On to the Convention

Gov. Mitt Romney promises to keep fighting
Governor Mitt Romney’s Super Tuesday night's promise was to go on to the Convention.

Romney, a problem solver, is not a Washington insider like Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain. In addition to that he is the only one qualified to fix what they broke in Washington.

Let's go all the way to the convention and win the Whitehouse!

McCain Steals WV Hands it off to Huckabee Then Steals the Night

McCain:No stopping him now?
Huckabee wins…huh not so fast, Huckabee was used as a pawn by the McCain campaign to block Mitt Romney from becoming the first victor in the Super Tuesday race for delegates and thus becoming the Republican nominee for President proving that a vote for Huckabee is a vote for McCain.

Elections are supposed to be for voters to decide who they wish to represent them so why is it that in West Virginia the voters didn’t decide Sen. John McCain decided for them!

It’s the same old thing Washington insider backstabbing and horse trading. No wonder they call him Maverick! McCain faced with the unfavorable situation of a Mitt Romney lead in West Virginia used his ability to reach across the aisle to join with a political opponent against another.

McCain achieved the results and outcome that he wanted. Mike Huckabee the lesser of his competition won West Virginia while Mitt Romney was cheated out of an early victory that possibly could have set the tone for the rest of the night and all because of a McCain brokered backroom deal.

McCain’s over twenty years of politics taught him that it is better that one manipulates events and outcomes to get what you want than allow the people to get what they want.

What did the people of West Virginia want? Did they want Sen. McCain to affect the outcome of their elections? Well it was beneficial for McCain that Mitt Romney be denied a victory in West Virginia so McCain colluded with Mike Huckabee to give Huckabee the Victory in West Virginia . This type of sad example is exactly what we need to rid Washington of. The idea that a representative of the people can void out the peoples will to exert his or her own will is not what is best for America and it’s not the American way.

It’s like CIRA the Comprehensive Immigration Reform McCain and a tight knit group of rouge Republicans attempted to force on the American people. In this little oligarchy’s mind Comprehensive Immigration reform was a done deal; So much so that the President boasted, “See ya’ll at the bill signing!”

Its apparent that the change that America is calling for will deal with political insiders like John McCain who have forgotten that they are sent to Washington D.C. to work for the people not against them.

Yet on Super Tuesday none if it seem to really matter. Washington insiders Hillary Clinton and John McCain are leading in delegates.

McCain leads with 613 delegates that’s only 578 short of the 1,191 that he needs to claim his Party’s nomination and Clinton leads her race with 845 delegates in a much tighter two man race to claim the ultimate prize of 2,025 delegates to win.

We have seen a delegate handoff in West Virgina once already making this Republican race a two against one, McCain and Huckabee against Romney fight.

Who knows, if no one has the 1,191 delegates at this summer's Republican convention in St. Paul, Minn. maybe Governor Huckabee will return the favor and hand off his delegates to Sen. McCain for the win.

Just think this all made possible by McCain's Super Tuesday win in which he manipulated the outcome just enough to achieve the win. Here are state by state voting returns.

Good for John McCain, but is it good for the Country or his Party? That it seems has always been the problem with Sen. John McCain lately he appears to act on what is good for him first leaving his Country a secondary consideration and his Party a distant tertiary concern.

UPDATE:

According to Politico it now appears that Sen. Obama has the lead of delegate in the Democrat race for the nomination. It is being reported that he lays claim to 840 to Sen. Clinton’s 830 in any event Democrats are still saying that it is to close to call.

McCain is Bush Lite - Less bright more Liberal

McCain supported by Lite Republicans Schwarzenegger and Guiliani

"I was in a conference in Germany over the weekend and President Putin of Germany gave one of the old Cold War style speeches"—Sen. John McCain

With all of the negatives and none of the positives John McCain is Bush Lite. Sen. McCain thinks that Russia President Vladimir Putin is President of Germany. I’m not kidding. Democrats accuse President Bush of being dumb but McCain is dumber. See for yourself:



You may also remember this little ditty sung by Sen. John McCain on the tune of Barbara Ann...

Bomb, bomb, bomb...bomb, bomb Iran! Not only a stupid attempt at humor but warmongering when people want to end the war in Iraq, now that’s dumb!

I thought that America didn’t want a dumb President so why are the Liberals, Independents and Moderates backing the intellectually challenged McCain?

John McCain has promised that there will be other wars! So much for ending the war now and bring the troops home. McCain says the troops will be in Iraq for 100 years. (Why don’t you tell us what you’re really thinking Sen. McCain?)



Like DNC Chairman Howard Dean, You may hate President Bush and the Republicans but you find yourself strangely drawn to Sen. John McCain because well he's so liberal but boy is he dumb.

How does one make a career in the United States Senate of pissing off Conservatives and then decide to run as the Republican nominee to be President unless you’re dumb or either you think Republicans are as dumb as you.

McCain was one of five senators implicated in the 1989 Keating Five, a congressional scandal alleging federal regulators were pressured against an investigation of Charles Keating, the former chairman of the Lincoln Savings and Loan Assn.
McCain was cited by the Senate Ethics Committee for “poor judgment” but it recommended no further action. -- Rick Pearson

Speaking of poor judgment John McCain is bff (best-friends-forever) with the Clintons according to President Bill Clinton. He spoke of McCain’s and Hillary’s relationship he said, "She (Hillary) and John McCain are very close," Clinton said. "They always laugh that if they wound up being the nominees of their party, it would be the most civilized election in American history, and they're afraid they'd put the voters to sleep because they like and respect each other."

The comments may not be welcome by the McCain camp — which yesterday faced fire from several of its rivals for winning the backing of the New York Times — a longtime archenemy of conservatives.-- Alexander Mooney

According to Pat Buchanan : Where Bush has been at his best, cutting taxes and nominating conservative judges, McCain has been his nemesis. Not only did he vote twice against the Bush tax cuts, McCain colluded to sell out the most conservative of Bush’s judges.

In 1993, McCain voted to confirm the pro-abortion liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg. But when Bush set out to restore constitutionalism, McCain formed the Gang of 14, seven senators from each party. All agreed to vote to block the GOP Senate from invoking the “nuclear option”—i.e., empowering the GOP to break a filibuster of judicial nominees by majority vote—unless the seven Democrats agreed.

With this record of voting for Clinton justices and joining with Democrats anxious to kill the most conservative Bush’s nominees, what guarantee is there a President McCain would nominate and fight for the fifth jurist who would vote to overturn Roe v Wade?

McCain also colluded with liberals to pass McCain-Feingold, a law that denies to Second Amendment folks and right-to-lifers their First Amendment right to identify friends and foes in TV ads before national elections.

On ANWAR, too, McCain votes with the liberals, and on global warming he has moved toward Gore.

After five record trade deficits have denuded the nation of thousands of factories and 3 million manufacturing jobs, McCain is still babbling on about Smoot-Hawley. “When you study history,” he told a Detroit newspaper, “every time we’ve adopted protectionism, we’ve paid a very heavy price.”

But what history was McCain talking about? From Lincoln through Calvin Coolidge, the GOP was the Party of Protection that put 12 presidents in the White House to two for the Democrats, and the U.S. became the most awesome industrial power and self-reliant nation in the history of mankind, producing 42 percent of the world’s manufactured goods.

Even Hillary, whose husband passed NAFTA with McCain’s support, has begun to question the free-trade paradigm and the disastrous results it has produced.

On controlling America’s borders and halting the invasion through Mexico, McCain collaborated with Senate liberals in the McCain-Kennedy amnesty, which was rejected only after a national uprising.

When 190,000 Arizonans petitioned in 2004 to put Prop 200 on the ballot, requiring proof of citizenship before an individual could vote or receive welfare benefits, John McCain led the GOP congressional delegation in opposing it unanimously. Prop 200 passed with the support of 56 percent of all Arizona voters and 46 percent of Hispanics.

Unsurprisingly, Juan Hernandez, the open-borders chatterbox and former adviser to Vicente Fox, has turned up in McCain’s campaign.

So you see McCain is Bush Lite, but less smart and much more aggravating to Conservative causes. Those of you who are asking for change this election will just get the same old ill-advised decisions but only worst, if John McCain were to win the election.

Still You may agree with Sen. McCain on this views of Global warming, giving prisoners of war habeas corpus rights and bring enemy combatant to the United States and you may cast your Super Tuesday’s vote for him just know that just like Lite Beer isn’t real Beer, Sen. McCain really isn’t a real Conservative.


Exercise your Constitutional Guaranteed Rights and Vote!

Hold Your Noise and Vote Tuesday

Sen. McCain and Sen. Clinton in a Moment of Mutual Admiration

Yes, I think holding their nose they’re going to have to take him.-- Roberta McCain, mother of Sen. John McCain

John McCain has always been friendlier with Democrats than he has been with Republicans and recently Sen. John McCain’s White haired mother, Roberta McCain, was asked about her son’s prospects for winning the Republican nominee to be president and although she acknowledged that her son had no support among Conservatives she speculated that came election against a Democrat her son would be the Republican representative and that Conservatives would just have to hold their noises and vote for him.

McCain with a face that only a mother could love has became the face of a Party that is fast becoming a Party that no one can love.

In the 2006 mid-term elections voters threw Republican out on their ears and voted Democrats into majority status in both the House and the Senate because Republicans had become depraved little Democrat wannabes. The country began seeing both Parties as an extension to the other and some even name them as such with the derisive designations Demo-cans and Republi-crats.

Homosexual child affairs with Congressional pages that heretofore were Democrat territory, fiscal and monetary corruption that was, before the Republicans came into power for their short 12 year majority reign, was primarily a Democrat staple for the 40 years that Democrats held power. And then the America people kicked Democrats out in 1994 when Newt Gingrich lead Conservatives with a promise to clean up Congress with Conservative ideas.

Ideas like small government, less taxes, ethics and integrity in government and above all respect and adherence to the Constitution of the United States of America. So what happened?

Apparently our esteemed political leaders sensed a change in the American people one which 40 years of homosexual rights, abortion rights and multiculturalism have brought about. Ideologically American is a liberal hedonistic post-Christian society.

Many Republican Congressmen and Senators believe that with what they perceive as a seismic shift in social morays that it is no longer expedient for them to fight for Conservative ideas.

Therefore the blurring of the Parties, you vote for a Republican and voilà you get a closet Democrat like Governor Arnold Schwarznegger of California who betrayed Conservatives, though he presented himself and ran as a Conservative, by signing into California Law assembly bill and senate bill AB394 and SB777 that forces homosexuality on the citizens of California by law.

There is terrible news from California. On October 12, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed into law three bills which, the opposition argues, introduce the radical homosexual agenda into educational institutions.--Paul Weyrich

Not to mention that California is facing a cataclysmic fiscal deficit yet a couple of years ago Californians duped by politically correct leaders and Movie Stars voted to fund stem cell research 3 billion dollars right in the middle of their fiscal crisis.

Californians backed their opinions with money with 59 percent of those who showed up at the polls voting for last November's Proposition 71, which will funnel $3 billion of the cash-strapped state's funds into embryonic stem-cell research over the next decade.-- Michael Fumento

Now the Democrat mismanaged State of California is talking about laying off state workers, closing state parks and slashing school funding because they don’t have any money. What morons!

You know it’s said that as California goes, so goes the rest of the United States. So as California crashes and burns under the wildfire of a false Republican Governor and a totally Democrat controlled state government, we can preview what America will be like when a Democrat controlled Congress and either a Republi-crat or a Demo-can is elected President.

But I’ve digressed. The point that I’m making is Sen. John Cain represents the old guard of the Trent Lott Republican Party that believes that you have to be like Democrats to win. Republi-crats like McCain are ashamed of Conservative values because those values are not the politically correct values that everyone is embracing now.

Former Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.), a longtime McCain ally, said that when it looked like the bottom fell out over the summer, he rallied a group of McCain supporters in Washington.
Lott told The Hill that the meeting was far from a “celebration,” but the group resolved to stay with McCain.
“I said, ‘Look, just relax,’ ” Lott said. “ ‘If we can come up with a million, million and a half [dollars] a month to keep him afloat, he’ll come out of this by October.’ ”--Sam Youngman, The Hill

Everyone wants amnesty for illegal aliens; everyone wants government health care, everyone wants homosexual instruction in schools like in Massachusetts and everyone wants homosexuals normalized. Homosexual sex on the big screen, on the cable, in airport bathrooms and in the living rooms of all America, everyone wants that.

And if everyone wanted to jump off of the proverbial cliff Democrats and Republi-crats like McCain would want to legislate that into law too!

In the pass I have identified a number of Republi-crats who should not be re-elected, I termed them “Former Senators walking” for their part in attempting to force amnesty down the throats of Americans, and John McCain was one of the Senators that I named.

At the very least McCain should be forced back to Arizona and either be challenged by a Republican or made to run as a Democrat and if the people of Arizona elect him as a Democrat he would be fairly representing them. But to be running as a potential Republican Presidential Candidate is absolutely astonishing.

Yet McCain and other Republi-crats are the reason that the Republican Party lost in 2006 and subsequently they are the reason Republicans have lost their way.

Sen. McCain mother was right the Senator has no Conservative Republican support his candidacy is made up of Republi-crats like the disgraced retired Sen. Trent Lott (Thank God!) and others who are working to transform the Republican Party in a splitting image of the Democrat Party.

These losers believe that Republicans can’t win and they are ashamed of Conservative values. To which I say, they have that right but they should leave the Republican Party and join a Party that is more reflective of their values.

And their man McCain should run for President, but not of the Republican Party, no McCain best represents Independent and Moderate Democrats as you know he was considering leaving the Republican Party in 2004 and running with John Kerry.

On the Democrat side it should be Obama, Clinton and McCain vs. Romney and Huckabee on the Republican side.

Jeez I think that I’m going to have to hold my noise on any of the above.

Just put McCain in the correct category and let the Republicans elect their own poison.

Republicans should have the right to elect who they want to represent them not some fake Republican who used the Republican hating media and self hating Republican Democrat wannabes along with Independents and Democrat Moderates to win the Republican nomination.

Where is a Conservative when you need one? Jim DeMint, Rick Santorim, John Cornyn or John Thune where are you?

If you are a Conservative out there take my advice and hold your noise because it’s going to be a smelly 4 years if Obama, Clinton or McCain is elected.

But you’ve only have yourselves to blame if you don’t fight everyday for Conservative ideas and vote for Conservative representatives to lead this Country out from the moral malaise which we presently find ourselves.

McCain, Obama and Clinton are a step backward to the free love 60’s a time of anything goes that brought on the AIDS of the 80’s and 90’s

Even free love has its consequences and so does a vote for Democrats or a Republi-crat!

Ann Coulter says she’d vote for Hillary before she’d vote for McCain. McCain’s mother is right no Conservatives support John McCain.

A Super Tuesday Message

This was sent to me by someone who I considered to be a Democrat. (I assumed please forgive me.)This person is woman and a racial minority. I receive stuff all of the time but this is something that I thought I’d simply pass it on because it seemed to me that someone had done their homework.

There are many of you considering voting for Hillary Clinton simply because she is a woman. And though I consider that sexist there is no reasoning with some of you so this emotional little rant ought to speak your language.

It’s not as good as a fake cry but hey it’s something every Super Tuesday voter should take inside the voting booth! --Alaphiah

PLEASE REMEMBER THIS FOREVER

Worse than you thought & worth remembering
and this came from a Democrat
Dear Mr. Ex President Clinton,
I recently saw a bumper sticker that said, "Thank
me, I voted for Clinton-Gore." So, I sat down and
reflected on that, and I am sending my "Thank you"
for what you have done, specifically:

1. Thank you for introducing us to Gennifer
Flowers, Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky, Dolly
Kyle Browning, Kathleen Willey, and Juanita
Broderick. Did I leave anyone out?

2. Thank you for teaching my 8 year old about oral
sex. I had really planned to wait until he was a
little older to discuss it with him, but now he
knows more about it than I did as a senior in college.


3. Thank you for showing us that sexual harassment
in the work place (especially the White House) and
on the job is OK, and all you have to know is what
the meaning of "it" is. It really is great to know
that certain sexual acts are not sex, and one person
may have sex while the other one does NOT have sex.

4. Thank you for reintroducing the concept of impeachment
to a new generation and demonstrating that the ridiculous
plot of the movie "Wag the Dog" could be plausible after all.

5. Thanks for making Jimmy Carter look competent,
Gerald Ford look graceful, Richard Nixon look honest,
Lyndon Johnson look truthful, and John Kennedy look moral.

6. Thank you for the 73 House and Senate witnesses
who have pled the 5th Amendment and 17 witnesses who
have fled the country to avoid testifying about
Democratic campaign fund raising.

7. Thank you, for the 19 charges, 8 convictions,
and 4 imprisonment's from the Whitewater "mess" and
the 55 criminal charges and 32 criminal convictions
(so far) in the other "Clinton" scandals.

8. Thanks also for reducing our military by half,
"gutting" much of our foreign policy, and flying all
over the world on "vacations" carefully disguised as necessary
trips.

9 Thank you, also, for "finding" millions of dollars
(I really didn't need it in the first place,
and I can't think of a more deserving group of
recipients for my hard-earned tax dollars)
for all of your globe-trotting. I understand your,
family and your cronies have logged in more time
aboard Air Force One than any other administration.

10. Now that you've left the White House, thanks for the
140 pardons of convicted felon s and indicted felons-in-exile.
We will love to have them rejoin society.
(Not to mention the scores you pardoned while Governor of Arkansas)

11. Thanks also for removing the White House silverware. I'm sure
that
Laura Bush didn't like the pattern anyway. Also, enjoy the housewarming
gifts you've received from your "friends."

12. Thanks to you and your staff in the West Wing
of the White House for vandalizing and destroying
government property on the way out. I also appreciate removing all of
that excess weight (China, silverware, linen, towels, ash trays, soap,
pens, magnetic compass, flight manuals, etc.) out of Air Force 1.

The weight savings means burning less fuel, thus less tax dollars
spent
on jetfuel. Thank you!

13. Please ensure that Hillary enjoys the $8 million dollar advance
for
her "tell-all" book and you, Bill, the $10 million advance for your
memoirs. Who says crime doesn't pay!
>
14. The last and most important point - thank you for forcing Israel
to
let Mohammed Atta go free.
Terrorist pilot Mohammed Atta blew up a bus in Israel in 1986. The
Israelis captured, tried and imprisoned him. As part of the Oslo
agreement with the Palestinians in 1993, Israel had to agree to release
so-called "political prisoners". However, the Israelis would not
release
any with blood on their hands. The American President at the time, Bill
Clinton, and his Secretary of State, Warren Christopher, "insisted"
that
all prisoners be released. Thus Mohammed Atta was freed and eventually
thanked the US by flying an airplane into Tower One of the World Trade
Center. This was reported by many of the American TV networks at the
time
that the terrorists were first identified. It was censored in the US
from
all later reports. Why shouldn't Americans know the real truth?

What a guy!!

If you agree that the American public must be made aware of these
facts,
pass this on. God bless America and THANK YOU (once again) for spending
my
taxes so wisely and frugally.

SINCERELY,
A US Citizen

PS. Please pass along a special thank you to Al Gore for "inventing"
the
Internet, without which I would not be able to send this wonderful,
factual e-mail.

AND THE REST OF THE STORY Hillary Rodham Clinton,
as a New York State Senator, now comes under the
"Congressional Retirement and Staffing Plan," which
means that even if she never gets reelected, she
STILL receives her Congressional salary until she
dies. (Would it not be nice if all Americans were
pension eligible after only 4 years?)

If Bill outlives her, he then inherits HER salary
until HE dies. He is already getting his Presidential salary
until he dies. If Hillary ou tlives Bill, she also gets HIS salary
until
she dies. Guess who pays for that?
WE DO!

It's common knowledge that in order for her to
establish NY residency, they purchased a million
dollar-plus house in upscale Chappaqua, New York.
Makes sense. They are entitled to Secret Service
protection for life. Still makes sense.

Here it becomes interesting. Their mortgage payments hover at
around $10,000 per month. BUT, an extra residence HAD to be built
within
the acreage to house the Secret Service agents.

The Clintons charge the Federal government $10,000 monthly rent for
the
use of that extra residence, which is just about equal to their
mortgage payment. This means that we, the taxpayers, are paying the
Clinton's salary, mortgage, transportation, safety and security, as
well
as the salaries for their 12 man staff -- and, this is all perfectly
legal!

&nb sp;When she runs for President, will you vote for her?

How many people can YOU send this to?


WAKE UP AMERICA..................

Don’t Worry McCain Can’t Win

McCain and Martinez: Amnesty buddies

Don’t worry, don’t worry calm down, Senator John McCain will not be President of the United States of America! You can quote me.

Think about it all of Senator McCain’s victories have been at the hands of non-Conservatives (even the Florida victory) which means that voters who voted for him have an alterative candidate to fall back on.

Most of the voters that voted for Sen. McCain in the primaries were non-Conservatives and they view McCain as an alterative to Conservatives so in a head to head race McCain vs. any Democrat, non-Conservatives will vote for the real choice, a Democrat, 90% of the time. McCain loses!

That places McCain in a dilemma because a dispirited Republican vote will be suppressed if he is the Republican nominee. Why? Conservatives don’t trust John McCain that is a fact, so all of a sudden the numbers just aren’t there.

McCain loses to any Democrat even to a Dennis J. Kucinich. Why, because despite what the Liberals say they are the ones who vote along straight party lines. As well Liberals tend to vote for special interest such as Global warming, fetal stem cells and for the race or sex of their candidate.

On the other hand it is conservatives who normally vote for principle so any Democrat will get a Liberal vote but not any Republican will get a Conservative vote, again McCain loses.

Oh I know what the polls are saying but that is only idle talk like, what if the Cowboys would have beaten the N.Y. football Giants they would be in the Superbowl. In reality the Cowboys lost 21-17 and John McCain will lose to any Democrat!

So throw out the thought that McCain has the best chance to win as a Republican that is simply balderdash!

Now allow me to explain the dynamics that are in play in this election. You feel defeated and somewhat betrayed but you can’t quite identify just how McCain is winning without any Conservative support. Allow me to explain.

The explanation is, if you are a conservative you are being punished and there is an attempt to destroy your Party. How could I know that?

Let’s start at the beginning George W. Bush for all Liberal accounts was not supposed to win the Presidency in 2000 and 2004 (I know that you’ve heard that a thousand times) but you Conservatives backed him and because of your support he won.

Remember the Dubai Ports deal? Very powerful Saudis where supposed to buy interest in U.S. Ports but you Conservatives came against it and stopped it.

Then there was the Comprehensive Immigration Plan back by our Globalist Republican President George W. Bush. Conservatives rose up against their Party leaders and said no and you stopped it and cost corporate interest a lot of money.

Also no one is more vocal against the North American Community Plan than conservatives. A plan where Global elitist including President Bush plan to erase internal continental borders for one border that outlines the outer North American Continent and in the process blurring the national sovereignty of Canada, the United States and Mexico. Conservatives are the ones questioning this plan.

Conservatives have weaken terrorism, they have slowed the Liberal agenda, they have changed the course of the moral decline that much of the world hates the United States for and hold us in contempt for. We had become a laughingstock because a U.S. President was involved in untoward behavior in the very house that belongs to the people.

Osama bin Laden himself cited Bill Clinton’s behavior as one of the reasons that he declared jihad against America! I bet you didn’t know that!

Who can forget your President Clinton's immoral acts committed in the official Oval office? After that you did not even bring him to account, other than that he 'made a mistake', after which everything passed with no punishment.

Is there a worse kind of event for which your name will go down in history and remembered by nations?--Osama bin Laden, In open letter to America

Truth is you conservatives have become too pesky, too powerful and you hinder the Liberal’s socialist progress for that you must be stopped.

So to guarantee that no one more Conservative than George Bush would win the Republican nomination and consolidate conservative power and momentum a plan was enacted to destroy the Republican Party from within.

But who could enemies of Conservatives get to perform such an act. Just who wears the Conservative title but would not object to working at odds against Conservative principles?

His name is John McCain. McCain is a wolf in sheep’s clothing doing the bidding of unseen forces he is being used to stop the progress of Conservativism in the Republican Party.

Therefore you don’t have to worry he was never intended to be President, the same people who support McCain now will support either Hillary or Obama in the general election in an effort to deal Conservativism a final fatal Coup d’état.

McCain is merely a tool that is being used to that end. He, Liberals, Moderates, Progressives, Socialist and Compassionate Conservatives all have combined efforts to crush the Conservative movement that has dominated Presidential elections in this country the last 8 years.

So don’t worry this fight is not about electing John McCain this fight is about stopping Conservatives.

And because Conservatives don’t realize the real natural of this fight I’m afraid they are at a disadvantage.

Right now Conservatives should be fighting to elect someone who best represents their ideas. Someone who is willing to fight and do what it takes for the ideas of Conservativism to prevail or there is always the alternative. Don’t fight. Allow McCain to win the Republican nomination and watch him get grubbed by either Hillary or Obama.

Then watch Hillary or Obama set in motion an agenda that will end Conservativism in America.

Remember you heard it from me Sen. McCain doesn’t have a snowball’s chance of becoming President.

It may already be too late but if Conservatives were smart they’d back a Conservative that does have a chance or will at least represent their principles. And by the way Rudy is no Conservative either he says so!



You decide!

Where’s the Recount?

Sen. John McCain exalts in Florida victory

It was the state of Florida that put the word Chad in the political lexicon, in not its finest hour I must say!

The 2000 election year in Florida will be forever remembered as one of the biggest fiascos in modern American election history. Confused geriatric voters that meant to vote for Al Gore but accidentally voted for George W. Bush or so they claimed.

Recounts, court decisions and allegations of election fraud forever seared into memory that Florida presidential politics are perhaps the worst in America. Which begs the question, has Florida become a third world Banana Republic?

This election result causes us to remember a time when Butterfly ballots and Florida State Supreme Court intervention brought the electoral process in the United States to its lowest point in American modern politics. Such is the questionable Florida election process that we have all come to dread and expect.

Many of us while not approving were not disappointed by Fox News who called early the Florida elections for Sen. John McCain. Many of us got the outcome that we expected not the one we had hoped for. An outcome that we don’t trust, in fact for many of us there will never be trust for any election result in the state of Florida ever again.

If New York was ground zero on 9/11 2001, Florida was ground zero on 11/8 2000 the day after elections when thousands began their ascension down on the orange juice state to count Chads in the Florida political heat. A day after the 11/7 Election Day in which the 2000 Presidential Elections resulted in the recount of six million votes in 67 counties in an election process that was described as bizarre and susceptible to manipulation.

So isn’t it more than ironic that in the state that made Diebolt an American election necessity Sen. John McCain would prevail as the anti-Conservative Candidate in the 2008 Republican Florida elections for nominee to be President.

Sen. McCain won among the Geriatric, Independent and Illegal Alien supporters in Florida to which the main stream media will foist the designation of Republican front runner on his diminished 5’ 9” frame.

Governor Romney won among Conservatives but in Florida that’s not enough, in Florida winning among Conservatives in a Republican election is not enough.

Apparently the dynamics which threw the 2000 elections into utter chaos and turmoil are still at play in Florida and at the risk of sounding a little like sour grapes I look at the exit polling which shows McCain wins once again on the strength of the anti-Conservative vote.

So-called Moderates, Independents, Illegal Alien supporters and a demographic of voters who were confused by the butterfly ballot in 2000, are a virtual coalition of the anti-Conservative vote.

Governor Romney will live to fight anew another day but Florida will forever remain the state that couldn’t tell a Republican from a Democrat on the ballot in 2000 and apparently they still can’t!

…And where is the recount?

Stand up and Fight!

Presidential hopefuls Governor Mitt Romney and Sen. John McCain

But I know what it takes to stand your ground and defeat Republicans and I have a track record that proves that.

Nobody else has been through it in the way I have been through it. And I think it’s going to be important to have somebody who will be ready immediately in the campaign to stand up and fight back.—Hillary Clinton

Where are the fighting Republicans?

Listening to the Democrats one would think that all they do is fight. Hillary makes the claim that she has been fighting for 35 years. Here’s Sen. Clinton’s ad demonstrating that she’s a fighter:



Barack claims that he’s a fighter too. He has fought against Conservative ideas. So we know who is fighting against Republicans what we don’t know is who is fighting for Conservative ideas.

Will Senator McCain fight for Conservativism? Will Governor Romney? That’s the problem we don’t know. Though Sen. McCain is supportive on the war there is little else that he is willing to fight for that is important to Conservatives. Romney is a recent born again Conservative that just found Ronald Reagan as his spiritual guide to Conservativism.

While McCain can be described as Conservative on national defense and Romney seems to be an Economic Conservative the question is which one of these men will appoint the strict constructionists judges that are needed to protect the integrity of our Constitution?

According to McCain Judge Sam Alito wears Conservativism on his sleeve and is an example of someone that he wouldn’t appoint as a judge. If that’s the case Judge Alito is who we should be considering for President, as Conservatives, not John McCain.

Because what Conservatives, what Republicans need right now is someone who is not afraid to be a Conservative what we need is someone who is not afraid to proudly demonstrate that fact. Conservatives need not be ashamed, of any of our values if Hillary and Obama can wear their beliefs on their sleeves, and they do, we certainly are entitled.

Hillary and Obama proudly confess their allegiance to Liberalism they don’t care who knows that they hold disdain for Conservatism. They boast of their life long fight against Conservatism. Never do you hear Conservative politicians making claims that they are fighting against the wrong ideas of Liberalism.

Too often John McCain Republicans are to often ready to forsake conservative principles to get along with Liberal Democrats who hate them and everything that they stand for, to borrow a sentiment from Democrat National Chairman Howard Dean.

So as Florida considers which Republican should carry the banner for the Republican Party one thing is certain, there is no prefect candidate but you must remember that George W. Bush came to Washington D.C. stating that he was a uniter and for that he was demonized and made a polarizing figure because Democrats don’t unite with Republicans they fight them.

Congressman Barney Frank speaking on behalf of the Clinton campaign says that Barack Obama would not be the right Democrat to lead his Party because Senator Obama doesn’t know the fights of the 90’s. Democrats and Liberals are still fighting the 90’s fights they are like the Southern Jefferson Davis Confederates who will not acknowledge that the North won the Civil war so they’re still fighting the Civil war.

As long as the Democrats are fighting the fights of the 90’s Republicans need someone who will not appease them. Republicans need a skillful politician that is able to communicate Conservative ideas and idealism, someone who is able to put voice to the ideas of Ronald Reagan. like Barak Obama so rightly recognized Ronald Reagan was able to speak to the hearts and minds of the American people and inspire Americans to put America first.

George Bush was woefully lacking in this regard, John McCain is no better a communicator and less of a committed Conservative.

Conservatives are about preserving the ideas and institutions that make this country uniquely E Pluribus Unum, out of many one, one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

The Change that Liberals are offering is a Balkanizing Multi-cultural special interest divided heavy regulated nation that is contradictory to the American ideas of freedom and unity.

In my opinion John McCain doesn’t represent nor does he fight for Conservativism, John McCain betrays Conservativism.

What we most need now is someone who can articulate Conservative ideas and who is willing to stand up and fight for those ideas.

If Floridian Republicans fail to stand up and fight for the candidate that will most benefit the Conservative cause our country will definitely fall back in the wrong direction.

A bridge to the 20th Century! Fighting the old fights of the 90’s a la Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party.

Clinton Fading from Inevitable

Senator Clinton fading

Employing innuendo and half-truths against Sen. Barack Obama, Sen. Hillary Clinton and her husband, the former President, have introduced the politics of personal destruction to the Democratic presidential campaign. They bear responsibility for cheapening the tone of the contest.

Sen. Clinton began distorting Obama's record in Monday night's debate and yesterday began airing a television attack that twists a recent Obama statement about former President Ronald Reagan to the point of clear inaccuracy. Bill Clinton, meanwhile, has wrongly accused Obama both of injecting race into the debate and of running a negative campaign against his wife. --Daily News

You think that Democrats lying is something new? Then you must be a partisan because for almost 8 years Democrats have relentlessly attacked George Bush and the Republican Party with lies and deceit but it didn’t matter because partisan Democrats believed that Republicans deserve to be lied on and have their record and words distorted.

But what is new is Democrats lying on one another and distorting Democrat words with the perfidy that they usually reserve for Republicans.

Barack Obama just devastated the Democrat field in South Carolina with 55% of the vote in spite of the Clinton campaign’s lies. These are lies that are normally reserved for Republicans and using them against a fellow Democrat poses a major problem for the Clinton campaign because if the Clinton’s win the Party’s nomination they have already shown that they are willing to say and do anything, right or wrong, true or false.

What this means that everything that they say is now cast in doubt. They will not be able to draw honest and principled Independents, Moderates and Liberal John McCain Republicans.

Who is going to believe anything that the Clinton’s say except the hard left partisan Clinton supporter. That means that only those who care nothing about anything except getting Hillary elected for whatever unfathomable reason that they may have, whether it’s because she’s a woman or because she’s a woman. (There’s really no other reason to vote for her) will vote for her.

Hillary’s fade from inevitability comes because the stark reality is her followers can no longer nod their heads collectively and blame Bush, the Republicans and the vast right wing conspiracy for Clintonesque politics of personal destruction.

Because her attacks have targeted fellow Democrats the partisan Democrat zombies that usually hang on her every word are now waking from their lockstep sleepwalk and are questioning Bill’s and Hillary’s truthfulness.

There are some that will never question a Democrat like the rabid Ultra-partisan Eleanor Clift who tries desperately to convince herself that Clinton tactics and lying are actually good for Democrat politics. And there are some like the Los Angeles Times Opinion page that at least raises the question about the Clinton’s and their unscrupulous campaigning.

One thing everyone is willing to acknowledge and that is the Clintons have damaged Democrat politics by exposing Democrat tactics that would normally go unquestioned if those tactics were used against Republicans according to Ronald Brownstein.

Well, that’s not how I heard it, Bob, But if that were the case, you know, we all have to compare and contrast our records. That’s legitimate. You know, the idea that somehow someone’s record, someone’s words are off-limits, I’ve never—I’ve never seen that in American politics, to be, you know, reflective of my experience.

And I think it’s important that we draw these contrast. You’ll have to look at exactly what was said, but that’s up to the commentators. – Sen. Hillary Clinton, To Face the Nation

In her interview on to Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer Sen. Clinton said, “You know, the idea that somehow someone’s record, someone’s words are off-limits, I’ve never—I’ve never seen that in American politics, to be, you know, reflective of my experience.”

Another lie Hillary the facts are your records as first lady of Arkansas and your records as the first lady of the United States of America are locked up safe and sound until 2012 by order of President Clinton. So that puts your record and words off-limits while you send your dumpster divers to dig up Sen. Obama’s Kindergarten essays. Do you think that's fair Hillary?

The lack of access is emerging as an issue in Hillary's presidential campaign: she cites her years of experience as First Lady as one of her prime qualifications to be president. Like other Democratic candidates, she has decried the "stunning record of secrecy" of the Bush administration; her campaign Web site vows to bring a "return to transparency" to government.

But Clinton's appointment calendar as First Lady, her notes at strategy meetings, what advice she gave her husband and his advisers, what policy memos she wrote, even some key papers from her health-care task force—all of this, and much more documenting her years as First Lady, remains locked away, most likely through the entire campaign season. -- Michael Isikoff , NEWSWEEK

After all of the hype of the Clinton campaign we have seen Hillary for ourselves and judged that she is not inevitable she is not even certain to win the Democrat nomination.

If Democrats sign off on Hillary and accept her as their nominee they are making the statement that they approve of her lies, her deceit and her rapist husband. That statement is that the Democrat Party has selected another loser for the third consecutive presidential election and like Hillary the Democrat Party is fading fast into political irrelevance.

Judge the lies and deceit for yourself!

Stimulus transfers Banking and Business debt to Taxpayers

President Bush and Congress complicit in this scheme

My Daddy use to say that there ain't no free government cheese someone's got to pay for it! Likewise there isn't any free government $600 to $1200 dollar checks someone has to pay for them. You ever thought who?

Call me cynical but I found it somewhat disconcerting that the government has to give Americans money in the form of $150 billion dollars of tax refunds and tell Americans to go spent that money shopping in order for the economy to be stimulated.

Aren’t economies supposed to be based on something like, I don’t know, productively? When is consumer spending equal to factory and industrial production of real goods?
What? Is there nothing being produced in America anymore? Are there no jobs from which people can receive adequate salary compensation, we need the government to dole out money like writing checks on an empty checking account because jobs that paid living wages were outsourced to minimize corporate cost while maximizing corporate profits?

That brings us to the question are we so far under government and corporate control that big daddy government has to give us each an allowance and tell us to run along and go to the movies and buy some popcorn?

Am I the only one? Who else is raising this question?

To stimulate the economy the president and congress just voted for $300 to $1200 dollar tax cuts for 117 million families. Now I would be the last person to speak against tax cuts but when these particular tax cuts are tied to the welfare of the economy I’m thinking “house of cards” time and it’s about to all come tumbling down.

Does anyone want to know what’s in the package, how it will work and why the U.S. economy is in such disrepair? This can’t be good. Here on one hand the government is speaking about competing in Global Market economies and on the other hand it is doling out dollars to prop up a U.S. economy that has no economy infrastructure other than spending money at restaurants and Wal-Mart.

It’s like shopping is the only thing what fuels the U.S. economy. Is that true, is the consumer the economic stimulus that fuels our economy? Do you know how crazy that is? Is that why at the beginning of the Iraq war the president admonished us all to continue with our normal lives go shopping and go to the mall?

Maybe you’ve noticed a pattern like me that at every change of Presidential leadership someone decides to siphon off money from the U.S. economy and send the country into a recession. Who are the forces behind this? It happened in 2001 when Clinton was leaving the White house and it is once again happening as Bush is exiting. Maybe they think that we would be too busy with politics to notice.

Now the question is who would be best to lead in this kind of economic crisis? Conventional wisdom would favor the Democrats. The only problem is neither Hillary nor Barack has ever had any executive or business experience. And as Hillary has said on several occasions you need someone who would know what to do the first day that they enter into the White house. Unfortunately that would not be her! Hillary ruled herself out by her own standard of competence.

The only candidate that has the executive and business experience needed to lead in this crisis is Republican Governor Mitt Romney. He is the only one who has run a successful multi-million dollar business and he alone has executive experience as Governor of Massachusetts.

This is not an endorsement of Governor Romney but seeing how most voters are determining their vote based on the candidate’s sex, race or likeability I thought that I would mention that if most American really knew what we face as China, Russia, the EU and Islamic terrorist have joined in attempting to dismantle the U.S. economy, meaning no jobs, no homes and recession. This is happening now no matter what some of the other candidates are promising you.

Maybe Americans should rethink and select a serious candidate with credentials rather than the fairly tale of the first female or black president. (To borrow a term from Bill Clinton)

You want to know how bad it really is? President Bush and a Democrat controlled Congress just sat down together and agreed to give American money that we don’t have to go spend in an economy that is in collapse because of economic policies that have allowed corporations and banks to rip off Americans in sub-prime mortgages and other deceptive business and banking practices.

So you the taxpayer/consumers are being put on the hook to cover the debt that is being passed to you from defaulting banks and corporations because you the consumer/taxpayers could not pay the usurious balloon adjustable interest rates connected to your teaser sub-prime loans.

Banks and business are not going to suffer these losses you the tax payer are going to pay for it.

And because the Government, Banks, and Corporations think that you are stupid it comes in the form of a $600 to $1200 dollar tax refund that you will pay back with interest in stealth taxes which will bail out mortgage companies and banks and business by allowing them to pass on the losses to the American taxpayer/consumers.

You ever seen the Matrix? The human energy cells that the machines derived their power from? That’s you! And Soylent green, that’s you too!

Isn’t it great to be an American! Vote wisely.

Clintons make elections Race and Sex Wars and then Sleep

Bill and Hillary Sleeping at the Reagan Funeral

Bill Clinton said Wednesday he expects blacks to vote for Barack Obama and women to vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton, and the dynamic may cause his wife to lose the South Carolina Democratic presidential primary Saturday.-- CHARLES BABINGTON

Who injected race and sex into the 2008 presidential elections? Well it wasn’t Barack Obama. On the contrary Obama has been doing everything that he can to minimize race as a factor in this election.

While he's awake President Clinton is in South Carolina fighting for every black vote that he can get. And in apparent acts of desperation Bill and Hillary Clinton have played both the race and the sex card in order to split the vote and attempt to give Hillary an advantage according to Dick Morris. (More White people than Black people)

So why is he (President Clinton) making such a fuss over a contest he knows he's going to lose?
Precisely because he is going to lose it. If Hillary loses South Carolina and the defeat serves to demonstrate Obama's ability to attract a bloc vote among black Democrats, the message will go out loud and clear to white voters that this is a racial fight. It's one thing for polls to show, as they now do, that Obama beats Hillary among African-Americans by better than 4-to-1 and Hillary carries whites by almost 2-to-1.

But most people don't read the fine print on the polls. But if blacks deliver South Carolina to Obama, everybody will know that they are bloc-voting. That will trigger a massive white backlash against Obama and will drive white voters to Hillary Clinton.—Dick Morris

Mr. Clinton also attended the Martin Luther King birthday on Monday where he fell asleep right in the pulpit. Not the first time the Clintons have fallen asleep at an important event they used President Ronald Reagan’s funeral to catch up on some much needed rest too. (see picture above)


And then tired of a hard month of dissing Barack Obama, well you know running down your wife’s competition can take a lot out of you, Mr. Clinton fell asleep at the Martin Luther King birthday celebration. (maybe he and Mrs. Clinton suffer from severe Sleep Apnea)

Apparently President Clinton thought it a great idea to grab some shut-eye and have a dream of his own at the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. celebration on Dr. King’s birthday right behind Dr. King’s son Martin Luther King III.

After all Martin III is not the speaker that his daddy was and Mr. Clinton hasn’t campaigned this hard since he whipped George H.W. Bush, H. Ross Perot and then Bob Dole in his own presidential campaigns. So get some rest Bill!



Am I the only one getting the distinct feeling that we are boring the Clintons! Please, someone just wake Mr. and Mrs. Clinton coronate Hillary and get it over with!

Chris Matthews was right

Liberal Pundit Chris Matthews

"[T]he reason she's a U.S. senator, the reason she's a candidate for president, the reason she may be a front-runner is her husband messed around."—Chris Matthews on Senator Hillary Clinton

Mea Culpa, Mea Culpa was Chris Matthews’ forced confession. His sins were that he dared to state the obvious and he dared to tell the truth.

Matthews is the ultra Liberal talk show pundit who normally lands on the correct side of Liberal issues but alas this time he got it terribly wrong. He told the truth.

There is really no accounting for Matthews’ sudden fit of veracity, Tourette syndrome temporary madness or perhaps early Alzheimers can’t tell, but whatever the malady that caused his superfluity of truthfulness Liberals are enraged at him.

Liberals are best known for nodding in mindless unison to any lie just as long as the lie begins or ends with the name George Bush.

Matthews is reported to have said that the only reason that Hillary Clinton is a U.S. senator, a candidate for president or even the front-runner for the Democrat nomination is that her husband the former president Bill Clinton is a philanderer. Matthews’s statement clearly intimating that Senator Clinton political good fortune is due to total unmerited sympathy not a result of any political acumen on her part is something intuitively known by all but apparently considered sacrilege to speak.

But we have recently seen the power of the sympathy vote! In New Hampshire where Hillary demonstrated the “I almost had a tear” speech, women rallied to her cause because apparently they thought they were supporting a sister in distress thus lifting Senator Clinton from a predicted dire two digit defeat in New Hampshire to a historical comeback victory over Senator Obama. Little did they know that Mrs. Clinton was following her scripted campaign agenda which called for her to show a more human side because the polls said that a softer side was a winning formula and did it ever work! Were women ever suckered?

So now National Organization for Women, Feminist Majority and National Women's Political Caucus have sent a joint letter of complaint to NBC News President Steve Capus regarding Matthews’ comments yet these hypocrites never ever defended a single woman that Bill Clinton abused. And believe me there were multiple opportunities for these so-called women’s rights organizations to do so. NOW, Feminist Majority or National Women’s Political Caucus could have defended any of the many women that were assaulted by Bill Clinton why didn't they?

According to JT Thompson of the Hillary project feminist have not been so quick to defend women’s rights when those rights were violated by Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Eileen Wellstone: a 19-year-old English woman who said Clinton sexually assaulted her after she met him at a pub near Oxford where the future President was a student in 1969. It was this rape that caused Clinton to be quietly expelled from Oxford and the loss of his Fulbright Scholarship.

In 1972, a 22-year-old woman told campus police at Yale University that she was sexually assaulted by Clinton while he was a law student at the college. No charges were filed, but retired campus policemen contacted by Capitol Hill Blue confirmed the incident

In 1974, a female student at the University of Arkansas complained that then-law school instructor Bill Clinton groped her and forced his hand inside her blouse. She complained to her faculty advisor who confronted Clinton, but Clinton claimed the student ''came on'' to him. The student left the school shortly after the incident. Reached at her home in Texas, the former student confirmed the incident.

Juanita Broaddrick: a gubernatorial campaign volunteer said Mr. Clinton raped her during a nursing-home-operators convention in Little Rock in April 1978.

From 1978-1980, during Clinton's first term as governor of Arkansas, state troopers assigned to protect the governor were aware of at least seven complaints from women who said Clinton forced, or attempted to force, himself on them sexually.

Gennifer Flowers: In 1992, Flowers claimed she had a 12 year affair with Bill Clinton. Although this was a consensual relationship, he lied to the American people on national television that he was not having an affair.

Flowers was smeared in the media after going public of the affair. "These are the people that literally went out to destroy my life and were very successful in many aspects," reported Flowers. "[Hillary] was the general who gave the directives to her troops to go out and search and destroy."

Sally Perdue: a former Miss Arkansas who said she had a four-month affair with him in 1983. After coming forward, she had her car window smashed, and shotgun shells left on the driver's seat.
Sandra Allen James: a former Washington, D.C., political fund-raiser who said Mr. Clinton invited her to his hotel room during a 1991 campaign trip, pinned her against the wall and put his hand under her dress.

Christy Zercher: an airline flight attendant on Mr. Clinton's 1992 campaign plane, who said Mr. Clinton exposed himself and grabbed her breasts and made explicit remarks about oral sex. A video shot on board the plane by ABC News shows an obviously inebriated Clinton with his hand between another young flight attendant's legs.

German Clinton Float

Carolyn Moffet: a legal secretary in Little Rock in 1979 said, "I was escorted there [Mr. Clinton’s hotel room] by a state trooper. When I went in, he was sitting on a couch, wearing only an undershirt. He pointed at his penis and told me to suck it. I told him I didn't even do that for my boyfriend and he got mad, grabbed my head and shoved it into his lap.

Elizabeth Ward Gracen: a former Miss Arkansas and Miss America who won the crown in 1982, told friends she was forced by Clinton to have sex with him shortly after she won her state crown.

Elizabeth received threatening phone calls, and her belongings were ransacked while Elizabeth was on vacation in St. Martin by 3 men in suits (according to a witness). Her manager Vincent Vento said these intimidating phone callers said "You should really keep your mouth shut about Bill Clinton and go on with your life. You could be discredited. You could have an IRS investigation."

Paula Jones: in a hotel room in 1991, Jones claimed Bill Clinton dropped his pants, exposed himself, and asked for sexual favors from her. In 1994, she filed a lawsuit against Bill Clinton. The case was settled out of court, and Jones was awarded $850,000.

Kathleen Willey, a one-time White House aide, who accused him of groping her. During a November 1993 interview at the White House when, she testified under oath in federal court, Mr. Clinton was "very forceful" in the unwanted sexual advance -- kissing her on the mouth, touching her breasts and putting his hands under her dress.

After coming forward with her allegations, Kathleen Willey had the tires on her car mysteriously punctured with dozens of nails and her cat suddenly disappeared.

Monica Lewinksy – an intern who had an affair with President Clinton while in the oval office. Bill Clinton publicly denied under oath having a sexual relationship with Miss Lewinksy, but was later forced to admit that he did have an "inappropriate relationship", after tape recordings were released during a trial as evidence of the affair. Clinton’s perjury lead to an impeachment trial.

Linda Tripp -- close confidante to Monica Lewinksy was vindictively fired from government service In January 1998 the last day of the Clinton administration, for being a whistle blower.

Tripp gave surreptitiously recorded tapes to then-Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr in exchange for Immunity from prosecution. Tripp disclosed to Starr that she was aware of the relationship between Lewinsky and President Clinton, that Lewinsky had executed a false affidavit denying the relationship that was submitted to the federal court in Arkansas in the Jones v. Clinton lawsuit, and that Lewinsky had attempted to suborn Tripp's perjury in the Jones v. Clinton suit to conceal the Clinton-Lewinsky relationship as well as Tripp's knowledge of the Kathleen Willey incident from the federal court.

As Tripp explained, she was being solicited to commit a crime to conceal evidence in the Jones civil rights case.[5]

Tripp also informed Starr of the existence of a navy blue dress that Lewinsky owned that was impregnated with Clinton's semen. During their friendship, Lewinsky had shown the dress to Tripp and said she intended to have it dry-cleaned; Tripp convinced her not to.

Kim Gandy, NOW's president, said last night that "Chris Matthews is a repeat offender when it comes to sexist attitudes toward women politicians. . . . I wasn't really looking for an apology. I was looking for a behavior change, and for him to treat female politicians the same way as male politicians."

Well if Chris Matthews is a repent offender Ms. Gandy, he’s not the only one. And where was NOW or any of the so-called feminist organizations when Bill Clinton was offending repeatedly? Hypocrites!

Finally I noticed that no one said that Matthews was lying only that his remarks were nasty.

It’s ironic that Hillary Clinton who at worst is complicit in several of Bill Clinton’s cover-ups of his abuse of women or she is at best an enabler of her husband’s wantonly criminal behavior is being defended by National Organization for Women, Feminist Majority and National Women's Political Caucus on behalf of women’s rights.

Rights that Mrs. Clinton herself violated every time she stood by her man against women that he had violated. Chris Matthews was right Hillary would never have gotten where she is if it wasn’t for her appearing to be a victim in Bill Clinton’s a long sorted sexual predatory career. A career where she more often than not was not a victim but Bonnie to his Clyde!

And you want to let this, back into the White house?

Great News....... or is it?

Great News from the Federal Reserve Bank.
A three-quarter point cut in the federal funds
and the prime rates.

Would be a great help in reducing the massive
consumer debt on the books at high interest
rates, if it weren't for the "sacred-cow" of the
credit world.............. the thieving credit card
companies.

There are still millions of middle and lower
class people, who are being forced to pay 25%
and even up as high as 29.5% interest on their
credit cards................... in spite of the fact that
they have never been late paying, and have always
paid at least the minimum payment due.

WHY??????? Simple answer is that the "powers
that be" at the banks, decided in their infinite wisdom
............. that YOU, might be carrying just a little more
debt than they think you should. And so, they are
anticipating a default by the cardholder, even without
proof that it will happen.

If the White House and our do-nothing Democratic
Congress, really want to help this country get out of
it's massive debt..................... FORCE the banks to
bring the credit card interest down to a justifiable rate
............ one that is realistic in today's interest rate scenario
............... and one that is morally right!

So long as the banks can keep favor with Congress,
and are free to rake in massive profits on the backs
of those who can least afford it.....don't expect any
miracles. What we need is some legislation that will
protect the public, instead of our elected officials, and
those who keep them in power.

brooklyn

Something Evil Comes this Way

This year, for the first time, expatriate Democrats can cast their ballots on the Internet in a presidential primary for people living outside the United States.--JESSICA BERNSTEIN-WAX

It portends to be the end of American elections as we know them and I wouldn’t call it ironic that the news is coming out of Mexico City. What’s being reported will have consequences that will undoubtedly have world-wide implications on American elections.

What is being reported is Americans Abroad Can Now Vote Online. But the truth is only Americans who are Democrats can vote online, that’s right Democrats only, just read the article. What this means is now Mexico and Europe will be able to taper online with American elections starting in 2008.

Sounds just about right huh? After all American elections are about getting as many people to vote as possible right? Just as long as they are Democrats and it doesn’t matter whether they are illegal aliens, felons or so called expatriate Democrats (better known as Mexican and European voters) if you help the Party’s plan of advancing homosexuality, tax increases and making America less safe at home and abroad then vote online even if you left the country because George Bush was elected in 2000 and re-elected in 2004.

In the 2000 Presidential elections China and Europe would have given their eye’s tooth to affect the outcome for Democrats.

In the 2004 elections Terrorist and Europeans would have voted for Democrats if they were allowed.

U.S. citizens wanting to vote online must join Democrats Abroad before Feb. 1 and indicate their preference to vote by Internet instead of in the local primaries wherever they last lived in the United States. They must promise not to vote twice for president, but can still participate in non-presidential local elections.

So it’s an honor system, Democrats must promise not to vote twice for president… Yeah right!

Hey you think Democrats were complaining about the Clinton campaign cheating in the Nevada primary last weekend? This ability to vote on-line is just ripe for corruption. How could the Congress allow it? Oh yeah Democrat controlled Congress with RINO’s like John McCain making sure that we have equal and “fair” elections.

Didn't it occur to anyone that one Party shouldn't be able to vote online if the other Party can not? For this incompetence alone Congress should be disbanded!

And everyone knows that a fair election is an election won by Democrats right? In America we only call for recounts if a Republican wins.

Muslims have riots over cartoons and teddy bears, what will it take for Americans to take exception at the corrupting of American elections, Osama bin Laden casting a vote for his favorite Democrat candidate?

Are there any Republicans out there? There may not be after 2008 with Democrat’s latest innovation in stealing elections, world participation in America’s electoral process.

My, what will they think of next?!?

Oh yeah and will someone please logon for Alex Baldwin, Kim Basinger, Eddie Vedder, and Robert Altman who all promised to become expatriates if George Bush won in 2000.

I’m sure they don’t want to miss this election being that they’re out of the country!

Dead Campaign Walking

Senator McCain wife Cindy and Sen. Joe Lieberman

Once considered the favorite in a multi-candidate field, McCain capsized last year, his campaign plummeting as he defended a plan to give illegal immigrants an eventual path to citizenship, angering a GOP conservative base that had never fully trusted the senator, especially after he broke with President Bush on tax cuts. A raft of senior aides abandoned ship, and more were laid off as McCain ran out of money. -- Libby Quaid, AP writer

John McCain is a man without a Party! Funny how that works. You spend a political career disassociating with the Party that you supposedly represent to curry favor with the opposition Party and come your quest to become President you can’t find a Party to support you. Independents and Democrats aren’t going to support you in the 2008 Presidential election; they’ve got their own candidate and well the Party that you’ve betrayed is looking for a Conservative. Mavericks need not apply!

Sure McCain won New Hampshire and South Carolina but that was only on the strength of Independent and Democrat votes. Are Independents and Democrats going to support McCain in a contest against an Obama or Hillary candidate for President? One word answer… NO!

The one thing that Independents, Democrats and Republicans all agree on is that absolutely no one is going to vote for Senator John McCain for President in the upcoming 2008 Presidential elections. Nobody! John McCain has allowed himself to be used as a tool by the enemies of Conservatives to fracture the Party. Outside of that function McCain serves no useful purpose to anyone.

McCain is the choice of Independents and Democrats for the Republican Party kind of like Democrats where the favorite Party of the enemies of America in 2000 and 2004. You do remember bin Laden chiming in on our 2004 elections attempting to dissuade Americans from voting for President Bush. Same thing! Independents and Democrats are attempting to dissuade Republicans from voting for a Conservative candidate to lead the Republican Party ergo McCain’s primary wins in New Hampshire and South Carolina.

In New Hampshire, McCain's fate was determined by independent voters, who helped McCain win the state over Bush eight years ago. While he was neck-and-neck with Romney among Republicans, more than a third of independents backed McCain, compared with a quarter for Romney, according to exit surveys for The Associated Press and the television networks.

McCain's main challenge is to re-assure the right. He is still weak among Republicans and conservatives, obviously major vulnerabilities in a GOP nomination fight. He only tied Huckabee among Republicans in South Carolina; his margin came from a 39-22 percent victory over Huckabee among the 19 percent of voters who were independents.
He won overwhelmingly among liberal and moderate voters, but lost self-identified conservatives.-- Rich Lowry

John McCain had no chance of winning the Republican nominee last summer his campaign was written of as a “fare thee well” Senator McCain because McCain had completed a Liberal trifecta of back stabbing in the Republican Party.

McCain-Feingold, the gang of 14, and McCain-Kennedy, one poke after another from McCain in the eye of his nemeses, Conservatives. If John McCain has shown anything in his long career of insider politics, he demonstrates that he has a propensity to make deals with political enemies who have sworn to destroy the Conservative Party.

Amongst grassroots conservatives, John McCain's name is an expletive -- and for good reason -- because he has made a name for himself by knifing conservatives time and time again for the amusement of his liberal pals in the mainstream media. --John Hawkins

So it is not beyond reason to ask the question did John McCain make a secret deal with his Liberal allies. A deal that would cause disruption within the Republican Party and guarantee that no Conservative would receive the nomination from the Republican Party?

Was Senator McCain encouraged to running in spite of the fact that he has zero Conservative backing? Encouraged by those whose plan is to win the White house for Liberals and if not win then place a Liberal Manchurian Candidate in the White house who will do the bidding of Liberals at the code words “This is Ted Kennedy McCain Listen.”

John McCain would be a Liberal “sleeper” in the White house much like the sleeper terrorist cells that are undoubtedly waiting for their cues which are presently embedded in America now.

McCain’s campaign is like “Weekend at Bernie’s” so you’ve got to be asking who’s propping him up? If not Conservatives who?

That is the point! With no Republican or Conservative backing we shouldn’t even be wasting time even considering the Maverick.

Sooo just who is so inclined to prop up Sen. McCain as a potential Republican candidate for President if Conservatives and Republicans aren’t? Where’s McCain’s base?

That’s exactly my point a dead campaign walking!

The Sacred Cow of Global warming is in the Freezer

Greenland

Dr Hansen said we have about 10 years to put into effect the draconian measures needed to curb CO2 emissions quickly enough to avert a dangerous rise in global temperature.

Otherwise, the extra heat could trigger the rapid melting of polar ice sheets, made far worse by the "albedo flip" - when the sunlight reflected by white ice is suddenly absorbed as ice melts to become the dark surface of open water.

The glaciers and ice sheets of Greenland in the northern hemisphere, and the western Antarctic ice sheet in the south, both show signs of the rapid changes predicted with rising temperatures. "--Steve Connor, Science Editor quoting Dr. James Hansen

One would never eat a sacred cow even if it meant that one would be saved from starvation. Likewise, one would never accept any scientific evidence countering the theory of anthropomorphic global warming because global warming has became the politically correct sacred cow of the warm-earthers, those who believe in the theory of global warming based on pseudo-scientific economically driven politics.

In spite of Al Gore’s and Dr. James Hansen’s dire warnings of imminent catastrophic consequences of global warming there has not been overall temperature change in the global ambient temperature since 1998.

And now the playground for global warming advocates has frozen over. Oh you didn’t know? Greenland the place that everyone goes to see the melting and receding glaciers is frozen over.

Greenland had recently become to the Arctic Circle what Disneyworld is to Florida, one giant tourist attraction, everyone goes to Greenland to say, I have seen with my own eyes the affects of global warming on the melting glaciers of Greenland.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has gone to Greenland! She went last Memorial day 2007. And as I just mentioned she came back a born again warm-earther. She believes, she believes!

Yet recent evidence is suggesting that the Global is actually cooling rather than warming. That would throw a wrench in the Global warming theory because CO2’s and other green house gases effects are supposed to heat the earth not allow it to cool!

Green house gases trap heat into the earth’s atmosphere and according to Al Gore, James Hansen and the United Nations’ IPCC this trapped heat will cause the earth to become warmer until the heat reaches biblical cataclysm proportions.

Uh question? Where is the cold coming from? If heat is trapped in the Earth’s atmosphere, and we know that it is, because Al Gore’s film, “An Inconvenient Truth” (which he won an Oscar for) told us so.

Why are scientists saying that by 2012 the earth will be in a global cooling trend? Here and here. And why is Greenland freezing over?

One would think that if heat is trapped in the Earth’s atmosphere there would not be any room for cold would it?

This is my wish if there is a trend of global cooling and it is proven to happen as predicted. My wish is for everyone who propagated Global warming be stripped of any office of leadership or awards that they may have and have acquired. And that anyone associated with this farce should be fired from any job that depends on credibility and/or scientific knowledge that they claim to have.

Also any money that they made from claims of global warming should be confiscated.

As a matter of fact all of their worldly possessions should be confiscated and they should be shamed before the world as charlatans and fools never to be listened to or given a place of prominence ever again.

Democrats Offer Affirmative Action Candidates: None qualified

Affirmative Action babies Obama, Edwards and Clinton
Senator Clinton wrongly assessing the surge in spite of her experience

So I give you tremendous credit for presenting as positive a view of a rather grim reality. And I believe that you, and certainly the very capable people working with both of you, were dealt a very hard hand.

And it's a hand that is unlikely to improve, in my view.
[Y]ou have been made the de facto spokesmen for what many of us believe to be a failed policy.

Despite what I view as your rather extraordinary efforts in your testimony both yesterday and today, I think that the reports that you provide to us really require the willing suspension of disbelief. –Sen. Hillary Clinton, Questions General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker on Iraq at Senate Armed Services Committee Hearing

Democrat front runners have a lot in common even though they take great pains to draw artificial distinctions between themselves.

Distinctions like Race, experience or who really is for change.
Yet the glaring reality is they each have something in common. What that is, is they are all unqualified to be President of the United States.

The bar has been significantly lowered to allow for this crop of Democrat Affirmative Action Babies; a Black, a woman and a rich lawyer trying to pass himself off as a populist. The bar had to be lowered to allow them to present themselves as worthy choices.

Also it gives you, the voter, chance to entertain the notion that one of them is worthy of your vote, or as Senator Clinton put it, to believe that any one of the Democrat front runners are qualified to be President requires the willing suspension of disbelief.

Clinton said that in regards to General Petraeus’ testimony before Congress regarding the surge of American troop in Iraq. Then Clinton dressed General Petraeus down as a surrogate for the Bush administration failed Iraqi policy before Democrats knew that the surge would work. No one in his or her right mind would dire say that the surge is not working now!

But since one of the major candidates is making experience her main platform stance lets take a look at their qualifications. Timothy Noah of Slate says that Senator Clinton claim of experience is not what it seems and Christopher Hitchens reminds us of what an absolute mess the Clintons put the country through the first time they were in the White house.

First the qualified Democrat candidates have already dropout of contention leaving in effect a Democrat process that is the equivalent of a High school Prom King and Queen contest. “Is Hillary likable?” She’s a woman so vote for her.

The most experienced and qualified among the major candidates seeking the Democratic nomination were Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware and Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut. They have now dropped out. If Democrats really wanted experience they’d bring back Biden or Dodd!

What Democrats have left are Affirmative Action Candidates.

Edwards [the rich lawyer/populist] served a single term in the Senate. Obama [the Black] served eight years in the Illinois state Senate and is halfway through his first term in the U.S. Senate.

Clinton [the woman] is about to begin her eighth year in the U.S. Senate. Going by years spent as an elective official, Obama's 11 years exceeds Clinton's seven, which in turn exceeds Edwards' six.—Timothy Noah

If Mrs. Clinton receives the Democrat nomination it won’t be that she’s the best qualified though she is running on her experience. Instead Democrats who vote for Senator Clinton will do it for other reasons. They will vote for her because they like her, she’s a woman, she’s a Democrat, she’s white or she is a candidate of dynasty.

Some Democrats will vote for Senator Obama because he is a charismatic speaker, he’s black and he’s not Hillary.

And some Democrats will vote for Senator Edwards because he’s not Hillary or Obama.

This year Democrats aren't really running on real experience. To be President this year it only matters that you like them, you really like them! That is how unsubstantive Democrats are today. Oh and it doesn’t hurt if you’re a women, a black or a $500.00 dollar haircut candidate.

Anyone can be the Prom King or Queen (President) under Affirmative Action because it's only a High School popularity contest anyways.

So goes the Republic under Liberals and Democrats!