 100,000 years, at the earliest, and will be much worse than the previous. Europe will be ice-bound, with glaciers reaching south of Moscow.--Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin

If predictions of the possibility of a new Ice Age doesn't give you pause you're already too far gone. The brainwashing is complete. Or the very least that you can do is call for the cessation of Global warming scares and all plans to enact any draconian tax systems on the world peoples based on those errantly false predictions of Global warming until such time that the science is credible. If Global warming can ever be credible!

Who knows if Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin’s predictions of a coming Ice Age are truth then one day you will be praying for Global warming not vainly attempting to prevent it!

So is Global warming scientific delusion or big politic economics, right now it appears to be both!

Hillary Clinton is so 90’s

1968 Hillary Diane Rodham


As heard in the New Hampshire Primaries:

Like did you see what she’s still wearing? OMG pants suits went out like in the 80’s! And all that talk about experience to produce change, don’t you have to be old or something to get experience?

I know sleeping around can get you plenty of experience! Maybe that’s the reason she has Bill tagging along as a show of all the experience that they’ve had. (Well at least all the experience that Bill has had!)

OMG, I heard that Hillary thinks that that Obama guy is not ready to be President ‘cause he’s all young and stuff and he hasn’t been in the White house for 8 years in the 90’s like she has.

I would just die if someone thought that I was old enough to be doing something political in the White house in the 90’s, you know? I think I was only 8 years old in the 90’s anyways!

Oh and have you seen that Obama, why he’s so young, energetic and handsome. Yeah I bet if he wasn’t married Chelsea wouldn’t mind hooking up with him! Yeah I’d be his Obama girl in a minute!

Yeah and OMG Hillary is John McCain old! Definitely bringing “NOT-sexy” back!

And did you hear that Hillary’s theme is change? But what has she really been able to change in her over 35 years of politics? While she was in the White house she attempt to change Health Care but failed.

She’s been apart of the 109th and the 110th Congresses both named the “do nothing Congress.” No change there.

Plus she’s still wearing pants suits clearly no change there! But to hear her tell it she is solely responsible for every change in America. Listen to her rant in New Hampshire last night:


So just what change has she already made? And what capacity has she been in to be able to make any changes. I’m thinking that all the old cadgers in spandex leisure suits who think that “staying alive” is a mission statement and not a song sang by the Bee Gees will vote for her. Or maybe they’re looking for that Fleetwood Mac generation that can’t stop thinking about the 90’s to vote for her!

Whatever! I’m just tired of the same old rethreaded politicians trying to pass themselves off as agents of change. Yeah like anyone would want to see a rethreaded American Gladiators return to TV! Yeah as if!

OMG, OMG the Voters in New Hampshire are not even buying Hillary’s bull about change anymore when a focus group was asked whether Hillary’s arguments for experience and change in last night’s New Hampshire debate made them want to back her the group ripped her a new one. Check it out:



I can’t believe that anyone is still considering voting for Hillary Clinton.

Yeah like voting for Hillary would be soooo 90’s!

Back to the Future in Iowa

Presidential hopeful John Edwards

Money, a defining measure of candidate strength throughout 2007, turned out to be not so determinative in Iowa. -- JIM KUHNHENN

Remember when politics were about who had the best ideas and not the biggest war chest. Remember when candidates were selected on the strength of their character and not the strength of their political machine.

Remember when candidates had the backing of the people instead of the backing of corporate giants who exert control over the American government by buying Presidents, Senators and Congressmen.

The Iowa Caucus is a throw back to the days when the people selected their leaders independent of the empty political messages of asking what America can do for you instead of asking what you can do for America!

Universal Health Care equals what America can do for you, Homosexual marriage equals what America can do for you, aiding and abetting illegal aliens equals what America can do for you.

Many of these campaigns are base in promises of what America can do for you. John Fitzgerald Kennedy would be ashamed.

What can you do for America? You can vote for a candidate that will put the interest of America and the interest of the American people first.

What you can do for America is vote for the candidate who will fight for America, enforces her borders, and fight for the traditions that made this a great country.

Those ideas are embodied in America’s constitution not the made up false court given civil rights that killed 35 million unborn U.S. citizens or allows homosexuals to pretend that they are man and wife or protects terrorist by giving them rights to carry out their subversive plans to destroy this country from within as well as without.

Unconstitutional court decisions have declared constitutional acts unconstitutional and made unconstitutional subversive America hating plans law!

As we move on to New Hampshire and other more politically correct caucuses we will certainly see a catering to the ask what America can do for you crowd that will certainly suck the remaining life out of what is left of this country that we once proudly called America.

Iowa was a call back to what we could be if we were free from the special interest and corporate interest which rule us today.

Senator Barack Obama and Governor Mike Huckabee won in Iowa what they will not win again due to who really controls an America that is in its last troughs of freedom.

We will not see again the results garnered in Iowa what we will see in the coming days is an empty political process that is pretending to be the same process that once made this country great.

What we will see is corporate and special interest candidates being forced on the American people by polls and media reporting while America sinks into obscurity as the results of Iowa fade from recent memory.

The 2008 Liberalism vs. Conservativism Elections

Will American Liberalism stump out the last vestiges of Conservativism in the world? That’s the only question that hangs in the balance in 2008.

World Liberals that have been rebuffed of late by the France’s election of an American loving Conservative President Nicolas Sarkozy and Germany’s election of America supporting Chancellor Angela Merkel . Both new leaders support the Bush administration once and for all dispelling the myth that there is world-wide anti-Americanism and hatred of President Bush.

On the other hand Australians have given in to Liberalism by electing Liberal Prime Minister Kevin Rudd. Now world Liberals are waiting with baited breath to see if America the last bastion of Nationalism and Conservativism will bow to the pressure of conformity to the United Nations and world peer pressure to become like them accepting the theory of global warming and one world government.

Labor Party leader Kevin Rudd's emphatic victory swings Australia toward the political left after almost 12 years of conservative rule, and marks a generational shift that will result in a greater focus on issues such as global warming. --The Associated Press

2008 Iowa is the just the latest battlefield where the ideological opposes of self indulgence and the self gratification of homosexuality, masturbation, Universal Health care and Global warming that American Liberalism represents attempt to put down the evil forces of Christianity, Family values and the rule of law represent by Conservativism.

Nowhere is this more apparent as in Moisés Naím’s article, “The world wants America back.” Or more fittingly I would entitle his article the world wants to use American resources for the promotion of a world-wide Liberal agenda. Naím says:

Of course, the America that the world wants back is not the one that preemptively invades potential enemies, bullies allies or disdains international law. The demand is for an America that rallies other nations prone to sitting on the fence while international crises are boiling out of control; for a superpower that comes up with innovative initiatives to tackle the great challenges of the day, such as climate change, nuclear proliferation and violent Islamist fundamentalism. The demand is for an America that enforces the rules that facilitate international commerce and works effectively to stabilize an accident-prone global economy. Naturally, the world also wants a superpower willing to foot the bill with a largess that no other nations can match.—Moisés Naím

Can you believe Mr. Naím’s analysis in the article posted in the Washington Post? Naím’s thesis statement is that; well let me quote him, "The world wants America back."

Yet what he wrote was a blatant anti-Bush screed full of all of the ignorance of someone who knows nothing about world affairs or what the world wants.

Naím attempts in his article to precariously balance the facts that there is not a consensus of world animosity against America against his preconceived biases against Conservatives and President Bush. And it doesn’t work for the discerning reader nor does it support the narrative that America is hated because of Conservativism.

Even the most neophyte world observer knows that France and Germany have recently openly embraced the Bush administration for the entire world to see. After these nations rejected their corrupted anti-America leaders President Jacques Chirac and Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and voted these tarnished enemies of America and American hating men out of office France and Germany replaced them by voting in pro-America, pro-Bush allies, France President Nicolas Sarkozy and Chancellor Angela Merkel. These are friends to America and the Bush administration.

There is no world-wide anti-Americanism there is only the enemies of an unrestrained Corporatism that is international and owes it’s allegiance to no country.

True Corporatism has been most closely identified with America because this is where freedom of commerce was perfected. However like the ungrateful child that it is Corporatism has rebelled against American law and American accountability.

Corporations no longer obey American institutions of governess or the American government. Corporate power is an unrestrained bastard child that consumes everything before it and then vomits it’s consumption out as waste for others to clean up as it savages world markets in tyrannous gluttony. This is one insular isolated point that I concur with Presidential hopeful John Edwards.

What misplaced anti-American sentiment there is, is only by those who are inappropiately the enemies of American Conservativism and those who have rightly place hatred against unrestrained corporate power.

Those two place are where the hatreds of the left are focused. These liberals believe that socialism, communism and tyrannous agencies,disconnected from the people, like the world court at The Hague or the United Nations, are the rightful international bodies of government for the new world citizenry of Earth’s citizens.

Iowa, New Hampshire and the 2008 Presidential elections will be what the 2000 and 2004 elections where not, the death toll of Conservativism in the view of world liberals.

And if Europe is our example this is how it will happen. First there will be Liberalism, then godlessness and then Islam! Whereas, presently we see that Islam is overtaking and filling the godless void in Europe today.

It is difficult for some to see how 2008 Iowa is at all connected to the end of Western civilization and the beginning of the rise of Eastern repression but make no mistake about it; it all begins in Iowa today!

If this 2008 election is Liberalism vs. Conservativism and Liberalism wins then all of mankind will lose, you have only look to Europe if you don’t believe me!