About Global warming/Climate change? No. Gore announced that the debate about GW/CC is over he is right about that. Gore's piped piper like arguments has the whole world following and the latest addition to his list of devotees is President Bush.
President Bush has recently announced that his administration wants Congress to pass a law to fight Global warming.
Bush administration officials have told Republicans in Congress that they feel pressure to act now [on Global warming legislation] because they fear a coming regulatory nightmare.--Stephen Dinan
This regulatory nightmare is a world carbon tax that will be imposed on industrial nations by the United Nations backed by profiteers who stand to make trillions of dollars from taxing world economies and changing world energy consumption to sources that these profiteers control.
Instead of Bush challenging Gore's premise as mounting scientific evidence shows that Global warming as Al Gore is presenting it is all wrong, President Bush caves, in "go along to get along" fashion .
Following is a February 2008 presentation that Al Gore gave to the TED corporation it is about 27 minutes long. In it are the usual Global warming doomsday scenarios however about 15 minutes into this pitch to “raise the consciousness” of the world Mr. Gore admits that he is profiting and that he stands to profit a great deal from these initiatives as the whole world starts to comply.
Gore’s final thought is with you the American people and your Congress. His wish is to strip out all opposition in Congress to his plans to change the world and he cites the very plan used to accomplish that in Australia with the newly elected administration there. He also notes that all three current U.S. presidential hopefuls are on board with his program.
President Bush’s about face on this issue is a warning that World Carbon taxes are inevitable no matter if the science of Global warm is wrong the consensus is to be followed. And now Al Gore making his case. And note from the very beginning he wishes to control worldwide behavior. (please play video)
There are a lot of great investments you can make. If you are investing in tar sands, or shale oil, then you have a portfolio that is crammed with sub-prime carbon assets.
And it is based on an old model. Junkies find veins in their toes when the ones in their arms and their legs collapse. Developing tar sands and coal shale is the equivalent. Here are just a few of the investments I personally think make sense.
I have a stake in these so I’ll have a disclaimer there. But geo-thermal concentrating solar, advanced photovoltaics, efficiency, and conservation. – Al Gore
As Gore spoke these words, pictures of electric cars, windmills and solar panels appeared in multiple slides on the screen with company names at the bottom such as Amyris (biofuels), Altra (biofuels), Bloom Energy (solid oxide fuel cells), Mascoma (cellulosic biofuels), GreatPoint Energy (catalytic gasification), Miasole (solar cells), Ausra (utility scale solar panels), GEM (battery operated cars), Smart (electric cars), and AltaRock Energy (geothermal power).
As such, like an investment advisor or stock broker giving a seminar to prospects and clients, Al Gore was actively recommending people put money in companies he already has a financial stake in.
And, as he tours the world demanding nations stop burning fossil fuels, he will financially benefit if they follow his advice and move to technologies that he has already invested in. -- Noel Sheppard
Least you forget Global warm/Climate change is really about Global money, Global profiteering, Global taxes and Global control over people that’s what I hear when I listen to Al Gore, what are you hearing?
I just heard on the news that Barack Obama has criticized former President Jimmy Carter, for meeting with the leaders of Hamas!
Obviously he is annoyed at this development, since he wanted to be the first to meet with terrorist groups such as Hamas, al Qaeda and the like.
Wasn't that part of his "platform" a couple of months ago?......to meet with our terrorist enemies, in order to bring closure to the mid-East problems with these redical groups?
He not only lies through his teeth, he waffles from one side of the issue to the other.
I cannot believe the stupidity of those who are backing this fraud!
Al.............. that debate, or whatever you choose to call it, was an expose of Barack Obama, a man who pretended to be someone that he certainly isn’t!
Those horses ARE, Wright, Ayers, Farrakhan, the Million Man March, saluting the American Flag, and a host of other issues that have neither been completely addressed, nor sufficiently explained by Obama. They will continue being the millstones around his neck..... right through the upcoming elections, should he be the chosen Democratic candidate.
As the those political issues that both Hillary and Barack seemed to somewhat agree on............ their promises show that neither of them is qualified to lead this country. Any sitting president, who is determined to totally disregard the advice of the commanding generals, at a time of war, and recall an ever succeeding army home, is an idiot at best.
As for the “no new taxes on the middle class if elected”, claim....... how closely were you watching their definition of “middle-class”? If the Democrats in Congress allow the Bush tax cuts to expire, and they don’t kill the AMT, anyone making more than $50M per year, is in for the largest tax increase in history. Enough to bring on the most severe recession ever experienced in the US.
Time to stop waving the Obama flag Al........... and let Hillary loose on him. She is just echoing the feelings of most of the electorate, and he deserves everything that he is getting, after having deceived everyone, as to exactly who this Barack Obama really is. Once he is out of the way, she and McCaine can battle it out to the finish. I have no doubt of the outcome of that contest..
Senator Barack Obama found himself consistently on the defensive as he and Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton met Wednesday night in a tense debate that left him parrying questions and criticism on issues including values, patriotism and his association with onetime radicals from the 1960s.-- ADAM NAGOURNEY and JEFF ZELENY
I tuned in expecting a debate last night between Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama but instead the program that was on was Barack Obama’s extremities tied by rope to two horses that were pulling in opposite directions until Obama was ripped part. A debate this wasn’t. This was more like Obama being tortured at Abu Ghraib.
The team of ex-Clinton White house adviser George Stephanopoulos and Charles Gibson both ABC affiliates where the horses while Sen. Clinton was in cool command of the whip of personal destruction which she used unrelentingly to prod her two horses into directions that kept Sen. Obama stretched to the limits all night with limbs about to be pull away from his six foot frame. If given his druthers I’m sure Obama would have preferred water boarding to this piling on of Hillary shills.
Mangled words, Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, Louis Farrakhan, and the American Flag, most of which were Clinton smears (with the exception of the American Flag) brought to bear on Obama in this formal setting giving the smears even more legitimacy. One could see Sen. Obama wilting under the Clinton offensive with shots of Chelsea Clinton in the audience for good measure adding to that subliminal pro-Clinton ABC touch.
There were two salient points in the midst of this Obama Abu Ghraib session. One, both candidate vowed to withdraw troops from Iraq no matter what their Generals and Commanders advised if they were President and two, both candidates vowed no new taxes on the middle class if elected.
Other than those two points it was definitely an all out effort to sway Super delegates and Pennsylvanians to kept Sen. Clinton in the race for the presidency.
Yet I don’t think that Sen. Clinton baggage statement is a very good selling point if she intended to impress Super delegates and Pennsylvanians.
“I have a lot of baggage, and everybody has rummaged through it for years, and so therefore, I have, you know, an opportunity to come to this campaign with a very strong conviction and feeling that I will be able to withstand whatever the Republican sends our way.”—Sen. Hillary Clinton
Fact is Sen. Clinton it is your kind of baggage that we would do well to rid Washington of at the earliest opportunity that we can afford.
Other than show us the entire Democrat playbook this airing of Democrat dirty laundry did nothing to enhance either Democrat candidate’s standing in my opinion.
And then there was Sen. Clinton’s Yes, yes, yes, in response to the question would Sen. Obama be qualified to lead this nation as president, Sen. Clinton don't you realize that that type of blantant reversal still shows your propensity for lying.
What, after all that she has been saying about Sen. Obama’s lack of qualifications to be president she now all of a sudden believes that he is qualified?
In spite of all of the help from ABC in last night’s pile on and torture Obama, Sen. Clinton you still have not given the American people a reason to trust you or entrust you with the most powerful job in the world.
And for Democrats and ABC this pro-Hillary showing was a big No, no, no!
Time after time the MSM and the likes of CNN and CNBC, bend the news to make their leftist points.
The much despised "Christian coalition" FOX NEWS put out a straight-forward news story about Pope Benedict's XVI's trip to the US. They stated on their broadcast that "President Bush welcomes Pope Benedict with a State Dinner. Simple, unadorned and truthful reporting.
Not to be outdone, CNN brings it down to their usual gutter level, with, "White House justifies LAVISH dinner for Pope!" What kind of crapola is this? Are these people so into themselves that everything that isn't falling off the left coast, is something that has to be questioned or justified?
You want justification CNN??? Pope Benedict XVI happens to be a Head of State........ just the same as our President is, Queen Elizabeth is, and Putin was. So take your stupid gripe, along with your bent view of political relations, and stuff it!
I noticed that you haven't tried justifying former President Jimmy Carter's foolhardy and traitorous trip to meet with the leaders of Hamas!
President Bush, first lady Laura Bush and daughter Jenna Bush greet Pope Benedict XVI during the arrival ceremony at Andrews Air Force Base, Md., Tuesday, April 15, 2008. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
America is great because she is good. If America ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.— attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America by Sherwood Eddy, The Kingdom of God and the American Dream, chapter 1, p. 6 (1941)
In the 19th Century a French foreign visitor by the name of Alexis de Tocqueville came to America in an attempt to assess why America was so vibrantly healthy, successful and prosperous. He produced a tome one of the great works of American literature entitled, “Democracy in America” in which he dissected every aspect of American life looking for the answer to his question. In it he said, “The Americans combine the notions of religion and liberty so intimately in their minds that it is impossible to make them conceive of one without the other.” Well a lot has change since de Tocqueville’s visit.
In this the 21st Century Pope Benedict XVI comes to America to assess what is the failing of religion in America. The demonizing of Christianity in America has weakened the Church and the persecution of Christianity in America is just short of some of the more odious anti-religious regimes in current history. Of course the gaiety of a White house welcome is intended to blunt these realities but it won’t be successfully done.
The media has already lined up the running narrative of what will be negative coverage of the papal visit. It has to because what the Pope stands for is so diametrically polar opposite of what America has become and what the media stands for.
Of course the Church has aided in its own persecution by allowing itself the indulgence of sexual perversion and molestation.
In this the Church seems to have reversed its gospel command, “And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind,’ (Romans 12:2) and has became a secularized and marginalized “also ran” in the eclectic mix of poly- philosophic belief systems that make up the United States in the 21st Century.
For de Touqueville religion in America was a given reality. The only question was which form of Christianity was the most influential in this country.
I sought for the greatness and genius of America in her commodious harbors and her ample rivers—and it was not there … in her fertile fields and boundless forests—and it was not there … in her rich mines and her vast world commerce—and it was not there … in her democratic Congress and her matchless Constitution—and it was not there.
Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits flame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power. America is great because she is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.--Attributed to ALEXIS DE TOCQUEVILLE by Dwight D. Eisenhower in his final campaign address in Boston, Massachusetts, November 3, 1952.
For Pope Benedict he will find an American people on the whole ignorant of their Christian heritage and in rebellion against Christian tenets and teachings. Benedict will find superficial Christians who rather sequester themselves behind the four walls of their Churches rather than follow the Great Commission of “go and teach” or Apostle Paul’s edict to, “give everyman a reason for the hope that is within you”
Benedict will find love and total acceptance from the adherents of his faith but a cold austere rebuke is waiting if the Pontiff ventures into the kingdoms that were once offered to the Messiah if He but bow down. Those kingdoms are reserved for the secular real world that religion has no business in, a world in which the Pope or religion really ought not mettle.
Alexis de Tocqueville would not recognize the America which Pope Benedict XVI is visiting today.
Boy am I confused. I have been hammered with the propaganda
that it is the Iraq war and the war on terror that is bankrupting us.
I now find that to be RIDICULOUS.
I hope the following 14 reasons are forwarded over and over
again, until they are read so many times that the readers get
sick of reading them. I have included the URL's for verification
of all the following facts.
1. $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens
each year by state governments. Verify at: http://tinyurl.com/zob77
2. $2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs
such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens. Verify at: http://www.cis..org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html
10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's
two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US Verify at: http: //transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0606/12/ldt.01.html
11. During the year of 2005 there were 4 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens
that crossed our Southern Border also, as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from Terrorist Countries. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin and marijuana, crossed into the U. S from the Southern border. Verify at: Homeland Security Report: http://tinyurl.com/t9sht
12. The National Policy Institute, "estimated that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion or an average
cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.
"Verify at: http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/pdf/deportation.pdf
14. "The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration: Nearly One Million Sex
Crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States."Verify at: http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml The total cost is a whopping $ 338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR.
Are we THAT stupid? Seems the Mayor of Phoenix sure is!
Bilderberg’s head Viscount Davignon. Does this man control the world?
Every year since 1954, a small network of rich and powerful people have held a discussion meeting about the state of the trans-Atlantic alliance and the problems facing Europe and the US. Organised by a steering committee of two people from each of about 18 countries, the Bilderberg Group (named after the Dutch hotel in which it held its first meeting) brings together about 120 leading business people and politicians. –BBC News
I heard an argument the other day which thesis was that Business should be trusted over government. The idea being advanced was we need limited government on the one hand and free trade on the other in order for the United State to effectively compete in this global market. This argument was put forward by a very famous Conservative who is just as wrong about this topic as he is famous.
First the question is not whether we can trust one, government or business, above the other we can not. Both are equally worthy of our disdain. In this much I agree with Sen. John McCain, corporate power should be curtailed.
What is clear is that our founding fathers had a disdain for government. What is apparently unclear is why they did. The founders realized that consolidated power in whichever form it took, government or religion, would be ultimately used against the people. What the founders did not see coming was the entity that we face, unregulated and unrestrained global corporate power. And (here)
That notwithstanding is why they took great pains to warn us against government and that is why they invented the checks and balances of a triadic form of government. The intention was to keep power from consolidating into any one branch of government. In addition, the vote of the people was instituted to ensure that this government would be answerable to the people.
Therefore, Government can be feared slightly less than business because there are these mechanisms in place to make government somewhat responsive to the people and government must comply, if only for appearance sake, to the vote of the people whereas unlike government there is relatively nothing that citizens can do to make business heed the will of the people.
"If we will not endure a king as a political power we should not endure a king over the production, transportation, and sale of any of the necessaries of life."—John Sherman
And don’t trot out the idea that market forces control business. Business has made it it’s business to control market forces as well, business has made it it's business to control governments as I will attempt to argue.
I have previously argued that everything that is wrong with America today can be laid at the feet of Corporations.
Everything that is wrong in America today can be blamed on an out-of-control corporate environment that will do anything and everything for the sake of the bottom line. Profit!—Alaphiah
It was the Oil Corporations that made billionaires and trillionaires in the middle east therefore these Corporations are directly and indirectly responsible for the rise of Islamic terrorism, the war in Iraq, secret Saudi manipulations and funding of terrorists, a brazen Iran and an out of control Venezuela.
Oil revenues provided by corporations have lead to the undermining of the Western way of live through the Middle East control of oil prices and have set the stage for an upcoming mother of all jihads, battle of economic power between the West and the East.
Without the oil revenues that corporations made possible Islamist would still be running around in the Middle Eastern deserts waging tribal wars against one another instead of the global terrorism that we are daily forced to contend with.
With only regard for their own enrichment Oil Corporations have put the world in grave danger by placing the world economic power in the oil reserves of the Middle East thus changing the balance of economic power from the West to the East.
As testament to this even as you read this the U.S. dollar is being replace by the Euro which in turn will be replaced by what ever currency that oil enriched nations decide will benefit their objectives, business and otherwise, of world domination.
In addition to the just mentioned Middle Eastern investors and bankers are buying up U.S. debt placing the United States in the power of foreign creditors. This is a world that unregulated and unrestrained corporations have created not government!
America is in the last throes of a decadent sexualized wanton hedonistic consumer driven society in which value is only placed in how much money one can make and/or what one can eat, wear, play with and have sexual relationship with for the moment.
It is corporations that have worked hard to appeal to our most debased appetites in effort to condition us to buy their latest little i-phone or i-pod bobble which to entertain ourselves to death with while simultaneously increasing their bottom line.
Every aspect of one’s life is now controlled by Corporations what you hear, what you watch where you work or if you work. America is truly at the mercy of corporate power.
And we allow these controlling corporate bodies to virtually manipulate every aspect of our lives from who to vote for to which automobile to purchase. From health care, HMO’s and Pharmaceuticals unregulated and unrestrained corporations are the cause for the economic woes of the United States of America.
"The combined profits for the ten drug companies in the Fortune 500 ($35.9 billion) were more than the profits for all the other 490 businesses put together ($33.7 billion).
Over the past two decades the pharmaceutical industry has moved very far from its original high purpose of discovering and producing useful new drugs. Now primarily a marketing machine to sell drugs of dubious benefit, this industry uses its wealth and power to co-opt every institution that might stand in its way, including the US Congress, the FDA, academic medical centers, and the medical profession itself."-- Marcia Angell, M.D.
Last, but certainly not least, how is the world food supply holding up? Well since control of the world’s food supply has fallen under corporate control even food is being mismanaged.
Food is being genetically altered or becoming scarce because of use for biofuels either of which has exposed and left vulnerable world food supplies.
From food to energy and to medicine unregulated and unrestrained corporate business have remained unaccountable for all of the world-wide disasters that they have caused.
How anyone can argue that government should be limited with respect to controlling corporations is beyond me and not to mention that thought is not in line with concepts of liberty and freedom and certainly not in line with what is best for America.
Phil Gordon, Mayor of Phoenix Arizona is an enemy of the United States of America. Why? Mayor Gordon is using the United States’ own laws and it’s Constitution against it in order to help foreign nationals in their goal to reconquer Azlan.
What is Azlan? Here’s is what Phoenix news.com had to say about it, and here’s some commentary from La Indymedia.org regarding a threat against a La Raza school in Los Angeles which the writer believes is because of the white man’s fear of Azlan philosophy. Better yet here’s a student MeCHA club at Western Oregon University giving the history of Azlan. Finally here Pat Buchanan warning back in 1996 as reported by Drudge about the plan to reconquer Azlan. Read and decide for yourself.
Mayor Gordon has asked the FBI to interfere and intercede against Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the only elected sworn official of Phoenix who is attempting to protect the United States.
The Mayor is attempting to prevent the sheriff from protecting the United States from those who would violate her immigration laws.
ICE officials say Arpaio is not violating the formal agreement he has with their office that allows sheriff's deputies to enforce immigration laws.
In an April 4 letter to U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey, Mayor Phil Gordon asked the agency and the Justice Department's civil rights division to examine what he called discriminatory harassment and improper stops, searches, and arrests by sheriff's deputies in Maricopa County, which encompasses the metropolitan area.
Yet Mayor Gordon and the U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey are conspiring against the United States of America claiming phony civil rights violations against Sheriff Arpaio in an effort to aid and abet foreign nationals who violate immigration laws.
Can you believe it? In this topsy-turvy world of civil rights for foreign nationals and public officials who act to enforce these false rights, it is the citizens of the United States who are being cheated of their rights by these actions.
Mayor Gordon and U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey should be immediately thrown out of office and Sheriff Arpaio should be supported and commended.
Enough of the anti-Americanism from public officials, down with Gordon and Mukasey and down with elected officials who violate the spirit and letter of the law in attempts to destroy this union.
I can't believe that the liberals are still sucking their Kool-aid!
What has to happen before they believe that this Obama is a fraud? He presented himself as a "uniter" (he figured it worked for Bush) but has never reached across the aisle, except for a couple of bills that he thought would help his image.
What kind of a President would he make? He doesn't salute our flag, he won't wear the small American flag pin on his lapel, he associates with known terrorists and a "Reverend" who insults the spirit of Christianity. How dumb can the American voter be?
I don't care what people call me.......... racist, bigot, etc. I call the shots as I see them............ and let the chips fall where they may. Obama can attempt to explain away his associations, but when you lie down with dogs, you get fleas.
"Reverend Wright" was his pastor, confidant, friend and counselor for some 23 years. He married the Obamas and christened their two children. Over this period of years, not a short time I might add, Barack had dozens of opportunities to discover just what a bigotted, racist, unpatriotic man Wright is................ and yet, he continued his close association. Does anyone really believe that he had no idea of where the "Reverend" was coming from?
First........ when the news about Wright broke, Obama played typical politician, and disclaimed any knowledge of the vitriolic sermons......stating that had he known of them, he most certainly would have expressed his dissatisfaction to his mentor. I don't believe that for one minute!
As the facts would have it, when he found himself caught in a lie (not a small one, I might add), he spoke publically at length, but somehow managed to turn the conversation toward race, and just skirted the real issue. This outcry wasn't about race............. though Wright is definitely a racist............ but about pride in country and patriotism. We all had to suffer through Obama's labored explanations, even involving his grandmother, who was described as a "typical white person". One thing that was conveniently left out, was an open and honest explanation of why he had lied about sitting in the church hearing those sermons, in the first place. But I guess he figured that he had masked the whole situation with the race-bait. The really amazing part of this is, that Obama, the DNC, the Democratic strategists, and most of the liberal MSM, just can't understand why we keep revisiting this situation. What part of lies and deceit don't any of them understand?
Now, as more comes to light over Obama's "friendship" with the organizer of the "weathermen", who has a total lack of remorse over the bombings at the Capital, NYC Police Headquarters, and other government facilities...... those same lame-brains are wondering why people are getting upset once again. This is even a more serious situation than the Wright controversy, and is going to require a lot more detailed explaining.
I want to know just how "friendly" Obama and Ayers really are..... and what Obama really thinks about his participation in these terrorist operations. I also will not feel completely comfortable, until an in-depth investigation of Obama is done. On the surface, his wife seems cold and uncaring.... in spite of the fact that she had the benefit of attending the best schools in the world, received her degrees, became an attorney, and earns well into the six figures each year.
And THIS is the first time that she is proud of her country?..... only because her husband is in the Democratic primaries??? Where was she when we caused the collapse of one of the most oppressive regimes in history, the Soviet Union, where was she when we were feeding, clothing and protecting million around the globe?......... where was she when they were teaching American history? She got hung up on slavery in America, and still hasn't gotten past that. In her thesis, she states that she is FIRST AND FOREMOST BLACK............ and THEN everything else. She should be an American, who happens to be black. But then, I guess that she got to where she is BECAUSE she is black, and had the benefit of Affirmative Action. So she made it all about race!
For the reasons above,............ I am totally uncomfortable with the idea of an Obama presidency. I hope that the American people will see through this sham, and vote according to their own brains and hearts.
Will someone turn the Global warming up ‘cause its Cold! I’m never amazed at how gullible people are. Sure we all are concerned about our environment and our planet but to allow people to use our concerns against us in this Global warming/Climate change scheme indicates that people in general have lost the ability to reason when so many people are assaulting reason on the topic of Global warming/Climate change.
You’ve probably heard that Los Angeles that bastion of common sense, logic and reason is considering imposing a Global warming tax on its citizens. Oh you haven’t heard?
Well its billed as a "climate change mitigation and adaptation fee,” it targets LA motorist and according to the Orange County Register it would cost motorists either an additional 3 percent motor fuel tax, or up to a $90 annual flat fee, based on vehicle emissions. The new charges would be on top of taxes already paid at the pump. Either option requires a majority approval by a vote of the people.
But wait, what scientific fact(s) is this new Global warming tax based on? Why it’s not base on scientific facts, which support the theory of Global warming/Climate change at all. No, Assemblyman Mike Feuer’s, a Los Angeles Democrat and author of California Assembly Bill 2558, reason for attempting to impose about $400 million in additional taxes on the people of Los Angeles is in his words, "At this point the people of the Los Angeles region have just had it when it comes to traffic and air quality,"
Okay he said “air quality” so I’m guessing that that ties into Global warming/Climate change in some way that Californians only understand.
But really to attempt to sneak a new tax on the people of California on something that they are already paying taxes for “traffic congestion and air quality” by labeling it a Global warming/Climate change is simply unconscionable Assemblyman Feuer. But to have the people vote on taxing themselves on your scheme is criminally insane sir and you should be recalled at the earliest opportunity.
Global warming at best amounts to less than a degree of temperature increase during the past century. If the recent several-year cooling trend is an indication, global warming may be going away.
But because the only "proof" of long-term catastrophic consequences lies in contrived computer models, politicians like Mr. Feuer can insist even as temperatures decline that doomsday still lies ahead unless people tax themselves to fix the problem.—The Orange County Register
But it is not only the little peon politicians who are attempting to abscond with your Global cash the World bank knows a patsy when it sees one (that would be you) and is already plotting on getting all of those “Global warming/Climate change” billions of dollars when you my friend are taxed on your carbon emissions which is coming soon, the tax that is.
At the week-long Bangkok conference, the World Bank pushed its proposals for a $5-10 billion Clean Technology Fund, a $500 million "adaptation" fund and possibly a third fund dealing with forestry.
However, developing countries want climate change cash to be administered through the existing United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC), which they feel is much less under the control of the Group of 8 (G8) richest countries. --Ed Cropley
What’s at stake here is that rich nations, countries like the United States, would be taxed billions of dollars for their carbon emissions and that money will be given to poor nations as payment for our environmental sins. It’s true!
What? You thought that Global warming/Climate change was about saving the Earth? Wrong again it’s about wealth transfer and the World Bank wants in on this cash cow and its cut of the loot.
Before they agree to any sort of restrictions on emissions of the greenhouse gases fuelling global warming, poor countries want firm commitments of billions of dollars in aid from their rich counterparts.
The money will be used for everything from flood barriers against rising sea levels to "clean" but costly power stations, an example of the "technology transfer" developing countries say they need to curb emissions of gases such as carbon dioxide. --Ed Cropley
It’s the Global warming/Climate change hokey-pokey and taking your money is what it’s all about!
Finally, all this talk about the revenues that Global warming/Climate change will produce we forgot the important stuff like actual Global warming!
Well according to David Archibald, a solar scientist speaking at the "Greener Skies 2008" conference an environmental confab in Hong Kong recently this year Global warming/Climate change is mostly dictated by solar cycles, not carbon dioxide levels, as conventional wisdom suggests.
And to top that bit of shocking news off Archibald told the scientist gathered to hear about global warming that they should figure out ways of increasing CO2 output because the sun is not as giving as in the past. More Carbon Dioxide?
In other words according to Archibald trends of Global cooling are afoot. If there is the remotest possibility that Archibald is correct the schemes to collect all of that Global loot would be put in jeopardy so you can believe that Archibald will be silenced even though the Earth hasn’t warmed since 1998.
Was Iraq worth it? That's the economic question Democrats are again highlighting because of Gen. David Petraeus's congressional testimony this week. And implicit in that question is the assumption that even if the surge works and Iraq someday ends up as a democratic capitalist, antiterrorist ally of America, the price has been too high—James Pethokoukis
Democrats wish to frame the argument for leaving Iraq in terms of “blood and treasure,” meaning that the cost is too great both in American lives and tax payer’s money and they want to just leave. They wish to quit without regard to the consequences of that action.
Though there is no denying that the cost is great in American lives and resources. I believe that the cost is worth every life lost and every dollar spent if we defeat those who are attempting to destroy this country.
Newt Gingrich appearing on Hannity and Combs and speaking to Allan Combs put it another way when asked by Combs, how can the American people vote for someone who is out of sync with the American people’s present views on the war in Iraq?
Gingrich adeptly pointed out to Mr. Combs that he (Combs) was asking the wrong question the proper question is, are the consequences of defeat too great for America if Congress manufactures America’s defeat by sabotaging American’s war efforts. (See video)
And then James Pethokoukis of Capital Commerce says it in another way when crunching the numbers in his, “The Cost of Not Liberating Iraq.”
Mr. Pethokoukis’ cost analysis list the cost of containing Iraq, which is what we would have had to do had we not put Saddam out of power, at $350 billion to $700 billion dollars, he projects that gas prices would have risen because of our containment activities, and that the U.S. economy notwithstanding recent economic news has done remarkably well in the five years of war.
Real GDP has increased by 16 percent, or 3 percent annually. The unemployment rate has hovered below a historically low 5 percent for quite some time. Nearly 10 million jobs have been created. Household net worth has increased by $20 trillion. Industrial production has expanded by 13.5 percent.
Even home prices, despite the current correction, have increased by 20 percent. Global GDP has averaged nearly 5 percent annually. The capitalization of the world's stock markets increased 159 percent, or $35 trillion. Meanwhile, new emerging-market economies saw their stock market index collectively rise by 223 percent.
In all I agree with Gingrich and Pethokoukis. Gingrich believes that if Congress manufactured a defeat in Iraq it would hurt America’s image in the world and if we withdraw or if we were defeated. Defeat would signal to the world that America's word is no good and American can’t be trusted to live up to it’s commitments.
Pethokoukis thinks that politicians who talk about the cost of the war are disingenuous when they do nothing about the $2trillion dollar crisis in additional long-term liabilities that is soon to be facing the United States. Also he cites a strong U.S. economy during the war, though that has recently changed.
The consequences of losing are too great of a price for America to pay and this Congress should cease attempting to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory and let Gen. Petraeus and the U.S. military win this war without anymore interference.
Gen. David Petraeus, left, accompanied by Ambassador Ryan Crocker (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Democrats plan to push legislation this spring that would force the Iraqi government to spend its own surplus in oil revenues to rebuild the country, sparing U.S. dollars.-- ANNE FLAHERTY
Bet you never thought you’d see that title here, but when you’re right you’re right. I thought that I would never see anything positive come out of a Committee Chaired by Democrats about the Iraq war but this one thing did.
Iraq has about $30 billion in surplus funds stored in U.S. banks, according to Sen. Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) and this is one point that we can all agree, Iraq should use those funds to rebuild their country.
I believe everyone agrees that the American tax payers have shouldered tremendous financial and personal cost in this 5 year war and Iraq is not exactly cash strapped. What the Democrats are proposing is not only acceptable but sensible in this regard.
Iraq is looking at a potential boon in oil revenue this year, possibly as much as $100 billion in 2007 and 2008. Meanwhile, the U.S. military is having to buy its fuel on the open market, paying on average $3.23 a gallon and spending some $153 million a month in Iraq on fuel alone.
This recommendation is but one of the positive developments coming out of the SASC hearings the other is Gen. Petraeus’ professional assessment of the war.
Petraeus is recommending to the President the withdrawal of the 20,000 extra troops. Beyond that, the general proposed a 45-day period of "consolidation and evaluation," to be followed by an indefinite period of assessment before he would recommend any further pullouts.
Democrats should accept this aspect of Gen. Petraeus’ plan too; it wouldn’t hurt to be right twice in the same day now would it?
The Huffington Post and the Daily Kos should be ashamed to face the world. Their disgusting posts after the death of Charlton Heston, were unworthy of even such degenerative websites.
To wish agonizing deaths on the likes of former First Lady Nancy Reagan, and celebrate the death of such steadfast Americans as Mr. Heston, shows the low level to which the likes of Arriana and Kos will stoop.
But I guess when you are that far down into the gutter, it isn't such a big step after all.
Convening today are the Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations committees where General David Petraeus returns to a partisan divided Capital Hill.
There will be three simultaneous things happening in those hearings Gen. Petraeus will be attempting to give an assessment of the conditions as they are in Iraq.
Democrats will be attempting to justify their anti-Bush stance by insisting that no substantial political progress has been achieved in Iraq.
And Republicans will be attempting to justify their support for the war and argue for its successful completion.
What is undeniable is that the Iraqi people have changed their sentiments with regards to al Qaeda in Iraq. Iraqis now view al Qaeda with distain because of the shear brutality with which al Qaeda indiscriminately destroyed property and killed fellow Muslims.
Iraq’s are rejecting al Qaeda’s presence in Iraq largely because of the way that America has conducted itself in this war.
America has allowed the Iraqis to see a clear distinction between the way we fight and the way that al Qaeda wages war.
It is not so much that America has won the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people it is more that al Qaeda lost the hearts and minds of the Iraqis.
Our role is to deal a blow to Al-Qaeda and the militias, wherever they may be. The militias, by the way, also play a role in Iraq, when it comes to the displacement of people and mass murder.--Sheik Ali Hatem Ali Seliman
In the following remarkable example Sheik Ali Hatem Ali Seliman issues a fatwa against al Qaeda fighters in Iraqi
And in this video clip U.S. soldier Maj. Gen. Kevin Bergner remarks on the change of attitude with which al Qaeda has achieved “personae non gratae” status and with the help of the Sunni Muslims who once helped al Qaeda the U.S. is finding intelligence to aid in destroying al Qaeda.
I’m betting that because this is a remarkable victory for the American forces it will not even be brought up in these hearings.
But in essence America as won, we have won at last the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people.
To abandon them or to betray them by immediately withdrawing troops at this time would be a slap in the face of all those Iraqis who are now standing up to al Qaeda because they feel supported by America.
Sens. Obama and Clinton lose this discussion if they suggest anything but support for the mission and its successful completion with victory!
I wish that the rest of us in the West, had the courage of this gentleman from England. He is voicing what I and many that I know, have felt for a very, very long time.
It is impossible for me to reproduce the entire article here, so I will just attach the link. I hope that those who view this will wake up and smell the coffee, before it is too late.
We can be slow as well to give greatness its due, a mistake I made myself long ago when I voted against a federal holiday in memory of Dr. King.
I was wrong and eventually realized that, in time to give full support for a state holiday in Arizona. We can all be a little late sometimes in doing the right thing…--Sen. John McCain, 4/5/08 40th Anniversary of Dr. King’s assassination
For three solid weeks, if not a month, my fellow Republicans pounded Sen. Barack Obama for the words and actions of another man, his former pastor of 20 years Rev. Jeremiah Wright. The inference being made was that because Sen. Obama chose to attend Pastor Wright’s congregation Obama is a racist.
I repeatedly warned this was a path that we did not needed to take nor that we should have wanted to take to defeat Sen. Obama because though it made sense to some of us I believed this attack would not gain traction among Obama supporters.
I was right the Rev. Wright story while it dissuaded some did not sufficiently harm the Obama campaign rather it made Republicans look as if we where desperately attempting to attack Sen. Obama by any means necessary. Meaning by projecting Republican’s own weakness onto Sen. Obama that weakness was and is Racism.
So it was only fitting that standing in front of the Lorraine Hotel this past weekend where 40 years ago Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King was assassinated Republican Presidential nominee Sen. John McCain was booed for obliquely acknowledging his own racist past as a 47 year old Senator who voted against making Dr. King’s birthday a national holiday. (Transcript of McCain’s remarks)
For years the state of Arizona refused to recognize the day as a day of significance making Arizona the last state to do so. Sen. John McCain is the classic kind of Racist yet the same holier-than-thou Republicans who excoriated Sen. Obama and Rev. Wright have seemed to have forgotten the history of their own racist candidate, John McCain.
This would be but a foot note in the 2008 presidential campaign were it not for Republicans who self righteously have whipped themselves up in a racial frenzy regarding Sen. Obama’s former pastor Rev. Wright connecting Obama by inference to Wright’s words and ultimately suggesting that because Obama listened to Wright and was a member of Wright’s congregation that Obama somehow bears responsibility for Wright’s words and actions. Republicans have gone as far to label Sen. Obama a racist because he was a member of Rev. Wright’s congregation.
But with Sen. McCain we have no secondary party guilt, no we have McCain’s own words and actions they convict him of the actual racism, racism which Republicans attempt to project on Sen. Obama by association. Sen. McCain’s racism led him to actions, such as voting against the King Holiday and working against acknowledging Dr. King’s accomplishments.
While Sen. McCain attempted to hide behind the military and his POW experience his racism is clearly evident. On Friday McCain said, “I remember first learning what had happened here on the 4th of April, 1968, feeling just as everyone else did back home, only perhaps even more uncertain and alarmed for my country in the darkness that was then enclosed around me and my fellow captives.”
Yet when McCain arrived home and became a Senator at the age of 47 he voted against a national King Holiday in 1983 and according to Buzzflash.com McCain supported efforts in his state of Arizona to repeal the King Holiday in 1987 and opposed the Holiday even as late as 1989.
In 1994 McCain continued his assault on civil rights and voted against funding the commission that’s purpose was to promote the King Holiday.
John McCain’s actual racism in action is the difference between him and Obama. Obama according to Republicans is guilty of going to Rev. Wright’s congregation. McCain is guilty of overt racism and racist acts against the memory of the icon of the civil rights movement in this country Dr. Martin Luther King specifically and against Black people in general. When asked about his record on civil rights Sen. McCain instead of being repentant often becomes combative as he did in this interview about his opposition to the King Holiday.
See how Republican candidate John McCain lies as he attempt to hide behind this POW and military experience as the reason that he didn’t know about racism in American, McCain suggest that there was no racism in the military so he didn’t understand and he had to learn how important Dr. King was.
Though it has been stated that Obama was a member of Wright’s church for twenty years there has not been produced one act of racism on Sen. Obama part.
Furthermore Rev. Wright has been labeled anti-American and racist in spite of the fact that he served his country as a U.S. Marine.
It is being advanced by some Republicans that Wright preaches hate yet there can not be attributed to Wright one instance when the people of his church after a sermon poured out into the streets and rioted, not one burning cross on white people’s lawns, not one lynched white person, not one bombed white church, no one shot, no one killed, no suicide bombings and no one committed any act of violence whatsoever that would support the contention that Rev. Wright was promoting hatred.
Either Rev. Wright is the most ineffectual preacher that ever stood in a pulpit or perhaps his messages where not advocating death and destruction of white America. Wright must feel incompetent, after twenty years of preaching we would have expected at least one roadside bomb in America or one beheading or act of Wright inspired violence wouldn’t we?
Osama bin Laden says the word and hundreds of thousands of people are willing to sacrifice themselves to kill their enemies so what’s wrong with Wright’s preaching that he can’t produce the same results? You saw the videos you heard the messages you’d certainly think that those awe inspiring messages would have produced some action in the last twenty years wouldn’t you?
Yet, John McCain though reserved about his religious beliefs and affiliations did act in a way that was consistent with hate and racism by opposing the efforts of Black people to be treated equally and by opposing legislation that would honor Dr. King a man who epitomized equality.
The irony is no matter how one justifies their hate for Rev. Wright and Sen. Obama there was no actions put to the words of Rev. Wright, words that Republicans are so viscerally attacking.
Yet the soon to be leader of the Republican Party, Sen. John McCain 40 years after the death of Dr. King and now because he is running for president of the United States is now just realizing that maybe he should apologize for his acts of opposition against Blacks and a holiday in the honor of Dr. King.
All Republicans and moderate Democrats alike who vilified Obama via Rev. Wright are now finding that the chickens are coming home to roost in their own racist and very flawed candidate. And if they feel as strongly as they do about Obama’s alleged racism then they must denounce John McCain as strongly as they’ve denounced Obama and Wright.
McCain’s sins are his own not another man’s.
I attempt to warn Republicans not to go down this road against Obama when there were so many other viable ways of demonstrating that Obama should not be president yet you did and now you are caught, trapped in your own self righteous piety.
Now in order not to be seen as completely hypocritical McCain must be denounced with the same visceral hatred as you used against Sen. Obama.
McCain can’t be allowed to hide behind his POW and military experience as an excuse as if he knew nothing about racism in America as if there was no racism in the military. To hear McCain tell it he didn’t understand the importance of Dr. King’s work until he was convinced of it by others.
McCain was a grown man a U.S. Senator and he had to be convinced that civil rights work was justified?
Your racism was only a mistake Sen. McCain? It is interesting how running for President can make one realize that racism is wrong but to use the 40th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s death to excuse your racism and campaign on that day Sen. McCain is still wrong.
And yes you were wrong to harbor racist attitudes as you are wrong to think that your convenient “I found Jesus” moment in front of the Lorraine Hotel on April 4, 2008 is any consolation for the over 40 years history of your racist life Sen. McCain.
The Continent of Antarctica hasn’t warmed since 1979
Let’s put this in perspective. The account [Wilkins Ice Shelf collapse] may be misinterpreted by some as the ice cap or a significant (vast) portion is collapsing.
In reality it and all the former shelves that collapsed are small and most near the Antarctic peninsula which sticks well out from Antarctica into the currents and winds of the South Atlantic and lies in a tectonically active region with surface and subsurface active volcanic activity. The vast continent has actually cooled since 1979 – Icecap
Like many of you I was astonished when I saw the video of the Wilkins Ice Shelf collapse in Antarctica. Unlike many of you I was skeptical enough not to accept the dinosaur media’s account without a little further investigation.
The reports all touted the fact that the huge enormity of area that this particular Ice Shelf covered as well as the event itself demonstrated more proof of Global warming.
However there is another side to this story. So if everyone can just step back a little and take a breath.
The crops are not all about to die because of Global warming and we are not going to all be forced into cannibalism because of Global warming. Oh and another thing just because you’re rich doesn’t mean that you’re smart. I think you will see what I mean in a moment.
The Ice in Antarctic is not melting at a dangerous rate because of Global warming. In reality temperatures have been cooling on the continent since 1979.
Yet this MSNBC report filed by Andrea Thompson gives the unwarranted impression that one, the shelf collapse was due to Global warming and two, this collapse was an enormous Ice mass.
Wrong on both counts tectonic activity (earth movement) was the cause of the Wilkins Ice Shelf collapse not Global warming as reported. This movement is usually associated with Earthquakes, volcanic activity, mountain-building and oceanic trench formation and secondly in relations to the vast geographic region of Antarctica the Wilkins Ice Shelf collapse is but a small section of ice in comparison. The picture above demonstrates how large and cold the area is which we are discussing.
According to Joseph D’Aleo a certified consulting meteorologist last year the Antarctic set a new record for ice growth and this summer a unprecedented snow fall covered the southern hemisphere but you didn’t hear that in the media did you? Why? I think we all know why. That type of news doesn’t fit in with the popular media meme of Global warming.
D’Aleo claims that recent reports citing Global warming as the fault for the phenomena in Antarctica are misleading. According to D’Aleo in comparison to the vast ice mass of Antarctica the Wilkins ice sheet break amounts to an icicle falling from a snow and ice cover roof. No big deal.
It is also D’Aleo claim that,
…winter is coming on quickly. Satellite images show the ice has already refrozen around the broken pieces and expanded. In fact the ice is returning so fast, it is running an amazing 60% ahead (4.0 vs 2.5 million square km extent) of last year when it set a new record.
The ice extent is already approaching the second highest level for extent since the measurements began by satellite in 1979 and just a few days into the Southern hemisphere fall season and 6 months ahead of the peak. (In other words Antarctica’s ice is growing not shrinking because of Global warming.)
We are very likely going to exceed last year’s record. Yet the world is left with the false impression Antarctica’s ice sheet is also starting to disappear.
Speaking of false impressions, these are the false impressions that drive the discussion on Global warming in all areas of our society. In politics candidates often pander to constituents regarding what they will do about Global warming as Sen. Barack Obama did recently by promising that Al Gore will be at the table of his Global warming problem solving if he is elected President. Sen. Obama promised to insert the controversial Al Gore in the middle of an already highly contested social subject. (see for yourself)
Not everyone is convinced like people at an Obama rally apparently are, that the Climate is warming by anthropogenic means or that Al Gore is anything more than a Global warming con man.
Yet inspired by and because of Mr. Gores propaganda millions of people believe in man-made Global warming in spite of facts that point to no Global warming since 1998 and that man’s CO2 emissions or Carbon footprint have relatively nothing to do with earthly temperature increase.
Media mogul Ted Turner
A recent Court ruling in Great Britain found that Gore exaggerated his case in his film, “An Inconvenient Truth.” Yet media mogul Ted Turner is so taken by Gore’s arguments that Turner has taken the liberty to add a few Hillary Clinton enhancements to the story of Global warming.
According to Turner crops will fail and we all devolve into cannibalistic sub-humans by the year 2025 because of Global warming. Listen to the rantings of a fellow all hyped up like a junkie on Gore propaganda: (see video)
Joseph D’Aleo says that earth movement, wind and sea caused the Wilkins Ice Sheet break off and in any event temperatures are so cold in Antarctica that the self is already frozen back a far different story than was report by Andrea Thompson on MSNBC but you will only hear the MSNBC story and think that the world is coming to an end like Ted Turner if you get your news from CNN or MSNBC.
Now we know why Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid believes that the Iraq war is lost and that the surge is a failure in spite of the evidence to the contrary which is we are winning the war and the surge is a huge success.
Reid is a Liberal and by definition that means he is a contrarian, whatever the facts are, people like Reid will say or believe the opposite. This is especially true if the facts are present by anyone who a Liberal believes is connected to the Republicans in any way.
You remember General David Petraeus’ report before the Congress on surge in Iraq? Moveon.org condemned Petreaus before they heard one word of testimony and several Democrat Senators, Hillary Clinton was one, contradicted Petraeus’ every factual claim.
They were all wrong. Petraeus was right!
No clearer example of this is this interview where interviewer Jan Helfeld makes the statement that the government forces people to pay taxes. Sen. Reid takes exception at that statement and attempts to contradict Helfeld by arguing that taxes are not forced the American people pay taxes voluntarily. (Do you?)
This is a free country right? So if you decided, “I’m not paying a single penny more in taxes!” Could you just flat out stop paying your voluntary taxes?
The Democrats are set to increase their majority status in the Congress this election year and the country will be at the mercy of people who think like Senator Reid. Do we really want that? Before you answer you might want to take a look at this! (Please view video)
Al and Tipper Gore sharing a intimate moment with us all
If neither Mr Obama nor Mrs Clinton has the 2,025 delegates needed to win the nomination, and if both appear unable to beat Mr McCain, under one scenario a group of about 100 party elders - the "super-delegates" - could sit out the first ballot in Denver, preventing either candidate winning outright, and then offer Mr Gore the nomination for the good of the party.-- Tim Shipman
They're kidding right?
Democrats want the win in November and fearing that their two History making candidates who have fought their way to the top of their nomination process are flawed beyond electability they are casting about for an alternative.
But Al Gore? Really? Has desperation brought them so low that their two history making prospects, a Black man and a woman, makes even Al Gore look tenable?
What has brought the high flying Democrats to this nadir? Need I remind you that it was Al Gore that single handedly caused the ultra-partisanship that drives the hate from the left today?
Gore conceded to George Bush on election night November 1999 and upon advice from his advisers took his concession back thus launching the country into the nasty bitterness that divides us today.
At a time when Gore could have shown statesmanship and conceded graciously for the good of the country he chose the divisive road of counting Chads that led to the red state blue state divide. So the father of Global warming can lay claim to the fact that he invented the reason that Democrats are so crazed today.
So it is not at all surprising that the conflict that Democrats openly waged against Republicans has found its way home inside the Democrat camp. Boy Karma is great isn’t it?
Eight years of total Bush bashing and the politics of personal destruction have commentated into Democrats virtually destroying one another with the same tactics, dirty tricks and lies that they used against Republicans, they’re using these things against one another.
No matter who comes out of this dog fight they will be crippled in their future attacks against Republicans because no one, but the dumbest partisan Democrat is going to believe the things Democrats say about Republicans are anything but some fake “paint by the numbers” scripted play book attacks that they will use against anyone Democrat or Republican.
So after waging attacks against one another that would normally be reserved for Republican enemies both Democrat candidates are severely wounded prompting senior Party Democrats to consider the prospects of dumping both the front runner Sen. Barack Obama and his challenger Sen. Hillary Clinton at the Democratic Convention by withholding their Superdelegate votes in the first round of voting and when neither candidate has enough votes to claim the nomination they would then draft Al Gore to be the Democrat nominee.
So much for disenfranchising Democrat voters and count every vote, every vote counts, Democrat Party leaders would simply void out their whole primary election casting aside hundreds of thousands of votes. But it would be for the good of the Party!
Do Democrats honestly believe that anyone but them would have Al Gore this Global warming charlatan and profiteer as the President of the United States?
Well maybe Europeans would but the last I checked they're not voting in American elections or are they voting too along with the illegals?
By all accounts this was supposed to be the Democrat’s year yet it appears that they have virtually self destructed by their own made gender, race and pseudo-scientific environmental specific politics.
Now they believe they have no good choices. They know it and now we know that they know it and they know that we know that they know it. Karma!
So all of the talk about groundbreaking first and getting past race and getting past gender have led the Democrats to the same place they they’ve always been in back to the 1950s.
In their hate mongering Democrats have managed to stir up neo-racists against Sen. Obama and the anti-women against Sen. Clinton and their solution? Al Gore a white man.
How ironic if you remember on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 in front of a Georgetown audience Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean is reported to have said the 2008 GOP presidential field, "looks like the 1950s and talks like the 1850s," according to The Georgetown Voice since the GOP nominee is Sen. John McCain but obviously spoken before Democrats realized that they conjured up the hates of the 1950s or a recounting of the actual history of the 1950 and 1850s.
In the 1800s, it was Democrats who gave their lives to perpetuate slavery during the American Civil War, and it was Democrat governors and sheriffs who used fire hoses and attack dogs on black civil rights activists in the 1950s according to an answer to Mr. Deans remarks by Christ Plante.
Such an a lustrous history and fitting too that Democrats are considering dumping the woman and the black that they touted as proof that they were no longer tied to the discriminations of the past.
These same duplicitous Democrats are considering appointing Al Gore as their Democratic nominee thus starting the 21st Century off like they’re back in the future and this after all of that bravado from Howard Dean!
Yes, Democrats are thinking like the 1950s and acting like the 1850s by even considering bringing back yesterday’s old news of Al Gore!
