Friday, June 20, 2008

The Global Warming Alternative Reality of the Democrat Party

Sens. John Warner and Joe Lieberman
"It's clear a majority of Congress wants to act,"—Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
Like March the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act of 2008 came in like a Lion and went out like a Lamb. What happen to the legislation that was supposed to end Global warming? It got capped and traded off to defeat in Congress!

Why it fell 48 to 36 votes short of a majority and it was stopped and blocked in the Senate and all that the hapless Democrat majority in the Senate could do was produced letters from six senators — including both presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain — saying that they would have voted for the measure had they been there. Yeah woulda, coulda, shoulda, maybe you shoulda been there, after all that is your job Senators!

Undoubtedly Democrats will blame the dastardly Republicans for blocking their bill but if a Democrat majority of Congress wanted to act on this legislation, Sen. Boxer, why then couldn’t you muster up a few more votes? You are in the majority you know.

Oh I see it’s that new math and that new reality that Sen. Boxer is using. You know the reality is the Planet is actually getting cooler according to Scientists, BUT to the Al Gore Global warming enthusiast the Planet has a fever. That’s the new reality regardless of the facts! Even Sen. Harry Reid can do a very good Al Gore new reality impersonation:



So instead of debating the Lieberman-Warner legislation on its merits Sen. Reid pulled the legislation to reintroduce it after the elections believing that his reality will prevail with a new President and additional Democrat victories in both the House and Senate.

So why is he blaming Republicans, he has control of the Senate agenda and he has the majority in the Senate.

Oh that’s right according to Sen. Reid the Iraq war is lost and America can’t win in Iraq, there is such a phenomenon as Global warming and the Republicans are the cause for everything that’s wrong with America.

Democrat Alternative Reality!

Thursday, June 19, 2008

Haditha: Killing a Honorable Military Career in Coldblood

Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani

The 2005 Haditha massacre as it came to be known in the media was portrayed as a tale of military murder and cover-up in which 4 Marines infantrymen and 4 Marines in the chain of command were accused of the out of control murder of 24 noncombatant innocents and a subsequent military cover-up. Congressman John Murtha a former Marine called the incident cold blooded murder.

United States Marine Corps Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey Chessani, battalion commander, is the highest-ranking officer to face a combat-related court-martial since the Vietnam War was accused of failing to investigate the 2005 shooting deaths of the 24 Iraqi civilians.

On Tuesday, June 17 Col. Steven Folsom, presiding as the military judge over the case against Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani, ordered the charges dismissed after finding that General James Mattis then commander of both the Marine Corps Forces Central Command and the commander of the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force at Camp Pendleton was improperly influenced by Col. John Ewers who was an investigator and witness in the case.

Gen. Mattis approved the filing of charges against Chessani. The General has since been promoted and serves as commander of NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation and of U.S. Joint Forces.

The Political influence in this case goes as high as Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and possibly even the President.

Col. Folsom’s watershed ruling found that Col. Ewers, acting as legal adviser to Gen. Mattis, should not have sat in on meetings and discussions along with generals who have overseen the case. That degree of participation by Ewers, who also investigated the killings in the city of Haditha, Iraq, irreparably tainted the decision to charge and prosecute Lt. Col Chessani, Folsom ruled.

Col. John Ewers, a military lawyer took Chessani's statement regarding the 2005 incident, and later became a top legal adviser to Gen. Mattis and also sat in on briefings that helped Mattis decide who would be charged.

Gen. Mattis testified he never talked with Ewers about Haditha, although Ewers was present during a number of legal meetings where Haditha and Chessani were discussed.

Military policy prohibits Ewers from offering legal advice in such meetings because he also was an investigator in the case.

Six of the original eight Marines have had their cases either dismissed or have been acquitted of all charges leaving only Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich to face trial and theMarine Corps has announced that it is appealing Col. Folsom’s ruling that dismissed dereliction of duty charges against Lt. Col. Chessani, who was accused of failing to investigate the 2005 shooting deaths Iraqi civilians.

The whole Haditha incident is reported to be a hoax reported by Time magazine’s Tim McGirk who was fed anti-American propaganda by al Qaeda insurgents to create anti-Americanism at home and abroad.

Lt. Col. Chessani is considering suing Congressman Murtha for libel because Murtha in an overthetop accusation accused Chessani and his men of murder and cover-up.

The Bush administration seems to be looking to war against terrorism within Islamic states without offending Muslims which will only continue to result in needless deaths of American military and the cold blooded killing of honorable military careers!

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Rothenberg's Wrong: There are no good options for Democrats

Stuart Rothenberg

Stuart Rothenberg’s “Why a McCain Win May Be Bad for GOP, Good for Democrats” has it wrong. (see here) Rothenberg’s lose, lose scenario for Republicans comes straight out of a liberal perspective from which he can only forecast dire inevitabilities for Conservatives but allow me to show what could happen if Sen. McCain were to win.

First, Rothenberg is correct there is a Civil War within the Republican Party, John McCain, Arnold Schwarzenegger RINOs vs. Ronald Reagan, Newt Gingrich Republicans. Democrats have been very successful in aligning themselves with the McCain Schwarzenegger oft times socially Liberal Republicans but Democrat leaders of the 110th Democrat controlled Congress have been often frustrated that their RINO allies have not given them the victories that they promised the American people in 2006.

Victories as ending the Iraq war and other disabling anti-Bush measures, what all of this suggests is Republicans may not be as bad off as many Liberals suppose.

Yet, Democrats have been successful on two fronts branding or negatively defining Republicans and Conservative ideas and triangulation which is stealing Conservative ideas, positions and arguments and presenting those ideas, positions and arguments as their own. Triangulation was how Bill Clinton managed to win against and stay one step ahead of his Republican rivals.

Eight years of bashing George Bush without the president or any Republican defending themselves or protecting their brand has created the huge negatives and low polling approval ratings that we presently see in the media today which affects all Republicans.

Republicans should take a page out of the Obama play book. Sen. Obama immediately started protecting his brand by putting up a website to defend himself against what he presents as unwarranted attacks against him and his supporters has demonstrated the first rule in publicity 101, “Protect your Brand.” President Bush should have done this, years ago.

The fact that Republicans didn’t protect themselves and the fact that they allowed President Bush to twist in the wind against all of the lies and mis characterizations against him, with that “Glad it’s him and not me” attitude, was patently wrong and now Republicans who are attempting to get reelected or elected are realizing that it was really about them all along, the whole Republican Party, not only George Bush but Republican unwillingness to fight for the president and themselves has attributed to even greater numbers of Democrats elected to the House and Senate because Republicans failed to protect their brand and the face of the Republican Party George Bush.

President Bush was merely the living persona which Liberals used to totally annihilate the other side, the Republicans, by proxy. The entire Republican Party was misbranded by scurrilous attacks on the Republican president and apparently Republicans were too stupid to know it although I warned of in 2007 when Democrats were threatening the impeachment of President Bush as the rest of the Republican Party stood idly by just watching.
Understand it isn’t actually about George W. Bush. It isn’t George W. that Democrats wish to impeach, censure or just run out of Washington on a rail, sure Democrats put in a lot of work to destroy his Presidency, but it would be the same thing if any other Republican candidate representing Conservative ideology would dare to lay claim to the most powerful elected office in the world.

Democrats can’t stomach the thought of a Conservative leading this nation. So they’ve skewered President Bush for almost 8 years and so having the chance to impeach him and drive him out of office in shame would give Democrat haters orgasmic shivers of ecstasy which even sex couldn’t duplicate for the ardent Liberal Conservative hater.
Alaphiah
When Bush was being lied on the Republican Party was being lied on. When Bush was being called stupid the Republican Party was being called stupid, When Bush was being made radioactive the entire Republican Party was being made radioactive.

By attacking President Bush so effectively Democrats damaged all Republicans and in this case Republicans were too daft to realize that!

Secondly Democrats gained from their anti-Bush, anti-Republican campaign by winning the majority in both the House and the Congress how did they do it?

While Republicans were running away from George Bush and Conservativism Democrats where running Conservative Democrats in Conservative States and Districts against Republicans who were trying to act more like Liberal Democrats. Triangulation, taking the others positions or arguments as your own to negate your opponent’s strengths and appeal against you and It worked beautifully!

Now seeing the overall negativity that Democrats had created against the Republican brand and the losses in both the House and the Senate by Democrat Triangulation RINO Republicans saw it as their opportunity to establish themselves as the avant guard in Republican leadership and propped up John McCain to win the Republican nomination for the presidency and that worked too.

That said this is why Stuart Rothenberg’s assessment, that a McCain win is bad for Republicans is wrong.

John McCain has fought in the past to disassociate himself from the Conservative base of the Republican Party. Only now does he realize that he needs the backing of this very powerful coalition if he hopes to win in November. But McCain makes it easy for Conservatives to disassociate themselves from many of McCain less favorable positions.

What Rothenberg has interpreted as Conservatives rallying behind Sen. McCain in some loyal fashion to defeat Sen. Obama is not what Mr. Rothenberg thinks it is.

Conservatives are aware and understand all to well what a McCain Presidency would mean but too, Conservatives agree with Sen. Clinton’s assessment that Barack Obama is not ready to be President.

Therefore Conservatives reluctantly support John McCain and will hold President John McCain at arms length and anything that this one term President does will be chalked up as what was expected from a RINO and easily blamed on Democrats who if not for them voting for McCain in the early primaries he would not have received the Republican nomination and would not be President.

John McCain actually will give Conservatives the ability to denounce a President McCain’s Liberal social agenda while supporting McCain’s views on the war and Supreme Court nominations.

Conservatives will have the ability to say, “I told you so,” when McCain courts his Liberal allies. As well Conservatives will be able to utter, “I’m so glad it’s not Obama!” when McCain does the right thing concerning the war and the Supreme Court.

A McCain win contrary to Rothenberg’s assessment is actually a win, win for Conservatives. Conservatives get to blame McCain on the Democrats when appropriate and enjoy the benefit of some Conservative principles regarding the war and judges.

As for the conflict within the Republican Party if McCain should fail miserably at being President Conservatives would be more than happy to put up a true Conservative in 2012 with the knowledge that if Hillary Clinton could run with all of her baggage then certainly Newt Gingrich should not be afraid to man up and run on the principles that gave Conservatives victories in 1994.

Actually Conservatives should be looking ahead now and planning for the 2012 elections because the change that this country needs is the same change that European politics are experiencing. European politics have gotten more Conservative not less in recent elections.

The change that we need is oppose from a Liberal and Democrat controlled Congress, the change that America needs is change from wanna be proud Liberal Conservative Republicans, or Compassionate Conservative Republicans or from just plain RINOs.

The change that America needs will reverse recent judicial activism and overreaching, the change we need, will reverse big government and overspending, the change we need will stop al Qaeda and prevent future threats against America. The change we need will protect our boarders, language and culture.

All changes that come with true Conservatism not Liberalism.

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Gods of California


I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. -- Isa 14:14


So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, --Genesis 1:27-28

Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! -- Isaiah 5:20
The Gods looked over California and said let there be homosexuality and homosexuality became legal, and they looked and said it is good!

Yes Virginia there is God and His/Her name is legion and He/She lives in the heavens called California and He/She wears black robes not white and He/She has other names such as: Ronald M. George, Carlos R. Moreno, Kathryn Mickle Werdegar and Joyce Kennard.

God must be getting forgetful these days because in the Bible’s first book, Genesis He/She created the species Man, male and female yet yesterday, Monday at 5:01PM PST God reversed Him/Herself and created a new species of man, male and male or female and female.
Barring any further legal action, gay couples will be able to start marrying at 5:01 p.m. Monday, when a California Supreme Court ruling legalizing gay marriages goes into effect.

Some counties plan to open their clerk's offices after-hours that day to accommodate couples wanting to be among the first to marry, but most across the state will wait until Tuesday.
-- AMANDA FEHD
You say wait a minute God didn’t do that Ronald M. George, Carlos R. Moreno, Kathryn Mickle Werdegar and Joyce Kennard of the California Supreme Court did that. Yes and by their ruling which went into effect for the first full day today the California Supreme Court has declared that they are like the most High because they have created man in their own image, male and male or female and female.

America has officially entered into the days of woe where evil is good and good is evil. California that leader in environmentalism and Hollywood’s alternative reality is leading the way in a new area and now plans to save energy by putting darkness for light and light for darkness.

Moving ahead of Massachusetts which was the first state that legally sanctioned Homosexuality, but only for the state of Massachusetts, The Gods of California will allow everyone on God’s green earth to come and bow down before the alters of state matrimony and be created in the image of the new God, the state Government of California.
Homosexual Lobby claims California


Just one of the many repercussions of what the Gods of California have done is no longer does the state need parental consent to teach California second graders or Kindergarteners about homosexuality nor does it need parental consent to teach California middle schoolers the graphic details of homosexual sex because the Gods of California have declared homosexuality law therefore no parental consent is required for something lawful.

How do I know this? It has already be established in the state Massachusetts. When parents objected to the lessons about homosexuality that their second graders were receiving the parents were told on every level up to the courts that homosexuality is the law and parents need not be informed what the state schools teach it’s children regarding homosexuality. There is no doubt that California’s schools and courts will do the same!

Just like scientists predicted years ago, California has fallen off into the Pacific Ocean due to the San Andreas Fault of homosexuality and a Court that fancies itself as God.

Today we get to witness the handiwork of the Gods of California and for any person of true faith that is anything but good.

Monday, June 16, 2008

Weather expert debukes the theory of Glodal warming

John Coleman on the far left


Nobody is better qualified to argue this point so here’s John Coleman in his own words:

Global Warming and the Price of a Gallon of Gas
by John Coleman

You may want to give credit where credit is due to Al Gore and his global warming campaign the next time you fill your car with gasoline, because there is a direct connection between Global Warming and four dollar a gallon gas.

It is shocking, but true, to learn that the entire Global Warming frenzy is based on the environmentalist’s attack on fossil fuels, particularly gasoline. All this big time science, international meetings, thick research papers, dire threats for the future; all of it, comes down to their claim that the carbon dioxide in the exhaust from your car and in the smoke stacks from our power plants is destroying the climate of planet Earth. What an amazing fraud; what a scam.

The future of our civilization lies in the balance.

That’s the battle cry of the High Priest of Global Warming Al Gore and his fellow, agenda driven disciples as they predict a calamitous outcome from anthropogenic global warming. According to Mr. Gore the polar ice caps will collapse and melt and sea levels will rise 20 feet inundating the coastal cities making 100 million of us refugees. Vice President Gore tells us numerous Pacific islands will be totally submerged and uninhabitable.

He tells us global warming will disrupt the circulation of the ocean waters, dramatically changing climates, throwing the world food supply into chaos. He tells us global warming will turn hurricanes into super storms, produce droughts, wipe out the polar bears and result in bleaching of coral reefs. He tells us tropical diseases will spread to mid latitudes and heat waves will kill tens of thousands. He preaches to us that we must change our lives and eliminate fossil fuels or face the dire consequences. The future of our civilization is in the balance.

With a preacher’s zeal, Mr. Gore sets out to strike terror into us and our children and make us feel we are all complicit in the potential demise of the planet.
Here is my rebuttal.

There is no significant man made global warming. There has not been any in the past, there is none now and there is no reason to fear any in the future. The climate of Earth is changing. It has always changed. But mankind’s activities have not overwhelmed or significantly modified the natural forces.

Through all history, Earth has shifted between two basic climate regimes: ice ages and what paleoclimatologists call “Interglacial periods”. For the past 10 thousand years the Earth has been in an interglacial period. That might well be called nature’s global warming because what happens during an interglacial period is the Earth warms up, the glaciers melt and life flourishes. Clearly from our point of view, an interglacial period is greatly preferred to the deadly rigors of an ice age.

Mr. Gore and his crowd would have us believe that the activities of man have overwhelmed nature during this interglacial period and are producing an unprecedented, out of control warming.

Well, it is simply not happening. Worldwide there was a significant natural warming trend in the 1980’s and 1990’s as a Solar cycle peaked with lots of sunspots and solar flares. That ended in 1998 and now the Sun has gone quiet with fewer and fewer Sun spots, and the global temperatures have gone into decline. Earth has cooled for almost ten straight years. So, I ask Al Gore, where’s the global warming?

The cooling trend is so strong that recently the head of the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change had to acknowledge it. He speculated that nature has temporarily overwhelmed mankind’s warming and it may be ten years or so before the warming returns. Oh, really. We are supposed to be in a panic about man-made global warming and the whole thing takes a ten year break because of the lack of Sun spots. If this weren’t so serious, it would be laughable.

Now allow me to talk a little about the science behind the global warming frenzy. I have dug through thousands of pages of research papers, including the voluminous documents published by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

I have worked my way through complicated math and complex theories. Here’s the bottom line: the entire global warming scientific case is based on the increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from the use of fossil fuels. They don’t have any other issue. Carbon Dioxide, that’s it.

Hello Al Gore; Hello UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Your science is flawed; your hypothesis is wrong; your data is manipulated. And, may I add, your scare tactics are deplorable. The Earth does not have a fever. Carbon dioxide does not cause significant global warming.

The focus on atmospheric carbon dioxide grew out a study by Roger Revelle who was an esteemed scientist at the Scripps Oceanographic Institute. He took his research with him when he moved to Harvard and allowed his students to help him process the data for his paper. One of those students was Al Gore. That is where Gore got caught up in this global warming frenzy.

Revelle’s paper linked the increases in carbon dioxide, CO2, in the atmosphere with warming. It labeled CO2 as a greenhouse gas.

Charles Keeling, another researcher at the Scripps Oceanographic Institute, set up a system to make continuous CO2 measurements. His graph of these increases has now become known as the Keeling Curve. When Charles Keeling died in 2005, his son David, also at Scripps, took over the measurements. Here is what the Keeling curve shows: an increase in CO2 from 315 parts per million in 1958 to 385 parts per million today, an increase of 70 parts per million or about 20 percent.

All the computer models, all of the other findings, all of the other angles of study, all come back to and are based on CO2 as a significant greenhouse gas. It is not.

Here is the deal about CO2, carbon dioxide. It is a natural component of our atmosphere. It has been there since time began. It is absorbed and emitted by the oceans. It is used by every living plant to trigger photosynthesis. Nothing would be green without it. And we humans; we create it. Every time we breathe out, we emit carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. It is not a pollutant. It is not smog. It is a naturally occurring invisible gas.

Let me illustrate. I estimate that this square in front of my face contains 100,000 molecules of atmosphere. Of those 100,000 only 38 are CO2; 38 out of a hundred thousand. That makes it a trace component. Let me ask a key question: how can this tiny trace upset the entire balance of the climate of Earth? It can’t. That’s all there is to it; it can’t.

The UN IPCC has attracted billions of dollars for the research to try to make the case that CO2 is the culprit of run-away, man-made global warming. The scientists have come up with very complex creative theories and done elaborate calculations and run computer models they say prove those theories.

They present us with a concept they call radiative forcing. The research organizations and scientists who are making a career out of this theory, keep cranking out the research papers. Then the IPCC puts on big conferences at exotic places, such as the recent conference in Bali. The scientists endorse each other’s papers, they are summarized and voted on, and viola, we are told global warming is going to kill us all unless we stop burning fossil fuels.

May I stop here for a few historical notes? First, the internal combustion engine and gasoline were awful polluters when they were first invented. And, both gasoline and automobile engines continued to leave a layer of smog behind right up through the 1960’s. Then science and engineering came to the environmental rescue. Better exhaust and ignition systems, catalytic converters, fuel injectors, better engineering throughout the engine and reformulated gasoline have all contributed to a huge reduction in the exhaust emissions from today’s cars. Their goal then was to only exhaust carbon dioxide and water vapor, two gases widely accepted as natural and totally harmless.

Anyone old enough to remember the pall of smog that used to hang over all our cities knows how much improvement there has been. So the environmentalists, in their battle against fossil fuels and automobiles had a very good point forty years ago, but now they have to focus almost entirely on the once harmless carbon dioxide. And, that is the rub. Carbon dioxide is not an environmental problem; they just want you now to think it is.

Numerous independent research projects have been done about the greenhouse impact from increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide. These studies have proven to my total satisfaction that CO2 is not creating a major greenhouse effect and is not causing an increase in temperatures. By the way, before his death, Roger Revelle coauthored a paper cautioning that CO2 and its greenhouse effect did not warrant extreme countermeasures.

So now it has come down to an intense campaign, orchestrated by environmentalists claiming that the burning of fossil fuels dooms the planet to run-away global warming. Ladies and Gentlemen, that is a myth.

So how has the entire global warming frenzy with all its predictions of dire consequences, become so widely believed, accepted and regarded as a real threat to planet Earth? That is the most amazing part of the story.

To start with global warming has the backing of the United Nations, a major world force. Second, it has the backing of a former Vice President and very popular political figure. Third it has the endorsement of Hollywood, and that’s enough for millions. And, fourth, the environmentalists love global warming. It is their tool to combat fossil fuels.

So with the environmentalists, the UN, Gore and Hollywood touting Global Warming and predictions of doom and gloom, the media has scrambled with excitement to climb aboard. After all the media loves a crisis. From YK2 to killer bees the media just loves to tell us our lives are threatened. And the media is biased toward liberal, so it’s pre-programmed to support Al Gore and UN. CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, The LA Times, The Washington Post, the Associated Press and here in San Diego The Union Tribune are all constantly promoting the global warming crisis.

So who is going to go against all of that power? Not the politicians. So now the President of the United States, just about every Governor, most Senators and most Congress people, both of the major current candidates for President, most other elected officials on all levels of government are all riding the Al Gore Global Warming express. That is one crowded bus.

I suspect you haven’t heard it because the mass media did not report it, but I am not alone on the no man-made warming side of this issue. On May 20th, a list of the names of over thirty-one thousand scientists who refute global warming was released.

Thirty-one thousand of which 9,000 are Ph.ds. Think about that. Thirty-one thousand. That dwarfs the supposed 2,500 scientists on the UN panel. In the past year, five hundred of scientists have issued public statements challenging global warming. A few more join the chorus every week. There are about 100 defectors from the UN IPCC. There was an International Conference of Climate Change Skeptics in New York in March of this year. One hundred of us gave presentations. Attendance was limited to six hundred people. Every seat was taken. There are a half dozen excellent internet sites that debunk global warming.

And, thank goodness for KUSI and Michael McKinnon, its owner. He allows me to post my comments on global warming on the website KUSI.com. Following the publicity of my position form Fox News, Glen Beck on CNN, Rush Limbaugh and a host of other interviews, thousands of people come to the website and read my comments. I get hundreds of supportive emails from them. No I am not alone and the debate is not over.

In my remarks in New York I speculated that perhaps we should sue Al Gore for fraud because of his carbon credits trading scheme. That remark has caused a stir in the fringe media and on the internet. The concept is that if the media won’t give us a hearing and the other side will not debate us, perhaps we could use a Court of law to present our papers and our research and if the Judge is unbiased and understands science, we win. The media couldn’t ignore that. That idea has become the basis for legal research by notable attorneys and discussion among global warming debunkers, but it’s a long way from the Court room.

I am very serious about this issue. I think stamping out the global warming scam is vital to saving our wonderful way of life.

The battle against fossil fuels has controlled policy in this country for decades. It was the environmentalist’s prime force in blocking any drilling for oil in this country and the blocking the building of any new refineries, as well.

So now the shortage they created has sent gasoline prices soaring. And, it has lead to the folly of ethanol, which is also partly behind the fuel price increases; that and our restricted oil policy. The ethanol folly is also creating a food crisis throughput the world – it is behind the food price rises for all the grains, for cereals, bread, everything that relies on corn or soy or wheat, including animals that are fed corn, most processed foods that use corn oil or soybean oil or corn syrup. Food shortages or high costs have led to food riots in some third world countries and made the cost of eating out or at home budget busting for many.

So now the global warming myth actually has lead to the chaos we are now enduring with energy and food prices. We pay for it every time we fill our gas tanks. Not only is it running up gasoline prices, it has changed government policy impacting our taxes, our utility bills and the entire focus of government funding. And, now the Congress is considering a cap and trade carbon credits policy.

We the citizens will pay for that, too. It all ends up in our taxes and the price of goods and services.

So the Global warming frenzy is, indeed, threatening our civilization. Not because global warming is real; it is not. But because of the all the horrible side effects of the global warming scam.

I love this civilization. I want to do my part to protect it.
If Al Gore and his global warming scare dictates the future policy of our governments, the current economic downturn could indeed become a recession, drift into a depression and our modern civilization could fall into an abyss. And it would largely be a direct result of the global warming frenzy.

My mission, in what is left of a long and exciting lifetime, is to stamp out this Global Warming silliness and let all of us get on with enjoying our lives and loving our planet, Earth.

(source)

Friday, June 13, 2008

Supremes gives al Qaeda Constitutional Right to Destroy America

Military detention at Guantanamo
“This decision will come at a cost, the Supreme Court just moved us closer to the day when U.S. Marine rifle teams will have to have lawyers read Miranda rights to terrorists captured on the battlefield.”-- Rep. Duncan Hunter of California, the House Armed Services Committee.
(click on video)


Five Justices on the United States Supreme Court just created a Constitutional right for al Qaeda to wage war against the United States of America. In essence Justices Anthony Kennedy, John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer ruled that sworn enemy combatants who are captured on the battle field and actively engaged in war against the United States are protected by the Constitution of the United States to do so. (related story)

This ruling is analogous to saying that AIDS has the constitutional right to ravage a homosexual’s body and further the AIDS virus must be given adequate nourishment to conduct its goal of killing that body.

Here’s what others had to say about the 5-4 split decision:

"Enemies of the United States committed to attacking America and killing Americans who have been captured on the battlefield and designated alien enemy combatants are entitled to the protections afforded by the Geneva Convention, not the Constitution. The Supreme Court's decision changes that and does so in a way that will only increase the burdens and responsibilities placed on our brave men and women in the military.

The Supreme Court's decision fails, in a dramatic way, to appreciate that we are at war and that our enemies are relentless in their pursuit of our destruction. Let us not forget that at least 30 prisoners that have been released have already returned to the battlefield."
Senator Joseph Lieberman(I-Connecticutt)

"Today the court strikes down as inadequate the most generous set of procedural protections ever afforded aliens detained by this country as enemy combatants, the majority merely replaces a review system designed by the people's representatives with a set of shapeless procedures to be defined by federal courts at some future date.

[The court's] ambitious opinion [means that Americans] today lose a bit more control over the conduct of this nation's foreign policy to unelected, politically unaccountable judges."
—Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the minority

[The majority has extended] "a constitutional right to habeas corpus on alien enemies detained abroad by our military forces in the course of an ongoing war. . . . The nation will live to regret what the court has done today."—Justice Anthony Scalia
Of course Liberal Democrats hail the courts decision as a slap against President Bush and the war in Iraq.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) praised the Court for “uphold[ing] the constitution of the United States” and reiterated her desire to see Gitmo shut down.

If nothing else this ruling and Activist judges of the U.S. Supreme Court and the California Supreme Court are the strongest and only argument for voting for Sen. John McCain over any Democrat nominee.

To which I will hold my nose and vote.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

NAFTA’s Revenge

California Tomato Farmers President Ed Beckman said that at this time of year almost all tomatoes sold in the United States come from either Mexico or Florida.

Mexico supplies about one-third of all tomatoes consumed in the U.S. in the winter months and Florida is the No. 1 producer, with $600 million in sales annually.

California is the second-largest producer, with $400 million in sales annually.
CARLA K. JOHNSON, Associated Press Writer
Florida and California have been cleared by the FDA but you wouldn’t hear who the FDA suspects as the originator of Salmonella laced tomatoes any time soon because that would reflect badly on NAFTA.

You know the North American Free Trade Agreement signed into law by President Bill Clinton that allows borderless free trade with Mexico and Canada. Oh by the way Canada has been cleared too.

As a matter of fact here’s a list of all of the regions; states and countries that have been cleared by the FDA;

• Alabama
• Arkansas
• California
• Colorado
• Delaware
• Florida (counties of: Jackson, Gadsden, Leon, Jefferson, Madison, Suwannee, Hamilton, Hillsborough, Polk, Manatee, Hardee, DeSoto, Sarasota, Highlands, Pasco, Sumter, Citrus, Hernando, Charlotte)
• Georgia
• Hawaii
• Louisiana
• Maine
• Maryland
• Minnesota
• Mississippi
• New Jersey
• New York
• Nebraska
• North Carolina
• Ohio
• Pennsylvania
• South Carolina
• Tennessee
• Texas
• West Virginia
• Wisconsin
• Belgium
• Canada
• Dominican Republic
• Guatemala
• Israel
• Netherlands
• Puerto Rico

Humm… No Mexico? Well not yet always. Speaking of Mexico what does this salmonella outbreak and Mexico have in common?

It’s called Montezuma’s Revenge, Gringo Gallop, the Aztec Two-step or traveler’s diarrhea caused by a bacterium strain present in food and water, to which Mexicans are normally immune, but that causes disease in foreigners.

Tourists that eat and drink the water south of the border in Mexico know that they are susceptible to a very nasty tummy ache, diarrhea, and fever for at least 12 to 72 hours for 4 to 7 days.
Salmonella live in the intestinal tracts of humans and other animals, including birds. Salmonella are usually transmitted to humans by eating foods contaminated with animal feces.

Contaminated foods usually look and smell normal. Contaminated foods are often of animal origin, such as beef, poultry, milk, or eggs, but any food, including vegetables, may become contaminated. Thorough cooking kills Salmonella.

Food may also become contaminated by the hands of an infected food handler who did not wash hands with soap after using the bathroom.
What’s interesting is that U.S. citizens who are affected by this tomatoe born salmonella infection are afflicted with diarrhea, fever, and 12 to 72 hours of abdominal cramps.
Salmonellosis is an infection with bacteria called Salmonella. Most persons infected with Salmonella develop diarrhea, fever, and abdominal cramps 12 to 72 hours after infection. The illness usually lasts 4 to 7 days, and most persons recover without treatment.

However, in some persons, the diarrhea may be so severe that the patient needs to be hospitalized. In these patients, the Salmonella infection may spread from the intestines to the blood stream, and then to other body sites and can cause death unless the person is treated promptly with antibiotics.

The elderly, infants, and those with impaired immune systems are more likely to have a severe illness.
--Centers for Disease Control Prevention
As a result of NAFTA one no longer has to cross the southern border to be infected with traveler’s diarrhea because goods and services cross the border so freely between the two countries we now have the benefit of staying right at home and traveling back and forth to our toilets or our hospitals after we consume NAFTA related foods. Isn’t free trade great!

Speaking of free trade, a very large Mexican business that ships tomatoes to the United States and Canada is losing millions of dollars in tomato sells, Art Salinas owner of the tomato import company Bonanza 2001 has 500 tons of tomatoes sitting in his warehouse on Anaya Road near the Pharr-Reynosa International Bridge in McAllen, Texas that he can’t sell.

Bonanza is one of the largest Roma tomato importers in Texas. The company, owned by Salinas, has about 150 acres of tomatoes in the Mexican state of Jalisco and imports about a 25 million pounds of tomatoes a year.

Mexican distributors also send watermelon and avocados across the border I’d be suspicious of these NAFTA items too if I were you.

Every time I bite into a luscious red tomato I'll think of Bill and Hillary! Bon Appétit!

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

"OBAMA'S "NOT EXACTLYS"

Finally, some one with some statistics...

1.) Selma Got Me Born - NOT EXACTLY, your parents felt safe enough to have you in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965. (Google 'Obama Selma' for his full March 4, 2007 speech and articles about its various untruths.)

2.) Father Was A Goat Herder - NOT EXACTLY, he was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.

3.) Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter - NOT EXACTLY, he was part of one of the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had.

4.) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom - NOT EXACTLY, your cousin Raila Odinga has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya. It is the first widespread violence in decades. The current government is pro-American but Odinga wants to overthrow it and establish Muslim Sharia law. Your half-brother, Abongo Oba ma, is Odinga's follower. You interrupted your New Hampshire campaigning to speak to Odinga on the phone. Check out the following link for verification of that....and for more.

Obama's cousin Odinga in Kenya ran for president and tried to get Sharia muslim law in place there. When Odinga lost the elections, his followers have burned Christians' homes and then burned men, women and children alive in a Christian church where they took shelter.. Obama SUPPORTED his cousin before the election process here started. Google Obama and Odinga and see what you get. No one wants to know the truth.

5.) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian - NOT EXACTLY, she does her daily Salat prayers at 5am according to her own interviews. Not to mention, Christianity wouldn't allow her to have been one of 14 wives to 1 man.

6.) My Name is African Swahili - NOT EXACTLY, your name is Arabic and 'Baraka' (from which Barack came) means 'blessed' in that language. Hussein is also Arabic and so is Obama.
Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. If elected, he would be the first Arab-American President, not the first black President. Barack Hussein Obama is 50% Caucasian from his mother's side and 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African Negro from his father's side. While Barack Hussein Obama's father was from Kenya, his father's family was mainly Arabs.. Barack Hussein Obama's father was only 12.5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father's birth certificate even states he's Arab, not African Negro). From....and for more....go to.....
http://www.arcadeathome.com/newsboy.phtml?Barack_Hussein_Obama_-_Arab-American,_only_6.25%25_African

7.) I Never Practiced Islam - NOT EXACTLY, you practiced it daily at school, where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31 years, until your wife made you change, so you could run for office.
4-3-08 Article "Obama was 'quite religious in islam'" http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=60559 ;

8.) My School In Indonesia Was Christian - NOT EXACTLY, you were registered as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces (check your own book).
February 28, 2008. Kristoff from the New York Times a year ago: Mr. Obama recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated (it'll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to prayer as "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset." This is just one example of what Pamela is talking about when she says "Obama's narrative is being altered, enhanced and manipulated to whitewash troubling facts."

9.) I Was Fluent In Indonesian - NOT EXACTLY, not one teacher says you could speak the language.

10.) Because I Lived In Indonesia, I Have More Foreign Experience - NOT EXACTLY, you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and couldn't even speak the language. What did you learn, ....... how to study the Koran and watch cartoons.

11.) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs - NOT EXACTLY, except for Africa (surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise), you have never been anywhere else on the planet and thus have NO experience with our closest allies.

12.) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion - NOT EXACTLY, you were quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya and no mention of struggle to identify - your classmates said you were just fine.

13.) An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office - NOT EXACTLY, Ebony has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.

14.) A Life Magazine Article Changed My Outlook On Life - NOT EXACTLY, Life has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn't, and never did, exist.

15.) I Won't Run On A National Ticket In '08 - NOT EXACTLY, here you are, despite saying, live on TV, that you would not have enough experience by then, and you are all about having experience first.

16.) Voting "Present" is Common In Illinois Senate - NOT EXACTLY, they are common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO VOTES.

17.) Oops, I Misvoted - NOT EXACTLY, only when caught by church groups and Democrats, did you beg to change your misvote.

18.) I Was A Professor Of Law - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.

19.) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer - NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer ON LEAVE.

20.) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill - NOT EXACTLY, you didn't write it, introduce it, change it, or create it.

21.) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass - NOT EXACTLY, it took just 14 days from start to finish.

22.) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill - NOT EXACTLY, your bill was rejected by your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation - mainly because of your Nuclear donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.

23.) I Have Released My State Records - NOT EXACTLY, as of March, 2008, state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, exposing all the special interests pork hidden within.

24.) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess - NOT EXACTLY, you were part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens. You failed to mention anyone else but yourself, in your books.

25.) My Economics Bill Will Help America - NOT EXACTLY, your 111 economic policies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, and even YOU voted against your own bill.

26.) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois - NOT EXACTLY, even your own supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part.

27.) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year - NOT EXACTLY, they were not YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by a fellow Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office.

28.) No One on my campaign contacted Canada about NAFTA - NOT EXACTLY, the Candian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your campaign had with them.

29.) I Am Tough On Terrorism - NOT EXACTLY, you missed the Iran Resolution vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction off Israel.

30.) I Want All Votes To Count - NOT EXACTLY, you said let the delegates decide.

31.) I Want Americans To Decide - NOT EXACTLY, you prefer caucuses that limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote, and only operate during small windows of time.

32.) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate - NOT EXACTLY, you passed 26, most of which you didn't write yourself.

33.) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics - NOT EXACTLY, you used tactics to eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you.

34.) I Don't Take PAC Money - NOT EXACTLY, you take loads of it.

35.) I don't Have Lobbysists - NOT EXACTLY, you have over 47 lobbyists, and counting.

36.) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad - NOT EXACTLY, your own campaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one afternoon.

37.) I Have Always Been Against Iraq - NOT EXACTLY, you weren't in office to vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time.

38.) I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care - NOT EXACTLY, your plan leaves us all to pay for the 15,000,000 who don't have to buy it.

Carol Kalwa
(304) 838-6652
"Qui non intelligit aut discat aut taceat"
Who does not understand should either learn, or be silent.

Eat Tomatoes and Die

Mark Roh, U.S. Food and Drug Administration's acting regional director holds a bag of tomatoes being tested for salmonella bacteria

Federal officials hunted for the source of a 17-state salmonella outbreak linked to three types of raw tomatoes, while the list of supermarkets and restaurants yanking those varieties from shelves and menus grew.

McDonald's, Wal-Mart, Burger King, Kroger, Outback Steakhouse, Winn-Dixie and Taco Bell were among the companies that voluntarily withdrew red plum, red Roma or round red tomatoes unless they were grown in certain states and countries.
-- CARLA K. JOHNSON
Usually when one hurls the epithet, “Eat [blank] and die” they usually use the “S” word. No not Salmonella the other “S” word, though you can die if you eat Salmonella tainted foods.

The “S” word that I’m referring to is what corporations that control agriculture has gotten this country into. A whole lot of “S”!

Is it just me or does it strike anyone else that lately the U.S. has been having some problems with its food supply?

Recent outbreaks of Salmonella, E. coli, Listeria, Botulism, and also Genetically Altered Foods, portend of something terribly wrong.

In the latest case same tomatoes are in question for salmonella contamination causing restaurants and stories to pull the raw vegetable. There as been a long line of such contamination;

Authorities have warned people not to consume bottled carrot juice after some people in Georgia, Florida and Toronto became ill with botulism poisoning. One person in Florida, and two in Toronto became paralyzed after consuming carrot juice. The carrot juice is produced by Bolthouse Farms, Bakersfield, California.

The Salinas Valley, California, was the focus of possible fresh lettuce E. coli contamination. The possible contamination affects California, Arizona, Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana and Nevada. It is possible that the retail outlets sold the lettuce on to restaurants, schools, prison, hospitals and other institutions. Consumers and retailers were told to look out for Green Leaf 24 Count and Green Leaf 18 Count packages, lot code 6SL0024.


Raw spinach, tainted with E. coli, from the same valley, caused the deaths of three people in the USA and made almost 200 people ill. (source)

The first GM food crop containing human genes was touted by the California-based Ventria Bioscience Company, The laboratory created rice which produces some of the human proteins found in breast milk and saliva.

This Genetically Altered yummy has been given preliminary approval to grow it on more than 3,000 acres in Kansas. And it is set to be approved for commercial production. (see article)

5,200 pounds of ground beef had to be recalled after federal inspectors had questioned the testing methods used at a slaughterhouse in Nebraska.

Hallmark Meat Packing of Chino California, was shown using forklifts, electric prods and high-pressure water hoses to force cows to their feet by law only a standing cow can be slaughtered for food consumption. (related Story)

Hallmark was the second-largest supplier of ground beef to the National School Lunch Program, which provides commodities and cash subsidies to schools. (see video) ***Warning depiction of animal mistreatment is graphic!***



Its Tomatoes today, yet I predict that a major food related disaster is about to befall the United States because of its failure to protect its Farmers and Agriculture industry from corporate interests that have driven the American family farmer out of business by Wal Martdizing the Agriculture industry in America.

This ensuing disaster will be more devastating than Global warming, Terrorism and high gas prices combined. Millions of Americans will have nothing to eat because our food supply is failing. Salmonella, E. coli, Listeria, Botulism, and Genetically Altered Foods are but the canary in the mine shaft, they warn us of the impeding disaster to our food supply.

Are you listening?

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

Why can’t you say Global warming anymore?


Naturally, numerous senators have employed the end-of-world scenario of catastrophic global warming . . . I mean climate change . . . to sell the cap and trade. But of course, few mention a recent study by the U.N.'s World Meteorological Organization — the organization behind the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — explaining there has been no warming the past decade.-- David Harsanyi
The theory of Anthropogenic Global warming has been debunked with such profound scientific proof that in order for the masses to accept $45 trillion dollar tax rip off there has to be a name change. Climate Change is as good as any name because the climate does change and no one can disprove that!

Congress, however, is not ready to turn over for the big green machine a.k.a the big corporate investors who want you and me to pay for their research and development so that they can make those trillions of dollars their the latest global merchandise and schemes.
Senators also criticized Warner-Lieberman's failure to clearly specify what would happen with the vast revenues the climate bill would generate – some $1 trillion over the first decade, which environmental groups wanted as a slush fund to finance "green technologies." Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire insisted the proceeds be used for other tax cuts, like the elimination of the corporate income tax.Wall Street Journal
I’m betting that Congress thinks that there isn’t enough cover for them to turn the U.S. economy on its head just yet. Outsourcing middle class jobs, open borders, out of control global trading and Middle East driven exorbitant gasoline prices may be just about the maximum that the U.S. public is willing to accept without revolting.

Also, there is enough doubt in the proponents of Global warming or it’s newer sleeker name Climate Change that no one can just propose mega billion dollar tax increases and think that a usually unaware public is not going to notice.

We notice that Al Gore was decorated like a Christmas Tree with Environmental awards on Global warming to give him legitimacy so that Joe and Janet Greeny would fall in line with Global warming mumbo jumbo. And it worked to a point.

Yet, the reason that you can’t say Global warming anymore is that there is no Global warming and in order to lift the $45 trillion dollars in new taxes off of the public there has to be some reason. Climate Change is as good as any.

Only Congress is a bit antsy now because you aren’t sitting down for high gas prices no the sleeping giant is stirring about and you just might sweep Democrats out of Congress if you were to connect the dots and realize that Democrats have been the corrupting force in American government for over 60 years.

Even if that is the case there is no Global warming. Global warming’s proponents themselves have ceded that point when they opted to change the terminology from Global warming to climate change. No, there is only a $45 trillion dollar Global power change where the United States is no longer the preeminent military, economic and political power in the world.

The persons or countries that control the carbon are in control of the world. What we are witnessing is an economic world-wide attempt to shift control of resources; gasoline, carbon credits, food supplies, your so-called “carbon footprint” are all commodities in the new Global economy or the new Transatlantic Economy.
Some of the summit discussions will deal with the nuts-and-bolts of cooperation: the Transatlantic Economic Council, formed at last year's summit, to foster economic integration on both sides of the Atlantic by aligning regulations, accounting practices and erasing other roadblocks to expanding what is already a $500 billion trans-Atlantic relationship.—DEB RIECHMANN
High gas prices, tainted food, a worsening American economy are mere birth pains of the new Transatlantic economy that is being born right before our eyes.

President Bush is in Europe right now as I post saying his last goodbyes to the European Union the power behind the new Global economy.

But it’s not in place just yet so you must be preoccupied with some imminent threat to keep your minds off of fact that you are losing your country. So don’t say Global warming say Climate Change and don’t say the United States of America say The North American Community or better yet say we are Global citizens united under international law with Transatlantic markets fighting climate change.

One other thing that you can’t say, you can’t say that you haven’t been warned!

Monday, June 09, 2008

Do you actually have to say the words I concede?

Sen. Clinton thumbs up Suspension Speech, not looking like a loser is she.

"Today as I suspend my campaign, I congratulate him on the victory he has won and the extraordinary race he has run.

I endorse him and throw my full support behind him and I ask of you to join me in working as hard for Barack Obama as you have for me,"
--Sen. Hillary Clinton
Did you listen to Hillary’s speech on Saturday? If you didn’t, you missed what everyone else missed, everyone who did listen to her speech that is.

Sen. Clinton has managed to hit on that most ancient Bruce Lee style of Kung Fu, in the political realm of course. Master Lee termed his brand of Karate as the art of fighting without fighting.

Likewise Sen. Clinton has managed to say that she’s supporting Sen. Obama without releasing control of her delegates and without conceding. Nice work, the art of suspending her campaign without conceding!

If you notice the more sophisticated reporters and analysts are reporting that she is suspending her campaign while only a few amateur types are using the “C” word.

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SUSPENDING AND CONCEDING

Concede and that it is over you’ve quit. Suspend well that’s another story. You get all of the benefits of conceding without that nasty detached from the campaign feeling. And if something where to happen (wink, wink God forbid) well after all you didn’t really quit you just suspended so you could just pick right up were you left off all nice and neat.
[By]suspend[ing] her campaign, Clinton kept some options open. She gets to retain her delegates to the nominating convention this summer and she can continue to raise money.

It also means she could reopen her campaign if circumstances change before the Denver convention, but gave no indication that was her intention.
Beth Fouhy
The most important benefit by the way is money. You recall Clinton “loaned” her campaign 11.4 million dollars and her campaign was mismanaged so badly that it's in debt up to their ears. The benefit that derives from the Obama Clinton, Diana Feinstein secret meeting is with Hillary agreeing to endorse Obama with their deal is one she can pay off her campaign debt and two she can reimburse herself her loan of millions of dollars.

So in essence the moveon.org netroots who back Obama and that fought so hard to defeat Sen. Clinton will pay for Clinton’s campaign and will repay her personal investment if Sen. Obama agrees to pay for Sen. Clinton campaign thereby buying her personal endorsement and the support of her backers.




One additional thing that really bugs me about this set up. Sen. Clinton is being extolled as some phenomenally glorious politician, some civil rights and woman’s suffrage champion with her 18 million cracks in the glass ceiling reference. As if her campaign was about advancing women's rights instead of just advancing Hillary Clinton.

Truth be told Hillary Clinton is a below average politician who couldn’t even win in a Democrat primary. Something that both Al Gore and John Kerry did do. And that was the case with all of the name recognition and high profile advantage that she, the candidate of inevitability to win the Presidency, had over a young upstart Senator who himself had nothing going for him according to Clinton but a speech. Losing to him, she proved herself to be a miserable politician at best.
It’s ironic that Hillary Clinton who at worst is complicit in several of Bill Clinton’s cover-ups of his abuse of women or she is at best an enabler of her husband’s wantonly criminal behavior is being defended by National Organization for Women, Feminist Majority and National Women's Political Caucus on behalf of women’s rights.

Rights that Mrs. Clinton herself violated every time she stood by her man against women that he had violated.
Alaphiah
As far as women’s suffrage and civil rights are concerned Hillary Clinton has done more to hurt women and set back the feminism movement 100 years.

Hillary Clinton is not someone to be admired for any aspect of her campaign Hillary Clinton and her husband should be reviled for the partisan hatred, sexism, and racism that she and Bill injected into the American politico in her narcissistic attempt to grab power. Hillary's campaign was for her alone not for women, not for suffrage and certainly not for America!

It was a self serving grab that she has yet to relinquish because she has not conceded she has only suspended her campaign!

Will she continue to come back and back and back like Nightmare on Elm Street’s Freddy Kruger?

Geez I hope not but she could because she hasn't conceded!

Sunday, June 08, 2008

The Myth that is Obama!

I can’t believe how the delegates and super delegates are
falling all over themselves to jump on the Obama bandwagon
before it leaves.

Truth is that with all his claims, empty rhetoric and promises,
he will be as helpless as the current administration in alleviating
the oil crisis and most of the other problems that we face here
at home. He will be as powerless as President Bush is to
get OPEC to increase production............... not so long as it isn’t
in their self interest to do so.

How about an American “food boycott”against all the OPEC
nations, until they loosen the spigots on the wells? If not an
outright boycott.........why don’t we tie the price of flour, meat
and other commodities directly to oil,....... and as oil’s price rises,
so goes the foodstuffs. When the Saudis and other Arab
nations get tired of paying $4.00 per pound for flour, wheat or
corn, and $75 per pound for a good steak, maybe we can get
some real price reductions out of them.

Of course, this is only wishful thinking, since Obama has no
intention of being tough with any country....... quasi-friend or
foe. He will sit down with them and beg for mercy, as we
flounder in the misdirected domestic programs that the Democratic
Congress has in store for us. Expect increased taxes on every class
of American, and not the “tax reductions for the middle class” as
the Obama fairy tale claims. To do just half of what he and the
Democratic Congress have promised, and to avoid tripling the
present budget deficit, taxes must be raised, not just on corporations
and small businesses............ those who create the jobs in our
country..................... but on every wage earner in the US.

To believe anything else, is to be a babbling idiot!

Friday, June 06, 2008

Democrats are Abysmal Losers

Sen. Obama and an apparently unhappy sore loser Sen. Clinton

But no. Once again, it's all about Hillary Clinton, who delivered the most abrasive, self-absorbed, selfish, delusional, emasculating and extortionate political speech I've heard in a long time. And I've left out some adjectives, just to be polite.—Michael Tomasky
It’s not like they aren’t use to it but every time they lose they make the whole country pay.

Al Gore in 2000

John Kerry in 2004

Hillary Clinton in 2008

Someone is always stealing an election from them, swiftboating them, lying on them or vast right-wing conspiring against them. No Democrat has ever lost by their own volition so the rest of us have to suffer the un-statesman like behavior of their post defeat tantrums.

Whatever happened to graciousness or statesmanship? What ever happened to conceding for the good of the Party or Country or both? And what’s with this waiting until Saturday to acknowledge that you have been defeated in the primary race?

A defeated Democrat is like an uninvited guest who has bad table manners. Someone who eats up all of your food, belches, rises from your table and leaves your home without acknowledging the hospitality of the host.

Hillary Clinton is one in a long line of Democrats with bad political manners instead of conceding in defeat graciously she is going to hold a press conference Saturday, 4 days after Sen. Obama clinched enough delegates to claim the Democrat nomination for president, as if to say I’m still the most important, most electable Democrat in this Campaign…Bellllllch!!!

Spoiled sport, sore loser, or prima donna we have seen this kind of behavior from the Clinton camp before.

In 2000 President Clinton’s Vice-President Al Gore lost to then former Governor George Bush. Gore conceded the lost the night of the election only to withdraw his concession consequently Gore dragged this country through the most divisive political partisan battle in recent times.

In 2004 John Kerry didn’t drag the country through the after election trauma that Gore did, instead Kerry accused rival Republicans of swiftboating him, that's lying about his military experience, this he did as he waged the most denigrating and scorched earth attacks against the war in Iraq and a sitting president in recent memory.

Now Hillary Clinton is absolutely disrespecting the presumptive Democrat nominee Barack Obama, in a blatant show of contempt which she rather wage against the Republicans as the Democrat nominee herself no doubt, but nonetheless Sen. Clinton has shown that Democrat uncouthness will be unsheathed for any political opponent no matter what the Party.

Clinton’s belching all over Sen. Obama's moment is not being lost on Democrats and Liberals Michael Tomasky reports that Sen. Clinton is a naracissis with no shame and no consideration for anyone but herself.

CARRIE BUDOFF BROWN writes that after a historic win, the Obama campaign is reduced to tip-toeing on eggshells as the prima donna of losing, rudely barely makes mention of the fact that Sen. Obama has won enough delegates to be the presumptive nominee of the Democrat Party.

Sore losers, poor sports and prima donnas! Whether their excuses are hanging chads, swiftboats, media bias, sexism, or the vast left-wing conspiracy, Democrats rather destroy this country than lose an election. But if they lose you can bet the whole country will suffer for it.

I’m afraid to think of what will happen if Democrats are handed defeat at the hands of John McCain. As unlikely as that is if it should happen, look for Hillary Clinton to belch out an I told you so, I told you Barack Obama couldn’t win. Bellllch!

Yeah, like her 50 percent negative rating, higher than any other candidate, the albatross around her neck, would have allowed her to fare any better. Yeah right! Belllllch!

Thursday, June 05, 2008

The Alleged Victory of an Inadequate Black Male

The Inadequate Sen. Barack Obama?

Still others were also unwilling to concede. “He [Sen. Obama] can declare victory all he wants,’’ said Trudy L. Mason, a Manhattan resident and member of the state Democratic Committee. “That really takes a lot of chutzpah on his part,’’ said Ms. Mason. “It’s an ‘alleged victory.’ ”—Leslie Wayne, NYTimes
Women are angry and Sen. Hillary Clinton wouldn’t have it any other way.

Now that Sen. Hillary Clinton faces the inevitability that Democrats, Liberals and Progressives have moved passed the 1990’s and don’t care to revisit, is there any way of assessing just how much damage she has caused the Democrat’s hopes of measuring curtains for the White house?

Oh I know, I know that there will be talks of unity and what the Democrats must do to defeat the evil Republicans. And Hillary will say all sorts of supportive stuff about Sen. Obama (as she stands by just in case something happens) but you’ve got to admit that there is an awful lot of hating out there especially among women, the residual affects from the in-your-face politicking that Democrats normally reserve exclusively for Republicans that and this the first time in history that a major candidate has used sexism in an attempt to win the White house.

Joe and Janet Six pack who knocked a few back with “I’m your girl” Hillary and who were so fond of her on the campaign trail won’t be cozying up to the bar with Obama any time soon, that’s for sure.

As a matter of fact I think that Hillary’s campaign message has seeped through to the residents of the Appalachias and older American women who revere her as the best Democrat nominee that’s possible in a pants suit.

For instance take Harriet Christian a proud older American woman if you just close your eyes and listen to her rant you would swear that it was Sen. Clinton or Geraldine Ferrer speaking. Ms. Christian summaries the Clinton campaign message in a 1 minute sound bite. (see video)



There you have it!

Women against Men

Blacks against Whites

Liberals against Conservatives

That is the world of Sen. Hillary Clinton. In her wake Sen. Clinton leaves devastation anger and resentment as women of all economic levels consider what their next steps will be. (see here)

It's an awful lot to ask someone to get over when one believes that their Party threw them under the bus for an inadequate Black male.

As Harriet Christian emoted, “God Damn the Democrats!” I guess Ms. Christian is an attendee of Trinity United Church of Christ. I wonder how many years has she sat under Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s teachings?

Wednesday, June 04, 2008

Bill Blames Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy On Hillary’s Defeat

Bill Clinton
With Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign on the verge of defeat, Bill Clinton has been placing blame on enemies including a brazenly biased media that tried to suppress blue-collar votes, a powerful anti-war group that endorsed rival Barack Obama and weak-willed party leaders unable to stand up to either of these nefarious forces.—Kenneth P. Vogel


You can’t make stuff like that up! Bill Clinton in a recent conference call bemoans the fact that Media bias, Moveon.org and the Democrat Party all conspired to end his wife’s bid to become the second Clinton to wake up at 3am in the morning at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to put their cat Socks out. (see article)

But Bill, blaming the vast left-wing conspiracy completely misses the real reason that you and Hillary lost your bid to once again throw those swinging Lincoln bedroom soirées for all of your close political allies.

In my own indomitable way allow me to set the record straight with 5 reasons as to why Hillary lost the nomination to be the Democrats Presidential nominee.

1) The 1996 trademark Clinton-Gore “Bridge to the 21st Century” became a “Bridge to the Past” during Sen. Clinton’s campaign. A bridge to the smarminess of the first Clinton White house. Sen. Clinton constantly reminded the American people of a Presidency that half of us are still trying to forget!

2) Sexism. Sen. Clinton used sexism early and often hoping that the novelty of being a woman would be enough to win her the Whitehouse. Only to blame and accuse her own Party of sexism when her obvious ploy didn’t work for her. Apparently Democrats weren’t sexist enough to select her over a man.

3) Racism. Not only a man but a Black man as Geraldine Ferrar reminded us, if Sen. Obama had not, had that Black thing going for him why he would have been toast like those other White men!

4) Experience. Sen. Clinton’s campaign will be remembered as the most mismanaged campaign in recent memory. A little experience would have been a great help for the candidate of experience!

5) Slick Willie Politics. UTube and the Internet stopped the slick Willie politics of Sen. Clinton saying one thing and then another. Unlike the days of her husband’s campaign lies, Sen. Clinton’s lies where readily recorded for playback ad finitum. UTube and the Internet are also great memory enhancers if one should ever get sniper fire confused with flowers.


Abraham Lincoln said, “You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.”

Maybe that’s true Mr. Clinton maybe you couldn’t even fool all of the Democrats all of the time or maybe Democrats like David Geffen are just tired of all of the Clinton lies.

"Everybody in politics lies, but they do it with such ease, it's troubling."--David Geffen, one time friend and confidante of the Clintons

Whatever the reason Mr. Clinton, and speaking of vast left-wing conspiracies, Sen. Clinton can always not concede and wait for something to happen…

Tuesday, June 03, 2008

Why is Gasoline so High?

Ariel Cohen, Ph.D, Senior Research Fellow in International Energy Security at The Heritage Foundation and the author of The Real World, a weekly column published in The Middle East Times.


"If we will not endure a king as a political power we should not endure a king over the production, transportation, and sale of any of the necessaries of life."—John Sherman

Supply and Demand, the weak dollar, just why are gas prices skyrocketing are there not market forces and market controls that would prevent the devastation of the American economy and the devaluation of the dollar? Or is that just how the supply and demand ball bounces? Before you hear more of that supply and demand mumbo jumbo about it’s all because of a weak dollar you should ask yourself then why is the dollar weak?
From Russia to Iran to Venezuela, America's adversaries are splurging on oil windfalls, while programs directed against Uncle Sam and his allies are funded by petroleum revenues. Big bucks are allowing the oil sultans and dictators to intimidate US allies, buy politicians and academics, and purchase election outcomes.

Oil prices are going up partly because of supply and speculation - but also because these countries can decide to punish the US or limit our influence, particularly when they disagree with policies toward Iraq and Israel.
--Ariel Cohen

The inconvenient truth is the war in Iraq and the war on terrorism has always been about a hidden war on the United States economy. Whether you like it or not, whether you realize it or not the United States of America is in the economic fight of its life because the global economy is attempting to supercede the U.S. economy as the preeminent world economy and everything is connected.

Global warming and carbon dioxide reduction, food shortages, exorbitant gasoline prices are all a part of a plan to damage the U.S. economy. Corporations like big oil have handed over economic control of the world through the instrument of free trade to Russia and OPEC nations who are slowly bleeding the United States economic life dry. (see article)

Part of the reason they can do this is that governments of the Oil Producing and Exporting Countries (OPEC) cartel, and the non-cartel producers like Russia, make sure that international oil companies do not own reserves in the ground. Exxon, for instance, spent only 4 percent of its exploration budget in the Middle East last year - local governments do not allow Western companies to take control of their own destiny.—Ariel Cohen


In 2002 former President William Jefferson Clinton foretold that this day would come before an audience in Australia speaking at the 2002 World Congress on the Peaceful Reunification of China and World Peace in Sydney, Clinton opined:

[T]his "brief moment in history" when the US had pre-eminent military, economic and political power, would not last.

"This is just a period, a few decades this will last, and I think that all of us who are Americans should think about this and ask ourselves how do we wish this moment to be judged 50 years from now,"
Bill Clinton


It has even become clear to even the ipod wearing entertainment distracted American that something is terribly wrong with our economy. Somehow the people whom we have entrusted to make decisions about our economy, government and private, have failed us.

They have allowed the United States to be strapped with a multi-billion dollar trade deficit to countries that hate us. They have allowed the United States to run up a staggering National debt which weakens the dollar and they have lost control of the markets which commodities, futures and stocks are traded upon. U.S. markets are now superceded by a Global market that foreign influences control.


There is no corporate exit plan to free America from the addiction of foreign oil which they created. Yet we denigrated an American President for having no exit plan out of a war that corporations caused by the wealth that they funneled into the Middle East by their oil exploits.

If corporations had not began using the Middle East as the oil center of the world Islam would not be funding world-wide terrorism with their oil profits. They would have remain powerless tribes running around in the desert cutting one another’s throats rather than buying nuclear facilities now which will allow them to wage an Islam threat against the world.
Alaphiah


Gas prices are high because oil producing nations are taking advantage of the power that U.S. companies gave them when those oil companies thought it more profitable to cap the oil wells in American and import oil from foreign countries which cut manufacturing cost and increasing profits for those companies.

In summary, the trade deficit, the National debt and staggering Gas prices are all the result of short-sighted profit driven U.S. corporations that continue to sell out America for the sake of their bottom lines.

What’s next? U.S. investment corporations are already pressuring Congress to get into the foreign controlled cap and trade Carbon markets. Congress is debating this right now as you read.(see here)

Gas is high because Corporations can make record profits on gas as foreign governments bleed the U.S. economy dry. Supply and demand? No it’s more like supply and speculation and you and I are witnessing what Bill Clinton speculated about in 2002, the decline of America’s military, economy and political power.

Welcome to the post-American world and higher food, goods and gas prices, the 21st Century weapons of mass destruction.