McCaine Will Be President!

Since the Democratic party has been hijacked by the
far left.............. the liberals have been having a field day.

Their attack machines have done some damage to the
Bush administration, but much to their chagrin, he is
far from out...... as attested to by the fact that he is still
getting the legislation that he has fought for since 2000.

By pitting Obama against Hillary, they have once again
played the "race card", dividing the party. Nobody can
deny that........... even CNN, CNBC, NYT or any of the other
liberal MSM. Figures show that Obama has garnered
nearly all of the available "black vote". If it weren't for
color, he would probably never have advanced to where
he is today. This race is not supposed to be about color,
as we hear from black politicians, but they are the first
ones to back him because he is black.

After the bloodletting, the accusations, the "investigations"
and the revelations.......... both Obama and Clinton will be
ready for the garbage heap. And that's before the Republicans
even start on whichever one makes it through the fray.

Each day, it appears more and more, that Obama will be
the Democratic candidate for president. In the polls it
looks very impressive, but polls have been wrong before
............more often wrong than right. If I recall, Kerry
was going to 'steam-roll' over Bush in '04. I made
some money on that bet!

Pitting Obama...... a rookie Senator............ against McCaine,
with all his faults and warts,.......... there is no contest. The
hopeful "democratic candidate", who is the most liberal of
all the Senators in Congress, will galvanize moderate and
conservative Democrats disgusted with the party, and most
Republicans, even including the ultra-conservatives.

Why will this happen? The answer is simple. McCaine has
an overall 85% conservative voting record: voting for extending
the Bush tax cuts, a strong defense, victory in Iraq, border
security and fiscal responsibility.......... against Obama's 100%
liberal record.

Those in their right minds will not want to see this
country slip more and more toward Socialism, which is
basically what the Democrats, and particularly Obama,
have been preaching. His programs go in only one direction
............. tax the middle-class, and give to the lower class.
Grant amnesty to all the illegals in the US. Give them
Social Security. Give them drivers licenses..................
give them your job!

No my far-left wackos..........the United States is still about those
Americans who have built this country, sacraficed for it, and
refuse to turn it over to free-loaders. If I have to go door to
door come November, I will do my damndest to see that this
country is not surrendered............ to terrorists, opportunists
or overly-ambitious and underqualified politicians.

How McCain Is Doing It

Senators John Kerry and John McCain

Was Senator McCain encouraged to running in spite of the fact that he has zero Conservative backing? Encouraged by those whose plan is to win the White house for Liberals and if not win then place a Liberal Manchurian Candidate in the White house who will do the bidding of Liberals at the code words “This is Ted Kennedy McCain Listen.” -- Alaphiah

There are no accidents in politics only the careful planning of assassinations or the equally carefully planned making of a king. In politics unlike Vegas the house always wins, however like Vegas you never get to see who the house is!

From worst to first, from politically dead to Republican front runner posed to steal or claim the Republican nomination for President of the United States all this without the support of Conservatives how was it done, purely serendipitously? Not hardly!

It’s a story of political subversion, betrayal and treachery. It is a story of turning on Party members, turning on the Party, turning on Party values and then turning on the grass roots of the Party.

Were there conspirers on the grassy knoll of McCain’s unexplainable come back and if so who were they? And why John McCain, why should he have the good fortune of being the one designated to be leader and front man of this secret movement to gain electoral power?

To explain how it happened we must first explained why it happened.

It is no secret that there is a partisan war being waged in our government. President George W. Bush is perhaps the most maligned United States President in modern times.

His presidency has been sabotaged, undermined, lied on and unfairly criticized by partisans on the left. Partisans that he in no short measure has attempted to reach across the aisle too.

Yet all that the president has been able to produce for his efforts is a fervor of ferocious Bush bashing. In spite of it the President still attempted to legislate what Democrats wanted and supported, CIRA or Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act. And policies that were apparently important to him such as the North American Community the Dubai Ports Deal, Homeland Security and fighting Terrorism.

Several of the president’s agenda met with strong Conservative opposition, CIRA, North American Community, and the Dubai Ports Deal. In fact Conservatives were able to turn back the tide on these three main Bush agenda items.

Sen. John McCain is punishment for you Conservatives that did not allow this agenda to go though.

What you say? That’s correct John McCain is retaliation against Conservatives that stopped CIRA and the vast Left wing conspiracy. I’m not kidding!

Until the mid term elections of 2006 Republicans enjoyed the majority in Congress for twelve short years compared to the nearly 50 years that Democrats controlled both houses of Congress before the 1994 Newt Gingrich Conservative revolution called the Contract with America which swept corrupt Democrats out of office.

Instead of Republicans using their majority status to further solidify their agenda Republicans began partying like Rockstars so much so that they began to mimic the very corruption that they promised to over throw.

Other Republicans began to buy into the Liberal social agenda of homosexuality, illegal immigration, global warming, misspending the public’s money and larger government just to name a few agenda items.

John McCain was apart of this second group. So much so that Democrats began to court him and other Republicans like him, believing that they would be able to defeat President Bush by back dooring Bush with a weaken Republican Congress weakened by defectors.

The only Republican that they could manage to completely get to embarrass Bush publicly by defecting was James Jeffords of Vermont in 2001 who went independent.

However Sen. McCain was so in play that Sen. John Kerry considered having him run with him instead of John Edwards. McCain chose not to.

Yet McCain let it be known that though he was not willing to bolt the Party he was quite willing to undermine Republican principles similar too but a little less than Sen. Lincoln Chaffe a known Republican malefactor.

Sen. McCain had a third way, he could remain a Republican in name while receiving George Soros and Teresa Heinz Kerry moneys to support his McCain-Feingold campaign to stomp out free speech as well as his open borders pursuits though a non-profit that he created called, The Reform Institute. This Liberal monetarial support plus his Liberal friends would be all that Senator McCain would need to be the Republican nominee for President.

McCain supports amnesty for illegal aliens, was behind the Gang of 14, is a gun grabber, opposed the Bush tax cuts, ran roughshod over the Constitution with McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform, opposes a Constitutional amendment to protect marriage, was rumored to be considering switching parties multiple times, talked with John Kerry about being his Vice-President, lines up with the global warming alarmists, wants to close Gitmo, wants to coddle captured terrorists -- you can go on and on with this. – John Hawkins

There are 23 other Republicans Senators besides Sen. McCain who make the Republican Party unstable and weak they are:

Alaska Sens. -Lisa Murkowski and Ted Stevens, Arizona -Sen. Jon Kyl,
Florida -Sen. Melquiades Martinez, Idaho -Sen. Larry Craig, Indiana -Sen. Richard Lugar, Kansas -Sen. Samuel Brownback, Kentucky -Sen. Mitch McConnell, Maine -Sens. Susan Collins, and Olympia Snowe, Minnesota -Sen. Norm Coleman, Missouri - Sen. Christopher Bond, Mississippi -Sen. Chester Lott .(No longer serving), North Carolina -Sen. Richard Burr, Nebraska -Sen. Charles Hagel, New Hampshire -Sen. Judd Gregg, New Mexican -Sen. Pete Domenici, Neveda -Sen. John Eric Ensign, Ohio -Sen. George Voinovich, Pennsylvania -Sen. Arlen Specter, South Carolina -Sen. Lindsey Graham, Utah -Sen. Robert Bennett, and Virginia -Sen. John Warner.

John McCain, the Senators listed above and a Liberal plot to turn Republicans plus Republican Senators and Congressmen who were caught up in corruption scandals are the reasons that Republicans lost both houses of Congress in 2006!

Then the coup d’état, an already weaken President Bush weaken by the Liberal Democrat’s plan to subvert his presidency, the Republican Party and the war on terrorism and in Iraq, did the unexplainable he started pushing CIRA or Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act. Bush got many of the above named Senators to go along with his Party splitting plan and it worked.

No, CIRA didn’t pass, Conservatives stopped that, but the President and his cohorts split the Republican Party at a time when the Party could lest afford it, just prior to the 2008 Presidential elections.

A block of Lincoln Chaffe Republicans were born, Sen. Trent Lott, Sen. Lindsey Graham, Sen. Arlen Specter, Sen. Melquiades Martinez, Sen. Olympia Snowe and Sen. John McCain just to name a few all Republican in name but often championing other than Republican causes and legislation before these events they worked independently but now they began working together.

Because of John McCain’s open (and media supported) defiance of the Republican Party McCain was cheered on by the Left and mistrusted by the Right. McCain lost the 2000 nomination to President Bush and it looked like any hopes for a 2008 nomination would be pointless his campaign had collapsed and he had no money.

But a group of Lincoln Chaffe Republicans spurred on by now former Sen. Trent Lott made John McCain their instrument of revenge against the Conservative wing of the Republican Party for handing them a defeat on Comprehensive Immigration Reform.

Former Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.), a longtime McCain ally, said that when it looked like the bottom fell out over the summer, he rallied a group of McCain supporters in Washington.
Lott told The Hill that the meeting was far from a “celebration,” but the group resolved to stay with McCain.
“I said, ‘Look, just relax,’ ” Lott said. “ ‘If we can come up with a million, million and a half [dollars] a month to keep him afloat, he’ll come out of this by October.’ ”The Hill

And come up with the money they did Liberal money George Soros and Teresa Heinz Kerry money funneled to Sen. McCain’s Reform Institute!

The Reform Institute was founded in 2001 in direct response to the millions of Americans who, during the 2000 presidential campaign, expressed profound disillusionment with corrupt fundraising activities and the political “closed shop.” The initial bipartisan Honorary Chairs of the Advisory Committee were Senator John McCain (R-AZ) and former Senator Bob Kerrey (D-NE). After Senator McCain resigned his position in 2005, former Congressman and former Fortune 500 CEO Amo Houghton of New York served as President.

It was Lott and the Lincoln Chaffe wing of the Republican Party that backed McCain and orchestrated the front running status that McCain now enjoys and it was George Soros and Teresa Heinz Kerry moneys that funded it as laid out by blogs the Captain’s Quarters, David Horowitz the Frontpage magazine and Michele Malkin.

If you look at McCain’s supporters they are all Lincoln Chaffe Republicans, Rudy Guianni, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Lindsey Graham, all Republicans who would rather switch than fight for Conservative ideas.

John McCain has managed to connect with a virulent strain of anti-Conservativism right in the heart of the Republican Party. A perusal of the backers of this campaign will out these self hating Republicans and explain why McCain won the state delegates he thus far has won from their support.

John McCain has managed to unite what is worst in the Republican Party the appeasers and the Democrat Lincoln Chaffe wannabes. He now stands before a Conservative base, one that he has defied for many years and tauntingly suggests that, you’ve got to accept me now, there is nothing else that you can do!

Sen. McCain and you Lincoln Chaffe Republicans, you are wrong. There is plenty left to do. Just like the retired Sen. Trent Lott, we will show you the way out of the Republican Party and that doesn’t mean we promote you for your political incompetence and treachery to the highest elected office in the land as a reward for your years of betrayal of Conservatives and Conservative values.

John McCain may have gotten this far with his group of Moderates, Liberals and Mavericks, all funded by Liberals, whose plan was to destroy the Party from within, but he will soon find out that he needs Conservatives much more than Conservatives need him!

Long live Conservative values that have heretofore made this Country great and may all who oppose these values go down to defeat!

Pimp my Child

Chelsea Clinton being used to campaign for Mom

Ah, Political Arts or the art of confusing and destroying meaning, that is what the Clintons are so damn good at.

They can take a comment and make it totally different than what it was intended to mean and then they can have you fired and make you apologize for ever even thinking the thought!

Case in point the MSNBC’S Dave Schuster observation that perhaps the “do anything”, “say anything” Clintons were using their daughter inappropriately to get votes.

Shuster guest-hosted Tucker Carlson's MSNBC show, "Tucker," and in referring to Chelsea Clinton's role in calling superdelegates on behalf of the Clinton presidential campaign, he asked whether she was "sort of being pimped out in some weird sort of way?"

But before anyone else could ask the question, are the Clinton’s using Chelsea inappropriately, the Clinton’s turned Schuster’s remake on its head and acted like the remark was some affront to Chelsea Clinton when in fact it was an assessment on the way that Ma and Pa Clinton were using their dear sweet girl to get superdelegate votes and exposing her to the harsh realities of politics

“I found the remarks incredibly offensive,” Clinton told reporters in this snowy town outside Bangor. Earlier, she sent a letter to NBC brass that called for swift action against Shuster, who was suspended Friday by MSNBC.

“Nothing justifies the kind of debasing language that David Shuster used and no temporary suspension or half-hearted apology is sufficient,” Clinton wrote to NBC News President Steve Capus, who apparently had already called Clinton to personally apologize.

“I would urge you to look at the pattern of behavior on your network that seems to repeatedly lead to this sort of degrading language,” Clinton wrote. “There’s a lot at stake for our country in this election. Surely, you can do your jobs as journalists and commentators and still keep the discourse civil and appropriate.” --Kenneth P. Vogel and Michael Calderone

Is this the kind of authoritarian America that we have to look forward to under a Hillary Clinton one which she issues edicts demanding the firing or black balling of journalist when she has made a political career of equally demeaning and defamatory remarks against the president of the United States of America, George W. Bush?

Do we really want an America were the presidential wannabe will threaten a reporter or an entire news organization? First it was FOX news network and then it was Tim Russert, it was GQ magazine,it was the CNN debates, it was Chris Matthews and now its David Shuster and MSNBC! I see a distinct pattern here!

And another thing in order to be offended don’t you at least have to know what the remark meant? In an email from Clinton Press Secretary Philippe Reines to David Shuster, Reines admits that the Clinton camp doesn't even know that the comment in question means! Take a look:

From: Philippe Reines
To: David Shuster
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 7:14 p.m.

David - how hard is it for someone, anyone, in the vast MS/NBC universe to contact any one of us at the campaign for comment about Chelsea before going on air and saying that she is being "pimped out" ? It's absurdly offensive.

And what the hell does that even mean?

I just don't get MSNBC - does GE not allow you to make toll calls? What's the problem.

Philippe Reines
Press Secretary
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton

What? They don’t know what it meant but they’re offended? Give me a break!

Check your memories go back as far as you like now when is the last time that a presidential candidate had their husband and child stomping for her?

You might think well there’s never been a female presidential candidate. Wrong! That’s the fairly tale that the Clinton’s want you to believe there have been many!

Unless Senator Clinton was born in year 1872 her statement was an ignorant attempt to frame all civil rights gains and women’s suffrage around her lifetime. The fact is Hillary is not the first woman to, as she said, “to be running to be the first woman president" there have been many! (list courtesy of Worldwide Guide to Women in Leadership) —Alaphiah

But that aside when do you remember a presidential candidate actually having their child stomping for them?

Same answer as before, never! So that begs the question, why would Ma and Pa Clinton expose Chelsea to the rough and tumble world of presidential politics a world in which the Clintons, themselves employee the politics of personal destruction against opponents but now apparently they faint at the very prospect that anyone would say anything seemingly untoward about the way that they conduct business by using their daughter.

One must remember that under a Hillary Clinton presidency one would never be able to say anything that is considered negative or "absurdly offensive" about the Clintons neither could you say anything about the way that they conduct business if you dared too you risk lost of job or an IRS audit or both!

I can just hear the conversation now, (Bill Clinton voice) Hey Hillary why don’t we use Chelsea in the campaign. You know young people and Blacks are going for that Obama fairly tale like nuts. And I can’t make you younger, taller, hipper, or blacker.

(Hillary) Well you know Bill, that’s a wonderful idea. After all I’ve used my mother and you on the campaign!

So David Shuster’s question is not so absurd when you think about it. As a matter of fact I’m now wondering if the Clinton campaign has been pimping out Bill and Hillary’s mother to win votes.

But that would just be asking the obvious!

Romney: Conservative Values not Worth Fighting For

Governor Mitt Romney ending his Campaign

In the Gene Hackman, Denzel Washington movie “Crimson Tide” Hackman plays a captain of the submarine, the Arizona. He calls a war drill right in the middle of a fire that had broken out in the ships galley. One crewman was killed.

Washington’s character, Lt. Commander Ron Hunter, who was second in command, seemed visibly shaken that a Captain would call a war drill while the ship was in apparent fire danger.

Hackman’s character, Capt. Frank Ramsey, after asking whether or not Commander Hunter thought it was inappropriate to run a drill during a fire response was, “Confuse on a ship is nothing to fear, it’s to be taken advantage of. Lest you forgot Mr. Hunter we are a ship of war designed for battle.

We don’t just fight battles when everything is honky-dory, what'd you think, son? That I was just some crazy old coot, putting everyone in harm's way as I yelled "YEE-HA!"?”

The Captain’s point was that war is not a nice neat thing and one must be prepared to go to battle in spite of the difficulties one faces and one should be willing to do what ever it takes to win.

On October 29, 2007 I posted “Why Mitt Romney won’t win the Republican nomination” (see here) to which one of you dear readers took exception. My over all point was that Conservatives need someone willing to fight anyone and everyone who would attempt to destroy America by destroying her values. At that time I did not feel that Governor Romney was willing to fight for Conservative values. One of the things that I said was,

The last thing that Conservatives or Republicans need at this time is someone to portray themselves as a Conservative but once in office fail to fight for Conservative ideas as fervently as Democrats fight for their Liberal ideas like the girly Republican Governor of California Arnold Schwarznegger who recently sold out California to the homosexual lobby. --Alaphiah

No matter how good or noble Governor Romney’s intentions the one thing that separates Democrats from Republicans today is that Democrats will do and say anything to win. Governor Romney is a good and honorable man who didn’t have it in him to fight a political fight that is less than honorable therefore he was destined to lose.

Some of you don’t realize it but this election, this war on terror is America fighting for its very existence and because the White house isn’t physically bombed or some apparent obvious grave threat you don’t realize the danger that you are actually in.

America is under attack from the left, from Europe, China, Russia , and the Middle East. Many times it’s not a blatant attack that you can see but every time you buy gasoline you are being attacked, every time you spend a dollar bill you are being attacked, everything from our economy to our way of life is under attack.

Oh the Left is very cleaver to call their attack “change” but make no mistake, it is an all out full frontal attack on the values that have heretofore made America great.

Mitt Romney says that because of the war and because Democrats might win he will end his campaign for the presidency. I on the other hand believe that Capt Ramsey had it right, “We don’t just fight battles when everything is honky-dory,” We fight in the midst of the chaotic times too because contrary to what many on the left believe and some on the right, CONSERVATIVE VALUES ARE WORTH FIGHTING FOR!

On to the Convention

Gov. Mitt Romney promises to keep fighting
Governor Mitt Romney’s Super Tuesday night's promise was to go on to the Convention.

Romney, a problem solver, is not a Washington insider like Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain. In addition to that he is the only one qualified to fix what they broke in Washington.

Let's go all the way to the convention and win the Whitehouse!

McCain Steals WV Hands it off to Huckabee Then Steals the Night

McCain:No stopping him now?
Huckabee wins…huh not so fast, Huckabee was used as a pawn by the McCain campaign to block Mitt Romney from becoming the first victor in the Super Tuesday race for delegates and thus becoming the Republican nominee for President proving that a vote for Huckabee is a vote for McCain.

Elections are supposed to be for voters to decide who they wish to represent them so why is it that in West Virginia the voters didn’t decide Sen. John McCain decided for them!

It’s the same old thing Washington insider backstabbing and horse trading. No wonder they call him Maverick! McCain faced with the unfavorable situation of a Mitt Romney lead in West Virginia used his ability to reach across the aisle to join with a political opponent against another.

McCain achieved the results and outcome that he wanted. Mike Huckabee the lesser of his competition won West Virginia while Mitt Romney was cheated out of an early victory that possibly could have set the tone for the rest of the night and all because of a McCain brokered backroom deal.

McCain’s over twenty years of politics taught him that it is better that one manipulates events and outcomes to get what you want than allow the people to get what they want.

What did the people of West Virginia want? Did they want Sen. McCain to affect the outcome of their elections? Well it was beneficial for McCain that Mitt Romney be denied a victory in West Virginia so McCain colluded with Mike Huckabee to give Huckabee the Victory in West Virginia . This type of sad example is exactly what we need to rid Washington of. The idea that a representative of the people can void out the peoples will to exert his or her own will is not what is best for America and it’s not the American way.

It’s like CIRA the Comprehensive Immigration Reform McCain and a tight knit group of rouge Republicans attempted to force on the American people. In this little oligarchy’s mind Comprehensive Immigration reform was a done deal; So much so that the President boasted, “See ya’ll at the bill signing!”

Its apparent that the change that America is calling for will deal with political insiders like John McCain who have forgotten that they are sent to Washington D.C. to work for the people not against them.

Yet on Super Tuesday none if it seem to really matter. Washington insiders Hillary Clinton and John McCain are leading in delegates.

McCain leads with 613 delegates that’s only 578 short of the 1,191 that he needs to claim his Party’s nomination and Clinton leads her race with 845 delegates in a much tighter two man race to claim the ultimate prize of 2,025 delegates to win.

We have seen a delegate handoff in West Virgina once already making this Republican race a two against one, McCain and Huckabee against Romney fight.

Who knows, if no one has the 1,191 delegates at this summer's Republican convention in St. Paul, Minn. maybe Governor Huckabee will return the favor and hand off his delegates to Sen. McCain for the win.

Just think this all made possible by McCain's Super Tuesday win in which he manipulated the outcome just enough to achieve the win. Here are state by state voting returns.

Good for John McCain, but is it good for the Country or his Party? That it seems has always been the problem with Sen. John McCain lately he appears to act on what is good for him first leaving his Country a secondary consideration and his Party a distant tertiary concern.

UPDATE:

According to Politico it now appears that Sen. Obama has the lead of delegate in the Democrat race for the nomination. It is being reported that he lays claim to 840 to Sen. Clinton’s 830 in any event Democrats are still saying that it is to close to call.

McCain is Bush Lite - Less bright more Liberal

McCain supported by Lite Republicans Schwarzenegger and Guiliani

"I was in a conference in Germany over the weekend and President Putin of Germany gave one of the old Cold War style speeches"—Sen. John McCain

With all of the negatives and none of the positives John McCain is Bush Lite. Sen. McCain thinks that Russia President Vladimir Putin is President of Germany. I’m not kidding. Democrats accuse President Bush of being dumb but McCain is dumber. See for yourself:



You may also remember this little ditty sung by Sen. John McCain on the tune of Barbara Ann...

Bomb, bomb, bomb...bomb, bomb Iran! Not only a stupid attempt at humor but warmongering when people want to end the war in Iraq, now that’s dumb!

I thought that America didn’t want a dumb President so why are the Liberals, Independents and Moderates backing the intellectually challenged McCain?

John McCain has promised that there will be other wars! So much for ending the war now and bring the troops home. McCain says the troops will be in Iraq for 100 years. (Why don’t you tell us what you’re really thinking Sen. McCain?)



Like DNC Chairman Howard Dean, You may hate President Bush and the Republicans but you find yourself strangely drawn to Sen. John McCain because well he's so liberal but boy is he dumb.

How does one make a career in the United States Senate of pissing off Conservatives and then decide to run as the Republican nominee to be President unless you’re dumb or either you think Republicans are as dumb as you.

McCain was one of five senators implicated in the 1989 Keating Five, a congressional scandal alleging federal regulators were pressured against an investigation of Charles Keating, the former chairman of the Lincoln Savings and Loan Assn.
McCain was cited by the Senate Ethics Committee for “poor judgment” but it recommended no further action. -- Rick Pearson

Speaking of poor judgment John McCain is bff (best-friends-forever) with the Clintons according to President Bill Clinton. He spoke of McCain’s and Hillary’s relationship he said, "She (Hillary) and John McCain are very close," Clinton said. "They always laugh that if they wound up being the nominees of their party, it would be the most civilized election in American history, and they're afraid they'd put the voters to sleep because they like and respect each other."

The comments may not be welcome by the McCain camp — which yesterday faced fire from several of its rivals for winning the backing of the New York Times — a longtime archenemy of conservatives.-- Alexander Mooney

According to Pat Buchanan : Where Bush has been at his best, cutting taxes and nominating conservative judges, McCain has been his nemesis. Not only did he vote twice against the Bush tax cuts, McCain colluded to sell out the most conservative of Bush’s judges.

In 1993, McCain voted to confirm the pro-abortion liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg. But when Bush set out to restore constitutionalism, McCain formed the Gang of 14, seven senators from each party. All agreed to vote to block the GOP Senate from invoking the “nuclear option”—i.e., empowering the GOP to break a filibuster of judicial nominees by majority vote—unless the seven Democrats agreed.

With this record of voting for Clinton justices and joining with Democrats anxious to kill the most conservative Bush’s nominees, what guarantee is there a President McCain would nominate and fight for the fifth jurist who would vote to overturn Roe v Wade?

McCain also colluded with liberals to pass McCain-Feingold, a law that denies to Second Amendment folks and right-to-lifers their First Amendment right to identify friends and foes in TV ads before national elections.

On ANWAR, too, McCain votes with the liberals, and on global warming he has moved toward Gore.

After five record trade deficits have denuded the nation of thousands of factories and 3 million manufacturing jobs, McCain is still babbling on about Smoot-Hawley. “When you study history,” he told a Detroit newspaper, “every time we’ve adopted protectionism, we’ve paid a very heavy price.”

But what history was McCain talking about? From Lincoln through Calvin Coolidge, the GOP was the Party of Protection that put 12 presidents in the White House to two for the Democrats, and the U.S. became the most awesome industrial power and self-reliant nation in the history of mankind, producing 42 percent of the world’s manufactured goods.

Even Hillary, whose husband passed NAFTA with McCain’s support, has begun to question the free-trade paradigm and the disastrous results it has produced.

On controlling America’s borders and halting the invasion through Mexico, McCain collaborated with Senate liberals in the McCain-Kennedy amnesty, which was rejected only after a national uprising.

When 190,000 Arizonans petitioned in 2004 to put Prop 200 on the ballot, requiring proof of citizenship before an individual could vote or receive welfare benefits, John McCain led the GOP congressional delegation in opposing it unanimously. Prop 200 passed with the support of 56 percent of all Arizona voters and 46 percent of Hispanics.

Unsurprisingly, Juan Hernandez, the open-borders chatterbox and former adviser to Vicente Fox, has turned up in McCain’s campaign.

So you see McCain is Bush Lite, but less smart and much more aggravating to Conservative causes. Those of you who are asking for change this election will just get the same old ill-advised decisions but only worst, if John McCain were to win the election.

Still You may agree with Sen. McCain on this views of Global warming, giving prisoners of war habeas corpus rights and bring enemy combatant to the United States and you may cast your Super Tuesday’s vote for him just know that just like Lite Beer isn’t real Beer, Sen. McCain really isn’t a real Conservative.


Exercise your Constitutional Guaranteed Rights and Vote!

Hold Your Noise and Vote Tuesday

Sen. McCain and Sen. Clinton in a Moment of Mutual Admiration

Yes, I think holding their nose they’re going to have to take him.-- Roberta McCain, mother of Sen. John McCain

John McCain has always been friendlier with Democrats than he has been with Republicans and recently Sen. John McCain’s White haired mother, Roberta McCain, was asked about her son’s prospects for winning the Republican nominee to be president and although she acknowledged that her son had no support among Conservatives she speculated that came election against a Democrat her son would be the Republican representative and that Conservatives would just have to hold their noises and vote for him.

McCain with a face that only a mother could love has became the face of a Party that is fast becoming a Party that no one can love.

In the 2006 mid-term elections voters threw Republican out on their ears and voted Democrats into majority status in both the House and the Senate because Republicans had become depraved little Democrat wannabes. The country began seeing both Parties as an extension to the other and some even name them as such with the derisive designations Demo-cans and Republi-crats.

Homosexual child affairs with Congressional pages that heretofore were Democrat territory, fiscal and monetary corruption that was, before the Republicans came into power for their short 12 year majority reign, was primarily a Democrat staple for the 40 years that Democrats held power. And then the America people kicked Democrats out in 1994 when Newt Gingrich lead Conservatives with a promise to clean up Congress with Conservative ideas.

Ideas like small government, less taxes, ethics and integrity in government and above all respect and adherence to the Constitution of the United States of America. So what happened?

Apparently our esteemed political leaders sensed a change in the American people one which 40 years of homosexual rights, abortion rights and multiculturalism have brought about. Ideologically American is a liberal hedonistic post-Christian society.

Many Republican Congressmen and Senators believe that with what they perceive as a seismic shift in social morays that it is no longer expedient for them to fight for Conservative ideas.

Therefore the blurring of the Parties, you vote for a Republican and voilà you get a closet Democrat like Governor Arnold Schwarznegger of California who betrayed Conservatives, though he presented himself and ran as a Conservative, by signing into California Law assembly bill and senate bill AB394 and SB777 that forces homosexuality on the citizens of California by law.

There is terrible news from California. On October 12, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed into law three bills which, the opposition argues, introduce the radical homosexual agenda into educational institutions.--Paul Weyrich

Not to mention that California is facing a cataclysmic fiscal deficit yet a couple of years ago Californians duped by politically correct leaders and Movie Stars voted to fund stem cell research 3 billion dollars right in the middle of their fiscal crisis.

Californians backed their opinions with money with 59 percent of those who showed up at the polls voting for last November's Proposition 71, which will funnel $3 billion of the cash-strapped state's funds into embryonic stem-cell research over the next decade.-- Michael Fumento

Now the Democrat mismanaged State of California is talking about laying off state workers, closing state parks and slashing school funding because they don’t have any money. What morons!

You know it’s said that as California goes, so goes the rest of the United States. So as California crashes and burns under the wildfire of a false Republican Governor and a totally Democrat controlled state government, we can preview what America will be like when a Democrat controlled Congress and either a Republi-crat or a Demo-can is elected President.

But I’ve digressed. The point that I’m making is Sen. John Cain represents the old guard of the Trent Lott Republican Party that believes that you have to be like Democrats to win. Republi-crats like McCain are ashamed of Conservative values because those values are not the politically correct values that everyone is embracing now.

Former Sen. Trent Lott (R-Miss.), a longtime McCain ally, said that when it looked like the bottom fell out over the summer, he rallied a group of McCain supporters in Washington.
Lott told The Hill that the meeting was far from a “celebration,” but the group resolved to stay with McCain.
“I said, ‘Look, just relax,’ ” Lott said. “ ‘If we can come up with a million, million and a half [dollars] a month to keep him afloat, he’ll come out of this by October.’ ”--Sam Youngman, The Hill

Everyone wants amnesty for illegal aliens; everyone wants government health care, everyone wants homosexual instruction in schools like in Massachusetts and everyone wants homosexuals normalized. Homosexual sex on the big screen, on the cable, in airport bathrooms and in the living rooms of all America, everyone wants that.

And if everyone wanted to jump off of the proverbial cliff Democrats and Republi-crats like McCain would want to legislate that into law too!

In the pass I have identified a number of Republi-crats who should not be re-elected, I termed them “Former Senators walking” for their part in attempting to force amnesty down the throats of Americans, and John McCain was one of the Senators that I named.

At the very least McCain should be forced back to Arizona and either be challenged by a Republican or made to run as a Democrat and if the people of Arizona elect him as a Democrat he would be fairly representing them. But to be running as a potential Republican Presidential Candidate is absolutely astonishing.

Yet McCain and other Republi-crats are the reason that the Republican Party lost in 2006 and subsequently they are the reason Republicans have lost their way.

Sen. McCain mother was right the Senator has no Conservative Republican support his candidacy is made up of Republi-crats like the disgraced retired Sen. Trent Lott (Thank God!) and others who are working to transform the Republican Party in a splitting image of the Democrat Party.

These losers believe that Republicans can’t win and they are ashamed of Conservative values. To which I say, they have that right but they should leave the Republican Party and join a Party that is more reflective of their values.

And their man McCain should run for President, but not of the Republican Party, no McCain best represents Independent and Moderate Democrats as you know he was considering leaving the Republican Party in 2004 and running with John Kerry.

On the Democrat side it should be Obama, Clinton and McCain vs. Romney and Huckabee on the Republican side.

Jeez I think that I’m going to have to hold my noise on any of the above.

Just put McCain in the correct category and let the Republicans elect their own poison.

Republicans should have the right to elect who they want to represent them not some fake Republican who used the Republican hating media and self hating Republican Democrat wannabes along with Independents and Democrat Moderates to win the Republican nomination.

Where is a Conservative when you need one? Jim DeMint, Rick Santorim, John Cornyn or John Thune where are you?

If you are a Conservative out there take my advice and hold your noise because it’s going to be a smelly 4 years if Obama, Clinton or McCain is elected.

But you’ve only have yourselves to blame if you don’t fight everyday for Conservative ideas and vote for Conservative representatives to lead this Country out from the moral malaise which we presently find ourselves.

McCain, Obama and Clinton are a step backward to the free love 60’s a time of anything goes that brought on the AIDS of the 80’s and 90’s

Even free love has its consequences and so does a vote for Democrats or a Republi-crat!

Ann Coulter says she’d vote for Hillary before she’d vote for McCain. McCain’s mother is right no Conservatives support John McCain.

A Super Tuesday Message

This was sent to me by someone who I considered to be a Democrat. (I assumed please forgive me.)This person is woman and a racial minority. I receive stuff all of the time but this is something that I thought I’d simply pass it on because it seemed to me that someone had done their homework.

There are many of you considering voting for Hillary Clinton simply because she is a woman. And though I consider that sexist there is no reasoning with some of you so this emotional little rant ought to speak your language.

It’s not as good as a fake cry but hey it’s something every Super Tuesday voter should take inside the voting booth! --Alaphiah

PLEASE REMEMBER THIS FOREVER

Worse than you thought & worth remembering
and this came from a Democrat
Dear Mr. Ex President Clinton,
I recently saw a bumper sticker that said, "Thank
me, I voted for Clinton-Gore." So, I sat down and
reflected on that, and I am sending my "Thank you"
for what you have done, specifically:

1. Thank you for introducing us to Gennifer
Flowers, Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky, Dolly
Kyle Browning, Kathleen Willey, and Juanita
Broderick. Did I leave anyone out?

2. Thank you for teaching my 8 year old about oral
sex. I had really planned to wait until he was a
little older to discuss it with him, but now he
knows more about it than I did as a senior in college.


3. Thank you for showing us that sexual harassment
in the work place (especially the White House) and
on the job is OK, and all you have to know is what
the meaning of "it" is. It really is great to know
that certain sexual acts are not sex, and one person
may have sex while the other one does NOT have sex.

4. Thank you for reintroducing the concept of impeachment
to a new generation and demonstrating that the ridiculous
plot of the movie "Wag the Dog" could be plausible after all.

5. Thanks for making Jimmy Carter look competent,
Gerald Ford look graceful, Richard Nixon look honest,
Lyndon Johnson look truthful, and John Kennedy look moral.

6. Thank you for the 73 House and Senate witnesses
who have pled the 5th Amendment and 17 witnesses who
have fled the country to avoid testifying about
Democratic campaign fund raising.

7. Thank you, for the 19 charges, 8 convictions,
and 4 imprisonment's from the Whitewater "mess" and
the 55 criminal charges and 32 criminal convictions
(so far) in the other "Clinton" scandals.

8. Thanks also for reducing our military by half,
"gutting" much of our foreign policy, and flying all
over the world on "vacations" carefully disguised as necessary
trips.

9 Thank you, also, for "finding" millions of dollars
(I really didn't need it in the first place,
and I can't think of a more deserving group of
recipients for my hard-earned tax dollars)
for all of your globe-trotting. I understand your,
family and your cronies have logged in more time
aboard Air Force One than any other administration.

10. Now that you've left the White House, thanks for the
140 pardons of convicted felon s and indicted felons-in-exile.
We will love to have them rejoin society.
(Not to mention the scores you pardoned while Governor of Arkansas)

11. Thanks also for removing the White House silverware. I'm sure
that
Laura Bush didn't like the pattern anyway. Also, enjoy the housewarming
gifts you've received from your "friends."

12. Thanks to you and your staff in the West Wing
of the White House for vandalizing and destroying
government property on the way out. I also appreciate removing all of
that excess weight (China, silverware, linen, towels, ash trays, soap,
pens, magnetic compass, flight manuals, etc.) out of Air Force 1.

The weight savings means burning less fuel, thus less tax dollars
spent
on jetfuel. Thank you!

13. Please ensure that Hillary enjoys the $8 million dollar advance
for
her "tell-all" book and you, Bill, the $10 million advance for your
memoirs. Who says crime doesn't pay!
>
14. The last and most important point - thank you for forcing Israel
to
let Mohammed Atta go free.
Terrorist pilot Mohammed Atta blew up a bus in Israel in 1986. The
Israelis captured, tried and imprisoned him. As part of the Oslo
agreement with the Palestinians in 1993, Israel had to agree to release
so-called "political prisoners". However, the Israelis would not
release
any with blood on their hands. The American President at the time, Bill
Clinton, and his Secretary of State, Warren Christopher, "insisted"
that
all prisoners be released. Thus Mohammed Atta was freed and eventually
thanked the US by flying an airplane into Tower One of the World Trade
Center. This was reported by many of the American TV networks at the
time
that the terrorists were first identified. It was censored in the US
from
all later reports. Why shouldn't Americans know the real truth?

What a guy!!

If you agree that the American public must be made aware of these
facts,
pass this on. God bless America and THANK YOU (once again) for spending
my
taxes so wisely and frugally.

SINCERELY,
A US Citizen

PS. Please pass along a special thank you to Al Gore for "inventing"
the
Internet, without which I would not be able to send this wonderful,
factual e-mail.

AND THE REST OF THE STORY Hillary Rodham Clinton,
as a New York State Senator, now comes under the
"Congressional Retirement and Staffing Plan," which
means that even if she never gets reelected, she
STILL receives her Congressional salary until she
dies. (Would it not be nice if all Americans were
pension eligible after only 4 years?)

If Bill outlives her, he then inherits HER salary
until HE dies. He is already getting his Presidential salary
until he dies. If Hillary ou tlives Bill, she also gets HIS salary
until
she dies. Guess who pays for that?
WE DO!

It's common knowledge that in order for her to
establish NY residency, they purchased a million
dollar-plus house in upscale Chappaqua, New York.
Makes sense. They are entitled to Secret Service
protection for life. Still makes sense.

Here it becomes interesting. Their mortgage payments hover at
around $10,000 per month. BUT, an extra residence HAD to be built
within
the acreage to house the Secret Service agents.

The Clintons charge the Federal government $10,000 monthly rent for
the
use of that extra residence, which is just about equal to their
mortgage payment. This means that we, the taxpayers, are paying the
Clinton's salary, mortgage, transportation, safety and security, as
well
as the salaries for their 12 man staff -- and, this is all perfectly
legal!

&nb sp;When she runs for President, will you vote for her?

How many people can YOU send this to?


WAKE UP AMERICA..................

Don’t Worry McCain Can’t Win

McCain and Martinez: Amnesty buddies

Don’t worry, don’t worry calm down, Senator John McCain will not be President of the United States of America! You can quote me.

Think about it all of Senator McCain’s victories have been at the hands of non-Conservatives (even the Florida victory) which means that voters who voted for him have an alterative candidate to fall back on.

Most of the voters that voted for Sen. McCain in the primaries were non-Conservatives and they view McCain as an alterative to Conservatives so in a head to head race McCain vs. any Democrat, non-Conservatives will vote for the real choice, a Democrat, 90% of the time. McCain loses!

That places McCain in a dilemma because a dispirited Republican vote will be suppressed if he is the Republican nominee. Why? Conservatives don’t trust John McCain that is a fact, so all of a sudden the numbers just aren’t there.

McCain loses to any Democrat even to a Dennis J. Kucinich. Why, because despite what the Liberals say they are the ones who vote along straight party lines. As well Liberals tend to vote for special interest such as Global warming, fetal stem cells and for the race or sex of their candidate.

On the other hand it is conservatives who normally vote for principle so any Democrat will get a Liberal vote but not any Republican will get a Conservative vote, again McCain loses.

Oh I know what the polls are saying but that is only idle talk like, what if the Cowboys would have beaten the N.Y. football Giants they would be in the Superbowl. In reality the Cowboys lost 21-17 and John McCain will lose to any Democrat!

So throw out the thought that McCain has the best chance to win as a Republican that is simply balderdash!

Now allow me to explain the dynamics that are in play in this election. You feel defeated and somewhat betrayed but you can’t quite identify just how McCain is winning without any Conservative support. Allow me to explain.

The explanation is, if you are a conservative you are being punished and there is an attempt to destroy your Party. How could I know that?

Let’s start at the beginning George W. Bush for all Liberal accounts was not supposed to win the Presidency in 2000 and 2004 (I know that you’ve heard that a thousand times) but you Conservatives backed him and because of your support he won.

Remember the Dubai Ports deal? Very powerful Saudis where supposed to buy interest in U.S. Ports but you Conservatives came against it and stopped it.

Then there was the Comprehensive Immigration Plan back by our Globalist Republican President George W. Bush. Conservatives rose up against their Party leaders and said no and you stopped it and cost corporate interest a lot of money.

Also no one is more vocal against the North American Community Plan than conservatives. A plan where Global elitist including President Bush plan to erase internal continental borders for one border that outlines the outer North American Continent and in the process blurring the national sovereignty of Canada, the United States and Mexico. Conservatives are the ones questioning this plan.

Conservatives have weaken terrorism, they have slowed the Liberal agenda, they have changed the course of the moral decline that much of the world hates the United States for and hold us in contempt for. We had become a laughingstock because a U.S. President was involved in untoward behavior in the very house that belongs to the people.

Osama bin Laden himself cited Bill Clinton’s behavior as one of the reasons that he declared jihad against America! I bet you didn’t know that!

Who can forget your President Clinton's immoral acts committed in the official Oval office? After that you did not even bring him to account, other than that he 'made a mistake', after which everything passed with no punishment.

Is there a worse kind of event for which your name will go down in history and remembered by nations?--Osama bin Laden, In open letter to America

Truth is you conservatives have become too pesky, too powerful and you hinder the Liberal’s socialist progress for that you must be stopped.

So to guarantee that no one more Conservative than George Bush would win the Republican nomination and consolidate conservative power and momentum a plan was enacted to destroy the Republican Party from within.

But who could enemies of Conservatives get to perform such an act. Just who wears the Conservative title but would not object to working at odds against Conservative principles?

His name is John McCain. McCain is a wolf in sheep’s clothing doing the bidding of unseen forces he is being used to stop the progress of Conservativism in the Republican Party.

Therefore you don’t have to worry he was never intended to be President, the same people who support McCain now will support either Hillary or Obama in the general election in an effort to deal Conservativism a final fatal Coup d’état.

McCain is merely a tool that is being used to that end. He, Liberals, Moderates, Progressives, Socialist and Compassionate Conservatives all have combined efforts to crush the Conservative movement that has dominated Presidential elections in this country the last 8 years.

So don’t worry this fight is not about electing John McCain this fight is about stopping Conservatives.

And because Conservatives don’t realize the real natural of this fight I’m afraid they are at a disadvantage.

Right now Conservatives should be fighting to elect someone who best represents their ideas. Someone who is willing to fight and do what it takes for the ideas of Conservativism to prevail or there is always the alternative. Don’t fight. Allow McCain to win the Republican nomination and watch him get grubbed by either Hillary or Obama.

Then watch Hillary or Obama set in motion an agenda that will end Conservativism in America.

Remember you heard it from me Sen. McCain doesn’t have a snowball’s chance of becoming President.

It may already be too late but if Conservatives were smart they’d back a Conservative that does have a chance or will at least represent their principles. And by the way Rudy is no Conservative either he says so!



You decide!

Where’s the Recount?

Sen. John McCain exalts in Florida victory

It was the state of Florida that put the word Chad in the political lexicon, in not its finest hour I must say!

The 2000 election year in Florida will be forever remembered as one of the biggest fiascos in modern American election history. Confused geriatric voters that meant to vote for Al Gore but accidentally voted for George W. Bush or so they claimed.

Recounts, court decisions and allegations of election fraud forever seared into memory that Florida presidential politics are perhaps the worst in America. Which begs the question, has Florida become a third world Banana Republic?

This election result causes us to remember a time when Butterfly ballots and Florida State Supreme Court intervention brought the electoral process in the United States to its lowest point in American modern politics. Such is the questionable Florida election process that we have all come to dread and expect.

Many of us while not approving were not disappointed by Fox News who called early the Florida elections for Sen. John McCain. Many of us got the outcome that we expected not the one we had hoped for. An outcome that we don’t trust, in fact for many of us there will never be trust for any election result in the state of Florida ever again.

If New York was ground zero on 9/11 2001, Florida was ground zero on 11/8 2000 the day after elections when thousands began their ascension down on the orange juice state to count Chads in the Florida political heat. A day after the 11/7 Election Day in which the 2000 Presidential Elections resulted in the recount of six million votes in 67 counties in an election process that was described as bizarre and susceptible to manipulation.

So isn’t it more than ironic that in the state that made Diebolt an American election necessity Sen. John McCain would prevail as the anti-Conservative Candidate in the 2008 Republican Florida elections for nominee to be President.

Sen. McCain won among the Geriatric, Independent and Illegal Alien supporters in Florida to which the main stream media will foist the designation of Republican front runner on his diminished 5’ 9” frame.

Governor Romney won among Conservatives but in Florida that’s not enough, in Florida winning among Conservatives in a Republican election is not enough.

Apparently the dynamics which threw the 2000 elections into utter chaos and turmoil are still at play in Florida and at the risk of sounding a little like sour grapes I look at the exit polling which shows McCain wins once again on the strength of the anti-Conservative vote.

So-called Moderates, Independents, Illegal Alien supporters and a demographic of voters who were confused by the butterfly ballot in 2000, are a virtual coalition of the anti-Conservative vote.

Governor Romney will live to fight anew another day but Florida will forever remain the state that couldn’t tell a Republican from a Democrat on the ballot in 2000 and apparently they still can’t!

…And where is the recount?

Stand up and Fight!

Presidential hopefuls Governor Mitt Romney and Sen. John McCain

But I know what it takes to stand your ground and defeat Republicans and I have a track record that proves that.

Nobody else has been through it in the way I have been through it. And I think it’s going to be important to have somebody who will be ready immediately in the campaign to stand up and fight back.—Hillary Clinton

Where are the fighting Republicans?

Listening to the Democrats one would think that all they do is fight. Hillary makes the claim that she has been fighting for 35 years. Here’s Sen. Clinton’s ad demonstrating that she’s a fighter:



Barack claims that he’s a fighter too. He has fought against Conservative ideas. So we know who is fighting against Republicans what we don’t know is who is fighting for Conservative ideas.

Will Senator McCain fight for Conservativism? Will Governor Romney? That’s the problem we don’t know. Though Sen. McCain is supportive on the war there is little else that he is willing to fight for that is important to Conservatives. Romney is a recent born again Conservative that just found Ronald Reagan as his spiritual guide to Conservativism.

While McCain can be described as Conservative on national defense and Romney seems to be an Economic Conservative the question is which one of these men will appoint the strict constructionists judges that are needed to protect the integrity of our Constitution?

According to McCain Judge Sam Alito wears Conservativism on his sleeve and is an example of someone that he wouldn’t appoint as a judge. If that’s the case Judge Alito is who we should be considering for President, as Conservatives, not John McCain.

Because what Conservatives, what Republicans need right now is someone who is not afraid to be a Conservative what we need is someone who is not afraid to proudly demonstrate that fact. Conservatives need not be ashamed, of any of our values if Hillary and Obama can wear their beliefs on their sleeves, and they do, we certainly are entitled.

Hillary and Obama proudly confess their allegiance to Liberalism they don’t care who knows that they hold disdain for Conservatism. They boast of their life long fight against Conservatism. Never do you hear Conservative politicians making claims that they are fighting against the wrong ideas of Liberalism.

Too often John McCain Republicans are to often ready to forsake conservative principles to get along with Liberal Democrats who hate them and everything that they stand for, to borrow a sentiment from Democrat National Chairman Howard Dean.

So as Florida considers which Republican should carry the banner for the Republican Party one thing is certain, there is no prefect candidate but you must remember that George W. Bush came to Washington D.C. stating that he was a uniter and for that he was demonized and made a polarizing figure because Democrats don’t unite with Republicans they fight them.

Congressman Barney Frank speaking on behalf of the Clinton campaign says that Barack Obama would not be the right Democrat to lead his Party because Senator Obama doesn’t know the fights of the 90’s. Democrats and Liberals are still fighting the 90’s fights they are like the Southern Jefferson Davis Confederates who will not acknowledge that the North won the Civil war so they’re still fighting the Civil war.

As long as the Democrats are fighting the fights of the 90’s Republicans need someone who will not appease them. Republicans need a skillful politician that is able to communicate Conservative ideas and idealism, someone who is able to put voice to the ideas of Ronald Reagan. like Barak Obama so rightly recognized Ronald Reagan was able to speak to the hearts and minds of the American people and inspire Americans to put America first.

George Bush was woefully lacking in this regard, John McCain is no better a communicator and less of a committed Conservative.

Conservatives are about preserving the ideas and institutions that make this country uniquely E Pluribus Unum, out of many one, one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

The Change that Liberals are offering is a Balkanizing Multi-cultural special interest divided heavy regulated nation that is contradictory to the American ideas of freedom and unity.

In my opinion John McCain doesn’t represent nor does he fight for Conservativism, John McCain betrays Conservativism.

What we most need now is someone who can articulate Conservative ideas and who is willing to stand up and fight for those ideas.

If Floridian Republicans fail to stand up and fight for the candidate that will most benefit the Conservative cause our country will definitely fall back in the wrong direction.

A bridge to the 20th Century! Fighting the old fights of the 90’s a la Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party.

Clinton Fading from Inevitable

Senator Clinton fading

Employing innuendo and half-truths against Sen. Barack Obama, Sen. Hillary Clinton and her husband, the former President, have introduced the politics of personal destruction to the Democratic presidential campaign. They bear responsibility for cheapening the tone of the contest.

Sen. Clinton began distorting Obama's record in Monday night's debate and yesterday began airing a television attack that twists a recent Obama statement about former President Ronald Reagan to the point of clear inaccuracy. Bill Clinton, meanwhile, has wrongly accused Obama both of injecting race into the debate and of running a negative campaign against his wife. --Daily News

You think that Democrats lying is something new? Then you must be a partisan because for almost 8 years Democrats have relentlessly attacked George Bush and the Republican Party with lies and deceit but it didn’t matter because partisan Democrats believed that Republicans deserve to be lied on and have their record and words distorted.

But what is new is Democrats lying on one another and distorting Democrat words with the perfidy that they usually reserve for Republicans.

Barack Obama just devastated the Democrat field in South Carolina with 55% of the vote in spite of the Clinton campaign’s lies. These are lies that are normally reserved for Republicans and using them against a fellow Democrat poses a major problem for the Clinton campaign because if the Clinton’s win the Party’s nomination they have already shown that they are willing to say and do anything, right or wrong, true or false.

What this means that everything that they say is now cast in doubt. They will not be able to draw honest and principled Independents, Moderates and Liberal John McCain Republicans.

Who is going to believe anything that the Clinton’s say except the hard left partisan Clinton supporter. That means that only those who care nothing about anything except getting Hillary elected for whatever unfathomable reason that they may have, whether it’s because she’s a woman or because she’s a woman. (There’s really no other reason to vote for her) will vote for her.

Hillary’s fade from inevitability comes because the stark reality is her followers can no longer nod their heads collectively and blame Bush, the Republicans and the vast right wing conspiracy for Clintonesque politics of personal destruction.

Because her attacks have targeted fellow Democrats the partisan Democrat zombies that usually hang on her every word are now waking from their lockstep sleepwalk and are questioning Bill’s and Hillary’s truthfulness.

There are some that will never question a Democrat like the rabid Ultra-partisan Eleanor Clift who tries desperately to convince herself that Clinton tactics and lying are actually good for Democrat politics. And there are some like the Los Angeles Times Opinion page that at least raises the question about the Clinton’s and their unscrupulous campaigning.

One thing everyone is willing to acknowledge and that is the Clintons have damaged Democrat politics by exposing Democrat tactics that would normally go unquestioned if those tactics were used against Republicans according to Ronald Brownstein.

Well, that’s not how I heard it, Bob, But if that were the case, you know, we all have to compare and contrast our records. That’s legitimate. You know, the idea that somehow someone’s record, someone’s words are off-limits, I’ve never—I’ve never seen that in American politics, to be, you know, reflective of my experience.

And I think it’s important that we draw these contrast. You’ll have to look at exactly what was said, but that’s up to the commentators. – Sen. Hillary Clinton, To Face the Nation

In her interview on to Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer Sen. Clinton said, “You know, the idea that somehow someone’s record, someone’s words are off-limits, I’ve never—I’ve never seen that in American politics, to be, you know, reflective of my experience.”

Another lie Hillary the facts are your records as first lady of Arkansas and your records as the first lady of the United States of America are locked up safe and sound until 2012 by order of President Clinton. So that puts your record and words off-limits while you send your dumpster divers to dig up Sen. Obama’s Kindergarten essays. Do you think that's fair Hillary?

The lack of access is emerging as an issue in Hillary's presidential campaign: she cites her years of experience as First Lady as one of her prime qualifications to be president. Like other Democratic candidates, she has decried the "stunning record of secrecy" of the Bush administration; her campaign Web site vows to bring a "return to transparency" to government.

But Clinton's appointment calendar as First Lady, her notes at strategy meetings, what advice she gave her husband and his advisers, what policy memos she wrote, even some key papers from her health-care task force—all of this, and much more documenting her years as First Lady, remains locked away, most likely through the entire campaign season. -- Michael Isikoff , NEWSWEEK

After all of the hype of the Clinton campaign we have seen Hillary for ourselves and judged that she is not inevitable she is not even certain to win the Democrat nomination.

If Democrats sign off on Hillary and accept her as their nominee they are making the statement that they approve of her lies, her deceit and her rapist husband. That statement is that the Democrat Party has selected another loser for the third consecutive presidential election and like Hillary the Democrat Party is fading fast into political irrelevance.

Judge the lies and deceit for yourself!

Stimulus transfers Banking and Business debt to Taxpayers

President Bush and Congress complicit in this scheme

My Daddy use to say that there ain't no free government cheese someone's got to pay for it! Likewise there isn't any free government $600 to $1200 dollar checks someone has to pay for them. You ever thought who?

Call me cynical but I found it somewhat disconcerting that the government has to give Americans money in the form of $150 billion dollars of tax refunds and tell Americans to go spent that money shopping in order for the economy to be stimulated.

Aren’t economies supposed to be based on something like, I don’t know, productively? When is consumer spending equal to factory and industrial production of real goods?
What? Is there nothing being produced in America anymore? Are there no jobs from which people can receive adequate salary compensation, we need the government to dole out money like writing checks on an empty checking account because jobs that paid living wages were outsourced to minimize corporate cost while maximizing corporate profits?

That brings us to the question are we so far under government and corporate control that big daddy government has to give us each an allowance and tell us to run along and go to the movies and buy some popcorn?

Am I the only one? Who else is raising this question?

To stimulate the economy the president and congress just voted for $300 to $1200 dollar tax cuts for 117 million families. Now I would be the last person to speak against tax cuts but when these particular tax cuts are tied to the welfare of the economy I’m thinking “house of cards” time and it’s about to all come tumbling down.

Does anyone want to know what’s in the package, how it will work and why the U.S. economy is in such disrepair? This can’t be good. Here on one hand the government is speaking about competing in Global Market economies and on the other hand it is doling out dollars to prop up a U.S. economy that has no economy infrastructure other than spending money at restaurants and Wal-Mart.

It’s like shopping is the only thing what fuels the U.S. economy. Is that true, is the consumer the economic stimulus that fuels our economy? Do you know how crazy that is? Is that why at the beginning of the Iraq war the president admonished us all to continue with our normal lives go shopping and go to the mall?

Maybe you’ve noticed a pattern like me that at every change of Presidential leadership someone decides to siphon off money from the U.S. economy and send the country into a recession. Who are the forces behind this? It happened in 2001 when Clinton was leaving the White house and it is once again happening as Bush is exiting. Maybe they think that we would be too busy with politics to notice.

Now the question is who would be best to lead in this kind of economic crisis? Conventional wisdom would favor the Democrats. The only problem is neither Hillary nor Barack has ever had any executive or business experience. And as Hillary has said on several occasions you need someone who would know what to do the first day that they enter into the White house. Unfortunately that would not be her! Hillary ruled herself out by her own standard of competence.

The only candidate that has the executive and business experience needed to lead in this crisis is Republican Governor Mitt Romney. He is the only one who has run a successful multi-million dollar business and he alone has executive experience as Governor of Massachusetts.

This is not an endorsement of Governor Romney but seeing how most voters are determining their vote based on the candidate’s sex, race or likeability I thought that I would mention that if most American really knew what we face as China, Russia, the EU and Islamic terrorist have joined in attempting to dismantle the U.S. economy, meaning no jobs, no homes and recession. This is happening now no matter what some of the other candidates are promising you.

Maybe Americans should rethink and select a serious candidate with credentials rather than the fairly tale of the first female or black president. (To borrow a term from Bill Clinton)

You want to know how bad it really is? President Bush and a Democrat controlled Congress just sat down together and agreed to give American money that we don’t have to go spend in an economy that is in collapse because of economic policies that have allowed corporations and banks to rip off Americans in sub-prime mortgages and other deceptive business and banking practices.

So you the taxpayer/consumers are being put on the hook to cover the debt that is being passed to you from defaulting banks and corporations because you the consumer/taxpayers could not pay the usurious balloon adjustable interest rates connected to your teaser sub-prime loans.

Banks and business are not going to suffer these losses you the tax payer are going to pay for it.

And because the Government, Banks, and Corporations think that you are stupid it comes in the form of a $600 to $1200 dollar tax refund that you will pay back with interest in stealth taxes which will bail out mortgage companies and banks and business by allowing them to pass on the losses to the American taxpayer/consumers.

You ever seen the Matrix? The human energy cells that the machines derived their power from? That’s you! And Soylent green, that’s you too!

Isn’t it great to be an American! Vote wisely.

Clintons make elections Race and Sex Wars and then Sleep

Bill and Hillary Sleeping at the Reagan Funeral

Bill Clinton said Wednesday he expects blacks to vote for Barack Obama and women to vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton, and the dynamic may cause his wife to lose the South Carolina Democratic presidential primary Saturday.-- CHARLES BABINGTON

Who injected race and sex into the 2008 presidential elections? Well it wasn’t Barack Obama. On the contrary Obama has been doing everything that he can to minimize race as a factor in this election.

While he's awake President Clinton is in South Carolina fighting for every black vote that he can get. And in apparent acts of desperation Bill and Hillary Clinton have played both the race and the sex card in order to split the vote and attempt to give Hillary an advantage according to Dick Morris. (More White people than Black people)

So why is he (President Clinton) making such a fuss over a contest he knows he's going to lose?
Precisely because he is going to lose it. If Hillary loses South Carolina and the defeat serves to demonstrate Obama's ability to attract a bloc vote among black Democrats, the message will go out loud and clear to white voters that this is a racial fight. It's one thing for polls to show, as they now do, that Obama beats Hillary among African-Americans by better than 4-to-1 and Hillary carries whites by almost 2-to-1.

But most people don't read the fine print on the polls. But if blacks deliver South Carolina to Obama, everybody will know that they are bloc-voting. That will trigger a massive white backlash against Obama and will drive white voters to Hillary Clinton.—Dick Morris

Mr. Clinton also attended the Martin Luther King birthday on Monday where he fell asleep right in the pulpit. Not the first time the Clintons have fallen asleep at an important event they used President Ronald Reagan’s funeral to catch up on some much needed rest too. (see picture above)


And then tired of a hard month of dissing Barack Obama, well you know running down your wife’s competition can take a lot out of you, Mr. Clinton fell asleep at the Martin Luther King birthday celebration. (maybe he and Mrs. Clinton suffer from severe Sleep Apnea)

Apparently President Clinton thought it a great idea to grab some shut-eye and have a dream of his own at the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. celebration on Dr. King’s birthday right behind Dr. King’s son Martin Luther King III.

After all Martin III is not the speaker that his daddy was and Mr. Clinton hasn’t campaigned this hard since he whipped George H.W. Bush, H. Ross Perot and then Bob Dole in his own presidential campaigns. So get some rest Bill!



Am I the only one getting the distinct feeling that we are boring the Clintons! Please, someone just wake Mr. and Mrs. Clinton coronate Hillary and get it over with!

Chris Matthews was right

Liberal Pundit Chris Matthews

"[T]he reason she's a U.S. senator, the reason she's a candidate for president, the reason she may be a front-runner is her husband messed around."—Chris Matthews on Senator Hillary Clinton

Mea Culpa, Mea Culpa was Chris Matthews’ forced confession. His sins were that he dared to state the obvious and he dared to tell the truth.

Matthews is the ultra Liberal talk show pundit who normally lands on the correct side of Liberal issues but alas this time he got it terribly wrong. He told the truth.

There is really no accounting for Matthews’ sudden fit of veracity, Tourette syndrome temporary madness or perhaps early Alzheimers can’t tell, but whatever the malady that caused his superfluity of truthfulness Liberals are enraged at him.

Liberals are best known for nodding in mindless unison to any lie just as long as the lie begins or ends with the name George Bush.

Matthews is reported to have said that the only reason that Hillary Clinton is a U.S. senator, a candidate for president or even the front-runner for the Democrat nomination is that her husband the former president Bill Clinton is a philanderer. Matthews’s statement clearly intimating that Senator Clinton political good fortune is due to total unmerited sympathy not a result of any political acumen on her part is something intuitively known by all but apparently considered sacrilege to speak.

But we have recently seen the power of the sympathy vote! In New Hampshire where Hillary demonstrated the “I almost had a tear” speech, women rallied to her cause because apparently they thought they were supporting a sister in distress thus lifting Senator Clinton from a predicted dire two digit defeat in New Hampshire to a historical comeback victory over Senator Obama. Little did they know that Mrs. Clinton was following her scripted campaign agenda which called for her to show a more human side because the polls said that a softer side was a winning formula and did it ever work! Were women ever suckered?

So now National Organization for Women, Feminist Majority and National Women's Political Caucus have sent a joint letter of complaint to NBC News President Steve Capus regarding Matthews’ comments yet these hypocrites never ever defended a single woman that Bill Clinton abused. And believe me there were multiple opportunities for these so-called women’s rights organizations to do so. NOW, Feminist Majority or National Women’s Political Caucus could have defended any of the many women that were assaulted by Bill Clinton why didn't they?

According to JT Thompson of the Hillary project feminist have not been so quick to defend women’s rights when those rights were violated by Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Eileen Wellstone: a 19-year-old English woman who said Clinton sexually assaulted her after she met him at a pub near Oxford where the future President was a student in 1969. It was this rape that caused Clinton to be quietly expelled from Oxford and the loss of his Fulbright Scholarship.

In 1972, a 22-year-old woman told campus police at Yale University that she was sexually assaulted by Clinton while he was a law student at the college. No charges were filed, but retired campus policemen contacted by Capitol Hill Blue confirmed the incident

In 1974, a female student at the University of Arkansas complained that then-law school instructor Bill Clinton groped her and forced his hand inside her blouse. She complained to her faculty advisor who confronted Clinton, but Clinton claimed the student ''came on'' to him. The student left the school shortly after the incident. Reached at her home in Texas, the former student confirmed the incident.

Juanita Broaddrick: a gubernatorial campaign volunteer said Mr. Clinton raped her during a nursing-home-operators convention in Little Rock in April 1978.

From 1978-1980, during Clinton's first term as governor of Arkansas, state troopers assigned to protect the governor were aware of at least seven complaints from women who said Clinton forced, or attempted to force, himself on them sexually.

Gennifer Flowers: In 1992, Flowers claimed she had a 12 year affair with Bill Clinton. Although this was a consensual relationship, he lied to the American people on national television that he was not having an affair.

Flowers was smeared in the media after going public of the affair. "These are the people that literally went out to destroy my life and were very successful in many aspects," reported Flowers. "[Hillary] was the general who gave the directives to her troops to go out and search and destroy."

Sally Perdue: a former Miss Arkansas who said she had a four-month affair with him in 1983. After coming forward, she had her car window smashed, and shotgun shells left on the driver's seat.
Sandra Allen James: a former Washington, D.C., political fund-raiser who said Mr. Clinton invited her to his hotel room during a 1991 campaign trip, pinned her against the wall and put his hand under her dress.

Christy Zercher: an airline flight attendant on Mr. Clinton's 1992 campaign plane, who said Mr. Clinton exposed himself and grabbed her breasts and made explicit remarks about oral sex. A video shot on board the plane by ABC News shows an obviously inebriated Clinton with his hand between another young flight attendant's legs.

German Clinton Float

Carolyn Moffet: a legal secretary in Little Rock in 1979 said, "I was escorted there [Mr. Clinton’s hotel room] by a state trooper. When I went in, he was sitting on a couch, wearing only an undershirt. He pointed at his penis and told me to suck it. I told him I didn't even do that for my boyfriend and he got mad, grabbed my head and shoved it into his lap.

Elizabeth Ward Gracen: a former Miss Arkansas and Miss America who won the crown in 1982, told friends she was forced by Clinton to have sex with him shortly after she won her state crown.

Elizabeth received threatening phone calls, and her belongings were ransacked while Elizabeth was on vacation in St. Martin by 3 men in suits (according to a witness). Her manager Vincent Vento said these intimidating phone callers said "You should really keep your mouth shut about Bill Clinton and go on with your life. You could be discredited. You could have an IRS investigation."

Paula Jones: in a hotel room in 1991, Jones claimed Bill Clinton dropped his pants, exposed himself, and asked for sexual favors from her. In 1994, she filed a lawsuit against Bill Clinton. The case was settled out of court, and Jones was awarded $850,000.

Kathleen Willey, a one-time White House aide, who accused him of groping her. During a November 1993 interview at the White House when, she testified under oath in federal court, Mr. Clinton was "very forceful" in the unwanted sexual advance -- kissing her on the mouth, touching her breasts and putting his hands under her dress.

After coming forward with her allegations, Kathleen Willey had the tires on her car mysteriously punctured with dozens of nails and her cat suddenly disappeared.

Monica Lewinksy – an intern who had an affair with President Clinton while in the oval office. Bill Clinton publicly denied under oath having a sexual relationship with Miss Lewinksy, but was later forced to admit that he did have an "inappropriate relationship", after tape recordings were released during a trial as evidence of the affair. Clinton’s perjury lead to an impeachment trial.

Linda Tripp -- close confidante to Monica Lewinksy was vindictively fired from government service In January 1998 the last day of the Clinton administration, for being a whistle blower.

Tripp gave surreptitiously recorded tapes to then-Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr in exchange for Immunity from prosecution. Tripp disclosed to Starr that she was aware of the relationship between Lewinsky and President Clinton, that Lewinsky had executed a false affidavit denying the relationship that was submitted to the federal court in Arkansas in the Jones v. Clinton lawsuit, and that Lewinsky had attempted to suborn Tripp's perjury in the Jones v. Clinton suit to conceal the Clinton-Lewinsky relationship as well as Tripp's knowledge of the Kathleen Willey incident from the federal court.

As Tripp explained, she was being solicited to commit a crime to conceal evidence in the Jones civil rights case.[5]

Tripp also informed Starr of the existence of a navy blue dress that Lewinsky owned that was impregnated with Clinton's semen. During their friendship, Lewinsky had shown the dress to Tripp and said she intended to have it dry-cleaned; Tripp convinced her not to.

Kim Gandy, NOW's president, said last night that "Chris Matthews is a repeat offender when it comes to sexist attitudes toward women politicians. . . . I wasn't really looking for an apology. I was looking for a behavior change, and for him to treat female politicians the same way as male politicians."

Well if Chris Matthews is a repent offender Ms. Gandy, he’s not the only one. And where was NOW or any of the so-called feminist organizations when Bill Clinton was offending repeatedly? Hypocrites!

Finally I noticed that no one said that Matthews was lying only that his remarks were nasty.

It’s ironic that Hillary Clinton who at worst is complicit in several of Bill Clinton’s cover-ups of his abuse of women or she is at best an enabler of her husband’s wantonly criminal behavior is being defended by National Organization for Women, Feminist Majority and National Women's Political Caucus on behalf of women’s rights.

Rights that Mrs. Clinton herself violated every time she stood by her man against women that he had violated. Chris Matthews was right Hillary would never have gotten where she is if it wasn’t for her appearing to be a victim in Bill Clinton’s a long sorted sexual predatory career. A career where she more often than not was not a victim but Bonnie to his Clyde!

And you want to let this, back into the White house?